DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:1708.09221V1 [Cs.DS] 30 Aug 2017 a Book Drawing Is Called a Book Embedding If It Is Drawing of K5 with Crossing-Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:1708.09221V1 [Cs.DS] 30 Aug 2017 a Book Drawing Is Called a Book Embedding If It Is Drawing of K5 with Crossing-Free Experimental Evaluation of Book Drawing Algorithms? Jonathan Klawitter1, Tamara Mchedlidze2, and Martin N¨ollenburg3 1 University of Auckland, New Zealand, [email protected] 2 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, [email protected] 3 TU Wien, Vienna, Austria, [email protected] Abstract. A k-page book drawing of a graph G = (V; E) consists of a linear ordering of its vertices along a spine and an assignment of each edge to one of the k pages, which are half-planes bounded by the spine. In a book drawing, two edges cross if and only if they are assigned to the same page and their vertices alternate along the spine. Crossing minimization in a k-page book drawing is NP-hard, yet book drawings have multiple applications in visualization and beyond. Therefore sev- eral heuristic book drawing algorithms exist, but there is no broader comparative study on their relative performance. In this paper, we pro- pose a comprehensive benchmark set of challenging graph classes for book drawing algorithms and provide an extensive experimental study of the performance of existing book drawing algorithms. 1 Introduction Book embeddings and book drawings are a fundamental and well-studied topic in graph theory and graph drawing. Combinatorially, a k-page book drawing of a graph G = (V; E) consists of a cyclic linear ordering of its vertices along a spine and an assignment of each edge to one of the k pages, which are half-planes bounded by the spine. The spine and the k pages form a book. Clearly, two edges fu; vg and fw; zg in a book drawing cross if and only if they are assigned to the same page and the four vertices alternate on the spine. Fig. 1: 3-page book arXiv:1708.09221v1 [cs.DS] 30 Aug 2017 A book drawing is called a book embedding if it is drawing of K5 with crossing-free. The book thickness (or pagenumber) of a two crossings. graph G is the smallest k such that G admits a k-page book embedding [5]. Deciding whether a graph can be embedded on k pages is an NP-complete problem even for k = 2 [6,29] and there are many results about lower and upper bounds on the book thickness of specific graph classes. A long- standing open question [13] is to determine whether the book thickness of planar graphs is three or four. Yannakakis [40] showed that any planar graph can be ? Preliminary results of this paper were presented in a poster at Graph Drawing 2016. 2 J. Klawitter et al. embedded on four pages and there are planar graphs that cannot be embedded on two pages. Likewise, the book thickness of k-planar graphs is open. Alam et al. [1] showed that there are 1-planar graphs that need four pages and that 16 is an upper bound. If the number k of pages is given, a k-page book embedding may not ex- ist. In this case, crossing minimization becomes the primary optimization goal. It reduces to two basic and interdependent combinatorial problems: the vertex ordering (VO) along the spine and the page assignment (PA) for the edges. Again, computing the k-page book crossing number, i.e., the minimum num- ber of crossings over all k-page book drawings of a graph, is an NP-hard prob- lem [29,34] and fixed-parameter tractable algorithms for 1- and 2-page crossing minimization are known [2]. Book drawings are motivated by several applica- tions, e.g., network visualization [4,16{18,38], VLSI design [39], RNA folding [11], and knot theory [14]. Various heuristic algorithms have been proposed in the lit- erature. In addition, crossing minimization in book drawings has been the chal- lenge problem of the Graph Drawing Contests in 2015 and 2016. Yet there are no broader comparative studies of these algorithms and no established set of chal- lenging benchmark graph classes. In this paper, we introduce a comprehensive benchmark set for book drawing algorithms and provide the first extensive ex- perimental study of the performance of state-of-the-art book drawing algorithms for multiple numbers of pages. There are several heuristics for 2-page crossing minimization [8{10] with a fixed linear vertex ordering, as well as algorithms for the general 2-page crossing minimization problem [21, 22]. Genetic and evolutionary crossing minimization algorithms have been proposed for one page [18], two pages [3, 19, 31], and any number of pages [33]. Further, neural networks have been used for 2-page crossing minimization [20, 37] and for k-page crossing minimization [28]. Experimental evaluations have been performed by Satsangi et al. [33], who, however, excluded previously best performing algorithms by Baur and Bran- des [4] and tested algorithms for VO and PA problems only independently from each other, not in combination. He et al. [23] performed an experimental study of several heuristics, but only for the 2-page crossing minimization problem. Contributions and outline. In this paper, we determine the strengths and weak- nesses as well as the relative performance of heuristic algorithms for the book drawing problem by means of a detailed quantitative experimental study. To this end, we present a list of state-of-the-art heuristic algorithms from the literature as well as some newly proposed heuristics in Section 2. Section 3 presents a col- lection of different graph classes together with suitable random graph generators to be used for creating benchmark graphs for our evaluation. Finally, Section 4 contains our comparative experimental evaluation. The main focus of our study is the relative performance of the heuristics in terms of crossing minimization depending on the properties of the benchmark instances, such as book thick- ness, graph size, edge density, and graph structure. Since out implementations are not optimized for a fast performance, we refrained from a detailed running time analysis. Some preliminary indications of the running times can be found Experimental Evaluation of Book Drawing Algorithms 3 in the appendix (Fig. 19). The code of our benchmark graph generators and of the book drawing algorithms can be found online4. 2 Algorithms We distinguished between constructive heuristics that have the common prop- erty that they consider each vertex and edge once, and local search heuristics that make several rounds re-considering the same vertices and edges iteratively. We evaluate these algorithms separately, as the latter can be seen as local search heuristics, which also use much more computation time. The constructive heuris- tics themselves can be characterized as VO heuristics, PA heuristics, and com- bined heuristics, that construct both VO and PA simultaneously. 2.1 Constructive Heuristics Four of the heuristics presented in this section have not appeared in the literature earlier, namely treeBFS, conGreedy, conGreedy+, and earDecomp (see [26] for more details). Several additional heuristics are referenced, but not included in our study because they were always outperformed by the other presented heuristics in previous experimentation. VO Heuristics. A VO heuristic considers vertices in some particular order and places them on the spine based on some criteria. An edge fu; vg where only one of u and v (resp. both) has been placed on the spine is called open (resp. closed). smallest degree DFS (smlDgrDFS) [18]. DFS-based heuristics set the VO to be the order in which the vertices are visited by a depth-first traversal of the graph. The smlDgrDFS heuristic starts with a smallest degree vertex and chooses a neighbor with smallest degree to proceed. random DFS (randDFS) [3]. In contrast to smlDgrDFS, randDFS starts with a random vertex and proceeds with a random neighbor. tree-based BFS (treeBFS). This heuristic generates a breath-first spanning tree of the graph and embeds it crossing-free in a 1-page book yielding the VO. All three search based heuristics have a running time of O(m + n). connectivity based (conCro) [4]. This heuristics builds the VO step by step. At each step it selects the vertex with the most neighbors already placed and breaks ties in favor of vertices with fewest unplaced neighbors (connectivity ! con). It places the vertex on that end of the already computed spine, where it introduces fewer crossings with open edges (crossings ! Cro). The intuition behind this heuristic is that the chosen vertex closes most open edges and opens fewest at ties. Its running time is O((m + n) log n). 4 Graph generators: github.com/joklawitter/GraphGenerators, book drawing algo- rithms: github.com/joklawitter/BookDrawingAlgorithms 4 J. Klawitter et al. greedy connectivity based (conGreedy). Like conCro it selects the next ver- tex to place based on connectivity, however, it places it on any position (not just one of the end points) of the current spine where it introduces fewer crossings with closed edges. With O(m2n) it has the highest running time. Heuristics excluded, due to relatively poor performance, are among others a maximum neighborhood heuristic, a vertex-cover heuristic, a simple BFS heuris- tic [33], and variations of conCro [4]. PA Heuristics. The following first three heuristics share a general framework. They first compute an edge order according to some strategy and then place the edges one by one on the page where the increase in crossings is minimal. ceil-floor (ceilFloor) [24]. In this strategy the edges are ordered non-increa- singly by their length in a circular drawing. length (eLen) [8, 33]. Here the edges are ordered non-increasingly by the dis- tance of their end vertices on a spine. Thus edge f1; ng is listed first and any edge fi; i + 1g last. Like ceilFloor, it has a O(m2) running time.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BOOK EMBEDDINGS of LAMAN GRAPHS 1. Definitions Definition 1
    BOOK EMBEDDINGS OF LAMAN GRAPHS MICHELLE DELCOURT, MEGHAN GALIARDI, AND JORDAN TIRRELL Abstract. We explore various techniques to embed planar Laman graphs in books. These graphs can be embedded as pointed pseudo-triangulations and have many interesting properties. We conjecture that all planar Laman graphs can be embedded in two pages. 1. Definitions Definition 1. A graph G with n vertices and m edges is a Laman graph if m = 2n − 3 and every subgraph induced by k vertices (where k > 1) contains at most 2k − 3 edges. Definition 2. A book embedding of a graph G is a drawing with no crossings of G on a book; every edge is mapped to a page (a half-plane), and every vertex is mapped to the spine (the boundary shared by all the half-planes). Definition 3. The book thickness of a graph G, denoted bt(G) also known as page number, is the minimum number of pages needed to book embed G. 2. Finding Book Thickness Using Henneberg Constructions Motivated by Schnyder labelings for triangulations, Huemer and Kappes proposed an analogous binary labeling for quadrangulations which decom- poses the edge set in two directed trees rooted at a sink. A weak version of this labeling is valid for Laman graphs; however, the labeling does not guarantee a decomposition into two trees. The binary labeling of Laman graphs of Huemer and Kappes is based on Henneberg constructions. The Henneberg construction provides a decomposition into two trees whereas the labeling does not. A Henneberg construction consists of two moves: I. Adding a vertex of degree two II.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Problems on Graph Drawing
    Open problems on Graph Drawing Alexandros Angelopoulos Corelab E.C.E - N.T.U.A. February 17, 2014 Outline Introduction - Motivation - Discussion Variants of thicknesses Thickness Geometric thickness Book thickness Bounds Complexity Related problems & future work 2/ Motivation: Air Traffic Management Separation -VerticalVertical - Lateral - Longitudinal 3/ Motivation: Air Traffic Management : Maximization of \free flight” airspace c d c d X f f i1 i4 i0 i2 i3 i5 e e Y a b a b 8 Direct-to flight (as a choice among \free flight") increases the complexity of air traffic patterns Actually... 4 Direct-to flight increases the complexity of air traffic patterns and we have something to study... 4/ Motivation: Air Traffic Management 5/ How to model? { Graph drawing & thicknesses Geometric thickness (θ¯) Book thickness (bt) Dillencourt et al. (2000) Bernhart and Kainen (1979) : only straight lines : convex positioning of nodes v4 v5 v1 v2 θ(G) ≤ θ¯(G) ≤ bt(G) v5 v3 v0 v4 4 v1 Applications in VLSI & graph visualizationv3 Thickness (θ) v0 8 θ, θ¯, bt characterize the graph (minimizations over all allowedv2 drawings) Tutte (1963), \classical" planar decomposition 6/ Geometric graphs and graph drawings Definition 1.1 (Geometric graph, Bose et al. (2006), many Erd¨ospapers). A geometric graph G is a pair (V (G);E(G)) where V (G) is a set of points in the plane in general position and E(G) is set of closed segments with endpoints in V (G). Elements of V (G) are vertices and elements of E(G) are edges, so we can associate this straight-line drawing with the underlying abstract graph G(V; E).
    [Show full text]
  • Local Page Numbers
    Local Page Numbers Bachelor Thesis of Laura Merker At the Department of Informatics Institute of Theoretical Informatics Reviewers: Prof. Dr. Dorothea Wagner Prof. Dr. Peter Sanders Advisor: Dr. Torsten Ueckerdt Time Period: May 22, 2018 – September 21, 2018 KIT – University of the State of Baden-Wuerttemberg and National Laboratory of the Helmholtz Association www.kit.edu Statement of Authorship I hereby declare that this document has been composed by myself and describes my own work, unless otherwise acknowledged in the text. I declare that I have observed the Satzung des KIT zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis, as amended. Ich versichere wahrheitsgemäß, die Arbeit selbstständig verfasst, alle benutzten Hilfsmittel vollständig und genau angegeben und alles kenntlich gemacht zu haben, was aus Arbeiten anderer unverändert oder mit Abänderungen entnommen wurde, sowie die Satzung des KIT zur Sicherung guter wissenschaftlicher Praxis in der jeweils gültigen Fassung beachtet zu haben. Karlsruhe, September 21, 2018 iii Abstract A k-local book embedding consists of a linear ordering of the vertices of a graph and a partition of its edges into sets of edges, called pages, such that any two edges on the same page do not cross and every vertex has incident edges on at most k pages. Here, two edges cross if their endpoints alternate in the linear ordering. The local page number pl(G) of a graph G is the minimum k such that there exists a k-local book embedding for G. Given a graph G and a vertex ordering, we prove that it is NP-complete to decide whether there exists a k-local book embedding for G with respect to the given vertex ordering for any fixed k ≥ 3.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION GENERALIZED BOOK EMBEDDINGS Submitted By
    DISSERTATION GENERALIZED BOOK EMBEDDINGS Submitted by Shannon Brod Overbay Department of Mathematics In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 1998 COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY May 13, 1998 WE HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE DISSERTATION PREPARED UNDER OUR SUPERVISION BY SHANNON BROD OVERBAY ENTITLED GENERALIZED BOOK EMBEDDINGS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING IN PART REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSO- PHY. Committee on Graduate Work Adviser Department Head ii ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION GENERALIZED BOOK EMBEDDINGS An n-book is formed by joining n distinct half-planes, called pages, together at a line in 3-space, called the spine. The book thickness bt(G) of a graph G is the smallest number of pages needed to embed G in a book so that the vertices lie on the spine and each edge lies on a single page in such a way that no two edges cross each other or the spine. In the first chapter, we provide background material on book embeddings of graphs and preview our results on several related problems. In the second chapter, we use a theorem of Bernhart and Kainen and a result of Whitney to present a large class of two-page embeddable planar graphs. In particular, we prove that a graph G that can be drawn in the plane so that G has no triangles other than faces can be embedded in a two-page book. The discussion of planar graphs continues in the third chapter where we define a book with a tree-spine.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Book Thickness of $ K $-Trees
    On the book thickness of k-trees∗ Vida Dujmovi´c† David R. Wood‡ May 29, 2018 Abstract Every k-tree has book thickness at most k + 1, and this bound is best possible for all k ≥ 3. Vandenbussche et al. (2009) proved that every k-tree that has a smooth degree-3 tree decomposition with width k has book thickness at most k. We prove this result is best possible for k ≥ 4, by constructing a k-tree with book thickness k + 1 that has a smooth degree-4 tree decomposition with width k. This solves an open problem of Vandenbussche et al. (2009) 1 Introduction Consider a drawing of a graph1 G in which the vertices are represented by distinct points on a circle in the plane, and each edge is a chord of the circle between the corresponding points. Suppose that each edge is assigned one of k colours such that crossing edges receive distinct colours. This structure is called a k-page book embedding of G: one can also think of the vertices as being ordered along the spine of a book, and the edges that receive the same colour being drawn on a single page of the book without crossings. The book thickness of G, denoted by bt(G), is the minimum integer k for which there is a k-page book embedding of G. Book embeddings, first defined by Ollmann [9], are ubiquitous structures with a vari- ety of applications; see [5] for a survey with over 50 references. A book embedding is also called a stack layout, and book thickness is also called stacknumber, pagenumber and fixed arXiv:0911.4162v1 [math.CO] 21 Nov 2009 outerthickness.
    [Show full text]
  • Upward Partitioned Book Embeddings
    Upward Partitioned Book Embeddings The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Akitaya, Hugo A. et al. "Upward Partitioned Book Embeddings." International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization, September 2018, Barcelona, Spain, Springer International Publishing, January 2018. © 2018 Springer International Publishing AG As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73915-1_18 Publisher Springer International Publishing Version Original manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/128437 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Upward Partitioned Book Embeddings Hugo A. Akitaya1, Erik D. Demaine2, Adam Hesterberg2, and Quanquan C. Liu2 1 Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA hugo.alves [email protected] 2 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA edemaine,achester,[email protected] Abstract. We analyze a directed variation of the book embedding prob- lem when the page partition is prespecified and the nodes on the spine must be in topological order (upward book embedding). Given a directed acyclic graph and a partition of its edges into k pages, can we linearly or- der the vertices such that the drawing is upward (a topological sort) and each page avoids crossings? We prove that the problem is NP-complete for k ≥ 3, and for k ≥ 4 even in the special case when each page is a matching. By contrast, the problem can be solved in linear time for k = 2 pages when pages are restricted to matchings. The problem comes from Jack Edmonds (1997), motivated as a generalization of the map folding problem from computational origami.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1908.08911V1 [Cs.DS] 23 Aug 2019
    Parameterized Algorithms for Book Embedding Problems? Sujoy Bhore1, Robert Ganian1, Fabrizio Montecchiani2, and Martin N¨ollenburg1 1 Algorithms and Complexity Group, TU Wien, Vienna, Austria fsujoy,rganian,[email protected] 2 Engineering Department, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy [email protected] Abstract. A k-page book embedding of a graph G draws the vertices of G on a line and the edges on k half-planes (called pages) bounded by this line, such that no two edges on the same page cross. We study the problem of determining whether G admits a k-page book embedding both when the linear order of the vertices is fixed, called Fixed-Order Book Thickness, or not fixed, called Book Thickness. Both problems are known to be NP-complete in general. We show that Fixed-Order Book Thickness and Book Thickness are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the vertex cover number of the graph and that Fixed- Order Book Thickness is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the pathwidth of the vertex order. 1 Introduction A k-page book embedding of a graph G is a drawing that maps the vertices of G to distinct points on a line, called spine, and each edge to a simple curve drawn inside one of k half-planes bounded by the spine, called pages, such that no two edges on the same page cross [20,25]; see Fig.1 for an illustration. This kind of layout can be alternatively defined in combinatorial terms as follows. A k-page book embedding of G is a linear order ≺ of its vertices and a coloring of its edges which guarantee that no two edges uv, wx of the same color have their vertices ordered as u ≺ w ≺ v ≺ x.
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Structures with Pseudo-Knots: Graph-Theoretical, Combinatorial
    Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (1999) 61, 437–467 Article No. bulm.1998.0085 Available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on RNA Structures with Pseudo-knots: Graph-theoretical, Combinatorial, and Statistical Properties Christian Haslinger Institut f¨ur Theoretische Chemie, Universit¨at Wien W¨ahringerstraße 17, A-1090 Wien, Austria E-mail: [email protected] Peter F. Stadler∗ The Sante Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Sante Fe, NM 87501, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] The secondary structures of nucleic acids form a particularly important class of contact structures. Many important RNA molecules, however, contain pseudo- knots, a structural feature that is excluded explicitly from the conventional definition of secondary structures. We propose here a generalization of secondary structures incorporating ‘non-nested’ pseudo-knots, which we call bi-secondary structures, and discuss measures for the complexity of more general contact structures based on their graph-theoretical properties. Bi-secondary structures are planar trivalent graphs that are characterized by special embedding properties. We derive exact upper bounds on their number (as a function of the chain length n) implying that there are fewer different structures than sequences. Computational results show that the number of bi-secondary structures grows approximately like 2.35n. Numerical studies based on kinetic folding and a simple extension of the standard energy model show that the global features of the sequence-structure map of RNA do not change when pseudo-knots are introduced into the secondary structure picture. We find a large fraction of neutral mutations and, in particular, networks of sequences that fold into the same shape.
    [Show full text]
  • Embedding Planar Graphs in Four Pages
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER AND SYSTEM SCIENCES 38, 3667 (1989) Embedding Planar Graphs in Four Pages MIHALIS YANNAKAKIS AT & T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974 ReceivedSeptember 23, 1986; revised August 25, 1987 An algorithm is presented which embeds any planar graph in a book of four pages. The algorithm runs in linear time. 0 1989 Academic Press, Inc. 1. INTRODUCTION A book embedding of a graph consists of an embedding of its nodes along the spine of a book (i.e., a linear ordering of the nodes), and an embedding of its edges on the pages so that edges embedded on the same page do not intersect. The objec- tive is to minimize the number of pages used. The minimum number of pages in which a graph can be embedded is called the pagenumber of the graph. The book embedding problem arises in connection with an approach to fault- tolerant VLSI design [R, CLRl, CLR2]. The graph models a desired interconnec- tion pattern among a set of processors. The processors are arranged (physically or logically) on a line and are tested to determine which ones are good and which are faulty. The good processors are interconnected via “bundles” of wires running parallel to the line. Each bundle functions like a stack: Scan the line from left to right and suppose that a good processor u wants to connect to some processor v to its right. At u, the connection (u, u) is pushed into one of the stack-bundles; that is, (u, Y) occupies the bottom wire of the bundle, while the other connections that are currently in this bundle are shifted up one place.
    [Show full text]
  • Fewer Bends Point-Set Embedding with Mapping
    6th International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering ICECE 2010, 18-20 December 2010, Dhaka, Bangladesh Fewer Bends Point-set Embedding with Mapping Md. Emran Chowdhury∗,MuhammadJawaherulAlam†, and Md. Saidur Rahman† ∗Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Northern University Bangladesh Email: [email protected] †Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology Email: [email protected], [email protected] v4 Abstract—An upward point-set embedding of an upward pla- nar digraph ! on a set of points " with a mapping Φ:# (!) " 3 is an upward planar drawing Γ of ! where each vertex of →! is placed on a point of " according to Φ. Γ is called an upward v3 1 4 topological book embedding of ! with the mapping Φ if the v2 points in " are aligned along a straight-line. In this paper, we 2 address the problem of minimizing the total number of bends v1 on the edges in an upward point-set embedding of ! with the G S mapping Φ. We first give an algorithm that finds an upward Fig. 1. An upward planar digraph ! with four vertices and a set " of four topological book embedding of ! with a mapping if such an points embedding exists. Using this result, we then give an algorithm to obtain an upward point-set embedding of ! with a mapping if it exists. The drawings obtained by our algorithm for both the problems contain at most ($-3)bendsperedge,whichimproves of ! where the ordering of the vertices along the spine follows the previously known upper bound of (2$-3)bendsperedge.
    [Show full text]
  • Generating Function Enumeration Example
    Combinatorics and Matrix model on RNA secondary structures SangKwan Choi Physics department, Sichuan University 1612.07468 w/ Chaiho Rim and Hwajin Um Integrability in low-dimensional quantum systems MATRIX, The University of Melbourne 26 June – 21 July 2017 Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? • Catalan number Recursion relation 퐶3 퐶2 Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? • Catalan number Recursion relation 퐶3 퐶2 Generating function Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? • Catalan number Recursion relation 퐶3 퐶2 Generating function Enumeration example Number of ways connecting vertices with non-crossing arcs on the upper half plane? • Catalan number Recursion relation 퐶3 퐶2 Generating function Enumeration in terms of Matrix model Gaussian matrix model 푉 − 퐸 + 퐹 = 휒 = 2 − 2푔 = 푁2 ( + ) + 푁0 Enumeration in terms of Matrix model Gaussian matrix model 푉 − 퐸 + 퐹 = 휒 = 2 − 2푔 = 푁2 ( + ) + 푁0 Enumeration in terms of Matrix model Gaussian matrix model 푉 − 퐸 + 퐹 = 휒 = 2 − 2푔 = 푁2 + + 푁0 ( ) Fatgraph Enumeration in terms of Matrix model Gaussian matrix model 푉 − 퐸 + 퐹 = 휒 = 2 − 2푔 = 푁2 + + 푁0 ( ) Fatgraph Enumeration in terms of Matrix model Gaussian
    [Show full text]
  • Planarity Testing and Embedding
    1 Planarity Testing and Embedding 1.1 Introduction................................................. 1 1.2 Properties and Characterizations of Planar Graphs . 2 Basic Definitions • Properties • Characterizations 1.3 Planarity Problems ........................................ 7 Constrained Planarity • Deletion and Partition Problems • Upward Planarity • Outerplanarity 1.4 History of Planarity Algorithms.......................... 10 1.5 Common Algorithmic Techniques and Tools ........... 10 1.6 Cycle-Based Algorithms ................................... 11 Adding Segments: The Auslander-Parter Algorithm • Adding Paths: The Hopcroft-Tarjan Algorithm • Adding Edges: The de Fraysseix-Ossona de Mendez-Rosenstiehl Algorithm 1.7 Vertex Addition Algorithms .............................. 17 The Lempel-Even-Cederbaum Algorithm • The Shih-Hsu Algorithm • The Boyer-Myrvold Algorithm 1.8 Frontiers in Planarity ...................................... 31 Simultaneous Planarity • Clustered Planarity • Maurizio Patrignani Decomposition-Based Planarity Roma Tre University References ................................................... ....... 34 1.1 Introduction Testing the planarity of a graph and possibly drawing it without intersections is one of the most fascinating and intriguing algorithmic problems of the graph drawing and graph theory areas. Although the problem per se can be easily stated, and a complete characterization of planar graphs has been known since 1930, the first linear-time solution to this problem was found only in the 1970s. Planar graphs
    [Show full text]