Chapter 10: The

Matthew Macauley

Department of Mathematical Sciences Clemson University http://www.math.clemson.edu/~macaule/

Math 4120, Summer I 2014

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 1 / 24 Overview This chapter about one question:

What groups are there?

In Chapter 5, we saw five families of groups: cyclic, dihedral, abelian, symmetric, alternating.

In Chapter 8, we classified all (finitely generated) abelian groups.

But what other groups are there, and what do they look like? For example, for a fixed |G|, we may ask the following questions about G:

1. How big are its ? 2. How are those subgroups related? 3. How many subgroups are there? 4. Are any of them normal?

There is no one general method to answer this for any given order.

However, the Sylow Theorems, developed by Norwegian mathematician Peter Sylow (1832–1918), are powerful tools that help us attack this question.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 2 / 24 The Sylow Theorems Definition A p-group is a group whose order is a power of a prime p. A p-group that is a of a group G is a p-subgroup of G.

Notational convention n n Throughout, G will be a group of order |G| = p · m, with p - m. That is, p is the highest power of p dividing |G|.

There are three Sylow theorems, and loosely speaking, they describe the following about a group’s p-subgroups:

1. Existence: In every group, p-subgroups of all possible sizes exist. 2. Relationship: All maximal p-subgroups are conjugate. 3. Number: There are strong restrictions on the number of p-subgroups a group can have.

Together, these place strong restrictions on the structure of a group G with a fixed order.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 3 / 24 Our unknown group of order 200 Throughout this chapter, we will have a running example, a “mystery group” M of order 200.

|M|=200 ? ? ? ? ? e ? ? • ? ? ? ? ?

Using only the fact that |M| = 200, we will unconver as much about the structure of M as we can.

We actually already know a little bit. Recall Cauchy’s theorem:

Cauchy’s theorem If p is a prime number dividing |G|, then G has an element g of order p.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 4 / 24 Our mystery group of order 200

Since our mystery group M has order |M| = 23 · 52 = 200, Cauchy’s theorem tells us that:

M has an element a of order2; M has an element b of order5;

Also, by Lagrange’s theorem, hai ∩ hbi = {e}.

|M|=200 ? ? ? b ? • 2 |b| = 5 |a| = 2 •b e ? ? a• •

• 3 • b ? 4 ? b ? ?

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 5 / 24 p-groups

Before we introduce the Sylow theorems, we need to better understand p-groups.

n Recall that a p-group is any group of order p . For example, C1, C4, V4, D4 and Q4 are all 2-groups.

p-group Lemma If a p-group G acts on a set S via φ: G → Perm(S), then

| Fix(φ)| ≡p |S| .

Proof (sketch)

Fix(φ) non-fixed points all in size-pk orbits Suppose |G| = pn. p elts pi elts p6 elts · · By the Orbit-Stabilizer theorem, the · · · · only possible orbit sizes are 3 2 n p elts p elts 1, p, p ,..., p . · · ·

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 6 / 24 p-groups Normalizer lemma, Part 1 If H is a p-subgroup of G, then

[NG (H): H] ≡p [G : H] .

Proof Let S = G/H = {Hx | x ∈ G}. The group H acts on S by right-multiplication, via φ: H → Perm(S), where

φ(h) = the permutation sending each Hx to Hxh.

The fixed points of φ are the cosets Hx in the normalizer NG (H):

Hxh = Hx, ∀h ∈ H ⇐⇒ Hxhx −1 = H, ∀h ∈ H ⇐⇒ xhx −1 ∈ H, ∀h ∈ H ⇐⇒ x ∈ NG (H) .

Therefore, | Fix(φ)| = [NG (H): H], and |S| = [G : H]. By our p-group Lemma,

| Fix(φ)| ≡p |S| =⇒ [NG (H): H] ≡p [G : H] . 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 7 / 24 p-groups Here is a picture of the action of the p-subgroup H on the set S = G/H, from the proof of the Normalizer Lemma.

S = G/H = set of right cosets of H in G

NG (H) Hg1

Hg4

Hg Hg H 3 2 Hg6 Hg5 Hg7 Ha1 Hg1 Hg8

Hg14 Hg9 Ha2

Hg13 Hg10 Ha3 Hg12 Hg11

The fixed points are precisely Orbits of size > 1 are of various sizes the cosets in NG (H) dividing |H|, but all lie outside NG (H)

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 8 / 24 p-subgroups The following result will be useful in proving the first Sylow theorem.

The Normalizer lemma, Part 2 n i n Suppose |G| = p m, and H ≤ G with |H| = p < p . Then H NG (H), and the index [NG (H): H] is a multiple of p.

[G : H] cosets of H (a multiple of p)

Hy2 ... H NG (H) ≤ G H Hx2 Hxk Hy1 Hy3 . .

[NG (H): H] > 1 cosets of H (a multiple of p) Conclusions:

H = NG (H) is impossible! i+1 p divides |NG (H)|.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 9 / 24 Proof of the normalizer lemma

The Normalizer lemma, Part 2 n i n Suppose |G| = p m, and H ≤ G with |H| = p < p . Then H NG (H), and the index [NG (H): H] is a multiple of p.

Proof

Since H C NG (H), we can create the quotient map

q : NG (H) −→ NG (H)/H , q : g 7−→ gH .

The size of the is [NG (H): H], the number of cosets of H in NG (H).

By The Normalizer lemma Part 1, [NG (H): H] ≡p [G : H]. By Lagrange’s theorem, |G| pnm [N (H): H] ≡ [G : H] = = = pn−i m ≡ 0 . G p |H| pi p

Therefore, [NG (H): H] is a multiple of p, so NG (H) must be strictly larger than H. 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 10 / 24 The 1st Sylow Theorem: Existence of p-subgroups

First Sylow Theorem G has a subgroup of order pk , for each pk dividing |G|. Also, every p-subgroup with fewer than pn elements sits inside one of the larger p-subgroups.

The First Sylow Theorem is in a sense, a generalization of Cauchy’s theorem. Here is a comparison:

Cauchy’s Theorem First Sylow Theorem If p divides |G|, then ... If pk divides |G|, then ... There is a subgroup of order p There is a subgroup of order pk which is cyclic and has no non-trivial proper subgroups. which has subgroups of order 1, p, p2 ... pk . G contains an element of order p G might not contain an element of order pk .

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 11 / 24 The 1st Sylow Theorem: Existence of p-subgroups Proof The trivial subgroup {e} has order p0 = 1.

Big idea: Suppose we’re given a subgroup H < G of order pi < pn. We will construct a subgroup H0 of order pi+1.

By the normalizer lemma, H NG (H), and the order of the quotient group NG (H)/H is a multiple of p.

By Cauchy’s Theorem, NG (H)/H contains an element (a coset!) of order p. Call this element aH. Note that haHi is cyclic of order p.

Claim: The preimage of haHi under the quotient q : NG (H) → NG (H)/H is the subgroup H0 we seek.

The preimages q−1(H), q−1(aH), q−1(a2H), . . . , q−1(ap−1H) are all distinct cosets i of H in NG (H), each of size p .

0 −1 i+1 Thus, the preimage H = q (haHi) contains p · |H| = p elements. 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 12 / 24 The 1st Sylow Theorem: Existence of p-subgroups

Here is a picture of how we found the group H0 = q−1(haHi). q

NG (H) NG (H) H H • • • aH H H0 • aH • ·· haHi a3H a2H a3H a2H · • • q−1

• g1 • g3 g1H g3H · · · · • g2 • g4 · g2H g4H ·

p−1 0 [ k Since |H| = pi , the subgroup H = a H contains p · |H| = pi+1 elements. k=0

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 13 / 24 Our unknown group of order 200 We now know a little bit more about the structure of our mystery group of order |M| = 23 · 52:

3 M has a 2-subgroup P2 of order2 = 8; 2 M has a 5-subgroup P5 of order 25 = 5 ; Each of these subgroups contains a nested chain of p-subgroups, down to the trivial group, {e}.

|M|=200 ? ? b 8 • b2 |b| = 5 4 • |a| = 2 e a• • 25

• 3 • b ? b4 ? ?

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 14 / 24 The 2nd Sylow Theorem: Relationship among p-subgroups

Definition n n A subgroup H < G of order p , where |G| = p · m with p - m is called a Sylow p-subgroup of G. Let Sylp(G) denote the set of Sylow p-subgroups of G.

Second Sylow Theorem Any two Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate (and hence isomorphic).

Proof Let H < G be any Sylow p-subgroup of G, and let S = G/H = {gH | g ∈ G}, the set of right cosets of H.

Pick any other Sylow p-subgroup K of G. (If there is none, the result is trivial.)

The group K acts on S by right-multiplication, via φ: K → Perm(S), where

φ(k) = the permutation sending each Hg to Hgk.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 15 / 24 The 2nd Sylow Theorem: All Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate

Proof A fixed point of φ is a coset Hg ∈ S such that

Hgk = Hg , ∀k ∈ K ⇐⇒ Hgkg −1 = H , ∀k ∈ K ⇐⇒ gkg −1 ∈ H , ∀k ∈ K ⇐⇒ gKg −1 ⊂ H ⇐⇒ gKg −1 = H .

Thus, if φ has a fixed point gH, then H and K are conjugate by g, and we’re done!

All we need to do is show that | Fix(φ)| 6≡p 0.

By the p-group Lemma, | Fix(φ)| ≡p |S|. Recall that |S| = [G, H].

Since H is a Sylow p-subgroup, |H| = pn. By Lagrange’s Theorem,

|G| pnm |S| = [G : H] = = = m, p m . |H| pn -

Therefore, | Fix(φ)| ≡p m 6≡p 0. 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 16 / 24 Our unknown group of order 200 We now know even more about the structure of our mystery group M, of order |M| = 23 · 52:

If M has any other Sylow 2-subgroup, it is isomorphic to P2;

If M has any other Sylow 5-subgroup, it is isomorphic to P5.

|M|=200 ? ?

8 4 |a| = 2 b • • a •b2 |b| = 5 If any other Sylow 2-subgroup exists, 25 it is isomorphic to •e the first • • 3 • b 4 b ?

?

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 17 / 24 The 3rd Sylow Theorem: Number of p-subgroups Third Sylow Theorem

Let np be the number of Sylow p-subgroups of G. Then

np divides |G| and np ≡p 1 .

n (Note that together, these imply that np | m, where |G| = p · m.)

Proof

The group G acts on S = Sylp(G) by conjugation, via φ: G → Perm(S), where

φ(g) = the permutation sending each H to g −1Hg.

By the Second Sylow Theorem, all Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate! Thus there is only one orbit, Orb(H), of size np = |S|.

By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem,

| Orb(H)| ·| Stab(H)| = |G| =⇒ np divides |G| . | {z } =np

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 18 / 24 The 3rd Sylow Theorem: Number of p-subgroups

Proof (cont.)

Now, pick any H ∈ Sylp(G) = S. The group H acts on S by conjugation, via θ : H → Perm(S), where

θ(h) = the permutation sending each K to h−1Kh.

Let K ∈ Fix(θ). Then K ≤ G is a Sylow p-subgroup satisfying

−1 h Kh = K , ∀h ∈ H ⇐⇒ H ≤ NG (K) ≤ G .

We know that:

H and K are Sylow p-subgroups of G, but also of NG (K).

Thus, H and K are conjugate in NG (K). (2nd Sylow Thm.)

K C NG (K), thus the only conjugate of K in NG (K) is itself. Thus, K = H. That is, Fix(θ) = {H} contains only 1 element.

By the p-group Lemma, np := |S| ≡p | Fix(θ)| = 1. 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 19 / 24 Summary of the proofs of the Sylow Theorems

For the 1st Sylow Theorem, we started with H = {e}, and inductively created larger subgroups of size p, p2,..., pn.

For the 2nd and 3rd Sylow Theorems, we used a clever group action and then applied one or both of the following:

(i) Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem. If G acts on S, then | Orb(s)|·| Stab(s)| = |G|.

(ii) p-group Lemma. If a p-group acts on S, then |S| ≡p | Fix(φ)|.

To summarize, we used:

S2 The action of K ∈ Sylp(G) on S = G/H by right multiplication for some other H ∈ Sylp(G).

S3a The action of G on S = Sylp(G), by conjugation.

S3b The action of H ∈ Sylp(G) on S = Sylp(G), by conjugation.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 20 / 24 Our unknown group of order 200 We now know a little bit more about the structure of our mystery group M, of order |M| = 23 · 52 = 200:

n5 | 8, thus n5 ∈ {1, 2, 4, 8}. But n5 ≡5 1, so n5 = 1.

n2 | 25 and is odd. Thus n2 ∈ {1, 5, 25}.

We conclude that M has a unique (and hence normal) Sylow 5-subgroup P5 (of order5 2 = 25), and either 1, 5, or 25 Sylow 2-subgroups (of order2 3 = 8).

The only Sylow |M|=200 5-subgroup is normal ?

b 8 • b2 |b| = 5 4 • |a| = 2 e a• • 25

• 3 • b ? b4 There may be other Sylow 2-subgroups ?

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 21 / 24 Our unknown group of order 200

The only Sylow |M|=200 5-subgroup is normal ?

b 8 • b2 |b| = 5 4 • |a| = 2 e a• • 25

• 3 • b ? b4 There may be other Sylow 2-subgroups ?

Suppose M has a subgroup isomorphic to D4.

This would be a Sylow 2-subgroup. Since all of them are conjugate, M cannot contain a subgroup isomorphic to Q4, C4 × C2, or C8!

In particular, M cannot even contain an element of order 8. (Why?)

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 22 / 24 Simple groups

Definition A group G is simple if its only normal subgroups are G and hei.

Since all Sylow p-subgroups are conjugate, the following result is straightforward:

Proposition (HW) A Sylow p-subgroup is normal in G if and only if it is the unique Sylow p-subgroup (that is, if np = 1).

The Sylow theorems are very useful for establishing statements like:

There are no simple groups of order k (for some k).

To do this, we usually just need to show that np = 1 for some p dividing |G|.

Since we established n5 = 1 for our running example of a group of size |M| = 200, there are no simple groups of order 200.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 23 / 24 Simple groups: an easy example Tip

When trying to show that np = 1, it’s usually more helpful to analyze the largest primes first.

Proposition There are no simple groups of order 84.

Proof Since |G| = 84 = 22 · 3 · 7, the Third Sylow Theorem tells us: 2 n7 divides 2 · 3 = 12 (so n7 ∈ {1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12})

n7 ≡7 1. The only possibility is that n7 = 1, so the Sylow 7-subgroup must be normal. 

Observe why it is beneficial to use the largest prime first: 2 n3 divides 2 · 7 = 28 and n3 ≡3 1. Thus n3 ∈ {1, 2, 4, 7, 14, 28}.

n2 divides 3 · 7 = 21 and n2 ≡2 1. Thus n2 ∈ {1, 3, 7, 21}.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 24 / 24 Simple groups: a harder example

Proposition There are no simple groups of order 351.

Proof Since |G| = 351 = 33 · 13, the Third Sylow Theorem tells us: 3 n13 divides 3 = 27 (so n13 ∈ {1, 3, 9, 27})

n13 ≡13 1.

The only possibilies are n13 = 1 or 27.

A Sylow 13-subgroup P has order 13, and a Sylow 3-subgroup Q has order 33 = 27. Therefore, P ∩ Q = {e}.

Suppose n13 = 27. Every Sylow 13-subgroup contains 12 non-identity elements, and so G must contain 27 · 12 = 324 elements of order 13.

This leaves 351 − 324 = 27 elements in G not of order 13. Thus, G contains only one Sylow 3-subgroup (i.e., n3 = 1) and so G cannot be simple. 

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 25 / 24 Simple groups: the hardest example Proposition If H G and |G| does not divide [G : H]!, then G cannot be simple.

Proof Let G act on the right cosets of H (i.e., S = G/H) by right-multiplication:

φ: G −→ Perm(S) =∼ Sn , φ(g) = the permutation that sends each Hx to Hxg.

Recall that the of φ is the intersection of all conjugate subgroups of H:

\ −1 Ker φ = x Hx. x∈G

Notice that hei ≤ Ker φ ≤ H G, and Ker φ C G.

If Ker φ = hei then φ: G ,→ Sn is an embedding. But this is impossible because |G| does not divide |Sn| = [G : H]!. 

Corollary There are no simple groups of order 24.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 26 / 24 Theorem (classification of finite simple groups) Every finite is isomorphic to one of the following groups:

A Zp, with p prime;

An An, with n ≥ 5; A Lie-type Chevalley group: PSL(n, q), PSU(n, q), PsP(2n, p), and PΩ(n, q);

A Lie-type group (twisted Chevalley group or the Tits group): D4(q), E6(q), 2 n 0 2 n 2 n E7(q), E8(q), F4(q), F4(2 ) , G2(q), G2(3 ), B(2 ); One of 26 exceptional “sporadic groups.”

The two largest sporadic groups are the: “baby monster group” B, which has order

|B| = 241 · 313 · 56 · 72 · 11 · 13 · 17 · 19 · 23 · 31 · 47 ≈ 4.15 × 1033;

“monster group” M, which has order

|M| = 246 · 320 · 59 · 76 · 112 · 133 · 17 · 19 · 23 · 29 · 31 · 41 · 47 · 59 · 71 ≈ 8.08 × 1053.

The proof of this classification theorem is spread across ≈ 15,000 pages in ≈ 500 journal articles by over 100 authors, published between 1955 and 2004.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 27 / 24 by Ivan Andrus, 2012

The Periodic Table Of Finite Simple Groups

0, C1, Z1 1 Dynkin Diagrams of Simple Lie Algebras C2 1 An F4 1 2 3 n 1 1 2 i 3 4 2

Dn 2 A1(4), A1(5) A2(2) 3 4 n A3(4) G2(2)0 2 2 2 A A (7) Bn G2 B (3) C (3) D (2) D (2 ) A (9) C 5 1 1 h 2 3 n 2 1 i 2 2 3 4 4 2 3 4

60 168 25 920 4 585 351 680 174 182 400 197 406 720 6 048 3

2 Cn E6,7,8 A1(9), B2(2)0 G2(3)0 1 i 2 3 n 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 2 2 2 A6 A1(8) B2(4) C3(5) D4(3) D4(3 ) A2(16) C5 228 501 360 504 979 200 000 000 000 4 952 179 814 400 10 151 968 619 520 62 400 5

Tits∗ 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 2 A7 A1(11) E6(2) E7(2) E8(2) F4(2) G2(3) D4(2 ) E6(2 ) B2(2 ) F4(2)0 G2(3 ) B3(2) C4(3) D5(2) D5(2 ) A2(25) C7

7 997 476 042 214 841 575 522 337 804 753 143 634 806 261 3 311 126 76 532 479 683 65 784 756 075 799 759 100 487 388 190 614 085 595 079 991 692 242 2 520 660 005 575 270 400 262 680 802 918 400 467 651 576 160 959 909 068 800 000 603 366 400 4 245 696 211 341 312 774 853 939 200 29 120 17 971 200 10 073 444 472 1 451 520 654 489 600 23 499 295 948 800 25 015 379 558 400 126 000 7

A3(2) 3 3 2 2 2 5 2 3 2 5 2 2 2 A8 A1(13) E6(3) E7(3) E8(3) F4(3) G2(4) D4(3 ) E6(3 ) B2(2 ) F4(2 ) G2(3 ) B2(5) C3(7) D4(5) D4(4 ) A3(9) C11

1 271 375 236 818 136 742 240 18 830 052 912 953 932 311 099 032 439 5 734 420 792 816 264 905 352 699 49 825 657 273 457 218 8 911 539 000 67 536 471 7 257 703 347 541 463 210 479 751 139 021 644 554 379 972 660 332 140 886 784 940 152 038 522 14 636 855 916 969 695 633 449 391 826 616 580 150 109 878 711 243 20 160 1 092 028 258 395 214 643 200 203 770 766 254 617 395 200 949 982 163 694 448 626 420 940 800 000 671 844 761 600 251 596 800 20 560 831 566 912 965 120 680 532 377 600 32 537 600 586 176 614 400 439 340 552 4 680 000 604 953 600 000 000 000 195 648 000 3 265 920 11

3 3 2 2 2 7 2 5 2 7 2 2 2 A9 A1(17) E6(4) E7(4) E8(4) F4(4) G2(5) D4(4 ) E6(4 ) B2(2 ) F4(2 ) G2(3 ) B2(7) C3(9) D5(3) D4(5 ) A2(64) C13

85 528 710 781 342 640 191 797 292 142 671 717 754 639 757 897 85 696 576 147 617 709 1 318 633 155 111 131 458 114 940 385 379 597 233 512 906 421 357 507 604 216 557 533 558 67 802 350 239 189 910 264 54 025 731 402 1 289 512 799 17 880 203 250 103 833 619 055 142 287 598 236 977 154 127 870 984 484 770 19 009 825 523 840 945 485 896 772 387 584 799 591 447 702 161 477 884 941 280 664 199 527 155 056 345 340 348 298 409 697 395 609 822 849 181 440 2 448 765 466 746 880 000 307 251 745 263 504 588 800 000 000 492 217 656 441 474 908 160 000 000 000 451 297 669 120 000 5 859 000 000 642 790 400 983 695 360 000 000 34 093 383 680 609 782 722 560 000 352 349 332 632 138 297 600 499 584 000 941 305 139 200 000 000 000 5 515 776 13

PSLn+1(q), Ln+1(q) O2n+1(q), Ω2n+1(q) + Z PSp2n(q) O2n(q) O2−n(q) PSUn+1(q) p 3 3 2 2 2 ( 2n+1) 2 ( 2n+1) 2 2n+1 2 2 2 2 C An An(q) E6(q) E7(q) E8(q) F4(q) G2(q) D4(q ) E6(q ) B2 2 F4 2 G2(3 ) Bn(q) Cn(q) Dn(q) Dn(q ) An(q ) p

36 12 9 8 63 9 120 30 24 36 12 9 8 2 2 q (q 1)(q 1)(q 1) q 2i q (q 1)(q 1) q (q 1)(q + 1)(q 1) n n n n ( ) n 1 n(n+1)/2 n 12 6 4 qn n 1 (qn 1) n(n 1) n n 1 n(n+1)/2 n+1 n! q + 6 − 5 − 2 − ∏ (q 1) 20 −18 −14 24 12 8 12 8 4 6 − 5 2 − q 2i q 2i − − 2i q − (q +1) − q (qi 1 1) (q 1)(q 1)(q 1) (2, q 1) − (q 1)(q 1)(q 1) q (q 1)(q 1) q (q + q + 1) (q 1)(q + 1)(q 1) q (q + 1)(q 1) (q 1) (q 1) − (q 1) (q2i 1) (qi ( 1)i) ∏ − − − − i=1 12− 8 − 2 − 6 − 2 − 6 6 2 6 2 − − 2 2 3 − 3 3 ∏ ∏ ( n ) ∏ n ∏ ∏ (n+1,q 1) = − (3, q 1) i=2,8 (q 1)(q 1)(q 1) (q 1)(q 1) q (q 1)(q 1) (q 1)(q 1) (3, q + 1) q (q + 1)(q 1) (q + 1)(q 1) q (q + 1)(q 1) (2, q 1) = − (2, q 1) = − 4,q 1 = − (4,q +1) = − (n+1,q+1) = − − p 2 − i 1 − 6 − − − − − − − − − − − − − i 1 − i 1 − i 1 i 1 i 2

Alternating Groups Classical Chevalley Groups Alternates† J(1), J(11) HJ HJM F7, HHM, HTH Chevalley Groups Classical Steinberg Groups Symbol M11 M12 M22 M23 M24 J1 J2 J3 J4 HS McL He Ru Steinberg Groups 86 775 571 046 Suzuki Groups Order‡ 7 920 95 040 443 520 10 200 960 244 823 040 175 560 604 800 50 232 960 077 562 880 44 352 000 898 128 000 4 030 387 200 145 926 144 000 Ree Groups and Tits Group∗ Sporadic Groups Cyclic Groups †For sporadic groups and families, alternate names in the upper left are other names by which they may be known. For specific non-sporadic groups 2 ∗The Tits group F4(2)0 is not a , these are used to indicate isomorphims. All such 2 ( ) but is the (index 2) subgroup of F4 2 . isomorphisms appear on the table except the fam- 3 2 1 It is usually given honorary Lie type status. m m Sz O’NS, O–S F5, D LyS F3, E M(22) M(23) F3+, M(24)0 F2 F1, M1 ily Bn(2 ) ∼= Cn(2 ). · · · Suz O’N Co3 Co2 Co1 HN Ly Th Fi22 Fi23 Fi0 B M The groups starting on the second row are the clas- ‡Finite simple groups are determined by their order 24 sical groups. The sporadic suzuki group is unrelated with the following exceptions: 4 157 776 806 273 030 51 765 179 90 745 943 4 089 470 473 1 255 205 709 190 808 017 424 794 512 875 to the families of Suzuki groups. Bn(q) and Cn(q) for q odd, n > 2; 4 154 781 481 226 426 886 459 904 961 710 757 448 345 497 600 460 815 505 920 495 766 656 000 42 305 421 312 000 543 360 000 912 000 000 004 000 000 887 872 000 64 561 751 654 400 293 004 800 661 721 292 800 191 177 580 544 000 000 005 754 368 000 000 000 A8 ∼= A3(2) and A2(4) of order 20160. Copyright c 2012 Ivan Andrus.

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 28 / 24 Finite Simple Group (of Order Two), by The Klein FourTM

M. Macauley (Clemson) Chapter 10: The Sylow Theorems Math 4120, Summer I 2014 29 / 24