DOCSLIB.ORG

Amending Implementing Decision (EU)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amending Implementing Decision (EU) L 101/80 EN Official Journal of the European Union 13.4.2017 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2017/696 of 11 April 2017 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2017) 2476) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra- Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 (3) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 in a number of Member States (‘the concerned Member States’) and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by the competent authority of the concerned Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC (4). (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the competent authorities of the concerned Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in the Annex to that Implementing Decision. (3) The Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 was subsequently amended by Commission Implementing Decisions (EU) 2017/417 (5) and (EU) 2017/554 (6), in order to take account of changes to the protection and surveillance zones established by the competent authorities of the Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, following the evolution of the epidiomiological situation as regards highly pathogenic avian influenza. (4) Since the date of the amendments made to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 by Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/554, the epidiomiological situation as regards highly pathogenic avian influenza has improved. Accordingly, the protective measures laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should be adapted to ensure that they are appropriate to cover the level of risks associated with the current epidemiological situation, and that they do not place burdens on operators that are disproportionate to the risks involved in the spread of that disease. It should be borne in mind that the current epidemic is causing a major disruption of operators' businesses, in particular for very specialised integrated production involving more than one Member State. Also, any amendments to the protective measures laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should take into account the varying levels of risks associated with the movements of different poultry commodities. (1) OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p. 13. (2) OJ L 224, 18.8.1990, p. 29. (3) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 of 9 February 2017 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (OJ L 36, 11.2.2017, p. 62). (4) Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (OJ L 10, 14.1.2006, p. 16). (5) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/417 of 7 March 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (OJ L 63, 9.3.2017, p. 177). (6) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/554 of 23 March 2017 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 on protective measures in relation to outbreaks of the highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (OJ L 79, 24.3.2017, p. 15). 13.4.2017 EN Official Journal of the European Union L 101/81 (5) Day-old chicks pose a very low risk for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza, in particular as the time period between the collection of the hatching eggs and the time of hatch of the day-old chicks permits the timely detection of infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses in the poultry holding of origin and provided that the hatchery of dispatch can ensure by its biosecurity and traceability measures that a proper level of disease control is maintained (6) In addition, any amendments to the current protective measures laid down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should be consistent with other rules laid down in Directive 2005/94/EC and also in Council Directive 2009/158/EC (1). Directive 2009/158/EC lays down general health rules governing trade within the Union in poultry and hatching eggs, including the veterinary certificates required to accompany consignments of those commodities dispatched to other Member States. (7) Article 6 of Directive 2009/158/EC provides that in order to be traded within the Union, day-old chicks and hatching eggs are to come from establishments which are not located in an area which for animal health reasons is subject to restrictive measures in accordance with Union legislation, as a result of an outbreak of a disease to which poultry are susceptible. Article 2 of Directive 2009/158/EC defines establishments as covering, inter alia, breeding establishments which are establishments which produce hatching eggs for the production of productive poultry, and hatcheries which are establishments which incubate and hatch eggs and supply day-old chicks. (8) Directive 2005/94/EC lays down specific rules to combat outbreaks of avian influenza in the Union. Article 30 of that Directive lays down the measures to be applied in the surveillance zone, including restrictions on the movements of day-old chicks and hatching eggs within the surveillance zone, and the conditions whereby the competent authority may authorise the dispatch of consignments of day-old chicks and hatching eggs from a surveillance zone. (9) Point (c)(iii) of Article 30 of Directive 2005/94/EC provides that the competent authority may authorise the direct transport of day-old chicks from the surveillance zone to any other holding, if they originate from hatching eggs from poultry holdings located outside the protection and surveillance zones and subject to certain conditions. (10) In addition, point (c)(iv) of Article 30 of Directive 2005/94/EC provides that the competent authority may authorise the direct transport of hatching eggs to a hatchery designated by the competent authority located inside or outside the surveillance zone provided that the hatching eggs and their packaging are disinfected before dispatch and the tracing of these eggs is ensured. (11) Accordingly, in order to prevent any disruption to trade in consignments of day-old chicks and hatching eggs from the surveillance zone, which pose a low risk for the spread of highly pathogenic avian influenza, but which could prove very costly for economic operators, it is necessary to lay down in Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247, the protective measures applicable to such consignments in accordance with the prevailing rules already laid down in Directives 2005/94/EC. (12) In addition, in order to verify compliance with the requirements of Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247, as amended by this Implementing Decision, it is appropriate that the veterinary certificates provided for in Article 20 of Directive 2009/158/EC, that are required to accompany consignments of day-old chicks, include a reference to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 to that effect. (13) It is also necessary to amend the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247, as since the date of the last amendments made to that Annex by Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/554, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France and Romania have notified the Commission of further outbreaks of avian influenza of subtype H5 in holdings outside the areas currently listed in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247, and they have taken the necessary measures required in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, including the establishment of protection and surveillance zones around those new outbreaks. (1) Council Directive 2009/158/EC of 30 November 2009 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 74). L 101/82 EN Official Journal of the European Union 13.4.2017 (14) In all cases, the Commission has examined the measures taken by Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France and Romania in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, and it has satisfied itself that the boundaries of the protection and surveillance zones, established by the competent authorities of those Member States, are at a sufficient distance to any holding where an outbreak of highly pathogenic avian influenza of subtype H5 has been confirmed. (15) In order to prevent any unnecessary disturbance to trade within the Union and to avoid unjustified barriers to trade being imposed by third countries, it is necessary to rapidly describe at Union level, in collaboration with Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Germany, Greece, France and Romania, the new protection and surveillance zones established in those Member States in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC. Therefore, the areas listed for those Member States in the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should be amended. (16) Accordingly, Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/247 should be amended to include rules for the dispatch of day- old chicks from surveillance zones or the dispatch of day- old chicks from hatching eggs originating from poultry in establishments located in the surveillance zone to other Member States, subject to certain conditions, and to update regionalization at Union level to include the new protection and surveillance zones established in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC and the duration of the restrictions applicable therein.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Report 2016
    Public Power Corporation S.A. 30 Halkokondyli St., Athens GR-10432, Τel.: +30 210 523 0301 www.dei.gr CONTENTS CONTENTS 1. MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND CEO 6 2. ABOUT THE REPORT 10 3. PPC CORPORATE PROFILE 14 3.1. ACTIVITIES 14 3.2 SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE 20 3.3 HOLDINGS IN SUBSIDIARIES 20 3.4 CORPORATE GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK 21 3.5 ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANISATION 21 3.6 GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE 23 3.7 CONFLICT OF INTEREST 26 3.8 AUDITS 26 3.9 RISK AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT 27 3.10 ENERGY MARKET OPERATIONS AND PUBLIC POLICY 29 3.11 NEW MARKETS AND INVESTMENTS 32 3.12 KEY FINANCIAL INFORMATION 33 4. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 36 4.1 MANAGEMENT APPROACH 36 4.2 GOVERNANCE FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 41 4.3 MATERIALITY ANALYSIS 42 4.4 STAKEHOLDERS 48 4.5 MEMBERSHIP OF ASSOCIATIONS AND ORGANISATIONS 53 4.6 AWARDS - DISTINCTIONS 53 4.7 KEY CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PERFORMANCE DATA 54 4.8 COMMITMENTS - GOALS 56 5. EMPLOYEES 60 5.1 HUMAN RESOURCES DATA 60 5.2 TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT 67 5.3 EMPLOYEE EVALUATION AND BENEFITS 69 5.4 EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS 70 5.5 HEALTH & SAFETY 70 5.6 INTERNAL COMMUNICATION 78 5.7 REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE COMPLIANCE 79 4 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2016 6. ENVIRONMENT 80 6.1 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 80 6.2 CONSUMPTION OF RAW MATERIALS, FUELS AND ENERGY 83 6.3 GREENHOUSE GAS AND OTHER GAS EMISSIONS 85 6.4 ACTIONS TO REDUCE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 92 6.5 WATER MANAGEMENT 95 6.6 WASTE MANAGEMENT - USE OF BY-PRODUCTS 100 6.7 BIODIVERSITY 105 6.8 REGULATORY AND LEGISLATIVE COMPLIANCE 109 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Note Communale De Saint-Christaud
    DIRECTION DEPARTEMENTALE DES TERRITOIRES DU GERS PLAN DE PREVENTION DES RISQUES D’INONDATION (P.P.R.I.) DES COMMUNES CONSTITUANT LES BASSINS VERSANTS DE L’ADOUR, DU LEES, DE L’ARROS ET DU BOUES LOT 2 : BASSINS DE L’ARROS ET DU BOUES COMMUNE DE SAINT-CHRISTAUD NOTE COMMUNALE Novembre 2018 PPRI des bassins d’Arros et Bouès Note communale de la commune de Saint-Christaud SOMMAIRE 1. Avant-Propos 3 1.1. Cadre de l’étude 3 1.2. Déroulement de la procédure 4 2. Nature des inondations prises en compte sur la commune 5 3. Qualification des aléas sur la commune 6 3.1. Rappel sur les critères retenus 6 3.2. Présentation des aléas inondation sur la commune 6 4. Qualification des enjeux sur la commune 8 4.1. Rappels sur la démarche engagée 8 4.2. Enjeux répertoriés sur la commune 8 5. Zonage du risque sur la commune 10 Conclusion 11 PRÉFECTURE DU GERS Novembre 2018 2 PPRI des bassins d’Arros et Bouès Note communale de la commune de Saint-Christaud I. Avant-propos 1.1. Cadre de l’étude. L’État et les communes ont des responsabilités respectives en matière de prévention des risques naturels. L’État doit afficher les risques en déterminant leur localisation et leurs caractéristiques et veiller à ce que les divers intervenants les prennent en compte dans leurs actions. Les communes ont le devoir de prendre en considération l’existence des risques naturels sur leur territoire, notamment lors de l’élaboration de documents d’urbanisme et de l’examen des demandes d’autorisation concernant l'utilisation des sols.
    [Show full text]
  • La Liste Des RPI
    La liste des RPI Extrait du SNUipp-FSU des Landes. https://40.snuipp.fr La liste des RPI - Infos Carrière - Mouvement - Mouvement 2010 - Date de mise en ligne : lundi 12 avril 2010 Description : Pour aider au mouvement. SNUipp-FSU des Landes. Copyright © SNUipp-FSU des Landes. Page 1/4 La liste des RPI DAX CENTRE LANDES AZUR, MESSANGES, MOLIETS LEVIGNACQ, UZA BEYLONGUE, CARCEN PONSON LESGOR, LALUQUE, TALLER ARENGOSSE,OUSSE SUZAN, ST YAGUEN,VILLENAVE RPC CARCARES, AUDON, GOUTS DAX SUD ADOUR ESTIBEAUX,MOUSCARDES,OSSAGES,TILH MIMBASTE, MISSON ORTHEVIELLE, PORT DE LANNE ORIST, PEY BELUS, ST ETIENNE D'ORTHE ST CRICQ DU GAVE, SORDE L'ABBAYE HASTINGUES, SAMES (64) CANDRESSE, NARROSSE ST VINCENT DE PAUL, TETHIEU HEUGAS, ST PANDELON MONT DE MARSAN HAUTE LANDE BOSTENS,POUYDESSEAUX, STE FOY,GAILLERES BELIS,BROCAS,CANENX,CERE, MAILLERES LUCBARDEZ, SAINT AVIT ARUE, CACHEN, LENCOUACQ BOURRIOT,LOSSE,RETJONS,VIELLE, SOUBIRAN,ST GOR GAREIN,LABRIT,LE SEN,VERT CREON, LABASTIDE LE FRECHE, ST JUSTIN LUXEY, SORE MONT DE MARSAN SUD ARMAGNAC ARTASSENX, BASCONS, BRETAGNE Copyright © SNUipp-FSU des Landes. Page 2/4 La liste des RPI BORDERES, CASTANDET, MAURRIN FARGUES, MONTGAILLARD BOURDALAT,HONTANX,ST GEIN PUJO, SAINT CRICQ VILLENEUVE BOUGUE, LAGLORIEUSE, MAZEROLLES MONT DE MARSAN SUD CHALOSSE AUBAGNAN, BATS, VIELLE TURSAN BRASSEMPOUY, SAINT CRICQ CHALOSSE HORSARRIEU, Ste COLOMBE, SERRES GASTON LACRABE,MANT,MORGANX,PEYRE,MONSEGUR, POUDENX ARSAGUE, BONNEGARDE, CASTEL SARRAZIN CASTAIGNOS, MOMUY, NASSIET BASTENNES,CASTELNAU,DONZACQ,GAUJACQ GAMARDE,GOOS,PRECHACQ GARREY, SORT EN CHALOSSE CASSEN,GOUSSE,LOUER,ONARD,ST GEOURS D'AURIBAT, ST JEAN DE LIER,VICQ D'AURIBAT LAUREDE, POYANNE CAUPENNE,LARBEY,MAYLIS,ST AUBIN HAURIET,MONTAUT,TOULOUZETTE AURICE, CAUNA, LAMOTHE, LE LEUY COUDURES,MONTSOUE,SARRAZIET AUDIGNON,BANOS,DUMES,EYRES MONCUBE MONT DE MARSAN TURSAN ASH PHILONDENX, URGONS PIMBO, SORBETS, MIRAMONT CAZERES, LE VIGNAU LARRIVIERE, RENUNG MIMIZAN PAYS DE BORN BIAS, MEZOS Copyright © SNUipp-FSU des Landes.
    [Show full text]
  • Carte Touristique Des Landes 2019 2019 Landes Des Touristique Carte D | | | Biscarrosse E Tonneins Y Biscarrosse
    le naturel LES LANDES Ouvert tous les jours jusqu’au 03/11/19 (Calendrier sur rhune.com) A B C D E F G H I J K L M N Léognan Aire-sur-l'Adour.................... J9 Maillères.............................H-i7 BASSIN LégendeSauveterre Amou..................................G10 Mano .................................... G3 1 -de-Guyenne Angoumé...............................D9 Mant ................................... H10 1 D’ARCACHON AngresseDuras ............................ C10 Marpaps .............................G10 Office de Tourisme Arboucave............................i10 Mauries ................................i10 Arengosse .............................F7 Maurrin...................................i8 Argelos...............................G10 Mauvezin-d'Armagnac...... J-K7 Musée de france Argelouse............................. G4 Maylis ................................... G9 Biganos Arjuzanx ................................F7 Mazerolles..............................i8 www.rhune.com Classé Patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO Arsague.............................. F10 Mées......................................D9 La Teste- Artassenx...............................i8 Meilhan................................. G8 de-Buch Arthez-d'Armagnac .............. J8 Messanges ............................C8 Musée Arue........................................i6 Mézos ....................................D6 Cap Ferret Arx......................................... L6 Mimbaste............................ E10 CarteLe Barp touristique Miramon Aubagnan......................
    [Show full text]
  • Bilan Des Sites Du Gers
    GESTION DES MILIEUX NATURELS ET BIODIVERSITE MIDI-PYRENEES Lieux de beauté, lieux de mémoire Bilan des sites classés et inscrits du Gers Décembre 2007 Le patrimoine paysager du département du Gers est remarquable. Il constitue l’un de ses atouts et contribue à la qualité de la vie. Notre département illustre la richesse des paysages de notre pays. La qualité de ses paysages et leur renommée internationale sont pour la France des facteurs d’attractivité touristique et résidentielle. Dans le cadre de ses compétences, l’Etat a le devoir de veiller à la préservation des éléments remarquables du paysage. C’est le sens des lois de protection des sites, maintenant intégrées au code de l’environnement. Les sites s’inscrivent dans des espaces vivants. Leur protection et la maîtrise de leur évolution doivent conduire les responsables à tous les niveaux et les citoyens à être vigilants face aux risques de mitage et à l’étalement urbain non maîtrisés. Le classement ou l’inscription d’un site n’est pas seulement une mesure de protection, c’est aussi une reconnaissance qui contribue à la valorisation du territoire concerné en tant que patrimoine reconnu et un cadre juridique pour garantir la maîtrise des évolutions et pour protéger ce qui constitue un patrimoine commun. Il est de notre responsabilité collective de préserver, valoriser et faire connaître ce patrimoine. Denis Conus, Préfet du Gers LE BILAN // Sommaire p4 Carte des sites classés et inscrits du Gers p5 Les Sites classés et inscrits du Gers p6 p7 LE DIAGNOSTIC Vue d’ensemble p11 Site exemple
    [Show full text]
  • Decisión De Ejecución (UE)
    7.6.2021 ES Diar io Ofi cial de la Unión Europea L 199 I/1 II (Actos no legislativos) DECISIONES DECISIÓN DE EJECUCIÓN (UE) 2021/906 DE LA COMISIÓN de 3 de junio de 2021 por la que se modifica el anexo de la Decisión de Ejecución (UE) 2021/641, sobre medidas de emergencia en relación con los brotes de gripe aviar de alta patogenicidad en determinados Estados miembros [notificada con el número C(2021) 4096] (Texto pertinente a efectos del EEE) LA COMISIÓN EUROPEA, Visto el Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, Visto el Reglamento (UE) 2016/429 del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 9 de marzo de 2016, relativo a las enfermedades transmisibles de los animales y por el que se modifican o derogan algunos actos en materia de sanidad animal («Legislación sobre sanidad animal») (1), y en particular su artículo 259, apartado 1, letra c), Considerando lo siguiente: (1) La gripe aviar de alta patogenicidad (GAAP) es una enfermedad vírica contagiosa de las aves que puede tener consecuencias graves en la rentabilidad de la cría de aves de corral, de manera que el comercio dentro de la Unión y las exportaciones a terceros países se vean perturbados. Los virus de la GAAP pueden infectar a las aves migratorias, que a continuación pueden propagarlos a largas distancias durante sus migraciones de otoño y primavera. Por tanto, la presencia de virus de la GAAP en aves silvestres constituye una amenaza continua de introducción directa e indirecta de estos virus en explotaciones en las que se crían aves de corral u otras aves cautivas.
    [Show full text]
  • CC Bastides Et Vallons Du Gers (Siren : 243200508)
    Groupement Mise à jour le 01/07/2021 CC Bastides et Vallons du Gers (Siren : 243200508) FICHE SIGNALETIQUE BANATIC Données générales Nature juridique Communauté de communes (CC) Commune siège Marciac Arrondissement Mirande Département Gers Interdépartemental non Date de création Date de création 08/11/2000 Date d'effet 08/11/2000 Organe délibérant Mode de répartition des sièges Répartition de droit commun Nom du président M. Jean-Louis GUILHAUMON Coordonnées du siège Complément d'adresse du siège Route du Lac Numéro et libellé dans la voie Distribution spéciale Code postal - Ville 32230 MARCIAC Téléphone 05 62 09 30 68 Fax 05 62 09 34 99 Courriel [email protected] Site internet Profil financier Mode de financement Fiscalité professionnelle unique Bonification de la DGF non Dotation de solidarité communautaire (DSC) non Taxe d'enlèvement des ordures ménagères (TEOM) non Autre taxe non Redevance d'enlèvement des ordures ménagères (REOM) non Autre redevance non Population Population totale regroupée 7 377 1/5 Groupement Mise à jour le 01/07/2021 Densité moyenne 24,60 Périmètre Nombre total de communes membres : 30 Dept Commune (N° SIREN) Population 32 Armentieux (213200082) 75 32 Beaumarchés (213200363) 705 32 Blousson-Sérian (213200587) 43 32 Cazaux-Villecomtal (213200991) 74 32 Couloumé-Mondebat (213201098) 201 32 Courties (213201114) 53 32 Galiax (213201361) 173 32 Izotges (213201619) 102 32 Jû-Belloc (213201635) 305 32 Juillac (213201643) 120 32 Ladevèze-Rivière (213201742) 222 32 Ladevèze-Ville (213201759) 230 32 Lasserrade
    [Show full text]
  • Reponse from the Greek Government to the Further Observations of Mfhr on the Merits
    EUROPEAN COMMITTEE OF SOCIAL RIGHTS COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DES DROITS SOCIAUX 3 August 2006 Collective Complaint No. 30/2005 Case Document No. 6 Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights v. Greece REPONSE FROM THE GREEK GOVERNMENT TO THE FURTHER OBSERVATIONS OF MFHR ON THE MERITS registered at the Secretariat on 2 August 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................II LIST OF FIGURES..............................................................................................III LIST OF ANNEXES ............................................................................................IV PART I: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS ON THE COMPLAINT AND THE MFHR’S OBSERVATIONS......................................................................................2 A-Environmental protection in Greece and pertinent related measures imposed on and taken by DEH: A general overview 2 B- A preliminary assessment of the Complaint: Unfounded allegations, ideological credo and manipulation of data 6 C- Steps taken for the improvement of environmental protection 10 D- Monitoring and controlling mechanisms 17 PART II : ANALYTICALLY ON THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CHARTER20 A-The right to the protection of health and of environment 20 A-1 General remarks about air quality 20 Regarding “particulate matter” ........................................................................................................................27 A-2 About air quality in Kozani-Ptolemais region 32 A-3 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Rythmes Scolaires Des Écoles Du Département Des Landes, Rentrée
    Rentrée scolaire 2021/2022 Rythmes scolaires des écoles du Département des Landes Libellé RNE Dénomination Rythmes scolaires Commune AIRE-SUR-L'ADOUR 0400442N ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE CLAUDE NOUGARO 4 jours et demi AIRE-SUR-L'ADOUR 0400937B ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE F. GIROUD 4 jours et demi AMOU 0400754C ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi AMOU 0400761K ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi ANGRESSE 0400290Y ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours ARENGOSSE 0400168R ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours ARJUZANX 0400170T ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours ARSAGUE 0400294C ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi ARTASSENX 0401008D ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours ARUE 0400533M ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi AUBAGNAN 0400504F ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi AUDIGNON 0400377T ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi AUREILHAN 0400223A ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours AURICE 0400378U ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours AZUR 0400346J ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours BANOS 0400379V ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi BASCONS 0400491S ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE 4 jours BASTENNES 0400297F ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi BATS 0400474Y ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE MATERNELLE 4 jours et demi BEGAAR 0400735G ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours et demi BELIS 0400523B ECOLE ELEMENTAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours BELUS 0400328P ECOLE PRIMAIRE 4 jours BENESSE-MAREMNE 0400733E ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE M. GENEVOIX 4 jours BENQUET 0400413G ECOLE PRIMAIRE PUBLIQUE 4 jours BEYLONGUE 0400232K ECOLE MATERNELLE PUBLIQUE 4 jours BIARROTTE
    [Show full text]
  • (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 Amending the Annex To
    25.2.2021 EN Offi cial Jour nal of the European Uni on L 66/5 COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/335 of 23 February 2021 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 concerning certain protective measures in relation to outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza in certain Member States (notified under document C(2021) 1386) (Text with EEA relevance) THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Having regard to Council Directive 89/662/EEC of 11 December 1989 concerning veterinary checks in intra-Community trade with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), and in particular Article 9(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary checks applicable in intra-Union trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (2), and in particular Article 10(4) thereof, Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (3), and in particular Article 63(4) thereof, Whereas: (1) Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 (4) was adopted following outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in holdings where poultry or other captive birds were kept in certain Member States and the establishment of protection and surveillance zones by those Member States in accordance with Council Directive 2005/94/EC. (2) Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1809 provides that the protection and surveillance zones established by the Member States listed in the Annex to that Implementing Decision, in accordance with Directive 2005/94/EC, are to comprise at least the areas listed as protection and surveillance zones in that Annex.
    [Show full text]
  • B COMMISSION DECISION of 24 February 2006 On
    2006D0148 — EN — 28.06.2006 — 001.001 — 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents ºB COMMISSION DECISION of 24 February 2006 on introducing preventive vaccination against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 and related provisions for movements in France (notified under document number C(2006) 632) (Only the French text is authentic) (2006/148/EC) (OJ L 55, 25.2.2006, p. 51) Amended by: Official Journal No page date ºM1 Commission Decision 2006/438/EC, of 27 June 2006 L 174 7 28.6.2006 2006D0148 — EN — 28.06.2006 — 001.001 — 2 ¼B COMMISSION DECISION of 24 February 2006 on introducing preventive vaccination against highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 and related provisions for movements in France (notified under document number C(2006) 632) (Only the French text is authentic) (2006/148/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, Having regard to Council Directive 2005/94/EC of 20 December 2005 on Community measures for the control of avian influenza and repealing Directive 92/40/EEC (1), and in particular, Article 57(2) thereof; Whereas: (1) Avian influenza is an infectious viral disease in poultry and birds, causing mortality and disturbances which can quickly take epizootic proportions liable to present a serious threat to animal health and under certain circumstances to human health. There is a risk that the disease agent might be spread to other holdings thus reducing sharply the profitability of poultry farming, to wild birds and from one Member State to other Member States and third countries through the international trade in live birds or their products.
    [Show full text]
  • PPRI Arros-Bouès
    DIRECTION DEPARTEMENTALE DES TERRITOIRES DU GERS PLAN DE PREVENTION DES RISQUES D’INONDATION (P.P.R.I.) DES COMMUNES CONSTITUANT LES BASSINS VERSANTS DE L’ADOUR, DU LEES, DE L’ARROS ET DU BOUES LOT 2 : BASSINS DE L’ARROS ET DU BOUES COMMUNE DE TIESTE-URAGNOUX NOTE COMMUNALE Novembre 2018 PPRI des bassins d’Arros et Bouès Note communale de la commune de Tieste-uragnoux SOMMAIRE 1. Avant-Propos 3 1.1. Cadre de l’étude 3 1.2. Déroulement de la procédure 4 2. Nature des inondations prises en compte sur la commune 5 3. Qualification des aléas sur la commune 7 3.1. Rappel sur les critères retenus 7 3.2. Présentation des aléas inondation sur la commune 7 4. Qualification des enjeux sur la commune 9 4.1. Rappels sur la démarche engagée 9 4.2. Enjeux répertoriés sur la commune 9 5. Zonage du risque sur la commune 11 Conclusion 12 PRÉFECTURE DU GERS Novembre 2018 2 PPRI des bassins d’Arros et Bouès Note communale de la commune de Tieste-uragnoux I. Avant-propos 1.1. Cadre de l’étude. L’État et les communes ont des responsabilités respectives en matière de prévention des risques naturels. L’État doit afficher les risques en déterminant leur localisation et leurs caractéristiques et veiller à ce que les divers intervenants les prennent en compte dans leurs actions. Les communes ont le devoir de prendre en considération l’existence des risques naturels sur leur territoire, notamment lors de l’élaboration de documents d’urbanisme et de l’examen des demandes d’autorisation concernant l'utilisation des sols.
    [Show full text]