Environmental Impact Statement Stage 2 Construction and Operation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Impact Statement Stage 2 Construction and Operation Environmental Impact Statement Stage 2 Construction and Operation Sydney Football Stadium 40-44 Driver Avenue, Moore Park Submitted to Department of Planning and Environment On behalf of Infrastructure NSW 12 June 2019 | 218948 CONTACT Michael Oliver Associate Director, Planning [email protected] 02 9409 4961 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without prior written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. This document has been prepared by: This document has been reviewed by: Anna Nowland 12 June 2019 Michael Oliver 12 June 2019 Reproduction of this document or any part thereof is not permitted without written permission of Ethos Urban Pty Ltd. Ethos Urban operates under a Quality Management System. This report has been prepared and reviewed in accordance with that system. VERSION NO. DATE OF ISSUE REVISION BY APPROVED BY Final for exhibition 12 June 2019 AN MO Ethos Urban Pty Ltd ABN 13 615 087 931. www.ethosurban.com 173 Sussex Street, Sydney NSW 2000 t 61 2 9956 6952 Contents Statement of validity 9 List of Abbreviations and Key Terms 10 Executive summary 11 1.0 Introduction 17 1.1 Overview of proposed development 17 1.2 Strategic need 18 1.3 Objectives of the development 20 1.4 Planning approval history 21 1.5 Analysis of alternatives 23 1.6 Secretary’s requirements 26 1.7 Project team 41 2.0 Site analysis 43 2.1 Site location and context 43 2.2 Site description and ownership 43 2.3 Surrounding development 55 3.0 Consultation 59 4.0 Description of the development 61 4.1 Design principles 61 4.2 Off-site works – not subject of this EIS 62 4.3 Numerical overview 63 4.4 Land use - ‘Recreation Facility (Major)’ and ancillary uses 63 4.5 Stadium design 64 4.6 Public domain 73 4.7 Signage 77 4.8 Lighting 82 4.9 Stadium operation and use 83 4.10 Parking, access and movement 86 4.11 Sustainability 93 4.12 Site preparation works 94 4.13 Water management 96 4.14 Utilities and services 97 4.15 Construction management 97 5.0 Legislation, policies and requirements 103 5.1 Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements 103 5.2 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act & Regulation 2000 103 5.3 Compliance with strategic planning framework 105 5.4 Compliance with legislation and Environmental Planning Instruments 117 5.5 Consistency with approved Concept Proposal 120 5.6 Design excellence 122 Ethos Urban Contents 6.0 Environmental assessment 125 6.1 Built form and urban design 126 6.2 Environmental amenity 135 6.3 Transport and accessibility 152 6.4 Noise and vibration 161 6.5 Construction management 168 6.6 Heritage 170 6.7 Sustainability 176 6.8 Safety, security and management 177 6.9 Social and economic impacts 181 6.10 Stormwater management, flooding and groundwater 182 6.11 Biodiversity 184 6.12 Contamination 185 6.13 Operational waste management 187 6.14 Utilities infrastructure 189 6.15 Disabled access 189 6.16 Fire Safety 190 6.17 Building Code of Australia 190 6.18 Environmental risk and climate change 190 6.19 Ecologically sustainable development principles 191 6.20 Site suitability 193 6.21 Public interest 194 7.0 Environmental risk assessment 195 7.1 Risk assessment framework 195 7.2 Environmental risk assessment 196 8.0 Mitigation measures 202 9.0 Conclusion and justification 206 Figures Figure 1 The stadium looking towards the Sydney CBD 16 Figure 2 The stadium as viewed from Moore Park across Kippax Lake 16 Figure 3 Planning process for Stage 2 18 Figure 4 Illustration of the stadium 20 Figure 5 Approved maximum building envelope 22 Figure 6 Location Plan 43 Figure 7 Aerial photo of the site including site boundaries and former stadium (January 2018) 44 Figure 8 National Rugby League Central Building being retained, as viewed from the MP1 car park (May 2018) 45 Figure 9 The Australian Rugby Development Centre (UTS) being retained, as viewed from the MP1 car park (May 2018) 45 Figure 10 Aerial of the former Sydney Football Stadium (2018) 47 Figure 11 Access and movement diagram 50 Ethos Urban Contents Figure 12 Moreton Bay Fig tree fronting Moore Park Road, to be protected (Tree 125) (May 2018) 51 Figure 13 Approximate location of Busby’s Bore and shafts in relation to the site (aerial from December 2018) 52 Figure 14 Illustration of soil conditions on the site and groundwater beneath the proposed stadium 53 Figure 15 Estuaries, wetlands and water bodies surrounding the site 54 Figure 16 Site context map 56 Figure 17 Sydney Cricket Ground 57 Figure 18 SCG Members Stand and Lady Members Stand 57 Figure 19 Brick wall demarcating the boundary with Fox Studios (left) and Paddington Lane 57 Figure 20 Pre-lodgement activities 59 Figure 21 The stadium looking towards the Sydney CBD 64 Figure 22 The stadium seating bowl 65 Figure 23 The stadium as viewed from Moore Park across Kippax Lake 65 Figure 24 The stadium as viewed from Moore Park Road 66 Figure 25 Western elevation (to Driver Avenue) 66 Figure 26 Northern elevation (Moore Park Road) 67 Figure 27 Sections through the taller eastern side of the stadium (left) and the reduced northern side of the stadium (right) 67 Figure 28 Alignment of the pitch and stadium 67 Figure 29 Basement level and vehicle circulation 68 Figure 30 Artist’s impression of the stadium concourse 68 Figure 31 Access points for the stadium concourse 69 Figure 32 Artist’s impression of the seating bowl 69 Figure 33 Artist’s impression of the seating bowl and video scoreboards 70 Figure 34 Outdoor terraces 70 Figure 35 Roof form 71 Figure 36 Stadium facade 71 Figure 37 Accessible seating and facilities 72 Figure 38 Materials and finishes of the stadium 72 Figure 39 The key nodes of activity in the public domain, and the circulation space between nodes 73 Figure 40 Landscape masterplan for the site 74 Figure 41 Moore Park Terrace 74 Figure 42 Fig Tree Place 75 Figure 43 Busby’s Corner 75 Figure 44 Seating in Fig Tree Place 76 Figure 45 Site wide tree planting 76 Figure 46 Signage zones on the stadium facades 77 Figure 47 Proposed lighting in the public domain 83 Figure 48 Non-event day activation 86 Figure 49 Bicycle parking on the site 87 Figure 50 Pedestrian access to the site – no event 88 Figure 51 Pedestrian access to the site – concurrent SCG and SFS events 89 Ethos Urban Contents Figure 52 Pedestrian access to the site – event only held at the SFS 89 Figure 53 Pedestrian access to the site – special events 90 Figure 54 New vehicle access/egress routes 91 Figure 55 Emergency vehicle access to the site 92 Figure 56 Accessible entries and paths of travel to access the stadium 93 Figure 57 Cut and fill across the site 95 Figure 58 Tree removal on the site 96 Figure 59 Materials handling zones 99 Figure 60 Vehicles entering and exiting the site during excavation and piling works 100 Figure 61 Vehicles entering and exiting the site during the construction of the stadium structure, facade, roof 100 Figure 62 Vehicles entering and exiting the site during the finishes and external works 101 Figure 63 Sydney’s Tier 1 and Tier 2 Stadia 107 Figure 64 Features of the Eastern City 108 Figure 65 The Eastern City District 111 Figure 66 Connections under the Master Plan and the proposed development 113 Figure 67 The proposed stadium sited within the approved building envelope 122 Figure 68 Maximum height of the stadium with the approved building envelope in red 127 Figure 69 View of the proposed stadium from the western edge of Kippax Lake 127 Figure 70 Key pedestrian routes 133 Figure 71 Public viewpoints assessed in the Visual Impact Analysis – near views 137 Figure 72 Public viewpoints assessed in the Visual Impact Analysis – distant views 137 Figure 73 Private viewpoints assessed in the Visual Impact Assessment 141 Figure 74 70/39-43 Cook Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 142 Figure 75 300 Moore Park Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 142 Figure 76 278 Moore Park Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 143 Figure 77 35 Alexander Street with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 143 Figure 78 69/49-51 Cook Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 144 Figure 79 69/49-51 Cook Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 144 Figure 80 42/57-67 Cook Road with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 145 Figure 81 43 Stewart Street with the existing view (left) and proposed view (right) 145 Ethos Urban Contents Figure 82 Shadow cast by the stadium during the winter solstice, as compared to the approved building envelope 147 Figure 83 Wind tunnel testing locations of proposed stadium 148 Figure 84 Wind tunnel testing locations of former stadium 148 Figure 85 Noise catchment areas and assessment locations 162 Figure 86 Measurement locations 163 Figure 87 Areas of archaeological potential on the site 171 Figure 88 Methodology for safeguarding potential archaeology when completing construction works 171 Figure 89 Borehole location plan 186 Figure 90 Risk Assessment Matrix 195 Tables Table 1 Secretary’s Requirements 26 Table 2 OEH additional ‘Water and Soils’ SEARs requirement response 40 Table 3 The project team 41 Table 4 Key heritage items 52 Table 5 Numerical overview 63 Table 6 Design description of the proposed stadium 67 Table 7 Design description of the proposed public domain 74 Table 8 Proposed wayfinding signage 78 Table 9 Former and proposed continuing time restrictions on fixtures 85 Table 10 Proposed cut and fill on the site 94 Table 11 Indicative construction staging 102 Table 12 Objects of the EP&A Act 103 Table 13 Other legislation which
Recommended publications
  • The Australia Stadium
    THE AUSTRALIA STADIUM SYDNEY’S OLYMPIC STADIUM HAS BEEN THE LARGEST Stadium Australia FACILITY IN THE HISTORY OF THE GAMES. TODAY, FOLLOWING A RE-STRUCTURING, IT IS THE ONLY ONE IN THE Capacity: 83,500, 81,500 (Oval) WORLD THAT CAN HOST FIVE DIFFERENT SPORTS AND STILL Opening: March 1999 IS AN EXAMPLE OF HOW HIGH QUALITY DESIGN AND Capacity during the Olympics: 110,000 RESPECT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT CAN HAPPILY CO-EXIST. Cost: $ 690 million Australian Start of work construction: September 1996 Restructuring: From October 2001 to October 2003 Owner: Stadium Australia Group Project: Populous (Bligh Lobb Sports Architects) Hosted sports: Australian Rules football, rugby 13, rugby 15, football, cricket (Australia) THE LARGEST OLYMPIC STADIUM TO DATE Stadium Australia was built to host the 2000 Sydney Olympic and Paralympic Games. The facility is located in Sydney’s suburb of Homebush, in the middle of the Olympic Park of the Australian city. When it was inaugurated, due to its 110,000 seats, it immediately conquered the “largest Olympic stadium in the world” title and at the same time it is the largest in Australia. The structure was designed and built with the intent of respecting demanding environmental conditions: compared to other Olympic stadiums (Athens and Beijing), as an example, less steel was used. The construction was started in September 1996 and completed just two and a half years later: on March 6, 1999, Sydney’s Olympic Stadium saw its first sport event: two rugby13 matches watched by 104,583 spectators. From October 2001 to October 2003, Stadium Australia was refurbished to make it the only stadium in the world capable of hosting five different professional sports: Rugby13 league, Rugby15 (Union), Australian Football, Soccer and Cricket.
    [Show full text]
  • SBA19-Winners Brochure
    THE STADIUM BUSINESS AWARDS 2019 Recognising leadership, innovation & achievement in the delivery, operation and management of sports facilities globally THE WINNERS 4 June 2019 • Emirates Old Trafford • Manchester SUSTAINABILITY & COMMUNITY AWARD Awarded to the individual, team or venue that has achieved success in the pursuit of sustainable venue management. ...and the award goes to... The Green Team successes at The O2 AEG 1Earth, UK About the Winner In 2018, we built a bespoke, on-site waste compound to house the latest recycling and waste technology, plus a wormery to compost food waste and generate fertiliser, which is distributed to local schools as well as utilised on-site. The O2 made a huge financial investment in the waste compound. Built especially for our needs, it houses a variety of waste solutions, including a state-of-the-art Waste Transfer Packer (the only one to currently exist in the world), which double compacts all general waste and an Eco-Food Digester, which processes 500kg of food waste into foul water waste every day. The O2 currently commits less than 1% of its 3,500 tonnes of waste per annum to landfill, segregating all oils, cardboard, wood, food, glass and Dried Mixed Recyclables. The Finalists • Sporting Salutes at Children’s Mercy Park (Sporting Kansas City), USA • Tackling Dementia Sports Café at Sixways Stadium (Worcester Warriors), UK • The Green Team successes at TheO2 (AEG 1Earth), UK • Protect The Pitch (LA Galaxy/Dignity Health Sports Park), USA • Reconstruction of Paride Tilesi Stadium after the Amatrice earthquake, Italy • Sensory Bags+ at Bridgestone Arena (Nashville Predators/Kulture City), USA EVENT OF THE YEAR AWARD For the best sports or non-sports event, guest event, concert or one-off spectacle held at a ...and the award goes to..
    [Show full text]
  • Adelaide Oval Stadium, Australia
    January 2018 Another Sky Climber Reference! Adelaide Oval Stadium, Australia DIVISION: Sky Climber Europe PROJECT NAME: Adelaide Oval Stadium, Australia APPLICATION: Renovation & Light Replacement The Adelaide Oval has been the headquarters of the South Australian Cricket Association (SACA) since 1871 and of the South Australian National Football League (SANFL) since 2014. The stadium was selected to host the Second Ashes Test on December 2nd, 2017 and a full capacity crowd of 55,000 was expected for this important cricket match. In order to provide the best show possible, all the lights in the stadium were replaced by LED floodlights. Sky Climber platforms were used during the renovation works and for the replacement of the floodlights in all the grandstands. Sky Stage Ultra platforms up to 8m long were used, fitted with low profile walk-through stirrups to offer: flexibility for the suspension points, maximum work space inside the platform and allow the platform to go up as high as possible close to the ceiling of the stands. The platforms were equipped with Alpha 500 traction hoists with integrated Sky OL overload detector and a central control box with integrated anti-tilt device. The platforms were suspended from straps wrapped around the steel structural tubes. Abseilers were used to move the straps from one location to another. Vertical Run 30m Suspension system Straps Type of platform Sky Stage Ultra with Low Profile Walk- Through Stirrups Length of cradle 8m Cradle rated load 610kg Type of hoist Alpha 500 with Sky OL overload Norms EN1808 www.skyclimber.be [email protected] .
    [Show full text]
  • He Maqazine of Th, Cen P&, AUTUMN Iggc CONTENTS
    ar he maqazine of th, cen p&, AUTUMN Iggc CONTENTS Realising the vision I 2 Directions n a public landscape rich with historical and social meaning, 3 What's On I management is not always a walk in the park. To nurture and protect 4 Landscape and such a precious cultural resource on Design Awards behalf of the commun~ty,requires Olympic Update skilled people and planning to cooperate as a unified whole. This edition of the Centennial Parkland's Magazine S Now and Then examines key ~nitiat~veswhich are helping the Trust achieve Park Perspectives our goals, including cultural expression, right of access, and living heritage. Preserving the integrity of the Parklands 6 Lachlan Swamp remains one of our top priorities. Nature Trail After hosting a string of high profile cultural events including I Dame Kiri Te Kanawa, Cirque du Soleil, Moonlight Cinema Pond and Mardi Gras, we are consolidating a dynamic start to the 3 7 new year with some intensive planning for construction works during 2000 and the Centenary of Federation year 2001. The challenge for the Trust is to swiftly deliver these 8 Making More of large capital works programs along with a series of major Moore Park upcoming events scheduled as part of the 2000 Olympics. Celebrating and preserving the living heritage of our 1 0 Bright Sparks in surrounding Parks, the Centenary of Federation 2001 will the Parks serve as an important milestone for our Parklands' history. C It's an opportunity we cannot underestimate - and Trust staff share a clear vision to help protect our Parklands and 12 Escqpe and shape our futures.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia and the Olympic Games 1956 Melbourne Olympics and 2000 Sydney Olympics the Games
    Australia and the Olympic Games 1956 Melbourne Olympics and 2000 Sydney Olympics The Games Preparations Melbourne 1956 preparations and venues Focus Threats to preparations in the months before the Melbourne Olympic Games. Activity Read the following account and note the main events and problems which made Melbourne’s preparations difficult at that time. By mid-1956, with Brundage satisfied and the Olympic machinery finally moving with real precision, it seemed Melbourne’s problems were finally over. Nothing could harm the Games now, except maybe an outbreak of War. This did come before long: twice, really, in the form of a couple of invasions. The armed forces of Israel, Britain and France moved into Egypt to contest what became known as the Suez Crisis, and a few weeks later bloody fighting broke out in Hungary, as huge columns of tanks rolled into Budapest and 200,000 Soviet troops began to suppress a rebellion. Tension between Taiwan and mainland China increased to a point where it was barely tolerable, and finally the People’s Republic refused to attend the Olympics. To some Cold War warriors, this last omission was a godsend. One of them, James (later Sir James) Plimsoll, had been outraged when he learned of plans to sit the People’s Republic team of 216 in the same dining hall as teams from Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam, Burma and Ceylon. After a detailed analysis of kitchen and mess-room arrangements for the Olympic village, he wrote in a confidential memo: “I appreciate that it is easier to cater for groups which eat similar food, but the result of putting all these people together is to make it easy for the Communist Chinese to maintain contact with the rest of East Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Stadium Australia
    Final Business Case Summary Stadium Australia September 2019 September 2019 About this report This document summarises the Final Business Case (Business Case) for the redevelopment of Stadium Australia. The stadium, located within Sydney Olympic Park, has 83,600 seats and was constructed as the main venue for the 2000 Sydney Olympic Games. The intent of the project is to redevelop the existing stadium into a permanent rectangular venue with 70,000 seats. This reconfiguration will move seats closer to the field of play and update the stadium to contemporary standards. The Business Case for the redevelopment of Stadium Australia was developed between September 2018 and March 2019, and was considered by the NSW Government in August 2019 following Gateway reviews and a peer review by the Centre for International Economics. Strategic context Stadium Australia is culturally and economically important Stadium Australia was the focus of the 2000 Sydney Olympics and is culturally important to the residents of Sydney and to Australians more broadly. The Stadium is also economically important and plays a significant role in NSW’s major event strategy. It hosts key national sporting events and attracts blockbuster international sport and entertainment. Events hosted at Stadium Australia create economic activity through ticket sales, television and broadcast rights, advertising, sponsorship and the sale of merchandise. This boosts the economy by contributing directly to output, to Gross Domestic Product and by providing employment opportunities for the local community. Sporting and entertainment events, particularly major events, also increase intrastate, interstate and international tourism. Events can attract visitors to NSW, and this promotes activity in tourism- related industries such as accommodation, cafes and restaurants, retail and transport.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Football Stadium Redevelopment
    SYDNEY FOOTBALL STADIUM REDEVELOPMENT STATE SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION Concept Proposal and Stage 1 Demolition SSDA 9249 APPENDIX C: Urban Design Guidelines (including Landscape Concept Plan, Shadow Diagrams, Concept Envelope Plans, Stage 1 Demolition Plan, and Public Art Strategy) SJB Architects Sydney Football Stadium Urban Design Guidelines Prepared for Infrastructure NSW Issued 6 June 2018 Level 2, 490 Crown Street Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia T. 61 2 9380 9911 [email protected] sjb.com.au We create amazing places At SJB we believe that the future of the city is in generating a rich urban experience through the delivery of density and activity, facilitated by land uses, at various scales, designed for everyone. Date of Issue Issue No. Issued by Issue Purpose 08.02.18 01 TH TOC for review 26.02.18 02 TH SCG Trust Workshop Ref: #5812 20.03.18 03 TH TK Draft Version: 14 Prepared by: TH, JF, LV 27.03.18 04 TH To COX/ASPECT for Checked by: JK, FL information 29.03.18 05 TH Preliminary Issue to Contact Details: consultants for comment SJB Architects 06.04.18 06 TH Draft Issue to TK Level 2, 490 Crown Street 24.24.18 07 TH Draft Issue to TK Surry Hills NSW 2010 Australia 08.05.18 08 TH Draft Issue to TK T. 61 2 9380 9911 22.05.18 09 JK Draft Issue to TK [email protected] 23.05.18 10 TH Final Issue to TK sjb.com.au 25.05.18 11 TH Final Issue #2 to TK SJB Architecture (NSW) Pty Ltd ABN 20 310 373 425 25.05.18 12 TH Final Issue #3 to TK/MO ACN 081 094 724 04.06.18 13 TH Final Issue #4 to TK/MO Adam Haddow 7188 John Pradel 7004 06.06.18 14 TH Final Issue #5 to TK/MO Executive Summary SJB has been engaged by Infrastructure NSW to prepare In a competitive rectangular stadium landscape nationally, Urban Design Guidelines which set out qualitative and the existing Sydney Football Stadium is now facing serious quantitative criteria for the design of new Sydney Football commercial and operational challenges in remaining relevant Stadium (SFS).
    [Show full text]
  • Stadium Australia Redevelopment Project Newsletter
    Stadium Australia Redevelopment Project Newsletter Artist impression The NSW Government is redeveloping Stadium Australia as part of the biggest investment in the state’s Major Stadia Network since the Sydney 2000 Olympics. The investment will deliver significant improvements to the fan experience whilst helping to attract and play host to the best events in the world. What are we doing? The planning process The redevelopment will involve reconfiguring the Infrastructure NSW, on behalf of the NSW Government, is existing stadium to create a purpose built 70,000- overseeing planning and delivery of the Stadium Australia seat rectangular sporting venue that brings fans Redevelopment, which will be assessed as a State Significant closer to the on-field action and delivers improved Development under the Environmental Planning and facilities for both spectators and participants. Assessment Act 1979. Major improvements include: Infrastructure NSW is preparing an Environmental Impact • 46,000 seats moving closer to the action than Statement as part of the State Significant Development ever before Application to be lodged with the Department of Planning, Industry and Environment. • A superior fan experience and stadium atmosphere The development application will seek approval to demolish • Extending the roof line coverage to improve sections of the existing stadium as well as design, construct weather protection for spectators and operate the redeveloped stadium. • New food and beverage offerings, with greater choice Prior to lodging the development application we want to get feedback from stakeholders and the local community. • New corporate hospitality suites and members’ facilities Please come along to one of our community events where you • Modern amenities and back of house facilities will have an opportunity to ask questions of the project team including gender neutral change rooms and our technical experts, learn more about the planning, design and construction process and provide feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 - Site Analysis
    Appendix 1 - Site Analysis 4 Moore Park 2040 Future Directions HASSELL 5 © 2017 A1 A1 - Site Analysis Existing Land Use Existing Land Use Victoria Barracks Moore Park serves a large residential catchment PADDINGTON including Paddington to the north-east, Kensington M O O R E OXFO P A to the south, Surry Hills to the west and the rapidly R K R R growing Green Square renewal precinct to the D D ST south-west. This growing population has reinforced the importance of the parklands, challenging its SCGT - ability to cater effectively to the needs of local SFS residents. D R I Moore Park is comprised mainly of open parkland; Moore Park V E SURRY SOUTH DOWLING STREET with the exception of the former Showground (now Moore Park East R A Fox Studios, the Entertainment Quarter and the HILLS West V SCGT - Equestrian Centre). Although Moore Park Golf E Sydney Course comprises open space, it is not publicly Cricket Fox Studios accessible parkland. Sydney A Ground N The SCGT land (including Sydney Cricket Ground & Boys High Z A C C Sydney Football Stadium) and the two secondary L E V Sydney P E D high schools (Sydney Boys High and Sydney Girls L A E N Girls High), while located outside of the Moore Park D S Hordern Entertainment boundary, make a key contribution to the overall THigh precinct. Pavilion Quarter AY RHI D The diversity of uses across Moore Park precinct are R a defining factor in the current success of the G LANG ROAD N A parklands, drawing people from a broad array of CPEC L interests into one central location.
    [Show full text]
  • 13 FEBRUARY 2013 Wednesday, 13 February 2013
    13 FEBRUARY 2013 www.hansard.act.gov.au Wednesday, 13 February 2013 National Arboretum Canberra .................................................................................... 429 Hospital emergency department waiting times .......................................................... 442 Major events at Manuka Oval .................................................................................... 462 Questions without notice: Auditor-General—audit findings .................................................................... 472 Art—public ..................................................................................................... 474 Children and young people—abuse ................................................................ 475 Schools—canteens .......................................................................................... 478 Electricity—feed-in tariff ............................................................................... 480 Bushfires—management ................................................................................ 482 Schools—early intervention program ............................................................. 484 Economy—support ......................................................................................... 486 Health—birthing centre .................................................................................. 492 Environment—Better Place ............................................................................ 494 Schools—swimming ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Vsl News 1999
    Your solution network HEADQUARTERS VSL International Ltd. Bernstrasse 9 - LYSSACH - CH 3421 - Switzerland Phone: 41 - 34 - 447 99 11 - Fax: 41 - 34 - 445 43 22 http:\\www.vsl-intl.com ISSUE TWO 1999 Australia / South East North East Central East Western Europe, Pacific territories Asia Asia Europe and Africa and Middle East Latin America REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL OFFICE REGIONAL OFFICE VSL Prestressing (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. VSL Singapore Pte. Ltd. VSL North East Asia VSL (Switzerland) Ltd L’Odyssée - Bât. A 6 Pioneer Avenue 75 Bukit Timah Road 3/F Stelux House Bernstrasse 9 2-12 Chemin des Femmes THORNLEIGH, NSW 2120 04-08 Boon Siew Building 698 Prince Edward Road East Lyssach - CH 3421 91886 MASSY Cedex AUSTRALIA San Po Kong / Kowloon SWITZERLAND FRANCE Singapore 229833 Phone: +61 - 2 - 9484 59 44 HONG KONG Phone: +41 - 34 - 447 99 11 Phone: +33 - 1 - 69 19 43 00 Fax: +61 - 2 - 9875 38 94 SINGAPORE Phone: +852 - 2590 22 22 Fax: +41 - 34 - 447 99 65 Fax: +33 - 1 - 69 19 43 01 Phone: +65 - 336 29 23 Fax: +852 - 2590 95 93 Fax: +65 - 337 64 61 AUSTRALIA - Queensland AUSTRIA ARGENTINA VSL Prestressing (Aust.) Pty. Ltd. HONG KONG Universale GSB VSL Sistemas Especiales de GEEBUNG BRUNEI VSL Hong Kong Ltd. VIENNA Construcción Argentina SA Phone: +61 - 7 - 326 564 00 San Po Kong / Kowloon Phone: +43 - 1 - 878 170 BUENOS AIRES VSL Systems (B) Sdn. Bhd. Fax: +61 - 7 - 326 575 34 Phone: +852 - 2590 22 88 Fax: +43 - 1 - 878 17 782 Phone: +54 - 11 - 4326 06 09 BRUNEI DARUSSALAM Fax: +852 - 2590 02 90 Fax: +54 - 11 - 4326 26 50 AUSTRALIA - New South Phone: +673 - 2 - 380 153 CZECH REPUBLIC Wales - 381 827 JAPAN VSL Systemy (CZ) s.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Olympic Park
    THESIS PROJECT SYDNEY OLYMPIC PARK OLYMPIC LEGACY OR BURDEN BY BEN JAMES 2007 AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS SUBMITTED AS A PARTIAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE BACHELOR OF PLANNING DEGREE, UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES 2007 ABSTRACT ‘The best Olympic Games ever’ are the words that Olympic organising committees around the world want to hear after they have hosted the Olympic Games. This title can only be held by one host city, and the current holder is Sydney. However, like many host cities in the past, infrastructure built for the Games has not had much of a post-games life. Due to this lack of post-games use, the main Olympic site at Homebush is perceived as a burden on Sydney rather than the unambiguous positive legacy envisaged. Sydney Olympic Park has even been described as a ‘white elephant’. This thesis will look at how the site as a whole has functioned since the Games, with particular reference to underutilisation of the two main stadiums. The potential of the 2002 master plan to inject new uses and vitality into the site is considered. The thesis provides a series of best practice guidelines that could be used by future hosts of similar mega-events to ensure that Games-related infrastructure does not become a burden on the host city. I ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would firstly like to thank Peter Williams, who as my thesis advisor provided me with the guidance and assistance that was required for me to complete my thesis. I secondly would like to thank Ellie for her assistance in the reading and formatting of my thesis, as well as her continued support throughout the thesis project.
    [Show full text]