U " S  > "   4  333 102    middle middle !!! (((((( upper upper !!! !!! (the furthest extent of * . . . lower foreshore aredefined follows: as Jun 28, 2012 Jun 28, any material (rock, wood, car bodies) thrown thrown bodies) car wood, (rock, any material LEGEND Symbols ...... Series or Map Name or Map Series (upper foreshore, middle foreshore, lower foreshore) Open File Map ME 2012-022 Map ME 2012-022 File Open a marshcovered by only highest andtides high stormswith some ...... a sitethe where naturalhydrology has been restored, enabling a marsh covered by moderate all and high tides and characterized visible of erosionsigns includingcliffing, however very little to no (bulkhead,causeway,wharf) road, (multi, single line) (multi, single no visible signs of erosion. erosion. of signs no visible significantsigns visible of erosion includingvegetation with cliffing, Explanation of Terms used in the Legend of Explanation Terms a horizontal sloping or gently surface (<10°) extendingseaward from the a low low a to moderately sloping (<40°)surface extending from seaward the salt marshthat intersects intertidal theasflat sloping a gently vegetated a rock fragment a rock largerthana pebbleandsmaller than a boulder, being an unconsolidated, natural accumulationof rounded rock fragments, marshthat salt intersectsintertidal the a cliff as >30 flat and cm a slope area between highlow and tides canwhich be divided into : the upper: of high orlimit tide storm wave levels (higher high large water a rock fragment a rock or detrital smallerparticle than a granule and larger than a (between the backshoreandhigh marsh, close to the backshore), (between and high low marsh) and Shore Zones Shore Backshore Highly stable ...... Partially stable ...... Not stable ...... Unconsolidated over bedrock . . . . Other Cliffed, highly stable ...... Cliffed, partially stable ...... Cliffed, not stable ...... and Nearshore Habitats Foreshore High salt marsh ...... Low salt marsh ...... Restored marsh ...... Cobble ...... Gravel...... Sand ...... Mud ...... Outcrop ...... Platform ...... Dyke ...... Foreshore a mixture of water or clay-sized and silt earth material withconsistency the . (active, inactive) 0 shore protection or armouring: or protection shore and currents by or waves erosion prevent to together fitted or irregularly together (Owens, rap) (i.e. rip structure underlying or slope surface, the preserving thereby 1994). platform: intertidalformedzone, on or rock-cliffrocky shores wave by andimpact erosion. Themay surfacebare be or littered rock. with outcrop: backshore composed of bedrock. mud: rangingfrom semifluidplastic; a wet, to soft soil or soft mass, earthy mire or sludge; an unconsolidated sediment consisting of clay and/ortogether silt, other with dimensions (sand),mixed with water, without connotation toas composition (Bates and Jackson, (<0.06251980) mm,Wentworth, 1922). sand: and particle individual an of of limit visibility lower that the at grain, or silt coarse that of the head of a small woodenmatch (Bates and Jackson, 1980) 1922). Wentworth, mm, (0.0625-2 gravel: resultingfrom erosion, consisting predominatelyparticles of larger thansand (diameter>2 mm) (Bates and Jackson, 1980). cobble: somewhat rounded or otherwise modified in the course of transport (Bates and Jackson, 1980) (6-256 cm,Wentworth, 1922). restored marsh: restored re-establishmentthe of marsh salt high and floodplain wetland conditions. habitat low salt marsh: littleby soildevelopment, species low diversity, hydrophilicoften and halophytic pioneer species (sedges, glasswort) and discontinuous cover (Owens, 1994). high salt marsh: marsh: salt high soil development, organic buildand uphigh a diversity species of plant dominated grassesby and shrubs(Owens, 1994). not stable: not slumping away fromthe shoreline. foreshore and nearshore habitats cliffed: >20 partially stable:partially vegetation slumpingaway from the shoreline. ramped: surface. highly stable: highly

Note: Legend is for map series. All units and symbols may not appear on each map. on each appear not may symbols and units All series. map for is Legend Note:

         The     Backshore of 1928 Datum Vertical Geodetic m 7.57 of (Canadian elevation an is at which tide), (CGVD28, elevationland vertical datum)) the in Southern ofthe Bight Basin Minas and 7.50(CGVD28) m the Cumberland in Basin. Foreshore: foreshore foreshore low marsh). The foreshorecan be either ramped or cliffedwhere salt marshis present.   Nonagricultural aboiteau or culvert ...... Agricultural aboiteau ...... Shore protection or armouring ...... Wharf ...... End of ACASA study area ...... Rock in water ...... Building point location ...... Arterial highway ...... Trunk highway ...... Collector highway ...... Hard surface road ...... Loose surface/resource access road ...... Trail, footpath, cart track ...... Railway * Coastline...... River, stream ...... County boundary ...... line Transmission Building footprint ...... Wetland ...... Lake/ocean ...... Incorporated marsh body ...... 45°50'N

45°42'0"N 45°42'0"N

N 67 N

45°45'0"N 45°45'0"N 62 000m 50 000m 50 66 65 64 63 64°17'58"W 64°17'58"W 64°17'58"W 64°17'58"W Ridge Maccan Nappan Amherst Fort Lawrence (1045850064200) (1045700064200) (1045800064200) (1045750064200) 64°20'W OFM ME 2012-022 64°20'W Hebert

Minudie

y Lower River

e Minudie Marsh

(1045800064300)

v (1045700064300) (1045750064300) r

u

s

r

a

d

i

l

e f

e o

g l

i t

o i

b

B m

u i J L New Brunswick 64°30'W 64°30'W Map series...... extent Current 0510km E 000m 98 3 E 45°50'N 000m 98 3 B. 2012: ShoreB. 2012: zonecharacterization s, Mineral Resources Branch, Open File ties and other partners. It wasothermade partners.ties and It Disclaimer Acknowledgments

Recommended Citation Recommended

k

o

o

r

B

"

" e

"

k

r

"

"

u " o

97

R

'

O " 97

This project is part of the Atlantic Climate Adaptation Solutions Association SolutionsAdaptation ClimateAtlantic the ofproject is part This (ACASA) project, a joint undertakingAtlantic Provinces, between Natural the Resources Canada, regional municipali thefromsupportfrom Province NovaScotia fundingand federal of possible with Natural ResourcesAdaptation Canada'sCollaborative Program. Regional informationonthisThe map mayhave government froma variety come of and nongovernmentThe Nova ScotiaNatural Department sources. Resources of Associationdo not SolutionsAdaptation Atlantic Climate partners the and of Thisfor mapis intended use at formayassume errors occur. any liability that 1:10 000. of published scale the van Proosdij, and Pietersma-Perrott, D. NovaNova Scotia; LowerRiverarea, the Cumberland Hebert map of County, Scotia Department of Natural Resource Map ME 2012-022, scale 1:10 000.

"

"

"

"

"

"

E

"

E

L

I

B

U J B. 2011: Shore zone characterization B. 2011: http://atlanticadaptation.ca/node/183/

Selected References

"

"

" " ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( 96 ( ( (

( http://www.gov.ns.ca/natr/wildlife/habitats/wetlands.asp

( " " ( ( "

96

" S (

(

( "

Bates, R. L. A. (editors)and Jackson, 1980:second J. Glossary of Geology, Virginia. AmericanInstitute,Falls River, Geological edition; R.Milton, 2009: Nova Scotia wetland vegetation and classification inventory; Resources,Nova Scotia Department NaturalHabitats of Wetlands and Coastal Program. Owens, E. H. 1994: Coastal zone classification system for the national sensitivity mapping program; Internal Report, Environment Canada, Cat.No.En 40-488/1995E, Dartmouth,Nova Scotia. A., K. Jenner, Solomon, Gareau, Forbes, S., D. L., P., P., G., Fraser, A. Sherin, decade in the life of a A coastal information2003: T. Hynes, S. and Lynds, system; Proceedings of CoastGIS 2003, Genoa, Italy. http://www.gisig.it/coastgis/papers/sherin.htm van Proosdij, and Pietersma-Perrott, D. climateUniversity, Bayoffor changeadaptationin the Fundy; Saint Mary’s Halifax, Nova Scotia, 33 p. processingflood Lidar and McGuigan,andMacDonald, K. 2011: C. T., Webster, risk mapping for andcoastal District areas of in the District of Lunenburg,Town Atlantic Windsor;Amherst,Cumberland, and County Wolfville Yarmouth, Association,Adaptation 130 p. Solutions Climate http://atlanticadaptation.ca/acasa/node/128/ scale of grade A and C.classWentworth, K. terms1922: for clastic sediments; 377-392.p. 30, v. Geology, Journal of "

(

( (

(

l

"

"

l i

(

"

H

"

(

"

"

e

i

" S

( t

s

i

"

r

h

C

"

"

"

" " 242

" y e rv u s r A a d N

" i O " l

" f " o C " t i H

im T

L A

"

R

"

"

T

S

" S

95

t

r

e

b

95 é

H

2012

r

e

v

i R R E

Halifax, Nova Scotia

"

V T

Scale 1:10 000

I

"

R

R

"

E

R

B E

Mineral Resources Branch Resources Mineral E

Open File Map ME 2012-022

H

W

" "

O

L

"

" " Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources

Crown Copyright © 2012, Province of Nova Scotia, all rights reserved. rights all Scotia, Nova of Province © 2012, Copyright Crown

"

"

"

" k "

o D o "

r L Lower River Hebert Area, Hebert Lower River

D. D. van Proosdij* and B. Pietersma-Perrott*

" "

B "

" E

"

I

" "

y "

" F le "

s S 00.51km

g "

N "

u

"

"

"

O

"

" "

P

"

R

" "

Cumberland County, Nova Scotia Cumberland County,

"

R

"

"

"

" S

" "

"

A

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

B

"

"

"

" "

Maritime Provinces Spatial Analysis Research Centre, Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Nova Scotia Halifax, University, Research Mary's Centre, Saint Analysis Spatial ProvincesMaritime

"

"

"

"

" " *

242

"

" "

Shore Zone Characterization Map of the

"

"

"

"

"

"

" "

"

" "

94

" S 94

(2011) for (2011)

" S

et al. et

" S "

r of the Nova Scotia Departmentofr of

"

" S dar bare-earth digital elevation model, elevationdar bare-earth digital a vertical exaggeration of 5. The lidar The 5.a vertical exaggeration of

ics Research Group, Nova Scotia

" S 3100lidar sensor; seeWebster

Map Notes

" S

"

"

"

"

"

"

" S

"

" " GIS shoreline databaseproducedProosdijvan and Barbara by Danika shoreline GIS Pietersma-Perrott Maritime Provincesof Saint Mary’s University, Spatial Analysis Research Centre. Data collected from June 19, 2010 to July 8, 2011. Cartography and Angie reproductionEhle by Natural Resources, Geoscience Information The Services Section, 2011-12. ArcGIS®maps were developed 10. using MercatorTransverse Universal Projection (UTM), Zone 20, Central Meridian American Datum (NAD)Reference 1983 Canadian Spatial North West. 63°00' System (CSRS) 98. BaseDatabase and datadigital derived from the Nova Scotia Topographic (NSTDB). Copyright Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Nova TheScotia. NSTDB is available from Service Nova Scotia and Municipal Relations (SNSMR), Land Information Services Division (LIS), Nova Scotia Amherst, Nova Scotia. Geomatics (NSGC), Centre Dyke, surveyaboiteau data and incorporated marsh body data from the Nova Agriculture, Resource Stewardship Land Protection.DepartmentofScotia Database (NSTDB), Topographic derivedWharf structures NovaScotia from the Series. Coastal Nova Scotia Shaded image relief derived from a 2 m li and 45° sun angle of 315°, azimuth of Applied was Geomatacquired by the Community College during a single mission on All data October 29, 2009. ALTM an Optech acquired using lidar processing,surfaceon the construction details and accuracyfurther validation.

93

"

"

"

"

"

"

" " "

93

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

" "

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

" "

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

"

" "

y "

"

"

" "

e " " v " r orical ratesA of coastal change. u of high tide), foreshore (area between

s dynamiccoastal as the zone will

" shoreline were characterized and

r characterization,the an understanding of a d li absence (consolidated of cliffs and

" f

o "

"

it Descriptive Text "

im

" "

L "

"

"

"

"

"

" "

k o o r

B 92

s e

E i inevitably lead inevitably to conflict between the natural variability of the coastal withinplaceactivitieseconomic, taking environment and culturaland the social it. Managers and planners need to have access to better information about tidal rivers, coastal processes and dynamics to ensure informed decision making. This requires up-to-date shore zone boundaries of coastal processes and hist Human settlement in environments as segmentation model ArcGIS®was 10developed using to delineate and characterize the backshore (upper limit low and high tides) and nearshore (low water line out to sea, but shallow) zones Minas Bay Cumberlandthein the Basin BightandSouthern the of Basin within shorelinesCanada. Multiplehyper-tidal werechosen the reflect to Fundy, of conditions (>14 m tides). Data were collected during shoreline surveys using a tablet. In areas YUMA where it was unsafe to conduct shoreline surveys, aerial imagery was used. Segments of the Areas ofcatalogued using the coast a customizedwere assessed decision key. presence or stability, shorelinefor unconsolidated) and anthropogenic structures. There are 15 maps in the Southern Bight of the Minas Basin study area and 7 maps in the Cumberland Basin study area. Maps are at a scale of 1:10 000. Analysis theproject was completed MaritimewithinThis Provinces Spatial (MP_SpARC)ResearchScotia Centre Nova collaboration from the with ResourcesDepartment Natural of (NSDNR). n

n 000m e

l k 92 46°N 44°N

o

3 G

o

r

B

y

r

r

u

C

60°W

n Sable Island

h 60°W

o

J n

Map series...... extent Current . sheets map NTS a

a e

i

c t

o

O

c

c

i S

t

n a

v a

l

t o

A N

Gulf of . I

E. St. Lawrence .

P

64°W

64°W

y

d n

E

Fu

f

000m

o 0100200km

N 67 N 62

000m 000m 50 50 New 91 y

3 66 65 64 63 a

64°24'2"W 64°24'2"W

64°24'2"W 64°24'2"W Brunswick B ± 45°45'0"N 45°45'0"N 45°42'0"N 45°42'0"N NSTDB 1:10 000 map sheet 10 457000 64300 (part of NTS Sheet 21H/09) 46°N 44°N