2015 Urban Water Management Plan for Santa Clarita Valley

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2015 Urban Water Management Plan for Santa Clarita Valley FINAL 2015 Urban Water Management Plan for Santa Clarita Valley Prepared for Castaic Lake Water Agency (CLWA) CLWA Santa Clarita Water Division Newhall County Water District Valencia Water Company (Los Angeles County Waterworks District No. 36/Cooperating Agency) Prepared by Kennedy/Jenks Consultants Nancy Clemm , P.E. Luhdorff & Scalmanini Consulting Engineers Stacy Miller Public Affairs June 2016 2775 North Ventura Road, Suite 100 Oxnard, California 93036 805-973-5700 FAX: 805-973-1440 2015 Santa Clarita Valley Urban Water Management Plan Final July 1, 2016 K/J Project No. 1544214*00 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... vii List of Figures............................................................................................................................... ix List of Appendices ........................................................................................................................ ix List of Abbreviations and Acronyms .............................................................................................. x Section 1: Introduction ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Basis for Preparing a Plan ................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Implementation of the Plan.................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Public Water Systems .............................................................. 1-3 1.4.2 Agencies Serving Multiple Service Areas/Public Water Systems ................................................................................... 1-4 1.4.3 Fiscal or Calendar Year ........................................................... 1-4 1.4.4 Joint Preparation of the Plan .................................................... 1-4 1.4.5 Plan Adoption ........................................................................... 1-8 1.4.6 Public Outreach........................................................................ 1-8 1.4.7 Resources Maximization .......................................................... 1-9 1.5 Water Management within CLWA’s Service Area ............................. 1-10 1.5.1 Castaic Lake Water Agency ................................................... 1-10 1.5.2 Retail Water Purveyors .......................................................... 1-11 1.6 Climate .............................................................................................. 1-13 1.7 Potential Effects of Climate Change.................................................. 1-14 1.8 Climate Change Vulnerability Analysis.............................................. 1-15 Section 2: Water Use .................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Overview ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Demographics ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.3 Historical Water Use............................................................................ 2-2 2.4 Projected Water Use (Demand) .......................................................... 2-4 2.4.1 Purveyor Demand Projections ................................................. 2-4 2.5 Distribution System Water Loss ........................................................ 2-11 2.6 Population ......................................................................................... 2-11 2.6.1 Historical Population .............................................................. 2-11 2.6.2 Population Projections ........................................................... 2-17 2.6.3 Comparison to City and County Planning .............................. 2-18 2.7 Existing and Targeted Per Capita Water Use ................................... 2-19 2.7.1 Base Daily Per Capita Water Use for SBX7-7 Reduction ...... 2-19 2.7.2 Urban Water Use Targets for SBX7-7 Reduction .................. 2-23 2.7.3 2015 Interim Target Compliance ............................................ 2-27 Santa Clarita Valley Urban Water Management Plan Final i Table of Contents (cont’d) 2.7.4 Purveyor Demand Projections and SBX7-7 Objectives ......... 2-27 2.7.4.1 Lower Income Projected Water Demands ........... 2-30 2.8 Other Factors Affecting Water Usage ............................................... 2-32 2.8.1 Weather Effects on Water Usage ........................................... 2-32 2.8.2 Conservation Effects on Water Usage ................................... 2-32 Section 3: Water Resources ....................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Overview ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Wholesale (Imported) Water Supplies ................................................. 3-4 3.2.1 State Water Project Supplies ................................................... 3-4 3.2.1.1 Background ............................................................ 3-4 3.2.1.2 SWP Table A Supply Assessment ....................... 3-10 3.2.2 Other Imported Supplies ........................................................ 3-14 3.2.2.1 Buena Vista-Rosedale Rio Bravo ........................ 3-14 3.2.2.2 Nickel Water - Newhall Land................................ 3-15 3.2.2.3 Yuba Accord Water .............................................. 3-15 3.3 Groundwater ..................................................................................... 3-17 3.3.1 Santa Clara River Groundwater Basin – East Subbasin ........ 3-17 3.3.2 Adopted Groundwater Management Plan .............................. 3-18 3.3.2.1 Available Groundwater Supplies .......................... 3-21 3.3.2.2 Alluvium ............................................................... 3-26 3.3.2.3 Saugus Formation ............................................... 3-32 3.3.3 Existing and Planned Groundwater Pumping ........................ 3-38 3.3.3.1 Impacted Well Capacity ....................................... 3-38 3.3.3.2 Alluvium ............................................................... 3-39 3.3.3.3 Saugus Formation ............................................... 3-39 3.3.3.4 Summary ............................................................. 3-40 3.4 Transfers and Exchanges ................................................................. 3-45 3.4.1 Core Transfers ....................................................................... 3-45 3.4.2 Spot Market Transfers ............................................................ 3-45 3.4.3 Option Contracts .................................................................... 3-46 3.4.4 Future Market Transfers ......................................................... 3-46 3.4.5 Water Exchanges ................................................................... 3-46 3.5 Groundwater Banking Programs ....................................................... 3-46 3.5.1 Semitropic Banking Program ................................................. 3-47 3.5.2 Rosedale-Rio Bravo Banking Program .................................. 3-48 3.5.3 Semitropic Banking Program – Newhall Land ........................ 3-49 3.5.4 Other Opportunities ................................................................ 3-49 3.6 Planned Water Supply Projects and Programs ................................. 3-49 3.7 Development of Desalination ............................................................ 3-50 3.7.1 Opportunities for Brackish Water and/or Groundwater Desalination ........................................................................... 3-50 3.7.2 Opportunities for Seawater Desalination ................................ 3-50 Santa Clarita Valley Urban Water Management Plan Final ii Table of Contents (cont’d) Section 4: Recycled Water ......................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Recycled Water Master Plan ............................................................... 4-1 4.2 Existing Wastewater Treatment Facilities ........................................... 4-2 4.3 Wastewater Treatment Facility Improvements and Expansions ......... 4-3 4.4 Recycled Water Supply and Demand ................................................. 4-7 4.5 Other Potential Sources of Recycled Water ...................................... 4-12 4.6 Recycled Water Demand .................................................................. 4-12 4.7 Recycled Water Comparison ............................................................. 4-16 4.8 Methods to Encourage Recycled Water Use .................................... 4-16 4.9 Optimization Plan for Recycled Water ............................................... 4-17 4.10 Additional Considerations Relating to the Use of Recycled Water ................................................................................................. 4-18 4.10.1 SCVSD Chloride Compliance Plan ........................................ 4-18 4.10.2 Salt and Nutrient Management Plan ...................................... 4-19 4.10.3 Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) ................................ 4-20 4.10.4 Nutrients ................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • San Fernando Valley Burbank, Burbank Sunrise, Calabasas
    Owens Valley Bishop, Bishop Sunrise, Mammoth Lakes, Antelope Valley and Mammoth Lakes Sunrise Antelope Valley Sunrise, Lancaster, Lancaster Sunrise, Lancaster West, Palmdale, Santa Clarita Valley and Rosamond Santa Clarita Sunrise and Santa Clarita Valley San Fernando Valley Burbank, Burbank Sunrise, Calabasas, Crescenta Canada, Glendale, Glendale Sunrise, Granada Hills, Mid San Fernando Valley, North East Los Angeles, North San Fernando Valley, North Hollywood, Northridge/Chatsworth, Sherman Oaks Sunset, Studio City/Sherman Oaks, Sun Valley, Sunland Tujunga, Tarzana/Encino, Universal City Sunrise, Van Nuys, West San Fernando Valley and Woodland Hills History of District 5260 Most of us know the early story of Rotary, founded by Paul P. Harris in Chicago Illinois on Feb. 23, 1905. The first meeting was held in Room 711 of the Unity Building. Four prospective members attended that first meeting. From there Rotary spread immediately to San Francisco California, and on November 12, 1908 Club # 2 was chartered. From San Francisco, Homer Woods, the founding President, went on to start clubs in Oakland and in 1909 traveled to southern California and founded the Rotary Club of Los Angeles (LA 5) In 1914, at a fellowship meeting of 6 western Rotary Clubs H. J. Brunnier, Presi- dent of the Rotary Club of San Francisco, awoke in the middle of the night with the concept of Rotary Districts. He summoned a porter to bring him a railroad sched- ule of the United States, which also included a map of the USA, and proceeded to map the location of the 100 Rotary clubs that existed at that time and organized them into 13 districts.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER REPORT Castaic Lake
    2016 SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER REPORT June, 2017 Prepared by Castaic Lake Water Agency CLWA Santa Clarita Water Division Los Angeles County Waterworks District 36 Newhall County Water District Valencia Water Company 2016 Santa Clarita Valley Water Report prepared for: Castaic Lake Water Agency CLWA Santa Clarita Water Division Los Angeles County Waterworks District 36 Newhall County Water District Valencia Water Company June 2017 JUNE 2017 2016 SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER REPORT Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 2016 Water Requirements and Supplies ............................................................................. ES-1 ES.2 Alluvial Aquifer ................................................................................................................... ES-2 ES.3 Saugus Formation............................................................................................................... ES-4 ES.4 Imported Water ................................................................................................................. ES-5 ES.5 Recycled Water ................................................................................................................... ES-6 ES.6 2017 Water Supply Outlook................................................................................................ ES-6 ES.7 Water Conservation ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • San Fernando Valley Business Journal the Valley 200 July 20, 2020 Table of Contents
    THE VALLEY 200THE MOST INFLUENTIAL LEADERS IN THE VALLEY AREA 2020 017_sfvbj_V200_Section Cover.indd 17 7/14/20 1:48 PM 18 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL THE VALLEY 200 JULY 20, 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS 20 INDEX 38 FINANCE 22 LETTER FROM THE 43 GOVERNMENT EDITOR & PUBLISHER 47 HEALTH CARE 24 ADVISORS 30 BUSINESS 51 ORGANIZATIONS 36 EDUCATION 54 REAL ESTATE We congratulate all the leaders in the Valley 200. Thanks to them, our economy is stronger and our community is better! 018_sfvbj_V200_TOC.indd 18 7/14/20 1:49 PM JULY 20, 2020 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL 19 MEET THE COMPANY THAT’S BEEN IMPROVING BOTTOM LINES SINCE 1991 We bring a new approach to business and personal insurance. One that makes sure you’re not simply protected against liability, but sheltered from risk in the first place. We put decades of experience and know-how to work in helping you avoid expensive claims before they start and then mitigating claims when they do occur. 800-578-8802 POMSASSOC.COM 009-57_sfvbj_fullpages20200720.indd 19 7/13/20 5:13 PM 20 SAN FERNANDO VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL THE VALLEY 200 JULY 20, 2020 INDEX PEOPLE K Shafferty, John . 29. Commerce Department . 51 N Kahn, Dan . .28 Shapiro, David . 46 Community Foundation of the Valleys 52. Northeast Valley Health Corp . 50 A Kasendorf, Alexander . 28 Sherman, Brad . 46 Compass Charter Schools . .36 O Adam, Al . .43 Katz, Richard . 28 Simpson, Danone . 42 ConsejoSano . .47 Oschin Partners . 29 Adelstein, Wayne . 24 Khorsand, Vahid . 40 Skeeter, Jane . 35 Cooper Communications Inc .
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.12 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes the drainage features, stormwater quality, flooding hazards, and flood-protection improvements within the City’s Planning Area. Regulatory agencies governing stormwater quality and flooding hazards are also discussed. The City’s Planning Area is comprised of the City’s boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. With implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, objectives, and policies potential impacts on hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Surface Water Drainage Patterns within City’s Planning Area Surface water drainage patterns are dependent on topography, the amount and location of impervious surfaces, and the type of flood control that is located in an area. The size, or magnitude, of a flood is described by a term called a “recurrence interval.” By studying a long period of flow record for a stream, hydrologists estimate the size of a flood that would have a likelihood of occurring during various intervals. For example, a five-year flood event would occur, on the average, once every five years (and would have a 20 percent chance of occurring in any one year). Although a 100-year flood event is expected to happen only once in a century, there is a 1 percent chance that a flood of that size could happen during any year.
    [Show full text]
  • Council Agenda Report 4.A
    City Council Meeting 03-11-19 Item Council Agenda Report 4.A. To: Mayor Wagner and the Honorable Members of the City Council Prepared by: Craig George, Environmental Sustainability Director Approved by: Reva Feldman, City Manager Date prepared: February 20, 2019 Meeting date: March 11, 2019 Subject: Updated Developer Fee Program for the Benefit of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County RECOMMENDED ACTION: 1) Conduct the public hearing; and 2) Adopt Resolution No. 19-11, adopting the updated developer fee and fire station plan for the benefit of the Consolidated Fire Protection District of Los Angeles County (District) and rescinding Resolution No. 18-04. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with the recommended action. The City delegates the authority of administering and collecting the Developer Fee to the District. DISCUSSION: On January 22, 2019, the Board of Supervisors of the County of Los Angeles (Board) conducted a public hearing to update the Consolidated Fire Protection District Developer Program, which included the updated Fire Station Plan and 2018 Developer Fee Summary. The current rate in the Malibu/Santa Monica Mountains Developer Fee Area of Benefit is $.9705 per square foot of new development. The rate reflects current costs associated with land acquisition, fire station construction, purchase of apparatus and equipment, and administration. No adjustments to the fee amounts are recommended this year. Under the Developer Fee Agreement between the District and the City, the City must adopt, by resolution, the updated Developer Fee and Fire Station Plan within 60 days of the Board adoption. On December 11, 2000, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2009 to 12/31/2009 Angeles National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2009 to 12/31/2009 Angeles National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring in more than one Region (excluding Nationwide) Geothermal Leasing - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:02/2010 03/2010 Tracy Parker Programmatic Environmental Orders FEIS NOA in Federal Register 505-758-6310 Impact Statement 10/24/2008 [email protected] EIS Description: The Bureau of Land Management and Forest Service are preparing a joint Programmatic Environmental Impac Statement to analyze the leasing of BLM and USFS administered lands with moderate to high potential for geothermal resources in 11 western states. Web Link: http://www.blm.gov/wo/st/en/prog/energy/geothermal/geothermal_nationwide.html Location: UNIT - Coronado National Forest All Units, Gila National Forest All Units, Lincoln National Forest All Units, Boise National Forest All Units, Bridger-Teton National Forest All Units, Clearwater National Forest All Units, Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest All Units, Bitterroot National Forest All Units, Lewis And Clark National Forest All Units, Medicine Bow-Routt National Forest All Units, San Juan National Forest All Units, White River National Forest All Units, Carson National Forest All Units, Cibola National Forest All Units, Cleveland National Forest All Units, Eldorado National Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Helping Families Thrive. Center & Foundation Boards
    A NNU A L R EPO R T 2 0 1 6 / 2 0 1 7 Helping families thrive. Center & Foundation Boards Center Board Officers (July - December 2016) William Cooper - Chair Mission Michael Berger - Vice Chair Dr. David Wong –Treasurer The Child & Family Center helps build a healthy Gloria Mercado Fortine –Secretary Steve Zimmer - Immed. Past Chair Santa Clarita Valley by providing mental health, (January - June 2017) Michael Berger - Chair behavioral and education services to children, Cheri Fleming –Vice Chair Michael Lebecki - Vice Chair adults and families. Dr. Marc Winger –Treasurer Ginger LeVang –Secretary William Cooper - Immed. Past Chair Foundation Board Officers (July - December 2016) Vision Nick Lentini - Chair Michael Lebecki – Vice Chair At the Child & Family Center, children, adults, and Chris Blazey – Treasurer Jane Bettencourt-Soto - Secretary families can easily access the help they need in a Members safe and nurturing environment. Responding to the Fred Arnold Lois Bauccio community’s need for services, the Child & Family Amanda Benson Joyce Carson Center continues to grow and expand. Reaching out Barbara Cochran Diana Cusumano to new areas of need, the Center provides children Michael DeLorenzo Neil Fitzgerald and adults the opportunity to live in healthy, Cheri Fleming John Geraci supportive relationships that encourage them to Stephanie Graziano Dan Gunning become responsible, caring citizens. Kiki Hacker Linda Hafizi G. Marshall Hann Alicia Humphries Darren Hernandez Debbie Holbrook Don Hubbard Jenny Ketchepaw Charlotte Kleeman Ken Kreyenhagen Terry Martin Laina McFerren John Musella Linda Pedersen Doreen Chastain-Shine Diane Stewart Steve Sturgeon Irene Thomas-Johnson Silvia Weeks Vanessa Wilk Michelle Witkin, PhD Apo Yessayan 2016/17 ANNUAL REPORT | 3 Message from our President/CEO and Board Chair The Child & Family Center, just like any other vibrant and evolving organization, continues to change over time to meet the needs of our clients and communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Snapshot May 2011 a Publication of the Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation
    Economic Snapshot May 2011 a publication of the Santa Clarita Valley Economic Development Corporation WHAT’S INSIDE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE Commercial Real Estate 1 New Permits Residential Real Estate 2 • No new permits for commercial space were issued in May 2011 by the City of Employment 3 Santa Clarita, down from one new permit issued in April 2011, but the same as May 2010. Enterprise Zone 3 Tenant Improvements/Alterations Tourism 4 • A total of 7 building permits for tenant improvements were issued in May 2011, Film 4 down 53% from the 15 permits in April 2011 and down 13% from the 8 permits in Sales Tax 5 May 2010. • In May 2011, a total of 29 permits for commercial alterations were issued, up 4% from the 28 permits in April 2011, yet down 28% from the 39 commercial Santa Clarita Valley (includes City) alterations in May 2010. Square Footage Vacancy - Q2 2011 Certificates of Occupancy • In May 2011, a total of 11 Certificates of Occupancy were issued, of which five were for retail, four were for o!ce and two was for industrial space. This compares to three Certificates of Occupancy issued in May 2010. 29% 31% • The Certificates of Occupancy issued in May 2011 represent a total of 46,791 (907,162) (972,760) square feet, of which 46% was for o!ce, 34% was for industrial and the remaining 20% was for retail. This represents a significant increase from the 6,548 square feet covered in Certificate of Occupancies issued in May 2010. 39% Vacancy Rates In the entire Santa Clarita Valley (including the City) o!ce, retail and industrial (1,226,487) • vacancy rates decreased in Second Quarter Quarter 2011 from the previous quarter.
    [Show full text]
  • All College Staff Meeting Spring 2014
    All College Staff Meeting Spring 2014 Presented by Chancellor, Dr. Dianne Van Hook Welcome to the All-College Staff Meeting! Today we will get caught up on the exciting things that have happened so far in 2014 and have a look ahead at what awaits in: • Awards • Campus Wide Initiatives & Accomplishments • The Foundation • Facilities • Partnerships • Canyon Country Campus – Update • Division & Department Initiatives & Achievements COC’s Community Impact • Budget Update • What’s on the Horizon? We have a lot to cover, so let’s get started! All College Spring 2014 2 APPLAUSE! APPLAUSE! All College Spring 2014 3 Public Information Office Each year, the District Communications Department enters the Community College Public Relations Organization (CCPRO) Awards, which recognize marketing public relations excellence in print and digital media. Colleges from throughout the state submit their best work, and an independent panel of judges chooses the best of the best for recognition. This year, College of the Canyons received awards in eight categories: College Webpage – cocathletics.com – First Place College Webpage – canyons.edu – Second Place Newsletter – Breaking News – Second Place Online Newsletter – The Monday Report – Second Place News Release – Fast Track Graduates – Second Place Feature Story – From the White House to iCuE – Third Place Brochure Division B – PAC Season Brochure – Third Place Annual Report – Dream. Think. DO! 2012-13 Annual Report – Third Place All College Spring 2014 4 Civil Rights Clinic Initiative Wins State Award
    [Show full text]
  • Ensuring Nature's Benefits Now, and Into the Future, Following The
    Ensuring Nature’s Benefits Now, and into the Future, following the Copper, Ranch, and Sayre Fires on the Angeles National Forest Water as Nature’s Benefit: The watersheds of the Angeles National Forest are the source of nearly one- third of the Los Angeles population’s drinking water, in addition to providing for all of the plant and animal life that live within the boundaries of the Forest. The Forest’s eighteen dams and debris basins support a massive flood control system to protect and provide for the millions of people that live downstream. And these are only a few of Nature’s Benefits the Forest provides. The Angeles National Forest serves as: • The natural picturesque backdrop for one of the country’s largest and most diverse urban centers, providing access to approximately 700,000 acres of open space in the greater Los Angeles metropolitan area for outdoor recreation that includes, hiking ,walking, nature viewing, camping, swimming and more. • The Forest host for between 3 and 4 million annual visitors, giving them the opportunity to explore a variety of landscapes including chaparral, oak thickets, high desert, pine woods, steep and rugged mountains, and numerous lakes, streams, and rivers. • One of the world’s vital biodiversity hot spots. The Forest contains many natural and cultural resources unique to Southern California as well as a variety of wildlife, including the California condor, spotted owl, bighorn sheep, and numerous other threatened and endangered species. • A green space neighbor to multiple communities, to include the 4th largest city in Los Angeles, Santa Clarita. Wildfire: In California, more than half of the state’s largest 20 wildfires have occurred within the last 10 years.
    [Show full text]
  • 21480 Needham Ranch Parkway Santa Clarita, Ca 91321 178,156 Sf (Divisible)
    THE CENTER AT NEEDHAM RANCH WELCOMES A NEW TMZ-LOCATED FACILITY TO ITS EXPANSIVE MIXED-USE CAMPUS 21480 NEEDHAM RANCH PARKWAY SANTA CLARITA, CA 91321 178,156 SF (DIVISIBLE) COMING Q2 2021 BUILDING 10 6 4 LEASED 5 187,859 SF 113,640 SF 2 172,324 SF 3 212,236 SF 1 LEASED YOU ARE HERE. PARKWAY RANCH NEEDHAM A PREMIER DEVELOPMENT SIERRA HIGHWAY STRATEGICALLY LOCATED. CLOSE TO TOP TALENT, PRIME AMENITIES AND YOU. BUILDING 10 21480 NEEDHAM NEEDHAM RANCH RANCHPARKWAY PKWY Total Building Area 178,156 Office Area 12,000 Mezzanine 10,000 Clear Height 36’ Sprinklers ESFR Bay Spacing 56’ x 60’ Parking Spaces 302 Dock High Doors 30 Ground Level Doors 4 Power Amps Capacity 3,200A 480/277V (expandable DIVISIBILITY OPTIONS LAYOUT 1 LAYOUT 2 178,156 DIVISIBILITY OPTIONS LAYOUT 3 AREA HIGHLIGHTS Local culture meets luxe style in picturesque North Los Angeles. A favorite of industry types, not only is this area within the Thirty Mile Zone (“TMZ”), it is just 25 minutes from Downtown Los Angeles, airports and major highways. Tucked in this ideal location, The Center at Needham Ranch allows you to connect with the most influential companies in Los Angeles and around the world - at the speed of business. Meanwhile, the local scene brims with excitement, placing you in the center of countless amenities, including diverse options at the Westfield Valencia Town Center- a 1.1 million square feet premier lifestyle destination offering upscale dining and high-end shopping from national retailers. In addition, Old Town Newhall, locally known as Santa Clarita’s arts and entertainment district, thrives with boutique shopping, casual dining and a variety of art and live entertainment choices.
    [Show full text]