STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES

Report for the

DECEMBER 2017

Kandyce Fernandez, Ph.D. Jennifer Alexander, Ph.D.

Nonprofit profiles submitted by each organization.

Funding provided by EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY FINDINGS

A ‘state of the sector’ survey was administered to nonprofit nnNonprofit respondents provide services across a broad spectrum of areas; organizations in Bexar, Atascosa, the largest were human services (22 percent); arts and culture (10 percent) Bandera, Comal, Frio, Gillespie, and education (10 percent). Guadalupe, Karnes, Kendall, Kerr, Medina, Uvalde, and Wilson nnOrganizations reported relatively stable financial conditions over the counties to generate a snapshot past three years with moderate to significant increases in revenues and of organizational contributions, expenses. Human service organizations were the most financially stressed challenges, and unmet needs. This as they covered the gap between service costs and reimbursements. study marks the first targeted nnThirty percent of all survey respondents reported fiscal stress in the past study of nonprofit organizations in fiscal year. By category, 25 percent of smaller organizations, 40 percent this area. of medium-sized organizations; 26 percent of large organizations and 33 percent of ‘extra large’ organizations indicated that expenses had nnThe survey was distributed via email to 1360 exceeded revenues in the past fiscal year. organizations in June of 2017; nnOrganizations consistently indicated that they were challenged to meet nn421 organizations completed the majority of their needs for operational expenses, (e.g., staff development, technology the survey, and equipment, capital improvements, and costs related to organizational nn244 respondents completed the survey in its capacity). Smaller organizations expressed more frequently the need for entirety, including the financial component of facility and capital-related expenses. the survey (18 percent response rate). nnThe most frequently expressed challenge outside of funding issues was the nnMore than 70 percent of survey respondents are need to engage in community education and awareness. This responsibility located in Bexar County although services were is largely unfunded and yet central to mission success. offered throughout the region. nnOrganizations extend programs or services across an average of three counties, and 12 percent of respondents are active in all thirteen counties.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 2 list of participants active in the SANC email reminders to complete the annual fundraiser (Big Give 2016), SAAF survey were sent out via email, and workshop participants, and nonprofit survey links were shared through social organizations identified by SA2020 media (Facebook) by the SAAF and and the United Way of San Antonio. All the Policy Studies Center at UTSA. organizations selected for the study Respondents were offered a variety of were located in Bexar County or one of incentives for completion of the survey the 12 surrounding counties of Atascosa, over the course of a four-week period Bandera, Comal, Frio, Gillespie, including weekly prizes ($200) and a Guadalupe, Karnes, Kendall, Kerr, grand prize ($1,000). During the fourth Medina, Uvalde, or Wilson. week, organizations were informed that the survey completion time had The survey instrument was comprised been extended for two weeks in order of five sections that addressed to increase response rates. At the general organizational information, end of six weeks, 421 organizational descriptive data regarding programs representatives had partially and services, financial information, completed the survey (30 percent organizational outcomes, and unmet INTRODUCTION response rate) and 244 organizations needs (See Appendix A). The survey had completed the survey in its entirety was distributed in June 2017 through (18 percent response rate). A challenge Qualtrics, an online survey package. to generating a greater response Each potential respondent received via The following study is least studied. In 2011, a statewide study rate was the lengthy amount of time email an introductory letter indicating of the sector was conducted by the required to complete the survey (more the first comprehensive the purpose of the survey, a survey Nonprofit Management Program within than 30 minutes). examination of the the Bush School at A&M, but no link, and a list of information required nonprofit sector in the focused examination of organizations to answer the questions. Respondents Analysis of survey results was first were offered technical assistance if conducted on the data available for region. located in this particular region of Texas has been conducted to date. they encountered difficulty with the all organizations represented in the The purpose of the study survey through the Policy Studies survey without financial indicators is to present a composite Given the intention of generating a Center at UTSA. The survey was sent to (421 organizations), and a subsequent better understanding of the impact 1360 email addresses, nearly 50 emails analysis was conducted on the snapshot of the sector, of the nonprofit sector on the greater were returned as inactive, and 552 smaller set of 244 organizations that including an indication San Antonio region, the San Antonio were opened. completed all sections of the survey Nonprofit Council reached out to including financial data. Results are of organizations that are A variety of efforts were undertaken College of Public Policy faculty members elaborated in the following sections. active, the populations to foster participation. The SANC at UTSA, Drs. Kandyce Fernandez Additional comparative information published notifications of the pending they serve, challenges they and Jennifer Alexander, to establish drawn from national studies is included survey and its purpose the month confront and identifiable parameters for a possible study. to provide context. Over the course of several months, prior to the survey distribution. Weekly impacts on the region. the group developed a pilot survey. Nationwide, the nonprofit sector Representatives from the San Antonio is recognized as a fundamental Area Foundation (SAAF), SA2020, “Nationwide, the nonprofit sector is recognized component of the economy and and the United Way of San Antonio as a fundamental component of the economy and civic structure, yet there is little data provided input toward the end of the available that provides an indication of survey development phase. More than civic structure, yet there is little data available their contribution. The nonprofit sector 1360 organizations were identified that provides an indication of their contribution.” in Texas is among the smallest and the as survey candidates based on the

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 4 TEXAS NONPROFIT SECTOR: PROFILE OF SURVEY HOW DO WE COMPARE? RESPONDANTS

Survey respondents represent a wide spectrum of nonprofit types based on The size of the nonprofit sector in Texas Relative to other metropolitan areas is among the smallest nationwide, of Texas, San Antonio has a slightly IRS codes (National Taxonomy of Exempt Entities). The highest percentage ranking 46th out of 50 states based on higher percentage of human service of respondents was in human services, followed by arts and culture and the number of registered nonprofits. organizations and fewer educational educational organizations. The percentages by classification are highly similar (Brown, Jo, Anderson, 2013). Texas and philanthropic organizations. to national studies, which is relevant for purposes of comparison (Nonprofit nonprofits account for only 5 percent Finance Fund, 2016). The Texas nonprofit sector has of total private sector employment experienced steady growth over the Human Services in the state, though the number is Percent of Organizations past two decades though it appears substantially higher in urban areas Arts, Culture, Humanities to be growing at a slightly lower rate by Category where the organizations are more than the national trend. Urban Institute Education prevalent. The nonprofit employment statistics indicate that nationally the rate of less than 6 percent statewide 2% Animal-Related number of nonprofits has grown by places Texas among the four states 50 percent since 2000. Comparable 3% 12% Religion-Related with the lowest nonprofit employment data available for Texas indicates 22% (other states are Alabama, Nevada, 4% Youth Development that four out of every 10 nonprofits and South Carolina). Nationwide, the were established between 2000-2010 Health Care nonprofit sector is responsible for more (Brown et al., 2013). The demographics 5% Diseases, Disorders, than 10 percent of all private sector Medical Research of organizational age and size largely 10% employment on average, and at least 5% Mental Health and parallel national data (McKeever, 2015). Crisis Intervention 5.4 percent of the gross domestic 6% Nearly 70 percent of nonprofits in Texas Community Improvment product (National Bureau of Labor are designated 501(c)(3) organizations, 6% 10% Statistics, 2014). Recreation and Sports a slightly larger percentage than 7% 8% Most of the nonprofit organizations in national data wherein 66 percent of Philanthropy & Grantmaking

Texas are located in urban areas and all nonprofits are designated 501(c)(3) Other nearly half operate either in the Dallas/ organizations. Nearly three quarters, or Fort Worth or Houston metropolitan 73 percent, of all charitable nonprofits regions. The San Antonio region has in Texas are human service or religious an average of 29 organizations per organizations. Organizations that are 10,000 people, compared with the 20 years old or more hold the majority Dallas Fort Worth “metroplex,” which of assets and generate nearly 60 has 32 organizations per 10,000 percent of the revenue of nonprofits people, and Houston with the fewest across the state, as would be expected number at 28 organizations per (Brown, et al., 2013). Two-thirds of 10,000 people. Austin has the highest registered 501(c)(3) organizations in number of nonprofits per capita of any Texas can be classified as ‘small’ based large city in the state (33 per 10,000), on having annual budgets of less than which relates to its designation as $500,000 (Brown, et. al. 2013). state capital (Brown et al., 2013).

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 6 under-resourced to meet the level of provide non-emergency health care Programs and Services need nationwide. services to individuals and families in need, placement of homeless pets, In an effort to discern the overall health and efforts to address mental health Survey respondents were asked to categorize their organizational purpose and of the social safety net in the greater issues through counseling and support given 13 possible choices, including “other”(see below). Respondents were free to San Antonio region, the survey asked services. Community education and choose all categories that pertained. Respondents selected an average of three respondents to indicate whether their advocacy-related programs include categories per organization. services and programs constituted mentoring youth, reading programs for safety-net, prevention, intervention, Organizational Purposes by Frequency Selected early readers, educating communities community education/advocacy, or Community Awareness/Education 40% about particular diseases (e.g. diabetes, another type of program. Parkinson’s, AIDS), or other community- Family Well-Being 37% Examples of social safety net programs related issues. Arts and Culture Access 14% include emergency medical services Organizations in the study that provide Civic Engagement 11% that are need based, food banks, safety net services and programs did homeless shelters, transitional housing, Community Safety 10% not indicate more financial stress mental health crisis services, and food than organizations categorized as Neighborhoods 9% delivery for elderly or individuals who prevention, intervention or community Animal Services 8% are shut in. Examples of prevention education/advocacy. This may be programs include sexual health and Economic Development 8% because there was not a statistically education, summer camps for troubled significant number of safety net Housing Access and Growth 7% youth, and spay-neuter services organizations or because their funding Environmental Sustainability 6% for animals. Intervention programs sources are relatively stable. Reducing Crime 5% Top Program Types by Percentage Education 4% Primary Program Second Program Third Program Health 4% Safety-net 12% 12% 12% Transportation 4% Prevention 19% 10% 11% 0% 50% 100% Intervention 22% 24% 13% The most frequently selected The third most frequently selected Community category of organizational purpose category was “arts and culture access.” 38% 54% 47% Education/Advocacy was community awareness and Respondents who selected this category Other 19% 0% 17% education. This selection reflects the to reference their organizational focus distinctive ability of nonprofits to bring include museums, music programs (e.g. unaddressed public issues to public choirs, dancers, orchestras), and local Location and Service Area attention and give voice to issues of theaters. community concern. It is not necessarily National studies conducted by the a program area but a component of the Nearly 70 percent of all survey that they serve two or more counties, Nonprofit Finance Fund over the past six organizational mission. Family well- responses identified an organizational and 12 percent of the organizations years have consistently indicated that being was the second most frequently address in Bexar County. Comal County provide services in all 13 counties nonprofits in the area of human services selected choice. This category refers to was the second most frequently included in the study. Most frequently have been unable to meet demand and the promotion and support of healthy identified county with 7 percent of all selected counties where services are the percentage of organizations unable family relationships and childhood respondents. Although the majority delivered are Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, to meet community need has continued development and includes programs of organizations are located in Bexar and Kendall Counties. Uvalde, Karnes, to climb from 47 percent in 2009 to and services that address any number of County, their service areas frequently and Gillespie had the fewest nonprofits 54 percent in 2016 (Nonprofit Finance domestic challenges such as substance extend into nearby counties. Forty- providing services. Fund, 2016). This data has been taken abuse, domestic violence, financial three percent of respondents indicated as an indication that the social safety counseling, and mental health services. 1 Based on address information collected from Guidestar (guidestar.org) or organizational websites. net is “frayed” and that nonprofits are 2  14 percent of organizations did not have an identified physical address bur rather PO boxes or on-line “presence.”

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 8 BLANCO TRAVIS Organizational Age GILLESPIE HAYS KERR KENDALL The average age of nonprofits in Texas of older organizations exhibited the is almost 25 years according to the greatest variety of program areas COMAL Texas A&M study (Brown et al., 2013). and organizational focus in the In the current study, the average age study. Human service organizations BANDERA of organizations was 31 years, and were consistently well represented The map to the left half of the organizations included in across all age categories, but among GUADALUPE shows the physical the survey are 20 years old or more, older organizations, arts and culture, locations of the nonprofit which may indicate a more established education, and religious organizations organizations that sector in this region. The category were also well represented. MEDINA BEXAR WILSON completed the survey. Organizations are also Organizational Age of Survey Respondents color-coded by their ATASCOSA Organizational Age Percentage of Organizations FRIO NTEE code, or their IRS 20 or more years old 50% designated service type. 10-20 years old 18% Arts, culture, humanities Employment Philanthropy, voluntarism, grantmaking foundations 5-10 years old 14% Education Food, agriculture, nutrition Science & technology Environment Housing & shelter 5 years or younger 19% Social science Animal-related Recreation & sports Public & societal benefits Healthcare Youth development A disproportionate number of animal-related organizations, including rescue Mental health & Human services Religion-realted programs, animal shelters, and rehabilitation programs were founded five or crisis intervention Mutual & membership benefit International, foreign fewer years ago. This may reflect growing public awareness and a need for these Diseases, disorders, affairs, security Other medical disciplines Civil rights, social action, services, which developed in the recent past. Medical research advocacy Crime & legal-related Community improvement & capacity building

The map below indicates the number of organizations in the survey that provide Organizational Staffing and Volunteers services or programs in the following counties. Organizational classifications that most frequently extend services beyond their particular county are in human services, arts and culture, and education. The organizations within the study the category of human services with indicated a total number of 6,670 full- an average of 68 full-time employees. Number of Nonprofits Providing Services time and 3,224 part-time employees Healthcare organizations had an working in their organizations. average of 30 full-time employees, and The average number of employees educational organizations averaged 62 GILLESPIE was 28 full-time and 14 part-time, 32 full-time employees. Religious 73 KERR but these figures are skewed due organizations averaged 60 full-time KENDALL 103 to organizational outliers. A more employees, making them some of the 86 124 COMAL BANDERA representative indication of the larger staffed organizations in the 104 GUADALUPE 314 BEXAR organizational norm is the median of study. Organizational respondents 57 UVALDE 82 MEDINA three full-time employees and two indicated total volunteer participation 83 WILSON part-time employees. Organizations in excess of 91,600 volunteers. The that typically exceeded the average median number of volunteers per 93 ATASCOSA 60 67 FRIO KARNES number of full-time employees were in organization was 70.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 10 organizational size exhibited the lowest percentage of total funding from the government, with an average of 5.6 percent ORGANIZATIONAL SIZE of total annual budget drawn from either AND CHARACTERISTICS state, local or federal funding. Organizations early in their life cycles typically lack established relationships with An organization’s stage in its life cycle organizations indicated similar financial funders that generate financial stability or can be a key indicator of challenges challenges or unmet needs in their the sophisticated operating systems that and opportunities. Accordingly, survey responses. enable an organization to manage the organizations were categorized as to In the following section, we describe accountability demands of government where they were in their life cycle based the characteristics of organizations funding. Hence, the low level of government on the size of their annual budgets according to each of the four categories funding as a percentage of total budgets and organizational age. Categories of organizational size indicated in the among organizations in this category is were then analyzed to discern whether table below. expected. Government funding requires a more sophisticated infrastructure capable Organizational Size by Total Revenue of tracking performance measures and Extra Large accounting data, which these organizations (Total Revenue > $7M) have yet to establish.

Large The majority of small organizations reported (Total Revenue between $1M-$7M) moderate increases in revenues and Medium (Total Revenue between $300,000-$1M) expenses over the past three years, while assets and liabilities stayed the same. Fully Small (Total Revenue < $300,000) 30 percent of them indicated that expenses exceeded revenues in the past fiscal year, The table below provides a summary of organizational characteristics by a possible indication of fiscal instability. orgainzational size. Sixty-two percent reported a moderate to significant increase in both revenue Average Median Average % and expenses over the past three years, Organizational Percent of Average Number of Average Number of budget from suggesting that they are surviving financially. Size Total Orgs Orgs Age FT/PT Revenue people Served government Employees (unduplicated) Programs and services were delivered across Extra Large 9% 74 yrs 216/90 $20M 47.6% 4,762 three counties on average. The classifications Large 26% 42 yrs 40/22 $3.05M 44.5% 4,950 of organizational services were the most Medium 24% 26 yrs 4.5/5 $541,100 19% 1,150 Small 41% 11 yrs >1/2 $87,360 5.6% 300 diverse among smaller organizations. Program areas included arts and cultural organizations (15 percent), animal-related services (14 percent), human services (11 Small Organizations percent) and youth development (10 percent).

Forty-one percent of survey Smaller nonprofits in the study respondents fell into the category of averaged fewer than one full-time smaller nonprofits. Their average age employee and nearly two part-time was slightly over 11 years, their annual employees. In the most recent fiscal budgets fell below $300,000, and year, smaller organizations most often average budget size was $87,360. had 25 volunteers. This category of

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 12 Medium Organizations

Nearly a quarter of the organizational As with the category of small were most frequently in human services, a quarter, or 26 percent, reported that respondents came from organizations organizations, they provide services arts and culture, education, and expenses had exceeded revenues in described as medium in size. Revenues to an average of three counties, but healthcare. Sixty-five percent reported the past fiscal year. ranged between $300,000 to $1 million. they were active primarily in Bexar moderate to significant increases in The average age of medium-sized and Comal Counties. Organizational revenues and expenses, and more than organizations was nearly 27 years, services were in human services, arts placing them in the mature range of and culture, education, and diseases the life cycle where core programs and or medical disorders. The majority (73 Extra Large Organizations funding streams are established. Medium- percent) reported moderate increases in sized organizations receive nearly 20 expenses; 68 percent reported increases percent of their budgets on average from in revenues and stable to moderate Organizations in the category of ‘extra and education. Organizations at this government sources, and they averaged increases in assets and liabilities. Close large’ included those with annual stage of their life cycle are categorized four full-time employees, five part-time to 40 percent of organizations reported revenues in excess of $7 million. These as mature and sustainable in that employees and 150 volunteers. that expenses exceeded revenues in the organizations represent 9 percent of programs, funding and operations are past fiscal year. the survey respondents. The annual established although they may exhibit budget of organizations in this category signs of stagnation and renewal. This averaged $20 million, organizational organizational category received age was 74 years, and the average the largest amount of government Large Organizations number of full-time employees was funding, with an average of 48 216, with 90 part-time employees and percent of their annual budgets drawn over 1600 volunteers. As with all other from some level of government; this Large nonprofits represent 26 percent of employees is 40 full-time, 22 part- organizational categories, extra large was not substantially different than of the organizations in this study. Their time and 572 volunteers per year. organizations serve an average of larger organizations that reported average budgets were over $3 million, These organizations provide services three counties. Sixty-six percent of the 44 percent of annual revenue from though annual revenue ranged from in an average of four counties, though extra large organizations are in human government sources. 33 percent of $1-7 million. These organizations are over half of them provide services in services and the remainder is evenly extra large organizations reported mature and established with an average only one, and 66 percent serve three distributed among the categories of expenses in excess of revenues over the age of 42 years. Their average number or fewer counties. Large organizations religion related, housing and shelter, past year.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 14 organizations, the appearance of fiscal In short, organizations that stress was greater. Close to 40 percent experienced some financial distress of medium-sized nonprofits reported over the past year were distributed expenses that exceed revenue during across all sizes and stages in their their most recent fiscal year. In the life cycle. The larger organizations final two categories of organizational have a higher percentage of human size, 65 percent of large and 63 percent service organizations and these of extra large organizations reported organizations indicated that some moderate to significant increases in of their fiscal stress was attributable revenue and expenses. Twenty-six to a gap between service costs and percent of large and 33 percent of extra reimbursement. large organizations reported expenses in excess of revenue in the past year.

The table below indicates the percentage of organizations that report increases or decreases in their revenue and expenses over the past three years. The majority of organizations report moderate to significant increases in revenue and expenses. FINANCIAL DATA AND TRENDS

Organizational respondents were asked expenses, assets, and liabilities). Only Three Year Financial Trends: to report expenses and sources of 4 percent of respondents reported Percent of Organizations by Size revenue over the past year (categories expenses had increased moderately included: government, individual to significantly in the past three years, donors, corporate contributions, while also reporting that revenues had Total Revenue Total Expenses foundations, special events, dues moderately to significantly decreased. S M L XL S M L XL and membership fees, and private However, this broadly drawn data Decreased sale of goods or services). In addition, does not provide a clear indication 6.5 3.4 0 0 2.2 5.1 1.7 0 respondents were asked to describe of whether organizations are able to Significantly financial trends over the past three meet community need or whether they Decreased 14.1 15.3 20 15.8 12 15.3 13.3 15.8 years and whether their organization are able to develop the operating Moderately had experienced moderate to system and staff commensurate with significant increases or decreases the services they are seeking to deliver. Stayed the Same 17.4 13.6 15 21.1 23.9 6.8 6.8 21.1 in revenues, expenses, assets or Their responses to unmet needs suggest Increased liabilities. Respondents also indicated otherwise (see next section). 41.3 52.2 40 47.4 43.5 52.2 52.2 47.4 Moderately whether revenue sources had changed In total, 30 percent of the survey significantly over the past three years. Increased 20.7 15.3 25 15.8 18.5 20.5 20.3 15.8 respondents indicated that expenses Significantly On the surface, results indicate a exceeded revenues over the past relatively stable financial picture year. One would anticipate that Not applicable 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 across all organizational categories. organizations earlier in their life cycle The majority of organizations of all would be the most fiscally unstable sizes reported stable to moderate and most likely to fail. Fully 25 percent increases in revenue over the past of small organizations in the study three years (see table below for reported that expenses exceeded percentage of organizations that revenues in the past fiscal year. reported three-year shifts in revenues, Surprisingly, among medium-sized

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 16 ORGANIZATIONAL CHALLENGES AND UNMET NEEDS “A sustainable funding source to support our new teacher professional WHAT DO WE NEED? The final portion of the survey queried they provide, or even community development, as well as a respondents about unmet needs facing participation. One nonprofit full-time teacher trainer. nonprofit organizations. Organizations commented, “the need is simple: we indicated that their greatest needs need more people who are willing Funding for technology continued to be funding and resources, to open their hearts and homes to support.” but across all classifications and sizes, foster care.” Or, “We need to shine a respondents raised the challenge brighter light on the issues of child of meeting the core element of abuse in the community.” Another their mission of building community organization working on homelessness awareness or community education. brought up a similar point, “one thing Language frequently referenced that the organization needs is better “We have several calls business terms such as marketing, awareness in the community about the branding, or communications, which is complicated issues that contribute to a day from people who generally understood to be advocacy in homelessness and that stand in the way cannot afford even our the form of community education. For of families overcoming their situation minimum payment for example, organizations mentioned the and achieving true independence.” need to educate the public about the Consistently mentioned was the WHAT DO WE NEED? counseling services. We complexity of issues such as substance difficulty of pursuing marketing or are also in need of a new abuse, foster care, homelessness, and community education, which are central location because we have the need for community engagement to organizational success but remain as a part of fulfilling the largely unfunded. outgrown our current organizational mission. facility and the rent is A number of unmet needs that Some community education pertained pertain to operational expenses were increasing every year.” to organizational needs for greater emphasized across all organizational visibility, community awareness sizes: funding for staff training, regarding the types of services professional development, technology support, health insurance and benefits for employees, and more competitive A number of unmet needs salaries. Smaller organizations “We need a paradigm shift expressed more frequently the need for were emphasized across all capital improvements, equipment, and in how communities view organizational sizes: funding larger facilities. Middle to extra-large nonprofits as a whole in for staff training, professional organizations consistently emphasized WHAT DO WE NEED? regard to its employees’ development, technology the need for unrestricted funds, for funding to bridge the gap between salaries and letting support, health insurance and government funding and total service that (influence) how the benefits for employees, and costs, and in some cases, the challenge community gives.” more competitive salaries. of need exceeding capacity to provide services.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 18 technologies have high fixed costs. They Outcome measures included the difficult to generate performance are also resource intensive, and nonprofits provision of particular services, such measures around. For example, the have lacked access to the assets available as dental care, housing, testing of a success of programs designed to to private sector organizations that health need, helping high-risk youth educate and prevent suicide among enable them to purchase this equipment. complete education, creating a registry teens or to reduce teen pregnancy in of families struggling with a mental Bexar County are challenging to assess. This data reflects a prevalent national health disorder, fostering legislative Other programs generate outcomes trend referenced as “the starvation change, increasing the number of that are expensive to track, will require cycle,” or the phenomenon of unrealistic service providers, finding a life-saving years to generate, and may be difficult expectations of overhead costs which option for nearly 7,000 animals per year to discern. For example, a program then hinder operational capacity and that would be euthanized, and a camp providing arts education may contribute stability. A rule of thumb for government that services children with moderate to to long-term success in schools by and foundations has been 15 percent severe special needs. boosting academic achievement and overhead or indirect costs. In fact, funders encouraging critical thinking, but it often regard a reduction in the cost of Admittedly, some highly valuable may be challenging to isolate program overhead as a positive step. In reality, organizational services would be impact as an outcome. unduly low overhead or reductions can jeopardize an organization’s capacity to track outcomes, to train staff, or to compete with the private sector which MOVING THE NEEDLE has more ready access to investment for equipment and overhead. AGENCY SPOTLIGHT: HEALTHY FUTURES

COMMUNITY BAE-B-SAFE (“Before Anyone Else” Be Safe) The purpose of the BAE-B-SAFE program is to support educational success and IMPACT increase graduation rates among community college students by reducing Organizations were asked to rank the unplanned pregnancies and providing effectiveness of their programs over young people with life skills to protect connect these youth to healthcare the past year and to provide examples their futures. BAE-B-SAFE provides services by partnering with community of measurable outcomes. Overall, 81 evidence-based sexual and reproductive clinics that provide an adolescent- percent of all respondents indicated health education programs to 18-19 year friendly clinical experience at a low-cost. that their primary program was highly olds, and 20 year olds who are currently Success – Colleges: Healthy Futures pregnant or parenting. effective; 22 percent indicated that entered into partnerships with Organizations of all sizes emphasized their primary program was somewhat Metrics: community colleges which were selected the need for infrastructure and effective. Secondary and tertiary Our annual goal is to provide evidence- based on demographic data that information technology, in particular. programs were ranked lower by based programs to 900 18-19 year olds identified zip codes in San Antonio with This data mirrors a national respondents; 69 percent and 68 percent and 20 year olds who are currently the highest rates of teen pregnancy. trend. As the nonprofit sector has of respondents ranked their programs pregnant or parenting on three Alamo The BAE-B-SAFE program is delivered professionalized and been required to as highly effective, and 29 percent and community college campuses and their to students in three Alamo Community demonstrate performance measures 26 percent indicated that they were surrounding communities. Participants Colleges, including San Antonio College, and accountability to funders, there has somewhat effective. No respondents complete surveys immediately upon St. Philip’s College, and Palo Alto College. been a need to purchase and maintain indicated that any program was entry and exit of the educational information technologies necessary ineffective, and a negligible number BAE-B-SAFE has successfully been program. They also complete follow for tracking outcomes. Information indicated that a program was adopted into the course syllabus of 30+ somewhat ineffective. up surveys. In addition, our goal is to Student Development and Educational

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 20 Success courses on all three campuses. practices. This staff training helps staff The goal is to expand to all first-year address barriers that students say they courses to provide the same educational encounter related to medical cost, fear experience for all first-year students. and anxiety, and lack of insurance that keeps them from accessing care. Success – Faculty & Staff: To build a supportive cadre of faculty and Impact: staff that can serve as a resource to From 2010 to 2014 San Antonio students, Healthy Futures provided experienced a 26 percent decrease in training to 27 faculty. Selected the teen birth rate for females ages faculty instruct courses to college 15 to 19, exceeding the SA2020 goal students through first year courses and of reducing the teen birth rate by 25 supplemental learning opportunities. percent by the year 2020. However, Training increased faculty knowledge while the teen birth rate in San Antonio levels in sexual and reproductive health declined 46 percent since 2000, it and their ability to comfortably discuss remained 55 percent higher than the this topic with students. Training topics U.S. rate. In 2014 in San Antonio, there included: Sex Ed 101, Trauma Informed were 2,441 births to females ages 10 to Approaches, Gender and Sexual 19. The highest percent (69 percent) of Diversity, and Cultural Proficiency. teen births (1,688) occurs in the 18 -19 Success – Students: While the first year age group. Clearly, there is still much of the program focused on developing work to be done. relationships with colleges and faculty, by the second year, the program Per The National Campaign to Prevent directed its focus on students. A total Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy, at of 631 participants (456 females and present, fully half of all pregnancies 175 males) received evidence based are described by women themselves as program courses. In addition 356 unplanned. Among unmarried women in students completed online lessons their twenties, seven in 10 pregnancies are developed by The National Campaign unplanned. As is true for teen pregnancy, to Prevent Teen and Unplanned unplanned pregnancy—especially among Pregnancy. Participants learned about single young adults—carries with it a HIV and STD prevention, healthy and broad array of socio-economic and health unhealthy relationships, anatomy, and risks to women and men, to children, and contraception. They completed critical to the larger community. goal setting and future orientation The BAE-B-SAFE program delivered activities in an age appropriate, safe to a young reproductive age group and comfortable setting. on community college campuses Success – Healthcare Referrals: supports Centers for Disease Control Healthy Futures implemented a and Prevention (CDC) findings that community clinic referral system with highlight the link between health- CentroMed clinics to link students to related behaviors and educational low-cost family planning and primary outcomes, suggesting that education care services. Through this partnership, and public health professionals can BAE-B-SAFE staff receive training find their respective education and on patient eligibility, clinic intake health improvement goals to be processes, and patient scheduling mutually beneficial.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 22 Happy Children MOVING THE NEEDLE Result 1. All children grow up in safe, Time Actual Current Baseline stable, and nurturing environments Period Value Trend % Change AGENCY SPOTLIGHT: Indicator 1.1. # of confirmed victims of child 2015 9.9 READYKIDSA COALITION abuse or neglect per 1,000 children ↓5 -27%↓ Indicator 1.2. % of children 0 to 17 experiencing 2014 23.4% food insecurity ↓3 -13%↓ ReadyKidSA was created because Indicator 1.2. % of families with children 0 to 17 2015 11.4 3 -17% research shows that early investments experiencing employment instability ↓ ↓ in children’s early childhood development not only benefit them now, but into the future as they Healthy Children transition into becoming healthy, Result 2. All children are healthy in mind, Time Actual Current Baseline thriving and contributing adults to the body, and spirit Period Value Trend % Change local workforce and to their community. Indicator 2.1. % of children 0to 17 without health 2015 6.6% It aims to create a comprehensive insurance coverage ↓2 -38%↓ early childhood system that promotes data collection and presentation are Indicator 2.2. % of pregnancies receiving late or 2014 36.6 the social, emotional, physical and dynamic and subject to change. The no prenatal care ↓1 59%↑ cognitive development of children 0-8 information on this Scorecard should Indicator 2.2. % of Kindergarteners assessed as 2016 8.4% and to provide parents and caregivers therefore be viewed in the spirit of a “Vulnerable” in the emotional maturity EDI domain ↑1 4%↑ with the tools and resources to better community striving together towards support their families. continuous improvement on behalf of children and families. ReadyKidsSA is a coalition of Ready Children organizations across Bexar County. Of The ReayKidsSA Coalition set three (3) Result 3. All children are curious learners Time Actual Current Baseline those organizations, the following are goals, which each have a desired result progressing towards their full potential Period Value Trend % Change with 3 measurable indicators: Indicator 3.1. # of Kindergarteners Assessed as also members of The Nonprofit Council: 2016 24.3% “Very Ready” in Four or More EDI domains ↑3 8%↑ • Any Baby Can The measured data includes percent Indicator 3.2. % of licensed child care capacity Q4 2016 29.5% ↑2 3%↑ • Children’s Shelter change, current trend and time with an accreditation measured. Each section features graphs Indicator 3.2. % of 3 and 4 year olds enrolled 2015 45.4% • Clarity Child Guidance Center plotting the change over a period in school ↑1 -3%↓ • Communities in Schools of years, heat maps where showing geographic distribution by county • Family Service Association of San (where appropriate), lists of factors Impact: • Decrease percent of families with Antonio, Inc. children experiencing employment affecting the data, practices with a The ReadyKidsSACoalition has built on • Martinez Street Women’s Center instability by 17 percent proven positive affect, practices that successful child and family programs • Decrease percent of children • YMCA of Greater San Antonio show promise, low cost solutions, and in San Antonio to help children in the without health insurance coverage recommendations for policy changes, San Antonio communities receive the by 38 percent Metrics: systems changes, direct service, and tools they need to develop and succeed family practices. • Increased percent of The ReadyKidSA Coalition Scorecard throughout their lives. kindergarteners assessed as represents the work in progress of Specifically, it has helped to: “Very Ready” in four or more Early the ReadyKidSA coalition in applying Development Instrument domains Results-Based Accountability • Decrease confirmed victims of child by 8 percent for whole populations and client abuse or neglect by 27 percent • Increased percent of licensed child populations. Because it is a work in • Decrease percent of children care capacity with an accreditation progress, the language, strategic experiencing food insecurity by 13 by 3 percent thinking and progress relative to percent

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 24 It is estimated that an additional near three thousand dogs are rescued annually via MOVING THE NEEDLE this San Antonio Pets Alive! marketing process. This additional three thousand animals saved through marketing contributes greatly to the ultimate live release number. AGENCY SPOTLIGHT: SAN ANTONIO PETS ALIVE

SAPA! was founded in 2011 as a hundred families engaged in temporary commitment to help the city of San care. We have launched a transportation Antonio address a devastating reality program with partner rescues in cities of thousands of dogs and cats (19,453 who do not face the pet overpopulation in 2011) being euthanized annually at that is so prevalent in many Texas the city shelter. In 2011 the live release cities, with a goal to send over fourteen rate (the number of dogs and cats who hundred dogs annually to adopters left the shelter alive) was thirty-two in these northern communities. Our percent. This means that seventy eight placement team works every day of percent of the dogs and cats entering the week on social media and email the city shelter were euthanized. The to highlight at risk dogs (at risk means national standard for being considered the dog has already been identified as a No Kill community is a live release of having a deadline to be euthanized) and ninety percent or better. work with partner rescues to place these San Antonio Pets Alive! was founded on animals in safe environments. the tenet that killing is not a solution to address pet overpopulation, and as a community, we are responsible City of San Antonio Live for finding life-saving solutions. Since Release Rate 88% inception, SAPA! has saved the lives of 0.9 81% 85% 37,500 dogs and cats pulled directly 77% from the city shelter. These efforts have 0.675 61% rapidly propelled the city to consistently realize a save-rate in the high eightieth percentile, with several months 0.45 achieving a save/live release rate of ninety percent or better. 0.225 SAPA! pulls the most vulnerable dogs, 0 cats, puppies 0.225and kitties already 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 slated for euthanasia. We are their last 0chance for life. 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, and 2016 Over eighty percent of the animals saved from the euthanasia kennels have treatable medical conditions. To this end San Antonio Pets Alive! staffs a clinic that houses an intensive care unit for puppies with parvo, wards to treat ringworm, heartworm and various other medical conditions. We have a robust foster team of over fourteen

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 26 Metrics: San Antonio Pets Alive! cannot control the live release number for the city. What we can do, is perform as the largest pet partner for the city, and continue to provide marketing for the dogs who are at risk for euthanasia. Our role and efforts have resulted in 37,500 lives saved in five years. The 37,500 save number is strictly the number pulled through the contract with the city. If the additional three thousand animals who find placement through the SAPA! marketing efforts annually were added, the impact number grows to 54,000 lives saved through San Antonio Pets Alive! efforts. As the largest partner to the city, we are responsible for the rescue of forty-five percent of all rescue organizations combined. CONCLUSION

Number of Animals Saved This initial study of the state of the open-ended questions that a number of by SAPA! sector of nonprofit organizations human service organizations are unable in Bexar and surrounding counties to meet need. It would be valuable to Per Calendar Year indicates a sector that is slightly smaller generate a clearer picture in a future than the national and state average study of the service areas in which 88% and it may be slightly older and more community needs are unmet and where 9000 81% 85% 77% established than the state norm. clients turn when organizations are Respondents were spread across a unable to respond. 6750 61% broad spectrum of service areas and National data indicate that there has the demographics of organizational been a steady pattern of reduced 4500 classification, size and age were funding and philanthropy has been sufficiently similar to national data to unable to fill the gaps (Nonprofit 2250 warrant comparisons. Finance Fund, 2016). Financial data in 0 Organizations indicate relatively this study is generalized and does not 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 stable financial conditions over the allow a direct comparison. However, past three years with moderate to thirty percent of all survey respondents significant increases in revenues and reported fiscal stress in the past fiscal expenses across all organizational sizes, year across all organizational sizes. Impact: although human service organizations While it would be expected among San Antonio can meet the national consistently indicated financial stress smaller organizations, as they are less standard of ninety percent live release: as reimbursements fall below service fiscally stable, the fiscal stress was No Kill Community. With San Antonio costs. While safety net organizations identified across all organizational sizes Pets Alive! fully functioning at our did not indicate more financial stress and continued through mature and capacity, we are the linchpin of the city than other categories it is clear from established organizations. meeting this goal.

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 28 Organizations consistently articulated to be caught in a number of double that they are under resourced with binds, between adopting financial Participating Organizations regard to operational expenses. Unmet strategies directed to individually needs included staff development, funded and measurable services and salaries, technology and equipment, the expectation that the sector be A World for Children Blueprint Ministries capital improvements, and other charitable, that nonprofits respond Abode Contemplative Care for the Dying Boerne Community Theatre costs related to overhead. Smaller to unmet and sometimes unfunded Acacia Medical Mission Boy With a Ball San Antonio organizations expressed more needs. Nonprofits are struggling with Acts of Hope Center Boys & Girls Clubs of Bandera County frequently the need for facility the conflicting expectation that they ADULT & TEEN CHALLENGE OF TEXAS Boys & Girls Clubs of San Antonio and capital related expenses. The provide professionalized services Alamo Area Resource Center Bright Star Ministries and Outreach, Inc phenomenon of the ‘starvation and also maintain low operational Alamo Breast Cancer Foundation Brighton Center Alamo chapter Us TOO prostate cancer support Camp to Success cycle’ appears to be in play in that costs. A thriving nonprofit sector will group CANINE CLASSMATES nonprofits with unrealistically low require that key stakeholders such as ALAMO CITY OPERA Canyon Lake Animal Shelter Society operational costs may appear to government and philanthropy work Alamo City Pit Bull Rescue and Rehabilitation CASA of South Texas be fiscally sound but are unable to with nonprofit leadership to find the Alamo Metro Chorus Celebration Circle of San Antonio build capacity. Finally, organizations means to respond creatively to the Alamo Public Telecommunications Council dba Center for New Communities across the spectrum indicated that challenges ahead. KLRN CentroMed Alpha Home CFAR-the Center for Formative Action and they lack the funding to engage in Alpha Home Reflection building community awareness, to ALS Association of Texas Child Advocates San Antonio ‘tell their story’ in a manner necessary Alzheimer’s Association Children’s Association for for community engagement and AMCB Foundation Maximum Potential (CAMP) organizational success. American Indians in Texas Spanish Colonial Children’s Chorus of Chosen Care The nonprofit sector in the greater American Red Cross Christian Assistance Ministry or CAM San Antonio region echoes a few Animal Defense League of Texas Christian Cupboard Inc. national trends. Nonprofits continue Any Baby Can Christian Job Corps of Kendall County Any Woman Can Christian Senior Services - Meals on Wheels San Arthur Nagel Community Clinic Antonio ARTS San Antonio Chrysalis Ministries Assistance League of San Antonio City Education Partners Association for the Advancement of Mexican Clarity Child Guidance Center Americans Colonial Hills United Methodist School Assumption Semia Comal County Senior Citizens Foundation Atascosa Family Crisis Center Communities In Schools of San Antonio Autism Lifeline Links Communities In Schools of South Central Texas Autism Treatment Center Community Council of South Central Texas, Inc. AVANCE-San Antonio, Inc. Congregation of Divine Providence Avenida Guadalupe Association Congregation of Sisters of Charity of the Baller Camps Incarnate Word Barshop Jewish Community Center of San Connections Individual and Family Services, Inc Antonio Contemporary Art for San Antonio dba Blue Star Bethel Community Development Corporation, Contemporary Inc. Converse Animal Shelter, Inc. Bexar County Community Health Collaborative Corazon Ministries, Inc. Bexar County Family Justice Center Foundation Court Appointed Special Advocates (CASA) of Big Brothers Big Sisters of South Texas Central Texas, Inc. Big Brothers Big Sisters of the Texas Hill Country Cressie Animal Refuge and Enrichment (CARE) Bihl Haus Arts CRRC of Canyon Lake, Inc. Blessed Ground, Inc. Crystal Sea Drama Company Blessed Sacrament Academy Daedalian Foundation Blue Star Families DaisyCares

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 30 Daughters of Charity Services of San Antonio Hemisfair Conservancy Mind Science Foundation Antonio, Texas, Inc. De Novo Foundation Heritage Society of New Braunfels Mission Possible 360, Inc. Roy Maas Youth Alternatives Diamond Dachshund Rescue of Texas Hill Country CASA Mission Road Ministries S.L.E.W., Inc aka SLEW Cancer Wellness Center disABILITYsa Hill Country Community Needs Council Mitchell Lake Audubon Center SA Christian Hope Resource Center Divine Redeemer Presbyterian ChurchDoor of Hill Country Crisis Council MMK9 SA Youth Hope Counseling Center Hill Country Family Services Molino de Suenos SA2020 Dress for Success San Antonio Hill Country Pregnancy Care Center Moonlight Fund, Inc. SAISD Foundation Dynamic Schools Research Institute Hill Country SPCA Morningside Ministries SAMSAT (San Antonio Museum of Science & Eagles Flight Advocacy and Outreach Historical Society of Helotes Multi-level Educational Youth Outreach Technology) East Central School Foundation Hope Hospice Musical Bridges Around the World, Inc. San Antonio A&M Club Foundation Eden Animal Sanctuary House of Neighborly Service Mystery Dog Rescue San Antonio AIDS Foundation El Bari Community Health Center HUG ME Ink NALCAB San Antonio Amputee Foundation Elite Counseling Inc. Humane Society of the New Braunfels Area National Hispanic Institute at San Antonio San Antonio Bar Foundation Ella Austin Community Center Inman Christian Center National Ovarian Cancer Coalition San Antonio Bike Share Esperanza Peace and Justice Center Inspire Community Fine Art Center National Western Art Foundation dba Briscoe San Antonio Botanical Garden Families Empowered Inspire community fine art center Western Art Musuem San Antonio Cares Circle of the National Cares Family Life Center International Joseph Project DBA STEPS For Life Natural Womanhood Mentoring Movement Family Promise of Greater New Braunfels Izabella’s Canine Rescue and Rehabilitation New Braunfels Community Cat Coalition San Antonio Chamber of Commerce Family Service Association Jefferson Outreach for Older People North East Educational Foundation San Antonio Christian Dental Clinic Family Violence Prevention Services, Inc./The Jireh House Community Development and NOWCastSA San Antonio Council on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Battered Women and Children’s Shelter Resource Center NuSMASH Project San Antonio CPA Society/CE Foundation Commission Junior Achievement of South Texas Ohr Lanu Foundation San Antonio Dance Theatre dba San Antonio First3Years K’STAR, Inc. Old Spanish Missions, Inc. Metropolitan Ballet Friends of Cibolo Wilderness DBA Cibolo Nature Katie’s Roadside Rescue OLLU’s Community Counseling Service San Antonio Education Partnership Center & Farm Kendall County Women’s Shelter Open Table San Antonio Guardian Angels Friends of Paws in Prison, Inc. Kendall County Youth Agriculture and Equestrian OPERA San Antonio San Antonio Humane Society Friends of The Tye Preston Memorial Library Center Operation Military Embrace, Inc. San Antonio Lifetime Recovery Frontier Times Museum Kinetic Kids Our Lady of Grace Catholic School-Pleasanton San Antonio Lighthouse For The Blind Get Up Community Center, Inc. Kirby Senior Center P16Plus Council of Greater Bexar County San Antonio Marriage Initiative Girls Inc. of San Antonio Las Casas Foundation Parent/Child Incorporated of San Antonio & San Antonio Metropolitan Ministry, Inc. (dba Girls on the Run of Bexar County Leon Valley Historical Society Bexar County SAMMinistries) Gizmo’s Gift Let’s Go to the Show! Pay It Forward - Clean & Sober Living San Antonio Pets Alive God’s Dogs Rescue Life Choices Medical Clinic peaceCENTER San Antonio Pets Alive! Good Samaritan Community Services Life Skills for Living Pi Theta Lambda Educational Foundation San Antonio Public Library Foundation Gorge Preservation Society, Inc. Lifetime Recovery Planned Parenthood South Texas San Antonio R.O.C.K.S. Grace House, Inc. Lions Sight & Tissue Foundation, Inc. dba Lions Presa Community Center Foundation Great Hearts Texas Sight Research Foundation, Inc. Presbyterian Children’s Homes and Services San Antonio Sports Greater Randolph Area Services Program Inc Literacy San Antonio dba SAReads Project Angel Fares San Antonio Threads Green Spaces Alliance of South Texas Lone Star Parkinson Society Project MEND San Antonio Youth Literacy Growing Empowered Together Low Vision Resource Center Project SMASH San Antonio Zoological Society Guadalupe Valley Family Violence Shelter, Inc. LULAC National Educational Service Centers, Inc. Project Transformation Rio Texas SASTEMIC Guardian House Luminaria Providence Place SATX Social Ride Guide Dogs of Texas Lupus Foundation of America, Lone Star Chapter Rainbow Senior Center at Kronkosky Place SAY SI Habitat for Humanity of San Antonio Lutheran Social Services of the South, dba RCBC Helping Hands Food Pantry School of Science and Technology (501c3 under half Helen Foundation Upbring Reaching Maximum Independence Riverwalk Education Foundation) Hallmark University, Inc. Lytle Animal Allies Reckless Rangers Veterans Equitherapy SCUC ISD Education Foundation HANK, Inc Madonna Center, Inc. RecoveryWerks! Seton Home Happened by Chance Horses Inc Magdalena House Respite Care of San Antonio Sight Savers America Haven for Hope Martinez St. Women’s Center Restore Education Silver & Black Give Back HCA de SA Martinez Street Women’s Center Returning Heroes Home Inc. Single Seed Enrichment School, Inc. Headwaters at Incarnate Word Masters Leadership Program of Greater San Revolution Thrift SJRC Texas Healthy Futures of Texas Antonio Rise Recovery Snack Pak 4 Kids San Antonio (wholly owned Healy-Murphy Center, Inc. Mavagi Enterprises River City Advocacy, Inc. subsidiary of The Lord’s Way, Inc.) Heart of Texas Concert Band McNay Art Museum River City Christian School So Live, Inc. HELOTES HUMANE SOCIETY Methodist Children’s Home Ronald McDonald House Charities of San Society of St Vincent de Paul San Antonio

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 32 Soldiers’ Angels Thrive Youth Center Somerset ISD Education Foundation ThriveWell Cancer Foundation References South Alamo Regional Alliance for the Homeless THRU Project South San Antonio Chamber of Commerce THRU Project Brown, W. Jo, S. Anderson, F. (2013). Texas Nonprofit Sector: Describing the Size Foundation Transplants for Children Spay-Neuter Assistance Program(SNAP) Tri city animal sanctuary & Scope. College Station, TX. Nonprofit Management Program, Texas A&M SRG Force Sports Triple H Equitherapy Center University. SS American Memorial Foundation TruLight127 Ministries, Inc St. 74Ranch for Children Texas Region Inc. dba Tuskegee Airmen, Inc.; San Antonio Chapter SJRC Texas United Way of San Antonio & Bexar County McKeever, B. (2015). The Nonprofit Sector in Brief: Public Charities, Giving and St. Louis Catholic School University of the Incarnate Word Volunteering. Washington, D.C. Urban Institute. St. Mary Magdalen School University Presbyterian Children’s Center St. Paul United Methodist Church Upbring St. Paul’s Episcopal Montessori School URBAN-15 GROUP National Bureau of Labor Statistics (2014). Nonprofits Account for 11.4 million jobs, St. Peter - St. Joseph Children’s Home Vet TRIIP, Inc. Summer of Service (SOS) VisionWorks, Inc. 10.3 Percent of All Private Sector Employment. U.S. Department of Labor. https:// Sunshine Cottage School for Deaf Children Visitation House Ministries www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2014/ted_20141021.htm Susan G. Komen San Antonio Voices for Children of San Antonio SWOOP - Southwest Outreach for Older People Wayland Baptist University TADSAW INC Wayward Whiskers Cat Rescue Nonprofit Finance Fund (2016). http://www.nonprofitfinancefund.org/sites/ Teach For America WellMed Charitable Foundation default/files/nff/docs/2015-survey-brochure.pdf Team Diego Women Involved in Nurturing Giving Sharing TEAMability, Inc. Women’s Global Connection Texas Agricultural Land Trust Work Out Help Out Texas Burn Survivor Society World Affairs Council of San Antonio Texas Diaper Bank YMCA of Greater San Antonio The authors would like to thank the following individuals for their support and Texas Foundation of Hope Yoga Seva Institute work on the survey tool and data collection: Texas International Folk Dancers YOSA (Youth Orchestras of San Antonio) Texas Kidney Foundation Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) Texas Public Radio Youth Code Jam TEXPOSITION Serge Atherwood, a doctoral student in the Applied Demography Ph.D. Program at The Arc of San Antonio UTSA for generating the map of organizational respondents’ physical locations. The Arc of the Hill Country The Arts Fund SA The Atonement Academy (Our Lady of the Roger Enriquez, J.D., the Director of the Policy Studies Center and Survey Research Atonement Catholic Church’s parish school) Center at UTSA for managing the survey distribution and providing technical The Brighter Days Horse Refuge, Inc. assistance to respondents. The Bulverde Food Pantry, dba Provisions: A 25:35 Outreach The Children’s Shelter The Chromosome 18 Registry & Research Society Gisel Prado, a graduate student in the Masters of Public Administration Program at The DoSeum UTSA who constructed the survey in Qualtrics, provided survey clean up, and data The Ecumenical Center verification assistance. The Greater San Antonio Chamber of Commerce The Healing Place The Leapfrog Foundation The Nonprofit Council The Overtime Theater The Pink Berets The Playhouse San Antonio The Prosthetic Foundation The Saddle Light Center The Salvation Army of Comal County The Ultimate Gift of Life Theatre For Change

STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES 34 STATE OF THE NONPROFIT SECTOR SAN ANTONIO AND SURROUNDING COUNTIES