Part Traffic, Safety and Environmental Management
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The London Congestion Charge
Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 20, Number 4—Fall 2006—Pages 157–176 The London Congestion Charge Jonathan Leape y the 1990s, the average speed of trips across London was below that at the beginning of the twentieth century—before the car was introduced (New- B bery, 1990, p. 35). Traffic speeds in central London had fallen more than 20 percent since the 1960s, from an average 12.7 mph for the morning peak period in 1968 (and a high of 14.2 mph in 1975) to 10 mph in 1998. Even in the larger area of inner London, drivers in 1998 spent almost 30 percent of their time stationary during peak periods and more than half their time traveling at speeds of less than 10 mph (Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, 1998). By 2002, the all-day average travel speed in central London was just 8.6 mph (14.3 km/hour), compared to an uncongested (night-time or “free flow”) average speed of around 20 mph (32 km/hour). Congestion, measured in terms of minutes of delay per mile compared to uncongested conditions, averaged 3.7 minutes/mile (2.3 min/km) (Transport for London, 2003a, p. 11). With more than one million people entering central London between 7:00 and 10:00 a.m. on an average workday, and more than one-quarter of those by road, the cost of congestion was clearly considerable. Public concern over levels of traffic congestion was high. An independent survey in 1999 identified public transport and congestion as the two most “impor- tant problems requiring action”—selected by 46 and 33 percent of London resi- dents, respectively, compared to 20 percent for crime or law and order. -
Highlight / Progress Report
HIGHLIGHT / PROGRESS REPORT PROJECT NAME: Kinloch Road Regeneration Project Manager: Ian Imlah Reporting Period: 28/03/2012 – 15/08/12 Date report prepared: 9 August 2012 Implementation of the Full Business Project stage: Project stage completion date: 31 May 2013 Case Tolerance levels for this stage: Project Plan + / - 15 working days Project budget + / - 10%, or £10,000 whichever is greater Progress – please refer to Project Plan Key products completed this period Key products outstanding this Revised Key products for next reporting Delivery date (including those completed ahead of schedule) period delivery date period (including brief explanation of why product outstanding) New Road Construction Works is underway Agreement on how to progress with 31/12/2012 Delivery of footway works 31 October land adjacent to former council 2012 depot site Detailed Design for Footway Works Completed Delivery of soft landscaping works 31 May 2013 Soft landscaping design agreed with ABC. Contract documents to be finalised and issued for tender. Royal Hotel Footway Works Complete. Risk Management – please refer to Risk Register (updates risks below in bold italic text) o:\a_campbeltown\cn03_kinloch_road\board_papers\l_150812\cn03_highlight_prog_rep_august 2012.doc Budget Management – please refer to Resource Allocation Schedule Total budget available to complete FBC stage: £100,000 Actual expenditure £102,209 Variance explanation if required: Revenue budget now used – Business Case developed and now progressing implementation stage (capital expenditure) Budget approved – implementation of public £2,080,000 realm and soft landscaping works: Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £715,013 Variance explanation if required: Budget approved - ACHA £800,000 Actual expenditure to date (as at 31 July 2012) £0 Variance explanation if required: Any further information Status update on elements: Public Realm - • Public realm associated with the new road has been procured through the road contract. -
MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing Road Risks for Taxi Drivers, Their Passengers and Other Road Users
MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing road risks for taxi drivers, their passengers and other road users May 2016 About PRAISE Using the roads is a necessary part of our working lives. But it’s an ordinary activity that leads to an incredibly high level of injury and death. ETSC’s PRAISE (Preventing Road Accidents and Injuries for the Safety of Employees) project addresses the safety aspects of driving at work and driving to work. Its aim is to promote best practice in order to help employers secure high road safety standards for their employees. The project is co-ordinated by the ETSC secretariat with the support of Fundación MAPFRE, the German Road Safety Council (DVR), the Belgian Road Safety Institute (IBSR-BIVV) and the Dräger Foundation. MAKING TAXIS SAFER Contributing Experts For more information ETSC gratefully acknowledges the invaluable contributions of European Transport Safety Council the following experts in the preparation of this report: 20 Avenue des Celtes B-1040 Brussels Fernando Camarero Rodríguez – Fundación MAPFRE Tel: +32 2 230 4106 [email protected] Ellen Schmitz-Felten – Kooperationsstelle Hamburg IFE www.etsc.eu/praise Lieven Beyl - Belgian Road Safety Institute Jacqueline Lacroix - German Road Safety Council The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of ETSC and do not necessarily Will Murray - Interactive Driving Systems represent the views of the sponsors or the organisations to which the PRAISE experts belong. Deirdre Sinnott - Health And Safety Authority, Ireland Bettina Velten – Draeger Foundation © 2016 European Transport Safety Council MAKING TAXIS SAFER Managing road risks for taxi drivers, their passengers and other road users Authors Luana Bidasca Ellen Townsend May 2016 CONTENTS 1. -
Interior Noise Reduction Approach for Monorail System
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UTHM Institutional Repository INTERIOR NOISE REDUCTION APPROACH FOR MONORAIL SYSTEM DJAMAL HISSEIN DIDANE A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirement for the award of the Degree of Master of Science in Railway Engineering Center For Graduate Studies Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia JANUARY 2014 v ABSTRACT This study presents an overview on the possibilities of interior noise reduction for monorail system using passive means. Nine samples out of three materials were subjected for noise test and the performance of each sample was observed. It is found that all of these samples have proved to reduce a significant amount noise at low and high frequencies even though the amount reduced differ from one sample to another. It is also been noticed that this reductions were denominated by means of absorption for some samples such as those from rubber material, and it was dominated by means of reflection for some others such as those from aluminum composite and paper composite. Moreover, from these different acoustic properties of each material, the whereabouts to install every material is different as well. It was suggested that, the rubber material should be installed on the upper floor of the monorail while, the paper composite should be installed under floor, and the aluminum composite should be installed at the outer parts from the monorail such as the apron door, ceiling, etc. However, despite their promising potential to reduce noise, there were few uncertainties with some samples at certain frequency, for example samples from aluminum composite could not reduce noise at 1250 Hz which denotes that it is not a good practice to use this material at that frequency. -
Road Transport Infrastructure
© IEA ETSAP - Technology Brief T14 – August 2011 - www.etsap.org Road Transport Infrastructure HIGHLIGHTS TECHNOLOGY STATUS - Road transport infrastructure enables movements of people and goods within and between countries. It is also a sector within the construction industry that has demonstrated significant developments over time and ongoing growth, particularly in the emerging economies. This brief highlights the different impacts of the road transport infrastructure, including those from construction, maintenance and operation (use). The operation (use) phase of a road transport infrastructure has the most significance in terms of environmental and economic impact. While the focus in this phase is usually on the dominant role of tail-pipe GHG emissions from vehicles, the operation of the physical infrastructure should also accounted for. In total, the road transport infrastructure is thought to account for between 8% and 18% of the full life cycle energy requirements and GHG emissions from road transport. PERFORMANCE AND COSTS - Energy consumption, GHG emissions and costs of road transport infrastructure fall broadly into the three phases: (i) construction, (ii) maintenance, and (iii) operation (decommissioning is not included in this brief). The construction and maintenance costs of a road transport infrastructure vary according to location and availability of raw materials (in general, signage and lighting systems are not included in the construction costs). GHG emissions resulting from road construction have been estimated to be between 0.37 and 1.07 ktCO2/km for a 13m wide road – depending on construction methods. Maintenance over the road lifetime (typically 40 years) can also be significant in terms of costs, energy consumption and GHG emissions. -
Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia
CPB Corporate Partnership Board Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia University of the Aegean, Chios Applying the Island Transport Equivalent to the Greek Islands 179 Roundtable Discussion Paper Lekakou Maria Remoundos George Stefanidaki Evangelia University of the Aegean, Chios The International Transport Forum The International Transport Forum is an intergovernmental organisation with 62 member countries. It acts as a think tank for transport policy and organises the Annual Summit of transport ministers. ITF is the only global body that covers all transport modes. The ITF is politically autonomous and administratively integrated with the OECD. The ITF works for transport policies that improve peoples’ lives. Our mission is to foster a deeper understanding of the role of transport in economic growth, environmental sustainability and social inclusion and to raise the public profile of transport policy. The ITF organises global dialogue for better transport. We act as a platform for discussion and pre- negotiation of policy issues across all transport modes. We analyse trends, share knowledge and promote exchange among transport decision-makers and civil society. The ITF’s Annual Summit is the world’s largest gathering of transport ministers and the leading global platform for dialogue on transport policy. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, -
Advertise in Ohio Asphalt
The Journal of Ohio’s Asphalt Professionals Summer 2017 Issue 2 • V o l u m e 1 4 FPO'S COOLEST EXP ! OHIO RIDES ON US OPERATOR COMFORT & CONVENIENCE MAKE THE JOB EASIER EACH ROADTEC PAVER IS ERGONOMICALLY DESIGNED FOR BETTER VISIBILITY, REDUCED NOISE, AND COMFORT. The New Clearview FXS® fume extraction system provides greater visibility to the front of the paver hopper, to the opposite side, and down to the augers. Paver controls are mounted to the pivoting seat station, which hydraulically swings out past the side of the machine for excellent visibility. All functions are easily accessible, including feed system and flow gate controls. Noise levels cut in half and improved visibility allow the operator to stay in constant communication with the rest of their crew. LET ROADTEC MAKE YOUR JOB EASIER - VISIT ROADTEC.COM © 2015 ROADTEC. INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 1.800.272.7100 +1.423.265.0600 Untitled-2 1 8/19/15 1:32 PM www.columbusequipment.com Ohio’s Dependable Dealer Columbus Equipment Company and Roadtec Partner to Optimize Uptime and Production Through “ Industry-Leading Support of Innovative, High-Quality, Dependable Road Building and Asphalt Paving Equipment. The biggest benefit of Roadtec equipment is uptime. We just don’t have the downtime we have had with other machines. “ Dean Breese; Vice President, Gerken Paving Inc. Serving You From Ten Statewide Locations COLUMBUS TOLEDO CINCINNATI RICHFIELD CADIZ (614) 443-6541 (419) 872-7101 (513) 771-3922 (330) 659-6681 (740) 942-8871 DAYTON MASSILLON ZANESVILLE PAINESVILLE PIKETON (937) 879-3154 (330) 833-2420 (740) 455-4036 (440) 352-0452 (740) 289-3757 www.columbusequipment.com Officers Chairman Cole Graham Shelly and Sands, Inc. -
Road Drainage in This Chapter
Road Drainage In this chapter 01 Introduction 3 02 Design principles 5 2.1 Water sensitive design (WSD) or Integrated Stormwater Management (ISM) 5 2.2 Integration of drainage 6 2.3 Tiered objectives for stormwater management design in road reserves 7 2.4 Major/minor drainage 11 03 Surface water management 12 04 Stormwater management devices 13 4.1 Treatment /Management Options Tool Box 15 4.2 Bio-retention swales, rain gardens and tree pits 16 4.3 Pervious paving 17 4.4 Sand filters, gravel trenches and rain tanks 18 4.5 Ponds and wetlands 18 4.6 Swales and vegetated swales 19 4.7 Soakage pits 20 4.8 Proprietary devices 20 05 Kerbs and channels 20 06 Catchpits 22 6.1 Catchpit location 22 6.2 Catchpit design 23 6.3 Catchpit approved types 25 6.4 Catchpit selection criteria 25 6.5 Catchpit inlet selection 25 6.6 Catchpit leads 26 07 Manholes 27 08 Rural road drainage 27 09 Subsoil drains 29 10 Minor culverts 29 11 Special areas 31 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE Road drainage & surface water control 01 Introduction PURPOSE This chapter gives guidance for the design of drainage in the road reserve. It specifies limitations on design choices to achieve consistency across the region, while catering for local conditions. It aims to promote efficiency, effectiveness and economy of capital investment and operational management water sensitive design. SCOPE The situations covered include: • Drainage of surface water within road reserves. • Collection, conveyance and treatment of run-off from roads. • Management of stormwater discharging from land onto road reserves. -
Revised Plans for Conditions 3,4 and 5
Car Parking 1:200 WILKINSON WAY 9 10 12 KEEP CLEAR New crossing points to be 1,200 formed including dropped 800 kerbs and blister type tactile paving. Existing tarmac paving made good as 19 necessary. Existing Yellow Zigzag line & 800 School wording to this side of KEEP CLEAR the Road overall length from 1,200 School gate around into Chapel Close = 52m. 18 20 Refer to Photograph below. 17 Existing Yellow Zigzag line & 21 1 School wording to this side of the Road overall length from School gate around into Foster Close = 45m. Refer to Photograph below. 12no. existing car parking 22 space to be retained. Spaces to receive new thermoplastic white lining Planting area to end of revised central island c/w 14no. new car parking new tree to replace existing spaces to be created to central island area delineated with new thermoplastic white lining 3 New thermoplastic white lining indicating one-way FOSTER CLOSE flow of traffic, (clockwise) New HB2 type kerbs to be provided to form planter area Line of 10No. existing car parking spaces within central island to be removed and layout amended thus 4 Planting area to end of 2no. limited time parking revised central island c/w spaces to be allowed for new tree to replace existing pick up/drop off etc. Existing Disabled Parking provision retained with 2no. oversize bays c/w pole Existing block paving New HB2 type kerbs to mounted signage and surface, where broken out, be provided to form thermoplastic white to be replaced with new planter area 15 disabled symbol to centre of tarmacadam highway bay construction to match existing build up adjacent 14 16 New thermoplastic white lining indicating one-way flow of traffic, (clockwise) 5 12 View towards School Entrance from Wilkinson Way 3No. -
Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public Transport – Bus Infrastructure
Public Transport - VERSION 1 Bus Infrastructure Public transport – bus Infrastructure In this chapter 01 Introduction 5 Bus stop types 35 07 02 Design parameters 6 Bus stop elements 40 08 2.1 Design vehicles 6 8.1 Bus stop kerbs 41 2.2 Design for bus drivers 11 8.2 Bus stop passenger area 44 2.3 Design for bus users 11 8.3 Bus shelters 46 8.4 Landscaping 52 03 Movement or upgrading of bus stops 15 Bus stop lighting 56 09 04 Bus stop location 15 4.1 Decisions about bus stop location 15 Bus stop branding 57 10 4.2 Bus stop spacing 16 Public transport interchanges 57 4.3 Bus stops for school bus routes 17 11 4.4 Bus stop capacity 17 Electric buses 57 12 4.5 Bus stop placement 19 4.6 Bus stop locations to avoid 23 Cycleways at bus stops 58 13 05 Bus stop layout 24 Bus layover and driver facilities 60 14 5.1 Bus stop layout types 26 14.1 Factors influencing bus layover location 61 14.2 Bus layover design 61 06 Bus stop signs and markings 33 6.1 Bus stop sign 33 6.2 Bus box road marking 34 6.3 No stopping at all times road marking 34 6.4 Bus stop road text 34 6.5 Coloured surface treatment 35 5794_16.04.21 2 TDM | ENGINEERING DESIGN CODE 3 Public transport – bus Infrastructure 01 Introduction PURPOSE Well-designed bus infrastructure must: • Provide easy access for buses through o accessible and safe walking routes to the bus stop o consider all user groups who will have different needs o making it easy and accessible to board and alight from the bus. -
Accessibility to Public Transport: a Best Practice Guide October 2010
Accessibility to public transport: a best practice guide October 2010 C. O’Fallon Pinnacle Research & Policy Ltd, Wellington Accessibility to public transport: a best practice guide Contents B1 Introduction to the best practice guide ..................................................................................... 4 B1.1 Overview ....................................................................................................................4 B1.2 Definitions .................................................................................................................4 B1.2.1 Users ...............................................................................................................4 B1.2.2 Modes, services and routes covered .............................................................5 B1.2.3 Source of best practice factors ......................................................................5 B1.3 Structure of the guide ...............................................................................................5 B2 Getting to the service by self ......................................................................................................... 5 B2.1 Introduction...............................................................................................................5 B2.2 Footpath ....................................................................................................................6 B2.2.1 Changes in surface level of accessible footpath...........................................6 B2.2.2 -
Triflex Preco Line 300
Product overview Marking system Triflex Preco Line 300 Triflex Preco Line 300 is a thin layer cold spray or roller applied, fast curing, marking system which offers a number of benefits when compared to traditional chlorinated rubber based solutions. The simple to apply 1 component solution is fully compatible with a wide range of substrates including direct application to asphalt and concrete and can be applied to many existing marking materials. The system is used extensively on car parks and roads and is widely used on airports due to its thin layer application. System highlights Application areas Toluene and xylene free Triflex Preco Line 300 is a toluene and xylene free solution, making it more Car park markings environmentally friendly and safer to apply than many other spray applied Road markings marking products, including the majority of chlorinated rubber markings. Industrial floor markings Warehouse markings Maximum colour and design possibilities Create a design to meet your safety and aesthetic requirements with a wide Compatible substrates range of standard colours and options for bespoke colours - refer to Triflex Preco Line 300 Colour card. The colour range is significantly wider than the traditional white and yellow offered by other materials. • Asphalt including Hot Rolled Asphalt (HRA) and Stone Mastic Asphalt Versatility and compatibility (SMA) Triflex Preco Line 300 is fully compatible with a wide range of substrates and • Tarmac / Tarmacadam / Macadam often requires no primer. • Fresh asphalt including HRA and SRA • Fresh Tarmac / Tarmacadam / Macadam Totally cold applied • Concrete There is no risk from hot works during installation as all Triflex materials are • Existing markings applied in a totally cold liquid form, curing to create a tough, durable solution • Pavers / brick paviours that lasts.