Arch 350: Architecture of the Ancient World

Arch 350: Architecture of the Ancient World Egypt 2: Architecture of the New Kingdom 3000bce 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Amarna Temple/Tomb of Mentuhotep II Temple of Hatshepsut Karnak Deir-el-Bahiri Abu Simbel Valley of the Kings Temple of Amun, Karnak Tell el-Amarna Temple of Ramesses II 3000 2000 1000 500 0 500 Old Kingdom Middle Kingdom New Kingdom Defeat of Cleopatra 3200-2158 (1-8) 2134-1786 (11-13) 1570-1085 (18-20) 31 bce Giza Memphis Amarna Thebes 1st cataract (Aswan) Nubia Kush Memphis Giza Saqqara Amarna Valley of Kings Deir-el-Bahiri Thebes Valley of Kings Deir-el-Bahiri Temple of Amun Valley of Kings Deir-el-Bahiri Thebes Temples: Mentuhotep II (2010), Thutmosis III (1425), Hatshepsut (1458) Mortuary temple Causeway Valley temple Mortuary temple Tomb (tunneled under the cliff) Temple of Mentuhotep II, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 2010 bce) Temple of Mentuhotep II, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 2010 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut (first court), Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut (Anubus Shrine), Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut (Hathor Temple), Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut (sanctuary), Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Temple of Hatshepsut, Deir-el-Bahiri (ca. 1458 bce) Tombs and temples, Deir-el-Bahiri and Karnak sons of Tutankhamen Ramesses II Tuthmosis 1, Hatshepsut Valley of the Kings (ca. 1539 – 1075 bce) to Dier-el-Bahiri Valley of the Kings, KV 20, Tuthmosis I, Hatshepsut (ca. 1450 bce) Valley of the Kings, KV 62, Tutankhamen (ca. 1323 bce) Valley of the Kings, KV 62, Tutankhamen, (ca. 1323 bce) Valley of the Kings, KV 62, Tutankhamen, (ca. 1323 bce) Valley of the Kings, KV 62, Tutankhamen, (ca. 1323 bce) Valley of the Kings, KV5 (Sons of Ramesses II) Temple of Hatshepsut, Deir-el-Bahiri Medinet Habu Temple of Amun, Karnak Temple of Amun, Mut and Khonsu, Luxor Temple of Amun, Karnak (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) sanctuary hypostyle hall peristyle court pylon Temple of Amun, Karnak,(temple Temple ofof KhonsKhonsu) (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak, first Pylon (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak, ram-headed sphinxes (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak, lotus blossom columns (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak, hypostyle hall (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak, obelisks (ca. 1550 – 370 bce) Temple of Amun, Karnak Temple of Amun, Mut and Khonsu, Luxor Temple of Amun, Mut and Khonsu, Luxor (ca. 1400 bce) Temple of Amun, Mut and Khonsu, Luxor (ca. 1400 bce) Temple of Amun, Mut and Khonsu, Luxor (ca. 1400 bce) Amarna Valley of Kings Deir-el-Bahiri Thebes Tell el-Amarna (Akhenaten, Nefertiti) 1350 bce Tell el-Amarna (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, worker housing (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, palace (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, central area (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, Great Temple of Aten (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, Great Temple of Aten (ca. 1350 bce) Tell el-Amarna, Great Temple of Aten (ca. 1350 bce) Temple of Ramesses II, Abu Simbel (ca. 1244 bce) Ptah Amun Ramesses Re Temple of Ramesses II, Abu Simbel (ca. 1244 bce) .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Nodjmet A, Daughter of Amenhotep, Wife of Piankh and Mother of Herihor*
54 ZÄS 140 (2013) / DOI 10.1524/zaes.2013.0005 AD THIJS Nodjmet A, Daughter of Amenhotep, Wife of Piankh and Mother of Herihor* Two books for one lady? At the time, I was of the opinion that their identities were to be “separated” as follows: Back in 1998, I published an article called – Nodjmet A, the mother of Herihor. Her “Two Books for One Lady, The mother of 6 7 1 mummy and coffins were found in the great Herihor rediscovered” . Although in the early Royal Cache. Since the title “God’s mother of days of Egyptology there had been much uncer- Khons-the-child” appears on her coffins and in 2 the Book of the Dead, BM 10541, the latter was tainty regarding her relationship to Herihor , 8 today Nodjmet is normally taken to have been tentatively ascribed to her . 3 – Nodjmet B, the daughter of Hrere and Piankh. the wife of Herihor . The reversed order of High She married Herihor with whom she is depicted Priests as proposed by Jansen-Winkeln has done on the Leiden Stela V 65 while he was still a mere little to alter this4. In my 1998 article, however, High Priest of Amun (HPA)9, and in the Temple of Khonsu, with her husband as king and a whole I postulated that there had been actually two 10 ladies called Nodjmet: Nodjmet A, the mother row of sons and daughters . The second funeral 5 papyrus belonging to a Nodjmet, Pap. BM 10490, of Herihor and Nodjmet B, his wife (see Fig. 1) .
[Show full text]
Serving the Traveling Public Since 1975
Serving the traveling public since 1975 Consolidated Tours Organization, Inc. 1675 Virginia Avenue Suite 200 Atlanta, GA 30337 Phone: 1-800-554-4556 Local: 404-767-2727 Fax: 404-766-4520 KEMET STUDY TOUR SUN. DAY 01: THE BEGINNING OF OUR STUDY TOUR Depart JFK International Airport via EgyptAir jet SAT. DAY 07: WASET/EDFU (THE TEMPLE OF service to KMT (Egypt). Meals will be served on board HERU [HORUS])/KOM OMBO (THE TEMPLE OF before your arrival in Cairo the next day. SOBEK)/ASWAN Leave Waset and journey towards Edfu on the Left Bank. Visit the Temple of Heru (Horus) which MON. DAY 02: INTO THE LAND OF THE PHARAOHS was excavated by Mariette and is one of the best preserved in Upon your arrival in Cairo, you will be met and transferred to KMT. Resume your journey to Kom Ombo, 103 miles. On your hotel. the hill, which you see long before you arrive in Kom Ombo, is the Temple, with a double dedication to the Crocodile- TUE. DAY 03: MEMPHIS/SAKKARA/GIZA Morning headed Sobek and the Sparrow-headed Haroeris. In the tour to Hi Ku Ptah (Memphis) and Sakkara. Located twenty middle of the temple area, a sanctuary was built for each of miles southwest of Cairo, Memphis was one of the most these divinities. Double entrances lead through the pylons to important cities through the history of ancient KMT and was the court, vestibule, pillared hall and the three antechambers once the ancient capital of KMT. Sakkara’s step pyramids to the Sanctuaries of the Gods.
[Show full text]
149 Original Article MONTU, the ORIGIN of a SACRED NETWORK
id1575000 pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com Egyptian Journal of Archaeological and Restoration Studies "EJARS" An International peer-reviewed journal published bi-annually Volume 7, Issue 2, December - 2017: pp: 149-160 www. ejars.sohag-univ.edu.eg Original article MONTU, THE ORIGIN OF A SACRED NETWORK Soliman, R. Tourism Guidance dept., Faculty of Archaeology & Tourism Guidance, Misr Univ. for Sciences & Technology, 6th October City, Egypt. E-mail: [email protected] Received 11/5/2017 Accepted 2/12/2017 Abstract A key issue in understanding the sacred landscape of Thebes is the origin of god Montu and how his cult, and system of temples, changed through time and in relationship to other gods. He had several temples built for him in the Theban region including those at the closely connected sites of Armant and Tod south of Thebes, and also at Medamoud north-east of Karnak. One aspect of Montu is his division into multiple forms, particularly visible by the time of the new kingdom where he can manifest himself in the form of four Montus connected with the four primary cult places of the Theban nome: Thebes proper, Tod, Armant and Medamoud. A network that could imply an originally linked series of Theban religious sites defined by the rituals and festivals dedicated to Montu. The evolution of Montu within a cultic and temple framework of the Theban nome is an issue yet to be resolved. However, the comparatively limited state of excavation and publication of these sites complicates the analysis and has led to various controversies such as that regarding the specific origin of Montu.
[Show full text]
Sample Text Template
SHIP OF THE GOD: THE AMUN-USERHET IN NEW KINGDOM EGYPT A Thesis by MEGAN ELIZABETH COLLIER Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Chair of Committee, Shelley Wachsmann Committee Members, Deborah Carlson Kevin Glowacki Head of Department, Cynthia Werner December 2013 Major Subject: Anthropology Copyright 2013 Megan Elizabeth Collier ABSTRACT The Amun-Userhet was a ship which played a crucial role in the development of religious thought in New Kingdom Egypt. The pharaoh and his entourage sailed down the Nile on its deck as part of a religious celebration called the Opet festival. This festival commemorated the annual renewal of the royal Ka and reinforced the order of the universe. This ship was the bridge between the human world and the divine. No one has found any archaeological remains of the ship, but iconography, artifacts that would have adorned a miniature version of the Amun-Userhet, and written sources offer an accurate depiction. From this evidence we know that this ship was gilded and covered in precious gems. It also had a specific formula of symbols attached to it that can give us insight into its function in New Kingdom religion. Through the review of the surviving iconography, artifacts, and written accounts of the Amun-Userhet, this thesis looks at the role this ship played in the development of New Kingdom religion. This ship was not only the bridge between the human and divine, but was also the bridge between the state religion of the Old and Middle Kingdom and the new idea of personal piety that arose in the New Kingdom.
[Show full text]
Karnak's Quaysides
Karnak’s Quaysides Angus Graham, Luc Gabolde, Mansour Boraik To cite this version: Angus Graham, Luc Gabolde, Mansour Boraik. Karnak’s Quaysides: Evolution of the Embankments from the XVIIIth Dynasty to the Graeco-Roman Period. Harco Willems (Université catholique de Louvain); Jan-Michael Dahms (Université de Heidelberg). The Nile: Natural and Cultural Landscape in Egypt, 36, Transcript Verlag, pp.97-144, 2016, Mainz Historical Cultural Sciences, 9783837636154. 10.14361/9783839436158-004. hal-01894903 HAL Id: hal-01894903 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01894903 Submitted on 13 Oct 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Karnak’s Quaysides Evolution of the Embankments from the Eighteenth Dynasty to the Graeco-Roman Period MANSOUR BORAIK, LUC GABOLDE, ANGUS GRAHAM 1. Introduction The results presented by Luc Gabolde and Angus Graham at the symposium held at Mainz in March 20131 have in part already been published or are in print.2 The authors proposed to the editors – who were very kind to accept it – a re-orientation of their contribution to the proceedings focused on the recent results gained through archaeology, history, geoarchaeology and geophysical survey on the evolution of the Nile embankments/quaysides at Karnak from the Eighteenth Dynasty onwards.
[Show full text]
Herihor's Kingship and the High Priest of Amun Piankh
HERIHOR’S KINGSHIP AND THE HIGH PRIEST OF AMUN PIANKH* Peter James Independent Researcher, London, UK Robert Morkot Department of Archaeology, University of Exeter, UK Abstract The theory of Jansen-Winkeln, which argues for a reversal of the traditional order of the late 20th Dynasty High Priests of Amun Herihor and Piankh, has provoked considerable controversy. The key to a resolution seems to lie in recognising that Herihor, on his elevation to kingship, was able (like later monarchs of the TIP) to co-opt a colleague/relative as High Priest of Amun. This way Piankh’s pontificate can be placed within the reign of King Herihor, explaining the genealogical and other evidence which might otherwise suggest a reversal of the two but avoiding the pitfalls of Jansen-Winkeln’s case. The evidence suggests a shortening of the high priestly genealogy at this period by one to two generations (from the stan- dard/Kitchen model). A first step is offered here towards a new model involving a short overlap between the 20th and 21st Dynasties, as well as between Herihor and Pinudjem I, as Upper Egyptian kings based at Thebes. * * * * The nature and dating of Herihor’s kingship has long been one of the most debated issues of 20th–21st Dynasty history. Practically all our evidence for this important ﬁgure comes from the Theban temple of Khonsu begun by Ramesses III and IV.1 The hypos- tyle hall was decorated by Ramesses XI, who is depicted making offerings together with the High Priest Herihor. However, in the forecourt Ramesses XI is completely absent and Herihor ofﬁciates * Our thanks to Robert Porter, Bill Manley and Ad Thjis for reading earlier drafts and providing valuable feedback.
[Show full text]
Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival
Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival Oracular Sessions and the Installations of Priests and Officials at the Opet Festival Masashi FUKAYA* The Opet Festival is known for its juridical function relating to the oracles of Amun. There are only three texts unequivocally relevant to its oracular sessions, dated to the Nineteenth Dynasty and later. However, other evidence can be associated with this celebration, based on the dates of events. This paper consists of two parts, each re-examining the known evidence and presenting new one. The new sources examined here are mostly related to the installations of high-ranking individuals, such as the high-priests of Amun, the divine wives, and viziers. Unlike juridical oracular sessions, the dates of their ceremonial appointments are rather peripheral in nature, taking place in proximity either to the beginning or the end of the festival. This may hint at the legal assumption of priestly titles prior to religious events and subsequent approval by the god in ceremonial settings, or reward ceremonies when those individuals received special favours from the king for their devotion to him after particular festivals. The author also notes that the accessions of kings were probably modeled on the same pattern in view that some rulers celebrated an accession anniversary at the Opet Festival in their first regnal year when they went on a tour all over Egypt to proclaim their new authority. Keywords: Opet Festival, oracle, decree, installation, appointment Introduction Clear evidence attesting Egyptian oracular rituals is known only from the New Kingdom onwards.1 We have no more than four examples from the Eighteenth Dynasty, all of which pertain to decision-makings on state affairs made by Amun at Thebes.2 Two of them are dated – II Peret 30 and III Peret 2.
[Show full text]
A Major Development Project of the Northern Area of the Amun-Re Precinct at Karnak During the Reign of Shabaqo Christophe Thiers, Nadia Licitra, Pierre Zignani
A major development project of the Northern area of the Amun-Re precinct at Karnak during the reign of Shabaqo Christophe Thiers, Nadia Licitra, Pierre Zignani To cite this version: Christophe Thiers, Nadia Licitra, Pierre Zignani. A major development project of the Northern area of the Amun-Re precinct at Karnak during the reign of Shabaqo. A major development project of the Northern area of the Amun-Ra precinct at Karnak during the reign of Shabaka, Oct 2013, Louqsor, Egypt. pp.549-564. halshs-00943468 HAL Id: halshs-00943468 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00943468 Submitted on 13 Feb 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Thebes in the First Millennium BC Edited by Elena Pischikova, Julia Budka and Kenneth Griffin Thebes in the First Millennium BC, Edited by Elena Pischikova, Julia Budka and Kenneth Griffin This book first published 2014 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2014 by Elena Pischikova, Julia Budka, Kenneth Griffin and contributors All rights for this book reserved.
[Show full text]
Some New Texts of Herihor and Ramesses IV in the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak Author(S): Ann Macy Roth Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol
Some New Texts of Herihor and Ramesses IV in the Great Hypostyle Hall at Karnak Author(s): Ann Macy Roth Source: Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 42, No. 1 (Jan., 1983), pp. 43-53 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/544746 . Accessed: 21/04/2011 16:12 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Near Eastern Studies. http://www.jstor.org SOME NEW TEXTS OF HERIHOR AND RAMESSES IV IN THE GREAT HYPOSTYLE HALL AT KARNAK* ANN MACY ROTH, Universityof Chicago IN his introduction to the recently published scenes of Herihor from the Khonsu temple, E.
[Show full text]
The Transition Between the Twentieth and Twenty-First Dynasties Revisited
Birmingham Egyptology Journal The Transition between the Twentieth and Twenty-First Dynasties Revisited Ian Mladjov Abstract Jansen-Winkeln’s argument for reversing the hitherto established order of the High Priests of Amun at the end of the Twentieth Dynasty has become almost universally accepted, but still presents some complications. Leaving aside the complexities of the royal and high priestly genealogy, this article attempts to find a solution for what is perhaps the most problematic aspect of Jansen-Winkeln’s placement of Herihor after Piankh. This is the notion that the datelines from the period reference the regnal years of High Priests of Amun (who had not yet assumed royal titles) rather than the regnal years of kings. To avoid this problem, we must assume a chronologically possible short reign between those of Ramesses XI and Smendes, corresponding to a period when neither Herihor nor Smendes were yet kings. The article disproves Thijs’ identification of such an intervening king with Khakheperre Pinudjem, considers alternative solutions by Dodson and Krauss, and posits a short-lived additional Ramesside king to be interpolated between Ramesses XI and Smendes. This Ramesses XII is possibly to be identified with a king attested on a Wadi Hammamat graffito, who can be shown to be distinct from Ramesses II, with whom he has long been identified in error, and to belong to the late Twentieth Dynasty. Although inevitably based on partly circumstantial evidence, the resulting arrangement keeps the overall chronological framework intact, while resolving a significant problem with Jansen-Winkeln’s popular thesis. Key words: Herihor, Pinudjem I, Smendes, Ramesses XI, Twentieth Dynasty, Twenty-First Dynasty, New Kingdom, Third Intermediate Period.
[Show full text]
Final Report
FINAL REPORT Season Two: October 2008 – April 2009 ARCE Groundwater Lowering Response Project, Luxor “Field School for SCA Conservators” Edward D. Johnson The Egyptian Antiquities Conservation Project (EAC) USAID Agreement No. 263-A-00-04-00018-00 Awarded to THE AMERICAN RESEARCH CENTER IN EGYPT (ARCE) Address: 8700 Crownhill Blvd. Suite 507, San Antonio, TX 78209 Tel: (210) 821-7000 by the USAID Program Office of Productive Sector Development / Office of the Environment USAID / Egypt In collaboration with the United States Agency for International Development and the Egyptian Ministry of State for Antiquities TABLE OF CONTENTS AIMS OF THE CONSERVATION FIELD SCHOOL…………………………………………………………………………………………………PAGE 1 PRELIMINARY PREPARATION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….PAGE 1 SUMMARY OF SUBJECT TAUGHT…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...PAGE 2 BAB EL AMARA/EUERGETES GATE………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….PAGE 6 WORK AT LUXOR TEMPLE……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….PAGE 6 COURSE REPORTS……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………PAGE 6 ASSESMENT OF INDIVIDUAL STUDENT PERFORMANCE………………………………………………………………………………..PAGE 14 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT………………………………………………………………………………….PAGE 19 ARCE Conservation Field School Component: Second Season, October 2008 – April 2009 Edward D. Johnson, Assistant Director The Conservation Field School, a part of the Luxor East Bank Groundwater Lowering Response Project, began the second round of teaching of conservation and related actual conservation
[Show full text]
The Personnel of Khonsu During the Third Intermediate Period at Thebes: a Prosopographical Study of the 21St Dynasty
The Personnel of Khonsu During the Third Intermediate Period at Thebes: A Prosopographical Study of the 21st Dynasty By Alba María Villar Gómez Submitted to the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid in fulﬁlment of the requirements for the Degreeof Doctor of Philosophy Tesis doctoral Doctorado en Estudios del Mundo Antiguo Departamento de Historia Antigua, Historia MedievalyPaleografía y Diplomática, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Abril 2015 Supervisors - Dr. John H. Taylor (Assistant Keeper Ancient Egypt of the Department of Ancient Egypt and Sudan of the British Museum) - Professor Dr. Joaquín Mª Córdoba Zoilo (Catedrático de Historia Antigua, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid) Cover and back cover image: Falcon-headed standart depicting the god Khonsu; Graffiti No. 21 from the roof of the Khonsu Temple at Karnak (Jacquet-Gordon 2003). This page image: Front view of the Khonsu temple at Karnak. Author’s personal picture SUMMARY The purpose of this doctoral thesis is to make a prosopographical reconstruction of the Theban personnel of Khonsu during 21st Dynasty as a means to understand the role played by their members both as servants of the different forms of Khonsu and as part of the cultic and administrative domains at Thebes. Although my research initially included the servants of this god during the whole Third Intermediate period throughout Egypt, the outstanding interpretations suggested by the variety of materials collected forced me to demarcate the limits of this dissertation. In this regard, I present a methodological proposal as well as a part of the results of a further reseach, whose main lines are summarised at the end of the dissertation.
[Show full text]