Energy Company Generates Fish-Friendly Hydro Power Power Company Hatches a Dam Clever Scheme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Energy Company Generates Fish-Friendly Hydro Power Power Company Hatches a Dam Clever Scheme Energy Customer Perspective Energy Company Generates Fish-Friendly Hydro Power Power Company Hatches a Dam Clever Scheme Puget Sound Energy is a power utility supplying both electricity and natural gas to three-quarters of Washington State. Headquartered in the Puget Sound technology corridor (which includes the major metropolitan areas of Seattle and Tacoma), the company provides both natural gas and electrical energy to 1.2 million customers living in a dynamic economy that includes the Boeing Company, Microsoft, Nintendo of America, AT&T Wireless, Amazon.com, and, of course, Zetron, Inc. kW. The Lower Baker development has a 285-foot Water under the dam: high concrete dam with a generation capacity of Thanks to its rainy climate and mountainous 70,000 kW for a total project capacity of 175,000 kW. topography with plenty of rivers, Washington State is Water flowing from the southern and eastern flanks of rich in hydroelectric power. This clean, renewable, and Mount Baker forms Baker Lake and Lake Shannon low-cost power source supplies the majority of Puget behind the dams. Sound Energy’s electrical generation capacity. A full Fishy business: 65 percent is generated by hydro plants on the mid- To preserve the important fish resources of the Columbia river in the eastern half of the state. In Baker River, Puget Sound Energy installed extensive addition, many smaller hydro plants in the fish handling facilities at both dams at a cost of about northwestern cascades provide sufficient electricity to $2,285,000. Fish migrating upstream are captured by power entire cities. a fish barrier dam and trap. They are then transported A new generation of hydropower: in specially designed trucks around the dams to Located close to the border between the U.S. and spawning areas in Baker Lake. Each year an average Canada, Mount Baker is the second highest mountain of 12,000 sockeye and silver salmon, king (Chinook), in Washington state. Renowned for its great wintertime humpback (pink) and steelhead are transported by the skiing, Mount Baker’s large winter snowpack and tank trucks. glacial runoff helps keep local river levels high year- In addition, Puget Sound Energy operates three round (at least, during most years). To take advantage spawning beach facilities at the Upper Baker Dam that of this fact, Puget Sound Energy instituted the Baker allow adult sockeye salmon to spawn in an artificial River hydroelectric project. environment that closely mimics a natural stream bed. Comprised of two dams and powerhouses on the In these beaches, salmon eggs incubate in the gravel Baker River near Concrete, Washington, the project bottoms. Upon hatching, the fry are trucked back to generates low-cost electricity while at the same time the lake. providing flood control to the Lower Skagit Valley. The Making the most of manpower: Lower Baker Dam became operational in 1925; the Dick Levy is a Power Generation Serviceman Level Upper Baker Dam came on line in 1959. 6e, who works at both the Upper and Lower Baker The Upper Baker development has a 312-foot high dams: concrete dam with a generation capacity of 105,000 “There’s one full time operator who is here 24/7,” is sensed, the SentriVoice transmits voice messages explained Levy. “The rest of the crew all work out of or pages over the radio or public address system. The Lower Baker. There are only seven of us to take care Model 18 Control Link is a kind of radio switch. of the dams and powerhouse complexes at both Capable of sending and receiving on/off commands, facilities. We’re a small but pretty diverse group. My each Model 18 has 8 digital inputs and outputs. At the responsibilities are anything Upper Baker Dam, Puget Sound electrical. The rest of the crew Energy is employing two Model takes care of anything from 1516 SentriVoices and a pair of mowing lawns to digging ditches Model 18 Control Links. to running heavy equipment and “We’ve got one SentriVoice overhead cranes and repairing for the dam itself,” Lofgren equipment.” explained. “It there’s low To free the dam operator transformer oil, or if anything from the need to watch over all goes wrong in generation it will the systems every minute of the page the dam operator who will day, a number of telemetry come and take a look. There’s a systems were added to monitor second Model 1516 at our vital functions. The initial spawning beach where we attempt at this, however, had breed salmon and reintroduce some drawbacks. Technician Dick Levy poses with the two Model 18s and them to the river. An alarm “Before we used a manual Model 1516 located in the powerhouse control room panel at the spawning beach paging system and the operator senses things like water had to sit at the dam all the time in case something turbidity, water level, intrusion, power loss, and valve went wrong,” explained Jim Lofgren, Foreman for open/closed. It’s connected to a Model 18 Control Link Radio at the Puget Sound Energy Operations Center that telemeters the alarm points from the spawning in Redmond, Washington. “The alarm system was a beach up to the dam where our second Model 1516 dial-up home-type alarm which dialed into a number will page to alert the operator that something at the for an alarm service here spawning beach needs in Seattle. Upon receiving their attention.” an alarm from the dam, Off-peak power: the service would call our At the Upper Baker load office in Redmond. dam, a certain amount of The Redmond Load water seeps through the Dispatcher would then earthen sides of the West page the dam operator Pass Dike and is up at Mount Baker. By collected in Depression the time the dam Lake. At night and during operator received the off-peak hours, power page it had been handed from the generator is off several times. Plus it used to run pumps that was intermittent, and pump the water from sometimes wouldn’t get Depression Lake back through. We wanted to into the Baker Lake be able to page the dam The spawning beach. reservoir. The reliable operator directly. If operation of these pumps there’s a storm down here in Redmond, all our people is vital, so they are also monitored by the Model 1516 at the load office might be busy. Plus there’s no time SentriVoice. If a pump breaks down or fails to turn on, delay allowable at the dam when the fish are left sitting an alarm page is immediately sent to the dam high and dry because all the water’s drained off.” operator. The wireless solution: “The alarm pages repeat every few minutes,” The solution Puget Sound now relies on is a Lofgren said. “Typical messages are things like ‘West combination of two Zetron products: the Model 1516 Pass Dike trouble.’ ‘Unit number one trouble.’ SentriVoice and the Model 18 Control Link. ‘Transformer trouble.’ We are also looking at putting The Model 1516 is a wireless voice alarm reporter the information on the company RTU system so we that monitors contact inputs. When an alarm condition can bring it back down to Redmond and log the information for the various regulatory agencies.” Reprinted from Zetron's monthly newsletter, the Advantage, February 2001 Zetron, Inc. PO Box 97004, Redmond WA 98073-9704 USA Ph: (425) 820-6363 Fax: (425) 820-7031 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www.zetron.com European Office: Zetron, Inc. 27-29 Campbell Court, Bramley, TADLEY, Basingstoke, RG26 5EG, UK Phone: +44 1256 880663 Fax: +44 1256 880491 Australasia Office: Zetron, Inc. PO Box 3045 Stafford Mail Centre, Stafford QLD 4053, Australia Phone: +61 7 3856 4888 Fax: +61 7 3356 6877 See Zetron price list for option pricing. Specifications subject to change without notice. Literature number: 005-7255A March 2001.
Recommended publications
  • Mount Baker, Washington
    WATER-QUALITY EFFECTS ON BAKER LAKE OF RECENT VOLCANIC ACTIVITY AT MOUNT BAKER, WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1022-B Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington Department of Ecology Water-Quality Effects on Baker Lake of Recent Volcanic Activity at Mount Baker, Washington By G. C. BORTLESON, R. T. WILSON, and B. L. FOXWORTHY VOLCANIC ACTIVITY AT MOUNT BAKER, WASHINGTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1022-B Prepared in cooperation with the State of Washington Department of Ecology UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE:1977 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bortleson, Gilbert Carl, 1940- Water-quality effects on Baker Lake of recent volcanic activity at Mount Baker, Washington. (Volcanic Activity at Mt. Baker) (Geologic Survey Professional Paper 1022-B) Bibliography: p. 30. Supt.ofDocs.no.: I 19.16:1022-6 1. Water quality-Washington (State)--Baker Lake. 2. Volcanism-Washington (State). 3. Baker, Mount, Wash. I. Wilson, Reed T., joint author. II. Foxworthy, Bruce, La Verne, 1925- joint author. III. Washington (State). Dept. of Ecology. IV. Title. V. Series: Volcanic activity at Mount Baker, Washington. VI. Series: United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1022-B. TD224.W2B67 363.6'1 77-21097 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 Stock Number 024-001-03008-0 CONTENTS Conversion factors _________________________. Ill Quality of surface waters draining to Baker Lake ______B16 Abstract__________________________________. Bl Water in Sherman Crater __________________ 16 Introduction ______________________________. 1 Boulder Creek and other streams _____________.
    [Show full text]
  • CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN Baker River Alluvial Fan Enhancement
    SKAGIT COUNTY SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM CONCEPTUAL RESTORATION PLAN Baker River Alluvial RESTORATION STRATEGY CONCEPT ELEMENTS 1. Increase off -channel rearing habitat by excavating a 11. Replace the existing shoreline stairway 66.6. Substitute pervious, natural-surface pedestrian channel connecting the mainstem Skagit with an off - shoreline access trails for impervious road surfaces. Fan Enhancement channel pond. 22.2. Reduce imperviousness of vehicular and pedestrian access along river banks 77.7. Provide channels to link habitats of the historic Little BACKGROUND 2. Improve instream complexity by adding large woody Baker River channel and alluvial fan as a backwater debris. 3.3. Replace invasive plant species with native trees and The Baker River Alluvial Fan area at the confl uence with 3 channel. shrubs. the larger Skagit River is located partly within the Town 3. Substitute pervious pedestrian trails for impervious 88.8. Provide low-impact recreational improvements such of Concrete and partly in unincorporated Skagit County. vehicular access road and parking areas where feasible 44. Improve the existing WDFW boat launch site as campgrounds outside the fl oodway. For more than a decade, various stakeholders including in areas adjacent to the Baker and Skagit Rivers. user groups, landowners, local governments, and other 55.5. Improve sinuosity of lower Baker River, establish 99.9. Place boulders, log structures, and/or engineered log interested parties have been considering habitat and 4. Remove invasive plant species and replace them with fl oodplain benches and meanders. jams to increase low-fl ow complexity and improve recreational improvement opportunities along the lower native trees and shrubs to provide riparian functions salmonid fi sh habitat for juvenile rearing and adult Baker River and its associated alluvial fan.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Record of Fish Related Issues on the Skagit River
    HISTORICAL RECORD OF FISH RELATED ISSUES ON THE SKAGIT RIVER SKAGIT COUNTY, WASHINGTON 1897 THROUGH 1969 By Larry Kunzler June 4, 2005 Updated and republished June 2008 www.skagitriverhistory.com Historical Record of Fish Related Issues On The Skagit River Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................ 2 PREFACE....................................................................................................................................... 4 Levees and Fish Discussed Early in Skagit History ....................................................................... 5 Flood Control Projects Impacted Fish Runs ................................................................................... 5 Fish Hatchery At Baker Lake Stops Work For Winter................................................................... 6 Seattle To Build State Hatchery On Upper River........................................................................... 6 Forest Service To Survey Road From Here To Baker Lake........................................................... 7 O’malley Is Appointed As Fish Commissioner.............................................................................. 7 Fish Hatchery Man Has Exciting Trip To Lake.............................................................................. 7 Preliminary Work On Baker Lake Road Started This Week.......................................................... 8 Power Company To Continue
    [Show full text]
  • Baker River Hydroelectric Project FERC No
    Baker River Hydroelectric Project FERC No. 2150 PDEA Initial Review Comments 1/16/04 The documents available to the general public, apparently Volume I, Part 1 of 2, and Volume II, Part 1 of 2, exclude key information including the results of numerous studies and other documents that are part of the license submittal. Because so many studies are incomplete and have therefore not been incorporated into the substantive compilation of factual material relevant to the current re-licensing effort, it is difficult to comment from the County’s perspective regarding addition of flood storage in the Baker Project. For example, there are several references to study “A09,” as yet incomplete, which will provide essential information regarding salmonid spawning and rearing habitat. It is also difficult to comment on a report that does not include the recommended conditions considered necessary to protect fish and wildlife from the federal resource agencies. In numerous instances, the PDEA refers to future actions that will be undertaken after the license is issued. (See page 5-117.) The mechanism to ensure these actions are completed is not clear. It should be noted that Puget Sound Energy (PSE) has refused to conduct a flood control study1 requested by Skagit County on December 2, 2002, to verify the County’s reservoir elevation recommendations, primarily based upon a concern that this study will not be complete in time to include with the license submittal. Yet in several other areas of the re-licensing effort, results of other studies are clearly
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System
    PNNL- 23040 Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System Volume 1: Financial Feasibility Analysis December 2013 Patrick Balducci, PNNL Patrick Leslie, Puget Sound Energy Chunlian Jin, PNNL Charles Daitch, Puget Sound Energy Di Wu, PNNL Andy Marshall, Primus Power Michael Kintner-Meyer, PNNL PNNL-23040 Assessment of Energy Storage Alternatives in the Puget Sound Energy System Volume 1: Financial Feasibility Analysis P Balducci, PNNL C Jin, PNNL D Wu, PNNL M Kintner-Meyer, PNNL P Leslie, Puget Sound Energy C Daitch, Puget Sound Energy A Marshall, Primus Power December 2013 Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 and the Bonneville Power Administration. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, Washington 99352 Executive Summary For more than a decade, the Pacific Northwest has been capable of generating more electric energy than the region’s utilities required for meeting customer demand. Now, however, the Regional Resource Adequacy Forum’s five-year forecast indicates the region will soon reach load-resource balance. As capacity constraints loom, the percentage of renewables on the grid continues to grow, driven by renewable portfolio standards throughout the region, production tax credits and decreasing costs. In the Bonneville Power Administration region, with a total of 6 gigawatts of wind power, the need to manage the variability and intermittency of renewable energy resources has become a very real challenge, sometimes necessitating wind curtailments to sustain reliable operations. The continued increase of these renewable sources will necessitate the deployment of technologies that can address intermittency in an environmentally sustainable fashion. Energy storage systems have the potential to improve the operating capabilities of the electricity grid.
    [Show full text]
  • Propagation and Distribution of Food Fishes
    U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE R. P. LAMONT, Secretary BUREAU OF FISHERIES HENRY O'MALLEY, Commieeioner Bureau of Fisheries Document No. 1098 PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES FISCAL YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH APPENDIX XVI TO REPORT OF COMMISSIONER OF FISHERIES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1930 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON i 1931 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. - - - - - - - - - Price 15 cents PROPAGATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF FOOD FISHES, FISCAL 1 YEAR 1930 By GLEN C. LEACH, Chief, Division of Fish Culture CONTENTS Page Introduction - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1125 Part 1.—Fish Production: Propagation and Rescue Work Species handled _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1126 Output 1127 Cooperation with other conservation agencies - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1128 Cooperative fish nurseries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1129 State fish-cultural activities - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1132 Salvage of food fishes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1135 Transfers of eggs between stations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1136 Shipments to foreign countries - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Output of stations and substations - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1137 Egg collections - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [Show full text]
  • Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan
    TOTAL DISSOLVED GAS ABATEMENT PLAN BAKER RIVER HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT FERC PROJECT NO. 2150 Puget Sound Energy Bellevue, Washington November 2, 2009 Baker TDG Abatement Plan.Doc PUGET SOUND ENERGY Baker River Hydroelectric Project Doc ID: BAK.20091102.0201.PSE.DOE 2 November 2009 Total Dissolved Gas Abatement Plan CONTENTS CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of this TDG Abatement Plan .............................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Organization of This TDG Abatement Plan...................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Project Features............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 TDG Information........................................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 TDG Sources at Hydroelectric Projects...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Puget Sound Power and Light Company Records, Acc. No. 2250
    UNIVERSITY U BRARIES w UNIVERSITY of WASHI NGTON Spe ial Colle tions Puget Sound Power and Light Company records Inventory Accession No: 2250-001 Special Collections Division University of Washington Libraries Box 352900 Seattle, Washington, 98195-2900 USA (206) 543-1929 This document forms part of the Guide to the Puget Sound Power and Light Company Records. To find out more about the history, context, arrangement, availability and restrictions on this collection, click on the following link: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/permalink/PugetSoundPowerLight2068_2250_5689/ Special Collections home page: http://www.lib.washington.edu/specialcollections/ Search Collection Guides: http://digital.lib.washington.edu/findingaids/search PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT COMPANY #2250 Guide Organizational History On October 19, 1885 the Seattle Electric Company, the earliest pred- ecessor of the present Puget Sound Power & Light Company, was organized. It began generating electricity on March 22, 1886. During the next ten years as many as 30 small electric companies operated within Seattle, but most were lost to financial insolvency and merger by 1899. During this same period the Stone & Webster Service Corporation was formed and began to provide management for small utilities nationwide. In 1899 Stone & Webster was engaged to study the competitive situation in Seattle. The result was a consolidation in 1900 which placed most of the power, light and railway -services in Seattle under the management of the newly organized Seattle Electric Company and thus established the city's first unified electric system. The increasing electrical demands of the following decade necessi- tated further mergers among the more than 50 separate utilities in the Puget Sound region, from which emerged five major operating companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Skagit River Basin Hydrology Report Existing Conditions October 2008
    Skagit River Basin Hydrology Report Existing Conditions October 2008 Prepared For: City of Burlington City of Mount Vernon Dike, Drainage and Irrigation District 12 Dike District 1 By: PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL PLLC ENGINEERING Skagit River Basin Hydrology Report Existing Conditions Skagit County, Washington Prepared by: Pacific International Engineering, PLLC October 2008 PACIFIC INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING PLLC POST OFFICE BOX 1599 • 123 SECOND AVENUE SOUTH • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON • 98020 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Summary .................................................................................... 1 2.0 Skagit River Watershed Characteristics..................................... 5 2.1 Topography....................................................................... 6 2.2 Geology............................................................................. 6 2.3 Sediment........................................................................... 7 2.4 Climate.............................................................................. 7 2.4.1 Temperature.......................................................... 8 2.4.2 Precipitation .......................................................... 8 2.4.3 Snowfall................................................................. 8 2.4.4 Wind ...................................................................... 9 2.5 Channel Characteristics.................................................... 9 2.5.1 International Border to Gorge Dam ....................... 9 2.5.2 Gorge Dam to Newhalem.....................................
    [Show full text]
  • James E. Stewart Skagit River Flood Reports
    TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE .............................................................................................................................4 PURPOSE.............................................................................................................................6 I. THE STEWART REPORTS........................................................................................7 A. 1918 REPORT.................................................................................................7 B. 1923 REPORT.................................................................................................9 1. Preliminary Report ................................................................................9 2. Field Notes..........................................................................................10 3. Additional Work...................................................................................13 4. 1923 Report Analysis ..........................................................................19 5. Tree Staining.......................................................................................23 6. Glacial History.....................................................................................25 C. 1961 REPORT...............................................................................................26 1. The “N-Factor”.....................................................................................28 2. H.C. Riggs & W. H. Robinson Report..................................................29
    [Show full text]
  • Baker River Hydroelectric Project Relicensing Comprehensive Settlement Agreement, Signed in November 2004 (Agreement)
    2 Based on the information provided in the Final Environmental Impact Statement, other documents, and conversations with staff from Puget Sound Energy, ACOE, and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), we have concluded that effects to the federally-listed grizzly bear and gray wolf associated with the proposed relicensing of the Baker Project would be insignificant and discountable. Therefore, we concur with your “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for grizzly bear and gray wolf. The FWS disagrees that “may affect, likely to adversely affect” is the appropriate effect determination for bull trout critical habitat. Virtually no areas below the Baker Dams are designated bull trout critical habitat, and therefore we believe that the appropriate determination is “no effect.” The FWS does not concur with the “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” determination for bald eagle, marbled murrelet, marbled murrelet critical habitat, northern spotted owl, and northern spotted owl critical habitat because of the potential for increased disturbance due to construction activities and increased visitor use, the potential to remove critical habitat and/or the potential to increase predation of marbled murrelet nests by corvids. We concur with the “may affect, likely to adversely affect” determination for bull trout. We therefore have conducted a formal consultation on the bald eagle, bull trout, marbled murrelet, marbled murrelet critical habitat, northern spotted owl, and northern spotted owl critical habitat. This consultation is complex, involving two Federal action agencies, the analysis of over 50 license articles proposed in the Baker River Hydroelectric Project Settlement Agreement and covering the effects of a license for operation for up to 50 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B: Resources
    Appendix B: Resources At least 35 public, non-profit, and private organizations are involved in The following pages summarily describe each organization based on open space preservation, enhancement, and maintenance within Skagit information provided during the workshop sessions, mapping data County – though not all are directly involved in such activities in or recorded in Skagit County’s GIS system, and organization publications. around the UGAs. Each organization’s land holdings are depicted in the graphic at the Workshops were conducted with most of these organizations at the top of each jurisdiction’s page based on the county’s current GIS beginning of this planning process in order to determine their mission, records. The county’s records may be incomplete in some instances resources, programs, projects, and other particulars. where the property record searches do not recognize all the titles under which an organization may own easements or lands – or B-1 Appendix B: Resources Skagit County UGA Open Space Plan instances where the title includes other jurisdiction or landholder names or references. Due to the extreme complexity of the GIS mapping characteristic overlays and map scale, the organization’s graphic only shows UGA boundaries in relation to the property easements or title holdings on record for the western portions of Skagit County. The purpose of the graphic is to illustrate the dimensions of each organization’s landholdings in relation to the county as a whole and the UGAs in particular. The simplified organizational landholding graphics are correlated with the water, slope, roadway, and UGA base map shown on the first page of this introduction section.
    [Show full text]