DOCSLIB.ORG

Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon Standard Full Assessment Report Tassal Operations Pty Ltd: Macquarie Harbour MF 214 and MF 219

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon Standard Full Assessment Report Tassal Operations Pty Ltd: Macquarie Harbour MF 214 and MF 219 SCS Global Services Report Aquaculture Stewardship Council Salmon Standard Full Assessment Report Tassal Operations Pty Ltd: Macquarie Harbour MF 214 and MF 219 Tassal Operations Pty Ltd 2 Salamanca Square, Battery Point, Hobart 7004, Australia USING: ASC Salmon Standard V1.0 June 2012 AUDITORS: Dr. Sabine Daume, D.B. O’Sullivan, James McNaughton ONSITE DATES: 10-15th January 2014 Prepared by: SCS Global Services Sustainable Seafood Program NATURAL RESOURCE DIVISION [email protected] 2000 Powell Street, Ste. 600, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA +1.510.452.8000 main | +1.510.452.8001 fax www.SCSglobalServices.com SCS Global Services Report Table of Contents Acronyms ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Audit Plan ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Previous Audits ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Names of the Auditors .............................................................................................................................. 6 Audit Plan as Implemented ....................................................................................................................... 7 Staff Interviews ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Stakeholder Submissions .......................................................................................................................... 9 Certification Determination .......................................................................................................................... 9 Determination for Chain of Custody (CoC) Certification ............................................................................ 10 Non-conformity Reports ............................................................................................................................. 11 Historical Background of Farm and Farming Area ...................................................................................... 15 Stakeholders ............................................................................................................................................... 16 Evaluation Results ....................................................................................................................................... 17 References .................................................................................................................................................. 99 Appendix 1: Stakeholder comments including CAB responses ............................................................ 101 Version 1-0 (August 2012) | ©SCS Global Services Page A-1 ASC FULL ASSESSMENT REPORT- TASSAL- MH Acronyms ABM Area Based Management ADAS Australian Diver Accreditation Scheme ADD Acoustic Deterrent Device AHD Acoustic Harassment Device AGD Amoebic Gill Disease AMA Area Management Agreement AMAMG Area Management Agreement Management Group AMBI AZTI Marine Biotic Index APC Australian Packaging Covenant APVMA Australian Pesticides and Veterenary Medicines Authority ASC Aquaculture Stewardship Council ASI Accreditation Services International ASX Australian Stock Exchange AWU Australian Workers’ Union AZE Allowable Zone Effect BAP Best Aquaculture Practices BET Bigeye Tuna BMP Best Management Practices BOD biochemical oxygen demand BQI Benthic Quality Index CAB Conformity Assessment Body CoC Chain of Custody CSIRO Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation DHI Consulting company DNA Deoxyribonucleic Acids DO Dissolved Oxygen DPIPWE Department of Primary Industry, Parks, Water and Environment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environmental Protection Authority EPO Eastern Pacific Ocean EUL Estimated Unexplained Losses FCR Food Conversion Rates FFDRo Fish Oil Forage Fish Dependency Ratio FFDRm Fishmeal Forage Fish Dependency Ratio FFEMP Fish Farm Environmental Management Plan FFL Fish farm Licenses FHMP Fish Health Management Plan FIP Fisheries Improvement Project FM Fish meal FO Fish oil FRDC Fisheries Research & Development Corporation GHG Green House Gas GMO Genetically Modified Organism GO Gordon Farm Version 1-0 (August 2012) | ©SCS Global Services Page 2 of 123 ASC FULL ASSESSMENT REPORT- TASSAL- MH GWP Global Warming Potential HAG Huon Aquaculture Group HO Head Office HoS Head of Sustainability IALA International Association of Marine Aids to Navigation and Lighthouse Authorities IFFO RS The International Fishmeal and Fish Oil Organisation - Responsible Supply IFS Inland Fisheries Service IMAS Institute of Marine & Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania ISEAL International Social and Environmental Accreditation and Labeling Alliance ISO International Organization for Standardization ITI Infaunal Trophic Index IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature IUU Illegal, Unregulated, and Unreported JSA Job safety Analysis LGA Life Cycle Analysis/Assessment MAS Marine Aeromonad Disease of Salmonids MDS multidimensional scaling MF Marine Farm MFB Marine Farming Branch MFDP Marine Farm Development Plan MH Macquarie Harbour Farm MHAMA Macquarie Harbour Area Management Agreement MiH Middle Harbour Farm MOP Marine Operations Protocol MSC Marine Stewardship Council NC Nonconformity OH&S Occupational Health and Safety OIE World Organization for Animal Health OTC Oxytetracycline PAL Petuna Aquaculture Ltd PPE Personal Protective Equipment QA Quality Assurance RCD Residue Current Device ROV Remotely Operated Vehicle RTRS Roundtable for Responsible Soy SAD Salmon Aquaculture Dialogue SAI Social Accountability International SARDI South Australian Research and Development Institute SCAT Southern Coastcare Association of Tasmania SOP Standard Operating Procedure SPP Special Plumbing Permit SRAC Sustainability Report Advisory Committee SROI Social Return on Investment TAB Tasmanian aquabirnavirus TARFISH Tasmanian Association for Recreational Fishing Tas-SR Tasmanian Salmonid Rickettsiosis TCT Tasmanian Conservation Trust Version 1-0 (August 2012) | ©SCS Global Services Page 3 of 123 ASC FULL ASSESSMENT REPORT- TASSAL- MH TFDA Tasmania Fisheries Development Authority TIMS Tassal’s integrated Management System TSGA Tasmanian Salmonid Growers Association TSHSP Tasmanian Salmonid Health Surveillance Program TSIC Tasmanian Seafood Industry Council TWG Technical Working group USA United States of America WCC West Coast Council WDP Waste Disposal Plan WHS Work Health and Safety WHO World health Organization WIP Wildlife Interaction Plan WPA Workplace Partnerships Agreement Version 1-0 (August 2012) | ©SCS Global Services Page 4 of 123 ASC FULL ASSESSMENT REPORT- TASSAL- MH Summary The Tassal Operations Pty Ltd.’s (Tassal) salmon culturing sites within the scope of this full-assessment, MF 214 and MF 219, in Macquarie Harbour, showed excellent overall compliance to the ASC salmon standard. The assessment team evaluated the operations against the ASC Salmon Standard V. 1.0 June 2012. Eight final minor non-conformities (NCs) were identified during the full assessment. Overall Tassal showed 93% of compliance against the 152 compliance criteria of the ASC salmon standard v 1.0; a proportion of these (17%) are in the not applicable (n/a) category. None of the non-conformities identified are graded as major and therefore would not preclude award of certification. The client has provided SCS with a root cause analyses and an action plan to address the minor non-conformities (see Table 2). Progress against the action plan will be assessed at the first surveillance audit. The assessment team identified one NC in Principle 1 (Comply with all applicable national laws and local regulations) related to health and safety regulations, two in Principle 2 (Conserve natural habitat, local biodiversity and ecosystem function), one related to feed testing and one pertaining to accessability of information by the public. There was one NC in Principle 4 (Use of resources in an environmentally efficient and responsible manner) related to the feed ingredients and their Sustianble Fisheries Partnership Fish Source score. We identified one NC in Principle 5 (Manage disease and parasites in an environmentally responsible manner) which relates to the frequency of farm site visits by the company veterinarian. Two NCs were identified in Principle 7 (Be a good neighbor and conscientious citizen), the first one related to informing the community regarding antibiotics treatments and potential health risks is associated with two compliance criteria, and the second one is about consultations with aboriginal groups. One NC was identified in Section 8 (Requirements for suppliers of smolt). The NC is about Dissolved Oxygen (DO) measurements in effluent of the semi-open hatchery system at Russell Falls. Scope Reference ASC Salmon Standard V1.0 June 2010 Standard & Audit Manual, ASC Salmon Standard V1.0 Guidance Scheme
Load more

Recommended publications
  • West Coast Land Use Planning Strategy
    " " " " " " " " " !"#$%&'(#$%&')*&+,%,(*-%)#"%.,(**+*/%#$0($"/1%" " #".$"23"0%4567% " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " Prepared for West Coast Council" " By:" ႛ Integrated Planning Solutions; ႛ Essential Economics; and ႛ Ratio Consultants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
    [Show full text]
  • Around the Bend
    Cultural Studies Review volume 18 number 1 March 2012 http://epress.lib.uts.edu.au/journals/index.php/csrj/index pp. 86–106 Emily Bullock 2012 Around the Bend The Curious Power of the Hills around Queenstown, Tasmania EMILY BULLOCK UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA Approaching the town of Queenstown you can’t help but be taken aback by the sight of the barren hillsides, hauntingly bare yet strangely beautiful. This lunar landscape has a majestic, captivating quality. In December 1994 after 101 years of continuous mining—A major achievement for a mining company—the Mount Lyell Mining and Railway Company called it a day and closed the operation thus putting Queenstown under threat of becoming a ghost town. Now, with the mine under the ownership of Copper Mines of Tasmania, the town and the mine are once again thriving. Although Queenstown is primarily a mining town, it is also a very popular tourist destination offering visitors unique experiences. So, head for the hills and discover Queenstown—a unique piece of ‘Space’ on earth.1 In his discussion of the labour of the negative in Defacement: Public Secrecy and the Labour of the Negative, Michael Taussig opens out into a critique of criticism. ISSN 1837-8692 Criticism, says Taussig, is in some way a defacement, a tearing away at an object that ends up working its magic on the critic and forging a ‘curious complicity’ between object and critic.2 Taussig opens up a critical space in which to think with the object of analysis, cutting through transcendental critique, as a critical defacement, which, in the very act of cutting, produces negative energy: a ‘contagious, proliferating, voided force’ in which the small perversities of ‘laughter, bottom-spanking, eroticism, violence, and dismemberment exist simultaneously in violent silence’.3 This complicity in thinking might be charged by critical methodologies which engage in, and think through, peripatetic movements.
    [Show full text]
  • West Coast Council, Zeehan Landfill Wetlands, Extension
    Environmental Assessment Report Zeehan Landfill Wetland Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan West Coast Council July 2021 Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 1 Environmental Assessment Report Proponent West Coast Council Proposal Zeehan Landfill Wetland Location Zeehan Waste Depot, 3990 Henty Road, Zeehan Tasmania 7467 NELMS no. PCE 10460 Permit Application No. 2021/13 West Coast Council Electronic Folder No. EN-EM-EV-DE 261742-001 Document No. D21-26020 Class of Assessment 2A Assessment Process Milestones 25 May 2020 Notice of Intent lodged 01 July 2020 Guidelines Issued 02 March 2021 Permit Application submitted to Council 03 March 2021 Application received by the Board 13 March 2021 Start of public consultation period 27 March 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Date draft conditions issued to proponent 7 May 2021 Statutory period for assessment ends, extension agreed until 21 May 2021 21 May 2021 Proponent submits amended layout to EPA with amended activity area and prepares to submit Permit Application. 12 June 2021 Start of public consultation period 26 June 2021 End of public consultation period 6 May 2021 Conditions forwarded to proponent for comment Environmental Assessment Report – West Coast Council – Zeehan Landfill Wetland, Zeehan Waste Depot, Zeehan 2 Acronyms 7Q10 Lowest 7 day average flow in a 10 year period AMD Acid and Metalliferous Drainage AMDMP Acid and Metalliferous Drainage Management Plan AMT Accepted Modern Technology ANZECC Guidelines Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality 2000 (co published by the Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council).
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Decisions. Strong Partnerships. Stronger Communities
    2025 smart decisions. strong partnerships. stronger communities. With Funding support from Australian Government through Primary Health 2 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 contents the plan 03 Our Future 05 Our Place Our Lifestyle 11 Our Community Plan 20 Future Directions 23 What We Said our plan for action Our People Our Community 29 Our Economy 32 Our Infrastructure 34 Our Environment 36 Our Partnerships Our Leadership 37 3 WEST COAST COMMUNITY PLAN 2025 from the Mayor & General Manager our future t is with great pride that we present the We look forward to continuing these West Coast Community Plan 2025, a valued partnerships and connections, as the vision for the West Coast which will guide community moves forward with a whole-of- the Region over the next 10 years and community response to the vision provided Ibeyond. for the West Coast. West Coast’s Community Plan provides an The community embraced the opportunity opportunity to strategically plan a future that to be part of a vision for the Region, and the community, Council, government, non- that is reflected through the engagement government organisations, businesses and process and reflected in the Plan. West stakeholders can work towards together. Coast Council would like to sincerely thank the community for their enthusiasm The Community Plan has been developed and responsiveness to the West Coast by the West Coast community, for the Community Plan engagement process. community. More than 2,000 people were The visions, suggestions, and comments involved in some way in the development provided by the community have resulted of this plan, and it is the culmination of the in the development of the first West Coast ideas, vision, and concerns of our community.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Power Scheme a Conservation Management Plan
    Lake Margaret Power Scheme A Conservation Management Plan Volume 1 March 2006 Paul Davies Pty Ltd Architects Heritage Consultants Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Paul Davies Pty Ltd Conservation Management Plan March 2006 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................ 1 1.1.1 How to Use the Plan....................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Limitations ...................................................................................... 2 1.1.3 Authors ........................................................................................... 2 1.1.4 Acknowledgments .......................................................................... 2 1.1.5 Identification of the Place ............................................................... 3 2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND........................................................................... 6 2.1 Preface....................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Summary History........................................................................................ 6 2.3 Major Stages of Development of the site ................................................... 7 2.4 Development of the Power Station Building............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania's Wilderness World
    Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area Ecotourism Investment Profile Reimagining the Visitor Experience of Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area: Ecotourism Investment Profile This report was commissioned by Tourism Industry Council Tasmania and the Cradle Coast Authority, in partnership with the Tasmanian Government through Tourism Tasmania and the Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service. This report is co-funded by the Australian Government under the Tourism Industry Regional Development Fund Grants Programme. This report has been prepared by EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania. Date prepared: June 2014 Design by Halibut Creative Collective. Disclaimer The information and recommendations provided in this report are made on the basis of information available at the time of preparation. While all care has been taken to check and validate material presented in this report, independent research should be undertaken before any action or decision is taken on the basis of material contained in this report. This report does not seek to provide any assurance of project viability and EC3 Global, TRC Tourism and Tourism Industry Council Tasmania accept no liability for decisions made or the information provided in this report. Cover photo: Huon Pine Walk Corinna The Tarkine - Rob Burnett & Tourism Tasmania Contents Background...............................................................2 Reimagining the Visitor Experience of the TWWHA .................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Council Email Address Web Site Mayor General Manager
    COUNCIL EMAIL ADDRESS WEB SITE MAYOR GENERAL MANAGER Break O'Day Council [email protected] http://www.bodc.tas.gov.au Mayor Mick Tucker Mr John Brown Brighton Council [email protected] http://www.brighton.tas.gov.au Mayor Tony Foster Mr James Dryburgh Burnie City Council [email protected] http://www.burnie.net Mayor Steve Kons Mr Andrew Wardlaw Central Coast Council [email protected] http://www.centcoast.tas.gov.au Mayor Jan Bonde Ms Sandra Ayton Central Highlands Council [email protected] http://www.centralhighlands.tas.gov.au Mayor Loueen Triffitt Ms Lyn Eyles Circular Head Council [email protected] http://www.circularhead.tas.gov.au Mayor Daryl Quilliam Mr Scott Riley Clarence, City Of [email protected] http://www.ccc.tas.gov.au Mayor Doug Chipman Mr Ian Nelson Derwent Valley Council [email protected] http://www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Mayor Ben Shaw Mr Dean Griggs Devonport City Council [email protected] http://www.devonport.tas.gov.au Mayor Annette Rockliff Mr Matthew Atkins Dorset Council [email protected] http://www.dorset.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Howard Mr Tim Watson Flinders Council [email protected] http://www.flinders.tas.gov.au Mayor Annie Revie Mr Warren Groves George Town Council [email protected] http://www.georgetown.tas.gov.au Mayor Greg Kieser Mr Shane Power Glamorgan Spring Bay Council [email protected] http://www.gsbc.tas.gov.au Mayor Jenny Woods (A/g) Ms Marissa Walters (A/g) Glenorchy City Council
    [Show full text]
  • National Competition Policy
    TASMANIA NATIONAL COMPETITION POLICY PROGRESS REPORT May 2003 CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 1 Overview 1 Review of the NCP Agreements 2 2 Reforms under the Competition Principles Agreement 3 Legislation review 4 Review processes 4 Progress with the LRP timetable 5 Major reviews 6 National reviews 12 Gatekeeper arrangements 13 Competitive neutrality 14 Government Business Enterprises 15 Recent reforms to GBEs 16 Other significant Government business activities 17 Competitive neutrality complaints mechanism 18 Monopoly prices oversight 18 Third Party Access 21 Electricity 21 Gas 21 3 Reforms under the Conduct Code Agreement 25 Extension of Part IV of the Trade Practices Act 1974 25 Reporting obligations under the CCA 25 4 Local Government and NCP reforms 27 Overview 28 Competitive neutrality 28 Prices oversight 29 Treatment of local government by-laws under the Government’s Legislation Review Program 29 iii 5 Sector Specific Reforms 31 Electricity industry reforms 32 Basslink 32 Wind Power Development 32 Structural Reform in Tasmania’s Electricity Supply Industry 32 Tasmania’s Participation in the National Electricity Market 33 Gas industry reforms 34 Water industry reforms 36 New water management legislation 37 Cost and pricing reforms 37 Institutional reform 52 Allocation and trading reforms 55 Environment and water quality reforms 60 Public consultation and education 74 Transport industry reforms 77 Transport reforms implemented since the 2002 Progress Report 80 Additional comments 80 6 Conclusion 83 7 Publications and Contacts 85 Policy
    [Show full text]
  • GRANVILLE TIN PROJECT GRANVILLE EXPANSION (LEVEL 2) Development Proposal and Environmental Management Plan
    GRANVILLE TIN PROJECT GRANVILLE EXPANSION (LEVEL 2) Development Proposal and Environmental Management Plan Aus Tin Mining Ltd. 21st December 2016 Document Control Issue/ Version Date Recipient Organisation Draft 1 9 June 2016 Damien Blackwell Environment Protection Authority Draft 2 10/10/16 Damien Blackwell Environment Protection Authority Final Draft 19/12/16 Damien Blackwell Environment Protection Authority Final 21/12/16 Damien Blackwell/ Environment Protection Authority / Kerry Graham West Coast Council 1 Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................................10 List of Tables .............................................................................................................................................................11 List of Plates ..............................................................................................................................................................12 Forward ....................................................................................................................................................................13 Glossary ....................................................................................................................................................................15 Acronyms ..............................................................................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Margaret Hydro-Electric Scheme
    NOMINATION OF LAKE MARGARET POWER SCHEME FOR A HISTORIC ENGINEERING MARKER Prepared for Engineering Heritage Tasmania by: Phil Mathers Reviewed: Bruce Cole Date: June 2007 Lake Margaret Power Scheme Historic Engineering Marker ___________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................ 1 NOMINATION FORM................................................................................. 2 BASIC DATA.............................................................................................. 3 BRIEF HISTORY........................................................................................ 5 ENGINEERING HERITAGE ASSESSMENT ............................................. 8 COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS..................................................................... 10 STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ........................................................... 11 DRAFT CITATION FOR PLAQUE ........................................................... 11 PHOTOGRAPHS ..................................................................................... 12 OWNER’S PERMISSION LETTER.......................................................... 17 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................ 18 REFERENCES......................................................................................... 19 APPENDIX A - Comparison with other early hydro-electric schemes ...... 20 i Lake Margaret Power Scheme
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Annual Report Version 5
    DEPARTMENTAL INFORMATION LEGISLATION ADMINISTERED NEW AND AMENDED LEGISLATION DEPARTMENTAL PUBLICATIONS FREEDOM OF INFORMATION Annual Report 2006-07 - 105 - LEGISLATION ADMINISTERED Legislation administered by the Department of Premier and Cabinet is listed below. All legislation, including any amending Acts, is available at the Tasmanian Legislation website: www.thelaw.tas.gov.au Premier Administrative Arrangements (Miscellaneous Amendments) Act 1990 Administrative Arrangements Act 1990 Anglican Church of Australia (All Saints Church) Act 1989 Anglican Church of Australia (Stanley Parsonage) Act 1984 Anglican Church of Australia Constitution Act 1973 Australia Acts (Request) Act 1985 Australia Acts (Request) Act 1999 Baptist Union Incorporation Act 1902 Church of England (Rectory of St. James the Apostle) Act 1980 Churches of Christ Tasmania Act 1978 Churches of Christ, Scientist, Incorporation Act 1980 Coastal and Other Waters (Application of State Laws) Act 1982 Constitution (State Employees) Act 1944 Constitution (Validation of Taxing Acts) Act 1991 Constitution Act 1934 Constitutional Powers (Coastal Waters) Act 1979 Crown Servants' Reinstatement Act 1970 Daylight Saving Act 1968 Ex-Servicemen's Badges Act 1967 Financial Management and Audit Act 1990 (in so far as it relates to the office of Auditor-General) Glebe Lands Act 1865 Governor of Tasmania Act 1982 (except in so far as it relates to the Governor's pension) Hobart Hebrew Congregation Act 1958 Legislation Publication Act 1996 Legislative Council Elections Act 1999 Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • Gerrity, Was Called, Made the Statutory Declaration and Was Examined
    Mayor DARRYL GERRITY, WAS CALLED, MADE THE STATUTORY DECLARATION AND WAS EXAMINED. CHAIR (Mr Wing) - Welcome Mayor Gerrity. We look forward to your comments on tourism in your area. Mr GERRITY - It has been a stop-start industry on the west coast and that is why council has taken a lead role in instigating a lot of tourism projects throughout the west coast. We run the visitor centre down in Strahan - that is a total west coast visitor centre - and we still market what we call a destinational philosophy. A destinational philosophy is to put in tourists' minds coming to the west coast destination that you have to stay. So it is an end-of-day trip rather than through here, out and back again. So we market that philosophy and everybody now, when they are coming to the west coast, expects to stay here. They have not in their brain, and thank god for our speed laws, that they can leave Hobart in a day come through here, go up to Burnie and up to Launceston, even though some tourism agents on the mainland tell them that they can. They are very unwise in telling them travelling distances in Tasmania. They tell them that it is a 100 kph road. Well it is but you cannot sit on 100 kph. You go down to 40 or 50 kph on occasions. Every time you educate these people on the east coast and in these tourism agencies, they change and so you get another new one. It is a re-educational program all over again, especially when they come here on what they call 'famils'.
    [Show full text]