Written Answers to Questions not answered at Mayor's Question Time on 17 July 2013 Confidence in the Met Question No: 2013/2433 Joanne McCartney Should Londoners have confidence in your oversight of the Metropolitan Police Service? Oral response
Pledge on job creation Question No: 2013/2434 Fiona Twycross You pledged in your 2012 manifesto that you would create 200,000 jobs directly through City Hall programmes. Exactly how many of these jobs have you created so far? Oral response
Your election manifesto and fire service cuts Question No: 2013/2435 Andrew Dismore Why did you not tell the people of London that you would support a proposal to close 12 of their fire stations, remove 18 of their fire engines, and cut 520 of their firefighters' jobs in your election manifesto last year? Oral response
Fares Question No: 2013/2436 Valerie Shawcross Your manifesto said, 'My approach will ensure that fares will be lower in the long term', but since you have been Mayor, fares have gone up by 6%, 7.1%, 6.8%, 5.6% & 4.2%. Is this keeping your manifesto promise? Oral response
NHS at 65 Question No: 2013/2437 Onkar Sahota On the 65th anniversary of the NHS, does the Mayor feel that London needs a pan-regional strategic health authority? Oral response
Page 1 Rough Sleeping Question No: 2013/2438 Tom Copley What will you do to stem the increase in rough sleeping?
Oral response
Air Pollution Question No: 2013/2439 Murad Qureshi Your 2012 manifesto pledged to 'champion improvement to London's air quality'. With your more substantive measures due to take place after the next mayoral election, are you delivering against this pledge? Oral response
Affordable rent programme Question No: 2013/2251 Darren Johnson A publication on the GLA web site provides figures for Affordable Rent programme starts and completions for 2011-12 and 2012-13 for the whole of Greater London, and broken down by borough. Please provide the same figures for the programme, but with separate figures for (a) new build homes and (b) conversions from social rent. The Mayor None of the homes reported on the GLA website (to which you refer to) relate to conversions from social rent.
Turnham Green Tube Stop Question No: 2013/2252 Caroline Pidgeon Further to your answer to MQ 1249/2013 please confirm the exact timetable for contacting interested parties to ask for their views on services stopping at this station? The Mayor TfL has had discussions with the local authority about the planned engagement programme, and is now similarly discussing this with the local MP. The full programme of engagement will commence in late August.
Page 2 St Pancras charity Oyster card collection Question No: 2013/2253 Caroline Pidgeon Since 2008 or when the collection began, whichever is earlier, please state the number of cards donated how much this box has raised for charity? Can you confirm that TfL also donates the Oyster card deposit to charity as well as any unused balance? The Mayor Since 2008, a total of 2,826 cards have been deposited at King's Cross St Pancras. From these, £8,222.87 has been donated to charity. This figure includes both the deposit and the remaining Pay As You Go (PAYG) credit. The average donation per card is £2.90, but it should be noted that older cards and Visitor cards do not have deposits, and that some cards have a zero PAYG balance when donated.
Summer Streets on Regent Street Question No: 2013/2254 Caroline Pidgeon Now that you have partially implemented this policy that I have long advocated will you be seeking to extend Summer Streets onto Oxford Street? The Mayor As you know, I have been a strong, long-standing advocate of Summer Streets. I am delighted that we've had agreement to the Summer Streets on Regent Street pilot programme of closures for four consecutive Sundays in July 2013. I understand that the Oxford Street retailers will look at the monitoring and assessment of the Regent Street scheme and consider whether they support its extension next summer.
Elephant & Castle TfL funding Question No: 2013/2255 Caroline Pidgeon Your answer to MQ 1255/2013 was vague at best. Can you please provide more detail about the level of funding that local residents can expect to see invested in Elephant and Castle? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. As part of the broader regeneration of the Elephant & Castle area, TfL will deliver a new Northern Line Ticket Hall and a new layout for the northern roundabout. The current estimate of the combined costs of these works is £140 million, provided the new ticket hall is integrated into a new shopping centre. These works will be funded by TfL, developer contributions, LB Southwark CIL and the GLA.
Page 3 Boxing Day service on London Overground Question No: 2013/2256 Caroline Pidgeon As you will be aware service on the London Overground has been severely disrupted on Boxing Day in recent years due to engineering work. Will you take steps to ensure that as much of the London Overground network as possible is running on Boxing Day 2013? The Mayor London Overground services do not currently run on Boxing Day. One of the reasons for this is that operation of the Overground network requires Network Rail signal box staffing, which is not in place on Boxing Day. TfL is considering whether to specify Boxing Day services when the concession is re-let. Clearly this would need to involve an agreement with Network Rail, as well as a review of demand and an assessment of whether services on Boxing Day would represent value for money.
Gold Card discount scheme Question No: 2013/2257 Caroline Pidgeon Please state the number of annual travel cards sold by TfL in 2011, 2012, 2013 and the number of Gold Card discounts that are loaded onto Oyster cards? The Mayor 110,000 Annual Travelcards were sold by TfL in 2011, which grew to 115,000 in 2012. 77,000 had been sold by the end of October 2013.
There are currently around 150,000 valid Annual Travelcards on Oyster, of which around 40,000 have the Gold Card discount set.
This has increased significantly from 24,000 in December 2012 due to an email campaign alerting holders of Annual Travelcards to their eligibility for the discount.
Page 4 'The Greatest City on Earth' (1) Question No: 2013/2258 Caroline Pidgeon In your 2020 Vision you state an aim to have 2000 New Buses for London on the road. Each of these buses will cost Londoners approximately £50,000 more than a standard hybrid bus. Do you agree that Londoners would prefer 2000 standard hybrid buses and have £100 million invested in other parts of the transport network? The Mayor No. The investment is providing a much-needed boost to economic growth in the UK as so many components are made and assembled here. The order of 600 production vehicles has already resulted in a new Wrightbus chassis plant opening in Antrim, creating 50 new jobs. This is before other jobs secured or generated at companies that supply the engines from Darlington, seats from Telford, moquette fabric from Huddersfield, and flooring from Liskeard, Cornwall, are taken into account. TfL has already confirmed that the average unit cost of the New Bus for London is £354,500 over the life of the delivery programme, which is in line with the average estimated cost of a double deck non-NBfL hybrid of £334,400 over the same period. This small price difference will be more than compensated by fuel savings over the life of the vehicle. Just focussing on prices ignores its additional features, including better fuel efficiency, very low emissions, and the fact it will accelerate development of cleaner hybrids of all kinds in the bus industry. Passengers rate the new vehicle very highly and relish the return of hop-on hop-off travel.
Page 5 'The Greatest City on Earth' (2) Question No: 2013/2259 Caroline Pidgeon In your 2020 Vision you state that transport links tackle social exclusion. Could you please cite your source for this 'fact'? The Mayor The 2020 Vision document refers to the French extending the RER to bring millions of people closer to centres of employment and opportunity, which they see as 'one of the most effective ways of tackling social exclusion'. Nevertheless it is now widely recognised that limitations of the transport system are a major factor in reducing or removing the ability of people living in disadvantaged areas to access key activities and that this is exacerbated by the broader context of a society and environment built around the assumption of high mobility. Following publication of a report on transport related social exclusion by the Government's Social Exclusion Unit in 2003; systematic accessibility planning has been practised in the UK. TfL carried out extensive research into this subject in the late 1990s. This found that at that time around a quarter of London's population suffered a lack of 'connection' with the 'activities and opportunities required to participate fully in society'. While there were many reasons, people's inability to physically access opportunities because of travel difficulties was found to be important. Subsequent evaluation research has identified that public transport improvements in deprived areas have delivered significant improvements in bus patronage and travel uptake, as well as having knock-on benefits in terms of the take-up of new employment, educational opportunities and healthcare visits. Nowhere in the document is it asserted that transport should be seen as the sole means of tackling social exclusion and many other polices are being pursued in this area.
'The Greatest City on Earth' (3) Question No: 2013/2260 Caroline Pidgeon In your 2020 Vision there is a welcome commitment to reducing car travel. However you also state that 'some people must drive'. Can you please outline who you think must drive in London? The Mayor I want to see more people using public transport but I am aware that there are many Londoners who need to drive because of where they live, work and other lifestyle choices. For too long these people have been forgotten by public policy makers and the Roads Task Force is intended to ensure that we cater for all road users while also making London a more liveable city. We have shown that these are not incompatible objectives.
Page 6 'The Greatest City on Earth' (4) Question No: 2013/2261 Caroline Pidgeon In your 2020 Vision you state an ambition to double the number of river journeys. Please outline how you expect this to be achieved? The Mayor I am fully committed to ensuring the river reaches its full potential and details of how TfL and I expect this to be achieved can be found in my River Action Plan which was published in February this year. It can be downloaded from the TfL website on the link below. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/river-action-plan.pdf
'The Greatest City on Earth' (5) Question No: 2013/2262 Caroline Pidgeon In your 2020 Vision you state a desire to run more roads through tunnels. Have you been given ballpark costs for this work? Please provide details. The Mayor One of the main conclusions of the Roads Task Force (RTF) is that to achieve the overall vision for London, an expanded 'toolbox' of interventions is needed, together with a greater willingness to use the full range of tools within it. New tunnels are something which might offer good potential solutions to some of the problems the RTF has identified and I want to see them considered within this context. Over the next two years, TfL will undertake work which will provide us with a clearer understanding of the feasibility, potential effectiveness and affordability of more tunnels in London.
Road safety action plan (1) Question No: 2013/2263 Caroline Pidgeon The plan states that replacing wet film safety cameras with digital safety cameras will improve safety. Can you please state how the digital cameras will improve safety? The Mayor Safe Streets for London states that wet film safety cameras will become obsolete by 2015. These cameras have proven extremely successful in reducing speed related casualties on London's roads. The replacement of these cameras will continue to maintain these casualty savings. A digital safety camera network will have several advantages over the existing wet film network. They allow for a more efficient and cost effective operation because digital safety cameras are more flexible in their use. For example, the new cameras are able to enforce red light running and speeding using the same unit. Further, at locations with central reservations, the new cameras are able to operate in both carriageway directions simultaneously improving coverage from a single location.
Page 7 Road safety action plan (2) Question No: 2013/2264 Caroline Pidgeon The plan includes a commitment to improve and grow the Freight Operator Recognition Scheme. Please state how you will attempt to bring as many operators as possible into the scheme including companies with just one or two vehicles? The Mayor There are already almost 3000 operators within the Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) which covers over 160,000 vehicles; approximately 50% of these are small operators of 10 vehicles or less. The number of operators and vehicles accredited by the Fleet Operator Recognition Scheme (FORS) will continue to grow primarily as a result of FORS bronze accreditation being a contractual requirement. TfL's contracts have included this requirement since February 2012 and to encourage other organisations to follow its lead, TfL published the award winning 'Improving Road Safety through Procurement' guidance in May 2013. (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/freight/documents/improving-road-safety-through- procurement.pdf) This approach is being promoted to public and private sector organisations. Crossrail, The London Legacy Development Corporation, Thames Water, MACE and a number of London boroughs have already committed to this approach. TfL's Construction Logistics Plan guidance (for planners and developers) (http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/freight/publications.aspx#logistics-plan-guidance) also shows how the planning process can be used to promote FORS accreditation, which is now made a condition for many planning applications. In all instances the small fleet operator, often employed as a sub-contractor, is included because the contractual requirement to become FORS accredited is passed-down the supply- chain.
Road safety acti on plan (3) Question No: 2013/2265 Caroline Pidgeon The plan includes a commitment to improve and grow the Freight Operator Recognition Scheme. Will you also seek improvements to taxi and private hire licensing and training to ensure these drivers and vehicles meet the highest possible standards of cycle safety perhaps through a new recognition scheme? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 Measures that enhance taxi and private hire drivers' skills and behaviour are to be welcomed. TfL is currently actively working on how this could be best addressed.
Page 8 Road safety action plan (4) Question No: 2013/2266 Caroline Pidgeon You state that as part of this plan all 52 actions from the Cycle Safety Action Plan (CSAP) will be completed. Please set out the timetable for completing these actions. Will you commit to publishing progress towards completing these actions on the TfL website? The Mayor Through the Cycle Safety Working Group, TfL is currently working with stakeholders to develop an updated Cycle Safety Action Plan (CSAP 2) which is due for publication this year. Of the 52 actions in the first CSAP, published in 2010, 43 have been completed, many of which are now embedded into TfL's cycle safety activity. The remaining nine are still in progress and will be incorporated into the new CSAP 2. A summary of the work completed against each of the actions from the original CSAP will be provided as part of the publication of CSAP 2 later this year and will be available on TfL's website.
Road safety action plan (5) Question No: 2013/2267 Caroline Pidgeon In common with your plans for improving cycle safety the success of the Road Safety Action Plan relies on the co-operation and commitment of the boroughs. What plans do you have to help you overcome boroughs who are resistant or hostile to the changes you are proposing? The Mayor Written response from the Mayor As you say, the boroughs, as highway, planning and education authorities, have a vital role to play in further reducing casualties in London. In 2012, more than two-thirds of collisions in London occurred on borough roads, and TfL is working closely with boroughs to focus road safety measures in areas with high casualty rates. A programme of training and best practice sharing for borough road safety teams will be put in place to ensure that the skills needed to make casualty reductions in London are available. I have also written to the leaders of London's 33 boroughs stressing my commitment to coordinated action, and TfL invited senior borough officers to a 'London Road Safety Summit' to agree early action and co-operation on the key measures in the Safe Streets for London action plan. The Commissioner, Sir Peter Hendy CBE, has also raised the issue at the Chief Executives Liaison Committee. I will continue to develop the dialogue with boroughs in future to work together to improve the safety of London's roads.
Page 9 Road safety action plan ( 6) Question No: 2013/2268 Caroline Pidgeon The plan highlights the value and importance of Road Safety Audits. Will you commit to setting a target for the number of Road Safety Audits completed on Borough roads? In addition will you also commit to publishing the number of Road Safety Audits carried out per Borough? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 Where they are the highway authority, it is for individual boroughs to decide whether a road safety audit is required. TfL has designed its road safety audit procedure and process, based on national guidance, to be specifically tailored for London. TfL audits all of its highway improvement schemes with this procedure and strongly encourages boroughs to use it. Where boroughs choose a road safety audit scheme, they are encouraged to use the expertise made available by TfL but are at liberty to select alternative providers of this service. For this reason, it is only the boroughs themselves who hold the data on the total number of road safety audits completed. I am encouraged by boroughs' willingness to use the expertise available at TfL. In 2012, TfL completed 56 road safety audits on borough roads, more than were completed in 2011, and in the first 6 months of 2013 TfL is already on course to exceed last year's total.
Road safety action plan (7) Question No: 2013/2269 Caroline Pidgeon Do you have a timetable for the roll out of pedestrian and cycle SCOOT timings?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
TfL continues to develop its proposals for pedestrian and cycle SCOOT and will shortly be in a position to update on the next steps to bring this innovative technology to the Capital.
Page 10 Road safety action plan (8) Question No: 2013/2270 Caroline Pidgeon TfL is currently testing electronic tags that can warn truck drivers that cyclists are nearby. Do you accept that this type of technology will only ever be a small part of the cycle safety solution? The Mayor TfL is currently working to understand the role that electronic tags and Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) technology have in improving cycle safety, particularly in relation to heavy goods vehicles and their blind spots. This work is part of a wider suite of activity by TfL aimed at improving safety for cyclists through a number of different approaches, including infrastructure and engineering measures, marketing campaigns, cyclist training, driver awareness initiatives, enforcement and changes to vehicle specifications. Investigating the potential for the use of technology, such as electronic tags, is a vital step in improving cyclist safety, but the potential initiatives that result will only ever be one part of a more comprehensive package of measures. I remain committed to making London's streets safer for cyclists and I and TfL will continue to explore all possible ways of achieving this.
Road safety action plan (9) Question No: 2013/2271 Caroline Pidgeon The plan helpfully sets out specific action lists for each area of road safety. Will you commit to publishing these lists on the TfL website with live updates of progress towards achieving them? The Mayor My road safety action plan sets out a comprehensive programme of 56 actions to deliver casualty reductions in London up to 2020. There are no current plans to publish live updates against each action on the TfL website; however, action 55 is to annually report on the outcome of progress in delivering the programme. This annual account will be published on the TfL website.
Page 11 Road safety action plan (10) Question No: 2013/2272 Caroline Pidgeon As you state in the plan car use is falling in the capital. Will you commit to reduce the amount of space allocated to private vehicles as private vehicle usage falls? The Mayor No. Different sorts of roads in London serve many different users and we don't allocate space to private vehicles per se. For example, a typical high street may be used by private vehicles, freight and servicing vehicles, emergency services, pedestrians crossing the road, buses and cyclists - all sharing the same space. In some instances, we do allocate road space for specific uses, for example through the use of bus lanes, cycle lanes and in numerous public realm schemes across London that have increased space for pedestrians.
My Roads Task Force (RTF) supports the ambition for road space to more effectively allocated between different modes of transport and uses. TfL, working with the boroughs, will apply the RTF's proposed street-type approach to managing road space.
Road safety action plan (11) Question No: 2013/2273 Caroline Pidgeon The plan states that 2.8% of car drivers and 4.5% of van drivers use a mobile phone while driving. Given that the majority of van drivers will be driving for a commercial purpose, do you agree that professional drivers should exhibit much higher standards of road behaviour than amateur drivers? The Mayor All drivers should demonstrate full respect for the laws of the road, including not using a handheld mobile phone while driving.
Road safety action plan (12) Question No: 2013/2274 Caroline Pidgeon Will you consider rewarding Boroughs with additional LIP funding if they successfully reduce KSIs in their Boroughs? The Mayor The LIP funding is in part determined on the basis of the number of KSIs in each borough, with a larger proportion of the available funding provided to those boroughs with the greatest number of collisions. I am sure you will agree that focusing resources where they are most needed makes eminent sense. This approach was agreed with the London boroughs and London Councils in 2010 and there are no plans to change the arrangements at the current time.
Page 12 Road safety action plan (13) Question No: 2013/2275 Caroline Pidgeon Would you consider incentivising freight and commercial drivers to participate in cycle safety training by offering reductions on the congestion charge? The Mayor The cycle safety awareness training that TfL funds is a financial incentive in itself. This free course meets the regulatory requirements of Driver Certificate of Professional Competence (DCPC), which drivers would usually have to pay for. TfL is working closely with the freight industry to encourage the uptake of cycle safety awareness training. Driver training requirements are written into all of TfL's procurement contracts and are promoted through TfL's 'Improving Road Safety through Procurement' and Construction Logistics Plan guidance (for planners and developers) which is now made a condition in many planning applications. These documents are available here: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/freight/documents/improving-road-safety-through- procurement.pdf http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/freight/documents/construction-logistics-plan-guidance- for-developers.pdf http://www.tfl.gov.uk/microsites/freight/documents/construction-logistics-plan-guidance- for-planners.pdf
Station Hotspot Congestion Question No: 2013/2276 Caroline Pidgeon During the Olympics TfL produced congestion hot spot maps to help passengers avoid stations at the busiest times. Will you consider producing similar hot spot maps for the most congested Tube stations in London to allow passengers to more accurately plan when to travel? The Mayor Yes. TfL is already intending to provide information on the times at which the busiest Tube stations are congested to help customers plan their journeys. The best format in which to provide that information is currently under development and being tested with customers and stakeholders. In keeping with their wider approach to open data, TfL will make this information openly and freely available for developers to build information products for customers over and above those TfL provides itself. Subject to the results of testing with customers and stakeholders, I expect this information to be available before the end of the financial year.
Page 13 20mph limits Question No: 2013/2277 Caroline Pidgeon Isabel Dedring was recently quoted as saying in response to a question about a London wide 20mph limit 'It could be realistic by 2020'. Can you confirm that you are supportive of a move towards London Wide 20mph limit by 2020 through supporting 20mph Boroughs? The Mayor As you know, TfL and I have long supported 20 mph zones in boroughs which choose to implement them through the LIPs programme, which has funded more than 400 20 mph schemes. A number of boroughs are currently looking to introduce borough-wide 20 mph schemes. In relation to the TLRN, TfL as usual will keep speed limits under review and will consider 20mph limits whenever appropriate, for example at Waterloo IMAX roundabout, where we are trialling a 20mph speed limit.
Cycle Hire Question No: 2013/2278 Caroline Pidgeon For the 12 months preceding July 17th 2013 please list the average time per day that each docking station has: a) no available bikes b) no available docking spaces for bikes The Mayor Please find this data attached as Appendices 2278a and 2278b. We hold data up until the end of June 2013. TfL has recently negotiated an improved Key Performance Indicator (KPI) with Serco regarding the number of instances stations are full or empty. The new KPIs took effect on 1 May 2013, and require Serco to achieve an immediate improvement in redistribution along with a further improvement in August. Since May we have also been changing the redistribution strategy in West London. We will continue to monitor redistribution in this area, and I am confident that this will continue to improve.
Streatham High Road Question No: 2013/2279 Caroline Pidgeon Can you confirm that the Outer London Fund grant for Streatham High Road is secure and provide a timescale for the work? The Mayor The Outer London Fund contribution to improvements to the central reservation on Streatham High Road is confirmed, and amounts to £450,000 of the £1.61 million Outer London Fund investment in Streatham. The project is scheduled to start on site on end of September and complete by March 2014.
Page 14 TRL trial Question No: 2013/2280 Caroline Pidgeon Following the successful trials of cycle safety infrastructure at the TRL, what is the estimated timescale for bringing these innovations onto London streets? The Mayor I am pleased to hear that you have seen the trials first hand at TRL on 7 June. The trials comprise nine separate test programmes. Once the outcome of each programme is known, approval will be sought from the DfT for on street trials. Approval for the use of a high level red cycle aspect signal on street is currently under consideration by the DfT. The timetable for introduction depends on DfT approval. We are pressing for an urgent decision. Details of the trials can be found at: www.trl.co.uk/cyclinginnovationtrials/
Page 15 Tube passengers claiming compensation for delays (1) Question No: 2013/2281 Caroline Pidgeon Please publish a table which shows on a monthly basis the number of Tube passengers who have successfully claimed compensation for a delayed journey between 1st January 2012 and 30th June 2013.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013 Customer Charter refund claims for Tube delays have been declining in line with the improvements made to reliability on the London Underground. In the first six months of this year 123,568 claims were paid. The number of refunds paid is as follows:
2012 2013 Jan 30,016 22,962 Feb 50,248 21,384 Mar 37,045 18,758 April 28,348 13,782 May 41,224 34,512 June 50,819 12,170 July 26,201 August 27,004 Sept 8,680 Oct 20,274 Nov 23,827 Dec 15,768
Page 16 Tube passengers claiming compensation for delays (2) Question No: 2013/2282 Caroline Pidgeon Please publish a table which shows on a monthly basis the estimated number of Tube passengers who are eligible for delayed journey compensation between 1st January 2012 and 30th June 2013. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. I am afraid that TfL's systems cannot measure this with any precision and it does not hold such numbers. In the event of major disruption due to circumstances within our control, we routinely make automated refunds to customers without the need for them to make a claim. I am committed to improving reliability on the Tube by 30 per cent. Tube reliability is at an all- time high with the effects of capital investment visible in better performance.
Tram extension to Sutton Question No: 2013/2283 Caroline Pidgeon Is an extension of tram services part of your vision for Sutton? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes, it certainly, Caroline, we want to do it. We are looking at this as part of the 2020 Vision, we are supportive of the extension, we think it would bring regeneration to Sutton as well as improving accessibility and, if you look at where London is going to grow, outer London town centres are part of the future of our city, Sutton is definitely part of it. The leadership in Sutton is right on for it, Paul Scully [Conservative Parliamentary Candidate for Sutton and Cheam], who campaigns hard there on that issue, is very actively supporting, and I support him in what he is saying and doing. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): Thank you for that. Obviously the huge benefits you have mentioned are regeneration, but are you aware that the planned extension could create about 10,000 new jobs and also could ultimately link to the exciting Sutton life science cluster, which links to part of the Royal Marsden, the Institute of Cancer Research and Epsom & St Helier Hospital. It has huge wider benefits than just the regeneration of Sutton town centre. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I am aware of those points and I completely agree with you. I would just say something about the issue, because I happened to be in Sutton quite recently and was doing one of those things where you stand up in the high street and you give a general harangue about whatever comes into your head. I thought I would try it out on the assembled multitudes the idea of the tram, and I said, 'And we are working with the council to put in a new tram', and this vast audience looked at me a bit apathetically. I said, 'Do you want a tram?' and one voice said, 'Yeah', and one voice said, 'No'. The point of this is I think it is all very well for politicians to get behind this, there now needs to be a process of active consultation with local people so that they understand the issues, so that they are genuinely supportive of the scheme and of the vision. To make this work, you not only need political buy-in from the borough level, you need local people to be strongly engaged as well. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): I think that is absolutely right and we saw that previously with the Cross River Tram and the support for that. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): There was support for that, but then that support
Page 17 collapsed. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): Let me move on, Mr Mayor, because in your 2020 Vision you stated that you want to Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Sorry, West London Tram Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): secure a stable tenure funding settlement for TfL to help extend the tram network to Sutton. While I accept that the overall funding package for this has to come from land values increases and so on, TfL did receive a very good six-year financial settlement. Will you commit to using some TfL money and staff time to help seed-fund the Sutton tram project to take it to the next stage? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Inevitably that is happening now, that is part of what we are doing. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): How much money are you putting in at the moment? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I cannot give you a figure but there are now three south London tram schemes that are being quite actively worked up by TfL. The Sutton extension is one of them and we are looking at which is the best. We cannot do all three but we are going to try and do at least one of them. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): Given that Sutton is one of only five boroughs that does not have the Underground, it is not included in Crossrail, it is not part of London Overground, but Sutton obviously does contribute to the community levy for all these major transport projects in London. Given also that the Independent Investment Programme Advisory Group (IIPAG), your independent advisers, have advised that the TfL major capital contingency fund budget could release about £1 billion over the next ten years, surely there is some money there that could help to spur this project forward to really transform public transport and regeneration of this part of London. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes. Obviously public funding, TfL funding, will be part of the package that is put together, but, as is the case with Crossrail 2, the private sector will have to come to the table, there will have to be buy-in from the council, there will have to be a vision, there will have to be a clear sense of how an increase in business rates and so on and taxation is going to deliver the funding that we need. As I say, I think there also needs to be wider public awareness in Sutton of the attractions of this scheme. I know that Steve O'Connell has been working on that, but there needs to be a very, very strong understanding in the local area of what this is about and the benefits it will bring. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): We are clearly taking it forward and I know the local Members of Parliament (MP) and council have been doing a lot of work around this. I am sure, as you say, the next stage is to get the people of Sutton onboard. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Not enough yet. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): But you said you definitely will commit some TfL money to this. When will you have a firm decision, when will you make the final decision whether this is the tram extension that goes ahead? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I cannot give you a time for that, Caroline. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): This year, next year, next month? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): It will depend on, as I say, I was a little bit concerned that there has not been widespread activity in Sutton about this yet. It is not something that people know or understand in any great detail. I want to see real progress on people understanding the effect of the route, the benefits it would bring. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): When do you hope to make a decision, this year? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): We will work with the borough and with all south London boroughs to progress some or all of those, or at least one of those schemes, as soon as we can, but I cannot give you -- Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): Do you think you will make a decision whether to progress it this
Page 18 year, yes or no? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes or no, the answer is yes or no. Caroline Pidgeon MBE (AM): Fantastic, thank you. This year we should get a decision, thank you.
St Pancras charity Oyster card collection Question No: 2013/2284 Caroline Pidgeon Since 2008 or when the collection began, whichever is earlier, please state the number of Oyster cards donated and how much this box has raised for charity? Please can you give figures for each other box of this type that is collecting Oyster cards? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 21 January 2014
Please see my response to MQ 2253/ 2013.
West Brompton Train Shelter Question No: 2013/2285 Caroline Pidgeon Further to your answers to questions 1573/2010 and 1820/2013, I have not received any confirmation or communication from TfL as to the works to be carried out to install shelters for passengers waiting at West Brompton. Can you please ensure swift action is taken to install both benches and shelters at this increasingly busy station? The Mayor TfL expects the new benches and shelters to be installed in the autumn. I will ask TfL to write to you with the timetable.
Page 19 Publicity for new London bus on route 24 Question No: 2013/2286 Caroline Pidgeon What marketing and publicity materials and advertising (including concertina-style postcards) have been designed, printed and placed to promote the new London bus running on route 24 and what has been the cost for each item?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The following materials have been designed to raise awareness and understanding of the features of the new bus and will be scaled back once the bus becomes more familiar to passengers and is introduced onto more routes. This is in line with the approach we use to support the introduction of all new pieces of public transport infrastructure. Costs incurred are for route 24 only. Materials:
• Posters on both commercial sites and sites that TfL has free access to • Mobile media, targeting those living and travelling close to the route 24 • Door drop mailing of postcard • Additional distribution of postcard in local shops, bars and other venues • Emails using TfL database • Metro ads on TfL's daily travel page
Costs:
• Paid for media - £42,337 • Door drop mailing and other local distribution - £7,562 • Email - £795 • Print - £10,524 • Design and production - £25,912* • Total: £87,130
*50% of total design costs as shared between route 24 and route 11
Page 20 Cost of Policing Outside the Ecuadorian Embassy Question No: 2013/2287 Caroline Pidgeon What representations have you made to the Government to ask them to cover the £11,000 per day costs of policing the Ecuadorian Embassy since Julian Assange took up residency there? The Mayor I am concerned about the costs of this operation to taxpayers. MOPAC already receives a special payment provided in recognition of legislative or other requirements or duties that arise in policing London. Such funding addresses the costs of unique or additional policing activities which are demonstrably greater than those undertaken by other forces, and which arise because of London's status as the capital city of the United Kingdom. To date it has been considered that the policing of the Ecuadorian Embassy should be funded in this way. I will be reviewing this situation to ensure that if this is to be a long-term arrangement then the policing must be proportionate and the funding should be fair to Londoners, who expect MPS resources to be used efficiently to keep the city safe.
Police Procurement Hub Question No: 2013/2288 Caroline Pidgeon What percentage of goods do the Metropolitan Police procure through the national police procurement hub? The Mayor MOPAC and the MPS procure 48 per cent volume of all goods and services through the National Police Procurement Hub. This figure has risen month on month since go-live on 9 July 2012.
Custody language translation softwar e Question No: 2013/2289 Caroline Pidgeon Have the Metropolitan Police looked at introducing the language translation software successfully piloted by Surrey Police, which has reduced the cost of translators by 70 per cent by using a touchscreen system to take non-English speaking detainees through the booking in process in custody suites? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The MPS IT strategy is currently being reviewed. As part of this a visit to Surrey Police is scheduled for the near future to evaluate this software.
Page 21 London Safeguarding Trafficked Children Toolkit Question No: 2013/2290 Caroline Pidgeon The recent report 'Human Rights of unaccompanied migrant children and young people in the UK' from the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights noted that a survey of local authorities suggested that only eight had confirmed their implementation of the London Safeguarding Trafficked Children Toolkit and Practical Guidance. What more can MOPAC do to assist local authorities in tackling child trafficking? The Mayor MOPAC sits on the London Safeguarding Children Board which oversees and coordinates safeguarding activity in the capital. MOPAC also supports the European Communities Against Trafficking (ECAT) Project, which aims to establish a multi-agency, best practice approach to whole community engagement in the prevention of human trafficking alongside victim-centred intervention and aftercare, which can be replicated transnationally. MOPAC recognises the value of the London Safeguarding Trafficked Children Toolkit and will positively encourage more local authorities to implement it. Trafficking is a key part of the Mayors VAWG strategy refresh and features as part of the current VAWG consultation which runs until 9 August. MOPAC are encouraging boroughs and other stakeholders to respond.
Use of Child Protection Registers in cases of FGM Question No: 2013/2291 Caroline Pidgeon The recent report 'Violence Against Women and Girls' from the House of Commons International Development Committee found that the Metropolitan Police does not collaborate with social services to ensure that at-risk girls are placed on the Child Protection Register. What steps will you take to ensure that there is a more joined up approach to tackling FGM in London and that child protection policies are used as part of the way to safeguard at-risk girls? The Mayor I have established a Harmful Practices Taskforce which brings together key London partners including the MPS to coordinate and improve the way we tackle harmful practices including FGM in London. The Taskforce is currently developing a pilot initiative which will focus on early identification, prevention, safeguarding, enforcement and community engagement. I absolutely agree that existing child protection policies and frameworks should be routinely utilised to safeguard girls at risk of this form of violence and through my second Violence Against Women and Girls (VAWG) strategy and the Taskforce I will work with London partners to ensure that this happens. As highlighted by the Co-Chair of my Violence Against Women and Girls Panel, Joan Smith (Journalist, Author and Women's Rights Campaigner) in her article in the Independent on Sunday on 21 July 2013, the police alone cannot tackle this hidden crime. They need professionals such as teachers and GPs to identify and refer cases on but at present few are able to spot the warning signs. Community engagement is also crucial. All of these issues will feed into through the London Harmful Practices pilot intiative my second London VAWG strategy which is out for public consultation until 9 August.
Page 22 Metropolitan Police Service - Cars and drivers ( 1) Question No: 2013/2292 Caroline Pidgeon How much was spent during 2011/12 and 2012/13 on chauffeur driven cars for police officers of ACPO rank, broken down by: a) drivers b) cars c) maintenance and fuel d) insurance costs The Mayor Total expenditure for the following areas in 2011/12 and 2012/13 is as follows: 2011/12 2012/13 £k £k Drivers 871 641 Cars (capital expenditure) 109 192 Maintenance 176 176 Fuel 80 80 Insurance 14 13 Total 1,250 1,102
Metropolitan Police Service - Cars and drivers (2) Question No: 2013/2293 Caroline Pidgeon Which officers and staff had a designated driver, and which were eligible to access the pool of drivers in 2012/13? How many cars and how many drivers were in that pool? The Mayor The following officers have dedicated drivers: Commissioner Deputy Commissioner 3 Assistant Commissioners 3 ACPO officers with security considerations On average there were 41 ACPO rank officers in 2012/13, each officer has a car and all ACPO rank officers without a dedicated driver are eligible to use a pool driver.
Page 23 Me tropolitan Police Service - Cars and drivers (3) Question No: 2013/2294 Caroline Pidgeon How many officers are eligible for a car for personal use under ACPO terms and conditions? How many have taken this up? What is the current payment rate which officers reimburse for private mileage?
The Mayor
Written response from the Mayor At the end of June 2013 there were 35 officers at the rank of Commander or above who were entitled to the use of a car under ACPO terms and conditions. The rate at which officers reimburse the Service for their private mileage is that set by the HMRC for company cars. The rates below apply to all journeys on or after 1 June 2013.
Engine size Petrol 1400cc or less 15p 1401cc to 2000cc 17p Over 2000cc 25p Engine size Diesel 1600cc or less 12p 1601cc to 2000cc 14p Over 2000cc 18p At the request of my Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, a review of ACPO Officer terms and conditions and, in particular the provision of cars is currently underway.
Safer Neighbourhood Boards - funding Question No: 2013/2295 Caroline Pidgeon Can you confirm what funding and additional resources will be available per Board for the new Safer Neighbourhood Boards in 2014/15? The Mayor Each Safer Neighbourhood Board will receive £5200 for the provision of administrative support. This is the equivalent of 11 to 12 hours per week at the London Living Wage. This money will come from a £1 million Community Safety Fund to which the boards can also bid to support or deliver specific crime reduction or problem solving initiatives. The new MOPAC structure will also deliver officer support for the boards through four area based teams and the Community Engagement Unit.
Page 24 Safer Neighbourhood Boards - priorities Question No: 2013/2296 Caroline Pidgeon One of the roles of Safer Neighbourhood Boards is going to be establishing policing priorities for their borough. Yet currently Ward Panels set ward priorities. Given that not all wards will be represented on the new Boards how will you ensure that ward priorities are reflected in borough plans? How do you plan to reconcile potential conflicts between ward and borough priorities? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. A programme of MOPAC discussions with borough partners about Safer Neighbourhood Boards (SNB) has been underway since March this year. These discussions on future plans for the establishment of SNBs are continuing.
Safer Sutton Partnership Service Question No: 2013/2297 Caroline Pidgeon A recent article in The Police Journal highlights the excellent work of the Safer Sutton Partnership Service (SSPS) and considers the challenges ahead, for example the community safety fund no longer being ringfenced. How are you ensuring that despite budget cuts the use of such partnerships, which provide extremely good value for money, are extended? The Mayor MOPAC has set out its strategy to deliver crime prevention within the Police and Crime Plan and intends to support and challenge partners across London to achieve this. This includes supporting innovative new ways to prevent crime through the London Crime Prevention Fund. Boroughs were invited to bid for funding to support local policing and crime initiatives that were in line with their own as well as Mayoral priorities. MOPAC has allocated £18 million of this Fund to boroughs in 2013/14 and has provided funding commitments for a further three years. Sutton has been allocated £212,500 for 2013/14, with a commitment for four year funding as long as stated outcomes for the initiatives being funded are met and sufficient funding is made available to MOPAC. This represents a significant increase on the funding that came from the Home Office via MOPAC to Sutton local authority in 2012/13.
Page 25 Police Constable recruitment Question No: 2013/2298 Caroline Pidgeon The Met Police website states 'We plan to recruit more new police constables from the summer'. When will this recruitment start? Are there capacity limits on how many recruits the Met can take on in any given month or year? How many new constables will be recruited by 31 March 2014? The Mayor The Police Constable recruitment campaign is expected to be launched in early August 2013. The MPS plans to recruit up to 700 officers from this campaign. Further campaigns are likely to be run in the autumn. Overall the MPS expects to recruit around 2,300 new officers this financial year. There are no fixed capacity limits, but in practice account will need to be taken of training capacity and overall budget position.
Police Constable recruitment - positive action Question No: 2013/2299 Caroline Pidgeon MOPAC Challenge on 20 June discussed a range of potential positive action initiatives which the MPS might use to increase diversity during the forthcoming recruitment drive. Can you confirm what these initiatives will be and how you will be promoting them to potential recruits? The Mayor The MOPAC Challenge on 20 June established a Taskforce led by my senior advisor on mentoring Ray Lewis. This Taskforce will advise and inform the positive action initiatives being developed by the MPS. Current initiatives taking place include potential recruits being directed to a call centre where they register their interest. This includes workbooks and interactive sessions on completing the application form, live webinars where they can ask questions online or over the phone, face-to-face workshops, a virtual candidates support site with information and practical exercises and further workshops to help candidates prepare for the assessment centre called SEARCH. Those already in the Police family (Special Constabulary, Police Community Support Officers and Police Staff) can attend a preparation session as well as have the opportunity to practice elements of the selection process. They also have access to a mentor at Borough level.
Page 26 Police Constable rec ruitment - cost of Certificate in Knowledge in Policing Question No: 2013/2300 Caroline Pidgeon At MOPAC Challenge on 20 June it was acknowledged that the £800-£1000 cost of the Certificate in Knowledge of Policing (CKP) which the MPS now requires recruits to complete before they can start as a new police constable presents a barrier to many potential recruits. Please provide details of what financial and other support is going to be available to address this. The Mayor Written response from the Mayor The MPS is currently doing some work to determine whether the cost of the course is a barrier to entry that needs to be addressed, and if so, what financial support might be feasible to ensure those from low-income backgrounds are not put off applying. I committed in my manifesto to work with the MPS Commissioner to create a police force that looks more like London. For the MPS to be at its strongest, it must reflect, and be fully accepted by, the population it seeks to serve.
Police Front Counter Closures Question No: 2013/2301 Caroline Pidgeon Please list all the police front counters, by borough, which closed to the public on or around Monday 24 June. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The changes to public access set out in the borough public access documents available at: http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/mission-priorities/police-and-crime-plan were made on 24 June in the following boroughs: 1. Barnet 2. Bexley 3. Camden 4. Hackney 5. Hammersmith 6. Haringey 7. Havering 8. Hillingdon 9. Kensington 10. Lambeth 11. Merton 12. Southwark 13. Sutton 14. Tower 15. Wandsworth 16. Westminster
Page 27 Police Front Counter Closures - Publicity Question No: 2013/2302 Caroline Pidgeon Please list what publicity the Metropolitan Police and MOPAC provided in the run up to the closure of police front counters and who they contacted about the changes. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The MPS Public Access project has been running since 2011. As part of the project, the MPS has undertaken wide ranging borough level engagement. The feedback from this exercise assisted in shaping the final landscape of front counters which was promoted via MOPAC publicity outlets in March 2013. This included maps and documentation available via the website and an extensive programme of face-to-face engagement with the public during open meetings held in every borough. To publicise the new arrangements, the MPS has updated their internet site to provide improved access to on-line services and information on local public access. Additionally a leaflet explaining these changes is being delivered to households across London as part of the LPM roll out.
Closure of Hampstead Police Station Question No: 2013/2303 Caroline Pidgeon A constituent has raised with me that the Metropolitan Police did not inform anyone locally about the closure of Hampstead Police Station on 24 June. The first locals knew was seeing an advert for its sale in the local paper. Do you believe that this is the right way to go about community engagement? What alternative police public access provision will you provide in Hampstead? Has any progress been made on opening a contact point at the Royal Free Hospital? The Mayor Closure of Hampstead was part of the original consultation by MOPAC within the Police and Crime Plan and the pan London public access strategy. This included a public meeting in Camden on 22 January 2013. On 11 June the Camden Borough Commander briefed Councillors and the Assembly Member for Camden & Barnet, as well as local newspapers. The borough plans detailed all decisions around front counter closures when they were published alongside the final Police and Crime Plan on 25 March. On 3 June 2013 Chief Inspector Wright briefed the local ward panel chair. The public access plans for Camden published in March identified a potential Contact Point at The Royal Free Hospital. Discussions about this are on-going and a final decision has yet to be made.
Page 28 Incorrect signage at Police Stat ions Question No: 2013/2304 Caroline Pidgeon Three days after several police stations were closed and the hours changed at others Southwark Police Station was still, incorrectly, displaying signage suggesting that it was open 24 hours, when it is now only open Monday to Friday 10am-6pm, and also listing alternative Stations at East Dulwich and Rotherhithe, which had closed. Can you assure me that all Police Stations across London are displaying correct signage to the public? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Contact Points not open (1) Question No: 2013/2305 Caroline Pidgeon In November 2012 I asked whether you would guarantee that there would be no time gap between a front counter closing and a new contact point opening. You said 'Clearly we will want to make sure that there is no closure before the equivalent provision is capable of being used, is up and running ... My understanding is that there will be direct equivalence and there will be no loss of cover. There will be no interim gap in cover' [MQ 3365/2012]. Yet in June 2013 police front counters closed in sixteen London boroughs and contact points have not yet opened. How is this not a clear breach of your promise on public access to the police? The Mayor The transition to new public access arrangements in the first 16 boroughs went smoothly. On 24 June 2013 15 Boroughs changed their front counter service in line with the implementation of the Local Policing Model. All defined contact points, as described in the MOPAC document 'Policing and Public Access in London summary', first opened as planned on these boroughs on the Wednesday of that week (26 June). A further Borough (Merton) followed on 8 July, with its contact points first opening as planned on the Wednesday of that week (10 July). Public access to the police via a traditional front counter was available in these boroughs throughout as every borough retains at least one counter open 24/7, under my plans.
Page 29 Contact Points not open (2) Question No: 2013/2306 Caroline Pidgeon As of 1 July the Metropolitan Police website did not provide details of any Contact Points in: Merton; Barking and Dagenham; Brent; Bromley; Croydon; Ealing; Enfield; Greenwich; Harrow; Hounslow; Kingston upon Thames; Lewisham; Newham; Redbridge; Richmond upon Thames or Waltham Forest. When will they be open? Please provide details. The Mayor The LPM go-live for Merton Borough was delayed until 8 July (due to the resourcing implications of The Wimbledon Championships) and therefore front counters did not change and contact points did not start until this date. Merton contact points therefore first opened on the Wednesday of that week (10 July). The MPS website was update to reflect these changes at this stage. 15 of the remaining 16 Boroughs listed are currently planning to go-live with LPM and implement the changes to public access on 16 September, with their contact points first opening on the Wednesday of that week (18 Sept) and the website will again be updated to reflect these changes at this stage. The final borough (Croydon) is currently planning to go- live with LPM and implement the changes to public access on 7 October, with its contact points first opening on the Wednesday of that week (9 Oct) and the website being further updated at this stage to reflect this.
Police Front Counters - Croydon Question No: 2013/2307 Caroline Pidgeon The Metropolitan Police document 'Local Police Estate and Public Access' for Croydon on the MOPAC website lists the Front Counters as Croydon Police Station and Windmill Road Custody Centre. However as of 3 July only Croydon Police Station is listed on the Metropolitan Police website. This means that there appears to be only one public access point for the police for the whole borough. When will the front counter at Windmill Road Custody Centre open? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 Ensuring that the estate in Croydon is fit for the LPM has been a complex piece of work, involving the closure and sale of several large buildings. Croydon custody centre (Berin Underwood House) requires some remedial building work to ensure that the new front counter is of an appropriate standard. It will be open no later than the week beginning October 7th in line with the roll out of the LPM in Croydon and the opening of the contact points in Croydon.
Page 30 Implementation of Local Policing Model (1) Question No: 2013/2308 Caroline Pidgeon What metrics will you use to monitor, and judge the success of, the new Local Policing Model? The Mayor A benefits realisation dashboard is used to monitor the success of the Local Policing Model (LPM). Each benefit has an associated set of measures. These include: Neighbourhood crimes; Visibility; Response times; Quality of investigations; Police numbers in Safer Neighbourhoods and Emergency Response & Patrol; Public Confidence and satisfaction; and Complaints. Post implementation assurance work will combine self-assessment by boroughs with field work conducted separately, providing independence to the evaluation. MOPAC will be developing a series of performance metrics to oversee MPS implementation of the LPM.
Implementation of Local Policing Model (2) Question No: 2013/2309 Caroline Pidgeon How will you monitor community reaction to the implementation of the Local Policing Model? The Mayor The membership and functions of the Safer Neighbourhood Boards mean they will provide the ideal forum to monitor community reaction to the implementation of the Local Policing Model (LPM). Ward panels will be the bedrock of police and community engagement in a pyramid structure with Safer Neighbourhood Boards at the top. The views of the ward panels will be escalated to the boards through the neighbourhood representatives. The boards will include members representing a diverse range of community groups and the duty to monitor police performance, local confidence and complaints will capture how well the community thinks the LPM is working. The implementation of the LPM will also be monitored by survey of: performance information relating to public confidence in the police; satisfaction levels with policing services; visibility of the police; and whether the public can rely on the police being there when needed.
Page 31 Implementation of Local Policing Model (3) Question No: 2013/2310 Caroline Pidgeon For each of the boroughs which implemented the Local Policing model in June please provide the number of police officers and PCSOs allocated to each cluster of wards.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
The total number of officers allocated to each borough is published in the Police and Crime Plan which can be viewed at: www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/mission- priorities/police-and-crime-plan
Allocation within boroughs at a ward and cluster level is flexible and are operational decisions for Borough Commanders based on their local circumstances.
Air Quality on the Tube (1) Question No: 2013/2311 Stephen Knight Why did you recently state that dust levels on the tube were below 1 mg/m3 (MQ1298/2013), when in answer to MQ 0788/2013 you made clear that the most recent readings were up to 1.23 mg/m3? The Mayor The answer to MQ0788 / 2013 contains the actual dust levels recorded during the monitoring period (typically an eight hour period). In order to compare to the HSE levels, staff exposure is calculated as a time weighted average over an eight hour working day. This means their specific exposure to dust is lower than the actual dust levels recorded because station staff are based at several locations during the course of their working day and train operators aren't typically in the cab for the entirety of their shift. The answer provided last month said: TfL measures air quality regularly on the Tube and results show dust levels are consistently below the Workplace Exposure limits set by the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) as the enforcing body. They are also below the guidance levels recommended by the Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), at 1 mg/m3 and 5mg/m3 for 'respirable' and 'inhalable' dust respectively.
Page 32 Air Quality on the Tube (2) Question No: 2013/2312 Stephen Knight Why have you not sought independent scientific advice on the health risks of tube dust, as your predecessor did in 2003? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. The independent study carried out by the Institute of Occupational Medicine in 2003 was comprehensive. TfL does not believe that it is necessary to conduct another study of this type given that the levels and content of dust in the underground sections of its infrastructure do not change markedly over time. TfL regularly reviews new research findings and regularly measures dust levels in the underground sections of its infrastructure, using the Health and Safety Executive respirable dust measures.
Air Quality on the Tube (3) Question No: 2013/2313 Stephen Knight How can you state that exposure to tube dust is 'safe' when both the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM) advise that exposure should be kept as low as practically possible? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. Our research results have given us sufficient reassurance that the dust on the Tube does not pose a significant risk to the health of our customers or staff. Dust levels are currently less than a third of the HSE's exposure limit and LU will continue with its stringent cleaning regime to ensure that dust levels remain low.
Air Quality on the Tube (4) Question No: 2013/2314 Stephen Knight When will you publish information and advice on Transport for London's website or elsewhere about tube dust? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. Measurements consistently show that dust levels are below the limits set by both the Health and Safety Executive and Institute of Occupational Medicine meaning that the Tube is safe for staff and customers. However, TfL is currently developing its new website and hopes to be able to publish this information by the end of the year.
Page 33 London Underground - Tunnel Cleaning Machine (1) Question No: 2013/2315 Stephen Knight By when do you expect TfL's Tunnel Cleaning Train to begin: (a) testing and (b) full operation? The Mayor Testing is currently scheduled to start in December 2013. Subject to a successful testing period operation would start in the spring.
London Underground - Tunnel Cleaning Machine (2) Question No: 2013/2316 Stephen Knight What is the anticipated total cost of London Underground's new Tunnel Cleaning Machine? The Mayor The detailed costs are currently being finalised.
GLA Fleet - Diesel Particle Filters Question No: 2013/2317 Stephen Knight Have factory fitted diesel particle filters been removed from any current GLA Group vehicles operated either (a) directly by the GLA Group or (b) by its contractors? The Mayor GLA
No diesel particle filters have been removed from GLA fleet vehicles.
LFEPA
No factory fitted diesel particle filters have been removed from LFB vehicles.
MOPAC
Neither MOPAC, the MPS or its contractors have removed any diesel particulate filters.
TfL
No diesel particle filters have been removed from TfL vehicles.
Page 34 GLA Fleet - Emissions Control Equipment Question No: 2013/2318 Stephen Knight Has factory fitted emissions control equipment been removed, modified or tampered with on any current GLA Group vehicles operated either (a) directly by the GLA Group or (b) by its contractors? The Mayor GLA
No factory fitted emissions control equipment has been removed from GLA fleet vehicles.
LFEPA
All factory fitted emissions control equipment is still in the original configuration.
MOPAC
Neither MOPAC, the MPS or its contractors have removed, modified or tampered with any emission control equipment.
TfL
TfL has upgraded 120 Euro IV and V buses to improve the originally installed exhaust gas after treatment system on 120 Scania buses as part of the Clean Air Fund programme. Neither TfL nor its contractors have removed, modified or tampered with any other emission control equipment.
Growing Places Fund (2)
Computer modelled air pollution emissions Question No: 2013/2319 Stephen Knight Have there been any changes in the computer modelling and/or underlying assumptions used to evaluate air pollution emissions across London since 2008? If so, what has the consequence of these changes been? The Mayor Please see my recently published Mayor's Air Quality Strategy Progress Report available at, which contains a summary of changes to the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory: http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/MAQS%20Progress%20Report%20- %20July%202013.pdf
Page 35 London Atmo spheric Emissions Inventory Question No: 2013/2320 Stephen Knight When do expect to publish the latest iteration of the London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory? Will this identify diesel exhaust separately? The Mayor This has been published and is available at: http://data.london.gov.uk/datastore/package/london-atmospheric-emissions-inventory-2010 Diesel vehicles, including exhaust emissions, are identified separately.
Diesel Exhaust across London Question No: 2013/2321 Stephen Knight Further to your recent commitment to introduce an Ultra Low Emission Zone, will you undertake to eliminate diesel exhaust from the most polluted parts of London by 2020? The Mayor I have set out my ambition for an Ultra Low Emission Zone in central London by 2020. As part of their feasibility study, I have asked TfL to consider air quality issues associated with the rapid dieselisation of the car fleet and how these could be addressed through the scheme. This would be in addition to the steps I have already taken, such as replacing the old Congestion Charging Green Vehicle Discount with a tighter Ultra Low Emission Discount. To qualify, vehicles must meet both a Euro 5 standard and emit less than 75g CO2/km. I have also called for the Government to follow my lead and consider both air pollutant emissions and carbon savings when designing any incentives to support the uptake of low emission vehicles.
Page 36 Brompton Road - diesel exhaust Question No: 2013/2322 Stephen Knight Following the release of exhaust emissions data held by Transport for London what specific action are you taking to stop pedestrians being 'gassed' in Oxford Street and 'showered in dangerous airborne particles' along Brompton Road as Clean Air in London claims is happening with diesel exhaust? The Mayor The data you refer to is a sub-set of the GLA's London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory 2010 (LAEI 2010), which is publically available on the London Datastore. Both Brompton Road and Oxford Street are classified by TfL as one of 187 air quality focus areas, owing to high levels of NO2 concentrations and human exposure. In these areas, local measures are targeted against transport emissions in the short term - for example the roll out of retrofitted buses, hybrid buses and most recently, borough projects as part of my new Air Quality Fund. In the longer term, I have tasked TfL with examining the feasibility of introducing an Ultra Low Emission Zone in central London by 2020. This scheme is likely to increase the proportion of ultra low and alternatively fuelled vehicles, with the primary objective of reducing ground- based transport emissions. This work is supported by my Roads Taskforce findings and the work undertaken by the West End Commission
Review of EU Air policy Question No: 2013/2323 Stephen Knight Will you publish your responses and those of the Air Quality Initiative of the Regions to the two consultations held by the European Commission into the future of air pollution legislation in 2011 and 2013 respectively? The Mayor I am committed to an open and transparent lobbying process in relation to the EU's review of air quality legislation and their thematic strategy. My consultation response is published online at: www.london.gov.uk/eupartnerships. The AIR Quality Initiative of the Regions position paper (which was submitted as the consultation response) is also available there.
Page 37 'Greener Vehicle Discount' for diesel vehicles Question No: 2013/2324 Stephen Knight How many diesel vehicles registered for the 'Greener Vehicle Discount' in the period between your announcement that the scheme was closing and its actual closure, and separately in January, February and March of this year? The Mayor The total number of all vehicles registered for the Greener Vehicle Discount (GVD) when the discount closed on 28 June 2013 was in excess of 28,000. 1,009 diesel vehicles registered in the three months between the announcement of my decision to close the GVD and its closure. This compares with 806 registrations of diesel vehicles in the preceding three months, with 256 registering in January, 302 in February and 248 in March. airTEXT Question No: 2013/2325 Stephen Knight Why do you promote the airTEXT service but not the London Air Quality Network's alert service? The Mayor airTEXT is a specific forecast tool designed to provide health advice to vulnerable Londoners. It was developed by the London boroughs and co-funded by the GLA. The London Air Quality Network, run by King's College London on behalf of the GLA, Transport for London and the London boroughs, provides useful data on its website, including a 'Now Cast', and an excellent app. I am happy to promote all of these services and will be doing so on the new Cleaner Air for London website.
Zero Emission Taxi Question No: 2013/2326 Stephen Knight In light of the intention spelt out in your 2020 Vision - 'to serve due notice to consumers and manufacturers that by [2020] we expect to restrict central London only to those vehicles that have zero or near-zero tailpipe emissions' - when will you ensure that all new taxis licensed to operate in London are zero emission? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thank you, Stephen. You are asking when all new taxis licensed to operate in London will be zero emission, or close to zero omission. We will be clear here, some may have some emissions but that issue is what we have at the moment. We set a deadline. The first deadline is for 2020 for the ultra low emissions but we now think we can get it earlier than that and we will be making some announcements fairly soon about that. Stephen Knight (AM): Sorry, Mr Mayor, did you just say that new taxis will be close to the zero emission zone by 2020? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): All new vehicles by 2020. We are now looking at trying to accelerate that timetable.
Page 38 Stephen Knight (AM): Mr Mayor, your ambition, as you have set out to us under your low emission zone, talks about all vehicles within Central London being zero or near zero emissions by 2020, so presumably new vehicles are going to have to start a lot earlier than that if you are going to achieve all vehicles by 2020. Do you not need to ensure that new vehicles now Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): 2020 is not that far away now. People are already investing in vehicles which they expect to use for a considerable time. It is unfair to tell them that their vehicles will be illegal in only seven years' time or six years' time. That is not reasonable. What you can do is look at targets for new vehicles and we are looking at that. Stephen Knight (AM): This is why presumably in order to achieve compliance across the fleet by 2020, you need to start now in terms of ensuring Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): We are not going to achieve compliance across the fleet by 2020; that is a stupid idea. Stephen Knight (AM): OK, so what you are suggesting is that the latest vehicles Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): That is just stupid. Forget it. Get it out of your head, forget it. Stephen Knight (AM): will be given a sort of free pass to carry on working within Central London past 2020. Is that right? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): No. What we are trying to Stephen Knight (AM): Because it is not what you have said, is it? Your 2020 Vision is quite clear that you want to serve notice on consumers and manufacturers that by 2020, we expect to restrict Central London only to those vehicles that have zero or near zero tailpipe emissions. Now you are saying that is not the case. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): For new vehicles. Stephen Knight (AM): That is not what your 2020 Vision says, with respect, Mr Mayor, is it? Your Vision says to restrict to only those vehicles that have zero emission vehicles; not only those new vehicles that have Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Then let me clarify it by saying it has to be for new vehicles because we are talking about a deadline that is only seven years away now. It is not reasonable to expect you to invest £20,000 or £34,000 in a taxi that has a life expectancy of only seven years. That is just crazy. What we are talking about is new vehicles. Stephen Knight (AM): So what you are actually saying is you expect new vehicles Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): What we are also saying, what I am saying to you this morning, is that it may be possible to bring forward the deadline by which all new vehicles will have zero or near zero tailpipe emissions. Stephen Knight (AM): Mr Mayor, I think this is quite a significant statement you have just made because you appear to have completely torn up the announcement that you made back in February about the low emission zone in London. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): No, rubbish. Stephen Knight (AM): You are now saying it won't apply to all vehicles. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): No. I think if you go and look at what I said when I announced the ultra low emission zone. Stephen Knight (AM): I have. I have it here but you have said, and your 2020 Vision is very clear Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): No. Go and look at what I said when we announced the ultra low emission zone. I made it absolutely clear we are talking about new vehicles. Go on. Get it. Stephen Knight (AM): I think I have it here actually, so we will look at that, but certainly your 2020 Vision is absolutely clear that you expect this to apply to all vehicles. Indeed, TfL's position Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes. I am saying all new vehicles, Stephen, because
Page 39 otherwise it is stupid, all right? It is sort of Liberal Demo crat Stephen Knight (AM): This is a very different policy you are announcing this morning to the policy that you announced in February, the policy that you announced more recently Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): No, it is not. Stephen Knight (AM): when you presented your 2020 Vision. So I think Londoners need clarity, Mr Mayor. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I think what they need is a modicum of intelligence. Stephen Knight (AM): OK. Let's look at this in some more detail. TfL have brought proposals just last week to the Assembly's Environment Committee showing a range of options for implementing your Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Are you seriously saying Stephen Knight (AM): Hold on, let me put the question to you, Mr Mayor, with respect. A range of options. One of the options being looked at is merely that the restriction will be vehicles that meet Euro 6 standards. Now, as you know, that will be mandatory for all vehicles from next year. If what you are suggesting is the ultra low emission zone will only apply to new vehicles, and if that is applied, then you will have an ultra low emission zone in all of London, in fact, the whole of Europe by the middle of next year, so what difference will your emission zone make? It will be no different from what is already in place from the middle of next year. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): We are not happy with and I certainly don't support the Euro 6 option; that is nothing like good enough, so I hope that reassures you on that point. Stephen Knight (AM): That is very helpful. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I really think you need to be clear with what you are asking for because if you are seriously saying that, in only seven years time, we will be telling all drivers that they cannot use current technology in London, that is crazy and that is not what we are saying. We are saying that we want a deadline for new cars and I think 2020 is reasonable. We are now looking at whether we can actually bring that a little bit forward.
Ultra Low Emission Zone - consultation Question No: 2013/2327 Stephen Knight Further to your answer to MQ1289/2013, can you confirm that public consultation will take place following TfL's initial work on the feasibility of creating an Ultra Low Emission Zone in central London?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
TfL has been undertaking feasibility work into an Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) since February and will develop recommended ULEZ proposals for my consideration by the end of the year. Once final options have been identified, there will of course be a public consultation on the proposals.
Page 40 Ultra Low Emission Zone exemptions Question No: 2013/2328 Stephen Knight How does the pledge in your recent '2020 Vision' document to 'restrict central London only to those vehicles that have zero or near-zero tailpipe emissions' square with your statement at Mayor's Question Time in June that diesel buses and HGVs will be exempt from the proposed Ultra Low Emission Zone? The Mayor I am committed to improving air quality in London and am delivering an ambitious package of measures to reduce emissions. As part of this I have asked TfL to undertake a feasibility study into my vision for a central London Ultra Low Emission Zone by 2020, reporting to me by the end of the year. This will consider all vehicle types, including buses and HGVs. Already as part of my efforts to reduce bus emissions I have set out my plans to have 1,700 hybrid buses - including 600 of the iconic New Bus for London - by 2016. By 2020 I expect all buses operating in central London to be hybrid or better.
Source London charging network Question No: 2013/2329 Stephen Knight In the light of news reports that the launch of a 50-strong electric taxi fleet in London has been delayed because only one 'rapid' charge point is capable of replenishing electric car batteries to 80 per cent of their capacity within 30 minutes, what more will you do to ensure that London's charging network is suitable for electric cars of all types? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. This is incorrect. Over the last quarter, a number of Source London partners have installed rapid charging units at locations across London which can allow an EV to be charged to 80 per cent of its capacity in around 30 minutes. There are a total of 128 rapid charging points in Source London. These units can be used to support the launch of electric mini cab fleets and taxis and TfL has made this information available to interested parties within the EV private hire and taxi industry. Source London charge points do provide charging facilities for all current models of domestic and business EVs in the market and will be compatible with all makes of EVs that are due to launch in the next two years.
Electric Vehicles - GLA fleet Question No: 2013/2330 Stephen Knight How many electric vehicles are currently being operated as part of the various Greater London Authority Group fleets? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 1886 /2013.
Page 41 Taxi Age Limits Question No: 2013/2331 Stephen Knight How many taxis were removed from service between April 2012 and March 2013 as a result of the 15 year age limit? The Mayor 3,120.
Licensed Taxi Drivers Question No: 2013/2332 Stephen Knight How many licensed taxi drivers were operating in London as of April 2013? The Mayor As at 1 April 2013, the total number of licensed taxi drivers in London is 25,571. Of these, 21,831 are 'All London' drivers with the remaining 3,740 holding a Suburban licence.
Licensed Taxis - Engine Standard Question No: 2013/2333 Stephen Knight Please provide a breakdown of London's licensed taxis by 'Euro' engine standard? The Mayor There are currently 22,138 licensed taxis and the breakdown of 'Euro' emissions is as follows:
Euro Emissions Total % of total Euro III 11747 53.05% Euro IV 7250 32.76% Euro V 3141 14.19% Grand Total 22138 Taxis which are Euro III are licensed with either abatement equipment fitted or with alternative fuel conversions. These taxis are, as a minimum, Euro III for N0x and PM10. The only exception to this are 3 exempted Asquith taxis which are categorised as historic type vehicles.
Page 42 TfL bus fleet - Euro standard Question No: 2013/2334 Stephen Knight Further to MQ0786/2013, are you now in a position to provide a breakdown of London's bus fleet by engine standard (as used to produce a graph in the Commissioner's Report to TfL's Board on 3 July 2013)?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
The table below shows the yearly profile of the fleet by engine standard following the latest survey of April 1 this year.
London Buses by Euro Standard
Year 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 Euro II 2,596 2,052 1,426 777 286 Euro III 4,721 4,152 3,952 3,246 2,970 Euro IV (PM+NOx) 1,161 1,708 1,745 1,989 1,916 Euro V/EEV 74 712 1,418 2,726 3,518 Euro VI 0 0 0 0 0 All pre-Euro IV buses are fitted with diesel particulate filters to reduce their PM emissions.
As part of my air quality announcement in February this year, I committed to all buses meeting a minimum Euro IV NOx and PM emission standard by 2015.
New Bus for London and Euro VI compliance Question No: 2013/2335 Stephen Knight What proportion of the planned 600 New Bus for London fleet will be compliant with Euro VI emission standards? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 I anticipate three quarters of New Bus for London production vehicles will meet the new Euro VI engine emission standard. The exact number will depend on when the engine is available from the manufacturer for incorporation into production line vehicles during 2014.
Page 43 Air quality - planning advice Question No: 2013/2336 Stephen Knight Further to MQ3375/2011, what progress have you made in developing 'a checklist to guide boroughs and developers in the assessment of the potential emissions from new developments, and providing guidance for boroughs in producing their Supplementary Planning Documents on air quality to assist them in determining planning applications'? The Mayor Further guidance for boroughs on assessing the potential emissions from new developments is provided in my emerging SPG on Sustainable Design and Construction, which is to be published for consultation in the last week of July.
Sustainable Design and Construction SPG Question No: 2013/2337 Stephen Knight Further to MQ1050/2012, can you confirm when consultation will take place on new Sustainable Design and Construction Supplementary Planning Guidance? The Mayor It is intended that the draft Sustainable Design and Construction SPG will be published for consultation in the week of 29th July.
Best Practice Guidance on construction and demolition Question No: 2013/2338 Stephen Knight Further to MQs 0285/2012, 2006/2012 and 0800/2013, can you confirm when a review of best practice guidance on the control of dust and emissions from construction and demolition sites will take place? The Mayor The review has taken place and is complete. To clarify its legal status and ensure wider application, I have decided to publish the revised construction and demolition guidance as 'Supplementary Planning Guidance' to the London Plan. A public consultation is expected to begin this year.
Breathe Better Together - communications campaign Question No: 2013/2339 Stephen Knight Further to your award of £130,000 to Camden, Croydon and Islington's 'Breathe Better Together' project, will you launch a London-wide communications campaign to reduce public exposure to air pollution during smog episodes? The Mayor Breathe Better Together is being developed by a consortium of the GLA, TfL, airTEXT, Camden, Croydon and Islington. Further announcements will be made in due course.
Page 44 Enfield Market Gardening Project Question No: 2013/2340 Stephen Knight How will you ensure that the award of £600,000 to the Enfield Market Gardening Project compliments, rather than conflicts with, existing food growing schemes such as the Capital Growth project? The Mayor The Enfield Market Gardening project is a fantastic example of the next stage of Capital Growth which is now focused on turning some of the more successful community food growing initiatives into social enterprises. Capital Growth has over 60 spaces already registered in Enfield and this project will work with many of them to develop grow to sell initiatives, access to trading platforms - including pop-up shops, as well as providing training. Close ties between the project and the Capital Growth initiative are being fostered by my Food Team who are acting in an advisory capacity to the Project Board.
Capital Growth Scheme Question No: 2013/2341 Stephen Knight Of the 100,000 volunteers engaged in growing food through your Capital Growth scheme, how many are still participating in the programme? The Mayor Annual monitoring of Capital Growth volunteering levels takes place in October. To date the project has created over 2,000 spaces and engaged more than 100,000 Londoners in food growing activities. The project is continuing and is focused on supporting spaces to become more sustainable by finding avenues to generate income through social enterprise activities. Capital Growth continues to work with my Team London initiative to promote even more volunteering opportunities and they have recently been awarded a grant to engage 200 new volunteers in a project called Harvest Mobs. The Big Dig element of Capital Growth in March attracted 503 volunteers to spaces around London.
Pocket Parks Programme Question No: 2013/2342 Stephen Knight Of the 26 'Pocket Parks' which have so far received funding through your Great Outdoors programme, how many were previously inaccessible to the public? The Mayor Only one site is inaccessible to the public. Two other sites have very limited public access. The remaining sites are accessible but are degraded, underused spaces.
Page 45 Parental Employment - European Funds Question No: 2013/2343 Stephen Knight Given that London has among the highest child poverty rates in the country, and the lowest rates of mothers in employment, what consideration have you given to using future European funds to support parental employment in London? The Mayor Interventions to support parents returning to work will be included in the London Enterprise Panel's 2014-2020 European Structural and Investment Funds Strategy; which Government is expected to request shortly. The strategy will set out the priorities for investment in London using the European Social Fund (ESF). We are working with a range of partners including the Child Poverty Action Group to identify prospective areas of support for parents - a priority group we are keen to support using ESF.
Parental Employment Question No: 2013/2344 Stephen Knight Are you aware that over 100,000 fewer mothers are in work in London than would be the case if the capital achieved the UK average maternal employment rate? Does this explain the continued employment gap between London and the rest of the UK? The Mayor The employment rate of women with dependent children is one of the significant factors in explaining this gap. I am also aware that the reasons for this are complex, varied and that designing and delivering effective responses will have to respond to particular challenges in different areas, which is why, as I have set out in my response to MQ2343 I consider it a potential area of focus for the next round of European Structural Funds.
GLA - Managing Authority Status Question No: 2013/2345 Stephen Knight What, if any, response have you had from the Government following your application for the Greater London Authority to become a 'Managing Authority' for the 2014-20 European Regional Development Fund and European Social Fund programmes? The Mayor The Government has confirmed an allocation of 748.6 million of European Regional Development Fund and European Social Fund for London for 2014-20 together with proposed continuance of Greater London Authority management of those funds as an 'Intermediate Body'. My officials are currently in discussions with Government officials about this recent proposition.
Page 46 London Living Wage and GLA tenants Question No: 2013/2346 Stephen Knight Will you make it a condition of tenancy for all businesses taking leases on GLA Group property (such as retail outlets in TfL ticket halls) that staff employed on these premises will be paid at least the London Living Wage? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 TfL is supportive of businesses paying the London Living Wage and would encourage all of its own tenants to pay it. As you know, I have been and continue to be a resolute champion of the London Living Wage. I promote it with businesses whenever I get the opportunity, and work closely with London Citizens to see as many businesses as possible adopt the LLW commitment. London Citizens would be happy to meet with you to explain the voluntary nature of the LLW commitment, which has been so crucial to its success.
London Living Wage and major retail , hotel and restaurant chains Question No: 2013/2347 Stephen Knight What discussions have you had with (a) major supermarket chains, (b) major hotel chains and (c) major restaurant chains, to encourage them to adopt the London Living Wage as their minimum pay rate? The Mayor I am working with the Living Wage Foundation to encourage employers across London's economic sectors to adopt the London Living Wage. I have recently written to major London employers from a mixture of sectors to ask them to commit to paying the London Living Wage. I shall be working with the Foundation over the summer to approach major retail and hospitality employers to encourage them to pay the London Living Wage. I am also engaging with the British Retail Consortium to understand the barriers businesses face in adopting the London Living Wage.
Old Street Roundabout Question No: 2013/2348 Stephen Knight What plans do you have to regenerate Old Street roundabout following confirmation that the roundabout itself will not be able to accommodate the high-technology institute previously envisaged for this site? The Mayor The GLA is currently in the process of conducting an engagement with the potential users and suppliers of the institute to establish what its functions and content should be: the exact form the institute should take, or location it should have, is therefore not yet confirmed. GLA and TfL officers are working closely together in respect of potential plans for the roundabout itself but no firm plans are yet agreed.
Page 47 He althier High Streets Question No: 2013/2349 Stephen Knight Will you commit to publish a copy of the draft cumulative impact policy statement on betting shops currently being prepared on behalf of the GLA so that all interested local authorities can benefit from this work? The Mayor Work on the Cumulative Impact Policy Statement for betting shops is being led by the London Health Inequalities Network and will be published on their web portal when it is complete.
GLA Land & Property Ltd - revenue raising Question No: 2013/2350 Stephen Knight How much revenue was raised from GLA Land & Property Ltd's estate in 2012/13? The Mayor In 2012/13 the property portfolio generated rental income of £3.46m and in addition, £50k was raised from filming, photo shoots etc.
London & Partners Question No: 2013/2351 Stephen Knight Given your desire to 'lead the way in openness and transparency' will you encourage London & Partners - the official promotional organisation for London - to make it easier for members of the public to find out when, where and how it spends its money, including the £11.176m of GLA grant funding it has been awarded in 2013/14? The Mayor I am committed to running a transparent administration and I encourage London & Partners to improve its accountability to Londoners. London & Partners is a company limited by guarantee and as such files its annual accounts at companies house which give a breakdown of its overall expenditure. London & Partners Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer give annual public evidence to the London Assembly and report to me via my Economic and Business Policy Unit on a quarterly basis on how it spends its grant as part of its regular performance review.
Page 48 London Fire Brigade Museum - visitor numbers Question No: 2013/2352 Stephen Knight How many people visited the London Fire Brigade Museum in 2011/12 and 2012/13? The Mayor Year Number of visitors to the London Fire Brigade Museum 2011/12 10,397 2012/13 9,863
Draft Fifth London Safety Plan Question No: 2013/2353 Stephen Knight What discussions have you had with the Commissioner of the London Fire Brigade following the conclusion of the public consultation on the draft fifth London Safety Plan? The Mayor I met with the Fire Commissioner on 27 June as part of our cycle of quarterly meetings. We discussed the high level outcomes of the 2015-16 Spending Review for LFEPA. I also met with the Fire Commissioner on 5 July to discuss progress with the Fifth London Safety Plan.
Surveillance activiti es by the Metropolitan Police Service (1) Question No: 2013/2354 Caroline Pidgeon What assurances have you sought from the Metropolitan Police that there will be a full investigation into their authorisation of the secret recording of at least one meeting involving Duwayne Brooks and his lawyer in 1999/2000? The Mayor In response to a letter from Mr Brooks' solicitor, this matter is being investigated by the MPS's Department of Professional Standards. They have confirmed that they have found documentation authorising one meeting in May 2000. The investigation is on-going. It should be noted that there are a number of on-going investigations in this area, including the investigation being led by Chief Constable Mick Creedon and the HMIC review.
Page 49 Surveillance activities by the Metropolitan Police Service (2) Question No: 2013/2355 Caroline Pidgeon Further to the Metropolitan Police admitting that at least one meeting with Duwayne Brooks was secretly recorded have you asked the Metropolitan Police how often they used this practice with other victims of crime? The Mayor The Commissioner has assured me that this is not common practice and would only authorised in rare circumstances. It should be noted that there are a number of on-going investigations in this area, including the investigation being led by Chief Constable Mick Creedon and the HMIC review.
Surveillance activities by the Metropolitan Police Service (3) Question No: 2013/2356 Caroline Pidgeon Can you confirm on how many occasions the Metropolitan Police authorised meetings with Duwayne Brooks to be secretly recorded? The Mayor Please see my response MQ 2354/ 2013
New bus for London Question No: 2013/2357 Caroline Pidgeon How many complaints has Transport for London received about excessive heat faced by passengers using the new bus for London? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 In recent weeks, TfL has received approximately 55 complaints about heating on the New Bus for London. Passengers on route 24 should now be experiencing more comfort following work to fix the air cooling system on some New Buses identified with issues on the first few days of operation. TfL has carried out temperature checks on the upper decks of vehicles since and found they are performing as intended.
Page 50 Cycle Superhighways (1) Question No: 2013/2358 Caroline Pidgeon What steps is Transport for London taking to review the safety of all existing Cycle Superhighways? The Mayor As outlined in my Vision for Cycling in London, TfL is committed to upgrade all four existing Barclays Cycle Superhighways. TfL is also reviewing and improving major junctions along the routes as part of its Better Junctions programme. The delivery schedules for both programmes are under development and will be made available shortly. In addition TfL has commissioned TRL to undertake a range of off-street trials of innovative cycling improvements, such as the use of a high level red cycle aspect signals. These off-street trials will look at a number of options and based on analysis of the trials, decisions will be made as to whether or not they can be introduced on-street, including on existing Cycle Superhighways where appropriate, subject to Department for Transport approval. Details of the trials can be found at: www.trl.co.uk/cyclinginnovationtrials/
Cycle Superhighways (2) Question No: 2013/2359 Caroline Pidgeon Please state what proposed safety improvements are planned over the next 12 months at each existing Cycle Superhighway? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2358 / 2013. TfL is reviewing all four existing Barclays Cycle Superhighways to see how they can be further improved.
Cycle Superhighways (3) Question No: 2013/2360 Caroline Pidgeon What steps is Transport for London now undertaking to specifically review the junction outside Aldgate East tube station on the Cycle Superhighway 2? The Mayor I was deeply saddened to hear of the tragic death of cyclist Philippine Degerin-Ricard following her collision with a heavy goods vehicle on Whitechapel High Street. I announced plans to upgrade the existing Barclays Cycle Superhighways in my Vision for Cycling in London, published earlier this year. Following publication of the Vision, TfL has been undertaking feasibility work to see what can be done to improve the inner section of CS2 between Aldgate and Bow. This work is under development and TfL will engage with the borough and other stakeholders when complete.
Page 51 Thames Cable Car and Prudential RideLondon 2013 (1) Question No: 2013/2361 Caroline Pidgeon What proposed steps will be taken to ensure that the Thames cable car operates for longer hours on the days of the Prudential RideLondon events on Saturday 3 and Sunday 4 August. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. A normal scheduled service will operate on Saturday 3 August (from 08.00 to 21.00), as that day's events begin at 09.00. The Emirates Air Line will be opening three and a half hours earlier than the usual scheduled time on Sunday 4 August - from 05.30 instead of 09.00 - in order to support the event, which starts at 06.00.
Thames Cable Car and Prudential RideLondon 2013 (2) Question No: 2013/2362 Caroline Pidgeon Will cyclists be encouraged through free or reduced ticket prices to use the Thames cable car when travelling to (1) the Prudential RideLondon Cycling Show at Excel from 1-3 August, (2) the Prudential RideLondon events on the 3 and 4 August. The Mayor The Emirates Air Line (EAL) will be open to all cyclists on 1-3 August, including those visiting the Ride London Cycling Show at Excel. Normal ticket fares will apply, including a discount to all Oyster card holders. The EAL will be operating a special timetable on 4 August in order to support the Ride London event - opening at 05.30 instead of 09.00 - and free travel will be offered to participants during these times.
Accountab ility of undercover police Question No: 2013/2363 Jenny Jones In light of allegations around undercover police and the Lawrence family, will Operation Herne be able to restore the public's confidence in the police?
The Mayor
A response to this question has not been recorded. In view of the timescales involved, no further action to identify a response is being taken.
Threat to refuges for women fleeing domestic violence Question No: 2013/2364 Jenny Jones
Page 52 Specialist domestic violence service providers i n London are worried that many of their refuges do not meet the official definition of 'supported exempt accommodation', meaning that women fleeing domestic violence may fall foul of the benefit cap. Will you urgently raise this with the Minister for Welfare Reform to ensure that all refuges are exempt, and ensure that this is made clear to all boroughs and service providers in London? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thanks very much, Jenny, for this. You are asking a very good question. This relates to the possible impact of the benefit cap - which is in principle a good thing - on women fleeing domestic violence who are in refuges, and the awful possibility that they might effectively be forced to pay two sets of rent, both for their home and for their refuge as it were, and that exceeding the threshold. This is a live issue now, we are lobbying Government, Lord Freud [Minister for Welfare Reform] is well aware of the position and we are trying to ensure that there can be absolutely no question of people in refuges being affected by the cap in the way that you are worried about. Jenny Jones (AM): That is really good. Just to be clear, you are lobbying Government on this and following through? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes. Jenny Jones (AM): Are you thinking about putting in pan-London commissioning? This is another area, because the refuges themselves are struggling at the moment to keep going and some sort of pan-London commissioning would help them to actually keep going. I think there was talk about it at a Greater London Authority (GLA) meeting in September 2010, which said that pan-London commissioning was being considered. Then I think in January or February 2011 the London Crime Reduction Board, a partnership of the GLA, the police and London Councils, then discussed pan-London provision as well. Is that something you are working on? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Sorry, Jenny, tell me what you are after? Jenny Jones (AM): Well when councils commission these facilities, i.e. refuges, it is the refuges for women I am talking about, because there is all sorts of other commissioning for people who are trying to not take drugs anymore and that sort of thing. However, because councils are short of money, they are clumping together all sorts of aspects of care of people, and it means that actually women's refuges, that are so specialist, cannot get the money for this because they cannot cover all these different I am sorry, I am not explaining it very well. Pan-London commissioning of women's refuges is something that you have talked about in the past and you have done good work on this in the past, this is a friendly question, so could I ask you to look at pan-London commissioning and just push it. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thank you, and again this is something that actually, when Kit [Malthouse, AM] was the Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime, we did a lot of work on this. You will remember we expanded greatly the rape crisis centre provision in London so there was one in each quadrant. The optimistic view of some of the figures is that people are more confident about reporting their experiences they are suffering and going to these centres, and that is why we have seen an increase in some of the crime types. I am very keen to support all such commissioning. What I do not think we can do is step in as the GLA and become a primary provider of such services. Jenny Jones (AM): No, no, it was more about encouraging the practice. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): That I am certainly keen to do. Jenny Jones (AM): Thank you.
Page 53 Pedestrian safety on Oxford Street (1) Question No: 2013/2365 Jenny Jones Thank you for your response to Q1328/2013. Please break down the data on pedestrian injuries provided in both tables 1 and 2 by casualty severity (number of fatal, serious and slight injuries) on a per month basis? The Mayor Table 1 below shows the number of pedestrians injured in collisions with a bus or coach on Oxford Street, by month and severity, between 2009 and 2012. Table 2 shows the number of pedestrians injured in all collisions on Oxford Street, by month and severity, between 2009 and 2012. Table 1: Pedestrians injured in collisions with a bus or coach on Oxford Street Table 2: Pedestrians injured in collisions on Oxford Street
Climate Change denial Question No: 2013/2366 Jenny Jones You are responsible for delivering statutory strategies on climate change mitigation and adaptation, which are based on the overwhelming climate scientific consensus that human activity contributes heavily to climate change and that extreme weather will hit us harder and faster as a result. With reference to your personal article 'weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end' published in the Sunday Telegraph on the 23rd June 2013, is it your position as the Mayor of London to deliberately confuse weather forecasts and your amateur observations with this scientific consensus on climate? The Mayor No.
Fracking in London Question No: 2013/2367 Jenny Jones Following on from your controversial comments about offering up the streets of London to companies hoping to solve London's looming energy crisis by drilling for shale gas, are you planning to carry out any work into the scope for this technology in London? The Mayor We are awaiting a British Geological Survey report for south-east England and my officers are in contact with DECC officials to discuss the potential for exploiting any shale gas reserves in London, which are accessible subject to normal planning controls and environmental protection.
Page 54 2020 Vision and obesity Question No: 2013/2368 Jenny Jones According to the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges 'Measuring Up' report, the overwhelming majority of the medical profession believe that obesity is the 'greatest public health crisis' and warn that unless urgent and effective action takes place at all levels 'the NHS will no longer be able to cope'. Given this situation why did your 2020 Vision not set out a strategic vision for tackling childhood obesity? The Mayor As you will be aware, childhood obesity is a complex area with many causes. Every part of the system needs to play its part in tackling it. I am committed to playing my part and much of my 2020 vision will help to achieve this by: making London a greener, safer and cleaner space improving transport, cycling and walking and increasing the life chances of children through volunteering, job and sporting opportunities to help improve self-esteem and physical activity. My Healthy Schools London programme and the work of the London Food Board will also help to improve child health and wellbeing and reduce obesity.
Low pay in the GLA group Question No: 2013/2369 Jenny Jones What was the lowest level of remuneration for a member of staff, expressed as full time equivalent, in each of the GLA, TfL (including Crossrail), MPS, LFB during the financial years 2008/09, 2009/10, 2010/11, 2011/12 and 2012/13?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
GLA response
The lowest level of remuneration paid to permanent GLA staff, expressed as a full time equivalent is in the table below. Note that the amounts reflect what was actually paid rather than a particular point on a pay scale. The table does not include industrial work placements and apprentices who are paid at least London’s Living Wage
Financial Year Salary paid Pay grade 2008/09 £21,069 Grade 2 2009/10 £20,762 Grade 2 2010/11 £20,762 Grade 2 2011/12 £22,024 Grade 2
Page 55 2012/13 £22,574 Grade 2 TfL response
Financial Year Non Apprentice Annual Salary 2008 - 2009 £17,912.50 TfL 2009 - 2010 £16,000.00 Crossrail 2010 - 2011 £17,608.00 TfL 2011 - 2012 £18,488.00 TfL 2012 - 2013 £20,000.00 Crossrail The data is a combination of Transport for London and Crossrail employees using the lowest value for each year.
MPS response
The below is based on the entitlements (basic pay and location allowance) of members of staff.
2008/09: £14,610
2009/10: £14,986
2010/11: £15,372
2011/12: £15,805
2012/13: £16,380
LFEPA response
Role 2008/9 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 £17,438 £18,526 £18,526 Fire and Rescue Staff (including (including (including £19,044 £19,444 Grade A London London London weighting) weighting) weighting)
Page 56 High pay in the GLA group in 2008/09 Question No: 2013/2370 Jenny Jones How much were the Chief Executive of the GLA, the Commissioner of the LFB, the CEO of Crossrail, the Chief Executive of the LDA and the Commissioner of TfL paid in 2008/09, including bonuses and other benefits excluding pension contributions? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 GLA response Due to the departure of the Chief Executive in August 2008, three individuals held the post of Chief Executive on a permanent or interim basis during the period April 2008 to March 2009. In total, £215,565 remuneration was paid to all post holders. Anthony Mayer 96,631 (includes £17,000 as GLRO) Jeff Jacobs 69,889 Leo Boland 49,045 Total 215,565 LFEPA contribution £195,895 and he received no bonus or other benefits. Crossrail response Crossrail did not have a CEO as such at this time. Doug Oakervee was the Executive Chairman and his salary for 2008/09 was £340,000. LDA response Figures from the LDA Statement of Accounts across the three financial years from 2007/2010 are listed below. The highest employee is assumed to be the Chief Executive. The number of employees whose remuneration during the period 1 April 2007 to 31 March 2008, excluding pension contributions, was more than £210,000 2007/08 £210,000 - £219,999 1 employee The number of employees whose remuneration during the period 1 April 2008 to 31 March 2009, excluding pension contributions, was more than £350,000. 2008/09 £350,000 - £359,999 1 employee The number of employees whose remuneration during the period 1 April 2009 to 31 March 20010, excluding pension contributions, was more than £225,000 2009/10 £225,000 - £229,999 1 employee TfL contribution Details are published in TfL's Annual Report & Statement of Accounts 2008/09 http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/annual-report-and-statement-of- accounts-2008-09.pdf The Commissioner's salary for 2008/09 was £348,444. He received a performance related pay of £146,440 during the year in respect of performance for the year ended 31 March 2008. For the year ended 31 March 2009, he would have been entitled to a payment of £136,590, but elected to receive only £61,466 in recognition of the current economic circumstances at the time.
Page 57 Review of EU membership (1) Question No: 2013/2371 Jenny Jones Your Chief Economic Advisor has been seeking opinions on Britain's membership of the European Union and its implications for London's economy. Who has he met so far, who else has he approached, and who else does he plan to approach? Please supply names, organisations and roles. The Mayor My Chief Economic Advisor, Gerard Lyons, will be engaging with as broad a spectrum of London stakeholders as possible. This will include key stakeholders in the finance and business service industries, alongside a broad spectrum of London's economy, including groups that represent SME's, as well as SMEs themselves. We are also engaging with a number of political stakeholders including ministries, representatives of major political parties and working closely with departments of Local Government. Finally, we are aiming to engage with a wide variety of think-tanks, NGOs, academics and other learned individuals, to get a picture of the most up to date thinking on Europe across the board.
Re view of EU membership (2) Question No: 2013/2372 Jenny Jones Can you supply me with the brief, or scope, of your Chief Economic Advisor's analysis of Britain's membership of the European Union and its implications for London's economy? The Mayor I have asked my Chief Economic Advisor, Gerard Lyons, to carry out an economic and financial Report on the pros and cons for London of EU membership. This will take into account all the key issues as they impact London linked to the forthcoming UK debate, renegotiation and possible Referendum on membership of the EU. The aim is to better understand issues such as how London is currently impacted by EU membership, the possible impact of future regulation, how London might better maximise opportunities within the EU either now or, as part of any renegotiation and, an assessment, based on possible future scenarios, regarding UK membership. As the Report progresses, other issues will likely arise that we need to take into account.
Page 58 Monitoring of worst pollution spot in London Question No: 2013/2373 Jenny Jones Will you write to the Government informing them that the monitoring station at Marylebone Road is not on the stretch of road suffering the highest quantities of nitrogen dioxide pollution in London? The Mayor I have recently published the 2010 London Atmospheric Emissions Inventory. This contains both emissions and concentrations data. It is not appropriate to estimate which sites are the most polluted based on emissions alone as actual air quality is the result of a complex interplay between local emissions, external sources, meteorology, road and building layout and other factors. It is also important to consider human exposure when identifying potential air pollution hotspots. Using a combination of concentrations and human exposure the GLA and TfL have identified 187 air quality focus areas across London, including the Marylebone Road and Euston Road corridor. The value of the Marylebone Road monitoring super site is not necessarily that it is located at the most polluted location in London. Instead, it gives a good understanding of air pollution and its sources with sufficient continuous monitoring data to enable historic comparisons. Although this data is captured at Marylebone Road it has Londonwide application, e.g. understanding tyre and brake wear.
Page 59 Road Safety Plan Question No: 2013/2374 Jenny Jones Transport for London's new road safety plan 'Safe Streets for London' states (p.42) that "there are around 150 roads and more than 100 junctions where the casualty history would warrant the installation of safety cameras to reduce KSIs through speed and red light enforcement". Please list these roads and junctions. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The list of roads and junctions that you requested is attached in appendix 11. The list identifies the locations that pass only the first stage of a six stage process whereby new safety camera sites are identified. Clearly this is only the first step in the full process which can be summarised as: 1 Assess the KSI numbers. For speed cameras there must have been four or more KSIs at the location in the last three years, two of which must have been speed related. For red light cameras, there must have been two personal injury collisions (one with a KSI severity) on the same arm of the junction and both as a result of a vehicle running the red light. 2 Assess effectiveness of other interventions to establish whether a camera is the most effective road safety intervention. 3 Secure funding and agreement for installation from the highway authority. 4 Conduct a detailed site survey to establish the suitability of the site. 5 Agree enforcement for proposed site enforcement. 6 Progress with installation Therefore not all of these sites will necessarily proceed to installation of cameras.
Road safety budget Question No: 2013/2375 Jenny Jones How much is Transport for London intending to spend on road safety in 2013/14, including planned expenditure by the safety camera partnership and boroughs? Can you provide a breakdown of the main cost headings, including safety cameras, 20mph limits and publicity/educational work? The Mayor As I have previously stated, road safety is considered a cross-cutting priority in the organisation with spend on this objective being embedded across a range of budgets. It is therefore difficult to break down funding as you've requested. Leaving aside the hundreds of millions of pounds we are spending on a range of cross-cutting programmes such as the Better Junctions programme, it is expected that TfL will spend around £21 million on 'pure' road safety programmes during 2013/14. Furthermore, TfL invests to reduce casualties on borough roads through Local Implementation Plan (LIP) programmes. As I have previously said to you, there have been, and continue to be, a large number of LIP schemes which are focused on road safety. This includes hundreds of focused safety initiatives as well as broader schemes that help improve road safety.
Page 60 Hornsey Lane Bridge Question No: 2013/2376 Jenny Jones In January 2012 in response to my question 193/2012 you agreed to work with Haringey Council to review the physical environment that may have contributed to the loss of life at the Hornsey Lane Bridge. In light of the tragic death of a man on 7th June 2013 after falling from the Hornsey Lane Bridge, please could you update me on what progress you have made with Haringey Council? Will you press the council to urgently implement measures such as a net and a free SOS phone in order to prevent further loss of life? The Mayor TfL has funded the preliminary design of a cable system to help prevent anyone from climbing onto the bridge parapets. The design is based on the scheme introduced on the Clifton suspension bridge in Bristol. This design work was completed at the end of 2012 and, in partnership with Haringey Council, we are now discussing the proposed design with English Heritage, as Hornsey Bridge is a Grade II-listed structure. Once agreement with English Heritage has been reached, detailed design will be undertaken, which is currently programmed to begin in October 2013, with construction planned to commence in early 2014.
Unanswered questions (1) Question No: 2013/2377 Jenny Jones Please could you let me know when I can expect a response to the questions I asked you in September 2012, 2457/2012, and in December 2012, 3994/2012, about the number fully fit officers in support roles within the Metropolitan Police Service? The Mayor The MPS provides an annual return to the Home Office each March which analyses the workforce. The following table shows the number of fully fit officers who are categorised as providing Operational or Organisational Support. It also shows what proportion they comprise of the overall workforce strength. (source MetHR).
Unanswered questions (2) Question No: 2013/2378 Jenny Jones Please could you let me know when I can expect a response to the question I asked you in January 2013, 146/2013, about the number of staff in the Metropolitan Police Service and the Operational Policing Measure? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 Please see my response to MQ 146 /2013.
Page 61 Unanswered questions (3) Question No: 2013/2379 Jenny Jones Please could you let me know when I can expect a response to the question I asked you in February 2013, 695/2013, about Safer Neighbourhood Teams? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. Please see my response to MQ 695/ 2013.
Unanswered questions (4) Question No: 2013/2380 Jenny Jones Please could you let me know when I can expect a response to the question I asked you in September 2012, 2453/2012, about the number of fully warranted police officers on the streets? The Mayor My manifesto committed to maintaining the number of officers 'on the street' during my term in office. This was a reference to the overall police officer strength. The Police Officer strength at 6 May 2012 was 31,984 Full Time Equivalents. After excluding seconded officers and those on maternity leave from the Operational Policing Measure analysis shows 24,021 (76.4%) to be in Operational roles, 6,578 (20.9%) to be in Operational Support roles and 859 (2.7%) to be in Organisational Support roles.
Page 62 Households covered by Safer Neighbourhood Teams (1) Question No: 2013/2381 Jenny Jones Could you provide the average number of households covered by a Safer Neighbourhood Team sergeant under your new Local Policing Model? The Mayor A list of all wards in London and the total number of households in each ward is available on the Office for National Statistics website. The list below shows the Local Policing Model (LPM) 'tranche one' boroughs that have wards with a shared sergeant. Barnet borough: No shared wards Bexley borough: Colyers And Northumberland Heath Lesnes Abbey And Thamesmead East Danson And Falconwood & Welling East Wickham And St Michaels Blackfen & Lamorbey And Longlands Blendon & Penhill And Sidcup Camden borough: Cantelowes And Kentish Town Fortune Green And West Hampstead Frognal & Fitzjohns And Hampstead Town Hackney: No shared wards Hammersmith and Fulham borough: Addison And Avonmore & Brook Green Parsons Green & Walham And Sands End Munster And Fulham Town Fulham Reach And Palace Riverside Haringey borough: Fortis Green And Alexandra Haringey And St Ann's Hornsey And Stroud Green Highgate And Crouch End Havering borough: Havering Park And Mawneys St Andrews And Emerson park Hacton And Elm Park Hillingdon borough: Harefield And Ickenham Northwood And Northwood Hills Manor And Cavendish West Ruislip And Eastcote & East Ruislip Islington borough: No shared wards. Kensington and Chelsea borough: No Shared wards Lambeth borough: Princes And Bishops Cold Harbour And Herne Hill Streatham Wells And Thorton Merton borough: Hillside And Trinity Page 63 Cannon Hill And Lower Morden Figgs Marsh And Longthorton Collier Wood And Cricket Green Households covered by Safer Neighbourhood Teams (2) Question No: 2013/2382 Jenny Jones Please could you provide the average number of households previously covered by a Safer Neighbourhood Team sergeant under the previous Local Policing Model? The Mayor A list of all wards in London and the total number of households in each ward is available on the Office for National Statistics website. The following Safer Neighbourhood Teams shared a Sergeant before the Local Policing Model (LPM). Barking and Dagenham borough: Valence And Becontree Goresbrook And Mayesbrook Parsloes And Alibon Eastbrook And River Barnet borough: Hale And Mill Hill Hendon And West Hendon East Finchley And Garden Suburb Totteridge And Oakleigh Brunswick Park And Coppetts Bexley borough: Longlands And Sidcup St Mary's And Blendon & Penhill Barnehurst And Crayford Falconwood & Welling And East Wickham Lesnes Abbey Covered by both 1) Thamesmead and 2) Belvedere Brent borough: Barnhill And Welsh Harp Kenton And Queensbury Northwick Park And Preston Mapesbury And Brondesbury Park Kilburn And Queens Park Bromley borough: Copers Cope And Shortlands Biggin Hill And Darwin Plaistow & Sundridge And Bickley Chelsfield & Pratts Bottom And Farnborough & Crofton Orpington And Petts Wood & Knoll Camden borough: Cantelowes And Kentish Town Belsize And Camden Town and Primrose Hill Fortune Green And West Hampstead Frognal & Fitzjohns And Hampstead Town Croydon borough: Addiscombe And Woodside Shirley And Ashburton Coulsdon East And Coulsdon West
Page 64 Fieldway And Heathfield Sanderstead And Selsdon & Ballards Croydon Town Centre And Fairfield Ealing borough: Hobbayne And Cleveland Dormers Wells And Lady Margaret Ealing Common And Northfield Greenford Green And North Greenford South Acton And Southfield Enfield borough: Cockfosters And Southgate Southgate Green And Bowes Palmers Green And Winchmore Hill Chase And Highlands Grange And Bush Hill Park Greenwich borough: Blackheath & Westcombe And Kidbrooke with Hornfair Woolwich Riverside And Woolwich Common Coldharbour & New Eltham And Eltham South Middle Park & Sutcliffe And Eltham West Hackney: Cazenove And Springfield Brownswood And New River Clissold And Lordship Kings Park And Leabridge Victoria And Leabridge Hammersmith and Fulham borough: Addison And Avonmore & Brook Green Parsons Green & Walham And Sands End Munster And Palace Riverside Fulham Reach And North End Haringey borough: Fortis Green And Alexandra Bounds Green And Woodside Hornsey And Stroud Green Highgate And Crouch End St. Ann's And Seven Sisters Harrow borough: Pinner And Pinner South West Harrow And Rayners Lane Headstone North And Headstone South Kenton East And Kenton West Hatch End And Harrow Weald Havering borough: Havering Park And Mawneys Pettits And Squirrels Heath Cranham And Upminster Elm Park And Hacton Hillingdon borough: Harefield And Northwood
Page 65 Northwood Hills And Eastcote & East Ruislip Cavendish And Ruislip Manor (also referred to as Manor) West Ruislip And Ickenham Uxbridge North And Hillingdon East Brunel And Yiewsley Hounslow borough: Feltham North And Bedfont Heston East And Heston Central Hounslow Central And Hounslow South Chiswick Riverside And Chiswick Homefields Osterley & Spring Grove And Isleworth Islington borough: Mildmay And Highbury East Barnsbury And Caledonian Junction And St. George's Canonbury And St. Peter's Kensington and Chelsea borough: Hans Town And Royal Hospital Cremorne And Stanley Abingdon And Queen's Gate Holland And Norland Kingston borough: St. Mark's And Surbiton Hill Alexandra And Berrylands Old Malden And St. James Beverley And Coombe Vale Lambeth borough: Lambeth borough is currently piloting a new model of response policing that aims to maintain or enhance emergency response whilst at the same time delivering a better service on non- emergency calls. This has led to the creation of smaller but specialised emergency response teams, dealing solely with Immediate (I) and Significant (S) response. Officers released from existing response teams have been deployed, primarily, in Local Policing Teams (LPT), available to support Safer Neighbourhoods teams or for other borough duties. Therefore the work of Safer Neighbourhoods Teams has been supplemented with additional responsibilities. This means that the individual teams are larger. In the course of creating this model, Lambeth has already made savings in terms of Sergeants and as a consequence no further savings are required from Safer Neighbourhoods Sergeants at this stage. Lewisham borough: Grove Park And Downham Catford South And Whitefoot Lee Green And Blackheath Ladywell And Crofton Park Merton borough: Hillside And Dundonald Raynes Park And West Barnes Lower Morden And St. Helier Cannon Hill And Merton Park Wimbledon Park And Village Newham borough:
Page 66 Green Street East And Green Street West Custom House And Royal Docks Canning Town North And Canning Town South East Ham North And Manor Park East Ham Central And Wall End Redbridge borough: Bridge And Monkhams Fullwell And Fairlop Snaresbrook And Wanstead Clementswood And Mayfield Seven Kings And Chadwell Richmond borough: Hampton And Hampton North Heathfield And Whitton Teddington And Hampton Wick West Twickenham And South Twickenham Southwark borough: East Dulwich And Village South Camberwell And Brunswick Park Nunhead And Peckham Rye Surrey Docks And Rotherhithe Faraday And Newington Sutton borough: Sutton West And Cheam Worcester Park And Nonsuch Belmont And Sutton South Sutton supervision sharing involves two part-time Sergeants working across particular wards Tower Hamlets borough: Bethnal Green North And Mile End and Globe Town St. Katherine's Wapping And Shadwell Bow West And Bow East East India & Lansbury And Limehouse Waltham Forest borough: Endlebury And Chingford Green Halle End & Highams Park And Chapel End Larkswood And Valley Higham Hill And William Morris Grove Green And Leyton Wandsworth borough: Roehampton And West Putney East Putney And West Hill Wandsworth Common And Earlsfield Nightingale And Bedford Shaftesbury And Queenstown Westminster borough: Harrow Road And Maida Vale Westbourne And Little Venice Bayswater And Lancaster Gate Tachbrook And Warwick The Oxford Street, Regent's Street and Bond Street (ORB) team has reduced from two
Page 67 Sergeants to one The Victoria Business team has reduced from two Sergeants to one
Borough police officers who live in London Question No: 2013/2383 Jenny Jones Of the police officers working in each borough please could you let me know the number who live in London and the number who are residents of the borough they work in? The Mayor There are currently 15,319 MPS Officers living in London. Of those, 1,126 are residents of the borough they work in.
Territorial Support Group Question No: 2013/2384 Jenny Jones How many members of the Territorial Support Group live in London? The Mayor There are 745 members of the Territorial Support Group, 329 of whom live in London.
Undercover police relationships Question No: 2013/2385 Jenny Jones The Commissioner made the following comment to the Home Affairs Select Committee regarding undercover officers engaging in sexual relationships with the people they are targeting: 'It certainly should not be part of the strategy to do that. The fact that it may sometimes happen, I think, could almost be inevitable, not that I would encourage it obviously.' Do you think this sends the right message as the head of the Metropolitan Police Service?' The Mayor The Commissioner is very clear in his position that this is not part of good policy and has committed to following ACPO guidance which is very clear on this issue: Sexual relationships should not occur on any UC deployment They would not be pre-authorised and would be unacceptable The training of officers specifically covers the need to avoid such activity All officers before they are deployed are expressly told what the terms of their deployment allow them to do which they then have to sign to say they have understood. If a situation arose where any of these terms of deployment were breached, then there are sufficient regulations within the police disciplinary code to deal with these if they arise
Page 68 Legal action against the MPS by former undercover police Question No: 2013/2386 Jenny Jones How many former undercover officers have brought legal action against the Metropolitan Police Service? Please could you include those officers who have brought legal action, but settled out of court? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The MPS cannot provide such information on undercover officers including former undercover officers, to protect their safety.
'Lawrence amendment' on undercover policing Question No: 2013/2387 Jenny Jones Do you support Liberty's 'Lawrence amendment' to the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill, which is backed by Doreen Lawrence and would require prior judicial authorisation for undercover policing operations to ensure they are necessary and proportionate?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
There is already significant oversight of the authorisation of covert policing operations.
That said, it is crucial that the public have confidence in the way this tactic is used and ACPO has long supported increased oversight of undercover policing and supports recent recommendations by the Minister of State for Policing and Criminal Justice for robust oversight of undercover policing by the Office of the Surveillance Commissioners. I have also asked the MOPAC Ethics Panel to consider undercover policing as a matter of urgency.
Undercover police misconduct Question No: 2013/2388 Jenny Jones Have the misconduct processes against the supervising officer who authorised Jim Sutton to give evidence in court under his alias been completed? If so, could you let me know what the outcome was and if this officer is still employed by the Metropolitan Police Service? The Mayor The investigation into the supervision of this and other Special Demonstion Squad operatives continue and is being dealt with by Operation Herne.
Page 69 Female Genital Mutilation (1) Question No: 2013/2389 Jenny Jones Will your new Violence Against Women and Girls strategy take into account a) the lack of robust data on the number of girls affected by female genital mutilation in London, b) the crucial role of engaging with FGM affected communities, c) FGM related training for all frontline professionals? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2291 /2013.
Fema le Genital Mutilation (2) Question No: 2013/2390 Jenny Jones Would you be supportive of introducing non-intrusive compulsory medical checks for girls at risk of female genital mutilation, to act as a deterrent? The Mayor 'Non-intrusive' compulsory medical checks are not an approach I endorse. Prevention, early intervention and community engagement should be at the heart of our response to FGM along with undertaking robust enforcement action against those who perpetrate these crimes. MOPAC sits on the London Safeguarding Children Board which oversees and coordinates safeguarding activity in the capital. FGM is a key part of my VAWG strategy refresh and features as part of the current VAWG consultation which runs until 9 August. MOPAC are encouraging boroughs and other stakeholders to respond.
London Accident and Emergency closures Question No: 2013/2391 Darren Johnson Given the increase in ambulance diverts from over-crowded Accident and Emergency centres, will you support calls for all A&E closures in London to be put on hold until a long term solution is found to this growing crisis? The Mayor My overall concern is that Londoners have access to the high quality health care that they need, including A&E, both now and in the future.
Page 70 Sheltered housing in Lambeth Question No: 2013/2392 Darren Johnson Will you write to the London Borough of Lambeth urging them not to evict 60 residents - some of whom are terminally ill - from The Glebe sheltered housing in Streatham, splitting the residents up and moving them away from the local area? Will you also explore how your housing budget can be used to support Lambeth in bringing its sheltered housing up to the Decent Homes standard, and to provide new extra care facilities without affecting residents of existing sheltered housing? The Mayor The Glebe is one of 24 schemes in a proposed programme of redevelopment to improve older persons provision in Lambeth. The full consultation has only recently been completed and no decisions have been made. The Decent Homes budget for London is £821 million and Lambeth received the highest allocation: £100.5 million to bring homes up to the Decent Homes standard. The Borough has also been able to bid for funds under my Housing Covenant programmes.
London & Partners Question No: 2013/2393 Darren Johnson Further to my question 1383/2013, will you agree to require openness and transparency as part of the funding agreement for London & Partners, at the very least for the 2014/15 settlement onwards? The Mayor I am committed to running a transparent administration and I encourage London & Partners to improve its accountability to Londoners. London & Partners is a company limited by guarantee and as such files its annual accounts at companies house which give a breakdown of its overall expenditure. London & Partners Chief Executive and Chief Operating Officer give annual public evidence to the London Assembly and report to me via my Economic and Business Policy Unit on a quarterly basis on how it spends its grant as part of its regular performance review.
Page 71 Earls Court Exhibiton Centres demolition - economic impacts (1) Question No: 2013/2394 Darren Johnson According to the Association of Event Organisers, the trade association representing the organisations responsible for over 75% of the UK consumer and trade events annually, your decision to back the Earl's Court demolition proposals 'highlights a blinkered and biased perspective, without proper and educated consideration of the longer term, detrimental effects this will have for the UK exhibitions and events industry and the UK economy as a whole'. Given these views from the very businesses you claim to serve do you regret not heeding the call to defer you decision until an independent study on the economic effects of the loss of the exhibition space had been completed? The Mayor No. Due material consideration on planning grounds was given as per my report (ref: PDU 2780/02 & 2871/02)
Earls Court Exhibiton Centres demolition - economic impacts (2) Question No: 2013/2395 Darren Johnson According to the Association of Events Organisers the events and exhibition industry contributes £11bn+ in expenditure annually to the UK economy (NB - the wider events industry, incl. Conferences, Meetings, Experiential, etc contributes nearer £40bn annually) and the volume of business actually stimulated at events reaches into the £100bn's per year. How is the Earls Court redevelopment proposals which will take 20-25 years to complete going to outperform an existing high performance industry sector? The Mayor The direct and indirect economic benefits of the UK events industry are not disputed. The Earl's Court proposals are not expected to economically outperform the entire UK events industry nor are they required to.
Page 72 Earls Court Exhibiton Centres demolition - economic impacts (3) Question No: 2013/2396 Darren Johnson With the Mayor being such an enthusiastic champion of the London 2012 Games, for which Earls Court was a crucial element in the London bid and recognised highly by Lord Coe, the Association of Events Organisers have asked 'why did the Mayor of London not recognise the events industry and ensure more support rather than condemning the organisers to seek better opportunities abroad (especially in Germany)? We are losing business from our own UK organisers to World Cities which deliver their vision by capitalising on the power of the events industry to stimulate their economies'. Will you meet with the events industry so that you can fully understand the implications of your decision? The Mayor In making my decision I took full account of the representations received from the Association of Events Organisers and others regarding the loss of Earls Court Exhibition Centres. A meeting to discuss these after the decision has been made would be of questionable value but my spatial strategy planners would welcome ongoing engagement with representatives of the events industry to ensure that the spatial needs of the events industry are considered in producing future iterations of the London Plan.
Earls Court development - Lillie Bridge Depot relocation Question No: 2013/2397 Darren Johnson Why did you give the go-ahead to the Earls Court demolition plans before Transport for London had even completed its feasibility study looking at alternative locations and at other considerations such as passenger safety, essential track repairs, costs and potential jobs losses arising from the proposed relocation of the Lille Bridge Tube maintenance depot? The Mayor London Underground Limited (LUL), as owner and operator of the Lillie Bridge Depot, has considered the future operational need for this facility. At present, it is anticipated that whilst some aspects can be accommodated in existing or expanded facilities elsewhere in London, there will be an ongoing need to accommodate some operational facilities at this location and this is incorporated in the proposal. The Lillie Bridge Depot cannot be removed in part or in full until the specification and programme for the replacement stabling facilities and the removal have been agreed in writing by Transport for London. LUL will continue to review the future operational need for retaining the Depot on the site as the proposal is implemented in phases over circa 20 years and as owner of the Depot retains full control over the Depot's future.
Page 73 Blackfriars Road Question No: 2013/2398 Darren Johnson Will you support segregated cycle lanes for Blackfriars Road as part of the new development there? The Mayor Improvements at this location are under development by TfL in conjunction with London Borough of Southwark and developers.
Cycling sensitive streets (1) Question No: 2013/2399 Darren Johnson Do you agree that heavy duty roads with large volumes of traffic need a higher standard of Highways Maintenance intervention than roads carrying smaller volumes of traffic and if so where is this documented in TfL's Highways Maintenance Plans for the management of road defects? The Mayor I agree that the number and type of users of a road directly influence the standard to which it needs to be maintained. TfL's defect rectification takes account of this in line with the National Code of Practice, 'Well Maintained Highways'. London boroughs generally adopt the National Code of Practice and TfL provides funding for maintenance of their principal roads, which are the most heavily trafficked of the locally owned roads. TfL's maintenance regimes are documented within its Highway Asset Management Plan (HAMP): http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/businessandpartners/HAMP-2Oct.pdf. The HAMP will be updated shortly to reflect the new London Highways Alliance Contracts and TfL's response to the Roads Task Force report.
Cycling sensitive streets (2) Question No: 2013/2400 Darren Johnson Would you consider designating some routes as 'Cycle Sensitive Streets', which would have lower thresholds for surface defects before intervening, protecting the large number of vulnerable road users who use these routes? The Mayor This is an interesting idea which I will ask my Cycling Commissioner to consider.
Page 74 Enforcement of advance stop lines Question No: 2013/2401 Darren Johnson In order to be able to penalise drivers who breach advance stop lines and mandatory cycle lanes, TfL must request that the Department for Transport passes a commencement order. As Chair of the TfL board, what representations have you made to the Department for Transport in support of these ends? The Mayor I have recently written to the Secretary of State asking for a number of policy and regulatory changes to improve road safety. This includes a number of proposals in relation to Advanced Stop Lines (ASLs) and mandatory cycle lanes, amongst other issues, which would enable the police, and potentially TfL, to enforce these more effectively. On ASLs, it is been requested that a specific, civil offence is created for the infringement of an ASL by motorised traffic when the signal is red. A request has also been made that the DfT creates a commencement order to decriminalise cycle lane infringement, to give TfL the capability of enforcing them more effectively.
Cycle parking on TfL roads Question No: 2013/2402 Darren Johnson Please share details of the criteria which TfL uses when deciding where to install new cycle parking along TfL roads. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 7 August 2013 In my Vision for Cycling in London, I outlined plans to deliver 80,000 additional cycle parking spaces in residential locations, stations, workplaces and other trip destinations by 2016. These stands will be installed where people most need them. TfL has a comprehensive cycle parking programme, including on the TLRN. TfL's programme is responsive to customer requests and focuses on locations with the highest demand for cycle parking, typically shops, local services, stations, and other attractions. TfL also considers borough suggestions and locations where there is evidence of 'fly parking' demonstrating demand; e.g cycles being parked against other street furniture such as pedestrian guardrail. The exact location of cycle parking is determined by: - available space (ensuring the footway remains a suitable width for pedestrian access) - acceptable clearance between cycles and vehicles on the carriageway - the position of utilities - land ownership - the need to ensure access to loading bays/facilities - ensuring safe sightlines at junctions
Page 75 Expansion of tram services (1) Question No: 2013/2403 Darren Johnson Car use has dropped by nearly 19% in Croydon since the tram scheme began operations there in 2000. Will you, where feasible, ensure TfL gives serious thought to expanding tram services in London in a bid to continue this positive trend? The Mayor I am a supporter of extensions to Croydon Tramlink and have personally pushed this forward. A piece of work is just being finalised by TfL that develops understanding of potential extensions of the Tramlink network to Crystal Palace and Sutton and includes a study of the engineering feasibility of both routes. Part of the purpose of this work is to identify potential funding sources for the extensions.
Expansion of tram services (2) Question No: 2013/2404 Darren Johnson Croydon's trams only emit 46 per cent of the CO2 per passenger km of a bus and only 85 per cent of that emitted by London Underground operations. Will you ensure that TfL gives serious thought to expanding tram services in London in order to tackle poor air quality? The Mayor Please see my answer to MQ 2403 /2013. By way of note normalised emissions from trams is 60 per cent of that from London Underground and 55 per cent of that from buses. It should also be noted that CO2 emissions are not a cause of poor air quality, which is caused by PM and NOx. Since trams are powered by electricity they do not impact on local air quality.
TfL funding to car clubs Question No: 2013/2405 Darren Johnson In your response to Q0993/2012 you confirmed that TfL provides funding and support to local authorities for the expansion of car clubs as well as funding for car club research and accreditation. Please provide data on the amount of funding TfL has provided to local authorities in support of car clubs in each year of your Mayoralty, excluding LIPs funding for car club bays.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. TfL does not fund car clubs directly, but until March 2013 it has provided dedicated funding and support to local authorities for the expansion of car clubs' on-street parking. Local
Page 76 authorities have also used, and can continue to use TfL's LIP funding for car club bays. The table below sets out the amount of money made available by TfL and the amount of money subsequently claimed and spent by local authorities. The table does not include funding providing through LIPs. The table also shows funding provided to Carplus, a national charity that accredits car club operators. TfL has supported Carplus since 2008 and, through Section 159, funds the charity to obtain car club membership and vehicle numbers, provide advice to operators and boroughs, facilitate industry forums and undertake research for the Annual Survey. Car clubs have expanded rapidly in London over the past ten years. There are now over 2,500 vehicles in the capital, with approximately half of all Londoners being within five minutes walk of a car club vehicle. However, in the last few years operators of traditional car clubs have significantly scaled back the roll out of new vehicles and there have been new entrants to the market in the form of 'peer-to-peer' and 'one-way' car club schemes that have different requirements and are not reliant upon the provision of dedicated parking bays. For these reasons, there has been a year-on-year reduction in the amount of funding allocated and claimed by the boroughs for the provision of new car club bays. TfL is currently in active discussion with the car club industry on how it can help support them further in other ways as well, including marketing, journey planner and branding.
Financial Year 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12 2012/13 TfL funding made available to local £621k £548k £424k £351k £293k authorities in support of car clubs Amount claimed and spent by local £415k £495k £374k £351k £261k authorities TfL funding to Carplus for research £55k £55k £55k £55k £55k and car club operator accreditation
Affordable Rent conversions - rent levels Question No: 2013/2406 Darren Johnson What are the average rents charged (or to be charged) for homes converted from Social Rent to Affordable Rent so far? Please break the figure down by borough, and if possible by the number of bedrooms. The Mayor The GLA does note collect information from housing providers on conversions from social to affordable rent.
Page 77 Affordable Rent new build - rent levels Question No: 2013/2407 Darren Johnson What are the average rents charged (or to be charged) for newly built Affordable Rent homes? Please break the figure down by borough, and if possible by the number of bedrooms. The Mayor This information will shortly be published on the GLA website covering the 2012/13 financial year. It will be updated on an annual basis.
Viability of Affordable Rent contracts Question No: 2013/2408 Darren Johnson Did you make an assessment of tenants' likely need for housing benefit to pay the rent when evaluating each of the Affordable Rent contracts with providers? Please provide details. The Mayor Contracts signed by registered providers account for local housing allowance caps when rents are set.
GLA -funded housing starts Question No: 2013/2409 Darren Johnson What are the estimated housing starts in 2013/14 funded by GLA, including funding inherited from the HCA? Please break down social rent, 'affordable' rent, intermediate rent, shared ownership and market sale. The Mayor The estimated number of starts currently expected in 2013-14 is c 9,500. This is a risk assessed estimate of starts due this year and cannot be broken down by tenure.
Borough -funded housing starts Question No: 2013/2410 Darren Johnson What are the estimated housing starts in 2013/14 funded by local authorities and without GLA/HCA funding? Please break down social rent, 'affordable' rent, intermediate rent, shared ownership and market sale. The Mayor The GLA does not estimate housing starts delivered without GLA funding.
Page 78 Other housing starts Question No: 2013/2411 Darren Johnson What are the estimated housing starts in 2013/14 funded by planning obligations, without funding from local authorities, the GLA or the HCA? Please break down social rent, 'affordable' rent, intermediate rent, shared ownership and market sale. The Mayor The GLA does not estimate housing starts funded by planning obligations, without funding from local authorities, the GLA or the HCA.
Estimated housing completions Question No: 2013/2412 Darren Johnson What are the estimated housing completions in each of 2013/14, 2014/15 and 2015/16 funded by the GLA, including funding inherited from the HCA? Please break down social rent, 'affordable' rent, intermediate rent, shared ownership and market sale. The Mayor The estimate housing completions from GLA funded programmes and additional completions reported by DCLG in The Affordable Housing Supply Live tables is 7,786 for 2013-14 and 21,160 for 2014-15. Estimates for 2015-16 will be provided following analysis of funding provision and expected allocations for the next CSR period. The estimates for 2013-14 and 2014-15 are based on a risk assessed review of current programmes and, as estimates, cannot be broken down by tenure at this stage. I am on track to achieve my housing delivery targets of 55,000 affordable homes by March 2015.
New Bus for London test results Question No: 2013/2413 Darren Johnson Can you please confirm the fuel consumption figure for the New Bus for London? Is it the 12mpg you told Jenny Jones AM at the 22nd May meeting of the London Assembly, the 11mpg registered in the Millbrook test results, or the 7mpg fleet average from on the road results which Transport for London told BBC London? The Mayor The independent test by Millbrook Proving Ground gave a fuel consumption result of 11mpg. In order to provide meaningful data of the on-street performance of the production NBfL vehicles, TfL requires a robust period of operational data before it can confirm their fuel efficiency.
These figures should be available by early next year, and will be the best measure of the NBFL's on-street fuel efficiency and emissions performance. I am confident that the NBfL will be the cleanest and most fuel efficient hybrid double decker bus available.
Page 79 New Bus for London prototypes Question No: 2013/2414 Darren Johnson How many of the eight prototype buses of the New Bus for London currently in active service on London bus routes have bus assistants staffing the rear doors? The Mayor There are currently 80 NBfL vehicles in service on routes 24, 11 and 9 which are operating at peak times with conductors, and TfL is currently conducting a staffing trial on a small number of NBfL vehicles operating on route 38. The trial will see conductors deployed on just the busiest central London sections of the route.
Cost of publicity New Bus for London Question No: 2013/2415 Darren Johnson Are there any costs to the Greater London Authority, or Transport for London, associated with the New Bus for London being toured around various countries? The Mayor TfL will not incur any costs as a result of loaning two vehicles to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office for its promotional GREAT campaign.
Page 80 Cost of PR for New Bus for London Question No: 2013/2416 Darren Johnson Can you outline the total spent to date on advertising, PR and promotional materials for the New Bus for London?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The following materials have been designed to raise awareness and understanding of the features of the new bus and will be scaled back once the bus becomes more familiar to passengers and is introduced onto more routes. This is in line with the approach we use to support the introduction of all new pieces of public transport infrastructure. Costs incurred cover both route 24 and route 11 to date. Materials:
• Posters on both commercial sites and sites that TfL has free access to • Mobile media, geo targeting residents along route 24 and people within close proximity to route 24 • Door drop mailing of postcard • Additional distribution of postcard in local shops, bars and other venues • Emails using TfL database • Metro ads on TfL's daily travel page
Costs:
• Media - £97,147 • Design, print and production - £62,699 • Total: £159,846
Page 81 New Bus for London tests Question No: 2013/2417 Darren Johnson One of the three results from the Millbrook 'inner London' test cycle for the New Bus for London appears to show the bus achieving 576mpg. Are you concerned that you have based your emission claims for the NBfL on flawed data? The Mayor The 0.49 litres per 100 kms figure you quote as 576mpg from the emissions test certificate shows the bus predominantly in electric-only mode, with net energy change taken into account. This was one aspect of the test but its overall fuel consumption is the important figure and the one that should be used for comparison purposes.
Emissions from the New Bus for London Question No: 2013/2418 Darren Johnson Why have both you and TfL been so reluctant to provide the background information behind the claims in your press release about emissions from the New Bus for London? Will you please provide the mpg basis for the pollutant figures? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2413.
Tottenham Court Road redesign Question No: 2013/2419 Darren Johnson Can you explain why 'all through traffic' is being removed from Tottenham Court Rd in the new redesign, except buses, and yet there's still no space for segregated cycle tracks? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. At this stage no decisions on the design of streets in the West End Project have been taken. The London Borough of Camden has been looking at the feasibility of a number of different options, including the potential for segregated and semi-segregated cycle tracks. These options will be assessed to better understand the impacts on all users, as well as the potential to revitalise Tottenham Court Road.
Page 82 Junctions Review Question No: 2013/2420 Darren Johnson Please provide the timetable for the delivery of the Better Junctions program, including the estimated spend in each of the three next years. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. TfL is currently re-evaluating the delivery schedule for its Better Junctions programme to reflect the priorities outlined in my Vision for Cycling in London. Key junctions, for example at Vauxhall, Tower Hill and Elephant & Castle, are committed in the Vision to be complete by 2016.
Cable Car Question No: 2013/2421 Darren Johnson According to TfL's latest Emirates Air Line customer satisfaction survey, just 12 per cent of Londoners who had used the cable car expressed an intention to use it again within one month. Do you agree that by incorporating the cable car into the oyster cap, travel cards and the freedom pass could make it a more attractive option for Londoners undertaking everyday travel and in doing so boost the number of regular users? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. The Emirates Air Line's fare strategy was designed to cover the costs of construction and operations, and with over 2.4 million passengers in the first 12 months, it is already proving very successful. There is a multi-journey fare available which allows regular passengers to make 10 river crossings at £1.60 each way. Clearly, as with all TfL transport modes, Emirates Air Line fares will be kept under review.
Traffic growth Question No: 2013/2422 Darren Johnson TfL's 'Travel in London 5' report states that the drop in vehicle kilometres driven in London between 2000 and 2011 'partly reflects increased public transport provision, partly reflects reductions in the capacity of the road network and congestion charging in central London'. Do you agree or disagree with TfL's analysis of the reasons why traffic declined in London during the last decade? The Mayor TfL's Travel in London reports provide robust and authoritative analysis of many aspects of transport and travel in London. The evidence presented in these reports supports the conclusions drawn by TfL.
Page 83 Taxi fares transparency Question No: 2013/2423 Darren Johnson The following information only appears on the 'Tariffs' section of the TfL web site: 'once the fare is £17.20 or greater then there is a charge of 20p for each additional 89.2 metres or 19.2 seconds (whichever is reached first), or part thereof'. This information doesn't appear in the more basic information about fares on the 'Taxi fares' section of the TfL web site. Is it not reasonable to properly inform Londoners that their taxi fares are being massively hiked up in this way once they reach £17.20? The Mayor The taxi fares section of the TfL website clearly states at the top of the page that the fares in the table are based on three different types of tariff. Additionally, fares and journey times can be higher due to delays or heavy traffic. This information can be found at:
Silvertown Tunnel Question No: 2013/2424 Darren Johnson Your plans for the Silvertown Tunnel would increase capacity for car traffic by one lane in either direction and meet what Transport for London see as the current demand for use of the Blackwall Tunnel, forecast to be 150% of existing capacity. Can you confirm that the logic of your proposal is to meet what you see as existing demand, which manifests itself as queuing on the approach roads? The Mayor There is a need for a new road tunnel at Silvertown because: It will approximately double cross-river highway capacity in the Blackwall area. This is essential to support growth, which is particularly important since London's population is forecast to grow by more than 1.1m by 2031. The east sub-region is predicted to account for more than a third of this growth. TfL has identified user charging and strategic traffic management as essential tools to ensure demand for the Silvertown tunnel could be kept to manageable levels. The proposed tunnel will also provide a much greater level of resilience. An unplanned incident at Blackwall tunnel can cause significant congestion throughout the area. Between January and September 2012, there were between 93 and 144 unplanned incidents at Blackwall per month. The Silvertown tunnel would provide a nearby diversionary route, greatly increasing the resilience of the local road network to cope when there are incidents at Blackwall tunnel.
TfL benefits for senior staff (1) Question No: 2013/2425 Darren Johnson Have you taken steps to end access to medical benefits for family members (spouses/partners) and child dependents of chief officers and other senior staff where applicable? The Mayor TfL has no current plans to alter the current provision of private medical benefit for its staff.
Page 84 TfL benefits for senior staff (2) Question No: 2013/2426 Darren Johnson Have you taken steps to end the entitlement to staff nominee Oyster cards for family members (spouses/partners) and child dependents of chief officers and other senior staff where applicable? The Mayor TfL has no current plans to alter the provision of this benefit to senior staff and their nominees.
Cycling budget (1) Question No: 2013/2427 Darren Johnson Can you please provide a breakdown of the main projects that the 2013/14 cycling budget is due to be spent on, including superhighways, bike hire, training, greenways, outer London, cycling Cross rail and junction review measures?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
The detailed breakdown of figures relating to the cycling programme is being established through the course of the TfL business planning process. When this is process is complete, the figures will of course be available.
Cycling Budget (2) Question No: 2013/2428 Darren Johnson What is the budget for spending on cycling 'quietways' between now and 2015/16 and during the course of the whole ten year plan?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
Please see my response to MQ 2427 / 2013.
Page 85 Cycling Budget (3) Question No: 2013/2429 Darren Johnson What is the estimated budget for completing cycling superhighways between April 1st 2013 and 2016?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
Please see my response to MQ 2427 / 2013.
Cycling Budget (4) Question No: 2013/2430 Darren Johnson What is the budget specifically dedicated to cycling in outer London between 2013/14 and 2015/16?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
Please see my response to MQ 2427 / 2013.
Page 86 Cycling Budget (5) Question No: 2013/2431 Darren Johnson Can you please clarify how much is due to be spent on making dangerous junctions safer, in each year between now and 2015/16?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
Please see my response to MQ 2427 / 2013.
Cycling Budget (6) Question No: 2013/2432 Darren Johnson What is the estimated budget for the central London cycling grid and how much of this do you anticipate will be spent by 2015/16?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
Please see my response to MQ 2427 / 2013.
Cros srail 2 Question No: 2013/2440 Jennette Arnold Given the excellent news that a feasibility study will be undertaken into the practicalities of Crossrail two will the Mayor commit to engage fully with communities along the proposed route and keep an open mind about where stations are sited? The Mayor I applaud the good news that the Government have made a direct financial commitment to Crossrail 2, allocating £2m towards undertaking further development work. My current consultation will help inform decision making about the strategic options for Crossrail 2 but more detailed project development will be undertaken over the next 12 to 18 months and this will continue to be undertaken through close engagement with local authorities and stakeholders.
Page 87 Co -operatives Fortnight Question No: 2013/2441 Jennette Arnold The theme for this year's Co-ops Fortnight was 'Local, Loved, Trusted' focusing on raising consumers' awareness and understanding of the diversity and benefits of co-operatives. Can the Mayor outline how his administration has raised awareness of the social and economic benefits co-ops bring to London? The Mayor I support the co-operative and mutual sectors through a number of practical measures such as my London Food Board, members of whom work in or with cooperative food companies.
Safeguarding the 'Co -operative 'status (1) Question No: 2013/2442 Jennette Arnold Can the Mayor confirm if his office submitted a response to the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) recent consultation on removing protected status for the term 'co- operative' for firms registering at Companies House? The Mayor My office did not submit a response to this consultation.
Safeguarding the 'Co -operative' status (2) Question No: 2013/2443 Jennette Arnold Does the Mayor share my concerns that the removal of the protected status for 'co-operative' enterprises means that firms wishing to give themselves 'ethical kudos' could simply appropriate the term and inflict considerable reputational damage on to an important sector of London's economy? The Mayor I await the conclusions, when published, of BIS's assessment of the responses it has received to its broader consultation on the regulation of company names.
Page 88 Metropolitan Police Corruption (1) Question No: 2013/2444 Jennette Arnold Given the recent allegations that Metropolitan Police officers conducted an undercover operation to discredit the family of Stephen Lawrence can the Mayor assure my constituents that he will make combating alleged police corruption a priority? The Mayor These are clearly very serious allegations that need to be fully investigated. The investigation is on-going. The Met take corruption and malpractice seriously, with current procedures many reviews involve the police investigating the police. I am already considering, as I said at the question time session, what additional oversight of police standards will enhance accountability and reassure Londoners.
Metropolitan Police Corruption (2) Question No: 2013/2445 Jennette Arnold Does the Mayor believe there needs to be a new, judge led, enquiry into the claims that Met officers tried to smear the family of Stephen Lawrence? The Mayor It should be noted that there are a number of on-going investigations in this area, including the investigation being led by Chief Constable Mick Creedon and the HMIC review. Whilst I am hopeful that these reviews will establish what happened and why - and that these reviews will be completed more quickly than a judge-led inquiry, like the Home Secretary, I will review my position if they cannot ensure the full facts.
Metropolitan Police Corruption (3) Question No: 2013/2446 Jennette Arnold Can the Mayor outline what procedures and safeguards are currently in place that would stop re-occurrences of the alleged activities undertaken by the Met's 'Special Demonstration Squad' in seeking to criminalise law abiding citizens by acting as 'agent provocateurs?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 Special Demonstration Squad (SDS) officers were not authorised to act as 'agent provocateurs'. Allegations relating to the Met's SDS are currently the subject of an investigation overseen by Chief Constable Mick Creedon. I will ask my Deputy Mayor to write to you to provide full details of the procedures and safeguards that the MPS has in place for undercover policing operations.
Page 89 Comprehensive Spending Review Question No: 2013/2447 Jennette Arnold As an outer London borough with inner London challenges, many would say that Waltham Forest already receives less than its fair share of funding. Following the Comprehensive Spending Review, what is the Mayor doing to ensure that the impact of further cuts to local government in London does not affect the ability of councils such as Waltham Forest to deliver the range and quality of public services that residents need and deserve? The Mayor I will continue to stand up for London by presenting the case to Government and internationally that the city is the world's destination for investment, tourism and talent; and I work constructively with London Councils on representations to DCLG.
TfL pension fund (1)
Welfare changes Question No: 2013/2448 Jennette Arnold What discussions has the Mayor of London had about the likely movement of people from inner to outer London boroughs such as Waltham Forest as a result of the government's welfare changes? The Mayor I have had many discussions about welfare reform, and my Deputy Mayor for Housing, Land and Property, as well as my officials, regularly meet with London boroughs and government. These discussions rightly accept that some households receiving taxpayer-funded benefits will have to make the choices that most working households make about where they can and cannot afford to live.
William Morris Gallery Question No: 2013/2449 Jennette Arnold The William Morris Gallery in Waltham Forest was recently crowned as the Arts Fund's Museum of the Year. This is testament to the hard work of the museum's staff and the Council's efforts to secure investment - including £1.5 million of the Council's own money - for refurbishing the gallery. Does the Mayor agree that the success of the William Morris Gallery demonstrates the importance of local authority support for arts & culture and will he encourage other London boroughs to follow Waltham Forest's example? The Mayor Yes.
Page 90 Gang Violence Question No: 2013/2450 Jennette Arnold Waltham Forest has seen a significant reduction in gang related violence as a result of their innovative Enough is Enough programme, which brings together a range of partners to ensure the whole community comes together to tackle the problem. Will he urge other local authorities to consider working with Waltham Forest and adopting this whole family-intervention approach? The Mayor I am pleased with the success of the Waltham Forest 'Enough is Enough' approach. Not only has it resulted in a reduction in gang related violence, but also since its inception, the programme has seen four gang rivalry disputes resolved by conflict management. Enough is Enough reflects the priorities of the London Crime Reduction Board's Partnership Anti-Gangs Strategy which has a particular focus on partnership working; early intervention and diversion. I understand that aspects of the Waltham Forest model are already shared as best practice across other Boroughs via the MPS Trident central gangs unit. Via the London Crime Prevention Fund, the Mayor's Office for Policing And Crime have funded 25 gang-specific projects a number of which also focus on partnership working; early intervention and diversion.
West Angli a Rail Services 1 Question No: 2013/2451 Jennette Arnold Following the Government's recent announcement to devolve West Anglia rail services to TfL could the Mayor explain why the line via Tottenham Hale has been excluded from the proposed transfer?" The Mayor West Anglia services via Tottenham Hale have been excluded from the proposed transfer because the DfT has decided that it is not readily possible to separate out the longer distance services on this line. This does not rule out the potential for the devolution of services between Angel Road and Stratford via Tottenham Hale once Network Rail have completed the necessary new infrastructure.
West Anglia Rail Services 2 Question No: 2013/2452 Jennette Arnold Is it intended that the stations south of Cheshunt, including the new Lea Bridge station, and the local stopping train service will transfer to TfL at a later date when track improvements have been completed? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. TfL will be discussing the matter with the DfT in the coming months.
Page 91 Lea Valley Services Question No: 2013/2453 Jennette Arnold Is there an indicative timescale for the track and station improvements on the Tottenham Hale line and introduction of more frequent services to Stratford from the Lea Valley? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. Network Rail are leading the delivery of the scheme and are currently developing a plan for its implementation with completion expected for services to start in 2017.
Low Hall Farm Curve Question No: 2013/2454 Jennette Arnold Is there any plan for TfL and Network Rail to reinstate the Low Hall Farm curve to allow direct train services between Chingford and Stratford? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 This is not a matter for TfL. Network Rail has concluded in its London & South East route utilisation strategy that there is insufficient capacity to allow a turn-up-and-go service from both Chingford via a Hall Farm curve and from the Upper Lee Valley. There are no plans for Network Rail to reinstate this service. The Lea Valley upgrade (providing a more frequent service to stations between Stratford and Angel Road), now funded, will deliver significant transport and economic benefits, in particular enabling much needed housing development, over a wider area of the Lea Valley Opportunity Area.
New Rolling Stock Question No: 2013/2455 Jennette Arnold Are TfL intending to refurbish the existing trains on the devolved lines or will new trains be purchased within a few years? The Mayor TfL are starting the process of defining its specification for the West Anglia services, for which transfer is in 2015. We are evaluating what funding and budget there might be upon transfer and how it can best be spent to improve the customer environment on the trains.
Page 92 Betting Shops Question No: 2013/2456 John Biggs Following the recent decision in Newham, and given that I believe disadvantaged communities are preyed upon by betting shops, do you accept a need to act? The Mayor I have long been concerned about the proliferation and clustering of betting shops across London, and the role of planning and licensing legislation to give local communities and their representatives the ability to control this appropriately and manage the impacts on town centres and local amenity. I have commissioned a Cumulative Impact Policy Statement for betting shops to assess their impact on local communities. This is being led by the London Health Inequalities Network and will be published on their web portal when it is complete. This should provide a valuable evidence base in making the case for changes to the law.
Travel Zones Question No: 2013/2457 John Biggs As London's centre of gravity slowly moves, do you agree with me that there is merit in altering treavel zone boundaries to reflect this change? When will you institute a review and could you do this as part of this year's fares decision? The Mayor I am not proposing to review fare zone boundaries at this stage.
New Jail Question No: 2013/2458 John Biggs Are you willing to rule out a new jail on GLA land at Dagenham/Rainham? The Mayor Given the large number of prisoners who have to be located beyond London's boundaries because there is insufficient prison capacity here, it is absolutely right that we look at potential sites for a new prison in London, preferably where this can contribute to local job creation and regeneration. My officials are therefore working with the MoJ on a range of possible solutions to this pressing issue, including those on GLA owned land.
Page 93 Tate and Lyle Question No: 2013/2459 John Biggs What further support are you giving to the sugar refinery. Have you enlisted the support of the Government? The Mayor The issues affecting Tate & Lyle Sugars arise from the EU sugar regime, which is negotiated by EU Member State Governments and the European Parliament. On behalf of Tate & Lyle Sugars I have raised these issues with the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on a number of occasions and I am confident that he understands them.
Curtailment of Bus Route D6 Question No: 2013/2460 John Biggs Many of my constituents use this route from Crossharbour, or other stops on the route to travel to Mare Street. This route has now been curtailed due to the trial closure to traffic of part of Mare Street. Whilst understanding the part closure of Mare Street to traffic is a decision by LB Hackney and relates to their aspirations for the town centre, I feel that in curtailing the route earlier than is necessary and this impacts on passengers having to continue their journey by taking a second bus and paying a second fare. Will you instruct TfL to review this decision? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. As you state, the closure of Mare Street is due to a London Borough of Hackney trial which is due to finish on 31January 2014. TfL sought to minimise the disruption to bus passengers in their discussions with the Borough. As the original terminus of route D6 was no longer available, options for alternative stands for the D6 were explored with LB Hackney. Some were identified near to the town centre but either required some physical works or were not supported by the Borough as the roads were predominantly residential. They also presented significant operational and/or cost implications and were not viable. Ash Grove was the nearest available terminus for route D6. Hackney officers supported the D6 arrangement to enable the trial to proceed. Whilst TfL accepts that this requires some passengers to change buses, there are a number of high frequency services on which they can make their onward journey (routes 48, 55, 106 and 254).
Page 94 Electrification : Barking - Gospel Oak Line to Barking Riverside Question No: 2013/2461 John Biggs I am delighted that electrification now seems ready to proceed. Can you inform me of the results of the TfL evaluation with regard to the possible extension of this line to Barking Riverside? Have TfL adopted this further extension as policy? The Mayor I too am delighted that electrification is going ahead, following extensive lobbying by my team and myself at all levels. Improving transport is a key element of the plans to regenerate Barking Riverside and TfL is currently working with the local authority to see how this can best be achieved - clearly an extension of the London Overground is one option but this would need full evaluation.
World Public Services' Day Question No: 2013/2462 John Biggs As Mayor of London, a city which provides public services to over 8 million residents, what did you do to mark World Public Services' Day (June 24th) The Mayor The UN World Public Service Day was held on 23 June. I am fully aware of the tireless effort that goes into delivering London's public services.
Marine Policing Unit Question No: 2013/2463 John Biggs Can you provide me with a briefing note on the planned cuts to the Marine Policing Unit? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 The Marine Police Unit has been restructured. Through focusing on delivering its core tasks, the unit has reduced its overall officer numbers whilst maintaining the same number of officers working on the 24/7 response teams, and continuing to provide community policing and specialist support. In addition the MPS has brought together the Territorial Support Group, Dog Support Unit and Mounted Branch into one unit, reducing costs and bureaucracy. These changes have resulted in a reduction in the budget of 24 per cent without impacting on service delivery.
Page 95 Pollution on A13, Tower Hamlets Question No: 2013/2464 John Biggs Official emission figures released on 24th June by Clean Air in London show that the A13 in Tower Hamlets has been named as one of the worst three roads in the capital in terms of vehicle emissions for 2012. When are you going to take this issue seriously and what urgent action do you plan to take to eradicate this problem?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
I am committed to improving air quality across the whole of London and am investing £20 million in my new Air Quality Fund to help boroughs tackle hotspots like the A13. The first £5.6 million of funding has recently been allocated and I have granted Tower Hamlets and its partners £500,000 to improve air quality in the Borough.
Projects to be delivered include:
- working in partnership with Barts NHS Trust to reduce emissions from the hospital estate/vehicles and to develop "clean air zones", including around the Royal London hospital site in-between the A11/A13.
- an anti-engine idling campaign and electronic signage on Tower Bridge.
- funding the expansion of the Shoreditch Zero Emission Network into Tower Hamlets.
TfL has also taken action to improve air quality along the A13. Euro III buses on route 115 (which runs along the A13) are being retrofitted with selective catalytic reduction (SCR) equipment to reduce their NOx emissions. Traffics signals have been optimised and linked to SCOOT technology, which allows for the optimum flow of traffic along this corridor. This minimises engine idling and reduces stop/start acceleration and deceleration, which in turn reduces air pollution.
Page 96 Crossrail Fares Question No: 2013/2465 John Biggs My constituents who travel to and from Maryland, Forest Gate, Manor Park and Chadwell will welcome the advent of the Crossrail services in their areas but have concerns regarding the fares' structure. Can you confirm that fares will be in line with those of TfL and that all current Oystercards, Travelcards, Freedom Passes and Zip Cards will be valid? The Mayor I can confirm that I will be responsible for setting fares for journeys locally over Crossrail services, including fares to/from other LU/DLR stations via Crossrail. I intend that such fares will be in line with those charged on LU/DLR, and that the full ticketing range including Oyster Cards, Travelcards, Freedom Passes and Zip cards will be valid on Crossrail services.
Blacklisting Question No: 2013/2466 John Biggs Will you give a commitment to not allow BAM, Ferrovial and Kier to tender for GLA contracts or renew current GLA contracts until blacklisted worker Frank Morris is reinstated in his job at Crossrail? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. Blacklisting is an unacceptable and illegal practice. Crossrail Limited has asked for and received assurances from all its principal contractors providing confirmation that none have engaged in any blacklisting activity on the Crossrail project. The case of Mr Morris is currently subject to an Employment Tribunal.
River Crossings Question No: 2013/2467 John Biggs Do you accept the force of public opinion that, with safeguards to protect local communities, a fixed crossing should be built at Gallions Reach The Mayor TfL is evaluating the range of issues that were expressed during its most recent 'River Crossings' consultation. This consultation set out potential options to replace the ageing Woolwich ferry, including a new fixed link at Gallions Reach. A range of views and issues were expressed and TfL will respond to these later this summer.
Page 97 Technical Administrative Error Question No: 2013/2468 John Biggs In what sense is an increase of the order of 10% in Council Tax precept in the City of London, when the capping level was 2%, a technical error? The Mayor As reported to the Assembly on 22 May, regrettably, in the calculation of the unadjusted relevant basic amount of council tax, a technical administrative error was made which meant that the increase in the unadjusted amount for the City of London from 2012-13 to 2013-14 exceeded the two per cent threshold set by Parliament, by an amount equivalent to £5.89 for a Band D household. To rectify this oversight in respect of the unadjusted amount, a technical direction was issued by the Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government on 15 April 2013. The direction removed the referendum requirements which would otherwise have been in place for the level of increase involved for the unadjusted amount.
GLA precept Question No: 2013/2469 John Biggs A Londoner has asked me to put the following question to you. 'How can you justify the tiny cut in the GLA precept, which is obviously purely political and will make no noticeable difference to the council tax payers, but will cut funds which could be used for their benefit?' The Mayor I was re-elected in 2012 on a platform to cut waste and council tax. Every pound of Londoners' money is precious, and should be spent in a clear, open and honest way on their priorities - creating jobs and making London safer. We are going through tough economic times, and Londoners are understandably concerned about their jobs and the cost of living. I gave a commitment to reduce the GLA's precept by 10 per cent over the next four years. My 2013-14 budget works towards delivering this objective. Since I was elected there has been a 20% reduction in real terms in Council Tax bills. This council tax cut has been possible because of our careful and prudent management of City Hall's finances.
Page 98 Spending Review Question No: 2013/2470 Tom Copley What benefits did the Government's Spending Review bring to London? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. The main benefits to London of the Spending Review are: A long term six year deal that has been secured for TfL's investment grant which will enable it to continue to invest in critical transport infrastructure, including Crossrail and the Tube with greater certainty around its funding; Specific transport commitments given, such as the devolution of West Anglia suburban rail services, the electrification of the Gospel Oak to Barking overground line and feasibility studies for Crossrail 2; and A commitment to £3.3 billion of capital investment in affordable housing over three years from 2015-16, with London's share of this amount still to be announced.
Mayor 's Housing and Land Directorate Question No: 2013/2471 Tom Copley How many members of staff work in the Mayor's Housing and Land Directorate compared to the number that worked for the London region of the Homes and Communities Agency before its transfer to the Greater London Authority? The Mayor The Housing and Land Directorate contains 91 posts, covering functions previously carried out in the GLA, HCA, LDA and London Thames Gateway Development Corporation. Breakdown as follows: HCA 49 transferred LTG 9 transferred LDA 11 transferred LDA 6 transferred Plus 22 existing GLA staff
Rough Sleeping Question No: 2013/2472 Tom Copley On what date were you informed by your staff that you would not meet your pledge to end rough sleeping in London by the end of 2012? A rough estimate would suffice.
The Mayor
Please see my response to MQ 1432/ 2012.
Page 99 Help to Buy (1) Question No: 2013/2473 Tom Copley With reference to question 1864/2013, do you estimate that 'Help to Buy' will increase house building (i.e. supply) by more than it increases consumer demand for homeownership in London? Please explain your answer. The Mayor There is already evidence that Help to Buy is increasing new supply, which will have benefits in London not just in meeting the demand for new homes but also in improving affordability.
Help to Buy (2) Question No: 2013/2474 Tom Copley Will 'Help to Buy' lead to an increase in house prices in London? If so, is this a positive thing? The Mayor One of the ways to tackle the high costs of housing is to increase supply. This product offers an opportunity to stimulate housing supply in London, which is a positive thing.
Landlord Accreditation Question No: 2013/2475 Tom Copley With reference to question 2002/2013, on what date will you publish your proposals 'for further expanding accreditation in London'? The Mayor I am planning to publish my proposals this summer.
Advertisement on London's transport network Question No: 2013/2476 Tom Copley Have you been approached with proposals for advertising housing campaigns on London's transport network? The Mayor TfL's main advertising contractor, CBS Outdoor, has confirmed that the only housing related material that they have been approached to run recently are small campaigns advertising homes available in specific new developments in West London and East London. These campaigns are due to run over summer 2013.
Page 100 Empty Homes Question No: 2013/2477 Tom Copley In reporting that in 2012/13 your administration only brought eight empty homes back into use, while recording a 99% programme underspend, on 21 June 2013 the Evening Standard said 'City Hall insiders suggested the scheme had slipped behind due to difficulties getting the boroughs on board, raising fears for its £6.6 million budget next year'. Are the boroughs to blame for the current failure of your empty homes programme? Please provide details as to why. The Mayor The empty homes programme is not failing.
No fault eviction (1) Question No: 2013/2478 Tom Copley In response to question 2009/2013 you argue that landlords should not have to be 'fit and proper' persons because 'if tenants are genuinely at risk then there is a range of enforcement powers that local authorities can use to deal with the situation'. Conversely, you argue in response to question 2007/2013 that the abolition of landlord's right to 'no fault eviction' could impinge their 'legitimate right to gain possession of their properties'. This suggest that you believe landlords have fewer rights to evict tenants than tenants have to bring action against a bad landlord. Is this a correct assessment of your view? The Mayor Regarding the fit and proper person test, please see my answer to question 2479/2013. Regarding retaliatory eviction, I will comment on the specific safeguards if and when proposals come forward.
No fault eviction (2) Question No: 2013/2479 Tom Copley In response to question 2009/2013 you argue that landlords should not have to be 'fit and proper' persons because 'if tenants are genuinely at risk then there is a range of enforcement powers that local authorities can use to deal with the situation'. Why should tenants have to wait until they are 'genuinely at risk' before action is taken against such landlords when a simple fit and proper person test could help to prevent such possibilities? The Mayor Local authorities have powers to deal with the minority of cases where landlords act improperly.
Page 101 Affordable Housing (1) Question No: 2013/2480 Tom Copley What currently constitutes an affordable housing start? Is there any intention to alter this definition? The Mayor A full definition of what constitutes an affordable housing start is provided in the Homes and Communities Agency's Affordable Housing Capital Funding Guide section 3.4 http://www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/cfg?page_id=5577&page=36 This definition applies to the contracted programme currently underway and there is no intention to amend the definition.
Affordable Housing (2) Question No: 2013/2481 Tom Copley What currently constitutes an affordable housing completion? Is there any intention to alter this definition? The Mayor A full definition of what constitutes an affordable housing completion is provided in the Capital Funding Guide (section 3.6) http://www.homesandcommunities.co.uk/cfg?page_id=5577&page=36 This definition applies to the contracted programme currently underway and there is no intention to amend the definition.
Mobile home residents Question No: 2013/2482 Tom Copley Do you agree with the government's attempts to introduce a 'fit and proper' test for owners of mobile homes sites? The Mayor Government officials have confirmed to me that Ministers will not attempt to introduce a 'fit and proper' test until at least 2017, and even then only if certain conditions are met. The Mobile Homes Act 2013, which introduced licensing provisions for mobile homes sites, does include an enabling power to introduce a 'fit and proper' test for owners of these sites. However, this will only be considered following a review of the effectiveness of the existing legislation, no less than three years after its introduction (the licensing provisions will come into force on 1 April 2014, so not before 1 April 2017), and following full public consultation.
Page 102 Markets Question No: 2013/2483 Tom Copley Thank you for your response to question 2010/2013, which asked - in relation to excessive private rented sector rental increases - whether you always take an amoral position on the functioning of markets. By asserting that 'you can't buck the market' you seem to be suggesting that you do not believe in state intervention to correct any markets, even when they are dramatically impacting on the quality of people's lives, or, in terms of the private rented sector, people's ability to remain in their communities. To what other markets do you extend this logic? For example, do you think the state should not attempt to 'buck the market' in relation to health care provision and education? Please explain your answer. The Mayor Tackling rising rents by artificially holding them below market levels will only make matters worse. The high market price for private rental housing reflects the fact that we have a chronic shortage of housing. This will only be resolved if we attract more investment into new housing supply.
Private rented sector (1) Question No: 2013/2484 Tom Copley Have you ever rented in the private rented sector? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2012 / 2013.
Private rented sector (2) Question No: 2013/2485 Tom Copley Please provide an annual breakdown of forecasted private sector rent increases in each London borough. The Mayor No such forecasts are available.
Crossrail Question No: 2013/2486 Andrew Dismore How far can the Elizabeth tunnel boring machine currently tunnel in one day on the Crossrail project? The Mayor The Crossrail Elizabeth tunnel boring machine is one of six that are currently operational. The distance travelled per day by each tunnel boring machine varies due to local geology, the need to undertake inspection and maintenance activities, and logistics constraints.
Page 103 Crossrail #2 Question No: 2013/2487 Andrew Dismore What is the current average cost per day - in both working hours and money - of not operating the Elizabeth tunnel boring machine on the Crossrail project? The Mayor It would not be appropriate for me to provide information on the expenditure incurred on a daily basis by any of Crossrail's Tier 1 Contractors, as this is commercially sensitive information. I would note however that complex tunnelling projects are managed and costed using long-run average production rates. These production rates take account of maintenance activities and transits through subterranean structures, like the new Crossrail Canary Wharf station. These stoppages should not be viewed as additional costs but as a normal part of a complex tunnelling project.
Crossrail at Canary Wharf Question No: 2013/2488 Andrew Dismore Is it true that the breakthrough at canary wharf for Crossrail by the Elizabeth boring machine was delayed by several days for your convenience as you were not available for your photo opportunity when the breakthrough was ready; and if so how many days and what was the cost of this delay? The Mayor No.
Avanti School 1 Question No: 2013/2489 Andrew Dismore Have you now read the letter I sent you about the proposed move of Avanti school to Broadfields, Edgware, and the Fairway, Mill Hill, and if so what is your substantive response? The Mayor Please see my letter to you dated 2 July.
Avanti School 2 Question No: 2013/2490 Andrew Dismore Have you now found time to read the letter I sent you about the proposed move of Avanti school to Broadfields, Edgware and the Fairway, Mill Hill, will you now apologise to the thousands of residents who, in my opinion, you insulted at the last MQT by saying they 'disliked school children' and were 'nimbys'? The Mayor I have read your letter.
Page 104 Avanti School 3 Question No: 2013/2491 Andrew Dismore Will you make some of the 54.36 acres of land you are selling off on the Peel Centre site available for the Avanti free school? And if not, why not? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 I have answered this question in my letter to you of 2nd July 2013.
Fire service response times 1 Question No: 2013/2492 Andrew Dismore As DCLG guidance on fire service response times is to measure response times from the time of call to the arrival of the first pumping appliance, why has draft LSP5 been based on a different approach of taking the time from when the message is received at the station? The Mayor There is no guidance from DCLG on how fire and rescue authorities (FRAs) should measure response times. This has been the case since the abolition of national attendance standards in 2004. The current approach has been used in London since 2008 and the methodologies used have always been completely open. I understand that some FRAs do not have any attendance standards at all. The London Fire Commissioner has said in his recent report FEP2091 that he will look at the question of how response times should be measured and bring forward proposals for LFEPA members to consider.
Fire service response times 2 Question No: 2013/2493 Andrew Dismore Under the fire brigade plan, which proposes the closure of 12 fire stations, the removal of 18 fire engines and a reduction of 520 firefighters' jobs, that you recently directed LFEPA to consult upon, how many wards in London currently inside the 6 minute target first attendance time will go outside the time; and how many currently outside the attendance time will come within it? The Mayor Based on the Commissioner's draft plan published in January 2013, 40 wards currently within the 1st appliance 6 minute target will go outside the target joining the 267 wards that are currently performing outside target. No ward outside of the 1st appliance target would come within it. Under the Commissioner's revised plan, published for the LFEPA meeting on 18 July, 36 wards currently within the 1st appliance 6 minute target would fall outside the 1st appliance target of 6 minutes.
Page 105 Fire service and Chancellor's 26th June statement Question No: 2013/2494 Andrew Dismore How many more fire stations will you close, fire engines will you remove and how many front line firefighter jobs will go as a consequence of the Chancellor's 26th June statement? The Mayor The draft Safety Plan was drafted within existing budgets. The Chancellors Spending Review did not affect the Commissioner's plans.
Barnet FC and public transport Question No: 2013/2495 Andrew Dismore Barnet FC will be playing first team football matches at the Hive in Canons Park with effect from the start of the 2013/14 football season. In preparation for the move the Supporters Trust recently carried out a consultation exercise to establish how supporters expected to travel to the Hive. The results of the consultation identified that nearly 70% of supporters expected to travel to the stadium by car. For those travelling from the Barnet area this will be along already congested routes to an area of London where resident's existing concerns about parking have been magnified by the prospect of the regular arrival of an influx of additional football related traffic to the area. The Supporters Trust is supporting the Football Club's initiatives to reduce traffic but the absence of any direct public transport routes from the centre of Barnet to the Hive is a problem. An extension to the route of the 251 bus to Queensbury Jubilee Line station at the Hive end and High Barnet Northern Line station at the other would assist? Will you look at rerouting existing bus services to provide a. convenient public transport option for people wishing to get to and from the Hive from High Barnet, Underhill and possibly New and East Barnet? The Mayor Barnet FC's average crowd last season was 2,440 and the total capacity of the new stadium will be around 5,000. The new Barnet FC ground is served by route 288 on Camrose Avenue which connects with the Jubilee Line at Queensbury and the Northern Line at Edgware. Interchange to other bus services to and from the wider borough of Barnet is available at Edgware. An extension of route 251 to Queensbury would either mean it could no longer serve Edgware or would have to serve Edgware High Street twice in both directions. Serving High Barnet would have an even more significant effect as it would either not serve Brunswick Park and Arnos Grove, or have a very circuitous routeing to and from High Barnet. The disbenefit to existing passengers on the 251 and the increase in TfL's operating costs could only be justified if there were significant increases in trips due to the new ground. TfL will continuously monitor the situation once the football season starts.
Page 106 Orbital express bus routes Question No: 2013/2496 Andrew Dismore In 2008 you promised: 'In the short-term we will commission a trial of orbital express bus routes for outer London, connecting key hubs ... These will be express buses ... limited to two or three stops along each route, [using] coach style vehicles.' (Manifesto p.20) Why have you not honoured this pledge? what happened? The Mayor I have honoured this pledge. A trial was introduced in November 2008 when route X26 was increased in frequency. A full review was undertaken, including customer research. Usage increased significantly during the trial and the enhanced service levels were retained. However, the trial demonstrated that services of this type require a high subsidy for the benefit they deliver. There is an existing extensive network of orbital services that provide links from town centre to town centre, catering for the 'shorter' journeys the majority of bus users wish to make. Given this and the wider funding position, TfL consider that further express services do not have a good business case. The report can be read using the following link: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/Item07-Orbital-Bus-Services.pdf
Stirling Corner 1 Question No: 2013/2497 Andrew Dismore Further to your answer to Questions No: 4161/2012 'I cycle the whole of London. When I next do Stirling Corner I will give you a report' and your answers to questions 261/2013, 522/2013, 1041/2013, 1464/2013 and Question No: 2039/2013 referring back to that answer and my invitation to you to attempt to go round Stirling Corner on your bike, and your repeated answer 'I have nothing to add to MQ 4161/2012.', have you ever cycled round Stirling Corner? Have you cycled round Stirling Corner yet since you promised to do so; if not why not; and if not when do you expect to cycle round Stirling Corner? Or is it that you have no intention of doing so in the foreseeable future and just want to pretend you are a keen cyclist with cyclists' concerns at heart and have no intention of honouring your commitment to do so, so that your original answer can be seen as nothing more than a fobbing off exercise? Or are you frightened of doing so, as it is too dangerous? The Mayor I have nothing to add to MQ 4161/2012.
Page 107 Beds in sheds Question No: 2013/2498 Andrew Dismore A constituent has complained to me that the owners of the house at the rear of his family's home have built a "self-contained unit" with the purpose of renting it out - a 'shed for a bed'. The council have said their hands are tied as matters stand - they've investigated but as it's not yet rented out they can't act. Numerous estate agents are marketing such properties claiming them to be 'self-contained units' for which they have planning permission. Do you support beds in sheds or will you lobby the Government to tighten planning controls to stop this kind of unwelcome development? The Mayor I do not support beds in sheds and I have been very active in encouraging local authorities and government to deal with this problem. London has benefited from a significant share of the Beds in Sheds funding and local authorities already have many powers to tackle the issue. I will ask my Deputy Mayor for Housing, Land and Property to raise this issue at the next meeting of the Beds in Sheds Ministerial Taskforce, of which he is a member.
Outer London Fund: Cricklewood Question No: 2013/2499 Andrew Dismore Of the money allocated to this project, how much has been spent on administration, , how much on consultants, how much on staff time; and how much on physical improvements to the area? The Mayor In total, to project completion, the projected spend on public realm improvements is over £1m. Of the total money allocated to this project including match the following has been spent to date: Administration (project management, footfall survey, land registry, insurance, storage): £90,636.00 Consultants (design and other preparatory work for shop front/building improvements, site activation, festive lights, creative window displays, marketing material, public realm improvements, design charter, place-shaping guide): £172,049.00 Borough staff time (project administration/management including new post created, highways): £56,287.69 Physical improvements (hanging baskets, paving materials): £38,723.30 Other revenue based outcomes: (direct business support, marketing material, festive events, website, newsletter, Youth Engagement Scheme: £71,297.14
Page 108 Outer London Fund: North Finchley Question No: 2013/2500 Andrew Dismore Of the money allocated to this project, how much has been spent on administration, how much on consultants, how much on staff time; and how much on physical improvements to the area? The Mayor In total, to project completion, the projected spend on public realm improvements is over £850k. Of the total money allocated to this project including match the following has been spent to date: Administration (parking review): £25,000 Consultants (design and other preparatory work for shop front/building improvements, site activation, public realm improvements): £33,072.50 Borough staff time (project management including new post created, signage review, survey work): £63,362.82 Physical Improvements (de-cluttering): £23,000 Other revenue based outcomes (Olympic Outdoor Arts Event, winter event, business support): £137,294.68
Reporting crime 1 Question No: 2013/2501 Andrew Dismore Residents in the Fairway, Mill Hill , have been complaining of drug dealing in their area for up to 2 years and have produced strong evidence of this to the police. Why has no action been taken? is it because you have cut police numbers in Barnet so there are 91 fewer warranted officers than in 2010; and is this also the reason why you continually delay and obfuscate in answering my written Mayor's questions about police numbers in Barnet? The Mayor I have not cut the number of police officers in Barnet. In fact I have committed to increasing the number of police officers in Safer Neighborhood Teams in Barnet from 60 officers in 2011 to 135 in 2015. This will result in 75 additional officers working in local teams. I have been advised by the MPS that a search warrant was executed in the area in response to information provided but no offences were identified. The MPS have also recently completed a two week surveillance operation where again no offences were identified. Following on from this the MPS completed a resident's survey in the area and again there were no notable issues. However, the MPS will continue to monitor the situation.
Page 109 Reporting crime 2 Question No: 2013/2502 Andrew Dismore A Golders Green resident has reported to me that she had the misfortune to fall foul of a typical bank scam where the ATM machine at the NatWest bank in Golders Green did not return her card and her card was stolen along with the pin number. This happened at around 10 p.m. on Monday night. 17th June. The criminals proceeded to withdraw £1,500 in cash and spend another approximately £1000 in various outlets before she got to the bank and reported it at 9 a.m. the following morning. The resident was so incensed by the whole incident she wanted to report the matter to the police but this is where the problem started. She tried to find the number of the local police station in yellow pages, the Thomson local directory and the Barnet telephone directory but had no luck. Then she resorted to the internet and found a number which looked likely so rang that. It was not the number she needed and she was advised to go to the local police station in Golders Green, but the young lady at the other end of the phone could not tell me when the station was open. She eventually found the opening times on the internet 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. So on 19th June she went to the police station. There she was told that she needed to report the crime on the internet using a website called Fraud Alert. However, she did not want to report a fraud so eventually this morning - very frustrated she rang 101. At last she got someone who was willing to take down the details and give her a crime number. How many other people in a similar situation just give up? Is this how you massage the crime figures to create a rosier picture than is in fact the case? Is this not a product of the consequences of your cuts to the police? The Mayor I am sorry your constituent had a frustrating experience. I am committed to improving public confidence in the police and my police and crime plan recognises that a consequence of a lack of confidence can be under-reporting. Through my police and crime plan I am committed to a wide ranging public access strategy includes improving the number of options through which crime can be reported including publicising 101 and increasing the types of crimes that can be reported over via the web. The Commissioner has also pledged that every victim of crime will be guaranteed the offer of a visit by an officer to see them at a convenient time and place if they wish to do so.
Police questions at MQT Question No: 2013/2503 Andrew Dismore Why are you so rubbish at answering questions about the police and MOPAC? At the last MQT I tabled 31 questions, most of which were repeating questions from earlier MQTs some dating back to February and March which were again answered 'Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.' Only 4 had a substantive answer, and one of those didn't address the question. What does 'shortly' mean? And when will you get a grip and ensure prompt answers to questions about the police? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2537 / 2013.
Page 110 Hampstead police station 1 Question No: 2013/2504 Andrew Dismore Do you agree that your proposal for an alternative police base at the Royal Free Hospital is not progressing on costs grounds, and is it not the case that your decision to immediately close Hampstead police station and market it as a 'boutique hotel' has broken several verbal & written promises to the local community and is somewhat premature as a consequence? The Mayor The public access plans for Camden published in March identified a potential Contact Point at The Royal Free Hospital. Discussions about this are on-going and a final decision has yet to be made. Hampstead police station closed on the date originally planned. This was widely discussed as part of the pan-London public access consultation which included a meeting with the local community on 22 January. The bid process only closed on 19 July.
Hampst ead police station 2 Question No: 2013/2505 Andrew Dismore Is it not the case that your proposal to make closed police and fire stations available to free schools a sham, in light of your decision to make free schools compete on the open market to buy them, for example Hampstead Police station? The Mayor Former police stations are openly marketed in order that MOPAC complies with its obligations to achieve 'best value' under the Police Crime and Social Responsibility Act 2011. MOPAC officials have been working with my free schools team to ensure that they are made aware of sites that might be suitable for free schools.
Hampstead Police Station 3 Question No: 2013/2506 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1482 / 2013, repeated as Question No: 2048 / 2013 'Why is the car park building for police vehicles on the corner of Eton College Road/Adelaide Road in Chalk Farm NW3 not planned to be sold rather than Hampstead Police station. Do you believe it is more important in the NW3 postcode to keep this Police car park open in preference to Hampstead Police station which is such a vital local resource?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQs 1482 and 2048 / 2013 were sent on 9 July 2013.
Page 111 Police promotion Question No: 2013/2507 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1487 / 2013 repeated as Question No: 2057 / 2013 'How many officers currently with the Met have passed the sergeants' and inspectors' examinations and are eligible for promotion, and how many vacancies in these ranks do you expect for each of the next two years?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQs 1487 and 2057 / 2013 were sent on 1 July 2013.
Police recruitment 1 Question No: 2013/2508 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1488 / 2013 repeated as Question No: 2058 / 2013 'How much do potential recruits including from specials and PCSOs have to pay to go on the prequalification course?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response received 26/07/13: My response to MQ 1488/ 2013 was sent on 31 May and MQ 2058 /2013 was sent on 1 July.
Police recruitment 2 Question No: 2013/2509 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1489 / 2013 repeated as Question No: 2059 / 2013 'How much of a pay cut will an experienced PCSO take if he or she becomes a probationary new police constable?' The Mayor Information relating to the pay and conditions of Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Police Constables (PCs) and Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) is available on the MPS careers website. www.metpolicecareers.co.uk/newconstable/pay_and_benefits.html The exact salary of a PCSO depends on a variety of factors but basic salary ranges from £20,874 to £24,015. There is also a location allowance depending on which zone is being worked in - this is currently £3,466 (inner zone) or £1,883 (outer zone). All new police constables in the MPS, will receive a basic starting salary of £22,000 per annum. However, in addition to basic salary, all Metropolitan Police officers receive London weighting and allowances currently amounting to approximately £6,500.
Page 112 Camden Police Numbers 1 Question No: 2013/2510 Andrew Dismore As of 31st may 2013, how many full time sworn police officers were there in Camden; how many special constables; how many PCSOs; how many sergeants; how many non PCSO civilian staff were there; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 31st may 2012; and what do you expects the figures to be on 31st may 2014?'
The Mayor
The strengths for the relevant dates are set out in the table below:
01 May 31 May 31 May 31 May Employee Group 2010 2012 2013 2014 Police Officers 886.76 786.67 716.99 Sergeants 135.16 124.79 109.26 PCSOs 123.20 74.62 62.68 Not Available MSC 180.00 268.00 207.00 Police Staff 164.04 119.23 72.12 The figures for 31 May 2014 are not yet available.
Camden Police Numbers 2 Question No: 2013/2511 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1486 / 2013 repeated as Question No: 2054 / 2013 ' As of 31st March 2013, what were the strength of each of the SNTs in Camden, broken down by officer ranks and types; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 31st January 2012; and what he expects the figures to be on 31st March 2014?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The table below shows the strengths of Sergeants, Constable and PCSOs in Camden the Safer Neighbourhood Teams at 01 May 2010, 31 January 2012 and 31 March 2013. At present we have no confirmed target strengths for 2014. We remain committed to protecting police officer numbers together with frontline delivery, but Police Officer numbers by borough will be affected by a range of factors, including recruitment timescales. However, under the Local Policing Model, Camden will have 751 police officer posts overall by 2015 with 157 officers in Safer Neighbourhood teams.
Page 113 Camden Police Numbers 3 Question No: 2013/2512 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2055 / 2013 'As of 30th April 2013, how many full time sworn police officers were there in Camden; how many special constables; how many PCSOs; how many sergeants; how many non PCSO civilian staff were there; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 30th April 2012; and what do you expects the figures to be on 30th April 2014?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved: My response to MQ 2055/ 2013 was sent on 9 July 2013.
Camden Police Numbers 4 Question No: 2013/2513 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No 2056 / 2013 'As of 30th April 2013, what were the strength of each of the SNTs in Camden, broken down by officer ranks and types; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 30th April 2012; and what he expects the figures to be on 30th April 2014?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The table below shows the strengths of Sergeants, Constable and PCSOs in Camden the Safer Neighbourhood Teams at 01 May 2010, 30 April 2012 and 30 April 2013. At present we have no confirmed target strengths for 2014. We remain committed to protecting police officer numbers together with frontline delivery, but Police Officer numbers by borough will be affected by a range of factors, including recruitment timescales. However, under the Local Policing Model, Camden will have 751 police officer posts overall by 2015 with 157 officers in Safer Neighbourhood teams.
Page 114 New policing model Question No: 2013/2514 Andrew Dismore When you answered Question No: 2060/2013 which repeated Question No: 1490 / 2013 'Under the new policing model shift pattern, what percentage of officers allocated to the new ward clusters will be on duty at any one time when they are in operation, allowing for scheduled leave, sickness, training and any other pre-arranged absences?', you failed to specify what percentage of officers would be on duty. From your answer, the figure can be calculated to be 20% is this correct? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. Please see my response to MQ 3071 /2013.
Barnet Police Numbers 1 Question No: 2013/2515 Andrew Dismore As of 31st May 2013, how many full time sworn police officers were there in Barnet; how many special constables; how many PCSOs; how many sergeants; how many non PCSO civilian staff were there; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 31st May 2012; and what do you expects the figures to be on 31st May 2014?'
The Mayor
The strengths for the relevant dates are set out in the table below:
01 May 31 May 31 May 31 May Employee Group 2010 2012 2013 2014 Police Officers 595.18 536.85 547.26 Sergeants 98.73 90.48 82.68 PCSOs 176.76 99.75 87.58 Not Available MSC 133.00 156.00 157.00 Police Staff 105.28 87.04 69.90 The figures for 31 May 2014 are not yet available.
Page 115 Barnet Police Numbers 2 Question No: 2013/2516 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 1484 / 2013 repeated as Question No: 2050 / 2013 'As of 31st March 2013, what were the strength of each of the SNTs in Barnet, broken down by officer ranks and types; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 31st March 2012; and what he expects the figures to be on 31st March 2014?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The table below shows the strengths of Sergeants, Constable and PCSOs in Barnet the Safer Neighbourhood Teams at 01 May 2010, 31 March 2012 and 31 March 2013. At present we have no confirmed target strengths for 2014. We remain committed to protecting police officer numbers together with frontline delivery, but Police Officer numbers by borough will be affected by a range of factors, including recruitment timescales. However, under the Local Policing Model, Barnet will have 564 police officer posts overall by 2015 with 135 officers in Safer Neighbourhood teams.
Barnet Police Numbers 3 Question No: 2013/2517 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No 2051 / 2013 'As of 30th April 2013, what were the strength of each of the SNTs in Barnet, broken down by officer ranks and types; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 30th April 2012; and what do you expect the figures to be on 30th April 2014? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The table below shows the strengths of Sergeants, Constable and PCSOs in Barnet the Safer Neighbourhood Teams at 01 May 2010, 30 April 2012 and 30 April 2013. At present we have no confirmed target strengths for 2014. We remain committed to protecting police officer numbers together with frontline delivery, but Police Officer numbers by borough will be affected by a range of factors, including recruitment timescales. However, under the Local Policing Model, Barnet will have 564 police officer posts overall by 2015 with 135 officers in Safer Neighbourhood teams.
Page 116 Barnet Police Numbers 4 Question No: 2013/2518 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2052 / 2013 'As of 30th April 2013, how many full time sworn police officers were there in Barnet; how many special constables; how many PCSOs; how many sergeants; how many non PCSO civilian staff were there; what were the comparable figures for 1st May 2010, and 30th April 2012; and what do you expects the figures to be on 30th April 2014?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQ 2052 /2013 was sent on 9 July 2013.
Race claims against the police Question No: 2013/2519 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 532/ 2013 from February repeated as Question No: 2043 / 2013, 'How much compensation has the Metropolitan Police paid in respect of race claims in each of the last 3 years in respect of each of i) claims settled out for court, ii) as a result of court awards, iii) as a consequence of tribunal claims; to a) members of the public; and b) Metropolitan Police staff c) police officers d) PCSOs ; and in relation to each of these categories, how many cases were involved?' Your answer to Question No: 1480 / 2013 in similar terms to this was yet again 'Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.' Is a wait for an answer from February to now 'shortly'? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 532 / 2013.
Cyprus Demonstration 14/7/13 1 Question No: 2013/2520 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2044 / 2013 'Is it correct that the Cypriot community is being charged £5,000 to hold their annual demonstration from the Turkish embassy to Trafalgar Square to protest against the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus? If so, why? Do you agree that this is an unfair restriction on the right to protest?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQ 2044 /2013 was sent on 24 July 2013.
Page 117 Cyprus Demonstration 14/7/13 2 Question No: 2013/2521 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2045 / 2013,'Is it correct that the Cypriot community has been told that their annual demonstration from the Turkish embassy to Trafalgar Square to protest against the Turkish occupation of northern Cyprus will not be policed? If so, why? Do you agree that this is an unfair restriction on the right to protest?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 02 September 2013 Please see my response to MQ 2045 / 2013 which has now been answered.
Charging for demonstrations 1 Question No: 2013/2522 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2046 / 2013 'How many demonstrations have been charged a fee in the last 12 months, and how many have not?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQ 2046 /2013 was sent on 24 July 2013.
Charging for demonstrations 2 Question No: 2013/2523 Andrew Dismore When will you answer substantively Question No: 2047 / 2013 'What is your policy towards charging the organisers of demonstrations for the privilege of protesting in London?' The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response recieved 26/07/13: My response to MQ 2047 /2013 was sent on 24 July 2013.
Ospre Exams (1) Question No: 2013/2524 Andrew Dismore For how long is a police officer qualified to apply for promotion to sergeant after passing the Ospre Examination process to become a sergeant? The Mayor A Police Officer is qualified to apply for promotion to sergeant for five years from the date of passing the Ospre Examination.
Page 118 Ospre Exams (2) Question No: 2013/2525 Andrew Dismore How many police officers who have passed the Ospre Examination process to become sergeants will see their qualifications lapse in 2014/15 and 2015/16? The Mayor Assuming that no promotion processes are run during this period the number of police officers who have passed the Ospre Examination process to become sergeants and who would see their qualifications lapse is: 542 in 2014 928 in 2015 680 in 2016
Ospre Exams (3) Question No: 2013/2526 Andrew Dismore For how long is an officer qualified to apply for promotion to Inspector after passing the Ospre Examination process to become an Inspector? The Mayor A Police Officer is qualified to apply for promotion to inspector for five years from the date of passing the Ospre Examination.
Ospre Exams (4) Question No: 2013/2527 Andrew Dismore How many officers who have passed the Ospre Examination process to become Inspectors will see their qualifications lapse in 2014/15 and 2015/16? The Mayor Assuming that no promotion processes are run during this period then the number of police officers who have passed the Ospre Examination process to become Inspectors and who would see their qualifications lapse is: 252 in 2014 197 in 2015 242 in 2016
Page 119 202 Bus Service Question No: 2013/2528 Len Duvall Some of my constituents have noticed that bus service 202, from Blackheath to Crystal Palace via Catford and Sydenham - which is usually a single deck bus - is sometimes operated using double deck vehicles in the late evenings and at weekends. This is very well received, however, given that some constituents have mentioned that they have been left behind at bus stops during peak times, (especially during the morning with children accessing the various schools in Sydenham), because the single deck buses are full, I have been asked to find out why double deck buses cannot be used on this route at more appropriate times? The Mayor There are occasions when double deck vehicles are allocated at weekends owing to higher than usual demand on the route. For example, the 'Race For Life' and the London Marathon see heavy demand in the Blackheath area. These double deck vehicles would be used on other routes during the week, but as fewer are required on those routes at weekends they are available for route 202 if required. Whilst TfL consider that the single deck vehicles on the 202 are generally sufficient to carry the loads, they are happy to investigate the issue raised by your constituents further. Could you please provide TfL with more information about where, when and in what direction the problems identified in Sydenham occur.
Green Belt (1) Question No: 2013/2529 Nicky Gavron The London Plan says that inappropriate development on Green Belt and Metropolitan Open Land should be refused 'except in very special circumstances'. Can you please explain what circumstances constitute 'special' when considering these applications? The Mayor Every application has to be determined on its individual merits and considered against the policies in my London Plan.
Green Belt (2) Question No: 2013/2530 Nicky Gavron Secretary of State Eric Pickles rejected a planning application for residential development in Castle Point Borough Council local authority area because the proposed homes were on Green Belt land, despite recognising the area's 'severe lack' of housing land supply. Do you agree that even a severe lack of housing land supply is not sufficient justification for building on Green Belt? The Mayor Each case must be judged on its merits. The Secretary of State's own decisions on applications for housing development in the Green Belt, some of which he has approved and some rejected, demonstrate that such generalisations cannot be made.
Page 120 Safeguarded Wharves Question No: 2013/2531 Nicky Gavron Has the planning team held any pre-planning application advice meetings regarding prospective development on any sites listed as a Safeguarded Wharf in the 2005 document Safeguarded Wharves in the Safeguarded Wharves on the River Thames: London Plan Implementation Report? If so with regards to which site? The Mayor Yes. Formal pre-application meetings have in recent years taken place affecting the following Safeguarded Wharves: Hurlingham Wharf, Swedish Wharf, Cremorne Wharf and Convoy's Wharf.
Basement development Question No: 2013/2532 Nicky Gavron What are your thoughts on the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea's move to restrict the size of basement development in the borough? The Mayor I am supportive of the boroughs developing local planning approaches to the development of basements to address local environmental conditions.
Comprehensive Spending R eview Question No: 2013/2533 Nicky Gavron What actions will you take to mitigate the impact on local services of the government's proposed further 10 per cent cut to local authorities? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. It is not yet clear that the impact of the Spending Review will be to reduce local authorities grant funding in 2015-16 by 10 per cent, as the Government is intending to transfer around £3.8 billion of NHS resources to local government. I will continue to stand up for London by presenting the case to Government and internationally that the city is the world's destination for investment, tourism and talent and plan for London's future by lobbying for the recommendations of the London Finance Commission and the 2020 Vision, to help meet the challenges of tomorrow's infrastructure.
Page 121 Neighbourhood forums Question No: 2013/2534 Nicky Gavron As of May 2012, only twelve neighbourhood forums had been designated in London, and 23 others had pending designation applications. Are you satisfied with the progress of neighbourhood planning in London? The Mayor Whilst I support the principle of Localism, it is entirely a matter for local determination as to whether applications are made to the local authority for designation. In some parts of London there has been good progress on the formation of neighbourhood fora. I understand that although only 12 have been designated, another 23 have submitted applications and another 37 groups have expressed an interest. It is early days in establishing what is an innovative planning mechanism and I will monitor its progress with interest.
Earls Court (1) Question No: 2013/2535 Nicky Gavron You recently waved through the planned redevelopment of Earls Court despite the lack of an economic impact assessment of the loss of exhibition space and before the publication of a pending report from Transport for London (TfL) on the relocation of the Lillie Bridge Depot. Do you think it is appropriate to make important planning decisions before all the facts are in? The Mayor I gave due regarded weight to all relevant material planning considerations in making my planning decision.
Earl 's Court (2) Question No: 2013/2536 Nicky Gavron A constituent has contacted me about your decision re Earl's Court and has called your decision 'appalling'. Perhaps you could explain the reasoning behind your decision to local residents, some of whom are very upset by what is happening. The Mayor The reasons for my decision are set out in the associated report PDU/2780/02 & PDU/2781/02.
Page 122 MOPAC responses to Assembly Questions Question No: 2013/2537 Joanne McCartney Do you think it's reasonable that of the 22 questions I asked you about policing last month you only answered 5 on time? What processes are you putting in place to ensure a better performance? The Mayor I apologise for the delay in responding to your questions. Given the importance of Mayor's questions (MQs), the complexity of the questions and the significant time constraints involved MOPAC continuously keeps its MQ process under review. Delays are often caused because MOPAC does not hold the data required to respond to the vast majority of the questions put to it and has to rely on other parties such as the Metropolitan Police Service in order to respond. We recognise that MOPAC's MQ turnaround times in June were not good enough. We also note that Assembly Members have the ability to provide their questions one week in advance of the usual deadlines, giving functional bodies more time to answer them.
Safer Neighbourhood Teams Question No: 2013/2538 Joanne McCartney Can you please provide a list of PC and Sergeant target strength, actual strength and vacancy levels per Borough for May 2013 for London's Safer Neighbourhood Teams?
The Mayor
The table below sets out the target* and actual strengths at 31 May 2013 for the Safer Neighbourhood Teams across London.
Rank Tar get Strength Actual Strength 31 May 2013 Vacancies Sergeants 487 380 -107 Constables 1260 1,402 +142 PCSOs 1,260 1,717 +457 *NB - The targets are those prior to the implementation of the Local Policing Model (LPM) whilst the actual strength reflects the gradual transition to the LPM with new Neighbourhood Policing structures. Information is taken from the MPS corporate HR system. Details of individual SNTs are provided in the spreadsheet attached as Appendix 1. Lambeth borough has been piloting a new model of response policing. This model incorporates the SNTs and it is not possible to separate out sergeants. Consequently, the HR records show no Sergeants attached to SNTs in Lambeth compared to the target of 21.
Page 123 Police Officer Turnover Question No: 2013/2539 Joanne McCartney Please give the level of police officer turnover of the MPS for 2010/11, 2011/12 and 2012/13? The Mayor Police Officer turnover, i.e. Full Time Equivalents (FTE) departing the MPS, in the last three years has been: 2010/11 1,355 2011/12 1,641 2012/13 1,891
Contact Points (1) Question No: 2013/2540 Joanne McCartney Please list all of the contact points that have been agreed across London, broken down by Borough. The Mayor Details of all the confirmed contact points can be found in the public access documentation for each borough on the MOPAC website. Future potential contact points are currently being explored at a borough level.
Contact Points (2) Question No: 2013/2541 Joanne McCartney What is the cost to the MPS so far of the contact points that have been agreed across London? The Mayor Written response from the Mayor For the contact points set up to date (all in MOPAC owned or leased properties), no additional cost has been incurred with the exception of signage installation. The cost for signage can be confirmed for the whole LPM model following go live of Tranche Two. Costs for those contact points that will be established in partner accommodation may vary from those in MOPAC properties; however, we expect costs to be minimal.
Page 124 Contact Points (3) Question No: 2013/2542 Joanne McCartney You have stated that 'the individual cost of contact points is dependent on a number of factors and will vary from location to location'. Please list the individual costs of the Contact Points agreed so far. The Mayor Written response from the Mayor For the contact points set up to date (all in MOPAC owned or leased properties), no additional cost has been incurred with the exception of signage installation. The cost for signage can be confirmed for the whole LPM model following go live of Tranche Two. Costs for those contact points that will be established in partner accommodation may vary from those in MOPAC properties; however, we expect costs to be minimal.
Cost of b ecoming a police officer (1) Question No: 2013/2543 Joanne McCartney What is the estimated cost to a candidate to become a fully qualified Police Constable? Please provide a breakdown of how you arrive at this estimate. The Mayor Written response from the Mayor New Police Constables are required to obtain a pre-joining qualification called the Certificate in Knowledge of Policing (CKP).The cost of the CKP varies from £800 to £1,000, depending on the chosen provider. Other costs associated with uniform provision and training following successful applications are covered by the MPS. The MPS is currently doing some work to determine whether the cost of the course is a barrier to entry that needs to be addressed, and if so, what financial support might be feasible to ensure those from low-income backgrounds are not put off applying. I committed in my manifesto to work with the MPS Commissioner to create a police force that looks more like London. For the MPS to be at its strongest, it must reflect, and be fully accepted by, the population it seeks to serve.
Cost of becoming a police officer (2) Question No: 2013/2544 Joanne McCartney On average how much does it cost the MPS to train a new recruit to become a fully qualified police officer? The Mayor The average cost of training a new recruit is £2,124.00 (excluding wages, uniform, accommodation, equipment etc)
Page 125 Certificate of Policing - Gender and Ethnicity Question No: 2013/2545 Joanne McCartney Please provide a breakdown of the gender and ethnicity of candidates who have sat the exams for the Certificate of Policing so far. The Mayor The College of Policing operates an Approved Provider Scheme for providers of the Certificate in Knowledge of Policing. From September 2013 all providers registered with the scheme will be required to provide data about the candidate profile in compliance with the Equality Act 2010.
Gender and Ethnicity of New Recruits Question No: 2013/2546 Joanne McCartney Please provide the figures for 2013/14 so far for new recruits broken down by gender and by ethnicity. The Mayor The latest figures (30 June 2013) show 639 new recruits have joined the MPS since 01 April 2013. These numbers include 223 (34.9%) female officers and 99 (15.5%) BME officers. The MPS is about to embark on a significant programme of recruitment. I have asked Ray Lewis to form a taskforce to develop sustainable and creative initiatives aimed at increasing the diversity of MPS police officers.
Exams for promo tion Question No: 2013/2547 Joanne McCartney What criteria to the MPS apply in allowing a candidate sit the Ospre exams for promotion to sergeant? The Mayor Admission to the OSPRE Part I examination for promotion to the rank of sergeant is currently restricted to constables who by the date of the examination must: Have completed two years service. Have been confirmed in their appointment as a substantive constable. Do not currently hold a valid OSPRE part 1 pass. Have had their line manager certify, in their PDR for the reporting year ending 31 March (i.e. in the year in which they apply to sit the exam), that they are competent in their current rank i.e. have achieved an overall box marking of 3 or higher. If this authority is not given or is withdrawn the officer will not be entered into the examination. Have met the MPS Attendance Management Criteria Have no live written improvement notices issued under the Police (Performance) Regulations) 2008 or reduction in rank under those procedures in the previous 18 months. Have no live written warning, final written warning or extended final written warning issued under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2008.
Page 126 Knife Crime (1) Question No: 2013/2548 Joanne McCartney Please provide data on the amount of victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure, by Borough, by Age Group and by Financial Year from 2008/9 to 2012/13. The Mayor Appendix 2 provides data on the amount of victims of crime where a knife was used to injure by borough from 2008 - 2013. The data sets in MQ 2548, 2549, 2553 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQs 2550, 2551, 2552. A comparison between the victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure with the perpetrators of knife crime where a knife was used to injure would not provide robust outcome.
Knife Crime (2) Question No: 2013/2549 Joanne McCartney Please provide data on the amount of victims of Knife Crime where Knife was used to Injure, by Borough and by Age Group For the period February 2012 to date. The Mayor The attached tables in Appendix 3 provide data on the amount of victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure by borough and age group covering the period from February 2012 to date. The data sets in MQ 2548, 2549, 2553 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQs 2550, 2551, 2552. A comparison between the victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure with the perpetrators of knife crime where a knife was used to injure would not provide robust outcome.
Knife Crime (3) Question No: 2013/2550 Joanne McCartney Please provide data on the amount of perpetrators of knife crime where a knife was used to injure, by Borough, by Age Group and by Financial Year from 2008/9 to 2012/13. The Mayor MPS records show that the following numbers of people were proceeded against for knife crime where a knife was used to injure. The data provides information on 'people proceeded against' only, namely those individuals who have been accused of an offence and proceeded against resulting in a detection (i.e.: charge, summons, fixed penalty notice, taken into consideration or caution.) The data sets in MQ 2548, 2549, 2553 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQs 2550, 2551, 2552. A comparison between the victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure with the perpetrators of knife crime where a knife was used to injure would not provide robust outcome. For example, a perpetrator can be proceeded against for multiple offences but would only be counted once. The following data in Appendix 4 is by borough, financial years and age group.
Page 127 Knife Crime (4) Question No: 2013/2551 Joanne McCartney Please provide data on the amount of perpetrators of Knife Crime where Knife was used to Injure, by Borough and by Age Group For the period February 2012 to date. The Mayor MPS records show that the following numbers of people were proceeded against from the period February 2012 to date for knife crime where a knife was used to injure. The data provides information on 'people proceeded against' only, namely those individuals who have been accused of an offence and proceeded against resulting in a detection (i.e.: charge, summons, fixed penalty notice, taken into consideration or caution.) The data sets in MQ 2548, 2549, 2553 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQs 2550, 2551, 2552. A comparison between the victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure with the perpetrators of knife crime where a knife was used to injure would not provide robust outcome. For example, a perpetrator can be proceeded against for multiple offences but would only be counted once. The following data in Appendix 5 is by borough, financial years and age group.
Knife Crime (5) Question No: 2013/2552 Joanne McCartney Please provide a breakdown of the number of victims of knife crime broken down by month and year and injury class from Jan 2010 to date.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
The table below shows the number of victims of knife crime in the period 1st January 2010 - 30th June 2013. The data is by year, month and injury class of the victim.
Knife crime potentially encompasses a very broad range of offences and this causes problems in both the definition and determination of its prevalence. Whilst the data in the table captures crime where the perpetrator was in possession of a knife, it may not be the case that the possession of the knife was the direct cause of the injury sustained by the victim.
Broken down by Financial Year:
Page 128 Knife Crime (6) Question No: 2013/2553 Joanne McCartney Please provide a breakdown of the number of perpetrators of knife crime broken down by month and year and injury class from Jan 2010 to date. The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 MPS records show that the following numbers of people were proceeded against in the period January 2010 - June 2013. The data provides information on people proceeded against (PPA) only, namely those individuals who have been accused of an offence and proceeded against resulting in a detection (i.e.: charge, summons, fixed penalty notice, taken into consideration or caution.) We are unable to provide the injury class as the injury class belongs to the victim, and not the PPA. There can be multiple victims and PPA on a single record, and there is no way of linking a specific PPA to a specific victim, and thus the injury that they have caused. The data sets in MQ 2548, 2549, 2553 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQs 2550, 2551, 2552. A comparison between the number of victims of knife crime with the perpetrators of knife crime would not provide robust outcome. For example, a perpetrator can be proceeded against for multiple offences but would only be counted once. In addition, knife crime potentially encompasses a very broad range of offences and this causes problems in both the definition and determination of its prevalence. Whilst the data in the table captures crime where the perpetrator was in possession of a knife, it may not be the case that the possession of the knife was the direct cause of the injury sustained by the victim.
Serious Youth Violence (1) Question No: 2013/2554 Joanne McCartney Please provide a breakdown of Serious Youth Violence perpetrators by Borough and Age Group for financial year 2011/12 and 2012/13 The Mayor MPS data indicates that the following numbers of people have been proceeded against* for Serious Youth Violence in the period 1st April 2011 - 31st March 2013. The data provides information on 'people proceeded against' only, namely those individuals who have been accused of an offence and proceeded against, resulting in a detection (ie: charge, summons, fixed penalty notice, taken into consideration or caution.) The data sets in MQ 2554 are irreconcilable with the data sets in MQ 2555 and therefore a comparison between the victims of Serious Youth Violence with the perpetrators of Serious Youth Violence would not provide robust outcome. For example, a perpetrator of Serious Youth Violence could be proceeded against for multiple offences but would only be counted once in this table. This data in Appendix 6 is displayed by borough, financial year and age group of the person proceeded against.
Page 129 Serious Youth Violence (2) Question No: 2013/2555 Joanne McCartney Please provide a breakdown of Serious Youth Violence victims by Borough and Age Group for financial year 2011/12 and 2012/13 The Mayor The following table provides data on the number of victims of Serious Youth Violence for the period 1st April 2011 - 31st March 2013. The definition for Serious Youth Violence used by the MPS is as follows: 'Any offence of most serious violence or weapon enabled crime, where the victim is aged 1-19.' The data below is by borough, financial year and by age group of the victim.
MOPAC Datastor e- Definitions Question No: 2013/2556 Joanne McCartney Please provide a definition for each of the crime categories listed on London Datastore. 'Metropolitan Police Service Recorded Crime Figures and Associated Data'. Please include the crime types included in the categories, whether the figures refer to victims or perpetrators and any other relevant information. The Mayor A list of definitions will be published on the London Datastore by the end of July 2013.
Use of Regulation A19 Question No: 2013/2557 Joanne McCartney Is the Metropolitan Police Service considering invoking regulation A19 which compels officers over 30 years' service to retire? The Mayor MOPAC and the MPS has decided not to invoke Regulation A19 at this time.
Effect of Regulation A19 on MPS Question No: 2013/2558 Joanne McCartney If the Metropolitan Police Service were to invoke regulation A19, how many officers would be forced to retire? Please detail numbers and rank. The Mayor MOPAC and the MPS has decided not to invoke Regulation A19 at this time.
Page 130 Police vehicles Question No: 2013/2559 Joanne McCartney What is the average time a police vehicle is unavailable due to routine maintenance/servicing? The Mayor On average a vehicle is in the workshop 22 days per year for maintenance.
Mayor 's Mentoring Scheme (1) Question No: 2013/2560 Joanne McCartney How many mentors have now been trained and are ready for pairing with young people? The Mayor As of March 31st 2013, 443 mentors have been recruited, vetted and trained for participation in the Mayor's Mentoring Programme. The validated figures for the first quarter of this financial year will be available in August.
Mayor 's Mentoring Scheme (2) Question No: 2013/2561 Joanne McCartney How many pairings between mentors and young boys have now been made? The Mayor As of March 31st 2013, 274 boys had been successfully matched with fully vetted and trained mentors. The validated figures for the first quarter of this financial year will be available in August.
Mayor 's Mentoring Scheme (3 ) Question No: 2013/2562 Joanne McCartney How many pairings between mentors and young boys have been unsuccessful? The Mayor The relationship between mentor and mentee is defined as a match after an agreement between both parties to meet on a regular basis is secured. Thereafter these matches are monitored at six and twelve months. It is too early in the programme to draw conclusive attrition rates.
Page 131 Mayor 's Mentoring Scheme (4) Question No: 2013/2563 Joanne McCartney How many young boys have been referred to the Mayor's Mentoring Scheme? The Mayor As of March 31st 2013, 490 young boys had been referred to the Mayor's Mentoring Programme. The validated figures for the first quarter of this financial year will be available in August.
Mayor 's Mentoring Sch eme in Haringey Question No: 2013/2564 Joanne McCartney Can you please provide me with an update regarding the establishment of the Mayor's Mentoring Scheme in Haringey, including how many mentoring pairings have been made? The Mayor There are currently two delivery partners for the Mayor's Mentoring Programme in the borough of Haringey; the Tottenham Hotspurs Foundation and Kori, (a local grass-roots organisation specialising is supporting young people and children). To date, there are 50 mentoring relationships underway in the borough; validated figures for the first quarter of this financial year will be available in August.
Funerals of Police Officers Question No: 2013/2565 Joanne McCartney When a member of the armed services is killed in the service of their country, quite rightly, the MOD pays for the funeral but when a police officer is murdered on duty serving the people of London the funeral expenses are paid for by the Police Federation out of the officers own subscriptions. Do you agree that this arrangement should be reassessed? The Mayor The MPS is currently considering whether it would be appropriate to have in place a more formal process for dealing with this most sensitive of issues.
Page 132 Incinerators Question No: 2013/2566 Murad Qureshi In your oral answer to Nicky Gavron's Question about incineration on 19th June you stated 'I am not opposed to incineration per se'. However your waste strategy states that incineration without energy recovery should be the very last resort. Could you please clarify your policy on waste incineration in the capital? The Mayor I have taken an outcome-based approach instead of prescribing specific waste management technologies. I want facilities generating energy from London's waste to be no more polluting in carbon terms than the energy source that they are displacing. This will typically rule out traditional mass burn incinerators burning mixed untreated waste generating electricity only, but may allow for incineration of non-recyclable waste generating both heat and power. My approach supports technologies including anaerobic digestion and gasification that can achieve high efficiencies and greater fuel flexibility over incineration.
Adverse effect of Heathrow on London boroughs Question No: 2013/2567 Murad Qureshi How many households are affected by aircraft noise emanating from the Heathrow flight paths in each London borough? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. The 'Strategic Noise Maps for Heathrow Airport 2011' report (Environmental Research and Consultancy Department of the Civil Aviation Authority on behalf of the Department for Transport, June 2013) show 766,100 people and approximately 330,000 households exposed to aircraft noise of 55 dB Lden and above. The Report does not show the information by borough. TfL estimates that the approximate distribution of population and households by London Borough within the Heathrow 2011 55 dB Lden noise contour to be: LB of Hounslow 24.2% LB of Richmond upon Thames 15.7% LB of Wandsworth 14.5% LB of Lambeth 10.7% LB of Hammersmith & Fulham 9.3% LB of Ealing 3.7% LB of Kensington and Chelsea 2.1% LB of Hillingdon 1.2% LB of Southwark 0.1% The remaining 18 per cent are in the civil administrations outside of London, in Bracknell Forest, Runnymede District, Slough, Spelthorne District, South Bucks and Windsor and Maidenhead.
Page 133 Cuts Question No: 2013/2568 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2113/2013, please outline from what sources the GLA environment team now receives from sources external to the GLA Budget. Please also outline how much money comes from each. The Mayor The figures below relate to confirmed budget expenditure for the financial year 2013/14. It does not include for example EU funding that has been agreed in principle but not yet confirmed. Also not included levered and match funding - if these were included the figures would be significantly higher.
Funding from Total Government £1,140,000.00 EU Funding £1,144,000.00 Private Sector/Other £200,000.00 Total £2,484,000.00
ECO Question No: 2013/2569 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2114/2013, can we therefore assume that no specific outputs have been agreed at any of these meetings? The Mayor The objective of these meetings was to develop working relationships with the 'big six' energy suppliers. The final output will be a consistent approach across all six suppliers for mutually maximising these relationships to deliver ECO in London.
Welfare reform Question No: 2013/2570 Murad Qureshi Will welfare reform in London lead to an increase in fuel poverty? The Mayor Welfare reform will lead to more people entering work. Taken with the Government reducing the tax burden on the lowest paid as the personal allowance is raised these measures will mean that fewer people are in danger of entering fuel poverty.
Page 134 Energy costs and TfL Question No: 2013/2571 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2116/2013, when will the TfL energy strategy be presented to the TfL board? The Mayor TfL expects to present details of the energy strategy to the Board early next year (2014) as part of the overall TfL corporate environment strategy.
Job losses in the insulation industry Question No: 2013/2572 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2121/2013, how many of these 40 jobs are jobs created and how many are jobs saved? The Mayor Of the 40 jobs, eight were new contracts.
London Energy Efficiency Fund Question No: 2013/2573 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2130/2013, can you confirm that this means only the one scheme has been awarded funding through the London Energy Efficiency Fund? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. We are working with LEEF to ensure the fund is fully deployed and are expecting further projects to be funded by the end of the year.
Energy Performance Certificate Question No: 2013/2574 Murad Qureshi With reference to your answer to question 2135/2013, can you confirm that no Energy Performance Certificates have been provided to homes visited through RE:NEW? The Mayor A number of boroughs (Barnet, Haringey and Enfield) chose to incorporate a requirement for Energy Performance Certificates into their RE:NEW delivery and 2,293 homes in these boroughs received Energy Performance Certificates.
Page 135 Green Deal Question No: 2013/2575 Murad Qureshi The Government highlighted what I consider the woeful performance of their flagship environmental programme, the Green Deal, in statistics published last week. How will the Mayor stop the Green Deal being a total disaster in London? The Mayor The Green Deal is successful where it leads to improved energy efficiency. Seventy-eight per cent of homes that received a Green Deal Advice Report, following a Green Deal assessment, said they had, were getting or would install energy efficiency measures; 10 per cent of the UK's Green Deal assessments so far have taken place in London. This is great progress after receiving just 6 per cent of all CERT measures and considering that London did not have a head start as one of DECC's seven Core Cities. While uptake of Green Deal finance packages has been slow, this is expected given that Green Deal is a completely new product and approach. I am developing approaches to stimulate further demand and uptake of energy efficiency measures this autumn.
London Mansion Tax Question No: 2013/2576 Murad Qureshi New York, a comparable city to London in many ways, levies a 1 per cent 'mansion tax' on properties over $2 million. Would you ever support any form of mansion tax in London? The Mayor No.
Land Valuation Tax better than Compulsory Orders Question No: 2013/2577 Murad Qureshi Do you agree with me that a Land Valuation Tax would be a better way to deter landlords from stock piling empty land sites and preferable to using compulsory purchasing orders to gain control of such sites in London? The Mayor The London Finance Commission report recommends that further assessment should be undertaken of the potential benefits and costs of new taxes such as those on undeveloped land as part of the wider reforms of property taxation advocated in its report. This assessment will be carried out in due course. As outlined in my 2020 Vision, I want to introduce a 'use it or lose it' planning permission for developers.
Page 136 Non -black, black cabs Question No: 2013/2578 Murad Qureshi Of the total stock of black cabs in London, how many are not actually black? The Mayor 9,076 of the current total of 22,138 licensed taxis are not black which equates to 41% of the licensed fleet.
Route 24 bus postcards Question No: 2013/2579 Murad Qureshi Can you confirm? 1. How many of these folding postcards have been issued? 2. In which geographical areas they have been distributed? 3. What has been the cost of producing and distributing them? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013 The recent mailing promoting the New Bus for London on Route 24 was sent to residents living within ¼ mile of the route via door drop method and distributed via venues in close proximity to the route such as shops, cafes, libraries and restaurants. In total, 141,000 postcards were produced. The design, production and distribution cost was £30,229. This includes 25 per cent of design and production costs shared across multiple formats and other promotional materials for the New Bus for route 24 and route 11. The postcard was designed, alongside other materials, to raise awareness and understanding of the features of the new bus and will be scaled back once the bus becomes more familiar to passengers and is introduced onto more routes.
Return of two -way traffic to Earls Court gyratory Question No: 2013/2580 Murad Qureshi Following the recent return of the Tottenham Hale gyratory to two-way traffic, with all the benefits this will bring, can we expect a similar return for the Earls Court gyratory? The Mayor While road gyratories, such as that at Earls Court, can help London's road network to operate reliably, they often have an unacceptably detrimental impact on the economic vitality and liveability of the town centres and the communities through which they pass.
In taking forward the recommendations of my Roads Task Force, TfL is reviewing a number of such locations and the feasibility of gyratory removal. The planning consent for the Earl's Court development presents an opportunity to review the road layout in that area, but it is too early to make any specific commitments at this stage about what may be achievable.
Page 137 Mayor 's Ambient Noise Strategy Question No: 2013/2581 Murad Qureshi The Mayor's Ambient Noise strategy will be ten years old in March 2014. When can Londoners expect you to review this critical issue for them? The Mayor
My Ambient Noise Strategy is not timetabled for review at the present time. As I set out in my answer to MQ 1129 / 2013 it is still fit for purpose.
Aircraft noise issues in Hounslow Question No: 2013/2582 Murad Qureshi In the recent Hounslow community consultation on Heathrow, 94 per cent of residents said that they wanted better noise mitigation measures and compensation packages. What are you doing to represent their interests? The Mayor I recognise the scale of the noise problem generated by Heathrow which is responsible for more than a quarter of all those in Europe who are exposed to aircraft noise (766,000 people according to the DfT's figures). Noise mitigation measures and compensation packages are the responsibility of Heathrow and subject to any planning conditions imposed by the planning authorities. I have pressed for a lower threshold for the compensation when: I responded to the Heathrow Airport consultation on noise mitigation schemes calling for this to be extended to more households. I responded to the Government's Draft Aviation Policy Framework stating that the current 57LAeq decibel contour as the level marking the onset of significant community annoyance should be reviewed and serious consideration given to establishing a new noise threshold based on the European standard of a 55Lden decibel contour, which also takes into account night time noise. This is lower than the current decibel contour operating at Heathrow. Minimising the number of people affected by aircraft noise is a priority when looking at where the UK should increase its aviation capacity. This is recognised in the Government's Aviation Policy Framework and the Airports Commission's sift criteria. This is why the only credible solution is to build a new hub airport away from densely populated areas. A new four runway hub airport in the Thames Estuary or at Stansted would affect a fraction of the number of people affected by Heathrow today, less than 5%.
Page 138 Air quality issues in Hounslow Question No: 2013/2583 Murad Qureshi In the recent Hounslow community consultation on Heathrow, over 70 per cent of the residents said they were concerned about poor air quality and high levels of pollution. What are you doing to represent their interests on these issues? The Mayor Improving London's air quality is a priority for me and since I was elected I have put in place an ambitious package of measures, including tighter Low Emission Zone standards, retiring the oldest, most polluting taxis and cleaning up the bus fleet. Together these measures have reduced emissions of NOx by 20 per cent and PM10 by 15 per cent since 2008. Through my Mayor's Air Quality Fund I have provided £450,000 to Hounslow and other West London boroughs for two projects. The first is to assess and identify potential mitigations for the air quality impacts along strategic West London corridors. The second will support the use and uptake of electric vehicles along the Great West Road by working with local businesses such as Glaxo SmithKline. One of the major sources of air pollution in the Hounslow area is caused by the operations of Heathrow Airport. Minimising the harmful impacts of aviation is a key objective of both the Government and the Airports Commission and this is one of the main reasons why I am calling for a new hub airport to be built to the East of London.
Turnham Green & the Piccadilly line Question No: 2013/2584 Murad Qureshi Piccadilly line trains stop at Turnham Green on Monday to Saturday until 0650; on Sundays to 0745; and after 2230 every evening. Why do Piccadilly line trains not stop at Turnham Green outside of these hours? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. I committed to have TfL look again at the rationale for the times during which the Piccadilly line stops at Turnham Green station, and the impact that any changes would have. TfL is doing that now and will be carrying out an engagement programme with customers and stakeholders later this summer.
Grosvenor Square Police Phone box Question No: 2013/2585 Murad Qureshi Are there any plans to reinstate the Grosvenor Square Police Phone box so that it can be used by the public? I recently came across this and it looked to be in a very poor state of repair. The Mayor At present there are no plans to re-instate the service from this phone box.
Page 139 New phase of modernisation on Piccadilly line Question No: 2013/2586 Murad Qureshi Following the recent Comprehensive Spending Review, what can users of the Piccadilly line in West London expect from the new phases of modernisation included in the London Underground approved capital programme? The Mayor The Piccadilly line upgrade is a key priority and I am very pleased that we are able to progress it as a result of the funding settlement. Piccadilly line customers will be the first to benefit from a new phase of upgrades for the Tube which will be delivered through a new, combined programme. The upgrade of the line will deliver much greater capacity (potentially around 50 per cent more) and a more reliable service through the introduction of new trains and a new signalling system. The trains will be the first of the 'next generation' of Tube trains with walk-through carriages, greater energy efficiency (and so generating less heat) and, for the first time on our deep Tube lines, air-conditioning. Feasibility and design work is now underway and following the Spending Review TfL is currently reviewing the whole of the Business Plan to confirm the investment plans. This will include reviewing details of the proposed timescales and phasing of the individual line upgrades.
New phase of modernisation on Bakerlo o line Question No: 2013/2587 Murad Qureshi Following the recent Comprehensive Spending Review, what can users of the Bakerloo line in North-West London expect with the new phases of modernisation included in London Underground approved capital programme? The Mayor I am very pleased with the six-year capital funding settlement. It will support the delivery of the Tube modernisation programme, including completion of the improvements currently underway (such as on the Metropolitan line which serves north-west London). It will also enable TfL to begin the next phase of Tube upgrades through a new, combined programme. The upgrade of the Bakerloo line will deliver greater capacity and a more reliable service through the introduction of new trains and a new signalling system. The trains will be the next generation of Tube trains specifically designed to operate in deep, smaller tunnels. They will have walk-through carriages and will be more energy efficient, generating less heat, making better use of space and including air-conditioning for the first time on a deep Tube line. TfL is reviewing its business plan following the Spending Review announcement including reviewing details of its investment plans, proposed timescales and phasing of the individual upgrades.
Page 140 Comprehensive Spending Review impact on River Action Plan Question No: 2013/2588 Murad Qureshi Following the recent Comprehensive Spending Review and assuming you now know the impact of this on TfL's investment programme, can you confirm the impact this will have on your Passenger River Action Plan? The Mayor I don't expect any impact on the River Action Plan as the Comprehensive Spending Review protected investment programmes.
Suicide Numbers on the tube (1) Question No: 2013/2589 Murad Qureshi Further to your answer to question 1638/2013, could you provide figures on the number of suicides occurring on the tube in the last ten years by a break up of Age, Sex and Ethnicity? The Mayor Of the 431 incidents over the past ten years detailed in my previous answer, 69 per cent involved men and 31 per cent involved women. TfL does not hold information on the age or ethnicity of the individuals involved. However, data on the Office for National Statistics' and Samaritans' websites gives information about overall suicide rates in the UK including by age. The relevant links are: http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/subnational-health4/suicides-in-the-united- kingdom/2011/stb-suicide-bulletin.html http://www.samaritans.org/support-us/why-support-samaritans/facts-and-figures-about- suicide.
Page 141 Suicide Numbers on the tube (2) Question No: 2013/2590 Murad Qureshi Can you list the Boroughs in which these tragedies took place? The Mayor The incidents identified in my answer to question 1638/2013 occurred at stations in the following London Boroughs and District Councils: Barking & Dagenham 9 Barnet 15 Brent 19 Camden 58 City of London 19 Ealing 12 Enfield 6 Hammersmith & Fulham 10 Hackney 1 Haringey 15 Harrow 22 Havering 2 Hillingdon 13 Hounslow 19 Islington 24 Kensington & Chelsea 18 Lambeth 14 Merton 5 Newham 16 Redbridge 13 Southwark 7 Tower Hamlets 22 Waltham Forest 4 Wandsworth 15 City of Westminster 66 Chiltern D.C 1 Epping Forest DC 4 Three Rivers D.C 2
Page 142 Ur gent work to prevent the increase of suicides on the tube Question No: 2013/2591 Murad Qureshi The statistics you provided me in your answer to question 1638/2013 shows that the number of suicides in London has increased in the last ten years. What measures do you have in place to reduce the number of suicides in London? The Mayor Clearly any suicide, on the Tube network or elsewhere, is one too many. The statistics show that, particularly over the past six years, the level of incidents has remained both low and relatively stable. TfL has taken and is planning a range of different measures to reduce the number of suicides and attempted suicides on the Tube. As explained in my earlier answer, TfL works closely with other agencies, including Network Rail, other train operating companies, the British Transport Police and the Samaritans, to help prevent and mitigate such incidents, including as part of the National Suicide Prevention Working Group. This group meets every four weeks and shares ideas and best practice. In conjunction with the Samaritans, TfL is developing a specific training package for staff to recognise the indications of somebody who may be about to attempt suicide and give staff confidence to intervene and move the person to a place of safety. It is also working to raise awareness of the Samaritans' help line services (e.g. through posters) and is undertaking site audits to identify potential mitigations. TfL's introductory and ongoing training for relevant staff also covers the issue of monitoring types of behaviour which could lead to such an incident. Someone standing close to the edge of a platform, in front of the yellow line, or who has been standing in the same place after the passage of a few trains might raise suspicions. Staff are encouraged to take action in such circumstances where it is safe and practical to do so and / or to report such suspicions if (for example in the case of a train operator) they cannot deal with it themselves. The British Transport Police currently detain about 400 people a year under the Mental Health Act where there are grounds to suspect that they represent a threat to themselves or others. In about 50% of attempted suicides the individuals have known mental health problems.
Citigen Combined Heat and Power Station Question No: 2013/2592 Murad Qureshi Has the Mayor's Environmental Adviser visited the Citigen Combined Heat and Power (CHP) station and district heating network in Smithfield? The Mayor No.
Page 143 Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation Question No: 2013/2593 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide a copy to the Assembly of the Memorandum of Understanding to be signed by the GLA and major energy suppliers in relation to the role out in London of the Green Deal and Energy Company Obligation (ECO)? What are both parties agreeing to deliver? Over what period will this Memorandum operate? How many energy suppliers have signed the Memorandum to date? The Mayor I am asking energy suppliers to help steer the delivery of my RE:NEW programme to ensure ECO is delivered efficiently and competitively in London. I am committed to developing and driving a pipeline of energy efficiency projects through my RE:NEW Support Team. This approach has support from all six suppliers. The precise wording of this agreement is in draft and will be made available by autumn 2013.
Energy security of supply study Question No: 2013/2594 Murad Qureshi In light of the energy regulator, Ofgem's comments last week on the increased potential for electricity blackouts in the next two years, will the Mayor commission an energy security of supply study for London, to include costs to London's businesses of interrupted power supply? The Mayor I am considering the value of such a study in the context of the Infrastructure and Investment Plan.
RE :FIT Framework Question No: 2013/2595 Murad Qureshi Who are the approved suppliers on the RE:FIT Framework? When was this Framework established? When will framework next be reviewed? The Mayor The RE:FIT Framework was established in January 2010 for 3 years. In Jan 2013 following a review of the programme the GLA re-procured the framework for a further 4 years. The current list of suppliers and information on the framework are available on the RE:FIT website: http://www.refit.org.uk/
Page 144 GLA publications Question No: 2013/2596 Murad Qureshi With reference to MQ 1149/2013 from March 2013 and 4248/2012 from December 2012 it is not clear if all Mayoral responses to Government consultations have been posted on the relevant sections of the GLA website. Have the issues raised in MQ 1149/2013 now been resolved? The Mayor The web team is working with teams across the GLA with the aim of creating as a single listing for government consultation responses on the website, if the number we respond to as an organisation warrants that. In the meantime, officers should be uploading any such responses under the 'publications' section of the relevant priority area. I have asked my Government Relations Team to remind teams that they need to do this.
Drain London Forum (1) Question No: 2013/2598 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on the work of the Drain London Forum and the Drain London sub-groups? Can the meeting minutes, agendas and all other papers from Forum meetings be published on the GLA website? Can the links to the two Drain London Forum newsletters on the GLA website be fixed? The Mayor The Drain London project has produced Surface Water Flood Risk Maps and a draft Surface Water Management Plan for every London Borough. The project has also instigated partnerships between boroughs which have significantly improved the level of understanding and co-ordination on flood risk management across London. In turn, these have led to over 30 projects being started to examine the causes, impacts and solutions to high surface water flood risk areas across London. I have asked officers to update the Drain London section on the website and this will make the Drain London Forum agendas and minutes publicly available. The sub-groups across London are led by boroughs so I cannot publish the details of all of these.
Drain London Forum (2) Question No: 2013/2599 Murad Qureshi Your London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy states that the The Drain London Forum will develop a surface water management plan for London by Winter 2011. Can you please provide an update on this? The Mayor The Drain London project has produced Surface Water Flood Risk Maps and a draft Surface Water Management Plan for every London borough. These were produced on time and achieved a significant budget saving, compared to each borough commissioning its own mapping. We are working with the Environment Agency, who is also working on flood risk maps, to make these publicly available by the end 2013.
Page 145 Drain London Forum (3) Question No: 2013/2600 Murad Qureshi Your London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy states that the Drain London Forum will create an online data portal to allow flood risk management partners to more effectively share information. Can you provide an update on how this portal has been operating to date? The Mayor The Drain London Portal is operational and over 100 officers of partner organisations have access to it. The Portal is to enable Flood Risk Management Authorities to view and share data easily, as such it is not publicly available.
Drain London Forum (4) Question No: 2013/2601 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on your commitment to work with the Drain London Forum to identify two communities at significant flood risk and work with them to develop bespoke community flood plans to build their capacity to manage flood risk? The Mayor My officers have been working with residents from Purley (LB Croydon) and Brackley Square (LB Redbridge). This has resulted in Purley residents establishing the flood warden scheme. LB Redbridge residents have identified a suite of priority actions and are implementing these including holding a public meeting on insurance issues this summer.
Surface water flood Question No: 2013/2602 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on your commitment to work with Thames Water and the Environment Agency to trial an intensive urban greening retrofitting pilot project to manage surface water flood risk? The Mayor 2 pilot projects are currently underway in Counters Creek (led by Thames Water) and Beckton (led by the Environment Agency). Options to delivery additional pilots are being explored.
Page 146 Critical infrastructure and vulnerable communities at flood risk Question No: 2013/2603 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on your commitment to work with the London Resilience Partnership and the London Climate Change Partnership to identify and prioritise critical infrastructure and vulnerable communities at flood risk? The Mayor Working with several partners, including the London Resilience Team, the Drain London Project has commissioned projects to examine flood risk in detail at a number of schools, hospitals, fire stations and other infrastructure sites which have been identified as having a high surface water flood risk. These projects are on-going at present and expected to be complete by April 2014. Drain London is also working with TfL and London Underground to assist in the assessment of transport assets with surface water flood risks. Drain London has supported work on community flood plans as covered by MQ2601/2013.
Water efficiency improvements Question No: 2013/2604 Murad Qureshi With reference to Action 4.2 of your 2011 London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy, can you detail how water efficiency improvements were integrated into the £5.6 million DECC funding you received for energy efficiency retrofitting programmes earlier this year? The Mayor The DECC funding was integrated into the RE:NEW programme as one of the funding streams that the delivery agents could access. Water measures were already being installed as part of RE:NEW.
Rainwater harvesting Question No: 2013/2605 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on your commitment to work with the London Sustainable Schools Forum to promote rainwater harvesting? How many schools have subsequently integrated rainwater harvesting systems as an output of this programme of activity? The Mayor Four London schools have installed rain water harvesting technology as part of the GLA's Water for Schools' Programme. The lessons learnt from this pilot have been applied to further schools joining the Water for Schools' Programme and other programmes.
Page 147 London -specific Drought Plan Question No: 2013/2606 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on whether the London Resilience Partnership has decided to develop a London-specific Drought Plan? The Mayor Each water company has a statutory duty to prepare their own drought plan. The aim of the proposed London-specific drought plan was to ensure better communication and co-ordination between London's four water companies to deliver a more coherent London-wide response. It was felt that with the Environment Agency convening a 'Water Resources in the South East' working group, which brings together all of the water companies in the South East to identify and deliver opportunities for joint working - including responding to droughts - the need for a London-specific plan was no longer necessary. The effectiveness of the WRSE working group was demonstrated by its response to last year's drought.
Climate change strategy Question No: 2013/2607 Murad Qureshi Action 5.1 of your London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy states that "The Mayor will work with partners to improve our understanding of how climate change will affect summer temperatures in the future, and to identify and prioritise areas of overheating risk and risk management options". In light of your personal article in the Daily Telegraph on 23 June 2013 'The weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end', will you now as Mayor be abandoning this commitment? The Mayor No.
Weather stations Question No: 2013/2608 Murad Qureshi Will the Mayor be commissioning his own weather projection data for London as a result of his condemnation of the work by the Met Office in his personal article in the Daily Telegraph on 23 June 2013 'The weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end'? The Mayor The London Climate Change Partnership has been working with the Met Office to undertake this work and will launch their report later this month.
Page 148 Urban heat island effect Question No: 2013/2609 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with partners to enhance 1,000 ha of green space by 2012 to help offset the urban heat island effect? The Mayor The Mayor's Climate Change Adaptation Strategy included a commitment to enhance 1,000ha of green space by 2012 to offset the urban heat island effect (and other benefits). The Mayor has directly supported the Help a London Park programme (325ha); Olympic Park (98ha); Dagenham Washlands (58ha) and Rainham Marshes (60ha) alongside many more smaller projects including Ladywell Fields (16ha) and Jubilee Gardens (1.75ha).The Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) has funded enhancements at, Barking Park (29ha), Raphael Park (17ha) and Markfield Park (8ha). Enhancement delivered by the programmes of individual London Boroughs has not been quantified, but the area is likely to exceed that of the Mayor and HLF supported projects.
New green roofs Question No: 2013/2610 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with partners to enable the delivery of 100,000m2 of new green roofs by 2012 (from 2008/09 baseline)? Can the Mayor develop a publicly-accessible online database of all buildings with green roofs and walls in London? The Mayor According to industry data, over 50,000m2 of green roofs were delivered in London in 2008. London Plan policies on Urban Greening (5.10) and Green Roofs (5.11) promote the installation of green roofs on new developments. We have not been provided with comprehensive London-wide data by industry and we have estimated that at least another 100,000m2 has been installed between 2008 and 2012. Once my officers have access to 2012 aerial imagery they should be able to verify these figures in the absence of industry data. Officers are currently developing a publicly-accessible interactive map to display known green roofs in London. It is envisaged that members of the public will be able to submit green roof data for inclusion in the map.
Page 149 Overheating in new developments Question No: 2013/2611 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with the Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers to publish design guidance for architects and developers to reduce the risk of overheating in new developments? How is use of this guidance being encouraged through the London Plan? The Mayor The design guidance is in the final stages of development and will be published by CIBSE under the heading 'Technical Manual 49' shortly. The publication was delayed by complications in licensing Met Office data.
Cavity wall insulation Question No: 2013/2612 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with social housing providers to test the relative benefits of cavity wall insulation in managing overheating? What did the results of these tests reveal? The Mayor My officers have been working with the University of Reading and University College London to understand the relative impacts of different forms of insulation through the year. This work included developing a building retrofit toolkit http://www.iesd.dmu.ac.uk/crew/ and working with CLG to review the training of Green Deal assessors to specifically consider overheating risk.
Cool roof technology Question No: 2013/2613 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with partners to assess and promote 'cool roof technology' in London to reduce demand for mechanical cooling? How many buildings in London are currently utilising cool roof technologies? The Mayor We have supported the EU CoolRoofs project, which established a case-study building in west London to examine the energy benefits of cool roof technology by measurement and simulation. Brunel University are now working to publish research on quantified summer benefits and winter disbenefits, which will influence our approach to cool roofs. It is not known how many buildings in London utilise cool roof technology since there is currently no method for recording this data.
Page 150 Heatwaves Question No: 2013/2614 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to review the best way to encourage a community-level response to heatwaves? The Mayor My Adaptation Strategy states that we will use the experiences and contacts gained from working with communities in helping them develop their own Community Flood Plans (CFP) to help them manage heatwaves. This work has begun, though the recent spate of cool summers has made promoting this risk to communities more difficult. The national heatwave plan also requires doctors and social care staff to identify heat-vulnerable residents and to develop processes to ensure that they are monitored and supported through hot weather.
Climate risk information Question No: 2013/2615 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to facilitate the provision of climate risk information to borough Health and Well Being Boards? Can information provided to the Boards be published online on the GLA website? The Mayor My officers are currently developing bespoke guidance on 7 environmental wider determinants of health for each of the 33 Health & Well Being Boards. The guidance will be published by the end of the year.
Health building Question No: 2013/2616 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his bid to the Technology Strategy Board for funding to retrofit a health building to improve its resilience to the impacts of extreme weather and climate change? The Mayor The London Climate Change Partnership, in collaboration with the GLA, developed a bid with St. Charles' Hospital for Technology Strategy Board funding. The bid was submitted but was ultimately unsuccessful.
Page 151 London Rivers Action Plan Question No: 2013/2617 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his work related to the London Rivers Action Plan? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor Since the launch of the River Action Plan in February this year, many of the actions are progressing through planning stages, however, achievements already include: The introduction of an enhanced Putney to Blackfriars river bus service; The launch of an official London River Services twitter feed; and The introduction of a new real-time information system for river bus services. Further work completed includes: Good progress in developing closer relationships with riparian boroughs and other key stakeholders; Design of new signage elements for the pilot piers of Westminster and Embankment piers; and Initial analysis of new cycle parking and Barclays Cycle Hire locations relevant to piers. If you would like a more detailed update TfL would be happy to speak to you about this.
Building regulations relating to climate resilience Question No: 2013/2618 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on his commitment to work with the insurance sector in calling for the government to amend building regulations to require buildings being rebuilt or renovated to be climate resilient? The Mayor My officers have worked with ClimateWise and the London Climate Change Partnership to promote the sustainable refurbishment of buildings following a flood to the insurance sector and my officers have lobbied CLG to encourage a supporting policy change to the planning system.
Page 152 Action plan for key climate risks Question No: 2013/2619 Murad Qureshi Has Transport for London developed a prioritised action plan for key climate risks, as set out in your London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy? The Mayor TfL has extreme weather resilience action plans for each business area. It has also reported to Defra on current and future climate change risks to its existing and planned assets and services, which can be found here: http://archive.defra.gov.uk/environment/climate/documents/adapt-reports/06road- rail/transport-london.pdf The report includes actions to address high temperatures, such as optimising service patterns to minimise trains halting in tunnels, air conditioned trains on sub-surface lines and specifications through its procurement contracts. It also considers other measures to mitigate flood risks and tidal surges. Whilst the Defra reporting process is currently pending consultation, TfL is continuing to prioritise actions to address key climate risks. This includes a recently announced comprehensive flood risk review of London Underground.
London Energy Efficiency Fund (1) Question No: 2013/2620 Murad Qureshi The Mayor launched the London Energy Efficiency Fund (LEEF) in a press release on 2 September 2011 stating that "Hundreds of public buildings in London including schools, libraries and hospitals are set to get a green makeover, with low cost loans from a new £100 million fund." How many schools, libraries and hospitals have benefited from the scheme to date? By what date must the £50m EU funding be spent by? The Mayor Funding is yet to be committed to any school, library or hospital; however, the project pipeline presented at LEEF's Advisory Committee Meeting in June 2013 included potential borrowers from such organisations. The £50 million EU funding must be paid to borrowers by 31 December 2015.
London Energy Efficiency Fund (2) Question No: 2013/2621 Murad Qureshi Will the Mayor commission an independent audit of the operation of the £100m London Energy Efficiency Fund (LEEF)? The Mayor No. The Fund is already subject to usual audit rules, and also the extra audits that relate to EU funds.
Page 153 London Was te and Recycling Board Question No: 2013/2622 Murad Qureshi Will the Mayor commission an independent audit of the operation of the London Waste and Recycling Board's (LWARB) £16 million Targeted Waste Infrastructure Fund? The Mayor No. The London Waste and Recycling Board has appointed KPMG as its internal auditors who have audited the Board's operational procedures for the past 4 years. The Board's annual accounts are audited by external auditors (The Audit Commission from 2008/9 to 2011/12 and Grant Thornton from 2012/13). All internal and external audits are reported to the Board's Audit Committee and are available on the Board's website. No issues of concern have been raised in any recent audits and I see no need for commissioning any further audit of the Board's operation.
Weather projection data for London Question No: 2013/2623 Murad Qureshi Will the Mayor be commissioning his own weather projection data for London as a result of his condemnation of the work by the Met Office in his personal article in the Daily Telegraph on 23 June 2013 'The weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end'? The Mayor No.
London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (1) Question No: 2013/2624 Murad Qureshi As a result of his personal article in the Daily Telegraph on 23 June 2013 'The weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end', has the Mayor not undermined the ground- breaking work undertaken by GLA officers and partner organisations such as the London Climate Change Partnership in developing the London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy? The Mayor No.
Page 154 London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (2) Question No: 2013/2625 Murad Qureshi How does the Mayor reconcile comments made in his personal article in the Daily Telegraph on 23 June 2013 'The weather prophets should be chucked in the deep end', and his own 2011 London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy statement that 'There will be years when summers are wetter, or winters are colder than the predicted trend. This does not mean that the climate change projections are wrong, or that efforts to reduce emissions are working, but it underlines the complexity and natural variability of the climate. Adaptation actions must allow for this variability'? The Mayor There is no contradiction and my article was not questioning the broad consensus on climate change but rather an observation on the general predictions of what was expected to happen to the UK's weather.
London Climate Change Adaptation Strat egy (3) Question No: 2013/2626 Murad Qureshi Will the Mayor be publishing an update to his 2011 London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy this summer alongside his stated commitment in MQ 1151/2013 to publish an update to his Climate Change Mitigation and Energy Strategy at that time? The Mayor I do not plan to publish a review of my adaptation strategy this summer.
London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy (4) Question No: 2013/2627 Murad Qureshi How much funding has the Mayor allocated in his 2013/14 budget to delivering the commitments set out in his 2011 London Climate Change Adaptation Strategy? The Mayor It should be noted that many, if not most, of the actions in the adaptation strategy are to be delivered by or with other partners. Projects receiving funding in this financial year that have adaptation benefits include: £145k from my programme budget towards projects that support actions in my adaptation strategy. £475k for Drain London surface water flood risk projects £6m over 2012-15 through my 'pocket' parks', street tree and Big Green Fund programmes (which contribute to actions 5.3, 5.4 and 5.5 in the strategy). £490k for London Underground to undertake a flood risk analysis.
Page 155 London Transport Emissions Action plan Question No: 2013/2628 Murad Qureshi Can the Mayor provide an update on progress made by Transport for London to develop a London Transport Emissions Action plan? The Mayor Building on the achievements of my first term, I am committed to continuing to improve air quality in London and recognise that different parts of the capital face different challenges. For this reason, I have asked TfL to prepare an Air Quality and Emissions Action Plan, with TfL reporting to me by the end of the year. The Ultra Low Emission Zone feasibility study forms part of this work.
Police public access point in Brentford Question No: 2013/2629 Murad Qureshi What are the projected annual revenue budgets for the public access points which will replace the front counter at Brentford Police station? The Mayor It is not possible at this stage to confirm the cost as we continue to explore options for contact points in Hounslow including Brentford.
Police public access point in Westminster Question No: 2013/2630 Murad Qureshi What are the projected annual revenue budgets for the public access points which will replace the front counters at Marylebone, Harrow Road and St John's Wood Police station? The Mayor It is not possible at this stage to confirm the costs in these locations as we continue to explore options for contact points in Westminster.
Police public access point in Kensington & Chelsea Question No: 2013/2631 Murad Qureshi What is the projected annual revenue budget for the public access point which will replace the front counter at Chelsea Police station? The Mayor It is not possible at this stage to confirm any cost as we continue to explore options for the replacement of the front counter at Chelsea Police Station.
Page 156 Number 24 Bus stop on Lupus Street SW1 Question No: 2013/2632 Murad Qureshi The bus stop which used to be located on Lupus Street SW1 outside the Tesco store has disappeared. Did TFL undertake any form of consultation prior to removing this bus stop and if not, why? The Mayor The bus stop is being moved, not removed. TfL and Westminster City Council have reviewed the current site and neither party is in favour of keeping the stop there. The stop was removed quickly for safety reasons after being damaged by a delivery vehicle and has also been hit by passing traffic in the past. It was not accessible and difficult for buses to serve because of loading and parking issues. TfL discussed options with Westminster City Council and a better alternative was identified 50m east. At this location, there will be access for wheelchair users and a 'bus stop cage' will be marked out on the road. TfL is waiting for approval from the council to carry out proposed work which includes removing some parking. TfL did not anticipate it would take so long to put the new stop in place but is asking the council to expedite the matter so passengers can resume travel there.
Bus for London Question No: 2013/2633 Murad Qureshi What was the cost of the recent mailing that was sent to London residents promoting the 'Bus for London'? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. Please see my response to MQ 2579 / 2013.
Revenue for police public access points Question No: 2013/2634 Murad Qureshi What are the projected annual revenue budgets for the public access points which will replace the lost front counters across London? The Mayor As part of Policing and Public Access in London (March 2013), 94 contact points are being opened. It is not possible at this stage to confirm the cost as we continue to explore options for contact points across London.
Page 157 Black Outs in London Question No: 2013/2635 Murad Qureshi Following the recent warning by Ofgem that the risk of blackouts had doubled in less than a year because not enough new power stations were being built to replace old coal and gas plants, have you made any representations to utility companies and/or government to stop the lights going out in London? The Mayor My officers are in constant contact with DECC officials on the issue of energy supply and I have written to the Energy and Climate Change Secretary asking that all measures are taken to ensure London's security of supply. We are also engaging with energy companies to ensure that London's development is not held back by a lack of energy capacity or distribution infrastructure.
Public Realm Investment Question No: 2013/2636 Onkar Sahota What is the Mayor's assessment of the impact the Chancellor's budget will have on TfL's available resources for investment in public realm schemes, particularly those in West London that are seeking to extract the benefits for Ealing from the delivery of Crossrail. The Mayor With the capital being a key driver of growth across the country, I was pleased the Government recognised the vital importance of continued investment into London in the spending round. Transport for London's (TfL) six-year capital funding commitment begins with an investment grant of £925m in 2015/16 rising to £1,007m in 2020/21, alongside borrowing limits to finance capital investment. Existing and separate financing and borrowing for the completion of Crossrail remain in place. The settlement also means a reduction in TfL's total Government grant of 12.5 per cent (£222m) in 2015/16. TfL will continue to drive its major programme of efficiencies and savings to demonstrate value for the taxpayer and I am confident this can be achieved without compromising the priority projects London so urgently needs. This cut will be addressed as part of TfL's regular business planning process, with a revised Business Plan published in December 2013.
Page 158 District Line Upgrade Question No: 2013/2637 Onkar Sahota What is the Mayor's assessment of the impact the Chancellor's budget will have on the upgrade of the District Line? The Mayor One of the most positive outcomes of the Chancellor's Spending Review is the success we have had in securing a six year capital programme settlement for TfL. This does of course mean TfL can continue with delivering the much needed transformation of the lines known as the sub-surface railway (the Circle, District, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan lines) which includes some of the oldest parts of the Underground network. The upgrade of these lines is already benefitting passengers with the Metropolitan line now operated entirely by new bigger air-conditioned trains. There are also now nine in service on the Hammersmith & City line and from the end of August the first of the new trains will start running on the Circle line. Rollout on to the District line will begin early next year. A key part of the modernisation programme for these lines is the introduction of a new signalling system. This will eventually enable the new trains to be driven automatically and will allow them to run at higher speeds and closer together, thereby providing the increase in capacity and reductions in journey times. The upgrade also includes the improvement of existing depots and replacement of life-expired track infrastructure including points and crossings at some of the major junctions across the SSR network (like at Earl's Court, High Street Kensington and Aldgate) to enable TfL to exploit the new signalling to its full advantage and deliver a much more reliable service.
Key Worker Travel & TfL (1) Question No: 2013/2638 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor outline the annual cost of the provision of free travel on the Transport for London network for Police Officers travelling with Warrant Cards? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 4209/2012.
Key Worker Travel & TfL (2) Question No: 2013/2639 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor outline what the annual cost of providing free travel on the Transport for London network for qualified operational personnel of the London Ambulance Service, in each year, based on the recent OHR capacity modelling (2012/13 = 2750, 2013/14 = 2979, 2014/15 = 3014, 2015/16 = 3044) would be? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2638/2013. There is no cost associated with this concession.
Page 159 Diabetes Plan Question No: 2013/2640 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor outline when he will publish the anti-obesity strategy he promised Londoners in his personal Telegraph column on the 11th of June 2012, and will he explain why, as of July 2013 the strategy has yet to be published, despite him promising it would be by April? The Mayor When the London Health Improvement Board (LHIB) was not given statutory status, delivery in its priority areas, including childhood obesity, did not proceed as originally planned. In order not to lose the momentum generated through the LHIB obesity programme I have worked with colleagues to secure the continuation of key elements of the programme. These include three years of GLA funding from April 2013 for: Healthy Schools London (which engages parents and the wider community as well as school children) Public health expertise within TfL and my spatial planning teams - to ensure that London's public realm is developed in a way that supports health and physical activity. Public Health England's London office also has an interest in London city-wide approaches to obesity and my team is working closely with them.
Healthy Eating Question No: 2013/2641 Onkar Sahota Is the Mayor concerned that the decision by the Chancellor to buy a burger from Byrons in advance of the spending review was a poor choice, given his previous assessment that McDonald's variants are " absolutely bursting with nutrients.", and concern over the outlet's practices in influencing buying behaviour and contribution to obesity is in his view "classic liberal hysteria about very nutritious, delicious, food - extremely good for you I'm told - not that I eat a lot of it myself," and does he now regret making these comments during the Olympics, considering 1 in five child Londoner's are obese? The Mayor No.
How will Mayor be marking 65 Years of NHS? Question No: 2013/2642 Onkar Sahota How will the Mayor be marking the 65th Birthday of the National Health Service? The Mayor The NHS is an institution that we should all be proud of. I have no specific plans to mark the 65th anniversary of the NHS, other than to offer its workers my continued support. I am working closely with NHS colleagues on an on-going basis through my chairing of the London Health Board (LHB).
Page 160 Jobs and Prosperity from Heathrow Question No: 2013/2643 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor explain how he intends to fulfil his Manifesto commitment he made to West Londoners in 2012, that he will 'Protect the jobs and wider economic prosperity created by the global connections with suppliers and markets that Heathrow provides' given his strong advocacy of an airport in the Thames Estuary that could well lead to serious economic turmoil for my constituents? The Mayor A new airport in the Thames Estuary will ensure London stays well connected to the world's growing economies thereby benefitting London as much as the national economy. Improved connections and frequencies, twice as many offered by Heathrow today, will add 0.5% to GDP and deliver 375,000 new jobs nationally. In addition, if Heathrow closed as an airport it would be an attractive redevelopment site for over 200,000 people with over 40,000 new jobs.
Takeaway Toolkit Question No: 2013/2644 Onkar Sahota Given the growing obesity epidemic, does the Mayor believe it is enough to leave powers of regulating fast food outlets to supplementary planning guidance at the Borough level, or does he feel that stronger provisions should be included within the London Plan? The Mayor The London Plan requires borough planners, through their local plans, to work with partners to identify and address local health issues, including increasing the access to healthy food. The Takeaways Toolkit (published last year) recommends that in areas where there is a high concentration of fast food outlets, particularly where the diet of vulnerable groups such as children and young people are a concern, local authorities should adopt clear planning policies that allow them to restrict the opening of new takeaways.
Sugary Drinks Tax Question No: 2013/2645 Onkar Sahota Does the Mayor support the introduction of a Sugary Drinks Tax, given the role sugary drinks play in exacerbating London's obesity epidemic? The Mayor It is clear that too many sugary drinks do not form part of a healthy diet but I believe that a specific tax, whose laudable aim would be to reduce their consumption, would be very regressive and I could not support such a measure.
Page 161 Healthy Schools London & Vending Machines (1) Question No: 2013/2646 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor outline why the banning of unhealthy vending machines is not a pre-requisite of awards from Healthy Schools for London, given that Free Schools are not bound by the ban, and are able to apply for awards? The Mayor Currently schools that achieve a Healthy Schools London Award must comply with the Children's Food Trust food standards for school meals and food other than lunch. This encompasses vending machines and ensures that food sold must be healthy. Food such as confectionery and chocolate coated items, crisps and drinks other than milk, water and juice are not permitted. Free Schools are eligible to apply for a Healthy Schools London Award but they must comply with the same Children's Food Trust food standards.
Healthy Schools London & Vending Machines (2) Question No: 2013/2647 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor outline how many schools have received a Healthy Schools London Award, despite selling sugary drinks and snacks from their premises? The Mayor None of the 59 schools which have achieved a Healthy Schools London bronze award sell sugary drinks and snacks. Please see my response to MQ 2646/2013 which sets out why it is not possible for any school selling sugary drinks and snacks to achieve a Healthy Schools London Award.
Southall Gas Works Site Question No: 2013/2648 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor explain why he included the figure of 4,000 homes being delivered in Southall and Ealing in his Vision 2020 document, despite no indication of the development progressing since my last question (MQT 0422/2013) and what work has been progressed to date in order to deliver much needed homes in Southall, and the vital access road secured from the Hayes Bypass? The Mayor The Southall Gas works scheme envisages the delivery of circa 3,700 homes. We now understand there is a preferred developer and negotiations are progressing well. The GLA are in active discussions with the land owner to help expedite the schemes delivery.
Page 162 Appointment of a Health Czar (1) Question No: 2013/2649 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor confirm his expectations of London's new Health Czar, given that the terms of appointment will have her work only 12 days until her contract is over? The Mayor Dame Ruth Carnall's extensive experience and knowledge of the health system in London means she can efficiently provide high level strategic guidance: to safeguard the pre-eminence of London's world-leading teaching hospitals; to encourage & engage the NHS in the development of London's life sciences sector; to explore the use of redundant NHS land holdings for housing, regeneration and other initiatives and to enable reinvestment into community health programmes and hospital re- configuration.
Royal Brompton Children's Heart Surgery Question No: 2013/2650 Onkar Sahota Given the Mayor's strong support for the campaign to save the Royal Brompton Children's Heart Surgery Unit in Sept 2011, will he join me in expressing relief that the Royal Brompton Children's Heart Surgery Unit has been spared from closure following the decision of the Secretary of State for Health to suspend the review, and will he condemn the comments made by his Health Czar that it could well still see closure? Will he also instruct her should the review recommence to offer a robust defence of the much loved and needed service for Londoners? The Mayor As you know I have no direct responsibility for NHS services in London. I was however very willing to raise your concerns with Anne Rainsberry, London Regional Director, NHS England which was the appropriate course of action. I have shared both my letter and her response with you.
Royal Brompton Children's Heart Surgery Question No: 2013/2651 Onkar Sahota Considering the Mayor has, on my urging, made a representation to NHS NWL for the 'Shaping a healthier future' consultation, can he confirm that he will also make a representation to the Independent Reconfiguration Panel now considering the review, given Ealing Council's decision to refer the decision to the Secretary of State? The Mayor As you know I have no direct responsibility for NHS services in London. I was however very willing to raise your concerns with Anne Rainsberry, London Regional Director, NHS England which was the appropriate course of action. I have shared both my letter and her response with you.
Page 163 Kings Fund - 'Leading Health Care in London' (1) Question No: 2013/2652 Onkar Sahota Does the Mayor agree with the Kings Fund that the Government's reorganisation of the NHS in London has left it with a 'leadership vacuum' that threatens to seriously undermine patient care? The Mayor Victoria Borwick, my Deputy Mayor, attended the launch of the King's Fund report 'Leading health care in London' and we have read it with interest. She and officers will be meeting with the King's Fund to discuss the recommendations in more detail. My understanding is that NHS reforms are designed to empower clinicians to lead commissioning of services as they have the best understanding of their patients' needs.
Kings Fund - 'Leading Health Care in London' (2) Question No: 2013/2653 Onkar Sahota Does the Mayor agree that the Government reforms to the NHS in London has been detrimental to health services in London, leaving it without the leadership it needs? The Mayor I recognise that the NHS has been through a major change since 1 April this year. We now have the London Office of NHS England. The reforms are designed to empower clinicians to lead commissioning of services as they have the best understanding of their patients' needs. The London Health Board aims to provide a pan-London leadership role where the key leaders from across health and social care in the capital convene to discuss important issues for the benefit of Londoners.
Kings Fund - 'Leading Health Care in London' (3) Question No: 2013/2654 Onkar Sahota Following the Governments reorganization of the NHS, London's health economy now includes 32 Clinical Commissioning Groups, 33 health and wellbeing boards, 33 local authorities, 33 local HealthWatch organizations, 21 NHS trusts, 19 foundation trusts, and three commissioning support units. Does he agree with Kings Fund that this has led to no clear strategic leadership for health services in London and that this will serious undermine the care that Londoners get from their local NHS? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2652 /2013.
Page 164 Mini -Holland 's Question No: 2013/2655 Onkar Sahota Can the Mayor confirm that his £100m fund for outer-London Boroughs will not be affected by the Government's Spending Review? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 Yes.
Crossrail at Hanwell Station (1) Question No: 2013/2656 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor ensure that the residents of Hanwell can truly benefit from the introduction of Crossrail by securing a 4 trains per hour service? The Mayor I am supportive of Hanwell being served by four trains per hour and of the introduction of services on Sundays. Crossrail is working closely with Network Rail to determine whether it is possible to provide this frequency of service, as tracks have to shared with existing National Rail and freight services.
Crossrail at Hanwell Station (2) Question No: 2013/2657 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor ensure that the residents of Hanwell can truly benefit from the introduction of Crossrail by ensuring a Sunday service? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ 2656 / 2013.
Crossrail at Hanwell Station (3) Question No: 2013/2658 Onkar Sahota Will the Mayor ensure that the residents of Hanwell can truly benefit from the introduction of Crossrail, and deliver the much anticipated and needed re-opening of the south entrance on Station Approach? The Mayor I am keen to see Crossrail deliver the maximum benefits for Hanwell and have asked TfL to examine the feasibility of reopening the Southern entrance as part of their plans.
Page 165 2020Vision - Harrow (1) Question No: 2013/2659 Navin Shah The 2020 Vision doesn't make any mention about the 'Intensification Area' proposals in general for London and in particular specific to Harrow. Does this mean that you are giving low priority for economic regeneration in Harrow? What is your reason for this and can you explain your vision for Harrow? The Mayor The 20/20 Vision did not make reference to all the 33 Opportunity Areas and 10 Intensification Areas identified in the London Plan. I of course am committed to all parts of London. My vision for Harrow and Wealdstone is as a thriving outer London Metropolitan Centre with substantial jobs and homes growth.
2020Vision - Harrow (2) Question No: 2013/2660 Navin Shah How many jobs do you expect to create in Harrow from the implementation of 'Intensification Area' in Harrow? The Mayor The Harrow and Wealdstone Area Action Plan (July 2013), which the GLA helped produce with Harrow Council, estimates around 3000 new jobs.
2020Vision - Brent Question No: 2013/2661 Navin Shah The 2020 vision makes reference to the 'Opportunity Area' in Brent (Wembley) which I welcome. Please explain the basis of the creation of 11,000 local jobs. Where will these local jobs come from? The Mayor The figure comes from the London Plan. This figure has been updated by Brent Council's Wembley Area Action Plan (2013) to 10,000 jobs. These are expected to come from a range of sectors including retail, offices, hotels, conference facilities, sports, leisure, tourism, creative industries and educational facilities
Page 166 2020Vision - Brent Cross -Cricklewood Question No: 2013/2662 Navin Shah The 2020 vision makes reference to the controversial 'metropolitan -scale town centre' at Brent Cross - Cricklewood. Your Outer London report came against proposals for such super hubs due to adverse impact on local economies in the neighbouring boroughs of Camden and my Constituency of Brent and Harrow. What is the justification for still promoting the super hub? The Mayor Brent Cross is currently a 'regional shopping centre'; London's only big, largely car based and almost purely retail location. The 2020 Vision refers to proposals for it to evolve into a much more broadly based town centre with a wide range of commercial, civic, social and housing uses including shopping, set in an attractive environment and with much improved access by public transport and for pedestrians and cyclists. When complete it will function as what the London Plan terms a 'metropolitan' centre, complementing the offers of other centres serving the communities of north London by providing convenient access to a wider range of competitive goods and services. As planning permission has been granted in 2012 for 1.4 million square metres of new mixed use development, when implemented this new North London town centre will be of 'metropolitan' scale in London Plan definition terms.
Old Oak Common - HS2 (1) Question No: 2013/2663 Navin Shah There are serious concerns in my constituency about the plans for a super hub station at Old Oak Common. The concerns relate to issues such as the design and appearance of Old Oak Common Station and its impact; long term blight (lasting some 10 years) on local areas like the Wells House Road affecting some 120 homes - that would suffer from hundreds of daily HGV trips creating environmental problems along with difficulty in accessing local shops, schools etc. I am concerned that there is practically no detailed information available about the mitigating measures and compensation for those above tunnels. Do you have plans in place to make representations to the Department for Transport to ensure that the necessary details are available, along with measures to fully consult residents and businesses that will be directly affected? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. I am fully supportive of the proposal for a new rail hub at Old Oak Common that would act as a catalyst for future development. My officials have been working with the HS2 Ltd, DfT and local boroughs to ensure the proposals for a new station fully maximise the development potential. I have also raised these issues repeatedly with the Secretary of State for Transport. Whilst HS2 Ltd has made some positive changes to improve the design of the station, I am concerned that the plans do not currently include an Overground station within the interchange, which would offer the excellent local rail links required to fully unlock the potential for the site. In relation to construction, I have responded to the Draft Environmental Statement consultation, stating formally that HS2 Ltd needs to provide more clarity regarding the construction impacts of the HS2 scheme, in particular for residents living at Wells House Road.
Page 167 Old Oak Common - HS2 (2) Question No: 2013/2664 Navin Shah Will you also join me in working to ensure that my constituents are fully protected from the local impact of HS2 and receive appropriate compensation? The Mayor While I welcome the news that the HS2 alignment will be placed in tunnel between Old Oak Common and West Ruislip, I remain concerned that the compensation process for those affected the HS2 proposals is unclear. Following the judicial review process, HS2 Ltd has been instructed to re-consult on their compensation proposals. The objective of the re-consultation is to ensure that residents and those affected by the scheme are adequately compensated, and that the process for claiming compensation is clear. This consultation is due to take place later in 2013 and I will be reviewing the proposals carefully to ensure the concerns of all affected Londoners are properly reflected in the revised plans.
Safety of Religious Groups and Places of Worship in Harrow and Brent Question No: 2013/2665 Navin Shah Harrow and Brent are religiously very diverse boroughs. What is the Mayor doing in London to make sure our diverse communities and their places of worship feel safe, especially following attacks on Mosques and meeting places like the Islamic Community Centre in Muswell? The Mayor MPS Borough Commanders meet regularly with leaders of all religious communities to listen to any concerns they may have. I am aware that when necessary, police officers have visited mosques up to three times a day to allay any fears that members of the community may have.
There have been a number of Community Engagement events aimed at demonstrating solidarity across Brent and Harrow. One at Brent Town Hall, which was attended by about 150 people including the Mayor of Brent, local MPs, and leading counsellors, as well local police officers. During the event the message from communities was clear, that any such attacks were not committed in the name of any faith, and that they wouldn't divide communities.
The Borough Commanders for Harrow and Brent would be happy to discuss your specific concerns in more detail.
Page 168 Electric vehicle charging points -Question No: 2197 / 2013 Question No: 2013/2666 Navin Shah Thank you for your reply to my question (2197). I'm aware of the installations on local authority land both in Brent and Harrow. What are the future plans to install borough-wide charging points in Brent and Harrow? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. Over the last three years, TfL has engaged with several hundred public and private sector organisations to identify opportunities to include charge points in the Source London scheme. In Brent and Harrow this has resulted in 6 organisations joining Source London as scheme partners (LB of Brent, LB of Harrow, Asda, POLAR, Park @ my House and Ikea). TfL is always keen to discuss and support organisations that plan to install further charge points as part of the Source London scheme, and at present TfL is aware of around 40 charging points that will be made available to the public when the new Brent Civic Centre is fully opened in summer 2013. TfL is actively working with the boroughs to see what else can be done to progress this further.
Free Schools at Fire Station Sites Question No: 2013/2667 Navin Shah You referred to fire stations as viable sites for Free Schools. Which fire stations identified for closure under draft LSP5 provision are deemed suitable for Free School use? The Mayor LFEPA is working with the GLA to determine whether any of the sites earmarked for disposal might be suitable for Free Schools. This process is ongoing.
Application No. 13/0938 - West Hendon Estate, NW9 Question No: 2013/2668 Navin Shah Doesn't your Stage 1 response totally compromise the very fundamental issues related to provision of socially rented affordable housing; unacceptably high densities and protection of the SSSI designation? The Mayor No. In the case of affordable housing and density my stage I report sets out why I have found these elements to be acceptable. With regard to the SSSI I have said that the issue will require further discussion pending the views of Natural England, which were not available at the time the report was written.
Page 169 Closure of Kilburn Police Station Question No: 2013/2669 Navin Shah The 'Local Police Estate and Public Access' proposals for Brent does not propose closure of front at Kilburn police station and also does not propose closure of the station itself. However, there is clear indication that the station has already been closed. Can you explain me why this has happened without any consultation and why has not a suitable front counter been provided before the closure of Kilburn police station? The Mayor Kilburn Police Station has not been closed and proposals for public access have not altered since the publication of the Police and Crime Plan.
Future of the South Harrow Police Station Question No: 2013/2670 Navin Shah The 'Local Police Estate and Public Access' proposals for Harrow flags up the main police station in South Harrow is not fit for purpose. Can you tell me what the future of this key police station for which there were redevelopment plans being promoted and agreed some years ago? The Mayor The building will be retained for the foreseeable future. There is an aspiration to replace the site with one containing the same facilities in the local area in due course. No timetable has yet been planned and the current building will not be closed until a new site is up and running.
Ramps at Kilburn Station Question No: 2013/2671 Navin Shah I understand that at Kilburn station the train is lower than the platform. Can you please help commuters by pressing TfL to introduce safe ramp access to trains so that all wheelchair users are able to use Kilburn with freedom and independence? The Mayor I want TfL to do everything possible to improve accessibility and you will no doubt be aware that we have just introduced manual boarding ramps at a further 16 Tube stations (bringing the total across the network to 35). Unfortunately, manual boarding ramps are not suitable at stations like Kilburn where the train is lower than the platform however TfL continues to investigate possible solutions to addressing access at these types of station.
Page 170 Proposed SNTs in Harrow (1) Question No: 2013/2672 Navin Shah To date there is NO indication whatsoever of what Harrow's new SNTs would look like? What will be typical number of officers and composition of dedicated teams for Harrow's wards? How will the allocation of Sergeants be made? Will the sergeants and SNTs be exclusively dedicated to their respective wards? When will the implementation of the new SNTs will take place and when will the completion take place? The Mayor Under the Local Policing Model (LPM) every ward in Harrow will have two PCSOs (one of which will be named and dedicated to the ward), one dedicated named PC and one named sergeant - with the exception of Pinner and Pinner South wards, which will share a sergeant. In addition to the dedicated PC, each ward team will have 3 to 5 further PCs. The additional PCs and PCSO's will be deployable throughout the Neighbourhood area, which is a cluster of 6- 8 wards. Harrow is currently planning for a 'go- live' date for LPM on 16th September 2013.
Proposed SNTs in Harrow (2) Question No: 2013/2673 Navin Shah Please confirm future of the existing bases in Harrow. Are you planning closure of any of the existing for operational purposes? If you are, will you be able make these available to local resident/community organisations? The Mayor Details of the Police Estate for Harrow including Safer Neighbourhood bases are published on the MOPAC website at http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Harrow.pdf .
Zero hour contracts (1)
Page 171 Proposed SNTs in Brent (1) Question No: 2013/2674 Navin Shah To date there is NO indication whatsoever of what Brent's new SNTs would look like? What will be typical number of officers and composition of dedicated teams for Brent's wards? How will the allocation of Sergeants be made? Will the sergeants and SNTs be exclusively dedicated to their respective wards? When will the implementation of the new SNTs will take place and when will the completion take place? The Mayor Under the Local Policing Model (LPM) every ward in Brent will have two PCSOs (one of which will be named and dedicated to the ward), one dedicated named PC and one named sergeant - with the exception of Kenton and Queensbury wards, which will share a sergeant. In addition to the dedicated PC, each ward team will have 4 to 7 further PCs. The additional PCs and PCSO's will be deployable throughout the Neighbourhood area, which is a cluster of 6- 8 wards. Brent's current structure of three Neighbourhood clusters, and existing Neighbourhood bases, will be retained. Brent is currently planning for a 'go- live' date for LPM on 16th September 2013.
Proposed SNTs in Brent (2) Question No: 2013/2675 Navin Shah Please confirm future of the existing bases in Brent. Are you planning closure of any of the existing for operational purposes? If you are, will you be able make these available to local resident/community organisations? The Mayor The local Police Estate and Public Access for Brent was published in March 2013.
All bases included in the Local Policing Plan for Brent will remain in operational use for the life of this plan, with the exception of Kilburn Police Station, which, as we explained in the Plan, will not meet longer term needs. Alternative facilities will be required nearby to meet future policing requirements, including Front Counter facilities with appropriate public access. Kilburn Police Station will be retained until alternative facilities are in place; therefore it is too early to make a decision about its future use.
Policing the Ecuadorian Embassy
Page 172 Earl 's Court Redevelopment Question No: 2013/2676 Navin Shah Why have you not accepted invitation made by local resident associations to visit the estates? Why are you not listening to the local residents who have repeatedly refused demolition proposals, fought against provision of only 10% affordable homes and sought an opportunity to determine their own future? The Mayor I have visited the area and have taken full account of the views of all local residents along with other representations received. Refer to my planning report PDU/2780/02 & PDU 2781/02.
Domestic Extensions with Planning Consent Question No: 2013/2677 Navin Shah You quite rightly expressed concerns about government proposals for permitted development rights for 6M deep extensions and 'adverse impacts on the quality of life of residents and renewed attempts at 'garden grabbing'. This policy now is already creating issues for Councils, neighbours and neighbourhoods. Do you agree with me that the government should scrap this policy and are you prepared to write to the government accordingly to prevent damage Londonwide? The Mayor Government responded to concerns expressed by myself and others over its initial proposal for permitted development rights for rear extensions. I will work with the boroughs through London Councils to assess whether its final approach is creating issues which cumulatively are of strategic importance. This will inform any response I may make to government.
Page 173 Northwick Park Hospital & Alexandra Clinic Question No: 2013/2678 Navin Shah There are serious worries about the crisis in local A&E services in Northwick Park Hospital. Recent statistics suggest that the A&E waiting times of over 4 hours are the second worst in London at Northwick Park. This is even before the disastrous closure of other local A&E services in neighbouring Boroughs - including closure of A & E at Central Middlesex Hospital. Alternative provision, in Harrow such as Alexandra Polyclinic has reduced its walk-in hours and locally it is difficult to get a convenient GP appointment quickly. Will you help me support Harrow Council in our efforts for a local review by lobbying Jeremy Hunt MP and increase the hours of opening at Alexandra Clinic for walk-in patients. The Mayor I have been informed by the NHS Trust Development Authority that A&E performance at North West London Hospitals NHS Trust (of which Northwick Park forms a part) has improved in recent weeks as a result of a range of actions overseen by the local Urgent Care Board. The purpose of Urgent Care Boards is to bring together hospitals, community services and social care to identify root causes behind poor performance and ways to improve performance. As you may be aware, in November I wrote to Dr Anne Rainsberry, London Regional Director, NHS England in November to raise a number of points about the North West London Hospitals reconfiguration proposals which had been put to me by a delegation led by Dr Onkar Sahota. These proposals are currently being reviewed by the Independent Reconfiguration Panel and I await its decision with interest.
Office -to -residential change of use (1) Question No: 2013/2679 Navin Shah In response to Question No: 2071 / 2013 about the exemptions announced from the new office-to-residential change of use PD rights, you 'welcome[d] recognition of the force of the case I and the boroughs concerned made' for the 'nationally important office locations' of central and inner London. What are your thoughts on the cases made by local authorities for areas which were not exempted? The Mayor As I only saw some of the borough exemption cases, I would not want to comment on them as a whole.
Office -to -residential change of use (2) Question No: 2013/2680 Navin Shah Do you believe the exemptions announced from the new office-to-residential change of use PD rights reflected a robust and independent assessment of the evidence provided by local authorities, or do you think other considerations were made? The Mayor I was not part of the decision-making process for the exemption process, so am unable to comment on the way central Government came to their conclusions on this process
Page 174 Office -to -residential change of use (3) Question No: 2013/2681 Navin Shah What protections for B1(a) office space can local authorities provide to offices which were not granted exemptions from the new office-to-residential change of use PD rights? The Mayor Boroughs in this position can make a Direction under Article 4 of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 to remove or restrict the permitted development rights where this is necessary to protect local amenity or the well-being of their area.
Phasing -out pol luting vehicles Question No: 2013/2682 Valerie Shawcross I was recently asked by a member of the public to put the following question to you: 'When will certain older polluting buses that travel through the West End and other central areas be replaced with cleaner, quieter, hybrid vehicles? 'I am thinking of the fleets on routes such as 6, 9 and 55, which travel through areas such as Oxford Street, though there are many others. 'Upgrading these fleets to hybrids would bring immediate benefits in terms of air quality in central London, plus related savings from lower fuel costs etc.' The Mayor By December 2015, there will be a 20 per cent reduction in overall NOx emissions from the bus fleet as all older Euro 3 buses will meet the Euro 4 engine emission standard for particulate matter and NOx. Routes 6, 9 and 55 are among those being planned for significant emission improvements in 2014. By 2016 London will have 1,700 hybrid buses, including 600 of the iconic New Bus for London. This will be the largest fleet of hybrid buses in Europe.
Stop and shop bays Question No: 2013/2683 Valerie Shawcross Following on from MQT 881/2013 can you provide details of the next steps in implementing your manifesto pledge? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 In my response to MQ 881 /2013, I explained that we had asked boroughs how they wished to implement the proposals in their area. We have had views back from all the affected boroughs. Those boroughs that did not want to see changes will retain the twenty minute bays as they had requested. We are currently preparing to start the statutory process for those boroughs that said they would like to see 30 minute bays. This will make the required changes to Traffic Management Orders and subject to the outcome of the statutory process, changes to signs in the boroughs who supported a change could appear on street before the end of the year.
Page 175 Boroughs Parking Review Question No: 2013/2684 Valerie Shawcross Following on from MQT 3041/2012 can you please share information with me on the parking reviews undertaken in 2013/14 and a copy of the good practice guidance? The Mayor Within their 2013/14 LIP annual programmes, the following boroughs have indicated they are undertaking parking reviews, or implementing revisions to existing parking controls: Barnet, Brent, Bromley, Croydon, Greenwich, Hounslow, Hillingdon, Lambeth and Southwark. The draft advice on parking in town centres was contained within the draft Town Centre Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG), issued by the GLA for consultation in January 2013. The final version of the Town Centre SPG will be issued later this year.
Electric vehicles i n the GLA fleet Question No: 2013/2685 Valerie Shawcross How many were there at the start of your first term? The start of your second term? And how many are there now?
The Mayor
Since I was elected I have championed the uptake of electric vehicles, developing London’s first Electric Vehicle Delivery Plan, delivering 1,400 electric vehicle charge points and introducing an Ultra-Low Emission Discount to the Congestion Charge. I have also set out my proposals for an Ultra-Low Emission Zone in central London from 2020 which will be a game-changer for the city.
I have used the GLA’s purchasing power and profile to drive the development and uptake of electric and ultra-low emission vehicles. At the start of my term in 2008 there were 81 ultra-low emission vehicles in the GLA Family fleet and I increased this to 139 by the beginning of my second term. Currently there are 113, which is a temporary reduction reflecting the end of a number of trial leases which will be off-set by new tenders over the coming months. I will be making further announcements about this in due course.
It should also be remembered that Transport for London also has 700 electric-hybrid buses in its fleet, with an additional 1,000 to be delivered by 2016. TfL is also trialling eight hydrogen and two pure electric buses, with a further six electric buses to be on street by early 2015.
Taken together I am well on track for delivering my target of 1,000 ultra-low emission vehicles in the GLA fleet by 2016.
Page 176 Delay busting plan Question No: 2013/2686 Valerie Shawcross Following on from MQT 2108/2012 please provide more details on the timescale for delivering your 14 point delay busting plan for the underground. The Mayor A full summary of the plan and progress against it was presented to the TfL Board in February. Full details can be accessed via this link: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/Part-1-Item07-London-Underground- Reliability.pdf The plan has already delivered significant results - with Tube delays at a record low - and we continue to focus on achieving further reductions as a result of the measures set out.
Automatic Train Control Question No: 2013/2687 Valerie Shawcross Following on from MQT 1465/2012 can you confirm what percentage of the LU network now has ATC? The Mayor Automatic train control is currently used on Central, Jubilee and Victoria lines, representing 31 per cent of the London Underground network. The Northern line upgrade is progressing well and we are on track to deliver the full upgrade by the end of 2014. This will bring the total amount of the network under automatic train control to 48 per cent. As outlined in in 2020 Vision, I would like to deliver automation on the Tube to 75 per cent by 2020.
London Infrastructure Fund Question No: 2013/2688 Valerie Shawcross Can you update us on progress towards your manifesto commitment to, 'ask the London Infrastructure Fund to harness pension fund and other institutional investment to support the [Crossrail 2] project.' The Mayor I am working on a number of initiatives that I hope will eventually result in pension fund investment in infrastructure projects. I have set up the infrastructure sub-group of the London Enterprise Panel and I have made appointments to ensure the London Pension Fund Authority's board contains world-class infrastructure expertise.
Page 177 Train Operating Companies & the Freedom Pass Question No: 2013/2689 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 2835/2012, can you update us on what progress has been made in getting the Train Operating Companies to allow the use of the Freedom Pass before 9.30am? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor My Deputy Mayor for Transport, alongside TfL, has been in extensive discussion with ATOC on this subject. As you know, ATOC has argued that the cost of providing the Freedom Pass before 9:30 am would be exorbitant, a view I and TfL do not share. As a result of these discussions, ATOC agreed to do a detailed piece of work to establish the 'correct' cost of this extension. ATOC have now confirmed that this would be £35 million per annum. I find this extraordinary considering that the TOCs only charge the London boroughs £20 million currently for Freedom Pass availability at all other times. My experts within TfL consider that a figure closer to £5 million would be reasonable and relatively accurate. I will be writing to the chair of ATOC to express my stupefaction and frustration at this latest figure, and asking for them for a more detailed explanation. It may be useful to add that those Londoners currently served by the Greater Anglia services, which will come under my control in 2015, will enjoy 24 hour Freedom Pass availability from that date.
Page 178 DLR extension to Bromley Question No: 2013/2690 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 454/2013 can you update us on the first stage of work that was due to be completed by the end of June 2013?
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
TfL has been working with the London Boroughs of Lewisham and Bromley to consider options, assess the case and identify funding opportunities for a potential DLR extension from Lewisham to Bromley. A number of options for serving the corridor have been identified, which range in cost from £200 million to £1 billion. In the absence of any public funding currently for an extension of the DLR, TfL and the boroughs have been assessing a range of potential alternative funding options.
A key component of this work has been to identify the potential uplift in development and land values that could occur with such an extension and the potential to secure contributions from future development towards the capital cost. This has been discussed at a senior level with Bromley and further work has now been agreed with the Borough to examine this further and to consider in more detail a broader range of funding options.
Page 179 Tramlink extensions to Crystal Palace & Sutton Question No: 2013/2691 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 447/2013 will you publish the draft Tramlink Strategy and update us on the work you are doing to extend the tram to Crystal Palace & Sutton.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
Written response from the Mayor received 28 October 2013
The Tramlink Strategy sets out the key constraints and opportunities for the existing Tramlink system and identifies three key extensions for further investigation – Bromley, Crystal Palace and Sutton. Recently, further work has been undertaken on the feasibility of the Crystal Palace and Sutton extensions along with an assessment of possible funding opportunities. This work was developed in conjunction with the boroughs and is currently being considered by them.
The key results of this work will be included in the Tramlink Strategy which will be circulated as a revised draft to the relevant boroughs later this year, and I will ensure you receive a copy too.
Tramlink extensions Question No: 2013/2692 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT MQT 1176/2012 will you publish the feasibility studies? The Mayor Work has been ongoing, further refining business cases and assessing funding opportunities for these potential extensions. The result of this work is nearing completion and will be available shortly.
Roads task force report Question No: 2013/2693 Valerie Shawcross When do you now expect to receive and publish the Roads Task Force report, given in MQT 879/2013 you said it would be 'late Spring'? The Mayor The Road Task Force Report and TfL's response to the report were both published on the 10 July. The reports can be found on the TfL website at: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/projectsandschemes/28187.aspx.
Page 180 Lane Rental scheme Question No: 2013/2694 Valerie Shawcross How much money did the scheme raise in its first year? And what projects did you spend the proceeds on? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 The Lane Rental Scheme raised £1.88 million in the financial year to March 2013, well below the forecast of £4 million, which shows how successful the scheme has been in changing the behaviour of works promoters. The net proceeds, after deducting initial scheme implementation and operating costs, are statutorily ring fenced to be spent on measures mitigating the effects of roadworks on the traffic network. The net revenue from the first year is £624,00, out of which £365,000 was invested with the Transport Research Laboratory in researching innovative measures to reduce disruption caused by roadworks, like rapid curing materials, road plates, and 'keyhole surgery' techniques. The remaining £259,000 has been carried over to be allocated to projects in the current financial year.
Report It Question No: 2013/2695 Valerie Shawcross When will the 'Report It' mobile phone app be launched? The Mayor TfL took advice from experts in the technology field who advised that mobile applications are generally installed by customers that have a frequent use for specific software. The vast majority of Report It customers only submit one-off cases to report problems with Roadworks, and would therefore not be inclined to install specific software on their mobile devices for this purpose. It was therefore decided to offer a solution that would recognise a customer's mobile device and automatically reconfigure the Report It form to be suitable for this device. This new method of reporting was launched at the Roadworks summit in April 2013.
SCOOT Question No: 2013/2696 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 3049 / 2012 can you share with us the results of the trial of SCOOT for pedestrians? The Mayor The proof of concept trial for pedestrian SCOOT has proven that it is possible to measure and use pedestrian demand to increase the invitation to cross time at traffic signals with an all- round pedestrian stage if there is sufficient pedestrian demand. Further on-street trials will now take place to test the integration of the SCOOT software with the pedestrian detection described above.
Page 181 Review parking in non -residential, strategic shopping areas (1) Question No: 2013/2697 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 2178 / 2012 will you publish all the 2013/14 Borough LIP spending plans? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 TfL has copies of all the 2013/14 LIP spending plans and is currently in the process of making these available on its website.
Review parking in non -residential, strategic shopping areas (2) Question No: 2013/2698 Valerie Shawcross For each borough LIP will you outline how they intend to review parking in non-residential, strategic shopping areas and your thoughts on their plans? The Mayor As previously advised in my response to question 2178/2012, the 2013/14 LIP Annual Spending Guidance issued by TfL to all boroughs in June 2012, highlighted the call in my manifesto for boroughs to review parking in non-residential, strategic shopping areas. Further advice on the matters boroughs should consider when reviewing parking within Town Centres was set out in the draft Town Centre Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG), issued by the GLA for consultation in January 2013. The final version of the Town Centre SPG will be issued later this year, which will confirm the issues that boroughs should consider when undertaking such reviews.
Review parking in non -residential, strategic shopping areas (3) Question No: 2013/2699 Valerie Shawcross Will you publish the good practice guidance that TfL has produced? The Mayor Please see my answer to MQ 2698/2013.
Rickshaws Question No: 2013/2700 Valerie Shawcross Further to MQT 1446/2012 can you publish your response to the Law Commission consultation? The Mayor The TfL response to the Law Commission consultation on Taxi and Private Hire Services is available from the Law Commission website as response TPH1080. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/taxi-private-hire-services-docs.htm
Page 182 Law Commission Taxi and Private Hire Services Review Question No: 2013/2701 Valerie Shawcross TfL responded in detail to the consultation on 9 April 2013. Can you publish a copy of their response? The Mayor TfL submitted its response to the Law Commission consultation on taxi and private hire services on 1 October 2012. A copy of the TfL response (reference number 1080) can be found using the link below http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/area/taxi-private-hire-services-docs.htm
Taxi Drivers Question No: 2013/2702 Valerie Shawcross Can you update us on TfL's plans to produce a 'ranks plan' that will protect existing ranks as far as possible and identify new ones? The Mayor Taxi ranks are an essential part of our capital's transport network, providing a dedicated space where the public can safely access taxi services. However, I am concerned about the fact that ranks around London are continually under threat and so in my election manifesto I pledged to ask TfL to produce a 'ranks action plan' to protect existing ranks as far as possible and identify locations for new ranks so as London's taxi rank network can grow and develop. A draft plan has been produced and is being reviewed within TfL prior to publication. Whilst the plan is being finalised TfL has continued to meet with the London Cab Ranks Committee every month to discuss changes to existing taxi ranks, review locations for possible new ones and appoint new taxi ranks.
Page 183 Taxi Drivers Question No: 2013/2703 Valerie Shawcross Can you update us on TfL's plans to produce a Suburban Action Plan to identify and address the specific concerns of yellow badge holders. The Mayor Following concerns raised by the taxi trade I asked TfL to undertake a review of taxi licensing in suburban areas. The review has centred around suggestions and ideas from the taxi trade and TfL has held workshops with representatives from each suburban area. TfL is now in the final stages of preparing a consultation document that consolidates all these suggestions and plan to launch the consultation in Autumn 2013. The consultation document will be sent to every licensed taxi driver as well as other stakeholders and interested parties and will remain open for 12 weeks to allow time for responses to be submitted. Once the consultation has closed, TfL will use the responses to help create a sustainable taxi service in the suburbs that benefits both taxi drivers and the travelling public.
Feasibility study in cycle hire in outer London Question No: 2013/2704 Valerie Shawcross In MQT 2409 / 2012 you said the study would be published by the end of 2012. Can you provide me with a copy? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. My Cycling Vision for London has superseded all other cycling projects and programmes, including the Outer London Town Centre study. TfL is looking to support boroughs that are interested in providing appropriate types of hire or bike library schemes through the Mini- Hollands programme. Boroughs eligible for the Mini-Hollands programme have now submitted expressions of interest, and we expect to announce the shortlisted candidates by autumn. TfL will work with the selected boroughs to work up more detailed plans over the next few months, before I announce the successful boroughs towards the end of the year. I want to see the cycle hire network extended to the north, south, east and west. In my 2020 Vision, I made clear that by 2020 and beyond I want to see bike hire as the rule and not the exception - even in some of the furthest suburbs.
Page 184 New footbridge Question No: 2013/2705 Valerie Shawcross Can you update us on what has happened since MQT 3070/2012 and 3071/2012 and where the key findings have been published? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 04 September 2013. Since November 2012, TfL has been working on a detailed feasibility study into a potential new bridge with stakeholders including the London boroughs of Wandsworth, Lambeth and Westminster, the Nine Elms Delivery Team and the GLA. In order to fully understand the issues associated with a new bridge in this location, a decision was made to widen the scope and split the study into three main stages as follows: Stage 1 - Identification of potential locations Stage 2 - Analysis of potential demand Stage 3 - Key engineering constraints and outline business case Stages 1 and 2 of this study have been largely completed. Stage 3 is currently underway and once complete, it is planned that all three stages of the study will be reported to the Vauxhall Nine Elms Strategy Board, following which the reports will circulated to stakeholders and the key findings will be made available on the Nine Elms website at: www.nineelmslondon.com. The initial high level feasibility study that was completed in June 2012 is now available on the Nine Elms website, but this will largely be superseded by the detailed study outlined above.
Night Flights (1) Question No: 2013/2706 Valerie Shawcross Please explain how you have been able to reduce the number of night flights from Heathrow since the start of your second term? The Mayor In my recent response to the Government's recent consultation on a new night flight regime, I have called for Government policy to work towards prohibiting flights at Heathrow between 11pm and 7am - when most people are asleep. The Department for Transport will be consulting on specific proposals for night flights Heathrow (and other London airports) later in the year and I will ensure that Londoners views are properly represented in my response to this. There is an economic benefit to London and the UK in accommodating night flights for passengers and freight. They maximise our global connectivity and support our economic activity and international trade capability. However, minimising the number of people affected by aircraft noise is an absolute priority when looking at where the UK should increase its aviation capacity. This is set out in both the Government's Aviation Policy Framework and the Airports Commission's sift criteria. This is why the only credible solution is to establish a new hub airport, away from densely populated areas.
Page 185 Night Flights (2) Question No: 2013/2707 Valerie Shawcross Please explain how you have been able to ban the oldest, noisiest aircraft from Heathrow since the start of your second term? The Mayor The Government set the rules and have already banned the oldest and noisiest aircraft during the night. Airlines that choose to fly the noisiest aircraft during the day can be charged higher landing fees by the airport operators as they look to incentivise airlines to use newer, quieter planes. I am calling for a new monitoring regime and increased penalties for breaching the rules, and appropriate incentives for airlines to adopt the quietest and cleanest technologies as soon as possible. A move towards quieter planes will never eliminate the negative impacts on people who live in close proximity to an airport. Minimising the number of people affected by aircraft noise is an absoluter priority when looking at where the UK should increase its aviation capacity. This is set out in both the Government's Aviation Policy Framework and the Airports Commission's sift criteria. This is why the only credible solution is to establish a new hub airport, away from densely populated areas.
A new airport for London (1) Question No: 2013/2708 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 1796/2012, when will you actually publish 'A new airport for London - Part 3' given it was due out in Autumn 2012? The Mayor The Government has established the Airports Commission to look at where the UK should locate additional aviation capacity. The Commission has set out a clear timescale for receiving evidence and submissions from interested parties. I have commissioned TfL to undertake detailed studies of three locations where you could locate a new hub airport to the east of London. Rather than publishing a third 'A new airport for London' report I will be submitting the outcome of that work to the Commission by their deadline of 19 July. Details of all submissions and other publications on aviation can be found at www.tfl.gov.uk/aviation.
Page 186 A new airport for London (2 Question No: 2013/2709 Valerie Shawcross Following MQT 1897/2012 When will part 4 be published? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. The Government has established the Airports Commission to look at where the UK should locate additional aviation capacity. The Commission has set out a clear timescale for receiving evidence and submissions from interested parties. I commissioned TfL to undertake detailed studies of three locations where you could locate a new hub airport to the east of London. I have now submitted the outcome of that work to the Commission. Details of all submissions and other publications on aviation can be found at: www.tfl.gov.uk/aviation.
ANPR Question No: 2013/2710 Valerie Shawcross Please update us what is happening to allow Transport for London (TfL) and the Metropolitan Police Service to assume joint responsibility for TfL's ANPR camera system? The Mayor Rather than assuming joint responsibility for TfL's ANPR camera system, the proposal is that TfL will feed data to the MPS for investigation (reactive) and interception (proactive) purposes. This change of use requires an exemption from the Data Protection Act (a limited exemption is already in place for national security purposes). Because of the civil liberties issues arising out of the change of use an extensive consultation and public awareness campaign is being developed, in accordance with advice from the Information Commissioner.
Page 187 Safer Transport Team Question No: 2013/2711 Valerie Shawcross Please provide a breakdown of by month of Safer Transport Team strength in London by month from October 2012 to June 2013.
The Mayor
Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly.
The target strength for Safer Transport Teams is 1,138 officers. The vacancy rate, as of June 2013, was low and stood at only 1.6%. Most teams were at or close to full strength and out on the network providing visible policing and reassurance to the travelling public.
Safer Transport Team strength
Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May June Nov Target Oct 2012 2012 2012 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 2013 Strength Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual Actual 1138 1160 1159 1161 1160 1158 1160 1131 1125 1120
London Command Question No: 2013/2712 Valerie Shawcross What lobbying have you done for a single 'London Command' for the British Transport Police? What success have you had? The Mayor The creation of a single London Command for the BTP would deliver real benefits for London. TfL has been working closely with the British Transport Police (BTP) and its Police Authority (BTPA) to achieve this. The one London BTP Command will now be delivered as part of a wider restructure of the national force. The high-level proposal for the creation of three force areas - London and the South East, Scotland and the remainder of England and Wales, was agreed in principle by the British Transport Police Authority at its meeting on 13 June. An Assistant Chief Constable for London and the South East area has been appointed and will manage the transition to the new London structure. TfL is actively engaged with the BTP on the structure, resources, financial arrangements and performance management to ensure the best outcome for London. It is expected that the new structure will be in place by Spring 2014.
Page 188 Land and Property databas e Question No: 2013/2713 Valerie Shawcross When will the database be extended to include all TfL assets? The Mayor The database includes all of TfL's property assets (excluding roads, railway lines etc).
Step free Rail Network Question No: 2013/2714 Valerie Shawcross You said in 2012 'My aim is for half the rail network to be step free by the end of this decade.' Can you confirm, by number and percentage of the total number of stations How many were step free at the start of your first term? How many were step free at the start of your second term? How many you plan to make step free in the future, and which projects are currently funded? Please name all stations for each category above. The Mayor Over 40 per cent all stops and stations across London's rail based public transport network (including National Rail, Tube, DLR and Tramlink) are now step-free - 269 stations/stops in total. This has increased from 208 stations and stops which were step-free at the start of my first term - around 32 per cent. 258 stations and stops were step-free at the start of my second term - around 39 per cent - and a further 11 stations have been made step-free since then. Funding is committed for providing step-free access at a further 47 stations and TfL is continuing to work with Network Rail to identify priorities for additional step-free schemes that could be funded through the DfT's Access for All programme. TfL will also continue to work with developers to explore further opportunities for step-free access at additional stations - and of course any new stations, such as those planned as part of the extension of the Northern line to Battersea, will also be step-free, as well as all new Crossrail stations. Please see Appendix 7 for details of each station which is already step-free or has funding in place for step-free access, including all LU and Overground stations, all DLR and Tram stops/stations and all National Rail stations in the GLA area. Further information on future projects (including indicative further step-free station schemes linked to major projects or programmes) can be found, alongside the wider strategy for transport accessibility, at: http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/taking-forward-the-mts-accessibility- implementation-plan-march-2012-final.pdf
Page 189 New 24 Buses Question No: 2013/2715 Valerie Shawcross Can you update us on how many times your new buses broke down during the first 2 weeks of service on route 24. And how many of the old style buses broke down during their last 2 weeks of service? The Mayor All new vehicles entering service have teething issues and the level experienced on route 24 is not unusual for a totally new type of vehicle.
TfL measures mechanical failures by recording mechanical lost mileage. This entails the mileages vehicles were not available for service due to mechanical reasons in relation to the total scheduled mileage for the route. There was 2.97% of mechanical lost mileage in the first week that New Bus for London vehicles started operating on route 24 and 0.79% in the second week. During the two weeks prior to conversion, mechanical lost mileage was 0.15% and 0.19%.
The bus is now operating at around 0.3% mechanical lost mileage which demonstrates an overall improvement and is in line with the forecast of 0.3% for the whole bus network this year.
It is important to note that all operating companies are required to have a number of spare vehicles should a bus need to be taken out of service for whatever reason. The bus will be replaced with the same type of vehicle as this is normal operating practice. Therefore, if a NBfL bus encounters any problems, another NBfL vehicle will be deployed along the route to ensure there is no customer impact.
Page 190 Bus blinds Question No: 2013/2716 Valerie Shawcross Several bus routes in London now feature a 'white on black' route number and information, rather than 'yellow on black'. I understand that 'yellow on black' has been traditionally used as there is evidence that it is easier to see/read, particularly for those with poor eyesight. I have been contacted directly by constituents about this and also by the charity Transport for All, who ask: a) What is the rationale for this change? b) Which bus routes is this now being implemented on? c) What consultation has been done with regard to this issue, particularly with visually impaired bus users? The Mayor White lettering on a black background is the maximum contrast available, and TfL is using this format on bus destination blinds for all new buses entering service, following improvements to powerful LED lighting used to back-illuminate blinds. TfL previously used 'dayglo' yellow on black at a time when they were illuminated by ordinary bulbs or florescent tubes. Since then, TfL has reduced the number of words displayed and introduced much larger numbers and very bold destinations to increase visibility. There are some other advantages of black and white over dayglo yellow which are not immediately apparent. Dayglo yellow fades over time. The route numbers fade more quickly as they are changed less often than destination. Thus we have inconsistency on vehicles. The white on black that will now be used as the standard for new vehicles fully complies with the Discrimination Disability Act, as well as meets legibility standards. In addition, the heritage Routemasters on routes 9 and 15 have always retained their black and white blinds, and the prototype New Bus for London vehicles on route 38 were introduced with them. Throughout this time, no concerns from passengers have been raised regarding their use.
63 bus Question No: 2013/2717 Valerie Shawcross Local councillors have been calling for the extension of the 63 bus to the end of Brenchley Gardens -where the bus lane is separated by an island - for some time. They believe that this one bus stop extension would be useful for many people and not costly as the 63 goes there anyway to turn. It would also allow better interchange with the P12 and hence, Honor Oak Park overground station. The councillors believe that there is space for two buses at this location. Please ask TfL to investigate this. I understand that works are taking place at this stretch of bus lane in August, and other changes might usefully be done at the same time. The Mayor TfL is investigating the possibility of having a set-down stop in the section of bus lane you mention. Some work would be required to allow this to happen as the existing kerb is too low to allow wheelchair ramps to be deployed and there may also need to be changes to the traffic signals. TfL will contact you once the investigations are complete.
Page 191 P4 bus Question No: 2013/2718 Valerie Shawcross I have received several complaints from users of the P4 bus - from all along the route as far as Brixton, about delays, long waits etc. I understand that this is being exacerbated by works in Ladywell village - what steps have TfL taken to mitigate the effect of these works with regard to the P4 bus? The Mayor Roadworks in Ladywell started in May and have affected route P4. The second stage began on Friday, 5th July involving the closure of Adelaide Avenue. This means that route P4 has now been diverted, which should better retain the reliability of the service. TfL will monitor the situation closely.
Baytree Road, Brixton Question No: 2013/2719 Valerie Shawcross Please give an update on steps which have been taken and discussions between London Borough of Lambeth and TfL to deal with the issues caused by the recent changes to the road layout in Brixton involving Baytree Road. The Mayor As you will be aware, following requests from the local community, Lambeth has progressed a scheme to make Baytree Road no entry from Brixton Hill (except cyclists). TfL has supported this measure on the basis of predicated safety benefits. Since the installation of the scheme in early June feedback from local residents, backed up by site visits by TfL and Borough officers, has confirmed that a significant number of motorists are ignoring the no entry signs. Although the current signing is correct, in order to make the new layout as clear as possible to all users it is proposed that the 'humps ahead' signs on Brixton Hill will be removed and replaced with banned left and banned right turn signs on the approaches to Baytree Road. In addition 'no entry' markings will be applied on the carriageway at the mouth of Baytree Road. These works are due to be completed by the end of July. Although some motorists may be taking time getting used to the new layout, it is clear that some are choosing to ignore the restriction and, as a result TfL will consider how enforcement activities can be stepped up with regards to the banned turn once the additional signage and markings are in place.
Page 192 A23 Streatham Question No: 2013/2720 Valerie Shawcross Please give an update on progress on works to improve the A23 through Streatham. The Mayor An Outer London Fund grant has been secured for significant improvement works to Streatham High Road. The design is being led by London Borough of Lambeth, working with TfL as Highway Authority. These works build on the successful scheme already completed between Becmead Avenue and Woodbourne Avenue. The scheme outcome will be to reduce the community severance caused by the existing road layout, and enhance the area with new trees and other urban realm improvements. The detailed design for the scheme is now being completed and works are planned to commence at the end of September for four months. Delivery will of course be mindful of the increased pedestrian movements leading up to Christmas and local engagement will ensure this is given due consideration.
Page 193 Mayor 's Fund for London Question No: 2013/2721 Valerie Shawcross Please give an update on how the Mayor's Fund for London is benefitting communities in Lambeth and Southwark. The Mayor As an independent charity, the Mayor's Fund for London is not part of my administration and thus not subject to Mayor's Questions. However, to be helpful, I would point out the following: The Mayors Fund For London aims to support young Londoners from disadvantaged areas by providing them with the additional support they need to get a good job and escape the threat of poverty. It's charitable activities include three flagship projects, Inspiring Reading, Breakfast Clubs and Young London Working. The Inspiring Reading Project works with our delivery partner Beanstalk placing volunteers in schools to work with children who are falling behind with their reading. The Mayors Fund Breakfast Club project works with Magic Breakfast to support 50 breakfast clubs in schools where more than 50% of the children get free school meals. The aim is to make sure children who go to school hungry are fed and get a good start to a productive school day. These projects have been running since late to 2012 and include schools in both Southwark and Lambeth. More recently it has expanded the Young London Working Project, which aims to provide organizations helping young people looking for work with greater access to suitable jobs. Since June this project has been reaching out to organizations in Southwark and will soon be establishing links in Lambeth. Alongside the existing portfolio of work, it is developing a programme known as Count on Us which aims to tackle numeracy challenges. Lambeth and Southwark are included in the list of boroughs we are targeting for roll out. As well as intervention projects, the Fund has just launched a small grants scheme in partnership with Santander, known as Community Plus. It is looking for bids from charities across London for activities involving young people. It is optimistic that there will be awards in both these borough as the Fund has been promoting the scheme through links with its projects as well through wider channels. The Mayor's Fund has very strong links with schools in both these boroughs, some of which have been involved in events, which have included celebrities reading in their schools, visits to City Hall and breakfast with me. The Fund hope's that these will have inspired the pupils who have taken part.
Page 194 Peabody Hill Estate Question No: 2013/2722 Valerie Shawcross I am told by residents and one of the local councillors for the Peabody Hill Estate in Lambeth (Thurlow Park ward), that a bus service is desperately needed to serve the estate. The councillor states 'Peabody Hill is very isolated and the hill itself very steep. It is a difficult walk, even for people without mobility problems but there are no local facilities at all, so residents are obliged to do this walk for shopping, for visits to the doctor or other health services, to go to work or school.' Please could you ask Transport for London to instigate a review of bus services in this area, and specifically with regard to the needs of the estate residents? The Mayor TfL understands why a bus service has been requested in this area. If it were possible to justify this, it would be necessary to make significant changes to traffic management in the area. TfL will therefore initiate a discussion with LB Lambeth on these issues and will keep you informed of progress.
Poverty Figures for London (1) Question No: 2013/2723 Fiona Twycross In light of the recently published Poverty figures for London 2011/2012, what steps will the Mayor take to address the fact that one third of London's Children live below the poverty line? The Mayor I will continue to do all I can to tackle child poverty and deprivation in London. The main and best ways are through promoting employment and growth across London and driving up skills, as set out in my Jobs and Growth Plan for London. This includes driving a huge apprenticeship programme and tackling low pay through promoting the London Living Wage. I want to make sure that no child's academic future is limited or frustrated by their social- economic background. That is why I am supporting Free Schools and Academies, have set up a School's Excellence Fund and, established my mentoring programme. These things should help young people gain an excellent and rigours education and equip them with the skills to succeed. Improving London's transport network is one of the most effective ways of tackling social exclusion and I am continuing make vital improvements in London's transport infrastructure. My 2020 Vision document for London sets out my ambitions to narrow social inequality and produce steady improvements in academic attainment.
Page 195 Poverty Figures for London (2) Question No: 2013/2724 Fiona Twycross The latest figures poverty figures for London 2011/2012 show that poverty rates in London has seen little change over the past few years. Do you agree that this is a sign that his economic strategy has failed, and that he should focus on economic growth that includes all Londoners? The Mayor London has led the UK out of recession, my Economic Recovery Action Plan and Economic Development Strategy have both provided clear direction for London's continued economic growth. Since the election in May 2012 the number of jobs located in London has increased by over 100,000. Ensuring Londoners benefit from this growth is a key priority, which is why I have set priorities around creation of 250,000 apprenticeships, the promotion of a London Living Wage, the piloting of a £12.3 million European Social Fund Day One Support for Young People trailblazer work placement programme project and a wider programme of ESF programmes supporting thousands of Londoners to access the opportunities being generated in London.
Minimum Wage Holiday Question No: 2013/2725 Fiona Twycross Does the Mayor support the proposal made by Tony Arbour AM on the London Assembly for a minimum wage holiday? The Mayor No.
Page 196 Pilot scheme for young partially sighted and blind Question No: 2013/2727 Fiona Twycross RLSB (Royal London Society for Blind People) would like you to consider funding a pilot to support 50 young blind and partially sighted people through their Visionary Placements programme. At a cost of £75,000 this scheme encourages vision impaired young people to take up a voluntary and/or a paid work placement in a company or organisation as a significant step to economic engagement, social and community inclusion. Will you look into this proposal? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 7 August 2013 Whilst the London Enterprise Panel (LEP) believes that all Londoners should have the skills to compete for and sustain London's jobs, unfortunately there is no LEP or GLA fund in place at this time that could be used for this specific purpose. However, the 2007-13 European Social Fund (ESF) programme includes a regional target to support a minimum of 22 per cent participants not in work with disabilities or a health condition. The LEP is also leading on the development of the 2014-20 European Structural Funds Strategy which includes ESF spend and will need to incorporate Gender Equality, Equal Opportunities, Non-Discrimination and support for disadvantaged groups. If RLSB staff working on the Visionary Placements programme would like further information about what support may be available, please ask them to make contact with the providers direct: Leonard Cheshire Disability 020 7112 1489 (Option 1) [email protected] www.LCDisability.org/worksmart Remploy 0300 456 8307 [email protected] Also, if they wish to submit more information around the Visionary Placements initiative, this may allow us to explore whether other opportunities, such as placements, may exist though wider networks.
Disused Public Phone Boxes Question No: 2013/2728 Valerie Shawcross Do you have figures on how many disused phone boxes there are in London? The Mayor This information not collated centrally by the GLA.
Page 197 Dormant Oyster Card balances (1) Question No: 2013/2729 Valerie Shawcross We recently learnt that £100m is sitting dormant on unused Oyster cards. At several stations there are boxes for unwanted Oyster cards where the remaining balance on the card goes to charity. Will you consider extending this to more stations? The Mayor The £100m does not sit dormant. It is always available to the card holder and many of our customers choose to maintain balances for their convenience. Please also see my answer to MQ 2731/2013.
Dormant Oyster Card balances (2) Question No: 2013/2730 Fiona Twycross Are there other ways the balances on dormant Oyster cards could be donated directly to charities? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. Please see my response to MQ 2731 /2013.
Charitable Giving with Oyster Cards Question No: 2013/2731 Fiona Twycross Would you consider introducing a more systematic scheme across London so people can easily donate to charities of their choice using their Oyster card? The Mayor A collection box scheme by which Oyster card balances can be donated to charity has been in operation at a small number of stations. Usage has been low and in view of the administration costs involved, there are no plans to extend this scheme. There are a number of interesting ideas for how Oyster could facilitate charitable contributions from Oyster users which TfL are discussing with those proposing the schemes.
Page 198 'Bedroom Tax' (1) Question No: 2013/2733 Fiona Twycross In the light of the comments by the National Housing Federation that the impact of the 'bedroom tax' is at least as bad as they had anticipated, and in many respects worse. Do you accept this policy is failing? What representations have you made to the Government on the impact of the policy on Londoners? The Mayor I do not accept that the policy is failing.
'Bedroom Tax' (2) Question No: 2013/2734 Fiona Twycross Following my previous question about the lack of available suitable properties (Question 1387/2013) have you now looked into how many properties are available for Londoners affected by the 'bedroom tax' to move into? The Mayor My focus is on delivering homes of all sizes through my affordable housing programme and in doing so increasing the opportunities for those seeking smaller homes, including those downsizing. I also invited bids through my 'Building the Pipeline' prospectus to provide a Tenants Incentive Schemes that will support existing tenants seeking to leave the social sector and free up social housing stock into which people affected can downsize. I expect to make announcements on funding for this in the near future.
Fire Station Closures Question No: 2013/2735 Fiona Twycross How many further fire stations will close following the Government's announcement that CLG will see a further 10% reduction in their budget, and specifically a 7.5% reduction in the fire and rescue budget The Mayor None.
Page 199 European Social Funding and parental employment Question No: 2013/2736 Fiona Twycross 'What discussions have you had with the London Enterprise Panel about the priorities for the next round of European Social Fund spending, and have you considered the importance of closing the parental employment gap between London and the rest of the country' The Mayor The London Enterprise Panel (LEP) has been tasked by Government with developing 2014- 2020 European Social Fund (ESF) priorities. Draft priorities drawn up by my officials in consultation with stakeholders including London Boroughs have already been discussed at the LEP; EU funds will be discussed at next week's LEP meeting, and the consultation process will continue over the summer. Interventions to support parents returning to work will be included in the LEP's 2014-2020 European Structural and Investment Funds Strategy, which the Government is expected to request shortly.
2020 Vision Question No: 2013/2737 Fiona Twycross I was recently asked by a constituent to put the following question to you: 'Have you scheduled your proposals for 2020 because you don't think you'll achieve your goals or and will have left office by this time, or is it merely an inducement for Londoners to vote for you in either the next general and mayoral election'? The Mayor London is facing an unprecedented demographic challenge and it will take long-term planning to 2020 and far beyond to meet this in a sustainable way so that London lengthens its lead as the greatest city on earth. Your constituent can visit the 2020 interactive timeline at: http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor- assembly/mayor/vision-2020/interactive-timeline
Page 200 Cost of living in London (1) Question No: 2013/2738 Fiona Twycross I was recently asked by a constituent to put the following question to you: 'What makes you think that Londoners on low or part time wages can afford to wait until 2020 to receive a London Living Wage?' Wages are far below rents, let alone paying bills or buying food. Only the rich will still be living in some parts of London to serve other rich Londoners by then.' The Mayor I am fully behind the London Living Wage campaign for precisely these reasons. Housing and childcare costs are particularly high in the capital and it is a struggle for some Londoners to make ends meet. Changing employer practices however takes time and making the London Living Wage the norm by 2020 will require thousands of businesses to take difficult decisions and implement changes in their pay rates for staff as well as in their supply chains. I am committed to playing a leading role in encouraging businesses to meet this challenge.
Cost of living in London (2) Question No: 2013/2739 Fiona Twycross I was recently asked by a constituent to put the following question to you: 'Could you survive in London working 25hrs a week at only £7 an hour before tax and National Insurance if you also had to find money for rent, council tax, bills, and food?' The Mayor One of my earliest commitments on election as Mayor of London in 2008 was to support the London Living Wage. I believe in the value of London's entire workforce, our great city depends on everyone's contributions whether preparing meals or cleaning our workplaces. It is right that their skills and commitment to London's success are appropriately recognised and rewarded.
Page 201 Lambeth Housing Evictions Question No: 2013/2740 Andrew Boff Do you share my deep concern about Lambeth Council's attempts to evict co-op tenants who have lived in the borough for up to 40 years, and will you do all you can to support the campaign by local residents to stop these evictions? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thanks, Andrew. I just want to say I think this is a bit of a paradox here because while I don't in any way want to interfere with the borough's right to manage their own housing stock, I do think it interesting that it is Conservatives who seem to be sticking up for local people here. I suppose I congratulate them on that. Andrew Boff (AM): Thank you, Mr Mayor. Do you see a difference between the regeneration that was mentioned earlier at Earls Court where all the residents there have been offered alternate accommodation within the development and the difference between that Conservative regeneration project and the ones in, for example, Lambeth and Hackney where they are compulsory purchasing residents' flats for less than the market value and, in some cases, less than the residents actually paid for it? Jennette Arnold OBE (AM): Evidence, evidence. Andrew Boff (AM): Plenty of evidence, you are completely evidence free and if you want to look the people in the eye that you are cheating, your council is cheating, Jennette, I will take you down to the Colville Estate and you can say that to their face. And also Lambeth where I understand the council describes itself as a co operative council and has, in the past two days, kicked down the front doors, made 73 people homeless including families without any guarantee whatsoever of alternate accommodation. Do you see a difference between Labour regeneration projects and Conservative regeneration projects, Mr Mayor? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I certainly think there is. Obviously it is up to the council to manage its assets and I am told the current occupiers have all been offered rehousing by the borough. If that is not the case, then that is obviously Andrew Boff (AM): No. They have been offered help to find alternate accommodation. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): All right. I certainly disapprove of any heartlessness in handling these matters. Andrew Boff (AM): Thank you.
Raids with N GOs Question No: 2013/2741 Andrew Boff Some 'criminals' who are discovered on cannabis farms by police are trafficked children. Would you support following Bristol's example and ensuring relevant NGOs accompany police whenever they carry out a raid on a cannabis farm? The Mayor The MPS has assured me that any children or young people identified on Cannabis Farms are treated as potential victims and where there is evidence of trafficking, appropriate specialist advice would be sought and local child protection teams or social services are contacted when children or young people are identified. The MPS retains an open mind to adopting practice from elsewhere but regional differences and contexts must also be taken into account.
Page 202 Trafficking and Prostitution Unit Question No: 2013/2742 Andrew Boff How many officers are there in the Trafficking and Prostitution Unit (TPU) in 2013? The Mayor The Trafficking and Prostitution Unit has 40 staff for the financial year 2013/14 (38 police officers and 2 police staff).
Trafficking and Prostitution Unit Question No: 2013/2743 Andrew Boff How many officers were there in the Trafficking and Prostitution Unit (TPU) in 2009? The Mayor The TPU was created in April 2010.
Property Portal Question No: 2013/2744 Andrew Boff How will your new property portal help to improve Londoners' access to new homes? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I think the property portal seems to be working well. The idea is to make it easier for Londoners to find the information they need for new homes and, as far as I can remember, the First Steps Programme has helped about 50,000 people so far. Andrew Boff (AM): Do you agree with me, Mr Mayor, that the most important thing in London is to increase the housing supply? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes. Andrew Boff (AM): Thank you very much. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I do.
Empty Homes Question No: 2013/2745 Andrew Boff How many empty homes in London have been brought back into use since 2008 per borough? The Mayor Since 2008, the number of empty homes in London has decreased by 12,025 with around half bought back into use through GLA funding. Long term empty homes now at lowest level since 1970s. The data for each borough is published by DCLG and can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/49764/20 130111_Live_table_615.xls
Page 203 Lower Thames Crossing Question No: 2013/2748 Roger Evans Will you join me in opposing Option C for the proposed Lower Thames Crossing, which would cause significant harm to the Green Belt and residents in North Ockenden? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thanks, Roger, I don't think I am going to join you in opposing the option altogether, because obviously we will take account of the environmental concerns that you raised about North Ockenden and we will make sure that we minimise any impacts. However, that particular option C corridor, whether or not we actually go down that route, seems to us to offer the greatest economic benefits by shortening the times from Kent to Essex, so I do not know whether I can be as useful to you there as you perhaps would like. What I certainly ought to say also is I think that route offers the best connection between the new DP World deepwater port and the proposed site, or one of the proposed sites, for a new airport. So it is, for my money, a very interesting route. Roger Evans (Deputy Chairman): Well obviously I am disappointed to hear that, but of course the figures that you have quoted and the case that you have quoted is the one that is made by the Department for Transport on a national basis. That is that option C will be a big benefit to Essex and to Kent and to the north of the country, which it undoubtedly will be. However, my belief is that option A, which is an additional crossing at the existing site of the Dartford Crossing, will be of more benefit to London, and I think it would be entirely respectable for you, as London mayor, to support an option which will see better use from Londoners and reduce congestion on the M25, which is after all the purpose of the exercise. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I think those are powerful arguments and we will certainly look at that point. What I certainly want to do is, if they go ahead with option C, I would certainly lobby very hard with you to protect the residents of North Ockenden and minimise any environmental impacts. Roger Evans (Deputy Chairman): Thank you.
Page 204 Newbury Park Station Question No: 2013/2749 Roger Evans What reassurance can you offer to residents in Redbridge about disabled access to Crossrail at Seven Kings and the Central Line at Newbury Park? The Mayor 66 Tube stations offer step-free access and it is one of my key priorities to extend this further. The costs for making Tube stations step-free tend to be very steep and so TfL is focussing its limited resources on key interchange stations which benefit higher numbers of passengers. There are therefore no plans currently to make Newbury Park step-free. The closest Tube station to Newbury Park with step-free access is Hainault which might be a suitable alternative. Low-floor accessible bus journeys are available to get to Hainault. Alternatively, customers could take an accessible bus to Ilford National Rail station; there are stair lifts at Ilford. My Accessibility Implementation Plan identifies Seven Kings as one of the stations prioritised for step-free access in 2014-19. The criteria for funding from the Department for Transport's Access for All programme in this period have not yet been established. TfL would support the application for investment at Seven Kings, subject to a positive business case including an assessment of the feasibility and cost.
Knife attacks Question No: 2013/2750 Roger Evans How will the changes in the local policing model help reduce the number of people who are victims of knife crime? The Mayor Since 2009/2010 there has been a steady but promising decrease in victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure. In 2009/2010, there were 4351 victims of knife crime where a knife was used to injure and this had decreased to 4095 by 2011/2012. Violence with injury is one of the seven neighbourhood crimes types that I have challenged the MPS to cut by 20% and therefore remains a priority for the Mayor's Office for Policing And Crime. One of the fundamental principles of the Local Policing Model is to ensure that neighbourhood policing is the foundation of policing in London with officers and staff deployed flexibly to meet the demands across the Capital. Therefore, the Model will provide greater visibility in communities and enable more problem solving at local level. Grip and Pace centers in every borough identify emerging risk and harm, and deploy officers where they are needed. In addition, Borough Tasking Teams can respond when additional resources are required or they can be tasked to emerging threats or crime hotspots. Finally, further capacity is provided by both the Proactive and Gangs element of the Criminal Investigation Department, which allows boroughs to respond to intelligence and analysis.
Page 205 Increase in shootings Question No: 2013/2751 Roger Evans The number of shootings has dramatically increased this year after a reduction in 2011. What is being done to tackle this rise? The Mayor MPS data indicates that gun crime is in fact down 20% for the year 2012/2013. In this current financial year to date (30th June 13) gun crime remains on a downward trajectory at 11%. Two thirds of shooting victims are under the age of 24 and approximately 50% of shootings involve individuals connected to gangs. The MPS has enhanced the resources available to the Trident Gang Crime Command. The Command has a dedicated engagement team that delivers school and community based programmes to prevent young people from being drawn into gun crime and gang criminality.
Screened out data Question No: 2013/2752 Roger Evans When do you intend to start publishing screened out data alongside monthly borough crime statistics? The Mayor There are no current plans to make this information available alongside monthly borough figures.
Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) Question No: 2013/2753 Roger Evans There are reports that FGM takes place in Harley Street. Will the Met agree to carry out raids to start targeting those who carry out FGM? The Mayor The MPS cannot comment on individual pieces of intelligence or disclose operational activity but will take a proactive approach to bring the perpetrators of this crime to justice and will be led by any direct intelligence it receives relating to FGM. Anyone with any information regarding FGM being practiced in Harley Street or anywhere else in London has a duty to report it to the MPS immediately.
Page 206 Mental health nurses and police Question No: 2013/2754 Roger Evans ACPO research demonstrates that police officers are losing more than an hour a day managing mental health incidents that should be dealt with by healthcare professionals. Would you consider replicating the new Department of Health scheme, whereby mental health nurses patrol with police officers in four pilot sites across the UK? The Mayor MOPAC are taking the recommendations from The Independent Commission on Mental Health and Policing chaired by Lord Adebowale seriously, and are keen that the learning and implementation of the 28 recommendations is shared amongst wider partners, including public health services. MOPAC are in dialogue with the Department of Health and NHS England, London Region with a view to take forward the 'Street Triage Services' as part of the wider pilots currently running across the UK. Mental health is a serious issue for all public services.
TfL Bonuses Question No: 2013/2755 Richard Tracey Do the bonuses recently awarded to TfL executives for their performance over the Olympics represent good value for money? The Mayor TfL's performance during the Olympics was universally acclaimed and that a deferral of existing performance related pay was put in place for achieving Olympics targets, it would be wrong to say that good value was not achieved.
Page 207 6 Point Plan Question No: 2013/2756 Richard Tracey Can you foresee a way to raise the revenue needed to plug the £225 million funding gap created by the reduction of the DfT's grant, whilst bearing down on fares, without implementing the 6 Point Plan for TfL savings I suggested last month? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thank you very much, Dick, for this excellent question. I think there is a lot of good stuff in the 6 Point Plan, much of which we are obviously doing and we are going to get on with delivering the savings in TfL, the automation in TfL, and tackling some of the costs in TfL that will allow us to deliver an ever better service for our customers and to invest in transport infrastructure. Richard Tracey (AM): We heard yesterday at the Budget and Performance Committee that the funding gap is probably £238 million, rather than £225 million, which I gather TfL think is severe but doable. As regards the 6 Point Plan, are you aware that one of the points is indeed to introduce automated train control onto the Underground? The other day the Government of the City of Paris announced that they were making yet another line driverless. Why is it that TfL seem to be so slow on this piece of progress? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): They are not slow under me. What we are doing, we will never buy another train with an old-fashioned drivers cab. The funding package that we have means that we can now go ahead with the buying of the Piccadilly line trains and they will be beautiful and they will operate automatically. Richard Tracey (AM): One of the other points in the 6 Point Plan that we produced for you is actually to have a look at the TfL pension scheme which, quite uncommonly, compared to all other pension schemes seems to be extremely beneficial with amazingly high contributions made by TfL to the workforce. In your search for efficiency in TfL, are you going to ask them to look at that again? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Nothing is excluded, Dick. We are certainly looking at all such efficiencies. Richard Tracey (AM): Thank you.
Page 208 Struck Out Question No: 2013/2757 Richard Tracey Given the £225 million reduction in the DfT's grant to TfL, do you agree that it would be only reasonable for the Government to pass legislation to enact the plan I suggested in my 'Struck Out' Report to end strike action on the London Underground? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor 09 September 2013 As you know I have long argued that Londoners need relief and protection from the disruptive impacts - including the financial impacts - of threatened or actual strike action on the Underground, a course of action pursued too readily and with insufficient mandate by trades unions over many years. This is why I have repeatedly made the case to the Government to require unions to have a 50 per cent turnout threshold in order for strike action to be lawful.
Crossrail 2 Question No: 2013/2758 Richard Tracey Given the Government's requirement that at least half of Crossrail 2's budget will have to come from private sources, what avenues are you exploring to raise the necessary funds? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thank you, Dick, a characteristically good question about transport matters, which you have pursued for many years. The good news here really is that the Government has agreed to stump up at least half the cost of Crossrail 2, which is a fantastic turn up for the books. Obviously the funding package we will put together will involve the private sector, it will involve business, it will involve income from the developments that would naturally follow Crossrail 2, and we will be working with partners across the city to put that package together as the package for Crossrail 1 was put together. I mean you cannot create something on this scale without asking for very substantial contributions from the private sector; that is entirely right. I think the question Londoners might vaguely wonder is why we are so ready and so willing to do the right thing and put together a public/private package whereas a project like High Speed 2 (HS2) for instance is entirely publicly funded. Richard Tracey (AM): Yes, thank you, Mr Mayor, for that assurance of what you are doing to pursue this and indeed thank you for all the efforts that you have put into pushing Crossrail 2 forward, which we on this side of the Chamber very much share, we have been very much upfront with you on this. Presumably, if Crossrail 2 route plans go ahead, and indeed, as has been suggested, it may well extend further into south London than simply Wimbledon and further into north London from Tottenham, there will be a large number of companies and private enterprises in those areas that would be very keen to see it extended into their areas and may well be interested in contributing to the funds by sponsorship and so on, would you agree? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Absolutely, and now is the time when the consultation is taking place on the route, now is the time for those boroughs, those areas, those businesses, to get stuck into the conversation. I am very, very bullish about Crossrail 2. We have been given admittedly a token fund from the Government to get on with the feasibility study, but they are
Page 209 now committed to a project that I think, with a fair wind, we can get done by the middle years of the next decade or the later years of the next decade. It will be fantastically important for this city; it is absolutely vital that we do it, given the population boom that we face. Richard Tracey (AM): As the funding is so important to take this forward really as quickly as possible, do you not think it is rather odd that the Government continues to talk about completely funding the HS2 project when they are expecting London, London companies and yourself, to provide a portion of the funding of this extremely important railway? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I do think it is a paradox and I think you would have to ask why it is that there are two different funding models. If the business case for HS2 is what it is then you would expect some of the uplift in values that HS2 is going to provide to help finance the scheme. Richard Tracey (AM): Thank you.
Tramlink Extension Question No: 2013/2759 Steve O'Connell In light of the Chancellor's welcome confirmation in June of a six year financial settlement for Transport for London, I urge the Mayor to continue to commit to the Tramlink extensions to Sutton & Crystal Palace. Mr Mayor, are you able to provide me with the reassurance that you will continue to do so? The Mayor Please see my response to Question Number 2283/2013, which I answered during the course of the meeting.
Improvements to Fiveways Junction Question No: 2013/2760 Steve O'Connell In view of Transport for London having recently secured long-term transport investment until the end of the decade, will you please assure me that some of these funds will be channelled towards improving traffic flow at Fiveways Junction in Croydon, a problem which has blighted the journeys of local motorists for years? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thank you very much, Steve, another good question reflecting your campaigning for the great Borough of Croydon. Yes we are. It is certainly one of my highest priority locations for congestion relief as part of TfL's investment programme. This is all going to happen in the context of huge investments that are to be made in that part of Croydon, as part of the Westfield development with Hammerson and so on. Steve O'Connell (AM): Thank you, Mr Mayor, for that response. As you point out, Westfield and Hammerson are coming to Croydon under your leadership of the council. It is vital, as we say, that the wallet share is not stopped coming into Croydon by transport difficulties, particularly the wallet share of North Surrey. Mr Mayor, can you confirm that you agree that it is crucial Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): You said the 'wallet share'? Steve O'Connell (AM): Yes. What is important is that we bring those good people from North Surrey on a Saturday, and the rest of the week, to drive into Croydon, and by public transport,
Page 210 to spend their money in our town centre. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): That is called 'wallet share', is it? Steve O'Connell (AM): Very much so and we want the wallet share of Surrey. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): With the wallet share. Steve O'Connell (AM): Would you agree Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Wallet share is when you get out your Steve O'Connell (AM): Exactly, and I expect you to come Croydon with your wallet to share it with my businesses as well. Steve O'Connell (AM): Mr Mayor, could you please then confirm the importance that we free up the Fiveways Junctions so that people can access that new wonderful shopping centre that will be Westfield and Hammerson? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Yes, and we certainly are doing that. Steve O'Connell (AM): OK, and you will support that because Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I will support it because it is one of the busiest junctions in London. It is heavily congested at the moment and it is part of a big programme of regeneration and relief in that area. Steve O'Connell (AM): When may we expect to see the plans unfold, Mr Mayor? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Shortly. It is on the delivery programme for 2013/14, so you should see action on it by the end of next year. Steve O'Connell (AM): Because you are aware that all the partners involved, both the developers, the council and your office here, are keen to get this moving. We do not want any delays so it will move properly at pace along with the planning system. I would urge you that you make sure that TfL does assist this process to make sure that that funding is made available. Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I shall. Steve O'Connell (AM): Do I have your commitment on that, Mr Mayor? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): You shall. You do. Steve O'Connell (AM): Thank you very much.
Planning Powers Question No: 2013/2761 Steve O'Connell How would your proposed 'use it or lose it' regime work for stalled development sites, as proposed in your '2020 Vision' document? The Mayor Where referable to the GLA for renewals of expiring planning permissions for major residential- led developments, serious consideration will be given to refusal of such applications, where there are no reasonable grounds demonstrated for continual non-implementation. In some exceptional circumstances other powers may be resorted to including CPO, where appropriate.
Page 211 20mph Roads in Sutton (2) Question No: 2013/2763 Steve O'Connell Does the Mayor back 199 local residents in seeking to make Grosvenor Avenue in Sutton a 20mph road? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 7 August 2013 I believe that the question relates to Grosvenor Avenue which connects with Grosvenor Road. Sutton Council is the Highway Authority for both roads and has allocated £30,000 of its 2013/14 LIP funding from TfL towards implementing a scheme on Grosvenor Avenue that addresses safety concerns raised by local residents and Ward Members. Sutton Council's current plans involve introducing a 20mph speed limit on Grosvenor Avenue with appropriate supporting measures. A final design will be consulted on at Committee level in September.
New London bus Question No: 2013/2764 Victoria Borwick Having made the innovative investment in the new Routemaster bus would it be possible to offer these buses to other parts of the UK? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. The vehicles have been built for the operating conditions and needs of London but are not exclusive to the capital. Other operators could buy them from Wrightbus for use elsewhere. Wrightbus is currently marketing the product in the UK and overseas.
Page 212 Corruption on the rise Question No: 2013/2765 Victoria Borwick The number of Metropolitan Police officers investigated for misusing the Police National Computer (PNC) has more than doubled since 2009. What is being put in place to prevent these types of activities? The Mayor Misuse of intelligence systems and unauthorised disclosure of data breach the Professional Standard of 'Confidentiality' which the MPS 'Outcome Guidance for Misconduct Panels' defines as gross misconduct; misconduct so serious that dismissal could be justified. Where officers are dismissed details are published both internally and externally to serve as a deterrent. Conduct matters concerning misuse of the PNC have risen from 12 officer allegations in 2009 to 25 officer allegations in 2012. This is the result of the following factors. The roll out since 2009 of PNC via Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) and Mobile Data Terminal (MDT) has increased the number of mobile users (although the number of desktop PNC users has remained static at around 23,500); Improved data analysis on MPS IT system for recording all police complaints; An enhanced auditing regime progressed by the ACPO lead on Information Leakage, including the implementation of Op Cheslatta (2011) which identified PNC checks of concern, data standards and training issues. Each Operational Command Unit (OCU) now has a security champion responsible for Information security, and the Directorate of Professional Standards prevention team has engaged in preventative briefings across the MPS.
Page 213 TfL staff taxis (1) Question No: 2013/2766 Gareth Bacon What is the cost of TfL staff taxis to and from work during unsocial hours for the periods 2011/2012 and 2012/2013? The Mayor Taxis are used to get our staff to and from their places of work in the very early hours of the morning where there is no alternative transport available. This is vital for the effective operation of London's transport network and the Capital's economy. In order for the Tube to operate effectively every day, staff taxis are provided for train drivers, depot and station staff. Taxis do not pick staff up from their homes, these vehicles are used between predetermined points on designated routes and are shared with other staff wherever possible. Around 2,500 LU staff begin work at about 3.30am each day and approximately 550 require the staff taxi service. Without this provision we would not be able to guarantee the first services of the day for the many customers who use them. The alternative would be either increased staff costs or an increased level of night bus cover to ensure sufficient transport capacity is provided. Every request for a staff taxi has to be scrutinised and authorised. Journeys and spend on taxis by TfL to get staff to and from work during unsocial hours was as follows: 2011/2012 77,901 taxis, costing £3.3m - each of these taxis carries between 1 and 10 passengers on its run, on average there are 3 persons per taxi. 2012/2013 81,363 taxis, costing £3.79m - each of these taxis carries between 1 and 10 passengers on its run, on average there are 3 persons per taxi (2,077 of these taxis were during the Olympic and Paralympics' period). The increase is due to a combination of a rate increase and abnormal levels of activity during the Olympics and Paralympics when TfL had significantly more staff than normal working until the Tube closed to ensure that visitors could get to their destinations.
TfL staff taxis (2) Question No: 2013/2767 Gareth Bacon How many journeys have been taken via TfL staff taxis to and from work during unsocial hours for the periods 2011/2012 and 2012/2013? The Mayor Please see my response to MQ2766 / 2013.
Page 214 TfL staff taxis (3) Question No: 2013/2768 Gareth Bacon Could you give me the total taxi bill for all TfL staff, contractors, and hospitality for the periods 2011/2012 and 2012/2013? The Mayor Written response from the Mayor Almost all taxi expenditure relates to unsocial hours journeys as detailed in my answer to MQ 2766 /2013. In addition to those amounts, the following costs were claimed by staff in relation to taxi fares: 2011/12 £22,000 2012/13 £34,000 These claims are subject to the TfL business expenses policy, and are reviewed for compliance with the policy and authorised individually before any payment is made to the individual. We are unable to track if contractors have billed us for taxi fares as part of their invoice charge.
TfL staff taxis (4) Question No: 2013/2769 Gareth Bacon How many employees used the TfL staff taxis to and from work during unsocial hours for the periods 2011/2012 and 2012/2013? The Mayor Officers are drafting a response which will be sent shortly. Written response from the Mayor received 26 July 2013. As I explained in my answer to MQ 2766 /2013, taxis are used to get TfL staff to and from their places of work in the very early hours of the morning where there is no alternative transport available. In order for the Tube to operate effectively every day, staff taxis are provided for train drivers, depot and station staff. Taxis do not pick staff up from their homes, these vehicles are used between predetermined points on designated routes and are shared with other staff wherever possible. Around 2,500 LU staff begin work at about 3.30am each day and approximately 550 require the staff taxi service. The numbers are as follows: Year No of Employees 2011/12 5425 2012/13 5999
Page 215 Air Quality Question No: 2013/2770 James Cleverly What schemes will be funded from your £5.4 million air quality grant to boroughs and businesses? The Mayor Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): Thanks, James. The air quality, the £5.4 million that has already gone, a few examples of the projects. We are working on Amersham, transport in Hillingdon and Hounslow. We are supporting measures to improve the construction industry air quality in Camden, Islington and Lambeth, Lewisham, Wandsworth, Hammersmith and Fulham. There are projects to encourage healthcare professionals to train staff to enable them to communicate better about air quality messages to residents and to patients in some Central London boroughs, City of London, Newham, Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest. James Cleverly (AM): Thank you, Mr Mayor. In terms of continuing the forward progress of this scheme, do you envisage that this will continue to be delivered primarily through borough sponsored schemes or are you looking to also encourage businesses, for example, to make use of this fund directly? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I don't see any reason why businesses should not be supported. It depends what they apply to do. James Cleverly (AM): OK, thank you. In terms of promoting this scheme and encouraging entrants, are there particular areas that you are looking to focus on in terms of improvement? Is there something within the bids that would curry more favour, as it were, and give people the best chance of actually accessing these funds? Boris Johnson (Mayor of London): I think they just have to improve air quality, they have to be practical and they have to have a good business case. James Cleverly (AM): Thank you.
Page 216 $SSHQGL[
MQ 2538 / 2013 Safer Neighbourhood Teams
Safer Neighbourhood Team Police Sergeant Police Constable PCSO Target Strength Variance Target Strength Variance Target Strength Variance BS - Kensington & Chelsea Borough Total 14.00 16.00 2.00 36.00 35.00 (1.00) 36.00 116.18 80.18 CW - Westminster HQ Total 21.00 17.68 (3.32) 50.00 92.99 42.99 50.00 78.51 28.51 EK - Camden Borough Total 14.00 12.79 (1.21) 36.00 49.57 13.57 36.00 51.83 15.83 FH - Hammersmith & Fulham Borough Total 12.00 7.00 (5.00) 32.00 44.75 12.75 32.00 35.86 3.86 GD - Hackney Borough Total 14.00 11.00 (3.00) 38.00 47.80 9.80 38.00 42.75 4.75 HT - Tower Hamlets Borough Total 13.00 13.00 - 34.00 32.00 (2.00) 34.00 42.89 8.89 JC - Waltham Forest Borough Total 15.00 15.00 - 40.00 37.71 (2.29) 40.00 51.42 11.42 JI - Redbridge Borough Total 16.00 13.60 (2.40) 42.00 44.91 2.91 42.00 61.44 19.44 KD - Havering Borough Total 14.00 14.90 0.90 36.00 47.51 11.51 36.00 53.58 17.58 Page 217 KF - Newham Borough Total 15.00 7.00 (8.00) 40.00 54.60 14.60 40.00 54.64 14.64 KG - Barking & Dagenham Borough Total 13.00 8.00 (5.00) 34.00 44.60 10.60 34.00 49.64 15.64 LX - Lambeth Borough Total 21.00 - (21.00) 42.00 48.00 6.00 42.00 80.00 38.00 MD - Southwark Borough Total 16.00 17.00 1.00 42.00 45.00 3.00 42.00 53.28 11.28 NI - Islington Borough Total 12.00 10.00 (2.00) 32.00 31.00 (1.00) 32.00 47.61 15.61 PL - Lewisham Borough Total 14.00 11.00 (3.00) 36.00 42.50 6.50 36.00 57.44 21.44 PY - Bromley Borough Total 17.00 12.00 (5.00) 44.00 39.00 (5.00) 44.00 71.31 27.31 QA - Harrow Borough Total 16.00 13.58 (2.42) 42.00 35.00 (7.00) 42.00 44.00 2.00 QK - Brent Borough Total 16.00 13.00 (3.00) 42.00 45.00 3.00 42.00 57.00 15.00 RG - Greenwich Borough Total 13.00 13.00 - 34.00 34.00 - 34.00 46.99 12.99 RY - Bexley Borough Total 16.00 12.85 (3.15) 42.00 33.90 (8.10) 42.00 55.55 13.55 SX - Barnet Borough Total 16.00 13.86 (2.14) 42.00 48.94 6.94 42.00 78.58 36.58 TW - Richmond upon Thames Borough Total 14.00 13.00 (1.00) 36.00 34.37 (1.63) 36.00 41.00 5.00 TX - Hounslow Borough Total 15.00 11.55 (3.45) 40.00 43.95 3.95 40.00 44.98 4.98 VK - Kingston upon Thames Borough Total 12.00 8.00 (4.00) 32.00 29.00 (3.00) 32.00 31.09 (0.91) VW - Merton Borough Total 15.00 11.00 (4.00) 40.00 40.01 0.01 40.00 45.78 5.78 WW - Wandsworth Borough Total 15.00 12.00 (3.00) 40.00 50.35 10.35 40.00 38.63 (1.37) XB - Ealing Borough Total 18.00 13.80 (4.20) 46.00 44.56 (1.44) 46.00 57.66 11.66 XH - Hillingdon Borough Total 16.00 8.00 (8.00) 44.00 44.86 0.86 44.00 33.06 (10.94) YE - Enfield Borough Total 16.00 9.00 (7.00) 42.00 47.58 5.58 42.00 52.76 10.76 YR - Haringey Borough Total 14.00 13.00 (1.00) 38.00 49.50 11.50 38.00 32.14 (5.86) ZD - Croydon Borough Total 19.00 17.00 (2.00) 50.00 44.45 (5.55) 50.00 61.12 11.12 ZT - Sutton Borough Total 15.00 11.75 (3.25) 36.00 39.42 3.42 36.00 47.96 11.96 Grand Total 487.00 380.36 (106.64) 1,260.00 1,401.83 141.83 1,260.00 1,716.68 456.68
Page 218 $SSHQGL[
: FY 08-09 FY 08-09 Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 0 1 28 29 19 13 2 2 0 0 94 Barnet 0 1 15 20 19 8 1 1 0 0 65 Bexley 2 0 12 20 9 11 4 1 0 0 59 Brent 1 2 21 42 34 17 5 1 0 0 123 Bromley 2 0 24 30 23 11 3 0 1 0 94 Camden 1 0 19 31 20 8 6 1 0 0 86 City of Westminster 2 0 25 54 25 13 5 1 0 0 125 Croydon 0 0 55 44 25 16 4 3 0 0 147 Ealing 2 3 43 52 26 28 5 2 0 0 161 Enfield 4 1 30 49 24 7 6 3 1 0 125 Greenwich 1 2 25 50 31 13 1 1 0 0 124 Hackney 0 0 56 51 33 15 3 3 2 0 163 Hammersmith & Fulham 1 0 21 27 24 9 7 1 0 0 90 Haringey 0 0 43 64 20 19 3 1 0 1 151 Harrow 0 0 20 25 13 5 0 0 0 0 63 Havering 0 0 11 25 9 8 0 3 1 1 58 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 1 0 20 32 17 11 5 1 1 0 88 Hounslow 2 0 17 33 11 11 3 0 1 0 78 Islington 0 0 40 40 24 20 8 1 1 0 134 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 7 19 13 9 4 2 0 0 54 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 13 13 6 3 2 1 0 0 38 Lambeth 1 0 63 67 41 35 6 4 0 0 217 Lewisham 2 1 45 54 34 21 8 1 2 0 168 Merton 1 0 8 17 7 16 1 3 0 0 53 Newham 1 1 60 87 57 21 6 3 0 0 236 Redbridge 2 0 24 28 24 16 3 4 0 0 101 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 12 9 4 6 1 1 0 0 33 Southwark 0 0 91 71 49 27 9 4 2 0 253 Sutton 1 2 11 15 11 4 1 0 0 0 45 Tower Hamlets 0 3 30 65 31 19 6 2 1 0 157 Waltham Forest 2 1 35 41 30 15 2 3 1 0 130 Wandsworth 1 0 23 38 19 14 6 1 0 0 102 Grand Total 30 18 947 1242 732 449 126 55 14 2 3615
Page 219
FY 09-10 FY 09-10 Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 0 0 42 51 22 22 6 1 0 0 144 Barnet 2 1 33 33 13 13 7 1 1 0 104 Bexley 0 0 13 19 8 7 3 1 0 0 51 Brent 2 0 44 58 34 19 7 4 0 1 169 Bromley 1 1 23 39 13 14 4 3 1 0 99 Camden 2 2 17 35 19 14 8 0 0 0 97 City of Westminster 0 0 22 49 30 13 4 3 0 0 121 Croydon 0 0 76 47 26 17 11 4 1 0 182 Ealing 2 1 46 82 42 25 9 1 1 0 209 Enfield 1 1 50 48 27 12 5 1 0 0 145 Greenwich 0 0 27 58 37 22 5 0 0 0 149 Hackney 1 0 78 67 42 21 12 3 0 0 224 Hammersmith & Fulham 2 0 29 32 22 21 3 2 0 0 111 Haringey 3 0 49 76 39 21 12 2 1 0 203 Harrow 0 0 10 25 13 6 0 0 0 0 54 Havering 2 2 23 25 21 11 3 2 2 1 92 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 0 0 23 47 28 16 2 0 0 0 116 Hounslow 0 0 18 39 14 10 7 1 1 0 90 Islington 0 0 44 54 29 20 11 1 0 0 159 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 12 14 18 10 2 1 0 0 57 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 11 14 9 5 2 0 0 0 41 Lambeth 0 0 87 64 33 32 7 1 0 0 224 Lewisham 1 0 60 50 31 21 9 2 0 0 174 Merton 1 0 21 27 9 11 3 2 0 0 74 Newham 3 1 98 108 50 31 9 3 0 0 303 Redbridge 1 0 31 33 12 17 3 0 0 0 97 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 9 12 3 2 0 2 0 0 28 Southwark 4 2 135 104 50 34 7 2 1 0 339 Sutton 1 0 8 21 6 15 3 1 1 0 56 Tower Hamlets 0 0 41 50 35 7 6 2 0 1 142 Waltham Forest 1 0 45 62 32 13 6 0 1 0 160 Wandsworth 1 1 33 49 32 16 4 0 0 1 137 Grand Total 31 12 1258 1492 799 518 180 46 11 4 4351
Page 220 FY 10-11 FY 10-11 Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 1 0 32 46 11 19 3 1 0 0 113 Barnet 1 0 25 34 15 18 4 3 0 0 100 Bexley 0 0 19 13 6 4 2 1 0 0 45 Brent 0 0 53 44 35 21 3 0 1 0 157 Bromley 2 0 19 37 15 23 5 1 1 0 103 Camden 0 0 40 57 24 14 5 2 0 0 142 City of Westminster 0 0 37 65 24 16 5 3 0 0 150 Croydon 3 1 49 55 32 15 6 1 1 0 163 Ealing 4 0 50 81 33 16 5 2 1 0 192 Enfield 0 1 59 36 25 20 4 2 1 1 149 Greenwich 0 1 40 51 30 16 4 2 0 1 145 Hackney 3 2 56 69 32 24 9 0 1 0 196 Hammersmith & Fulham 1 0 35 37 17 18 4 1 0 0 113 Haringey 3 0 76 73 43 29 10 2 1 0 237 Harrow 0 0 19 25 7 9 4 1 0 0 65 Havering 1 1 17 32 17 12 5 1 0 0 86 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 1 0 23 28 20 10 3 0 0 0 85 Hounslow 0 0 23 40 31 7 3 0 1 0 105 Islington 1 2 44 62 36 14 7 1 0 0 167 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 11 16 13 7 4 2 1 0 54 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 14 12 10 6 2 0 0 0 44 Lambeth 1 0 88 84 41 34 14 1 0 0 263 Lewisham 1 0 86 66 38 20 15 1 0 2 229 Merton 0 1 18 18 15 9 3 2 0 1 67 Newham 0 2 91 110 39 23 9 1 1 0 276 Redbridge 1 0 17 27 19 6 4 0 0 1 75 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 6 12 2 4 2 0 0 0 26 Southwark 3 5 89 75 44 34 14 4 1 2 271 Sutton 0 0 14 17 13 9 4 0 0 1 58 Tower Hamlets 0 0 41 55 28 17 5 0 0 0 146 Waltham Forest 0 0 42 46 28 9 2 4 0 0 131 Wandsworth 3 0 29 42 22 9 6 0 1 0 112 Grand Total 30 16 1262 1465 765 492 175 39 12 9 4265
Page 221
FY 11-12 FY 11-12 Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 0 0 32 50 14 13 5 2 0 0 116 Barnet 0 0 16 20 21 16 4 1 0 1 79 Bexley 1 0 9 12 10 4 2 1 0 1 40 Brent 1 2 40 59 36 20 5 1 0 0 164 Bromley 1 0 20 40 9 20 2 2 0 0 94 Camden 0 1 36 41 22 15 6 0 0 0 121 City of Westminster 1 0 53 57 26 19 4 2 1 0 163 Croydon 1 2 53 61 31 17 7 5 0 0 177 Ealing 1 0 33 67 29 22 5 0 0 1 158 Enfield 0 0 42 49 10 16 4 1 1 0 123 Greenwich 0 0 39 49 32 21 8 1 1 0 151 Hackney 2 0 40 63 26 13 10 0 0 0 154 Hammersmith & Fulham 2 0 21 44 18 11 6 0 0 0 102 Haringey 0 1 66 82 37 22 7 2 0 0 217 Harrow 0 0 25 27 8 11 2 0 0 0 73 Havering 0 0 9 21 17 12 2 2 0 0 63 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 0 0 27 44 16 13 2 4 0 0 106 Hounslow 0 0 17 56 27 12 0 1 1 0 114 Islington 2 0 39 48 30 19 7 2 0 0 147 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 12 25 11 7 2 0 0 0 57 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 9 10 7 3 2 0 0 0 31 Lambeth 2 0 91 76 58 28 11 1 1 0 268 Lewisham 0 0 56 70 30 29 14 1 2 1 203 Merton 0 0 18 32 10 5 3 0 0 0 68 Newham 3 0 69 89 39 25 4 1 0 0 230 Redbridge 0 0 19 35 16 10 6 3 0 0 89 Richmond-upon-Thames 3 0 10 9 7 4 1 1 0 0 35 Southwark 2 0 109 90 41 33 10 4 0 0 289 Sutton 0 0 4 13 7 7 1 0 1 0 33 Tower Hamlets 1 0 53 81 28 21 9 1 1 0 195 Waltham Forest 0 1 45 47 27 14 10 1 0 0 145 Wandsworth 1 0 18 31 17 17 3 1 1 0 89 Grand Total 24 7 1130 1498 718 499 164 41 10 4 4095
Page 222
FY 12-13 FY 12-13 Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 0 2 20 38 23 9 4 1 0 0 97 Barnet 0 0 24 27 14 10 3 0 0 1 79 Bexley 0 0 11 13 8 8 6 0 0 0 46 Brent 2 1 24 43 27 14 3 1 0 1 116 Bromley 2 0 17 18 8 12 7 1 0 1 66 Camden 0 0 11 36 11 11 2 0 0 0 71 City of Westminster 0 1 24 30 17 14 4 2 0 0 92 Croydon 0 1 49 45 27 21 6 2 1 0 152 Ealing 0 2 29 51 45 23 4 0 0 0 154 Enfield 1 0 32 27 23 13 2 1 1 0 100 Greenwich 0 0 17 41 31 11 10 0 1 0 111 Hackney 0 0 49 40 17 16 4 1 2 0 129 Hammersmith & Fulham 0 0 10 17 13 10 8 2 1 1 62 Haringey 0 1 35 58 29 26 5 3 2 1 160 Harrow 1 1 17 23 10 10 1 0 0 0 63 Havering 0 1 11 21 9 10 1 1 3 1 58 Heathrow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 0 0 17 30 18 10 5 0 0 0 80 Hounslow 0 0 24 42 30 14 7 0 0 0 117 Islington 2 0 23 46 25 8 5 1 0 0 110 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 23 18 14 6 0 0 0 0 61 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 8 14 3 1 1 0 0 0 27 Lambeth 0 0 64 67 25 26 10 2 1 0 195 Lewisham 2 0 42 44 40 30 6 1 1 0 166 Merton 0 1 15 17 11 7 3 1 0 0 55 Newham 0 0 41 67 40 24 6 2 0 0 180 Redbridge 1 0 13 34 16 13 4 0 1 0 82 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 5 18 6 3 6 1 0 0 39 Southwark 1 0 58 83 46 32 10 3 2 0 235 Sutton 0 0 4 15 7 7 0 0 0 0 33 Tower Hamlets 2 1 32 58 27 23 5 0 0 1 149 Waltham Forest 0 0 35 45 18 15 4 1 2 0 120 Wandsworth 3 1 27 37 22 11 5 3 1 1 111 Grand Total 17 13 811 1164 660 448 147 30 19 8 3317
Page 223 $SSHQGL[
February 2012 - March 2012 (Last two months of FY 11/12)
Age Group Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 0 0 2 8 1 1 0 0 0 0 12 Barnet 0 0 2 8 1 3 0 0 0 0 14 Bexley 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 4 Brent 1 0 6 11 7 2 1 0 0 0 28 Bromley 0 0 2 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 11 Camden 0 1 5 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 17 City of Westminster 0 0 4 4 5 3 0 0 0 0 16 Croydon 0 0 10 11 7 1 1 0 0 0 30 Ealing 1 0 5 5 4 3 1 0 0 1 20 Enfield 0 0 5 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 13 Greenwich 0 0 6 9 12 0 1 0 0 0 28 Hackney 0 0 5 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 16 Hammersmith & Fulham 0 0 1 10 2 0 0 0 0 0 13 Haringey 0 0 8 12 11 7 1 1 0 0 40 Harrow 0 0 4 3 1 2 1 0 0 0 11 Havering 0 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 8 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 0 0 4 7 4 1 1 0 0 0 17 Hounslow 0 0 3 8 2 3 0 0 0 0 16 Islington 0 0 4 5 7 3 3 1 0 0 23 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 2 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 3 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 Lambeth 0 0 21 14 11 5 3 0 0 0 54 Lewisham 0 0 9 11 4 2 4 0 1 0 31 Merton 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 Newham 2 0 9 25 5 9 0 0 0 0 50 Redbridge 0 0 1 6 3 1 0 0 0 0 11 Richmond-upon-Thames 1 0 6 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 9 Southwark 0 0 14 12 7 5 3 2 0 0 43 Sutton 0 0 2 1 0 3 1 0 0 0 7 Tower Hamlets 0 0 8 12 3 5 0 0 0 0 28 Waltham Forest 0 0 2 5 0 1 0 0 0 0 8 Wandsworth 0 0 1 4310000 9 Grand Total 5 1 160 223 120 73 21 4 1 1 609
Page 224 Financial Year 2012/13
Age Group Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 0 2 20 38 23 9 4 1 0 0 97 Barnet 0 0 24 27 14 10 3 0 0 1 79 Bexley 0 0 11 13 8 8 6 0 0 0 46 Brent 2 1 24 43 27 14 3 1 0 1 116 Bromley 2 0 17 18 8 12 7 1 0 1 66 Camden 0 0 11 36 11 11 2 0 0 0 71 City of Westminster 0 1 24 30 17 14 4 2 0 0 92 Croydon 0 1 49 45 27 21 6 2 1 0 152 Ealing 0 2 29 51 45 23 4 0 0 0 154 Enfield 1 0 32 27 23 13 2 1 1 0 100 Greenwich 0 0 17 41 31 11 10 0 1 0 111 Hackney 0 0 49 40 17 16 4 1 2 0 129 Hammersmith & Fulham 0 0 10 17 13 10 8 2 1 1 62 Haringey 0 1 35 58 29 26 5 3 2 1 160 Harrow 1 1 17 23 10 10 1 0 0 0 63 Havering 0 1 11 21 9 10 1 1 3 1 58 Heathrow 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 0 0 17 30 18 10 5 0 0 0 80 Hounslow 0 0 24 42 30 14 7 0 0 0 117 Islington 2 0 23 46 25 8 5 1 0 0 110 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 23 18 14 6 0 0 0 0 61 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 8 14 3 1 1 0 0 0 27 Lambeth 0 0 64 67 25 26 10 2 1 0 195 Lewisham 2 0 42 44 40 30 6 1 1 0 166 Merton 0 1 15 17 11 7 3 1 0 0 55 Newham 0 0 41 67 40 24 6 2 0 0 180 Redbridge 1 0 13 34 16 13 4 0 1 0 82 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 5 18 6 3 6 1 0 0 39 Southwark 1 0 58 83 46 32 10 3 2 0 235 Sutton 0 0 4 15 7 7 0 0 0 0 33 Tower Hamlets 2 1 32 58 27 23 5 0 0 1 149 Waltham Forest 0 0 35 45 18 15 4 1 2 0 120 Wandsworth 3 1 27 37 22 11 5 3 1 1 111 Grand Total 17 13 811 1164 660 448 147 30 19 8 3317
Page 225 April 2013 - June 2013 (First three months of FY 13/14)
Age Group Borough Name 0 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 0 1 1 7 3 5 1 0 0 0 18 Barnet 0 0 7 12 3 7 2 1 1 0 33 Bexley 0 0 5 7 0 2 0 0 0 0 14 Brent 0 0 7 16 10 9 1 0 0 0 43 Bromley 0 0 3 1 2 4 0 0 0 0 10 Camden 0 1 7 5 6 0 3 1 0 0 23 City of Westminster 1 0 2 16 5 5 2 0 0 0 31 Croydon 1 0 8 20 8 4 3 0 0 0 44 Ealing 0 0 7 18 1 5 2 0 0 0 33 Enfield 0 0 7 5 8 4 4 1 0 0 29 Greenwich 0 0 6 8 7 5 1 0 0 0 27 Hackney 0 0 12 14 8 2 3 0 0 0 39 Hammersmith & Fulham 0 0 7 9 1 2 2 1 0 0 22 Haringey 0 1 13 15 10 4 4 0 0 0 47 Harrow 0 0 3 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 11 Havering 0 0 8 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 14 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 0 0 7 5 3 4 0 0 0 0 19 Hounslow 0 0 10 9 5 2 1 0 1 0 28 Islington 0 0 7 9 1 3 1 1 0 0 22 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 2 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 12 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 0 0 3 3 2 0 0 0 0 8 Lambeth 0 0 14 21 9 8 4 0 0 0 56 Lewisham 0 0 9 12 4 4 1 0 1 0 31 Merton 0 0 5 6 3 3 0 0 0 0 17 Newham 0 0 13 23 11 4 4 1 0 1 57 Redbridge 0 0 7 8 3 2 1 0 0 0 21 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 Southwark 1 0 10 16 6 6 4 0 0 0 43 Sutton 0 0 3 4 2 1 3 0 0 0 13 Tower Hamlets 0 0 6 9 6 7 1 0 0 1 30 Waltham Forest 0 0 7 5 6 3 3 0 0 0 24 Wandsworth 2 0 4 9 7 1 1 1 0 0 25 Grand Total 5 3 207 301 149 115 54 7 3 2 846
Page 226 $SSHQGL[
FY 08-09 FY 08-09 Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 4 7 4 1 1 0 1 0 18 Barnet 3 6 6 8 2 0 0 0 25 Bexley 3 7 3 5 1 0 0 0 19 Brent 2 15 4 5 2 0 0 0 28 Bromley 7 6 16 4 0 0 0 0 33 Camden 4 18 5 4 2 0 0 0 33 City of Westminster 5 14 13 3 3 0 0 0 38 Croydon 20 11 10 5 1 0 0 0 47 Ealing 8 10 4 5 1 0 0 0 28 Enfield 11 17 8 3 1 0 0 0 40 Greenwich 10 16 10 2 1 0 0 0 39 Hackney 41 19 10 7 3 0 0 0 80 Hammersmith & Fulham 5 6 6 5 1 0 0 0 23 Haringey 18 17 8 3 3 0 0 0 49 Harrow 6 10 5 1 0 0 0 0 22 Havering 2 8 4 2 0 0 1 0 17 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 1 16 9 1 2 0 0 0 29 Hounslow 2 13 2 5 1 0 0 0 23 Islington 9 13 10 5 5 0 0 1 43 Kensington & Chelsea 2 4 2 4 1 0 0 0 13 Kingston-upon-Thames 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 9 Lambeth 12 15 8 6 2 0 0 0 43 Lewisham 6 18 7 9 1 0 1 0 42 Merton 1 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 9 Newham 32 22 17 9 3 1 0 0 84 Redbridge 7 8 5 10 2 0 0 0 32 Richmond-upon-Thames 9 4 2 6 1 0 0 0 22 Southwark 29 18 10 11 8 0 1 0 77 Sutton 2 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 10 Tower Hamlets 19 21 10 6 2 1 0 0 59 Waltham Forest 13 12 3 7 1 0 0 0 36 Wandsworth 12 13 4 5 0 0 0 0 34 Grand Total 306 375 212 151 53 2 4 1 1104
Page 227
FY 09-10 FY 09-10 Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 10 13 11 5 1 0 0 0 40 Barnet 9 10 5 3 1 1 0 0 29 Bexley 6 5 3 1 4 1 0 0 20 Brent 16 20 7 6 2 1 0 0 52 Bromley 13 10 7 5 1 0 0 0 36 Camden 8 5 7 7 1 0 0 0 28 City of Westminster 8 17 16 6 2 0 0 0 49 Croydon 17 14 4 5 2 0 0 0 42 Ealing 17 17 14 8 5 0 0 0 61 Enfield 14 14 8 5 2 1 0 0 44 Greenwich 5 30 16 6 1 0 0 0 58 Hackney 30 24 24 5 3 0 0 1 87 Hammersmith & Fulham 8 9 8 4 0 0 0 0 29 Haringey 21 14 10 8 3 0 2 0 58 Harrow 4 5 9 3 1 0 0 0 22 Havering 11 5 4 6 0 0 1 0 27 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 3 15 7 3 2 0 0 0 30 Hounslow 10 9 8 4 1 0 1 0 33 Islington 20 24 5 7 1 0 0 0 57 Kensington & Chelsea 5 2 5 3 1 0 0 0 16 Kingston-upon-Thames 7 7 2 2 0 0 0 0 18 Lambeth 25 23 8 12 1 1 0 0 70 Lewisham 37 26 10 5 2 0 0 0 80 Merton 6 7 2 3 1 0 0 0 19 Newham 36 27 17 6 1 0 1 0 88 Redbridge 9 5 7 4 2 0 0 0 27 Richmond-upon-Thames 9 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 17 Southwark 62 15 15 13 4 2 0 0 111 Sutton 2 11 4 5 4 1 0 0 27 Tower Hamlets 43 19 5 8 1 2 0 0 78 Waltham Forest 22 9 8 5 2 0 1 0 47 Wandsworth 18 12 7 6 2 0 0 0 45 Grand Total 511 425 268 170 54 10 6 1 1445
Page 228
FY 10-11 FY 10-11 Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 12 10 8 6 1 0 0 0 37 Barnet 9 10 8 5 1 1 0 0 34 Bexley 7 3 5 2 0 0 0 0 17 Brent 11 11 13 15 3 2 0 0 55 Bromley 8 11 4 3 0 0 1 0 27 Camden 14 14 5 3 6 2 0 0 44 City of Westminster 26 14 8 7 1 0 0 0 56 Croydon 27 20 10 3 3 0 0 0 63 Ealing 14 18 14 9 1 0 0 0 56 Enfield 24 16 6 6 4 1 0 0 57 Greenwich 10 10 14 13 2 0 1 0 50 Hackney 41 26 10 11 2 0 0 0 90 Hammersmith & Fulham 9 9 6 6 3 0 0 0 33 Haringey 23 22 15 5 5 0 0 0 70 Harrow 3 6 6 1 2 0 0 0 18 Havering 11 13 5 4 1 0 0 0 34 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 9 11 8 2 0 0 0 0 30 Hounslow 10 9 8 5 2 0 0 0 34 Islington 16 10 10 8 1 1 0 0 46 Kensington & Chelsea 2 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 15 Kingston-upon-Thames 1 4 8 0 1 0 0 0 14 Lambeth 36 16 14 9 4 1 0 0 80 Lewisham 35 19 11 9 4 0 0 0 78 Merton 5 7 7 3 2 0 0 0 24 Newham 36 34 19 9 6 0 0 0 104 Redbridge 7 12 5 5 0 1 0 0 30 Richmond-upon-Thames 4 7 0 3 1 0 0 0 15 Southwark 33 25 17 10 4 2 0 0 91 Sutton 4 4 6 4 1 0 0 1 20 Tower Hamlets 25 26 7 7 1 0 2 0 68 Waltham Forest 3 8 9 2 3 0 0 0 25 Wandsworth 12 10 5 3 3 0 0 0 33 Grand Total 487 423 274 180 68 11 4 1 1448
Page 229
FY 11-12 FY 11-12 Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 11 13 8 2 1 1 0 0 36 Barnet 12 2 5 5 1 3 0 0 28 Bexley 9 11 7 4 0 0 0 0 31 Brent 12 15 5 8 1 0 0 1 42 Bromley 10 21 11 10 2 0 0 0 54 Camden 13 11 6 6 2 0 0 0 38 City of Westminster 21 17 6 4 3 1 0 0 52 Croydon 16 15 7 4 1 1 0 0 44 Ealing 13 21 9 6 3 0 0 0 52 Enfield 12 14 6 6 3 0 0 0 41 Greenwich 17 19 16 12 3 1 0 0 68 Hackney 23 15 14 9 0 1 0 0 62 Hammersmith & Fulham 19 6 8 9 2 0 0 0 44 Haringey 23 19 11 2 0 1 0 0 56 Harrow 14 11 0 2 0 1 0 0 28 Havering 9 10 2 2 0 0 0 0 23 Heathrow 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 12 13 4 4 2 0 0 0 35 Hounslow 13 14 3 5 3 1 0 0 39 Islington 10 9 7 8 2 0 0 0 36 Kensington & Chelsea 3 8 0 3 1 0 0 0 15 Kingston-upon-Thames 3 10 4 1 0 0 0 0 18 Lambeth 25 15 13 12 4 2 0 0 71 Lewisham 16 15 13 12 4 1 0 0 61 Merton 6 1 6 2 1 0 0 0 16 Newham 44 18 6 10 1 1 1 0 81 Redbridge 6 11 10 5 1 1 0 0 34 Richmond-upon-Thames 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 Southwark 36 17 16 9 1 0 0 0 79 Sutton 0 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 Tower Hamlets 16 20 21 11 1 1 0 0 70 Waltham Forest 27 7 6 6 2 0 0 0 48 Wandsworth 7 7 5 6 2 0 0 0 27 Grand Total 461 393 241 185 47 17 1 1 1346
Page 230
FY 12-13 FY 12-13 Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Total Barking & Dagenham 10 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 26 Barnet 8 4 2 3 0 2 0 0 19 Bexley 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 8 Brent 9 13 8 6 1 0 0 0 37 Bromley 3 5 4 6 0 0 0 0 18 Camden 7 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 23 City of Westminster 13 13 4 4 0 0 0 0 34 Croydon 17 19 7 11 0 1 0 0 55 Ealing 12 11 16 8 4 0 0 0 51 Enfield 11 10 9 4 1 1 0 0 36 Greenwich 9 16 12 10 1 1 0 0 49 Hackney 11 8 6 5 3 0 0 0 33 Hammersmith & Fulham 3 13 7 4 4 0 0 0 31 Haringey 14 11 10 8 4 0 0 0 47 Harrow 5 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 14 Havering 3 6 4 2 0 1 0 0 16 Heathrow 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 7 8 7 7 1 2 0 0 32 Hounslow 15 13 3 4 1 0 0 0 36 Islington 15 11 5 2 3 0 0 0 36 Kensington & Chelsea 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 Kingston-upon-Thames 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 12 Lambeth 13 11 9 5 2 2 0 0 42 Lewisham 19 13 13 7 4 1 1 0 58 Merton 3 9 4 4 1 0 0 0 21 Newham 20 29 19 8 4 0 0 0 80 Redbridge 4 13 4 4 1 0 0 0 26 Richmond-upon-Thames 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 11 Southwark 10 19 15 12 4 1 1 0 62 Sutton 1 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 Tower Hamlets 19 29 11 5 3 0 0 0 67 Waltham Forest 8 12 11 3 2 0 0 0 36 Wandsworth 11 8 10 6 2 0 0 0 37 Grand Total 289 343 223 151 50 12 2 0 1070
Page 231 $SSHQGL[
February 2012 - March 2012 (Last two months of FY 11/12)
Age Group Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 2 4 2 0 1 0 0 0 9 Barnet 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Bexley 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 Brent 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 Bromley 0 4 1 1 1 0 0 0 7 Camden 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 8 City of Westminster 1 4 0 1 2 1 0 0 9 Croydon 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 7 Ealing 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 5 Enfield 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 Greenwich 8 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 16 Hackney 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 7 Hammersmith & Fulham 2 0 1 5 0 0 0 0 8 Haringey 9 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 19 Harrow 0 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 4 Havering 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 5 Hounslow 4 7 0 1 0 0 0 0 12 Islington 1 5 1 3 0 0 0 0 10 Kensington & Chelsea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Kingston-upon-Thames 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 Lambeth 3 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 11 Lewisham 6 1 5 3 0 0 0 0 15 Merton 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Newham 1 4 0 1 0 0 0 0 6 Redbridge 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 Southwark 9 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 16 Sutton 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tower Hamlets 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 10 Waltham Forest 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Wandsworth 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Grand Total 63 69 42 28 10 2 0 0 214
Page 232 Financial Year 2012/13
Age Group Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 10 7 6 2 1 0 0 0 26 Barnet 8 4 2 3 0 2 0 0 19 Bexley 2 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 8 Brent 9 13 8 6 1 0 0 0 37 Bromley 3 5 4 6 0 0 0 0 18 Camden 7 8 5 2 1 0 0 0 23 City of Westminster 13 13 4 4 0 0 0 0 34 Croydon 17 19 7 11 0 1 0 0 55 Ealing 12 11 16 8 4 0 0 0 51 Enfield 11 10 9 4 1 1 0 0 36 Greenwich 9 16 12 10 1 1 0 0 49 Hackney 11 8 6 5 3 0 0 0 33 Hammersmith & Fulham 3 13 7 4 4 0 0 0 31 Haringey 14 11 10 8 4 0 0 0 47 Harrow 5 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 14 Havering 3 6 4 2 0 1 0 0 16 Heathrow 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Hillingdon 7 8 7 7 1 2 0 0 32 Hounslow 15 13 3 4 1 0 0 0 36 Islington 15 11 5 2 3 0 0 0 36 Kensington & Chelsea 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 8 Kingston-upon-Thames 2 7 2 1 0 0 0 0 12 Lambeth 13 11 9 5 2 2 0 0 42 Lewisham 19 13 13 7 4 1 1 0 58 Merton 3 9 4 4 1 0 0 0 21 Newham 20 29 19 8 4 0 0 0 80 Redbridge 4 13 4 4 1 0 0 0 26 Richmond-upon-Thames 2 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 11 Southwark 10 19 15 12 4 1 1 0 62 Sutton 1 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 8 Tower Hamlets 19 29 11 5 3 0 0 0 67 Waltham Forest 8 12 11 3 2 0 0 0 36 Wandsworth 11 8 10 6 2 0 0 0 37 Grand Total 289 343 223 151 50 12 2 0 1070
Page 233 April 2013 - June 2013 (First three months of FY 13/14)
Age Group Borough Name 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80+ Grand Total Barking & Dagenham 1 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 4 Barnet 0 2 1 4 0 2 0 0 9 Bexley 0 2 2 1 1 0 0 0 6 Brent 9 6 2 4 1 0 0 0 22 Bromley 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 Camden 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 6 City of Westminster 2 3 1 4 0 0 1 0 11 Croydon 4 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 14 Ealing 6 8 2 3 1 0 0 0 20 Enfield 0 5 4 1 0 0 0 0 10 Greenwich 1 2 2 1 2 0 0 0 8 Hackney 6 6 2 3 3 0 0 0 20 Hammersmith & Fulham 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 5 Haringey 3 12 1 5 0 0 0 0 21 Harrow 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 3 Havering 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Hillingdon 9 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 15 Hounslow 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 7 Islington 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 Kensington & Chelsea 4 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 9 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 4 Lambeth 4 1 4 5 0 0 0 0 14 Lewisham 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 6 Merton 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 3 Newham 4 5 2 3 0 0 0 0 14 Redbridge 7 3 0 1 1 0 0 0 12 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Southwark 3 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 13 Sutton 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 Tower Hamlets 9 2 3 2 2 0 0 0 18 Waltham Forest 0 4 0 1 1 0 0 0 6 Wandsworth 3 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 10 Grand Total 93 100 43 53 18 3 1 0 311
Page 234 $SSHQGL[
FY 11-12 FY 11-12 FY 12-13 FY 12-13 Borough Name 1-9 10-19 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59Total 60-69-9 10-19 70-79 20-29 30-39 1 40-49 50-59 60-69Total 70-79 Barking & Dagenham 0 31 12 1 1 1 0 0 46 0 27 9 3 1 0 0 0 40 Barnet 0 34 9 2 3 0 1 0 49 0 41 9 1 0 0 0 0 51 Bexley 0 34 5 3 1 1 0 0 44 0 25 3 3 3 1 0 0 35 Brent 0 38 8 3 1 0 0 0 50 0 17 12 3 2 0 0 0 34 Bromley 0 48 19 4 2 1 0 0 74 0 23 7 2 1 1 0 0 34 Camden 0 38 13 2 2 0 0 0 55 0 12 1 2 1 1 0 0 17 City of Westminster 0 64 15 6 3 1 0 0 89 0 43 8 7 0 1 0 0 59 Croydon 0 58 18 3 0 0 0 0 79 0 65 18 3 1 0 0 0 87 Ealing 0 29 11 1 2 0 0 0 43 0 45 8 3 2 0 0 0 58 Enfield 0 53 10 0 0 0 0 2 65 0 47 3 2 2 1 0 0 55 Greenwich 0 58 12 8 4 2 0 0 84 0 31 5 1 0 0 0 0 37 Hackney 0 44 15 5 2 0 0 0 66 0 32 6 2 4 0 0 0 44 Hammersmith & Fulham 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 0 18 0 9 2 1 1 0 0 0 13 Haringey 0 47 13 0 2 0 0 0 62 0 38 6 0 1 0 0 0 45 Harrow 0 39 7 1 2 0 0 0 49 0 16 2 1 1 1 0 0 21 Havering 0 42 5 1 0 0 0 0 48 0 19 9 4 0 0 0 0 32 Heathrow 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Page 235 Hillingdon 0 39 19 2 2 0 1 0 63 0 32 9 3 0 0 0 0 44 Hounslow 0 27 8 4 3 0 0 0 42 0 27 5 1 0 0 0 0 33 Islington 0 34 11 2 1 1 0 1 50 0 28 4 1 0 1 0 0 34 Kensington & Chelsea 02 14 1 0 1 0 0 18 0 12 6 0 0 0 0 0 18 Kingston-upon-Thames 0 24 12 0 1 0 0 0 37 0 7 4 0 1 0 1 0 13 Lambeth 0 66 9 2 2 1 0 0 80 0 49 11 0 1 0 0 0 61 Lewisham 0 68 13 6 2 2 0 0 91 0 38 13 1 2 0 0 0 54 Merton 0 16 2 0 0 0 1 0 19 1 25 9 2 0 0 0 0 37 Newham 0 89 18 2 2 0 0 0 111 0 49 23 6 6 0 0 0 84 Redbridge 0 48 17 7 2 0 0 0 74 0 21 10 1 2 0 0 0 34 Richmond-upon-Thames 0 12 5 0 1 1 0 0 19 0 11 1 1 0 0 0 0 13 Southwark 0 72 12 1 1 0 0 0 86 0 36 13 2 1 0 0 0 52 Sutton 0 31 4 0 2 0 0 0 37 0 24 8 2 1 0 0 0 35 Tower Hamlets 0 51 23 4 2 1 0 0 81 0 46 9 1 2 1 0 0 59 Waltham Forest 0 35 13 2 2 1 0 0 53 0 30 11 2 1 1 0 0 45 Wandsworth 0 39 18 2 1 1 0 0 61 0 22 4 5 1 0 1 0 33 Grand Total 0 1339 359 75 49 15 3 3 1843 1 947 248 66 38 9 2 0 1311 $SSHQGL[
LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Abbey Road DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Abbey Wood NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Acton Central OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Acton Main Line NR Committed funding Acton Town LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Addington Village TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Addiscombe TL Step-free at 01/05/08 All Saints DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Ampere Way TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Anerley OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Arena TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Avenue Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Balham NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Bank (Northern, Waterloo & City lines) LUL DLR Committed funding Barbican LUL Committed funding Barking LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Beckenham Hill NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Beckenham Junction NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Beckenham Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Beckton DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Beckton Park DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Beddington Lane TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Belgrave Walk TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Belmont NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Belvedere NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Bermondsey LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Bexleyheath NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Birkbeck NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Blackfriars NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Blackfriars LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Blackheath NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Blackhorse Lane TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Blackhorse Road OG NR Committed funding Blackwall DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Bond Street LUL Committed funding Bow Church DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Brentford NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Brimsdown NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Brixton LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Brockley OG NR Committed funding Bromley North NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Bromley South NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Bromley-By-Bow LUL Committed funding Caledonian Rd & Barnsbury OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Caledonian Road LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Camden Road OG NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Canada Water LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Canary Wharf DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Canary Wharf LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Canning Town LUL DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Cannon Street NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Canonbury OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Carpenders Park OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Catford Bridge NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Centrale TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Chadwell Heath NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Chalfont & Latimer LUL NR Step-free at 01/05/08
Page 236 LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Charing Cross (NR) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Charlton NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Cheam NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Chelsfield NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Chesham LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Chingford NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Chiswick NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Chorleywood LUL NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Church Street TL Step-free at 01/05/08 City Thameslink NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Clapham Junction OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Coombe Lane TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Coulsdon Town (previously called Smitham) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Crayford NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Crossharbour DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Crystal Palace OG NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Custom House DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Cutty Sark DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Cyprus DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Dagenham Dock NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Dagenham Heathway LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Dalston Junction OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Denmark Hill NR Committed funding Deptford Bridge DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Devons Road DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Dundonald Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Ealing Broadway LUL NR Committed funding Earl's Court LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Earlsfield NR Step-free following 03/05/12 East Croydon NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 East Ham LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 East India DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Edgware LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Edmonton Green NR Committed funding Elephant & Castle (Northern line) LUL Committed funding Elm Park LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Elmers End NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Elmstead Woods NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Eltham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Elverson Road DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Emerson Park NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Enfield Lock NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Enfield Town NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Epping LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Euston OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Farringdon LUL NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Feltham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Fenchurch Street NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Fieldway TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Finchley Central LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Finsbury Park NR Committed funding Finsbury Park (LU) LUL Committed funding Forest Gate NR Committed funding Forest Hill OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Fulham Broadway LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Gallions Reach DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 George Street TL Step-free at 01/05/08
Page 237 LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Gidea Park NR Committed funding Golders Green LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Goodmayes NR Committed funding Gospel Oak OG NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Gravel Hill TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Green Park LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Greenford LUL NR Committed funding Greenwich NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Greenwich DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Grove Park NR Committed funding Hackbridge NR Committed funding Hackney Central OG NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Hackney Wick OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Haggerston OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Hainault LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Hammersmith (Dist&Picc Line) LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Hammersmith (H&C Line) LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Hampstead Heath OG NR Committed funding Hampton NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Harold Wood NR Committed funding Harringay Green Lanes OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Harrington Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Harrow & Wealdstone LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Hayes & Harlington NR Committed funding Hayes (Kent) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Heathrow Central NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Heathrow Terminal 4 LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Heathrow Terminal 4 NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Heathrow Terminal 5 LUL NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Heathrow Terminals 123 LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Hendon Central LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Herne Hill NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Heron Quays DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 High Barnet LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Highbury & Islington (OG) OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Hillingdon LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Homerton OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Honor Oak Park OG NR Committed funding Hounslow NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Hounslow East LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Hounslow West LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Hoxton OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Ilford NR Committed funding Imperial Wharf OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Island Gardens DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Kenley NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Kensal Rise OG NR Committed funding Kensington (Olympia) LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Kew Gardens LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Kidbrooke NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Kilburn LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 King George V DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 King Henry's Drive TL Step-free at 01/05/08 King's Cross NR Step-free at 01/05/08 King's Cross St.Pancras LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Kingsbury LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Kingston NR Step-free by 03/05/12
Page 238 LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Ladywell NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Langdon Park DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Lebanon Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Lee NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Lewisham DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Lewisham NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Limehouse NR Committed funding Limehouse DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Liverpool Street NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Liverpool Street (Crossrail, Circle, Hammersmith & City lines) LUL Committed funding Lloyd Park TL Step-free at 01/05/08 London Bridge NR Step-free at 01/05/08 London Bridge LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 London City Airport DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Lower Sydenham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Marylebone NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Maze Hill NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Merton Park TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Mitcham Eastfields NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Mitcham TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Mitcham Eastfields NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Mitcham Junction NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Moorgate LUL NR Committed funding Morden LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Morden Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Mottingham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Mudchute DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 New Addington TL Step-free at 01/05/08 New Beckenham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 New Cross OG NR Committed funding New Cross Gate OG NR Committed funding New Eltham NR Committed funding New Malden NR Committed funding Norbiton NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Norbury NR Step-free at 01/05/08 North Greenwich LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Northolt Park NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Northumberland Park NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Oakwood LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Orpington NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Paddington NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Paddington (Crossrail ,Hammersmith & City, Circle, District lines)LUL Committed funding Penge East NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Phipps Bridge TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Pinner LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Ponders End NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Pontoon Dock DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Poplar DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Prince Regent DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Pudding Mill Lane DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Purley NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Putney NR Committed funding Queens Rd Peckham NR Committed funding Rainham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Reeves Corner TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Richmond LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Riddlesdown NR Step-free at 01/05/08
Page 239 LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Roding Valley LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Romford NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Royal Albert DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Royal Victoria DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Sanderstead NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Sandilands TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Shadwell DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Shepherd's Bush (NR) OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Shoreditch High Street OG NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Sidcup NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Slade Green NR Step-free at 01/05/08 South Acton OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 South Greenford NR Step-free at 01/05/08 South Quay DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 South Tottenham OG NR Committed funding Southall NR Committed funding Southfields LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Southwark LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 St Pancras NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Stanmore LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Star Lane DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Stratford LUL DLR OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Stratford High Street DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Stratford International DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 Stratford International NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Strawberry Hill NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Streatham Common NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Streatham Hill NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Sudbury Town LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Surbiton NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Sutton (Surrey) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Sydenham OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Teddington NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Therapia Lane TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Thornton Heath NR Committed funding Tottenham Court Road LUL Committed funding Tottenham Hale NR Committed funding Tottenham Hale (LU) LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Tower Gateway DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Tower Hill LUL Committed funding Twickenham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Upminster LUL NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Upney LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Upper Holloway OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Uxbridge LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Vauxhall NR Committed funding Vauxhall (LU) LUL Committed funding Victoria NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Victoria LUL Committed funding Waddon Marsh TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Wallington NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Walthamstow Central (NR) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Walthamstow Queens Road OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Wandle Park TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Waterloo (main line) NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Waterloo East NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Waterloo (LU Jubilee) LUL Step-free at 01/05/08
Page 240 LUL DLR OG NR TL Station Name Step-free Watford Junction OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Wellesley Road TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Welling NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Wembley Central LUL OG NR Step-free following 03/05/12 Wembley Park LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Wembley Stadium NR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Croydon OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Croydon TL Step-free at 01/05/08 West Drayton NR Committed funding West Ealing NR Committed funding West Finchley LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 West Ham LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 West Ham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Ham DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Hampstead Thameslink NR Step-free by 03/05/12 West India Quay DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Norwood NR Step-free at 01/05/08 West Silvertown DLR Step-free by 03/05/12 West Wickham NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Westcombe Park NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Westferry DLR Step-free at 01/05/08 Westminster LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Whitechapel LUL OG NR Committed funding Willesden Junction LUL OG NR Step-free at 01/05/08 Wimbledon LUL NR TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Wood Lane LUL Step-free by 03/05/12 Woodford LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Woodside TL Step-free at 01/05/08 Woodside Park LUL Step-free at 01/05/08 Woolwich Arsenal DLR NR Step-free by 03/05/12 Worcester Park NR Step-free following 03/05/12
NB Stations that are only step-free in one direction are considered not step-free. Where two different modes share a station located in exactly the same place this is treated as one station, but where two or more rail modes interchange but the stations are separate these stations are considered separately. For more information see http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloads/corporate/taking-forward- the-mts-accessibility-implementation-plan-march-2012-final.pdf
Key: LUL - London Underground DLR - Docklands Light Rail OG - Overground NR - National Rail TL - Tramlink
Page 241 $SSHQGL[
Percentage of bike availability and average minutes empty per day for the period 01 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 All data is based on when each empty instance ended and after exclusions have been applied
Docking Station % Bike Availability Average minutes empty per day Albert Gardens, Stepney 100.00% 0 Endsleigh Gardens, Euston 100.00% 0 John Islip Street, Westminster 100.00% 0 Old Brompton Road, South Kensington 100.00% 0 Sumner Place, South Kensington 100.00% 0 Thornfield House, Poplar 100.00% 0 Wenlock Road, Hoxton 100.00% 0 Teviot Street, Poplar 100.00% 0 Borough Road, Elephant & Castle 100.00% 0 Preston's Road, Cubitt Town 99.99% 0 Stebondale Street, Cubitt Town 99.99% 0 East India DLR, Blackwall 99.98% 0 Lightermans Road, Millwall 99.97% 0 Southwark Station, Southwark 99.96% 1 Bromley High Street, Bow 99.95% 1 Pennington Street, Wapping 99.95% 1 Langdon Park, Poplar 99.92% 1 St. John's Wood Church, Regent's Park 99.92% 1 The Green Bridge, Mile End 99.90% 2 Coborn Street, Bow 99.89% 2 Spindrift Avenue, Millwall 99.86% 2 Jubilee Cresent, Cubitt Town 99.86% 2 Clinton Road, Mile End 99.82% 3 Castalia Square, Cubitt Town 99.81% 3 Westfield Southern Terrace, Shepherd's Bush 99.78% 3 Gaywood Street, Elephant & Castle 99.75% 4 Hop Exchange, The Borough 99.74% 4 East Ferry Road, Cubitt Town 99.73% 4 LSBU (Borough Road), Elephant & Castle 99.68% 5 Burdett Road, Mile End 99.67% 5 Westferry DLR, Limehouse 99.67% 5 Malmesbury Road, Bow 99.65% 5 Harper Road, The Borough 99.64% 5 Saunders Ness Road, Cubitt Town 99.63% 5 Empire Square, The Borough 99.63% 5 Westfield Library Corner, Shepherd's Bush 99.63% 5 Lindfield Street, Poplar 99.63% 5 Devons Road, Bow 99.61% 6 Westminster Bridge Road, Elephant & Castle 99.60% 6 Royal Mews, Victoria 99.59% 6 Bow Road Station, Bow 99.53% 7 Elizabeth Bridge, Victoria 99.53% 7 King Edward Walk, Waterloo 99.48% 7 Hansard Mews, Shepherds Bush 99.48% 8 Lollard Street, Vauxhall 99.45% 8 Claverton Street, Pimlico 99.45% 8 Queen Mother Sports Centre, Victoria 99.37% 9 Cadogan Place, Knightsbridge 99.37% 9 Cardinal Place, Victoria 99.34% 9 Denyer Street, Knightsbridge 99.34% 9 Tyers Gate, Bermondsey 99.34% 10 South Parade, Chelsea 99.33% 10 Mostyn Grove, Bow 99.32% 10 Sloane Avenue, Knightsbridge 99.31% 10 Howick Place, Westminster 99.31% 10 Chelsea Green, Chelsea 99.30% 10 Manresa Road, Chelsea 99.25% 11 St John's Park, Cubitt Town 99.24% 11 Royal Avenue, Chelsea 99.22% 11 Flood Street, Chelsea 99.21% 11 Warwick Road, Olympia 99.18% 12 Alpha Grove, Millwall 99.18% 12 Cantrell Road, Bow 99.18% 12 Newby Place, Poplar 99.17% 12 Oval Way, Vauxhall 99.16% 12 Harford Street, Mile End 99.16% 12 Vaughan Way, Wapping 99.12% 13 Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel 99.12% 13 New Road, Whitechapel 99.12% 13 Mudchute DLR, Cubitt Town 99.12% 13 Queen Mary's, Mile End 99.09% 13 Chrisp Street Market, Poplar 99.07% 13 Tanner Street, Bermondsey 99.06% 13 Limerston Street, Chelsea 99.06% 14 Bow Church Station, Bow 99.06% 14 Sutton Street, Shadwell 99.05% 14 Royal College Street, Camden Town 99.04% 14 Cleveland Way, Bethnal Green 99.03% 14 Eaton Square (South), Belgravia 99.01% 14 Ackroyd Drive, Bow 98.99% 15 Millharbour, Millwall 98.98% 15 Somerset House, Strand 98.98% 15 Borough High Street, The Borough 98.94% 15 Bankside Mix, Bankside 98.93% 15 Kennington Lane Tesco, Vauxhall 98.90% 16 Belgrave Square, Belgravia 98.89% 16 Sail Street, Vauxhall 98.89% 16 Sedding Street, Sloane Square 98.83% 17 Aberfeldy Street, Poplar 98.82% 17 Vincent Square, Westminster 98.77% 18 Speakers' Corner, Hyde Park 98.76% 18 Guildhouse Street, Victoria 98.72% 18 Pont Street, Knightsbridge 98.68% 19 Buxton Street, Bangla Town 98.66% 19 Parkway, Camden Town 98.65% 19 Grosvenor Road, Pimlico 98.65% 19 Dickens Square, The Borough 98.63% 20 Ashley Place, Victoria 98.59% 20 Lancaster Drive, Blackwall 98.55% 21 Salmon Lane, Limehouse 98.54% 21 Belgrave Road, Victoria 98.50% 22 Ontario Street, Elephant & Castle 98.47% 22 Harrington Square, Camden Town 98.47% 22 New Kent Road, The Borough 98.46% 22 Black Prince Road, Vauxhall 98.44% 22 Naval Row, Blackwall 98.44% 22 Watney Market, Stepney 98.43% 23 Webber Street, Southwark 98.41% 23 Nesham Street, Wapping 98.41% 23 Page 242 Ebury Bridge, Pimlico 98.41% 23 Furze Green, Bow 98.40% 23 Lambeth North Station, Waterloo 98.40% 23 Sidney Street, Stepney 98.37% 23 Triangle Car Park, Hyde Park 98.34% 24 St. Luke's Church, Chelsea 98.28% 25 Bourne Street, Belgravia 98.26% 25 Rectory Square, Stepney 98.26% 25 St. Mary and St. Michael Church, Stepney 98.26% 25 Antill Road, Mile End 98.25% 25 Tooley Street, Bermondsey 98.24% 25 South Quay West, Canary Wharf 98.21% 26 Vauxhall Walk, Vauxhall 98.20% 26 Philpot Street, Whitechapel 98.15% 27 Vauxhall Bridge, Pimlico 98.13% 27 Wapping High Street, Wapping 98.11% 27 Swan Street, The Borough 98.09% 27 Leman Street, Aldgate 98.03% 28 Regency Street, Westminster 97.97% 29 Soho Square, Soho 97.97% 29 Vincent Street, Pimlico 97.95% 29 Stamford Street, South Bank 97.94% 30 Hyde Park Corner, Hyde Park 97.92% 30 Palissy Street, Shoreditch 97.89% 30 Walworth Road, Elephant & Castle 97.88% 30 Walmer Road, Notting Hill 97.83% 31 Phillimore Gardens, Kensington 97.81% 32 Fire Brigade Pier, Vauxhall 97.79% 32 Southern Grove, Bow 97.78% 32 Albert Embankment, Vauxhall 97.76% 32 Hollybush Gardens, Bethnal Green 97.76% 32 Tysoe Street, Clerkenwell 97.75% 32 Tachbrook Street, Victoria 97.75% 32 Lower Marsh, Waterloo 97.69% 33 City Road, Angel 97.69% 33 Canton Street, Poplar 97.68% 33 Selby Street, Whitechapel 97.67% 34 Holy Trinity Brompton, Knightsbridge 97.64% 34 Belvedere Road, South Bank 97.58% 35 Stepney Green Station, Stepney 97.58% 35 Geraldine Street, Elephant & Castle 97.55% 35 Columbia Road, Weavers 97.54% 35 Union Street, The Borough 97.51% 36 Clarkson Street, Bethnal Green 97.48% 36 Queen's Gate (Central), South Kensington 97.47% 36 Kennington Oval, Oval 97.47% 36 South Quay East, Canary Wharf 97.46% 37 Vauxhall Street, Vauxhall 97.45% 37 Kennington Road, Vauxhall 97.45% 37 Bethnal Green Garden, Bethnal Green 97.43% 37 Argyll Road, Kensington 97.41% 37 Crinan Street, King's Cross 97.41% 37 Queen's Gate (South), South Kensington 97.40% 37 Lambeth Road, Vauxhall 97.35% 38 Castlehaven Road, Camden Town 97.35% 38 Jubilee Gardens, South Bank 97.34% 38 Napier Avenue, Millwall 97.34% 38 Rodney Street, Angel 97.29% 39 Aston Street, Stepney 97.26% 39 Ford Road, Old Ford 97.26% 39 Serpentine Car Park, Hyde Park 97.25% 40 Milroy Walk, South Bank 97.21% 40 Wright's Lane, Kensington 97.16% 41 Wardour Street, Soho 97.16% 41 York Hall, Bethnal Green 97.14% 41 Cephas Street, Bethnal Green 97.10% 42 Abbotsbury Road, Holland Park 97.09% 42 Hewison Street, Old Ford 97.06% 42 Cadogan Gardens, Sloane Square 97.04% 43 Greenland Road, Camden Town 97.04% 43 Curlew Street, Shad Thames 97.03% 43 Wapping Lane, Wapping 97.01% 43 Northumberland Avenue, Strand 96.99% 43 Flamborough Street, Limehouse 96.96% 44 Great Marlborough Street, Soho 96.96% 44 Colombo Street, Southwark 96.91% 45 Clerkenwell Green, Clerkenwell 96.88% 45 Eccleston Place, Victoria 96.84% 45 Baylis Road, Waterloo 96.83% 46 Rampayne Street, Pimlico 96.80% 46 Poured Lines, Bankside 96.76% 47 Drayton Gardens, Chelsea 96.74% 47 Falkirk Street, Hoxton 96.67% 48 Great Percy Street, Clerkenwell 96.65% 48 Embankment (Savoy), Strand 96.61% 49 Northdown Street, King's Cross 96.58% 49 Kennington Lane Rail Bridge, Vauxhall 96.52% 50 Finsbury Leisure Centre, St. Luke's 96.51% 50 Curzon Street, Mayfair 96.50% 50 Russell Gardens, Holland Park 96.48% 51 Gloucester Road (Central), South Kensington 96.44% 51 Paddington Green Police Station, Paddington 96.43% 51 Bancroft Road, Bethnal Green 96.38% 52 Arlington Road, Camden Town 96.35% 53 Hinde Street, Marylebone 96.35% 53 Abingdon Villas, Kensington 96.33% 53 Margery Street, Clerkenwell 96.33% 53 Windsor Terrace, Hoxton 96.30% 53 Old Montague Street, Whitechapel 96.21% 55 Emperor's Gate, South Kensington 96.14% 56 Eaton Square, Belgravia 96.11% 56 Portland Place, Marylebone 96.09% 56 Macclesfield Road, St. Luke's 96.08% 56 Marylebone Flyover, Paddington 96.06% 57 St Katharine’s Way, Tower 96.04% 57 Bermondsey Street, Bermondsey 96.01% 57 Old Ford Road, Bethnal Green 96.00% 58 Calshot Street, King's Cross 95.97% 58 Natural History Museum, South Kensington 95.93% 59 Kennington Cross, Kennington 95.92% 59 Gloucester Road Station, South Kensington 95.92% 59 Gloucester Street, Pimlico 95.91% 59 Chelsea Bridge, Pimlico 95.88% 59 Page 243 Whitehall Place, Strand 95.88% 59 Waterloo Station, Waterloo 95.87% 60 Nevern Place, Earl's Court 95.86% 60 Shadwell Station, Shadwell 95.83% 60 Sancroft Street, Vauxhall 95.82% 60 Gunmakers Lane, Old Ford 95.81% 60 Greycoat Street, Westminster 95.81% 60 Kennington Road Post Office, Oval 95.81% 60 Bramham Gardens, Earl's Court 95.81% 60 Queensbridge Road, Haggerston 95.79% 61 Albert Gate, Hyde Park 95.76% 61 Queen Street, Bank 95.69% 62 New North Road, Hoxton 95.68% 62 Altab Ali Park, Whitechapel 95.67% 62 Granby Street, Shoreditch 95.67% 62 Murray Grove, Hoxton 95.65% 63 Cotton Garden Estate, Kennington 95.62% 63 Park Street, Bankside 95.61% 63 Bouverie Street, Temple 95.60% 63 Bruton Street, Mayfair 95.57% 64 Driffield Road, Old Ford 95.57% 64 Finsbury Library, Finsbury 95.56% 64 The Tennis Courts, Regent's Park 95.55% 64 Eagle Wharf Road, Hoxton 95.53% 64 Hermitage Court, Wapping 95.53% 64 Fanshaw Street, Hoxton 95.52% 64 St. George's Square, Pimlico 95.46% 65 Pott Street, Bethnal Green 95.42% 66 Shoreditch High Street, Shoreditch 95.40% 66 Globe Town Market, Bethnal Green 95.40% 66 East Road, Hoxton 95.40% 66 Bricklayers Arms, The Borough 95.31% 68 Kennington Station, Kennington 95.29% 68 Cumberland Gate, Hyde Park 95.17% 70 Russell Square Station, Bloomsbury 95.17% 70 Hampstead Road, Euston 95.16% 70 Embankment (Horse Guards), Westminster 95.13% 70 Knaresborough Place, Earl's Court 95.12% 70 Hardwick Street, Clerkenwell 95.09% 71 Palace Gate, Kensington Gardens 95.07% 71 Whiteley's, Bayswater 95.07% 71 Liverpool Road (N1 Centre), Angel 95.06% 71 Ilchester Place, Kensington 95.04% 71 Wells Street, Fitzrovia 95.04% 71 Albany Street, Regent's Park 95.03% 72 Brick Lane Market, Bangla Town 95.01% 72 Beaumont Street, Marylebone 95.00% 72 Wansey Street, Walworth 95.00% 72 Alderney Street, Pimlico 94.94% 73 Christian Street, Whitechapel 94.90% 73 Wren Street, Holborn 94.85% 74 Killick Street, King's Cross 94.84% 74 Penywern Road, Earl's Court 94.83% 74 Euston Road, Euston 94.82% 75 London Zoo Car Park, Regent's Park 94.80% 75 Thurtle Road, Haggerston 94.78% 75 Horseferry Road, Westminster 94.77% 75 Cloudesley Road, Angel 94.76% 75 Warwick Square, Pimlico 94.74% 76 Montpelier Street, Knightsbridge 94.73% 76 Harriet Street, Knightsbridge 94.73% 76 Lodge Road, St. John's Wood 94.71% 76 Whiston Road, Haggerston 94.70% 76 Sadlers Sports Centre, Finsbury 94.68% 77 Park Road (Baker Street), Regent's Park 94.67% 77 Penfold Street, Marylebone 94.65% 77 Cleaver Street, Kennington 94.64% 77 North Audley Street, Mayfair 94.63% 77 Great Dover Street, The Borough 94.61% 78 Wellington Row, Bethnal Green 94.61% 78 Bonny Street, Camden Town 94.60% 78 Hoxton Street, Hoxton 94.58% 78 Doric Way, Somers Town 94.58% 78 Percival Street, Finsbury 94.54% 79 De Vere Gardens, Kensington 94.53% 79 Reardon Street, Wapping 94.50% 79 Old Quebec Street, Marylebone 94.50% 79 Graham Street, Angel 94.48% 80 Fashion Street, Whitechapel 94.44% 80 Risinghill Street, Angel 94.39% 81 Rodney Road, Walworth 94.39% 81 St. Chad's Street, King's Cross 94.38% 81 Shoreditch Park, Hoxton 94.37% 81 George Place Mews, Marylebone 94.33% 82 Trebovir Road, Earl's Court 94.33% 82 Concert Hall Approach, South Bank 94.28% 82 Taviton Street, Bloomsbury 94.26% 83 Pitfield Street (North), Hoxton 94.23% 83 Frampton Street, Paddington 94.16% 84 Garnet Street, Shadwell 94.11% 85 Bolsover Street, Fitzrovia 94.10% 85 South Audley Street, Mayfair 94.04% 86 Bayswater Road, Hyde Park 94.01% 86 Hoxton Station, Haggerston 94.01% 86 Ampton Street, Clerkenwell 94.00% 86 Pancras Road, King's Cross 93.98% 87 Twig Folly Bridge, Mile End 93.95% 87 Long Lane, Bermondsey 93.94% 87 Farringdon Lane, Clerkenwell 93.93% 87 Cheshire Street, Bethnal Green 93.93% 87 Lansdowne Walk, Notting Hill 93.83% 89 West Cromwell Road, Earl's Court 93.82% 89 Jubilee Street, Stepney 93.78% 90 Pritchard's Road, Bethnal Green 93.78% 90 Waterloo Bridge, South Bank 93.77% 90 Eastbourne Mews, Paddington 93.76% 90 Wellington Arch, Hyde Park 93.72% 90 Guilford Street, Bloomsbury 93.68% 91 West Smithfield Rotunda, Farringdon 93.67% 91 Hampton Street, Walworth 93.65% 91 St. George Street, Mayfair 93.56% 93 Lexham Gardens, Kensington 93.51% 93 Pitfield Street Central, Hoxton 93.49% 94 Page 244 Watney Street, Shadwell 93.47% 94 Broadcasting House, Marylebone 93.42% 95 Queen's Gate, Kensington Gardens 93.40% 95 Edgware Road Station, Paddington 93.39% 95 Turquoise Island, Notting Hill 93.35% 96 North Wharf Road, Paddington 93.27% 97 Mallory Street, Marylebone 93.23% 97 Woodstock Street, Mayfair 93.23% 97 Belgrove Street, King's Cross 93.22% 98 Paddington Green, Paddington 93.21% 98 Clifton Road, Maida Vale 93.13% 99 Marloes Road, Kensington 93.06% 100 Chepstow Villas, Notting Hill 93.02% 100 Crosswall, Tower 93.02% 101 Waterloo Road, Southbank 93.01% 101 Foley Street, Fitzrovia 92.81% 103 Walnut Tree Walk, Vauxhall 92.78% 104 Black Lion Gate, Kensington Gardens 92.76% 104 Cartwright Gardens, Bloomsbury 92.60% 107 LMU Commercial Road, Whitechapel 92.59% 107 Gloucester Avenue, Camden Town 92.53% 108 Dorset Square, Marylebone 92.52% 108 Green Street, Mayfair 92.51% 108 Craven Street, Strand 92.45% 109 Bell Street, Marylebone 92.41% 109 Great Titchfield Street, Fitzrovia 92.40% 109 Regent's Row, Haggerston 92.35% 110 New Globe Walk, Bankside 92.34% 110 Bethnal Green Road, Shoreditch 92.33% 110 Collingham Gardens, Earl's Court 92.28% 111 Seville Street, Knightsbridge 92.27% 111 Prince Albert Road, Regent's Park 92.23% 112 Gloucester Road (North), Kensington 92.22% 112 Nutford Place, Marylebone 92.22% 112 Strata, Elephant & Castle 92.20% 112 Tavistock Place, Bloomsbury 92.15% 113 Vauxhall Cross, Vauxhall 92.03% 115 River Street, Clerkenwell 92.00% 115 Pall Mall East, West End 91.99% 115 Wellington Road, St. John's Wood 91.97% 116 Porchester Place, Paddington 91.95% 116 Lancaster Gate, Bayswater 91.90% 117 William IV Street, Strand 91.89% 117 Millbank Tower, Pimlico 91.88% 117 Bell Lane, Liverpool Street 91.82% 118 Westbourne Grove, Bayswater 91.75% 119 Goldsmiths Row, Haggerston 91.73% 119 St. John's Wood Road, St. John's Wood 91.65% 120 Pembridge Villas, Notting Hill 91.61% 121 Montgomery Square, Canary Wharf 91.52% 122 Notting Hill Gate Station, Notting Hill 91.47% 123 Kensington Church Street, Kensington 91.39% 124 Kensington Olympia Station, Olympia 91.29% 125 Warren Street Station, Fitzrovia 91.29% 125 Claremont Square, Angel 91.27% 126 Holland Walk, Kensington 91.25% 126 Chadwell Street, Angel 91.11% 128 Warwick Avenue Station, Maida Vale 91.10% 128 Lisson Grove, St. John's Wood 91.03% 129 Hampstead Road (Cartmel), Euston 90.95% 130 Grove End Road, St. John's Wood 90.90% 131 Eversholt Street, Camden Town 90.89% 131 Rochester Row, Westminster 90.88% 131 Palace Gardens Terrace, Notting Hill 90.85% 132 London Zoo, Regent's Park 90.84% 132 Hatton Wall, Holborn 90.84% 132 Roscoe Street, St. Luke's 90.78% 133 Shouldham Street, Marylebone 90.76% 133 Southwick Street, Paddington 90.75% 133 St. Martin's Street, West End 90.71% 134 Gloucester Terrace, Bayswater 90.55% 136 Victoria Embankment, Temple 90.49% 137 Drummond Street, Euston 90.49% 137 Baker Street, Marylebone 90.45% 138 Kensington Town Hall, Kensington 90.45% 138 New Cavendish Street, Marylebone 90.37% 139 Milford Lane, Temple 90.36% 139 Westminster University, Marylebone 90.29% 140 New Inn Yard, Shoreditch 90.28% 140 Brunswick Square, Bloomsbury 90.26% 140 Lord's, St. John's Wood 90.24% 141 Heron Quays DLR, Canary Wharf 90.19% 141 Park Lane, Hyde Park 90.15% 142 Crawford Street, Marylebone 90.10% 143 Winsland Street, Paddington 90.09% 143 Goswell Road (City Uni), Finsbury 90.07% 143 Leonard Circus, Shoreditch 89.83% 146 Greenberry Street, St. John's Wood 89.77% 147 Tower Gardens, Tower 89.73% 148 Ladbroke Grove Central, Notting Hill 89.73% 148 Lower Thames Street, Monument 89.70% 148 Charlbert Street, St. John's Wood 89.67% 149 Bath Street, St. Luke's 89.64% 149 Bishop's Bridge Road West, Bayswater 89.60% 150 Commercial Street, Shoreditch 89.53% 151 St. John Street, Finsbury 89.47% 152 Baldwin Street, St. Luke's 89.47% 152 Stonecutter Street, Holborn 89.46% 152 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf 89.43% 152 Old Street Station, St. Luke's 89.22% 155 Bishop's Bridge Road East, Bayswater 89.19% 156 Harewood Avenue, Marylebone 89.11% 157 Finsbury Circus, Liverpool Street 88.98% 159 Aberdeen Place, St John's Wood 88.97% 159 Knightsbridge, Hyde Park 88.95% 159 Derry Street, Kensington 88.92% 159 Golden Lane, Barbican 88.80% 161 Harrowby Street, Marylebone 88.79% 161 Aldersgate Street, Barbican 88.72% 162 Grosvenor Crescent, Belgravia 88.67% 163 Moorfields, Moorgate 88.64% 164 Jubilee Plaza, Canary Wharf 88.49% 166 Berry Street, Clerkenwell 88.31% 168 Page 245 Hereford Road, Bayswater 88.29% 169 South Kensington Station, South Kensington 88.03% 172 Butler Place, Westminster 88.01% 173 Abingdon Green, Great College Street 87.72% 177 Northington Street, Holborn 87.42% 181 Monument Street, Monument 87.40% 181 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury 87.28% 183 Cleveland Gardens, Bayswater 87.23% 184 Cheapside, Bank 87.14% 185 St. James's Square, St. James's 87.02% 187 Abbey Orchard Street, Westminster 86.89% 189 Longford Street, Regent's Park 86.75% 191 Devonshire Terrace, Bayswater 86.62% 193 Braham Street, Aldgate 86.33% 197 Campden Hill Road, Notting Hill 86.21% 199 Ilchester Gardens, Bayswater 86.16% 199 Wormwood Street, Liverpool Street 85.96% 202 Princes Square, Bayswater 85.81% 204 Waterloo Place, St. James's 85.80% 204 South Wharf Road, Paddington 85.77% 205 Torrens Street, Angel 85.73% 205 Smith Square, Westminster 85.58% 208 Fishermans Walk West, Canary Wharf 85.43% 210 Orsett Terrace, Bayswater 85.30% 212 Newgate Street, St. Paul's 85.04% 215 Barbican Centre, Barbican 84.97% 216 Tavistock Street, Covent Garden 84.77% 219 Panton Street, West End 84.72% 220 Vicarage Gate, Kensington 84.55% 223 Green Park Station, West End 84.35% 225 Strand, Strand 84.28% 226 Paddington Street, Marylebone 84.20% 228 Finsbury Square, Moorgate 83.82% 233 Charles II Street, West End 83.71% 235 Fournier Street, Whitechapel 83.71% 235 Godliman Street, St. Paul's 82.96% 245 George Street, Marylebone 82.87% 247 Snow Hill, Farringdon 82.80% 248 Portman Square, Marylebone 82.36% 254 Sun Street, Liverpool Street 82.33% 254 Hatton Garden, Holborn 82.21% 256 Brushfield Street, Liverpool Street 82.18% 257 Queen Victoria Street, St. Paul's 82.10% 258 Howland Street, Fitzrovia 82.00% 259 Christopher Street, Liverpool Street 81.92% 260 British Museum, Bloomsbury 81.65% 264 Great Tower Street, Monument 81.28% 270 Bunhill Row, Moorgate 80.98% 274 Devonshire Square, Liverpool Street 80.79% 277 Exhibition Road, Knightsbridge 80.21% 285 Drury Lane, Covent Garden 79.95% 289 Holborn Circus, Holborn 79.91% 289 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf 79.88% 290 Red Lion Square, Holborn 79.82% 291 Grafton Street, Mayfair 79.72% 292 Southampton Street, Strand 79.55% 294 Exhibition Road Museums, South Kensington 79.50% 295 Theobald's Road, Holborn 79.10% 301 Museum of London, Barbican 78.96% 303 Queen's Gate (North), Kensington 78.82% 305 Malet Street, Bloomsbury 78.80% 305 Gower Place, Euston 78.76% 306 Jewry Street, Aldgate 78.71% 307 Stanhope Gate, Mayfair 78.69% 307 Fore Street, Guildhall 78.67% 307 Wellington Street, Strand 78.40% 311 Clifton Street, Shoreditch 78.04% 316 Moor Street, Soho 78.04% 316 Breams Buildings, Holborn 77.89% 318 Bank of England Museum, Bank 77.85% 319 Bayley Street, Bloomsbury 77.03% 331 Golden Square, Soho 76.92% 332 St. Mary Axe, Aldgate 76.91% 332 Grosvenor Square, Mayfair 76.91% 333 Kensington Gore, Knightsbridge 76.87% 333 Kingsway, Covent Garden 76.70% 335 Kingsway Southbound, Strand 76.68% 336 Frith Street, Soho 76.62% 337 Southampton Place, Holborn 76.34% 341 Little Argyll Street, West End 76.34% 341 Great Russell Street, Bloomsbury 75.11% 358 Red Lion Street, Holborn 74.98% 360 Clifford Street, Mayfair 74.85% 362 Broadwick Street, Soho 74.83% 362 Farm Street, Mayfair 74.81% 363 Clarges Street, West End 74.78% 363 Chapel Place, Marylebone 74.76% 363 Upper Grosvenor Street, Mayfair 74.69% 364 High Holborn, Covent Garden 74.63% 365 Rathbone Street, Fitzrovia 74.34% 370 Appold Street, Liverpool Street 74.20% 372 Imperial College, Knightsbridge 73.90% 376 Sackville Street, Mayfair 73.86% 376 Norton Folgate, Liverpool Street 73.78% 378 Alfred Place, Bloomsbury 73.77% 378 Sardinia Street, Holborn 73.52% 381 Carey Street, Holborn 73.48% 382 Millennium Hotel, Mayfair 73.48% 382 Marylebone Lane, Marylebone 72.76% 392 Scala Street, Fitzrovia 72.38% 398 New Fetter Lane, Holborn 71.67% 408 The Guildhall, Guildhall 71.31% 413 Wood Street, Guildhall 70.59% 424 King Edward Street, St Pauls 70.29% 428 Earnshaw Street, Covent Garden 70.16% 430 Charlotte Street, Fitzrovia 70.14% 430 Bury Place, Holborn 69.31% 442 Chancery Lane, Holborn 69.06% 446 Houghton Street, Strand 68.63% 452 Prince Consort Road, Knightsbridge 68.57% 453 Portugal Street, Holborn 64.61% 510
Page 246 $SSHQGL[
Percentage of docking availability and average minutes full per day for the period 01 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 All data is based on when each full instance ended and after exclusions have been applied
Docking Station % Docking Availability Average minutes ĨƵůů per day Albert Gardens, Stepney 100.00% 0 Endsleigh Gardens, Euston 100.00% 0 John Islip Street, Westminster 100.00% 0 Old Brompton Road, South Kensington 100.00% 0 Sutton Street, Shadwell 100.00% 0 Wenlock Road, Hoxton 100.00% 0 Palace Gardens Terrace, Notting Hill 100.00% 0 Marylebone Flyover, Paddington 99.98% 0 St. John's Wood Church, Regent's Park 99.98% 0 Claremont Square, Angel 99.98% 0 Buxton Street, Bangla Town 99.98% 0 Hampstead Road, Euston 99.97% 0 Frampton Street, Paddington 99.97% 0 Orsett Terrace, Bayswater 99.97% 0 St. John's Wood Road, St. John's Wood 99.96% 1 Eastbourne Mews, Paddington 99.96% 1 Southwark Station, Southwark 99.95% 1 Beaumont Street, Marylebone 99.95% 1 Campden Hill Road, Notting Hill 99.95% 1 London Zoo Car Park, Regent's Park 99.94% 1 Gloucester Terrace, Bayswater 99.93% 1 Harrington Square, Camden Town 99.93% 1 Notting Hill Gate Station, Notting Hill 99.93% 1 Speakers' Corner, Hyde Park 99.91% 1 South Quay East, Canary Wharf 99.91% 1 London Zoo, Regent's Park 99.90% 1 Chepstow Villas, Notting Hill 99.90% 1 Royal College Street, Camden Town 99.90% 1 Westfield Eastern Access Road, Shepherd's Bush 99.89% 2 St John's Park, Cubitt Town 99.86% 2 Baker Street, Marylebone 99.85% 2 Vicarage Gate, Kensington 99.85% 2 Green Street, Mayfair 99.84% 2 Ilchester Place, Kensington 99.83% 2 Crawford Street, Marylebone 99.83% 3 De Vere Gardens, Kensington 99.81% 3 Lancaster Gate, Bayswater 99.81% 3 Sumner Place, South Kensington 99.78% 3 Longford Street, Regent's Park 99.78% 3 Kensington Olympia Station, Olympia 99.77% 3 Gloucester Avenue, Camden Town 99.77% 3 Rodney Street, Angel 99.76% 3 Lexham Gardens, Kensington 99.75% 4 Mallory Street, Marylebone 99.74% 4 Abbotsbury Road, Holland Park 99.74% 4 Stonecutter Street, Holborn 99.74% 4 Lindfield Street, Poplar 99.73% 4 West Cromwell Road, Earl's Court 99.72% 4 Nutford Place, Marylebone 99.70% 4 Phillimore Gardens, Kensington 99.70% 4 Upper Grosvenor Street, Mayfair 99.67% 5 Portland Place, Marylebone 99.65% 5 Jubilee Cresent, Cubitt Town 99.65% 5 Greenberry Street, St. John's Wood 99.65% 5 North Wharf Road, Paddington 99.64% 5 Lansdowne Walk, Notting Hill 99.63% 5 Shoreditch High Street, Shoreditch 99.62% 5 Ladbroke Grove Central, Notting Hill 99.62% 5 River Street, Clerkenwell 99.61% 6 Penfold Street, Marylebone 99.61% 6 Guilford Street, Bloomsbury 99.60% 6 Sidney Street, Stepney 99.60% 6 Charlbert Street, St. John's Wood 99.58% 6 Jubilee Plaza, Canary Wharf 99.58% 6 Grove End Road, St. John's Wood 99.57% 6 Triangle Car Park, Hyde Park 99.56% 6 Russell Square Station, Bloomsbury 99.54% 7 Bayswater Road, Hyde Park 99.53% 7 Warren Street Station, Fitzrovia 99.52% 7 Princes Square, Bayswater 99.52% 7 Philpot Street, Whitechapel 99.51% 7 The Tennis Courts, Regent's Park 99.51% 7 Old Quebec Street, Marylebone 99.51% 7 Warwick Road, Olympia 99.51% 7 Trebovir Road, Earl's Court 99.51% 7 Watney Market, Stepney 99.50% 7 St Katharine’s Way, Tower 99.49% 7 Wellington Road, St. John's Wood 99.49% 7 St. John Street, Finsbury 99.49% 7 Granby Street, Shoreditch 99.48% 7 East India DLR, Blackwall 99.48% 8 Cumberland Gate, Hyde Park 99.47% 8 Wellington Arch, Hyde Park 99.46% 8 New North Road, Hoxton 99.46% 8 Risinghill Street, Angel 99.46% 8 Hardwick Street, Clerkenwell 99.43% 8 Hoxton Street, Hoxton 99.42% 8 Queensbridge Road, Haggerston 99.42% 8 Queen Street, Bank 99.41% 8 City Road, Angel 99.41% 9 Westminster Bridge Road, Elephant & Castle 99.40% 9 Pembridge Villas, Notting Hill 99.40% 9 South Quay West, Canary Wharf 99.40% 9 Castalia Square, Cubitt Town 99.34% 9 Edgware Road Station, Paddington 99.34% 10 Bolsover Street, Fitzrovia 99.33% 10 Grosvenor Road, Pimlico 99.32% 10 Albany Street, Regent's Park 99.32% 10 Montgomery Square, Canary Wharf 99.31% 10 Nevern Place, Earl's Court 99.29% 10 Wren Street, Holborn 99.29% 10 Devons Road, Bow 99.28% 10 Vauxhall Bridge, Pimlico 99.28% 10 East Road, Hoxton 99.22% 11 Gloucester Street, Pimlico 99.21% 11 Waterloo Station, Waterloo 99.20% 12 Lisson Grove, St. John's Wood 99.19% 12 Pennington Street, Wapping 99.19% 12 Porchester Place, Paddington 99.19% 12 Page 247 Emperor's Gate, South Kensington 99.18% 12 Park Lane, Hyde Park 99.18% 12 Torrens Street, Angel 99.18% 12 Kensington Town Hall, Kensington 99.18% 12 Upper Bank Street, Canary Wharf 99.16% 12 Argyll Road, Kensington 99.14% 12 Euston Road, Euston 99.13% 12 Regency Street, Westminster 99.10% 13 Greenland Road, Camden Town 99.09% 13 Clinton Road, Mile End 99.07% 13 George Place Mews, Marylebone 99.04% 14 Lord's, St. John's Wood 99.03% 14 Hoxton Station, Haggerston 99.02% 14 Finsbury Library, Finsbury 99.02% 14 Finsbury Leisure Centre, St. Luke's 99.01% 14 Bethnal Green Road, Shoreditch 99.00% 14 Braham Street, Aldgate 99.00% 14 Old Ford Road, Bethnal Green 98.99% 15 Knaresborough Place, Earl's Court 98.97% 15 Teviot Street, Poplar 98.96% 15 Paddington Green, Paddington 98.95% 15 Abingdon Villas, Kensington 98.94% 15 Bedford Way, Bloomsbury 98.93% 15 Paddington Street, Marylebone 98.93% 15 Knightsbridge, Hyde Park 98.93% 15 Percival Street, Finsbury 98.92% 16 Barbican Centre, Barbican 98.91% 16 Mostyn Grove, Bow 98.90% 16 Royal Mews, Victoria 98.89% 16 Queen Mary's, Mile End 98.88% 16 Malet Street, Bloomsbury 98.87% 16 Watney Street, Shadwell 98.84% 17 Chadwell Street, Angel 98.84% 17 Cheapside, Bank 98.84% 17 Ackroyd Drive, Bow 98.83% 17 Rampayne Street, Pimlico 98.83% 17 George Street, Marylebone 98.82% 17 Crinan Street, King's Cross 98.82% 17 Natural History Museum, South Kensington 98.81% 17 Bourne Street, Belgravia 98.80% 17 Lightermans Road, Millwall 98.78% 18 Collingham Gardens, Earl's Court 98.77% 18 Leman Street, Aldgate 98.76% 18 North Audley Street, Mayfair 98.75% 18 Wright's Lane, Kensington 98.75% 18 Moorfields, Moorgate 98.75% 18 Bow Road Station, Bow 98.73% 18 Westfield Ariel Way, White City 98.71% 19 Kensington Gore, Knightsbridge 98.71% 19 Fashion Street, Whitechapel 98.70% 19 Hyde Park Corner, Hyde Park 98.69% 19 Old Street Station, St. Luke's 98.68% 19 Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel 98.67% 19 Saunders Ness Road, Cubitt Town 98.66% 19 Goswell Road (City Uni), Finsbury 98.65% 19 Fanshaw Street, Hoxton 98.65% 19 Lodge Road, St. John's Wood 98.64% 20 York Hall, Bethnal Green 98.61% 20 Doric Way, Somers Town 98.61% 20 Portman Square, Marylebone 98.61% 20 Berry Street, Clerkenwell 98.59% 20 Warwick Avenue Station, Maida Vale 98.59% 20 Castlehaven Road, Camden Town 98.57% 21 Bell Lane, Liverpool Street 98.55% 21 Walmer Road, Notting Hill 98.55% 21 Macclesfield Road, St. Luke's 98.54% 21 Millennium Hotel, Mayfair 98.54% 21 Bell Street, Marylebone 98.51% 21 Queen's Gate (Central), South Kensington 98.51% 21 Bethnal Green Garden, Bethnal Green 98.50% 22 Cheshire Street, Bethnal Green 98.50% 22 Theobald's Road, Holborn 98.49% 22 Brick Lane Market, Bangla Town 98.49% 22 Alfred Place, Bloomsbury 98.47% 22 Lancaster Drive, Blackwall 98.44% 22 New Cavendish Street, Marylebone 98.44% 22 Taviton Street, Bloomsbury 98.44% 22 Clifton Road, Maida Vale 98.40% 23 Cephas Street, Bethnal Green 98.39% 23 Great Percy Street, Clerkenwell 98.38% 23 Bow Church Station, Bow 98.37% 23 Hampstead Road (Cartmel), Euston 98.34% 24 Embankment (Savoy), Strand 98.33% 24 Green Park Station, West End 98.32% 24 Baldwin Street, St. Luke's 98.32% 24 Arlington Road, Camden Town 98.32% 24 Hinde Street, Marylebone 98.31% 24 Russell Gardens, Holland Park 98.28% 25 West Smithfield Rotunda, Farringdon 98.27% 25 Newgate Street, St. Paul's 98.26% 25 Foley Street, Fitzrovia 98.25% 25 Parkway, Camden Town 98.24% 25 Fire Brigade Pier, Vauxhall 98.23% 25 Serpentine Car Park, Hyde Park 98.22% 26 Woodstock Street, Mayfair 98.21% 26 Liverpool Road (N1 Centre), Angel 98.20% 26 Denyer Street, Knightsbridge 98.20% 26 Tysoe Street, Clerkenwell 98.19% 26 Cadogan Place, Knightsbridge 98.18% 26 Sun Street, Liverpool Street 98.17% 26 Finsbury Square, Moorgate 98.17% 26 Crosswall, Tower 98.17% 26 Great Titchfield Street, Fitzrovia 98.16% 27 Milroy Walk, South Bank 98.16% 27 Heron Quays DLR, Canary Wharf 98.14% 27 Selby Street, Whitechapel 98.13% 27 Turquoise Island, Notting Hill 98.13% 27 South Audley Street, Mayfair 98.09% 27 Leonard Circus, Shoreditch 98.09% 27 Gower Place, Euston 98.07% 28 Bishop's Bridge Road West, Bayswater 98.06% 28 Westferry DLR, Limehouse 98.06% 28 Malmesbury Road, Bow 98.05% 28 Page 248 Sadlers Sports Centre, Finsbury 98.05% 28 Wellington Row, Bethnal Green 98.05% 28 Gaywood Street, Elephant & Castle 98.04% 28 Millbank Tower, Pimlico 98.04% 28 Falkirk Street, Hoxton 98.04% 28 The Green Bridge, Mile End 98.03% 28 Southern Grove, Bow 98.03% 28 Howland Street, Fitzrovia 98.01% 29 Butler Place, Westminster 98.00% 29 Churchill Place, Canary Wharf 98.00% 29 Fishermans Walk West, Canary Wharf 97.99% 29 Ilchester Gardens, Bayswater 97.98% 29 Alderney Street, Pimlico 97.97% 29 Northington Street, Holborn 97.96% 29 Brunswick Square, Bloomsbury 97.96% 29 Finsbury Circus, Liverpool Street 97.95% 29 Harrowby Street, Marylebone 97.94% 30 Naval Row, Blackwall 97.94% 30 British Museum, Bloomsbury 97.93% 30 Bishop's Bridge Road East, Bayswater 97.93% 30 Rectory Square, Stepney 97.92% 30 Kingsway Southbound, Strand 97.90% 30 Sloane Avenue, Knightsbridge 97.89% 30 Chapel Place, Marylebone 97.89% 30 Westminster University, Marylebone 97.88% 31 Eaton Square, Belgravia 97.88% 31 Furze Green, Bow 97.88% 31 Park Road (Baker Street), Regent's Park 97.86% 31 Chelsea Green, Chelsea 97.82% 31 Shadwell Station, Shadwell 97.82% 31 Wells Street, Fitzrovia 97.82% 31 Bonny Street, Camden Town 97.82% 31 Marylebone Lane, Marylebone 97.78% 32 Red Lion Street, Holborn 97.78% 32 Harewood Avenue, Marylebone 97.76% 32 Kensington Church Street, Kensington 97.76% 32 Mudchute DLR, Cubitt Town 97.74% 33 Paddington Green Police Station, Paddington 97.73% 33 Gloucester Road (Central), South Kensington 97.71% 33 Queen's Gate, Kensington Gardens 97.70% 33 Devonshire Square, Liverpool Street 97.66% 34 New Road, Whitechapel 97.65% 34 Bath Street, St. Luke's 97.65% 34 Clarges Street, West End 97.64% 34 Prince Albert Road, Regent's Park 97.60% 35 Golden Lane, Barbican 97.55% 35 Stanhope Gate, Mayfair 97.55% 35 Southwick Street, Paddington 97.53% 36 Cantrell Road, Bow 97.50% 36 Cleveland Way, Bethnal Green 97.49% 36 Eagle Wharf Road, Hoxton 97.49% 36 Whiteley's, Bayswater 97.47% 36 Clifton Street, Shoreditch 97.46% 37 Drury Lane, Covent Garden 97.43% 37 Eversholt Street, Camden Town 97.42% 37 Vincent Square, Westminster 97.41% 37 Holborn Circus, Holborn 97.41% 37 Red Lion Square, Holborn 97.40% 37 Museum of London, Barbican 97.40% 37 Hatton Wall, Holborn 97.37% 38 Langdon Park, Poplar 97.37% 38 Sail Street, Vauxhall 97.36% 38 Eaton Square (South), Belgravia 97.35% 38 Albert Gate, Hyde Park 97.34% 38 Millharbour, Millwall 97.30% 39 Antill Road, Mile End 97.30% 39 Hatton Garden, Holborn 97.28% 39 Fournier Street, Whitechapel 97.28% 39 Hop Exchange, The Borough 97.25% 40 Brushfield Street, Liverpool Street 97.24% 40 Thurtle Road, Haggerston 97.23% 40 Clarkson Street, Bethnal Green 97.22% 40 Appold Street, Liverpool Street 97.22% 40 Somerset House, Strand 97.21% 40 Belvedere Road, South Bank 97.16% 41 Queen's Gate (North), Kensington 97.15% 41 Bankside Mix, Bankside 97.15% 41 Strand, Strand 97.15% 41 Great Marlborough Street, Soho 97.14% 41 Lower Marsh, Waterloo 97.14% 41 New Inn Yard, Shoreditch 97.12% 41 Abbey Orchard Street, Westminster 97.10% 42 Graham Street, Angel 97.09% 42 Harper Road, The Borough 97.08% 42 Imperial College, Knightsbridge 97.08% 42 Southampton Place, Holborn 97.07% 42 Windsor Terrace, Hoxton 97.05% 42 Manresa Road, Chelsea 97.04% 43 Bancroft Road, Bethnal Green 97.03% 43 Exhibition Road Museums, South Kensington 97.02% 43 LSBU (Borough Road), Elephant & Castle 97.01% 43 Goldsmiths Row, Haggerston 96.97% 44 Colombo Street, Southwark 96.93% 44 Alpha Grove, Millwall 96.92% 44 Aldersgate Street, Barbican 96.90% 45 Dorset Square, Marylebone 96.90% 45 Lambeth Road, Vauxhall 96.89% 45 Stebondale Street, Cubitt Town 96.84% 46 Tower Gardens, Tower 96.83% 46 Preston's Road, Cubitt Town 96.83% 46 Westbourne Grove, Bayswater 96.81% 46 Great Russell Street, Bloomsbury 96.81% 46 St. Mary Axe, Aldgate 96.78% 46 Whiston Road, Haggerston 96.78% 46 Whitehall Place, Strand 96.73% 47 Norton Folgate, Liverpool Street 96.72% 47 Lower Thames Street, Monument 96.72% 47 Grosvenor Square, Mayfair 96.71% 47 Greycoat Street, Westminster 96.71% 47 Milford Lane, Temple 96.71% 47 Thornfield House, Poplar 96.70% 47 Broadcasting House, Marylebone 96.69% 48 King Edward Walk, Waterloo 96.68% 48 Page 249 Murray Grove, Hoxton 96.67% 48 Baylis Road, Waterloo 96.67% 48 Regent's Row, Haggerston 96.63% 49 Lollard Street, Vauxhall 96.62% 49 Charles II Street, West End 96.60% 49 Clerkenwell Green, Clerkenwell 96.58% 49 South Kensington Station, South Kensington 96.57% 49 Guildhouse Street, Victoria 96.53% 50 Wapping Lane, Wapping 96.48% 51 Burdett Road, Mile End 96.46% 51 Vaughan Way, Wapping 96.46% 51 Garnet Street, Shadwell 96.44% 51 Westfield Library Corner, Shepherd's Bush 96.41% 52 Columbia Road, Weavers 96.41% 52 Queen Victoria Street, St. Paul's 96.40% 52 Salmon Lane, Limehouse 96.39% 52 Great Tower Street, Monument 96.37% 52 LMU Commercial Road, Whitechapel 96.34% 53 Bank of England Museum, Bank 96.32% 53 Soho Square, Soho 96.32% 53 Pritchard's Road, Bethnal Green 96.30% 53 Ashley Place, Victoria 96.29% 53 Old Montague Street, Whitechapel 96.24% 54 Farm Street, Mayfair 96.23% 54 Christian Street, Whitechapel 96.22% 54 Monument Street, Monument 96.22% 54 Breams Buildings, Holborn 96.20% 55 Golden Square, Soho 96.19% 55 Canton Street, Poplar 96.18% 55 Stepney Green Station, Stepney 96.15% 55 Drummond Street, Euston 96.15% 55 Little Argyll Street, West End 96.13% 56 Houghton Street, Strand 96.10% 56 Clifford Street, Mayfair 96.09% 56 Hewison Street, Old Ford 96.09% 56 Pont Street, Knightsbridge 96.06% 57 Derry Street, Kensington 96.03% 57 Grosvenor Crescent, Belgravia 96.02% 57 Webber Street, Southwark 95.97% 58 Sedding Street, Sloane Square 95.96% 58 Union Street, The Borough 95.95% 58 Seville Street, Knightsbridge 95.93% 59 Queen's Gate (South), South Kensington 95.93% 59 Bramham Gardens, Earl's Court 95.93% 59 Kingsway, Covent Garden 95.92% 59 Snow Hill, Farringdon 95.91% 59 St. George Street, Mayfair 95.91% 59 Bunhill Row, Moorgate 95.91% 59 Jubilee Street, Stepney 95.81% 60 Sardinia Street, Holborn 95.79% 61 Howick Place, Westminster 95.78% 61 Godliman Street, St. Paul's 95.78% 61 Killick Street, King's Cross 95.77% 61 Gloucester Road (North), Kensington 95.75% 61 Christopher Street, Liverpool Street 95.75% 61 Wood Street, Guildhall 95.74% 61 Rathbone Street, Fitzrovia 95.74% 61 Bury Place, Holborn 95.69% 62 Craven Street, Strand 95.69% 62 Aston Street, Stepney 95.69% 62 St. James's Square, St. James's 95.68% 62 Globe Town Market, Bethnal Green 95.68% 62 Ebury Bridge, Pimlico 95.67% 62 Wormwood Street, Liverpool Street 95.66% 62 Fore Street, Guildhall 95.66% 63 Gunmakers Lane, Old Ford 95.63% 63 Geraldine Street, Elephant & Castle 95.62% 63 Curzon Street, Mayfair 95.58% 64 Broadwick Street, Soho 95.58% 64 Concert Hall Approach, South Bank 95.58% 64 New Fetter Lane, Holborn 95.57% 64 Holy Trinity Brompton, Knightsbridge 95.57% 64 Palissy Street, Shoreditch 95.56% 64 Empire Square, The Borough 95.55% 64 Sackville Street, Mayfair 95.53% 64 Altab Ali Park, Whitechapel 95.52% 64 Aberdeen Place, St John's Wood 95.51% 65 Jubilee Gardens, South Bank 95.50% 65 Poured Lines, Bankside 95.49% 65 Cloudesley Road, Angel 95.46% 65 Claverton Street, Pimlico 95.45% 65 Spindrift Avenue, Millwall 95.44% 66 Commercial Street, Shoreditch 95.44% 66 Bayley Street, Bloomsbury 95.42% 66 Hollybush Gardens, Bethnal Green 95.40% 66 St. Mary and St. Michael Church, Stepney 95.40% 66 Earnshaw Street, Covent Garden 95.38% 66 Harford Street, Mile End 95.30% 68 Albert Embankment, Vauxhall 95.28% 68 Cartwright Gardens, Bloomsbury 95.27% 68 Scala Street, Fitzrovia 95.27% 68 Chrisp Street Market, Poplar 95.24% 68 Kennington Road, Vauxhall 95.22% 69 Hereford Road, Bayswater 95.22% 69 Portugal Street, Holborn 95.20% 69 Pitfield Street Central, Hoxton 95.19% 69 Waterloo Place, St. James's 95.19% 69 Napier Avenue, Millwall 95.19% 69 Horseferry Road, Westminster 95.17% 69 Roscoe Street, St. Luke's 95.14% 70 Exhibition Road, Knightsbridge 95.10% 70 St. Luke's Church, Chelsea 95.08% 71 Driffield Road, Old Ford 95.05% 71 Abingdon Green, Great College Street 95.04% 71 Newby Place, Poplar 95.03% 72 Dickens Square, The Borough 95.02% 72 Kennington Lane Rail Bridge, Vauxhall 95.02% 72 Black Lion Gate, Kensington Gardens 95.01% 72 Smith Square, Westminster 95.00% 72 Farringdon Lane, Clerkenwell 94.99% 72 Twig Folly Bridge, Mile End 94.99% 72 Marloes Road, Kensington 94.95% 73 New Kent Road, The Borough 94.95% 73 Page 250 Bouverie Street, Temple 94.86% 74 Margery Street, Clerkenwell 94.82% 75 Carey Street, Holborn 94.80% 75 Northumberland Avenue, Strand 94.80% 75 Prince Consort Road, Knightsbridge 94.76% 75 Lambeth North Station, Waterloo 94.71% 76 Westfield Southern Terrace, Shepherd's Bush 94.69% 76 Cadogan Gardens, Sloane Square 94.68% 77 High Holborn, Covent Garden 94.66% 77 Grafton Street, Mayfair 94.63% 77 King Edward Street, St Pauls 94.63% 77 Shouldham Street, Marylebone 94.63% 77 Embankment (Horse Guards), Westminster 94.57% 78 The Guildhall, Guildhall 94.57% 78 Gloucester Road Station, South Kensington 94.50% 79 Jewry Street, Aldgate 94.47% 80 Harriet Street, Knightsbridge 94.46% 80 South Wharf Road, Paddington 94.46% 80 Aberfeldy Street, Poplar 94.42% 80 Bruton Street, Mayfair 94.41% 80 Victoria Embankment, Temple 94.37% 81 Calshot Street, King's Cross 94.37% 81 Charlotte Street, Fitzrovia 94.35% 81 Cleveland Gardens, Bayswater 94.33% 82 William IV Street, Strand 94.32% 82 Rochester Row, Westminster 94.28% 82 Pancras Road, King's Cross 94.24% 83 Bromley High Street, Bow 94.24% 83 Tavistock Place, Bloomsbury 94.22% 83 Chancery Lane, Holborn 94.06% 86 Kennington Oval, Oval 94.00% 86 Pitfield Street (North), Hoxton 93.97% 87 Belgrave Square, Belgravia 93.94% 87 Pott Street, Bethnal Green 93.92% 88 Panton Street, West End 93.91% 88 Belgrove Street, King's Cross 93.89% 88 Cotton Garden Estate, Kennington 93.86% 88 Vauxhall Cross, Vauxhall 93.85% 89 Stamford Street, South Bank 93.66% 91 Tyers Gate, Bermondsey 93.65% 91 Curlew Street, Shad Thames 93.50% 94 Sancroft Street, Vauxhall 93.50% 94 Montpelier Street, Knightsbridge 93.48% 94 Royal Avenue, Chelsea 93.46% 94 Belgrave Road, Victoria 93.41% 95 East Ferry Road, Cubitt Town 93.40% 95 Coborn Street, Bow 93.29% 97 Ampton Street, Clerkenwell 93.24% 97 Wardour Street, Soho 93.22% 98 Kennington Station, Kennington 93.20% 98 Black Prince Road, Vauxhall 93.15% 99 Borough Road, Elephant & Castle 92.82% 103 Tavistock Street, Covent Garden 92.82% 103 Drayton Gardens, Chelsea 92.80% 104 Park Street, Bankside 92.80% 104 Palace Gate, Kensington Gardens 92.76% 104 Kennington Cross, Kennington 92.74% 105 New Globe Walk, Bankside 92.66% 106 Rodney Road, Walworth 92.64% 106 Borough High Street, The Borough 92.52% 108 Elizabeth Bridge, Victoria 92.41% 109 Queen Mother Sports Centre, Victoria 92.32% 111 Swan Street, The Borough 92.25% 112 Vauxhall Walk, Vauxhall 92.12% 114 Cardinal Place, Victoria 92.08% 114 Tooley Street, Bermondsey 92.06% 114 Ford Road, Old Ford 91.93% 116 Wapping High Street, Wapping 91.77% 118 Penywern Road, Earl's Court 91.75% 119 Great Dover Street, The Borough 91.74% 119 Eccleston Place, Victoria 91.72% 119 Wellington Street, Strand 91.68% 120 St. Martin's Street, West End 91.47% 123 Wansey Street, Walworth 91.43% 123 Flood Street, Chelsea 91.39% 124 Bermondsey Street, Bermondsey 91.36% 124 Flamborough Street, Limehouse 91.32% 125 Frith Street, Soho 91.13% 128 Bricklayers Arms, The Borough 90.84% 132 Hermitage Court, Wapping 90.78% 133 Northdown Street, King's Cross 90.75% 133 Waterloo Bridge, South Bank 90.61% 135 Winsland Street, Paddington 90.33% 139 Tachbrook Street, Victoria 90.23% 141 Oval Way, Vauxhall 89.85% 146 Strata, Elephant & Castle 89.73% 148 St. Chad's Street, King's Cross 89.71% 148 Southampton Street, Strand 89.63% 149 Walworth Road, Elephant & Castle 89.59% 150 Devonshire Terrace, Bayswater 89.43% 152 Ontario Street, Elephant & Castle 89.38% 153 Moor Street, Soho 89.33% 154 Shoreditch Park, Hoxton 89.11% 157 Vincent Street, Pimlico 89.07% 157 South Parade, Chelsea 89.04% 158 Reardon Street, Wapping 89.02% 158 Hampton Street, Walworth 88.97% 159 Pall Mall East, West End 88.60% 164 Vauxhall Street, Vauxhall 88.44% 166 Walnut Tree Walk, Vauxhall 88.19% 170 Tanner Street, Bermondsey 88.11% 171 Cleaver Street, Kennington 88.06% 172 St. George's Square, Pimlico 88.04% 172 Limerston Street, Chelsea 88.00% 173 Kennington Road Post Office, Oval 87.85% 175 Long Lane, Bermondsey 87.67% 178 Hansard Mews, Shepherds Bush 84.95% 217 Waterloo Road, Southbank 84.39% 225 Chelsea Bridge, Pimlico 83.55% 237 Kennington Lane Tesco, Vauxhall 82.93% 246 Nesham Street, Wapping 81.51% 266 Warwick Square, Pimlico 81.43% 267
Page 251 Table showing Environment Funding for year 2013/14 (non Environment GLA funding). Appendix 10
H O For Green Funding from Total Celcius Drain London ERDF food DEPDU 2 Low C Price TSB Air Quality Schools Streets Government £1,140,000.00 640000 0 500000 EU Funding £1,144,000.00 50000 288000 806000 0 TfL £0.00 23000000 LWARB £56,000.00 £56,000 Other £120,000.00 70000 50000 5000000 £24,000.00 24000 5000000 £0.00 5400000 Total £2,484,000.00 Notes Not allocated at time of MQT 100k food team - not included £70k T.Water 50 Siemens First year allocation £23m green bus fund Funded Ballpark figure £50k £24k E Agency as per IPB paper £5m from DFT for CAF via Agreed SW £5m from DFT for buses
Page 252 AQF: boroughs to but no contract signed From Programme budget matching funding of £5.4m Drain Lon Responsible SW KR LB PN AF SD RH ET AJ person
Funding from Total Government £1,140,000.00 EU Funding £1,144,000.00 Private Sector/Other £200,000.00 Total £2,484,000.00
Check £2,484,000.00 $SSHQGL[
2374 / 2013 - Road Safety Plan Potential safety camera locations (2009 to 2011)
Name Network Potential camera type Crook Log/Brampton Road Borough Red light safety camera Erith Road/Gravel Hill Borough Red light safety camera Wembley Hill Rd/Harrow Rd Borough Red light safety camera Broadmead Rd/Chigwell Rd Borough Red light safety camera Cromwell Road/Richmond Road Borough Red light safety camera High Street North/Heigham Road Borough Red light safety camera Major Road/Chobham Road Borough Red light safety camera High Road (N22)/Lordship Lane Borough Red light safety camera Shaftesbury Avenue/St Giles High Street/High Holborn Borough Red light safety camera Exhibition Rd/Kensington Rd Borough Red light safety camera The Broadway/West Ham Lane Borough Red light safety camera London Road/Spur Road Borough Red light safety camera Greenford Road/Ruislip Road Borough Red light safety camera Northumberland Av/Trafalgar Sq Borough Red light safety camera Bounds Green Rd/Park Avenue Borough Red light safety camera Cannon St/Dowgate Hill/Wallbrook Borough Red light safety camera London Rd/Cecil Rd Borough Red light safety camera Willow Rd/Southbury Rd Borough Red light safety camera High Road (N17)/Park Lane Borough Red light safety camera Piccadilly/Albemarle Street Borough Red light safety camera Coldharbour Lane/Loughborough Road Borough Red light safety camera Regent Street/Glasshouse Street Borough Red light safety camera Mitcham Lane/Thrale Road Borough Red light safety camera Grove Rd/Roman Rd Borough Red light safety camera Rainham Rd/South End Rd Borough Red light safety camera Old Ford Rd/Parnell Rd Borough Red light safety camera Selsdon Park Road/Featherbed Lane Borough Red light safety camera Westminster Bridge Road/Kennington Road Borough Red light safety camera HounslowHouns low Road/HanworthRoa d/H anwor th RoadRoa d BoroughBoroug h RedRed lightli ght safetysa fety camera George St/Marylebone High St Borough Red light safety camera High Street/Park Road Borough Red light safety camera Bromley Road/Royal Parade Borough Red light safety camera Morden Road/London Road Borough Red light safety camera Broadway/Drayton Green Road Borough Red light safety camera Staines Road/Sixth Cross Road Borough Red light safety camera Cherry Lane Roundabout Borough Red light safety camera Theobalds Road/Southampton Row Borough Red light safety camera Sydenham Road/Stanton Way. Borough Red light safety camera Herne Hill/Half Moon Lane/Milkwood Road Borough Red light safety camera Boleyn Road/King Henrys Walk/Crossway Borough Red light safety camera Plough Lane/Stafford Road Borough Red light safety camera Kilburn High Road/Maygrove Road/Christchurch Avenue Borough Red light safety camera Amhurst Rd/Mare S t Borough Red light safety camera Holborn Circus/Borough Boundary Borough Red light safety camera Goldhawk Rd/Shepherds Bush Green Borough Red light safety camera Hoe Street/Selborne Road Borough Red light safety camera Snaresbrook Road/Woodford New Road Borough Red light safety camera Holland Park Ave/Ladbroke Grove Borough Red light safety camera Wood Lane Borough Red light safety camera Waterloo Road. Borough Red light safety camera High Street North Borough Red light safety camera Greenford Rd Borough Red light safety camera St James's Street Borough Red light safety camera Northend Road Borough Red light safety camera Whitehorse Lane Borough Red light safety camera Dreadnought Street - Bugsby's Way Borough Red light safety camera Acre Lane Borough Red light safety camera Ilford Lane. Borough Red light safety camera
Page 253 Page 1 Great Eastern Road. Borough Red light safety camera High St(Feltham) Borough Red light safety camera Chiswick High Road Borough Red light safety camera Long Lane Borough Red light safety camera Western Way. Borough Red light safety camera Maddox-St Borough Red light safety camera Hounslow Road Feltham Borough Red light safety camera Croydon Rd Penge Borough Red light safety camera High St Borough Red light safety camera Westgate St Borough Red light safety camera Chepstow Rd Borough Red light safety camera Park Lane Borough Red light safety camera Millbank Borough Red light safety camera Ealing Rd Borough Red light safety camera Cranbrook Rd Borough Red light safety camera Theobalds Road Borough Red light safety camera Uxbridge Road Borough Red light safety camera Kirkdale Borough Red light safety camera Gunnersbury Lane Borough Red light safety camera Kilburn High Road Borough Red light safety camera Roman Way/Mitcham Road. Borough Red light safety camera Kingston Road (New Malden) Borough Red light safety camera Old Oak Lane Borough Red light safety camera Kensington High Street Borough Red light safety camera Whitechapel High St/Osborn St TLRN Red light safety camera Shoreditch High Street/Bethnal Green Road/Holywell Lane TLRN Red light safety camera Whitechapel Rd/Vallance Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Camden St/Camden Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Old Kent Road/St James Road TLRN Red light safety camera Trinity Road/Windmill Roadad TLRN Red light safety camera Apsley Gate/Hyde Park Corner TLRN Red light safety camera Seven Sisters Rd/St Thomas's Rd(Ats) TLRN Red light safety camera VauxhallVaux hall BridgeBrid ge Rd/DrummondRd/D rummon d GateGate. TLRN RedRed lightli ght safetysa fety camera Whitechapel Rd/Cambridge Heath Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Archway Intersection TLRN Red light safety camera Acre Lane/Brixton Hill TLRN Red light safety camera Clapham Common N/Side/Elspeth Road TLRN Red light safety camera Kingsland Rd/Old St TLRN Red light safety camera The Green/Farnborough Way/High Street TLRN Red light safety camera Mile End Road/Burdett Road TLRN Red light safety camera Bow Rd/Fairfield Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Bromley Road/Southend Lane TLRN Red light safety camera Deptford Broadway/Brookmill Road TLRN Red light safety camera Wickham Court Road/High Street TLRN Red light safety camera Purley Way/Edgehill Road TLRN Red light safety camera The Cut/Blackfriars Road TLRN Red light safety camera Stamford Street/Blackfriars Road TLRN Red light safety camera Kingsland Road/Whiston Road/Nuttall Street TLRN Red light safety camera Newham Way/Prince Regent Lane TLRN Red light safety camera Edgware Road/Sussex Gardens TLRN Red light safety camera Newham Way/Woolwich Manor Way TLRN Red light safety camera Great South-West Road/The Causeway TLRN Red light safety camera Harrow Rd/Nth Circular Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Kingsland Rd/Englefield Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Kensington High St/Holland Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Chelsea Embankment/Cheyne Walk/Battersea Bridge TLRN Red light safety camera Lee High Road/Lee Road/Burnt Ash Road/Eltham Road TLRN Red light safety camera Chelsea Embankment/Chelsea Bridge Road/Grosvenor Road TLRN Red light safety camera Seven Sisters Road/Green Lanes Boro Bdy TLRN Red light safety camera Farringdon Road/Clerkenwell Road TLRN Red light safety camera East India Dock Road/Upper North Street TLRN Red light safety camera Watford Way/The Burroughs TLRN Red light safety camera
Page 254 Page 2 Vauxhall Cross TLRN Red light safety camera Edgware Road/Harrow Road TLRN Red light safety camera Commercial Rd/Cannon St Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Shooters Hill/Well Hall Rd TLRN Red light safety camera Peckham Road/Southampton Way TLRN Red light safety camera Old Kent Road TLRN Red light safety camera Victoria Embankment TLRN Red light safety camera Tooting High Street TLRN Red light safety camera New Kent Road TLRN Red light safety camera Bromley Road TLRN Red light safety camera Coldharbour Lane/Loughborough Road Borough Safety speed camera Wandsworth Road/Silverthorne Road Borough Safety speed camera Hampton Court Road/Chestnut Avenue Borough Safety speed camera Hackney Rd/Cambridge Heath Rd Borough Safety speed camera Cherry Lane Roundabout Borough Safety speed camera Theobalds Road/Southampton Row Borough Safety speed camera Crown Dale/Beulah Hill/Knights Hill/Crown Lane Borough Safety speed camera Holborn Circus/Borough Boundary Borough Safety speed camera Holland Park Ave/Ladbroke Grove Borough Safety speed camera Wandsworth Bridge Road Borough Safety speed camera Wandsworth Bridge Road Borough Safety speed camera Wood Lane Borough Safety speed camera Waterloo Road. Borough Safety speed camera High Road (N22) Borough Safety speed camera Heath Road Borough Safety speed camera Wimbledon Park Side Borough Safety speed camera Forest Rd Borough Safety speed camera Brentwood Road Borough Safety speed camera Fulham Road Borough Safety speed camera Hertford Road Borough Safety speed camera High Street North Borough Safety speed camera Westbourne Park Rd Borough Safety speed camera WalworthWalwor th RoadRoa d BoroughBoroug h SafetySafety speedspee d camera Kings Road Borough Safety speed camera Brockley Rd Borough Safety speed camera Leytonstone Road/The Grove. Borough Safety speed camera Romford Rd Borough Safety speed camera High Road (N22) Borough Safety speed camera Dreadnought Street - Bugsby's Way Borough Safety speed camera Ilford Lane. Borough Safety speed camera Bloomsbury Way Borough Safety speed camera Romford Road Borough Safety speed camera High Road (N17) Borough Safety speed camera Plumstead High Street Borough Safety speed camera Great Eastern Road. Borough Safety speed camera Mandeville Road Borough Safety speed camera Kings Head Hill Borough Safety speed camera Plough Road Borough Safety speed camera Highgate West Hill Borough Safety speed camera High Road Leytonstone Borough Safety speed camera Queenstown Road Borough Safety speed camera Joel St Borough Safety speed camera Golders Green Road Borough Safety speed camera Kings Road Borough Safety speed camera Westminster Bridge Road Borough Safety speed camera Waterloo Road Borough Safety speed camera Ewell Road Borough Safety speed camera Brighton Road Borough Safety speed camera High Rd (Goodmayes) Borough Safety speed camera Croydon Rd Beckenham Borough Safety speed camera Downham Way Borough Safety speed camera Lodge Avenue Borough Safety speed camera
Page 255 Page 3 Baring Rd Borough Safety speed camera New Kings Rd Borough Safety speed camera Greenford Road Borough Safety speed camera High Street Borough Safety speed camera Millbank Borough Safety speed camera Church Rd-Greenford Ave Borough Safety speed camera Uxbridge Rd Borough Safety speed camera Sevenoaks Way Borough Safety speed camera Creek Rd Borough Safety speed camera Burntwood Lane Borough Safety speed camera Longwood Gardens Borough Safety speed camera Lampton Rd Borough Safety speed camera Uxbridge Road Borough Safety speed camera Shepherds Bush Road Borough Safety speed camera Leigham Court Road Borough Safety speed camera Green Lanes Borough Safety speed camera Uxbridge Road Borough Safety speed camera Whitton Road Borough Safety speed camera Finchley Road (Temple Fortune) Borough Safety speed camera Kirkdale Borough Safety speed camera Norwood Road Borough Safety speed camera Stonegrove Borough Safety speed camera High Street(Edgware) Borough Safety speed camera Harrow Manor Way Borough Safety speed camera Herne Hill Borough Safety speed camera Blackfen Rd Borough Safety speed camera Kensington Road Borough Safety speed camera Sydenham Road Borough Safety speed camera Blackhorse Rd-St James's St Borough Safety speed camera West Green Rd Borough Safety speed camera Shooters Hill Road Borough Safety speed camera Green Lane Borough Safety speed camera AvenueAvenue RoadRoa d- PickfordPi ckf or d LaneLane BoroughBoroug h SafetySafety speedspee d camera Broadway Borough Safety speed camera Uxbridge Road. Borough Safety speed camera Cheam Common Road-Central Road TLRN Safety speed camera Old Kent Road/Asylum Road TLRN Safety speed camera Eastway/Homerton Road TLRN Safety speed camera Old Kent Road/St James Road TLRN Safety speed camera Seven Sisters Rd/St Thomas's Rd(Ats) TLRN Safety speed camera Wandsworth High Street/Garratt Lane TLRN Safety speed camera Kingsland Rd/Old St TLRN Safety speed camera Stamford Hill/Amhurst Park TLRN Safety speed camera Upper Richmond Road/Sheen Lane TLRN Safety speed camera Brixton Road/Stockwell Road/Gresham Road TLRN Safety speed camera Mile End Road/Burdett Road TLRN Safety speed camera Bow Rd/Campbell Rd TLRN Safety speed camera New Bridge St/Queen Victoria St/Watergate TLRN Safety speed camera Clapham Road/Harleyford Street TLRN Safety speed camera Albert Embankment/Lambeth Bridge TLRN Safety speed camera Kingsland Road/Whiston Road/Nuttall Street TLRN Safety speed camera Newham Way/Prince Regent Lane TLRN Safety speed camera High Road (N15)/St Anns Road TLRN Safety speed camera North Circular Road/M1 Motorwa y TLRN Safety speed camera Great Cambridge Road/Hedge Lane/North Circular Road TLRN Safety speed camera Balls Pond Road/Kingsland Road/Boro Bdy TLRN Safety speed camera Seven Sisters Road/Green Lanes Boro Bdy TLRN Safety speed camera Balham Hill/Nightingale Lane Boro Bdy TLRN Safety speed camera Queens Road/Pomeroy Street TLRN Safety speed camera Vauxhall Cross TLRN Safety speed camera Pentonville Road/Islington High Street TLRN Safety speed camera Whitechapel High Street/Commercial Street TLRN Safety speed camera
Page 256 Page 4 Elephant And Castle (North Roundabout) TLRN Safety speed camera Highbury Corne r TLRN Safety speed camera Shooters Hill/Well Hall Rd TLRN Safety speed camera Queens Road TLRN Safety speed camera Victoria Embankment TLRN Safety speed camera Bowes Rd TLRN Safety speed camera Balham Hill TLRN Safety speed camera Lower Clapton Road TLRN Safety speed camera Old Kent Road TLRN Safety speed camera Church Rd TLRN Safety speed camera Victoria Embankment TLRN Safety speed camera East Hill TLRN Safety speed camera Loampit Hill-Lewisham Way TLRN Safety speed camera Tooting High Street TLRN Safety speed camera Battersea Rise TLRN Safety speed camera North Circular Road TLRN Safety speed camera Mile End Road TLRN Safety speed camera Western Avenue TLRN Safety speed camera Upper Richmond Road TLRN Safety speed camera New Kent Road TLRN Safety speed camera Stockwell Road TLRN Safety speed camera New Cross Road TLRN Safety speed camera Eltham Road TLRN Safety speed camera Swbr r TLRN Safety speed camera Battersea Bridge Road TLRN Safety speed camera Watford Way TLRN Safety speed camera Bromley Road TLRN Safety speed camera South Lambeth Road TLRN Safety speed camera Brixton Road TLRN Safety speed camera Lambeth Palace Road TLRN Safety speed camera Tooley Street TLRN Safety speed camera York Road TLRN Safety speed camera NewhamNew ham WayWay TLRN SafetySafety speedspee d camera Harlington Rd West TLRN Safety speed camera Newham Way. TLRN Safety speed camera A13 (New 1998) TLRN Safety speed camera Wellington Rd TLRN Safety speed camera Sterling Way (North Circular Road) TLRN Safety speed camera Western Avenue TLRN Safety speed camera Commercial Street TLRN Safety speed camera Grosvenor Place TLRN Safety speed camera Holland Road TLRN Safety speed camera Shooters Hill Road TLRN Safety speed camera Catford Rd TLRN Safety speed camera Holloway Road TLRN Safety speed camera Peckham Road TLRN Safety speed camera Peckham High Street TLRN Safety speed camera
Page 257 Page 5 This page is intentionally left blank
Page 258