'a-)

o {qqr6,r '6) 3Tk6'n RICHT TO ffi H INFORMATIOI{ ffi €aif4 iqd NACHAL PRADESH INFORMATION COMM ISSION ITANAGAR

BEFORE THE COURT OF DR.JORAM BEGI, STATE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER

No.APlC-99/2019 Dated, ltanagar the 17'n September' 201'9

Under Section 19(3) RTI Act, 2005

Appellant ResPondent

Shri Shoney Pertin, Shri Tashiram Pertin, PIO-cum- President, Siang Right Forum, EE(HQ), SE(Boleng)Circle, CamP- 39 Mebo (ST), Air Field , East , Pasighat, Ward No.5, Vs , , Arunachal Pradesh.

Dated of hearin g: L7'h Septemb er' 2OL9.

ORDER

Whereas, an appeal under Section 19(3) of RTI Act, 2005 has been received from Shri Shoney Pertin, President, Siang Right Forum, 39 Mebo (ST), Air Field pasighat, Ward No.6, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, for non-furnishing of information, by The Public lnformation Officer, Of o Superintendent Engineer, PWD Boleng Circle, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh, Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, as sought, by the appellant under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005 on 05/0312019'

Whereas, the 1't hearing was held on 27'h August, 2019. Shri Tashiram Pertin, pto-cum-EE(He), SE(Boleng) Circle, Camp- Pasighat and the appellant Shri Shoney pertin were present during the hearing. The PIO informed the Commission that the appellant was denied of the information as the information is exempted under Section g(fxd11g) and also involves the Third Party Information. He also said that the Third party has denied to disclose his informations.

Whereas, the Commission, made it clear that the information sought under Sl.no, 1. does not attract Section 8(1)(d) and (e). However, it is a Third Party lnformation and hence it is to be dealt under Section 11 of the RTI Act 2005.

The plO said that the Third Party has given in writing, denying the disclosure of the information. However, the PlO could not produce any evidence of such letter during the hearing nor the appellant was made available with a copy of such letter' Contd..p..2 -2-

Therefore, the Commission directed the PIO to furnish the information sought under Sl.no. 1of the application to the appellant within 2nd September'20i.9. The Commission also directed the PIO to furnish the information under 2 & 3 within the same date.

Whereas, the 2nd hearing was held on 17th September' 2019. Shri Tashiram Pertin, PIO-cum-EE(HQ), SE(Boleng) Circle, Camp- Pasighat was found absent during the hearing. The appellant Shri Shoney Pertin was present. The appellant submitted a letter to the Commission vide letter no. Nil Dated 30th August'2019 stating that the PIO has furnished information as directed by the Commission during the 1't hearing. Further, the appellant appealed the Commission to dispose of the case.

, the case is hereby disposed of, sd/- (Dr. Joram Begi) State Chief Information Commissioner ffi Arunachal Pradesh Information Commission Itanqgar,, Memo No.AP tc-ss| 2019 f q a Dated, ltanagar the lSqseptember' 2019 Copy to:

1. Shri Tashiram Pertin, PIO-cum-EE(HQ), SE(Boleng)Circle, Camp- Pasighat, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, 2. Shri Shoney Pertin, President, Siang Right Forum, 39 Mebo (ST), Air Field Pasighat, Ward No.6, East Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, $Zomputer Programmer, APIC, ltanagar, to upload in APIC Website, 4. Case file.

Aru nacha I Pradesh ln tion Commission Itanagar