Affimer-Based Impedimetric Biosensors: the New Analytical Platform for Biorecognition Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Affimer-Based Impedimetric Biosensors: the New Analytical Platform for Biorecognition Applications 1 Affimer-based impedimetric biosensors: the new analytical platform for biorecognition applications By Pattanapong Thangsunan Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Biological Sciences June 2018 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. The right of Pattanapong Thangsunan to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. i Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Prof. Paul Millner, for his continuous support that he has given me academically and also guidance for everyday life. I really appreciate his patience, motivation and kindness and I could not have come this far without him. I also would like to thank all the previous and current members in the Millner group, especially Ploy, Asif, Shazana, Jack and Kaniz, for the stimulating academic discussions and pleasant moments as we worked together in the lab. All of them made my times in Leeds unforgettable. Additionally, I would like to thank my co-supervisors, Prof. Michael McPherson and Dr. Darren Tomlinson and the members of the BSTG, especially Anna, Christian and Tom, for their assistance regarding Affimers and important knowledge of molecular biology. I also thank Dr. Lars Jeuken, my assessor, for his guidance in electrochemistry and impedance spectroscopy. My deep appreciation also goes to Dr. James Robinson (at St James’s University Hospital) for his assistance with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and Dr. James Ault and his group for mass spectrometry facility. I gratefully acknowledge the Royal Thai Government and the National Institute of Metrology (Thailand) for the financial support and the opportunity of PhD study. A million thanks go to my lovely friends at the University of Sheffield, particularly Sine and Tee, for being with me during our wonderful and memorable trips around UK and Europe. Special thanks also go to Piyanee for being my buddy when having meals, shopping and sharing our PhD experiences. Last but not the least, for my family, I would like to thank my dad, my mom and my grandma for their immeasurable love and encouragement. Your support always boosts me up and makes me energetic to pursue my dreams. I also thank my ii twin brother, Pan, for always believing in me and lifting my spirits during low points. Throughout my life, you have always been there for me as I will always be there for you as well. As this journey is coming to an end, I cannot wait to start a new journey of my life and hopefully it will be as an awesome experience as I have had here in the UK. Pattanapong Thangsunan June 2018 iii Abstract Thanks to their high sensitivity and specificity, short-processing times, low cost of production, small size, and no requirement for professional users, biosensors have increasingly gained popularity. Electrochemical impedance biosensors have successfully been applied to detect a wide range of target analytes including whole cells, proteins, and small molecules. However, there are some limitations, for example reproducibility and non-specific binding, which still require further development. The main objective of this thesis is to develop impedimetric biosensors using Affimers, novel non-antibody binding proteins, as bioreceptors to detect a small molecule target, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), and a protein biomarker, fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Initial work in this thesis was the selection of Affimers using phage display technology. Affimers were selected from a phage library provided by the BioScreening Technology Group (BSTG) at the University of Leeds. The selected Affimer-encoding sequences were then subcloned into the pET expression vector and expressed in E.coli cells. Prior to using the selected Affimers for biosensor fabrication, specific interaction of the Affimers with their analytes was investigated using ELISA, surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and immunoprecipitation (pull- down) assay. Even though none of the Affimers against DDT succeeded in binding specifically to DDT, some of the Affimers against FGFR3 showed binding to it and were then utilised for biosensor fabrication. Two sensor fabrication methods, the ELISHA “gluing” protocol and NeutrAvidin-biotin linkage, were tested and the latter one was selected for further study. By using the NeutrAvidin-biotin interaction method to functionalise the sensor surfaces, several parameters such as Affimer concentration, NeutrAvidin concentration and blocking agents to minimise non-specific binding were optimised. The fully fabricated Affimer-based biosensors were incubated with the analyte iv (FGFR3) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was employed to interrogate FGFR3 binding. The data showed that the Affimer-based sensors could detect FGFR3 protein to very low levels. However, further optimisation is still needed in order to minimise non-specific binding effects and make the sensors work consistently. The work presented in this thesis is the first Affimer-based impedimetric biosensor for the detection of FGFR3, a promising biomarker for early diagnosis of bladder cancer. This sensor platform may not only provide an effective tool for bladder cancer surveillance, but also pave the way of designing a new analytical method for monitoring other protein biomarkers of disease. v Abbreviations β2M Beta-2-microglobulin BCA Bicinchoninic acid BLI Biolayer interferometry BSA Bovine serum albumin BSTG The BioScreening Technology Group Cdl Double-layer capacitance CEA Carcinoembryonic antigen CPE Constant phase element CV Cyclic voltammetry DDT Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EIS Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy ELISA Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay FGFR3 Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 GFP Green fluorescent protein HRP Horseradish peroxidase HSA Human serum albumin Hz Hertz IgG Immunoglobulin G IPTG Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside ITC Isothermal titration calorimetry KD Dissociation constant koff Dissociation rate constant kon Association rate constant vi LC-MS Liguid chromatography – mass spectrometry PBS Phosphate-buffered saline PBST Phosphate-buffered saline plus 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20 PCR Polymerase chain reaction PEG Polyethylene glycol PMDA Pyromellitic dianhydride Rct Charge transfer resistance Rs Solution resistance SAM Self-assembled monolayer SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis SEM Standard error of the mean SPR Surface plasmon resonance Sulfo-SMCC Sulfosuccinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)cyclohexane-1- carboxylate TCEP Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine hydrochloride TMB 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine W Warburg impedance Z’ Real component of impedance -Z” Imaginary component of impedance vii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................... i Abstract ....................................................................................................... iii Abbreviations ............................................................................................... v Table of Contents....................................................................................... vii List of Figures ............................................................................................. xi List of Tables ............................................................................................. xvi Chapter 1 Introduction ................................................................................ 1 1.1 Overview ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 What is biosensor and how is it important? ................................... 2 1.3 Types of biosensors ..................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Optical biosensors ............................................................... 5 1.3.2 Piezoelectric biosensors ...................................................... 7 1.3.3 Electrochemical biosensors ................................................. 8 1.4 Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) ......................... 12 1.4.1 The brief principle of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy ...................................................................... 12 1.4.2 Fabrication of impedimetric biosensors .............................. 19 1.4.3 Applications of impedimetric biosensors ............................ 34 1.5 Classification of bioreceptors ...................................................... 37 1.5.1 Types of common bioreceptors used for fabricating electrochemical biosensors ................................................ 37 1.5.2 Antibodies and their limitations .......................................... 42 1.5.3 Antibody-derived fragments ............................................... 51 1.5.4 Non-antibody binding proteins ........................................... 54 1.5.5 Affimers ............................................................................. 61 1.6 Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) ......................................
Recommended publications
  • Wo2015188839a2
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 08, 2021 General detection and isolation of specific cells by binding of labeled molecules Pedersen, Henrik; Jakobsen, Søren; Hadrup, Sine Reker; Bentzen, Amalie Kai; Johansen, Kristoffer Haurum Publication date: 2015 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Pedersen, H., Jakobsen, S., Hadrup, S. R., Bentzen, A. K., & Johansen, K. H. (2015). General detection and isolation of specific cells by binding of labeled molecules. (Patent No. WO2015188839). General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2015/188839
    [Show full text]
  • Fig. 1C Combination Therapy of Tumor Targeted ICOS Agonists with T-Cell Bispecific Molecules
    ( (51) International Patent Classification: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every C07K 16/30 (2006.01) A61P 35/00 (2006.01) kind of national protection av ailable) . AE, AG, AL, AM, C07K 16/28 (2006.01) A 6IK 39/00 (2006.01) AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, C07K 16/40 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (21) International Application Number: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, PCT/EP20 18/086046 KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (22) International Filing Date: MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 20 December 2018 (20. 12.2018) OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (25) Filing Language: English TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (26) Publication Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (30) Priority Data: kind of regional protection available) . ARIPO (BW, GH, 17209444.3 2 1 December 2017 (21. 12.2017) EP GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): F. HOFF- TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, MANN-LA ROCHE AG [CH/CH]; Grenzacherstrasse EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, 124, 4070 Basel (CH).
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Screening of Degenerate-Codon-Based Protein Ensembles with M13 Bacteriophage
    Design and Screening of Degenerate-Codon-Based Protein Ensembles with M13 Bacteriophage by Griffin James Clausen B.S. Biomedical Engineering University of Minnesota – Twin Cities, 2012 Submitted to the Department of Biological Engineering in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biological Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2019 © 2019 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author: ____________________________________________________________ Griffin Clausen Department of Biological Engineering January 14, 2019 Certified by: ___________________________________________________________________ Angela Belcher James Mason Crafts Professor of Biological Engineering and Materials Science Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: ___________________________________________________________________ Forest White Professor of Biological Engineering Graduate Program Committee Chair This doctoral thesis has been examined by the following committee: Amy Keating Thesis Committee Chair Professor of Biology and Biological Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology Angela Belcher Thesis Supervisor James Mason Crafts Professor of Biological Engineering and Materials Science Massachusetts Institute of Technology Paul Blainey Core Member, Broad Institute Associate Professor of Biological Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2 Design and Screening of Degenerate-Codon-Based Protein Ensembles with M13 Bacteriophage by Griffin James Clausen Submitted
    [Show full text]
  • Affimer Proteins Inhibit Immune Complex Binding to Fcγriiia with High Specificity Through Competitive and Allosteric Modes of Action
    Affimer proteins inhibit immune complex binding to FcγRIIIa with high specificity through competitive and allosteric modes of action James I. Robinsona,b, Euan W. Baxtera,b,1, Robin L. Owenc,1, Maren Thomsend,1, Darren C. Tomlinsond,e,1, Mark P. Waterhousea,b,1, Stephanie J. Wina,b, Joanne E. Nettleshipf,g, Christian Tiedee, Richard J. Fosterd,h, Raymond J. Owensf,g, Colin W. G. Fishwickd,h, Sarah A. Harrisd,i, Adrian Goldmane,j, Michael J. McPhersond,e,2, and Ann W. Morgana,b,2 aLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds LS9 7TF, United Kingdom; bNational Institute of Health Research-Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds LS7 4SA, United Kingdom; cDiamond Light Source, Didcot OX11 0DE, United Kingdom; dAstbury Centre for Structural and Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; eBioScreening Technology Group, School of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; fOxford Protein Production Facility-United Kingdom Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Oxford OX11 0FA, United Kingdom; gDivision of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre for Genomic Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom; hSchool of Chemistry, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; iSchool of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom; and jFaculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FIN-0014 Helsinki, Finland Edited by Lawrence Steinman, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, and approved November 17, 2017 (received for review May 15, 2017) Protein–protein interactions are essential for the control of cellular domains and chains, poor stability, high production costs, and functions and are critical for regulation of the immune system.
    [Show full text]
  • Affimer Technology Nov 2017
    Non-confidential Technical Introduction to the Affimer® Technology for Therapeutics and Reagents Dr. Alastair Smith Chief Executive, Avacta Group plc Introduction Avacta Group plc AIM: AVCT • 80 staff over two sites: • 1300 m2 of bespoke laboratory, production and logistics space in Wetherby. • 790 m2 of bespoke laboratory space in Cambridge. • Balance sheet to support existing plans. Wetherby • Experienced management team with interests aligned to shareholders. • Strongly supportive shareholder base. Cambridge London Shareholders >5% . IP Group plc 24.8% Lombard Odier 11.4% Aviva 9.6% Baillie Gifford 7.2% Ruffer LLP 7.1% Fidelity 5.9% J O Hambro 5.7% © Avacta Group plc 2 Leadership Team Dr Alastair Smith, CEO Dr Matt Johnson, CTO Mr Tony Gardiner, CFO • Over 10 years experience as a public • Genetics & Microbiology Molecular • Joined Avacta from AHR, an company CEO Biology international architecture practice • Was a leading UK biophysicist - founded • 8 years at Abcam becoming global • Chief Financial Officer of AIM listed Avacta in 2006 Head of R&D Fusion IP plc 2007 – 2011 which was acquired by IP Group plc in 2014 • World class scientific and technical • Joined Avacta in 2014 knowledge with a highly commercial • Joined Avacta in 2016 mindset Dr Philippe Cotrel, CCO Dr Amrik Basran, CSO • Over 20 years’ commercial experience in senior • Over 10 years’ experience of both the biotech and positions in Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Oxford pharma industries Glycosciences, Affymetrix and Abcam • Director of Protein Biosciences at Domantis, Head of • Commercial Director of Abcam since 2008 – grew Topical Delivery (Biopharm) at GSK revenue from £36.7m to £144m over a 7-year period • Joined Avacta in 2013 • Joined Avacta in 2016 © Avacta Group plc 3 Affimer Technology Affimer®: A proprietary protein scaffold with key technical benefits What is an Affimer? Binding Surface • Based on a naturally occurring proteins (cystatins) and engineered to stably display two loops which create a binding surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategies and Challenges for the Next Generation of Therapeutic Antibodies
    FOCUS ON THERAPEUTIC ANTIBODIES PERSPECTIVES ‘validated targets’, either because prior anti- TIMELINE bodies have clearly shown proof of activity in humans (first-generation approved anti- Strategies and challenges for the bodies on the market for clinically validated targets) or because a vast literature exists next generation of therapeutic on the importance of these targets for the disease mechanism in both in vitro and in vivo pharmacological models (experi- antibodies mental validation; although this does not necessarily equate to clinical validation). Alain Beck, Thierry Wurch, Christian Bailly and Nathalie Corvaia Basically, the strategy consists of develop- ing new generations of antibodies specific Abstract | Antibodies and related products are the fastest growing class of for the same antigens but targeting other therapeutic agents. By analysing the regulatory approvals of IgG-based epitopes and/or triggering different mecha- biotherapeutic agents in the past 10 years, we can gain insights into the successful nisms of action (second- or third-generation strategies used by pharmaceutical companies so far to bring innovative drugs to antibodies, as discussed below) or even the market. Many challenges will have to be faced in the next decade to bring specific for the same epitopes but with only one improved property (‘me better’ antibod- more efficient and affordable antibody-based drugs to the clinic. Here, we ies). This validated approach has a high discuss strategies to select the best therapeutic antigen targets, to optimize the probability of success, but there are many structure of IgG antibodies and to design related or new structures with groups working on this class of target pro- additional functions.
    [Show full text]
  • International Patent Classification: KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU
    ( 2 (51) International Patent Classification: DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, A61K 39/42 (2006.01) C07K 16/10 (2006.01) HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, C07K 16/08 (2006.01) KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, (21) International Application Number: OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, PCT/US20 19/033 995 SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, (22) International Filing Date: TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. 24 May 2019 (24.05.2019) (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (25) Filing Language: English kind of regional protection available) . ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, TZ, (26) Publication Language: English UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, TJ, (30) Priority Data: TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, 62/676,045 24 May 2018 (24.05.2018) US EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, SM, (71) Applicant: LANKENAU INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, Cl, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, RESEARCH [US/US]; 100 Lancaster Avenue, Wyn- KM, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/144999 Al 09 August 2018 (09.08.2018) W ! P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/144999 Al 09 August 2018 (09.08.2018) W ! P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Lennart; c/o Orionis Biosciences NV, Rijvisschestraat 120, A61K 38/00 (2006.01) C07K 14/555 (2006.01) Zwijnaarde, B-9052 (BE). TAVERNIER, Jan; c/o Orionis A61K 38/21 (2006.01) C12N 15/09 (2006.01) Biosciences NV, Rijvisschestraat 120, Zwijnaarde, B-9052 C07K 14/52 (2006.01) (BE). (21) International Application Number: (74) Agent: ALTIERI, Stephen, L. et al; Morgan, Lewis & PCT/US2018/016857 Bockius LLP, 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washing ton, D.C. 20004 (US). (22) International Filing Date: 05 February 2018 (05.02.2018) (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (25) Filing Language: English AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (26) Publication Language: English CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, (30) Priority Data: HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, 62/454,992 06 February 2017 (06.02.2017) US KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, (71) Applicants: ORIONIS BIOSCIENCES, INC. [US/US]; MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA 02466 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Affinity Chromatography (AC)
    Affinity Chromatography (AC) 1 Affinity Chromatography (AC) • Principles of AC • Main stages in Chromatography • How to prepare Affinity gel - Ligand Immobilization - Spacer arms – Coupling methods – Coupling tips • Types of AC • Elution Conditions • Binding equilibrium, competitive elution, kinetics • Industrial Examples: Protein A/G for Therapeutic proteins • Future Considerations 2 What is affinity chromatography? Affinity chromatography is a technique of liquid chromatography which separates molecules through biospecific interactions. The molecule to be purified is specifically and reversibly adsorbed to a specific ligand The ligand is immobilized to an insoluble support (“matrix”): resin, “chip”, Elisa plate, membrane, Western, IP (immuneprecipitation), etc Introduction of a “spacer arm” between the ligand and the matrix to improve binding Elution of the bound target molecule a) non specific or b) specific elution method 3 What is it used for? Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies Fusion proteins Enzymes DNA-binding proteins . ANY protein where we have a binding partner!! 4 Designing and preparing an affinity gel Choosing the matrix Designing the ligand - Spacer arms Coupling methods 5 Ligand Immobilization Ligand + Activating agent + Matrix Activated Immobilised matrix ligand 6 Designing the ligand Essential ligand properties: interacts selectively and reversibly with the target Carries groups which can couple it to the matrix without losing its binding activity Available in a pure form 7 Steric considerations & spacer arms Small ligand (<1,000) Risk of steric interference with binding between matrix and target molecule Often need spacer arm but watch out for Spacer arm adsorption to the spacer! 8 Design of spacer arms Alkyl chain Real risk of unspecific interactions between H H spacer and target molecule O O Hydrophilic chain Risk of unspecific interactions greatly O H reduced No coupling reaction will use 100% of the available binding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies
    EURL ECVAM Recommendation on Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies EUR 30185 EN Joint Research Centre This publication is a Science for Policy report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. EURL ECVAM Recommendations The aim of a EURL ECVAM Recommendation is to provide the views of the EU Reference Laboratory for alternatives to animal testing (EURL ECVAM) on the scientific validity of alternative test methods, to advise on possible applications and implications, and to suggest follow-up activities to promote alternative methods and address knowledge gaps. During the development of its Recommendation, EURL ECVAM typically mandates the EURL ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC) to carry out an independent scientific peer review which is communicated as an ESAC Opinion and Working Group report. In addition, EURL ECVAM consults with other Commission services, EURL ECVAM’s advisory body for Preliminary Assessment of Regulatory Relevance (PARERE), the EURL ECVAM Stakeholder Forum (ESTAF) and with partner organisations of the International Collaboration on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). Contact information European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Chemical Safety and Alternative Methods Unit (F3) Address: via E.
    [Show full text]
  • Generation of Novel Intracellular Binding Reagents Based on the Human Γb-Crystallin Scaffold
    Generation of novel intracellular binding reagents based on the human γB-crystallin scaffold Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt der Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I-Biowissenschaften der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg Institut für Biochemie und Biotechnologie von Ewa Mirecka geboren am 17. Dezember 1976 in Gdynia, Polen Table of contents Table of contents 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................1 1.1 Monoclonal antibodies as a biomolecular scaffold..........................................................1 1.2 Binding molecules derived from non-immunoglobulin scaffolds.....................................3 1.2.1 Alternative protein scaffolds – general considerations............................................................ 3 1.2.2 Application of alternative binding molecules ........................................................................... 6 1.3 Affilin – novel binding molecules based on the human γB-crystallin scaffold................... 6 1.3.1 Human γB-crystallin as a molecular scaffold........................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Generation of a human γB-crystallin library and selection of first-generation Affilin molecules ................................................................................................................................ 8 1.4 Selection of binding proteins by phage display ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction and Key Feature Comparison
    Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction and Key Feature Comparison Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction and Key Feature Comparison 1 Contents Abstract Introduction Affinity-based applications in the detection, analysis and manipulation of protein targets In vitro applications Diagnostic applications Therapeutic applications Antibodies and their limitations as affinity binders Production considerations: ease, speed, cost and process control Size and structural complexity Stability under assay conditions Immobilisation onto solid support Success rate Limitations of antibodies as biosensors – stability, size and orientation Limitations of antibodies as therapeutics – immunogenicity, toxicity and 3D structure recognition Antibody engineering: future directions Alternatives to antibodies Engineered antibody fragments Aptamers Aptamer engineering – future enhancements Non-antibody protein scaffolds Affimer binders: what’s different? Affimer binders can be generated to almost any protein target, and show high discriminatory powers In practice: Development of novel Affimer diagnostic reagents for Zika virus outbreak management In practice: Affimer binders can be targeted to extracellular effector domains and allosteric regions of receptor proteins In practice: The ability of Affimer proteins to form multimers and fusion proteins allows fine tuning of therapeutic activity and stability in vivo Conclusion References Affimer® non-Antibody Binders for Affinity Applications: Introduction
    [Show full text]