2 0 0 9 R e p o r t to the Community F o r t A i r P a r t n e r s h i p t A B l e o f C o n t e n t s M e s s a g e f r o m t h e B o a r d Fort Air Partnership Board of Directors: Front row from left to 1 Mission 8 Summary of Key Technical Data right: Keith Purves, Chair, Public Member; 1 Message from the Board 11 Network Average Instrument Uptime Neil Shelly, ’s Industrial Heartland Association Administrative; Laurie 2 The Year in Review 11 FAP Continuous Monitoring Stations Danielson, Northeast Capital Industrial and Parameters 5 FAP Board and Subcommittees Association, Industry; Greg Norum, 12 Alberta Regional Comparisons Public Member Back row from left to right: 5 FAP Staff and Contracted Staff Ludmilla Rodriguez, Alberta Health 13 Summary of Year End Financial Report 5 Recognition of Partners and Sponsors Services Representative; Carrie Trenholm, Public Member; Joy Wesley, Vice Chair, 6 Map of FAP Airshed and Monitors Public Member; Ed van Delden, Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association, Elected Representative; Amit Banerjee, Alberta Environment Representative; Yolanta Leszczynski, Shell Canada Energy, Treasurer, Industry Representative • Not shown: John Cocchio, Dow Chemical Canada ULC, Recording Secretary, Industry Representative; Karl Hauch, Public member; John Navratil, Public Member G l o s s a r y o f T e r m s I am pleased to present the 2009 Annual Report to the a Governance organizational structure dealing with FAP Community on the behalf of the Fort Air Partnership policy and direction. FAP’s contractors and committees AAAQO – Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objective H S – hydrogen Sulphide (FAP). This year saw FAP’s continued growth and will concentrate on managing the operational aspects 2 evolution as we continue to provide accurate and timely of FAP, as directed by the 2010 – 2012 Business Plan. AENV – Alberta Environment NCIA – northeast Capital Industrial Association air quality monitoring data to the FAP region. I’d like to give special thanks to the members of AIHA – Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association NO – nitrogen Dioxide 2 In the past year we have begun the transition from our Board, specifically our Vice-Chair, Treasurer and

AQI – Air Quality Index O3 – ozone an industrial fence line based monitoring network Secretary and to the members of our Technical Working CASA – Clean Air Strategic Alliance PM – Respirable Particulate Matter into a regional monitoring network. This change is Group and Communications Committee. Your hard 2.5 supported by Alberta Environment (AENV) and the work and dedication to FAP has allowed us to meet our CO – Carbon Monoxide PM – inhalable Particulate Matter 10 Clean Air Strategic Alliance (CASA). It is our goal to challenges and achieve our goals in the past year and CWS – Canada Wide Standards QA/QC – Quality Assurance / Quality Control provide residents and stakeholders of the FAP region together we will make 2010 just as successful. with accurate ambient air quality information for their FAP – Fort Air Partnership (registered SO2 – sulphur Dioxide I’d also like to thank the public for their feedback as Fort Regional communities. VOC – Volatile Organic Compounds over the past year. We very much appreciate hearing Air Monitoring Society) In late 2009, FAP made a proposal to place a new from you and we encourage you to contact us with monitoring trailer in the town of Bruderheim which any suggestions, questions or concerns so that we can For more definitions of terms, go to: http://www.fortair.org/what_we_monitor.php was supported by AENV and other stakeholders. This continue to respond to the needs of our communities. new station will begin operating in April 2010. This Bruderheim station was one of two new air monitoring trailers purchased by FAP in 2009. The second is already Keith Purves, Chair n o t e s active, having replaced the previous Ross Creek station in November of 2009. • Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives • Many of the chemicals monitored by FAP are In March 2009 we welcomed Nadine Blaney aboard as v i s i o n FAP’s new Executive Director. This addition has allowed (AAAQOs) are based on an evaluation of reported in parts per billion (ppb). One part per Public, industry and government have the board to shift its focus from operational issues to scientific, social, technical, and economic factors. billion is equivalent to one drop of water diluted a clear understanding of ambient air policy driven governance. We also welcomed three new Alberta Environment works with a variety into 250 200-litre barrels or three seconds out quality in the region. of stakeholders, including other government of every 100 years. public members to the Board in 2009, including Greg departments, the scientific community, Norum, Karl Hauch and Joy Wesley. M i s s i o n environmental organizations, industry and the In November 2009 our board met for a development general public to develop these objectives. To operate a regional network to monitor workshop where we revisited our vision and mission, and report credible and comprehensive and set our priorities for the next three years. With ambient air quality information. the addition of our Executive Director and other contractors, the FAP board will continue to evolve into

Fort Air Partnership 2 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 1 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership ( F A P ) In December of 2009 FAP proposed to redeploy Capital Region Ozone the monitors at Station 401- Road to Management Plan Fort Air Partnership (FAP) was formed in 1997 to address a need for local solutions to local air more effective locations in the FAP network. This In 2009, the Capital Airshed Partnership (CAP), quality issues. plan was supported by Alberta Environment since the production of chemicals that Station 401 was comprised of FAP, Alberta Capital Airshed FAP monitors air quality in a 4,500 square kilometer region NE of that includes Fort intended to monitor had ceased and there was Alliance,West Central Airshed Society and AENV Saskatchewan, Gibbons, Bon Accord, Bruderheim, Lamont, Redwater, Waskatenau, Thorhild and redundant monitoring of the remaining parameters at began the implementation of recommendations from the Capital Region Ozone Management Plan. One Elk Island National Park. FAP has been monitoring and reporting air quality data on behalf of other nearby stations. A full report titled “Strategy for Locating a Monitoring Station in Bruderheim” fully of the recommendations of the plan was to perform industry, Alberta Environment and Environment Canada since 2003. discusses these details of the network changes and is an ozone network assessment. This included an In 2009, the monitoring network consisted of eight continuous monitoring stations and 57 available at www.fortair.org. assessment of existing ozone monitoring in the region. A final assessment report will be available in passive monitoring sites; these are identified in the centerfold map on pages 6 and 7. The FAP Technical Working Group has begun to early 2010. Fort Air Partnership is a community driven multi-stakeholder organization with representation redefine the monitoring objectives of the network. Broad categories of monitoring objectives are to: Reporting from industry, government and the public. FAP’s daily operations are managed by contracted staff and services including an executive director, a communications director, a technical director and • Establish regulatory compliance FAP continues to submit near real time hourly- average monitoring data to Alberta Environment for an air quality monitoring contractor. • Track spatial distributions of pollutants public viewing at (www.envinfo.gov.ab.ca/airquality). • Understand historical trends Validated monthly data, suitable for use in reports, T h e Y e a r i n R e v i e w • Evaluate population exposure to air pollutants is submitted to the provincial Clean Air Strategic • Characterize specific sources or locations Alliance (CASA) Data Warehouse (www.casadata.org), In 2009 Fort Air Partnership (FAP) took steps to The FAP monitoring stations were audited by • Develop scientific understanding generally before the end of the following month that become a regional air monitoring network, moving Alberta Environment in June of 2009 with a follow- the data is collected in. FAP also reports exceedances away from the previous model of operating a up audit in December of 2009 to ensure that Monitoring objectives and development of longer- of Alberta Ambient Air Quality Objectives to Alberta collection of industrial fence line monitors. FAP’s monitoring practices were in compliance with the term network monitoring plans will be developed Environment. commitment to informing the community continued Air Monitoring Directive. FAP received an audit further in 2010. with the production of the Making it Clear series of closure letter on December 16, 2009, indicating that pamphlets and fact sheets, which were mailed out to Alberta Environment was satisfied that FAP fulfilled residents and stakeholders in the spring of 2009. Two the requirements of the audit findings. Audit summary new monitoring trailers were purchased in 2009 to reports and the audit correspondence are posted on replace aging structures and several analyzers were the FAP website at www.fortair.org. upgraded. FAP also added a co-located passive monitor Two new monitoring trailers were added to FAP’s at the continuous monitoring inventory in 2009. The first trailer was used to station for data quality assurance. The past year also saw replace the aging Ross Creek Monitoring Station. the continued implementation of recommendations The second trailer has been designated for the town from the Capital Region Ozone Management Plan. of Bruderheim and is scheduled begin operating in FAP’s Monitoring Network the spring of 2010. The Bruderheim station is the first station expressly place to be part of the FAP FAP operates a network of eight continuous regional air monitoring network and will continuously monitoring stations and 57 passive monitoring monitor the air quality where people live. This sites that collectively measure the air quality of the focus on regional monitoring will provide more region. These monitoring instruments are zeroed representative data for understanding the cumulative daily, calibrated monthly and audited by Alberta effects of regulated industrial emissions, as well as other Environment annually in accordance with the Alberta non-regulated sources, on air quality. Environment Air Monitoring Directive.

Fort Air Partnership 2 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 3 Report to the Community 2009 FAP’s 2009 Technical Annual Report is available at www.fortair.org. F o r t A i r P a r t n e r s h i p This report has been designed to meet the annual government reporting B o a r d a n d S t aff requirements, document the current monitoring network details and as of December 31, 2009 present a summary of monitoring results for the year. Executive Communications Marcella deJong P.Eng. FAP Communications and Outreach Dow Chemical Canada ULC John Cocchio P.Eng., MBA Subcommittee Key communications activities in 2009 included the widespread Recording Secretary Nadine Blaney B.Sc. Paula Horn Shell Scotford Manufacturing distribution of the 2008 Annual Report to the Community, along with Dow Chemical Canada ULC Executive Director the 2008 Annual Technical Report. In addition to these reports FAP Industry Representative Fort Air Partnership Monique Lapalme continued to publish and distribute the fact sheets and information Yolanta Leszczynski P.Eng. Jennifer Downs Meteorological Service of Canada Treasurer, Shell Canada Energy Shell Canada Ltd. Melanie Larsen P.Eng. pamphlets in the Making It Clear series. In 2009 FAP also made Industry Representative Vanessa Goodman Committee Chair, Fort Air Partnership, presentations to industry groups, stakeholders and the public, including Technical Director Keith Purves Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association presenting at the Alberta Airshed Council ZoneVolution conference Chair, Public Member Karl Hauch Darren Morissette in October 2009. AGAT Laboratories Joy Wesley MSc. Eng. EIT Public Member Vice Chair, Public Member A joint FAP-Alberta Environment fact sheet was developed in response Dallas Huybregts Shelley Morris Alberta Environment to a recommendation from the Energy and Resources Conservation Directors Committee Chair Board, explaining the roles of various organizations involved in air Fort Air Partnership Communications Jennifer Nisbet Amit Banerjee P.Eng. Sherritt International Corporation quality monitoring, regulation and management. This fact sheet, as well Alberta Environment Representative Joy Wesley MSc. Eng. EIT Public Member Matt Nordstrom as various other communications materials, can be found on the FAP Laurie Danielson PhD, P.Chem AGAT Laboratories website. Northeast Capital Industrial Association, Alana Yim Industry Representative Northeast Capital Industrial Association Maurice Ouellet In 2009 the name of FAP’s “Redwater” continuous monitoring Shell Canada Ltd. Karl Hauch Technical Working Group station was changed to “Redwater Industrial” in an effort to avoid Public member Keith Purves misinterpretation of monitoring results. Shane Adam Public Member John Navratil AGAT Laboratories Public Member Ludmilla Rodriguez M.Eng., P.Eng. FAP also continues to support the Life in the Heartland initiative, which Yayne-abeba Aklilu Ph.D. Alberta Health Services is a collaboration between five organizations operating in the industrial Greg Norum Alberta Environment Public Member Melanie Sharpe P.Biol. heartland with a common goal of communicating with residents and Doug Bertsch Total E&P Canada Ltd. stakeholders. Ludmilla Rodriguez M.Eng., P.Eng. North West Upgrading Alberta Health Services Representative Merry Turtiak MSc. Nadine Blaney B.Sc. Alberta Health and Wellness For More Information about FAP Neil Shelly PhD Executive Director, Fort Air Partnership Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association, Darcy Walberg Please contact FAP directly if you have any questions, concerns or Administrative Representative Laurie Danielson PhD, P.Chem. Agrium Inc. Northeast Capital Industrial Association comments about air quality and air monitoring in the region. Comments Carrie Trenholm Mike Varley CPP are always appreciated and help us assess whether we are meeting the Public Member Umicore Canada Inc. needs of the community. The public is welcome to attend our board Ed van Delden Joy Wesley MSc. Eng. EIT meetings, which are generally held on the second Monday evening Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association Public Member of each month. For more information contact us at 1-800-718-0471 Elected Representative or email [email protected]. T h a n k s t o o u r F u n d e r s Fort Air Partnership would like to thank the following partners and funders for their continued support:

Alberta Environment Alberta’s Industrial Northeast Capital (www.environment.alberta.ca) Heartland Association Industrial Association (www.industrialheartland.com) (www.ncia.ab.ca)

P r o J E C T S P E C I F I C C o n t r i BU t i o n s Alberta Environment provided the Alberta Environment conducted audits Alberta Environment provided the resources to hire an Executive Director of monitoring stations equipment. resources to complete the “Making it Clear” for 2009. fact sheet package on air quality.

Fort Air Partnership 4 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 5 Report to the Community 2009 t i o n s a t S 51 s h i p 50 49 r t n e s Monitoring u p A R 48

o 52 r 57 u 4 t A i r 7 F o 56 54 58 C o n t i n d n a 55 e 53 v s s i a P Disclaimer: This map is intended to provide a geographical representation of features understood to be as accurate as possible based on the date of creation &/or revision. This map should be used for &/or revision. understood based on the date of creation of features to be as accurate possible a geographical representation This map is intended to provide Disclaimer: Air Partnership and its data contributors for will not be held responsible Fort is not recommended. purposes, other than for reference purposeson, other reliance general reference only and any 2010 April 21, : Map created errors &/or omissions. and concentrations of specific pollutants. hourly data on wind speed and direction, Continuous monitoring stations provide concentrations for specific pollutants. Passive monitoring stations collect a monthly average

Fort Air Partnership 6 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 7 Report to the Community 2009 S UMMA R Y O F K E Y t e C h n i CA L D A T A A n n ua l A v e r a g e s

53 53 52 51 Ozone Concentrations 51 Sulphur Dioxide Concentrations Annual Average: Annual Average: 2009 Passive Data (in parts per billion) 2009 Passive Data (in parts per billion) Isopleth using Kriging Interpolation 54 50 Isopleth using Kriging Interpolation

5 5 18 Note: Isopleth lines are interpolated between data points and 18 Note: Isopleth lines are interpolated between data points and 63 are less certain where there are fewer monitoring sites and at the 55 are less certain where there are fewer monitoring sites and 63 4 edges of the Airshed. 48 4 at the edges of the Airshed.

28 28 • Ozone is not emitted directly, but is a • The annual average sulphur dioxide 28.4 secondary pollutant, chemically formed concentrations vary slightly throughout the 56 42 49 by a reaction between oxides of nitrogen 1.4 FAP region, between 0.4 ppb and 1.4 ppb ,

831 27.4 (NO ) and oxygen in the atmosphere, in the 831 all of the concentrations were well below 6 x 6 1.3 651 651 29 presence of sunlight. 30 the annual AAAQO of 11 ppb. 41 38 26.6 41 38 1.2 • However, in the absence of sunlight (during 28 • Higher concentrations are indicated by 45 45 27 1.1 28 25.8 the night) NOx consumes ozone, so over the 28 darker areas on the map. 3 37 12 3 averaging period of a year, ozone levels are • Important sources of SO are found near 7 1.0 2 7 8 25.0 8 32 11 13 35 lower in areas where more NO is present. 35 39 x 24 most of the darkened areas: Site 35 is near 31 26 57 14 15 0.9 24.2 • The lighter areas on this map coincide 16 a gas battery. Site 11 is located near natural

28A 9 45 28A 9 15 with the areas where we expect to see 15 gas processing, refining and upgrading 25 20 0.8 10 10 17 18 19 33 23.4 34 33 43 40 more NOx (and therefore higher levels of 40 facilities. Site 2 is likely affected by oil 0.7 ozone consumption), due to proximity of 46 refining processes just outside the Airshed. 22.6 21 37 NO sources such as cities, transportation 37 x 22 0.6

corridors and large industrial sources. 23 36 21.8 36 0.5 15 15 21.0 28 28 0.4 1 1 (ppb) 2 2 (ppb) 16 16 Annual Average Sulphur Dioxide (SO ) 16 16 2 Annual Average Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 47 2009 Continuous47 Monitoring Data Annual Average Ozone (O ) 2009 Continuous Monitoring Data 3Annual Average Ozone (O ) 2009 Continuous Monitoring Data 3 2009 Continuous Monitoring Data Redwater Industrial

Lamont County AAAQO = 11 ppb Lamont County Fort Saskatchewan

Range Road 220 Elk Island Ross Creek

Scotford 2 Fort Saskatchewan Elk Island

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Ozone Concentration (ppb) Sulphur Dioxide Concentration (ppb)

Fort Air Partnership 8 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 9 Report to the Community 2009 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Concentrations Air Quality Index in FAP Region in 2009

53 51 Annual Average: 2009 Passive Data (in parts per billion) Isopleth using Kriging Interpolation

Note: Isopleth lines are interpolated between data points and 5 18 are less certain where there are fewer monitoring sites and at the edges of the Airshed.

63 4

28 • The annual average nitrogen dioxide concentrations vary between 0.7 ppb and 4.4 4.4 ppb, all of the concentrations were well below the annual AAAQO of 32 ppb.

3.9 At the Elk Island, Fort Saskatchewan, and Lamont AQM stations, fair, poor or very poor AQI values are 831 • The map indicates that NO sources outside 6 2 651 the Airshed from the City of Edmonton have typically based on either ozone or PM2.5; high AQI values are seldom based on carbon monoxide, sulphur 3.5 41 38 an impact on air quality in the region. dioxide or nitrogen dioxide. 45 3.1 28 • The lighter areas in the northern part of the 3 Airshed are far from NO sources. 2.7 2 7 8 39 FAP Continuous Monitoring Stations and Parameters 35

2.3 Redwater Lamont Fort Range Road Station 401 Elk Island Bruderheim Scotford 2 Ross Creek Saskatchewan (ends March 2010) National Prk (starts April 2010) 28A 9 15 Industrial County 220 10 1.9 Wind speed and 34 33 40 wind direction

1.5 Air temperature 37 Relative humidity 1.1 36 Barometric 15 pressure 0.7 28 Air quality index 1 (ppb) 2 Ammonia (NH ) 16 3 16 Carbon 47 monoxide (CO)

Ethylene (C2H4) Ground-level ozone (O3) Annual Average Nitrogen Dioxide (NO ) Total Annual Average 2Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) hydrocarbons 2009 Continuous Monitoring Data Non-methane 2009 Continuous Monitoring Data hydrocarbons

Methane (CH4) Hydrogen Ross Creek Sulphide (H2S) Nitrogen

AAAQO = 32 pp b oxides (NO ) Fort Saskatchewan X Nitric oxide (NO) Station 401-Josephburg Rd Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) Redwater Industrial Reactive oxidized (NOy) Inhalable particulates (PM ) Range Road 220 10 Respirable particulates (PM ) Lamont County 2.5 Sulphur dioxide (SO ) Elk Island 2 Benzene (C6H6) Toluene (C H ) 0 10 20 30 7 8 Ethylbenzene (C H ) Nitrogen Dioxide Concentration (ppb) 8 10 o-Xylene (C24H30)

Styrene (C8H8)

Fort Air Partnership 10 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 11 Report to the Community 2009 A l b e r t a R e g i o n a l C o m pa r i s o n s 2009 Annual Average Sulphur Dioxide (SO2) 2 0 0 9 F i n A N C I A L s t A t e M e n t s ba s e d o n c o n t i n u o u s da t a Fort Saskatchewan Regional Air Monitoring Society (FAP) 12 2009 10 AAAQO = 11 ppb The following statement of financial position as at December 31, 2009 and the statement of operations for the year ended 8 Annual Average 6 3.8 December 31, 2009 were prepared without audit or review by Brian D. Kelly, Chartered Accountant on March 16, 2010. 4 1.4 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.7 0.6 These statements were compiled from information provided by FAP. Sulphur Dioxide 2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.2 (SO ) 0 A FAP Internal Audit Committee conducted a review of bank statements, cash disbursements, cash receipts, and equipment 2 eek d 2 oline purchase records as well as the general ledger and concluded that documentation is representative of the 2008 financial y East t McKay Car Elk Island For Tomahawk Scotfor transactions. Calgar Ross Cr Edmonton East t Saskatchewan 1.1. STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT 31/12/2009 Redwater Industrial For 2009 Annual Average Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) ASSETS 2009 35 30 AAAQO = 32 ppb CURRENT 25 Annual Average 21.8 Cash $ 564,579 20 15 Nitrogen Dioxide 15 12 11.8 Accounts Receivable 48,337 10 6 5.1 (NO ) 4.7 4.3 3.8 2.8 Prepaid expenses 968 Concentration (ppb) 5 2 2

NO 0 TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 613,884

oline y East EQUIPMENT 2009 Annual Average Car t MacKay Elk Island Calgar RespirableFor ParticulateBeaverlodge Matter (PM ) Air monitoring equipment 302,437 Edmonton East Lamont County 2.5 t Saskatchewan Cold Lake South Red Deer - RiversideFor Computer and office equipment 2,202 ) 3 Communications equipment 6,409 2009 14 12 TOTAL ASSETS $ 924,932 Annual Average 10 8.5 8.4 8.1 7.8 8 5.9 5.7 5.7 6 5.2 4.9 LIABILITIES and NET ASSETS Respirable 4.1 3.8 4 2.9 Particulate Matter Concentration (ug/m 2 CURRENT LIABILITIES 2.5 0 (PM ) PM Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 199,086 2.5 alley y East Deferred contributions 104,735 t MacKay Elk Island Lethbridge Calgar For Drayton V Beaver Lodge Edmonton East Cold Lake South t Saskatchewan Hightower Ridge TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 303,821 Red Deer - Riverside Red Deer Industrial For

2009 Annual Average Ozone (O3) NET ASSETS 50 44.1 2009 45 Net assets invested in equipment 311,048 40 Annual Average 35 31.9 31.7 Unrestricted net assets 310,063 28.9 27.2 30 24.8 23.6 23.2 Ozone (O3) 25 19.4 19.3 TOTAL NET ASSETS $ 924,932 20 15 10 Concentration (ppb) 3

0 5 1.2. STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS 01/01/2009 TO 12/31/2009 0 Revenue eek oline y East Lamont Car ot Cr t MacKay Northeast Capital Industrial Association $ 738,375 Beaverlodge Carr For Calgar Edmonton East Hightower Ridge 2009 Annual 1- hr ColdMaximum Lake South Ozonet Saskatchewan (O3) Alberta Environment - Grant 182,718 For Alberta’s Industrial Heartland Association 32,000 120 2009 Interest income 524 100 90 87 85 82 82 Annual Maximum 76 74 AAAQO =82 ppb 80 TOTAL REVENUE $ 64 63 59 953,617 One-Hour Ozone 60 40 EXPENSES (O3) 20 Administration $ 239,331

Ozone Concentration (ppb) 0 Communications 63,287

eek Monitoring 446,778 oline y East Lamont Car ot Cr t MacKay Calgar Carr For Beaverlodge TOTAL EXPENSES $ 749,396 Edmonton East t Saskatchewan Hightower Ridge Cold Lake South For EXCESS OF REVENUE OVER EXPENSES $ 204,221 Fort Air Partnership 12 Report to the Community 2009 Fort Air Partnership 13 Report to the Community 2009 FA P R e p o r t s a n d R e s o u r c e s

Fort Air Partnership collects and distributes the following information: • Air quality data from our eight continuous and 57 passive monitoring stations • Educational resources for teachers, students and parents • Making It Clear, a series of fact sheets on air quality • Reports, resources and other information about air quality, and FAP’s role in monitoring and reporting air quality

To access this information, including live air monitoring data from eight continuous monitoring stations, please visit our website, www.fortair.org

Please note: A detailed 2009 Technical Annual Report has also been compiled and is available at www.fortair.org or by calling 1-800-718-0471.

P.O. Box 3051 Fort Saskatchewan, AB T8L 2T1 P: 1-800-718-0471 E: [email protected] www.fortair.org

Fort Air Partnership 14 Report to the Community 2009