.;....._ File No. ....;...;.._;___17047____ _ Item No. 7 ______
SUNSHINE ORDINANCE TASK FORCE AGENDA PACKET CONTENTS LIST
-=S..;::;O;....;.T...::..F_-_C=o=m:..:.;.,a;;;p=la=in=t::....C;;;;...o=m~m=itt=e;;..;;;e'--______Date: May 30, 2017
131. Petition/Complaint Page: "1&'/ ~ Memorandum - Deputy City Attorney Page: )5J"5 ~ Complainant's Supporting Documents Page:J OTHER D D D D D D D D D D D Completed by:_--=-V-'-.Y-=--o=-u=n=g ______Date 05/26/17 · *An asterisked item represents the cover sheet to a document that exceeds 25 pages. The complete document is in the file. P383 Young, Victor From:· Google Forms Your form has a new entry. Here are the results. Complaint against which Department San Francisco Board of Supervisors or Commission Name of individual contacted at . London Breed Department or Commission Alleged Violation Public Records I have seen numerous complaints on Twitter of people stating they are blocked from Please describe her @LondonBreed Twitter account. She posts information concerning the public's alleged violation business to her account and blocking people from viewing her posts violates the CPRA. Name Angela Greben Email [email protected] Pull email addresses from Gmail with Address Extractor for Gmail. This email was sent via the Google Forms Add-on. 1 P384 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY DENNIS J. HERRERA NICHOLAS COLLA City Attorney Deputy City Attorney Direct Dial: (415) 554-3819 Email: nicholas.colla @sfgov.org MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force FROM: Nicholas Colla Deputy City Attorney DATE: May 26, 2017 RE: Complaint No. 17047 - Greben v. Supervisor London Breed COMPLAINT Complainant Angela Greben ("Complainant") alleges that the Supervisor London Breed ("Supe. Breed") of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors ("BOS") violated provisions of the Sunshine Ordinance by blocking certain Twitter users from viewing her account posts. COMPLAINANT FILES THIS COMPLAINT On May 8, 2017, Complainant filed this complainant with the Task Force regarding Supe. Breed's alleged blocking of certain Twitter users. JURISDICTION Supe. Breed is a member of a policy body under the Ordinance. The Task Force therefore generally has jurisdiction to hear a complaint of a violation of the Ordinance against the Supe. Breed. Supe Breed has not contested jurisdiction. APPLICABLE STATUTORY SECTION(S) Section 67 of the San Francisco Administrative Code: • Section 67.21 governs responses to public records requests. Section 6250 ·et seq. of the Cal. Gov't Code ("CPRA") • Section 6253 governs the release of public records and the timing ofresponses. APPLICABLE CASE LAW • · City ofSan Jose v. Superior Court (2017) -- Cal.4th-214 Cal. Rptr.3d 274 (Public business conducted on personal electronic devices or accounts may be subject to disclosure pursuant to PRA requests). BACKGROUND On May 8, 2017, Complainant filed this complaint with the Task Force in which she alleged the following: I have seen numerous complaints on Twitter of people stating they are blocked from her @LondonBreed Twitter account. She posts information Fox PLAZA • 1390 MARKET STREET, 6TH FLOOR • SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94102-5408 RECEPTION: (415) 554-3800 · FACSIMILE: (415) 437-4644 n:\codenf\as2014\9600241 \01195358.doc P385 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: May 26, 2017 PAGE: 2 RE: Complaint No. 17047 -Greben v. Supervisor London Breed concerning the public's business to her account and blocking people from viewing her posts violates the CPRA. Supe. Breed did not file a response to this complaint. LEGAL ANALYSIS In San Jose, the City of San Jose received a request for all voicemail messages, email or text messages sent or received on private electronic devices used by the City's Mayor, members of its City Counsel and/or their staff regarding San Jose City matters. In response, the City provided records sent from/received on private electronic devices using City accounts but not records from private devices using private accounts. The requestor, Smith, challenged this decision in an action for declaratory relief. The State Supreme Court held that communications on personal electronic devices or personal accounts involving the conduct of the public's business may be public records subject to disclosure. Such writings include, but are not limited to, emails on personal computers and text messages on personal cell phones. The Task Force may want to consider whether the information at issue is a form of conducting public business via a private Twitter account. QUESTIONS THAT MIGHT ASSIST IN DETERMINING FACTS • Did Complainant ever receive a response from Supe. Breed? • How does Complainant contend that the blocked Twitter users should have access to all of Supe. Breed's tweets, regardless of each tweet' s content? · LEGAL ISSUES/LEGAL DETERMINATIONS • Did Supe. Breed violate Administrative Code Sections 67.21 by blocking Twitter users? • Did the Department violate CPRA 6253(c) by blocking certain Twitter users from viewing her account? n:lcodenf\as2014\9600241\0l l 95358.doc P386 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: May 26, 2017 PAGE:· 3 RE: Complaint No. 1704 7 - Greben v. Supervisor London Breed CONCLUSION THE TASK FORCE FINDS THE FOLLOWING FACTS TO BE TRUE: THE TASK FORCE FINDS THE ALLEGED VIOLATIONS TO BE TRUE OR NOT TRUE. n:\codenf\as2014\9600241 \01195358.doc P387 . CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: May 26, 2017 PAGE: 4 RE: Complaint No. 1704 7 - Greben v. Supervisor London Breed *** CHAPTER 67, SAN FRANCISCO ADMINISTRATIVE CODE (SUNSHINE ORDINANCE) SEC. 67.21. PROCESS FOR GAINING ACCESS TO PUBLIC RECORDS; ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS. (a) Every person having custody of any public record or public information, as defined herein, (hereinafter referred to as a custodian of a public record) shall, at normal times and during normal and reasonable hours of operation, without unreasonable delay, and without requiring an appointment, permit the public record, or any segregable portion of a record, to be inspected and examined by any person and shall furnish one copy thereof upon payment of a reasonable copying charge, not to exceed the lesser of the actual cost or ten cents per page. (b) A custodian of a public record shall, as soon as possible and within ten days following receipt of a request for inspection or copy of a public record, comply with such request. Such request may be delivered to the office of the custodian by the requester orally or in writing by fax, postal delivery, or e-mail. If the custodian believes the record or information requested is not a public record or is exempt, the custodian shall justify withholding any record by demonstrating, in writing as soon as possible and within ten days following receipt of a request, that the record in question is exempt under express provisions of this ordinance. ( c) A custodian of a public record shall assist a requester in identifying the existence, form, and nature of any records or information maintained by, available to, or in the custody of the custodian, whether or not the contents of those records are exempt from disclosure and shall, when requested to do so, provide in writing within seven days following receipt of a request, a statement as to the existence, quantity, form and nature of records relating to a particular subject or questions with enough specificity to enable a requester to identify records in order to make a request under (b ). A custodian of any public record, when not in possession of the record requested, shall assist a requester in directing a request to the proper office or staff person. (d) If the custodian refuses, fails to comply, or incompletely complies with a request described . in (b ), the person making the request may petition the supervisor of records for a determination whether the record requested is public. The supervisor of records shall inform the petitioner, as soon as possible and within 10 days, of its determination whether the record requested, or any part of the record requested, is public. Where requested bYthe petition, and where otherwise desirable, this determination shall be in writing. Upon the determination by the supervisor of records that the record is public, the supervisor of records shall immediately order the custodian of the public record to comply with the person's request. If the custodian refuses or fails to comply with any such order within 5 days, the supervisor of records shall notify the district attorney or the attorney general who shall take whatever measures she or he deems necessary and appropriate to insure compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. (e) If the custodian refuses, fails to comply, or incompletely complies with a request described in (b) above or if a petition is denied or not acted on by the supervisor of public records, the person making the request may petition the Sunshine Task Force for a determination whether the n:\codenf\as2014\960024 l \01195358.doc P388 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATIORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: May26, 2017 PAGE: 5 RE: Complaint No. 17047 -Greben v. Supervisor London Breed record requested is public. The Sunshine Task Force shall inform the petitioner, as soon as possible and within 2 days after its next meeting but in no case later than 45 days from when a petition in writing is received, of its determination whether the record requested, or any part of the record requested, is public. Where requested by the petition, and where otherwise desirable, this determination shall be in writing. Upon the determination that the record is public, the Sunshine Task Force shall immediately order the custodian of the public record to comply with the person's request. If the custodian refuses or fails to comply with any such order within 5 days, the Sunshine Task Force shall notify the distriCt attorney or the attorney general who may take whatever measures she or he deems necessary to insure compliance with the provisions of this ordinance. The Board of Supervisors and the City Attorney's office shall provide sufficient staff and resources to allow the Sunshine Task Force to fulfill its duties under this provision. Where requested by the petition, the Sunshine Task Force may conduct a public hearing concerning the records request denial. An authorized representative of the custodian of the public records requested shall attend any hearing and explain the basis for its decision to withhold the records requested. SEC. 67.25. IMMEDIACY OF RESPONSE (a) Notwithstanding the 10-day period for response to a request permitted in Government Code Section 6256 and in this Article, a written request for information described in any category of non-exempt public information shall be satisfied no later than the close of business on the day following the day of the request. This deadline shall apply only ifthe words "Immediate Disclosure Request" are placed across the top of the request and on the envelope, subject line, or cover sheet in which the request is transmitted. Maximum deadlines provided in this article are appropriate for more extensive or demanding requests, but shall not be used to delay fulfilling a simple, routine or otherwise readily answerable request. (b) If the voluminous nature of the information requested, its location in a remote storage facility or the need to consult with another interested department warrants an extension of 10 days as provided in Government Code Section 6456.1, the requester shall be notified as required by the close of business on the business day following the request. ( c) The person seeking the information need not state his or her reason for making the request or the use to which the information will be put, and requesters shall not be routinely asked to make such a disclosure. Where a record being requested contains information most of which is exempt from disclosure under the California Public Records Act and this article, however, the City Attorney or custodian of the record may inform the requester of the nature and extent of the non exempt information and inquire as to the requester's purpose for seeking it, in order to suggest alternative sources for the information which may involve less redaction or to otherwise prepare a response to the request. ( d) Notwithstanding any provisions of California Law or this ordinance, in response to a request for information describing any category of non-exempt public information, when so requested, the City and County shall produce any and all responsive public records as soon as reasonably possible on an incremental or "rolling" basis such that responsive records are produced as soon as possible by the end of the same business day that they are reviewed and collected. This section is intended to prohibit the withholding of public records that are responsive to a records request until all potentially responsive documents have been reviewed and collected. Failure to comply with this provision is a violation of this Article. · n:\codenf\as2014 \9600241\01195358.doc P389 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY MEMORANDUM TO: Sunshine Ordinance Task Force DATE: May 26, 2017 PAGE: 6 RE: Complaint No. 17047 - Greben v. Supervisor London Breed CAL. PUBLIC RECORDS ACT (GOVT. COD'E §§ 6250, ET SEQ.) SEC. 6253 ( c) Each agency, upon a request for a copy of records, shall, within 10 days from receipt of the request, determine whether the request, in whole or in part, seeks copies of disclosable public records in the possession of the agency and shall promptly notify the person making the request of the determination and the reasons therefor. In unusual circumstances, the time limit prescribed in this section may be extended by written notice by the head of the agency or his or her designee to the person making the request, setting forth the reasons for the extension and the date on which a determination is expected to be dispatched. No notice shall specify a date that would result in an extension for more than 14 days. When the agency dispatches the determination, and ifthe agency determines that the request seeks disclosable public records, the agency shall state the estimated date and time when the records will be made available. As used in this section, "unusual circumstances" means the following, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the particular request: (1) The need to search for and collect the requested records from field facilities or other establishments that are separate from the office processing the request. (2) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are demanded in a single request. (3) The need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, with another agency having substantial interest in the determination of the request or among two or more components of the agency having substantial subject matter interest therein. n:\codenf\as2014\9600241 \01195358.doc P390 Sunshine Ordinance Task Force Complaint Summary File No. 17047 Angela Greben V. President London Breed, Board of Supervisors Date filed with SOTF: 5/8/17 Contacts information (Complainant information listed first): [email protected] (Petitioner) Breedstaff(a)sfgov. org; (Respondent) File No. 17047: Complaint filed by Angela Greben against President London Breed, Board of Supervisors, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner. Administrative Summary if applicable: The Petitioner alleges that blocking certain members of the public from President Breed's Twitter account prevents the viewing of posts and is a violation of the Public Records Act. Complaint Attached.· P391 Young, Victor From: Angela Greben Dear Mr. Young, This email is being forwarded to you as part of my response to a complaint I recently filed (#17047). Thank you, Angela Greben ------Forwarded message ------From: Lee, Ivy (BOS) Please find below, screenshots of the Twitter-muted or blocked accounts requested. Supervisor Kim does not mute or block any words, phrases or hashtags. Supervisor Kim does not block any user on Facebook. This is all the responsive information that our office has in its possession and completes our response to this public records request. Thank you. Ivy 1 P392 Muted accounts TRUMPAFORNIA '· · @sea329 Merchant marine Bosun, Nam VE Animal lover. Adventure Is My BL oppo·sed to lazy shiftless bums c I Nothing but the truth! SmirKing Revenge @Hi'sM.ajesty78 SWM, wait! ... wrong listing. -- TeJ Pump That Crude -- Ecclesiaste. Fi sea Uy Cons:ervative/Social Li be · March"'2nd -- Gubme·nt Shrink! John Rankin. ·@JohnR.an1kin13 2 P393 3 P394 < Blocked accounts Imported ··-···~····- Stallion · ~ , . ·. ·. @Stallion2011 ~ · . Proud mem·ber of the vast right-wlng conspiracy .ll§I ~ WHOmentors.com., Inc. ~· i @Rauhn1eJFoX='CEO · ~ Rauhmel Fox CEO §509(a)(2) Scientific Research Corporation §501(c)(3) Fiscal Sponsor, Cap-Exempt H-18 Em·ployer, Qualifying as Accredited Investor,. USAFA 93 Grad Senpai Sfow..,taku @sabotagebeats 4 P395 5 P396 < Blocked acco!unts Done Scott ~ @USMC~Vet ~ Gamer, UFO/Paranormal Freak, Gun Tater, RPM Junky, Republican, Rock-n-Roller, Aviatipn/ Space Crazy and Founder of @VETERANS_GAMIN.G j; ... 'flJ.~ Bori·s Badenov MJ @DevilinGeorgia Unapologetic conservative fighting against the progressive agenda focused on destroying the dream that is America. #MAGA SF Handyman @SFHandym,an Making, fixing & building. ·inveterate walker. Gay atheist. Architectural Historian. No really. @generic~ admit no cure 6 P397 7 P398 < Blocked accounts Done AJI ' ' - LeanJ_ rnore!aboutho.MVto im1porthlock lists. <. -- ' ' ' I' ~ _- ~ - =- ~ ~ -• .,'. ·, 8 P399 9 P400 < Blocke·d accounts Done All LE3arn rnoreabodthoW fo irnport black lists. 1·', 10 P401 11 P402 - < _- Block users ' • • • : .' ,'. - ·, '. • ' ; t • "-~ '" ' - --.·--; '_ - •• '• ··,.' --1 '<.:) ;" :''.·:-;:;-, •" '·- {·· _;_• 1 ,.-,~--- -~ . }': ;·:-'.: ~-!/:· _:.·;:.~~:':··1:' -:'ht , .:>' _, ' ,' 1' <-''- .. ;:·_,,-~<','./_,-,·~-> - ·t:_:-,~::·.>~·--:: ·- ~-.'<:~.<-· . · :... :., //··:··::cT.-: /::<"°_-- ·-: --- ~-=--·- _]_- ~-.,'_'-.-,,'._.;'=c',"-~"-··· ·-' :··:--~~'·:: · .:- l,,:~ ~,:-~-°--~°=:~.-~.-~)~:~'..:-oo.'.~ ,: _:-. ~__:_~: ;:_._-~_;_; I-~~·~:-·,;• __ ~--=-=~ • Once you block someone, that person can no longer see things you post on your time line, tag your invite you to events or groups, start a conversation with you, or add you as a friend. Note: Does not f:nclude apps, games or groups you both participate in. I Ty~e a name oren~a1l Blocked users You haven~t added anyone to your block list 12 P403 Sent from my iPhone 13 P404 Young, Victor From: Angela Greben Dear Mr. Young, · This email is being forwarded to you as part of my response to a complaint I recently filed (#17047). Thank you, Angela Greben ------Forwarded message------From: Boilard, Chelsea (BOS) Hi Angela, \ Thanks for your email. The Twitter account associated with Sandra Lee Fewer has no muted or blocked words, phrases or contacts. The Facebook account associated with Sandra Lee Fewer had three contacts blocked during the electoral campaign which we did not realize were still blocked, and as of yesterday, after receivingyour inquiry, they have been unblocked. The contacts unfortunately were unblocked before documenting the three names, and although we have reached. out to Face book, there does not appear to be a way to recover that information. There are now no blocked or muted contacts, pages, words or phrases associated with the Fewer Facebook account. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Best, Chelsea 1 P405 From: Angela Greben [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2017 10:26 AM To: Fewer, Sandra (BOS) I am requesting a listing of all words, phrases, or hashtags currently muted by the @SandraleeFewer Twitter account and the @SandraleeFewer Facebook account; and a listing of all people currently blocked or muted by the @Sandra Lee Fewer Twitter account and the @SandraleeFewer Facebook account. You may provide a response via email: [email protected]. Thank you, Angela Greben 2 P406 Young, Victor From: Angela Greben Dear Mr. Young, This email is being forwarded to you as part of my response to a complaint I recently filed (#17047). I emailed Ms. Breed my public records request on the 1Oth. This is the reply I received. I am still awaiting a response. Thank you, Angela Greben ------Forwarded message------From: Breed, London (BOS) Thank you for your email. I receive a large volume of e-mails at this address and will get back to you as soon as I can. In the meantime, the following resources are available for some of your more immediate needs: If you are writing with a request for non-emergency neighborhood services (such as park repairs, street and sidewalk cleaning, and tree maintenance), or for inquiries regarding the shelter reservation waitlist, please Call 3-1-1. If your request has not been addressed and you would like our office to follow up, please email my Legislative Aide Samantha Roxas at [email protected] with your confirmation number. If there is a homeless individual in distress on the street in need of assistance, please contact the SF Homeless Outreach Team (SF HOT) at the following dispatch numbers: • For all urgent matters: 415-355-7445 (Services include 24/7 urgent/emergent client transportation; transportation to shelter drop-in center or resource center; and client care coordination) • Fornon-urgentmatters: 415-355-7401 1 P407 (Services include outreach requests and/or client wellness checks; and client consultation) **Please note that non-urgent calls to the urgent dispatch lines will be asked to call the non-urgent line so that the urgent medical providers and operators can be available for emergency situations.** If you wish to make a Request for Public Records or other request under the City's Sunshine Ordinance, please forward your request to Legislative Aide Kayleigh Lloyd at [email protected]. If you are making an immediate disclosure request, please remember to put the words "Immediate Disclosure Request" in the subject line of your e-mail. For any questions about legislation, Board of Supervisors meetings, Government Audit & Oversight Committee, or Golden Gate Bridge Board, please contact my Chief of Staff, Michael Howerton, at michael.howerton@sfgov .org. For all scheduling inquiries and requests, please contact Kayleigh Lloyd at [email protected] with the following information: • For events: event details and nature ofrequest (speaking, attending, hosting, etc.) • For meetings: purpose of meeting and meeting attendees Lastly, for ongoing updates from our office, sign up for my newsletter here or visit my website here. Sincerely, London Breed President of the Board of Supervisors District 5 2 P408 3 P409 Young, Victor From: Angela Greben Dear Mr. Young, This email is being forwarded to you as part of my response to a complaint I recently filed (#17047). This is my public records request I sent to Ms. Breed and her staff on May 1Oth. Thank you, Angela Greben ------Forwarded message ------From: Angela Greben I am requesting a listing of all words, phrases, or hashtags currently muted by the @London Breed Twitter account and the @supervisorlondonbreed Facebook account; and a listing of all people currently blocked or muted by the @London Breed Twitter account and the @supervisorlondonbreed Facebook account. You may provide a response via email: [email protected]. Thank you, Angela Greben 1 P410 Young, Victor From: Angela Greben The following information is in response to a complaint I recently filed (#17047). • In January 2016 Ms. Breed provided her Twitter block list to Mr. Michael Petrelis. He posted her block list to his blog http://govtaccessproject.blogspot.com/p/blocked-twitter-accounts-of- public.html?m=l& sm au =iVVjCrZLSWOOs44C. An article about this block list also appeared in the SanFrancisco Magazine http://www.modernluxury.com/ san-francisco/story/who-are-san- franciscos supervisors-blocking-twi tter. · • On May 10, 2016 I emailed Ms. Breed and her staff my public records request for information regarding her Twitter and Facebook accounts. I am still awaiting a response. • The attached PDF provides further relevant records to my complaint. The document shows complaints made by other people on Twitter who claim to be blocked by Ms. Breed. I found these Tweets by searching Twitter using the following search terms: "@LondonBreed block" "@LondonBreed blocked" "@LononBreed blocking" • I've also sent the same request to all members of the SF Board of Supervisors. So far I've received a response from Ms. Kim and Ms. Fewer. Both of those responses have been forwarded to you. The responses indicate that both individuals are either currently blocking or have previously been blocking people from their social media accounts. 1. Ms. Fewer's response also indicates that she uses her@SandraLeeFewer Facebook account to both campaign with and to post information regarding the public's business. Her response further indicates that she also fails to archive the information she posts to her account. 2. Ms. Kim's response indicates that she has blocked people on Twitter that have never contacted her. I posted further details about her block and mute lists to my own blog http://govblock.blogspot.com/#!/2017/05/board-of-supervisors-member-jane-kim.html. These are all the documents I have (including the 4 forwarded emails that I sent earlier this morning) in . response to my complaint. If I receive any further responses to my public requests that I sent to Ms. Breed or any of the other members of the Board of Supervisors then I will forward those to you as well. 1 P411 Please let me know if you have further questions. Thank you, Angela Greben 2 P412 https://twitter.com/HomelessSanFran/status/761617849114693632 ' SF Homeless Crisis _ ~ _, @HomelesssanFr;:m @londonbreed did exactly what #SF politicians do when asked to fix the #homeless problem. 8,fock y·ou on Twitter. Turn a blind eye. @sfgov LIKE 1 10:40 AM...: 5 Aug 2016 'from San Francisco, CA ¥1 https://twitter.com/MichaelPetrelis/status/693592253843910656 Act up & fight back! .!,•Follow v ·:: @Michae!Petre\is I've posted @LondonBreed's Twitter block list, govtaccessproject.blogspot.com/p/blocked twit .. _. Will @srslynow update @SanFranMag story, mo·dernluxury.com/san- francisco/ ___ ? ·Who Are San Francisco's supervisors Blocking on Twitter? Trolls, jingoists, amL.housing advooales? modernlu.r.ur)l.Dom 4:30 PM - 30 Jan 2016 P413 https:/~twitter.com/tigerbeat/status/693246165265965056 Steve Rhodes @tigerbeat · 29 Jan 2016 @Micl1aelPetfells@londonbreed blocked me after these 2 tweets from simply covering a #sfbos mtg but I'm not on llst He's say;ngf1 was0Ue11-?ive ,, L.Dr:d:Yi1Y:n0ci adjoum!ld ' :;ib0s rn1g & left ~Bb::ku·"~'-·l;;rwr :;--~ht)!HD01'"11 -,~-.:;rn,F1~1c:.rscn London Breed adjourrn'ld p, JeF1 bul other @londonbreed suvervisors sm hern <'5fm.~yor Yc>U ;~1re l;ilocJ:ed f10rn iol!0\'<'ir~9 r:J1Jl.ir:ri0nt.1re1Zd -Jrid 1!1f'..·\vlng ~~:i1\-'ndui~bl'ei;d'•;: '!v1·G1Hi;, ledf!'l 1r.tH~ Act up & fight back! ~·Follow @Mlcl1aelPetrelis Replying to @Ugerbeat Yes, you're on her block list. Curious that @avalossf has longest list. Can't ask 4 Weener's sked due 2 court order @tigerbeat @londonbreed LH 1·1 :30 PM - 29 Jan 2016 P414 https://twitter.com/MichaelPetrelis/status/656549443974488064 • - Act up & fight back! 1..· Follow v - @tvl;ichae!Petrelis Both @londonbreed & @SFDAO'ffice block me from reading their tweets. So much 4 #SF open govt! @upp1tyfag @tobiemarx RETvVEETS 2 12:'16 PM - 20 Oct 2015 . https ://twitter.com/uppityfag/status/777198922112524288 ...\d. Patrick Connors ~!n.<-... :12'.. 1..· Follow v ;:'jK:' @uppityfag 11 HOURS LEFT Even though she blocked me on Twitter (#SFValues) maybe VOTE~ @London. Breed herself will chime inl . Patrick Connors @uppityrag SAN FRANClSCO VOTES: Which is the proper pronuncfation of@LomlonBreed's description of@48Hills? #SF #HmvestMoon RETli\'EET LIKE 1 1 1 0:33 AM - 17 Sep 2016 P415 httQs://twitter.com/kimoco/status/693183074662686720 kim oconnor ft.• Follow v. @kirnoco Replying to @sanfranmag @sanfrann1ag I' have no memory of doing anything to deserve it, but I am blocked by @LondonBreed At least she is not my sup_ who just ignores 1 :24 PM - 2S1 Jan 20'1 G https://twitter.com/Pkittytrisha/status/623532786024984576 Trisha F .!.* Follow v @PKittytrist1a @uppityfag I'm no longer blocked by @londonbreed_ l'sn't that strange? Maybe she'll help w my moldy apartment LIKE 'I 9:39 Afvi - 21 Jui 2015 '[ P416 Other sources: http://govtaccessproject.blogspot.com/p/blocked-twitter-accounts-of public.html?m=l& sm au =iVVrkH7rZWQNDSQ7 http://www.modernluxury.com/san-francisco/story/who-are-san-franciscos-supervisors blocking-twitter P417 Young, Victor From: SOTF, (BOS) Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 1:56 PM To: Angel, Lucia (DPH); Leung, Lydia (UCSF); Christensen, Diana (ADM); · '[email protected]'; 'Ray'; Blackman, Sue (LIB); Herrera, Luis (LIB); 'Angela Greben'; Breed, London (BOS); BreedStaff, (BOS) Cc: Lloyd, Kayleigh (BOS); Calvillo, Angela (BOS) Subject: SOTF - Notice of Hearing - Compliance and Amendments Committee: May 30, 2017, 4:30 p.m. Good Afternoon: Notice is hereby given that the Compliance and Amendment.s Committee (Committee) of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (Task Force) shall hold hearings on complaints listed below to: 1) review the status of the Order of Determination; 2) determine ifthe Task Force has jurisdiction; 3) review the merits of the complaints; and/or 4) issue a report and/or recommendation to the Task Force. Date: May 30, 2017 Location: City Hall, Room 408 Time: 4:30p.m. Complaints: File No.16092: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination- Complaint filed by Anonymous against Dr. Lydia Leung. Department of Public Health, for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.25(a), by failing to respond to an Immediate Disclosure Request in a timely and/or complete manner. (On February 1, 2017, the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) heard the matter, found violations ofthe Sunshine Ordinance, requested that the Respondent provide all communications and documents related to the Family Health Center Patient Advisory Committee for the period of January 1, 2014, through September 18, 2016, and/or providejustificationfor any redactions/withholdings, and referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee.) File No. 16109: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination - Complaint filed by Mike Black against Animal Care and Control for violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section(s) 67.21(d) and 67.24(i), by failing to respond to a public records request in a timely and complete manner and withholding records and not citing an appropriate provision of the Sunshine Ordinance. {On February 1, 2017, the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force {SOTF} heard the matter, found violations of the Sunshine Ordinance, requested that the Respondent provided records related to the City's dog lease laws for the period of January 1, 2014, through February 1, 2016, and referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee.) File No. 16117: Hearing on the Status of the Order of Determination - Complaint filed by Ray Hartz against City Librarian Luis Herrera and the Public Library for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67 .29-6, by failing to disclose the amount and source of all outside funds 1 P418 or services worth more than one hundred dollars in aggregate, accepted by the Public Library for the purpose of carrying out or assisting any City function, on their website. (On March 1, 2017, the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force (SOTF) heard the matter, found violations ofthe Sunshine Ordinance referred the matter to the Compliance and Amendments Committee to review the draft memorandum of Understanding between the Public Library and the Friends ofthe Public Library to ensure that Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.29-6, has been addressed.) File No. 17047: Complaint filed by Angela Greben against President London Breed, Board of Supervisors, for allegedly violating Administrative Code (Sunshine Ordinance), Section 67.21, by failing to respond to request for public records in a timely and/or complete manner. Complainants: Your attendance is required for this meeting/hearing. Respondents/Departments: Pursuant to Section 67.21 (e) of the Ordinance, the custodian of records or a representative of your department, who can speak to the matter, is required at the meeting/hearing. Documentation (evidence supporting/disputing complaint) For a document to be considered, it must be received at least five ( 5) working days before the hearing. For inclusion into the agenda packet, supplemental/supporting documents must be received by 5:00 pm, May 23, 2017. Victor Voung Administrator Sunshine Ordinance Task Force 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Plac.e, City Hall., Room 244 San Francisco CA 94102 phone 415-554-7724 I · fax 415-554-5163 [email protected] I www.sfbos.org •I':)• Click here to complete a Board of Supervisors Customer Service Satisfaction form. The Legislative Research Center provides 24-hour access to Board of Supervisors legislation, and archived matters since August 1998. Disclosures: Personal information that is provided in communiq:itions to the Board of Supervisors is subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act and the San Francisco Sunshine Ordinance. Personal information provided will not be redacted. Members of the public are not required to provide personal identifying information when they communicate with the Board of Supervisors and its committees. All written or oral communications that members of the public submit to the Clerk's Office regarding pending legislation or hearings will be made available to all members of the public for inspection and copying. The Clerk's Office does not redact any information from these submissions. This means that personal informotion-including names, phone numbers, addresses and similar information that a member of the public elects to submit to the Board and its committees-may appear on the Board of Supervisors website or in other public documents that members of.the public may inspect or copy. 2 P419