DOCSLIB.ORG

Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of Bath and North East Somerset VOLUME I Technical Report April 2008

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of Bath and North East Somerset VOLUME I Technical Report April 2008 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment of Bath and North East Somerset VOLUME I Technical Report April 2008 s u c c e s s f u l p e o p l e s u c c e s s f u l p r o j e c t s s u c c e s s f u l p e r f o r m a n c e Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................... i 1. Introduction................................................................................................... 1-1 2. Strategic assessment................................................................................... 2-1 3. Environment and planning context............................................................. 3-1 4. Flood defences and assets.......................................................................... 4-1 5. Flood warning and emergency planning .................................................... 5-1 6. Flooding from rivers..................................................................................... 6-1 7. Flooding from the sea .................................................................................. 7-1 8. Flooding from land (surface water)............................................................. 8-1 9. Flooding from groundwater......................................................................... 9-1 10. Flooding from sewers ................................................................................ 10-1 11. Flooding from artificial sources ................................................................ 11-1 12. Glossary and notation................................................................................ 12-1 Annex A - Maps Overview maps Map O Overview of B&NES Map T1 Sources of topographic data Map T2 Topography Map G1 Soils Map G2 Geology Map E1 to E6 Examples of non-flooding constraints to development in B&NES Map H(A) and H(B) Recorded historic incidents of flooding Map M1 Catchment Flood Management Plan policies Map M2 Approaches to river flood modelling in B&NES Map N New potential development sites Map X Existing land use Flood defences and flood warning Map D1 Draft Environment Agency 'System Asset Management Plan' units Map D2 Flood defences in B&NES Map W Environment Agency flood warning areas Flooding from rivers (fluvial) Map F Flood zones (As per Table D1 in PPS25) Map A1 Extent of actual flooding from rivers (with flood defences) Map A2 Depth of actual flooding from rivers (with flood defences) Map A3 Velocity of actual flooding from rivers (with flood defences) Map C Extent of flooding from rivers with allowance for climate change Flooding from land Map L1 Areas prone to flooding from land Map L2a to L2f Suitability of different sustainable drainage systems Flooding from groundwater Map G3 Land more prone to groundwater flooding Flooding from sewers Map S1 Historic incidents of sewer flooding Map S2 Areas with higher incidents of sewer flooding Flooding from artificial sources Map R Location of potential artificial sources of flooding Foreword Foreword Bath and North East Somerset (B&NES) Council are required to prepare a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) to support the production of their Local Development Framework (LDF). The SFRA creates a strategic framework for the consideration of flood risk when making planning decisions. It has been developed in accordance with Planning Policy Statement 25: Development and Flood Risk (PPS25), as well as additional guidance provided by the Environment Agency. The guidance provided in PPS25 requires local authorities and those responsible for development decisions to demonstrate that they have applied a risk-based, sequential approach in preparing development plans and considered flooding through the application of a Sequential Test. Failure to demonstrate that such a Test has been undertaken potentially leaves planning decisions and land allocations open to challenge during the planning process. The underlying objective of the risk-based sequential allocation of land is to reduce the exposure of new development to flooding and reduce the reliance on long-term maintenance of built flood defences. Within areas at risk from flooding, it is expected that development proposals will contribute to a reduction of flood risk. A SFRA is essential in enabling a strategic and proactive approach to be applied to flood risk management. The assessment allows us to understand current flood risk on a wide-spatial scale and how this is likely to change in the future. The main objective of the B&NES SFRA is to provide flood information; • so that an evidence-based and risk-based sequential approach can be adopted when making planning decisions, in line with PPS25 • that is strategic in that it covers a wide-spatial area and looks at flood risk today and in the future • that supports sustainability appraisals of the local level documents (including the LDF) • that identifies what further investigations may be required in detailed flood risk assessments (FRAs) for specific development proposals. The SFRA is presented in a number of documents; • Non technical summary • Volume I – technical report and flood maps • Volume II – user guide • Volume III – management guide Volume III – management guide The SFRA is a live document which is intended to be updated as new information and guidance becomes available. The outcomes and conclusions of the SFRA may not be valid in the event of future changes. It is the responsibility of the user to ensure they are using the best available information when making a land planning decision. B&NES SFRA (April 2008) i Volume I - Technical Report Introduction 1. Introduction The B&NES SFRA is a 'live' document. The current version has been developed using the best information and concepts available at the time. As new information and concepts become available the document will be updated and so it is the responsibility of the reader to be satisfied that they are using the most up-to-date information and that the SFRA accounts for this information. All revisions to this summary document are listed in the table. Version Issue Date Issued by Issued to Final 23/04//2008 Capita B&NES, EA Symonds Ltd B&NES SFRA (April 2008) 1-1 Volume I - Technical Report Introduction Purpose of this report This Bath and North East Somerset (B&NES) SFRA has been developed to inform the Local Development Framework (LDF). The SFRA must be robust and be evidence-based so that it does not leave planning decisions and land allocations open to challenge through the land use planning process. It is crucial that there is transparency in the data and methods used in the assessment. This volume of the Bath & North East Somerset Strategic Flood Risk Assessment is the Technical Report (or evidence base) This report represents Volume I of the SFRA, and is the evidence base of Flood Risk in B&NES. This document contains all of the technical information and methods used in the assessment of flood risk across the study area. It includes information on the sources and reliability of data, methods used in the assessment, discussions regarding uncertainty, and key assumptions made. To ensure that the technical information is easily updated when new assessments are undertaken in the future, the six ‘sources of flooding’ have been reported in stand alone chapters. Chapter 2 provides a summary of flood risk across the B&NES District. The maps generated during the assessment are provided in Annex A to this document. The user is referred to Volumes II and III for guidance on how to interpret the information in this technical report and how to update the SFRA following improvements in data or changes in guidance. The SFRA is based on a range of data from different sources and of various degrees of certainty. It is the responsibility of the user to consider the source and certainty of the data when referring to the flood risk summaries and flood maps. Overview of B&NES District Location B&NES district covers a 350km² area south east of Bristol in South West England. Map O in Annex A shows the district boundary and main rivers. The largest urban area is the historic and world heritage city of Bath, which lies in the north east corner of the B&NES district. Bath is famous for its naturally occurring hot springs and the land surrounding the city is designated as an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). The towns of Keynsham and Midsomer Norton also fall within the district. The remaining area is predominantly rural, featuring medieval enclosed fields and Avon forest. Chew Valley Reservoir lies in the south west corner and is an important water resources reservoir. It is designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Special Protection Area (SPA). The population of B&NES has been slowly but steadily growing during recent decades and at the 2001 census stood at 169 040. About half the population lives in the city of Bath with the remaining living in Keynsham, Midsomer Norton and Radstock. There are also many villages and hamlets spread across 47 rural parishes which accommodate a substantial rural population. Map X in Annex A shows the existing land use in B&NES. The rural landscape of the District is striking and diverse. Around a quarter of the rural areas lie within designated Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB). Thirty villages in B&NES are designated as Conservation Areas, to preserve and enhance their existing character. Strung along the foothills of the Mendips are the villages of Ubley, Compton Martin and East and West Harptree. To the north of the Mendips is the undulating valley of the River Chew within which lie Chew Valley and Blagdon Lakes and a network of small villages. The largest of these is the historic village of Chew Magna which acts as a community focus for villages and hamlets. Maps E1, E2, E3 and E5 provide an indication of environmental constraints in B&NES. B&NES SFRA (April 2008) 1-2 Volume I - Technical Report Introduction Topography The topography of B&NES is shown in Map T2 in Annex A. The Lower Avon valley in the north east corner of B&NES is the lowest lying area of land and slopes gently westward towards the Severn Estuary. The remaining area is fairly steep and generally slopes in a north easterly direction to meet the Lower Avon.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Practices of Carnival: Community, Culture and Place
    The Practices of Carnival: Community, Culture and Place. Submitted by Jonathan Freeman Croose to the University of Exeter as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Geography May 2014 This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material has previously been submitted and approved for the award of a degree by this or any other University. …………………………………………………………………….. 1 Abstract: This thesis analyses ethnographic data gathered during participant observation within two vernacular town carnivals in East Devon and Dorset during 2012 and within the professional Cartwheelin’ and Battle for the Winds street performances which were staged as part of the Maritime Mix programme of the 2012 Cultural Olympiad at Weymouth. The thesis presents qualitative perspectives with regard to the cultural performance of carnival in the fieldwork area, in order to analyse the ‘performativity’ of carnival in these contexts: how it enacts and embodies a range of instrumentalities with regard to notions of community, culture and place. The thesis serves to unpack the ‘performance efficacy’ of carnival within the wider political and cultural landscape of the UK in the early 21st century, revealing the increasing influence of institutional policy on its aesthetics and cultural performance. By way of contrast, the thesis also asserts the value of vernacular carnivalesque street performance as a contestation of hegemonic notions of ‘art’, ‘place’ and ‘culture’.
    [Show full text]
  • Sol\!ERSET I [KELLY'8 T
    • • • SOl\!ERSET I [KELLY'8 t . • Mellor .Alfred Somerville Arthur Fownes LL.B. (deputy chairman of Middleton Charles Marmaduke quarter sessions), Dinder house, Wells *Mildmay Capt. Charles Beague St. John- R.A. Hollam, Southcombe Sidney Lincoln, Highlands, .A.sh, Martock Dulverton Sparkes SI. Harford, Wardleworth, Tonedale, Wellingtn Mildmay Capt. Wyndham Paulet St. John . *Speke Col. Waiter Hanning, Jordans, Ilminster Miller John Reynolds, Haworth, High street, WellinO'ton Spencer Huntly Gordon l\Iinifie Mark, 27 Montpelier, Weston-super-Mare "' Staley Alfd. Evelyn, Combe Hill,Barton St.David,Tauntn l\Ioore Col. Henry, Higher W oodcomhe, Minehead Stanley Edward Arthur Vesey, Quantock lodge, Over Morland John, Wyrral, Glastonbury Stowey, Bridgwater 1\forland John Coleby, Ynyswytryn, Glastonbury Stanley James Talbot Mountst•even Col. Francis Render C.M.G. Odgest, Ston Staunton-Wing George Stauntoll, Fitzhead court,Tauntn Easton, Bath Stead Maurice Henry, St. Dunstan's, Magdalene street, Murray-Anderdon Henry Edward, Henlade ho. Taunton Glastonbury *Napier Lieut.-Col. Gerard Berkeley, Pennard house, Stenhouse Col. Vivian Denman, Netherleigh, Blenheim Shepton Mallet ' road, :M:inehead Napier Henry Burroughes, Hobwell,Long Ashton,Bristol Stothert Sir Percy Kendall K.B.E. Woolley grange, Nathan Lieut.-Col. Right Hon. Sir Matthew G.C.M.G., Bradford-on-Avon, Wilts R.E., K 2 & 4 Albany, London W I Strachey Capt. Hon. Edward, Sutton court, Pensford, Naylor James Richard C.S.I. Hallatrow court, Bristol Bristol Neville Adm.Sir George K.C.B., C.V.O. Babington house, Strachey Richard Sholto, .Ashwick grove, Oakhill, Bath near Bath ' *Strachie Lord, Sutton court, Pensford, Bristol; & 27 *~e~ille Grenville Robert, Bntleigh court, Glastonbury Cadogan gardens, London SW 3 .
    [Show full text]
  • Keynsham Station I Onward Travel Information Buses Local Area Map
    Keynsham Station i Onward Travel Information Buses Local area map Key Key km 0 0.5 A Bus Stop LC Keynsham Leisure Centre 0 Miles 0.25 Station Entrance/Exit M Portavon Marinas Avon Valley Adventure & WP Wildlife Park istance alking d Cycle routes tes w inu 0 m Footpaths 1 B Keynsham C Station A A bb ey Pa r k M D Keynsham Station E WP LC 1 1 0 0 m m i i n n u u t t e e s s w w a a l l k k i i n n g g d d i i e e s s t t c c a a n n Rail Replacement Bus stops are by Keynsham Church (stops D and E on the Bus Map) Stop D towards Bristol, and stop E towards Bath. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2018 & also map data © OpenStreetMap contributors, CC BY-SA Main destinations by bus (Data correct at October 2019) DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP DESTINATION BUS ROUTES BUS STOP 19A A E Hanham 17 C Radstock 178 E Bath City Centre ^ A4, 39 E Hengrove A4 D 19A A E Bilbie Green 349 D High Littleton 178 E Saltford 39, A4 E 39, 178, A4 D Highridge A4 D 664* B E Brislington 349 E Hillfields 17 C Southmead Hospital 17 C 39, 178 D 663* B E Staple Hill 17, 19A C Keynsham - Chandag Bristol City Centre Estate 349 E 178** E Timsbury 178 E Willsbridge (for Avon Valley Bristol Airport A4 D 349 E 17, 19A C Keynsham - Park Estate Railway) Bristol Parkway ^ 19A C 665* B E UWE Frenchay Campus 19A C 39, 178 D Kingswood 17, 19A C Bristol Temple Meads ^ 349 E Longwell Green 17 C Cribbs Causeway 19A C Marksbury 178 E Downend 19A C Midsomer Norton 178 E Notes Eastville 17 C 19A A E Newton St Loe Bus routes 17, 39 and A4 operate daily.
    [Show full text]
  • Midsomer Norton Town Council
    Midsomer Norton Town Council Council Offices, Town Hall, The Island, Midsomer Norton, Bath BA3 2HQ Tel: 01761 418701 Email: [email protected] Mayor: Cllr Lynda Robertson Town Clerk: Donna Ford PSLCC To: a) Members of the Planning Committee Quorum Level: 3 Members b) All Other Members of the Council (for information) 5th January 2021 Dear Councillor PLANNING COMMITTEE A Summons to Attend is hereby given for a meeting of the Planning Committee on Monday 11th January 2021 at 7pm. The meeting will be held electronically. To join the meeting via Zoom, click on the link below: https://us02web.zoom.us/j/3148815890?pwd=R2pwaXZ0NEJMTGJVQU1aNkRZSUtKU T09 Or use the following login details: Meeting ID 314 881 5890. Password 747049. The agenda is set out below. Yours faithfully Donna Ford Town Clerk Fire Safety – Evacuation Procedure / Recording Protocol The Council is requested to note the fire safety procedure and the Town Council’s recording protocol. Before the meeting there will be a public session to enable the electorate of Midsomer Norton to ask questions, and make comments, regarding matters within the jurisdiction of the Committee. Questions not answered at this meeting will be answered in writing to the person asking the question, or may appear as an agenda item for the next meeting. Members of the Public are asked to restrict their comments, and/or questions to three minutes. Midsomer Norton Town Council Planning Committee – 11th January 2021 7.00pm Public Question Time This section (at the Appointed Person’s discretion) may last up to 20 minutes and is not part of the formal meeting of the Planning Committee and minutes will not be produced.
    [Show full text]
  • Part of Claverton Down SNCI) (Part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas Adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake
    SNCI Site Name (part of Claverton Down SNCI) (part of Rush Hill & Eastover Coppice SNCI) Areas adjacent to Kennet and Avon Canal Ash Brake Ashcombe Wood Atgrove Wood and stream Avoncliff Wood Ayford Farm Babylon Brook Bannerdown, and Shockerwick and Woodleaze Woods Bath University (part) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI (part of ) Bathampton Oxbow Bathford Brook and adjacent land Bathwick Slopes (part of) (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Bathwick Wood (part of Bathampton Down and Woodlands SNCI) Beach Wood Complex Beach Wood complex Beacon Hill Beechen Cliff Belle Vue Tip Bellflower Hill Bengrove Wood and adjacent fields Bitham's Wood and meadows Bitton to Bath railway track Bladdock Gutter Blagdon Lake SSSI and adjacent land Bowlditch Quarry SSSI Brake Wood Breach Hill Common Breach Wood and adjacent land Broad Mead field Broad Wood Broadhill Copse Bromley Farm mine Brown's Folly - Warleigh complex Buckley Wood, Lady Wood, and adjacent fields Burledge Common and adjacent fields Burnett Brook and woods By Brook and associated marginal habitats Cam Brook and adjacent land Cam Brook disused railway Camerton New Pit Tip Camerton Wood Carrs Wood Castle Wood Catsley Wood Charlcombe Lane field Charlcombe Valley Charlton Bottom and Queen Charlton Watercourse Charmy Down Chelscombe and Lansdown Woods SNCI Chew Valley Lake SSSI and adjacent land Chewstoke Brook Clandown Bottom Claverton Wood & Vineyard Bottoms Clay Pits Woods Cleaves Wood, adjacent woodland and fields Cleveland Walk and
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Agency South West Region
    ENVIRONMENT AGENCY SOUTH WEST REGION 1997 ANNUAL HYDROMETRIC REPORT Environment Agency Manley House, Kestrel Way Sowton Industrial Estate Exeter EX2 7LQ Tel 01392 444000 Fax 01392 444238 GTN 7-24-X 1000 Foreword The 1997 Hydrometric Report is the third document of its kind to be produced since the formation of the Environment Agency (South West Region) from the National Rivers Authority, Her Majesty Inspectorate of Pollution and Waste Regulation Authorities. The document is the fourth in a series of reports produced on an annua! basis when all available data for the year has been archived. The principal purpose of the report is to increase the awareness of the hydrometry within the South West Region through listing the current and historic hydrometric networks, key hydrometric staff contacts, what data is available and the reporting options available to users. If you have any comments regarding the content or format of this report then please direct these to the Regional Hydrometric Section at Exeter. A questionnaire is attached to collate your views on the annual hydrometric report. Your time in filling in the questionnaire is appreciated. ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Contents Page number 1.1 Introduction.............................. .................................................... ........-................1 1.2 Hydrometric staff contacts.................................................................................. 2 1.3 South West Region hydrometric network overview......................................3 2.1 Hydrological summary: overview
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Reduction
    Introduction to Payments for Ecosystem Services Dr. Bruce Howard (Co-ordinator EKN) & Dr. Chris Sherrington (Principal Consultant, Eunomia) What Are Ecosystem Services? • Benefits we derive from the natural environment • Provision of: • Food, water, timber What Are Ecosystem Services? • Benefits we derive from the natural environment • Regulation of: • Air quality, climate, flood risk What Are Ecosystem Services? • Benefits we derive from the natural environment • Cultural Services: • Recreation, tourism, education What Are Ecosystem Services? • Benefits we derive from the natural environment • Supporting Services: • Soil formation, nutrient cycling Payments for Ecosystem Services PES Principles • Voluntary • Stakeholders enter into PES agreements on a voluntary basis • Additionality • Payments are made for actions over and above those which land managers would generally be expected to undertake Bundling and Layering • Bundling • A single buyer pays for the full package of ecosystem services • E.g. agri-environment scheme delivering landscape, water quality etc. on behalf of public • Layering • Multiple buyers pay separately for different ecosystem services from same parcel of land • E.g. peatland benefits of carbon sequestration, water quality and flood risk management may be purchased by different buyers Payments for Ecosystem Services UK interest in PES PES timeline 1990 New York Long-term Watershed Protection Vittel, NE France Costa Rica forest protection 2000 UK - Visitor Payback schemes UK - United Utilities SCaMP1 2010 UK - Exploratory
    [Show full text]
  • Information Requests PP B3E 2 County Hall Taunton Somerset TA1 4DY J Roberts
    Information Requests PP B3E 2 Please ask for: Simon Butt County Hall FOI Reference: 1700165 Taunton Direct Dial: 01823 359359 Somerset Email: [email protected] TA1 4DY Date: 3 November 2016 J Roberts ??? Dear Sir/Madam Freedom of Information Act 2000 I can confirm that the information you have requested is held by Somerset County Council. Your Request: Would you be so kind as to please supply information regarding which public service bus routes within the Somerset Area are supported by funding subsidies from Somerset County Council. Our Response: I have listed the information that we hold below Registered Local Bus Services that receive some level of direct subsidy from Somerset County Council as at 1 November 2016 N8 South Somerset DRT 9 Donyatt - Crewkerne N10 Ilminster/Martock DRT C/F Bridgwater Town Services 16 Huish Episcopi - Bridgwater 19 Bridgwater - Street 25 Taunton - Dulverton 51 Stoke St. Gregory - Taunton 96 Yeovil - Chard - Taunton 162 Frome - Shepton Mallet 184 Frome - Midsomer Norton 198 Dulverton - Minehead 414/424 Frome - Midsomer Norton 668 Shipham - Street 669 Shepton Mallet - Street 3 Taunton - Bishops Hull 1 Bridgwater Town Service N6 South Petherton - Martock DRT 5 Babcary - Yeovil 8 Pilton - Yeovil 11 Yeovil Town Service 19 Bruton - Yeovil 33 Wincanton - Frome 67 Burnham - Wookey Hole 81 South Petherton - Yeovil N11 Yeovilton - Yeovil DRT 58/412 Frome to Westbury 196 Glastonbury Tor Bus Cheddar to Bristol shopper 40 Bridport - Yeovil 53 Warminster - Frome 158 Wincanton - Shaftesbury 74/212 Dorchester
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118)
    NELMS target statement for Bristol, Avon Valleys and Ridges (NCA 118) Your application is scored and a decision made on the points awarded. Both top priorities and lower priorities score points but you should select at least one top priority. Scoring is carried out by... Choosing priorities To apply you should choose at least one of the top priorities, and you can choose lower priorities - this may help with your application. Top priorities Priority group Priority type Biodiversity Priority habitats Priority species Water Water quality Flood and coastal risk management Historic environment Designated historic and archaeological features Undesignated historic and archaeological features of high significance Woodland priorities Woodland management Woodland planting Landscape Climate Change Multiple environmental benefits Lower priorities Priority group Priority type Lower priorities Water quality Archaeological and historic features Woodland Biodiversity - top priorities Priority habitats You should carry out land management practices and capital works that maintains, restores and creates priority habitats. Maintain priority habitat such as: • Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional orchard • Lowland dry acid grassland Wood Pasture and Parkland Restore priority habitats (especially proposals which make existing sites bigger or help join up habitat networks) such as: ● Coastal and floodplain grazing marsh • Lowland meadows • Lowland calcareous grassland Reedbeds Traditional
    [Show full text]
  • Local Flood Rep News Spring 2019
    October 2018 Local Flood Rep ©Image Lewis Clarke Spring 2019 News Locals manage flood risk in Chew Magna with personalised river level gauge Jim Collings, Flood Authority Manager, says “We can't stop the river from flooding, but this technology gives people the information to help protect their homes. We need more local communities to put someone forward as their Flood Representative who will be able to identify local flooding issue to us.” The Winford Brook responds rapidly to rainfall. Having up to the minute information on river levels is vital to preparing for flooding. Around 70 homes in Chew Magna are information on the water level of the at a high risk of flooding from the Brook. Winford Brook and the River Chew. This information enables the community The community has developed a to respond directly to immediate river nationally recognised community flood levels and trigger different actions within plan, which includes a network of Flood the flood plan. Wardens managing different ‘zones’ within the village. One advantage of the new gauge is that rather than relying on visual Installing the gauge, February 2018. In order to aid the community’s observations of the river level, which preparedness, in 2018 the Council’s are only practical during daylight hours, Drainage and Flooding team installed a text messages and emails are sent to be-spoke river level gauge on the The Council is keen to support Flood Wardens whenever a particular Winford Brook. communities that can help to manage river level is reached. This means that if their flood risk.
    [Show full text]
  • West of England South Road Combine Littlehampton 9Th June 2018 162 Members 18 Clubs 2006 Birds. Liberated at 9.15Am in No Wi
    WEST OF ENGLAND SOUTH ROAD COMBINE LITTLEHAMPTON 9TH JUNE 2018 162 MEMBERS 18 CLUBS 2006 BIRDS. LIBERATED AT 9.15AM IN NO WIND THIS RACE KINDLY SPONSORED BY BARTHOLOMEWS Name Club Ring Number Colour Sex Distance AFT Velocity 1 A George Broad Plain GB17N51560 Blue C 98/1316 1:47:31 1616.456 2 Mr & Mrs Hodges Glastonbury GB16N74949 Cheq H 84/313 1:31:45 1614.834 3 M Chwedoruk Glastonbury GB17V38647 Cheq C 97/751 1:46:15 1613.917 4 M Chwedoruk Glastonbury GB17V38621 Cheq C 97/751 1:46:15 1613.917 5 M Chwedoruk Glastonbury PL1604415783 Cheq H 97/751 1:46:16 1613.664 6 P Barry Broad Plain GB17N54193 Blue C 99/445 1:48:19 1612.725 7 M Chwedoruk Glastonbury PL1604416664 Cheq H 97/751 1:46:20 1612.653 8 M Chwedoruk Glastonbury GB17V38641 Blue Pd C 97/751 1:46:22 1612.147 9 Mrs S Nutt Glastonbury GB17N58337 Cheq C 98/1280 1:47:49 1611.703 10 B Goodwin Midsomer Norton GB17B08782 Blue H 90/743 1:38:49 1610.487 11 B Goodwin Midsomer Norton GB16Z81407 Blue C 90/743 1:38:52 1609.673 12 S Wilcox Towers GB17N71210 Blue H 100/147 1:49:28 1609.209 13 S Wilcox Towers GB17N71278 Blue H 100/147 1:49:29 1608.964 14 M Staddon Crewkerne GB15N08387 Blue C 99/146 1:48:34 1606.330 15 S Wilcox Towers GB17N71256 Blue H 100/147 1:49:42 1605.786 16 M Staddon Crewkerne GB17N24342 Cheq H 99/146 1:48:42 1604.360 17 M Staddon Crewkerne GB17N08878 Cheq C 99/146 1:48:42 1604.360 18 M Staddon Crewkerne GB17N08806 Dark Ch C 99/146 1:48:45 1603.630 19 Mr & Mrs Rakes Midsomer Norton GB17N40305 Blue C 91/951 1:40:30 1603.095 20 B Goodwin Midsomer Norton GB17F23265 Blue H 90/743
    [Show full text]
  • NRFA Peak Flow Dataset
    National River Flow Archive NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology WINFAP-FEH DATA FILES VERSION 6 Note on changes from v5 VERSION: 1.0 STATUS: FINAL DATE: FEBRUARY 2018 AUTHOR: KATIE MUCHAN, CATH SEFTON, STEVE TURNER, OLIVER SWAIN DOCUMENT VERSION CONTROL Version Date Author Description 1.0 FEBRUARY KATIE MUCHAN, CATH SEFTON, STEVE 2018 TURNER, OLIVER SWAIN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 2 NETWORK CHANGES ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 REMOVAL OF GAUGING STATIONS......................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 ADDITION OF GAUGING STATIONS......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3 CLOSURE OF GAUGING STATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2.4 COMBINED PEAK FLOW TIME SERIES FROM MULTIPLE STATIONS ................................................................................................ 3 2.5 COMPONENT STATIONS .....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]