Memorandum Date: June 22, 2018

Order Date: July 10, 2018

TO: Board of Commissioners

DEPARTMENT: Health & Human Services

PRESENTED BY: Karen Gaffney, Director

Steve Manela, Human Services Division Manager

AGENDA ITEM TITLE: IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH HOMES FOR GOOD FOR THE HOUSING FIRST BUILDING SITE AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN THE APPROVED AGREEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

I. MOTION In The Matter Of Approving an Intergovernmental Agreement With Homes For Good for the Housing First Building Site and Delegating Authority to the County Administrator to Sign the Approved Agreement In The Department Of Health & Human Services

II. AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY The Board of County Commissioners is being asked to consider the transfer of ownership of property adjacent to the County Behavioral Health Building. This property is zoned (PL) public land and would be used for the development of a 50-unit Housing First building . The property will be transferred for the price of one dollar based upon conditions that are outlined in the Intergovernmental Agreement attached to this agenda memo. The County Administrator would be delegated authority to determine that the conditions have been met and to sign the agreement. This will allow Homes for Good Housing Agency to apply for funding from the Health Authority Health Systems Division for a $650,000 grant in support of housing homeless person with severe and persistent mental illness.

III. BACKGROUND/IMPLICATIONS OF ACTION A. Board Action and Other History

The BCC last received an update on Housing First efforts in a board memorandum dated July 10, 2017 that included portions of a predevelopment portfolio for the construction and operation of a 50-unit Housing First Building to be built adjacent to the Lane County Behavioral Health building at 2411 Martin Luther King, Jr Blvd, Eugene, OR 97401. Since that time, Lane County Health and Human Services (H&HS) and Homes for Good have worked on funding applications to the State of Oregon Housing and Community Services, Federal Reserve Bank, Myer Memorial Trust and prepared documents and made solicitations to major healthcare companies for contributions for Housing First project construction and services.

B. Policy Issues Given the unmet need for supportive housing for homeless residents with behavioral and/or physical health needs, the Lane County Poverty and Homelessness Board (PHB) has developed a housing initiative as a part of their strategic plan called “Operation 600”. Operation 600 will move chronically homeless adults, unaccompanied youth and families with children into supportive housing. The PHB has pledged to create 600 units by 2021 for residents most vulnerable to homelessness to include 200 Housing First Permanent Supportive Housing units, in the next several years. The PHB Supportive Housing and Shelter Committee chaired by Commissioner Farr are moving this effort forward. Jacob Fox the Executive Director of the Homes for Good and Steve Manela the Human Services Division Manager staff this committee.

Supportive housing is a community-based service model that provides housing integrated with support services such as: mental health services, primary health care, alcohol and drug services, case management and social services to help homeless individuals with behavioral health issues gain stability and live more productive lives.

C. Board Goals The Lane County Strategic Plan calls for addressing the communities need for affordable housing and addressing homelessness. Specifically, it calls for increasing housing options for residents to reduce the incidence of homelessness and increase affordability. Specific strategies including: convening, sponsoring, and implementing a collaborative multi-jurisdictional affordable housing action plan; identifying and implementing programs for supportive housing, short-term transitional housing, and long-term and permanent solutions to address homelessness; increasing access to prevention and treatment services and developing programs; and for developing policy focused on behavioral health, community health, and youth. It also calls for identifying and enhancing programs to address food security and access to healthy food.

D. Financial and/or Resource Considerations Lane County is being asked to transfer ownership to Homes for Good for one dollar for Lane County owned property adjacent to its Behavioral Health Building for the development of the 50 unit housing first building. Lane County H&HS is being asked to identify and commit resources for providing services to building residents. H&HS has proposed transferring existing HUD Continuum of Care Funds and State of Oregon EHA funds and billing for eligible Medicaid reimbursable services. Homes for Good has proposed using project based federal Section 8 certificates to subsidize most of the operating costs for the 50 units. However at this time additional operating funds are needed to be identified by Homes for Good and H&HS.

E. Health Implications Hospital emergency departments, inpatient services and jails are inundated with large numbers of chronically homeless individuals and families, many of whom have complex, unmet needs not effectively or efficiently dealt with in high-cost, acute care settings and jails. The PHB goal of creating additional housing first opportunities was to create a more responsive system that would proactively address housing needs, produce better outcomes, and free up emergency department resources for acute medical crises and also allow jails to address criminal behaviors rather than mental health challenges.

F. Analysis Lane County’s housing inventory for homeless persons currently does not provide enough bed capacity to shelter and house all of Lane County’s homeless population leaving 1133 people unsheltered on any given night. The poverty and homeless board has a goal of creating 600 units of supportive housing for homeless persons with behavioral health needs and 300 units of emergency shelter along with homeless prevention and diversion programs to bridge the current gap and reduce the number of unsheltered persons on any given night. The MLK Housing First Project is Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH) is a combination of housing and services designed for people with serious mental illnesses or other disabilities who need support to live stably in their communities. These services can include case management, substance abuse or mental health counseling, advocacy, and assistance in locating and maintaining employment. PSH is a proven solution for people who have experienced chronic homelessness as well as other people with disabilities, including people leaving institutional and restrictive settings. Housing First is an approach and framework for ending homelessness that is centered on the belief that everyone can achieve stability in permanent housing directly from homelessness and that stable housing is the foundation for pursuing other health and social services goals. The County has property, zoned (PL) public land, available adjacent to the County Behavioral Health Building that is available for the development of a 50- unit Housing First building where specialized housing is permitted as an outright use when it is operated by the public agency that owns the development site, as would be the case if the land were transferred to Homes for Good. The Lane Use analysis indicates that the site must be surveyed and partitioned in order to move forward. Attached is a site map drawing that shows the proposed foot print for the building in relation to the entire Lane County Behavioral Health site. If Lane County were to retain the land and Homes for Good were own the structure and operate the PSH project, a few major land use processes would be required to enable the proposed use: 1. Metro Plan Amendment approval to change the plan designation from Government & Education to a suitable corresponding designation (i.e. Medium Density Residential); 2. Zone Change approval to change the zoning designation from Public Land (PL) to a suitable designation (i.e. Medium Density Residential (MDR)).

G. Alternatives/Options 1. Delegate authority for the County Administrator to sign an intergovernmental agreement with Homes for Good to transfer property for the development of the Housing First building. 2. Retain ownership of the Housing First project site and proceed with Lane Use changes in order to make it available to Homes For Good for development and program operation. 3. Retain ownership of the site and develop an alternative finance strategy for County to own and operate the Housing First project. 4. None of the above.

IV. RECOMMENDATION Delegate authority for the County Administrator to sign an intergovernmental agreement with Homes for Good to transfer property for the development of the Housing First building.

V. TIMING/IMPLEMENTATION Following approval of this board order Homes for Good will proceed with hiring a surveyor and prepare the application for partition of the site. Homes for Good will proceed in working with the City of Eugene on the environmental sit review including the HUD Flood plan review. In addition to other resource development, in March 2019 Homes for Good will submit a 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credit Application to the State of Oregon for approval. In September 2019 all predevelopment activities should be completed to proceed with development and construction of the project.

VI. FOLLOW-UP The parties must complete all the conditions listed in the Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) attached in order to proceed with the development of the project. The BCC will be notified when all the conditions in the IGA are met and will be updated on the progress of the project.

VII. ATTACHMENTS

Board Order Intergovernmental Agreement Draft Lane Use Analysis Site Map Supportive Apartment Community on MLK Blvd. Overview BEFORE THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF LANE COUNTY, OREGON

ORDER NO: IN THE MATTER OF APPROVING AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH HOMES FOR GOOD FOR THE HOUSING FIRST BUILDING SITE AND DELEGATING AUTHORITY TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO SIGN THE APPROVED AGREEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES

WHEREAS, the Housing First model is effective for people that have long histories of homelessness with complex service needs and provides permanent stable housing as a first priority; and

WHEREAS, The Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County, dba Homes for Good Housing Agency of Lane County (“Homes for Good”) has undertaken the development of a Housing First Apartment Community on Lane County property adjacent to the Lane County Behavioral Health Building; and

WHEREAS, Homes for Good is seeking funding from the Oregon Health Authority Health Systems Division that requires an option agreement to purchase the project property; and

WHEREAS, Lane County has the aforementioned property available that is zoned (PL) public land where specialized housing is permitted as an outright use when it is operated by the public agency that owns the development site;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Lane County ORDERS as follows:

1. An option to transfer ownership of Lane County property adjacent to Lane County Behavioral Health to Homes for Good for the price of one dollar once conditions laid out in the attached Intergovernmental Agreement are met is approved. 2. An Intergovernmental Agreement between Lane County and Homes for Good for the Housing First building site is approved in a final form to be negotiated by the parties. 3. The County Administrator is delegated authority to execute the resulting Intergovernmental Agreement.

ADOPTED this 10th day of July, 2018.

APPROVED AS TO FORM Jay Bozievich, Chair Date Lane County Board of Commissioners

LANE COUNTY OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR HOUSING FIRST BUILDING SITE

This Agreement is entered into by and between Lane County, a political subdivision of the State of Oregon (“County”), and The Housing And Community Services Agency of Lane County, (“HACSA”) dba Homes for Good Housing Agency of Lane County, (“Housing Agency”), referred to collectively in this Agreement as the Parties. County and Agency agree as follows: 1. RECITALS

1.1 ORS 190.010 and the Lane County Home Rule Charter provide that units of local government may enter into agreements for the performance of any or all functions and activities that a party to the agreements, its officers, or agents, have authority to perform. 1.2 The Parties recognize the need to address the issue of people in our community that have been chronically homeless. 1.3 The Parties recognize the chronically homeless use proportionally a much higher per capita share of community resources, including shelters, emergency services and have a higher rate of incarceration and recidivism. 1.4 Building on past successful collaborative efforts, the Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Housing Agency Board of Commissioners have determined that it is in their mutual interests to develop, operate and provide Housing First services in support of chronically homeless adjacent to the County Behavioral Health Building; histories of homelessness with complex service needs and recognize the need to provide permanent stable housing as the first priority. 1.5 The Housing Agency has undertaken the development of a Housing First Apartment Community on Martin Luther King Boulevard in Eugene Oregon to address this community need. 1.6 The Housing Agency wishes to obtain assistance from the Oregon Health Authority Health Systems Division to provide funding for units specifically set aside for individuals with severe and persistent mental illness. 1.7 The Parties desire to build on past successful collaborative efforts, the Lane County Board of Commissioners and the Housing Agency Board of Commissioners have determined that it is in their mutual interests to develop, operate and provide Housing First services in support of chronically homeless adjacent to the County Behavioral Health Building. 1.8 The County has property available adjacent to the County Behavioral Health Building that is available for the development of a 50-unit Housing First building that is zoned (PL) public land were specialized housing is permitted as an outright use when it is operated by the public agency that owns the development site. The property is described in Exhibit “A”.

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 1 1.9 ORS 271.330(1) permits Lane County to transfer title to its real property to a governmental body if the property is used for a public purpose for not less than 20 years. 1.10 Housing And Community Services Agency of Lane County dba Homes for Good Housing Agency of Lane County is a governmental body as that term is defined in ORS 271.330(1).

2. SCOPE OF AGREEMENT.

2.1 County shall:

.1 The County will transfer ownership of the property in Exhibit A to Housing Agency for the price of one dollar for the development of a 50 unit Housing First Building once the conditions in Section 2.2 are met. .2 Commitment of all financing for the services for the project by County. County will be utilizing certain forms of financial assistance provided for by federal and state law, and by County policy. This assistance may include, but is not limited to, the use of Continuum of Care funding, Emergency Housing Account funding, billable Medicaid services under the Oregon Health Plan. County shall use its best efforts to determine availability of public financial assistance as expediently as possible. .3 Commitment of all financing for the operations by the parties. The Housing Agency and County will be utilizing certain forms of financial assistance provided by federal and state law, and the parties policies. The assistance may include Project Based Section 8 Certificates and Continuum of Care funding, and others. The parties shall use their best efforts to determine availability of public assistance as expediently as possible.

2.2 Housing Agency shall:

.1 Complete a Due Diligence Investigation: Housing Agency shall have the right to conduct an investigation of the Property to determine, among other things, its suitability for use as low income housing. This Due Diligence Investigation, which is at Housing Agency’s sole cost and expense, may include, but is not necessarily limited to, a physical inspection of the Property, including, without limitation, soil, geological, environmental, structural, mechanical, engineering, title review, and any other assessments and tests the Housing Agency deems necessary or desirable. Such Due Diligence Investigation may also include investigation of financial, legal and political matters, which may affect the Housing Agency’s ability to develop the property as it proposes. .2 Complete an Environmental Review: The Housing Agency shall have no obligation to purchase the Property, and no transfer of title to Housing Agency may occur,

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 2 unless and until Housing Agency has provided County written notification that: (1) it has completed a federally required environmental review and its request for release of federal funds has been approved and, subject to any other Contingencies in this Agreement, (a) the purchase may proceed, or (b) the purchase may proceed only if certain conditions to address issues in the environmental review shall be satisfied before or after the purchase of the property; or (2) it has determined that the purchase is exempt from federal environmental review and a request for release of funds is not required. .3 Complete a Partition of the Property: Housing Agency shall arrange for a surveyor to develop plot map for legal partition of property. County shall review and approve the partition. .4 Commitment of all financing for the development of the entire project by Housing Agency: Housing Agency intends to finance the purchase of the property and development of the housing by utilizing certain forms of financial assistance provided for by federal and state law, and by Housing Agency policy. This assistance may include, but is not limited to, the use of tax-exempt mortgage financing, federal low income housing tax credits, exemptions from real and personal property taxation, Community Development Block Grant, HOME Investment Partnerships Program, payment of building permit fees and system development charges, and low interest loans. Housing Agency shall use its best efforts to determine the availability of public financial assistance as expediently as possible. .5 Commitment of all financing for the services for the project by County. County will be utilizing certain forms of financial assistance provided for by federal and state law, and by County policy. This assistance may include, but is not limited to, the use of Continuum of Care funding, Emergency Housing Account funding, billable Medicaid services under the Oregon Health Plan. County shall use its best efforts to determine availability of public financial assistance as expediently as possible. .6 Commitment of all financing for the operations by the parties. Housing Agency and County will be utilizing certain forms of financial assistance provided by federal and state law, and the parties policies. The assistance may include Project Based Section 8 Certificates and Continuum of Care funding, and others. The parties shall use their best efforts to determine availability of public assistance as expediently as possible.

3. DOCUMENTS FORMING THE AGREEMENT

3.1 The Agreement. The Agreement consists of this document and all exhibits listed below, which are incorporated into this Agreement. 3.2 Exhibits. With this document, the following exhibits are incorporated into the Agreement: Exhibit A: Property description.

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 3 4. CONSIDERATION AND PAYMENT

4.1 In consideration for Housing Agency's performance under this Agreement, County shall: .1 The County will transfer ownership of the property in Exhibit A to Homes Agency for the price of one dollar for the development of a 50 unit Housing First Building.

4.2 In consideration for County's performance under this Agreement, Housing Agency shall: .1 Develop, build and operate a 50 unit Housing First Apartment facility on the property. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE AND DURATION

5.1 Effective Date. Upon the signature of all parties, this Agreement is effective or July 19, 2018 whichever is sooner. 5.2 Duration. Unless extended or terminated earlier in accordance with its terms, this Agreement will terminate two (2) years from July 10, 2018. However, such expiration shall not extinguish or prejudice either party's right to enforce this agreement with respect to any breach or default in performance which has not been cured.

6. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Each of the parties designates the following individuals as their authorized representatives for administration of this Agreement. Any notice required under this Agreement must be addressed to the authorized representative stated here. A party may designate a new authorized representative by written notice to the other. 6.1 County's Authorized Representative. Steve Manela, Lane County Health & Human Services, [email protected] , 541-682-3797 6.2 Housing Agency's Authorized Representative. Jacob Fox, Homes for Good Housing Agency, [email protected], 541-682-2527 7. INDEMNIFICATION. To the extent permitted by the Oregon Constitution, and to the extent permitted by the Oregon Tort Claims Act, and to the extent otherwise provided for in private contracts of insurance, each party agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the other and its officers, employees, or agents, harmless from all damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorney fees, and to defend all claims, proceedings, lawsuits, and judgments arising out of or resulting from the indemnifying party’s negligence in the performance of or failure to perform under this Agreement. No party to this Agreement will be required to indemnify or defend the other party for any liability arising solely out of wrongful acts of another party, or that party's own officers, employees, or agents.

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 4 8. MODIFICATION AND TERMINATION. No modification or amendment to this Agreement will bind either party unless in writing and signed by both parties. The parties may jointly agree to terminate this Agreement at any time by written agreement.

9. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 9.1 Disputes. The parties are required to exert every effort to cooperatively resolve any disagreements that may arise under this Agreement. This may be done at any management level, including at a level higher than the persons directly responsible for administration of the Agreement. In the event that the parties alone are unable to resolve any conflict under this Agreement, they are encouraged to resolve their differences through mediation or arbitration, using such process as they may choose at the time. 9.2 Waiver. Failure of either party to enforce any provision of the Agreement does not constitute a waiver or relinquishment by the party of the right to such performance in the future nor of the right to enforce that or any other provision of this Agreement. 9.3 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is declared by a court to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the remaining terms and provisions are not affected; and the rights and obligations of the parties are to be construed and enforced as if the Agreement did not contain the particular provision held to be invalid. 9.4 Time is of the Essence. The parties agree that time is of the essence with respect to all provisions of this Agreement. 9.5 No Third-Party Beneficiaries. County and Housing Agency are the only parties to this Agreement and are the only parties entitled to enforce its terms. Nothing in this Agreement gives or may be construed to give or provide any benefit or right to third persons, either directly or indirectly, that is greater than the rights and benefits enjoyed by the general public, unless that party is identified by name in this Agreement. 9.6 Headings. The headings and captions in this Agreement are for reference and identification purposes only and may not be used to construe the meaning or to interpret the Agreement. 9.7 Force Majeure. Neither party will be held responsible for delay or default due to Force Majeure acts, events or occurrences unless they could have been avoided by the exercise of reasonable care, prudence, foresight, and diligence by that party. 9.8 Multiple Counterparts. This Agreement and any subsequent amendments may be executed in several counterparts, facsimile or otherwise, all of which when taken together will constitute one agreement binding on all parties, notwithstanding that all parties are not signatories to the same counterpart. Each copy of this Agreement and any amendments so executed will constitute an original. 9.9 Merger. This Agreement contains the entire agreement of County and Housing Agency with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement, and supersedes all prior negotiations, agreements and understandings.

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 5 EACH PARTY, BY EXECUTION OF THIS AGREEMENT, HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS READ THIS AGREEMENT, UNDERSTANDS IT, AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS AND CONDITIONS.

HOUSING AGENCY, DBA: COUNTY: HOMES FOR GOOD OF LANE COUNTY LANE COUNTY, OREGON

By: By:

Title: Title:

Date: Date:

Homes for Good Housing Agency Lane County, Public Service Building 177 Day Island Road 125 E. 8th Avenue Eugene, Oregon, 97401 Eugene, Oregon 97401

Intergovernmental Agreement, rev. 01/01/2017 6

Memorandum

To: Kristen Karle, SVDP Jacob Fox, HACSA

From: Colin McArthur, AICP

Date: December 12, 2016

Subject: SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review

OVERVIEW

The purpose of this review is to inform the St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lane County (SVDP) and the Housing and Community Services Agency of Lane County (HACSA) in their planning for the development of a 54 dwelling unit, Housing First Project. The review considers current conditions and planned conditions to assess whether development can fulfill applicable requirements established by the City of Eugene. SVSP and HACSA have particular interest in identifying factors affecting overall feasibility, timing, and cost of the project. The feasibility review results in the identification of land use requirements that potentially affect timing and cost and includes recommendations for resolving those requirements.

BACKGROUND

Existing Conditions The proposed site is identified on Assessor’s Map 17-03-29-40 as Tax Lot 00400. The site is a 13.42-acre parcel within Eugene and is designated Government & Education by the Eugene- Springfield Metro Plan and Public Land (PL) by the Eugene Zoning Ordinance. A Water Resource Conservation Overlay (/WR) also applies to a portion of the site. Additionally, the entire parcel lies within the FEMA designated 100-year Floodplain (Zone AE, 1% Annual Chance). The parcel is the site of the Lane County Behavioral Health facility, which occupies the eastern half of the site. The remainder of the site is vacant and has historically been used for temporary University of Oregon football game day parking and tailgating; and, as a temporary homeless shelter.

The site is bounded by Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard to the south (a Minor Arterial), the Q Street Channel to the north and west, and Scout Access Road to the east (a local street). Scout Access Road currently provides site access to the Lane County Behavioral Health facility and the Oregon Trail Council Boy Scouts of America facility, located to the east of the site. The City of Eugene’s 2035 Transportation System Plan identifies Coburg Road, Country Club Road, and Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard as near capacity and recommends further monitoring, including the intersection of Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard and Leo Harris Parkway, immediately west of the site.

Cameron McCarthy 1 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

Given the subject site’s location in an urbanized, developed area and the relatively recent development of the Lane County Behavioral Health complex, and no known capacity and availability issues, it is assumed that utility lines in the vicinity of the site (water, wastewater, stormwater, power) are available and of sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed development.

Environmental The proposed site is within a water resource protection area, with an associated Water Resource Conservation Overlay (/WR) designation. According to the Eugene Code, the purpose of the /WR overlay zone is to protect significant riparian, wetlands, and other water- related wildlife habitat areas included in the City’s adopted Goal 5 inventory. Development occurring within the /WR Conservation Overlay will require adherence to conservation setback requirements, measured from the top of the high bank or ordinary high water mark, specific to various Stream and Wetland Classifications.

According to Eugene’s Goal 5 Water Resources Conservation Plan, the site contain two Goal 5 Resources associated with the Q Street Channel. Site Alton Baker (Riparian) (E42 C-1) is a designated riparian corridor and is classified as a Category C Stream. Site Alton Baker wetland (WKZ-14B1) is a designated wetland is classified as a Category A Wetland. EC 9.4920 (1)(c)(2) specifies a Conservation Setback for Category C Streams of 40 feet from the tip of high bank measurement, or 50 feet from the ordinary high water mark. EC 9.4920(2) specifies a 50 feet setback from Category A Wetland boundaries. Both setbacks apply to the subject site. There are no significant Wildlife Habitat areas identified on or near the site.

The entire site is located within the FEMA designated 100-year Floodplain (Zone AE, 1% Annual Chance) with a base flood elevation of approximately 418.5 feet. According to the Eugene Code and Eugene Public Improvement Design Standards Manual, a Floodplain Development Permit is required prior to any development occurring within the regulatory floodplain. Current floodplain regulations specify that buildings be elevated one foot above the base flood elevation.

Floodplain regulations will be revised in the future based on a lawsuit at the federal level related to the Endangered Species Act and protection of salmon habitat. The current timeline calls for cities in Oregon to adopt new regulations by April 2018; however, depending on how the process at the state and federal level unfolds, it may occur later. It is not yet known exactly what the changes will entail, but it appears that it may become more difficult to build in the floodplain.

DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

Building Program The project, as initially envisioned, involves a single four (4) story building with three (3) residential floors, above one (1) floor of administrative offices and health-oriented services. Original projections estimate 50 units at approximately 350 square feet, with a small living room on each floor and a larger community space on the top floor. The total gross area estimated for the project is 40,580 square feet; of which, 32,580 square feet is residential, and 8,145 square feet is administrative and residential service area. The estimated timeline for the having the facility operational is June 2019.

Cameron McCarthy 2 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

Funding The only primary source of funding available for the project is the Federal Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC). Funded projects receive an allocation in tax credits per year over a 10-year period. Since non-profit housing agencies such as HACSA have federal tax liability, they must partner with an investor on the project in order to use the tax credits. Typically, a partnership is formed as a limited liability corporation (LLC) for profit entity.

Zoning and Development Standards Assuming the existing PL zoning is retained, the following base zone, overlay zone, and specific use standards apply to proposed development and inform the preliminary stages of design (EC 9.4900, /WR Water Resource Conservation Overlay Zone; EC 9.5500 Multiple- Family Development Standards; and EC Chapter 7, Public Improvement Standards).

▪ Lot area: 6,000 sq. ft. for all lots (EC (9.2686), 50 ft. minimum width for corner lots. ▪ Minimum street frontage: Lots: 50 ft. for corner lots (EC 9.2686). ▪ Maximum lot coverage and density: None. ▪ Minimum setbacks for primary structures: 10 ft. for front and interior yard setbacks (EC 9.2684). ▪ Maximum building height: None for Main or Accessory Buildings (EC 9.2684). ▪ Landscaping and open space: None (EC 9.2644) ▪ Parking: Design and location of internal circulation and parking areas, including entrances and exits shall consider the capacity of adjacent streets (EC 9.2684(2)(a). ▪ Streets: All access connections shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Design Standards and Guidelines for Eugene Streets, Bikeways, and Accessways beginning at EC 7.408. The EC specifies that each development site is entitled to at least one (1) access connection (EC 7.410). If a parcel has frontage on two or more streets of different street classifications, the access connections shall access the street with the lowest classification (EC 7.420 (1)(c). However, the EC allows one or more development sites to share an access connection; provided the City Engineer approves of the shared access connection finding that it will result in safe and efficient ingress and egress (EC 7.410 (6)). The property owners of the shared connection must also execute a recordable agreement providing for the shared use of the access connection (EC 7.410 (8)). The EC specifies that access connections to local streets shall have the connection begin no less than 20 feet from the end of the radius of the curb, or 20 feet from the property corner if there is no curb (EC 7.420(3)(c). Due to current capacity constraints with Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard and the proximity of the site to the Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard/Leo Harris Parkway intersection, it is assumed that the City would not allow a new access connection from the development site to Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. Site access may be taken from Scout Access Road (a local road), consistent with access guidelines, or shared with the Lane County Behavior Health facility. ▪ Stormwater: Proposed development must demonstrate adequate capacity of the existing and/or proposed stormwater management systems, consistent with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Manual, City’s Stormwater Basin Master Plans, Standard Specifications and Drawings, and Eugene Code Chapter 6 and 7. A stormwater study is required for all stormwater systems that carry runoff from more than one acre of land. It is assumed that stormwater systems in the vicinity of the site are of sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed development. ▪ Wastewater: Sanitary sewers to serve each new development must connect to existing mains. Proposed development must be designed and constructed in accordance with the City’s Wastewater Master Plan, Standard Specifications, and Eugene Code Chapters 6 and 7. Wastewater service to the site shall be extended in conformance with the approved wastewater basin master

Cameron McCarthy 3 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

plans, and public mains shall be extended at minimum slope unless an engineering study demonstrates the basin can adequately be served by steeper grades or shallower mains. Wastewater mains shall also be extended to the limits of the development served for the purpose of future extension. It is assumed that wastewater systems in the vicinity of the site are of sufficient capacity to accommodate proposed development, and no future extension requirements apply to the site.

Land Use Processes As described in the funding section, and given that the developer must be a for profit, land use feasibility was evaluated under three options:

▪ Option 1. The facility is owned by a for profit limited partnership, which leases land from HACSA. The facility is operated by a nonprofit (i.e. SVDP). ▪ Option 2. The facility is owned by a for profit limited partnership, which leases land from HACSA. The facility is operated by HACSA. ▪ Option 3. The facility and land are owned by a for profit limited partnership. The facility is operated by a nonprofit or HACSA.

The proposed use (specialized housing with accessory support services) is not explicitly listed in EC 9.2682 Public Land Zone Uses and Permit Requirements. However, the EC does provide direction on permitted Public or Semi-Public uses according to operation and ownership structures. According to EC 9.2682(1)(b) a Public Use is permitted outright the PL public land zone, when the use is:

“Operated by the public agency that owns the development site, except the intensification of uses that require a site review or conditional use permit according to EC 9.2683 Special Use Limitations. Examples include government offices, libraries, park and recreation facilities, neighborhood and community centers, post offices, fire stations, pump stations, electrical substations, school district offices, schools, reservoirs, and specialized housing. (Refer to EC 9.2683 Special Use Limitations.)” (emphasis added)

The proposed project is consistent with the intent of specialized housing. Operation of the facility and ownership of the land are the other determinants in establishing consistency with this code provision.

The subject property is presently owned by Lane County. HACSA was created by the Lane County Board of Commissioners in 1949 as the Lane County Housing Authority and was renamed HACSA in 1977 following a reorganization. HACSA is independent agency from Lane County, although the Agency’s seven person Board of Commissioners is comprised of five Lane County commissioners and two appointed commissioners.

Because HACSA is an independent agency, and because they do not own the subject development site, the proposed project (specialized housing) would not be considered an outright permitted use in the PL zone. Therefore, none of the above options are currently viable. However, HACSA can pursue initial actions that enable development of the project under Option 2. These include:

▪ Joint Ownership: Lane County listing HACSA as a co-owner of the subject property (Tax Lot 00400). or

Cameron McCarthy 4 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

▪ Single Ownership: Partition the subject property into two separate tax lots and transfer ownership of the lot to be developed as Housing First to HACSA.

Based on a literal interpretation of EC 9.2682(1)(b), only Option 2 is permitted within the current PL zone designation contingent upon HACSA obtaining ownership of the property to be developed. There are no restrictions on the lease of the facility to another entity so long as the land remains owned by the public agency and is operated by the same public agency (i.e. HACSA).

The PL zone does not contain any allowances for permitting specialized housing as a special use or a conditional use. Therefore, Option 2 is the only viable development scenario within the current PL zone designation. Option 1 and Option 3 are not feasible under the current zoning. Correspondence with City staff planning during the course of the review confirmed this finding.

Should SVDP/HACSA wish to proceed with development and operation/ownership of the facility in accordance with Option 1 or Option 3, several land use processes will be required to enable the proposed use: ▪ Partition approval to create a separate tax lot and development site and to transfer ownership to HACSA; ▪ Metro Plan Amendment approval to change the plan designation from Government & Education to a suitable corresponding designation (i.e. Medium Density Residential); ▪ Zone Change approval to change the zoning designation from Public Land (PL) to a suitable designation (i.e. Medium Density Residential (MDR)).

Partition applications are reviewed in accordance with Type II procedures with a decision by the planning director; Zone Change applications are reviewed in accordance with Type III procedures with a decision by the hearings official; and, Metro Plan amendments are reviewed in accordance with Type IV procedures with a decision by the City Council (CC) following a recommendation by the Planning Commission (PC). All applications can be processed concurrently and elevated to the highest level (Type IV). Correspondence with City planning staff revealed a strong likelihood of support for the project at the PC/CC levels. The project is expected to comply with all applicable approval criteria, or can be designed for compliance. Thus, approval of the project through the process outlined above appears feasible. The timeline for approval of Partition, Zone Change, and Plan Amendment application is approximately 6-12 months, not including preparation time. Estimated City review fees are $14,840.35, not including planning services.

SUMMARY

The findings from the land use feasibility review indicate that, to be permitted outright within the PL zone, the project will require a development scenario in which the land is owned by a public agency and operated by the same agency (i.e. HACSA). The facility itself may be leased by anther entity. There are significant advantages to the project being permitted outright as specialized housing in the PL zone, including the avoidance of land use processes that expend

Cameron McCarthy 5 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

time and cost and can be challenged or appealed. Therefore, the following option is recommended: ▪ The facility is owned by a for profit limited partnership, which leases land from the HACSA. The facility is operated by HACSA.

Alternatively, the project can be realized under other development scenarios using available land use processes. The primary tradeoff is that these processes will consume time, add cost, and are subject to extensive public scrutiny, hearings, and appeal provisions.

EXHIBITS

▪ Exhibit A RLID Property Report ▪ Exhibit B Goal 5 Map & Tables ▪ Exhibit C FEMA Map

Cameron McCarthy 6 SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

EXHIBIT A

RLID Property Report

Cameron McCarthy Exhibit A

Produced by Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe on 7/27/2016 at 11:48AM using RLID (www.rlid.org) Page 1 of 5

Detailed Property Report

Site Address 2345 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner 1 Map & Taxlot#17-03-29-40-00400 LANE COUNTY SIC N/A LANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE Tax Account# 0248920 a EUGENE, OR 97401 a Additional site address(es) are associated with this tax account See Owner/Taxpayer section for additional owners

Tax account acreage 12.78 Mapped taxlot acreage† 13.42

† Mapped Taxlot Acreage is the estimated size of a taxlot as derived from the county GIS taxlot layer, and is not to be used for legal purposes.

Map & Taxlot # 17-03-29-40-00400

Business Information

RLID does not contain any business data for this address

Improvements

Photos & Sketches for Tax Account

Building 1: C02 Office Building

Year Built 2001 Sq Ft 40792 Effective Year Built 2001 Fireproof Steel Sq Ft 0 Grade 5 Reinforced Concrete Sq Ft 40792 Floor Number 1 Fire Resistant Sq Ft 0 Wall Height Ft 12 Wood Joist Sq Ft 0 Occupancy Number 344 Pole Frame Sq Ft 0 Pre-engineered Steel Sq Ft 0

Commercial Appraisal Card 1703294000400

Site Address Information

2345 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD EUGENE, OR 97401

House # 2345 Suffix N/A Pre-directional N/A Street Name MARTIN LUTHER KING JR Street Type BLVD Unit type / # N/A Mail City EUGENE State OR Zip Code 97401 Zip + 4 N/A Create Date Mar 01, 2007 Update Date May 13, 2016 Produced by Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe on 7/27/2016 at 11:48AM using RLID (www.rlid.org) Page 2 of 5

Land Use 6729 Other Protective Functions & Their Related Activities USPS Carrier Route N/A

Additional site address(es) attached to this tax account 2411 MARTIN LUTHER KING JR BLVD

General Taxlot Characteristics

Geographic Coordinates Taxlot Characteristics Incorporated City Limits EUGENE X 4244994 Y 882981 (State Plane X,Y) Urban Growth Boundary Eugene Latitude 44.0609 Longitude -123.0729 Year Annexed 1960 Annexation # N/A Zoning Approximate Taxlot Acreage 13.42 Approx Taxlot Sq Footage 584,575 Zoning Jurisdiction Eugene Eugene 2010 Census Tract 3102 Parent Zone PL PUBLIC LAND 2010 Census Block Group 3 Overlay WR Water Resource Plan Designation Metro Plan Map Eugene Neighborhood Harlow Neighbors Metro Area Nodal Dev Area No Land Use Historic Property Name N/A General Land Use City Historic Landmark? No National Historical Register? No Code Description G Government

Detailed Land Use Code Description 6749 Other Correctional Institutions

Service Providers

Fire Protection Provider Eugene Fire & EMS Department Ambulance Provider Eugene Fire & EMS Ambulance District WC Ambulance Service Area West/Central LTD Service Area? Yes LTD Ride Source? Yes Soil Water Cons. Dist/Zone UPPER WILLAMETTE / data not available Emerald People's Utility District N

Environmental Data

FEMA Flood Hazard Zone Code Description AE Areas of 100-year flood, base flood elevations determined.

FIRM Map Number 41039C1137F Community Number 410122 Post-FIRM Date 09/29/1986 Panel Printed? Yes

Soils Soil Map Unit# Soil Type Description % of Taxlot Ag Class Hydric % 97 Newberg-Urban land complex 92% 2 0 W Water 8% 8 0

Schools

Code Name School District 4J EUGENE Elementary School 4157 Bertha Holt Middle School 524 Monroe High School 538 Sheldon

Political Districts

Election Precinct 1455 State Representative District 13 City Council Ward E4 State Representative Nancy Nathanson City Councilor George A. Poling State Senate District 7 County Commissioner District 3 (Eugene-South) State Senator Chris Edwards County Commissioner Pete Sorenson EWEB Commissioner John Brown LCC Board Zone 5

Produced by Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe on 7/27/2016 at 11:48AM using RLID (www.rlid.org) Page 3 of 5

Liens

None

Building Permits

Eugene Building Permits

Log Number Project Description 02-05585-01 New commercial building on Lane County Land 02-05596-01 Erosion prevention for new commercial building on Lane County land.

Land Use Applications

Eugene Land Use Applications

Log Number Project Description M-72-019 Minor Partition CU-72-013 Conditional Use MA-97-001 Metro Plan Amendment Z-05-008 Zone Change

Eugene Land Use Application Search Page

Petitions

None

Tax Statements (current and previous tax years)

ACCOUNT#: 0248920 View tax statement(s) for: 2015 2014

Owner/Taxpayer

Owners No. Owner Address City/State/Zip 1 LANE COUNTY LANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE EUGENE, OR 97401 2 COUNTY OWNED LANDS DEPT LANE COUNTY COURTHOUSE EUGENE, OR 97401

Taxpayer Party Name Address City/State/Zip LANE COUNTY ATTN: JEFF TURK EUGENE, OR 97408 3050 N DELTA HWY

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

Account Status

Status Active Account Current Tax Year

Account Status none Remarks none Special Assessment Program N/A

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

General Tax Account Information

Tax Account Acreage 12.78 Fire Acres N/A Property Class 211 COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL ZONE, IMPROVED Statistical Class 432 OFFICE - ONE TO THREE STORY Neighborhood Code 80408 Category Land and Improvements

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

Township-Range-Section / Subdivision Data

Subdivision Type N/A Subdivision Name N/A Subdivision Number N/A Phase N/A Lot/Tract/Unit # TL 00400 Recording Number N/A Produced by Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe on 7/27/2016 at 11:48AM using RLID (www.rlid.org) Page 4 of 5

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

Property Values & Taxes

The values shown are the values certified in October unless a value change has been processed on the property. Value changes typically occur as a result of appeals, clerical errors and omitted property. The tax shown is the amount certified in October. This is the full amount of tax for the year indicated and does not include any discounts offered, payments made, interest owing or previous years owing. It also does not reflect any value changes.

Real Market Value (RMV) Total Assessed Value Tax Year Land Improvement Total 2015 $8,684,472 $5,694,504 $14,378,976 $7,901,760 $ 0.00 2014 $8,684,472 $5,694,504 $14,378,976 $7,671,612 $ 0.00 2013 $8,350,455 $5,475,485 $13,825,940 $7,448,167 $ 0.00 2012 $6,334,958 $7,026,306 $13,361,264 $7,231,230 $ 0.00 2011 $6,334,958 $7,637,290 $13,972,248 $7,020,612 $ 0.00 2010 $6,334,958 $7,637,290 $13,972,248 $6,816,128 $ 0.00 2009 $6,398,949 $7,714,430 $14,113,379 $6,617,600 $ 0.00 2008 $2,573,029 $6,304,730 $8,877,759 $6,424,854 $ 0.00 2007 $2,237,417 $7,164,470 $9,401,887 $6,237,722 $ 0.00 2006 $1,657,346 $5,427,630 $7,084,976 $6,056,041 $ 0.00 2005 $1,375,391 $4,504,260 $5,879,651 $5,879,651 $ 0.00 2004 $1,185,682 $3,882,980 $5,068,662 $5,068,662 $ 0.00 2003 $1,209,880 $3,962,220 $5,172,100 $5,172,100 $ 0.00 2002 $1,222,100 $2,507,000 $3,729,100 $3,729,100 $ 0.00 2001 $1,357,890 $150,000 $1,507,890 $1,507,890 $ 0.00 2000 $1,357,890 $3,508,550 $4,866,440 $3,204,586 $ 0.00 1999 $1,150,750 $2,973,350 $4,124,100 $3,111,249 $ 0.00 1998 $1,117,230 $2,915,050 $4,032,280 $3,020,630 $ 0.00 1997 $1,117,230 $2,534,830 $3,652,060 $2,932,650 $ 0.00 1996 $900,990 $2,461,000 $3,361,990 $3,361,990 $ 0.00 1995 $958,500 $2,300,000 $3,258,500 $3,258,500 $ 0.00

Current Year Assessed Value $7,901,760 Less Exemption Amount * ($7,901,760) Taxable Value $0 * Frozen Assessed Value Exemption Type Charitable Property; County

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

Tax Code Area & Taxing Districts

Tax Code Area (Levy Code) for current tax year 00400 Produced by Cameron McCarthy Gilbert & Scheibe on 7/27/2016 at 11:48AM using RLID (www.rlid.org) Page 5 of 5

Taxing Districts for TCA 00400 CITY OF EUGENE EUGENE SCHOOL DISTRICT 4J EUGENE URBAN RENEWAL DOWNTOWN LANE COMMUNITY COLLEGE LANE COUNTY LANE EDUCATION SERVICE DISTRICT

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

Sales & Ownership Changes

No sales or ownership change data available.

Data source: Lane County Assessment and Taxation

SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

EXHIBIT B

Goal 5 Map & Tables

Cameron McCarthy Exhibit B

WKZ-6

WKZ-5E

WKZ-7 Jeppesen Ave

Dr

nd Isla

Long

Roland Way

Hideaway Ct

Lariat Mesa Private Road

E50 A Way E50 B

Antelope WKZ-9

E50 B

WKZ-13

WA WKZ-14B3

E42 C-2 Rd

E42 C-1

b WKZ-14B1 u l C Martin Luther King Jr Blvd WKZ-14A

E42 A-2

E42 A-1

E42 A-3

Goal 5 Water Resources Conservation Plan, Section IV, Map 14 Eugene Goal 5 ESEE Conclusions Protected Goal 5 Resources ²

Eugene Urban Growth Boundary Wetland Designated for Protection Eugene City Limits Riparian Corridor Designated for Protection Feet Taxlots Upland Wildlife Habitat Designated for Protection 0 370 740 1,110

ESEE Conclusions Summary Table - Riparian Corridor Sites 9/1/05 PROPOSED PROPOSED SETBACK ESEE

SITE SUB-SITE PROTECTION (Feet from CONCLUSIONS SITENAME LABEL LABEL TYPE ACRES ESEE CONCLUSION LEVEL* TOB)** MAP NUMBER Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 A R 14.14 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 5 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 B R 5.19 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 5 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 D R 11.37 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 10 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 E R 9.12 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 10 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 F R 1.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 10 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 G R 2.95 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 10 Amazon Channel Natural/Urban E30 E30 H R 10.48 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 10 Glenwood Slough E39 E39 R 0.10 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Riverfront Park E40 E40 R 16.85 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 A-1 R 6.75 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 A-2 R 9.67 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 A-3 R 13.75 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 A-4 R 15.58 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 A-5 R 10.59 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 B R 22.32 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 C-1 R 2.46 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 C-2 R 6.84 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 C-3 R 9.82 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 13 Alton Baker (Riparian) E42 E42 C-4 R 1.68 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Ascot Park E45 E45 A R 2.70 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Ascot Park E45 E45 B R 0.48 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Ascot Park E45 E45 C R 0.80 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Ascot Park E45 E45 D R 5.29 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Beltline Drainage Channel E48 E48 A1 R 0.45 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Beltline Drainage Channel E48 E48 A2 R 3.80 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Ayres Pond/Dodson Slough E48 E48 B-1 R 1.59 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 15 Ayres Pond/Dodson Slough E48 E48 B-3 R 1.05 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 15 Ayres Pond/Dodson Slough E48 E48 B-4 R 29.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 15 Ayres Pond/Dodson Slough E48 E48 B-5 R 3.21 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Debrick Slough E50 E50 A R 4.28 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 14 Debrick Slough E50 E50 B R 10.32 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 14 Debrick Slough E50 E50 C R 1.95 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 River Loop No. 1 E56 E56 A-1 R 0.45 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 River Loop No. 1 E56 E56 A-2 R 0.84 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 16 River Loop No. 1 E56 E56 B R 0.97 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 16 East Santa Clara Waterway E57 E57 A R 1.70 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 East Santa Clara Waterway E57 E57 B R 4.98 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 East Santa Clara Waterway E57 E57 C R 6.05 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 16 East Santa Clara Waterway E57 E57 D R 7.01 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 16 Spring Creek E58 E58 A R 2.49 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 1 Spring Creek E58 E58 B R 5.30 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 1 Spring Creek E58 E58 C1-C2 R 1.19 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Spring Creek E58 E58 C-3 R 0.19 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Spring Creek E58 E58 D R 8.89 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 A R 3.42 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 B-1 R 2.21 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 B-2 R 0.36 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 B-3 R 1.11 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 C R 5.37 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 D R 3.28 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 1 Flat Creek E59 E59 E R 0.94 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 A-1 Channel E60 E60 A R 12.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 2 A-1 Channel E60 E60 B R 7.65 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 2 A-1 Channel E60 E60 C R 2.16 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 A R 0.96 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 B R 3.80 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 C-1 R 7.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 C-2 R 2.00 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 D R 8.08 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 E R 2.08 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Middle Flat Creek E61 E61 F R 1.48 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 NW Expressway Ponds E62 E62 A R 10.32 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 3 NW Expressway Ponds E62 E62 B R 8.47 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Taney Waterway E64 E64 R 1.69 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Empire Pond E65 E65 R 3.13 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Golden Gardens (DeSoto Lake) E66 E66 R 5.30 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 4 Highway 99/McDougal E68 E68 R 6.68 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3 Emerald Park/South Flat Creek E69 E69 A R 3.40 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Emerald Park/South Flat Creek E69 E69 B R 4.77 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 3

PROPOSED PROPOSED SETBACK ESEE

SITE SUB-SITE PROTECTION (Feet from CONCLUSIONS SITENAME LABEL LABEL TYPE ACRES ESEE CONCLUSION LEVEL* TOB)** MAP NUMBER Emerald Park/South Flat Creek E69 E69 C R 4.42 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Beltline/A-2 Channel E70 E70 R 1.24 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 A R 2.60 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-1 R 2.32 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-2A R 1.06 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-2B R 0.73 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-3A R 0.87 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-3B R 0.07 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-3C R 0.36 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-3D R 0.02 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4A R 0.25 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4B R 0.73 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4C R 0.19 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4D R 2.47 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 5 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4E R 0.10 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 B-4F R 0.44 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Marshall Ditch E72 E72 C R 1.95 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 County Farm Road E73 E73 A R 2.51 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 County Farm Road E73 E73 B R 2.26 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 A-1 R 17.07 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category B 60 13 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 A-2 R 3.23 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 13 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 B-1 R 3.78 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 B-2 R 4.40 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 13 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 B-3 R 2.26 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 B-4 R 5.14 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category E 0 13 Goodpasture Island Slough E75 E75 B-5 R 1.43 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Gilham E76 E76 A-1 R 0.41 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Gilham E76 E76 A-2 R 1.32 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Gilham E76 E76 B-1 R 0.56 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Gilham E76 E76 B-2 R 3.40 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 15 North Gilham E76 E76 B-3 R 3.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 15 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 A R 0.64 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 B R 0.63 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 D R 0.40 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 E R 0.47 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 F R 0.05 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 G R 1.60 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 12 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 H R 3.80 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 12 Augusta Creek/Laurel Valley Creek E78 E78 I R 0.64 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 12 Lorane Highway Riparian E81 E81 R 5.82 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Tugman Creek Riparian E83 E83 R 3.18 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 A-B R 1.89 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 C R 1.55 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 D R 5.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 E R 0.29 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 F R 0.13 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 G R 1.85 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 10 Braeburn Riparian E86 E86 H R 0.46 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 10 Willow Creek Tributaries E87 E87 A R 0.48 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Willow Creek Tributaries E87 E87 B R 5.18 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 6 Willow Creek Tributaries E87 E87 C R 0.62 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category D 20 6 Bailey Hill Riparian E88 E88 R 4.78 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category C 40 6 WA WA R 453.49 Limit Conflicting Uses Stream Category A 100 13

*Stream categories are from the draft /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone **Setback distances are measured from top of bank (TOB) ESEE Conclusions Summary Table - Wetland Sites 9/1/05 PROPOSED PROPOSED SETBACK ESEE SITE SUB-SITE PROTECTION (Feet from CONCLUSIONS SITENAME LABEL LABEL TYPE ACRES ESEE CONCLUSION LEVEL* JWB)** MAP NUMBER West Eugene Uplands wetland at Skyview Park AMA-3 AMA-3 W 0.53 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 7 West Eugene Uplands wetland at Hawkins AMA-4 AMA-4 W 1.44 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 West Eugene Uplands wetland at Videra Ck AMA-5 AMA-5A W 0.16 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 7 West Eugene Uplands wetland at Videra Ck AMA-5 AMA-5B W 1.00 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 7 West Eugene Uplands wetland at Videra Ck AMA-5 AMA-5C W 0.04 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6A W 5.65 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6B W 2.35 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6C W 1.23 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6D W 0.03 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6E W 0.04 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Westmoreland wetlands AMA-6 AMA-6F W 0.10 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7A W 3.62 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7B W 1.62 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7C W 0.24 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7D W 0.18 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7E W 0.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Creek wetlands AMA-7 AMA-7F W 1.83 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Park wetland ash grove AMA-9 AMA-9 W 14.84 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Amazon Park wetland 24th AMA-10 AMA-10 W 1.42 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 10 Amazon Park wetland pool/ballfield AMA-11 AMA-11A W 5.58 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Park wetland pool/ballfield AMA-11 AMA-11B W 2.78 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 10 Amazon Park wetland 29th AMA-12 AMA-12A W 0.59 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 10 Amazon Park wetland 29th AMA-12 AMA-12B W 0.44 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 10 Owl Road wetland AMA-13 AMA-13 W 1.43 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 9 Barber wetland AMA-14 AMA-14 W 0.86 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 9 Amazon Park wetland prairie AMA-16 AMA-16 W 0.89 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 10 Bethel-Danebo wetland at Terry BD-2 BD-2 W 5.35 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-3 BD-3A W 4.74 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-3 BD-3B W 0.44 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-3 BD-3C W 0.53 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-4 BD-4 W 9.06 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-5 BD-5 W 23.97 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-6 BD-6A W 12.19 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-6 BD-6B W 1.68 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A1 W 0.44 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A2 W 0.08 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A3 W 1.26 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A4 W 0.88 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A5 W 0.08 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A6 W 0.14 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7A7 W 9.24 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7B1 W 1.50 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7B2 W 4.86 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7C1 W 1.54 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7C2 W 0.63 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7C3 W 1.81 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7C4 W 1.77 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-7 BD-7C5 W 1.50 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8A1 W 0.52 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8A2 W 0.57 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8A3 W 0.94 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8A4 W 0.21 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8B W 1.16 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8C W 4.79 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-8 BD-8D W 0.62 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9A W 2.49 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 5 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9B1 W 12.95 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 5 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9B2 W 0.63 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9B3 W 0.16 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9C W 0.83 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9D1 W 5.08 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 5 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9D2 W 0.93 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E1 W 0.02 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E2 W 0.65 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E3 W 3.94 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E4 W 1.24 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E5 W 29.17 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E6 W 2.80 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5

PROPOSED PROPOSED SETBACK ESEE SITE SUB-SITE PROTECTION (Feet from CONCLUSIONS SITENAME LABEL LABEL TYPE ACRES ESEE CONCLUSION LEVEL* JWB)** MAP NUMBER Amazon Creek wetland at Royal BD-9 BD-9E7 W 0.44 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-10 BD-10A1 W 0.30 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-10 BD-10A2 W 1.13 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-10 BD-10A3 W 0.51 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-10 BD-10A4 W 2.10 Limit Conflicting Uses Category C Wetland 0 5 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-10 BD-10B W 3.31 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Royal Avenue wetlands BD-11 BD-11 W 0.57 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Bethel-Danebo wetland at Beltline BD-13 BD-13 W 2.66 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Bethel-Danebo wetland at Beltline BD-15 BD-15 W 0.63 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Bethel-Danebo wetland at Beltline BD-16 BD-16 W 1.97 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Bethel-Danebo wetland at Beltline BD-17 BD-17 W 1.01 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Empire Pond wetland BD-20 BD-20 W 1.84 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Taney Waterway wetland BD-21 BD-21 W 0.73 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 NW Exp'wy Pond/Railroad wetland BD-22 BD-22 W 5.31 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 RSC-1 RSC-1 W 111.44 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 A-1 Channel wetland RSC-2 RSC-2A W 8.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 A-1 Channel wetland RSC-2 RSC-2C W 0.24 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 A-1 Channel wetland RSC-2 RSC-2B W 3.08 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-5 RSC-5 W 10.44 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-6 RSC-6 W 2.57 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-8 RSC-8 W 0.90 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-9 RSC-9 W 0.57 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-10 RSC-10A W 1.72 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-10 RSC-10B W 3.67 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-12 RSC-12 W 6.10 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-15 RSC-15 W 1.04 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-16 RSC-16 W 0.84 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-17 RSC-17 W 15.16 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 A-1 Side Channel RSC-18 RSC-18 W 2.77 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Highway 99/McDougal Pond wetlands RSC-20 RSC-20 W 1.86 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Highway 99/McDougal Pond wetlands RSC-21 RSC-21 W 2.38 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Wetland at Lancaster RSC-22 RSC-22 W 1.27 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23A W 0.33 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23B W 0.10 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23C W 0.80 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23D W 0.09 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23E W 0.35 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23F W 2.06 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23G W 0.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-23 RSC-23H W 0.11 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 North Flat Creek wetlands RSC-25 RSC-25 W 1.73 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 2 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-26 RSC-26A W 0.04 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-26 RSC-26B W 0.90 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Prairie Rd/Hwy 99 wetlands RSC-27 RSC-27 W 0.63 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Middle Flat Creek wetlands RSC-28 RSC-28A W 0.77 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Middle Flat Creek wetlands RSC-28 RSC-28B W 3.45 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Middle Flat Creek wetlands RSC-28 RSC-28C W 2.59 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Middle Flat Creek wetlands RSC-29 RSC-29 W 3.53 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 3 NW Expressway Pond/Diana's Pond wetland RSC-30 RSC-30A W 11.33 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 3 NW Expressway Pond/Diana's Pond wetland RSC-30 RSC-30B W 0.78 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 South Flat Creek wetland RSC-32 RSC-32 W 2.70 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Middle Flat Creek wetland RSC-33 RSC-33A-B W 2.89 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 3 Middle Flat Creek wetland RSC-34 RSC-34 W 1.18 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-35 RSC-35 W 1.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 1 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-36 RSC-36 W 2.20 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 1 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-37 RSC-37A W 0.38 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 1 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-37 RSC-37B-C W 0.60 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 1 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-37 RSC-37D W 0.12 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-38 RSC-38 W 5.64 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 1 Spring Creek wetlands RSC-39 RSC-39 W 0.61 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 East Santa Clara Waterway wetland RSC-40 RSC-40 W 1.56 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 1, 3 Willow Creek wetland WC-1 WC-1 W 1.38 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 6 Patterson Slough wetland WKZ-1 WKZ-1A W 1.71 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Patterson Slough wetland WKZ-1 WKZ-1B W 2.40 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Ayres Pond wetland WKZ-2 WKZ-2 W 0.48 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Green Acres wetland WKZ-3 WKZ-3 W 1.00 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-4 WKZ-4 W 6.58 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-5 WKZ-5A W 3.61 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-5 WKZ-5B W 1.75 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-5 WKZ-5C W 2.35 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13

PROPOSED PROPOSED SETBACK ESEE SITE SUB-SITE PROTECTION (Feet from CONCLUSIONS SITENAME LABEL LABEL TYPE ACRES ESEE CONCLUSION LEVEL* JWB)** MAP NUMBER Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-5 WKZ-5D W 3.57 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Goodpasture wetlands WKZ-5 WKZ-5E W 2.42 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Delta Ponds wetlands WKZ-6 WKZ-6 W 18.95 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Delta Ponds wetlands WKZ-7 WKZ-7 W 65.54 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Willagillespie wetland WKZ-8 WKZ-8 W 0.62 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Debrick Slough wetland WKZ-9 WKZ-9 W 10.03 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 County Farm wetland at Game Farm WKZ-10 WKZ-10 W 0.55 Fully Allow Conflicting Uses None 0 Sorrel Pond wetland WKZ-13 WKZ-13 W 2.69 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14A W 0.54 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14B1 W 1.18 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14B2 W 0.46 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14B3 W 3.51 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14C W 1.27 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Alton Baker wetland WKZ-14 WKZ-14D W 0.33 Limit Conflicting Uses Category B Wetland 25 13 Willamette River wetlands WR-1 WR-1 W 1.94 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Willamette River wetlands WR-2 WR-2 W 1.79 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Delta Ponds wetlands WR-3 WR-3 W 25.46 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Riverfront Park/Millrace wetland WR-4 WR-4 W 6.30 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Willamette River wetlands WR-5 WR-5A W 1.05 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13 Willamette River wetlands WR-5 WR-5B W 0.12 Limit Conflicting Uses Category A Wetland 50 13

*Wetland categories are from the draft /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone **Setback distances for wetlands are measured from the jurisdictional wetland boundary (JWB). SVDP/HACSA Housing First Land Use Feasibility Review December 12, 2016

EXHIBIT C

FEMA Map

Cameron McCarthy Exhibit C APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET 5CO 0 500 E3 E3 E3

LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD HAZ..\RD .\REAS :NUNDATF.D BY 100-YEAR FLOOD ZONE A

ZONE AE

ZONE AH FlufJ c( 1 to .1 foct !u,;ulH\• .t:"t' lS of ixmdin!\i; has flood. cllions dNtTmoOfd.

ZONE AO ff1><1d depth' "f 1:t> 3 iP.•t (•;>u:1>ed for areas oi ollu,iai fan lloudini;. vekx:iti$ .ilo determi1'l<'<.i.

ZONE A99 To be prot"":td fr0m lGO-year flrx1d by Fcdercir (1ood oro:(·<.:Con y!>t('m ,,:;cfor constru::.tic1'1 ; no' b.Jst ftood c•lev.:Jtou d4.-.-tcrmiried with vbdty hu.v·d l\'i'1Vt' a(.Cior.•; no b.uc tood i(" ?.tions dc:t rrninC'd. ZONE Vii (oasf[ llood with velocity hJi

OTHFR FLOOD AREAS ZONI! X 1\rea or 5CO-\le;u tlood: Jreas of ·mo-veC11r I il1h• of les ;han 1 foot C>r with dr<1in.age areas 'ess the1n 1 1uan: mil: t)!'ld ar•lS pro1e<1ed t}' .·jI l<>We$ from 100-wa·· flcotl. l . i OTHER AREAS I ZONE X ,.o\Tas deterrnind to be out$lde CO-ye.u flo(1dplain.

. ZONE D Areas in whrch flood hazards are · .. ·. . .- :1 unde1e1mir.ed. ZONE · ·.. · I . . . [ UNDEVELOPED COASTAL BARRIERS ·. ·. r ZONE X I I Identified Identified O:h<:dr,la n Bcundarv

Z:>ne D Boundarv

Bovodary 01·dirg Spec al lood Ha2a1<1 Zones. ad 80..mdary Di•1iding Areas of Ctifen llt Coa$tal Base Flood Ele- aticns \Nithin Special F\ood Hazard Zones. Base Flood Elevation Une. [leva:ior, 1n Feet. See Map hide< 'or Ele·Jat;on 0-0turn. Ccos!') Sectior• Ur.a Bse Flood E!evatio,n ii Feet (EL 987} Where Ur.ifrrn V\l'ithin Zor.

This is an official copy of a portion of the abo-ve referenced ftood map. H was extracted using F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reftect changes or amendments which may have been made subseciuent to the date on the title block. For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance Program ftood maps cheek the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.msc.fema.gov

0

SITE AREA: +/- 38,000 SF

BUILDING AREA 22 9 00 FLR1 : 8,400 SF

0 0 FLR 2: 8,900 SF

0 0* FLR 3: 8,900 SF 0 0 FLR 4: 8,900 SF

TOTAL: 35,100 SF

LCBH 0

UNITS

47 STANDARD STUDIO UNITS 3 ADA STUDIO UNITS 50 TOTAL 0

0 _ ..-----! 0 0 0 0 0

HOUSING FIRST 0• * ST.VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY OF LANE COUNTY en () 0 HOUSING AND COMMUNITY SERVICES AGENCY c PF LANE COUNTY -I

-

- CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1'= 60'-0" 5/3/17 MARTIN LUTHER KING BLVD REV 1 5-23-17 -- ERGSUND

DELANEY Architecture & Plannin , PC SUPPORTIVE HOUSING APARTMENT COMMUNITY ON MLK BLVD

PROJECT CONCEPT HOUSING FIRST Homes for Good Housing Agency and Lane County PRINCIPLES are leading the effort to develop a Supportive Housing Apartment Community on MLK Blvd in HOMELESSNESS IS FIRST Eugene, Oregon. This is a community partnership to AND FOREMOST A HOUSING PROBLEM AND SHOULD BE identify, engage, house and support the people in TREATED AS SUCH our area who have been experiencing homelessness the longest and utilize the most resources. Using the HOUSING IS A RIGHT TO Housing First/harm reduction model, this apartment WHICH ALL ARE ENTITLED IT community will provide permanent, stable housing IS NOT A REWARD FOR as the first priority, while also offering the support CLINICAL SUCCESS OR services necessary to ensure an individual’s COMPLIANCE maximum opportunity for overcoming homelessness. PEOPLE WHO ARE HOMELESS Research has shown that the Housing First model OR ON THE VERGE OF HOMELESSNESS SHOULD BE is more effective than shelters and transitional RETURNED TO OR housing systems at housing the "hardest to serve" STABILIZED IN PERMANENT individuals, who often struggle with complex and HOUSING AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE AND CONNECTED overlapping health, mental health, and substance TO RESOURCES NECESSARY abuse disorders. TO SUSTAIN THAT HOUSING

Research also identifies that if not housed, the ISSUES THAT MAY HAVE chronically homeless utilize 50% of the shelter CONTRIBUTED TO A system resources, utilize a higher percentage of HOUSEHOLD’S HOMELESSNESS CAN BEST BE hospital emergency services and require longer ADDRESSED ONCE THEY ARE care, and have higher rates of incarceration and HOUSED recidivism. SUPPORTIVE HOUSING APARTMENT COMMUNITY ON MLK BLVD

PROGRAM SERVICES DESIGN PROGRAM Lane County will secure 24/7 on-site The 50 furnished studio apartments will be supportive services in collaboration with approximately 360 square feet with partner agencies that will include: kitchenettes and private bathrooms. The four (4) story structure will be Case management approximately 35,100 sq.ft. The exterior has Service coordination been designed to complement the surrounding buildings and green space. Community building Three (3) of the units will be fully ADA compliant and all other units will be ADA Social and recreational activities adaptable. The ground floor will include common use areas, laundry facilities, a 24/7 Connections to mainstream resources, reception desk, and ample supportive service meeting rooms and offices. health care, substance abuse, mental

health services, self-help groups, and FINANCING Homes for Good intends to apply for peer resources Project-Based Section 8 vouchers for this apartment community. This means residents Connections to employment and will only need to pay 30% of their income on rent. This federal rent subsidy ensures that educational services the units are accessible and affordable to people with extremely low, or no, incomes. Assistance with independent living skills,

including money management The overall estimated project cost is $12 million: approximately $8.8 million in Outreach and engagement of resident construction, $3.1 million in soft costs, and the land is being donated by Lane County. Resident council development and Homes for Good is pursuing private, local, support and state financing options, and anticipates applying for tax credit financing in the Spring of 2019.