Public Investment Letter CAP EPI R3.Indd

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public Investment Letter CAP EPI R3.Indd STATEMENT FROM LEADING AMERICAN ECONOMISTS Cutting investments from the federal budget will undermine the strength of America’s economy. Dear President Obama and Members of Congress: As economists, we believe it is short-sighted to make budget cuts that eliminate necessary investments in our human capital, our infrastructure, and the next generation of scientifi c and technological advances. Th ese cuts threaten our economy’s long-term economic competitiveness and the strength of our current economic recovery. Investment is the cornerstone of economic growth and the key to our long-run national prosperity. It creates jobs now and lays the foundation for long-term economic growth and a strong middle class. As Congress begins to debate the federal budget, it must be careful to sustain critical investments in the productive capacity of the United States. Both the private sector and the government have critical roles to play in growing our economy: Business investment drives the economy, but public investments provide the foundations on which business investment depends. Th is winning combination paves the way for America’s economic success. Cutting necessary investments from the federal budget will only undermine the long-term competitiveness and productivity of the American economy. We recognize that resources are scarce and that fi scal responsibility demands that federal budget policies tackle the long-term budget defi cit. But responsible governance demands that we neither damage the recovery today nor forsake America’s economic future by cutting critical investments. Heather Boushey Larry Mishel Center for American Progress Action Fund Economic Policy Institute Alan Blinder Laura Tyson Princeton University University of California, Berkeley ECONOMIC POLICY INSTITUTE • 1333 H STREET, NW • SUITE 300, EAST TOWER • WASHINGTON, DC 20005 • 202.775.8810 • WWW.EPI.ORG ORIGINAL SIGNERS R ANDY ALBELDA LAURIE BASSI FRANCINE BLAU University of Massachusetts Boston McBassi & Company Cornell University SYLVIA ALLEGRETTO FRANCIS BATOR ROBERT BLECKER University of California, Berkeley Harvard Kennedy School American University GAR ALPEROVITZ SANDY BAUM MARY BORROWMAN University of Maryland George Washington University New School for Social Research ALICE AMSDEN AMANDA BAYER BARRY BOSWORTH Massachusetts Institute of Technology Swarthmore College Th e Brookings Institution RALPJ ANDREANO MICHAEL BELZER RALPH BRADBURD University of Wisconsin-Madison Wayne State University Williams College FRANCISCO ARCEO LOURDES BENERIA ELISSA BRAUNSTEIN Clemson University Cornell University Colorado State University KENNETH J. ARROW PETER BERG DAVID BRENEMAN Stanford University Michigan State University University of Virginia MICHAEL ASH BARBARA BERGMANN VERNON BRIGGS, JR. University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Maryland and American Cornell University University ROJHAT B. AVSAR CLAIR BROWN Columbia College Chicago GUNSELI BERIK University of California, Berkeley University of Utah M. V. LEE BADGETT BYRON BROWN University of Massachusetts, Amherst ALEXANDRA BERNASEK Michigan State University Colorado State University RON BAIMAN GARY BURTLESS Center for Tax and Budget ERNST BERNDT Th e Brookings Institution Accountability Massachusetts Institute of Technology DALLAS BURTRAW NESECAN BALKAN DAVID BETSON Resources for the Future Hamilton College University of Notre Dame PAUL D. BUSH NINA BANKS CIHAN BILGINSOY California State University, Fresno Bucknell University University of Utah MARTHA CAMPBELL WILLIAM BARCLAY SHERRILYN BILLGER SUNY Potsdam Chicago Political Economy Group Illinois State University JIM CAMPEN DRUCILLA BARKER CYRUS BINA University of Massachusetts, Boston University of South Carolina University of Minnesota RON CAPLAN CHARLES BARONE MELISSA BINDER Richard Stockton College Dickinson College University of New Mexico GERARD CAPRIO DONALD BASCH JOHN BISHOP Williams College Simmons College Cornell University MARTIN CARNOY Stanford University STATEMENT FROM LEADING AMERICAN ECONOMISTS l MARCH 2011 l PAGE 2 ORIGINAL SIGNERS CHRISTOPHER CARROLL JAMES CYPHER ELIZABETH ELMORE Johns Hopkins University California State University Richard Stockton College STEPHEN CASLER ANITA DANCS ERNIE ENGLANDER Allegheny College New England College George Washington University School of Business MANUEL CASTELLS MONICA DAS University of Southern California Skidmore College LORETTA FAIRCHILD Nebraska Wesleyan University JOHN DENNIS CHASSE PAUL A. DAVID SUNY Brockport Stanford University DAVID FAIRRIS University of California, Riverside JANIE CHERMAK JAYNE DEAN University of New Mexico Wagner College HENRY FARBER Princeton University HOWARD CHERNICK JAMES BRADFORD DELONG Hunter College, CUNY University of California, Berkeley REZA FAZELI Th e New School LAWRENCE CHIMERINE GEORGE DEMARTINO Radnor International Consulting University of Denver STEVEN FAZZARI Washington University CHARLES CHITTLE RANJIT DIGHE Bowling Green State University SUNY Oswego RASHI FEIN Harvard University CARL CHRIST ARINDRAJIT DUBE Johns Hopkins University University of Massachusetts, Amherst WILLIAM FERGUSON Grinnell College KIMBERLY CHRISTENSEN ROBIN DUBIN Sarah Lawrence College Case Western Reserve University RUDY FICHTENBAUM Wright State University PAUL CHRISTENSEN AMITAVA DUTT Hofstra University University of Notre Dame DEBORAH FIGART Richard Stockton College CLIFFORD CLARK MANORANJAN DUTTA Wayne State University Rutgers University CATHERINE FINNOFF University of Massachusetts, Boston AMELIA CLARKE ROBERT EBERT Skidmore College Baldwin-Wallace College JOHN FITZGERALD Bowdoin College RICHARD COE JOHN EDGREN New College of Florida Eastern Michigan University MARIA FLORO American University STEVE COHN RONALD EHRENBERG Knox College Cornell University FREDERICK FLOSS Buff alo State College DAVID COLE EVERETT EHRLICH Harvard University ESC Company ELLEN FOSTER Union College WILLIAM COMANOR BARRY EICHENGREEN University of California, University of California, Berkeley KEVIN GALLAGHER Santa Barbara and University of Boston University California, Los Angeles BERNARD ELBAUM University of California, Santa Cruz DAVID GALLO RICHARD CORNWALL California State University, Chico Middlebury College STATEMENT FROM LEADING AMERICAN ECONOMISTS l MARCH 2011 l PAGE 3 ORIGINAL SIGNERS JOHN GALLUP TERRY GUSTAFSON BARBARA HOPKINS Portland State University California State University, Chico Wright State University HEIDI GARRETT-PELTIER ROBERT GUTTMANN ANN HOROWITZ Political Economy Research Institute Hofstra University University of Florida CHRIS GEORGES JONATHAN HAMILTON IRA HOROWITZ Hamilton College University of Florida University of Florida ARMAGAN GEZICI MITCHELL HARWITZ CHARLES HOWE Keene State College University at Buff alo University of Colorado TERESA GHILARDUCCI ROBERT HAVEMAN DAVID HOWELL Th e New School University of Wisconsin-Madison Th e New School RICHARD GILBERT SUE HEADLEE FREDERICK S. INABA University of California, Berkeley American University Washington State Univesity MICHAEL GILLESPIE CAROL E HEIM DORENE ISENBERG Eastern Illinois University University of Massachusetts, Amherst University of Redlands NORMAN GLICKMAN PAUL HEISE MARK JOHNSON Rutgers University Lebanon Valley College Chicago State University ROBERT GLOVER SUSAN HELPER HARRY KATZ University of Texas at Austin Case Western Reserve University Cornell University AMOS GOLAN ADAM HERSH LAWRENCE KATZ American University Center for American Progress Harvard University LONNIE GOLDEN STEPHEN HERZENBERG DAVID KAUN Penn State University-Abington College Keystone Research Center University of California, Santa Cruz DEBBIE GOLDMAN DONALD HESTER ROBERT KEMP Communications Workers of America University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Louisiana-Monroe STEVEN GOLDMAN MARTHA HILL MARLENE KIM University of California, Berkeley University of Michigan University of Massachusetts Boston DON GOLDSTEIN RAUL HINOJOSA MARY KING Allegheny College University of California, Los Angeles Portland State University NEVA GOODWIN P. S AI-WING HO LORI KLETZER Tufts University University of Denver Colby College and University of California, Santa Cruz ULLA GRAPARD EMILY HOFFMAN Colgate University Western Michigan University JAMES KLUMPNER Georgetown University JERRY GREEN JOAN HOFFMAN Harvard University John Jay College of Criminal Justice, TIMOTHY KOECHLIN CUNY Vassar College CHRISTOPHER GUNN Hobart and William Smith Colleges HARRY HOLZER ANDREW KOHEN Georgetown University James Madison University STATEMENT FROM LEADING AMERICAN ECONOMISTS l MARCH 2011 l PAGE 4 ORIGINAL SIGNERS KATE KRAUSE JANICE MADDEN FRED MOSELEY University of New Mexico University of Pennsylvania Mount Holyoke College MORDECHAI KREININ MARK MAIER LEON MOSES Michigan State University Glendale College Northwestern University PETER KARL KRESL JAY MANDLE ESHRAGH MOTAHAR Bucknell University Colgate University Union College MORDECAI KURZ MICHAEL MARTELL TRACY MOTT Stanford University Elizabethtown College University of Denver DAVID LAIBMAN ERIC MASKIN RICHARD MURNANE City University of New York Institute for Advanced Study Harvard University THOMAS LAMBERT THOMAS MASTERSON MICHAEL MURRAY Indiana University, Southeast Levy Economics Institute of Bates College Bard College JOHN LAPP ELLEN MUTARI North Carolina State University PETER MATTHEWS Richard Stockton College Middlebury College WILLIAM LAZONICK MICHELE NAPLES University of Massachusetts ELAINE MCCRATE Richard Stockton College University of Vermont PAUL LEIGH DONALD NICHOLS University of California, Davis CHARLES W. M CMILLION University
Recommended publications
  • Laura Tyson the Highest Ranked Woman in the Clinton White
    Laura Tyson 1 The highest ranked woman in the Clinton White House, Laura Tyson was the president's national economic advisor from 1993-1995. She is currently dean of the London Business School in England. Tyson discusses her experiences in the Clinton administration, views on international trade, and the impact of technology on the global economy. The Clinton Campaign INTERVIEWER: How did you become head of the Council of Economic Advisors? LAURA TYSON: I had been active in the 1980s with various groups that worked on the issue of changing global competitiveness, U.S. competitiveness, and changes in trade relations. Through that set of commissions, I met a number of people like Bob Rubin and Bob Reich, who ended up being involved in the campaign for President Clinton. They asked me if I wanted to join on because we work on these issues through these commissions. I read what the then- candidate Clinton was espousing, and I was in support of his vision, so I agreed to sign on to the campaign. I didn't do a whole lot during the campaign; I stayed out here in California. But then I got a call to work on the transition team, and from there I was asked by the president to become head of the Council of Economic Advisors. INTERVIEWER: How important were economic and global economic issues in the campaign? LAURA TYSON: Economic issues were obviously central to the campaign, like the famous slogan "It's the economy, stupid," but I would say the issues were primarily domestic in focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary China: a Book List
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY: Woodrow Wilson School, Politics Department, East Asian Studies Program CONTEMPORARY CHINA: A BOOK LIST by Lubna Malik and Lynn White Winter 2007-2008 Edition This list is available on the web at: http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinabib.pdf which can be viewed and printed with an Adobe Acrobat Reader. Variation of font sizes may cause pagination to differ slightly in the web and paper editions. No list of books can be totally up-to-date. Please surf to find further items. Also consult http://www.princeton.edu/~lynn/chinawebs.doc for clicable URLs. This list of items in English has several purposes: --to help advise students' course essays, junior papers, policy workshops, and senior theses about contemporary China; --to supplement the required reading lists of courses on "Chinese Development" and "Chinese Politics," for which students may find books to review in this list; --to provide graduate students with a list that may suggest books for paper topics and may slightly help their study for exams in Chinese politics; a few of the compiler's favorite books are starred on the list, but not much should be made of this because such books may be old or the subjects may not meet present interests; --to supplement a bibliography of all Asian serials in the Princeton Libraries that was compiled long ago by Frances Chen and Maureen Donovan; many of these are now available on the web,e.g., from “J-Stor”; --to suggest to book selectors in the Princeton libraries items that are suitable for acquisition; to provide a computerized list on which researchers can search for keywords of interests; and to provide a resource that many teachers at various other universities have also used.
    [Show full text]
  • OUTPUT-WSIB Voting Report
    2006 Proxy Voting Report 3M Company Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status MMM CUSIP9 88579Y101 05/09/2006 Voted Issue Mgmt For/Agnst No.Description Proponent Rec Vote Cast Mgmt 1.1Elect Linda Alvarado Mgmt For For For 1.2Elect Edward Liddy Mgmt For For For 1.3Elect Robert Morrison Mgmt For For For 1.4Elect Aulana Peters Mgmt For For For 2Ratification of Auditor Mgmt For For For Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation to Declassify the 3Board Mgmt For For For STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EXECUTIVE 4COMPENSATION ShrHoldr Against Against For STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING 3M S ANIMAL 5WELFARE POLICY ShrHoldr Against Against For STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING 3M S BUSINESS 6OPERATIONS IN CHINA ShrHoldr Against Against For Abbott Laboratories Inc Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status ABT CUSIP9 002824100 04/28/2006 Voted Issue Mgmt For/Agnst No.Description Proponent Rec Vote Cast Mgmt 1.1Elect Roxanne Austin Mgmt For For For 1.2Elect William Daley Mgmt For For For 1.3Elect W. Farrell Mgmt For For For 1.4Elect H. Laurance Fuller Mgmt For For For 1.5Elect Richard Gonzalez Mgmt For For For 1.6Elect Jack Greenberg Mgmt For For For 1.7Elect David Owen Mgmt For For For 1.8Elect Boone Powell, Jr. Mgmt For For For 1.9Elect W. Ann Reynolds Mgmt For For For 1.10Elect Roy Roberts Mgmt For For For 1.11Elect William Smithburg Mgmt For For For 1.12Elect John Walter Mgmt For For For 1.13Elect Miles White Mgmt For For For RATIFICATION OF DELOITTE & 2TOUCHE LLP AS AUDITORS. Mgmt For For For SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - PAY-FOR-SUPERIOR- 3PERFORMANCE ShrHoldr Against Against For Page 1 of 139 2006 Proxy Voting Report SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - 4POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS ShrHoldr Against Against For SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL - 5THE ROLES OF CHAIR AND CEO .
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management
    The Political Economy of Industrial Policy: Structural Interdependencies, Policy Alignment and Conflict Management Antonio Andreoni* and Ha-Joon Chang** *Department of Economics, SOAS University of London and South African Research Chair in Industrial Development, University of Johannesburg *Faculty of Economics and Centre of Development Studies, University of Cambridge Forthcoming in Structural Change and Economic Dynamics for the Special Issue: Frontiers of Industrial Policy: Structures, Institutions and Policies (eds. Andreoni, A., Chang, H.-J. and R. Scazzieri) Abstract Industrial policy is back in the mainstream debates. The paper provides a long-term analytical perspective of the industrial policy debate, and it critically assesses the current mainstream phase of the debate in light of three fundamental theoretical insights that developed along several decades of industrial policy theory and practice. These are related to the (i) structural interdependencies, tensions and dualism arising in the industrialisation process; (ii) variety and types of institutions for industrialisation and the importance of policy alignment; (iii) conflict management role of the government, alongside his entrepreneurial function, and the importance of government organisational capabilities. Building on this theoretical analysis, the last section of the paper provides a framework for the strategic coordination of packages of interactive industrial policy measures. The Policy Package Matrix is introduced as an operationalisation of the framework and a tool
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Center Europe
    28557_Redenbroschuere_U1_U4 05.12.2006 14:50 Uhr Seite 1 Trade Center Europe 16th Frankfurt European Banking Congress 2006 www.frankfurt-ebc.com 28557_Redenbroschuere 05.12.2006 15:40 Uhr Seite 1 Trade Center Europe 16th Frankfurt European Banking Congress November 17, 2006 28557_Redenbroschuere 05.12.2006 15:40 Uhr Seite 2 Contents Dinner, Römer (Frankfurt City Hall) November 16, 2006 Welcome Address: Petra Roth Mayor, City of Frankfurt am Main Speech presented by Horst Hemzal Treasurer, City of Frankfurt am Main …………………………………………………… 7 Introduction: Josef Ackermann Chairman of this year’s Frankfurt European Banking Congress, Chairman of the Management Board and of the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main ……………………………………………………… 9 TRADE CENTER EUROPE Dinner Speech: Laura D.Tyson* Dean, London Business School, London ……………………………………………… 11 Frankfurt European Banking Congress, Alte Oper Frankfurt November 17, 2006 TRADE CENTER EUROPE Welcome Address: Petra Roth Mayor, City of Frankfurt am Main ……………………………………………………… 19 Opening Remarks: Josef Ackermann Chairman of this year’s Frankfurt European Banking Congress, Chairman of the Management Board and of the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main …………………………………………………… 21 * Transcription from tape by the organizer of the Frankfurt European Banking Congress 28557_Redenbroschuere 05.12.2006 15:40 Uhr Seite 3 I. FREE TRADE AND FREEDOM Keynote Speech: Václav Klaus President, Czech Republic, Prague……………………………………………………… 25 Panel Chairman: Josef Ackermann Chairman of the Congress, Chairman of the Management Board and of the Group Executive Committee, Deutsche Bank, Frankfurt am Main…………………………… 29 Jassim Al-Mannai Director General Chairman of the Board,Arab Monetary Fund, Abu Dhabi………………………………………………………………………………… 33 Christine Lagarde* Minister of Foreign Trade, French Republic, Paris……………………………………… 37 Patrick A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Education and Training Strategies in Singapore, Taiwan and S
    Journal of Education and Work, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2002 The Evolution of Education and Training Strategies in Singapore, Taiwan and S. Korea: a development model of skill formation D. ASHTON, F. GREEN, J. SUNG & D. JAMES Centre for Labour Market Studies, University of Leicester, 7–9 Salisbury Road, Leicester LE 1 7QR ABSTRACT This paper challenges the conventional explanation of the role of the state in skill formation in the high performing Asian economies as advocated by World Bank economists. It does this through an examination of the institutions which supported bene cial strategic state intervention in the process of skill formation in Singapore, Taiwan and S. Korea. These enabled governments to produce a pace of skill formation so high that it achieved within the space of one generation something that took the advanced industrial countries three generations to achieve. Our research has identi ed a set of government strategies and associated institutional structures in the eld of education and training in these economies which, it is argued, played a crucial role in ensuring that economic growth could proceed without employers experiencing severe skill shortages. We put forward a model of the skill formation process which is dynamic in character, focussing on the relationship between the state and the rapidly changing demand for skills during the process of industrialisation. This model allows us to examine some of the processes which are currently sustaining as well as threatening existing forms of intervention in the area of skill formation, including those related to the nancial crisis of the late 1990s. Introduction In her contribution to the debate which followed the publication of the World Bank report on the ‘East Asian Miracle’ (World Bank, 1993), Alice Amsden proposed that it was time to identify, with more precision, the institutions which supported bene cial strategic state interventions in the economy (Amsden, 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Nobel Laureates Say the Bush
    Hundreds of economists across the nation agree. Henry Aaron, The Brookings Institution; Katharine Abraham, University of Maryland; Frank Ackerman, Global Development and Environment Institute; William James Adams, University of Michigan; Earl W. Adams, Allegheny College; Irma Adelman, University of California – Berkeley; Moshe Adler, Fiscal Policy Institute; Behrooz Afraslabi, Allegheny College; Randy Albelda, University of Massachusetts – Boston; Polly R. Allen, University of Connecticut; Gar Alperovitz, University of Maryland; Alice H. Amsden, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Robert M. Anderson, University of California; Ralph Andreano, University of Wisconsin; Laura M. Argys, University of Colorado – Denver; Robert K. Arnold, Center for Continuing Study of the California Economy; David Arsen, Michigan State University; Michael Ash, University of Massachusetts – Amherst; Alice Audie-Figueroa, International Union, UAW; Robert L. Axtell, The Brookings Institution; M.V. Lee Badgett, University of Massachusetts – Amherst; Ron Baiman, University of Illinois – Chicago; Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research; Drucilla K. Barker, Hollins University; David Barkin, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana – Unidad Xochimilco; William A. Barnett, University of Kansas and Washington University; Timothy J. Bartik, Upjohn Institute; Bradley W. Bateman, Grinnell College; Francis M. Bator, Harvard University Kennedy School of Government; Sandy Baum, Skidmore College; William J. Baumol, New York University; Randolph T. Beard, Auburn University; Michael Behr; Michael H. Belzer, Wayne State University; Arthur Benavie, University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill; Peter Berg, Michigan State University; Alexandra Bernasek, Colorado State University; Michael A. Bernstein, University of California – San Diego; Jared Bernstein, Economic Policy Institute; Rari Bhandari, University of California – Berkeley; Melissa Binder, University of New Mexico; Peter Birckmayer, SUNY – Empire State College; L.
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd Development Centre
    OECD DEVELOPMENT CENTRE Working Paper No. 262 STRENGTHENING PRODUCTIVE CAPACITIES IN EMERGING ECONOMIES THROUGH INTERNATIONALISATION: EVIDENCE FROM THE APPLIANCE INDUSTRY by Federico Bonaglia and Andrea Goldstein Research area: Policy Coherence and Productive Capacity Building July 2007 Strengthening Productive Capacities in Emerging Economies through Internationalisation DEV/DOC(2007)5 DEVELOPMENT CENTRE WORKING PAPERS This series of working papers is intended to disseminate the Development Centre’s research findings rapidly among specialists in the field concerned. These papers are generally available in the original English or French, with a summary in the other language. Comments on this paper would be welcome and should be sent to the OECD Development Centre, 2, rue André Pascal, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16, France; or to [email protected]. Documents may be downloaded from: http://www.oecd.org/dev/wp or obtained via e-mail ([email protected]). THE OPINIONS EXPRESSED AND ARGUMENTS EMPLOYED IN THIS DOCUMENT ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHORS AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THOSE OF THE OECD OR OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF ITS MEMBER COUNTRIES CENTRE DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DOCUMENTS DE TRAVAIL Cette série de documents de travail a pour but de diffuser rapidement auprès des spécialistes dans les domaines concernés les résultats des travaux de recherche du Centre de développement. Ces documents ne sont disponibles que dans leur langue originale, anglais ou français ; un résumé du document est rédigé dans l’autre langue. Tout commentaire relatif à ce document peut être adressé au Centre de développement de l’OCDE, 2, rue André Pascal, 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16, France ; ou à [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Proposals to Improve the Low-Wage Labor Market for Older Workers
    f NOVEMBER 2020 Better jobs, longer working lives: Proposals to improve the low-wage labor market for older workers ______________________________________________________ Beth C. Truesdale Research Associate, Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard University This report is available online at: https://www.brookings.edu The Brookings Economic Studies program analyzes current and emerging economic issues facing the United States and the world, focusing on ideas to achieve broad-based economic growth, a strong labor market, sound fiscal and monetary pol- icy, and economic opportunity and social mobility. The re- search aims to increase understanding of how the economy works and what can be done to make it work better. ECONOMIC STUDIES AT BROOKINGS Contents About the author .......................................................................................................................3 Statement of independence ......................................................................................................3 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................3 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 5 Many Americans in their 50s are already out of the labor force .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Retiree Health Vebas: a New Twist on an Old Paradigm Implications for Retirees, Unions and Employers
    MED ICARE Retiree Health VEBAs: A New Twist On An Old Paradigm Implications for Retirees, Unions and Employers Prepared By: Phyllis C. Borzi, J.D., M.A. Research Professor The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services Department of Health Policy For: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation March 2009 This paper was commissioned by the Kaiser Family Foundation. Conclusions or opinions expressed in this report are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Kaiser Family Foundation. Retiree Health VEBAs: A New Twist On An Old Paradigm Implications for Retirees, Unions and Employers By Phyllis C. Borzi1 Executive Summary Employers have been using traditional trusts called VEBAs (voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations) for decades to put aside money to pay medical and other benefits for their employees as a hedge against future payment difficulties. But as health care costs have continued to escalate and businesses have faced growing economic challenges, many employers are rethinking their long-term health care promises to retirees. As part of this transformation, the traditional VEBA has taken on a different character and a new form of VEBA has emerged: the so-called “stand-alone” VEBA trust, through which some employers have been able to rid themselves of future obligations to pay retiree health benefits in exchange for making a significant payment to the VEBA designed to approximate the total projected cost of the benefits. The purpose of this issue brief is to discuss several key questions in connection with the current use of stand-alone VEBAs. The paper profiles three VEBAs through case studies, draws preliminary conclusions from their early experiences, and considers the implications and future questions raised by this approach to providing retiree medical benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • Laura Tyson and I Am a Professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley
    Testimony of Dr. Laura D’Andrea Tyson Professor, Business Administration and Economics Haas School of Business, University of California U.S. Senate Committee on Finance Hearing on "Tax Reform, Growth and Efficiency" February 24, 2015 Chairman Hatch, Senator Wyden, and other members of the committee, thank you for the opportunity today to address the issue of tax reform and its role in promoting stronger U.S. economic growth and higher wages for American workers. My name is Dr. Laura Tyson and I am a professor at the Haas School of Business at the University of California Berkeley. I served as the Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and as Chair of the National Economic Council under President Clinton. I was a member of President Obama’s Economic Recovery Advisory Board and his Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. I am currently an economic adviser to the Alliance for Competitive Taxation, a coalition of American businesses that favor comprehensive corporate tax reform. The views in this testimony are my own. My remarks will focus on corporate tax reform. Over fifty years ago under President Kennedy and perhaps as recently as 30 years ago under President Reagan, the American economy was the most competitive in the world, and the U.S. could design its corporate tax code with little consideration of the global economic environment. American companies derived most of their income from their domestic operations and to the extent they were engaged globally, they were typically larger than their foreign-based counterparts. But we no longer live in that world. Emerging market economies, falling trade barriers, and remarkable leaps in information and communications technology have expanded opportunities for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1) Competitors with No Carrier-Of-Last-Resort Obligations And
    ACCESS CHARGE REFORM AND UNIVERSAL SERVICE FUNDING ANALYSIS COMMENTS OF DR. LAURA TYSON incompatible with competition, because: 1) competitors with no carrier-of-last-resort obligations and price averaging requirements can exploit the prices ofthose who bear these obligations; and 2) states will no longer be able to use the franchise regulation as a tool to ensure a fair return on the investments oftelecommunications service providers. Hence, competition requires the use of different tools to achieve public policy objectives. Although the telecommunications industry is moving toward a more competitive environment, regulation remains a powerful force in this industry, as is evidenced by the fact that these issues are before the FCC and state regulatory commissions throughout the nation. In this transition period, regulatory uncertainty can provide a large impediment to efficient investment. c. Universal Service and Di$tributional Equity Goals Historically, there have been two distributional equity objectives in telephone regulation. The first equity objective is "universal service." To reach this objective, it is necessary that basic telecommunications service is affordable for all households that desire service. To achieve this objective in a regulated environment, regulators maintained the prices ofresidential services at low, geographically averaged levels that nearly everyone could afford and made lifeline support available for the remaining households. In many instances the price ofresidential service did not cover the full economic cost ofproviding this service. There is nothing exceptional about subsidizing the price ofgoods or services to make them more affordable. 9 Typically, however, policy-makers fund social equity objectives with taxes and distribute the money directly. In the telephone industry, universal service is funded largely through internal cross-subsidies and distributed with investments and other costs in rural areas.
    [Show full text]