sign in sign up
<<
Home , AP1000, Background radiation, Fission barrier, Health Physics Society, Integral fast reactor, Ionizing radiation

FINAL PROGRAM

55th Annual Meeting of the Health Society (American Conference of Radiological Safety) 22nd Biennial Campus Safety Officers Meeting

27 June - 1 July 2010 Salt Palace Convention Center Salt Lake City, Utah

Headquarters Hotel Hilton Salt Lake City Center 255 South West Temple Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Telephone: 801-328-2000 Fax: 801-238-4888

Speaker Ready Room Salt Palace Convention Center, Room 150D Sunday...... 2:00-5:00 pm Monday-Wednesday. . . . . 8:00-11:00 am; 2:00-5:00 pm Thursday...... 8:00-10:00 am You must check in at the Ready Room (even if you have already submitted your presentation) . See Page 11 for more information .

Meeting Sponsors Thank you to the following meeting sponsors EnergySolutions = Platinum PerkinElmer = Welcome Reception Safety and Ecology Corporation (SEC) = Bronze

HPS Secretariat 1313 Dolley Madison Blvd. Suite 402 McLean, VA 22101 (703) 790-1745; FAX: (703) 790-2672 Email: [email protected]; Website: www.hps.org

1 Table of Contents Important Events ...... 6. Awardees ...... 7 . General Information ...... 10 . Committee Meetings ...... 12. Scientific Program ...... 14. AAHP Courses ...... 49 . Professional Enrichment Program ...... 51 . Continuing Education Lecture Abstracts ...... 71. Exhibitors ...... 75 . Works-In-Progress Abstracts ...... 89 . Author Index ...... 94 . Floorplan Salt Palace Convention Center ...... 103. Floorplan Hilton ...... 104. Schedule-at-a-Glance ...... Inside/Outside Back Cover

Registration Hours and Location Registration at the Salt Palace Convention Center Ballroom A/B Foyer Saturday, 26 June ...... 2:00 - 5:00 pm Sunday, 27 June ...... 10:00 am - 5:00 pm Monday, 28 June ...... 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Tuesday, 29 June ...... 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Wednesday, 30 June ...... 8:00 am - 4:00 pm Thursday, 1 July ...... 8:00 - 11:00 am

Future Midyear Topical Meeting 44th 6-9 February 2011 Charleston, SC Future Annual Meetings 56th 26-30 June 2011 Palm Beach, FL 57th 21-26 July 2012 Sacramento, CA Look online for future meeting details hps.org/meetings

2

Officers Howard W . Dickson, President Edward F . Maher, President Elect Robert Cherry, Jr ., Secretary Darrell R . Fisher, Treasurer John P . Hageman, Treasurer-Elect Richard E . Toohey, Past President Richard J . Burk, Jr ., Executive Secretary Board of Directors Edgar D . Bailey Alex J . Boerner Liz Brackett Eric Goldin Barbara L . Hamrick Patricia L . Lee Matthew P . Moeller Dan Strom Terry Yoshizumi Advisory Panel to the Board Richard J . Burk, Jr ., Executive Secretary Kelly L . Classic, Media Relations Liaison Keith H . Dinger, Government Relations Liaison John Edwards, Special Publications Editor Kent N . Lambert, Parliamentarian/Rules Chair Craig A . Little, Operational Radiation Safety Editor-in-Chief Matthew C . McFee, Program Committee Chair Genevieve S . Roessler, Newsletter Editor-in-Chief, Web Site Editor Michael T . Ryan, Journal Editor-in-Chief

4 2010 Program Committee 2010 Task - Salt Chair: Matthew C . McFee, ‘12 Lake City Nicolas Bates, ‘10 Matthew McFee, Program Com- Robin Hill, ‘10 mittee Chair Tara Medich, ‘10 Ben E Edwards, Task Force Chair Laura Pring, ‘10 Nick Bates Kathryn Brock, ‘11 Kathy Brock Ben Edwards, ‘11 Tim Kirkham Tim Taulbee, ‘11 Bryan Lemieux Kelly Crandall, ‘11 Tony Mason Tim Kirkham, ‘12 Tara Medich Bryan Lemieux, ‘12 Michael Noska Michael Noska, ‘12 Latha Vasudevan Latha Vasudevan, ‘12 Local Arrangements Committee Co-chairs: Karen Langley, James O’Rear Adam Arndt Dave Bernhardt Bill Craig Julie Felice Jared Frandsen Robert J . Hoffman Wayne Johns Steve Jones Elliott Lesses Jeff Lodwick Tony Mason Joe McDonald Abol Mortazavi John Olson Dell Potter Farand Smith Walter Wagner

5 Important Events Welcome Reception Sessions and Course Locations Please plan on stopping in at the AAHP Courses on Saturday take Hilton Hotel, Grand Ballroom, on place in the Hilton Hotel . All other Sunday, 27 June, from 6:00-7:00 PEPs, CELs and sessions Sunday pm . There will be an opportunity to through Thursday will take place at meet friends to start your evening the Salt Palace Convention Center . in Salt Lake City . Cash bar and HPS Awards Banquet snacks will be available . An enjoyable evening spent with Exhibits members of the Free Lunch! Free Lunch! – Noon, Society . This event will be held on Monday, 28 June . All registered at- Tuesday, 29 June, in the Hilton Ho- tendees are invited to attend a com- tel Grand Ballroom, and is an excel- plimentary lunch in the exhibit hall . lent opportunity to show your sup- Breaks Monday Afternoon- port for the award recipients as well Wednesday Morning – Featur- as the Society . The awards will be ing morning continental breakfasts presented after the dinner and the and afternoon refreshments such event will last from 7:00-9:00 pm . as fruit, ice cream and cookies . Be HPS Annual Business Meeting sure to stop by and visit with the ex- The Business Meeting will be con- hibitors while enjoying your refresh- vened at 5:15 pm on Wednesday, ments! 30 June, in Ballroom B Salt Palace .

Different this YEAR! CRSO is meeting with HPS CRSO Sessions are Wednesday afternoon and Thursday morning - See pages 42 and 47 for details Things to Remember! All Speakers are required to check in at the Speaker Ready Room at least one session prior to their assigned session. All posters up Monday–Wednesday in Exhibit Hall Poster Session featured Monday, 1:00-3:00 pm No other sessions at that time

AAHP Awards Luncheon

The AAHP is sponsoring an Awards Luncheon on Tuesday, 29 June, Noon- 2:15 pm, in the Salt Palace Convention Center, Room 151G . You may pur- chase tickets on site at the Registration Desk .

6 Tuesday Evening Awards Reception & Banquet Join your peers in honoring the following awardees while enjoying a delicious meal . Brief award presentations will immediately follow the din- ner . All attendees are strongly encouraged to stay and show support for the award recipients . This event will take place in the Hilton Salt Lake City Center Grand Ballroom on Tuesday, 29 June from 7:00 - 9:00 pm . The fol- lowing awards are to be presented:

Distinguished Achievement Award Ralph Lapp Distinguished Public Service Award Presented during Plenary Session Pete Lyons Elda E. Anderson Award Derek Jokisch Founders Award Bryce Rich Evans Medal Award William J Bair Teacher Award Shannon Hudson Honor Roll Awards Lutz Moritz James E . Watson, Jr Fellows Eugene H . Carbaugh Steven H . King Thomas H . Essig Kent N . Lambert Barbara L . Hamrick Harold T . Peterson, Jr .

New This Year Honor Roll Award This award is given posthumously to members who signifi- cantly contributed to the profession of health physics during their careers, but were not otherwise honored by the Society during their lifetimes . Such contributions may include, but are not limited to education, research and administration .

7 Tuesday Evening Awards Menu Hilton house salad, Mediterranean stuffed breast of chicken, Utah creamed corn and wild rice, dessert trio of marinated berries, petite creme brulee and flourless chocolate cake, raspberry lemonade, coffee, tea and decaf G. William Morgan Trust Fund When G . William Morgan died in 1984, Bill began his health physics career at he bequeathed a substantial fund to the Oak Ridge National as part of . The will requires the Manhattan Project . He later joined the that the fund’s interest be used to have Atomic Commission and was in- internationally known experts present pa- strumental in the development of the initial pers at the Society’s meetings . Michael C . regulations that became part of 10 CFR O’Riordan of the United Kingdom’s National Part 20 . He was a great champion of edu- Board was the first in- cation and helped establish the AEC Health ternational expert to be supported by the So- Physics Fellowship Program . Bill later be- ciety through the Morgan Fund . O’Riordan’s came very successful in the real estate presentation “ in Albion” was part of business, but always retained his interest the Indoor Radon Session at the 1989 Albu- in the health physics profession . The So- querque meeting . ciety’s Presidents Emeritus Committee has G . William Morgan was a Charter responsibility for the selection of the inter- member of the Society and during the So- national experts who will be supported by ciety’s early years a very active member . the G . William Morgan Trust Fund .

8 Radiation Safety

The Technical Certificate program teaches entry-level skills required for employment as Radiation Control/Health Physics Technicians in the nuclear industry. Qualified radiation safety technicians at Commercial nuclear plants regulated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), National overseen by Department of Energy (DOE), and other laboratories, medical facilities, and independent and university research facilities that work with radioactive materials. Program instructional components will be provided in the areas of radiation protection, radiation detection and instrumentation, safety and hygiene, communications in radiological safety, practical radiation survey techniques, nuclear plant systems, and radiological chemistry. Students are HAZWOPER trained and qualified.

WHY TRAINING AT EITC? Our students make the best RCTs/HPs available in the industry.

Real Education • Real Jobs • Real Life www.eitc.edu • 208-524-3000 AA/EEO Institution Registration Fees: Session Location Pre On-Site All sessions will take place in the Salt HPS Member $390 $475 Palace Convention Center unless not- HPS Member with ‘10 DUES $520 $605 ed otherwise . Non-Member $485* $575* CRSO $100 $115 LAC Room HPS Member/CRSO Reg $465 $565 Sunday-Thursday 150E HPS Member with HPS dues/CRSO Reg Salt Palace Convention Center $595 $695 HPS Non-Member/CRSO Registration Activities and Tours $560* $665* Student $ 60 $ 60 Note: Tickets still available for sale; Emeritus Member $195 $238 they can be purchased at the HPS One-Day Registration $250 $250 Registration Desk . HPS PEP Lecturer ------Companion $ 65 $ 65 Sunday 27 June Emeritus Companion $ 33 $ 33 “America’s Choir” 8:30-10 AM Exhibition ONLY $ 35 $ 35 (no ticket or sign up required) Monday 28 June Badge Color Code: Open Mic Night 8-11 PM White=HPS Member, NonMember, (no ticket or sign up required) Student Tuesday 29 June Blue=Companion 5K Run/2K Walk 6:30-8:30 AM Green=Exhibition Only Salmon=Exhibitor Wednesday 30 June Park City 8:30 AM-5:30 PM Pub Crawl 6-11 PM Thursday 1 July Tech Tour EnergySolutions 8:30 AM-1 PM

OPEN MIC NIGHT

The 2010 (5th Annual) HPS Open Mic Night will be held on Monday, 6/28/10 at Keys on Main – featuring the host band Mollydrive with spe- cial guest vendor band “Randy Radman and The Exhibitors” . The doors open at 8:00 PM with music beginning at 9:00 – going until they kick us out – or we run out of songs .

Please subscribe to the Facebook page – HPS Open Mic Night to get involved and stay up to date on all of the event details . If you are Face- book averse, please feel free to contact John O’Neil at joneil@chaseenv . com to make requests and get involved!

We hope to see you all there . The event will be limited to 21 and older . Photo identification will be required .

10 Speaker Information Companion Hospitality Room Technical Sessions The Hospitality Room is in Room Speaker Instructions 324 on the 3rd level of the Hilton Ho- You are allotted a total of 12 min- tel . Come meet with friends and learn utes of speaking time unless you have about the available attractions in Salt been notified otherwise . Lake . Local HPS members will be on The Ready Room (Room 150D, hand to help with planning day trips and Salt Palace Convention Center) will restaurant recommendations . On Mon- be open Sunday from 2-5 pm, Mon- day morning from 8 to 9 am, we invite day through Wednesday from 8-11 am all registered companions to an official and 2-5 pm, and Thursday 8-10 am . welcome from a local representative You must check in at the Ready Room who will provide an orientation to Salt (even if you have already submitted Lake and answer any questions you your presentation) no later than the fol- might have . The Monday breakfast will lowing times: take place in the Topaz Room in the Salt Presentation Time Check-In Deadline Lake Hilton . Monday am 5 pm Sunday Continental breakfast will be avail- Monday pm 11 am Monday able Monday through Wednesday Tuesday am 5 pm Monday mornings for registered companions . Tuesday pm 11 am Tuesday Wednesday am 5 pm Tuesday Wednesday pm 11 am Wednesday Thursday am 5 pm Wednesday Hospitality Room Please report to your session for Registered Companions room 10 minutes prior to the Session in the Hilton Salt Lake start to let your session chair(s) know Room 324 that you are there . Monday Welcome Breakfast PEP/CEL Courses 8:00-9:00 am, Topaz Room The PEP Ready Room (251A) in the Convention Center will have hours Days/Hours posted on the door Saturday-Thursday . Room 324 Placement Service Sunday ...... 10 am - Noon Placement Service listings will be Monday ...... 9 am - 1 pm posted in the Exhibit Hall . Tuesday ...... 8 am - 1 pm Wednesday ...... 8 am - 1 pm

11 Health Physics Society Committee Meetings Salt Lake City Hilton (H); Salt Palace Convention Center (CC) Friday, 25 June 2010 ANSI HPS N13.14 WORKING GROUP ABHP BOARD MEETING 2:00-3:00 pm Salon 3 (H) 8:30 am-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) HPS SECTION COUNCIL MEETING Saturday, 26 June 2010 2:30-3:30 pm 251D (CC) FINANCE COMMITTEE HISTORY COMMITTEE 8:00 am-Noon Granite Boardroom (H) 2:30-4:30 pm Exec Boardroom (H) ABHP BOARD MEETING ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING 8:30 am-Noon Salon 2 (H) GROUP 2:30-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) HPS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Noon-4:00 pm Presidental Suite SCIENTIFIC AND PUBLIC ISSUES AAHP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE COMMITTEE 3:00-4:30 pm President Dickson’s 1:00-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) Suite (H) HP/ORS JOURNAL BOARD MEET- ING Tuesday, 29 June 2010 3:00-6:00 pm Topaz Room (H) RULES COMMITTEE Sunday, 27 June 2010 9:00-10:00 am 252A (CC) AAHP PROFESSIONAL DEVELOP- AAHP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MENT 10:30 am-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) 10:00 am-Noon 252B (CC) HPS BOARD OF DIRECTORS LABORATORY ACCREDITATION 10:30 am-5:00 pm Alpine East (H) POLICY AND ACCREDITATION PROGRAM COMMITTEE COMMITTEES 11:00 am-1:00 pm 150D (CC) 10:00 am-2:00 pm 150F (CC) INTERNATIONAL COLLABORA- HP PROGRAM DIRECTORS ORGA- TION COMMITTEE NIZATION 1:00-3:00 pm Topaz Room (H) Noon-2:00 pm Salon 2 (H) ACCELERATOR SECTION BOARD PUBLIC INFORMATION COMMIT- OF DIRECTORS TEE 5:00-6:00 pm Topaz (H) Noon-2:00 pm 252A (CC) ANSI N323 A&B Monday, 28 June 2010 1:00-3:00 pm 252B (CC) NOMINATING COMMITTEE GOVERNMENT AND SOCIETY RE- Noon-3:00 pm 150F (CC) LATIONS COMMITTEE CHAPTER COUNCIL MEETING 1:30-3:30 pm Exec Boardroom (H) 1:00-2:00 pm Ballroom A (CC) ANSI N320 1:00-4:00 pm Topaz (H) 12 CURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE CONTINUING EDUCATION CHAPTER OFFICERS TRAINING COMMITTEE SESSION 1:00-3:00 pm 251A (CC) 2:30-4:00 pm 251D (CC) STANDARDS/HPSSC MEETING AAHP NOMINATING COMMITTEE 1:00-4:00 pm Salon 1 (H) 3:00-4:00 pm 252A (CC) WEB EDITORS MEETING ANSI N42.17 A&C COMMITTEE 1:00-5:00 pm Salon 2 (H) 3:00-5:00 pm 252B (CC) ANSI N42.5X CSU RECEPTION - ALL ARE 1:30-4:00 pm Canyon C (H) WELCOME ACADEMIC EDUCATION 5:30-7:00 pm Alpine East (H) COMMITTEE/AEC ACCREDITA- TION SUBCOMMITTEE Wednesday, 30 June 2010 2:00-4:00 pm 252B (CC) ANSI N13.52 ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING 8:00 am-Noon 252B (CC) GROUP HPS N.13.3 DOSIMETRY FOR 2:30-5:00 pm Topaz (H) CRITICALITY ACCIDENTS HOMELAND SECURITY 8:00 am-Noon Salon 1 (H) COMMITTEE ANSI/HPS N2.1 WORKING GROUP 4:30-6:00 pm Canyon B (H) 9:00 am-Noon Salon 2 (H) Thursday, 1 July 2010 DECOMMISSIONING SECTION LOCAL ARRANGEMENTS COM- BOARD MEETING MITTEE Noon-1:00 pm Exec Boardroom (H) 7:30-9:30 am 150E (CC) SCIENCE SUPPORT COMMITTEE ANSI N13.1 REVISION WORKING Noon-2:00 pm 252A (CC) GROUP MILITARY SECTION HPS, 9:00 am-Noon Topaz (H) EXECUTIVE BOARD MEETING HPS BOARD OF DIRECTORS Noon-2:00 pm Topaz (H) MEETING STUDENT BRANCH MEETING 11:00 am-5:00 pm Canyon AB (H) Noon-2:00 pm Canyon B (H) PROGRAM COMMITTEE SOCIETY SUPPORT COMMITTEE 12:30-3:00 pm Salon 2 (H) Noon-3:00 pm 150F (CC) SUPPORT COMMITTEE ON STAN- DARDIZING RADIATION RISK 12:15-1:15 pm 252B (CC) MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE 12:30-2:30 pm Salon 3 (H)

13 55th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society Salt Lake City, UT, 27 June - 1 July, Scientific Program Presenter’s name is asterisked (*) if other than first author . MONDAY 9:15 AM PL.2 7:00-8:00 AM 251D Realities of US Nuclear Industry CEL1 ABHP Exam Fundamentals Archie, J. – Tips for Successfully Completing South Carolina Electric & Gas Com- the Certification Process pany Cheryl Olson, Andy Miller, Patricia 9:50 AM PL.3 Milligan Radiation Protection Challenges Dominion KPS, Vanderbilt Univer- Harris, W. sity, US NRC Exelon 7:00-8:00 AM 251E 10:25 AM BREAK Update on Medical Internal CEL2 10:45 AM PL.4 Radiation Dosimetry: MIRD Com- Global Energy Needs: Defining a mittee Recommendations for Uni- Role for a “Right Sized Reactor” fying MIRD and ICRP Formulas, Sanders, T. (Landauer Lecturer) Quantities, and Units ANS Darrell R. Fisher, Wesley E. Bolch Pacific Northwest National Labora- 11:20 AM PL.5 tory, University of Florida Human Resource Requirements Berrigan, C. 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom E/F/G/H Industry Infrastructure, NEI Plenary: The Future of the Noon-1:00 PM Exhibit Hall A Nuclear Industry Chair: Howard Dickson Complimentary Lunch in 8:30 AM Introduction Exhibit Hall for all Registrants Howard Dickson and Opening of Exhibits President, HPS 1:00-3:00 PM Exhibit Hall A Presentation of Distinguished Pub- lic Service Award to Peter Lyons P: Poster Session Richard Toohey, Past President, Accelerator HPS P.1 Analysis of a Linear 8:40 AM PL.1 Accelerator Using Radiochromic Regulatory Prospective Film, Radiographic Film, and Activa- Jaczko, G. tion Foils Chairman, US Nuclear Regulatory Bond, J., Balzer, M., Harris, J. Commission Accelerator Center, Idaho State University

14 P.2 Preliminary Production of Decommissioning Cu-67 at Idaho State University us- P.8 RadBall: Position and Ori- ing a Linear entation Determination System Sinha, V., Harris, J., Wells, D. (PODS) Idaho State University, Idaho Accel- Harpring, L., Gordon, J., Farfan, E.*, erator Center Foley, T., Jannik, G., Gladden, J., P.3 A Comparison of Optically Stanley, S., Holmes, C. Stimulated Luminescence, Thermo- Savannah River National Labora- luminescence and Film Dosimetry tory, National Nuclear Laboratory at the Idaho Accelerator Center Emergency Planning/Response Tormohlen, D., Harris, J., Balzer, M. P.9 A Real-Time Interaction GIS Idaho State University Management System for Environ- Biokinetics/Bioeffects mental Survey P.4 Carbon-14 Metabolism in Fang, H. the Human Body Institute of Nuclear Energy Research Masuda, T., Tako, Y., Nakamura, Y. Environmental Institute for Environmental Sciences P.10 Studies on Existence and P.5 Analysis of Mechanisms Un- Measurement of Radio in derlying Development of Malignant the Lower Mississippi River Sedi- in the Cohort of Nuclear ment Samples Collected in the Workers Employed at the South-West Mississippi Area Production Association Harper, A., Winfield, T., Pittman, J., Guryanov, M.Y., Belosokhov, M.V., Heard, J., Gidi, M., Alemu, T., Frank- Rusinova, G.G., Glazkova, I.V., lin, C., Copper, C., Billa, J., Aciel, S. Azizova, T.V. Alcorn State University Southern Urals Biophysics Institute P.11 : Incorporating (SUBI), Ozyorsk New Tools to Answer Complex Is- P.6 Analysis of Genomic Insta- sues of Radioactivity in the Environ- bility Transmission in Families of the ment Mayak Workers Based on Minisatel- Kuhne, W., Jannik, T.*, Farfan, E., lite Markers Gladden, J. Glazkova, I.V., Rusinova, G.G. Savannah River National Laboratory South Urals Biophysics Institute P.12 The Contribution of U-238 (SUBI), Ozyorsk and Th-232 to Radiation Dose and P.7 To Assess the Open Field Risk from Effluent of - Behaviour of Mice through Acute Fired Power Plants Exposure of Non- Beckfield, F., Johnson, T. by Wireless Communication Device/ Colorado State University Mobile Phone Kumar, N., Khan, R.A. Babasaheb Bhirao Ambedkar Uni- versity, India

15 P.13 A Study of Strontium 89/90 P.18 Assessment of Sr-90 and Analysis Method in Environmental Cs-137 Penetration into Reinforced Monitoring (Extent of ‘Deepening’) Lin, C.F., Wang, J.J., Chang, B.J., under Natural Atmospheric Condi- Chen, I.J., Chen, C.L.*, Wang, T.W. tions Institute of Nuclear Energy Re- Farfan, E., Gaschak, S., Maksymen- search, Atomic Energy Council ko, A., Jannik, G.*, Marra, J., Bond- External Dosimetry arkov, M., Donnelly, E. P.14 A Comparison between Savannah River National Labora- PHITS and Simulations of tory, Center for Nuclear HZE Interactions in an Alumi- Safety, and Ra- num Target dioecology, International Radioecol- Cox, B. ogy Laboratory, Centers for A&M University Control and Prevention P.15 INER’s Study of New Per- P.19 Assessment of sonnel Dosimetry Performance from Surface as Testing at 2009 a Relative Indicator for Chen, C., Fang, H. Distribution on External Surfaces of Institute of Nuclear Energy Research a Multistory Building in Pripyat Farfan, E., Gaschak, S., Maksymen- P.16 Experimental Study using ko, A., Jannik, G., Marra, J., Bondar- 142Pr Glass Eye Applicator for the kov, M., Donnelly, E. Treatment of Eye Plaques in Large Savannah River National Labora- Animals tory, Chernobyl Center for Nuclear Vasudevan, L., Jung, J., Fisher, T., Re- Safety, Radioactive Waste and Ra- ece, W., Walker, M. dioecology, International Radioecol- Texas A&M University, Cooper Uni- ogy Laboratory, Centers for Disease versity Hospital Control and Prevention Homeland Security Instrumentation P.17 Using Urban Terrain Data Development of an On-line for Monte Carlo Radiation Transport P.20 Radiation and Detection Measure- Calculations ments Lab Course Bergman, J., Millage, K., Madrigal, J. Kopp, D., DeVol, T. ARA, Inc. Clemson University and Bioassay 239 P.21 Critical Evaluation of PuO2 Wound and Lymph Node Retention Predicted by NCRP 156’s Recom- mended Biokinetic Transfer Rates Chelidze, N., Brey, R. R. Idaho State University

16 P.22 A Monte Carlo Simulation of P.28 Comparison of Computed the In-Vivo Measurement of Lung Tomography Dose in an Anthropo- Activity of the Lawrence Livermore morphic Phantom Using Optically National Laboratory Torso Phantom Stimulated and Thermoluminescent Acha, R.M., Brey, R.R., James, A., Dosimetry Capello, K. Gee, N., Verde, F., Brown, K. Idaho State University, USTUR, HML Geisinger Health System, Penn P.23 Bayesian Analysis of Bio- State College of assay and Autopsy Data from 18-y P.29 Protocol for Integrity Test Follow-up of an Acute Accidental In- and Discard of Radiation Protective halation of Refractory PuO2 Gear Avtandilashvili, M., James, A., Soares, F., Pereira, A. Birchall, A., Puncher, M., Gregoratto, IF-SC D., Brey, R. Military Idaho State University, US Trans- P.30 Nuclear Medical Science and Uranium Registries, Officers - Army Health Physicists: Health Protection Agency, UK Leaders in Radiation Safety P.24 Dose Uncertainty Estimate Melanson, M., Bosley, W., Hamilton, from Tissue Composition Variation D., Santiago, J., Chachian, A., Orte- Marsh, D., Caracappa, P. ga, M. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Army Surgeon General, Army Public Medical Health Physics Health Command P.25 Experience with the Epi- Operational Health Physics RadTM Device for Wet Macular De- P.31 The Estimates of Skin and generation in a Clinical Trial BFO Dose Rates, Dose Equivalent Evdokimoff, V. Rates and Accumulated Doses for Dade Moeller & Associates Human Crews on the Surface of the P.26 Investigation of Patient Dose from 15 January 2005 So- for Diagnostic Reference Level in lar Energetic Particle Event using Radiographic Examinations: Na- Earth-Moon-Mars Radiation Envi- tional Survey in Korea ronment Module Kim, K., Kim, H., Lee, K., Kim, Y., PourArsalan, M., Townsend, L.W., Sung, D. Hall, M.I., Schwadron, N.A., Koza- Kyung Hee University, National Insti- rev, K., Dayeh, M.A., Desai, M.I. tute of Food and Drug Safety Evalu- The , Bos- ation, Dong-A University, Chonnam ton University, Southwest Research National University Institute P.27 Radiation Dose from Coro- P.32 Validity of using RSAC 7 nary Artery Calcification Screening Computer Program to Determine Kim, K., Einstein, A., Berrington de Atmospheric Dispersion Factors Gonzalez, A. Schrader, J., Schrader, B. Kyung Hee University, Columbia Idaho State University, Idaho Nation- University, National Institute al Laboratory 17 P.33 Details of a Computer Code P.39 Assessment of Intake of Ra- for Confidence Intervals when the dionuclides from the Environment Sample is Counted an Integer Times into a Human Body Longer than the Blank Dimitrov, L.D. Potter, W., Strzelczyk, J. NPP Kozloduy, Bulgaria Consultant, Sacramento, University P.40 Behavior of a Parent Radio- of Colorado Hospital and its Daughters in a Multi- Regulatory/Legal Compartment System P.34 Radionuclide Emission Esti- Dimitrov, L.D. mation for the Center of Advanced NPP Kozloduy, Bulgaria Energy Studies (CAES) P.41 Software Application “DOSE Holzmer, J., Schrader, B. ART” for Assessment of Inhalation Idaho State University, Idaho State Intake and the Relevant Committed University Effective Dose of Internal Exposure International Valtchev, G.G., Dimitrov, L.D. P.35 Internal Dosimetry of Ellip- NPP – Kozloduy, Bulgaria soidal Targets: Models and Applica- P.42 The Significance of tions Cancer in Reactor Safety Assess- Amato, E., Lizio, D., Campennì, A., ment Herberg, A., Baldari, S. Higson, D. University of Messina, Italy Retired; Fellow and Executive Com- P.36 Determination of 210Pb and mittee Member of the Australasian 210Po in Sea Water Samples for Do- Radiation Protection Society, Fellow simetric Studies and Radiation Pro- of the Institution of , Aus- tection Purposes tralia Arginelli, D., Badolato, F., Avataneo, P.43 Estimation of Effective Dose O., Ridone, S. for Different Age Groups from 137Cs Radiation Protection Institute, Italy, And 90Sr due to Ingestion of Food University of Turin, Italy, and Drinking Water in Bosnia and P.37 Monitoring of Uranium in En- Herzegovina vironmental Samples by Means of Ilic Z., Deljkic D., Vidic A. Flow Techniques Institute for Public Health of Federa- Avivar, J., Ferrer, L., Casas, M., tion of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Sa- Cerdà, V. rajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina University of the Balearic Islands, P.44 NORM and Spain Partitioning during Water Treatment P.38 Evaluation of Viewing Con- Processes ditions for Radiological Images in Khater, A.E.M. Five Hospitals of Uruguay King Saud University, Kingdom of Blanco, D. Saudi Arabia, National Center for Montevideo, Uruguay, Universidad Nuclear Safety and Radiation Con- de la República trol, Atomic Energy Authority, Egypt

18 P.45 Uranium and Heavy Metals P.50 Assuring Diagnostic Qual- in Narghile (Shisha, Hookah) Moas- ity Bounds of JPEG 2000 Com- sel pressed, High Resolution Magnetic Khater, A.E.M., Amr, M., Chaouachi, Resonance Images Containing Le- K. sions of Multiple Sclerosis or Vir- King Saud University, Kingdom of chow Robins Space Enlargements Saudi Arabia, Atomic Energy Author- Paz, J.E., Pérez, M., Miranda, I., Ro- ity, Egypt, Nuclear Research Center, dríguez, J., Schelkens, P. University of Paris XI-XII, France Universidad Central “Marta Abreu” P.46 NORM and Trace Elements de las Villas, Cuba, Hospital Univer- Fractionation in Rock sitario “Arnaldo Milián Castro,” Cuba, Beneficiation Processes: Potential Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium Hazardous and Useful Applications P.51 Effect of Lossy Compression Khater, A.E.M. Over Head CT Image Quality at Low King Saud University, Kingdom of Doses: A Phantom Study Saudi Arabia, Atomic Energy Author- Pérez, M., Miranda, I., Estévez, E., ity, Egypt Paz, J.E., Khoury, H.J., Andrade, P.47 Technologically Enhanced M.E., Carvalho-Filho, A.E. NORM and Heavy Metals in Central University of Las Villas, and Steel Industry Cuba, Federal University of Pernam- Khater, A.E.M., Bakr, W.F. buco, Brazil King Saud University, Kingdom of P.52 Implementation of Quality Saudi Arabia, Atomic Energy Author- Assurance in Diagnostic ity, Egypt in Madagascar P.48 Could Death Play an Ramanandraibe, M.J., Randriamo- Important Role in Radon-Related ra, T.H., Randriantsizafy, R.D., An- ? driambololona, R. Madas, B.G., Balásházy, I., Farkas, Madagascar INSTN (Institut Nation- A. al des Sciences et Techniques Nu- Hungarian Academy of Sciences cléaires), Madagascar KFKI Atomic Energy Research Insti- P.53 Evaluation of Preclinical tute, Hungary Model Use in Metabolic Radiother- P.49 Does the Effectiveness of apy and Imaging, with Particular BNCT Depend on the Size of Me- Consideration to [153SM]SM-EDT- tastases? MP and Iodine Madas, B.G., Balásházy, I., Farkas, Ridone, S., Arginelli, D., Miranti, A., A. Vigna, L. Hungarian Academy of Sciences ENEA-Italian National Agency for KFKI Atomic Energy Research Insti- New , Italy, University tute, Hungary of Turin, Italy, Hospital “Maggiore della Carità” of Novara, Italy

19 P.54 Determination of Water- P.60 Estimation of Entrance Sur- to-Biota Concentration Ratios and face Doses (ESDs) for Common Sediment-Water Distribution Coef- Medical X-Ray Diagnostic Examina- ficients of Stable Elements in Japa- tions in Radiological Departments in nese Estuarine Areas Mashhad-IRAN Takata, H., Tagami, K., Aono, T., Esmali, S., Taghi, M., Toossi, B. Uchida, S. Mashad University of Medical Sci- National Institute of Radiological Sci- ences, Iran ences, Japan P.61 MCNP Simulating OSL Ring P.55 Investigating Radioactive Response for X-Ray Spec- Properties of Incense trums Alrefae, T., Nageswaran, T.N., Al- Xia, Z., Salasky, M. Failakawi, A., Al-Shemali, T. Landauer, Inc. Kuwait University, Kuwait P.62 Design And Simulation of a P.56 -to-Plant Transfer Factor Passive- Nozzle in Database in Japan – Use of Stable Beam Radiotherapy Elements as Analogues of Radionu- Guan, F., Poston, J., Braby, L. clides Texas A&M University Uchida, S., Tagami, K., Ishikawa, N. P.63 Radiographic Imaging of a National Institute of Radiological Sci- Low-Z Sample Using Comp- ences, Japan ton Scattered X-Rays P.57 Estimation of Naeem, S., Chouffani, K., Wells, D. Atmospheric Dispersion in Vicinity Idaho State University, Pocatello of Coal Power Plant Kakanj P.64 Application of Probabilistic Vidic, A., Ilic, Z., Deljkic, D., Adrovic, RESRAD-BIOTA Code in the IAEA F. EMRAS II Biota Working Group’s Institute for Public Health of Fed- Beaverlodge Scenario eration of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kamboj, S., Yu, C., LePoire, D., Klett, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, T., Cheng, J.-J., Normandy, J., Wil- University of Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia liams, W.A., Domotor, S., Wallo, A. and Herzegovina Argonne National Laboratory, US P.58 Practical X-Ray Alternative Department of Energy to Self-Shielded Gamma Irradiators P.65 PIMAL: A GUI for Enabling Mehta, K. Radiation Dose Assessment Using Arbeiterstrandbad Strasse, Phantoms with Realistic Postures Works-in-Progress Akkurt, H., Wiarda, D., Eckerman, K. P.59 Regulatory Research in Oak Ridge National Laboratory Radiation Protection, U .S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bush-Goddard, S. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission

20 P.66 Evaluation of Uranium 4:00 PM MPM-A.5 Chemical and Radio-Toxicity in the Specialized Measurements for a Workplace for Bioassays Homeland Security Project Meck, R., Leggett, R.W., Eckerman, Stansbury, P., Sandness, G., K.F., McGinn, C.W. Schweppe, J., Todd, L., Woodring, Science and Systems, M., Murphy, L. LLC, Oak Ridge National Laboratory Pacific Northwest National Lab, US Department of Homeland Security, 3:00-5:00 PM Ballroom A Domestic Nuclear Detection Office MPM-A: Instrumentation 4:15 PM MPM-A.6 Co-Chairs: Wayne Gaul, Karen Energy Calibration of Beta Particle Barcal Spectrometers with Active Gamma- 3:00 PM MPM-A.1 Ray Discrimination Capability Calibration of the Holdup Measure- Higginbotham, J.F. ment System 4 (HMS4) for Lower Oregon State University (LEU) Holdup 4:30 PM MPM-A.7 Measurements Using a Surrogate Application of Two New Portable Bi-207 Source Gamma Spectrometry Systems for Jadick, M., Riley, W., Estes, B. Monitoring Environmental Radioac- ORISE tivity 3:15 PM MPM-A.2 Yorks, P.J., Fallahian, N., Simpson, Unique Radiation Detection Method D.R. Using Si based Integrated Circuits Bloomsburg University, Pennsylva- Marianno, C., Khatri, S. nia Texas A&M University 4:45 PM MPM-A.8 3:30 PM MPM-A.3 Data Supporting Experimental Dose Results of a the Use of a Neutron Pager for Dose Prototypic Skin Rate Measurements and as an Ac- Cazalas, E., Hamby, D., Farsoni, A. tive Personal Warning Oregon State University Iwatschenko, M., Taylor, G., Thom- 3:45 PM MPM-A.4 as, D. A Comparison of the Stated Perfor- Thermo Fisher Scientific, National mance of Various Radon Measure- Physical Laboratory ment Instruments and Techniques Riccardi, A., Johnson, T. Colorado State University

21 3:00-4:15 PM Ballroom B 4:30-5:15 PM Ballroom B MPM-B1: Waste Management MPM-B2: Biokinetics and Co-Chairs: Jay Tarzia, Michael Bioeffects Benjamin Co-Chairs: Ray Guilmette, Mike 3:00 PM MPM-B1.1 Noska Development of Authorized Limits 4:30 PM MPM-B2.1 for Disposal of PCB from Radiation Biodosimetry via - Buildings 361 and 391 at Argonne ic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3T? National Laboratory, Argonne, Illi- Huda, A., Ramadan, S., Nagarajan, nois R., Thomas, M.A. Cheng, J., Chen, S., Brachmann, N., California State University, Fresno, Butala, S., Brumwell, F. Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Bos- Argonne National Laboratory ton, , Los An- 3:15 PM MPM-B1.2 geles A Standardized Approach for Low 4:45 PM MPM-B2.2 Level Waste Quantification at the Comparison of Two F-18 FDG Bio- Texas A&M University Nuclear Sci- kinetic Models for the Estimate of ence Center using Gamma Spec- Patient Dose from PET Imaging troscopy and ISOCS Mathematical Su, L., Mille, M., Xu, X.G., Stabin, M. Calibration Software Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Vasudevan, L., Dugan, K., Tijerina, A. Vanderbilt University Nuclear Science Center, Texas A&M 5:00 PM MPM-B2.3 University No Linear-No-Threshold Cancer 3:30 PM MPM-B1.3 Risk Model Applies to Protracted Results of Direct Gamma Radia- Ionizing Radiation Exposures tion Measurements Over Complet- Raabe, O.G. ed Low-Level Radioactive Waste University of California, Davis Trenches Benjamin, M. 3:00-5:30 PM Ballroom C EnergySolutions MPM-C: Power Reactor 3:45 PM MPM-B1.4 Section Special Session Field Gamma Spectroscopic Char- acterization of Low Level Waste Health Physics 2010 Drums Containing U-233 and U-232 Co-Chairs: Laura Pring, David Eth- Meyer, K. ridge, Roger Shaw Canberra 3:00 PM MPM-C.1 4:00 PM MPM-B1.5 The Resurgence of Nuclear Energy Assessment of the Potential for and Evolving Radiation Protection Building a Low Level Radioactive Challenges - A U .S . Perspective Waste Facility in Northern Louisiana Andersen, R. Wilson IV, C., Wang, W. Nuclear Energy Institute Louisiana State University

22 3:30 PM MPM-C.2 3:45 PM MPM-D.3 Health Physics Concerns in Com- Nuclear and Radiation mercial Nuclear Fabrication Safety Education and Research at Mabry, A. Prairie View A&M University Global -Americas, LLC Vasudevan, L., Aghara, S. K 4:00 PM MPM-C.3 Prairie View A&M University A Current Perspective on Manag- 4:00 PM MPM-D.5 ing the Back End of the Commercial Using “Science Cafès” as a Com- in the United munication Tool for the HPS States Dibblee, M. Sowder, A.G. Consultant EPRI 3:00-4:45 PM 150 ABC 4:30 PM MPM-C.4 Realignment of the Nuclear Regu- MPM-E: Board of latory Commission’s Reactor Over- Special Session sight Process Radiation Safety Co-Chairs: Myungchul Jo, Dewey Baseline Inspection Procedures Sprague Pedersen, R. 3:00 PM MPM-E.1 Office of Regula- What Health Physics Should Know tion, US NRC about Laser, Laser Safety and Why 5:00 PM MPM-C.5 Barat, K. Addressing the RP Technician Lawrence Berkeley National Labora- Shortage-Fall 2009 tory Hiatt, J. 3:30 PM MPM-E.2 BHI Energy Radiation Safety across the Elec- tromagnetic Spectrum - The Chal- 3:15-4:15 PM Ballroom D lenges of the National Ignition Facil- MPM-D: Contemporary Topics ity in Health Physics Beale, R., King, J., Sprague, D.* Co-Chairs: Ken Krieger, Martha Lawrence Livermore National Labo- Dibblee ratory 3:15 PM MPM-D.2 4:00 PM MPM-E.3 Public Perspective of Risk Expected Revisions of Laser Maxi- Howard, B. mum Permissible Exposure Limits Retired Sliney, D. (Order of presentations switched at Consultant Presenter’s request) 4:30 PM MPM-E.4 3:30 PM MPM-D.4 The Board of Laser Safety’s Certi- Texas Efforts to Increase Nuclear fied Laser Safety Officer Program Technology Workforce Edwards, B., Sams, B. Krieger, K., Morris, L. Duke University Medical Center Texas State Technical College

23 3:00-4:00 PM 150 G MPM-F: GTRI/NNSA Special Session Chair: William Rhodes 3:00 PM MPM-F.1 Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center Experience with the Global Threat Reduction Initiative Howell, D. Wake Forest University 3:15 PM MPM-F.2 Implementation of Radiological Material Security Enhancements at Rutgers University and the Uni- versity of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey McDermott, P.J., McCluskey, B., Pel- letier, J.F. Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Sandia National Laboratories 3:30 PM Panel Discussion

24 TUESDAY 9:15 AM TAM-A.5 Development and Evaluation of a 7:00-8:00 AM 251D Neutron Sensitive Memory Chip CEL3 ANSI N43 .1 Standard Draft: Sax, K.J. , Nelson, M.E., Ziegler, Radiation Safety for the Design and J.F., Cameron, C.B., Avramov-Za- Operation of Particle Accelerators murovic, S., Hughes, H.L., McMarr, James C. Liu, Lawrence S. Walker P.J. SLAC, LANSCE, Los Alamos Na- US Naval Academy, Naval Research tional Laboratory Laboratory 7:00-8:00 AM 251E 9:30 AM Break in Exhibit Hall CEL4 Overdose of Patients Re- ceiving CT Scans 10:00 AM TAM-A.6 Thomas L. Morgan Neutron Metrology Resources in the University of Rochester UK Using Monoenergetic and Simu- lated Workplace Fields from Ther- 8:30-11:30 AM Ballroom A mal to 20 MeV TAM-A: External Dosimetry I Taylor, G.C., Bennett, A., Cheema, Co-Chairs: Robin Hill, Derek S.S., Hawkes, N.P., Horwood, N.A., Jokisch Kolkowski, P., Roberts, N.J., Thom- 8:30 AM TAM-A.2 as, D.J. Neutron Conversion Coefficients for National Physical Laboratory, United Extremities Kingdom Veinot, K.G., Burgett, E.M. 10:15 AM TAM-A.7 Y-12 National Security Complex, An Evaluation of Methods to Correct Georgia Institute of Technology Historic NTA Film Dosimeters 8:45 AM TAM-A.3 Taulbee, T., Mahathy, J., DeBord, G. Specific Absorbed Fractions for Pro- NIOSH, ORAU, SRA tons in the Human Skeleton 10:30 AM TAM-A.8 Jokisch, D., Bahadori, A., Rajon, D., A Review of Personal and Ambient Bolch, W. Dose Equivalent Francis Marion University, University Hertel, N.E., Veinot, K.G. of Florida Georgia Institute of Technology, Y-12 9:00 AM TAM-A.4 National Security Complex The Effects of KAC WSI Kevlar Se- 10:45 AM TAM-A.9 curity Vests on Thermoluminescent Direct Ion Storage - Revolutionizing Neutron Dosimeters (TLNDs) Programs Gause, S.M., Wagoner, D.A. Bennett, K.E., Perle, S.C., Kahilain- Savannah River Nuclear Solutions, en, J., Voutila, M. Texas A&M University Mirion Technologies

25 11:00 AM TAM-A.10 (Order of presentations switched at Revised Compartment Factors Cal- Session Chair’s request) culating Effective Dose from Mul- 9:00 AM TAM-B.5 tiple Dosimetry Meeting Radionuclide Air Emissions Hill, R., Rathbone, B. Sampling Requirements for Tempo- Pacific Northwest National Labora- rary Sources under the Clean Air Act tory Fuehne, D., Martinez, H., Moore, M. 11:15 AM TAM-A.11 Los Alamos National Laboratory Micro Fricke Dosimeters Composed 9:15 AM TAM-B.4 of Cation Exchange Resin Beads Verifying a Universal Design for Sin- Bauhs, J.A., Hammer, B.E., Higgins, gle Point Exhaust Stack Sampling P.D. Moore, M., Fuehne, D., Schafer, D. 3M Company, University of Minne- Los Alamos National Laboratory sota 9:30 AM TAM-B.6 8:15 AM-Noon Ballroom B A Comparison of Building Wake Ef- fect Models TAM-B: Environmental I Simpkins, A. A. Co-Chairs: Michael Schierman, Dade Moeller & Associates Matthew Barnett 9:45 AM Break in Exhibit Hall 8:15 AM TAM-B.1 On-line Detection and Monitoring of 10:15 AM TAM-B.7 Radioactive Iodine in Water through Land and Water Use Characteristics the Use of Extractive Scintillating and Usage Parameters around the Resin Grogan, K., DeVol, T., Powell, B., Jannik, G., Farfan, E., Foley, T., Lee, Lee, C., Husson, S. P., Karapatakis, D. Clemson University Savannah River National Laboratory 8:30 AM TAM-B.2 10:30 AM TAM-B.8 Radon Flux from Evaporation Ponds Lessons Learned in DU Environ- Containing Elevated Concentrations mental Cleanup of -226 Miller, M. Simonds, M.H., Schierman, M.J.*, Sandia National Laboratories Baker, K.R. 10:45 AM TAM-B.9 Environmental Restoration Group Characterizing Accumu- 8:45 AM TAM-B.3 lation Dynamics in Uranium Biore- Development of Alternative Methods mediation by Principal Component for Quantification of -210 Analysis in Water Dong, H., Johnson, T. Matheny, T.E., DeVol, T.A. Colorado State University Clemson University 11:00 AM TAM-B.10 NCRP Dose Pie Chart - Creation, Decline, and Restoration Moeller, D.W. Dade Moeller & Associates 26 11:15 AM TAM-B.11 8:55 AM TAM-C.2 Study of Presence & Concentration Radiation Dose Reconstruction: of Radionuclides in Farm Raised Principles and Practices - A New Catfish in the State Mississippi (MS) NCRP Report Aceil, S., Billa, J. Napier, B.A. Alcorn State University Pacific Northwest National Labora- 11:30 AM TAM-B.12 tory Trends in Groundwater Chemistry 9:15 AM TAM-C.3 Pre- and Post-Remediation at Iri- Errors and Uncertainties in Radia- garay and Grover In-Situ Uranium tion Dose Reconstruction for Epi- Mines demiology: Approaches and Chal- Roche, N., Johnson, T. lenges Colorado State University Strom, D.J. 11:45 AM TAM-B.13 Pacific Northwest National Labora- Gamma Radioactivity Concentra- tory tions in Surface of Guadalupe 9:30 AM TAM-C.4 and Zacatecas Municipalities Skeletal Dose Estimates for Radium Mireles, F., Flores, F., Pinedo, J., Dial Workers Dávila, J., Rìos, C., López, H., Toohey, R.E. Saucedo, S. ORAU Universidad Autonoma de Zacate- 9:45 AM TAM-C.5 cas, Mexico Radon and Uranium Miner Dosim- 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom C etry: Current Status and Uncertain- ties TAM-C: AAHP Special James, A.C. Session I - Radiation Dose WSU/USTUR Reconstruction for 10:00 AM Break in Exhibit Hall Epidemiology 10:30 AM TAM-C.6 Co-Chairs: Richard Vetter, Marina Uncertainty in Dose Reconstruction Degteva for the Atomic Bomb Survivors in Hi- 8:30 AM Introduction roshima and Nagasaki Introductory Remarks and Overview Cullings, H.M. Rich Vetter, Dan Strom Radiation Effects Research Founda- Mayo Clinic, Pacific Northwest Na- tion, Hiroshima, Japan tional Laboratory 8:35 AM TAM-C.1 The Needs of a “Customer” of Dose Reconstruction Gilbert, E.S. National Cancer Institute

27 11:00 AM TAM-C.7 9:00 AM TAM-D.3 The 15-Country Nuclear Workers Evaluation of Innovative Technology Study - Quantification of Errors in for Decontamination of Contaminat- Doses ed Surfaces using Tc-99m Tagged Thierry-Chef, I., Marshall, M., Fix, Resin Powder J.J., Cardis, E., Bermann, F., Gilbert, Dua, S., Lagos, L., Calderin, D., E., Hacker, C., Heinmiller, B., Moser, Ngachin, M., Colon Mendoza, R. M., Pearce, M.S. Florida International University IARC, Consultant, Dade Moeller & 9:15 AM TAM-D.4 Associates, CREAL, NCI, AECL, Humboldt Bay Power Plant Decom- Bundesamt für Gesundheit, Univer- missioning Challenges sity of Newcastle Barley, W., Albers, J. 11:30 AM TAM-C.8 RosBar Enterprises, Inc., Pacific Radiation Organ Doses Received Gas & Electric by U S. . Radiologic Technologists: 9:30 AM Break in Exhibit Hall Estimation Methods and Findings 10:00 AM TAM-D.5 Simon, S.L. Activation Calculations to Support National Cancer Institute the Decommissioning of SEFOR 11:45 AM TAM-C.9 Hertel, N.E., Burgett, E.A., Shult, R. Dosimetry for NCI Chornobyl Stud- Private Consultant, EnergySolutions ies (Thyroid ) 10:15 AM TAM-D.6 Bouville, A., Drozdovitch, V., Luckya- Development of a Portable, Field, nov, N., Voillequè, P.G. Alpha and Spectrometer for National Cancer Institute, National the Clearance of Property with Con- Institutes of Health, MJP Risk As- taminated Surfaces sessment Millsap, W., Pappin, J., Balmer, D., 8:30-11:30 AM Ballroom D Glines, W. Dade Moeller & Associates, Mission TAM-D: Decommissioning Support Alliance, Pacific Northwest Co-Chairs: Scott Hay, Jerry Cooper National Laboratory, Department of 8:30 AM TAM-D.1 Energy The “MARSSIM Survey” and the Radiation Survey and Site Investi- 10:30 AM TAM-D.7 gation Process RadBall Deployment into a Shield- Hansen, T. ed Cell at Savannah River National Ameriphysics Laboratory Farfan, E., Foley, T., Jannik, G., 8:45 AM TAM-D.2 Gladden, J., Stanley, S., Holmes, C., Deriving Site-Specific Building DC- Oldham, M., Adamovics, J. GLs Savannah River National Labora- Downey, H., Lively, J. tory, National Nuclear Laboratory, MACTEC Duke University, Heuris Pharma

28 10:45 AM TAM-D.8 8:45 AM TAM-E.3 Partial Site Release as Part of De- Recapture Due to Rain and commissioning Snow at a Downey, H., Conant, J. Hinchcliffe, W., Harris, J., Miller, D. MACTEC, ABB Idaho State University, University of 11:00 AM TAM-D.9 Selection of Radionuclides for Ra- 9:00 AM TAM-E.4 diological Survey and Risk Assess- Atmospheric Dispersion of Radio- ment at the Santa Susana Field nuclide and Radiation Dose Calcu- Laboratory Area IV lation following a Hypothetical Ac- Rucker, T. L. cident Condition from Texas A&M Science Applications International University TRIGA Research Reactor Corporation Vasudevan, L. 11:15 AM TAM-D.10 Texas A&M University Use All Radioanalytical Laboratory 9:15 AM TAM-E.5 Results Investigation of Bioaccu- Cherry, R. mulation of Carbon-14 on the Glycol US Army Installation Management Piping in Pressurized Water Reac- Command tor Containment Buildings Hawkley, G.H., Harris, J.T., Miller, 8:15-9:45 AM 150 ABC D.W. TAM-E: Reactor Health Idaho State University Physics 9:30 AM TAM-E.6 Co-Chairs: John Poston, Latha ALARA Methods Incorporated into Vasudevan the Design of the AP1000 8:15 AM TAM-E.1 Slobe, E. D. Radionuclides Associated with De- Westinghouse commissioning of a Research Re- 9:45 AM Power Reactor Section actor Business Mtg Beckman, J. US Army Corps of Engineers 8:30-11:45 AM 150 G 8:30 AM TAM-E.2 TAM-F: Accelerator Section Dose Modeling for New Reactors Special Session I - Light Using ICRP-72 Dose Factors - Sources and FELs NRCDose 72 Co-Chairs: Linnea Wahl, Kamran DeMore, D.M., Bland, J.S., Vaziri Malafeew, V. 8:30 AM TAM-F.1 Chesapeake Nuclear Services Light Sources, Free- La- sers and the Accelerator Special Sessions Grissom, M.P. MPG—HP, Inc.

29 8:45 AM TAM-F.2 2:45-5:15 PM Ballroom A The BNL National Light Sources TPM-A: External Dosimetry II Casey, W.R. (Dade Moeller Lec- Co-Chairs: Tom Waters, Stephen turer) Egbert NSLS-II BNL 2:45 PM TPM-A.1 Optically Stimulated Luminescence 9:45 AM TAM-F.3 Dosimetry with Human Tooth Enam- Radiation Shielding and Radiation el: Possibilities and Limitations for Protection Issues at the European Retrospective Dosimetry Facility Sholom, S., DeWitt, R., Simon, S.L., Berkvens, P. Bouville, A., McKeever, S.W.S. European Synchrotron Radiation Oklahoma State University, National Facility Cancer Institute, National Institutes 10:00 AM Break in Exhibit Hall of Health 10:30 AM TAM-F.4 3:00 PM TPM-A.2 and Laser Safety’s Role in Dose Reconstruction: Nonuniform Accelerator Facilities Skin Dose from Exposure to Arse- Barat, K. nic-73 LBNL Waters, T.L., Bertelli, L., Bland, J.R., 11:00 AM TAM-F.5 Justus, A.L., Stallard, A.M., Walker, Advanced Laser Personnel Safety L.S. System at Jefferson Lab Los Alamos National Laboratory Benson, S.V., Jordan, K. 3:15 PM TPM-A.3 Thomas Jefferson National Accel- Post Event As-74 Measurements erator Facility Walker, L.S., Duran, M., Salazar, J., 11:15 AM TAM-F.6 Martinez, M., Justus, A., Thorn, D., Radiation Safety Aspects of the Lin- Fassbendern, M., Taylor, W. ac Coherent Light Source at SLAC Los Alamos National Laboratory Rokni, S.H., Liu, J.C., Mao, X.S., 3:30 PM TPM-A.4 Prinz, A.A., Leitner, M.S., Vollaire, J. City- and Range-specific Effects on SLAC National Accelerator Labora- the Energy Spectra of Air-Transport- tory ed and Gamma Rays at 11:45 AM Accelerator Section Hiroshima and Nagasaki Business Meeting Egbert, S., Kerr, G., Cullings, H., Fu- namoto, S. Science Applications International Corporation, Kerr Consulting, Radia- tion Effects Research Foundation, Hiroshima 3:45 PM Break in Exhibit Hall

30 4:15 PM TPM-A.5 2:15-3:00 PM Ballroom B Energy Spectra of the Shielded and Organ Fluences of Neutrons and TPM-B1: Environmental II Gamma Rays Calculated by Dosim- Co-Chairs: Michael Schierman, etry System DS02 for Atomic Bomb Matthew Barnett Survivors in Hiroshima and Naga- 2:15 PM TPM-B1.1 saki Concentration and Vertical Profile Cullings, H.M., Kerr, G.D., Egbert, of Cs-137 in the Undisturbed Soil of S.E., Funamoto, S. Southwestern Nigeria Radiation Effects Research Founda- Ajayi, I. tion, Kerr Consulting Co., Scientific Adekunle Ajasin University, Nigeria Applications International Corpora- 2:30 PM TPM-B1.2 tion Measurement of Radioactive Con- 4:30 PM TPM-A.6 tent from Naturally Occurring Ra- Monte Carlo Modeling of a Sitting dioactive Material (NORM) in Aban- Phantom for Improved Environmen- doned Mine Tailings tal Dose Assessment Rahman, N.M., Zhang , W., Baweja, Han, B., Na, Y.H., Caracappa, P.F., A., Atiya, I.A., Tracy, B.L. Xu, X.G. Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Canada, Canada, University of Mc- Master, Canada 4:45 PM TPM-A.7 Dosimetry and Partial Body Irradia- 2:45 PM TPM-B1.3 tion of Mice Determination of Heavy Metals in Pedersen, C., Ray, F.R., Johnson, Hair of Sanitation Workers Using T.E. the Method of Energy Dispersive X- Colorado State University Ray Fluorescence Khudzari, J.M.D., Ibrahim, N., Wagi- 5:00 PM TPM-A.8 ran, H., Agam, M. Thermoluminescence Response of Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malay- Ge- and Al-doped SiO Optical Fi- 2 sia, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia bres to 7, 10 and 14 MeV Electron 3:00 PM Break in Exhibit Hall Khudzari, J.M.D., Wagiran, H. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malay- 3:30-5:30 PM Ballroom B sia, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia TPM-B2: NESHAPs Radioactive Air Meeting Co-Chairs: Matthew Barnett, Gus Vazquez

31 2:30-5:15 PM Ballroom C 4:50 PM TPM-C.5 Differences between Radiation TPM-C: AAHP Special Session Dose Reconstructions used in Sup- II - Radiation Dose Recon- port of Compensation Program De- struction for Epidemiology cisions and Those of Epidemiologi- Co-Chairs: Richard Vetter, cal Studies Dan Strom Neton, J.W. (Order of presentations changed at NIOSH Session Chair’s request) 5:05 PM Wrap-Up 2:30 PM TPM-C.3 Dan Strom, Marina Degteva Bayesian Methods and Uncertainty for Internal Dose Reconstruction 5:15 PM AAHP Open Meeting Birchall, A., Puncher, M. 2:30-5:30 PM Ballroom D HPA, UK TPM-D: Decommissioning 3:00 PM TPM-C.2 Section Special Session Dose Reconstruction for Co-Chairs: James Berger, David Workers at the Mayak Production Ottley Association 2:30 PM TPM-D.1 Khokhryakov, V.V., Romanov, S.A., Status Report on the Revision to Suslova, K.G., Khokhryakov, V.F., the Surface and Clearance Vvedensky, V.E., Vostrotin, V.V. Standard ANSI/HPS N13 .12 Southern Urals Biophysics Institute Kennedy, Jr., W.E. 3:30 PM Break in Exhibit Hall Dade Moeller & Associates 4:00 PM TPM-C.1 3:00 PM TPM-D.2 Reconstruction of External Radia- Orphan Sources and Radioactively tion Doses for the Mayak PA Work- Contaminated Material in the Metal ers Recycling Industry Scherpelz, R.I. Rowat, J.H., Reber, E.H., Ljubenov, Pacific Northwest National Labora- V. tory IAEA, Vienna 4:20 PM TPM-C.4 3:30 PM Break in Exhibit Hall Dosimetry for the Extended Techa 4:00 PM TPM-D.3 River Cohort States Regulations, Practices and Degteva, M.O. (G. William Morgan Advances in Clearance of Materi- Lecture), Tolstykh, E.I., Vorobiova, als and Equipment from Licensed M.I., Shagina, N.B., Anspaugh, L.R., Sites, TENORM Sites, and Decom- Napier, B.A. missioning Sites Urals Research Center for Radia- Egidi, P., Shearer, D. tion Medicine, Russia, University CDPHE/CRCPD, PADEP/CRCPD of Utah, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

32 4:30 PM TPM-D.4 3:15 PM TPM-E.4 Status of Department of Energy An Alternative Approach to Opera- Management of the Clearance of tional Risk Management for Radia- Materials and Equipment from De- tion Emergencies partment of Energy Sites Daxon, E., Cuellar, J. Wallo III, A., Anderson, A.*, Regnier, Battelle Memorial Institute, Uni- E., Vázquez, G. formed Services University of the Department of Energy Health Sciences 5:00 PM TPM-D.5 3:30 PM Break in Exhibit Hall What is MARSAME and How It Can 4:00 PM TPM-E.5 Improve the Process for Conducting Tissue Characterization Radiological Disposition Surveys of Local Radiation Injury Buchholz, M.A., Moroney, W.R.* Goans, R., Sugarman, S., Chris- ORAU tensen, D. 2:30-5:15 PM 150 ABC REAC/TS, MJW Corporation 4:15 PM TPM-E.6 TPM-E: Homeland Security IP Radiation Security: Networking Co-Chairs: Armin Ansari, Ronald Technologies Enabling Better Re- Goans sponse 2:30 PM TPM-E.1 Reynolds, K. Global Nuclear Detection Architec- IP Radiation Security Associates ture (GNDA) Passow, R.P., Albert, T., Zabko, J., 4:30 PM TPM-E.7 Wittrock, M. An Approved, Affordable, Appropri- Department of Homeland Security/ ate Action to Alleviate Anxiety DNDO Brodsky, A., Crowe, F., Stangler, M.J. 2:45 PM TPM-E.2 Georgetown University, Crowe and Deconstruction of Drums Containing Co, LLC, Consultant, Vienna, VA IAEA Conditioned Sealed Sources Tompkins, J.A. 4:45 PM TPM-E.8 Los Alamos National Laboratory- Promoting the Use of Volunteer Ra- OSR Project diation Professionals in Local and State Emergency Response Plan- 3:00 PM TPM-E.3 ning Use of Swipe Samples in Response Ansari, A., McBurney, R. to a Radiological or Nuclear Incident Centers for Disease Control and of National Significance Prevention, Conference of Radiation Griggs, J., Bassin, N.J., Berne, A., Control Program Directors , D., Gogolak, C.V.*, Litman, R., McCurdy, D.E., Shannon, R. US Environmental Protection Agen- cy, NAREL, Environmental Manage- ment Support,

33 5:00 PM TPM-E.9 3:15 PM TPM-F.4 Golden Guardian 2010: Multi-Agen- Dose Calculations using EGS4 for cy Full Scale Exercise Involving the Canted Undulator, 12-ID Beam- RDDs line at the Papin, P., Welty, B., Spero, K., Nel- Dooling, J.C., Emery, L. son, R. Argonne National Laboratory San Diego State University 3:30 PM Break in Exhibit Hall 2:30-5:00 PM 150 G 4:00 PM TPM-F.5 LANL As-73/74 Extremity Exposure TPM-F: Accelerator Section Events Special Session II - Light Walker, L.S., Duran, M., Martinez, Sources and FELs M.L., Salazar, J., Ortega, P. Co-Chairs: Mike Grissom, Henry Los Alamos National Laboratory Kahnhauser 4:15 PM TPM-F.6 2:30 PM TPM-F.1 Public Air Dose Estimate Compari- Experiences at SSRL from Commis- son between National Council on sioning and Operation under Top- Radiation Protection and Monte Off Injection and with Higher Stored Carlo N-Particle Extended Methods Currents for an Open Installation Linear Ac- Bauer, J.M., Liu, J.C., Prinz, A.A., celerator up to 60 MeV Rokni, S.H. Sandvig, M., Sterbentz, J. SLAC National Accelerator Labora- Idaho National Laboratory tory 4:30 PM TPM-F.7 2:45 PM TPM-F.2 First Use of the Fission Fragment Upgrade Challenges at a 2nd Gen- eration Light Source Baker, S., Moore, E., Pardo, R., Sa- Marceau-Day, M. vard, G. LSU/CAMD Argonne National Laboratory 3:00 PM TPM-F.3 4:45 PM TPM-F.8 The Review and Approval Process Protocols for the Unrestricted Re- of Radioactive Material Experi- lease of Metals at SLAC ments at Stanford Synchrotron Ra- Sabourov, A., Allan, J., Fasso, A., diation Lightsource (SSRL) at SLAC Liu, J., Ligeti, O., Rokni, S., Vollaire, National Accelerator J., Yamanishi, H. Campos Torres, M.M., Allan, J., Mor- SLAC National Accelerator Labora- ris, C.A., Padilla, M.T., Rokni, S.H. tory, National Institute for Fusion Sci- SLAC National Accelerator Labora- ence tory

Don’t forget the Awards Banquet 7:00-9:00 pm, Hilton Grand Ballroom

34 WEDNESDAY 10:00 AM WAM-A.5 Large Variation in Organ Dose over 7:00-8:00 AM 251D Manufacturer and Model of CT CEL5 Radiological Releases and Scanners at Com- Dauer, L., Prins, R., St.Germain, J., mercial Nuclear Power Reactors Thornton, R. Jason Harris Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Idaho State University Center - , Memorial 7:00-8:00 AM 251E Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center - Ra- CEL6 Dose Reconstruction for Ra- diology diation Epidemiology 10:15 AM WAM-A.6 Daniel J. Strom CT X-ray Spectrum Analyzer Pacific Northwest National Labora- Marsh, D., Haskins, V., Baeslack, J., tory Lundberg, E., Caracappa, P. 8:45-11:00 AM Ballroom A Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute WAM-A: Medical Health 10:30 AM WAM-A.7 Physics I A Combined Internal and External Co-Chairs: Larry Dauer, Dose Calculation Method for PET/ Mike Stabin CT 8:45 AM WAM-A.1 Mille, M., Gu, J., Ding, A., Caracap- Medical Physics - Safety in the pa, P., Xu, X., Stabin, M., Liu, B. Crosshairs Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Moeller, M., Austin, K., Austin, S. Vanderbilt University, Massachu- Dade Moeller & Associates setts General Hospital 9:00 AM WAM-A.2 10:45 AM WAM-A.8 Federal Radiation Protection Guid- Current Generation Realistic Do- ance for Diagnostic and Interven- simetry Models tional X-Ray Procedures Stabin, M., Fernald, M., Keenan, M., Keith, L., Sears, S., Boyd, M. Clark, L., Marine, P., Segars, W. Agency for Toxic Substances and Vanderbilt University, University of Disease Registry (ATSDR), US Idaho, Mid South Radiation Physics, Navy, National Naval Medical Cen- Aberdeen Proving Grounds, Duke ter, Environmental Protection Agen- University Medical Center cy (EPA) 11:00 AM Medical Section 9:15 AM WAM-A.4 Business Meeting Evaluation of Vendor Provided CT- DIvol Johnson, P.G., Dong, F., Davros, W. Cleveland Clinic 9:30 AM Break in Exhibit Hall

35 8:30-11:45 AM Ballroom B 10:45 AM WAM-B.5 Determining an Appropriate Dose- WAM-B: Environmental/Radon Modifying Factor for Biota Section Special Session Chambers, D., Higley, K., Kocher, Radioecology D., Real, A. Co-Chairs: Craig Little, Jan John- SENES Consultants Limited, Or- son egon State University, SENES Oak 8:30 AM WAM-B.1 Ridge, Inc., CIEMAT Radioecology: Pressing Forward 11:15 AM WAM-B.6 Whicker, J., Whicker, F.W., Bres- Regulatory Challenges for Radia- hears, D. tion Protection of the Environment Los Alamos National Laboratory, Graham, R., Boyd, M. Colorado State University, University US Environmental Protection Agen- of Arizona cy 8:45 AM WAM-B.2 11:30 AM WAM-B.7 Recent Advances in Radioecology Foliar Interception, Retention, and Garnier-Laplace, J., Gilbin, R.*, Translocation of 36Cl Alonzo, F., Hinton, T. Bytwerk, D., Higley, K. IRSN Oregon State University 9:15 AM WAM-B.3 The Need for Transparency in 11:45 AM Environmental/Radon Choosing Transfer Factors for Ra- Section Business Meeting dioecological and Radiological As- 8:15-11:15 AM Ballroom C sessments Higley, K. WAM-C: Internal Dosimetry Oregon State University and Bioassay Co-Chairs: Elizabeth Brackett, 9:45 AM Break in Exhibit Hall Gene Carbaugh 10:15 AM WAM-B.4 8:15 AM WAM-C.1 Development and Application of Phantom Male Series E: 1995 - Radiological Assessment Models 2009 for Release of Long-lived Radionu- Kramer, G., Hauck, B. clides to the Environment: Valida- Health Canada tion and Interpretation of Results 8:30 AM WAM-C.2 Smith, G. Determining Canine Organ Ra- GMS Abingdon Ltd diation Doses from PET-CT Proce- dures Martinez, N., Johnson, T., Kraft, S., Harmon, J., Gibbons, D. Colorado State University

36 8:45 AM WAM-C.3 10:00 AM Break in Exhibit Hall Measurement of in Hu- 10:30 AM WAM-C.8 man Tissue and Bioassay Samples Metabolism of 210Po and 131I in Rats: by Spectrometry Techniques Excretion of Volatile Species Li, C., Benkhedda, K., Kramer, G. Li, C., Sadi, B., Wyatt, H., Kramer, G. Health Canada Health Canada, Atomic Energy of 9:00 AM WAM-C.4 Canada Limited A Software Solution to Bioassay De- 10:45 AM WAM-C.9 tector Calibration using a Library of A Re-evaluation of 241Am in Growth Virtual Phantoms from 241Pu Intake with the Effect of Liu, T., Mille, M., Caracappa, P., Xu, Progeny Intake X., Nour, S., Inn, K. Bertelli, L., Waters, T., Miller, G., Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Hoffman, J.M., Gadd, M., Costigan, National Institute of Standards and S. Technology Los Alamos National Laboratory, 9:15 AM WAM-C.5 Los Alamos Assessing Internal Contamination 11:00 AM WAM-C.10 with a Portal Comparing an Ingestion Model with Monitor Data: ICRP 69 Uranium vs . New Palmer, R., Burgett, E.A., Hertel, York City Tissue Data N.E., Ansari, A. Harley, N., Fisenne, I., Robbins, E. Georgia Institute of Technology, New York University School of Medi- Centers for Disease Control and cine Prevention 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom D 9:30 AM WAM-C.6 Application of the Norman Voxel- WAM-D: Special Session: ized Computational Phantom for In Radiological Vivo Bioassay Simulations Incident Consequence Olsher, R., Ennis, M.*, Justus, A., Management I Bertelli, L., Waters, T. Co-Chairs: William Rhodes, Daniel Los Alamos National Laboratory Blumenthal 9:45 AM WAM-C.7 8:30 AM WAM-D.1 Disaggregating Variance Due to Field Test of Thermo Mobile De- Measurement Error from Variance tection System (MDS) via Vehicle, Due to Population Variability to Pro- Boat, and Helicopter duce a Distribution of Possibly True Baldini, E. Results Philadelphia Police Department Strom, D., MacLellan, J., Birchall, 9:00 AM WAM-D.2 A.*, Zharov, P., Lynch, T., Antonio, C. The Empire 09 Full-Scale Exercise Pacific Northwest National Labora- Blumenthal, D.J. tory, UK Health Protection Agency, US Department of Energy Mayak Production Association

37 9:30 AM Break in Exhibit Hall 8:30 AM-Noon 150 ABC 10:00 AM WAM-D.3 WAM-E: NCRP Special An Overview of the Federal Radio- logical Monitoring and Assessment Session - Overview of Current Center Report and Conference Laiche, T. Activities of the National Sandia National Laboratories Council on Radiation 10:30 AM WAM-D.4 Protection and Measurements Consequence Management Home Co-Chairs: Thomas Tenforde, Rich- Team - Expanding Beyond the FR- ard Toohey MAC 8:30 AM WAM-E.1 Mena, R. Overview of Current Report and Remote Sensing Laboratory-Nellis Conference Activities of National Council on Radiation Protection and 11:00 AM WAM-D.5 Measurements (NCRP) A State Perspective on Nuclear Det- Tenforde, T.S. onation Preparedness and Conse- National Council on Radiation Pro- quence Management tection and Measurements Lanza, J. Florida Department of Health Reports of Program Area Com- mittee 1 on Basic Criteria, Epide- 11:30 AM WAM-D.6 miology, and Risk Have I Been Nuked? A New System for Individual Retrospective Dosim- 9:00 AM WAM-E.2 etry to Aid in the Response to a Ra- Scientific Committee 1-16 Report diological Accident or Attack on “Uncertainties in the Estimation Larsson, C. L., Inrig, E. L., Andrews, of Radiation Risks and Probability of H.R., Voevodskiy, A., Robins, M., Disease Causation” Bray, N., Zhuo, H., Ing, H., Erhardt, Hoffman, F.O. L.S.* SENES Oak Ridge, Inc. Defence Research and Develop- 9:15 AM WAM-E.3 ment Canada - Ottawa, Bubble Scientific Committee 1-17 Report on Technology Industries, Inc. “Second and Cardiopulmo- nary Effects after Radiotherapy” Gilbert, E.S., Travis, L.B. National Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center Reports of Program Area Com- mittee 2 on Operational Radiation Safety 9:30 AM WAM-E.4 Scientific Committee 2-3 Report on “Fluoroscopically Guided Interven- tional Procedures” Balter, S. 38Columbia University 9:45 AM WAM-E.5 11:15 AM WAM-E.9 Report No . 162 on “Self Assess- Scientific Committee 64-22 Report ment of Radiation Safety Programs” on “NCRP Scientific Committee 64- Myers, D.S. 22: Design of Effective Radiological Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Effluent Monitoring and Environ- Livermore mental Surveillance Programs” Reports of Program Area Com- Kahn, B. mittee 4 (PAC 4) on Radiation Georgia Institute of Technology Protection in Medicine Reports of Program Area Com- 10:00 AM Break in Exhibit Hall mittee 6 on Radiation Measure- ments and Dosimetry 10:30 AM WAM-E.6 Overview of Current NCRP Activi- 11:30 AM WAM-E.10 ties in Radiation Protection in Medi- Summary of NCRP Report No . 158: cine “Uncertainties in the Measurement Bushberg, J.T. and Dosimetry of External Radia- University of California, Davis Health tion” System Simon, S.L., Beck, H.L. National Cancer Institute 10:45 AM WAM-E.7 Scientific Committee 4-2 Report on 11:45 AM WAM-E.11 “Population Monitoring and Radio- Scientific Committee 6-3 Report on nuclide Decorporation Following a “Uncertainties in Internal Radiation Radiological or Nuclear Incident” Dose Assessment” Vetter, R. Bouville, A., Bell III, R. Mayo Clinic National Cancer Institute Reports of Program Area Com- 8:30-11:30 AM 150 G mittee 5 on Environmental Ra- WAM-F: Operational Health diation and Radioactive Waste Issues Physics 11:00 AM WAM-E.8 Co-Chairs: Kevin Nelson, John Scientific Committee 5-1 Report on Hageman “Approach to Optimizing Decision 8:30 AM WAM-F.1 Making for Late-Phase Recovery Determining the Activity in a Ship- from Nuclear or Radiological Terror- ping Container Using a High Purity ism Incidents” Germanium Detector Chen, S. Gillenwalters, E.D., Debey, T.M., Argonne National Laboratory Johnson, T.E. Colorado State University, US Geo- logical Survey

39 8:45 AM WAM-F.2 10:30 AM WAM-F.7 Development of New American Na- Insights in Worker Counseling for tional Standards Institute Standard Health Physicists (N14 36),. Measurement of Package Johnson, R.H. and Coveyance Radiation Levels Dade Moeller Radiation Safety and Surface Contamination Academy Kapoor, A., Williams, J.*, Chen, S., 10:45 AM WAM-F.8 Kamboj, S. Neutron Calibration Sources Re- US Department of Energy, US De- placement Strategy at Lawrence partment of Transportation, Argonne Livermore National Laboratory National Laboratory Radev, R. 9:00 AM WAM-F.3 Lawrence Livermore National Labo- HPS Toolbox ratory Nelson, K. 11:00 AM WAM-F.9 Mayo Clinic Florida Validation of a Radon Stripping Al- 9:15 AM WAM-F.4 gorithm and Decay Curve Fitting for ALARA at a Byproduct Material Dis- Transuranic Assay of Operational posal Facility Air Filters Kraus, J., Kirkham, T., Kirk, J.S., Hayes, R., Pena, A. Britten, J., Klotz, K. WIPP Waste Control Specialists LLC, 11:15 AM WAM-F.10 TIDEWATER-Chesnuc Comparison of Methods Utilized for 9:30 AM WAM-F.5 the Decontamination of Irradiated Effect of Anatomical Modeling on Topaz Space Radiation Dose Estimates: A Sullivan, M., Miller, J., Harris, J., Comparison of Doses for NASA Do- Brey, R. simetry Phantoms and University of Idaho State University, International Florida Hybrid Phantoms Isotopes Incorporated Bahadori, A.A., Van Baalen, M., 2:30-5:00 PM Ballroom A Shavers, M.R., Semones, E.J., Dodge, C., Bolch, W.E. WPM-A: Medical Health University of Florida, NASA Johnson Physics II Space Center, Wyle Integrated Sci- Co-Chairs: John Kwofie, Chris ence and Engineering Martel 9:45 AM WAM-F.6 2:30 PM WPM-A.1 The Safe Packaging for Transpor- Characterizing Canine Organ Ra- tation of a 42 .8 GBq Radium Beryl- diation Doses from CT Procedures lium Source Hall, C., Harmon, J., Randall, E., Zarling, J., Stewart, W.* Johnson, T. GTRI/NNSA Los Alamos National Colorado State University Laboratory, Los Alamos National Lab 10:00 AM Break in Exhibit Hall 40 2:45 PM WPM-A.2 4:30 PM WPM-A.7 Occupational Dose Assessment Therapeutic Iodine-131 Administra- During Computed Tomography tion in Patients Unable to Swallow: Contrast Injections A Novel Technique Tannahill, G., Sturchio, G., Kofler, J., Johnson, J.E., Shields, A.T. Bruesewitz, M., Vrieze, T. University of Washington Mayo Clinic 4:45 PM WPM-A.8 3:00 PM WPM-A.3 Practical Experiences during Re- Dose Unawareness Causes Skin moval and Transfer of Medical LIN- Injury - A Review ACs Lanka, V. Williamson, M., Dauer, L., Quinn, B., VA New Jersey Health Care System, Soukphouangkham, P. East Orange, NJ Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer 3:15 PM WPM-A.4 Center Cost Benefit Analysis of Single Use 2:30-3:45 PM Ballroom B Patient Shields in Jackson, A. WPM-B: Accelerator Henry Ford Hospital Co-Chairs: Gary Zeman, Henry Kahnhauser 3:30 PM Break outside Meeting 2:30 PM WPM-B.1 Rooms Proposed Derived Air Concentra- 4:00 PM WPM-A.5 tion (DAC) Values for Radionuclides Radioembolization and Radiation Not Listed in 10 CFR 835 Appendix Safety A in Support of Neutron Kwofie, J., , L., Banghart, D., Source Operations at the Oak Ridge Amoroso, L. National Laboratory Stanford University McLaughlin, D., Schwahn, S., Greg- 4:15 PM WPM-A.6 ory, D., Rao, G., Gillespie, T. Use of a Patient Survey to Evaluate Oak Ridge National Laboratory Compliance with and Quality of In- 2:45 PM WPM-B.2 structions Given to Patients Treated Radiation Dosimetry for 10 MeV with Radioiodine Neutrons Using XRQA Radiochro- Vetter, R., Van Nostrand, D., Khor- mic Film jekar, G., Ringel, M., Carter, E., Brady, S., Gunasingha, R., Yoshizu- Bloom, G. mi, T., Howel, C., Crowell, A., Fallin, Mayo Clinic, Washington Hospital B., Tonchev, A., Dewhirst, M. Center, , Med- Duke University Star Research Institute, ThyCa: Thy- roid Cancer Survivors’ Association 3:00 PM WPM-B.3 Gamma Real-Time Dosimetry for Radiobiology Experiments Mestari, A.M., Wells, P.D., DeVeaux, C.L., Ankrah, M. Idaho Accelerator Center

41 3:15 PM WPM-B.4 2:30-5:00 PM Ballroom D Evaluation of Open Waveguide RF Hazard WPM-D: Special Session: May, R. Radiological Jefferson Lab Incident Consequence 3:30 PM WPM-B.5 Management II Shielding Evaluations for a Food Ir- Co-Chairs: William Rhodes, Daniel radiation Facility Blumenthal Napolitano, D., Hertel, N. E. 2:30 PM WPM-D.1 NYSIS, A Division of Enercon Ser- Recent Research to Improve Re- vices, Inc., Consultant to ScanTech sponse Planning for the Aftermath Sciences of a Nuclear Detonation Buddemeier, B. 3:45 PM Break outside Meeting LLNL Rooms 3:00 PM WPM-D.2 2:30-5:15 PM Ballroom C Assessment of External Dose from WPM-C: CRSO Session DOT Train-the-Trainer Hunt, B., Kraus, T. Chair: Marcum Martz Sandia National Laboratories 3:30 PM Break outside Meeting 2:30 PM WPM-C.1 Rooms DOT training is required every three years for all staff who ship radioac- 4:00 PM WPM-D.3 tive materials or prepare packages 10 Point Monitoring Strategy for shipment . This is a 90 minute Stump, R. presentation designed to acquaint Sandia National Laboratories the medical/academic RSO with all 4:30 PM WPM-D.4 the regulatory requirements to en- FRMAC Laboratory Analysis Opera- able the RSO to conduct complete tions and Capability Review training in-house . Shanks, A. Austin, S. Sandia National Labs Dade Moeller & Associates 4:00 PM Break outside Meeting Rooms 4:15 PM WPM-C.2 Low-Level Radioactive Waste at Universities Zittle, M. Oregon State University

42 2:30-5:00 PM 150 ABC 4:00 PM WPM-E.7 Radiation Safety Officer Safety Cul- WPM-E: NRC Special Session ture in my Work on Safety Culture Nelson, K. Chair: Richard Toohey RSO at Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville 2:30 PM WPM-E.1 4:10 PM WPM-E.8 Opening Remarks/Welcome What Safety Culture Means in my Toohey, R., Rakovan, L. Arena Health Physics Society, US Nuclear Kirk, S. Regulatory Commission Material Licensee at Waste Control 2:35 PM WPM-E.2 Specialists What is the Safety Culture from a 4:20 PM WPM-E.9 Theory Point of View International Radiation Protection Thompson, C. Association (IRPA) Work US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Toohey, R. 2:50 PM WPM-E.3 Health Physics Society NRC’s Safety Culture Initiative 4:30 PM WPM-E.10 Ibarra, J. Q&As - Facilitated Discussion US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rakovan, L. 3:05 PM WPM-E.4 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Activities and Reactions Leading up 2:30-4:45 PM 150 G to the Workshop, at the Workshop, and Reaction to the Workshop Defi- WPM-F: Military Section nition/Traits Special Session Toohey, R. Co-Chairs: Rick Rasmussen, Wil- Health Physics Society liam Hoak 3:20 PM WPM-E.5 2:30 PM WPM-F.1 Process in Arriving at Workshop Operation Iraqi Freedom/United Definition/Traits and Comparison to States -Iraq: Radiation Safe- NRC Definition/Traits ty Program Overview Solorio, D. Stewart, H. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Eisenhower Army Medical Center, 3:30 PM WPM-E.6 Department of Army Q&As - Facilitated Discussion 2:45 PM WPM-F.2 Rakovan, L. The Atomic Bomb Accident at Mars US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Bluff: New Experiences in Com- 3:50 PM Break outside Meeting municating Nuclear Science to the Rooms Public and the Media Jokisch, D. Francis Marion University

43 3:00 PM WPM-F.3 5:15 PM Ballroom B Intentional Poisonings with Radio- active Materials HPS Business Meeting Sorcic, J., Johnson, T. 6:00-8:00 PM Canyon A (Hilton) Colorado State University WPM-G: Aerosol 3:15 PM WPM-F.4 Measurements Medical Implications of Enhanced Chair: Morgan Cox Radiation Weapons Reeves, G. WPM-G.1 WIPP Air Monitor- TASC ing Measurements with the iSolo, Bladewerx ASC and the Alpha-7 3:30 PM Break outside Meeting CAMs Rooms Hayes, R., Pena, A. 4:00 PM WPM-F.5 Washington TRU Solutions, LLC Radiation Safety in the U .S . Army WPM-G.2 Modeling Radioac- Installation Management Command tive Aerosol Transport by Wind Ero- Cherry, R. sion through Vegetation Succession US Army Installation Management Whicker, J., Kirchner, T., Breshears, Command D. 4:15 PM WPM-F.7 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Review and Analysis of Army Radia- New Mexico State University/Carls- tion Exposures bad Environmental Monitoring and Bosley, W.S., Melanson, M., Harris, Research Center, University of Ari- W. zona Office of the Army Surgeon General, WPM-G.3 IEC Technical Com- US Army Dosimetry Center mittee 45 and ANSI N42 Nuclear 4:30 PM WPM-F.8 Instrument Standards- US Contribu- The Current State of the Depart- tors and Contributions ment of Defense’s Non-ionizing Cox, M. Bioeffects Research Efforts SEC Nichelson, S., Constable, R., Ziriax, WPM-G.4 WIPP Solutions for J., Stuck, B. Radon Progeny Mitigation in Opera- US Air Force, US Navy, US Army tions 2:30-5:00 PM 251 D Hayes, R., Pena, A. Washington TRU Solutions, LLC Movies WPM-G.5 The LANL Radiation Protection Group Wind Tunnel: A Facility Adapted to Three Standards and Applications Moore, M., Fuehne, D., Schafer, D. Los Alamos National Laboratory, University of New Mexico

44 WPM-G.6 Status of Two ANSI N42 Standards for Air Monitoring: ANSI N42 Radon Progeny Monitor- ing Instruments and the New Com- prehensive Air Monitoring Standard for all Radionuclides at all Locations Discussion moderator: Robert Hayes Discussion Challenges and Opportunities for the AMUG Co-moderated by Mark Hoover and Morgan Cox NIOSH, SEC

45 THURSDAY 8:30-10:30 AM Ballroom B 8:15-10:45 AM Ballroom A THAM-B: NCI Special Session THAM-A: Medical Health NCI Dosimetry Studies Physics Section Co-Chairs: Steve Simon, Andre Special Session Bouville Co-Chairs: Mahadevappa Mahesh, 8:30 AM THAM-B.1 Alan Jackson Overview of Fallout Dosimetry 8:15 AM THAM-A.1 Methods and History of Studies Patient/Public Dose Reduction Ef- Bouville, A., Simon, S.L., Drozdo- forts in an Academic Medical Center vitch, V., Luckyanov, N., Moroz, B., Jacob, N. Beck, H.L. Rhode Island Hospital/Warren Alpert National Cancer Institute, National Medical School of Brown University Institutes of Health, Bethesda, New 8:45 AM THAM-A.2 York City Fluoroscopic Patient Dose Track- 8:45 AM THAM-B.2 ing and Follow Up at a Large Urban Radiation Doses to Marshallese As- Hospital sociated with Exposure to Local and Martel, C., Weber, P., John, R., Regional Radioactive Fallout from O’Horo, S. Bikini and Enewetak Nuclear Weap- Brigham & Women’s Hospital ons Tests 9:15 AM THAM-A.3 Simon, S.L., Bouville, A., Melo, D., Quality Re- Beck, H.L., Moroz, B., Weinstock, lated Events: A R.M. Perspective National Cancer Institute, National Nelson, B. Institutes of Health, RTI, Inc. Triad Isotopes, Inc. 9:00 AM THAM-B.3 9:45 AM THAM-A.4 Reconstruction of Exposures from Beyond -99: Update Nuclear Tests in Kazakhstan on Radioisotope Production in the Drozdovitch, V., Beck, H.L., Bouville, U .S . A., Land, C.E., Luckyanov, N., Wein- Fisher, D. stock, R.M., Simon, S.L. Pacific Northwest National Labora- National Cancer Institute, National tory Institutes of Health, RTI, Inc. 10:15 AM THAM-A.5 9:15 AM THAM-B.4 Radiological Protection in Medicine Predictions of Dispersion and Depo- - Summary of Recent ICRP Advice sition of Fallout from Nuclear Test- Dauer, L. ing Using a Meteorological Com- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer puter Model Center Moroz, B.E., Beck, H.L., Bouville, A., Simon, S.L. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health

46 9:30 AM THAM-B.5 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom C Overview of Reconstructing Past Medical Exposures in Support of THAM-C: CRSO Session Epidemiologic and Health Risk Regulatory Trends Studies at the National Cancer In- Chair: Marcum Martz stitute l Simon, S.L., Thierry-Chef, I., Melo, Security (Part 37) D., Lee, C., Kim, K.P., Miller, D.L. l NARM Update National Cancer Institute, National l Medical Event Update Institutes of Health, International l ACMUI Agency for Research on Cancer, l NRC Speaker (TBD) France, Kyung-Hee University, Ko- rea, National Naval Medical Center 10:30 AM CRSO Business Meeting 9:45 AM THAM-B.6 Radiation Doses to the Female 8:15-10:00 AM Ballroom D Breast from from THAM-D: Emergency Planning 1960 to the Present Co-Chairs: John Lanza, Craig Thierry-Chef, I., Simon, S.L., Wein- Marianno stock, R.M., Linet, M.S. 8:15 AM THAM-D.1 International Agency for Research Radionuclide Resuspension Con- on Cancer, France, National Can- siderations for RDD Fallout cer Institute, National Institutes of Waller, E., Perera, S. Health, RTI International University of Ontario Institute of 10:00 AM THAM-B.7 Technology Organ Dose Reconstruction for Hy- 8:30 AM THAM-D.2 perthyroid Patients Treated with 131I Software for First Responders Al- Melo, D.R., Zanzonico, P., Brill, A., lowing for Interpretation of Portable Stabin, M., Vicini, P., Kwon, D., Mo- Responses in Radio- roz, B., Bouville, A., Simon, S.L. logical Triage Decisions National Cancer Institute, National Juneja, B., Bolch, W., Lee, C. Institutes of Health, Memorial Sloan- University of Florida, National Insti- Kettering Cancer Center, Vanderbilt tutes of Health University, University of Washington 8:45 AM THAM-D.3 10:15 AM THAM-B.8 Using Radioactive People Occupational Doses from Cardiac Kramer, G., Hauck, B. Catheterization Procedures Health Canada Kim, K.P., Simon, S.L. Kyung Hee University, Korea, Na- 9:00 AM THAM-D.4 tional Cancer Institute, National In- Exercise - Lessons Learned stitutes of Health Kramer, G. Health Canada

47 9:15 AM THAM-D.5 9:00 AM THAM-E.4 Is It an ‘Incident’ or an ‘Event’? Balance of Dose Limits Lanza, J. Waller, E. Florida Department of Health University of Ontario Institute of 9:30 AM THAM-D.6 Technology Response to Radiological and Nu- 9:15 AM THAM-E.6 clear Terrorism: A Guide for Decision Regulatory Challenges of Introduc- Makers (NCRP REPORT No .165) ing a Handheld Dental Intraoral X- Groves, K.L., Poston, Sr., J.W. Ray Device S2-Sevorg Services, LLC, Texas Harding, D.C., Turner, D.C., Bailey, A&M University E.D. 9:45 AM THAM-D.7 Aribex, Inc., Consultant, CHP A Stamp Sized Instant Casualty Do- 9:30 AM THAM-E.7 simeter Radiation Safety During the Reme- Patel, G.N., Watanabe, Y. diation of Legacy Sites Including JP Laboratories, Inc, Masonic Can- Spent Fuel Management . Regula- cer Center tory Challenges in Assessment and Supervision 8:15-9:45 AM 150 ABC Sneve, M.K., Shandala, N.K., THAM-E: Regulatory/Legal Kiselev, M. F. Co-Chairs: Kathryn Brock, Stanley Norwegian Radiation Protection Au- Hampton thority, Norway, Federal Medical Bio- 8:15 AM THAM-E.1 logical Center, Russian Federation Tritium Exit Sign Use 8:30-10:00 AM 150 G Hampton, S.D., Kay, S.E., Mays, T.L., Baker, J.P. THAM-F: Eli Lilly Special Session 8:30 AM THAM-E.2 Co-Chairs: Scott Walker, Overview of NRC Part 50 and Ap- Lorraine Marceau-Day pendix I Regulations Update 8:30 AM THAM-F.1 Dehmel, J., Roach, E. Potential Biological Effects of US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nanoparticles 8:45 AM THAM-E.3 Marceau-Day, M.L. National Priorities List Site Bound- LSU-CAMD ary Definition at the Oak Ridge Res- 9:00 AM THAM-F.2 ervation Nanotechnology Metrology and King, D.A. Risk Assessment Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Marceau-Day, M.L. Education LSU-CAMD 9:30 AM Discussion Nano-Particle Health Physics Panel Discussion

48 AAHP Courses Saturday 26 June 2010 - 8 AM-5 PM AAHP 1 Training Emergency coursework has been compressed Responders; Materials, Tools, and into this class designed for the ra- Methods for Health Physicists diation safety professional . The re- Brooke Buddemeier, Tom Claw- cently updated Modular Emergency son Response Radiological Transporta- Lawrence Livermore National tion Training (MERRTT) offers over Laboratory, Technical Resources 16 modules of multimedia rich train- Group, Inc. ing material including presentations, Research and development for student & instructor guides, tests, response to the aftermath of radio- practical exercises, and regionally logical or nuclear terrorism is cur- available training aids . rently being funded by the Depart- Morning Session ment of Homeland Security (DHS) . Modular Emergency Response DHS, the Health Physics Society, Radiological Transportation Train- and The National Council on Radia- ing Program (MERRTT), Train the tion Protection and Measurement Trainer session #1 and trainer cer- (NCRP) have been developing up- tification test dated guidance, some of which can Afternoon Session be found on the Homeland Security • Recent analysis on the effects Committee section of the HPS web- of a low yield nuclear detonation on site (www hps. org/hsc). . The course a modern US city and response rec- will discuss a summary of some of ommendations . the discoveries being made and • Additional modules on ra- how they impact the needs of the diological and nuclear terrorism re- response community . In addition sponse from Homeland Defense to certifications in the training pro- Equipment Reuse (HDER) grams below (3 CDs full movies and • Current guides, recommenda- training materials), information will tions, and standards for radiological be provided on the how to interface emergency response with emergency responders and na- • Engaging and interfacing with tional programs that are available to the responder community fund and equip local responders . AAHP2 8-hour HAZWOPER Re- Excellent training materials ex- fresher Course ist for training first responders (fire- Wayne Gaul fighters, law enforcements, EMT), Chesapeake Nuclear Services, but you can’t just download all them Inc. off the internet . Students who suc- The 8 hour HAZWOPER course cessfully complete this class will will be designed to refresh the stu- become certified trainers in at least dent in topics relevant to hazardous 2 responder training programs . waste operations in accordance with Over 20 hours of “Train the Trainer”

49 29 CFR 1910 120(e)(8). . The course is designed to fulfill the annual 8 hour training requirements and will include a short exam and the stu- dent will receive a Course Certificate upon successful completion of the course . Items covered will include, but not be limited to, review of appli- cable regulations, health and safety plans, job safety analysis, emergen- cy response, personnel protective equipment, hazard communication, TLV-PEL updates, confined space, fundamentals of chemical hazards, air sampling for chemicals, spill con- trol, engineering controls and decon- tamination techniques . Additional topics may be covered to update the student on new or upcoming regula- tory changes .

50 Professional Enrichment Program (PEP) Sunday 27 June through Thursday 1 July The Professional Enrichment sions which still have space available Program (PEP) provides a continuing after the waiting list has been admitted . education opportunity for those attend- Student admission will be on a first- ing the Health Physics Society Annual come, first-served basis and will only Meeting . The two hours allotted each begin 15 minutes after the start of the course ensure that the subjects can be session to allow for completion of ticket discussed in greater depth than is pos- processing . sible in the shorter programs offered Please Note!! elsewhere in the meeting . Please be on time for your ses- On Sunday 27 June, a series of 16 sions . The lecturer will begin promptly courses will be offered between 10:30 at the scheduled time . Please allow am - 4:00 pm . time for check-in . The HPS reserves the In addition to the above-mentioned right to schedule a substitute speaker or sessions for Sunday, six PEP lectures cancel a session in case the scheduled are scheduled on Monday, and five on speaker is unavailable . Tuesday and Wednesday afternoons Attendees not present at the start- from 12:15 - 2:15 pm, and five on Thurs- ing time of the session cannot be guar- day from 10:45 am - 12:45 pm . Registra- anteed a space, as empty spaces will tion for each two-hour course is $90 and be filled from the wait list at that time . is limited to 60 attendees on a first-come, Spaces left after the wait list has been first-served basis . Those whose registra- admitted may be filled with students . If tions are received before the preregistra- your duties at the meeting cause you to tion deadline will be sent confirmation of be late for your lecture (e g. ,. chairing a their PEP course registration . session), contact the PEP registration Students with a current ID card will desk so that your name can be placed be admitted free of charge to any ses- on the waiver list and your space held .

Sunday - 10:30 am-12:30 pm volved . The calculation of irradiance, radiant exposure, maximum permis- PEP 1-A Conducting ANSI Z136- sible exposure values, optical density, Based Laser Hazard Calculations and nominal ocular hazard distance Ben Edwards will also be covered for both continu- Duke University Medical Center ous wave and repetitively pulsed la- This course provides a step by sers . While some knowledge of laser step approach to performing the laser hazards will be helpful, both experi- hazard calculations specified in the enced and novice health physicists ANSI Z136 1-2007. Standard for the with laser safety responsibilities will Safe Use of Lasers . This session will benefit from this course . Students include a review of relevant radiomet- should bring a scientific calculator, ric terminology and the correspond- and will also find bringing their own ing Z136 nomenclature, as well as a copy of the ANSI Z136 1-2007. Stan- practical explanation of the physical dard a helpful reference . quantities and physics concepts in-

51 PEP 1-B Operational Accelera- environmental conditions, alarm- tor Health Physics Part I ing electronic personnel dosimeters, L. Scott Walker, Robert May airborne radioactivity monitors for all Los Alamos National Laboratory, radionuclides, radiation detection in- Thomas Jefferson National Accel- strument communication protocols, erator Facility in-plant plutonium monitoring, reactor The Operational Accelerator emergency monitoring instrumenta- Health Physics I class covers an tion, installed radiation monitors such overview of medium and high energy as area monitoring systems and con- accelerators, electron accelerators tamination monitors, carbon/quartz fi- configuration, electron accelerator ber personnel dosimeters, personnel radiation production, electron accel- radiation warning devices, and radon erator shielding, electron accelerator progeny and radon gas monitoring radioactive material production, and systems . electron accelerator environmental All of these standards are un- impacts . The class then begins to der continuous review using the five focus on proton accelerator configu- year rule wherein standards are reaf- ration, proton accelerator radiation firmed, revised or replaced following production, accelerator produced review . Some of the major contribut- isotopes, accelerator interlock sys- ing experts, past and present, are tems, general health physics prac- recognized for outstanding achieve- tices at accelerators, general accel- ments . erator health physics rules of thumb, Audience participation is re- high energy radiation physics for the quested and is important to the suc- health physicist, and useful referenc- cess of this presentation . es . PEP 1-D Health Physics Consid- PEP 1-C Status of ANSI N42.RPI erations for Production of PET Ra- Standards for Radiation Protec- dionuclides for Radiopharmaceu- tion Instrumentation tical and Research Uses Morgan Cox Roger Moroney CHP Siemens/PETNET This presentation covers sev- The use of Emission enteen (17) American National Stan- Tomography, or PET, has expanded dards Institute (ANSI) standards rapidly in the last few years, and is currently in effect for Radiation Pro- projected to continue to increase tection Instrumentation (RPI) in the in volume each year as physicians United States . These standards and patients become more aware of cover design, construction, perfor- PET’s diagnostic capabilities . All PET mance and performance testing re- radionuclide production starts with quirements, testing and calibration an accelerator . Most of the accelera- requirements for the range of nuclear tors in use for this purpose are small radiation detectors: from portable with maximum proton en- radiation detectors for use under all ergy of less than 20 MeV . These cy-

52 clotrons may be self-shielded or use PEP 1-E EH&S “Boot Camp” for a bunker . The prompt radiation fields Radiation Safety Professionals: A around these cyclotrons include high Unique 3 Part PEP Course Series, energy and neutrons with 2010 (Part 1) the magnitude of the field depending Robert Emery, Janet Gutierrez on the radionuclide being produced, The University of Texas Health the particle type and energy, and the Science Center at Houston, The beam current . Secondary radiation University of Texas School of Pub- fields arise from the desired PET ra- lic Health dionuclide produced as well as from It is currently quite rare for or- activation products . PET radionu- ganizations to maintain stand-alone clides produce two 511 keV photons radiation safety programs . Resource per positron, which requires much constraints and workplace complexi- thicker shielding than for the tradi- ties have served as a catalyst for the tional radionuclides creation of comprehensive environ- during production, research and mental health & safety (EH&S) pro- transport in order to manage person- grams, which include among other nel exposures . Activation products health and safety aspects, radiation present in the target and surrounding safety programs . Unfortunately, many areas create external radiation fields of these consolidations were not ac- during maintenance activities and companied by formal staff training ef- must be managed to keep exposures forts to instill an understanding of the low to personnel maintaining the cy- areas now aligned with the radiation clotron . Production of some radio- safety function . This situation is un- nuclides and fortunate because when armed with to airborne effluents that may a basic understanding of the other require control and/or monitoring to safety programs, the radiation safety demonstrate compliance with regula- staff can provide improved customer tions . Good facility design is critical service and address many simple to ensuring adherence to regulations issues before they become major as well as to improve operational ef- problems . This unique Professional ficiencies that will lead to lower radia- Enrichment Program (PEP) series is tion exposures to staff . The combina- designed to address this shortcoming tion of these items to a dynamic by providing an overview of a number and complex radiological environ- of key aspects of EH&S programs ment that provides a good challenge from the perspective of practicing ra- to today’s Health Physicists . diation safety professionals who now are involved in a broader set of health and safety issues . The PEP series will consist of three 2 hour segments: * Part 1 will address “The Ba- sics of Risk Management & Insur- ance” and “The Basics of Fire & Life Safety ”. The risk management & in- 53 surance portion of the session will program procedures to support these address the issues of retrained risks activities . The presentation will focus (those which are not covered by in- on the interaction between Training, surance) and transferred risks (those ALARA, Occupational and Environ- covered by a financial vehicle), and mental Monitoring Programs . These how these aspects impact EH&S programs are designed to minimize operations . Included in the fire & life dose to the individual worker, to the safety segment will be a discussion public and minimize impact on the on the basic elements of the life safe- environment . The critical aspects of ty code and the fire detection and effective programs are management suppression systems . The require- support, employee training, ALARA ments for means of egress will also committee, laboratory support and be discussed quality assurance . Each PEP segment is designed Key elements so that participants can take any * Training Program: Initial and session individually, although the periodic training of personnel . Top- maximum educational benefit will be ics are Regulations, Hazard and derived from the participation in all Risks, Protective Measures, ALARA three sessions . The particular topics Program, Occupational and Envi- included in the PEP series have been ronmental Monitoring Programs and consistently identified as extraor- Worker habits dinarily useful to participants in the * ALARA Program: ALARA Re- highly successful week-long “Univer- view Committee which consists of sity of Texas EH&S Academy ”. Ample the RSO, Assistant RSO, Safety time will be allotted for questions an- Supervisor, Operational Foreman swers and discussion, and each seg- and workers from operations, main- ment will be supplemented with key tenance and utility . Functions are to reference information . do weekly inspections, monthly and quarterly reviews with management, PEP 1-F Monitoring Strategies establish goals and be advocates in for Uranium Recovery Facilities the workplace . Jim Cain * Occupational Monitoring Pro- Cotter Corporation gram: Airborne particulate monitoring Regulatory guidance for occu- and radon progeny may be done us- pational and environmental monitor- ing fixed sampling locations as well ing programs is primarily provided as breathing zone personnel moni- in Nuclear Regulatory Commission toring . Mixtures of uranium and de- Guides 8 22,. 8 30,. 8 31,. 4 14. and cay products as well as solubility can 4 15. . Practical experience over 30 be quite variable, for instance, ura- years for an operating uranium mill as nium product areas generally have well as supporting remedial programs soluble uranium with minimal decay and dismantling and decommission- products whereas tailings areas may ing activities provides the basis for be dominated by -230 . Bio- providing flexible radiation protection assay for uranium in and chest 54 counting may be used to verify the rial, including nanoparticles and other confinement of particulates . Exter- ultrafine aerosols such as radon de- nal Dosimetry may be measured us- cay products . Given the consider- ing TLDs and supplemented by peri- able current interest in characterizing odic surveys . Contamination control and controlling risks to worker health may be verified by surveys especially from potential exposures to engi- for lunchrooms and/or control rooms . neered nanoparticles, this course will Dose estimation may be done using present fundamentals of inertia (ef- daily tracking of work locations in con- ficient collection for large ) junction with air monitoring data and and diffusion (efficient collection for TLD results . Doses are sometimes very small particles) that affect the modified based on bioassay results . efficiency and most penetrating par- * Environmental Program: Air- ticle size (MPPS) of filters; efficiency borne particulate monitoring (24/7) and MPPS for the various filter types may be done using fixed sampling that can be used for collection of locations including Radon and TLD; nanoparticles; and issues for selec- soil sampling may be done annually tion of filters with appropriate col- as well as vegetation . A 24/7meteo- lection efficiency, MPPS, durability, rological station may be maintained . pressure drop, and surface charac- Groundwater and surface water teristics . A series of practical prob- sampling may be done at selected lems will also be presented on how to locations generally quarterly . Stack avoid common errors in flow calibra- sampling may be done monthly or tion and control when rotameters are quarterly . Radon Flux may be done used to monitor and control the sam- on tailings beaches annually . Dose pling flow rate . Because rotameters compliance may be determined uti- are typically located downstream of lizing the MILDOS computer code a filter or other sampling device, the which uses stack emissions, area internal rotameter pressure is lower source emissions based on soil sam- than the ambient atmosphere from pling and meteorological data . Esti- which the sample is being drawn . mated concentrations from this mod- Depending on the pressure drop con- el may be compared to measured air, ditions (perhaps 1 psi for a filter and soil and vegetation concentrations . perhaps several psi for other sam- pling instruments such as a cascade PEP 1-G Filtration and Flow-Con- impactor) the errors can exceed the trol Fundamentals for Sampling 5% level recommended for making Airborne Nanoparticles and Other a correction . It will be emphasized Ultrafine Aerosols that both the rotameter equation and Mark D. Hoover the ideal gas law must be used to National Institute for Occupational determine the actual flow rate asso- Safety and Health ciated with a given scale reading in Sampling by filtration is an im- relation to the calibrated flow rate for portant method for collecting and that scale reading . Course problems evaluating any type of airborne mate- will demonstrate how confusion can 55 be eliminated by defining and using a With the current global warming multiple-frame-of-reference scheme issues and looming energy crisis, we involving the following conditions of must objectively evaluate the facts temperature and pressure: (1) cali- regarding the world energy crisis bration, (2) operation (inside the rota- and, based on the weight of the evi- meter), and (3) ambient (typically the dence, draw reasonable conclusions actual conditions where the worker is from them and then strive to see that located and the sample is being tak- they are implemented on a national en), as well as two types of reference and even world scale . There is no conditions (4) normal or standard question that there will be increas- ambient (760 mm Hg and either 20 ing potential for regional and global degrees Celsius or 25 Celsius), and conflict over access to conventional (5) standard (760 mm Hg and either energy resources which are essential 0 degrees Celsius for chemists or 25 to achieving a better standard of liv- degrees Celsius for ventilation spe- ing . Nuclear power will help address cialists) . This system clarifies that these crucial issues . We will explore the rotameter equation is only to be the Top Ten Myths about Nuclear En- used for the correction between cali- ergy as well as technical fundamen- bration and the operation, and that tals . the ideal gas law is to be used for corrections among all other combina- tions of the frames of reference . An Sunday - 2:00-4:00 pm Excel spreadsheet with detailed ex- PEP 2-A A Comparison of Two amples and calculations will be dem- University Affiliated Research Re- onstrated and provided to course actor Health Physics Programs participants . and some Lessons Learned from PEP 1-H Future of Nuclear Power Radiation Safety Program Bench- Mark Miller marking at these Reactors Sandia National Laboratories Ron Dobey, Dave Tucker This PEP will explore “Nuclear University of Missouri-Columbia, Power as Part of Our Energy & Eco- McMaster University, Canada nomic Surety Future ”. The presenta- The 10 MW University of Mis- tion will cover the role commercial souri Research Reactor (MURR) is nuclear power could play in the “en- North America’s largest university ergy portfolio” that this country (and based research reactor facility . The the world) should seek to assemble 5 MW McMaster Nuclear Reactor in as we face the seemingly insur- Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, is tied mountable problems of “clean” en- (with the MIT reactor) as the second ergy availability, economic prosperity, largest . Both have active teaching, global warming and . research and production pro- As we explore the issues, we will dis- grams . cover that the solution is SIMPLE, but Well developed peer and indus- it won’t be EASY! try association evaluation programs

56 exist in the nuclear power industry but shutters, radiation detection instru- no such program exists for research mentation, personnel dosimetry, high reactors . Radiation safety program dose dosimetry (measuring radiation benchmarking was undertaken by damage to equipment), high energy the facilities in order to identify best neutron spectroscopy, , re- practices and augment the self-eval- leases of airborne radionuclides ac- uation programs in place . The basis celerator related electrical hazards, for the evaluations was ANSI/ANS- and the accelerator health physics 15 11-1993. American National Stan- program . dard for Radiation Protection at Re- PEP 2-C Uranium Internal Do- search Reactor Facilities . Program simetry elements evaluated in the first round Bill Riley included: Oak Ridge Associated Universities • Program, Policy and Organi- This course offers a review of zation internal dosimetry with a focus on • Radiation Monitoring monitoring and calculating doses • ALARA Objectives, Program from intakes of uranium isotopes . and Audits Topics that will be presented are the Several challenges which had to effect of enrichment of uranium on be overcome included: different regu- dose calculation, biokinetics of ura- latory environments at the two facili- nium, and bioassay techniques and ties; significant differences in design dose calculation . The focus will be of the facilities; and differences in the on practical application of a uranium scope and nature of work underway . bioassay program with example dose Despite these difficulties, valuable calculations presented for different lessons were learned . Mutual ben- scenarios . Both ICRP 30 and ICRP efit was derived both from identifying 66 models will be discussed . consistent approaches between the facilities and in identifying opportuni- PEP 2-D Designing High Impact ties for improvement . Presentations for a Digital Genera- tion PEP 2-B Operational Accelerator Jeremy Krampert, Adam Cook, Health Physics Part II Vincent Williams L. Scott Walker, Robert May Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp., A Los Alamos National Laboratory, Subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. Thomas Jefferson National Accel- As health physicists, a very im- erator Facility portant part of our job is disseminat- Operational Accelerator Health ing information to members of the Physics II focuses on specific medi- general public, as well as colleagues um and high energy accelerator relat- and peers . No how accurate ed design, control and health physics or significant this information is, if the problems . The topics include: Spall- presentation packaging is mundane, ation targets, handling high dose rate it can affect the overall impact of your targets, design, isotope training program . production, cooling water systems, 57 This PEP will review a variety of PEP 2-F Interactions of Nano- the technologies available to assist technology and Health Physics you in creating engaging, multimedia Lorraine Day experiences . We will demonstrate the Center for Advanced Microstruc- various skills needed to implement tures and Devices (CAMD) your own creative ideas and discuss Recognizing the importance of the cost associated with using the emerging technologies and their po- technologies described throughout tential influence on the practice of the class . Health Physics, the HPS established During this session we will use a Nanotechnology working group at many of these technologies and the annual meeting in Minneapolis demonstrate their ease of use and ef- in 2009 . As more and more health fectiveness . Attendees will leave the physicists, especially those working session with new ideas and tools to with accelerators, like synchrotron improve their presentations . rings and neutron sources, are ex- posed to the potential hazards and PEP 2-E EH&S “Boot Camp” for technological breakthroughs of this Radiation Safety Professionals: A cutting-edge science, they must re- Unique 3 Part PEP Course Series, tool to be able to make informed de- 2010 (Part 2) cisions about nanotechnology . This Robert Emery, Janet Gutierrez PEP course is structured to give The University of Texas Health the participant a perspective on this Science Center at Houston, The technology, and proposes safe han- University of Texas School of Pub- dling techniques to enable he/she to lic Health make informed decisions . The initial See PEP 1-E for full description . section of the course will outline the * Part 2 will examine “Security special properties of . 101 for Radiation Safety Profession- This includes an overview of the field als” and “The Basics of Biological & of nanotechnology, including chem- Chemical Safety ”. The first part of istry, material properties, and metrol- this session will focus on security as ogy as it pertains to synthesis and it is applied in the institutional set- measurement . The 2nd portion of tings . Various strategies employed the course will focus on Nanotech- to improve security controls will be nology and Nanomaterials and their presented . The second part of the interaction in day to day operational session will address the classification health physics, and the potential for of infectious agents and the various this technology to impinge on medical assigned levels . Aspects of physics . In addition to these techni- chemical exposures, exposure limits, cal topics, some time is set aside for monitoring and control strategies will risk assessment and ethical issues also be discussed . pertaining to this relatively new field . This course offering relating to Nano- technology seeks to act as a building block for future lectures on this topic, 58as they relate to Health Physics . PEP 2-G Applied MARSSIM Ap- tion Survey and Site Investigation proaches and the Evolution of De- Process . The Historical Site Assess- commissioning Surveys ment, Scoping Survey, Characteriza- Tom Hansen tion Survey, Remedial Action Survey, Ameriphysics, LLC Final Status Survey, and Verification In 1997, the process by which will be discussed . Other topics to be we decommission radiologically im- covered include release criterion, de- pacted sites was revolutionized . rived concentration guideline levels, The NRC’s license termination rule and survey unit classification . gave us risk-based release criterion, This course will also describe and for the first time, site clean-up trends in applied MARSSIM method- was based on sound health-physics ologies . principles rather than meaningless Specific examples of how the values . That same year, the EPA, Radiation Survey and Site Investiga- DOD, DOE, and NRC agreed upon tion Process has degraded will be a consensus document that con- reviewed . ALARA goals, surveyor ef- tained a statistically rigorous, yet ficiency, and scan speed will be dis- flexible, methodology for conducting cussed in detail . and assessing radiological surveys: The course will conclude with the Multi-Agency Radiation Sur- examples of commercial sites that vey and Site Investigation Manual have undergone decommissioning (MARSSIM) . using the MARSSIM approach . The Originally, the Health-Physics lecturer will present a “Historical Site community embraced our shiny new Assessment” for each case and the tools, but over the past thirteen years, participants will be asked to help de- our interest has slowly subsided . The termine a MARSSIM-based solution MARSSIM remains an important part using what they have learned previ- of the decommissioning process, but ously . in many applications its significance Attendees are invited to bring has been reduced to more or less a their unique decommissioning prob- “rubber stamp” rather than that of an lems to the course . If time permits, important tool in decommissioning the lecturer will facilitate a discussion planning, particularly at commercial to suggest MARSSIM-based solu- sites in agreement states . A revision tions . of MARSSIM is planned for 2010, PEP 2-H Theory however, and this lecture is intended and Construction to revitalize interest in the guidance Thomas E. Johnson, Graduate the document provides . Students (assisting) The first part of this course will Colorado State University be a refresher on a few of the fun- Cloud chambers are excellent damental topics of MARSSIM . The tools for teaching and demonstrating scope, rationale, and limitations of how different types of radiation inter- MARSSIM will be discussed, fol- act with matter . Students from grade lowed by an overview of the Radia- school to post doctoral fellows are 59 consistently mesmerized by the in- issues . Are you stressed when con- teraction of radiation and the “clouds” fronted by emotional issues at work? created in a cloud chamber . This Do you know how to provide a help- class will consist of two parts, one ful response for an upset or fearful covering theory and another covering person, or would you rather avoid construction . In the first part of this these people? Do you believe the class we will briefly review the theory workplace would be more efficient on how cloud chambers operate, and if people left their feelings at home how particles and photons interact and just did their jobs? Do you find with the supersaturated atmosphere yourself perplexed about people who generated in a common cloud cham- are afraid of radiation? I suggest that ber . The second part of this class all of us could be afraid of radiation will consist of constructing a cloud under certain circumstances . Thus, chamber, setting it up, and operat- fear of radiation is a common de- ing it! Since Salt Lake City is at an nominator for all workers, although altitude of over 4000 feet, there will the extent of such fears appears to be plenty of cosmic rays to interact be related to technical understanding with the cloud chamber . If you would of radiation . Without special train- like to participate and construct your ing in radiation safety most workers’ own cloud chamber to build in class, understanding is based on radiation please contact the instructor . The mythology which is not supported by CSU student branch of the HPS will good science . Workers’ fears are provide the materials to construct often related to mythical beliefs and your very own cloud chamber that images of terrible consequences that you can take home with you for an may result from . additional fee . Beware! Often workers make assumptions The cloud chambers we will be about radiation effects without un- building will be too large to fit into derstanding that there are a series your suitcase, and they are addictive of steps for answering the question, to watch! “Is it safe?” Fears are always based on what we imagine and not on re- Monday - 12:15-2:15 pm ality . The basis of what we imagine PEP M-1 Counseling Workers – can be identified by asking the ques- Part I, Understanding the Basis for tion “What’s so bad about that?” By Upset and Fears repeating this question we can move Ray Johnson down through layers of images to the Dade Moeller Associates real motivation for upset and fear . What is the greatest challenge When we understand what drives up- in the course of your work in radiation set and fears, we can then offer the safety – technical issues or people is- most helpful responses . Attendees sues? For those of you that may an- should write down and bring to the swer the latter, this class will provide class one or more specific scenarios insights on how to better understand where they would like to apply the in- and be more successful with people sights from this class . 60 PEP M-2 EH&S “Boot Camp” for vey the intended message . Actual Radiation Safety Professionals: A before and after data display “make- Unique 3 Part PEP Course Series, overs” will be presented, and ample 2010 (Part 3) time will be provided for questions, Robert Emery, Janet Gutierrez answers, and discussion . The University of Texas Health PEP M-3 Optical Radiation: An Science Center at Houston, The Overview of Biological Effects and University of Texas School of Pub- Exposure Limits lic Health David H. Sliney See PEP 1-E for full description . Health physicists may occasion- * Part 3 will focus on “Measur- ally face questions about the safety ing and Displaying Radiation Protec- of an intense optical radiation source, tion Program Metrics That Matter to e g. . a high power lamp, a laser, the Management ”. Radiation protection sun, an open arc, an ultrabright light- programs typically accumulate data emitting diode . While detailed ANSI and documentation so that regula- Z136 standards address laser haz- tory officials can assess compliance ards, conventional optical radiation with established regulations . The im- sources often present an area of the plicit logic associated with this activ- unknown . Exposure limits and lamp ity is that compliance equates to an safety standards do exist . During acceptable level of safety . But in this the past 40 years a wide range of re- era of constricted resources, mere search has provided the basis for es- regulatory compliance is no longer tablishing human exposure limits for sufficient to justify all necessary pro- and radiation as grammatic resources . Radiation pro- well as for intense visible light . This tection programs are now expected course will summarize optical radia- to readily demonstrate how they add tion bioeffects and discuss the expo- tangible value to the core missions sure limits established by the Interna- of an organization . The demonstra- tional Commission on Non-Ionizing tion of this value is expected to be in Radiation Protection (ICNIRP – ex- the form of some sort of performance posure limits available free at www . metrics, but this is an area in which icnirp org). and the similar Threshold many radiation safety professionals Limit Values (TLVs) of the American have not been trained . The issue is Conference of Governmental Indus- further compounded by the need to trial Hygienists (ACGIH) . Despite display the metric information in man- the existence of safety standards ners that are succinct and compel- and regulations, accidental eye and ling, yet another area where formal skin injuries still occur . Accidents training is often lacking . This session are most frequently attributed to the will first describe a variety of possible lack of understanding of hazards radiation protection program perfor- and safety procedures . While some mance measures and metrics, and knowledge of optical radiation char- then will focus on the display of the acteristics may be helpful, both expe- information in ways that clearly con- 61 rienced and novice health physicists PEP M-5 Introduction to Mon- with optical radiation safety interests te Carlo Methods for the Health or responsibilities will benefit from Physicist (Part 1) this course . Peter F. Caracappa Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute PEP M-4 Part II Accelerator Monte Carlo techniques are Health Physics ABHP Exam Prob- extensively used in computer calcu- lems lations of radiation transport in mat- L. Scott Walker ter . Of interest to Health Physicists is Los Alamos National Laboratory the ability to determine values such Health Physics examinees as or dose equivalent normally stay away from Accelera- distributions in a variety of applica- tor Health Physics problems on the tions . The more complex the prob- ABHP Part II exam . For some rea- lem, the greater the need for comput- son accelerator health physics is er simulations, and it is desirable for seen as an obtuse field for most the health physicist to have some un- personnel who take the exam . With derstanding of their basis . The pur- some basic knowledge, most Part II pose of this course is to provide the accelerator based problems are not attendees with a feel for what Monte that difficult . More complex problems Carlo techniques are, how they are take computer assistance and usual- applied in health physics work, and ly involve more than an hour of effort . what their reliability and limitations Thus, ABHP Part II accelerator based may be . The course will be present- exam problems are normally straight ed in three parts . forward . The ABHP Part II problems Part I will provide a theoretical PEP class will focus on simple prob- overview of radiation transport and lems necessary to support the op- methods for estimating the radiation eration of an accelerator and solving flux or dose using Monte Carlo . We those problems given on the exam . will walk through the steps of a Monte Those completing this class will be Carlo simulation history and discuss provided with the necessary back- the needs in geometry, , ground to process these problems tallies and variance reduction that are in a straight forward manner . This used . class will include problems at both proton and electron accelerators and PEP M-6 HPS/ANSI N13.53, Con- includes high energy physics issues trol and Release of Technological- that impact health physics manage- ly Enhanced Naturally Occurring ment and are associated with accel- Radioactive Material erator operation . Philip Egidi Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment This new HPS/ANSI standard specifies dose limits and release cri- teria for the management of mate- rial, products, and waste containing 62 Technologically Enhanced Naturally Tuesday - 12:15-2:15 pm Occurring Radioactive Material (TE- NORM) . The standard applies to PEP T-1 Laser Safety for Health practices not covered by existing fed- Physicists eral or state regulations that use, pro- Ken Barat cess, recycle or reuse, and distribute Lawrence Berkeley National Labo- TENORM, including the generation ratory and disposal of wastes that may re- This course provides an over- sult in making radioactivity more ac- view of the elements of laser safety: cessible to humans or the environ- laser physics, biological effects, haz- ment . ard assessment, and control mea- It addresses practices and op- sures, as well as a concise distilla- erations that might concentrate and tion of the requirements in the ANSI relocate radioactivity or make radio- Z136 1-2007. Standard for the Safe activity more accessible such that Use of Lasers . Non-beam hazards, members of the public may receive emerging issues, and accident his- doses that would warrant the appli- tories with lessons learned will also cation of appropriate protective mea- be covered . Course attendees will sures and corrective actions . learn practical laser safety principles The standard adopts the princi- to assist in developing and conduct- ples of justification, optimization and ing laser safety training, performing limitation and provides supplemental safety evaluations, and institutional guidance for their implementation . elements . While some knowledge The control of occupational ex- of laser hazards will be helpful, both posures associated with TENORM experienced and novice health physi- is covered by the standard, although cists with laser safety responsibilities this aspect may already be ad- will benefit from this course . Stu- dressed through requirements of in- dents will also find bringing their own dustrial hygiene standards under cur- copy of ANSI Z136 1-2007. a helpful rent federal and state regulations . reference The standard offers further in- PEP T-2 Advances in Character- formative guidance to facilitate its im- izing the Radiation Output of CT plementation, including background Scanners information for recognizing and Donovan Bakalyar evaluating practices that may have Henry Ford Hospital potential impacts on the public, work- Recently several research en- ers, and the environment; various op- deavors, both theoretical and ex- tions for managing TENORM includ- perimental, have carefully examined ing supporting technical information . CTDI (Computed Tomography Dose Index) and its derivatives such as CTDIvol and DLP and have found some limitations . The AAPM Task Force 111 has thoroughly reviewed

63 this research and has recently pub- the entire dose profile in the phan- lished a report which has recom- tom including that part due to scat- mended some changes in phantom ter . Recent studies have shown that design and measurement methodol- the current phantom is far too short ogy which will better handle a more to capture the entire scatter tail, even diverse array of CT designs . It is also for a very narrow beam . With mod- hoped that measurements based on ern scanners, the beam width (in the sound physical principles will more z direction) is generally larger than correctly characterize the radiation for those in the past, escalating the output of the scanner as well as have problem . The current method uses a more direct and transparent inter- a 10 cm long chamber inside pretation . a stationary phantom to capture the Currently, the x-ray dose deliv- central portion of the integral ac- ery capabilities of a given scanner quired during a single gantry rota- and the scanning parameters used tion . An alternative (and more direct) for a particular study are character- method is to scan through the entire ized by CTDIvol, an index of the av- integral in the same manner that one erage dose delivered in the scanning would scan a patient . This allows the region and by the Dose-Length Prod- user to integrate over any portion of uct (DLP) which multiplies CTDIvol the dose profile including the entire by the length of the scan and is thus integral when both tails are included . a rough indicator of the total radia- In the far past (prior to the incorpora- tion energy absorbed by the patient . tion of slip ring technology), perform- Though the basic principles underly- ing this task would have been bur- ing these indicators are sound, the densome but with today’s scanners implementation of these principles the direct method is straightforward has often taken a circuitous route and allows for far more flexibility and sometimes resulting in confusion, completeness . misinterpretation and error . The values obtained using this The presentation will carefully methodology will properly character- review the contributors to patient ize the radiation output of the scan- dose during CT scans with an at- ner and therefore should prove to be tempt to pare them down to their useful as input parameters for more essentials . The difference between patient specific dose determinations the beam width and nominal beam (based, for example, on Monte Carlo width (often depicted as NT) will be calculations) . (The feasibility of this delineated . (This difference is often will also be presented ). blurred, yet can be substantial ). The concept of equilibrium dose will be presented along with the determina- tion of integral dose determined from readily measured parameters . For theoretical reasons it is de- sirable to determine the integral of 64 PEP T-3 Managing Low-Level reducing the volume and cost of ra- Radioactive Waste at an Academic dioactive and mixed waste disposal . Institution Without Breaking the PEP T-4 Training First Respond- Bank ers on Radiological Dispersal De- Mike Zittle vices (RDDs) and Improvised Nu- Oregon State University clear Devices (INDs) Events Management of low-level radio- K.L. “Ken” Groves active and mixed waste at academic S2-Sevorg Services, LLC and medical institutions is challeng- This PEP will present an over- ing due to the small quantities and view of the current training the au- wide variety of wastes generated . thor is presenting to First Respond- These organizations are often non- ers (firefighters, emergency medical profit or government funded and it is technicians, law enforcement and important to keep costs down while others) who may encounter either a maintaining regulatory compliance . Radiological Dispersal Device (RDD Although often perceived as difficult, or Dirty Bomb) or an Improvised it is possible to be in compliance with Nuclear Device (IND) as a part of all Federal and Agreement State their Emergency Response activi- NRC and EPA regulations without ties . The emphasis of the training is going over budget . putting the radiological/nuclear mate- This course presents waste rial in perspective as compared with management strategies for various other Weapons of Mass Destruction waste streams and processes includ- (WMD) materials such as chemical ing sanitary sewer disposal, decay- and/or biological weapon agents . A in-storage, bench top treatment of goal of the training is to help this First wastes, and the EPA mixed waste Responder Community understand conditional exemptions . Techniques that under almost all conditions, they to minimize the generation of radio- can perform their primary mission of active and mixed waste will be dis- “putting out fires, rescuing and treat- cussed as well as waste processing ing injured persons, and chasing bad services available to reduce the vol- guys” even in the presence of rela- ume of waste for disposal . Emphasis tively large amount of radiological/nu- will be placed on the six R’s: Re- clear contamination . The rare cases duce, Reuse, Recycle, Rethink, Re- of high activity unshielded sources fuse, and Repair . This course also will be reviewed and explained . Cur- highlights the importance of utilizing rent National/International guidance process knowledge, accurate sam- on dose “limits” will be discussed . ple analysis, and quality assurance The use of information contained in to efficiently manage radioactive and NCRP Commentary #19, “Key Ele- mixed waste . Creative ideas will be ments of Preparing Emergency Re- presented that allow waste manag- sponder for Nuclear and Radiological ers at academic and medical institu- Terrorism,” the New NCRP report en- tions to effectively raise awareness titled, “Response to Radiological and and train waste generators while also 65 Nuclear Terrorism: A Guide for Deci- seling is to hear, identify, and reflect sion Makers,” and the CRCPD “First their feelings (Active Listening) . One Responders Handbook” will be used of the reasons that worker upsets or extensively in the presentation . fears escalate is because no one re- A discussion of the use of Time, ally hears them . Perhaps this should Distance and Shielding as well as ap- not be surprising because most health propriate Personal Protective Cloth- physicists are not trained to hear feel- ing and how it will provide the needed ings . This class will show how this protection while immediate actions tool can be acquired and implement- take place early in an RDD/IND event ed in a short time . There are two keys will be reviewed . The use of appro- to listening: 1) feelings are more im- priate radiation detection instrumen- portant than what is said, and 2) lis- tation, documented Standard Oper- tening is more important than solving ating Procedures along with realistic problems . We will explore whether training, drills and exercises are the our role in radiation safety is to be the key to a successful response to an “giver of answers” or to be a resource RDD/IND event for this community of for assisting others in deriving their critical emergency responders . own answers . We will also consider a number of barriers to effective com- PEP T-5 Introduction to Mon- munication, including perceptions, te Carlo Methods for the Health images, feelings, resistance, values, Physicist (Part 2) social roles, decision preferences, Peter F. Caracappa and defensiveness . Insights on deal- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ing with each of these barriers will be Monte See PEP M-5 for full de- presented with applications to spe- scription . cific radiation worker scenarios pro- Part II will cover the fundamen- vided by attendees . We will look at a tal input components, code execu- sorting system for feelings and how tion, and interpretation of output for to best respond to worker concerns the MCNP/MCNPX radiation trans- and questions about radiation . This port codes . class will conclude with a list of things you can always say when you do not Wednesday - 12:15-2:15 pm know what to say . We will practice these tools on communication sce- PEP W-1 Counseling Workers narios which each attendee is invited – Part II, Tools for Effective Risk to write down and bring with them . Communication Ray Johnson PEP W-2 So now you’re the RSO: Dade Moeller Associates Elements of an Effective Radiation Understanding the basis for Safety Program worker upsets or fears can be helpful Thomas L. Morgan but may not be enough without effec- University of Rochester tive tools for risk communication . The Designation as a Radiation most powerful tool for worker coun- Safety Officer brings with it unique

66 opportunities and challenges . The PEP W-4 How the Legislature Re- author will offer insights on how to ally Works manage a radiation safety program Annette Glass from his 16 years experience as a Plain English USA RSO at medical, university, and in- A humorous, hands-on, inter- dustrial facilities . Regardless of the active workshop that reviews what type of facility, number of radiation many of us learned in government workers, or scope, an effective radia- class, but adds intriguing explana- tion safety program must be driven tions of the nuances of legislative ac- from the top down . Senior manage- tion unknown to the average citizen . ment must embrace the goals of the This course also provides tips on program . The RSO must have the how to communicate effectively with trust of senior management as well legislators and the people who influ- as a good working relationship with ence them . line mangers and workers . These re- PEP W-5 Introduction to Mon- lationships are built on the integrity, te Carlo Methods for the Health knowledge, experience, and accessi- Physicist (Part 3) bility of the RSO . This talk will focus Peter F. Caracappa on the role of the RSO in achieving Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and maintaining an effective pro- See PEP M-5 for full descrip- gram . tion . PEP W-3 Testifying as a Health Part III will be dedicated to sam- Physics Expert Witness ple problems for analyzing a radiation Lynn McKay shielding problem using MCNP . The Blank Rome LLP session will have opportunities to ex- This course will provide practi- plore problems of interest to the par- cal and interactive guidance to health ticipants . physicists who have been called to serve as an expert witness or are con- sidering serving in that role . Course Thursday - 10:45 am-12:45 participants will learn the procedural PEP TH-1 Health Physics Con- and evidentiary rules for expert wit- of Neutron Exposures, Criti- nesses and effective expert witness cality Safety and Criticality Acci- communication skills . The course dents will feature videotape segments of David R. Simpson actual expert testimony, and course Bloomsburg University participants will be invited to apply For most Health Physicists, what they have learned by critiquing neutron exposure is, at most, only these segments, and formulating al- a minimal issue in their workplace . ternative ways that the expert infor- However, with the potential terrorist mation could have been more effec- threats of the use of nuclear materi- tively presented . als, including weapons grade ma- terials; it is important that all Health

67 Physicists have at least some under- use of respiratory protection in radio- standing of neutron exposures, do- logical control . simetry and criticality safety . In this DISCLAIMERS presentation, a brief introduction will Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC be given describing sources of neu- is the managing contractor of the en- trons and the biological effects of vironmental management activities neutron exposures . Next, a review at the East Tennessee Technology of criticality safety will be given with Park, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, under special emphasis on areas where contract DE-AC05-98OR22700 to the Health Physicist may play a role, the U S. . Department of Energy . such as safely handling large quanti- The submitted manuscript has ties of special nuclear materials, spill been authored by a contractor of the control, etc . Finally, several criticality U S. . Government under contract DE- accidents will be reviewed and meth- AC05-98OR22700 . Accordingly, the ods discussed on how neutron doses U S. . Government retains a nonexclu- can be estimated based on both bio- sive, royalty-free license to publish or logical and physical neutron activa- reproduce the published form of this tion of materials from the exposed contribution, or allow others to do so, individuals . for U S. . Government purposes . Reference herein to any spe- PEP TH-2 Refresher for HPs Phys- cific commercial product, process, or iological Impacts of Respiratory service by trade name, trademark, Protection manufacturer, or otherwise, does not Gary S. Kephart necessarily constitute or imply its en- Bechtel Jacobs Company LLC dorsement, recommendation, or fa- Decontamination and decom- voring by the United States Govern- missioning challenges associated ment or any other agency thereof or with aging nuclear facilities continue its contractors or subcontractors . to drive some health physics reliance upon respiratory protection . This PEP TH-3 Advanced Techniques Professional Enrichment Program and New Technologies Used in will review the fundamental cardio- Emergency Response Exercises pulmonary parameters and their re- Ken Kerns, Stephen Simpson spective inter-relationships with use Iowa State University of respiratory protection . This pre- Developing and maintaining the sentation will summarize key findings necessary skills of first responders from the industrial hygiene, medical presents emergency planners with and ergonomic literature regarding many unique challenges . Genuine how various physiologic functions crisis situations are thankfully rare; are impacted by the use of respira- however, this severely limits an emer- tory protection . The objective is to gency worker’s ability to obtain on the refresh experienced health physicists job training . In response to this re- on the various physiological stresses ality, emergency planners must use and their interrelationships with the drills, simulations and exercises in

68 an effort to create a skill set that can 2 . Improve player understand- quickly adapt to any crisis situation . ing of exercise concepts, limitations, While emergency response ex- and expectations, ercises are inarguably necessary, it is 3 . Make exercise control more not uncommon for these activities to efficient, and; become routine, boring and too nar- 4 . Improve the evaluation and row in scope . Exercises do not need feedback process to be boring or routine if creativity If you are looking to “inject” more and innovation are incorporated into pizzazz into your exercises and en- the development and implementa- hance communications and exercise tion phases . Enhanced emergency control, then this is the PEP for you . response exercise planning will also PEP TH-4 A Fluoroscopy Creden- push the limits of responder’s skill tialing Program for Physicians sets, making them better prepared to Deirdre Elder address unanticipated situations . University of Colorado Hospital Ken Kerns and Stephen Simp- Fluoroscopy is used for diag- son have been involved in exercise nostic purposes and to guide nu- planning for over 20 years, and as merous diagnostic and therapeutic a result, have developed some ad- procedures in many departments of vanced exercise tools and tech- modern hospitals . Unfortunately, the niques that add efficiency and real- training requirements for physicians ism to players to ensure effective, who use fluoroscopic equipment are credible and enjoyable exercises . not always clearly delineated in the Kerns and Simpson will discuss, regulations or uniform within and be- then demonstrate some of these ad- tween facilities . The Colorado Regu- vanced exercise tools, including ex- lations Pertaining to Radiation Con- ercise enhancements for field exer- trol were recently revised to include cises, exercise control mechanisms new training requirements for fluoros- used during region-wide functional copy users . In order to comply with exercises (involving over 600 people the new regulations, which become playing at 50 sites), and new tools to effective July 1, 2010, the University assist in effective evaluation of the of Colorado Hospital has developed exercise . Some of the tools were de- and implemented a program to cre- veloped to meet the needs of specific dential physicians to use fluoroscopy . exercises, while others have global An on-line training program must be application that can be used to im- passed before the privilege of using prove exercise control and evalua- fluoroscopy is granted to any physi- tion . cian . In addition, all radiologic tech- Participants of this PEP session nologists are assigned the course to will learn how to: ensure consistency in procedures . 1 . Create more realistic exer- Lessons learned from the medical cises and scenarios, staff office and the credentialing com- mittee will be shared .

69 PEP TH-5 Fundamentals of Gam- ma Spectroscopy, Part 2 (Part 1 not included in the PEP program for 2010) Doug Van Cleef ORTEC/Advanced Measurement Technology, Inc. This course offers a fast-paced review of the basic physics of gamma- ray detection, formulation of spectra, interpretation of spectral data, inter- ferences, and calculations . Recent attendance at our Fundamentals of course is rec- ommended but not required . Objective: Upon completion of this course, student will have a work- ing knowledge of gamma radiation detection, gamma-ray spectra con- tent, spectrum evaluation, and gam- ma-ray spectroscopy analysis .

70 Continuing Education Lectures (CEL) Monday 28 June through Wednesday 30 June Monday 7:00-8:00 AM areas where they would be willing to assist in certification process . The CEL1 ABHP Exam Funda- material presented consolidates per- mentals – Tips for Successfully tinent exam policy/procedure into an Completing the Certification Pro- easily digestible format, offering real cess world examples of good and poor Cheryl Olson, Andy Miller, Patricia performance . Miligan Dominion KPS, Vanderbilt Univer- CEL2 Update on Medical In- sity, US NRC ternal Radiation Dosimetry: MIRD This presentation will discuss Committee Recommendations for the advantages of being certified Unifying MIRD and ICRP Formu- as well as the fundamentals of the las, Quantities, and Units ABHP exam process – from submis- Darrell R. Fisher, Wesley E. Bolch sion of the exam application to com- Pacific Northwest National Labo- pletion of the Part 2 examination . ratory, University of Florida Topics of discussion will include: The scientific foundations * What are qualifying academic underlying the MIRD schema for requirements? medical internal dosimetry and the * Why require a degree? general framework established by * What is meant by “profession- the International Commission on al level” experience? Radiological Protection (ICRP) for * How are the exams (Part 1 occupational internal dosimetry are and Part 2) prepared? mathematically similar, even though * How is the passing point de- they appear outwardly to be sub- termined? stantially different . The 2009 recom- * What are the keys to good mendations of the MIRD Committee performance on the exam? (Pamphlet No . 21) provide a revised * What pitfalls exist that detract framework for unifying the ICRP and from good exam performance? MIRD equations, models, and termi- This presentation will help per- nology . The result is a general sche- sons interested in certification to ma for internal dosimetry, consistent prepare an application that will ac- for both nuclear medicine and radia- curately reflect the applicant’s edu- tion protection, using standardized cation and experience as well as formulas, nomenclature, quantities, providing tips for preparing to take and units . The 2009 MIRD recom- the exam and answering part 2 mendations clarify the concept and questions in a format that promotes application of absorbed dose for awarding partial credit . Persons deterministic effects in patients (or- who are already certified may gain gans, tissues, tumors, and the whole insight into the process and identify body) from medically administered

71 radiopharmaceuticals . The radia- “Radiation Safety for the Design and tion protection quantities equivalent Operation of Particle Accelerators” dose and effective dose are reserved are presented . The Standard sets for evaluating stochastic risks in forth the requirements and recom- groups of patients and health care mendations for accelerator facilities workers . A new quantity and unit to provide adequate radiation pro- are proposed for comparing deter- tection for the workers, the public ministic effects (such as , and the environment . The Standard impaired organ function, and tumor applies to the design, installation, response) following high doses, high commissioning, operation, mainte- dose-rates, and high-LET radiation nance, upgrades and decommis- qualities associated with targeted sioning of accelerator facilities, i e. ,. radionuclide therapy (particularly for the complete life cycle of a facility . alpha emitters and Auger-electron The Standard specifies the require- emitters) . Unifying the MIRD and ments and recommendations for ICRP structural framework should both the management and the tech- help eliminate confusion and the nical aspects of the radiation safety mixing of units such as quality factor program, graded to the complexity (Q), relative biological effectiveness and hazard levels of the facility . This (RBE), and radiation weighting fac- Standard is applicable to all accel- tor (wR) for expressing the biologi- erator facilities, except facilities uti- cally relevant dose . This course is lizing accelerators solely for medical relevant to health physicists who applications (human or veterinary) . use internal dosimetry for retrospec- Chapter 2 of the Standard tive dose assessment, prospective provides the definitions of common treatment planning, and risk analy- terms . Chapter 3 specifies the radia- sis . This course is recommended tion safety programs for the accel- for practicing medical, regulators, erator facilities . Chapter 4 provides and administrators responsible for details of the requirements and radiation safety in medical centers recommendations for the Radiation and for the safe use of radiopharma- Safety System(s) (RSS) which are ceuticals . used to control prompt radiation haz- ards . The RSS includes the Access CEL3 ANSI N43.1 Standard Control System (ACS) and Radia- Draft: Radiation Safety for the De- tion Control System (RCS) . Chapter sign and Operation of Particle Ac- 5 describes the details of the ACS, celerators * while Chapter 6 describes the de- James C. Liu, Lawrence S. Walker tails of the RCS . Chapter 7 covers SLAC, LANSCE, Los Alamos Na- the accelerator operations . The Op- tional Laboratory erational Radiation Safety program * Work supported by Depart- is described in Chapter 8 . Chapter 9 ment of Energy contract DE-AC03- covers the personnel training . There 76SF00515 are five appendices to provide de- The latest development and tailed guidance and resources in status of the ANSI N43 1. Standard 72 addressing the five key issues: 1) ing programs (RETS-REMP) . In development of the Safety Assess- particular, ground water monitoring ment Document, 2) design and im- and protection initiatives, 3H, 14C plementation of the interlocked-type and regulation updates and chang- ACS systems, 3) decommissioning es will be presented . Radiological program, 4) measurements of radia- environmental monitoring practices tion and radioactivity, and 5) safety in different countries will also be dis- standards for commercially available cussed . and/or production-type accelerators . CEL6 Dose Reconstruction CEL4 Overdose of Patients for Radiation Epidemiology Receiving CT Scans Daniel J. Strom Thomas L. Morgan Pacific Northwest National Labo- University of Rochester ratory Recent news reports and FDA Professional health physicists advisories indicate that patients need to understand the scientific have been inadvertently overex- basis for radiation protection, includ- posed during certain CT scan pro- ing the basis for modeling radiation cedures . This talk will discuss health effects in people following background information about how exposure to ionizing radiation . This CT scanners operate, how dose is presentation highlights the practices estimated, and what is currently and limitations of reconstructing ra- known about these exposures . The diation doses to individuals who are focus will be on bringing the health subjects of radiation epidemiology . physicist up to speed on this rapidly Epidemiology is the study of pat- changing technology and what can terns of health, disease, and mortal- be done to prevent such mishaps in ity in human populations, and asso- the future . ciating those patterns with various risk factors . Epidemiologists take CEL5 Radiological Releases into consideration known risk factors and Environmental Monitoring at other than radiation, including date Commercial Nuclear Power Reac- of birth, sex, race, smoking status, tors socioeconomic status, and disease Jason Harris codes, as well as dates of hire, ex- Idaho State University posure, diagnosis, and, in mortality This lecture will present an studies, death . In many older stud- overview of the current issues fac- ies, researchers classified subjects ing health physics professionals at crudely as “exposed” or “unex- commercial nuclear power reactors . posed,” or using surrogate measures Specifically this presentation will fo- such as radon expo- cus on environmental (public) radia- sures in working level months or ra- tion protection found at these reac- dium body burden at time of death . tors . Topics will center on radioactive Modern epidemiologists require an- effluent technical specifications and nual absorbed doses (with no RBE, radiological environmental monitor- 73 Q, or wR) to various tissues and or- gans, separated by radiation type and even by LET, e g. ,. separating neutron doses into high- and low- LET components . For occupational studies, there may be personnel monitoring records or workplace monitoring records that can be as- sociated with individuals . Often, medical and environmental radiation exposures are considered in occu- pational studies . In the past couple of decades the effects of uncertainty in doses has been recognized . Clas- sical (measurement) and Berkson (grouping) errors lead to uncertain- ties in doses that are reconstructed for epidemiology . Furthermore, it has been shown that shared and unshared uncertainties have pro- foundly different effects on inferred dose-response relationships . Evalu- ation of autocorrelation of annual doses within individuals over time recognizes that doses in one year may not be statistically independent of doses in an earlier year . Manage- ment of these uncertainties for radi- ation epidemiology differs from that for radiation protection dosimetry or for dose reconstruction done in sup- port of compensation decisions . The needs of the customer, that is, the epidemiologists and biostatisticians, must be considered at every phase of dose reconstruction .

74 CONCESSION STO. SHOW MGR.

MEN WOMEN jan.

FHC PARTITION CONCESSIONS STORAGE FHC 2010 ExhibitF/S Hall Floor Plan F/S

125 UNIVERSITY 626 TABLES 123 624

121B 226 325 326 425 525 526 625 622B LUDLUM 424 121A 224 323 324 423 523 524 623 622A 124 121 522 621 622

119 120 219 LOUNGE 519 520 619 620 LANDAUER 418

117 118 217 517 518 617 618 F/S 218

113 614

111 112 211 512 611 612 THERMO MIRION MACTEC SCIENTIFIC 109 110 209 510 609 210 310 410 107 108 207

105 206 305 505 606 404 ENERGY F/S 103 204 303 CANBERRA 503 FHC DADE SOLUTIONS MOELLER 101 202 301 402 501 102 302 502 602

F/S F/S

ENTRANCE

File Name: HPS2010 HEALTH PHYSICS SOCIETY Version: 1.5 Exhibit Hall Hours 55th Annual Meeting Revision Date: 05/18/2010 June 27 - July 1, 2010 Monday NoonSalt Palace - 5:00 Convention pm Center - Hall A 3567 Mountain View Drive #159 Scale: West Mifflin, PA 15122 Salt Lake City, Utah Phone: (412) 882-1420 Fax: (412) 882-1421 Tuesday0' 5' 10' 20' 30' 9:30 am - 5:30 pm Wednesday 9:30 am - Noon

75 2010 Exhibitors 2011 Annual Booth: 121B Apantec LLC/Fuji Booth: 623 Meeting Palm Beach Electric Systems 4500 North Cannon Ave 2011 Midyear Tabletop Lansdale, PA 19446 Meeting Charleston, SC 267-436-3991; FAX: 215-362-5343 AAHP/ABHP Booth: 622A Fuji Electric Systems and Apantec LLC will jointly display an Access Aloka Co. Ltd. Booth: 123 Control System designed for detection 6-22-1 Mure,Mitaka-shi and monitoring radiation exposure Mitaka,Tokyo,181-8622, Japan to personnel working in restricted 81-422-45-6465; FAX: 81-422-45-4058 areas of nuclear power stations and Aloka’s radiation measuring nuclear facilities . Demonstarions of the instruments are used in various fields APD (NRF Series) dosimeter sytem, including nuclear power, medicine, computer with dosemeter reader with biochemistry, and pharmacology an entrance/exit turnstile, and a hand and play crucial roles in radiation and foot monitor will be featured . (safety) management, research, and examination . As the pioneer in the field Arrow-Tech Inc. Booth: 112 of radiation measurement, we have PO Box 1240, 417 Main Ave West contributed greatly to the peaceful use Rolla,ND,58367 of atomic energy and the development 701-477-6461; FAX: 701-477-6464 of isotope technology . With the Arrow-Tech Inc . is the manufacturer slogan “Science and Humanity,” we of the Direct-Reading Dosimeter . will continue to assist the progress of Arrow-Tech handles a full line of medicine and energy for the new age . Radiation Detection equipment and maintains customers throughout the Ameriphysics, LLC Booth: 324 world providing quality reliable durable 11634 Turkey Creek Rd . products and service . Industries served Knoxville, TN 37934 include the Health Physics Homeland 865-654-9200; FAX: 865-531-0092 Security NDI, Industrial & Medical Ameriphysics is a full-service Radiology and 1st Responders . Arrow- radiological and waste solutions Tech provides calibration services . provider . Our personnel exhibit a wide variety of radiation protection and Berkeley Nucleonics Booth: 110 waste management experience . From Corporation simple laboratory surveys to complex 2955 Kerner Blvd removals and MARSSIM- San Rafael,CA, 94901 based decommissioning projects; 415-453-9955; FAX: 415-453-9956 Ameriphysics has the experience Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation necessary to complete your project on is a leading manufacturer of precision time and within budget . electronic instrumentation for test measurement and nuclear research . BNC has its corporate headquarters in San Rafael California with several

76 additional manufacturing facilities and Canberra Industries Booth: 302 sales offices located throughout the 800 Research Parkway United States . Meriden, CT 06450 203-639-2148; FAX: 203-235-1347 Best Medical Booth: 522 CANBERRA is the world’s leading 7643 Fullerton Road supplier of analytical instruments, Springfield, VA 22153 systems and services for radiation 703-451-2378; FAX: 703-451-2378 measurement . Applications for Best Medical International, a family CANBERRA offerings include health of companies known as TeamBest, physics, nuclear power operations, is dedicated to affordable, quality Radiation Monitoring Systems healthcare for cancer diagnosis (RMS), nuclear safeguards, nuclear and treatment . The product lines waste management, environmental of TeamBest include systems for radiochemistry and other areas . The teletherapy, , cardiology, company has the broadest array of radiology, quality assurance, radiation Health Physics capabilities in the measurements and health physics . industry . HP related products include Best Medical has all your radiation a full range of gamma and alpha protection needs . spectroscopy equipment, personnel Bionomics, Inc. Booth: 510 contamination monitors, hand held PO Box 817 survey instruments for alpha, beta, Kingston, TN 37763 gamma and neutron measurement, 865-220-8501; FAX: 865-220-8532 whole body counters and area Bionomics provides generators monitors . The company also offers a with services associated with the full range of services including repair disposal of radioactive and mixed and maintenance, training and expert wastes . Emphasis is on proven, cost data review . effective methods that offer a reduction CBI Polymers Booth: 501 in long term liabilities . Other services 1946 Young Street, Suite 288 include surveys, sampling and project Honolulu, HI 96826 oversight of decontamination and 808-949-2208; FAX: 808-949-2209 decommissioning projects . CBI Polymers provides DeconGel™ Bladewerx LLC Booth: 305 which is the leading decontamination 103 Rio Rancho Dr NE, Suite C4 solution currently available for the Rio Rancho, NM 87124 radiological and chemical clean-up 505-892-5144; FAX: 505-890-8319 and spills . It is safe, user-friendly, Bladewerx and its subsidiary, and is able to effectively contain, Shieldwerx, provide instrumentation, trap, encapsulate and decontaminate custom software, neutron and gamma a broad range of radioisotopes and shielding, and chemicals on different substrates in a foils to the radiation protection and simple, easy, no-preparation process . measurement industry

77 CDC - Radiation Booth: 524 safety, public & Studies Branch protection, occupational safety & 4770 Buford Highway NE, MS F-58 health, and radiation safety training . We Atlanta, GA 30341 provide the full range of professional 404-488-3800 and technician services in radiation The Centers for Disease Control protection, health physics, and worker and Prevention, Radiation Studies safety to government and commercial Branch, presents the Radiological nuclear clients . Emergency Toolkit for Public Health Eastern Idaho Booth: 612 Officials . Please stop by booth 524 to Technical College request a free toolkit, or send an email 1600 S 25th E with your name and shipping address Idaho Falls, ID 83404 to cdcinfo cdc. gov. . 208-524-3000; FAX: 208-524-0429 Chase Environmental Booth: 217 Eastern Idaho Technical College Group Inc. is accredited by the Northwest 11450 Watterson Ct . Commission on Colleges and Louisville, KY 40299-2389 Universities, an institutional accrediting 865-481-8801; FAX: 865-481-8818 body recognized by the Council Chase Environmental Group, Inc . for Higher Education Accreditation is a full-service, decontamination, and/or the Secretary of the U S. . decommissioning, remediation, and Department of Education . The waste management firm, providing safe, Radiation Safety Program of study is high quality, practical, cost effective a Technical Certificate program which solutions to your environmental needs . teaches entry-level skills required for employment in the nuclear industry as CHP Consultants Booth: 624 a Radiological Control/Health Physics 100 Chatham Lane Technician ”. Oak Ridge, TN 37830 865-387-0028; FAX: 866-491-9913 Eckert & Ziegler Booth: 424 Analytics Conference of Booth: 622 1380 Seaboard Industrial Blvd . Radiation Control Program Atlanta, GA 30318 Directors (CRCPD) 404-352-8677; FAX: 404-352-2837 1030 Burlington Lane, Suite 4B Eckert & Ziegler Strahlen- und Frankfort, KY 40601 Medizintechnik AG, headquartered 502-227-4543; FAX: 502-227-7862 in Berlin, is a globally active isotope Dade Moeller Booth: 102 technology and holding company for & Associates a number of specialized subsidiaries 1855 Terminal Drive, Suite 200 that process radioisotopes as well as Richland,WA,99354 develop, manufacture and sell isotope 509-946-0410; FAX: 509-946-4412 technology components, medical www moellerinc. com. technology equipment and related Dade Moeller & Associates is a products . nationally-recognized consulting firm Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, located specializing in radiological & nuclear in Atlanta, GA and Eckert & Ziegler

78 Isotope Products, located in Valencia, Eichrom Technologies/ Booth: 101 CA supply high quality, NIST- Nuclear Power Outfitters traceable radioactive reference and 1955 University Lane calibration sources and standardized Lisle,IL,60532 solutions for the calibration of 630-963-0320; FAX: 630-963-1928 radiation measurement instruments . Radiochemical performance evaluation Energy Booth: 519 samples are provided quarterly for Laboratories Inc effluent and environmental monitoring PO Box 30916 programs . Billings, MT 59107 The recent acquisition of Nuclitec 406-252-6325; FAX: 406-252-6069 GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany, www energylab. com. formerly QSA Global GmbH and Energy Laboratories is a full service Nuclitec, Inc ,. Burlington, MA, formerly and analytical laboratory whose part of QSA Global, Inc . added the continued success depends on quality Isotrak brand product range . Isotrak of service and integrity of data . As a products include high quality anodized trusted resource since 1952, Energy wide area reference sources and a Laboratories provides independent, range of instruments including the quality-controlled, and confidential Teletector 6112B/M analytical services for testing of water, Eckert & Ziegler is the world’s largest waste, soil, air, and product supplier of high quality NIST-traceable samples . Visit our website www . radioactive standards . We operate 3 energylab com. . accredited calibration laboratories, 2 in EnergySolutions Inc. Booth: 502 the USA and one in Germany . 423 W . 300 S, Suite 200 Ecology Services Inc. Booth: 303 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 10220 Old Columbia Road 801-649-2102; FAX: 801-413-5690 Columbia, MD 21046 EnergySolutions is an international 410-381-2600; FAX: 410-381-2602 nuclear energy Services Company Ecology Services Inc . Provides in headquartered in Salt Lake City, Utah . depth services to waste generators Divisions include Federal Services, to include waste minimization, Commercial Services, International characterization, tracking, packaging, Division and Logistics, Processing manifesting, complete shipment and Disposal . EnergySolutions takes preparation . Remedial Services, great pride in the work we do and facility decon/decommissioning, close is committed safety first to support outs (MARSSIM) . We support the energy independence, reduced carbon requirements of both large and small emissions, environmental protection . generators, tailoring services specific Femto-Tech, Inc Booth: 111 to customer needs . While committing 25 Eagle Court to safety, regulatory compliance, Carlisle, OH 45005 environmental compliance, and 937-746-4427; FAX: 937-746-9134 complete customer satisfaction . Femto-TECH, INC . is a leader in the design and manufacture of continuous radon monitors and real time tritium instrumentation . 79 F&J Specialty Booth: 518 Gel Laboratories LLC Booth: 226 Products, Inc. 2040 Savage Road 404 Cypress Road Charleston, SC 29414 Ocala, FL 34472 843-906-5929; FAX: 843-766-1178 352-680-1177; FAX: 325-680-1454 GEL is the largest commercial F&J is a manufacturer of traditional environmental laboratory in the country . and microprocessor controlled air Our full service laboratory performs sampling systems, airflow calibrators, radiochemical characterization of accessories and consumables . environmental medium, bioassay, Products include High Volume, Low & mixed waste for DOE & Nuclear Volume and PAS air samplers, filter Power . Instrumentation includes: media and radioiodine collection Alpha spectrometry, Liquid scin- cartridges . Most instruments comply tillation, Gamma spectrometry, Gas with ANSI/UL electrical safety flow proportional counting, X-Ray standards . spectrometry, Radon emanation, Laser kinetic phosphorimetry & ICP-MS . Fluke Biomedical Booth: 301 6045 Cochran Road G/O Corporation Booth: 520 Cleveland, OH 44139 70161 Highway 59, Suite E 440-248-9300; FAX: 440-349-2307 Abita Springs, LA 70420 www FlukeBiomedical. com. 985-809-8085; FAX: 985-809-7440 Fluke Biomedical offers a complete G/O Corporation is a supplier of line of quality assurance test and both nuclear and industrial safety simulation products for biomedical/ equipment . G/O provides health clinical engineers and imaging physics supplies, -waste reduction technicians, along with a range of items, many custom signage and solutions for managers to optimize barrier products . their resources . From electrical- GTRI Booth: 119 safety testers, patient simulators and 995 L’Enfant Plaza, Suite 1400 performance analyzers to automation Washington, DC 20585 systems, we provide the benchmark in 202-406-1212; FAX: 202-863-2861 quality and value . The Department of Energy’s National Gamma Products, Inc. Booth: 617 Nuclear Security Administration (DOE/ 7730 W . 114th Place NNSA) Global Threat Reduction Palos Hills, IL 60465 Initiative (GTRI) works to prevent the 708-974-4100; FAX: 708-974-0071 acquisition of nuclear and radiological Gamma Products, Inc . has been materials for use in weapons of mass designing and manufacturing scientific destruction and acts of terrorism . GTRI instruments for 45 years . Our product works in cooperation with federal, line includes: low background a/b state, and local agencies and private automatic proportional counting industry to install security upgrades on systems, low background a/b manual high priority nuclear and radiological proportional counting systems, a gas materials at civilian sites in the United free automatic a/b counting system, States . RA226/8 & gamma automatic sample changers, lead or steel counting and storage shields . 80 Health Physics Booth: 209 HPS Journal Booth: 121A Instruments IAEA Careers - Booth: 517 330 S Kellogg Avenue, Suite D Argonne National Laboratory Goleta, CA 93117 9700 South Cass Avenue 805-964-3615; FAX: 805-964-3162 Argonne, IL 60439 Health Physics Instruments 630-252-5491; FAX: 630-252-3193 manufactures instruments and The International Atomic Energy detectors that measure gamma, Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, Austria is neutron, beta, and alpha radiation . the world’s center for cooperation The product line includes portable in the nuclear field committed to Geiger-counters through sophisticated promoting safe, secure and peaceful fixed monitors and includes rem uses of . IAEA meters, dosimeters, and multichannel offers opportunities to engage current, analyzers . HPI has been serving the meaningful issues of global peace, Health Physics community for over 35 security and development while years . working in a multicultural workplace . HI-Q Environmental Booth: 402 ICx Radiation Booth: 425 Products Co. 100 Midland Road 7386 Trade Street Oak Ridge, TN 37830 San Diego, CA 92121 865-220-8700; FAX: 865-220-7181 858-549-2820; FAX: 858-549-9657 ICx Radiation develops leading HI-Q Environmental Products edge radiation detection and Company has been a leading identification devices . Our handheld Manufacturer of Air Sampling systems can locate, measure and Equipment, Systems & Accessories identify specific radioactive sources as since 1973 . Our product line includes: well as discriminate between naturally Continuous duty high & low volume occurring, medical related and air samplers, air flow calibrators, harmful sources . Our stationary, high radioiodine sampling cartridges, performance spectral systems detect, collection filter paper, combination filter monitor and analyze possible radiation holders, and complete stack/fume sources either covertly or overtly . hood sampling systems including the Shrouded Probe designed per ANSI IN/US Systems, Inc Booth: 326 N13 1. 1999 . 1040 E Brandon Blvd Brandon, Fl 33511 Hopewell Designs, Inc. Booth: 505 800-875-4687; FAX: 813-620-3708 5940 Gateway Drive IN/US Systems was founded in Alpharetta, GA 30004 1990 to design, manufacture, sell, and 770-667-5770; FAX: 770-667-7539 service instruments used for the low- Hopewell Designs, Inc . provides level measurement of radioactivity in systems and solutions for research laboratories . That remains applications, X-ray inspection, and our primary focus to this day . Our radiation shielding . We offer standard innovative, unrivalled product set products and custom designs to meet makes us the leading provider for our customers’ requirements . radioisotope detection instrumentation

81 and radiochromatography software . Monitoring . Complete systems for Our products support various counting Stack and Duct Monitoring and Facility techniques used in the research wide networks . Applications within laboratory . Nuclear, Industrial and PET . J.L. Shepherd Booth: 323 Landauer Inc. Booth: 218 & Associates 2 Science Rd . 1010 Arroyo Ave . Glenwood, IL 60425 San Fernando, CA 91340-1822 708-755-7000; FAX: 708-755-7011 818-898-2361; FAX: 818-361-8095 Landauer is the world’s largest Biological research, radiation dosimetry service provider component, sterilization and process utilizing the proprietary OSL technology irradiators . Gamma, beta and neutron found in both Luxel+ and InLight . instrument calibration facilities . InLight is a turnkey onsite analysis Automated computer controls and system that meets routine personnel databases . Irradiator/Calibrator IC monitoring and emergency response security upgrades, service, repair, requirements . Both dosimeter types relocations and decommissioning . are NVLAP and DOELAP accredited . manipulators, windows and Landauer’s comprehensive diagnostic lead glass available . evaluation and reporting is backed by over 50 years’ experience . K & S Associates Inc. Booth: 609 1926 Elm Tree Drive Laurus Systems, Inc. Booth: 219 Nashville, TN 37210 3460 Ellicott Center Dr ,. Suite 101 615-883-9760; FAX: 615-871-8056 Ellicott City, MD 21043 K&S is accredited by the HPS as 410-465-5558; FAX: 410-465-5257 an Accredited Instrument Calibration LAURUS Systems specializes in the Laboratory (AICL) for calibration of sales and service of quality radiation instruments from15uR/h to 1000 R/h detection instruments to emergency for 137Cs and other rates for 60Co responders, health physics, homeland and x-rays from 30 to 250 kVp . K&S is security, the military, scrap metal/ also accredited by the AAPM and the recycling and the nuclear industry . American Association for Laboratory LAURUS is a private, 100% woman- Accreditation . owned small business concern that also provides training, maintenance Lab Impex Booth: 423 and calibration services . Systems Ltd. Impex House, 21 Harwell Road Los Alamos National Booth: 117 Nuffield Industrial Est, Poolet Laboratory/Offsite Source Dorset, BH17 OBE, United Kingdom Recovery Project BH21 1QU Road, SM30, MS: J552 44(120)-2684-848; FAX: 44(120)-2683- Los Alamos,NM,87545 571 505-667-9017; FAX: 505-665-7913 Instruments for Alpha-Beta The mission of the U S. . Radiological Continuous Air Monitoring (the Threat Reduction (US RTR) program SmartCAM), Area Gamma Monitoring, is to carry out efforts within the United Monitoring and Iodine States to reduce threats posed by high-

82 risk radioactive materials that could MACTEC, INC. Booth: 310 be used in a radiological dispersal 14062 Denver West Parkway, Ste 300 device (RDD) also known as a “dirty Golden, CO 80401 bomb ”. The core activity of the US 303-273-5071; FAX: 303-273-5000 RTR program is recovering high-risk MACTEC is one of only a few US radioactive sealed sources declared organizations with an NRC license excess and unwanted by domestic and the technical expertise to plan and licensees . These activities are carried execute complex radiological projects . out under the Off-Site Source Recovery From decommissioning planning and Program (OSRP) which is responsible MARSSIM-based surveys to strict for identifying recovering and storing- radiological engineering and the on an interim-basis- U S. . origin advantage of innovative scanning domestic and international radioactive spectrometer radiation detection sealed sources; and other radioactive technology, MACTEC meets project materials that pose a potential risk to goals and saves clients time and money health safety and national security . while meeting the demands of today’s For more information on the project complex regulatory requirements . please visit the OSRP website . Master-Lee Booth: 121 Ludlum Booth: 124 Hanford Corporation Measurements Inc 1904 Airport Way 501 Oak Street, PO Box 810 Richland,WA,99354 Sweetwater,TX,79556 509-943-2949; FAX: 509-943-2860 325-235-5494; FAX: 325-235-4672 Master-Lee Decon Services (MLDS) Ludlum Measurements Inc . has provides contracted decontamination been designing manufacturing and and industrial cleaning services to supplying radiation detection and nuclear and non-nuclear industry . measurement equipment in response We can provide many different to the worlds’ need for greater safety technologies, techniques, processes since 1962 . Throughout its nearly and disciplines to support our five decade history it has developed customer’s needs . We offer complete radiation detection technologies and decontamination services for outages instruments in support of enhancing the or continuous on-site maintenance . safety of personnel the environment and securing borders . Mirion Technologies Booth: 210 5000 Highlands Parkway, Suite 150 Smyrna, GA 30082 770-432-2744; FAX: 770-432-9179 Mirion Technologies (MGPI), Inc . provides a full range of instrumentation and engineering services for health physics applications and radiation monitoring systems for all nuclear facilities and markets . We are #1 in North America in electronic dosimetry .

83 Mirion Technologies Dosimetry diverse membership of nearly 11,000 Services Division is a worldwide engineers, health physicists, , leader in radiation dosimetry services . administrators, and educators Offering the broadest array of dosimetry represents 1600 corporations . Nuclear products in the marketplace, under the News has been an integral part of Global Dosimetry Solutions brand, we the advertising plans of nearly 1000 are fully accredited through several companies to promote their capabilities . well-known organizations . Oak Ridge Booth: 120 MJW Technical Booth: 404 Associate Universities Services Inc. MS-11, PO Box 117 243 Root Street, Suite 100 Oak Ridge,TN,37831 Olean, NY 14760 865-576-3576; FAX: 865-574-3687 716-372-5300; FAX: 716-372-5307 ORAU provides a variety of MJW Technical Services, Inc . services in the radiological sciences: provides high quality and timely Training environmental surveys calibrations and repairs for all types decommissioning epidemiology and of radiation detection equipment . emergency response . MJWTS is the Ludlum Measurements ORTEC Booth: 418 Authorized Eastern U S. . Service 801 S . Illinois Ave Center, SAIC Dosimeter Service Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Center and the Wm B . Johnson 865-483-2124; FAX: 865-425-1380 Authorized Service Center . With our ORTEC celebrates fifty years new state-of-the-art calibration facility providing solutions for a wide variety strategically located in the northeastern of Nuclear Detection Applications . U S. . we can quickly and efficiently Our team of highly qualified scientists service our customers . In addition to and engineers are dedicated to instrument calibrations MJWTS is the providing measurement system Northeastern sales distributor for Wm solutions for Homeland Security, B . Johnson instruments check out Waste Management, Personal our website at www mjwts. com. or call Monitoring, In-Situ measurements, toll free 1-866-300-3MJW for more and Radiochemistry Laboratory information . Applications . Visit our booth to see a NRRPT Booth: 620 demo of our latest products . PO Box 3084 Pacific Northwest Booth: 523 Westerly, RI 02891 401-637-4811; FAX: 401-637-4822 National Laboratory PO Box 999, MS K3-54 Nuclear News Booth: 619 Richland, WA 99352 American Nuclear Society 509-375-4376; FAX: 504-375-3618 555 North Kensington Avenue Pacific Northwest National LaGrange Park, IL 60526 Laboratory performs research for 708-579-8226; FAX: 708-352-6464 DOE, other government agencies, Nuclear News is the monthly and industry to deliver science and membership magazine of the technology to meet national needs . American Nuclear Society, whose PNNL draws upon its multidisciplinary

84 expertise to research, develop and manufacture a wide range of models, deploy solutions to energy and including automatic, manual, single environmental challenges including detector, multi-detector, windowed nuclear energy, environmental health, and windowless . We deliver twice the and remediation . Visit us at www pnl. . performance! gov . Qal-Tek Associates Booth: 626 PerkinElmer Booth: 109 3998 Commerce Circle 710 Bridgeport Ave Idaho Falls, ID 83401 Shelton, CT 06484 208-523-5557; FAX: 208-524-8470 203-402-6973 Qal-Tek Associates is an A2LA PerkinElmer is committed to the accredited calibration facility for all safe use and handling of NEN® types of radiological instrumentation . radiochemicals and radionuclides . We specialize in offering high quality Made in the USA and delivered globally, calibrations at very competitive pricing . our NEN radiochemicals arrive safely in Additionally, we offer a complete list of our exclusive NENSure™ packaging . radiological support services including Also, we provide the complete detection program assessments, training, source solution for monitoring and cleaning handing and removal, site inspection, radioactive spills or contamination…all decontamination and disposal . under one roof . Rad Source Booth: 606 Philotechnics, Ltd. Booth: 614 Technologies, Inc. 2328 Bluff Rd . 480 Brogdon Road, Ste 500 Harriman, TN 37748 Suwanee, GA 30024 865-483-1551; FAX: 865-483-1530 770-887-8669; FAX: 678-302-7510 Philotechnics, Ltd . is the premier Rad Source Technologies is waste management group in the currently the only company in the world country . We provide turn-key LLRW supplying a comprehensive line of and Mixed Waste Brokerage Services, commercial X-ray radiation products D&D/Health Physics Services, designed to replace self-shielded and Industrial Hygiene Services . gamma sources . Current products are Philotechnics has licensed facilities used for the irradiation of small animals, in Oak Ridge, TN and San Diego, cells, sterile insect technique (SIT) CA, as well as offices in Boston, MA, applications, viral inactivation, and Pittsburgh, PA, and Idaho Falls, ID . various other scientific applications . Protean Instrument Booth: 211 RADeCo, Inc. Booth: 107 Corporation 17 West Parkway 231 Sam Rayburn Pkwy Plainfield, CT 6324 Lenoir City, TN 37771 860-564-1220; FAX: 860-564-6631 865-717-3456; FAX: 865-717-3456 Air sampling equipment and filter Protean Instrument Corporation is media . a leading supplier in high performance alpha/beta counting systems and the only company 100% dedicated to the manufacture of these systems . We

85 Radiation Safety Booth: 204 RMD Instruments Corp Booth: 621 Associates 44 Hunt Street PO Box 107,19 Pendleton Drive Watertown, MA 02472 Hebron,CT,6248 617-668-6900; Fax: 617-926-9743 860-228-0487; FAX: 860-228-4402 RadCam Spectroscopic Gamma- Radiation consulting services Ray Imaging System . Makes images radiochemical analysis/lab services of gamma radiation superimposed instrument calibration & repair over a video image of the same field decontamination & decommissioning of view . Intensity of gamma radiation professional publications (journals & is presented in color . Progressively reference books) and software and brighter colors correspond to higher detection equipment for HPs . gamma activity for the user-set energy region-of-interest .Additional, emerging, Radiation Safety Booth: 207 nuclear detector technologies . & Control Services Inc. 91 Portsmouth Avenue Saint-Gobain Crystals, Booth: 618 Stratham,NH 03885 17900 Great Lakes Parkway 800-525-8339; FAX: 603-778-6879 Hiram, OH 44234 RSCS is a leader in Radiological 440-834-5600; FAX: 440-834-7680 Services including Instrument Sales Saint-Gobain Crystals provides Calibration and Repair HP Training innovative crystals and detectors and Consulting . We specialize in: for gamma and decommissioning LTP/FSS support solutions . This includes detectors regulatory compliance Groundwater with iodide and other crystals, Investigations REMP services and cast and liquid assessments . Specialty products and fibers, and gas-filled detectors . include Survey Meter Simulators and Notable brands include Bicron, HP Software . Gamma Labs and our new BrilLanCe® and PreLude®420 scintillators . Radiation Solutions Inc Booth: 503 386 Watline Ave Saphymo GmbH Booth: 525 Missauga, Ontario, L4Z 1X2 Canada Heerstrasse 149 905-890-111; FAX: 905-890-1964 Frankfurt Main, 60488 Germany Radiation Solutions Inc is a 49-69-9765140; FAX: 49-69-765327 manufacturer of low level radiation S.E. International Inc. Booth: 206 detection instruments . Products PO Box 150 include handheld nuclide identification Summertown,TN,38483-0039 (RIID) units, mobile systems for land 931-964-3561; FAX: 931-964-3564 vehicle, marine, airborne and stationary S E. . International Inc . is the monitoring . Applications range from manufacturer of the Radiation environmental, emergency response, Alert® product line offering handheld security and geological mapping . analog and digital ionizing radiation The various systems offer Survey/ detection instruments and multi- Search, ID, Mapping and Directional channel analyzers for surface and air capabilities . In addition, vehicle portal contamination . Proven to be reliable monitoring systems are also produced in the; environmental laboratory primarily for the scrap metal recycling industry . 86 research health physics industry license allows receipt of samples in hazmat educational and domestic the millicurie range . TBE provides preparedness fields . customized support to environmental consultants, government agencies, Solutient Booth: 512 waste processors, and a host of Technologies, LLC nuclear power customers . 6616 Promway Ave . NW North Canton, OH 44720 Teletrix Corporation Booth: 526 330-497-5905; FAX: 330-497-2045 PO Box 14209 Pittsburgh, PA 15239 Spectrum Booth: 224 412-798-3636; FAX: 412-798-3633 Techniques LLC Teletrix manufactures Radiation 106 Union Valley Rd Training Simulators for the nuclear Oak Ridge, TN 37830 power industry, first responders, the 865-482-9937; FAX: 865-483-0473 military, state and local governments, Gross Counting with Geiger- hospitals and universities . Radiation Mueller and Nal(Tl) detector systems . training with simulators presents Spectroscopy with Multi-channel realistic training scenarios in complete Analyzers for Nal(Tl) detector systems . safety without the use of any live Exempt Quantity Sealed Radioactive sources, strictly adhering to the spirit of Sources . Nominal and calibrated ALARA . Made in the USA since 1988, Gamma . Nominal Alpha and Beta . they are used in programs to advance Isotope Generator . hands-on training in radiation-related Technical Associates/ Booth: 602 work environments . Overhoff Technology Corp. Thermo Fisher Booth: 410 7051 Eton Avenue Scientific Canoga Park, CA 91303 1410 Gillingham Lane 818-883-7043; FAX: 818-883-6103 Sugar Land, TX 77478 Recent additions to TA’s Health 713-272-0404; FAX: 713-272-4573 Physics instrument line include air Radiation safety training and nuclear and area monitors, which are smarter, products . more sensitive and more rugged than previously available, in addition to pipe Thomas & Booth: 325 and plume and the latest advances in Associates Inc. portables . 1205 West Barkley Avenue Orange, CA 96868 Teledyne Brown Booth: 611 714-997-8090; FAX: 714-997-3561 Engineering, Inc. Thomas Gray & Associates, Inc ,. 2508 Quality Lane also representing Environmental Knoxville, TN 37931 Management & Controls, Inc . (EMC) 865-934-0373; FAX: 865-690-6187 and RWM-Utah, Inc . offers a full line TBE Knoxville Laboratory offers of Health Physics services including a broad spectrum of radioanalytical LLRW disposal, consolidation, services for bioassay, environmental transportation, site remediation and HP samples, and waste characterization . services . Our generous radioactive material

87 Tidewater Inc. Booth: 125 Uticom Systems, Inc. Booth: 113 7161 Columbia Gateway Drive, Suite C 109 Independence Way Columbia, MD 21046 Coatesville, PA 19320 410-997-4458; FAX: 410-997-8713 610-857-2655; FAX: 610-857-2986 Uticom Systems, Inc . manufactures Heavy Booth: 118 graphics for harsh environments, Powder Inc. specializing in nuclear grade signs, 9090 Kenamar Dr, Suite A labels, tags, and markers . Our stock and San Diego, CA 92121 custom graphics solutions are currently 858-693-6100; FAX: 858-693-8471 used by nuclear power companies US Navy Recruiting Booth: 103 across the country . Innovative and 5722 Integrity Drive durable products ensure safety and Millington, TN 38054 compliance at nuclear facilities . 800-US-NAVY US Nuclear Booth: 108 Regulatory Commission 11555 Rockville Pike, MS 0-3E 17A Rockville, MD 20852 301-415-1082; FAX: 301-415-3818 www nrc. gov. The mission of the U S. . Nuclear Regulatory Commission is to regulate the Nation’s civilian use of byproduct source and special nuclear materials to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety to promote the common defense and security and to protect the environment . Please visit our website at

88 Works-In-Progress Abstracts P.59 Regulatory Research in nostic reference levels (DRLs) as an Radiation Protection, U.S. Nucle- efficient standard for optimizing the ar Regulatory Commission radiation protection of patients . The Bush-Goddard, S. physical parameter recommended US Nuclear Regulatory Commission for monitoring the (DRLs) in conven- The field of radiation protec- tional is the entrance tion has made significant advances skin dose (ESD) and methods for in the last few decades, and these measuring it is clearly described in advances have various regulatory NRPB standard protocol . implications for potential occupa- Method: The data were col- tional and public exposures . This lected for 1183 radiographs of adult poster presentation will illustrate patients . The sample of patients was regulatory-research-related topics chosen so that the weight of patients concerning the impacts of adapting was between 50-80 kg . Eight con- the International Commission on ventional X-ray examinations were Radiological Protection recommen- chosen for this study . Entrance sur- dations in Publication 103 to 10 CFR face dose (ESD) of individual patient Part 20 regulations, a status of the was directly measured by thermo- Commission’s initiatives on analyz- luminiscence dosimeter, TLD chips ing cancer incidence and current sealed in a plastic sachet were stuck health risk . In addition, the poster on the skin of patient at the center of presentation will demonstrate cur- X-ray beam axis . rent research in radiation dosimetry, Results: In this study, 3rd quar- methods of beta and gamma dose tiles of measured ESDs for patients computations, and dose assess- undertaking a particular examina- ment projects including national and tion were selected as ESD for study international efforts in analyzing oc- sample, based on this assumption cupational exposure data and as low ESDs for X-ray examination includ- as reasonably achievable (ALARA) ed in this study are as follows: Chest techniques . PA- 0 37. mGy, Chest Lat- 1 8. mGy, Lumbar Spine AP- 3 6. mGy, Lumbar P.60 Estimation of Entrance Spine Lat- 5 6. mGy, Pelvis AP- 3 5. Surface Doses (ESDs) for Com- mGy, Abdomen AP- 3 7. mGy, Skull mon Medical X-Ray Diagnostic PA- 2 96. and Skull Lat- 1 79. mGy . Examinations in Radiological De- Conclusion: The data were partments in Mashhad-IRAN analysed statistically, and the mini- Esmali, S. Taghi, M., Toossi, B. mum, median, mean, maximum, first Mashad University of Medical and third quartile values of ESDs are Sciences, Iran reported . Finally, our results were Background: The British na- compared with the proposed Iranian tional radiological protection board DRLs, the international reference (NRPB) introduced the use of diag-

89 dose values reported by the Euro- filter distance was identified as an pean Commission, the International important characteristic concerning Atomic Energy Agency and the Na- the angular response of the dosim- tional Radiological Protection Board . eter . An element to filter distance It is evident that ESDs obtained in of 3 5. mm was simulated to be the this work for Abdomen AP, Pelvis AP, optimum distance to obtain a con- Lumbar AP and Lumbar Lat exami- sistent angular response for angles nation do not exceed DRLs values between +/- 80° . Benchmark irradia- worked out by NPRB . On the con- tions of proto-type dosimeters were trary for Chest PA, Chest Lat, Skull consistent with the simulated design PA and Skull Lat, higher ESDs were demonstrating agreement with the acquired in this study compared with simulation to within +/- 13% . DRLs suggested by NRPB . There is P.62 Design and Simulation of no single reason for dose variations, a Passive-Scattering Nozzle in but the reasons are complex, in gen- Proton Beam Radiotherapy eral, low filtration, high mAs and low Guan, F., Poston, J., Braby, L. tube potential are associated with Texas A&M University higher doses arising from applica- The objective of this research tion of various X-ray machines . is to obtain the three-dimensional P.61 MCNP Simulating OSL conformal dose distribution in proton Ring Response Matrix for X-Ray beam radiotherapy . The methods are Spectrums firstly to design a double-scattering Xia, Z., Salasky, M. system in a passive-scattering treat- Landauer, Inc. ment nozzle and then to simulate MCNP (Monte Carlo N-particle the transport of . The double- transport code) ver . 5 was used to scattering system is designed using simulate the photon response of a the NEU (Nozzle with Everything single element Al2O3:C extremity Upstream) codes package, and the ring dosimeter . A Sn filter of 0 35. transport of protons in the newly-de- mm thickness was determined to signed treatment nozzle and a wa- be the optimum thickness to flatten ter phantom is simulated using the the Al2O3:C photon response rela- Monte Carlo code MCNPX (Monte tive to 662 keV photon of Cs-137 to Carlo N-Particle eXtened) . The dy- within +/- 35% for photon between namic range modulation wheel in 53 keV and 662 keV, which covers the nozzle cannot be modeled in the the nuclear medicine application en- simulation of MCNPX . This problem ergy range . is solved by implementing a Perl Large doses were delivered to (a programming language) script, fingers in nuclear medicine appli- which is used to convert the dynam- cation area, which makes minimal ic simulation problem into a series angle response a necessity be- of successive static simulation prob- cause fingers twist a lot in the radia- lems . The other Perl script is used tion field . The Al2O3:C element to to collect the separate static simula-

90 tion results and merge them into one unwanted portions of the classical result as if it was directly produced x-ray tube’s x-ray spectrum . Radio- from the dynamic simulation . The graphic image of a low-Z sample three-dimensional dose (including (fish) was taken using ~20 keV LCS depth-dose and transverse-dose) x-rays . We collected approximately distributions in a water phantom 3,800 net LCS photons per centi- for different nozzle settings are ob- meters squared per second, that im- tained in this research . plies further intensity improvements are necessary in the future . The P.63 Radiographic Imaging of a quasi-monochromatic LCS photo- Low-Z Sample Using Laser Comp- peak was produced based on elec- ton Scattered X-Rays tron beams tuned to approximately Naeem, S., Chouffani, K., Wells, D. 33 MeV . The beam was brought Idaho State University, Pocatello to a collision with the 4 GW peak- Laser Compton Scattered powered Nd:YAG laser operating at (LCS) x-rays are produced as a re- 1064 nm wavelength . The linac was sult of the interaction between accel- operating at 60 Hz with an electron erated and a laser beam . beam pulse length of about 50 ps The yield and energy of LCS x-rays and a peak current of about 7 A . is dependent on angle of collision between interacting particles, emit- P.64 Application of Probabilis- tance of electron and laser beams, tic RESRAD-BIOTA Code in the the electron linear accelerator’s IAEA EMRAS II Biota Working (linac) electron beam energy and Group’s Beaverlodge Scenario current, and the laser’s wavelength Kamboj, S., Yu, C., LePoire, D., and its power . One of our on-going Klett, T., Cheng, J.-J., Normandy, J., research objectives at the Idaho Ac- Williams, W.A., Domotor, S., Wallo, celerator Center (IAC) is to improve A. spectral signal-to-noise ratios for Argonne National Laboratory, US radiographic imaging . Since LCS Department of Energy x-rays are both tunable and quasi- The RESRAD-BIOTA code has monochromatic, they offer much bet- been updated to include the capa- ter signal-to-noise ratios in imaging bility to conduct probabilistic/uncer- applications with minimal scattering tainty analyses, which uses input (lower ) . This parameter probability distributions improves contrast in the resulting compiled from literature data . Dis- radiographic image . Further, the ab- tribution functions have been devel- sence of “white noise” in LCS x-ray oped and used in RESRAD-BIOTA spectrum (LCS x-rays are polarized for many parameters, including fresh and non-isotropic) is not only suit- water/sediment distribution coeffi- able in low dose deposition for pos- cient (Kd), fraction of intake retained, sible medical applications but also fresh water species-specific bioac- eliminates the need to use filters cumulation factors (Biv), relative bio- traditionally being used to suppress logical effect (RBE), and many allo-

91 metric parameters used to estimate P.65 PIMAL: A GUI for Enabling biota ingestion and inhalation rates . Radiation Dose Assessment Us- The probabilistic version of RES- ing Phantoms with Realistic Pos- RAD-BIOTA code was applied to an- tures alyze the Beaverlodge scenario, as Akkurt, H., Wiarda, D., Eckerman, K. part of the modeling comparison ex- Oak Ridge National Laboratory ercise conducted by the Internation- Previously, a computational al Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA’s) phantom with moving arms and Second Environmental Modeling for legs and an accompanying graphi- Radiation Safety Program’s (EM- cal user interface (GUI), PIMAL, RAS II’s) Biota Working Group . In was developed to enable the dose this scenario, several lakes in the estimation using realistic postures Beaverlodge and Athabasca Re- in a user-friendly manner . The dose gion of Canada were assumed to be estimation for realistic posture is es- contaminated due to past uranium pecially important for occupational operations, resulting in im- exposure, in which the worker is pacts to the lakes’ invertebrate com- being exposed to radiation in differ- munities . The purpose of this model ent postures (i e. ,. glove-box worker comparison exercise was to assess or physician performing operation the potential impacts and compare on a patient) . The use of standard modeling methods and parameters vertical-upright phantom models for used by different modelers from the analysis of these cases would several countries . For this exercise, normally yield inaccurate dose es- water and sediment samples from timations . Therefore, PIMAL was four study areas at 16 sites collected developed to serve as a flexible from 2001 to 2006 were analyzed for software tool to ease the burden of Pb-210, Po-210, Ra-226, Th-230, setting up and executing radiation and U-238 . The whole-body con- transport simulations using different centration was predicted for White postures, using MCNP, for dose es- Sucker, Lake White Fish, Fingernail timations . However, the first version Clam, and Chironomus using the of the PIMAL was somewhat limited probabilistic fresh water (radionu- in its features, i e. ,. it contained only clide and biota-specific) Biv values . a hermaphrodite phantom model If the water concentration for a site and allowed only isotropic source was not available, the sediment con- definitions . Currently, the features of centration along with the Kd value PIMAL are being further enhanced was used to predict the whole-body by incorporating additional phantom concentration in the biota . In the sec- models, improving source features, ond part of the exercise, the predict- and improving user-friendliness in ed whole-body concentrations from general . In this new version, in ad- different models would be compared dition to the original hermaphrodite to the measured concentrations . phantom model, male and female phantom models are added . The user can still change the posture 92 using slider bars in addition to the ated with them . In vitro bioassays added text boxes . Furthermore, of urine or feces are indirect mea- the source features have been en- surements of the sensitive tissues’ hanced significantly . The source exposure to uranium as a chemical specification now includes internal and as a radiation source as inferred and external source options in a pull- through biokinetic models . We are down menu . For internal organs, the using contemporary biokinetic mod- source is assumed to be uniformly els from the International Commis- distributed within the organ . For ex- sion on Radiation Protection . These ternal sources, in addition to a point models link the timing and concen- source, the user can select from the tration of tissue exposures to the standard ICRP external source ge- concentrations excreted in the urine ometries (AP, PA, LLAT, RLAT, ISO) and feces . Based on published ob- using the pull-down menu . Once the servations of tissue effects from con- phantom model is selected, the pos- centrations of uranium and radiolog- ture is defined, and the simulation ical doses in humans and animals, parameters are set, the user can we estimate protective occupational generate the input and perform the limits of uranium intakes that can be MCNP computations using the GUI . technically defended with current After the radiation transport simula- scientific information and methods . tion is complete, the estimated or- We explicitly calculate the biokinet- gan dose values are displayed in ics of uranium intakes with various a tabulated form . In this paper, the characteristics in the human respi- main features of the PIMAL software ratory system, the alimentary tract, are described . *This work was fund- and in the blood . The character- ed by the Nuclear Regulatory Com- istics include: solubility, chemical mission . form, aerodynamic mean activity di- ameter (AMAD), acute and chronic P.66 Evaluation of Uranium intakes, enrichment, and default Chemical and Radio-Toxicity in values if the form of uranium is un- the Workplace for Bioassays known . We calculate the biokinetics Meck, R., Leggett, R.W., Eckerman, of both acute and chronic exposures K.F., McGinn, C.W. and the superimposed combination Science and Technology Systems, of acute and chronic exposures . LLC, Oak Ridge National Laboratory We have produced very informative The authors are reevaluating graphs of investigation levels and the chemical and radio-toxicity of ura- immediate action levels that show nium . We are including the most re- the cross-over of chemical toxicity cent published case reports and bio- to radiotoxicity as functions of air kinetic models to update approaches concentrations of uranium, solubility, for uranium bioassays . In vivo and percent enrichment . We also measurements of uranium intakes predict the optimum times for col- are direct measurements,however lecting bioassay specimens or mea- low counting efficiencies and rela- surements . tively high uncertainties are associ- 93 Author Index -A- Baker, JP ...... THAM-E 1. Aceil, S ...... TAM-B 11. Baker, KR ...... TAM-B 2. Acha, RM ...... P 22. Baker, SI ...... TPM-F 7. Aciel, S ...... P 10. Bakr, WF ...... P 47. Adamovics, J ...... TAM-D 7. Balásházy, I ...... P . 48,. P 49. Adrovic, F ...... P 57. Baldari, S ...... P 35. Agam, MA ...... TPM-B1 3. Baldini, E ...... WAM-D 1. Aghara, SK ...... MPM-D 3. Balmer, DK ...... TAM-D 6. Ajayi, IR ...... TPM-B1 1. Balter, S ...... WAM-E 4. Akkurt, H ...... P 65. Balzer, M ...... P 1,. P 3. Al-Failakawi, A ...... P 55. Banghart, D ...... WPM-A 5. Al-Shemali, T ...... P 55. Barat, KL .MPM-E 1,. TAM-F 4,. PEP T-1 Albers, JP ...... TAM-D 4. Barley, WH ...... TAM-D 4. Albert, T ...... TPM-E 1. Barnett, JM ...... TPM-B2 1. Alemu, T ...... P 10. Bassin, NJ ...... TPM-E 3. Allan, J ...... TPM-F 3,. TPM-F 8. Bauer, JM ...... TPM-F 1. Alonzo, F ...... WAM-B 2. Bauhs, JA ...... TAM-A 11. Alrefae, T ...... P 55. Baweja, A ...... TPM-B1 2. Amato, E ...... P 35. Beale, R ...... MPM-E 2. Amoroso, L ...... WPM-A 5. Beck, HL ...... WAM-E 10,. THAM-B 1,. . Amr, M ...... P 45. THAM-B 2,. THAM-B 3,. THAM-B 4. Andersen, RL ...... MPM-C 1. Beckfield, FJ ...... P 12. Anderson, A ...... TPM-D 4. Beckman, J ...... TAM-E 1. Andrade, ME ...... P 51. Bell III, RT ...... WAM-E 11. Andrews, HR ...... WAM-D 6. Belosokhov, MV ...... P 5. Andriambololona, R ...... P 52. Benjamin, MJ ...... MPM-B1 3. Ansari, A ...... TPM-E 8,. WAM-C 5. Benkhedda, K ...... WAM-C 3. Anspaugh, LR ...... TPM-C 4. Bennett, A ...... TAM-A 6. Antonio, CL ...... WAM-C 7. Bennett, KE ...... TAM-A 9. Aono, T ...... P 54. Benson, SV ...... TAM-F 5. Arginelli, D ...... P . 36,. P 53. Bergman, J ...... P 17. Atiya, IA ...... TPM-B1 2. Berkvens, P ...... TAM-F 3. Austin, KH ...... WAM-A 1. Bermann, F ...... TAM-C 7. Austin, SM ...... WAM-A 1. Berne, A ...... TPM-E 3. Avataneo, O ...... P 36. Berrington de Gonzalez, A ...... P 27. Avivar, J ...... P 37. Bertelli, L.TPM-A 2,. WAM-C 6,. WAM-C 9. Avramov-Zamurovic, S ...... TAM-A 5. Billa, J ...... TAM-B . 11,. P 10. Avtandilashvili, M ...... P 23. Birchall, A . . . TPM-C 3,. WAM-C 7,. P 23. Azizova, TV ...... P 5. Blanco, D ...... P 38. Bland, JR ...... TPM-A 2. -B- Bland, JS ...... TAM-E 2. Badolato, F ...... P 36. Bloom, G ...... WPM-A 6. Baeslack, JS ...... WAM-A 67. Blumenthal, DJ ...... WAM-D 2. Bahadori, AA ...... TAM-A 3,. WAM-F 5. Bolch, WE . . CEL2, TAM-A 3,. WAM-F 5,. . Bailey, ED ...... THAM-E 6. THAM-D 2. Bakalyar, D ...... PEP T-2 Bond, J ...... P 1.

94 Bondarkov, MD ...... P . 18,. P 19. Chambers, DB ...... WAM-B 5. Bosley, WS ...... WPM-F 7,. P 30. Chang, BJ ...... P 13. Bouville, A ...... TAM-C 9,. TPM-A 1,. Chaouachi, K ...... P 45. WAM-E 11,. THAM-B 1,. THAM-B 2,. . Cheema, SS ...... TAM-A 6. THAM-B 3,. THAM-B 4,. THAM-B 7. Chelidze, N ...... P 21. Boyd, MA ...... WAM-A 2,. WAM-B 6. Chen, CL ...... P . 13,. P 15. Braby, L ...... P 62. Chen, IJ ...... P 13. Brachmann, NM ...... MPM-B1 1. Chen, S-Y . . . . . MPM-B1. 1,. WAM-E 8,. Brady, SL ...... WPM-B 2. WAM-F 2. Bray, N ...... WAM-D 6. Cheng, J-J ...... MPM-B1 1,. P 64. Breshears, DD ...... WAM-B 1. Cherry, RN ...... TAM-D 10,. WPM-F 5. Brey, RR . . . WAM-F 10,. P 21,. P 22,. P 23. Chouffani, K ...... P 63. Brill, A ...... THAM-B 7. Christensen, DM ...... TPM-E 5. Britten, J ...... WAM-F 4. Clark, L ...... WAM-A 8. Brodsky, A ...... TPM-E 7. Clawson, T ...... AAHP1. Brown, KL ...... P 28. Colon Mendoza, RA ...... TAM-D 3. Bruesewitz, MR ...... WPM-A 2. Conant, JF ...... TAM-D 8. Brumwell, FR ...... MPM-B1 1. Constable, R ...... WPM-F. 8. Buchholz, MA ...... TPM-D 5. Cook, A ...... PEP 2-D Buddemeier, BR . . . AAHP1,. WPM-D 1. Copper, C ...... P 10. Burgett, EA ...... TAM-D 5,. WAM-C 5. Costigan, S ...... WAM-C 9. Burgett, EM ...... TAM-A 2. Cox, BW ...... PEP 1-C, P 14. Burns, D ...... TPM-E 3. Crowe, F ...... TPM-E 7. Bushberg, JT ...... WAM-E 6. Crowell, AS ...... WPM-B 2. Bush-Goddard, S ...... P59 Cuellar, JP ...... TPM-E 4. Butala, S ...... MPM-B1 1. Cullings, HM ...... TAM-C 6,. TPM-A 4,. . Bytwerk, D ...... WAM-B 7. TPM-A 5.

-C- -D- Cain, J ...... PEP 1-F Dauer, LT ...... WAM-A 5,. WPM-A 8,. . Calderin, D ...... TAM-D 3. THAM-A 5. Cameron, CB ...... TAM-A 5. Dávila, JI ...... TAM-B 13. Campennì, A ...... P 35. Davros, WJ ...... WAM-A 4. Campos Torres, MM ...... TPM-F 3. Daxon, EG ...... TPM-E 4. Capello, K ...... P 22. Day, L ...... PEP 2-F Caracappa, PF ...... TPM-A 6,. . Dayeh, MA ...... P 31. WAM-A 6,. WAM-A 7,. Debey, TM ...... WAM-F 1. WAM-C 4,. P 24,. PEP M-5, DeBord, GW ...... TAM-A 7. PEP T-5, PEP W-5 Degteva, MO ...... TPM-C 4. Cardis, E ...... TAM-C 7. Dehmel, J-C ...... THAM-E 2. Carter, EA ...... WPM-A 6. Deljkic D ...... P. 43,. P 57. Carvalho-Filho, AE ...... P 51. DeMore, DM ...... TAM-E 2. Casas, M ...... P 37. Desai, MI ...... P 31. Casey, WR ...... TAM-F 2. DeVol, TA . . . . TAM-B 1,. TAM-B 3,. P 20. Cazalas, EJ ...... MPM-A 3. Dewhirst, MW ...... WPM-B 2. Cerdà, V ...... P 37. DeWitt, R ...... TPM-A 1. Chachian, AB ...... P 30. Dibblee, MG ...... MPM-D 5. Dimitrov, LD ...... P 39,. P 40,. P 41.

95 Ding, A ...... WAM-A 7. Flores, FE ...... TAM-B 13. Dobey, R ...... PEP 2-A Foley, TQ ...... TAM-B 7,. TAM-D 7,. P 8. Dodge, C ...... WAM-F 5. Franklin, C ...... P 10. Domotor, S ...... P 64. Fuehne, DP ...... TAM-B 4,. TAM-B 5. Dong, F ...... WAM-A 4. Funamoto, S ...... TPM-A 4,. TPM-A 5. Dong, H ...... TAM-B 9. Donnelly, EH ...... P . 18,. P 19. -G- Dooling, J C ...... TPM-F 4. Gadd, M ...... WAM-C 9. Douglas, P ...... WPM-B 3. Garnier-Laplace, J ...... WAM-B 2. Downey, HT ...... TAM-D 2,. TAM-D 8. Gaschak, SP ...... P . 18,. P 19. Drozdovitch, V . . . TAM-C 9,. THAM-B 1,. . Gaul, W ...... AAHP2. THAM-B 3. Gause, SM ...... TAM-A 4. Dua, SK ...... TAM-D 3. Gee, NG ...... P 28. Dugan, K ...... MPM-B1 2. Gibbons, DS ...... WAM-C 2. Duran, M ...... TPM-A 3,. TPM-F 5. Gidi, M ...... P 10. Gilbert, ES ...... TAM-C 1,. TAM-C 7,. -E- WAM-E 3. Eckerman, K ...... P . 65,. P 66. Gilbin, R ...... WAM-B 2. Edwards, B ...... PEP 1-A, MPM-E 4. Gillenwalters, ED ...... WAM-F 1. Egbert, SD ...... TPM-A 4. Gillespie, TJ ...... WPM-B 1. Egbert, SE ...... TPM-A 5. Gladden, JB ...... P 11,. TAM-D 7,. P 8. Egidi, PV ...... TPM-D 3,. PEP M-6 Glass, A ...... PEP W-4 Einstein, AJ ...... P 27. Glazkova, IV ...... P 5,. P 6. Elder, D ...... PEP TH-4 Glines, WM ...... TAM-D 6. Emery, R.PEP 1-E, PEP 2-E, PEP M-2, Goans, RE ...... TPM-E 5. TPM-F 4. Gogolak, CV ...... TPM-E 3. Ennis, ME ...... WAM-C 6. Gordon, JR ...... P 8. Erhardt, LS ...... WAM-D 6. Graham, RV ...... WAM-B 6. Esmali, S ...... P 60. Gregoratto, D ...... P 23. Estes, BD ...... MPM-A 1. Gregory, DC ...... WPM-B 1. Estévez, E ...... P 51. Griggs, J ...... TPM-E 3. Evdokimoff, VN ...... P 25. Grissom, MP ...... TAM-F 1. Grogan, KP ...... TAM-B 1. -F- Groves, KL ...... THAM-D 6,. PEP T-4 Fallahian, N ...... MPM-A 7. Gu, J ...... Fallin, B ...... WPM-B 2. WAM-A 7. Fang, HF ...... P 9,. P 15. Guan, F ...... P 62. Farfan, EB . . . . TAM-B 7,. TAM-D 7,. P 8,. Gunasingha, R ...... WPM-B 2. P 11,. P 18,. P 19. Guryanov, MY ...... P 5. Farkas, A ...... P . 48,. P 49. Gutierrez, J ...... PEP 1-E, PEP M-2 Farsoni, AT ...... MPM-A 3. Fassbendern, M ...... TPM-A 3. -H- Fasso, A ...... TPM-F 8. Hacker, C ...... TAM-C 7. Fernald, MJ ...... WAM-A 8. Hall, C ...... WPM-A 1. Ferrer, L ...... P 37. Hall, MI ...... P 31. Fisher, DR ...... CEL2, THAM-A 4. Hamby, DM ...... MPM-A 3. Fisher, T ...... P 16. Hamilton, DS ...... P 30. Fix, JJ ...... TAM-C 7. Hammer, BE ...... TAM-A 11.

96 Hampton, SD ...... THAM-E 1. Ilic Z ...... P. 43,. P 57. Han, B ...... TPM-A 6. Ing, H ...... WAM-D 6. Hansen, TW ...... TAM-D 1,. PEP 2-G Inn, K ...... WAM-C 4. Harding, DC ...... THAM-E 6. Inrig, EL ...... WAM-D 6. Harley, NH ...... WAM-C 10. Ishikawa, N ...... P 56. Harmon, J ...... WPM-A 1. Iwatschenko, M ...... MPM-A 8. Harmon, JF ...... WAM-C 2. Harper, A ...... P 10. -J- Harpring, LJ ...... P 8. Jackson, AM ...... WPM-A 4. Harris, JT ...... TAM-E 3,. TAM-E 5,. Jacob, N ...... THAM-A 1. WAM-F 10,. P 1,. P 2,. P 3,. CEL5 Jadick, MG ...... MPM-A 1. Harris, W ...... WPM-F. 7. James, AC ...... TAM-C 5,. P 22,. P 23. Haskins, VM ...... WAM-A 67. Jannik, GT . . . . TAM-B 7,. TAM-D 7,. P 8,. Hauck, BM . . . . . WAM-C 1,. THAM-D 3. P 18,. P 19. Hawkes, NP ...... TAM-A 6. Jannik, TG ...... P 11. Hawkley, GH ...... TAM-E 5. John, R ...... THAM-A 2. Hayes, RB ...... WAM-F 9. Johnson, JE ...... WPM-A 7. Heard, J ...... P 10. Johnson, PG ...... WAM-A 4. Heinmiller, B ...... TAM-C 7. Johnson, RH . . . . . WAM-F 7,. PEP M-1, Herberg, A ...... P 35. PEP W-1 Hertel, NE ...... TAM-A 8,. TAM-D 5,. Johnson, TE . . . . . MPM-A 4,. MPM-D 1,. WAM-C 5,. WPM-B 5. TAM-B 9,. Hiatt, JW ...... MPM-C 5. TAM-B 12,. TPM-A 7,. WPM-A 1,. . Higginbotham, JF ...... MPM-A 6. . . WAM-C 2,. WAM-F 1,. WPM-F 3,. Higgins, PD ...... TAM-A 11. P 12,...... Higley, KA ...... WAM-B 3,. WAM-B 5,. . PEP 2-H WAM-B 7. Jokisch, DW ...... TAM-A 3,. WPM-F 2. Higson, D ...... P 42. Jordan, K ...... TAM-F 5. Hill, RL ...... TAM-A 10. Juneja, BR ...... THAM-D 2. Hinchcliffe, WA ...... TAM-E 3. Jung, J ...... P 16. Hinton, T ...... WAM-B 2. Justus, AL ...... TPM-A 2,. TPM-A 3,. Hoffman, FO ...... WAM-E 2. WAM-C 6. Hoffman, JM ...... WAM-C 9. Holmes, CJ ...... P 8,. TAM-D 7. -K- Holzmer, J ...... P 34. Kahilainen, J ...... TAM-A 9. Hoover, MD ...... PEP 1-G Kahn, B ...... WAM-E 9. Horwood, NA ...... TAM-A 6. Kamboj, S ...... WAM-F . 2,. P 64. Howard, BN ...... MPM-D 2. Kapoor, A ...... WAM-F 2. Howel, CR ...... WPM-B 2. Karapatakis, DJ ...... TAM-B 7. Howell, D ...... MPM-F 1. Kay, SE ...... THAM-E 1. Huda, A ...... MPM-B2 1. Keenan, MA ...... WAM-A 8. Hughes, HL ...... TAM-A 5. Keith, LS ...... WAM-A 2. Hunt, B ...... WPM-D 2. Kelly, ER ...... MPM-D 1. Husson, S ...... TAM-B 1. Kennedy, Jr, WE ...... TPM-D 1. Kephart, GS ...... PEP TH-2 -I- Kerns, K ...... PEP TH-3 Ibarra, J ...... WPM-E 3. Kerr, GD ...... TPM-A 4,. TPM-A 5. Ibrahim, N ...... TPM-B1 3. Khan, RA ...... P 7.

97 Khater, AEM ...... P 44,. P 46,. P 47. LePoire, D ...... P 64. Khatri, SP ...... MPM-A 2. Li, C ...... WAM-C 3,. WAM-C 8. Khokhryakov, VF ...... TPM-C 2. Ligeti, O ...... TPM-F 8. Khokhryakov, VV ...... TPM-C 2. Lin, CF ...... P 13. Khorjekar, G ...... WPM-A 6. Linda, C ...... WPM-B 3. Khoury, HJ ...... P 51. Linet, MS ...... THAM-B 6. Khudzari, JMD . . .TPM-A . 8,. TPM-B1 3. Litman, R ...... TPM-E 3. Kim, HJ ...... P 26. Liu, B ...... WAM-A 7. Kim, KP . . THAM-B 5,. THAM-B 8,. P 26,. Liu, J ...... P 27. CEL3, TAM-F 6,. TPM-F 1,. Kim, YH ...... P 26. TPM-F 8. King, DA ...... THAM-E 3. Liu, T ...... WAM-C 4. King, J ...... MPM-E 2. Lively, JW ...... TAM-D 2. Kirk, JS ...... WAM-F 4. Lizio, D ...... P 35. Kirk, S ...... WPM-E 8. Ljubenov, V ...... TPM-D 2. Kirkham, T ...... WAM-F 4. López, H ...... TAM-B 13. Kiselev, MF ...... THAM-E 7. Luckyanov, N . . . .TAM-C 9,. THAM-B 1,. . Klett, T ...... P 64. THAM-B 3. Klotz, K ...... WAM-F 4. Lundberg, EJ ...... WAM-A 67. Kocher, DC ...... WAM-B 5. Lynch, TP ...... WAM-C 7. Kofler, JM ...... WPM-A 2. Kolkowski, P ...... TAM-A 6. -M- Kopp, DG ...... P 20. Mabry, AM ...... MPM-C 2. Kozarev, K ...... P 31. MacLellan, JA ...... WAM-C 7. Kraft, SL ...... WAM-C 2. Madas, BG ...... P. 48,. P 49. Kramer, GH . . . . . WAM-C 1,. WAM-C 3,. Madrigal, J ...... P 17. WAM-C 8,. THAM-D 3,. THAM-D 4. Mahathy, JM ...... TAM-A 7. Krampert, J ...... PEP 2-D Maksymenko, AM ...... P . 18,. P 19. Kraus, J ...... WAM-F 4. Malafeew, V ...... TAM-E 2. Kraus, T ...... WPM-D 2. Mao, XS ...... TAM-F 6. Krieger, KV ...... MPM-D 4. Marceau-Day, ML . TPM-F 2,. THAM-F 1,. . Kuhne, WW ...... P 11. THAM-F 2. Kumar, N ...... P 7. Marianno, CM ...... MPM-A 2. Kwofie, J ...... WPM-A 5. Marine, PM ...... WAM-A 8. Kwon, D ...... THAM-B 7. Marra, JC ...... P. 18,. P 19. Marsh, DR ...... WAM-A 67,. P 24. -L- Marshall, M ...... TAM-C 7. Lagos, L ...... TAM-D 3. Martel, CB ...... THAM-A 2. Laiche, TP ...... WAM-D 3. Martinez, HA ...... TAM-B 5. Land, CE ...... THAM-B 3. Martinez, ML ...... TPM-A 3,. TPM-F 5. Lanka, VK ...... WPM-A 3. Martinez, NE ...... WAM-C 2. Lanza, JJ ...... WAM-D 5,. THAM-D 5. Masuda, T ...... P 4. Larsson, CL ...... WAM-D 6. Matheny, TE ...... TAM-B 3. Lee, C ...... TAM-B 1,. THAM-B 5,. May, RT . .PEP 1-B, PEP 2-B, WPM-B 4. THAM-D 2. Mays, TL ...... THAM-E 1. Lee, KN ...... P 26. McBurney, R ...... TPM-E 8. Lee, PL ...... TAM-B 7. McCluskey, B ...... MPM-F 2. Leggett, RW ...... P 66. McCurdy, DE ...... TPM-E 3.

98 McDermott, PJ ...... MPM-F 2. Nageswaran, TN ...... P 55. McGinn, CW ...... P 66. Nakamura, Y ...... P 4. McKay, L ...... PEP W-3 Napier, BA ...... TAM-C 2,. TPM-C 4. McKeever, SWS ...... TPM-A 1. Napolitano, D ...... WPM-B 5. McLaughlin, DA ...... WPM-B 1. Nelson, BL ...... THAM-A 3. McMarr, PJ ...... TAM-A 5. Nelson, K ...... WAM-F 3,. WPM-E 7. Meck, R ...... P 66. Nelson, ME ...... TAM-A 5. Mehta, K ...... P 58. Nelson, RS ...... TPM-E 9. Melanson, MA ...... WPM-F 7,. P 30. Neton, JW ...... TPM-C 5. Melo, DR ...... THAM-B 2,. THAM-B 5,. . Ngachin, M ...... TAM-D 3. THAM-B 7. Nichelson, S ...... WPM-F . 8. Mena, RM ...... WAM-D 4. Normandy, J ...... P 64. Meyer, KE ...... MPM-B1 4. Nour, S ...... WAM-C 4. Miligan, P ...... CEL1 Millage, K ...... P 17. -O- Mille, M ...... MPM-B2. 2,. WAM-A 7,. O’Horo, S ...... THAM-A 2. WAM-C 4. Oldham, M ...... TAM-D 7. Miller, A ...... CEL1 Olsher, R H ...... WAM-C 6. Miller, DL ...... THAM-B 5. Olson, C ...... CEL1 Miller, DW ...... TAM-E 3,. TAM-E 5. Ortega, MIA ...... P 30. Miller, G ...... WAM-C 9. Ortega, P ...... TPM-F 5. Miller, JJ ...... WAM-F 10. Miller, M ...... PEP 1-H -P- Miller, ML ...... TAM-B 8. Padilla, MT ...... TPM-F 3. Millsap, WJ ...... TAM-D 6. Palmer, R ...... WAM-C 5. Miranda, I ...... P. 50,. P 51. Papin, PJ ...... TPM-E 9. Miranti, A ...... P 53. Pappin, JL ...... TAM-D 6. Mireles, F ...... TAM-B 13. Pardo, RC ...... TPM-F 7. Moeller, DW ...... TAM-B 10. Passow, RP ...... TPM-E 1. Moeller, MP ...... WAM-A 1. Patel, GN ...... THAM-D 7. Mohammed, A ...... WPM-B 3. Paz, JE ...... P. 50,. P 51. Moore, EF ...... TPM-F 7. Pearce, MS ...... TAM-C 7. Moore, ME ...... TAM-B 4,. TAM-B 5. Pedersen, C ...... TPM-A 7. Morgan, TL ...... PEP W-2, CEL4 Pedersen, R ...... MPM-C 4. Moroney, WR ...... PEP 1-D, TPM-D 5. Pelletier, JF ...... MPM-F 2. Moroz, B ...... THAM-B 1,. THAM-B 2,. . Pena, AM ...... WAM-F 9. THAM-B 7. Pereira, AG ...... P 29. Moroz, BE ...... THAM-B 4. Perera, S ...... THAM-D 1. Morris, CA ...... TPM-F 3. Pérez, M ...... P. 50,. P 51. Morris, LL ...... MPM-D 4. Perle, SC ...... TAM-A 9. Moser, M ...... TAM-C 7. Philips, L ...... WPM-A 5. Murphy, LY ...... MPM-A 5. Pinedo, JL ...... TAM-B 13. Myers, DS ...... WAM-E 5. Pittman, J ...... P 10. Poston, Sr, JW ...... THAM-D 6,. P 62. -N- Potter, WE ...... P 33. Na, YH ...... TPM-A 6. PourArsalan, M ...... P 31. Naeem, S ...... P 63. Powell, B ...... TAM-B 1. Nagarajan, R ...... MPM-B2 1. Prins, RD ...... WAM-A 5.

99 Prinz, AA ...... TAM-F 6,. TPM-F 1. Salazar, J ...... TPM-A 3,. TPM-F 5. Puncher, M ...... TPM-C 3,. P 23. Sams, B ...... MPM-E 4. Sandness, GA ...... MPM-A 5. -Q- Sandvig, MD ...... TPM-F 6. Quinn, BM ...... WPM-A 8. Santana Leitner, M ...... TAM-F 6. -R- Santiago, JL ...... P 30. Raabe, OG ...... MPM-B2 3. Saucedo, S ...... TAM-B 13. Radev, R ...... WAM-F 8. Savard, G ...... TPM-F 7. Rahman, NM ...... TPM-B1 2. Sax, KJ ...... TAM-A 5. Rajon, DA ...... TAM-A 3. Schafer, DP ...... TAM-B 4. Rakovan, L ...... WPM-E 1,. WPM-E 6,. . Schelkens, P ...... P 50. WPM-E 10. Scherpelz, RI ...... TPM-C 1. Ramadan, S ...... MPM-B2 1. Schierman, MJ ...... TAM-B 2. Ramanandraibe, MJ ...... P 52. Schrader, B ...... P . 32,. P 34. Randall, E ...... WPM-A 1. Schrader, J ...... P 32. Randriamora, TH ...... P 52. Schwadron, NA ...... P 31. Randriantsizafy, RD ...... P 52. Schwahn, SO ...... WPM-B 1. Rao, GR ...... WPM-B 1. Schweppe, JE ...... MPM-A 5. Rathbone, BA ...... TAM-A 10. Sears, ST ...... WAM-A 2. Ray, FR ...... TPM-A 7. Segars, WP ...... WAM-A 8. Real, A ...... WAM-B 5. Semones, EJ ...... WAM-F 5. Reber, EH ...... TPM-D 2. Shagina, NB ...... TPM-C 4. Reece, WD ...... P 16. Shandala, NK ...... THAM-E 7. Reeves, GI ...... WPM-F . 4. Shanks, A ...... WPM-D 4. Regnier, E ...... TPM-D 4. Shannon, R ...... TPM-E 3. Reynolds, K ...... TPM-E 6. Shavers, MR ...... WAM-F 5. Riccardi, A ...... MPM-A 4. Shearer, DA ...... TPM-D 3. Ridone, S ...... P. 36,. P 53. Shields, AT ...... WPM-A 7. Riley, WP ...... MPM-A 1,. PEP 2-C Sholom, S ...... TPM-A 1. Ringel, MD ...... WPM-A 6. Shult, R ...... TAM-D 5. Ríos, C ...... TAM-B 13. Simon, SL ...... TPM-A 1,. TAM-C 8,. Roach, E ...... THAM-E 2. WAM-E 10,. THAM-B 1,. THAM-B 2,. Robbins, ES ...... WAM-C 10. THAM-B 3,. THAM-B 4,. THAM-B 5,. . Roberts, NJ ...... TAM-A 6. THAM-B 6,. THAM-B 7,. THAM-B 8. Robins, M ...... WAM-D 6. Simonds, MH ...... TAM-B 2. Roche, NJ ...... TAM-B 12. Simpkins, AA ...... TAM-B 6. Rodríguez, J ...... P 50. Simpson, DR . . . . .MPM-A 7,. PEP TH-1 Rokni, S ...... TPM-F 8. Simpson, S ...... PEP TH-3 Rokni, SH . TAM-F 6,. TPM-F 1,. TPM-F 3. Sinha, V ...... P 2. Romanov, SA ...... TPM-C 2. Sliney, DH ...... MPM-E . 3,. PEP M-3 Rowat, JH ...... TPM-D 2. Slobe, ED ...... TAM-E 6. Rucker, TL ...... TAM-D 9. Smith, G ...... WAM-B 4. Rusinova, GG ...... P 5,. P 6. Sneve, MK ...... THAM-E 7. Soares, FAP ...... P 29. -S- Solorio, D ...... WPM-E 5. Sabourov, A ...... TPM-F 8. Sorcic, J ...... WPM-F . 3. Sadi, B ...... WAM-C 8. Soukphouangkham, PB . . . . . WPM-A 8. Salasky, M ...... P 61. Sowder, AG ...... MPM-C 3.

100 Spero, K ...... TPM-E 9. Toossi, B ...... P 60. Sprague, D ...... MPM-E 2. Tormohlen, D ...... P 3. St Germain,. J ...... WAM-A 5. Townsend, LW ...... P 31. Stabin, MG . . . . . MPM B2. 2,. WAM-A 7,. . Tracy, BL ...... TPM-B1 2. WAM-A 8,. THAM-B 7. Travis, LB ...... WAM-E 3. Stallard, AM ...... TPM-A 2. Tucker, D ...... PEP 2-A Stangler, MJ ...... TPM-E 7. Turner, DC ...... THAM-E 6. Stanley, SJ ...... TAM-D 7,. P 8. Stansbury, PS ...... MPM-A 5. -U- Sterbentz, JW ...... TPM-F 6. Uchida, S ...... P . 54,. P 56. Stewart, HM ...... WPM-F . 1. Stewart, W ...... WAM-F 6. -V- Strom, DJ . . CEL6, TAM-C 3,. WAM-C 7. Valtchev, GG ...... P 41. Strzelczyk, J ...... P 33. Van Baalen, M ...... WAM-F 5. Stuck, B ...... WPM-F. 8. Van Cleef, D ...... PEP TH-5 Stump, R ...... WPM-D 3. Van Nostrand, D ...... WPM-A 6. Sturchio, GM ...... WPM-A 2. Vasudevan, L . . . MPM-B1 2,. MPM-D 3,. . Su, L ...... TAM-E 4,. P 16. MPM-B2 2. Vázquez, G ...... TPM-B2 1,. TPM-D 4. Sugarman, SL ...... TPM-E 5. Veinot, KG ...... TAM-A 2,. TAM-A 8. Sullivan, MM ...... WAM-F 10. Verde, F ...... P 28. Sung, DW ...... P 26. Vetter, RJ ...... WAM-E 7,. WPM-A 6. Suslova, KG ...... TPM-C 2. Vicini, P ...... THAM-B 7. Vidic A ...... P. 43,. P 57. -T- Vigna, L ...... P 53. Tagami, K ...... P. 54,. P 56. Voevodskiy, A ...... WAM-D 6. Taghi, M ...... P 60. Voillequé, PG ...... TAM-C 9. Takata, H ...... P 54. Vollaire, J ...... TAM-F 6,. TPM-F 8. Tako, Y ...... P 4. Vorobiova, MI ...... TPM-C 4. Tannahill, GM ...... WPM-A 2. Vostrotin, VV ...... TPM-C 2. Taulbee, TD ...... TAM-A 7. Voutila, M ...... TAM-A 9. Taylor, GC ...... MPM-A 8,. TAM-A 6. Vrieze, TJ ...... WPM-A 2. Taylor, W ...... TPM-A 3. Vvedensky, VE ...... TPM-C 2. Tenforde, TS ...... WAM-E 1. Thierry-Chef, I . . . TAM-C 7,. THAM-B 5,. . -W- THAM-B 6. Wagiran, Husin . . TPM-A. 8,. TPM-B1 3. Thomas, DJ ...... MPM-A 8,. TAM-A 6. Wagoner, DA ...... TAM-A 4. Thomas, MA ...... MPM-B2 1. Walker, LS ...... PEP. 1-B, PEP 2-B, Thompson, C ...... WPM-E 2. PEP M-4, CEL3, TPM-A 2,. TPM- Thorn, D ...... TPM-A 3. A 3,...... TPM-F 5,. THAM-F 3. Thornton, R ...... WAM-A 5. Walker, M ...... P 16. Tijerina, A ...... MPM-B1 2. Waller, EJ ...... THAM-D 1,. THAM-E 4. Todd, LC ...... MPM-A 5. Wallo III, A ...... TPM-D 4,. P 64. Tolstykh, EI ...... TPM-C 4. Wang, JJ ...... P 13. Tompkins, JA ...... TPM-E 2. Wang, TW ...... P 13. Tonchev, AP ...... WPM-B 2. Wang, W-H ...... MPM-B1 5. Toohey, RE ...... TAM-C 4,. WPM-E 1,. . Watanabe, Y ...... THAM-D 7. WPM-E 4,. WPM-E 9.

101 Waters, TL ...... TPM-A 2,. WAM-C 6,. -Y- WAM-C 9. Yamanishi, H ...... TPM-F 8. Weber, PJ ...... THAM-A 2. Yorks, PJ ...... MPM-A 7. Weinstock, RM . THAM-B 2,. THAM-B 3,. . Yoshizumi, TT ...... WPM-B 2. THAM-B 6. Yu, C ...... P 64. Wells, D ...... P 2,. P 63. Welty, B ...... TPM-E 9. -Z- Whicker, FW ...... WAM-B 1. Zabko, J ...... TPM-E 1. Whicker, JJ ...... WAM-B 1. Zanzonico, P ...... THAM-B 7. Wiarda, D ...... P 65. Zarling, J ...... WAM-F 6. Williams, JL ...... WAM-F 2. Zhang, W ...... TPM-B1 2. Williams, V ...... PEP 2-D Zharov, P ...... WAM-C 7. Williams, WA ...... P 64. Zhuo, H ...... WAM-D 6. Williamson, MJ ...... WPM-A 8. Ziegler, JF ...... TAM-A 5. Wilson IV, CA ...... MPM-B1 5. Ziriax, J ...... WPM-F . 8. Winfield, T ...... P 10. Zittle, M ...... PEP T-3 Wittrock, M ...... TPM-E 1. Woodring, ML ...... MPM-A 5. Wyatt, H ...... WAM-C 8.

-X- Xia, Z ...... P 61. Xu, XG ...... MPM-B2 2,. TPM-A 6,. WAM-A 7,. WAM-C 4.

102 6575 40 40 36 36 13' 13' 6575 40 40 36 36 13' 13' 1,700 170 1001,380 140 901,380 13' 140 601,700 170 60 84 100 13' 84 13' 90 13' A-F 24,000 2,400 1,000 1,000 15' A-F 8,300 850 500 430 20' A-F 8,800 900 550 450 20' A-B 980 80A-B 2,000 50 200 40 A-C 100 12' 4,500 90 450 12' 240 220 20' A-F 24,000 2,400 1,000 1,000 15' A-F 24,000 2,400 1,000 1,000 18' 155 250 251 252 253 254 255 257 258 259 260 355 Room 155A 2,530Room 155B 3,240Room 155C 260 3,240Room 155D 300 2,530Room 155E 120 300 3,240Room 155F 150 260 3,240 120 150 300 160 120 15' 300Room 250A 160 150 15' 1,450 Room 250B 120 150 15' 1,470 Room 250C 160 120 15' 1,480 Room 250D 160 120 15' 1,300 Room 250E 80 120 15' 1,300 Room 250F 80 110 1,300 80 80 110 60 80 110 20' Room 251A 80 60 20' 1,300 Room 251B 60 60 20' 1,300 Room 251C 110 60 1,600 20' Room 251D 120 60 1,600 20' Room 251E 60 120 20' 1,600 Room 251F 150 60 1,700 60 80 150 70 80 150 20' Room 252A 80 80 20' Room 252B 490 80 80 20' 490 80 20' 40 20' 80Room 253A 40 Room 253B 20 20' 990 1,010 20 100 15 100 Room 254A 15 12' 1,000 40 Room 254B 40 12' 2,500 Room 254C 100 1,000 40 40 250 12' 60 100 12' 120 40 60 140 20' 40 20' 20' Room 255A 2,530Room 255B 3,240Room 255C 260 3,240Room 255D 300 2,530Room 255E 120 300 3,240Room 255F 150 260 3,240 120 150 300 160 120 300 15' 160 150 15' 120 150 15' 160 15' 160 15' 15' Room 355A 2,530Room 355B 3,240Room 355C 260 3,240Room 355D 300 2,530Room 355E 120 300 3,240Room 355F 150 260 3,240 120 150 300 160 120 300 18' 160 150 18' 120 150 18' 160 18' 160 18' 18' Room 257A Room 257B Room 260A Room 260B Room Room Room Room Room Room Room Room Room Meeting Rooms (cont.) ROOMRoom SQ. FT. Theatre Banquet Classroom Ceiling Room Room Boardroom 20 Knight for table Kenneth 10' boardroom permanent Room Room Room A-G 6,080 700 350 340 15' A-G 6,500 700 350 330 15' 150 151 Room ARoom B 3,820 Room C 3,820 Room D 400 3,820 Room E 400 3,820 Room F 200 400 3,820 Room G 200 400 190 3,820 Room H 200 400 190 3,820 Room I 30' 200 400 190 3,820 Room J 200 30' 400 190 3,820 30' 200 400 190 3,820 30' 200 400 190 30' 200 380 190 30' 200 190 30' 200 190 30' 190 30' 30' Room 150ARoom 150B 600Room 150C 590Room 150D 660 50Room 150E 600 60Room 150F 590 60 20Room 150G 50 660 20 2,380 60 20 20 250 20 60 20Room 15' 151A 20 20 15' Room 151B 140 625 20 20 15' Room 151C 600 20 120 15' Room 151D 670 50 20Room 15' 151E 625 60 15' Room 151F 15' 600 60 20Room 151G 50 670 20 2,710 60 20 20 270 20 60 20 15' 20 20 15' 140 20 20 15' 20 120 15' 20 15' 15' 15' Exhibit Halls ROOMExhibit Hall A 48,600 SQ. FT.Exhibit Hall B* 24,300 TheatreExhibit Hall C 5,300 Banquet Classroom 2,600 48,600Exhibit Hall D Ceiling 2,700 1,350 48,600Exhibit Hall E 5,300 2,700 64,800Exhibit 1,300 Hall 5,300 1 2,700 30' Exhibit Hall 2 48,600 7,100 30' 2,700 2,700 16,200 Exhibit Hall 3 5,300 3,600 2,700 16,200 Exhibit Hall 4 1,700 30' 2,700 3,400 64,400 Exhibit Hall 5 1,700 30' 2,700 C. 130,300 or A 900 with conjunction in used be 6,500 must 30' hall; stand-alone a * not 12,000 is B Hall 30' 900 3,000 700 6,000 700 3,000 30' 6,000 30' 30' 30' Ballroom ROOMBallroom SQ. FT. Theatre 45,000 Banquet Classroom Ceiling 4,900 2,900 2,500 30' Meeting Rooms ROOMRoom SQ. FT. Theatre Banquet Classroom Ceiling Salt Palace Convention CenterRoom Floorplan – Escalators/Elevators/Stairs – Exhibit Halls – Meeting Rooms – Ballroom – Areas Public – Loading Docks – Parking – Concessions – Restrooms 355 EF ABC DEF 255 Thir d Level ABC D

S econ d Level Upper Mezzanine Upper West Lobby Board Room BA BA C 259 258 B 254 A B Center AB 260 257 252 253 A Business F E D 251 C A B F E D Upper Concourse 155 250 East Registration C A B ABC DEF First Level East Entrance

First Aid P Mezzanine Lower WEST West 5 4 3 2 1 Lobby Parking Entrance HALL HALL HALL HALL HALL Security F E D G 151 300 WEST C A B A HALL F E D G 150 C A B B First Aid HALL Foyer North B C HALL Lower Concourse BALLROOM D HALL IGECA JHFD South Foyer 200 WEST E HALL WEST TEMPLE South

Plaza South Entrance Shuttle Bus Loading/Unloading Bus Shuttle 515,000 gross square feet of contiguous exhibit hall space, divisible into 9 halls. With over 160,000 square feet of meeting space, we can host 67 concurrent meetings. Received Silver level LEED certification. An award-winning Utah exclusive Food caterer, Services, is located onsite. Holds no labor agreements with any union entities. 1,000 underground parking stalls and 40 loading docks. Cornerstone Audio-Visual is the in-house preferred capable A/V of provider, providing all A/V and production services. Internet communication system with 100 MB fast Ethernet service; able to hardwire network over 6,000 computers at a single time. 33 wireless access points throughout the venue; capable of operating 3,000 wireless users at a single time facility-wide.

SOUTH

Parking Salt Palace Facts: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Entrance SOUTH 200 P FLOOR PLANS Calvin L. Rampton Salt Palace Convention Center floorPlansFINAL 4/2/08 3:02 PM Page 2

103 Hilton Floorplans

104 Saturday, 26 June Monday, 28 June Tuesday, 29 June AAHP 1 Training Emergency Re- CEL1 ABHP Exam Fundamentals CEL 3 ANSI N43 1. Standard Draft: sponders; Materials, Tools, and Tips for Successfully Completing the Rad Safety for Design & Operation . . Methods for Health Physicists Certification Process 7:00-8:00 AM 251D 8:00 AM-5:00 PM Canyon B, Hilton 7:00-8:00 AM 251D CEL4 Overdose of Patients Receiv- Update on Medical Internal ing CT Scans AAHP 2 8-hour HAZWOPER Re- CEL2 fresher Course Radiation Dosimetry: MIRD Commit- 7:00-8:00 AM 251E 8:00 AM-5:00 PM Canyon A, Hilton tee Recommendations . . TAM-A External Dosimetry I 7:00-8:00 AM 251E 8:30 - 11:30 AM Ballroom A Environmental I Sunday, 27 June ABHP Exam - Part 1 TAM-B 8:00-11:00 AM Alpine East/West (H) 8:15 AM-Noon Ballroom B TAM-C AAHP Special Session I Rad PEP 1-A thru 1-H MAM-A Plenary: The Future of the 10:30 AM-12:30 PM Nuclear Industry Dose Reconstruction for Epidemiology 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom E/F/G/H 8:30 AM-Noon Ballroom C PEP 2-A thru 2-H TAM-D Decommissioning 2:00-4:00 PM Complimentary Lunch in Exhibit 8:30-11:30 AM Ballroom D Hall for all Registrants and PEP Rooms: TAM-E Reactor Health Physics 1A/2A - 250A Opening of Exhibits 8:15-9:45 AM 150 ABC Noon-1:00 PM Exhibit Hall A 1B/2B - 250B TAM-F Accelerator Section Special 1C/2C - 250C PEP Program Session I - Light Sources and FELs 1D/2D - 251B 12:15-2:15 PM 8:30-11:45 AM 150G 1E/2E - 251C PEP M1 Counseling Workers Part I, Power Reactor Business Meeting 1F/2F - 251D Understanding Basis for Upset & Fears 9:45 AM 150 ABC 1G/2G - 251E 251B Accelerator Section Business Mtg 1H/2H - 251F PEP M2 EH&S “Boot Camp” for Ra- 11:45 AM 150G diation Safety Professionals: A Unique Welcome Reception AAHP Awards Luncheon 3 Part PEP (Part 3) 251C 6:00-7:00 PM Noon-2:15 PM 151G Hilton Grand Ballroom PEP M3 Optical Radiation: An Over- PEP Program view of Biological Effects and Exposure 12:15-2:15 PM Limits 251D PEP T1 Laser Safety for Health Phys- PEP M4 Part II Accelerator Health icists 251B Physics ABHP Exam Problems 252A/B PEP T2 Advances in Characterizing PEP M5 Introduction to Monte Carlo Rad Output of CT Scanners 251C Methods for the HP (Part 1) 251F PEP T3 Managing Low-Level Radio- active Waste at an Academic Institution Saturday AAHP courses will PEP M6 HPS/ANSI N13 53,. Control Without Breaking the Bank 251D take place in the Hilton Salt and Release of Technologically En- Training First Responders on Lake. hanced Naturally Occurring Radioac- PEP T4 tive Material 251E (RDDs) and (INDs) Events 251E Intro to Monte Carlo Methods Sunday - Thursday ABHP Exam - Part II PEP T5 for the HP (Part 2) 251F All Sessions, CELs and PEPs 12:30-6:30 PM Alpine East/West (H) take place in HPS Chapter Council TPM-A External Dosimetry II the Salt Palace 1:00-2:00 PM Ballroom A 2:45-5:15 PM Ballroom A Convention Center TPM-B1 Environmental II Poster Session 2:15-3:00 PM Ballroom B 1:00-3:00 PM Exhibit Hall A TPM-B2 NESHAPs Radio Air Mtg MPM-A Instrumentation 3:30-5:30 PM Ballroom B 3:00-5:00 PM Ballroom A TPM-C AAHP Special Session II Rad MPM-B1 Waste Management Dose Reconstruction Epidemiology 3:00-4:15 PM Ballroom B 2:30-5:15 PM Ballroom C MPM-B2 Biokinetics and Bioeffects TPM-D Decommissioning Section 4:30-5:15 PM Ballroom B Special Session MPM-C Power Reactor Section Spe- 2:30 - 5:30 PM Ballroom D cial Session - Nuclear Power HP 2010 TPM-E Homeland Security 3:00-5:30 PM Ballroom C 2:30-5:15 PM 150 ABC MPM-D Contemporary Topics in HP TPM-F Accelerator Section Special 3:15-4:15 PM Ballroom D Session II - Light Sources and FELs MPM-E Board of Laser Safety Spe- 2:30 - 5:00 PM 150G cial Session AAHP Open Meeting 3:00-4:45 PM 150 ABC 5:15 PM Ballroom C MPM-F GTRI/NNSA Special Session Decommissioning Section Bus Mtg 3:00-4:00 PM 150G 5:30 PM Ballroom D Student Reception 5:30-6:30 PM 250AB (CC) HPS Awards Banquet 7:00-10:00 PM Hilton Grand Ballroom Wednesday, 30 June Thursday, 1 July Registration Hours CEL5 Rad Releases & Environ THAM-A Medical Health Physics Registration at the Salt Palace Monitoring at Commercial Nuclear Section Special Session Convention Center Power Reactors 8:15 - 10:45 AM Ballroom A Ballroom AB Foyer 7:00-8:00 AM 251D THAM-B NCI Special Session - NCI Saturday 2:00 - 5:00 PM CEL6 Dose Reconstruction for Ra- Dosimetry Studies Sunday 10:00 AM - 5:00 PM diation Epidemiology 8:30-10:30 AM Ballroom B Monday 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM 7:00-8:00 AM 251E THAM-C CRSO Session Regulatory Tuesday 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM WAM-A Medical Health Physics I Trends Wednesday 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM 8:45-11:00 AM Ballroom A 8:30 AM - Noon Ballroom C Thursday 8:00 - 11:00 AM WAM-B Environmental/Radon Sec- THAM-D Emergency Planning Exhibit Hall Hours tion Special Session - Radioecology 8:15 - 10:00 AM Ballroom D 8:30-11:45 AM Ballroom B THAM-E Regulatory/Legal Exhibit Hall A WAM-C Internal Dos & Bioassay 8:15 - 9:45 AM 150 ABC Monday Noon - 5:00 PM 8:15-11:15 AM Ballroom C THAM-F Nanotechnology Special Tuesday 9:30 AM - 5:30 PM WAM-D Special Session: Radiologi- Session Wednesday 9:30 AM - Noon cal Incident Consequence Mgmt I 8:30 - 10:00 AM 150G 8:30 AM - Noon Ballroom D CRSO Business Meeting WAM-E NCRP Special Session 10:30 AM Ballroom C Overview of Current Report and Con- PEP Program ference Activities of National Council . . 10:45 AM-12:45 PM 8:30 AM-Noon 150 ABC PEPTH1 Health Physics Concerns of WAM-F Operational Health Physics Neutron Exposures, Criticality Safety 8:30-11:30 AM 150G and Criticality Accidents 251B Medical Section Business Meeting PEPTH2 Refresher for HPs Physi- 11:00 AM Ballroom A ological Impacts of Respiratory Pro- Environ/Radon Section Bus Mtg tection 251C 11:45 AM Ballroom B PEPTH3 Advanced Techniques and PEP Program New Technologies Used in Emergen- 12:15-2:15 PM cy Response Exercises 251D PEP W1 Counseling Workers Part II, PEPTH4 A Fluoroscopy Credential- Tools for Effective Risk Comm 251B ing Program for Physicians 251E PEP W2 So Now You’re the RSO: Ele- PEPTH5 Fundamentals of Gamma ments of Effective Rad Safety 251C Spectroscopy, Part 2 (Part 1 not in- PEP W3 Testifying as a Health Phys- KEY cluded in PEP 2010) 251F ics Expert Witness 251D MAM Monday AM Session PEP W4 How the Legislature Really MPM Monday PM Session Works 251E TAM Tuesday AM Session PEP W5 Intro to Monte Carlo Meth- TPM Tuesday PM Session ods for the HP (Part 3) 251F WAM Wednesday AM Session WPM Wednesday PM Session WPM-A Medical Health Physics II THAM Thursday AM Session 2:30 - 5:00 PM Ballroom A WPM-B Accelerator 2:30 - 3:45 PM Ballroom B WPM-C CRSO Session DOT Train- the-Trainer NOTE FOR CHPs 2:30 - 5:15 PM Ballroom C The American Academy of Health Physics WPM-D Special Session: Rad Inci- dent Consequence Management II has approved the following meeting-related 2:30 - 5:00 PM Ballroom D activities for Continuing Education Credits for WPM-E NRC Special Session on CHPs: Safety Culture * Meeting attendance is granted 2 CECs per 2:30 - 5:00 PM 150ABC half day of attendance, up to 12 CECs; WPM-F Military Sect Special Session 2:30 - 4:45 PM 150G * AAHP 8 hour courses are granted 16 CECs Movies each; 2:30 - 5:00 PM 251D * HPS 2 PEP courses are granted 4 CECs HPS Business Meeting each; 5:15 PM Ballroom B * HPS 1 hour CELs are granted 2 CECs each . WPM-G ADJUNCT TECHNICAL SESSION: Aerosol Measurements 6:00 - 8:00 PM Canyon A (Hilton)