Done by Hand Chiropractics, the Headache Patient, and the Lost Art of Touch

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Done by Hand Chiropractics, the Headache Patient, and the Lost Art of Touch HEADACHE HORIZONS Done by Hand Chiropractics, the headache patient, and the lost art of touch. By Peter McAllister, MD The Birth of a Chiropractor Daniel David “DD” Palmer was a tall charismatic Blood supply to the head, pituitary gland, C1 scalp, bones of the face, brain, inner and grocer, who became a phrenologist, spiritualist, middle ear, sympathetic nervous system. Eyes, optic nerves, auditory nerves, sinuses, magnetic healer, and medicinal potions entre- C2 mastoid bones, tongue, forehead. Cheeks, outer ear, face bones, teeth, C3 trifacial nerve. preneur. Born inToronto, Canada, DD discov- Nose, lips, mouth, eustachian tube. C4 Vocal cords, neck glands, pharynx. ered as a young man that his “cures” found a C5 more receptive audience in the midwestern US, and so he emi- C6 Neck muscles, shoulders, tonsils. REGION NECK Thyroid gland, bursae in the shoulders, elbows. grated southwesterly, selling tonics and magnets out the back C7 1 Arms from the elbows down, including hands, of a horse-drawn wagon before settling in Davenport, IA. T1 wrists, and fingers, esophagus, and trachea. Heart, including its valves and covering, In 1895, with several spectators gathered and to great T2 coronary arteries Lungs, bronchial tubes, pleura, chest, breast. T3 fanfare, DD thrust his clutched hands so forcefully into his Gallbladder, common duct. T4 Liver, solar plexus, circulation (general). patient’s thoracic spine that all present heard the alarming and T5 audible crack. The patient, a janitor who serviced DD’s office, T6 Stomach. T7 Pancreas, duodenum. was middle-aged, stooped, and habitually complained to DD MID-BACK T8 Spleen. T9 Adrenal and suprarenal glands. about his hearing loss—telling him that one day his hearing Kidneys. T10 was sharp as a barn owl and the next he was deaf as a box Kidneys, uterus. T11 turtle. Weeks before the dramatic crack, DD had observed that T12 Small intestines, lymph circulation. the janitor’s spine seemed bent, as DD would later write, to “an L1 Large intestines, inguinal rings. Appendix, abdomen, upper leg. ungodly angle.” Palmer wondered if there could be a connec- L2 Sex organs, uterus, bladder, knees. tion between the janitor’s deafness and his bowed backbone? L3 Prostate gland, muscles of the lower back, DD had been considering the spine and its relationship to L4 sciatic nerve. LOW-BACK Lower legs, ankles, feet. health and posited that there existed a spiritual (ie, God-given) L5 life force or innate intelligence within the human body flow- SACRUM Hip bones, buttocks. Rectum, anus. COCCYX ing from brain to spinal nerves to liver, kidneys, stomach, and PELVIS other organs (including the hearing apparatus of the ear), Figure. Chiropractic chart of viscera supplied by vertebral nerves. supplying nourishing energy (Figure).2 Although without evi- dence, DD further postulated spinal subluxations (ie, vertebral well completely devoid of innervation. Although DD Palmer misalignments) hindered flow of vital spirit, and that reducing believed that “95% of human disease” comes from spinal- subluxation with vigorous manipulation (a high-velocity, low- subluxation problems, we know now that human maladies are amplitude thrust) could restore this flow. caused by myriad scientifically provable causes among them The next day, when the janitor commented his hearing had infectious, autoimmune, degenerative, genetic, nutritional, “somewhat improved,” DD knew he was onto something big. and other etiologies.3 There is ample anatomic evidence that Cobbling together notions from magnetism, vitalism, bone- no neural path connects the spinal cord or nerve roots to setting, and other fringes of pseudoscience, and borrowing the the ear. Although spinal subluxations exist, they do not inter- Latin words chiros and practis—meaning done by hand—DD rupt innate intelligence, nor are they reduced by chiropractic found commercial success better than any healing magnets or manipulation. Quite simply, DD’s crack of the janitor’s back elixirs he had sold out of his wagon. Chiropractic was born. could not have restored even a modicum of hearing. A scientifically rigorous review of contemporary research A Lack of Evidence concerning chiropractic is both brief and disappointing. There Modern science tells us that there is no nourishing vital are few well-designed studies, in part because the discipline force flowing from spinal nerves to organs, without which they was quite antiscience until the 1970s, and the only positive would not survive—for example, a transplanted liver functions objective result is that it may be helpful for acute musculo- 24 PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY JANUARY 2019 HEADACHE HORIZONS 4 skeletal low back pain. Chiropractic appears to be roughly TABLE. CHIROPRACTOR VS NEUROLOGIST TRAINING equivalent to physical therapy, or a sheet of back stretching exercises, and possibly slightly superior to nonsteroidal anti- Chiropractor Neurologist inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). That’s it. Chiropractic does Years of college 3 4 not treat asthma, ear infections, bed wetting, anxiety, irritable Average college GPA 3.37 3.78 bowel, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Entrance examination No Yes or any other nonmusculoskeletal condition, despite many practitioners’ website proclamations. Years of training 4 4 There is no evidence that chiropractic has any role in the Postgraduate training No ≥ 4 years 5 treatment of headache. Chiropractic may, in fact, be harm- Subspeciality certified 3% 75% ful when applied to the cervical region in an attempt to treat headache. Vertebral artery dissection leading to stroke (in schools, chiropractic students are taught marketing, finance, some cases fatal) has been reported, as have dural tears and and business operations from the beginning of training. There cervical nerve root and cord trauma.6 Under-reporting of cer- is a specific emphasis on what it takes to get patients in the vical trauma by chiropractors appears to be a major problem.7 door—and keep them coming. Many chiropractors market The use of total spine x-ray imaging, common in chiropractic themselves as primary care doctors, capable of providing offices, is also not without long-term health risk. 8 health care to the entire family from infancy through end of life; there have even been cases of intrauterine chiropractic Why Do Patients Go? manipulation!11 Although marketing a chiropractic practice Using email listserves of neurologists and headache special- as a primary care provider may be a good way to build up a ists, I asked 78 colleagues, “Do you send headache patients for patient base, not everyone agrees with that model; some chi- chiropractic care? If not, why not?” Of the 42 who responded, ropractors, for example, are antivaccination proponents. 35 (83%) said they did not and would not refer their patients with headache to a chiropractor, citing lack of evidence of Anchoring Bias efficacy and concerns about harm, particularly in the neck and Many musculoskeletal conditions resolve over time, without suboccipital regions. Only 7 (17%) routinely sent their head- intervention. If patients have less pain after a few visits, they ache patients to chiropractors, and all came with caveats, such may assume chiropractic manipulation was responsible, when as “I only refer to Dr. X; she’s gentle and doesn’t do manipula- it may have been nature taking its course. To be fair, the same tion” or “I only refer for low back pain, not headache.” could be said for visits to physicians or physical therapists. Although neurologists and headache specialists may not be enamored of chiropractic, it seems our patients are. There are Hands-On Care more than 77,000 chiropractors in the US treating more than Perhaps the chiropractor’s most valuable tool is neither 35 million annually (~12% of the population),9 vs approxi- their ill-proven gadgets—thermal analysis and wobble chairs mately 17,000 neurologists, 500 board certified in headache come to mind—nor their unnecessary whole spine x-rays, but medicine by the United Council on Neurologic Subspecialties rather their hands, for to lay hands on a patient is to establish (UCNS). There are 10,000 chiropractic students in 18 accred- a human connection, vital to the doctor-patient relationship. ited schools and 2,500 new chiropractors and1,500 chiroprac- Chiropractors lay hands on patients, instantly establishing a tic assistants annually. Differences in training and qualifications primal connection that has the unspoken power to engender abound (Table). The US Bureau of Labor predicts chiropractic goodwill and contribute to a heightened sense of well-being, will grow by 16% by 2026, because, as the Bureau’s website or even the perception of being “healed.” Traditional allopathic states, “The field is attractive to patients because chiroprac- medicine seems to have all but forgotten this ancient healing tors use nonsurgical treatment methods and do not prescribe art of touch, busy as we are ordering high-tech tests and click- drugs.”10 Many people go to chiropractors seeking chronic ing and box ticking on our computers, attending to an “iPa- pain relief that includes migraine and other headaches. Simply tient” in a machine, but leaving the real patient out in the cold. put—chiropractors see our patients. It is reasonable to ask why patients go to chiropractic, The Importance of Human Touch despite an overwhelming lack of evidence to support its use in Several months ago, I was rounding with a new medical all but a select group of patients with low back pain. student and observed that after seeing 10 patients, she had declined to shake hands with any. I gently asked if there was Chiropractic Marketing some reason, cultural, hygienic, or otherwise, for her lack of Chiropractors aggressively market themselves as a safe participation in this ageless form of greeting. To my surprise, alternative to traditional medicine. Unlike allopathic medical she informed me that at her medical school they were taught JANUARY 2019 PRACTICAL NEUROLOGY 25 HEADACHE HORIZONS not to “violate the patient’s personal space.” A handshake, percussed the region, mined deeply the muscle spasm.
Recommended publications
  • Philosophy, Science, Antiscience the Institute of Philosophy Summer School 2020 Zagreb, 15-17 June 2020
    Philosophy, Science, Antiscience The Institute of Philosophy Summer School 2020 Zagreb, 15-17 June 2020 MONDAY 9.30-10.00 Registration 10.00-13.00 Course 1 Dr. Luka Boršić (Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb) Anti-Aristotelianism and the Emergence of Modern Science 13.00-16.00 Break 16.00-19.00 Course 2 Professor Robert J. Hankinson (University of Texas at Austin) Physics, Mathematics, and Explanation in Aristotle TUESDAY 10.00-13.00 Course 3 Dr. Ivana Skuhala Karasman (Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb) Astrology: From Science to Pseudoscience 13.00-15.00 Break 15.00-18.00 Course 4 Professor Jure Zovko (Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb / University of Zadar) Does Relativism Threaten the Sciences? WEDNESDAY 10.00-13.00 Course 5 Dr. Marija Brajdić Vuković (Institute of Social Research, Zagreb) What is an Expert? Scientific and Public Controversies 13.00-15.00 Break 15.00-18.00 Course 6 Professor Luca Malatesti (University of Rijeka) Science in the Courtroom. Some Conceptual and Methodological Issues in Transferring Neuropsychological Science in the Insanity Defence 18:00-18:30 Break 1 18.30-20.00 Closing Lecture Professor Darko Polšek (Department of Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Zagreb) Science: Good, Bad and Bogus (New Challenges!) 2 COURSE 1 Anti-Aristotelianism and the Emergence of Modern Science INSTRUCTOR Dr. Luka Boršić (Institute of Philosophy, Zagreb) ABSTRACT We are going to inquire into the changes of paradigm that happened notably in the 16th century and which prepared the ground for the emergence of modern science. In more detail we are going to explore the texts of three Renaissance philosophers: Mario Nizolio (De veris principiis), Frane Petrić (Francesco Patrizi, Discussiones peripateticae) and Jacopo Mazzoni (In universam Platonis et Aristotelis philosophiam praeludia).
    [Show full text]
  • The Mystery and History of Spinal Manipulation
    Michael C. P. Livingston The Mystery and History of Spinal Manipulation SUMMARY SOMMAIRE This paper reviews the history of spinal Cet article raconte l'histoire de la manipulation de la manipulation and shows its origin in an colonne vertebrale, ses origines, son passe obscur obscure past among many cultures. The dans les diff6rentes civilisations. L'auteur suggere author suggests reasons for the medical plusieurs raisons qui peuvent expliquer le manque d'interet relatif de la profession medicale pour la profession's relative disinterest in manipulation et il s'interroge sur les motifs de cette manipulation, but questions this attitude. attitude. (Can Fam Physician 1981;27:300-302). I-i.....1 Dr. Livingston practices family Manipulation, meanwhile, was The doctress of Epsom has outdone medicine in Richmond, BC. being practiced in different localities you all . Reprint requests to: Suite 305, 7031 by different types of individuals in- A century later, Dr. Riadore, a Lon- Westminister Highway, Richmond, cluding priests, virgins and tame don physician, suggested a source for BC. V6X 1A3. bears-all trampling on the sufferers' much disease was the irritation of spi- backs. Captain Cook was "squeezed" nal nerves, while across the Atlantic, MANIPULATION of the spinal by Tahitian women for his sciatica in at Ohio Medical College, John Eberle Joints may be defined as an ex- 1777, noting in his diary that "they wrote: amination treatment procedure in made my bones crack". "When the pains are situated in the which the spinal joint or joints are In Europe, certain families came to head and upper extremities, the spi- moved beyond their restricted range to be called bone-setters, "knochen- nal affection, if any exist, will be their normal range of movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Manipulation — Not an 'Adjustment'
    Spinal Manipulation — Not an ‘Adjustment’ How Does Manual Physical Therapy and Chiropractic Differ? By: Joe Waller MPT, Cert. SMT, CMTPT Spinal Manipulation, also known as ‘High-Velocity Low-Amplitude Thrust’ or ‘Spinal Manipulative Therapy’, is an ancient art and science tracing its origins to the earliest of medical practitioners. Practiced principally by physical therapists and chiropractors, it is also utilized to a lesser degree by medical and osteopathic physicians. Spinal manipulation is unique compared with other manual therapy techniques in that the clinician applies a rapid impulse, or thrust, in order to achieve a gapping and subsequent cavitation of the target joint. Joint cavitation is accompanied by an audible release recognized as a ‘popping’, or ‘cracking’, sound. Spinal manipulation is used by physical therapists to facilitate movement, relieve pain, increase circulation, relax muscles, and improve muscle function. A common misconception is that spinal manipulation by a physical therapist is synonymous with a chiropractic adjustment. So the question follows: what is the difference between the two? Between manual physical therapy and chiropractic? While technique application between the professions can be very similar, the two professions operate under divergent treatment models. A clearer understanding of the context and reasoning used to guide treatment will help differentiate between these two professions. The key phrases in the Wisconsin Definition of Chiropractic Practice Act are spinal column adjustment and spinal subluxations and associated nerve energy expression. Most chiropractors, to varying degrees, subscribe to the theory of the ‘spinal subluxation complex’, which asserts that the subluxation of a vertebra actively alters neurological function, which, if left untreated, will lead to disorders and disease of the various organ systems.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are the Risks of Chiropractic Neck Adjustments?
    What are the Risks of Chiropractic Neck Adjustments? By William J. Lauretti, DC From time to time, news items have reported on the supposed risks of chiropractic manipulation to the neck. As a practicing chiropractor who uses neck manipulation everyday in my practice, I find these reports exaggerated and alarmist. I’ve been in practice for over 15 years, and I’ve personally performed well over 15,000 neck adjustments without a single serious complication that I am aware of. I often perform neck adjustments on my friends, family and loved ones, and often receive them myself from colleagues. Based on the available scientific evidence and my past clinical experience, I’m personally convinced that neck adjustments are a very safe and very effective form of treatment. Clearly, the risks of neck manipulation are not as extreme as some of the more irresponsible reports imply. Stroke and Neck Manipulation Criticisms regarding the safety of chiropractic neck treatments usually focus on the remote risk of a stroke or cerebrovascular accident (CVA) occurring as a result of the treatment. The most likely mechanism of stroke from neck movement involves injury to the vertebral artery (VA) as it goes through the sides of the upper cervical vertebrae and into the base of the skull. The part of the artery that passes through the cervical spine is called the vertebral artery. The continuation of the artery into the base of the brain is called the basilar artery. Both sections together are usually called the vertebrobasilar system. Rotation of the neck may injure an abnormally fragile vertebral artery along its course by partially tearing the inner artery wall (the intima).
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying the Placebo Effect
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2018 Demystifying the Placebo Effect Phoebe Friesen The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2775 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] DEMYSTIFYING THE PLACEBO EFFECT by PHOEBE FRIESEN A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2018 © 2018 PHOEBE FRIESEN All Rights Reserved ii Demystifying the Placebo Effect by Phoebe Friesen This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Philosophy in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________ ____________________________________ Date [Peter Godfrey-Smith] Chair of Examining Committee ___________ ____________________________________ Date [Nickolas Pappas ] Executive Office Supervisory Committee: Peter Godfrey-Smith Jesse Prinz John Greenwood THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Demystifying the Placebo Effect by Phoebe Friesen Advisor: Peter Godfrey-Smith This dissertation offers a philosophical analysis of the placebo effect. After offering an overview of recent evidence concerning the phenomenon, I consider several prominent accounts of the placebo effect that have been put forward and argue that none of them are able to adequately account for the diverse instantiations of the phenomenon. I then offer a novel account, which suggests that we ought to think of the placebo effect as encompassing three distinct responses: conditioned placebo responses, cognitive placebo responses, and network placebo responses.
    [Show full text]
  • The Manipulation Education Manual
    Manipulation Education Manual For Physical Therapist Professional Degree Programs Manipulation Education Committee APTA Manipulation Task Force Jointly sponsored by: Education Section and Orthopaedic Section, American Physical Therapy Association American Physical Therapy Association American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists 2004 April 2004 Dear Physical Therapist Educator, As you know, the practice of physical therapy has been under attack on many fronts recently; one of the most aggressive has been directed toward the physical therapist’s ability to provide manual therapy interventions including nonthrust and thrust mobilization/manipulations. APTA has been working with the American Academy of Orthopaedic Manual Physical Therapists (AAOMPT) and the Education and Orthopaedic Sections of APTA, to develop proactive initiatives to combat these attacks. In early 2003, strategies were developed to heighten awareness among academic and clinical faculty of legislative and regulatory threats to physical therapist use of manipulation in practice and in academic instruction. One of these strategies is to promote dialogue and resource sharing among physical therapy faculty regarding instruction, legislation, and regulation in the area of thrust manipulation. The Manipulation Education Manual (MEM) was developed to support the ongoing efforts in physical therapist education programs to provide appropriate, evidence-based instruction in thrust manipulation. Educational preparation of physical therapists for the practice of manipulative
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain, and Suggests Sources for Additional Information
    U.S. Department of Health & Human Services National Institutes of Health Spinal Manipulation for Low-Back Pain © Matthew Lester Low-back pain (often referred to as “lower back pain”) is a common condition that usually improves with self-care (practices that people can do by themselves, such as remaining active, applying heat, and taking pain-relieving medications). However, it is occasionally difficult to treat. Some health care professionals are trained to use a technique called spinal manipulation to relieve low-back pain and improve physical function (the ability to walk and move). This fact sheet provides basic information about low-back pain, summarizes research on spinal manipulation for low-back pain, and suggests sources for additional information. Key Points — Spinal manipulation is one of several options—including exercise, massage, and physical therapy—that can provide mild-to-moderate relief from low-back pain. Spinal manipulation appears to work as well as conventional treatments such as applying heat, using a firm mattress, and taking pain-relieving medications. — Spinal manipulation appears to be a generally safe treatment for low-back pain when performed by a trained and licensed practitioner. The most common side effects (e.g., discomfort in the treated area) are minor and go away within 1 to 2 days. Serious complications are very rare. — Cauda equina syndrome (CES), a significant narrowing of the lower part of the spinal canal in which nerves become pinched and may cause pain, weakness, loss of feeling in one or both legs, and bowel or bladder problems, may be an extremely rare complication of spinal manipulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Chiropractic Origins, Controversies, and Contributions
    REVIEW ARTICLE Chiropractic Origins, Controversies, and Contributions Ted J. Kaptchuk, OMD; David M. Eisenberg, MD hiropractic is an important component of the US health care system and the largest al- ternative medical profession. In this overview of chiropractic, we examine its history, theory, and development; its scientific evidence; and its approach to the art of medicine. Chiropractic’s position in society is contradictory, and we reveal a complex dynamic of conflictC and diversity. Internally, chiropractic has a dramatic legacy of strife and factionalism. Exter- nally, it has defended itself from vigorous opposition by conventional medicine. Despite such ten- sions, chiropractors have maintained a unified profession with an uninterrupted commitment to clini- cal care. While the core chiropractic belief that the correction of spinal abnormality is a critical health care intervention is open to debate, chiropractic’s most important contribution may have to do with the patient-physician relationship. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:2215-2224 Chiropractic, the medical profession that (whereas the number of physicians is ex- specializes in manual therapy and espe- pected to increase by only 16%).6 cially spinal manipulation, is the most im- Despite such impressive creden- portant example of alternative medicine tials, academic medicine regards chiro- in the United States and alternative medi- practic theory as speculative at best and cine’s greatest anomaly. its claims of clinical success, at least out- Even to call chiropractic “alterna- side of low back pain, as unsubstanti- tive” is problematic; in many ways, it is ated. Only a few small hospitals permit chi- distinctly mainstream. Facts such as the ropractors to treat inpatients, and to our following attest to its status and success: knowledge, university-affiliated teaching Chiropractic is licensed in all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Manipulation for Confirmed Symptomatic Cervical Disc JMPT 2013
    ORIGINAL ARTICLES OUTCOMES FROM MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING–CONFIRMED SYMPTOMATIC CERVICAL DISK HERNIATION PATIENTS TREATED WITH HIGH-VELOCITY, LOW-AMPLITUDE SPINAL MANIPULATIVE THERAPY: APROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY WITH 3-MONTH FOLLOW-UP Cynthia K. Peterson, RN, DC, M.Med.Ed, a Christof Schmid, DC, b Serafin Leemann, DC, b Bernard Anklin, DC, b and B. Kim Humphreys, DC, PhD c ABSTRACT Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate outcomes of patients with cervical radiculopathy from cervical disk herniation (CDH) who are treated with spinal manipulative therapy. Methods: Adult Swiss patients with neck pain and dermatomal arm pain; sensory, motor, or reflex changes corresponding to the involved nerve root; and at least 1 positive orthopaedic test for cervical radiculopathy were included. Magnetic resonance imaging–confirmed CDH linked with symptoms was required. Baseline data included 2 pain numeric rating scales (NRSs), for neck and arm, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). At 2 weeks, 1 month, and 3 months after initial consultation, patients were contacted by telephone, and the NDI, NRSs, and patient's global impression of change data were collected. High-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulations were administered by experienced doctors of chiropractic. The proportion of patients responding “better” or “much better” on the patient's global impression of change scale was calculated. Pretreatment and posttreatment NRSs and NDIs were compared using the Wilcoxon test. Acute vs subacute/chronic patients' NRSs and NDIs were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Fifty patients were included. At 2 weeks, 55.3% were “improved,” 68.9% at 1 month and 85.7% at 3 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Cervical Spine Manipulation: a Rapid Literature Review
    CERVICAL SPINE MANIPULATION: A RAPID LITERATURE REVIEW JANUARY 2017 Please note that this Rapid Literature Review is a summary of information from other sources, not a representation of the policy position of Manitoba Health, Seniors, and Active Living or the Manitoba Health Professions Advisory Council. Prepared for the Manitoba Health Professions Advisory Council 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________________________________ 3 Introduction ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Methods __________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Results ____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 7 Adverse Effects of Cervical Spine Manipulation ________________________________________________________________8 Minor Adverse Events __________________________________________________________________________________________8 Serious Adverse Events ______________________________________________________________________________________ 10 Predictors of Adverse Events ________________________________________________________________________________ 16 Beneficial Effects of Cervical Spine Manipulation ____________________________________________________________ 19 Headache _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ 19 Neck Pain _____________________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Spinal Manipulation • S
    12/30/2019 Disclosure Spinal Manipulation • S. Jake Thompson – No relevant financial relationship exists. S. Jake Thompson MPT, ATC, SCS Cert. SMT, Cert DN, Dip. Osteopractic, AAOMPT Fellow In Training 1 2 Presentation Objectives • Be cognizant of safety issues regarding spinal manipulation. • Recognize the current best evidence for the implementation of spinal manipulation in clinical practice 3 4 SPINAL MANIPULATION SPINAL MANIPULATION • Guide to PT Practice- •PROS Mobilization/Manipulation = “A manual therapy technique •Non pharm comprised of a continuum of skilled passive movements to •Non surgical joints and/or related soft tissues that are applied at varying speeds and amplitudes, including a small amplitude/high •Cost effective compared to exercise (UK BEAM 2002) velocity therapeutic movement” •Safe (Oliphant 2004) • Manipulation Education Committee, June 2003- •Current research is as strong as any other Thrust Joint Manipulation (TJM)- high velocity, low intervention (PT) amplitude therapeutic movements within or at end range of motion. 5 6 1 12/30/2019 SPINAL MANIPULATION SPINAL MANIPULATION •Cons • Placebo • Western Medicine perception • Alternative Medicine • Poor face validity “out of alignment” and “subluxation theory” • Lack of an identifiable mechanism of action for MT may limit the acceptability of these techniques • Viewed as less scientific Dekanich,J., Pitcher, M., Steadman Hawkins Sports Medicine Lecture Series: Chiropractic (2006) 7 8 History of Manipulation History of Manipulation • Hippocrates, Father of • Wharton
    [Show full text]
  • Manipulative Therapy – Commercial Medical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy Manipulative Therapy Policy Number: 2021T0541N Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ........................................................................... 1 • Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Pain and Definitions ........................................................................................... 2 Muscle Rehabilitation Applicable Codes .............................................................................. 2 • Home Traction Therapy Description of Services ..................................................................... 2 • Manipulation Under Anesthesia Clinical Evidence ............................................................................... 3 • Motorized Spinal Traction U.S. Food and Drug Administration ..............................................17 • References .......................................................................................17 Neuropsychological Testing Under the Medical Policy History/Revision Information..............................................23 Benefit Instructions for Use .........................................................................23 • Spinal Ultrasonography • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Community Plan Policy • Manipulative Therapy Medicare Advantage Coverage Summary • Chiropractic Services Coverage Rationale Manipulative therapy is proven and medically necessary for treating Musculoskeletal Disorders, except as
    [Show full text]