DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluations of Cultural Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluations of Cultural Properties WHC-2000/CONF.204/INF.6 UNESCO WORLD HERITAGE CONVENTION WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE 24th ordinary session (27 November - 2 December 2000) Cairns (Australia) EVALUATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES Prepared by the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) The IUCN and ICOMOS evaluations are made available to members of the Bureau and the World Heritage Committee. A small number of additional copies are also available from the secretariat. Thank you. 2000 WORLD HERITAGE LIST NOMINATIONS 2000 INTRODUCTION I NOMINATIONS OF MIXED PROPERTIES A Property which the Bureau recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List South Africa - Drakensberg Park alternatively known as oKhahlamba Park 1 B Properties which the Bureau referred back to the State Party China - Mount Qingcheng and the Dujiangyan Irrigation System 5 Lithuania-Russian Federation - The Curonian Spit 9 C Nomination to be considered by the twenty-fourth extraordinary session of the Bureau Nepal - Shey Phoksundo National Park 12 II NOMINATIONS OF CULTURAL PROPERTIES A Properties which the Bureau recommended for inscription on the World Heritage List Argentina - The Jesuit Block and the Jesuit Estancias of Córdoba 15 Armenia - The Monastery of Geghard and the Upper Azat Valley 20 Austria - The Wachau Cultural Landscape (the Wachau Region including 22 the Abbeys of Melk and Göttweig and the Historic Centre of Krems) Azerbaijan - The Walled City of Baku with the Shirvanshah's Palace and Maiden Tower 28 Belarus - The Mir Castle Complex 32 Belgium - The Historic Centre of Brugge 35 - The Major Town Houses of the Architect Victor Horta 39 - Archaeological Site of the Neolithic Flint Mines at Spiennes, Mons 44 - Notre-Dame Cathedral in Tournai 50 Bolivia - Tiwanaku: Spiritual and Political Centre of the Tiwanaku Culture 55 Chile - The Churches of Chiloé 58 China - Ancient Villages in Southern Anhui - Xidi and Hongcun 63 - Longmen Grottoes 66 - Imperial Tombs of the Ming and Qing Dynasties 69 Cuba - Archaeological Landscape of the First Coffee Plantations 73 in the Southeast of Cuba Czech Republic - The Holy Trinity Column in Olomouc 77 Denmark - Kronborg Castle 81 Germany - Monastic Island of Reichenau in Lake Constance 84 (Klosterinsel Reichenau im Bodensee) - Gartenreich Dessau-Wörlitz (The Garden Kingdom of Dessau-Wörlitz, 89 Cultural Landscape of Dessau-Wörlitz) Italy - Assisi, the Basilica of San Francesco and other Franciscan sites 94 - City of Verona 99 Japan - Gusuku Sites and Related Properties of the Kingdom of Ryukyu 104 Netherlands - Rietveld Schröderhuis (Rietveld Schröder House) 108 Peru - Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa 111 Republic of Korea - Kyongju Historic Areas 116 - Koch'ang, Hwasun, and Kanghwa Dolmen Sites 120 Russian Federation - Historical and Architectural Complex of the Kazan Kremlin 123 - The Ensemble of Ferapontov Monastery 128 Slovakia - Bardejov Town Conservation Reserve 131 Spain - The Roman Walls of Lugo 134 - The Palmeral of Elche: a Cultural Landscape Inherited from Al-Andalus 137 - The Archaeological Ensemble of Tárraco 140 Sweden - Södra Ölands Odlingslandskap (The Agricultural Landscape 145 of Southern Öland) Switzerland - Three Castles, Defensive Wall and Ramparts of the Market-town of Bellinzone 149 United-Kingdom - The Blaenavon Industrial Landscape 152 United Republic of Tanzania - The Stone Town of Zanzibar 159 Extension of cultural properties inscribed on the World Heritage List Armenia - The Monasteries of Haghpat and Sanahin 163 China - The Potala Palace and the Jokhang Temple Monastery 165 - The Classical Gardens of Suzhou 168 B Properties which the Bureau did not recommend for inscription Croatia - The Ancient Pula with the Amphitheatre 171 Latvia - The Abava Valley 175 C Properties for which the nominations were referred back to the State Party for further information Armenia - Echmiatsin and the Archaeological Site of Zvartnots 178 Bosnia and Herzegovina - The Old City of Mostar 181 Croatia - Cathedral of St James in Šibenik 184 France - The Loire Valley between Maine and Sully-sur-Loire 188 Hungary - Sopianae Palaeochristian Cemetery Site, Pécs 193 Nicaragua - The Ruins of León Viejo 196 Oman - The Shisr, Khor Rori, and al-Balid Archaeological Sites and 199 the Frankincense Park of Wadi Dawkha in the Dhofar Region Russian Federation - The Bolgar Historical and Architectural Complex 203 Senegal - Island of Saint-Louis 207 Spain - The Catalan Romanesque Cultural Landscape of the Vall de Boí 210 - The Archaeological Site of the Sierra de Atapuerca, 216 in the Municipalities of Atapuerca and Ibeas de Juarros (Burgos) United-Kingdom - The Historic Town of St George and Related Fortifications 219 Uzbekistan - Historic Centre of Shakhrisyabz 224 Venezuela - Ciudad Universitaria de Caracas 226 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL ON MONUMENTS AND SITES (ICOMOS) World Heritage Nominations 2000 1 Analysis of nominations Archaeological sites 9 (13%) In 2000 ICOMOS has been requested to evaluate 70 new Mixed sites 4 (6%) and deferred nominations of and extensions to cultural and mixed properties, the largest number since inscriptions Industrial sites 3 (5%) began to be made to the World Heritage List in 1978, and The main change by comparison with 1999 is an increase exceeding the previous highest total of 55, in 1999. This in the proportion of historic towns in the properties large number of nominations and the short period available considered in 2000 for the completion of missions, consultations, and the production of written evaluations have once again imposed At the 24th Session of the Bureau of the World Heritage a considerable strain on the resources of ICOMOS. Committee, held in Paris on 26 June–1 July 2000, presentations were made by ICOMOS in respect of each of The geographical spread largely duplicates the trend that these properties. has become apparent in recent years: The Bureau recommended that 40 properties should be Europe 44 nominations (14 deferred, 1 inscribed on the List and that 3 extensions should be extension) approved. Of the remainder, the Bureau recommended that 24 countries consideration of 6 nominations should be deferred; it referred 16 back to the States Parties concerned for further Asia/Pacific 11 nominations (2 extensions) information. The remaining 5 nominations were withdrawn by the respective States Parties before the 7 countries Bureau meeting, but these had already been fully evaluated Latin America/ 11 nominations (2 deferred) by ICOMOS. Caribbean 9 countries Africa 3 nominations (1 deferred) 2 ICOMOS procedure 3 countries a Preparatory work Arab States 1 nomination Following an initial study of the dossiers, expert advice The distribution by country from those States Parties was sought on the outstanding universal value of the nominating more than one property was as follows: nominated properties, with reference to the six criteria listed in the Operational Guidelines (1999), para 24(a). 6 nominations China (2 extensions) For this purpose, ICOMOS called upon the following: Spain (3 deferred nominations) •= ICOMOS International Scientific Committees; 5 nominations Russian Federation (1 joint with •= individual ICOMOS members with special expertise, Lithuania) identified after consultation with International and 4 nominations Belgium National Committees; 3 nominations Armenia (1 extension) •= non-ICOMOS members with special expertise, identified after consultation within the ICOMOS Croatia (1 deferred nomination) networks; Germany (1 deferred nomination) •= collaborating NGOs (TICCIH, DoCoMoMo). 2 nominations Argentina Concurrently, experts were selected on the same basis for Chile evaluation missions to nominated properties. The same procedure was adopted for selecting these experts as that Italy just described. The missions were required to study the Republic of Korea criteria relating to authenticity, protection, conservation, and management (Operational Guidelines, para 24(b)). United Kingdom Experts are sent photocopies of dossiers (or relevant parts The types of site are broadly comparable with those in of them, where the dossiers are extensive). They also 1999: receive documentation on the Convention and detailed guidelines for evaluation missions. Monument or group 24 (34%) ICOMOS missions were sent to all the nominated sites. Historic towns/town centres 20 (28%) The Chinese mixed site of Mount Qingcheng and the Dujiangyan Irrigation System was evaluated by an IUCN Cultural landscapes 10 (14%) expert, on behalf of both Advisory Bodies, and joint ICOMOS-IUCN missions visited the other mixed sites, competent authorities in States Parties, and ICOMOS and also the Swedish cultural landscape of Södra Öland. National Committees as well as the experts themselves. The consultation of specialists on cultural values also involves a The missions were carried out by a total of 53 experts from great deal of correspondence. Most of this work has 34 countries (it should be noted that in a few cases an normally been completed by January, however, and then the expert evaluated more than one nominated property). The written evaluations have to be drafted and translated in time geographical distribution of experts closely parallels that of for the meeting of the ICOMOS Executive Committee at the the nominated sites, in accordance with the ICOMOS end of March, at which the formal ICOMOS policy of selecting regional experts for missions. recommendations are approved during the course of a The countries from which ICOMOS experts were drawn meeting that is now extended to three full working days. were Argentina,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armenia and Georgia 9 Days / 8 Nights
    Armenia and Georgia 9 days / 8 nights 2020 Dates 2020: April 10 – April 17 * Easter Holidays May 22 – May 29 June 26 – July 03 July 24 – July 31 August 07 – August 14 August 28 – September 04 October 16 – October 23 Itinerary: Day 1: Departure from your home country Day 2 : Yerevan city tour / Echmiadzin / Zvartnots Arrival early in the morning and transfer to your hotel for some rest. After breakfast meet your tour guide and start city tour around Yerevan. Drive to Echmiadzin – the place where the only Begotten descended. Holy Echmiadzin is the whole Armenians’ spiritual center and one of the centers of Christianity all over the world. They will participate in Sunday liturgy. Return to Yerevan with a stop at the ruins of Zvartnots temple - the pearl of the 7th century architecture, which is listed as a UNESCO World Heritage. Lunchtime. Visit Tsitsernakaberd-walking through Memorial park and visit museum of the victims of Genocide. Visit Cafesjian Show Room. Visit Vernisage flea market, the place to get a little taste of Armenia, to see the fusion between national traditions, art & crafts with contemporary taste. Overnight in Yerevan. (B/--/--) Day 3 : Yerevan / Khor Virap / Noravank /Yerevan Sightseeing tour to Khor-Virap monastery the importance of which is connected with Gregory the Illuminator, who introduced Christianity to Armenia. It is a wonderful masterpiece situated on top of a hill. It is a pilgrimage place where every year a lot of tourists and native people visit. It looks like a castle, where everybody has the hint to sit and dream while admiring the beauty of the church.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Days Explore Turkey - Armenia - Georgia Tour
    Full Itinerary & Trip Details 12 DAYS EXPLORE TURKEY - ARMENIA - GEORGIA TOUR Istanbul Tour - Bosphorus and Two Continents - Yerevan, Garni - Geghard, Khor Virap - Noravank - Areni - Selim - Sevan - Dilijan - Haghatsin - Alaverdi - Haghpat - Sanahin - Sadakhlo border - Tbilisi - Mtskheta - Gudauri - Kutaissi - Kutaisi and Gori PRICE STARTING FROM DURATION TOUR ID € 0 € 0 12 days 932 ITINERARY Day 1 : Istanbul - Arrival Day Meet at the Istanbul international Ataturk airport and transfer to your hotel. You will be given your room key and the rest of the day is yours to explore Istanbul. Overnight in Istanbul. Day 2 : Istanbul Tour Breakfast Included Guided Istanbul walking old city tour visiting Topkapi Palace (closed on tuesdays) Hippodrome, Blue Mosque, Aya Sophia Museum (closed on mondays), Underground Cistern, Covered Grand Bazaar (closed on sundays). Overnight in Istanbul. Day 3 : Bosphorus and Two Continents Breakfast Included Pick up at 08:30 from the hotel for the tour of Bosphorus and the Asian part of Istanbul. During the tour we will enjoy a Bosphorus Cruise, having lunch and visiting the Dolmabahce Palace, Bosphorus Bridge, Asian side.Overnight in Istanbul Day 4 : Istanbul - Yerevan - Armenia Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner Included After breakfast check out from the hotel and depart for Istanbul Ataturk International airport. Arrive to Yerevan and you will be transferred from airport to your hotel by one of official guide of Murti’s tour. Check into the hotel where your accommodation has been reserved for the night. You will be given your room key and the rest of the day is yours to enjoy party and explore to Yerevan. Day 5 : Garni - Geghard Breakfast, Lunch and Dinner Included After breakfast you will depart for a guided city tour Garni and Geghard.
    [Show full text]
  • Galway City Walls Conservation, Management and Interpretation Plan
    GALWAY CITY WALLS CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT & INTERPRETATION PLAN MARCH 2013 Frontispiece- Woman at Doorway (Hall & Hall) Howley Hayes Architects & CRDS Ltd. were commissioned by Galway City Coun- cil and the Heritage Council to prepare a Conservation, Management & Interpre- tation Plan for the historic town defences. The surveys on which this plan are based were undertaken in Autumn 2012. We would like to thank all those who provided their time and guidance in the preparation of the plan with specialist advice from; Dr. Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Dr. Kieran O’Conor, Dr. Jacinta Prunty & Mr. Paul Walsh. Cover Illustration- Phillips Map of Galway 1685. CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 UNDERSTANDING THE PLACE 6 3.0 PHYSICAL EVIDENCE 17 4.0 ASSESSMENT & STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE 28 5.0 DEFINING ISSUES & VULNERABILITY 31 6.0 CONSERVATION PRINCIPLES 35 7.0 INTERPRETATION & MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES 37 8.0 CONSERVATION STRATEGIES 41 APPENDICES Statutory Protection 55 Bibliography 59 Cartographic Sources 60 Fortification Timeline 61 Endnotes 65 1.0 INTRODUCTION to the east, which today retains only a small population despite the ambitions of the Anglo- Norman founders. In 1484 the city was given its charter, and was largely rebuilt at that time to leave a unique legacy of stone buildings The Place and carvings from the late-medieval period. Galway City is situated on the north-eastern The medieval street pattern has largely been shore of a sheltered bay on the west coast of preserved, although the removal of the walls Ireland. It is located at the mouth of the River during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, Corrib, which separates the east and western together with extra-mural developments as the sides of the county.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism Without Modernity: the Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Management Papers Wharton Faculty Research 6-2004 Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Mauro F. Guillen University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers Part of the Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Management Sciences and Quantitative Methods Commons Recommended Citation Guillen, M. F. (2004). Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940. Latin American Research Review, 39 (2), 6-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/lar.2004.0032 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mgmt_papers/279 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modernism Without Modernity: The Rise of Modernist Architecture in Mexico, Brazil, and Argentina, 1890-1940 Abstract : Why did machine-age modernist architecture diffuse to Latin America so quickly after its rise in Continental Europe during the 1910s and 1920s? Why was it a more successful movement in relatively backward Brazil and Mexico than in more affluent and industrialized Argentina? After reviewing the historical development of architectural modernism in these three countries, several explanations are tested against the comparative evidence. Standards of living, industrialization, sociopolitical upheaval, and the absence of working-class consumerism are found to be limited as explanations. As in Europe, Modernism
    [Show full text]
  • The Inner City Seljuk Fortifications of Rey: Case Study of Rashkān
    Archive of SID THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES Volume 27, Issue 3 (2020), Pages 1-99 Director-in-Charge: Seyed Mehdi Mousavi, Associate Professor of Archaeology Editor-in-Chief: Arsalan Golfam, Associate Professor of Linguistics Managing Editors: Shahin Aryamanesh, PhD of Archaeology, Tissaphernes Archaeological Research Group English Edit by: Ahmad Shakil, PhD Published by Tarbiat Modares University Editorial board: Ehsani, Mohammad; Professor of Sport Management, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Ghaffari, Masoud; Associate Professor of Political Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Hafezniya, Mohammadreza; Professor in Political Geography and Geopolitics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Khodadad Hosseini, Seyed Hamid; Professor in Business, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Kiyani, Gholamreza; Associate Professor of Language & Linguistics, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Manouchehri, Abbas; Professor of Political science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran Ahmadi, Hamid; Professor of Political science, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran Karimi Doostan, Gholam Hosein; Professor of Linguistics, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran Mousavi Haji, Seyed Rasoul; Professor of Archaeology, Mazandaran University, Mazandaran, Iran Yousefifar, Shahram; Professor of History, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran Karimi Motahar, Janallah; Professor of Russian Language, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran Mohammadifar, Yaghoub; Professor of Archaeology, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran The International Journal of Humanities is one of the TMU Press journals that is published by the responsibility of its Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board in the determined scopes. The International Journal of Humanities is mainly devoted to the publication of original research, which brings fresh light to bear on the concepts, processes, and consequences of humanities in general. It is multi-disciplinary in the sense that it encourages contributions from all relevant fields and specialized branches of the humanities.
    [Show full text]
  • Obtaining World Heritage Status and the Impacts of Listing Aa, Bart J.M
    University of Groningen Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing Aa, Bart J.M. van der IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2005 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Aa, B. J. M. V. D. (2005). Preserving the heritage of humanity? Obtaining world heritage status and the impacts of listing. s.n. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 23-09-2021 Appendix 4 World heritage site nominations Listed site in May 2004 (year of rejection, year of listing, possible year of extension of the site) Rejected site and not listed until May 2004 (first year of rejection) Afghanistan Península Valdés (1999) Jam,
    [Show full text]
  • Putri Sulistyowati Sasongko 28/05/15 Modern Approach of Conserving
    Modern Approach of Conserving Historic Buildings ‘Castelvecchio & Palazo Chiericati’ By Putri Sulistyowati Sasongko Kingston University London The Journey to Observe and Study the Buildings from the Trip to Italy, 23 – 27 March 2015. The study trip itinerary had provided the list of from the study trip, focusing on the observation historic buildings that are mostly designed by of conservation works on both Castelvecchio Andrea Palladio, an internationally well-known (Verona) and Palazzo Chiericati (Vicenza). Italian architect from the 16th Century. With the Even though Castelvecchio was not designed influence of Greek and Roman style by Palladio, the castle was chosen along with architecture, he also produced many of Palazzo Chiericati to be part of the case study, renaissance style buildings. Palladio is focusing on their similar approaches of the considered as one of the most influential conservation works for the building. architects in the history of European architecture. Many of his works were found in all over Italy. However, the three points of areas of study are in Vicenza, Verona, and Venice. With its historic buildings that were born earlier than United Kingdom, the Italian style architecture influenced the United Kingdom and showed the resemblance in many of the Figure 1. Castelvecchio, Restored by Carlo Scarpa in 1958 – buildings as well. Therefore, it shows that 1974 (by writer) nothing is really ‘pure’ in architecture styles, design and art- they are the group and compilations of everything that were affecting the object. This trip was considered as an architectural trail for where the students were trying to find and history and character of Italian architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C
    2007 UNEP-WCMC Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas Lysenko I., Besançon C., Savy C. No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Ellesmere/Greenland 1 Canada Quttinirpaaq 300093 II 38148.00 Transboundary Complex Greenland Hochstetter Forland 67910 RAMSAR 1848.20 Kilen 67911 RAMSAR 512.80 North-East Greenland 2065 MAB-BR 972000.00 North-East Greenland 650 II 972000.00 1,008,470.17 2 Canada Ivvavik 100672 II 10170.00 Old Crow Flats 101594 IV 7697.47 Vuntut 100673 II 4400.00 United States Arctic 2904 IV 72843.42 Arctic 35361 Ia 32374.98 Yukon Flats 10543 IV 34925.13 146,824.27 Alaska-Yukon-British Columbia 3 Canada Atlin 4178 II 2326.95 Borderlands Atlin 65094 II 384.45 Chilkoot Trail Nhp 167269 Unset 122.65 Kluane 612 II 22015.00 Kluane Wildlife 18707 VI 6450.00 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 12200 WHC 31595.00 Tatshenshini-Alsek 67406 Ib 9470.26 United States Admiralty Island 21243 Ib 3803.76 Chilkat 68395 II 24.46 Chilkat Bald Eagle 68396 II 198.38 Glacier Bay 1010 II 13045.50 Glacier Bay 22485 V 233.85 Glacier Bay 35382 Ib 10784.27 Glacier Bay-Admiralty Island Biosphere Reserve 11591 MAB-BR 15150.15 Kluane/Wrangell-St Elias/Glacier Bay/Tatshenshini-Alsek 2018 WHC 66796.48 Kootznoowoo 101220 Ib 3868.24 Malaspina Glacier 21555 III 3878.40 Mendenhall River 306286 Unset 14.57 Misty Fiords 21247 Ib 8675.10 Misty Fjords 13041 IV 4622.75 Point Bridge 68394 II 11.64 Russell Fiord 21249 Ib 1411.15 Stikine-LeConte 21252 Ib 1816.75 Tetlin 2956 IV 2833.07 Tongass 13038 VI 67404.09 Global List of Transboundary Protected Areas ©2007 UNEP-WCMC 1 of 78 No TBPA Name Country Protected Areas Sitecode Category PA Size, km 2 TBPA Area, km 2 Tracy Arm-Fords Terror 21254 Ib 2643.43 Wrangell-St Elias 1005 II 33820.14 Wrangell-St Elias 35387 Ib 36740.24 Wrangell-St.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation in China Issue, Spring 2016
    SPRING 2016 CONSERVATION IN CHINA A Note from the Director For over twenty-five years, it has been the Getty Conservation Institute’s great privilege to work with colleagues in China engaged in the conservation of cultural heritage. During this quarter century and more of professional engagement, China has undergone tremendous changes in its social, economic, and cultural life—changes that have included significant advance- ments in the conservation field. In this period of transformation, many Chinese cultural heritage institutions and organizations have striven to establish clear priorities and to engage in significant projects designed to further conservation and management of their nation’s extraordinary cultural resources. We at the GCI have admiration and respect for both the progress and the vision represented in these efforts and are grateful for the opportunity to contribute to the preservation of cultural heritage in China. The contents of this edition of Conservation Perspectives are a reflection of our activities in China and of the evolution of policies and methods in the work of Chinese conservation professionals and organizations. The feature article offers Photo: Anna Flavin, GCI a concise view of GCI involvement in several long-term conservation projects in China. Authored by Neville Agnew, Martha Demas, and Lorinda Wong— members of the Institute’s China team—the article describes Institute work at sites across the country, including the Imperial Mountain Resort at Chengde, the Yungang Grottoes, and, most extensively, the Mogao Grottoes. Integrated with much of this work has been our participation in the development of the China Principles, a set of national guide- lines for cultural heritage conservation and management that respect and reflect Chinese traditions and approaches to conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • 9 Days World Heritages Sichuan Tour
    [email protected] +86-28-85593923 9 days World heritages Sichuan tour https://windhorsetour.com/sichuan-highlights-tour/chengdu-emei-jiuzhaigou-tour Chengdu Dujiangyan Mount Emei Leshan Jiuzhaigou Huanglong Chengdu This tour takes you explore the top fantastic natural sceneries and precious cultural heritage in Sichuan. Enjoy the happy time with the adorable pandas in Chengdu, unspoiled natural world at Jiuzhaigou and more. Type Private Duration 9 days Theme Culture and Heritage, Natural scenery, Panda Trip code WS-201 From £ 1,197 per person £ 1,088 you save £ 109 (10%) Itinerary The Chinese often refer to Sichuan as the Heavenly Kingdom (Tian Fu Zhi Guo), a reference to the province's abundance in natural resources and cultural heritage. Sichuan boasts a lot of mountains, rivers and historic relics. UNESCO inscribed Jiuzhaigou, Hulong scenic area, Mount Emei with the Leshan Giant Buddha, and Mount Qingcheng-Dujiangyan Irrigation Project on the World Heritage List in 1992, 1996 and 2000 respectively. Day 01 : Chengdu airport pick up Chengdu airport pick up and transfer to your hotel. Have a good rest at the first day. Overnight at Chengdu. B=breakfast Day 02 : Chengdu city one day sightseeing (B) Morning around 07:30 - 08:00 to be met in your hotel lobby and head over to Chengdu Panda Breeding and Research Center, about half an hour drive. You will catch pandas' feeding time, breakfast they most active time of a day. Enjoy both adult and baby pandas as the gobble up fresh bamboo. Later then watch the film at Panda Story Cinema to learn about a pandas daily life, baby's birth, dating, mating and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas of the Eu Importance in Latvia
    4. ES NOZĪMES PUTNIEM NOZĪMĪGĀS VIETAS LATVIJĀ | IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS OF THE EU IMPORTANCE IN LATVIA Skaits un platības | Numbers and size coverage In total, 71 Important Bird Areas have been identified in Latvia (Fig. 4-2, Table 4-1), 64 of those are inland territories with a total of 534,056 hectares comprising 8.3% of the country’s land surface. The other 7 areas are marine territories with a total coverage of ca. 339,470 hectares of the Baltic sea and Riga gulf waters. These marine sites are listed for information only, but they are not included in the site accounts. The individual area sizes of the inland IBAs range from 184 ha to 92,322 ha (on average 8345 ha), though most of them (56 sites, 88%) are below 15,000 ha. The number of IBAs in different area size groups is shown in Fig. 4-1. In comparison with the previous national IBA inventory (Raèinskis & Stîpniece 2000), the number of the inland IBAs has increased by 10 sites with their total extent increasing two-fold by 274,368 ha. All marine IBAs have remained unmodified, as the application of the BirdLife IBA criteria at sea are still under development. The long-term changes in number of IBAs in Latvia and their relative area size, compared to the country’s land surface, is illustrated in Fig. 4-3. Latvijâ ir noteikta 71 putniem starptautiski nozîmîgâ vieta (4.1. tabula, 4.2. attçls). 64 no tâm atrodas iekðzemç un aizòem 534 056 ha jeb 8,3% valsts teritorijas.
    [Show full text]
  • Brick Gothic Recovering Atmospheric Versatility Itinerary Route
    Brick Gothic Recovering atmospheric versatility Itinerary Route The contemporary dilemma of uniting building character with energy and Latvia Day 1-2 effciency considerations has often led to isolated specialist approaches that Riga overlook synergies in the inherent properties of common construction materials. A study of building traditions before the introduction of large-scale metal Poland Day 3-7 components and conditioning systems, however, reveals a tectonic richness Gdansk stemming from culturally self-aware and inherently economical approaches to Malbork structural and climatic challenges. In the case of the brick gothic architecture Torun of the former Hanseatic League cities, this awareness manifested in muscular buildings with polychrome patterns and bas-relief complexity, assembled from Germany Day 8-18 simple brick masonry units. Of many subsequent pan-European interpretations, Stralsund one British architect devoted to the neo-Gothic - Professor Alan Short - has Wismar Riga exhibited particular virtuosity in adapting this subtle form of exuberance to Lübeck his very different and highly specifc environmental requirements. His work Hamburg demonstrates the enduring versatility of this lineage of architectural expression Bremen in creating atmospheric depth with tectonic sophistication but material economy. Manchester Gdansk Netherlands Day 19-21 Lichfeld The backsteingotik, ‘brick gothic’ in German, partly evolved from a desire Zwolle Stralsund Leicester to reinforce continental culture along the shipping routes of the Hanseatic Amsterdam Lübeck Birmingham Malbork League of allied trading port-cities in the 12th - 15th centuries. With political Wismar and religious tensions as present as the harsh maritime conditions, important England Day 22-32 Bremen Coventry Amsterdam Hamburg commercial and public projects tended to be durable and aesthetically confdent Manchester Zwolle Torun structures, but due to the lack of stone resources, were often built using clay Lichfeld masonry.
    [Show full text]