Overview PDF 477.46 KB

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Overview PDF 477.46 KB IP 1184 [IPG514] NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE INTERVENTIONAL PROCEDURES PROGRAMME Interventional procedure overview of transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum This procedure is used for patients who need to have their whole rectum removed (for example, patients with rectal cancer or chronic inflammatory bowel disease that has not responded well enough to medical treatment). The rectum is removed using instruments introduced through an access device placed into the anus, combined with laparoscopic (keyhole) surgery through the abdomen, rather than through a long incision in the lower abdomen or a standard laparoscopic procedure alone. Introduction The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has prepared this interventional procedure (IP) overview to help members of the Interventional Procedures Advisory Committee (IPAC) make recommendations about the safety and efficacy of an interventional procedure. It is based on a rapid review of the medical literature and specialist opinion. It should not be regarded as a definitive assessment of the procedure. Date prepared This IP overview was prepared in April 2014 and updated in November 2014. Procedure name Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Specialist societies Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland British Association of Surgical Oncology (BASO). IP overview: Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Page 1 of 50 IP 1184 [IPG514] Description Indications and current treatment Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) can be used to treat malignant or benign disease of the rectum. Malignant disease: The incidence of rectal cancer rises sharply with age. Symptoms include rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit, although the early stages may be asymptomatic. Treatment of rectal cancer depends on its stage which is conventionally assessed using Dukes’ classification system: stage A – confined to the lining of the rectum stage B – grown into the muscle wall stage C – spread to at least 1 lymph node in the area stage D – spread to another organ in the body. Surgery is the main treatment modality for patients with locally confined disease. It involves resection of the affected part of the rectum, with or without preservation of the anus (and formation of a colostomy when preservation of the anus is not technically possible). Adjunctive radiotherapy and chemotherapy may also be used to reduce the risk of local recurrence and prevent metastatic disease. Benign disease: Benign conditions that may lead to the need for resection of the rectum include ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Both are chronic conditions, characterised by periods of clinical relapse and remission. Treatment depends on the severity and extent of the disease and is aimed at reducing the frequency and severity of recurrences. Drug therapy, including corticosteroids and immunosuppressive agents (such as azathioprine), usually controls the disease adequately. For more severe cases, treatment with a monoclonal antibody (such as infliximab) may be considered. Surgical removal of the affected areas may be necessary for severe cases that do not respond to medical treatment. What the procedure involves TaTME aims to improve the clinical outcome of rectal excision, and to reduce the length of stay in hospital and morbidity after surgery. It may facilitate proctectomy that would be difficult by an open or laparoscopic approach in people with a narrow pelvis or high body mass index, or where the position of the tumour is low in the rectum. IP overview: Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Page 2 of 50 IP 1184 [IPG514] Before surgery, the patient has bowel preparation and prophylactic antibiotics. With the patient under general anaesthesia and in the lithotomy position, standard laparoscopic mobilisation of the left colon and upper rectum is performed. After insertion of an operating platform into the anus, the lower rectum including the total mesorectum is mobilised in a reversed way using standard laparoscopic instruments. The transanal part of this procedure starts with insertion of a purse-string suture to close the rectal lumen, followed by a full thickness rectotomy. After identification of the total mesorectal excision (TME) plane, the dissection progresses proximally until connection is made with the dissection from above. The specimen can be removed through the transanal platform or, if the tumour is large, through the abdomen using a small incision. Anastomosis to connect the colon and the anus can be done using sutures (hand-sewn technique) or staples. When anastomosis is not possible, the patient is given a permanent stoma. When an anastomosis is done, a temporary ileostomy is usually created. Outcome measures Quality of the mesorectal excision. Quirke's grading assesses the quality of the mesorectal envelope from 3 indicating a completely intact specimen to 1 indicating an incomplete mesorectal envelope. It is assigned by pathologists. Literature review Rapid review of literature The medical literature was searched to identify studies and reviews relevant to transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) of the rectum. Searches were conducted of the following databases, covering the period from their commencement to 3 November 2014: MEDLINE, PREMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and other databases. Trial registries and the Internet were also searched. No language restriction was applied to the searches (see appendix C for details of search strategy). Relevant published studies identified during consultation or resolution that are published after this date may also be considered for inclusion. The following selection criteria (table 1) were applied to the abstracts identified by the literature search. Where selection criteria could not be determined from the abstracts the full paper was retrieved. IP overview: Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Page 3 of 50 IP 1184 [IPG514] Table 1 Inclusion criteria for identification of relevant studies Characteristic Criteria Publication type Clinical studies were included. Emphasis was placed on identifying good quality studies. Abstracts were excluded where no clinical outcomes were reported, or where the paper was a review, editorial, or a laboratory or animal study. Conference abstracts were also excluded because of the difficulty of appraising study methodology, unless they reported specific adverse events that were not available in the published literature. Patient Patients with benign or malignant rectal disease. Intervention/test Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum. Outcome Articles were retrieved if the abstract contained information relevant to the safety and/or efficacy. Language Non-English-language articles were excluded unless they were thought to add substantively to the English-language evidence base. List of studies included in the IP overview This IP overview is based on approximately 275 patients from 2 non-randomised comparative studies1-2 and 8 case series3-10. Other studies that were considered to be relevant to the procedure but were not included in the main extraction table (table 2) have been listed in appendix A. IP overview: Transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Page 4 of 50 IP 1184 [IPG514] Table 2 Summary of key efficacy and safety findings on transanal total mesorectal excision of the rectum Study 1 Fernandez-Hevia M (2014) Details Study type Non-randomised comparative study Country Spain Recruitment period 2011-13 (for transanal TME) and 2010-2011 (for laparoscopic TME) Study population and number n=74 patients with middle or low rectal cancer (37 transanal TME versus 37 laparoscopic TME) Age and sex Transanal TME mean 64.5 ± 11.8 years; 65% (24/37) male. Laparoscopic TME mean 69.5 ± 10.5 years; 60% (22/37) male. Mean BMI: 23.7 kg/ m2 [range 18 to 31kg/ m2] (transanal TME) versus mean BMI: 25.1 kg/ m2 [range 15 to 31.6 kg/ m2] (laparoscopic TME) Patient selection criteria Transanal TME group: consecutive patients with middle or low rectal histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma located up to 10 cm from the anal verge. Laparoscopic TME: retrospective cohort of consecutive patients of identical characteristics as in the transanal TME group. Technique Patients received mechanical bowel cleansing the day before surgery. They also received antibiotic prophylaxis with 2 g of cefoxitin, or 400 mg of ciprofloxacin and 500 mg of metronidazole for patients allergic to penicillin, intravenously. Transanal TME: 2 surgical teams worked at the same time (1 performing the abdominal phase as for the laparoscopic group and 1 performing the perineal phase). The Lone star retractor (CooperSurgical Inc.) was used. In very low tumours, the retractor was used to do an intersphincteric dissection and then, the Gelpoint path Transanal Access Platform was inserted. After dissection, the specimen was extracted transanally. A handsewn coloanal anastomosis was done. In middle and low rectal tumours, the Gelpoint path Transanal Access Platform was positioned in the anal canal after the Lone start retractor was positioned. The rectal anastomosis was done with a circular stapler EEA 33 mm single-use stapler with 4.8 mm staples (Autosuture, Covidien). For large tumours, a bulky mesentery or a size mismatch between the rectum and the specimen, an assisted incision was used to extract the specimen (Pfannenstiel or previous incision). Laparoscopic TME: A Pfannenstiel was often used as an assisted incision. In some cases, the
Recommended publications
  • Rectal Free Perforation After Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: a Case Report
    CASE REPORT – OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 30 (2017) 40–42 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Contents lists available at ScienceDirect provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector International Journal of Surgery Case Reports journal homepage: www.casereports.com Rectal free perforation after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: A case report ଝ of laparoscopic peritoneal lavage and repair without stoma a b,∗ Seokyong Ryu , Byung-Noe Bae a Department of Emergency Medicine, Inje University Snaggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea b Department of General Surgery, Inje University Snaggye Paik Hospital, Seoul,Republic of Korea a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: INTRODUCTION: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is widely performed for treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoids Received 30 August 2016 because of advantages, including shorter hospital stay and less discomfort, compared with conventional Received in revised form hemorrhoidectomy. However, it can have severe adverse effects, such as rectal bleeding, perforation, and 18 November 2016 sepsis. Accepted 18 November 2016 PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a healthy 28-year-old man who presented to the emer- Available online 21 November 2016 gency department with sudden-onset diffuse abdominal pain and hematochezia. He had undergone stapled hemorrhoidopexy 5 days earlier and was discharged after an uneventful postoperative course. For Keywords: the present condition, after immediate evaluation, we successfully performed emergency laparoscopic Rectal perforation repair of the rectal perforation without any stoma. His postoperative course was uneventful, and he was Stapled hemorrhoidopexy Laparoscopic surgery discharged on postoperative day 16.
    [Show full text]
  • A 20-Year Experience of Rectovaginal Fistula Management in a Tertiary University Hospital in Thailand
    A 20-year Experience of Rectovaginal Fistula Management in a Tertiary University Hospital in Thailand Varut Lohsiriwat MD, PhD*, Danupon Arsapanom MD*, Siriluck Prapasrivorakul MD*, Cherdsak Iramaneerat MD*, Woramin Riansuwan MD*, Wiroon Boonnuch MD*, Darin Lohsiriwat MD* * Colorectal Surgery Unit, Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine etiology, treatment and outcome of patients with rectovaginal fistula (RVF) who were treated in a tertiary university hospital in Thailand. Material and Method: The authors retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with RVF treating from 1994 to 2013 at the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. Data were recorded including patient’s demographics, etiology, treatment and outcome. Results: This study included 108 patients with median age of 55 years (range 24 to 81). Radiation injury was the most common cause of RVF (44%) followed by direct invasion of rectal or gynecologic malignancies (20%), postoperative complication (16%) (notably from 10 low anterior resections, 5 transabdominal hysterectomies, 1 stapled hemorrhoidopexy and 1 injection sclerotherapy for hemorrhoid) and obstetric injury (11%). Diverting colostomy was the most frequent operation performed for both radiation-related RVF and malignancy-related RVF. Most operation-related RVF were healed after fecal diversion with or without either local repair or major resection. All obstetric-related RVFs were successfully treated by local tissue repair with or without anal sphincteroplasty. Conclusion: Radiation injury and advanced pelvic malignancies were two most common causes of RVF in this study. Fecal diversion can be either initial operation or definite treatment in most patients with RVF.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Experience of Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy in a Medical College Setting
    Surgical Science, 2015, 6, 214-220 Published Online May 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ss http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ss.2015.65033 An Early Experience of Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy in a Medical College Setting Mushtaq Chalkoo*, Shahnawaz Ahangar, Naseer Awan, Varun Dogra, Umer Mushtaq, Hilal Makhdoomi Department of General Surgery, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India Email: *[email protected] Received 13 April 2015; accepted 18 May 2015; published 26 May 2015 Copyright © 2015 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Background: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy, popularly known as Longo technique is in use for the treatment of hemorrhoids since its first description to surgical fraternity in the world congress of endoscopic surgeons in 1998. Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility, patient acceptance, recur- rence and results of stapled haemorrhoidectomy in our early experience. Methods: Between Jan 2012 and Dec 2013, 42 patients with symptomatic GRADE III and IV hemorrhoids were operated by stapled hemorrhoidectomy by a single surgeon at our surgery department. The evaluation of this technique was done by assessing the feasibility of the surgery; and recording operative time, postoperative pain, complications, hospital stay, return to work and recurrence. Results: All the procedures were completed successfully. The mean (range) operative time was 30 (20 - 45) min. The blood loss was minimal. Mean (range) length of hospitalization for the entire group was 1 (1 - 3) days. Only 3 patients required more than 1 injection of diclofenac (75 mg) while as rest of the patients were quite happy switching over to oral diclofenac (50 mg) just after a single parenteral dose.
    [Show full text]
  • A Rare Complication of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Giant Pelvic Hematoma Treated with Super-Selective Percutaneous Angioembolization
    Ann Colorectal Res. 2018 December; 6(4):e83005. doi: 10.5812/acr.83005. Published online 2018 November 28. Case Report A Rare Complication of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: Giant Pelvic Hematoma Treated with Super-Selective Percutaneous Angioembolization Francesco Ferrara 1, *, Paolo Rigamonti 2, Giovanni Damiani 2, Maurizio Cariati 2 and Marco Stella 1 1Department of Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy 2Department of Diagnostic Sciences, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy *Corresponding author: Department of Surgery, San Carlo Borromeo Hospital, Milan, Italy. Email: [email protected] Received 2018 August 06; Revised 2018 October 01; Accepted 2018 October 03. Abstract Introduction: Procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) or hemorrhoidopexy is not free from complications, some of which have been described as serious, such as bleeding. This study describes a case of a female patient with post-operative huge pelvic hematoma, successfully treated with percutaneous angioembolization. Case Presentation: A 76-year-old female underwent PPH, with no intraoperative complications. Few hours later, the patient showed signs of acute abdomen. No external rectal bleeding was identified and vital signs were normal. A computerized tomography (CT)- scan showed a giant peri-rectal and retroperitoneal pelvic hematoma, with signs of active bleeding. A subsequent selective arteri- ography showed huge bleeding from superior hemorrhoidal artery, treated with super-selective embolization. The procedure was successful and the patient showed a symptomatic improvement. The subsequent hospital stay was uneventful and she was dis- charged on the ninth post-operative day, with no complications. At the 30-day post-discharge follow-up, the patient was completely pain free with no signs of pelvic discomfort.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorectal Update Ohio Chapter- ACS
    Colorectal Update Ohio Chapter- ACS William C. Cirocco, MD, FACS, FASCRS FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES NONE The AMERICAN PROCTOLOGIC SOCIETY (APS) d/b/a The AMERICAN SOCIETY of COLON & RECTAL SURGEONS (ASCRS) THE AMERICAN PROCTOLOGIC SOCIETY (APS)* 1899 AMA Meeting- Columbus, OH (Joseph Mathews AMA President ’99-’00) June 6 (Tuesday) - Great Southern Hotel (High & Main Streets) June 7-8 (Wednesday/Thursday)-Hotel Chittenden & St. Anthony’s Hospital-clinicals 1949 APS 50th Meeting (Columbus, OH) May 31- June 4 Deshler-Wallick Hotel *1st APS President Joseph Mathews preferred the term “rectum and colon” instead because it clearly stated what the specialty was about (1923) American Proctologic Society (APS) ▪ Purpose - to cultivate and promote knowledge of whatever relates to disease of the colon and rectum ▪ Make care of these maladies an acceptable part of practice (previously shunned by physicians) ▪ Stop quacks and charlatans FOUNDERS OF THE APS Joseph M. Mathews, Louisville APS President (1899-00,1913-14) James P. Tuttle, New York City(Vice Pres) APS President (1900-1901) Thomas C. Martin, Cleveland- OR APS President (1901-1902) *Samuel T. Earle, Baltimore - OR APS President (1902-1903) Wm M. Beach, Pittsburgh (Sec/Treasurer)APS President (1903-1904) *J. Rawson Pennington, Chicago- OR APS President (1904-1905) Lewis A. Adler, Jr., Philadelphia APS President (1905-1906) Samuel G. Gant, Kansas City APS President (1906-1907) *A. Bennett Cooke, Nashville APS President (1907-1908) George B. Evans, Dayton APS President (1908-1909) George J. Cook, Indianapolis APS President (1910-1911) B. Merrill Ricketts, Cincinnati Leon Straus, St. Louis Others: Charles C. Allison-Omaha, Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights Into the Management of Anorectal Disease in the Coronavirus 2019 Disease Era
    University of Massachusetts Medical School eScholarship@UMMS COVID-19 Publications by UMMS Authors 2021-07-09 Insights into the management of anorectal disease in the coronavirus 2019 disease era Waseem Amjad Albany Medical Center Et al. Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Follow this and additional works at: https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/covid19 Part of the Digestive System Diseases Commons, Gastroenterology Commons, Infectious Disease Commons, Telemedicine Commons, and the Virus Diseases Commons Repository Citation Amjad W, Haider R, Malik A, Qureshi W. (2021). Insights into the management of anorectal disease in the coronavirus 2019 disease era. COVID-19 Publications by UMMS Authors. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 17562848211028117. Retrieved from https://escholarship.umassmed.edu/covid19/285 Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This material is brought to you by eScholarship@UMMS. It has been accepted for inclusion in COVID-19 Publications by UMMS Authors by an authorized administrator of eScholarship@UMMS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TAG0010.1177/17562848211028117Therapeutic Advances in GastroenterologyW Amjad, R Haider 1028117research-article20212021 Advances and Future Perspectives in Colorectal Cancer Special Collection Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Review Ther Adv Gastroenterol Insights into the management of anorectal 2021, Vol. 14: 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848211028117DOI: 10.1177/ disease in the coronavirus 2019 disease era https://doi.org/10.1177/1756284821102811717562848211028117 © The Author(s), 2021. Article reuse guidelines: Waseem Amjad, Rabbia Haider, Adnan Malik and Waqas T. Qureshi sagepub.com/journals- permissions Abstract: Coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) has created major impacts on public health.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. Indications in 2021 Pablo Piccinini, Nicolas Avellaneda, Augusto Carrie Instituto Universitario CEMIC (Unidad Patología Orificial)
    REV ARGENT COLOPROCT | 2021 | VOL. 32, N° 1: 28-30 EXPERT OPINION DOI: 10.46768/racp.v32i01.122 Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy. Indications in 2021 Pablo Piccinini, Nicolas Avellaneda, Augusto Carrie Instituto Universitario CEMIC (Unidad Patología Orificial). CABA, Argentina. As a historical review, Antonio Longo in 1998 was the tle external component, although the latter is not an ab- first surgeon who made reference to the stapled hemor- solute contraindication since the procedure itself often rhoidopexy, describing it at that time as "an ideal solution ends up reducing said component. with minimal postoperative pain, without anal wound Second, some studies have emphasized that this tech- and with minimal operative time".1 The objective of the nique has a higher risk of major complications compared surgery was not excising the hemorrhoidal tissue, but to to conventional hemorroidectomy. Profuse bleeding from restore the anatomy and physiology of the hemorrhoid- the suture line, hematomas, rectal vaginal fistulas, peri- al plexuses. anal fistulas, perineal sepsis, rectal perforation, rectal ste- In 2003, a consensus of experts on this technique met nosis (often due to high sutures that generate the well- and determined the indications for this surgery:2 known hourglass defect), anal stenosis and anal sphincter • Grade III hemorrhoids. injuries (due to too low sutures) are described in the liter- • Uncomplicated grade IV hemorrhoids that can be ature.6-9 reduced during surgery. However, other studies postulate that stapled hemor- • Grade II hemorrhoids (selected cases). rhoidopexy has a lower complication rate. A recent me- • Failure of other surgical techniques (eg, rubber band ta-analysis with at least 2000 patients found that the ligation) to relieve symptoms associated with hemor- percentage of complications was 20.2% for stapled hem- rhoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Outcomes
    International Journal of Surgery Science 2019; 3(4): 226-229 E-ISSN: 2616-3470 P-ISSN: 2616-3462 © Surgery Science Analysis of stapled hemorrhoidopexy outcomes: A www.surgeryscience.com 2019; 3(4): 226-229 single-institution based study Received: 19-08-2019 Accepted: 23-09-2019 Usharani Rathnam, Santhosh Raju, Shivakumar Mallikarjun Algud, Usharani Rathnam Madhu Rajegowda and Lakkanna Suggaiah Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, ESIC Medical College, Post Graduate Institute of Medical DOI: https://doi.org/10.33545/surgery.2019.v3.i4d.246 Science and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, India Abstract Background: Although traditional surgery is the gold standard treatment for hemorrhoids, stapled Santhosh Raju hemorrhoidopexy (SH) is an alternative surgical technique. However, this technique has concerns of Department of Surgery, ESIC recurrence. We conducted this study to assess the clinical outcomes and complications of SH in patients Medical College, Post Graduate visiting our institution Institute of Medical Science and Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 115 patients from 2010 to 2012 who underwent SH with India PPH03 kit under spinal anesthesia. Clinical outcomes assessed included the operation time, hospital stay and rate of post-operative pain. Shivakumar Mallikarjun Algud Results: SH had lower operative procedural time (30 minutes), post- operative pain and hospital stay (1.8 Department of Surgery, ESIC days) along with minimal procedural complications and were comparable to the previous reports. Medical College, Post Graduate Conclusions: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is an effective alternative to traditional surgical technique in Institute of Medical Science and treating 3rd and 4th degree hemorrhoids, in terms of lesser operative procedural time, post-operative pain, Research, Bangalore, Karnataka, use of analgesics and hospital stay along with reduced procedure related complication.
    [Show full text]
  • Faecal Retention: a Common Cause in Functional Bowel Disorders, Appendicitis and Haemorrhoids
    PHD THESIS DANISH MEDICAL JOURNAL Faecal retention: A common cause in functional bowel disorders, appendicitis and haemorrhoids – with medical and surgical therapy Dennis Raahave quality of life and work (12,13). Currently, IBS is subdivided into This review has been accepted as a thesis together with seven original papers by University of Copenhagen 13th of june 2014 and defended on 6th of october 2014. IBS-C (constipation dominant), IBS-D (diarrhoea dominant), IBS-M Tutor: Randi Beier-Holgersen (mixed) and IBS-A (alternating), but does not have a clear aetiology. Official opponents: Steven D Wexner, Niels Qvist and Jacob Rosenberg. Constipation has many causes, including metabolic, endocrine, Correspondence: Department of Surgery, Colorectal Laboratory, Copenhagen University neurogenic, pharmacologic, mechanical, psychological, and idiopa - Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hilleroed, Denmark. thic, but only a few studies have focussed on the length of the colon E-mail: [email protected] as a cause of constipation (14,15,16, 17). Both constipation and IBS sufferers constantly seek care because of persisting symptoms in Dan Med J 2015;62(3):B5031 spite of many investigative procedures and therapeutic efforts, incurring high health care costs (12). When physically examining such a patient, two observations are ARTICLES INCLUDED IN THE THESIS: evident. Frequently a soft mass in the right iliac fossa is palpated 1. Raahave D, Loud FB. Additional faecal reservoirs or hidden constipation: a link between functional and organic bowel disease. Dan Med Bull 2004;51:422-5. with tenderness (suspicious of a faecal reservoir in the right colon) 2. Raahave D, Christensen E, Loud FB, Knudsen LL.
    [Show full text]
  • Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization (THD) Versus Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in Treatment of Internal Hemorrhoids: a Syste
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease (2019) 34:1–11 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3187-3 REVIEW Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in treatment of internal hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials Sameh Hany Emile1 & Hossam Elfeki1,2 & Ahmad Sakr1,3 & Mostafa Shalaby1 Accepted: 26 October 2018 /Published online: 12 November 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract Background Although conventional hemorrhoidectomy proved effective in treatment of hemorrhoidal disease, postoperative pain remains a vexing problem. Alternatives to conventional hemorrhoidectomy as transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) and stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were described. The present meta-analysis aimed to review the randomized trials that compared THD and SH to determine which technique is superior in terms of recurrence of hemorrhoids, complications, and postoperative pain. Methods Electronic databases were searched for randomized trials that compared THD and SH for internal hemorrhoids. The PRISMA guidelines were followed when reporting this meta-analysis. The primary endpoint of the analysis was persistence or recurrence of hemorrhoidal disease. Secondary endpoints were postoperative pain, complications, readmission, return to work, and patients’ satisfaction. Results Six randomized trials including 554 patients (THD = 280; SH = 274) were included. The mean postoperative pain score of THD was significantly lower than SH (2.9 ± 1.5 versus 3.3 ± 1.6). 13.2% of patients experienced persistent or recurrent hemorrhoids after THD versus 6.9% after SH (OR = 1.93, 95%CI = 1.07–3.51, p = 0.029). Complications were recorded in 17.1% of patients who underwent THD and 23.3% of patients who underwent SH (OR = 0.68, 95%CI 0.43–1.05, p =0.08).The average duration to return to work after THD was 7.3 ± 5.2 versus 7.7 ± 4.8 days after SH (p = 0.34).
    [Show full text]
  • Surgical Proctology
    THE ART OF Surgical Proctology MARIO PESCATORI MD FRCS EBSQ A Procedural Atlas Of Proctologic Gold Standards, Innovations And Tricks Of The Trade Pertinax Publishing Zbar_20000164_FM.indd 1 22/03/14 9:51 AM Copyright © 2014 by Pertinax Publishing ISBN: 978-0-9860726-0-4 Library of Congress Control Number: 2013923290 All Rights Reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the author, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Printed in the United States of America. Zbar_20000164_FM.indd 2 22/03/14 9:51 AM Contents Dedication ..........................................................................................vii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................ix Foreword ...........................................................................................xi Preface ............................................................................................xiii Chapter 1. Anorectal Sepsis: Abscess and Fistula ..........................................................1 1.1. Anatomy of the Perianal and Ischiorectal Spaces ........................................................5 1.2. Fistulectomy, Fistulotomy and Marsupialization .........................................................8 1.2.1. Fistulotomy and Abscess Excision .............................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Stenosis After Stapled Anopexy: Personal Experience and Literature Review
    Research Article Clinics in Surgery Published: 05 Oct, 2018 Stenosis after Stapled Anopexy: Personal Experience and Literature Review Italo Corsale*, Marco Rigutini, Sonia Panicucci, Domenico Frontera and Francesco Mammoliti Department of General Surgery, Surgical Department ASL Toscana Centro, SS. Cosma e Damiano Hospital - Pescia, Italy Abstract Purpose: Post-operative stenosis following SA is a rare complication, however it can be strongly disabling and require further treatments. Objective of the study is to identify risk factors and procedures of treatment of stenosis after Stapled Anopexy. Methods: 237 patients subjected to surgical resection with circular stapler for symptomatic III- IV degree haemorrhoids without obstructed defecation disorders. 225 cases (95%) respected the planned follow-up conduced for one year after surgery. Results: Stenosis was noticed in 23 patients (10.2%), 7 of which (3,1%) complained about “difficult evacuation”. All patients reported symptom atology appearance within 60 days from surgery. Previous rubber band ligation was referred from 7 patients (30,43%) and painful post-operative course (VAS>6) was referred from 11 (47,82%) of the 23 that developed a stenosis. These values appear statistically significant with p<0.05. Previous anal surgery and number of stitches applied during surgical procedure do not appear statistically significant. Symptomatic stenosis was subjected to cycles of outpatient progressive dilatation with remission of troubles in six cases. A woman, did not get any advantage, was been subjected to surgical operation, removing the stapled line and performing a new handmade sutura. Conclusion: The stenosis that complicate Stapled Anopexy are high anal stenosis or low rectal stenosis and they are precocious, reported within 60 days from surgery.
    [Show full text]