Arxiv:2006.16003V1 [Quant-Ph] 25 Jun 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Zitterbewegung and the Charge of an Electron Basil S. Davis∗ Department of Physics and Computer Science, Xavier University of Louisiana, New Orleans, Louisiana 70125, USA Abstract Dirac's Relativistic Wave Equation implies a measured electron velocity of ±c in any direction, in contradiction to Special Relativity and observation. It is shown in this article that this anomalous electron velocity reveals an internal structure of the electron whereby the mass and the charge of the electron cannot be described by the same position operator. The measured velocity of electron mass is always less than c in any direction but charge can be displaced at the speed of light. This speed is realizable only when the electron is in a state that is a superposition of positive and negative energy states, also known as a zitterbewegung state. It is shown that in zitterbewegung it is the charge and not the mass that undergoes rapid spatial oscillation, and that there are measurable consequences of this charge zitterbewegung. Zitterbewegung of charge also occurs in an entangled electron-positron pair created by a strong electric field. PACS numbers: 03.65.-w, 12.20.-m, 03.70.+k, 11.10.-z arXiv:2006.16003v1 [quant-ph] 25 Jun 2020 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION The problem of integrating spin and relativistic covariance into a quantum mechanical description of an electron was addressed by Dirac with his relativistic wave equation. Since an electron wave function is described by two independent spin base states, each with pos- itive or negative energy, a solution of Dirac's equation is a four component spinor. The Hamiltonian is a 4 × 4 matrix, which for an electron in a field described by the potentials (φ, A) takes the form [1] H = cα · (p − eA) + βmc2 + eφ (1) Here mc2 is the electron rest energy, p the electron momentum and α and β are 4×4 matrices 2 3 2 3 0 σi I 0 αi = 4 5 β = 4 5 (2) σi 0 0 −I that operate on the 4 × 1 Dirac spinors. The σi are the familiar 2 × 2 Pauli matrices and I is a 2 × 2 identity matrix. It is evident that the αi and β are traceless and hermitian. While Dirac's equation is fundamental to the highly successful quantum electrodynamics, the interpretation of this equation is an ongoing matter, raising questions such as whether it is a single particle wave equation [2{5], and whether the Hamiltonian is local [6]. The purpose of this article is not to offer a comprehensive interpretation of Dirac's equation. This article will use the Dirac equation to explore the electron's internal structure by focusing on two important consequences of the equation: the anomalous velocity of the electron, and the zitterbewegung solutions of the equation. A velocity operatorx _ i can be defined for the Dirac electron using the relation i~x_ i = −[H; xi] where H is given by Eq (1). It is a straightforward step to show that i x_ i = [H; xi] = cαi: (3) ~ @H Equivalently,x _ i = = cαi. The eigenvalues of each of the three αi matrices are ±1; and @pi so each component of the velocity operator has the two eigenvalues ±c: Dirac provided an explanation for this apparent violation of special relativity: \To measure the velocity we must measure the position at two slightly different times and then divide the change of position by the time interval. (It will not do to measure the momentum and apply a formula, as the ordinary connexion between velocity and momentum 2 is not valid.) In order that our measured velocity may approximate to the instantaneous velocity, the time interval between the two measurements of position must be very short and hence these measurements must be very accurate. The great accuracy with which the position of the electron is known during the time-interval must give rise, according to the principle of uncertainty, to an almost complete indeterminacy in its momentum. This means that almost all values of the momentum are equally probable, so that the momentum is almost certain to be infinite. An infinite value for a component of momentum corresponds to the value of ±c for the corresponding component of velocity (p 262) [1]." In the last sentence Dirac is evidently alluding to the relationship between velocity and momentum of a relativistic electron pc v = (4) pm2c2 + p2 whereby every component of velocity becomes ±c as the corresponding component of mo- mentum goes to ±∞. But - as Dirac himself acknowledges - the validity of Eq (4) for quantum mechanics is not obvious. It has been shown [7] that Eq (4) holds in quantum me- chanics in agreement with the definition of velocity as ∆r=∆t only when the time interval ∆t is so long that the initial and final uncertainties of the position are of no consequence, a requirement that contradicts Dirac's stipulation that the time interval should be very short. A quantum mechanical velocity operator v was defined [8] according to Eq (4) related to the expected values of position measured at an arbitrarily small interval of time ∆t satisfying hq(t)i = hq(0)i + ∆thvi (5) where q(t) is a position operator [9, 10]. However, it has been proved [11] that if one insists on strict localizability (A particle state is said to be localized in V at time t if the probability of finding the particle in V is 1) then causality (If at time t0 = 0 a particle state is localized in V, then there is a constant r = rt, such that, at time t > 0, the particle, when translated by ~a; j~aj ≥ rt, is not in V) will be violated when applying such a position operator. The problems encountered in attempts to provide an adequate definition of the Dirac velocity operator have led to speculation that any such operator could be no more than a mathematical artifact of Dirac's equation without physical meaning [12]. It can be readily shown - as we will see in the next section - that the velocity operator has eigenvalues ±c for an electron state that is a superposition of positive and negative energy 3 states. In this article we will examine some important consequences of this result. A super- position of positive and negative energy states emerges as a solution to the Dirac equation, and Schr¨odingerlabeled the motion of an electron in such a state as zitterbewegung [13]. Zitterbewegung has since been recognized as a manifestation of the structure of the electron, specifically as the electron's \relativistic structure" [4], though zitterbewegung has always been understood as a feature that is independent of the velocity of the electron, executed even by an electron with zero momentum. An investigation of the internal geometry of the electron undergoing zitterbewegung was carried out by Barut and Bracken [15], who defined a position operator to represent the position of the electron as a point charge. We will pursue this line of interpretation. We will identify the velocity operator with the time derivative of this charge position operator and explain why such an identification is justifiable. There is an emerging realization that the center of mass of the electron is not identical with the center of charge [30], but the relationship between the two has not been established. In this paper we will focus on the center of charge, which we shall call the position of the charge, and show that in zitterbewegung this position of the electron charge is displaced at the speed of light, a result that is both consistent with and required by Special Relativity. We will explore some interesting features of this charge zitterbewegung. We will provide a theoret- ical formulation, adduce experimental evidence, and show that our theoretical predictions are borne out in a model of the creation of an entangled electron-positron pair in a strong electric field. In the following section we will show (a) that the eigenvalue c of the electron velocity cannot be the velocity of the mass of the electron, and (b) that this velocity describes the motion of the electron charge. II. THEORETICAL ANALYSIS A. Electron Velocity and Electron Mass It follows directly from (1) and (2) that the Dirac Hamiltonian does not commute with any of the velocity operators: [H; cαi] 6= 0 (6) 4 Conversely, it is also trivial to verify that an eigenstate of H which is 2 3 2 3 a 0 6 7 6 7 6b7 607 6 7 6 7 a positive energy state such as 6 7 or a negative energy state such as 6 7 607 6b7 4 5 4 5 0 a is not an eigenstate of the velocity operator cαx (with corresponding statements for cαy and cαz). Moreover, it is easy to show that the eigenfunctions of each velocity operator are superpositions of positive and negative energy states [4]. Though it is elementary, we will provide a proof of this result, as this will help clarify the arguments we will make further in this paper. There are three components of the velocity operator corresponding to the three αi matri- ces. A possible set of normalized eigenstates - using the parameters a and b - corresponding to the positive eigenvalue +c of cαx, cαy and cαz are, in that order: 2 3 2 3 2 3 a a a 6 7 6 7 6 7 6b7 6 b 7 6 b 7 6 7 6 7 6 7 Eigenstates of cαx; cαy and cαz = 6 7 ; 6 7 and 6 7 (7) 6b7 6−ib7 6 a 7 4 5 4 5 4 5 a ia −b and a similar set can be obtained for the negative eigenvalue −c: It is evident that each of the three eigenstates listed above contains equal proportions of positive and negative energy states, since the probability of finding the electron in a positive (or negative) energy state becomes jaj2 + jbj2 = 1=2.