DOCSLIB.ORG

Deconstructing the Electron Clock David Hestenes Arizona State University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deconstructing the Electron Clock David Hestenes Arizona State University Waves versus Particles: Deconstructing the electron clock David Hestenes Arizona State University • • AGACSE 2018 Remembering Waldyr Rodrigues Jr. First encounter, Gent: 1988 A colleague’s greatest honor! They studied my papers! Waldr Rodrigues, Jr. Erasmo Recami Jaimie Vaz Giovanni Salesi W. Rodrigues, J. Vaz, E. Recami and G. Salesi. About zitterbewegung and electron structure. Physics Letters B, 318: 623 - 628, 1993. Belated recognition ~ 2005: Zitter iy versus yi phase As leader of the Physics Institute of Campinas State University (UNICAMP) Waldr brought physics at Campinas to the international stage by organizing conferences AGACSE 2018 as editor of Advances in Applied Clifford Algebras The Great Debate on the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics is centered on meaning of the wave function y and y*y as probability density for particle states (Born Rule) Two major schools: • The Copenhagen school (Bohr, Heisenberg, Pauli, . ) y provides a complete description of a physical state. Probability is frequency expressing an inherent randomness in nature. • The realist school (Einstein, de Broglie, Bohm, Jaynes, . ) y provides an incomplete description of a physical state –– only a statistical ensemble of similarly prepared states. Probability expresses incomplete knowledge about the physical state. [Bohmian enclave: http://www.bohmian-mechanics.net/] The central issue in the debate was famously articulated by EPR • Does QM admit an experimentally accessible substructure: “elements of reality” (Einstein) “hidden variables” (Bell) • Are there snarks lurking in Quantum Mechanics? Louis de Broglie always insisted that “relativity is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics.” Two relativistic pillars of QM: • Planck: energy is quantized in frequency! of fields or particle sources?! • Einstein: mass is energy! particle history de Broglie (1924) applied this to the electron: light Þ deBroglie: mass is frequency! cone Voila! a particle clock: • a plane wave: t = const. Þ Congruence of clocks: Þ ≈ a plane wave of clocks!! de Broglie’s clock was discarded almost immediately when Schrödinger introduced his wave equation. de Broglie himself was marginalized by the international physics community and his clock was all but forgotten, Except by a band of loyal followers, mostly in France. Michel Gouanère’s Snark hunt for de Broglie’s electron clock Gouanère reasoned that if the clock is real, it must be observable. But how could one observe time on a clock with such a high frequency? He found it in the resonant response to crystal periodicity in electron channeling Gouanère submitted his experimental results to Physical Review Letters REJECTED! as physically implausible! January 2007 “I won’t believe the experiment until it is confirmed by Theory!” – Eddington But one reviewer suggested a possible mechanism for the effect: “The Zitterbewegung Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics” Foundations of Physics 20: 1213-1232 (1990). → Google Paris 2007 Brief history of zitterbewegung 1923: de Broglie thesis: e-clock generates wave (Nobel 1929) 1925: Schrödinger reads de Broglie thesis 1926: Schrödinger’s wave equation (no clock) (Nobel 1933) 1928: Dirac equation: relativity implies spin? 1929: Negative energy states have opposite charge (proton?} Dirac smells a Snark! 1931: Dirac predicts the positron! (Nobel 1933) 1932: Anderson stumbles on the positron (Nobel 1936) Are there more Snarks lurking in the Dirac equation? γ 0 SpaceTime Algebra (STA): light matrix cone STA (Real) Dirac Algebra ⎯ ⎯rep⎯ → γ 2 Generated by a frame of vectors: {γ µ } γ1 γ1 γ2 γ 0 2 2 Geometric product: γ 0 = 1, γ k = −1 (k = 1,2, 3) bivector: γ µ γ ν = −γ νγ µ ≡ γ µ ∧ γ ν (µ ≠ ν) observer history Orthogonal vectors anticommute! specifies inertial SpaceTime Split: (Real) Pauli Algebra feame γ γ Spatial vector frame: {σk = k 0 } γ γ γ γ Unit pseudoscalar: i = σ1σ 2σ 3 = 0 1 2 3 i Many roots of minus one! Which root occurs in QM? Lorentz rotations without matrices or coordinates Rotation of a frame: γ → e = Rγ R = aηγ µ µ µ µ η η η η Matrix representation: aµ = γ ⋅eµ = γ Rγ µ R 1 B 1 B 2 − 2 Rotor R defined by: RR = 1 Ri = iR or: R = e R = e e ⋅e = Rγ RRγ R = Rγ γ R = γ ⋅γ Orthogonality: µ ν µ ν µ ν µ ν SpaceTime Split: R = LU γ e0 e = Rγ R = Lγ L = L2γ 0 Boost: 0 0 0 0 1/2 “Pure Lorentz” L = (e0γ 0 ) Spatial rotation: U γ 0U = γ 0 ⇒ ek ≡ Uσk U = Uγ kγ 0U = Uγ kUγ 0 = L ek e0 L Real wave function: Real Quantum Mechanics with STA Real Dirac equation: γ µ (∂ ψ γ γ − qA ψ ) = m ψγ µ 2 1 µ e 0 γ 0 or: ψ ψ ψ γ ∇ i − qA = me 0 geometric imaginary: i ≡ γ 2γ 1 = iσ 3 γ 2 2 2 i = (γ 2γ 1 ) = −1 γ1 γ1 γ2 1 Real wave function: ψ iβ 2 ψ = (ρe ) R = (x) Rotor: R = R(x) RR = 1 degrees of freedom: 1+1 + 6 = 8 Local observables: ψ γ ψ = ρe comoving frame: e = Rγ R µ µ µ µ ψ ψ velocity: v e Rγ R x Dirac current: γ 0 = ρv = 0 = 0 = Particle conservation: ∇ ⋅(ψ γ ψ ) = ∇ ⋅(ρv) = 0 ⇒ congruence of Dirac 0 streamlines: x = x(τ ) Spin: s = e3 = Rγ 3R S = isv = ie3e0 = e2e1 = Rγ 2γ 1R 2 2 2 2 2 Anatomy of the Dirac wave function 1 Dirac: ψ = (ρeiβ )2 R Local Observables γ γ boost v = R 0 R = L 0 L R LUe−iϕ/ SpaceTime split: = S = Rγ γ R = LisL 2 2 1 1 spatial rotation 2 −iϕ/ 1 1 Pauli: ψ P = ρ Ue is = U iσ 3U = i U σ 3U phase 2 2 1 ψ 2 −iϕ/ γ γ Schroedinger: S = ρ e i =iσ 3 = 2 1 Lessons learned from Real Dirac Theory • Complex numbers are inseparably related to spin in Dirac Theory. ⇒ Spin is essential to interpretation of QM even in Schroedinger Theory. • Bilinear observables are geometric consequences of rotational kinematics. ⇒ They are as natural in classical mechanics as in QM. • Spin and phase are inseparable kinematic properties of electron motion. ⇒ Wave function phase is a measure of rotation in the spin plane S = is. Say that again!! Are we looking at a Snark?! The claim is that the unit imaginary in quantum mechanics represents a spacelike bivector: γ γ i =iσ 3 = 2 1 1 1 specifying fermion spin: is = U iσ 3U = i U σ 3U 2 2 This is kind of idea that can ruin a young man’s career! – so preposterous that experts will dismiss it out of hand, usually with a demand for experimental evidence! – so compelling because it is a mathematical fact rather than mere speculation! – One implication is that the Copenhagen interpretation cannot be correct, because it does not explain how Planck’s constant in is related to electron spin! Δ x Δ px ≥ 2 Can the spin bivector be generating zitterbewegung?! To find out, we look at particle paths. Pilot Þ Þ determines ensemble of electron paths Singular Wave (from the Schrödinger current) Solutions slits [Phillipidis, Dewney & Hiley (1979), Nuovo Cimento 52B: 15-28] detector screen initial uniform central probability density maximum particle detection · enables one electron at a time Þ diffraction pattern is not a collective effect retrodiction of path Dirac equation has similar solutions Implications of Real Dirac Theory: the geometry of electron motion with de Broglie’s electron clock in quantum mechanics! Dirac equation determines a congruence of streamlines, each a potential particle history x = x(τ ) with particle velocity x = v(τ ) = Rγ R particle 0 history Spinning frame picture of electron motion 1 Dirac wave function ψ = (ρeiβ )2 R determines v −iϕ/2 Rotor: R = R(τ ) = R[x(τ )] = Ve • e2 e2e1 γ phase ϕ / 2 comoving frame: eµ = R µ R ϕ e1 e = Rγ R = v x0 velocity: 0 0 • e2 e2 e2e1 S e e e1 Spin: = 2 1 e 2 1 e2e1 = Rγ 2γ 1R = R0γ 2γ 1R0 p⋅x 2 − 1ϕ γ γ − γ 2γ 1 m c 1 dϕ R R e 2 2 1 R e e Plane wave solution: = 0 = 0 ω B = = 2 dτ Zitter Solutions of the Dirac equation The conservation law: ∇ i(ρu) = 0 p ≈ mv for the Dirac current: ψ γ 0ψ! = ρRγ 0 R! = ρu u = z 2 2 z = z(τ ) u = z u = z = 0 −r z = z(τ ) − Iϕ R = e V u = v + e2 vτ determines a lightlike helical path with Zitter c λ λ = = =1.93079 ×10-3 Å = C Radius e τ = 0 ω e 2mec 4π z0 If I = V i V! then and R = e− IϕV = Ve−iϕ reduces to a rotating frame solution Electron as singularity in the physical vacuum 1 Electromagnetic vacuum defined by: εµ = = ε µ (Maxwell) c2 0 0 Vacuum impedance undefined: µ / ε = ρ(x) (E. J. Post) Vacuum impedance defined by: ρ = ρ(x) = e−λc /r (Blinder) Point charge path & velocity: z = z τ , v = z! = 1 dz ( ) c dτ 2 Retarded distance: r = (x − z(τ ))⋅v with (x − z(τ )) = 0 2 2 Classical electron radius: λ c = e / m e c fixes scale charge (F. London) λc AC = eρv current charge Vacuum 1/ r ρ = e−λc /r ⎯⎯⎯→0 source: ⎯r⎯→0⎯→∞ r→0 Hole! All consistent with classical Maxwell electrodynamics What flows in solutions of the Dirac equation? ρv = probability current. Born–Dirac Theory eρu = charge current. Maxwell–Dirac Theory Giving the electron a charge requires a particle path u z( ) Blinder density: ρ = e−λc /r = 0 ⎯⎯= ! τ⎯→ path − Iϕ −iθ Solution: R = e Ve Coulomb • • Magnetic e e mecρu = c AC c AM = −∇ i (ρS) Electron vector potential: Ae = AC + AM What is an electron?! “It is a delusion to think of electrons and fields as two physically different, independent entities.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Zig-Zag Road to Reality 1 Introduction
    The zig-zag road to reality Author Colin, S, Wiseman, HM Published 2011 Journal Title Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical DOI https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/34/345304 Copyright Statement © 2011 Institute of Physics Publishing. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. Reproduced in accordance with the copyright policy of the publisher.Please refer to the journal's website for access to the definitive, published version. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/42701 Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au The zig-zag road to reality S Colin1;2;y and H M Wiseman1;z 1 Centre for Quantum Dynamics, Griffith University, Brisbane, QLD 4111, Australia. 2 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline Street North, ON N2L2Y5, Waterloo, Canada. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract In the standard model of particle physics, all fermions are fundamentally massless and only acquire their effective bare mass when the Higgs field condenses. Therefore, in a fundamental de Broglie-Bohm pilot-wave quan- tum field theory (valid before and after the Higgs condensation), position beables should be attributed to massless fermions. In our endeavour to build a pilot-wave theory of massless fermions, which would be relevant for the study of quantum non-equilibrium in the early universe, we are naturally led to Weyl spinors and to particle trajectories which give mean- ing to the `zig-zag' picture of the electron discussed recently by Penrose. We show that a positive-energy massive Dirac electron of given helicity can be thought of as a superposition of positive and negative energy Weyl particles of the same helicity and that a single massive Dirac electron can in principle move luminally at all times.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Remarks About Mass and Zitterbewegung Substructure Of
    Some remarks about mass and Zitterbewegung substructure of electron P. Brovetto†, V. Maxia† and M. Salis†‡ (1) †On leave from Istituto Nazionale di Fisica della Materia - Cagliari, Italy ‡Dipartimento di Fisica - Universit`adi Cagliari, Italy Abstract - It is shown that the electron Zitterbewegung, that is, the high- frequency microscopic oscillatory motion of electron about its centre of mass, originates a spatial distribution of charge. This allows the point-like electron behave like a particle of definite size whose self-energy, that is, energy of its electromagnetic field, owns a finite value. This has implications for the electron mass, which, in principle, might be derived from Zitterbewegung physics. Key words - Elementary particle masses, Zitterbewegung theory. Introduction The nature of mass of elementary particles is one of the most intriguing top- ics in modern physics. Electron deserves a special attention because, differently from quarks which are bound in composite objects (adrons), it is a free parti- cle. Moreover, differently from neutrinos whose vanishingly small mass is still controversial, its mass is a well-known quantity. At the beginning of the past century, the question of the nature of elec- tron mass was debated on the ground of the electromagnetic theory by various authors (Abraham, Lorentz, Poincar´e). Actually, the electron charge e origi- nates in the surrounding space an electromagnetic field −→E, −→H, associated with energy density E2 + H2 /8π and momentum density −→E −→H /4πc. These × densities, when integrated over the space, account for electron self-energy and inertial mass. However, peculiar models must be introduced in order to avoid divergent results.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the LOCALIZED QUANTUM VACUUM FIELD D. Dragoman
    1 THE LOCALIZED QUANTUM VACUUM FIELD D. Dragoman – Univ. Bucharest, Physics Dept., P.O. Box MG-11, 077125 Bucharest, Romania, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT A model for the localized quantum vacuum is proposed in which the zero-point energy of the quantum electromagnetic field originates in energy- and momentum-conserving transitions of material systems from their ground state to an unstable state with negative energy. These transitions are accompanied by emissions and re-absorptions of real photons, which generate a localized quantum vacuum in the neighborhood of material systems. The model could help resolve the cosmological paradox associated to the zero-point energy of electromagnetic fields, while reclaiming quantum effects associated with quantum vacuum such as the Casimir effect and the Lamb shift; it also offers a new insight into the Zitterbewegung of material particles. 2 INTRODUCTION The zero-point energy (ZPE) of the quantum electromagnetic field is at the same time an indispensable concept of quantum field theory and a controversial issue (see [1] for an excellent review of the subject). The need of the ZPE has been recognized from the beginning of quantum theory of radiation, since only the inclusion of this term assures no first-order temperature-independent correction to the average energy of an oscillator in thermal equilibrium with blackbody radiation in the classical limit of high temperatures. A more rigorous introduction of the ZPE stems from the treatment of the electromagnetic radiation as an ensemble of harmonic quantum oscillators. Then, the total energy of the quantum electromagnetic field is given by E = åk,s hwk (nks +1/ 2) , where nks is the number of quantum oscillators (photons) in the (k,s) mode that propagate with wavevector k and frequency wk =| k | c = kc , and are characterized by the polarization index s.
    [Show full text]
  • Zitterbewegung and a Formulation for Quantum Mechanics
    Zitterbewegung and a formulation for quantum mechanics B. G. Sidharth∗ and Abhishek Das† B.M. Birla Science Centre, Adarsh Nagar, Hyderabad - 500 063, India Abstract In this short note, we try to show that inside a vortex like region, like a black hole one cane observe superluminosity which yields some interesting results. Also, we consider the zitterbewegung fluctuations to obtain an interpretation of quantum mechanics. 1 Introduction As is well known, the phenomenon of zitterbewegung has been studied by many eminent authors like Schrodinger [1] and Dirac [2]. Zitterbewegung is a type of rapid fluctuation that is attributed to the interference between positive and negative energy states. Dirac pointed out that the rapidly oscillating terms that arise on account of zitterbewegung is averaged out when we take a measurement remembering that no measurement is instanta- neous. Interestingly, Hestenes [3, 4] too sought to explain quantum mechanics through the phe- nomenon of zitterbewegung. Besides, the authors of this paper have also studied the afore- said phenomenon quite extensively in the past few years [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10]. However, in this paper we shall derive some interesting results that substantiate that the Compton scale and zitterbewegung can delineate several phenomena. 2 Theory arXiv:2002.11463v1 [physics.gen-ph] 8 Feb 2020 Let us consider an object, such as a black hole or some particle, that is spiralling like a vortex. In that case, we know that the circulation is given by 2π~n Γ = vdr = ¼C m ∗Email: [email protected] †Email: [email protected] 1 where, C denotes the contour of the vortex, n is the number of turns and m is the mass of the circulating particle.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics
    FL47CH12-Bush ARI 1 December 2014 20:26 Pilot-Wave Hydrodynamics John W.M. Bush Department of Mathematics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2015. 47:269–92 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on walking drops, Faraday waves, quantum analogs September 10, 2014 The Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics is online at Abstract fluid.annualreviews.org Yves Couder, Emmanuel Fort, and coworkers recently discovered that a This article’s doi: millimetric droplet sustained on the surface of a vibrating fluid bath may 10.1146/annurev-fluid-010814-014506 self-propel through a resonant interaction with its own wave field. This ar- Copyright c 2015 by Annual Reviews. ticle reviews experimental evidence indicating that the walking droplets ex- All rights reserved hibit certain features previously thought to be exclusive to the microscopic, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 2015.47:269-292. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org quantum realm. It then reviews theoretical descriptions of this hydrody- namic pilot-wave system that yield insight into the origins of its quantum- Access provided by Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) on 01/07/15. For personal use only. like behavior. Quantization arises from the dynamic constraint imposed on the droplet by its pilot-wave field, and multimodal statistics appear to be a feature of chaotic pilot-wave dynamics. I attempt to assess the po- tential and limitations of this hydrodynamic system as a quantum analog. This fluid system is compared to quantum pilot-wave theories, shown to be markedly different from Bohmian mechanics and more closely related to de Broglie’s original conception of quantum dynamics, his double-solution theory, and its relatively recent extensions through researchers in stochastic electrodynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Gravitons Be Effectively Massive Due to Their Zitterbewegung Motion? Elias Koorambas
    Can gravitons be effectively massive due to their zitterbewegung motion? Elias Koorambas To cite this version: Elias Koorambas. Can gravitons be effectively massive due to their zitterbewegung motion?. 2014. hal-00990723 HAL Id: hal-00990723 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00990723 Preprint submitted on 14 May 2014 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Can gravitons be effectively massive due to their zitterbewegung motion? E.Koorambas 8A Chatzikosta, 11521 Ampelokipi, Athens, Greece E-mail:[email protected] Submission Date: May 14, 2014 Abstract: Following up on an earlier, De Broglie-Bohm approach within the framework of quantum gauge theory of gravity, and based on the Schrödinger-Dirac equation for gravitons, we argue that gravitons are effectively massive due to their localized circulatory motion. This motion is analogous to the proposed zitterbewegung (ZB) motion of electrons. PACS numbers: 04.60.-m, 11.15.-q, 03.65.Ta Keywords: Quantum Gravity, Gauge Field, Bohm Potential, Zitterbewegung Model 1. Introduction Following, D. Hestenes, the idea that the The ZB of photons is studied via the electron spin and magnetic moment are momentum vector of the electromagnetic generated by a localized circulatory motion of field.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I an Introduction 3Rd Edition (In Preparation)
    W Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations Greiner Greiner Quantum Mechanics Mechanics I An Introduction 3rd Edition (in preparation) Greiner Greiner Quantum Theory Mechanics II Special Chapters (in preparation) (in preparation) Greiner Greiner· Muller Electrodynamics Quantum Mechanics (in preparation) Symmetries 2nd Edition Greiner· Neise . StOcker Greiner Thermodynamics Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Statistical Mechanics Wave Equations Greiner· Reinhardt Field Quantization (in preparation) Greiner . Reinhardt Quantum Electrodynamics 2nd Edition Greiner· Schafer Quantum Chromodynamics Greiner· Maruhn Nuclear Models (in preparation) Greiner· MUller Gauge Theory of Weak Interactions Walter Greiner RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM MECHANICS Wave Equations With a Foreword by D. A. Bromley With 62 Figures, and 89 Worked Examples and Exercises Springer Professor Dr. Walter Greiner Institut fiir Theoretische Physik der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universitat Frankfurt Postfach 111932 D-60054 Frankfurt am Main Germany Street address: Robert-Mayer-Strasse 8-\ 0 D-60325 Frankfurt am Main Germany ISBN 978-3-540-99535-7 ISBN 978-3-642-88082-7 (eBook) DOl 10.1007/978-3-642-88082-7 Title of the original German edition: Theoretische Physik, Band 6: Relativistische Quantenmechanik, 2., iiberarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage 1987 © Verlag Harri Deutsch, Thun 1981 1st Edition 1990 3rd printing 1995 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilm or in any other way, and storage in data banks. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the German Copyright Law of September 9, 1965, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer­ Verlag.
    [Show full text]
  • Zitterbewegung in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics
    Zitterbewegung in relativistic quantum mechanics Alexander J. Silenko∗ Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China, Research Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University, Minsk 220030, Belarus Abstract Zitterbewegung of massive and massless scalar bosons and a massive Proca (spin-1) boson is analyzed. The results previously obtained for a Dirac fermion are considered. The equations describing the evolution of the velocity and position of the scalar boson in the generalized Feshbach- Villars representation and the corresponding equations for the massive Proca particle in the Sakata- Taketani representation are equivalent to each other and to the well-known equations for the Dirac particle. However, Zitterbewegung does not appear in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. Since the position and velocity operators in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation and their transforms to other representations are the quantum-mechanical counterparts of the corresponding classical variables, Zitterbewegung is not observable. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 03.65.Ta Keywords: quantum mechanics; Zitterbewegung ∗ [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION Zitterbewegung belongs to the most important and widely discussed problems of quantum mechanics (QM). It is a well-known effect consisting in a superfast trembling motion of a free particle. This effect has been first described by Schr¨odinger[1] and is also known for a scalar particle [2, 3]. There are plenty of works devoted to Zitterbewegung. In our study, only papers presenting a correct analysis of the observability of this effect are discussed. The correct conclusions about the origin and observability of this effect have been made in Refs.
    [Show full text]
  • Zitterbewegung in Quantum Mechanics of Proca Particles
    XVIII Workshop on High Energy Spin Physics "DSPIN-2019" IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1435 (2020) 012057 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1435/1/012057 Zitterbewegung in quantum mechanics of Proca particles Alexander J. Silenko Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna 141980, Russia Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, China Research Institute for Nuclear Problems, Belarusian State University, Minsk 220030, Belarus E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Zitterbewegung of a massive Proca (spin-1) boson is analyzed. The equations of motion of a massive Proca particle in the Sakata-Taketani representation are equivalent to the corresponding equations for the Dirac particle. However, Zitterbewegung does not appear in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation. Zitterbewegung is not observable because the quantum- mechanical counterparts of the classical position and velocity are the position and velocity operators in the Foldy-Wouthuysen representation and their transforms to other representations. 1. Introduction Zitterbewegung belongs to the most important and widely discussed problems of quantum mechanics (QM). It is a well-known effect consisting in a superfast trembling motion of a free particle. This effect has been first described by Schr¨odinger[1] and is also known for a scalar particle [2, 3]. We present results of the correct analysis of this effect made in Refs. [3, 4, 5] and study Zitterbewegung for a Proca (spin-1) boson. The system of units ~ = 1; c = 1 is used. 2. Previously obtained results The Dirac Hamiltonian for a free particle is given by HD = βm + α · p (1) and the Dirac velocity operator has the form dr v ≡ = i[H ; r] = α: (2) D dt D We use the standard denotations of the Dirac matrices (see, e.g., Ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Temperature High-Frequency Monolayer Graphene Conductivity As a Manifestation of Zitterbewegung
    Low temperature high-frequency monolayer graphene conductivity as a manifestation of Zitterbewegung Natalie E. Firsova and Sergey A. Ktitorov, Ioffe Institute, St. Petersburg 195267, Russia Abstract We consider the Zitterbewegung of Dirac electrons in the monolayer graphene as the non- relativistic analog of the phenomenon predicted by E. Schrödinger for the relativistic electrons in the free space. So we show that the Dirac electrons of monolayer graphene oscillate, i.e. produce fast fluctuation of an electron position around the mean value with rather high frequency but much less than the relativistic electrons in the free space. We also study relation between the Zitterbewegung of the conductivity electrons wave packet formed by the Fermi-Dirac distribution and the low temperature high-frequency complex conductivity of the monolayer graphene. Thus we find that the electromagnetic resonance properties of the monolayer graphene can be simulated by the set of the equivalent oscillatory circuits. This is useful in order to impart illustrativeness to electromagnetic processes that is particularly important for incorporation of graphene into electronic systems. PACS 73.22.Pr, 85.35.-p, 74.25.N- 1. Introduction Unique features of electronic states in graphene attract a permanent attention of theorists. In addition to such distinguished characteristics as colossal electronic mobility and gigantic thermoconductivity it is interesting to investigate the quantum electrodynamics effects based on the mathematical similarity of the relativistic states in the high energy physics and solid state physics. One of such effects is the intriguing Zitterbewegung (ZB) (or trembling motion from German) of the Dirac electrons. Here we will discuss this phenomenon in the monolayer graphene with special emphasis on relation to the low temperature high frequency conductivity problem.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PARTICLE ENIGMA-Restructured
    THE PARTICLE ENIGMA Gerald E. Marsh ABSTRACT The idea that particles are the basic constituents of all matter dates back to ancient times and formed the basis of physical thought well into modern times. The debate about whether light was a wave or a stream of particles also lasted until relatively recently. It was the advent of de Broglie’s work and its implications that revolutionized the concept of an elementary particle—but unfortunately did not banish the idea of a point particle despite its difficulties in both classical and quantum physics. Some of these problems are discussed in this essay, which covers chiral oscillations, Penrose’s “zigzag” picture of particles satisfying the Dirac equation, and some ideas derived from string theory. 1 What is a particle? We all know that the concept of a particle comes from Democritus’ idea of atoms. His conception, and what today we would call Brownian motion, was related by Lucretius to the origin of all motion in his poem On the Nature of Things (50 B.C.E.): Whence Nature all creates, and multiplies And fosters all, and whither she resolves Each in the end when each is overthrown. This ultimate stock we have devised to name Procreant atoms, matter, seeds of things, Or primal bodies, as primal to the world. ! ! ! For thou wilt mark here many a speck, impelled By viewless blows, to change its little course, And beaten backwards to return again, Hither and thither in all directions round. Lo, all their shifting movement is of old, From the primeval atoms; for the same Primordial seeds of things first move of self, And then those bodies built of unions small And nearest, as it were, unto the powers Of the primeval atoms, are stirred up By impulse of those atoms' unseen blows, And these thereafter goad the next in size; Thus motion ascends from the primevals on, And stage by stage emerges to our sense, Until those objects also move which we Can mark in sunbeams, though it not appears What blows do urge them.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending PRL 98, 253005 (2007) 22 JUNE 2007 Dirac Equation and Quantum Relativistic Effects in a Single Trapped Ion L. Lamata,1 J. Leo´n,1 T. Scha¨tz,2 and E. Solano3,4 1Instituto de Matema´ticas y Fı´sica Fundamental, CSIC, Serrano 113-bis, 28006 Madrid, Spain 2Max-Planck-Institut fu¨r Quantenoptik, Hans-Kopfermann-Strasse 1, D-85748 Garching, Germany 3Physics Department, ASC, and CeNS, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universita¨t, Theresienstrasse 37, 80333 Munich, Germany 4Seccio´nFı´sica, Departamento de Ciencias, Pontificia Universidad Cato´lica del Peru´, Apartado Postal 1761, Lima, Peru (Received 27 March 2007; published 22 June 2007) We present a method of simulating the Dirac equation in 3 1 dimensions for a free spin-1=2 particle in a single trapped ion. The Dirac bispinor is represented by four ionic internal states, and position and momentum of the Dirac particle are associated with the respective ionic variables. We show also how to simulate the simplified 1 1 case, requiring the manipulation of only two internal levels and one motional degree of freedom. Moreover, we study relevant quantum-relativistic effects, like the Zitterbewegung and Klein’s paradox, the transition from massless to massive fermions, and the relativistic and nonrelativistic limits, via the tuning of controllable experimental parameters. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.253005 PACS numbers: 31.30.Jv, 03.65.Pm, 32.80.Pj The search for a fully relativistic Schro¨dinger equation of freedom. We study some quantum-relativistic effects, gave rise to the Klein-Gordon and Dirac equations. P.A.
    [Show full text]