L-In ħawi ta’ Pembroke
Annex
Www www.natura2000malta.org.mt
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVE LOPMENT 4 A.1.1 Summary of Methodology 4 A.1.2 Data Collection 5 A.1.3 Formulation of Management Objectives 6 A.1.4 Formulation of Management Actions 6 A.1.5 Work Plan Structure and Reporting and Review Plan 7 ANNEX 2 RELEVANT PLANNING PO LICIES 8 A.2.1 Structure Plan and Local Plan Policies 8 ANNEX 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLO GY OF CONSERVATION STATUS 19 ANNEX 4 SPECIFICATIONS OF MA NAGEMENT ACTIONS 27 A.4.1 Guidelines for Standard Monitoring Plans for Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species of the Habitats Directive and Annex i S pecies of the Birds Directive 27 A.4.2 Guidelines for the Elaboration of National Species Action Plans 33 A.4.3 Guidelines for Habitat Restoration Actions 36 P3. Planning and implementation of an IAS species eradication programme on habitat 6220* 36 P6. Applic ation of animal access control measures to specific parts of habitats 3140 and 3170* 39 P7. Application of access control measures t o specific parts of habitats 1240, 5330, 5410 and 5420* 39 P8. Enhancement of habitat 5420 through seeding of Sarcopoterium spinosu m 40 P9. Enhancement of habitat 6220* through seeding of typical species (Brachypodium) 42 A.4.4 Patrolling Schedule 45 ANNEX 5 COST RECOVERY MECHAN ISMS 58 A.5.1 Revenue Generating and Self -financing Opportunities 58 A.5.2 Funding Opportunities 60 ANNEX 6 MAPS 63 A.6.1 Boundary Map 64 A.6.2 Hydrology Map 65 A.6.3 Geology Map 66 A.6.4 Cultural Heritage Map 67 A.6.5 Land Use Map 68 A.6.6 Habitats Map 69 A.6.7 Species Map 70 A.6.8 Land Ownership Map 71 A.6.9 Visitor Access Map 72 A.6.10 Actions Map 74 ANNEX BIBLIOGRAPHY 75
Tables Table A-1: Structure Plan policies; L -Inħawi ta’ Pembroke ...... 9 Table A-2: North Harbour Local Plan polici es applicable to L-In ħawi ta’ Pembroke ...... 13 Table A-3: Evaluating the current condition of a habitat type ...... 20 Table A-4: Evaluating the current condition of a species ...... 23 Table A-5: Maltese Islands Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species to be monitored ...... 27 Table A-6: Maltese Islands Bird Species to be monitored ...... 29 Table A-7: FRVs to be es tablished for the following habitats and species ...... 30
page A-2 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Table A-8: Parameters for determining Favourable Conservation Status according to Article 17 of the Habitats Directive ...... 31 Table A-9: Content explanation of Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure ...... 47 Table A-10: Content explanation of Table A-13: Activities per site ...... 47 Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure ...... 48 Table A-12: Half-year patrolling schedule ...... 52 Table A-13: Activities monitored through patrolling ...... 55
Figures Figure A-1: Actions Map ...... 44
Epsilon-Adi page A-3
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 1 MANAGEMENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
A standardised methodology has been developed for the development of all Natura 2000 Management Plans. The use of a standardised methodology allows for facilitated quality assurance and control. This chapter outlines the management planning methodology.
A.1.1 SUMMARY OF METHODOLOGY
Step -1 Information acquisition, evaluation : One of the first tasks that was undertaken was the identification of information requirements for the management planning process. Once this was done, the team acquired information available for the site from MEPA, literature, available reports, interviews, team experts and academia contacts. In addition to the above, a data gap analysis was carried out to determine what supplementary information was required to be gathered from the field / other sources ( Information and Gap Analysis ).
Step -2 Site/s visit & field work : The team conducted site visits as necessary to verify the information collected in Step-1 and collected additional information and data (Surveys and Data Gathering Exercise ) whilst concluding the gap analysis
Step -3 Database development and drafting of Chapter 2 : The team evaluated all information for consistency, quality and reliability, drafted Chapter 2 and stored information in an ArcGIS system. All baseline information was submitted to MEPA for their feedback. This information was thoroughly reviewed and revised as the Management Plan was drafted and was revisited each time new information was made available through additional site visits, stakeholder consultation and expert input ( Εvaluation of Data and Information Gathered ).
Step -4 Drafting of Chapter 3 : Based on the above, the team drafted Chapter 3 of the Management Plan. The 1 st draft was peer reviewed by the team and external consultants ( Evaluation of Data and Information Gathered , Setting Conservation Objectives ). This Chapter was circulated to MEPA for their feedback and revised following MEPA feedback.
Step -5 Drafting of Chapters 4 to 6, Draft -1: Based on the above, the team drafted Chapters 4, 5 and 6, by following the steps described below and produced a 1 st Draft of the Management Plan, including the Introductory Chapter 1 (Management Planning ). The draft was made available to MEPA for their comments and revised following MEPA feedback.
Step -6 Public consultation & stakeholders meetings : This is a horizontal action carried out concurrently with the above steps. The team organized public consultation meetings and public information days with stakeholders and the MEPA, presented the Natura 2000 programme for Malta, and acquired general and specific information for the sites. It also discussed the vision, management objectives, and actions for the site ( Stakeholder Involvement ).
Step -7 2nd site visit, verification, Draft -2; Consultation and Draft -3; Database update,
page A-4 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
maps, Live.Doc : The t eam conducted a 2 nd site visit to verify measures proposed in Draft-1 and produced a Draft-2 Management Plan. Draft-2 was peer reviewed by consultants and experts and the team used the feedback from these to produce Draft-3. Based on the above, the team updated the site database and GIS system and produced maps and other information ( Management Planning, update/contribution of/to the Surveys and Data Gathering Exercise and the Evaluation of Data and Information Gathered )
Step -8 Delivery of the Live.doc to the MEPA : The Live.doc was delivered for review to MEPA. Comments by MEPA were addressed as required.
Step -9 The final document is then produced : The live.doc has been circulated, comments have been incorporated and the Final Report has been produced which includes the Executive Summary.
A.1.2 DATA COLLECTION
Data has been collated for:
• Physical features • Management infrastructure • Relevant plans, policies and legislation • Ecology • Geology, Geomorphology, Hydrology, Climate • Cultural and heritage elements • Landscape features • Human uses within and around the site • Land Ownership • Tourism • Accessibility • Economic and social aspects including stakeholder consultation.
The data has been collated from various sources according to the procedures:
• A desk study was first carried out to gather all relevant data related to the site. • Typical information sources used are MEPA databases, maps and documents, information from the Lands Department, information from the Agriculture Department, information from the Malta Resources Authority. • Field surveys were carried out to support the desk study. • Surveys were carried out for land use and habitat mapping, in particular to confirm or update the habitats maps available at PA. • Meetings were held with relevant stakeholders during which the site was discussed and information as well as feedback was obtained. • Survey methodologies and details of the consultation carried out are described in detail in Chapter 2.
Epsilon-Adi page A-5
Natura 2000 Management Plan
A.1.3 FORMULATION OF MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES
Compiled data is evaluated in Chapter 3, leading to the vision of the site with the help of a SWOT analysis as described in the equivalent sections.
The essence of conservation management is the ability to improve the weak features (weaknesses) and to control the negative factors (threats) impacting a particular feature or group of features, while enhancing the strengths and increasing the probability of the opportunities identified.
To aid the process a Prospects Matrix is employed. Principal features targeted for conservation are plotted against the ecological, social and institutional prospects that can be contemplated for them and for the site as a whole.
In Natura 2000 sites the ecological prospects are well defined and refer to:
• The natural habitat types listed in Annex I of the Habitats Directive • The species listed in Annex II of the Habitats Directive • The species listed in Annex I of the Birds Directive and migratory birds as per Article 4 of the Birds Directive • Other important species defined for the site.
Institutional and social prospects, such as archaeological elements, cultural elements and landscape value, are site specific and derived from the evaluation of the features (other than habitats and species) and the factors influencing the site. Ideally every issue identified in the SWOT analysis should appropriately fit in a cell of the Prospect Matrix so that a formula for addressing weaknesses and threats and building on strengths and opportunities can be later constructed.
A vision for the site is then created to summarise the ideal situation after a period of management of the protected area. The vision is based on the evaluation of the prospects that can be contemplated for each of the features and the factors identified for the site.
The vision is composed of discrete vision statements. Each vision statement corresponds to a line in the Prospect Matrix.
The above led to the formulation of the Management Objectives and, subsequently, Operational Objectives. The Management Objectives define the policies through which the vision will be achieved and are long-term objectives to be attained over a long period of time. For every Management Objective defined, a number of Operational Objectives are assigned.
The Operational Objectives are basically the objectives to which all the management work is directly related and are to be attainted during the 5-year period of the plan. The Operational Objectives also lay the groundwork for the Management Actions.
A.1.4 FORMULATION OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
Operational Objectives are given a priority rating, based on urgency for addressing certain conservation problems (as they have been identified during the evaluation process) and
page A-6 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
subsequently lead to the formulation of Management Actions as described in Chapter 4. In most cases certain actions can be grouped together so that a more comprehensive final list of Management Actions is produced.
For each action a brief description is given together with expected results, priority ratings and foreseen constraints. For a number of Management Actions, some of which would be best implemented horizontally across sites, the aforementioned brief description is supplemented by specifications which are included in Annex 4. The specifications elaborate further on the needs of the implementation to facilitate future work.
A.1.5 WORK PLAN STRUCTURE AND REPORTING AND REVIEW PLAN
Prior to the Management Plan implementation a detailed Work Plan must be prepared by the relevant entity and site manager, on annual basis and reviewed at the end of each year, which makes clear what is expected to be achieved over specific periods of the plan and how much it will cost, as is indicated in Chapter 5.
To facilitate the elaboration of the Work Plan the following are provided:
• An indication of the financial resources needed annually for the implementation of each action. • The annual time schedule for the implementation of each action, checklist of the expected deliverables and year of delivery of each action and the entity proposed as responsible to deliver the actions.
In addition, cost recovery mechanisms are identified, both per site and horizontally, to facilitate securing resources for the subsequent implementation of the actions suggested within the Management Plan. These are included in Annex 5.
The management plan should be reviewed on an annual basis and given an in-depth review immediately after its five year period of validity, as indicated in Chapter 6. It is important to review the management plan on a regular basis since this:
• Makes clear whether or not all the objectives and targets are being achieved efficiently and effectively • Allows resource shifting and re-prioritisation if necessary • Assists forward planning for the following year or period, so that uncompleted projects can be added in and tasks re-timed in the light of experience.
To facilitate the five year revision plan and specifically to assist the evaluation of the effectiveness of the actions in achieving the objectives, a list of initial performance indicators is also provided.
Epsilon-Adi page A-7
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 2 RELEVANT PLANNING POLICIES
A.2.1 STRUCTURE PLAN AND LOCAL PLAN POLICIES
page A-8 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Table A-1: Structure Plan policies; L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke Str. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process SET 11 No form of urban development will be permitted outside existing and committed built-up areas, and The management plan will take note of primary development areas as designated in the Structure Plan even where roads and public utilities are this policy. available. Permitted forms of non urban development outside such areas are restricted to the categories referred to in Paragraph 7.6 SET 12 Notwithstanding the policy against any form of urbanisation outside areas designated for urban uses in the The management plan will take note of Structure Plan, the Planning Authority will consider applications for permission to develop which ostensibly this policy. infringe Policy SET 11. In any such case the onus will be on the applicant to present evidence as to why the policy should be infringed, giving reasons why from a planning point of view such proposed use cannot be located in areas designated for development. The Planning Authority will additionally require the applicant to submit at his own expense a full Environmental Impact Assessment of a form and content satisfactory to the Authority. This policy is not a means of evading policy SET 11 or any other policy. An Environmental Impact Assessment which adequately demonstrates acceptable impacts will not be a reason for the granting of a development permit if the proposed use can be located in an area intended for its development under the Structure Plan or any subsequent approved Planning Authority document. BEN 5 Applications for development permits outside urban areas will be judged against the policies and design The management plan will take note of guidelines of the Local Plans for Rural Conservation Areas, and in the interim period, to Structure Plan this policy. policies and the guidelines contained in the Explanatory Memorandum. RCO 1 Rural Conservation Areas are designated as illustrated in the Key Diagram. Within such areas the following Since the area is an Area of Ecological sub areas will be designated, using World Conservation Union definitions and criteria where relevant: Importance it is a Rural Conservation 1. Areas of Agricultural Value: areas comprised of high grade agricultural land including irrigated and Area. partially irrigated land 2. Areas of Ecological Importance: relatively large areas designated to protect typical and rare habitats 3. Sites of Scientific Importance: sites containing individual species, groups of species, and geological features 4. Areas of Archaeological Importance: concentrations of valuable archaeological sites 5. Sites of Archaeological Importance: individual and/or isolated archaeological sites 6. National Parks: relatively large areas of national significance not materially altered by human use, with managed visitor access and amenities 7. Areas of High Landscape Value RCO 2 Within Rural Conservation Areas and in accordance with Policy SET 11 no form of urban development will The management plan will take note of be allowed. However, in accordance with Policy BEN 5, applications for permission to develop structures or this policy. facilities essential to agricultural, ecological, or scenic interests will be favourably considered as long as the
Epsilon-Adi page A-9
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Str. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process proposed development does not infringe the principles set out in Policy RCO 4 as subsequently detailed in the relevant Local Plan (Policy RCO 3). See also Policies RCO 7 and 8. With regard to existing buildings and other structures in Rural Conservation Areas, and other rural areas, the overall aim is to improve the rural environment. To this end the rehabilitation and suitable change of use of some buildings will be permitted, in conjunction with the removal of other buildings and structures which adversely affect the rural environment. RCO 4 The Planning Authority will not permit the development of any structure or activity which in the view of The management plan will take note of the Authority would adversely affect scenic value because it would: this policy. 1. Break a presently undisturbed skyline 2. Visually dominate or disrupt its surroundings because of its mass or location 3. Obstruct a pleasant and particularly a panoramic view 4. Adversely affect any element of the visual composition - for example, cause the destruction or deterioration of traditional random stone walls 5. Adversely affect existing trees or shrubs 6. Introduce alien forms, materials, textures, or colours RCO 6 Following the adoption of the Local Plans for Rural Conservation Areas, the Planning Authority will institute The management plan will take note of a programme of enhancement and management in conjunction with the Ministry of Agriculture and the this policy. Secretariat of the Environment comprising: 1. Afforestation and landscaping schemes 2. Rehabilitation of abandoned quarries 3. Reactivation of abandoned agricultural land, encouraging compatible methods of cultivation 4. Reuse and conversion of rural buildings which are compatible with their scenic setting 5. Rehabilitation of degraded habitats 6. The encouragement of and provision of incentives for the relocation to appropriate existing or planned urban areas of structures and activities which are incompatible with the creation and maintenance of a high quality of rural environment. RCO 10 In identifying and designating Areas of Ecological L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke includes areas Importance in Local Plans, one or more of the following habitat types must be present: of garrigue, watercourses and gently 1. Permanent springs sloping rocky coasts. 2. Saline marshlands 3. Sand dunes 4. Forest remnants 5. Semi natural woodland
page A-10 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Str. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process 6. Natural freshwater pools and transitional coastal wetlands 7. Deep natural caves 8. Coastal cliffs 9. Representative examples of typical Maltese habitats such as garigue, maquis, valley sides, watercourses, and gently sloping rocky coasts. RCO 11 In identifying and designating Sites of Scientific Importance in Local Plans, one or more of the following Part of the Rocky Foreshore and the features must be present: Subsidence Strucutre is designated as a 1. The only known locality in the Maltese Islands where certain endemic and/or non endemic species are Site of Scientific Importance. found 2. A locality where certain endemic and/or non endemic species with a restricted distribution in the Maltese Islands occur (`restricted distribution' is taken to mean occurrence in five localities or less) 3. The type locality of an endemic species 4. An important bird nesting site or of some other major ornithological interest 5. A locality of special palaeontological interest 6. A lithostratigraphical type section 7. A locality of particular geomorphological interest 8. Some other specific feature of scientific importance not listed above RCO 12 In Local Plans, the Planning Authority will give protection ratings to Areas of Ecological Importance and The SAC contains all protection levels, Sites of Scientific Importance as follows: see Table 1. 1. LEVEL 1 zones will include important habitat types present only in small areas and/or sites with unique species or features 2. LEVEL 2 zones will include important habitat types present in relatively large areas and/or sites with rare species or features 3. LEVEL 3 zones will include areas where control is necessary to preserve habitats/species/features in adjacent sites 4. LEVEL 4 zones will include habitats and/or features of general interest RCO 20 Positive action will be taken to rehabilitate identified areas of degraded habitat and landscape, and The management plan will take note of proposals from Government agencies and non governmental bodies for rehabilitation schemes for these this policy. areas, provided that such schemes do not conflict with other policies and/or regulations concerning these areas, will be supported subject to scrutiny and approval by competent experts. RCO 21 There is a general presumption against development in areas prone to erosion. The management plan will take note of this policy. RCO 26 The removal of the vegetation cover from abandoned fields and derelict land without good reason will not The management plan will take note of
Epsilon-Adi page A-11
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Str. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process be permitted. this policy. RCO 28 Valleys will continue to be protected as important water catchment areas. The management plan will take note of this policy. CZM 3 Public access around the coastline immediately adjacent to the sea or at the top of cliffs (including in bays, The management plan will take note of harbours, and creeks) will be secured. This will include taking shorelands into public ownership, this policy. Government acquisition of illegal developments and encroachments, and suitable construction works. In the few cases where this is not practical (for example where security considerations are paramount), nearby detours will be established. All the coastline will be brought into public ownership within a specified period.
page A-12 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Table A-2: North Harbour Local Plan policies applicable to L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process NHSE Urban Development Boundaries are indicated in the relevant Area Policy Maps. Changes to these Boundaries The SAC includes a small part which is 01 are being recommended in order to secure their rationalisation. These recommended changes are indicated located within the Urban Development in the detailed Planning Control Maps (SB1 to SB15) and in the Area Policy Maps for the relevant settlements. Boundary.
Confirmation of these recommended changes to the Urban Development Boundaries will, however, have to wait the finalisation of the Structure Plan Review that takes place after the approval of the related local plan, in accordance with Policy SET8 of the Structure Plan (1990). These recommended changes are also subject to Parliamentary approval.
Urban development will not be permitted outside the approved boundaries unless indicated through this Local Plan. In addition, it will only be considered if in the opinion of PA, and in accordance with Structure Plan Policies SET11 and SET12, the site is essential for the development proposed and no specific designation for the use to be accommodated within the development boundary has been made. NHSE In accordance with Structure Plan Policies UCO 10 and RCO4, a number of Strategic View Corridors are The SAC includes the Madliena Tower 07 established to protect long views into and out of the plan area. Strategic Landmark Buildings are identified to area. provide a focus for these views. These View Corridors, as illustrated on Map SE2, include the building planes and skylines that should not be significantly disrupted by new development, especially high buildings. Views of important valleys will also be protected. Key identified view corridors are;
i. Valletta/Marsamxett Harbour to Msida Church and towards Mdina. ii. University Site to Tignè Point, Marsamxett Harbour and Valletta. iii. Fort Madliena to Madliena Tower, White Rocks Tower and Sir Adrian Dingli School. iv. Wied Ghomor/St. George’s Bay/Spinola Bay from Tal-Balal.
Where deemed necessary by PA, applicants shall be required to provide photo-montages in order to prove that the new development will not significantly disrupt the identified building planes and skylines. NHSE MEPA will adopt a flexible approach in considering appropriate new uses (like the provision of schools) for The management plan will take note of 10 scheduled historic buildings with a strong emphasis on putting such buildings to good use rather than just this policy. preserving them. Normal planning requirements relating to floor areas, use, parking standards or contribution to CPPS funds may be relaxed at the discretion of MEPA in order to achieve this aim. Proposals must, however, ret ain the original structure and architectural characteristics of the building or group of buildings, incorporate uses that do not have an adverse impact on the building’s fabric or character, and
Epsilon-Adi page A-13
Natura 2000 Management Plan
L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process must incorporate uses that are neighbour compatible.
In negotiations for rehabilitation or extensions to scheduled historic buildings, the replacement of existing non-traditional features with traditional al ternatives will be sought. Additions and alterations to scheduled buildings will be required to be in scale and sympathy with the original character of the building. No development will be allowed that would detract from the setting of the building, or that would be contrary to other relevant policy guidance. MEPA will require the developer to submit a satisfactory justification of the need for any proposed addition/alteration. NHTR Working with relevant local councils and other government and non-government agencies, MEPA will seek The Walking and Cycling Trail Project 05 the implementation of walkways/cycleways. Priority networks are detailed at Pembroke (Map PE1) and has already been implemented by the Paceville (Map PV2). MTA together with other NGOs. The management plan will take note of this Planning permission will not be granted for development that would jeopardise the establishment of these policy. routes or future approved schemes. NHCI Proposals for new medium to large scale office development (over 75 sqm) will only be acceptable in the The management plan will take note of 01 following areas: this policy.
i. The designated Town Centres in accordance with Policy NHRE01; ii. Small-scale office development up to 100sqm in Local Centres in accordance with Policy NHRE02; iii. The designated Commercial Areas in accordance with Policy NHRE03; iv. Manoel Island/Tignè Point Development Brief areas in accordance with the provisions of the Development Brief; v. The Gzira Drainage Pumping Station in accordance with Policy NHGT06; vi. The Ta’ Xbiex Residential Priority A rea in accordance with Policy NHGT11; vii. The Gzira Employment Node in accordance with Policy NHGT14; viii. The recommended Employment/Mixed Uses Site at Msida subject to confirmation by the Structure Plan Review and in accordance with the provisions of Policy NHMP13; ix. Utilising Key Historic Buildings in Pembroke in accordance with Policy NHPE08; x. Pembroke Development Brief Area in accordance with Policy NHPE09; xi. Paceville - Mercury House Development Brief area in accordance with the provisions of the Development Brief; xii. Small-scale office development up to 100sqm in the Entertainment Priority Areas of Paceville in accordance with Policy NHPV05;
page A-14 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process xiii. Designated Residential Buffer Zones in Paceville and Swieqi in accordance with Policies NHPV12 and NHSW10 respectively; xiv. The Swieqi ex-Hotel Site in accordance with Policy NHSW09; and, xv. Other sites or localities identified through specific area policies; NHCV MEPA designates Special Areas of Conservation as indicated on Maps CV1 and CV3 and in accordance with LN The management plan will take note of 01 257/03 and GN 877/03. Areas of Ecological Importance (AEIs), Sites of Scientific Importance (SSIs) and Areas this policy. of High Landscape Se nsitivity (AHLSs) are indicated on Maps CV1 to CV5, and these are designated by MEPA to be conserved in accordance with Section 46 of the Development Planning Act, 1992. In these protected areas and sites development will only be permitted provided it accords with all the relevant Structure Plan Policies, Legal and Government Notices relating to SACs, AEIs, SSIs and AHLSs. Proposed developments located within AHLSs are also to adhere to all the relevant provisions of PA’s Supplementary Guidance document entitled ‘Landscape Assessment Study of the Maltese Islands’. NHCV Within the designated natural coastal areas as indicated in the relevant Area Policy Maps, no urban The management plan will take note of 03 development will be permitted. In addition, all efforts will be made in order to retain or reinstate these this policy. designated areas in their natural state. ERA will however consider;
i. Minor interventions on the natural coastal areas that are required in order to provide for necessary access for sea craft, provided that such interventions do not detract from the character of the designated natural coastal areas; and ii. Minor interventions that would improve public access and use of the coast provided that these interventions are of a temporary nature, are totally reversible, and provided that they do not detract from the character of the designated natural coastal areas.
Furthermore, development that may result in damage or loss of coastal/marine habitats or species, and/or of cultural, natural or other important features will not be permitted within the coastal zone or in a location likely to negatively affect the Marine Conservation Area candidate site as identified through the Structure Plan. NHRL MEPA will promote the development of recreational walkways/cycle routes and heritage trails based on the The Walking and Cycling Trail Project 06 provision of circular routes and access from urban settlements to the countryside and the coast. Existing and has already been implemented by the proposed long distance footpaths will be protected from any development that would adversely affect their MTA together with other NGOs. The route or character. Where appropriate, these routes will incorporate tree planting schemes and picnic areas. management plan will take note of this MEPA in conjunction with Local Councils and other agencies will implement the way marking of policy. walkways/cycle routes/heritage trails and public access ways in order to protect rights of access. MEPA will
Epsilon-Adi page A-15
Natura 2000 Management Plan
L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process also seek to improve pedestrian linkages between the Outer Harbours area and the more urbanised Inner Harbours Area. Wherever feasible and desirable, improvements to public access will normally be required when new development takes place in the countryside, especially where links can be created from settlements into the countryside.
MEPA may require that an Environment Management Plan (EMP) be formulated and approved prior to the implementation of walkways/cycle routes/heritage trails and public access ways. These proposed routes are to follow th e guidance and recommendations set out in these EMPs so as to ensure that all environmentally important areas are protected and upgraded, and so that environmental impacts are minimized.
The promenade spanning from St. George’s Bay to Pieta`, as indicated in Map TR1, will be protected and upgraded. In particular, PA will ensure that the following criteria will be strictly adhered to in any proposal that is likely to affect this promenade; i. The continuity of the promenade will not be interrupted in any way; ii. The promenade will be maintained at a sufficient width that is necessary to allow uninterrupted heavy pedestrian flows throughout its length; iii. Temporary and permanent structures, and the placing of tables and chairs, will not be allowed where these will compromise the use of the promenade by interrupting heavy pedestrian flows; and iv. Temporary and permanent structures that obstruct views to the sea will not be allowed. NHTO MEPA will generally favourably consider proposals to establish new and innovative visitor attractions and The management plan will take note of 03 tourist-related leisure facilities within the designated town centres and in other suitable locations that are this policy. identified for these purposes in the Local Plan. These facilities are to conform to all the following provisions; i.e.; they are;
i. Not to cause any deleterious impacts on neighbouring residences; ii. To be well served by public transport; iii. To be located in close proximity to adequate existing/planned public off-street parking; and iv. To be in accordance with all other relevant Local Plan policies. NHTO Cultural tourism will be promoted in order to diversify the tourism base, aid the local economy and The management plan will take note of 04 encourage the upkeep of important local features. These attractions shall be linked through the this policy. identification of cycle and walking routes wherever possible.
The provision of other cultural or educational attractions will be promoted in appropriate locations,
page A-16 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process particularly where this would result in the sensitive rehabilitation of deteriorating scheduled and listed buildings or structures. NHPE In accordance with Structure Plan Policy REC 5, MEPA will encourage more intensive use of existing and The Walking and Cycling Trail Project 04 planned sports facilities in Pembroke as designated in Map PE1. The development of a range of sport and has already been implemented by the recreational facilities to serve people living in, working in or visiting Pembroke will be supported by MEPA. MTA together with other NGOs. The management plan will take note of this New sports/recreational facility uses will be considered outside these designated sites only where the policy. proposal:
i. Contributes to the rehabilitation of a scheduled building in terms of Policy NHPE08 and provides an appropriate use for the building itself; and ii. has an adequate catchment area that may also include adjacent localities; and iii. improves the standard/range of a school’s sports facilities.
In accordance with Policy NHTR05, Map PE1 also shows appropriate pedestrian and cycle routes for Pembroke. Development proposals that would compromise these routes will not be permitted. Any major (governmental or private) development proposal located within Pembroke will be required to include generous provision for cycle paths and footways, to the satisfaction of PA. NHPE In line with Policy NHSE10 (New Uses For Historic Buildings), MEPA will adopt a flexible approach in Martin Luther King Hall (also known as 08 considering appropriate new uses for Fort Pembroke, Australia Hall, the Ex-Raffles Discotheque, Chapels, the Territorial Force Camp and Officers’ Clock Tower Building and Martin Luther King Hall as indicated in Map PE2 and as detailed below: Mess) is located within the SAC.
i. Fort Pembroke (Grade I) - presently used as a school. Commercial and Community uses on this site will be considered including those in Use Class 5 (Offices), Use Class 7 (Non-Residential Institutions), and/or Use Class 8 (Education). The utilisation of the underground space of this Fort will also be considered for employment or other commercial purposes. ii. Australia Hall (Grade II) - built as a meeting hall for soldiers and currently vacant and internally gutted. This building could be used as a public meeting hall, for commercial use, exhibition space or other suitable cultural/recreational use, including those in Use Class 4 (Shops), Use Class 5 (Offices), Use Class 6 (Food and Drink), Use Class 7 (Non-Residential Institutions), Use Class 8 (Education) or Use Class 9 (Assembly and Leisure). iii. Ex-Raffles Discotheque (Grade II) - this building was used as a discotheque and is currently vacant. Appropriate reuses for this building may include a mix of club, local council premises or office uses in addition
Epsilon-Adi page A-17
Natura 2000 Management Plan
L. Plan Relevance to management plan Description Policy process to Use Class 5 (Offices), Use Class 6 (Food and Drink), Use Class 7 (Non-Residential Institutions), Use Class 8 (Education), or Use Class 9 (Assembly and Leisure). The reuse of the building as a disco will not be permitted given the likely impact on residents. iv. Church and Churchyard (Grade I)- currently used as a sports club. The existing church is well suited for a sports club, but alternative uses could include those in Use Class 5 (Offices), Use Class 7 (Non-Residential Institutions), or Use Class 9 (Assembly and Leisure). v. Martin Luther King Hall (Grade III)- currently used as a school. Should the existing use cease, the re-use of this building as a hostel, sports association, gym or research centre will be considered, as will uses in Use Class 3 (Hostels), Use Class 7 (Non-Residential Institutions), Use Class 8 (Education) or Use Class 9 (Assembly and Leisure). Existing access to this building will be retained and no new accesses will be permitted.
Any proposals submitted on these scheduled buildings shall respect the buildings’ structure, architectural integrity, setting and any views from a nd onto the scheduled buildings. In view of their scheduled nature, interventions may require a Restoration Method Statement.
page A-18 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
ANNEX 3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY OF CONSERVATION STATUS
The assessment of Conservation Status of habitats and species was done in accordance with methodology provided by the Competent Authority, the Malta Environment and Planning Authority (MEPA).
Table A-3 illustrates each of the parameters that were evaluated individually and were then used to establish the overall Conservation Status for each habitat type at each Natura 2000 site. The table presents the evaluation matrix for this assessment. The evaluated parameters are Area, Structure and Function (including typical species) and Future Prospects (in terms of area covered, structure and function). Typical species were identified with reference to Article 17 reporting sheets for the Maltese Islands and the European Commission’s Interpretation Manual of European Habitats Eur 27 (2007). Habitat evaluation was based on surveys carried out between 2012 and 2013, during which all Natura 2000 sites were visited; desk-top research and expert judgement were also used. The level of confidence in the habitats assessment is generally considered to be moderate.
Table A-4 presents the methodology for evaluation of parameters relevant in the assessment of species; the parameters are Range, Size of Population, Habitat for the Species, and Future Prospects (including range, population, its sustainability and habitat availability). Although during the habitat surveys Annex II species were actively noted, no specific species surveys were carried out. Instead, particularly for Annex II fauna, existing data and expert judgement provided the basis for the evaluation. In many cases, however, insufficient data was available that did not allow for a robust evaluation. In such cases, the Conservation Status was defined as Indeterminate. Due to the lack of data, most Annex II species evaluations were carried out with a low to moderate (in the case of some plants) level of confidence.
Table A-4 was also used to evaluate the conservation status of Annex I birds, breeding birds and migratory birds listed in the Birds Directive. The evaluations carried out on Annex I breeding seabirds were carried out with a high level of confidence given the fact that they were based on trend data for the most part spanning over approximately 25 years (data provided by John J Borg). Evaluations of other birds were carried out with a moderate level of confidence.
It is noted that the evaluation of all Annex I habitats and Annex II species was carried out at site level. Despite this, however, where necessary, the evaluation identifies scenarios where nation-wide data is required in order to obtain a more robust understanding at site level e.g. in the case of bats. Also, even though assessment was carried out at site level, expert judgement and associated desk-top and field surveys included an element of comparison to examples of each habitat-type at various sites. It should also be noted that Favourable Reference Values (FRVs), against which certain parameters used to evaluate habitats and species should be assessed, have not yet been assigned in the Maltese Islands. To reiterate, therefore, all evaluations have been undertaken in the absence of FRVs, and based largely on expert judgement.
Epsilon-Adi page A-19
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Table A-3: Evaluating the current condition of a habitat type Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion
Favourable Unfavourable – Inadequate Unfavourable – Bad (green / A) (amber / B) (red / C)
Area The area occupied by the habitat type. The area of the habitat is Any other condition other than The area has significantly Evaluation of area includes consideration stable in the long-term or A or C. deteriorated in coverage or of: increasing (based on current decreasing or may decrease due area, previous records or This category could be: to significant pressures and • current area evidence on site or, in the threats. • previous distribution, if available, which case of increasing area, the • B1 if the condition of the may indicate changes or stability in the presence of factors area is inadequate but This category could be: area and any correlation with factors contributing to the increase) improving • evidence on site that the area has • B2 if the condition of the • C1 if the condition of the area changed or is stable or is occupying its area is inadequate and stable is bad but improving full potential • B3 if the condition of the • C2 if the condition of the area • presence of factors which may be area is inadequate and is bad and stable influencing the current area at present deteriorating* • C3 if the condition of the area (e.g. encroaching agricultural land, is bad and deteriorating* competing habitat) (This evaluation is based on current area, previous records (This evaluation is based on or evidence on site or presence current area, previous records of factors contributing to a or evidence on site or presence change in area (positively in the of factors contributing to a case of B1 and negatively in the change in area (positively in the case of B3) case of C1 and negatively in the case of C3) Structure & The structure of a given habitat type can be The structure (including Any other condition other than More than 25% of the area is in function compared with the data of the EU typical species) and function A or C. a bad condition with regard to (including Interpretation Manual, the associated (including ecological its structure and function typical PHYSIS interpretations and the requirements) of the habitat This category could be: (including typical species) species) interpretation of each habitat (and its is in good condition, no typical species) provided at Malta’s significant deteriorations • B1 if the condition of the This category could be:
page A-20 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion national level through Malta’s reporting are experienced and no structure and function is sheets for Article 17. Not all typical species pressures are present. inadequate but improving • C1 if the condition of listed therein need to be present at the site • B2 if the condition of the structure and function is bad for the habitat to be interpreted as such. structure and function is but improving inadequate and stable • C2 if the condition of the Function refers to the ecological processes • B3 if the condition of the structure and function is bad and capacity of the habitat to maintain its structure and function is and stable structure. inadequate and • C3 if the condition of the deteriorating* structure and function is bad Typical species , as defined above, are also and deteriorating* included in this assessment. In order to (This evaluation is based on the assess the overall condition of the typical structure (including typical (This evaluation is based on the species consideration can be given to species) and function (including structure (including typical typical species richness, coverage of the ecological requirements) of the species) and function (including ruderals, ermes, invasive plant species and habitat and presence of ecological requirements) of the degree of interfloral competition affecting pressures or threats). habitat and presence of the area covered by the habitat. pressures or threats). Future Capacity and probability of the habitat type The habitat prospects for its Any other condition other than The habitat prospects are bad, prospects (as concerned on the site in question to future are excellent / good, A or C. with severe impacts from regards area maintain its structure for the future, given with no significant impacts threats expected. The long-term covered, on the one hand the possible unfavourable from threats expected. The This category could be: viability is not assured. structure & influences and on the other hand all the long-term viability is also function) reasonable conservation effort which is assured. • B1 if the future prospects are This category could be: possible. inadequate but improving • C1 if the future prospects are • B2 if the c future prospects bad but improving are inadequate and stable • C2 if the future prospects are • B3 if the future prospects are bad and stable inadequate and • C3 if the future prospects are deteriorating* bad and deteriorating* OVERALL CONDITION If the condition of all If the condition of one or more If the condition of one or more parameters is evaluated as parameters is Unfavourable- parameters is Unfavourable- favourable (green/A), then Inadequate (amber/B) and Bad (red/C) , then the overall the overall condition of the none of the parameters is condition of the habitat is
Epsilon-Adi page A-21
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current Condition Criterion habitat is FAVOURABLE evaluated as Unfavourable-Bad UNFAVOURABLE –BAD (red/C). (green/A). (red/C) , then the overall condition of the habitat is UNFAVOURABLE – INADEQUATE (amber/B) . * If one does not wish to assign a sub-category to this conservation status assessment, it would be sufficient to have a reasonably good justification from which this can be extracted by the reader. Source: MEPA
page A-22 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Table A-4: Evaluating the current condition of a species Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion
Favourable Unfavourable – Inadequate Unfavourable – Bad (green / A) (amber / B) (red / C)
Range Area over which a species is usually to be The range should be stable Any other condition other than Large decline in the range (or found in the protected area being or increasing and must not A or C evidence of loss from one year considered, and shows outer limits of the be contracting (based on to the next), which is foreseen overall area in which the species is found at current range, previous This category could be: to have a significant impact on present. Useful information to assess range records or evidence on site the survival of the species / includes: or, in the case of increasing • B1 if the condition of the population range, the presence of range is inadequate but • current range factors contributing to the improving This category could be: • previous records, if available, which may increase) • B2 if the condition of the indicate changes or stability in the range range is inadequate is and • C1 if the condition of the and any correlation with factors; stable range is bad but improving • evidence on site that the range has • B3 if the condition of the • C2 if the condition of the changed or is stable/at its full potential range is inadequate and range is bad and stable • presence of factors (such as abiotic deteriorating* • C3 if the condition of the factors) which may be influencing the range is bad and current range at present or in the future. (This evaluation is based on deteriorating* • range required for viability of species, current range, previous records including consideration of connectivity or evidence on site or presence (This evaluation is based on of factors contributing to a current range, previous records change in range (positively in or evidence on site or presence the case of B1 and negatively in of factors contributing to a the case of B3) change in range (positively in the case of C1 and negatively in the case of C3)
Size of The following information is commonly The size of the population is Any other condition other than Large decline in the size of the population needed for each species: maintained or increasing A or C population and reproduction, • estimate of the population size and reproduction, mortality mortality and age structure are
Epsilon-Adi page A-23
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion • unit used to express population size and age structure are This category could be: significantly affecting the long- maintained at a healthy term viability of the species. Examples of units commonly used are given balance. Maintenance • B1 if the population size is below: should be at the minimum inadequate but improving This category could be: • number of individuals or estimation necessary to ensure long- • B2 if the population size is thereof - (normally adult individuals) - As term viability of the species. inadequate is and stable • C1 if the population size is for vascular plant species, it is possible to • B3 if the population size is bad but improving count/estimate the number of flowering inadequate and • C2 if the population size is plants only and/or to exclude seedlings. deteriorating* bad and stable For vegetatively reproducing plants, • C3 if the population size is either tufts/clumps or individual shoots bad and deteriorating* or rosettes may be regarded as ‘individuals’. • area covered by population - estimation of the total area covered by the species, expressed in m2; • number of localities - a geographical area inhabited by a set of individuals which are able to reproduce or occur on a long- term basis and cover continuous space in a given period. ‘Continuous space’ means a portion of the territory with suitable biotic and abiotic conditions for the long- term occurrence of the species delimited by natural or artificially made ecological barriers, possibly also by social relationships or by some length of distance. Habitat for Area thought suitable for the species, both Area of the habitat is Any other condition other than Area of the habitat is clearly not the species currently occupied and currently sufficiently large, stable or A or C sufficiently large to ensure the unoccupied but suitable. The abiotic increasing and sufficient long term survival of the species features and structure of the habitat and good quality habitat exists This category could be: OR habitat quality is bad, clearly biological requirements of the species to support the population in not allowing long term survival
page A-24 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion should be taken into consideration as much the long term. • B1 if the habitat for the of the species. as possible. species is inadequate but improving This category could be: Pollinators, predators, symbionts and • B2 if the habitat for the fructivores of the species should be taken species is inadequate is and • C1 if the habitat for the into consideration where relevant. stable species is bad but improving • B3 if the habitat for the • C2 if the habitat for the species is inadequate and species is bad and stable deteriorating* • C3 if the habitat for the species is bad and deteriorating*
Future Capacity and probability of the species The species prospects for its Any other condition other than The species prospects are bad prospects (as concerned in the site in question to future are excellent / good, A or C or its future, with severe regards maintain its population dynamics and the with no significant impacts influence of pressures and range, availability of its habitat, given on the one from threats and pressures This category could be: threats expected. The long-term population, hand the possible unfavourable influences expected. The long-term viability is not assured. including its and on the other hand all the reasonable viability is also assured. • B1 if the future prospects are long-term conservation effort which is possible. inadequate but improving This category could be: sustainability • B2 if the c future prospects and habitat are inadequate and stable • C1 if the future prospects are availability) • B3 if the future prospects are bad but improving inadequate and • C2 if the future prospects are deteriorating* bad and stable • C3 if the future prospects are bad and deteriorating*
If the condition of all If the condition of one or more If the condition of one or more parameters is evaluated as parameters is Unfavourable- parameters is Unfavourable- favourable (green/A), then Inadequate (amber/B) and none Bad (red/C) , then the overall the overall condition for the of the parameters is evaluated condition of the habitat is habitat is FAVOURABLE as Unfavourable-Bad (red/C) , UNFAVOURABLE –BAD (red/C). (green/A). then the overall condition of the
Epsilon-Adi page A-25
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Parameter / Description of Parameter Description of Current condition Criterion habitat is UNFAVOURABLE – INADEQUATE (amber/B) . * If one does not wish to assign a sub-category to this conservation status assessment, it would be sufficient to have a reasonably good justification from which this can be extracted by the reader. Source: MEPA
page A-26 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
ANNEX 4 SPECIFICATIONS OF MANAGEMENT ACTIONS
A.4.1 GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD MONITORING PLANS FOR ANNEX I HABITATS AND ANNEX II SPECIES OF THE HABITATS DIRECTIVE AND ANNEX I SPECIES OF THE BIRDS DIRECTIVE
This section provides concise guidelines as regards the scope, the preparatory actions the requirements and deliverables of this action.
The Management Plan (MP) has identified the need for the establishment of a National monitoring programme applicable to the Maltese Islands Annex I habitats and Annex II species of the Habitats Directive and Annex I birds of the Birds Directive and a number of other relevant bird species (see Table A-5 and Table A-6). This monitoring programme consists of the development of standard monitoring plans specific for each habitat and species and the subsequent application of them in the field. The design of the standard monitoring plans will build on the habitat/species conservation assessment work carried during the development of the Management Plans for the terrestrial Natura 2000 sites. The elaboration of the monitoring plans is a once for all action and it is independent of any other action foreseen in the MPs. This task is a responsibility of ERA in connection with the habitats and species of the Habitats Directive listed in the tables below and the Wild Birds Regulation Unit with the Parliamentary Secretariat for Agriculture, Fisheries and Animal Rights in connection with the bird species listed in the table below and it will be accomplished within the first two years of the MP implementation in order to allow for the subsequent implementation and field testing of the monitoring plans, ideally within the last three years of the first MP period. This monitoring programme will ensure that data continues to be collected and that the data gathered over the MP period informs the re-assessment of the Conservation Status of habitats and species after the first planning period (5 years). Moreover, the data gathered will be used to determine Favourable Reference Values for garrigue and steppe habitats and for four Annex II plant species ( Elatine gussonei , Ophrys melitensis , Anacamptis urvilleana and Linaria pseudolaxiflora ) (see Table A-7).
Table A-5: Maltese Islands Annex I Habitats and Annex II Species to be monitored
Code Name
Annex I habitats
1150 Coastal lagoons 1170 Reefs 1210 Annual vegetation of drift lines 1240 Vegetated sea cliffs of the Mediterranean coasts with endemic Limonium spp. 1310 Salicornia and other annuals colonising mud and sand 1410 Mediterranean salt meadows ( Juncetalia maritimi ) 1420 Mediterranean and thermo-Atlantic halophilous scrubs ( Sarcocornetea fruticosi ) 1510 Mediterranean salt steppes ( Limonietalia ) 2110 Embryonic shifting dunes
Epsilon-Adi page A-27
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Code Name
2210 Crucianellion maritimae fixed beach dunes 2220 Dunes with Euphorbia terracina 3140 Hard oligo-mesotrophic waters with benthic vegetation of Chara spp. 3170 Mediterranean temporary ponds 5230 Arborescent matorral with Laurus nobilis 5330 Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub 5410 West Mediterranean clifftop phryganas ( Astragalo-Plantaginetum subulatae ) 5420 Sarcopoterium spinosum phryganas 5430 Endemic phryganas of the Euphorbio-Verbascion 6220 Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea 8210 Calcareous rocky slopes with chasmophytic vegetation 8310 Caves not open to the public 8330 Submerged or partially submerged sea caves 9320 Olea and Ceratonia forests 9340 Quercus ilex and Quercus rotundifolia forests 9540 Mediterranean pine forests with endemic Mesogean pines 9570 Tetraclinis articulata forests 92A0 Salix alba and Populus alba galleries 92D0 Southern riparian galleries and thickets ( Nerio-Tamaricetea and Securinegion tinctoriae )
Annex II Species
P Anacamptis urvilleana P Cremnophyton lanfrancoi P Crepis pusilla P Elatine gussonei P Hyoseris frutescens P Helichrysum melitense P Ophrys melitensis P Linaria pseudolaxiflora P Orobanche densiflora P Palaeocyanus crassifolius P Petalophyllum ralfsii P Riella helicophylla I Armadillidium ghardalamensis I Brachytrupes megacephalus I Lampedusa imitratix I Lampedusa melitensis I Myrmecophilus baronii
page A-28 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Code Name
I Pseudoseriscius cameroni F Aphanius fasciatus R Zamenis situla M Myotis punicus 1 M Rhinolophus hipposideros
Table A-6: Maltese Islands Bird Species to be monitored Other relevant Resident/ birds in Name Breeding Wintering connection visitors with Article 4 Tachybaptus ruficollis √ √ Hydrobates pelagicus √ Puffinus yelkouan √ Calonectris diomedea √ Aythya nyroca √ Accipitridae (Aquila pomarina, Pernis apivorus, Milvus migrans, Circus aeruginosus, Circus √ pygargus, Accipiter nisus) and Pandion haliaetus Falconidae (Falco peregrinus, Falco vespertinus, F.naumanni, F.biarmicus, F. eleonorae, √ F.subbuteo, F. tinnunculus) Ixobrychus minutus √ Himantopus himantopus √ Gallinula chloropus √ Fulica atra √ Alcedo atthis √ Wetland birds –staging (Phoenicopterus ruber, Platalea leucorodia, Pluvialis apricaria, Gallinago media, Philomachus pugnax, Porzana √ porzana, Plegadis falcinellus, Tringa glareola, Charadrius alexandrinus, Actitis hypoleucos) Charadrius dubius √ Larus michahellis √ Gulls/Terns (Larus melanocephalus, Larus √ genei, Sterna caspia)
1 The species referred to in the Annexes of the Habitats Directive is Myotis blythii s.l. Recent taxonomic data has divided this taxon into different species. The Maltese Myotis blythii s.l. is now considered as Myotis punicus . Consequently, Myotis punicus is still considered as an Annex II species.
Epsilon-Adi page A-29
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Other relevant Resident/ birds in Name Breeding Wintering connection visitors with Article 4 Calandrella brachydactyla √ Acrocephalus scirpaceus √ Cisticola juncidis √ Monticola solitarius √ Sylvia melanocephala √ Sylvia conspicillata √ Passeriformes (Cettia cetti, Hirundo rustica, Muscicapa striata, Passer montanus, Emberiza √ calandra) Passeriformes (Anthus campestris, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus, Ficedula albicollis, F. parva, F.semitorquata, Lanius collurio, Phylloscopus sibilatrix, Ph. trochilus, Saxicola rubetra, Sylvia √ communis, Emberiza pusilla, Emberiza schoeniclus, Erithacus rubecula, Phylloscopus collybita, Serinus serinus)
Table A-7: FRVs to be established for the following habitats and species
Code Name
Annex I habitats
5230 Arborescent matorral with Laurus nobilis 5330 Thermo-Mediterranean and pre-desert scrub 5410 West Mediterranean clifftop phryganas ( Astragalo-Plantaginetum subulatae ) 5420 Sarcopoterium spinosum phryganas 5430 Endemic phryganas of the Euphorbio-Verbascion 6220 Pseudo-steppe with grasses and annuals of the Thero-Brachypodietea
Annex II Species
Anacamptis urvilleana Linaria pseudolaxiflora Elatine gussonei Ophrys melitensis
a. Scope
In April 2005, the Habitat Committee (committee created under Article 20 of the Habitats Directive), adopted binding requirements for the compilation of monitoring data and for the assessment of the conservation status of natural habitats and species of common interest (). Member States must ensure that the design of their monitoring programme is harmonized with the working documents of the European Commission concerning the definition and description of the parameters that are included in the reporting requirements of the EU member states under Article 17 of Directive 92/43/EC and especially with the «Art 17
page A-30 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
guidelines» report. (http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/env/monnat/library?l=/&vm=detailed&sb=Title ).
The following parameters are specified for each of the assessment criteria to determine the Favourable Conservation Status mentioned above and defines an assessment scale (Assessment and reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive – Reporting Formats for the period 2007-2012 ):
Table A-8: Parameters for determining Favourable Conservation Status according to Article 17 of the Habitats Directive
Natural habitats Species of common interest
Range (overall distribution) Range Area (actually) covered Population (size of stock) Structure and functions, including characteristic habitat structures and characteristic species Habitat for the species inventory Outlook (including impairments, threats and Outlook (including impairments, threats and long-term survival prospects) long-term survival prospects)
To ensure a unified overall survey design that is adapted to the conditions in Malta, it is important that any existing programmes for surveillance and assessment of habitats and species based on surveys carried out by scientific and nature conservation agencies are consolidated into a comprehensive, nationally uniform monitoring system. This can be done through a research and development project that will also help to appropriately channel efforts in this field.
b. Requirements
The following activities are to be coordinated:
• Adaptation of existing approaches (primarily to arrive at a uniform cross-national survey method) • Cross-national coordination of monitored parameters, field survey methods, survey intervals, sample sizes and sample distribution • Development and coordination of methods for identifying areas and habitat sizes, threats and long term survival prospects. • Utilization of synergies with other ongoing survey programmes (e.g. monitoring under the EU Water Framework Directive, the Nitrates Directive, and spatial mapping programmes) • Design of databases for data aggregation and analysis • Compliance of spatial data to the INSPIRE principles
Steps towards this standardization include preparatory actions and the establishment of monitoring protocols, Conservation Status and Favourable Conservation Status.
i. Preparatory actions
Epsilon-Adi page A-31
Natura 2000 Management Plan
• Bibliographic reviews, recording and spatial mapping of each habitat type / species. For each habitat type and plant species, ERA will collect, document and spatially map in GIS, the existing distribution reports at least for the past 40 years, depending on the availability and accuracy of bibliographic data (point, line or surface distribution data), and for the entire national terrain. • Data storage and analysis. All the information collected shall be registered in a database, that will have provision for recording the presence of each habitat type and plant species documented in the literature review. This database will be linked to geographical mapping of information in GIS. • Registration of data gaps concerning habitats and species and the type, intensity, frequency and location of threats/pressures/limiting factors impacting them as they have been identified by the Management Plans. • Compilation of a summary report of existing knowledge and knowledge gaps/ requirements • The above reports will be valid for the first monitoring implementation period and will be updated from the second period and on. The next steps are based on these reports. ii. Establishment of monitoring protocols, Conservation Status and Favourable Conservation Status
Standardization of field survey protocols. At this stage the following will be established per habitat type and species/species group:
• The type of field data to be collected from field sampling specific to each habitat and species/species group (presence / absence, relative abundance, density, physicochemical parameters, threats, other impact factors, etc.). • The number and positioning of sampling stations Determination of the intensity and the sampling distribution pattern of and determination of the grid reference: a) the intensity of the sampling effort, b) the distribution pattern of sampling within and outside N2000 sites and c) the reference grid (grid) per habitat type or species. • The survey intervals to be defined specifically for each species and habitat type, according to their population dynamics • The sampling methods Cross-national survey methods and census parameters will be determined for all species and habitat types justified and supported by relevant international or national standards, or by the international scientific bibliography. Methodologies adopted by existing monitoring programmes (Habitat and plant species evaluation conducted through the Management Plan elaboration, the Aphanius fasciatus monitoring programme, sea birds survey methodologies) will be incorporated. The recording of appropriate environmental parameters and of the threats/pressures/limiting factors is included and given special emphasis.
Establishment of the methodology for the assessment of the conservation status and the definition of Favourable Reference Values for habitats and species/species groups. Selection of the methods (model use, etc) most suited to the Maltese natural territory for the analysis of field data as scheduled to be collected during the implementation of the monitoring plans, justified and supported by the relevant scientific experience recently acquired through the implementation of similar projects throughout the European Union.
NOTE: It is acknowledged that some differentiation in the methodology may occur since some aspects might be site-specific, such as the need for different monitoring frequencies depending
page A-32 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
on the status of habitats/species and/or the levels of pressures and impacts. These discrepancies will be identified and fully recorded during the site level implementation.
c. Deliverables
The following will be delivered for each habitat and species/species group.
1. Report and database of bibliographic references consolidating all current knowledge on the conservation status of the specific habitat/species. 2. Geographical extent in which surveys will take place with grid reference for each habitat type and species/species group. 3. Field work protocols for each habitat type and each species/ species group 4. Protocol for the GIS mapping of the existing and potential spread of each species 5. Field work scheduling and repeatability requirements at yearly, monthly and weekly levels. 6. Methodology for the evaluation of the conservation status to be applied during the implementation phase. 7. Methodology for the assessment of the Favourable Reference Values and the Favourable Conservation Status to be applied during the implementation phase.
A.4.2 GUIDELINES FOR THE ELABORATION OF NATIONAL SPECIES ACTION PLANS
Action Plans for threatened species are technical instruments vital to the conservation of flora and fauna. They define the actions that need to be taken to improve the status of a threatened species.
a. Targeted species
For the first period of implementation Action Plans are intended for the following animal taxonomical groups and species.
Invertebrates: All RDB species are presently included. The list may be further refined and species grouped according to experts
Amphibians:
Discoglossus pictus
Being the only amphibian in Malta and belonging to a taxonomic group especially vulnerable to climatic changes and with special water requirements, Discoglossus pictus should be treated with priority and with a cross-country spatial reference.
Reptiles
Chalcides ocellatus tiligugu Podarcis filfolensis maltensis Telescopus fallax Coluber viridiflavus carbonarius
Epsilon-Adi page A-33
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Coluber algirus
Action Plans can be elaborated either for each species or species groups according to the taxonomy and ecology of species.
Mammals :
Suncus etruscus Pipistrellus pipistrellus Pipistrellus kuhlii Pipistrellus pygmaeus Plecotus austriacus Tadarida teniotis Eptesicus serotinus Mustela nivalis
Action Plans can be elaborated either for each species or species groups according to the taxonomy and ecology of species.
b. Geographical scope of Action Plans
Action plans shall take into account species’ habitats both within and outside Natura 2000 sites taking into consideration the specific species’/species groups’ ecological requirements. Especially for Discoglossus pictus and the bat species, due to specific water requirements and mobility respectively, the entire Maltese Islands should be considered as the field of application of certain conservation actions.
c. General characteristics of Action Plans
The Action Plans:
• Aim to make possible in the short and medium term to maintain or even increase number of the targeted species. They clearly define the desirable population level, in order to ensure the sustainable conservation of species in their immediate environment. • Do not contain detailed biological information and they are usually based on the best available scientific knowledge. The emphasis is on conservation (not science) and on the actions required and the changes needed to achieve the targets. • Must have clear objectives, measurable goals and the follow up process (including update of success) should be integrated in the plan and budgeted accordingly. • During the site level implementation species plans need to adapt to site-specific concerns about the species in question as regards the status of its habitat or the levels of pressures and impacts. • Need to be realistic, taking into account the social and cultural characteristics in the areas where the plans will be implemented.
d. List of headings which may be incorporated into an action plan for an animal species
A following format can be adopted:
i. Current status/assessment of future prospects of species
page A-34 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
• Taxonomy of the species
• Biological data (reproduction, feeding habits, habitat, optimum population density, relation between species)
• International, national protection status
• Historical causes for decreasing numbers, current status and trends, possibilities for colonization
• Current and potential threats /limiting factors
• Lists of protected/unprotected areas in which the species is present and existing conservation measures taken in favor of the species
• Research work carried out in situ, ex situ and results
ii. Implementation of a restoration plan
• Conservation objectives
• Research work to be implemented in situ (reproduction, feeding habits) justifications, proposed timetable.
• Recovery plans
• Management measures to be put into practice to achieve the proposed conservation objective: - in relation to the species : on- going monitoring of population, feeding, reintroduction or strengthening populations, increase of species distribution. Proposed timetables.
- in relation to its habitat and other species present: review habitat management, creation of new protected areas, establishment of nesting area (trophic improvement, increasing numbers of prey, restricting numbers of predators, adapting infrastructure and modifying numbers of tourists). Proposed timetables.
- Legislative and economic measures
- Information activities to be carried out
- Training courses for administrative officials, local and regional authorities with direct responsibility for managing the species in the field
e. Indicative list of actions
Depending on the taxonomical groups different actions can be proposed, which generally may fall under the following categories
• Policy and legislation • Future research and monitoring • Site safeguard and management • Species management and protection • Communications and publicity
Epsilon-Adi page A-35
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Actions can indicatively include:
• Designation of new areas of vital importance for species • Reform and review of management methods for areas which have lost their original capacity to sustain the species • Surveys to determine distribution and population size • Genetic and population dynamics studies • Monitoring • Ex- situ conservation • Reintroduction and translocation • Water quality and quantity improvements • Special habitat management and restoration • Habitat creation • Control of competitors/predators • Wardening of sites • Communication and public awareness campaigns
Text adapted from: Council of Europe (1997). Drafting and implementing action plans for threatened species (Council of Europe publishing, Environmental Encounters No 39). Consulted document: MEPA (2011) Dossier on Wild Fauna in the Maltese Islands: Capture, Killing and Exploitation
A.4.3 GUIDELINES FOR HABITAT RESTORATION ACTIONS
P3. Planning and implementation of an IAS species control / eradication programme on habitat 6220*
The following specifications will apply:
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability.
b. Identification of IAS species to be removed
Acacia spp.
c. Spotting of treatment area
See Figure A-1.
d. Suggested method for IAS removal/eradication per species
The method of eradication for this species is as follows:
page A-36 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Acacia: The Acacias found within this SAC are scattered in small isolated populations or individual trees. In accordance with MEPA’s guidelines on managing non-native plant invaders, it is recommended that the trees are all felled. Felling should be carried out by horizontal cutting near ground level. This should be followed by stump grinding up to a depth of 2 feet. The holes produced should be filled in with soil. Stump grinding should only be used where the trees are easily accessible with the relevant equipment. Access should not be created where it is currently not available.
All woody material should be removed from the area and disposed of. Burning any vegetation on site is not recommended since fire is known to trigger seed germination in Acacias (MEPA, 2013). It is also recommended that the leaf litter and top 5cm of soil from beneath the trees is removed to deplete the soil seed bank. Trees belonging to this genus are known to accumulate large quantities of seed in their soil seedbank which can lie dormant for many years. Cutting the trees would eliminate shade and increase the light intensity on the ground, which in turn would trigger high germination rates during the following spring. Removing the top 5cm would drastically decrease regeneration potential of the soil seed bank and has been seen to be one of the best ways of reducing regeneration for these species (Le Maitre, et al., 2011). Moreover, the ground below the Acacias is already degraded with most of the seed bank being dominated by an accumulation of over 20 years of Acacia seeds. Thus the benefits of removing the top 5cm of the soil profile will outweigh any minor impacts. The removal of topsoil should however be restricted to immediately below the tree, and any typical garrigue shrubs growing underneath the Acacia should be left untouched. In the event that the tree resprouts following cutting, pruning of any shoots should be applied.
In order to address resprouting of cut stumps, particularly for those trees which are not accessible to a stump grinder, tarping with heavy black plastic will impede light reaching the trees and will also act as a physical barrier thereby preventing resprouting. All unused plastic should be removed from the site and the site manager should regularly visit the area to ensure that plastic from this activity does not litter the area.
Consistent and timely follow-up treatments to remove germinating seedlings are necessary for a number of years until seed bank is exhausted. Seedlings and saplings can be hand pulled.
Incineration of plant debris is the most desirable option especially when dealing with alien species which are prolific seed producers and/or spread by vegetative growth. Nevertheless, burning of plant material on-site should not be allowed, unless prior authorization for controlled burning on site is given by ERA .
Plant debris which is not able to grow into a new plant can be carried in a registered waste carrier that can be securely covered and disposed of in a registered landfill, unless prior authorization for controlled burning and disposal on site is given by ERA .
e. Suggested method of habitat restoration
Ecological restoration will involve the active restoration of the areas cleared of Acacia . Removing them and preventing their regeneration is not enough. This approach has been shown to fail to achieve the desired outcome of restoring the habitat since secondary invasions by invasive species (eg Oxalis pes-caprae) or by ruderals often follow, as they
Epsilon-Adi page A-37
Natura 2000 Management Plan
capitalise on the disturbance caused by the eradication and control operations (Le Maitre, et al., 2011). In view of this, the removal of invasive species will be part of a holistic restoration project involving the habitats concerned. The area where these species are found, in most cases, does not have access to a supply of water for irrigation. This inevitably rules out the long-term irrigation of introduced plantlets as a method of restoration. Instead a medium to low intensity restoration program is recommended. This will involve the planting of 6-10 month old potted seedlings belonging to the dominant species, following the first rains in late summer to ensure early root establishment in the field. These choices are based on the dominant species found in the same habitats. Up to five plants will be planted instead of each Acacia or Eucalyptus tree removed. The introduced plants will not be irrigated in view of the lack of a source of water. Planting will be augmented by active seeding of cleared up areas with seeds belonging to the dominant species. The choice of seeds will depend on their availability. Seeding will involve the random dispersal of seeds by hand, and should be done following the introduction of plants. No further intervention will be required after seeding. The introduced plants will be allowed to establish themselves on their own. The only intervention will involve the removal of any resprouts or emerging seedlings of Acacia .
f. Protective measures required
None
g. Information /warning signage required
Signage is required in the area of active restoration to inform visitors why species are being removed, what work is being undertaken and to stick to the footpath and avoid trampling on the sections being restored.
h. Monitoring and post removal monitoring requirements
The areas being restored should be monitored once a year to assess the success of the restoration programme and apply it to other areas in the country. The following data should be collected:
• Quantitative data on coverage, species dominance and diversity through the use of a 2m X 2m quadrat in each location where a tree was cut down and plants and seeds characteristic of the Annex I habitat were introduced. This will allow the manager to assess the rate of reestablishment of the targeted habitat and the success of the restoration program. This data shall be collected once every three years in spring for a period of ten years after the initiation of the restoration program.
• The survival rate of planted species should be monitored each year by recording the number of deceased plants. This data shall be collected each year in September for a period of five years after the planting phase.
• The quantity of seedlings of targeted alien species sprouting each year following the eradication of the trees. This data shall be collected each year in spring for a period of five years after the termination of the restoration program.
i. Reporting requirements
page A-38 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
It is important to document (and also inform ERA on) attempts made to remove invasive alien species as well as findings in order to serve as a learning tool and to keep track of actions taken across the Maltese Islands.
P6. Application of animal access control measures to specific parts of habitats 3140 and 3170*
The following specifications will apply:
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability.
b. Draft spotting of the intervention areas
All rock pools within the SAC.
c. Materials and equipment required
Hand held tools, and a portable enclosure of up to 2 feet high that is set up around rock pools that are close to the main footpath, during the wet season. These will be removed and stored once the rock pools dry up.
d. Methods of access control
A small portable enclosure should be set up around the pools to stop dogs from walking into the pools. Signs should also be set up asking people to keep the dogs on leash or along the path.
e. Supplementary interventions if required
None
f. Information /warning signage required
Information should be set up on boards along the main path explaining the importance of rock pools as vulnerable habitats and how eutrophication could lead to the death of the rockpool ecosystem.
g. Reporting requirements
Progress related to the above should be reported annually to ERA and compiled to the annual MP review report.
P7. Application of access control measures to specific parts of habitats 1240, 5330, 5410 and 5420*
Epsilon-Adi page A-39
Natura 2000 Management Plan
The following specifications will apply:
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability.
b. Draft spotting of the intervention areas
Habitats 1240, 5330, 5410, and 5420 throughout the SAC. (see Figure A-1)
c. Materials and equipment required
Hand held tools.
d. Methods of access control
The main existing pathway should be signposted asking visitors to stick to the paths in view of the sensitive ecosystems around them. Pathways should be maintained to ensure they are safe, so people will stick to walking along them. Minor pathways should be closed and rehabilitated.
e. Supplementary interventions if required
Blocking off certain vulnerable sites that are rich in orchids and are particularly vulnerable, such as all of habitat 5420. These should be identified and access in these areas discouraged.
f. Information /warning signage required
The walking trail should be marked well and signs installed to explain why people should stick to the designated areas. Information through the setting up of signs explaining the visions of the management plan should also be included.
g. Reporting requirements
Progress related to the above should be reported annually to ERA and compiled to the annual MP review report.
P8. Enhancement of habitat 5420 through seeding of Sarcopoterium spinosum
The following specifications will apply:
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability.
b. Mapping of the treatment area
See Figure A-1.
page A-40 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
c. Materials and equipment required
Hand held tools and plants
d. Methodology of restoration
It is recommended that the area covered by this habitat is extended through a low to medium intensity restoration project involving the planting of Sarcopoterium spinosum beyond the current area. Restoration will take place over two phases. The first involves a seed viability and germination trial to determine whether seeds of the extant population are viable. The restricted size of the population together with it being found at the edge of its natural Mediterranean distribution, may limit the potential viability of the seed bank (Gargano, et al., 2007). A protocol for the harvesting and germination of seeds should be developed. If the first phase is successful, this would lead to the establishment of an ex-situ seed stand. The second phase will involve the cultivation and planting of 12-18 month old potted seedlings belonging to Sarcopoterium spinosum following the first rains in late summer. A planting density of 1 plant per 5m2 will be applied with the objective of increasing the size of the population and area covered by the species, rather than on consolidating the current distribution. In view of the rarity of this species watering may be necessary and justified to increase the survival rate of the introduced plants. Planting has to be done early in the rainy season in October to ensure early root establishment in the field.
e. Method of recording saplings and habitat evolution
The areas being restored should be monitored once a year to assess the success of the restoration program and apply it to other areas in the country. The following data should be collected:
• Quantitative data on coverage, species dominance and diversity through the use of stratified random sampling, using a 2m X 2m quadrat in the targeted area. This will allow the manager to assess the rate of establishment of the targeted habitat and the success of the restoration program. This data shall be collected once every three years in spring for a period of fifteen years after the termination of the restoration program.
• The survival rate of planted species should be monitored each year by recording the number of deceased plants. This data shall be collected each year in September for a period of five years after the planting and seeding phase.
f. Protective measures required (Materials and Methods)
The area being actively restored, together with the extant habitat, should be demarcated and surrounded by a rope barrier to discourage people from accessing the habitat. A CCTV camera might be needed to monitor the area. This is economically feasible in view of its vicinity to the road.
g. Demonstration / information / signage required
Signage should be set up informing people of restoration works and why this rare habitat is being restored.
Epsilon-Adi page A-41
Natura 2000 Management Plan
h. Reporting requirements
Progress related to the above measure should be reported annually to ERA and compiled to the annual MP review report.
P9. Enhancement of habitat 6220* through seeding of typical species (Brachypodium)
The following specifications will apply:
a. Trained personnel required: Number and qualifications
3 persons with a qualification at EQF (European Qualifications Framework) Level 4 in Environmental science or sustainability or suitably experienced personnel.
b. Mapping of the treatment area
All area marked as habitat 6220 (see Figure A-1)
c. Materials and equipment required
Hand held tools and trowel and personal protective equipment.
d. Methodology of restoration
It is recommended that the area covered by Brachypodium retusum is extended through a low to medium intensity restoration project involving the transplanting of rhizomes of Brachypodium retusum throughout habitat 6220. Restoration will involve the transplantation of rhizomes of this species from areas where it is found to areas where it is absent. To be successful, the rhizomes should consist of rooted patches of rhizome and soil of at least 10cm X 10cm in size. Transplantation should be done early in the rainy season in October to ensure successful root establishment in the field during winter. The planting density should be of one patch per 50m 2. No further intervention will be required after seeding. The introduced plants will be allowed to establish themselves on their own. The introduced rhizomes will eventually become established and spread throughout habitat 6220 where suitable conditions are available.
e. Method of recording saplings and habitat evolution
The areas being restored should be monitored once a year to assess the success of the restoration program and apply it to other areas in the country. The following data should be collected:
• The survival rate of planted species should be monitored each year by recording the number and coverage of successful transplants. This data shall be collected and mapped each year in September for a period of five years after the planting and seeding phase.
f. Protective measures required (Materials and Methods)
None required.
page A-42 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
g. Demonstration / information / signage required
None required.
h. Reporting requirements
Progress related to this measure should be reported annually to ERA and compiled to the annual MP review report.
Epsilon-Adi page A-43
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Figure A-1: Actions Map for actions P3, P7, P8 and P9
page A-44 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
A.4.4 PATROLLING SCHEDULE
Safeguarding / wardening of the protected area is the most important conservation action to be performed under the management of the Natura 2000 sites. It is a constant action and subject to continuous adaptations in line with progress in site management. As it relies entirely on the capacity of human resources it has to be regularly re-evaluated in order to remain effective and fulfil its intended objectives.
The main objectives of patrolling the Maltese Natura 2000 sites are:
• Protection of the key features, habitats and wildlife and any other important features that have been identified for each site; • Prevention of illegal actions and activities according to law; • Control of harmful human activities; • Ensuring observance of site rules and regulations by visitors, owners, and users; • Protection and maintenance of management infrastructure; • Contribution to the managers’ knowledge about the protected site; and • Contribution to the knowledge and awareness raising of visitors and users of the area.
Patrolling staff
In order to fulfil the above tasks, it is recommended that the patrolling staff fulfils the following requirements:
• It has law enforcement powers; • It is skilled in outdoor working conditions and can work unsocial hours, including weekends and public holidays; • It has mastered a knowledge of the ecological features of the site, the vision, the conservation objectives and the management principles pertaining to the site; • Accordingly, it has mastered a knowledge on the identified and potential threats to the above features and the site’s integrity; • It possesses adequate communication and interpersonal skills; and • It possesses adequate recording and reporting skills.
As such the minimum requirements for patrolling officers should be:
• Preferably have an undergraduate diploma in natural sciences or similar or, in the absence of academic qualifications, a proven interest and a number of years of experience in nature conservation (persons with no academic qualifications will be required to sit for such courses as may be identified by the site manager / ERA ); • Report writing and computer skills (word processing, spreadsheet, database); • A valid driving license; • Good knowledge of both spoken Maltese and English; • First Aid Certificate (or the willingness to acquire this); • Fire-fighting certificate, especially for shrub fires (or the willingness to acquire this); • A clean police conduct; and • Preferably have map reading and trekking capabilities;
Epsilon-Adi page A-45
Natura 2000 Management Plan
• Preferably have a medical certificate attesting to the fitness and health of the officers that would not hinder them from carrying out their job or placing them at undue risk.
Staff training
Patrolling staff should undergo a series of training seminars that are prepared and implemented under the auspices of ERA . It is stressed that the recording and reporting requirements of the job must be taught in detail having in mind that these invaluable field data will feed into the Work Plan at the start of the MP implementation (see below), the habitat/monitoring plans and reports and ultimately all management actions in the following years.
Training of the patrolling staff must be provided both in the office and on the field. It is therefore recommended that a trained ecologist, police officer and a local stakeholder/inhabitant escort the crew team during the first period of implementation and provide knowledge and advice. Annual evaluation and additional/further training is required.
Training will aim at:
• Basic identification of protected habitats and species present in the Maltese Natura 2000 sites; • Dealing with people and preparation of evidence for investigations. • Anthropogenic impacts on the environment; • Knowledge of Maltese environmental legislation; • Professional recording and reporting techniques; • Basic arrest-and-control techniques; and • Self-defence and first aid.
Patrolling scheme
At this stage only preliminary recommendations are provided:
• A patrolling unit consists of at least 2 officers • The patrolling unit is equipped at least with : 1 conventional vehicle, intra/inter- communication equipment, 2 pairs of binoculars, 2 cameras, detailed digital maps, outdoors clothing and equipment, reporting sheets or electronic means of recording and a first aid kit. In addition to this, the text of the actions of the site’s Management Plan and, when applicable, the text of the code of conduct of the site.
Patrolling schedule
The patrolling schedule applicable to each site and to the entire network depends on the resources allocated to this task and, as already discussed, is subject to continuous changes and improvements as management progresses.
Input for the drafting of the site specific initial patrolling schedules is given below; an initial pilot schedule is given for the first six months of implementation (see Table A-11, Table A-12 and Table A-13). Ideally, these schedules should be run in parallel and in collaboration with the drafting of the site specific Work Plans based on the site specific Management Plan. This synergy will provide invaluable input to the author of the Work Plans and guarantee the
page A-46 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
drafting of effective and realistic patrolling schedules available at site level very early in the implementation period.
A half-year test period is considered as an adequate time to guide the composition of an effective and realistic annual schedule plan. Note that given frequencies (weekly, fortnightly and monthly) indicate minimum standard patrolling requirements at site level as they have been evaluated by the Management Plan. No attempt has been made to distinguish periods of increased requirements (e.g. hunting periods, first period of infrastructure installation, period of trapping devices removal, etc), or give further timeframe details. This is a task to be accomplished by the patrolling schedule compiler in a trial and error fashion and provided that the required administrative and funding are available.
Patrolling schedule specifications are explained in Table A-9 and Table A-10.
Table A-9: Content explanation of Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure
COLUMN TITLE CONTENT
Code and Name of each Natura 2000 site CODE / NAME Identification of the extent of the area to be patrolled AREA PROPOSED SITE New area under surveillance to be added whenever applicable ENLARGEMENT MANAGEMENT Wherever other entities apart from ERA are involved in the site’s SCHEME management, the level and content of cooperation of the patrolling entity STAKEHOLDERS with these entities must be specified. Indications of minimum INVOLVEMENT collaboration requirements are given in the Management Plans at site level Existing wardening schemes are indicated at site level, to be further WARDENING SYSTEM examined and incorporated in the patrolling schedules POLICE PATROLLING Existing police patrolling schemes are indicated at site level, to be further SYSTEM examined and incorporated in the patrolling schedules Existing and proposed cleaning schemes are indicated at site level, to guide CLEANING SCHEME related collaboration and allocation of responsibility
Table A-10: Content explanation of Table A-13: Activities per site
COLUMN TITLE CONTENT
Two main categories of physical objects of safeguarding are indicated: Infrastructure maintenance including existing and proposed visitor MANAGEMENT infrastructure, signposting etc, and physical materials related to habitat ACTIVITIES TO BE manipulation works, ie. fences, seeded plots etc. These features must be SAFEGUARDED listed and mapped in detail at site level together with the key physical features (Annex I habitats, etc) under protection An initial list of the identified major and common illegal – harmful human activities at site level is given. An initial map of identified point factors can be provided based on the information available in the Management Plans. MAJOR The list is not exhaustive and other already identified and newly ILLEGAL/HARMFUL investigated activities must be added progressively after mastering of the HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO recording and reporting skills is secured. BE CONTROLLED It is stressed, that the recording and reporting of the locations, the frequencies and the intensities of these factors is probably the principal patrolling task and it will also provide invaluable field data for the monitoring plans/reports.
Epsilon-Adi page A-47
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Table A-11: Site Identity – Management Structure
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME 1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn 54.56 LAND OWNERS / Barrani XAGHRA LOCAL COUNCIL / MINISTRY FOR GOZO / ERA 2 L-Inħawi ta’ 96.75 COMMITTEE COMMITTEE Pembroke 3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija 20.37 ERA / LAND
OWNERS 4 Il-Maqluba (limiti tal- 2.62 LAND OWNERS / Qrendi) QRENDI LOCAL COUNCIL / MTA / ERA 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla 7.42 GAIA ERA / GAIA FOUNDATION FOUNDATION 6 Is-Simar (limiti ta’ 58.38 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA PARTIAL San Pawl il-Baħar) WETLAND (RESERVE) ENLARGEMENT 7 Is-Salini 23.67 MINISTRY FOR TRANSPORT & INFRASTRUCTUR E / ERA 8 L-Għadira s-Safra 1.54 SITE ERA
ENLARGEMENT 9 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla 74.91 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA tat-Torri u tal-Irdum tal-Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin 12.61 LAND OWNERS /
ST PAUL’S BAY
page A-48 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME LOCAL COUNCIL / ERA 11 Għar Dalam 0.17 HERITAGE MALTA HERITAGE MALTA 12 Wied il-Miżieb 24.66 ERA / COMMITTEE 13 Iċ-Ċittadella 2.07 MINISTRY FOR MINISTRY FOR GOZO GOZO 14 Il-Ballut ta’ 23.3 ERA ERA
Marsaxlokk 15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira 97.94 BIRDLIFE MALTA BIRDLIFE MALTA (part of the site) / ERA PARTIAL DIN L-ART (RESERVE) HELWA (part of the site) 16 Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 6.58 ERA Madwarha 17 Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer 294.66 ERA ta’ Madwarha
18 L-Inħawi tal-Buskett 244.71 ELC (part of the ERA / PARKS PARTIAL PARTIAL u tal-Girgenti SAC) (BUSKETT (BUSKETT PARKS (part of GARDENS) GARDENS) the SAC) 19 L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra 86.93 MANAGEMENT ERA u tal-Qawra, inkluż COMMITTEE Ħaġret il-Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’
Epsilon-Adi page A-49
Natura 2000 Management Plan
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME Ħarrux sal-Bajja tax- Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux 20 L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u 296.3 ERA tal-Wied tal-Kantra / Rdumijiet ta’Għawdex: Id- Dawra tas-Sanap sa tal-Ħajt 21 L-Inħawi tal- 176.4 MELLIEHA LOCAL ERA Imġiebaħ u Tal- COUNCIL (part of Miġnuna the site) 22 Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 10.75 ERA
(Selmunett) 23 Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar 4.42 ERA / ta’ Marsaskala LOCAL COUNCIL 24 Rdumijiet ta’Malta: MAJJISTRAL COMMITTEE Ir-Ramla taċ- PARK BOARD PARTIAL PARTIAL
Ċirkewwa sar-Ramla (part of the site) (MAJISTRAL) (MAJISTRAL) tal-Mixquqa 25 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: GAIA COMMITTEE/ Għajn Tuffieħa FOUNDATION GAIA FOUNDATION 26 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: COMMITTEE Ir-Ramla ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa sax-Xaqqa 27 Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: COMMITTEE
Mix-Xaqqa sal-Ponta
page A-50 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
SITE IDENTITY MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE
AREA PROPOSED SITE MANAGEMENT SCHEME STAKEHOLDERS' WARDENING EXISTING POLICE CLEANING CODE NAME (ha) ENLARGEMENT EXISTING PROPOSED INVOLVEMENT SYSTEM PATROLLING SCHEME ta’ Bengħisa
28 L-Għar tal-Iburdan u 69.13 ERA / OWNER
l-Inħawi tal-Madwar 29 Il-Qortin tal-Magun u OWNER / ERA
il-Qortin il-Kbir 30 Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi OWNER OWNER / ERA ta’ Ta’Ċenċ
Epsilon-Adi page A-51
Natura 2000 Management Plan
Table A-12: Half-year patrolling schedule SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn Barrani √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 2 L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Il-Maqluba (limiti tal- 4 √ √ √ √ √ √ Qrendi) 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Is-Simar (limiti ta’ San 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Pawl il-Baħar) 7 Is-Salini √ √ √ √ √ √ 8 L-Għadira s-Safra √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ L-Inħawi tar-Ramla tat- 9 Torri u tal-Irdum tal- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin √ √ √ √ √ √ 11 Għar Dalam 12 Wied il-Miżieb √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 13 Iċ-Ċittadella √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 14 Il-Ballut ta’ Marsaxlokk √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ 15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 16 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer ta’ 17 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha L-Inħawi tal-Buskett u tal- 18 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Girgenti
page A-52 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra u tal- Qawra, inkluż Ħaġret il- Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ 19 Ħarrux sal-Bajja tax- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u tal- Wied tal-Kantra / 20 Rdumijiet ta’Għawdex: √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Id-Dawra tas-Sanap sa tal-Ħajt L-Inħawi tal-Imġiebaħ u 21 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Tal-Miġnuna Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 22 √ √ √ √ √ √ (Selmunett) Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar ta’ 23 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Marsaskala Rdumijiet ta’Malta: Ir- 24 Ramla taċ-Ċirkewwa sar- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Ramla tal-Mixquqa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: 25 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Għajn Tuffieħa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Ir- 26 Ramla ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ sax-Xaqqa
Epsilon-Adi page A-53
Natura 2000 Management Plan
SIX MONTH PATROLLING SCHEDULE SITE IDENTITY (Monthly – Weekly) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 CODE NAME W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4 W1 W2 W3 W4
Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Mix- 27 Xaqqa sal-Ponta ta’ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Bengħisa L-Għar tal-Iburdan u l- 28 √ √ √ √ √ √ Inħawi tal-Madwar Il-Qortin tal-Magun u il- 29 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Qortin il-Kbir Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ 30 Ta’Ċenċ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √
page A-54 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Table A-13: Activities monitored through patrolling MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT 1 L-Inħawi ta’ Għajn Barrani √ √ √ √ √ √ 2 L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke √ √ √ √ √ √
3 Il-Ballut tal-Wardija √ √
4 Il-Maqluba (limiti tal-Qrendi) √ √ √ 5 L-Inħawi tar-Ramla √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Is-Simar (limiti ta’ San Pawl il- 6 √ √ √ √ √ √ Baħar) 7 Is-Salini √ √ √ √ √ 8 L-Għadira s-Safra √ √ √ √ L-Inħawi tar-Ramla tat-Torri u 9 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ tal-Irdum tal-Madonna 10 Ix-Xagħra tal-Kortin √ √ √ √ 11 Għar Dalam √ √ 12 Wied il-Miżieb √ √ √ √ √ 13 Iċ-Ċittadella √ √ √
14 Il-Ballut ta’ Marsaxlokk √ √ √ √ √ √
15 L-Inħawi tal-Għadira √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Filfla u l-Gżejjer ta’ 16 √ Madwarha
Epsilon-Adi page A-55
Natura 2000 Management Plan
MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT Kemmuna u l-Gżejjer ta’ 17 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Madwarha L-Inħawi tal-Buskett u tal- 18 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Girgenti L-Inħawi tad-Dwejra u tal- Qawra, inkluż Ħaġret il- Ġeneral / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il-Ponta ta’ Ħarrux 19 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ sal-Bajja tax-Xlendi / Rdumijiet ta’ Għawdex: Il- Ponta ta’ San Dimitri sal- Ponta ta’ Ħarrux
L-Inħawi tax-Xlendi u tal- Wied tal-Kantra / Rdumijiet 20 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ta’Għawdex: Id-Dawra tas- Sanap sa tal-Ħajt
L-Inħawi tal-Imġiebaħ u Tal- 21 √ √ √ √ √ √ Miġnuna Il-Gżejjer ta’ San Pawl 22 √ √ √ (Selmunett) Il-Magħluq tal-Baħar ta’ 23 √ √ √ Marsaskala
page A-56 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
MAIN MANAGEMENT MAJOR ILLEGAL / HARMFUL HUMAN ACTIVITIES TO BE MONITORED / CONTROLLED THROUGH SITE IDENTITY ACTIVITIES TO BE PATROLLING SAFEGUARDED
CODE NAME SPECIES HABITAT HABITAT HUNTING HUNTING TRAPPING ACTIVITIES ACTIVITIES TRAMPLING TRAMPLING OFF-ROADING OFF-ROADING MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT UNCONTROLLED CONSTRUCTION, CONSTRUCTION, PLANTING OF IAS OF PLANTING HUMAN ACTIVITY HUMAN INFRASTRUCTURE INFRASTRUCTURE OUTDOOR LEISURE INSTALLATION AND AND INSTALLATION DUMPING / LITTERING / DUMPING MANAGEMENT WORKS MANAGEMENT Rdumijiet ta’Malta: Ir-Ramla 24 taċ-Ċirkewwa sar-Ramla tal- √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Mixquqa PARTIAL Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Għajn (MAJISTRAL 25 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ Tuffieħa / GHAJN TUFFIEHA) Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Ir-Ramla 26 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ ta’ Għajn Tuffieħa sax-Xaqqa Rdumijiet ta’ Malta: Mix- 27 √ √ √ √ Xaqqa sal-Ponta ta’ Bengħisa L-Għar tal-Iburdan u l-Inħawi 28 √ √ tal-Madwar Il-Qortin tal-Magun u il- 29 √ √ √ Qortin il-Kbir Rdumijiet u L-Inħawi ta’ 30 Ta’Ċenċ √ √ √ √ √
Epsilon-Adi page A-57
Natura 2000 Management Plan
ANNEX 5 COST RECOVERY MECHANISMS
Revenue generating mechanisms and self-financing opportunities for L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke are suggested. These initiatives can additionally contribute to promoting and establishing the concept of a network of Natura 2000 sites in Malta. Other funding mechanisms are also identified, excluding reference to governmental funding which could be induced in other ways, e.g. through the police undertaking patrol duties.
A.5.1 REVENUE GENERATING AND SELF -FINANCING OPPORTUNITIES
Pembroke lies within an urbanised matrix, which includes residential uses, hotels, educational and sports facilities and a number of historic structures which date back to the Knights’ and British Periods. All these assess raise social prospects of transforming the site into a recreational centre of national catchment. These possibilities increase the site’s future potential for self- financing.
Nevertheless, even in the present state, compensatory measures, i.e. any administrative or legislative action, procedure or enactment designed to redress disruptions of ecological integrity or damage to the supply of natural resources , in the form of a small financial contribution for the conservation management of the site can be imposed to the major infrastructures operating in the vicinity of the site.
Furthermore, noting the site’s proximity to prominent tourist attractions and locations and also noting the use of the site for recreation, certain activities on site could be charged a fee or a donation requested. Events that are organised on site and attract a number of visitors should encourage the payment of some donation. The use of volunteers for clean-ups should also be encouraged. The use of the site for educational and other activities should also be considered as a source of revenue generation.
The revenue generating and self-financing potential of L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke also derives from the multi-pronged promotion and marketing of the Natura 2000 network, as set by the national interpretation strategy, which considers the importance and contribution of each site at the national level, the local (individual site) level, and at the group level (groups of related sites with commonalities). Within this context, the Natura 2000 interpretation strategy will take forward a cohesive implementation programme of innovative mechanisms aimed at direct and indirect revenue generation as well as at the network and individual site level.
Examples of network-wide direct revenue-generating initiatives which can be adapted to individual sites, such as L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke, may include:
• Designation of an annual ‘Natura 2000 Day’ (this could be adapted locally as ‘L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke Day’). This would be added to the local calendar of events and, similar to events such as ‘Birgu by Candlelight’, would involve the holding of fairs / activities in a number venues, including within Natura 2000 sites, exposing Natura 2000 by a number of means, including guided tours, talks, promotional stands, and generating revenue through the display and sale of Natura 2000 related merchandise.
page A-58 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
• A ‘Friends of Natura 2000’ badge scheme (adapted at the local level as a ‘Friends of L- Inħawi ta’ Pembroke’ scheme), similar to established charity schemes (such as the ‘Poppy Appeal’), with badges on sale at the visitors centre and elsewhere in Pembroke (or nationally).
• An initiative with hotels and other tourism accommodation providers, as part of their corporate social responsibility programmes, to offer guests the opportunity to round-up their bill, or to give small donation, with the monies going towards the management of the Natura 2000 network (adapted at the local level to apply to hotels in the locality), and with monies directed to L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke and the other Natura 2000 sites. The MTA’s Eco-certification Scheme could be very influential in respect of this initiative, and a number of hotels in the immediate vicinity of L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke are already part of this Scheme. The initiative could also be applied to restaurants and other service providers.
• Creation of one or more ‘Natura Cafes’. Located in popular tourist locations and locations frequented by locals (adapted at the local level for a location in St George’s Bay, for example), and not necessarily within Natura 2000 sites, these could be already established cafes, or new cafes, which would act as a showcases and potentially as interpretations centre for the Natura 2000 network. Revenue would be generated from the sale of food and drink and from promotional merchandise / souvenirs. There would be set criteria for qualification as a Natura Cafe, with an emphasis on a sustainable business model (from the products on offer through to environmental management best practise); extension of the MTA’s Eco-certification Scheme to cover cafes and restaurants would be beneficial.
• An initiative with the Malta Crafts Council to produce and market a nature-themed range of crafts product (possibly a Natura 2000 themed range) that would be available on sale at Natura 2000 visitor centres, Natura cafes, and at other heritage and tourist sites.
• Initiatives with local farmers and producers to produce, market and sell food and drink (for example, honey, cheese, fruit and vegetables, wine, olive oil, etc.) and artisan crafts produced within and in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites, marketed under the Natura 2000 brand. This would also serve to encourage diversification and economic opportunity for local producers. As an extension of direct-point sale, non-perishable food products and crafts could also be sold on-line.
• Publication and sale of a high-quality photo book showcasing the Natura 2000 network, possibly commissioning professional photographers, but alternatively produced as the product of a photographic competition; this ‘coffee table’ book could be published in conjunction with postcards and other promotional images from the range.
Examples of network-wide in-direct revenue-generating initiatives which can be adapted to individual sites, such as L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke, may include:
• Recruitment of ‘Natura 2000 Ambassadors’ (adapted at the local level as ambassadors for L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke, or for Malta’s garrigue sites). These ambassadors would be tasked with raising awareness of the Natura 2000 network (or of individual sites or groups of sites) through their everyday activities; the ambassadors could be media personalities, experts in the field, educators, local people (particularly for individual sites), etc.
Epsilon-Adi page A-59
Natura 2000 Management Plan
• Exposure of Natura 2000 at visitor gateways, such as Malta International Airport and all ferry terminals. This could be delivered together with exposure at key tourist locations (in St. Julian’s, for example) and in key tourist publications, including il-Bizzilla, the Air Malta in-flight magazine.
• Initiatives with the Government’s Health Promotion Unit to encourage physical exercise and healthy lifestyles through the enjoyment of the natural environment within the Natura 2000 network. Initiatives could include low impact sporting events / activities (marathons, triathlons, cycling, walks, etc) organised within the network and promoted to advertise Natura 2000 (for example, an annual sporting / recreation activity organised in conjunction with ‘Natura 2000 Day’). It must be ensured that such activities do not negatively affect the site.
• Initiatives with the Department of Education and / or with local schools education facilities to establish better access to nature conservation and the Natura 2000 network. Adapting international best practice, initiatives could include following the ‘nature kindergarten’ models which are a growing trend in Europe and the US, where exposure to and experimentation in nature is seen to significantly benefit child development. Trained nature conservation professionals (possibly site wardens) could host nature sessions with school children of all ages. Additionally, and very applicable to the local level, schools could decide to ‘adopt’ a Natura 2000 site (adapted locally in Pembroke as ‘Adopt L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke’).
• Targeted tourism and recreation initiatives aimed at promoting the Natura 2000 network through working off the existing marketing capacity for rural and coastal recreation activities, for example, walking, cycling, snorkelling, diving, etc.
• Creation of a network-wide ‘Natura 2000 Walks’ initiative, whereby visitors would collect stamps (stamped into a ‘Natura 2000 Walks’ dedicated booklet). A stamp unique to each walk would be ‘collected’ after having completed the walking; a small memento could be awarded to those persons that had collected the stamps of all the Natura 2000 walks.
• Volunteering initiatives aimed at attracting international and local volunteers to undertake maintenance activities related to the ecology, geology, cultural heritage, awareness-raising and interpretation, etc. within Natura 2000 sites (this also has the potential to generate revenue through the introduction of a donation scheme).
• Creation of a Natura 2000 Loyalty Card (potentially operating with the ‘Friends of Natura 2000’ scheme), which would allow visitors to earn points as they visit different sites in the network, affording them discounts on Natura 2000 products and services, on activities carried out within or in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites (for example, bicycle hire, diving, etc.), and possibly on hotels and restaurants / cafes in the localities, including the Natura Cafes.
A.5.2 FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
In addition to the revenue generating initiatives on a national level, the following funding programmes provide opportunities for funding of the management and interpretation of L- Inħawi ta’ Pembroke, and of the Natura 2000 network:
page A-60 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
LIFE
A number of the management actions proposed for the site are eligible for co-funding under the Nature and Biodiversity component of the LIFE initiative.
LIFE is the EU’s financial instrument supporting environmental and nature conservation contributing approximately €3.1 billion to the protection of the environment. Since 1992, LIFE has co-financed some 3954 projects. Recently (09 December 2013) the European Council adopted a new regulation that establishes the Environment and Climate Action sub- programmes of the LIFE Programme for the next funding period, 2014–2020. The budget for the period is set at €3.4 billion in current prices.
The programme will contribute to sustainable development and to the achievement of the objectives and targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy, the 7th Union Environmental Action Programme and other relevant EU environment and climate strategies and plans.
The ‘Environment’ strand of the new programme covers three priority areas: environment and resource efficiency; nature and biodiversity; and environmental governance and information. The new regulation is in force from the 1st of January 2014.
European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development
The European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) is an important funding source for the taking forward of management actions for the site, providing for direct payments to farmers to compensate for implementing Natura 2000 related management requirements.
The EAFRD will continue to provide this and several other opportunities to fund Natura 2000 management and interpretation related activities during the EU 2014-2020 funding period. As during 2007-2013, the new round of EAFRD funding includes specific provisions for the LEADER approach, supporting the implementation of EAFRD objectives through the local action groups (LAGs). The new round also includes a provision to support the implementation of European Innovation Partnership (EIP) on Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability, with the objective of promoting a resource efficient, productive, low emission, climate friendly and resilient agricultural sector, and improving processes to preserve the environment, adapt to climate change and mitigate it. This opens up new opportunities for financing Natura 2000 related activities, for example, in the support of innovative approaches for agriculture and farming within and in the vicinity of Natura 2000 sites.
Structural Funds
The European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) provides some opportunities to fund Natura 2000 management activities during the period 2014-2020, with a number of actions eligible under the ‘Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services’ stream of the initiative; the ERDF provides for direct support for the protection of biodiversity and ecosystem services. There is also potential for funding for management and interpretation activities indirectly, through the ERDF’s support for broader sustainable development, for example, through the protection and promotion of cultural heritage.
The Cohesion Fund delivers a wide range of measures linked to the management of Natura 2000, as well as wider green infrastructure, and will continue to provide an important funding
Epsilon-Adi page A-61
Natura 2000 Management Plan
opportunity for Natura 2000 management actions during the 2014-2020 funding period. These funds can directly support restoration and conservation measures as well as support investments in sustainable tourism, awareness-raising, training and education, and communication and information activities relating to Natura 2000. Opportunities for Natura 2000 management are also available through investment support in the broader sustainable development sphere, for example, supporting investment in the adaptation to climate change.
The European Social Fund (ESF) addresses the support of economic and social cohesion but offers the opportunity for funding of actions and activities with possible indirect links to Natura 2000 management, for example, enhancing the competitiveness of small and medium-sized Natura 2000-related enterprises.
Horizon 2020
Horizon 2020 is the new EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, aimed at contributing to the creation of growth and jobs in research, innovation and technological development. The Programme will run from 2014 to 2020, with approximately €80 billion budgeted for this period. Thematic areas of interest for Natura 2000 include health, sustainable agriculture, the bio-economy, climate action, resource efficiency and raw materials.
Horizon 2020 offers opportunities for Natura 2000 management-related activities in respect of the research, development and testing of new management approaches and the evaluation and monitoring of management regimes.
page A-62 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
ANNEX 6 MAPS
This section includes the maps of the site in A3 format.
Epsilon-Adi page A-63
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.1 BOUNDARY MAP
page A-64 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
A.6.2 HYDROLOGY MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-65
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.3 GEOLOGY MAP
page A-66 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
A.6.4 CULTURAL HERITAGE MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-67
Natura 2000 Management Plan
A.6.5 LAND USE MAP
page A-68 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
A.6.6 HABITATS MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-69
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.7 SPECIES MAP
page A-70 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
A.6.8 LAND OWNERSHIP MAP
Epsilon-Adi page A-71
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.9 VISITOR ACCESS MAP
page A-72 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
Epsilon-Adi page A-73
Natura 2000 Management Plan A.6.10 ACTIONS MAP
page A-74 Epsilon-Adi
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
ANNEX BIBLIOGRAPHY
Gargano, D. et al., 2007. The status of Sarcopoterium spinosum (Rosaceae) at the western periphery of its range: Ecological constraints lead to conservation concerns . Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, Volume 55, pp. 1-13. Council of Europe (1997). Drafting and implementing action plans for threatened species (Council of Europe publishing, Environmental Encounters No 39). Le Maitre, D. C. et al. (2011). Impacts of invasive Australian acacias: implications for management and restoration. Diversity and Distributions, Volume 17, pp. 1015-1029. MEPA (2011) Dossier on Wild Fauna in the Maltese Islands: Capture, Killing and Exploitation. St Francis Ravelin: MEPA.
Epsilon-Adi page A-75
L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke
This is the L-Inħawi ta’ Pembroke Management Plan that contains information retrieved up to 2013 on the area. The Management Plan delivers details on site conservation and management for the next five years.
The Natura 2000 Management Planning for Malta and Gozo project is funded by the EAFRD and pioneered by MEPA. It is aimed to establish management plans and legal provisions for the management of all terrestrial Natura 2000 sites in the Maltese Islands and to increase awareness of Natura 2000 amongst the general public and stakeholders.
The project started in October 2012 and ended in March 2014. It is considered a milestone in the protection of Malta’s rural environment, as it undertakes necessary actions required in management planning for the 34 terrestrial Natura 2000 sites.
The project involved gathering information, carrying out surveys, defining conservation objectives and identifying management measures, with intensive stakeholder involvement. These management plans are not intended to restrain recreational or other economical activities within these sites, but rather to support the sustainable use of Malta’s natural resources with the involvement of stakeholders.