Dynamics of composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Jos´eBonet
Instituto Universitario de Matem´aticaPura y Aplicada IUMPA
Universidad Polit´ecnica de Valencia
Operator Theory and Related Topics, Lille (France),
June 2010
Joint work with P. Doma´nski,Pozna´n(Poland) Statement of the Problem
Problem Study the behavior of iterates of a composition operator
on the space of real analytic functions A (Ω) .
We are mainly interested in the case when all the orbits are bounded.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operator
Cϕ(f ) := f ◦ ϕ
ϕ : U → U holomorphic, U ⊂ Cd open set
Cϕ : H(U) → H(U)
ϕ :Ω → Ω real analytic, Ω ⊂ Rd open set
Cϕ : A (Ω) → A (Ω)
Iterates: n (Cϕ) := Cϕ ◦ Cϕ ◦ · · · ◦ Cϕ = Cϕn | {z } n times Universal functions for composition operators have been investigated by Bernal, Bonilla, Godefroy, Grosse-Erdmann, Le´on,Luh, Montes, Mortini, Shapiro and others.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Definitions
X is a Hausdorff locally convex space (lcs). L(X ) is the space of all continuous linear operators on X .
Power bounded operators m ∞ An operator T ∈ L(X ) is said to be power bounded if {T }m=1 is an equicontinuous subset of L(X ).
If X is a Fr´echetspace, an operator T is power bounded if and only if m ∞ the orbits {T (x)}m=1 of all the elements x ∈ X under T are bounded. This is a consequence of the uniform boundedness principle.
Hypercyclic operators An operator T ∈ L(X ) is called hypercyclic if there is x ∈ X such that its orbit is dense in X .
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Definitions
Mean ergodic operators An operator T ∈ L(X ) is said to be mean ergodic if the limits
n 1 X Px := lim T mx, x ∈ X , (1) n→∞ n m=1 exist in X .
A power bounded operator T is mean ergodic precisely when
X = Ker(I − T ) ⊕ Im(I − T ), (2)
where I is the identity operator, Im(I − T) denotes the range of (I − T ) and the bar denotes the “closure in X ”.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Motivation
Trivial observation
λ ∈ C, |λ| ≤ 1.
1 λ := (λ + λ2 + ... + λn) [n] n
λ = 1 ⇒ λ[n] = 1, n = 1, 2, 3, ...
2 λ 6= 1 ⇒ |λ | ≤ → 0 [n] n|1 − λ|
as n → ∞.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Motivation
von Neumann, 1931 Let H be a Hilbert space and let T ∈ L(H) be unitary. Then there is a 1 Pn m projection P on H such that T[n] := n m=1 T converges to P in the strong operator topology.
Lorch, 1939 Let X be a reflexive Banach space. If T ∈ L(X ) is a power bounded operator, then there is a projection P on X such that T[n] converges to P in the strong operator topology; i.e. T is mean ergodic.
Hille, 1945
There exist mean ergodic operators T on L1([0, 1]) which are not power bounded.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Motivation
Problem attributed to Sucheston, 1976 Let X be a Banach space such that every power bounded operator T ∈ L(X ) is mean ergodic. Does it follow that X is reflexive?
YES if X is a Banach lattice (Emelyanov, 1997).
YES if X is a Banach space with basis (Fonf, Lin, Wojtaszczyk, J. Funct. Anal. 2001). This was a major breakthrough.
There are non reflexive Banach spaces in which all contractions are mean ergodic (Fonf, Lin, Wojtaszczyk, Preprint 2009).
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Yosida’s mean ergodic Theorem
Barrelled locally convex spaces
Ls (X ), Lb(X )
Yosida, 1960 Let X be a barrelled lcs. The operator T ∈ L(X ) is mean ergodic if and 1 n only if it limn→∞ n T = 0, in Ls (X ) and
∞ 0 {T[n]x}n=1 is relatively σ(X , X )–compact, ∀x ∈ X. (3)
Setting P := τs -limn→∞ T[n], the operator P is a projection which commutes with T and satisfies Im(P) = Ker(I − T ) and Ker(P) = Im(I − T ).
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Yosida’s mean ergodic Theorem
∞ If {T[n]}n=1 happens to be convergent in Lb(X ), then T is called uniformly mean ergodic.
Corollary If X is a reflexive lcs, then every power bounded operator on X is mean ergodic.
If X is a Montel space, then every power bounded operator on X is uniformly mean ergodic.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Results of Albanese, Bonet, Ricker, 2008
Main Results Let X be a complete barrelled lcs with a Schauder basis. Then X is reflexive if and only if every power bounded operator on X is mean ergodic.
Let X be a complete barrelled lcs with a Schauder basis. Then X is Montel if and only if every power bounded operator on X is uniformly mean ergodic.
Let X be a sequentially complete lcs which contains an isomorphic copy of the Banach space c0. Then there exists a power bounded operator on X which is not mean ergodic.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Results of Albanese, Bonet, Ricker, 2008
Results about Schauder basis A complete, barrelled lcs with a basis is reflexive if and only if every basis is shrinking if and only if every basis is boundedly complete. This extends a result of Zippin for Banach spaces and answers positively a problem of Kalton from 1970.
Every non-reflexive Fr´echetspace contains a non-reflexive, closed subspace with a basis. This is an extension of a result of A. Pelczynski for Banach spaces.
Bonet, de Pagter and Ricker (Preprint 2010) A Fr´echetlattice X is reflexive if and only if every power bounded operator on X is mean ergodic.
This is an extension of the result of Emelyanov.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of analytic functions
Theorem Let U ⊆ Cd be a connected domain of holomorphy. The following assertions are equivalent:
(a) Cϕ : H(U) → H(U) is power bounded;
(b) Cϕ : H(U) → H(U) is uniformly mean ergodic;
(c) Cϕ : H(U) → H(U) is mean ergodic; (d) The map ϕ has stable orbits on U: n ∀ K b U ∃ L b U such that ϕ (K) ⊆ L for every n ∈ N; (e) There is a fundamental family of (connected) compact sets (Lj ) in U such that ϕ(Lj ) ⊆ Lj for every j ∈ N.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of analytic functions
The result is valid for Stein manifolds U.
The equivalence (a)⇔(b)⇔(c) is true for arbitrary open connected U ⊆ Cd .
If U is hyperbolic, the conditions of the theorem are equivalent to the fact that all the orbits of ϕ are compact.
If U is complete hyperbolic, the conditions of the theorem are equivalent to the fact that there is a compact orbit of ϕ.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of analytic functions
Theorem Let U be a connected open subset of C and let ϕ : U → U be a holomorphic self-map. If Cϕ is power bounded, then either ϕ is an automorphism of U or all orbits of ϕ tends to a constant u ∈ U such that u is a fixed point of ϕ.
If additionally U = D, then in the automorphism case ϕ has also a fixed point u and −1 ϕ = ϕu ◦ rθ ◦ ϕu, θ ∈ [0, 2), where u − z ϕ (z) := , r (z) = eiθπz u 1 − uz¯ θ
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Theorem continued Moreover,
(i) If ϕ is not an automorphism then the projection P associated to Cϕ is given: P(f )(z) = f (u).
p (ii) If ϕ is an automorphism and θ = q is rational then 1 Pq−1 −1 P(f )(z) = f (ϕu (r jp (ϕu(z)))). q j=0 q
(iii) If ϕ is an automorphism and θ is irrational then 1 R 2 −1 P(f )(z) = 2 0 f (ϕu (rθ(ϕu(z))))dθ.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Ω ⊆ Rd open connected set. The space of real analytic functions A (Ω) is equipped with the unique locally convex topology such that for any U ⊆ Cd open, Rd ∩ U = Ω, the restriction map R : H(U) −→ A (Ω) is continuous and for any compact set K ⊆ Ω the restriction map r : A (Ω) −→ H(K) is continuous. In fact,
(Ω) = proj H(K ) = proj ind H∞(U ). A N∈N N N∈N n∈N N,n
A (Ω) is complete, separable, barrelled and Montel.
Doma´nski,Vogt, 2000. The space A (Ω) has no Schauder basis.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Theorem Let ϕ :Ω → Ω, Ω ⊆ Rd open connected, be a real analytic map. Then the following assertions are equivalent:
(a) Cϕ : A (Ω) → A (Ω) is power bounded;
(b) Cϕ : A (Ω) → A (Ω) is uniformly mean ergodic;
(c) Cϕ : A (Ω) → A (Ω) is mean ergodic; (d) ∀ K b Ω ∃ L b Ω ∀ U complex neighbourhood of L ∃ V complex neighbourhood of K:
n n ∀ n ∈ N ϕ is defined on V and ϕ (V ) ⊆ U; (e) For every complex neighbourhood U of Ω there is a complex (open!) neighbourhood V ⊆ U of Ω such that ϕ extends as a holomorphic function to V and ϕ(V ) ⊆ V .
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Corollary Let ϕ :Ω → Ω be a real analytic map, Ω ⊆ Rd open connected set.
If Cϕ : A (Ω) → A (Ω) is power bounded, then for every complex neighbourhood U of Ω there is a complex neighbourhood V ⊆ U of Ω and there is a fundamental system of compact sets (Lj ) in V such that ϕ(Lj ) ⊆ Lj .
In particular, ϕ(V ) ⊆ V and Cϕ : H(V ) → H(V ) is power bounded and (uniformly) mean ergodic.
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Corollary Let Ω be a real analytic connected manifold and let ϕ :Ω → Ω be a real analytic map. If Cϕ is hypercyclic, then (1) ϕ is injective, its derivative ϕ0(z) at arbitrary point z ∈ Ω is never a singular linear map and ϕ runs away, i.e., for every compact set K ⊆ Ω there is n ∈ N such that ϕn(K) ∩ K = ∅. (2) There is a complex neighbourhood U of Ω such that for every complex neighbourhood V ⊆ U of Ω the map ϕ does not extend as a holomorphic self map on V .
Jos´eBonet Dynamics of composition operators Composition operators on spaces of real analytic functions
Example (Why does the complex case not solve the real analytic case?): Even if ϕ :] − 1, 1[→] − 1, 1[ maps all bounded sets in ] − 1, 1[ in one compact set it does not follow that Cϕ : A (] − 1, 1[) → A (] − 1, 1[) is power bounded.
2 1 − iz ϕ (z) := ln . α α · π 1 + iz