DOCSLIB.ORG

Leading Against Notrump Contracts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leading Against Notrump Contracts BB What’s Standard? by David Lindop This series is based on Grant So, unless we have a very good suit Standard, a set of conventions and Leading Against and some prospect of regaining the agreements that are in popular use lead, it’s best to lead partner’s suit. today, such as 15-17 1NT openings, Notrump Partner won’t say anything if we lead five-card majors, and weak two- a diamond, even if a heart was best, bids. A summary chart of Grant Contracts but may comment if we lead a heart Standard and the corresponding when a diamond was best. convention card can be found at 2. Lead the Longest Suit www.AudreyGrant.com . The site most tricks. This is typically the If partner hasn’t bid, we typically pick also has Grant Basic, a simpler set longest combined suit held by the our longest suit as the one with the of agreements. partnership. Even if declarer has most potential for developing tricks. Earlier articles in this series one or more stoppers in the suit, once they have been driven out, the With little else to guide us, leading appeared in the Bridge Bulletin and “fourth from longest and strongest” can also be found under ‘Articles’ at defenders can take any remaining winners in the suit once they gain is one of the oldest maxims in the www.AudreyGrant.com . the lead. There’s no trump suit to game...and it works remarkably well! help declarer. Still, there are exceptions. We try s with opening leads against If we’ve bid and raised a suit, then to avoid suits bid by the opponents, suit contracts (see last issue), that is likely to be a good source of especially major suits. Athere are two steps in choosing tricks. However, suppose we are on WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH the lead against a notrump contract: lead as West with this hand after 1m • Choosing the suit only partner has bid for our side: Pass 2o Pass 2NT • Choosing the card WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH Pass 3NT All Pass o Choosing the best suit to lead is 1 1NT m Leading a spade right the most critical aspect. Once we’ve Pass 3NT All Pass K J 8 5 4 into South’s advertised n 6 3 decided on the suit, selecting the Should we lead the suit five-card suit is unlikely m 7 6 3 o J 6 appropriate card is usually a matter partner bid, diamonds, to be a success. Better n Q 9 7 4 2 p Q 10 7 4 of rote. o or our long suit, hearts? to hope South will need 8 3 to develop tricks in spades, and our Let’s start with the guidelines for p 9 8 5 The guideline is clear. deciding which suit to lead. It says to lead partner’s holding will make that a challenge. suit! True, partner might have opened Instead, we can chose our second-best Choosing the Suit a three-card diamond suit, the better suit, and lead a club. Maybe partner The key to choosing the best suit to minor when holding no five-card will have some help for us there. lead is to listen to the auction. The major. Partner may have four hearts. Another exception is when we standard guidelines are: True, South’s 1NT overcall typically have a weak hand with a weak suit. 1. Lead partner’s suit shows one or more diamond stoppers. Even if we were to establish tricks 2. Otherwise, lead the longest Nevertheless, we don’t ‘know’ that in our long suit, it’s unlikely we suit, but: for certain. Partner could have a six- would ever gain the lead to be able - avoid the opponents’ suits, card or longer diamond suit. Even if to take them. In this situation, it’s especially major suits declarer has one or two stoppers in usually best to try and ‘find’ partner’s - with a weak hand and weak diamonds, partner did open the suit, and to help out by leading it. suit, try to find partner’s suit bidding and is likely to have the WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH 3. With a choice of suits, lead the high cards necessary to regain the 1NT Pass 3NT All Pass longer lead and take the diamond winners after they are established. 1. Lead Partner’s Suit Even if partner holds If we lead a heart, we’re taking a m 7 6 5 4 3 2 m n the A–K–Q, we’ll The basic idea when defending big gamble. Partner might be short J 10 7 never get in to take against a notrump contract is to take o 9 5 in hearts; it might remove partner’s p any tricks. Instead, we advantage of the opening lead by only high card in the suit; even if we 6 4 can ‘guess’ —hope — going after the partnership suit that can establish some tricks, we have no partner has length in hearts, and has the potential for developing the entry to regain the lead and take them. lead one to get things started. BETTER 14 BRIDGE VOL . 14, N O. 1 SEPTEMBER /O CTOBER 2009 BB 3. Lead the Stronger 3) DUMMY LEADING AGAINST With a choice of suits to lead, we m A 5 2 A NOTRUMP CONTRACT tend to pick the stronger suit. The US PARTNER more strength we hold in the suit, PARTNER ’S SUIT : m K Q 10 9 3 m 7 4 the less help we need from partner • Lead the top of a doubleton DECLARER to develop tricks. (mQ–6, n8–2). m J 8 6 WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH • Lead the top of touching honors If we lead another spade, declarer 1NT (oQ–J–3, pK–J–10). gets two tricks. Better to wait for Pass 3NT All Pass • With no sequence, lead low partner to get in and lead the suit. From this hand, we’d How can we resolve this problem? m 10 8 6 4 3 (mQ–6–3, n9–5–2, oA–8–5–4). lead a heart rather Some partnerships agree to lead the n K 10 7 5 2 LONG SUIT : o than a spade. The mQ from this type of holding, asking 8 n n n • Lead top of touching honors m p A 5 A, Q, or even J partner to play the J when holding from partner should from a sequence: it, and otherwise give a count signal. help us develop tricks. In spades, • A solid sequence That works well in this situation. the mA, mK, or mQ in partner’s (pK–Q–J–7–3, m10 –9–8–3) When partner plays the m4, we hand might not be enough to help us • A broken sequence ‘know’ it is layout 2). In layout 1), establish the suit. (nQ–J–9–6–5, oJ–10 –8–2) partner would have played the mJ. When we have to choose among • An interior sequence In layout 3), partner would have four-card suits, the decision is a little (pA–J–10 –6–4, mQ–10 –9–5) played the m7, showing a doubleton. closer. We sometimes opt for safety • Otherwise, lead fourth highest Although agreements like this can since there is less potential for (nK–J–9–5–2, oA–10 –5–3). be useful, they can cause confusion, developing tricks from length. since the lead of the mQ could also WEST NORTH EAST SOUTH There are a couple of considerations. be simply the top of a sequence, such as mQ–J–10 –7. So they are best left 1NT The Lead from K –Q–10 –9 Pass 3NT All Pass to experienced partnerships. Suppose we lead the mK from our The Lead of an Ace m Although our strongest broken sequence in this situation: A Q 6 3 suit in terms of high- A similar situation arises if we are n Q J 10 9 DUMMY on lead against 3NT with a holding o card points is spades, m A 5 2 n 6 there are a number of such as A–K–J–10 –7. If we lead p K 7 6 3 US PARTNER the nA and two or three low hearts factors that might sway m m us toward leading a heart. Since we K Q 10 9 3 4 appear in dummy, will we know have 12 high-card points and the DECLARER what to do next? Partner will try to opponents have bid game, it’s m 6 help us with an attitude signal, but The m2 is played from dummy, partner that won’t always be clear. What is unlikely partner has much in the n way of high cards. plays the m4, and declarer the m6. Is partner suppose to do with Q–2, for example? In fact, a count signal from By leading hearts, we can promote it safe to continue by leading the partner might be helpful. If we know two winners in the suit without any mQ? It’s okay if this is the layout: declarer started with a doubleton help from partner. Leading a spade 1) DUMMY n n m m Q, we can continue with the K away from our A–Q might cost a A 5 2 and take the first five tricks. trick and gain nothing in return, US PARTNER The classic way to deal with this especially if partner can never gain m K Q 10 9 3 m J 4 the lead to return our suit.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MILITARY BRIDGE DIRECTIONS Bridge Knowledge Not Required – Only a Desire to Have Fun!
    MILITARY BRIDGE DIRECTIONS Bridge Knowledge not required – only a desire to have fun! The game is played using the following equipment: 1. Set of Flags – 1 large fort flag and a small flag for each team. 2. Schedule Sheet – names trump for each round and shows where respective “Scouts” are to go. 3. A deck of cards for each table. Definitions: Trick: Each play is called a trick. There are 13 tricks in each game. The first to win 7 tricks wins that game. Trump: The card suit designated on the Schedule Sheet that leads each trick (hearts, diamonds, clubs, spades or no-trump). Each table has one Captain who is player #1 and three Scouts, players #2, 3 & 4. These can be selected or cut for (the highest card is your team’s Captain). Captains retain their seats during the entire 10 games, sending out their Scouts as per the Schedule Sheet to “capture” other Nations’ flags. The Scout designated to stay and play with the Captain sits opposite the Captain and they play against the Visitor Scouts at your table. The Captain always deals, announces the trump suit (from the Schedule Sheet), and makes the first lead. In Military Bridge, there is no Dummy Hand and no bidding. Trump is indicated on your Schedule Sheet. The play is similar to bridge, except that all players participate. The captain leads, and then each player (in clockwise order) plays a card. If playing a “no trump” hand, the highest card in the suit led wins the trick. With trump you may trump suit led only if you have none of that suit in your hand, then highest trump card played wins the trick.
    [Show full text]
  • Acol Bidding Notes
    SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION The following notes are designed to help your understanding of the Acol system of bidding and should be used in conjunction with Crib Sheets 1 to 5 and the Glossary of Terms The crib sheets summarise the bidding in tabular form, whereas these notes provide a fuller explanation of the reasons for making particular bids and bidding strategy. These notes consist of a number of short chapters that have been structured in a logical order to build on the things learnt in the earlier chapters. However, each chapter can be viewed as a mini-lesson on a specific area which can be read in isolation rather than trying to absorb too much information in one go. It should be noted that there is not a single set of definitive Acol ‘rules’. The modern Acol bidding style has developed over the years and different bridge experts recommend slightly different variations based on their personal preferences and playing experience. These notes are based on the methods described in the book The Right Way to Play Bridge by Paul Mendelson, which is available at all good bookshops (and some rubbish ones as well). They feature a ‘Weak No Trump’ throughout and ‘Strong Two’ openings. +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ INDEX Section 1 Introduction Chapter 1 Bidding objectives & scoring Chapter 2 Evaluating the strength of your hand Chapter 3 Evaluating the shape of your hand . Section 2 Balanced Hands Chapter 21 1NT opening bid & No Trumps responses Chapter 22 1NT opening bid & suit responses Chapter 23 Opening bids with stronger balanced hands Chapter 24 Supporting responder’s major suit Chapter 25 2NT opening bid & responses Chapter 26 2 Clubs opening bid & responses Chapter 27 No Trumps responses after an opening suit bid Chapter 28 Summary of bidding with Balanced Hands .
    [Show full text]
  • Hall of Fame Takes Five
    Friday, July 24, 2009 Volume 81, Number 1 Daily Bulletin Washington, DC 81st Summer North American Bridge Championships Editors: Brent Manley and Paul Linxwiler Hall of Fame takes five Hall of Fame inductee Mark Lair, center, with Mike Passell, left, and Eddie Wold. Sportsman of the Year Peter Boyd with longtime (right) Aileen Osofsky and her son, Alan. partner Steve Robinson. If standing ovations could be converted to masterpoints, three of the five inductees at the Defenders out in top GNT flight Bridge Hall of Fame dinner on Thursday evening The District 14 team captained by Bob sixth, Bill Kent, is from Iowa. would be instant contenders for the Barry Crane Top Balderson, holding a 1-IMP lead against the They knocked out the District 9 squad 500. defending champions with 16 deals to play, won captained by Warren Spector (David Berkowitz, Time after time, members of the audience were the fourth quarter 50-9 to advance to the round of Larry Cohen, Mike Becker, Jeff Meckstroth and on their feet, applauding a sterling new class for the eight in the Grand National Teams Championship Eric Rodwell). The team was seeking a third ACBL Hall of Fame. Enjoying the accolades were: Flight. straight win in the event. • Mark Lair, many-time North American champion Five of the six team members are from All four flights of the GNT – including Flights and one of ACBL’s top players. Minnesota – Bob and Cynthia Balderson, Peggy A, B and C – will play the round of eight today. • Aileen Osofsky, ACBL Goodwill chair for nearly Kaplan, Carol Miner and Paul Meerschaert.
    [Show full text]
  • The Alt Invitational V
    ALT V BULLETIN 4 THE ALT Friday, May 29, 2020 editor: Christina Lund Madsen INVITATIONAL V [email protected] logistics: Rosalind Hengeveld big data: Joyce Tito MAY 25 - 29 2020 Previous Winners Face in Final After two close semifinals, two previous winners face each other in the final of the Alt Invitational V. De Botton needed their carry over to beat Street in an e♥austing semifinal last night, and Gupta PRE-BULLETIN wouldTHE have lost toALT Blass had it not been for one boardMonday, May worth 11, 2020 20 IMPs. editor: Christina Lund Madsen During today's final the BBO-commentators are [email protected] to show up in full power to honour Roland INVITATIONALWald, who passed away suddenly. Let us hope theylogistics: Rosalindwill have Hengeveld much to talk about. MAY 11-15, 2020 big data: Joyce Tito We are looking forward to an actionpacked final. online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online THE ALT INVITATIONAL PRE-BULLETIN Final Important NoticeTHE ALT Monday, May 11, 2020 editor: Christina Lund Madsen Friday [email protected] 29 at 10.00 EDT/16.00 CET All players MAYshould 11-15, enter 2020 BBO 10 INVITATIONAL logistics: Rosalind Hengeveld minutes before their matchMAY starts 11-15, 2020 at big data: Joyce3 Tito x 12 boards online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online the latest. Tournamentonline bridgedirector events organized Denis by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online Dobrin is waiting for you and will De Botton vs. Gupta instruct you where to sit. THE ALT INVITATIONAL MAY 11-15, 2020 online bridge events organized by bid72, bridge24 & netbridge.online sign up for the newsletter sign up for the newsletter - 1 - The lightning that by Christina Lund Madsen backfired There are many stories of lightner doubles It is hard to blame East for doubling for a backfiring, and this was one of the more heart lead.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridgehands Emag Newsletter Notrump Leads February 2006
    BridgeHands eMag Newsletter Notrump Leads February 2006 Dear Michael, For the last few months, we featured two of declarer’s favorite play strategies – the finesse and the promotion play. This month in our first of a two part article, we will explore considerations for the defender to make the best lead when opponents are playing a Notrump contract. There’s more to this game beyond leading your fourth-best card: find out why. With our focus on leads this month, let’s review the Laws when something goes awry on the opening lead. Everyone loves to open a hand for bidding. Last month we learned how the “Rule of 15” gives us another hand evaluation criterion when partner is a passed hand. Now let’s explore the “Rule of 20” - a third hand evaluation method, useful even when partner hasn’t bid. My, partner, you have great shape – referring to your hand distribution, of course! Some hands have cute colloquial names associated with them to describe the shape: Swan, Rattlesnake, Two/Three Suiter, Pancake, (Ugly) Duckling, Freak, and Stiff. Regardless of how you play the cards, use these clichés and you’ll sound like you really know your stuff after you have finished this month's newsletter. Note: Viewing the hands below requires your EMAIL reader to use "fixed fonts" (not proportional). If you have problems reading this document, please view our online web-based copy or Adobe Acrobat PDF file suitable for printing at the BridgeHands website Leads: Trading a promotion for a finesse Last month we investigated scenarios where declarer promoted long suits to establish extra tricks.
    [Show full text]
  • Leads and Signals
    Leads and Signals o All things being equal, we tend to be on defense about half the time; and leading about half of this time o Opening lead frequently sets up the pattern on defense o Cooperation between partners on defense is extremely important — Don’t try to set your opponents all by yourself; enlist your partner in the effort by signaling what you hold — Watch what partner plays and infer defensive approach he is suggesting and cooperate Leading o The key to selecting an opening lead is to listen to the auction and infer what that says about everyone’s hand — Has your partner bid --> Possible indication of suit to lead — Have the opponents bid easily and swiftly to game with no interference and you have near an opening hand --> your partner has nothing and the defense is “up to you” — Have the opponents struggled and found a secondary place to play -- > They may not have enough trump and a trump lead might be appropriate — Do you have “Connected Honors (I.e., an AK)” --> then you might want to lead the honor to see what dummy has and then make your “real” lead — Do you have a series (I.e., QJT9) -- If you can lead enough times, you can eventually drive out their honors Example hand Example hand - Solved Types of Leads o Aggressive/Active -- Use if opponents have side source of tricks o Tapping -- Use when you have length in trump suit; try to make opponents use their trump by ruffing your long suit o High roller leads -- Very aggressive and gambling leads; usually want to use only in team games where payoff for gamble is large; can
    [Show full text]
  • February 24, 2017 President Donald J. Trump the White House United States of America
    February 24, 2017 President Donald J. Trump The White House United States of America Dear President Trump, Since the founding of this country, science has been fundamental to the advancement of sound policy and economic prosperity and innovation. Science improves the lives of Americans, stimulates our economy, advances our understanding of our world, and protects us and our families from harm. As you select advisors that will help you to draft a blueprint for American policy, we urge you to make appointing a Science Advisor an immediate priority. Science is in the DNA of the United States. It plays an integral part in our nation's security, economic growth, public health, and infrastructure. Appointing a Science Advisor quickly will enable the Administration to maximize investments in science and develop a strategic plan that secures America’s leadership in science. The Science Advisor will assist your administration in driving innovation, and provide scientifically sound solutions to the pressing issues facing our nation today; including updating deteriorating infrastructure, combatting health epidemics, providing clean air and water, and securing valuable natural resources and minerals. Appointing a Science Advisor is a smart investment for our nation and for keeping our position as a scientific leader globally. Due to the integral role of the Science Advisor, we urge you to appoint an individual with a strong scientific background who understands the rigorous scientific method, the need for evidence-based science, and who can leverage the collaborative nature of the scientific community and the value of scientific research in shaping America’s future. As supporters of science, we urge you to work with our scientific organizations as you commence the selection process and the important task of advancing America’s scientific enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Squeeze Plays
    The Squeeze Play By James R. Klein **** The most fascinating of all advanced plays in bridge is undoubtedly the squeeze play. Since the origin of bridge, the ability to execute the squeeze play has been one of the many distinguishing marks of the expert player. What is more important is the expert's ability to recognize that a squeeze exists and therefore make all the necessary steps to prepare for it. Often during the course of play the beginner as well as the advanced player has executed a squeeze merely because it was automatic. The play of a long suit with defender holding all the essential cards will accomplish this. The purpose of the squeeze play is quite simple. It is to create an extra winner with a card lower than the defender holds by compelling the latter to discard it to protect a vital card in another suit. While the execution of the squeeze play at times may seem complex, the average player may learn a great deal by studying certain principles that are governed by it. 1. It is important to determine which of the defenders holds the vital cards. This may be accomplished in many ways; for example, by adverse bidding, by a revealing opening lead, by discards and signals but most often by the actual fall of the cards. This is particularly true when one of the defenders fails to follow suit on the first or second trick. 2. It is important after the opening lead is made to count the sure tricks before playing to the first trick.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law Wins
    THE LAW WINS A Brief Look at the Law of Total Tricks* Most of you have heard about the Law of Total Tricks. The following is an attempt to explain it. Whether or not you have heard it discussed, it is applied by experts and the better bridge players frequently and with great success. Simply, the Law of Total Tricks says that the total number of tricks available on a bridge deal in a competitive auction is equal to the total number of trumps. The total number of tricks means the combined total tricks available to both sides if each were to play a contract in their longest and best trump fit assuming best play and defense. The total number of trumps means the combined total of trumps and is reached by adding together the number of trumps from each side's best trump suit. Sound a little difficult? It really isn=t....it=s just a little difficult to put it into an easily understood paragraph! I suggest that read and reread the above until you think you understand it. Now why, you might ask, do you care? The Law of Total Tricks is a tool to be used in competitive bidding situations. The law infers that the total trick count is constant and that neither the location of high cards nor the distribution of the suits changes it. With proper application of the Law, better decisions can be made on whether to bid more or to defend. Look at the following hand to see how the Law of Total Tricks works: North Í KJ6 Ì AQ102 Ë QJ10 Ê K98 West East Í 1043 Í AQ52 Ì 953 Ì K4 Ë 932 Ë K84 Ê AQ107 Ê J654 South Í 987 Ì J876 Ë A765 Ê 32 In this example North-South's best fit is hearts (8) and East-West's best fit is clubs (8).
    [Show full text]
  • Beginner's Bridge Notes
    z x w y BEGINNER’S BRIDGE NOTES z x w y Leigh Harding PLAYING THE CARDS IN TRUMP CONTRACTS INTRODUCTION TO BRIDGE Bridge is a game for four people playing in two partnerships. A standard pack of 52 cards is used. There are four Suits: z Spades, y Hearts, x Don’t play a single card until you have planned how you will make your Diamonds and w Clubs. Each suit has thirteen cards in the order: contract! A,K,Q,J,10,9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2. Ace is high. The plan will influence decisions you will have to make during the play, THE PLAY for example knowing when to delay drawing trumps, instead of drawing them all at the beginning. The cards are dealt so that each player receives 13 cards. It is best to arrange them in your hand with alternating red suits and black suits. The bidding starts with the dealer. After the bidding is over, one pair STEP 1. Know how many tricks you need to make your contract! become the declaring side. One member of this pair called the Declarer, plays the hand while the opponents Defend the hand. STEP 2. Estimate how many tricks in trump suit (assume most likely split). The partner of the declarer, called the Dummy, puts all of his cards face STEP 3. Count certain tricks in the other three suits. up on the table and takes no further part in the play. Declarer plays both hands, his own and dummy’s. The first person to play a card is the STEP 4.
    [Show full text]
  • March 2018 ACBL Bridge Bulletin Notes Jeff Kroll Sam Khayatt
    March 2018 ACBL Bridge Bulletin Notes Jeff Kroll Sam Khayatt Reisinger BAM Teams (p. 14 – 16) Page 15, column 1, fifth paragraph: When West doesn’t find the killing spade lead, 7C is made by setting up dummy’s diamonds. Declarer realized that both the CK and C7 are needed entries to the diamond suit. Don’t pull trump at tricks two and three. Pull them as you use the K and 7 as transportation to the diamonds. Page 15, column 2, sixth paragraph: the SQ is played by declarer to finesse against the SK. West chose to cover, the correct play. West is trying to set up his S9. When East plays the S7 then shows out, declarer unblocks the S8 to finesse against West’s S9. Gordon, page 32, topic 1: when you alert and are asked to explain, you must give an explanation of the alerted bid. If you end up declaring, you must give an explanation of any undisclosed agreement, and any misinformation given in the auction, before the opening lead. On defense, you must wait until after the deal to divulge any misinformation – you can’t clear it up for partner. The Bidding Box (p. 37 – 39) Problem 1 Both Easts appropriately pass after North opens 1S: East… Is not strong enough to double and bid, Cannot make a takeout double with only a doubleton heart double, and Cannot overcall that four- card diamond suit– especially at the two-level. East must pass and count on partner to keep the auction open in the balancing position.
    [Show full text]
  • The-Encyclopedia-Of-Cardplay-Techniques-Guy-Levé.Pdf
    © 2007 Guy Levé. All rights reserved. It is illegal to reproduce any portion of this mate- rial, except by special arrangement with the publisher. Reproduction of this material without authorization, by any duplication process whatsoever, is a violation of copyright. Master Point Press 331 Douglas Ave. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5M 1H2 (416) 781-0351 Website: http://www.masterpointpress.com http://www.masteringbridge.com http://www.ebooksbridge.com http://www.bridgeblogging.com Email: [email protected] Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Levé, Guy The encyclopedia of card play techniques at bridge / Guy Levé. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 978-1-55494-141-4 1. Contract bridge--Encyclopedias. I. Title. GV1282.22.L49 2007 795.41'5303 C2007-901628-6 Editor Ray Lee Interior format and copy editing Suzanne Hocking Cover and interior design Olena S. Sullivan/New Mediatrix Printed in Canada by Webcom Ltd. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 11 10 09 08 07 Preface Guy Levé, an experienced player from Montpellier in southern France, has a passion for bridge, particularly for the play of the cards. For many years he has been planning to assemble an in-depth study of all known card play techniques and their classification. The only thing he lacked was time for the project; now, having recently retired, he has accom- plished his ambitious task. It has been my privilege to follow its progress and watch the book take shape. A book such as this should not to be put into a beginner’s hands, but it should become a well-thumbed reference source for all players who want to improve their game.
    [Show full text]