<<

PROCEEDINGS of the AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 85, Number 4, August 1982

LOCALISOMETRIES OF COMPACTMETRIC SPACES

ALEKSANDER CALKA

ABSTRACT. By local isometries we mean mappings which locally preserve . A few of the main results are: 1. For each local isometry / of a compact space (M,p) into itself there exists a unique decomposition of M into disjoint open sets, M = Ai g U • • • U Ai>, (0 < n < oo) such that (i) f(M}0) = M!Q,and (ii) f(M{) C M{_x and M< ^ 0 for each i, 1 < i < n. 2. Each local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is a onto itself. 3. Each nonexpansive local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself. 4. Each local isometry of a convex metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself.

1. Introduction. A mapping / of a (M, p) into a metric space (N, 6) is said to be a local isometry if for each z Ç. M there exists a neighborhood U of z such that (1) S(f(x),f(y)) = p(x,y) for all x, y EU. Mappings, as above, satisfying (1) with U = M are called isometries. The present paper concerns local isometries of compact metric spaces into itself. In §3 we collect the necessary information concerning locally nonexpansive - pings. In §4 we prove the main result: For each local isometry / of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself, there exists a unique decomposition of M into dis- joint open sets, M = M* U • • • U M¿, such that (i) f(Mf0) = M¿, (ü) f(M{) C M{_x and M{ ^ 0 for each i, 1 < i < n. Moreover, there is a metric on M, topologically equivalent to p, with respect to which / is a nonexpansive local isometry and maps M^ isometrically onto itself. §5 contains some consequences of the main result. Namely, we prove: Each local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is a homeomorphism onto itself. Each nonexpansive local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself. Each local isometry of a convex metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself. It should be mentioned that open surjective local isometries were studied by Busemann [2] (cf. also [3]), Kirk [6] and Szenthe [10], in the special case where (M, p) is a G-space (Busemann [2] called them "locally isometric mappings"). Busemann [2, (27.14)] proved that every open local isometry of a compact G-space onto itself is an isometry. Thus (5.5) of the present paper generalizes this result to the case of general local isometries of convex metric continua. - Received by the editors January 5, 1981. 1980 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 54H20, 54E40. Key words and phrases. Locally nonexpansive mapping, nonexpansive mapping, local isometry, isometry, decomposition of the space, convex space. © 1982 American Mathematical Society 0002-9939/82/0000-0097/102.25 643

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 644 ALEKSANDER CALKA

2. Some preliminaries. The following definition is introduced: (2.1) Definition. Let pi, i = 0,1, be metrics on a M. We shall say that px is locally identical with po if the identity mapping, id a*, of M is a local isometry of the metric space (M, po) into the metric space (M, pi). We shall say that p\ and Po are locally identical if p¿ is locally identical with pj, for all i,j = 0,1. (2.2) REMARKS. Let p», i = 0,1, be metrics on a set M. If pi and po are locally identical then they are topologically equivalent. If the metric space (M, p0) is compact and p\ is locally identical with po then p\ and p0 are locally identical (and topologically equivalent). If / is a local isometry of (M, pQ) into itself and p\ and po are locally identical then / is a local isometry of (M, pi) into itself. (2.3) Definition. A mapping / of a metric space (M, p) into a metric space (N, 6) is said to be locally nonexpansive if for each z G M there exists a neighbor- hood U of z such that (2) à(f(x),f(y)) 0 such that for all x, y G M, (3) p(x, y) < e implies p(/(x), f(y)) = p(x, y) (respectively, (4) p(x, y)

(2.6) LEMMA. Each isometry of a compact metric space into itself is a surjection.

3. Locally nonexpansive mappings and induced metrics. (3.1) DEFINITION. Let / be a mapping of a metric space (M,p) into itself. Then the pf defined by (f° = idM, fn+1 = / ° /"), pf(x, y) = sup p(fn(x), fn(y)) for all x, y G M, n>0 will be called the induced metric on M. Note. If / is a mapping of a bounded metric space (M, p) into itself then the induced metric p/ is a metric on the set M such that (5) Pf > P,

(6) / is a nonexpansive mapping of the metric space (M, p/) into itself,

(7) pf = p if and only if / is a nonexpansive mapping of ( M, p) into itself.

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use LOCAL ISOMETRIES OF COMPACT METRIC SPACES 645

We have

(3.2) LEMMA. Let f be a locally nonexpansive mapping of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself. Then the induced metric, pf, is a metric on M such that pf and p are locally identical. In particular, p¡ and p are topologically equivalent.

PROOF. Since (M, p) is compact, it is bounded and thus p¡ is a metric on M. Let e > 0 be a number satisfying (4). Thus, by induction, p(fn(x), fn(y)) < p(x, y) for each n > 0 and all x, y G M with p(x, y) < e. Hence, p/(x, y) = p(x, y) for all x, y G M with p(x, y) < e, which shows that p/ is locally identical with p and therefore by (5) (or by (2.2)), pf and p are locally identical. REMARK. It should be noted that, conversely, if / is a mapping of a bounded metric space (M, p) into itself such that the induced metric pf is locally identical with p then / is locally nonexpansive. (3.3) Proposition. Let f be a locally nonexpansive mapping of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself and let pf be the induced metric on M. Then p¡ is a metric on M such that pf and p are locally identical and f is a nonexpansive mapping of (M, pf) into itself, which maps the set f]n>o fn(M) isometrically onto itself.

PROOF. By (3.2) and (6) we need only show that / maps the set nn>o fn(M) isometrically onto itself in the metric pf. However, since the sequence oFcompact sets fn(M), n = 0,1,..., is decreasing, hence / maps the compact set fln>o fn(M) onto itself and our assertion follows from (2.5). We have the following immediate corollaries of (3.3) (cf. also (2.2)):

(3.4) COROLLARY. Let f be a locally nonexpansive mapping of a compact metric space (M, p) onto itself and let pf be the induced metric on M. Then pf is a metric on M such that pf and p are locally identical and f is an isometry of (M, p¡) onto itself. (3.5) COROLLARY. Each locally nonexpansive mapping of a compact metric space onto itself is a homeomorphism and a local isometry. 4. Decomposition theorem. To show the main result we need two lemmas.

(4.1) Lemma. Iff is an injective local isometry of a compact metric space (M,p) into itself, then f is also surjective.

PROOF. Let e > 0 be a number satisfying (3). Since M is compact, / is a homeomorphism onto a compact subset of M, therefore there is a number 6 > 0 such that for all x, y G M, (8) p(f(x), f(y)) < 6 implies p(x, y) < e. Let r = min{5, e} and let pr(x, y) j= min{p(x, y), r} for all x, y G M. Thus pr is a metric on M topologically equivalent to p and it follows from (3) and (8) that / is an isometry of (M, pr) into itself. Our assertion follows now from (2.6).

(4.2) LEMMA. Let f be a local isometry of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself. Then the set B = C\n>o fn(M) is an open and closed subset of M and f(B) = B.

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use 646 ALEKSANDER CALKA

PROOF. By (3.3) (cf. also (2.2)) it is sufficient to prove this in the case where / is a nonexpansive local isometry and maps B isometrically onto itself, which we now assume. For each r > 0, let B(r) = {x£M: p(x, B) < r}. Thus (9) f(B(r))CB(r) forallr>0. Let e > 0 be a number satisfying (3). We assert that / maps B(e/4) injectively into itself. In fact, let x, y G B(e/4) be such that f(x) = f(y). Then p(x, o) < e/4 and p(y,b) < e/4 for some a,b£ B and by our assumption we have p(a,b) = pif{a),f{b)) < p{f{a),f{x)) + p(f(y),f{b)) < p{a, x) + p{y, b) < e/2. Thus pix, y) < p(x, o) + p{a, b) + p(6, y) < e/4 + e/2 + e/4 = e, and by the definition of e, p(x, y) = p(/(x), f(y)) = 0, therefore x = y, as desired. Now, let 0 < r < e/4 and let N be the closure of B(r). Thus 7Y C B(e/4) and by (9), the restriction of / to Af is an injective local isometry of N into itself. Since N is compact, it follows from (4.1) that f(N) = N. Thus for each n > 0, fn(N) = N, therefore N C fl„>o fn(M) = B- Hence, by the definition of N, B(r) = N = B and therefore B is an open and closed subset of M. This completes the proof. (4.3) THEOREM. Let f be a local isometry of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself. Then there exists a unique decomposition of M into disjoint open sets (10) M = Ml U • • • U M n such that (11) f(Ml) = Ml (12) f(M{ ) C M{_x and M{ ^ 0 for each i,l 0, let (13) M{ = {nm^of" \M) if i = 0, 1 \f-l(Mf)'(MDXf-^XMf) iîi = 0. By (4.2) and (13), f(Mf0) = Mf0 and f(M{) C M{_x for each i > 0 and the sets M(, i > 0, are disjoint, open and closed subsets of M. Since M is compact and MI = nm>o /m(A7) i8 open, there exists an integer m > 0 such that M^ = fm(M). Let n = min{m > 0: /m(A7) = MfQ}, then the sets M{, i = 0,... ,n, cover M and if 1 < i < n then M( ^ 0. This proves the existence of the decomposition (10) satisfying (11) and (12). For the uniqueness, it is sufficient to observe that for each decomposition (10), conditions (11) and (12) imply (13). The last statement of the theorem follows from (3.3), hence the proof is complete.

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use LOCAL ISOMETRIES OF COMPACT METRIC SPACES 647

We note the following: (4.4) COROLLARY. Let f be a local isometry of a compact metric space (M, p) into itself. Then the following are equivalent (i) / is injective, (ii) / is surjective, (iii) f is a homeomorphism of M onto itself. Further, if f is a nonexpansive local isometry, those conditions are equivalent to (iv) / is an isometry. PROOF. The proof follows from (4.3), since each of (i)—(iii) is equivalent to M^ = M, while if / is nonexpansive, then by (7), pf = p. 5. Some consequences. For local isometries on continua we obtain (5.1) Theorem. Let f be a local isometry of a metric continuum (M, p) into itself and let pf be the induced metric on M. Then pf is a metric on M such that Pf and p are locally identical and f is an isometry of(M, pf) onto itself. PROOF. The proof follows from (4.3) since, M is connected implies A7¿ = M. We have the following immediate corollaries of (5.1) and (4.4): (5.2) COROLLARY. Each local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is a homeomorphism onto itself. (5.3) COROLLARY. Each nonexpansive local isometry of a metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself. The convexity in the next result is to be understood in the sense of Menger [8] (cf. also [1]). A metric space (M, p) is convex if for each two distinct points x,y G M there exists a point z G M, z^x,y, such that p(x,y) = p(x,z) + p(z,y). The following fact is well known and may be found in [4, §3]: (5.4) LEMMA. Each locally nonexpansive mapping of a convex metric continuum into itself is (globally) nonexpansive. (5.5) THEOREM. Each local isometry of a convex metric continuum into itself is an isometry onto itself. PROOF. The proof follows from (5.3) and (5.4). References

1. L. E. Blumenthal, Theory and applications of geometry, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1953. 2. H. Busemann, The geometry of geodesies, Academic Press, New York, 1955. 3. _, Geometries in which the planes minimize area, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 55 (1961), 171-189. 4. M. Edelstein, An extension ofBanach's contraction principle, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1961), 7-10. 5. H. Freudenthal and W. Hurewicz, Dehnungen, Verkürzungen, Isometrien, Fund. Math. 26 (1936), 120-122. 6. W. A. Kirk, On conditions under which local isometries are motions, Colloq. Math. 22 (1971), 229-232. 7. A. Lindenbaum, Contributions à l'étude de l'espace métrique. I, Fund. Math. 8 (1926), 209-222. 8. K. Menger, Untersuchungen über allgemeine Metric, Math. Ann. 100 (1928), 75-163. 9. W. Nitka, Bemerkungen über nichtisometrische Abbildungen, Colloq. Math. 5 (1957), 28-31. 10. J. Szenthe, Über metrische Räume, deren locaiisometrische Abbildungen Isometrien sind, Acta Math. Acad. Sei. Hungar. 13 (1962), 433-441.

MATHEMATICAL INSTITUTE, WROCLAW UNIVERSITY, 50-384 WROCLAW, POLAND

License or copyright restrictions may apply to redistribution; see https://www.ams.org/journal-terms-of-use