*013* Ke,41*11 Sur,Ace Cer•le rj For North Private Bog 152, Memorial Ave 7 District Council 0 5 SEP 2019 Koikohe 0440, New Zeolord Freephone· 0800 920 029
Office Use Only Phone: (09) 401 5200
Application Number: Fox: (09) 401 2137
1-20.00 ,+k Emoil. osk.us@Ind(.govt.nz
Website: vt,vw.fid[.govt.ni
APPLICATION FOR RESOURCE CONSENT OR FAST-TRACK RESOURCE CONSENT
(Or Associated Consent Pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA)) (If applying for a Resource Consent pursuant to Section 87AAC or 88 of the RMA, this form can be used to satisfythe requirements of Form 9)
Prior to, and during, completion of this application form, please refer to Resource Consent Guidance Notes and Schedule of Fees and Charges - both available on the Council's web page.
1. Pre-Lodgement Meeting Have you met with a Council Resource Consent representative to discuss this application prior to lodgement'¢; No 2. Type of Consent being applied for (more than one circle can be ticked): Gs-1-her- f. Land Use O Fast Track Land Use* O Subdivision O Discharge Extension of time (s.125) Change of conditions (s.127) 0 Change of Consent Notice (s.221(3)) Consent under National Environmental Standard (e.g. Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil) 0 Other (please specify) *The fast track for simple land use consents is restricted to consents with a controlled activity status and requires you provide an electronic address for service.
3. Would you like to opt out of the Fast Track Process? Yes 4. Applicant Details:
Name/s: :0©10 40 1-41 j>sJV-0+ 6=h 0 1 C-1 j
Electronic Address for Service (E-mail): /'Flantl . M/./.Sen/E) -Adc.T 'W€'11_ Phone Numbers: Work: 6 9 4070 4 2,4 Home:
Postal Address: 1,1 , AM O 4/4 I Agenu f (or alternative method of service under section 352 of the Act) Pr; J 0 1-t £ 9% 15 -1 JG,le ok£0, Post Code: 04 9- O
5. Address for Correspondence: Name and address for service and correspondence (if using an Agent write their details here). Name/s: Man M '13 0 1
Electronic Address for Service (E-mail): 5,05 7 - W' /.r °-,r -4.Jc.·°4+' 01 -z-
Phone Numbers: Work: 6 T407042C Home:
Postal Address: As Ao re (or alternative method of service under section 352 of the Act)
Post Code:
All correspondence will be sent by email in the first iristance. Please advise us jf you would prefer an alternative means of communication. 6. Details of Property Owner/s and Occupier/s: Name and Address of the Owner/Occupiers of the land to which this application relates (where there are multiple owners or occupiers please list on a separate sheet if required)
Name/s: ¥6 , N orrh b ; s 6< c 4 Co a n JA
Property Address/: 21 n/1, P.1 o /4¤ 1 A-v enve Location )Ce I ko k L
7. Application Site Details: Location and/or Property Street Address of the proposed activity: S\le Addressl 21 M ervt o A a / A·v er,vtz, Location: /ce,lou
Legal Description: Lot I Dp 2 111 & Val Num ber:
Certificate of Title: Al ., 1 Please remember to attach a copy of your Certificate of Title to the application, along with relevant consent notices and/or easements and encumbrances (search copy must be less than 6 months old)
Site Visit Requirements: Is there a locked gate or security system restricting access by Council staff? Yes Is there a dog on the property? Yes lilbl Please provide details of any other entry restrictions that Council staff should be aware of, e.g. health and safety caretaker's details. This is important to avoid a wasted trip and having to re-arrange a second visit.
8. Description of the Proposal: Please enter a brief description of the proposal here. Attach a detailed description of the proposed activity and drawings (to a recognized scale, e.g. 1:100) to illustrate your proposal. Please refer to Chapter 4 of the District Plan, and Guidance Notes, for further details of information requirements. uf·Aga: 4-o rne-nnonal favli
+ Se& App/Occ>hok C Lpwilc fe 1 , r *kev di\-•4\ < -
If this is an application foran Extension of Time (s. 125); Change of Consent Conditions (s.127) or Change or Cancellation of Consent Notice conditions (s.221(3)), please quote relevant existing Resource Consents and Consent Notice identifiers and provide details of the change(s) or extension being sought, with reasons for requesting them.
9. Would you like to request Public Notification Yes 10. Other Consent required/being applied for under different legislation (more than one circle can be ticked): O Building Consent (BC ref # if known) O Regional Council Consent (ref # if known) O National Environmental Standard consent O Other (please specify) hi 4
11. National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil to Protect Human Health: The site and proposal may be subject to the above NES. In order to determine whether regard needs to be had to the NES please answer the following (further information in regard to this NES is available on the Council's planning web pages):
Is the piece of land currently being used or has it historically ever been 0 yes Gino 0 don't know used for an activity or industry on the Hazardous Industries and Activities List(HAIL)
Is the proposed activity an activity covered by the NES? £[f the activity is €42 c*wy don't know any of the activities listed below, then you need to tickWe 'yes' circle).
Subdividing land W Changing the use of a piece of land
ip Disturbing, removing or sampling soil Removing or replacing a fuel storage system
12. Assessment of Environmental Effects:
Every application for resource consent must be accompanied by an Assessment of Environmental Effects (AEE). This is a requirement of Schedule 4 of the Resource Management Act 1991 and an application can be rejected if an adequate AEE is not provided. The information in an AEE must be specified in sufficient detail to satisfy the purpose for which it is required. Your AEE may include additional information such as Written Approvals from adjoining property owners, or affected parties.
Please attach your AEE to this application.
13. Billing Details: This identifies the person or entity that will be responsible for paying any invoices or receiving any refunds associated with processing this resource consent. Please also refer to Council's Fees and Charges Schedule.
Name/s: (please write all names in full) €D 6,/t N i / | OJ 946,1 0 ,-1 MO 1 i 4 26 PW-9 -4 Email: roIX,t · will
Postal Address: AS- 6 o vt
Post Code:
Phone Numbers: Work: 07 40/56 -77 Home: Fax:
Fees Information: An instalment fee for processing this application is payable at the time of lodgement and must accompany your application in order for it to be lodged. Please note that if the instalment fee is insufficient to cover the actual and reasonable costs of work undertaken to process the application you will be required to pay any additional costs. Invoiced amounts are payable by the 20th of the month following invoice date. You may also be required to make additional payments if your application requires notification.
Declaration concerning Payment of Fees: 1/we understand that the Council may charge me/us for all costs actually and reasonably incurred in processing this application. Subject to my/our rights under Sections 357B and 358 of the RMA, to object to any costs, I/we undertake to pay all and future processing costs incurred by the Council. Without limiting the Far North District Council's legal rights if any steps (including the use of debt collection agencies) are necessary to recover unpaid processing costs I/we agree to pay all costs of recovering those processing costs. If this application is made on behalf of a trust (private or family), a society (incorporated or unincorporated) or a company in signing this application 1/we are binding the trust, society company to pay all the above costs and guaranteeing to pay all the above costs in my/our personal capacity.
Name: (please print) W,{f O,1 Signature' mA-al (signature of bill payer - mandatory) Date: 5-1 1 1 Note to applicant You must include all information required by this form. The information must be specified in sufficient detail to satisfy the purpose for which it is required. You may apply for 2 or more resource consents that are needed for the same activity on the same form. You must pay the charge payable to the consent authority for the resource consent application under the Resource Management Act 1991. Fast-track application Under the fast-track resource consent process, notice of the decision must be given within 10 working days after the date the application was first lodged with the authority, unless the applicant opts out of that process at the time of lodgement. A fast-track application may cease to be a fast-track application under section 87AAC(2) of the RMA. Privacy Information: Once this application is lodged with the Council it becomes public information. Please advise Council if there is sensitive information in the proposal. The information you have provided on this form is required so that your application for consent pursuant to the Resource Management Act 1991 can be processed under that Act. The information will be stored on a public register and held by the Far North District Council. The details of your application may also be made available to the public on the Council's website, www.fndc.qovt.nz. These details are collected to inform the general public and community groups about all consents which have been issued through the Far North District Council. Declaration: The information I have Aupplied with this application is true and complete to the best of my knowledge. Name: Al• '14 /61' 6 . 4 (please print) , 1 Signature: (signature) Date: 5(0911*17 (A signature is norrequired if the application is made by electronic means) Checklist (please tick if information is provided) •--0- Payment (cheques payable to Far North District Council) ?liati Invot'Le - A current Certificate of Title (Search Copy not more than 6 months old) N /1- -r_-O-* Copies of any listed encumbrances, easements and/or consent notices relevant to the application ,d/1- 4 Applicant / Agent / Property Owner / Bill Payer details provided \£2 Location of property and description of proposal Assessment of Environmental Effects t/Written Approvals / correspondence from consulted parties 0./ Reports from technical experts (if required) ....--9- Copies of other relevant consents associated with this application A1- 0/ Location and Site plans (land use) AND/OR 8/'Location and Scheme Plan (subdivision) 4--Elevations / Floor plans 4-Topographical / contour plans Please refer to Chapter 4 of the District Plan for details of the information that must be provided with an application. Please also refer to the RC Checklist available on the Council's website. This contains more helpful hints as to what information needs to be shown on plans. Only one copy of an application is required, but please note for copying and scanning purposes, documentation should be: UNBOUND SINGLE SIDED NO LARGER THAN A3 in SIZE //92/For North &7 District Council Te Kounihero o Toi Tokerou ki le Roki Assessment of Effects on the Environment Upgrades to Memorial Park, Kaikohe Report Information and Quality Control Prepan Robert Willoughby Community Development Advisor Far North District Council (FNDC) *E Mandy Wilson Infrastructure Consents Planner (FNDC) Documents Name: A2645924 2 Table of Contents Report Information and Quality Control...... 2 Table of Contents...... 3 1 Applicantand Property Details ...... 5 2 Information Requirements...... 5 3 The Proposal...... 3.1 Any Other Activities that are Part of the Proposal...... 7 3.2 Permitted Activities that are Part of the Proposal...... 7 4 The Existing Environment...... 7 4.1 Existing Environment...... ,.,,.,.,.,.,...... ,.,..,.,.,..,.,...... ,.,.,.,.,.,...... ,..,..,...,,.,...,...... ,.,.,....,.7 4.2 Location and Physical Characteristics...... 7 4.3 Legal Interests...... 4.4 Exiting Consents...... ,....,...,...... ,...... ,.,..,.,.,...... ,..,..,....,,.,.,.....,...,...... ,...... ,...,...,,....7 4.5 Archaeology...... 8 5 Reasons for Application...... ,...... ,...... ,...... ,....,.,...... ,.8 5.1 Operative Far North District Plan...... ,...... ,.,...... 8 5.2 Overall Status of Application...... 10 6 Notification Assessment...... ,...... ,...... ,...... ,...... ,...... ,...... 10 7 Assessment of Effects onthe Environment...... 11 7.1 Permitted baseline...... ,...... ,.,...,...... ,..,.,.,..,.,.,...... ,....,..,...... ,,...... ,...... ,,.,11 7.2 Stormwater Effects...... 11 7.3 Earthworks Effects...... ,.,.,.,.,.,...,...... ,...... ,...,..,..,...... ,..,.,...... 13 7.4 Positive Effects...... ,....,...... ,.,.,..,...,..,...... ,...... ,.....,...... ,..,.,.,..,...... ,.,.,....,...,.15 7.5 Summary of Effects ...... 15 8 Affected Persons Assessment...... 15 9 Statutory Assessment...,.,...,..,,...... ,.,.,.,.,....,,...... 9.1 Section 104(1)(a) Assessment of Affects...... 15 9.2 Section 104(1)(b)...... ,.,...... ,...... ,...... ,.15 9.2.1 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil (NES) 16 9.2.2 Regional Policy Statement...... 16 9.2.3 Far North District Plan ...... ,...... ,...... 16 9.3 Section 104(1)(c) Other Matters.,...... ,..,...... ,,.,..,...... ,...... 17 9.4 Part 2 Assessment...... ,..,...... 17 3 10 Conclusion...... 18 Appendix A - Deve/opment P/ans...... 19 Appendix B-L/NZ Report...... 20 Appendix C- Correspondence...... 21 Appendix D - Stormwater Adanagement Ca/cu/ations...... 22 4 1 Applicant and Property Details Applicant: Far North District Council Attn: Mandy Wilson, Senior Infrastructure Consents Planner Address for Service: Far North District Council Memorial Avenue Private Bag 752 Kaikohe 0440 Site Address: 21 Memorial Avenue Legal Description: Lot 1 DP 89178 Site Area: 12,707m2 Owner of Site: Far North District Council Occupiers of Site: FNHL District Plan Zone(s): Recreational Activities Summary of Proposal: To upgrade the recreational facilities in Memorial Park by: • The construction of an outdoor basketball court and footpath. • The construction of a whanau BBQ area, exercise area and public toilet. Summary of Reason for Resource consent is sought for a breach of the permitted Application: activity rules Stormwater Management and Excavation and/or Filling in the Recreational Activities zone. Appendices: A. Development Plans B. LINZ Report - note Recreation Reserve vested on deposit there is no Certificate of Title. C. Correspondence D. Stormwater Management Calculations 2 Information Requirements This assessment and report accompanies the Resource Consent Application, and is provided in accordance with Section 88 and Schedule 4 of the Resource Management Act 1991 (the Act). 5 The Proposal The application is for land use consent to upgrade the recreational facilities at Memorial Park, Kaikohe (refer to Appendix A for plans). The proposed upgrades will be staged over a number of years as funding allows and include the following: • Construction of an outdoor basketball court and footpaths (Stage 1 - Priority Works) • Construction of a family BBQ area, exercise area and public toilet (Stage 2 - Future Projects) The proposed activity areas will be used during daylight hours. Lighting of the basketball court is planned in the future but does not form part of this application. The court area will not be fenced and court side seating will be provided. »70« A t>7. 44 Kaikohe Memorial Hall *,i \ *f> 1 0 Oranga Tamariki -I -A-:A m ./. - 9,1 - t i IJA C.L NDC Offices Ify€ 0.4 4 ' A 7=- 41 * AL-"4:1 415* A .UN¥> , -„4 ..,2 . /0 1 0 , . A t. p..likalti, 2.4. a %il- 1.,·.e*4 2Y Propsed Baketball/6 ?IP 4,4. 9 \ 6/ VE N 13,4*140- L.- liflliv, 4 - r \t .„ pioneer Village 5 .: 1 "'=, 9, $97 j .UE"*1.-r'. t;;r. : r 1. y % a 4 r.. - B A Figure 1 Location of Memorial Park and proposed basketball court. The public toilet will be connected to the reticulated wastewater, water and stormwater networks. In addition stormwater from the basketball court will be collected and discharged to the reticulated network. Earthworks are required to create the foundations for the activity areas including the basketball court. 6 3.1 Any Other Activities that are Part of the Proposal Clause 2(1)(d) of Schedule 4 of the Act requires the applicant to identify other activities that are part of the proposal. This in intended to capture activities which need permission or licensing outside of the Act, for example, activities under the Building Act 2004. No further consents are required. 3.2 Permitted Activities that are Part of the Proposal Clause 3(A) of Schedule 4 of the Act requires that information about related permitted activities be provided in the resource consent application. As assessment of the activities that form part of the proposal that are permitted is provided in Section 5 of this report. 4 The Existing Environment 4.1 Existing Environment Section 104(1)(a) of the Resource Management Act 1991 (RMA) provides that when considering a consent application, the consent authority must, subject to Part 2, have regard to the actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity. Case law has determined that the environment must be read as the environment which exists at the time of the assessment and as the environment may be in the future as modified by the utilisation of permitted activities under the plan and by activities authorised by resource consents that are being exercised, or that are likely to be exercised in the future. 4.2 Location and Physical Characteristics The subject site (known as Memorial Park) is located on the corner of Memorial Avenue and Station Road, Kaikohe. Memorial Park sits at the urban periphery of the Kaikohe Township and the surrounding environment is characterised by the recreational activities to the south including the Pioneer Village and Lindvart Park, light industrial development to the west commercial development to the north and east. The site is flat and contains a number of existing activity areas including footpaths, a skate bowl, playground and lawn. Parking is provided by way of a formed and sealed carpark accessed off Memorial Avenue. The site is zoned Recreational Activities in the operative Far North District Plan and bounded by commercially zoned properties. 4.3 Legal Interests The parcel of land, Lot 1 DP 98178, vested on deposit in 1980 as a recreation reserve. There is no title associated with the land and as such no legal interests registered against it (refer to Appendix C). 4.4 Exiting Consents There are no known existing resource consents or building consents relating to the subject site. 1 4.5 Archaeology Heritage Pouhere Toanga New Zealand (HPTNZ) was consulted regarding the proposal as there is a recorded site (P05/207) within proximity to the park. HPTNZ archaeologist James Robinson advised that the recorded site refers to a Maori Reserve (wahi tapu) on the north side of Memorial Avenue and as such, the subject site is not within the area of the archaeological site. On that basis HPTNZ advised they are happy for work to proceed under and ADP (Refer to Appendix C). 5 Reasons for Application 5.1 Operative Far North District Plan An assessment of the relevant District Plan rules is set out in the table below. Table 1 District Plan Assessment ompliancessessment, 9.6.5.1.1 PURPOSE OF The only new building proposed is the public Permitted. BUILDINGS toilets which will support the principal recreational activities on the site. 9.6.5.1.2 SCALE OF ACTIVITIES The site is sewered. The permitted number Permitted. of persons on the site at any one time is 8/400mi This equates to 254 persons. The proposed development will not result in people on site exceeding this number. 9.6.5.1.3 BUILDING HEIGHT The maximum height of the building will not Permitted. exceed 8m. 9.6.5.1.4 SUNLIGHT No part of the building will project beyond a Permitted. 45 degree recession plane as measured inwards from any point 2m vertically above ground level on any site boundary. 9.6.5.1.5 STORMWATER The permitted maximum coverage of the site Does not comply - MANAGEMENT with impermeable surfaces is 10%. Discretionary Activity The existing impermeable surfaces are Does not comply with the 15.2%. Additional impermeable surfaces of restricted discretionary up to 1235m2 are proposed (Stage 1 and threshold of 15%. Stage 2) bringing the total to 3160m2 which equates to 24.9%. 9.6.5.1.6 SETBACK FROM No building will be located within 3m of road Permitted. BOUNDARIES boundaries or within 2m of any other boundaries. 9.6.5.1.7 TRANSPORTATION See below for assessment 9.6.5.1.8 HOURS OF The recreational activities associated with Permitted. OPERATION the proposed development will not exceed the permitted hours of operation. 8 9.6.5.1.9 SCREENING FOR All adjoining boundaries are zoned Permitted. NEIGHBOURS Commercial. No screening required. 9.6.5.1.10 OUTDOOR No commercial retailing, manufacturing, Permitted. ACTIVITIES altering, repairing, dismantling or processing activities are proposed. 9.6.5.1.11 KEEPING OF Not relevant. N/A ANIMALS 9.6.5.1.12 NOISE It is reasonable to assume that all noise Permitted. associated with the activity will comply with the permitted standard given there is no Residential, Coastal Residential or Russell Township Zones in proximity to the site. 9.6.5.1.13 HELICOPTER Not relevant. N/A MOVEMENTS 9.6.5.1.14 BUILDING Permitted building coverage of the site is 8%. Permitted. COVERAGE This equates to 1016mi There are no existing buildings. The proposed toilet building will not result in the permitted standard being exceeded. 15.1.6A.2.1 TRAFFIC INTENSITY A TIF of 200 is permitted. The TIF's for Permitted. existing uses and new activities has been determined by reference to Appendix 3A. The basketball court has a TIF of 50 (50 per court). The family picnic area could realistically cater for 20 persons therefore has a TIF of 40 (2 per person facility is designed for). The toilet (assuming 2 pan) has a TIF of 4 (2 person facility is designed for). The total TIF for new activities is calculated to be 94. In terms of the existing recreational uses it is estimated the skate bowl could cater for a max of 20 person, and the playground 10 persons bring the TIF's for existing activities to 60 (2 per person facility is designed for). Total TIF (existing and new uses) 154. 15.1.6B.1.1 ON-SITE CAR The minimum number of carparks required Permitted. PARKING SPACES has been determined by reference to Appendix 3C. In terms of new uses, the basketball court requires 3 (3 per court), the toilet requires 0.5 parks, and the family picnic area requires 5 parks (1 per every 4 persons the facility is designed for). In terms of the existing recreational uses 5 parks are required for the skate bowl, 2.5 for the playground. The total number of parks required is 16. There are 18 existing formed and sealed LD parks available on the site. 15.1.6B.1.4 ACCESSIBLE CAR One accessible park is required. There is Permitted PARKING SPACES sufficient space available for one of the existing parks to be a dedicated accessible park. 15.1.6B.1.5 CAR PARKING It is expected that the existing parks can Permitted SPACE STANDARDS meet the size and manoeuvring standards set out in Appendix D. All parking and manoeuvring areas are formed with an all- weather surface, and drained. 15.1.6B.1.6 LOADING SPACES No loading spaces required. Permitted. 12.3.6.1.2 EXCAVATION AND/OR Excavation and or filling is permitted Does not comply - FILLING, INCLUDING provided that it does not exceed 300m3 in Restricted Discretionary OBTAINING ROADING any 12 month period per site and there is no Complies with the MATERIAL BUT EXCLUDING cut or fill face exceeding 1.5m. Cut or fill restricted discretionary MINING AND QUARRYING, IN faces will not exceed 1.5. standard of 2000m3. THE RURAL LIVING, COASTAL The total volume of cut and/or fill has been LIVING, SOUTH KERIKERI estimated to be in the order of 500m3. INLET, GENERAL COASTAL, RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES, The majority is attributed to fill required to CONSERVATION, WAIMATE form the raised mounds around the NORTH AND POINT VERONICA basketball court. ZONES 12.3.6.1.4 NATURE OF FILLING All fill will comply with the permitted Permitted. MATERIAL IN ALL ZONES standards. Based on the assessment above resource consent is required for breaches of the following permitted activity rules: • Rule 9.6.5.1.5 Stormwater Management - 24.9% impermeable surface coverage exceeds both the permitted (10%) and restricted discretionary (15%) thresholds - Discretionary Activity. • Rule 12.3.6.1.2 Excavation and/or Filling - The estimated volume of 500m3 exceeds the permitted threshold of 300m3 cut and/or fill in any 12 month period - Restricted Discretionary Activity. 5.2 Overall Status of Application Overall the proposal is assessed as being a Discretionary Activity in accordance with 9.6.5.3 Discretionary Activities of the District Plan. 6 Notification Assessment An assessment of the notification provisions under section 95A - G, is provided below: • For the purpose of section 95A, the proposal does not require public notification as none of the three criteria of section 95A(3) apply and the application is not precluded from public notification pursuant to section 95A(5). The application is not required to be publicly notified in accordance with Section 95A(8), noting that an assessment of effects under Section 95D is provided further in this report. There are no special circumstances that exist as per section 95A(9). 10 • For the purpose of Section 95B, there are no affected protected customary rights groups and the proposed activity is not on land subject to any statutory acknowledgement. The criteria under Section 9513(6) do not apply to the proposal. In terms of Section 956(7) and (8), no persons are considered to be adversely affected by the proposal. An assessment of affected persons is provided further in this report. Therefore, it is requested that this application be processed as a non-notified application on the basis of the information provided in this application. 7 Assessment of Effects on the Environment The following assessment addresses those matters considered relevant under Section 95D, Section 104, and the Fourth Schedule of the Act. In doing so, the assessment also addresses the matters to which council's discretion restricted under rule 12.3.6.2.1 Excavation and/or Fill and the assessment criteria set out in section 11.3 Stormwater Management of the Operative Far North District Plan. 7.1 Permitted baseline In considering an assessment of effects Section 95D(b) and Section 104(2) provide for consideration of the permitted baseline, being activities that La consent authority may disregard an adverse effect of the activity on the environment if a national environmental standard or the plan permits an activity with that effect.' No further impermeable surfaces on the site are permitted. In this case it is considered that there is no permitted baseline that can be used to assist in assessing the effects of the activity. 7.2 Stormwater Effects The site currently has 15.2% impermeable surface coverage. The existing impermeable surfaces includes: a sealed carpark where stormwater is directed to the reticulated stormwater network via kerb and channel; and the footpaths and skate bowl where stormwater runoff is discharged to ground and naturally disperses. The plans (SK-01) show impermeable surfaces for the first stage of the development as being 20.4%. Stage 2 involves the construction of a toilet block, access footpaths and impermeable structures within the whanau BBQ area and exercise area. These facilities have not been designed and so impermeable calculations are not available. Given that the total impermeable surfaces are uncertain at this stage, it is considered pragmatic for stormwater management design purposes to assume that an area of 1235m2 (derived from SK-03 brown rock fill area) will be impermeable. The first stage of the development will result in an additional 666rrd of impermeable surfaces (see SK-01). While it is considered unlikely that the second stage will result in an additional 569m2 of impermeable surfaces the applicant has decided to take a precautionary approach to ensure that further consent or upgrades to the stormwater management system won't be necessary for the second stage. All stormwater runoff from the court and seating areas will be directed to cesspits, collected in a detention storage area onsite (this could be tanks and/or a detention pond/soakage pits) and then discharged at a controlled rate (attenuated) into the reticulated stormwater network. Any stormwater from the additional footpaths will discharge to ground and naturally disperse as currently occurs. 11 FNDC's Stormwater Engineer has prepared an assessment of the predevelopment and post development flows from the 1235m2 development area (refer to Appendix C) and had determined that the detention storage of 45,595 L is required to cater for a 1 :100 year rainfall event. Given that no decision has been made as to the best practicable option for stormwater detention storage at the time of preparing the application, it is proposed that a condition of consent be included that requires the final stormwater management design be submitted for approval prior to construction commencing. Stormwater from the new impermeable surfaces will not be directed to adjoining properties and no adverse stormwater effects to those properties are anticipated. The proposal has been assessed against the relevant criteria set out under 11.3 Stormwater Management of the District Plan. Assessment Criteria . I. Comment - (a) The extent to which building site coverage and • Collected stormwater runoff will directed to impermeable surfaces result in increased detention storage and then discharged at a stormwater runoff and contribute to total controlled rate to the public network. catchment impermeability and the provisions of • The predominant coverage on the site is and will any catchment or drainage plan for that catchment. remain grass/lawn. This provides filtering of the stormwater runoff that is not collected. (b) The extent to which Low Impact Design • In this instance stormwater detention and principles have been used to reduce site attenuation of stormwater runoff is considered impermeability. necessary to ensure that the stormwater network is (c) Any cumulative effects on total catchment not overwhelmed by the additional runoff. impermeability. • The overall impact on catchment impermeability as (d) The extent to which building site coverage and a result of the development is considered to be impermeable surfaces will alter the natural less than minor. contour or drainage patterns of the site or disturb the ground and alter its ability to absorb • Availability of land for disposal of effluent is not a There is water. consideration as the site is sewered. sufficient undeveloped land available to manage (e) The physical qualities of the soil type. the effective disposal of stormwater runoff where it (f) Any adverse effects on the life supporting is not collected (i.e. footpaths, skate bowl) and capacity of soils. disposed of to the reticulated network. (g) The availability of land for the disposal of • The impermeable surfaces proposed are the effluent and stormwater on the site without minimum necessary for the development. adverse effects on the water quantity and water • No landscaping is considered necessary to reduce quality of water bodies (including groundwater runoff effects as the majority of the stormwater will and aquifers) or on adjacent sites. be collected and disposed of to the reticulated (h) The extent to which paved, impermeable network. There is a significant undeveloped land surfaces are necessary for the proposed available in lawn/vegetation as assist in reducing activity. the effects of runoff from those areas where stormwater is not collected. (i) The extent to which landscaping may reduce adverse effects of run-off. (j) Any recognised standards promulgated by industry groups. (k) The means and effectiveness of mitigating stormwater run-off to that expected by the permitted activity threshold. (1) The extent to which the proposal has 12 FES@nerIM considered and provided for climate change. (m) The extent to which stormwater detention ponds and other engineering solutions are used to mitigate any adverse effects. Overall, with appropriate management of stormwater runoff from the additional impermeable surfaces it is considered that the adverse effects of the proposal will be less than minor. 7.3 Earthworks Effects The total volume of cut and/or fill has been estimated to be in the order of 500m: The majority of this is attributed to the brown rock fill required to construct the court foundation and areas around the basketball court, which will be completed with the first stage of the development. Given that volume of earthworks proposed is within the restricted discretionary threshold it is considered appropriate to refer to the relevant assessment criteria set out under rule 12.3.6.2.1 Excavation and/or Filling of the District Plan to determine the adverse effects. 9' a Assessment Criteria (i) the effects of the area and volume of soils • The majority of the earthworks required will be and other materials to be excavated; and completed in Stage 1 of the development. The (ii) the effects of height and slope of the cut or area of excavation covers approximately 1 235rn2, filled faces; and The maximum cut depth below ground level will be 400mm to construction the foundation for the (iii) the time of the year when the earthworks basketball court. will be carried out and the duration of the activity; and • Brown rock will be used as the fill material. (iv) the degree to which the activity may cause Excavated material with either be stockpiled on or exacerbate erosion and/or other natural site to be redistributed on site or removed if not hazards on the site or in the vicinity of the site, required. particularly lakes, rivers, wetlands and the • There is no set schedule for when the earthworks coastline; and will be carried out but it is expected that they will (v) the extent to which the activity may be completed during the next earthworks season adversely impact on visual and amenity values; (1 October to 30 April). and • The earthworks will be located no closer than 8m (vi) the extent to which the activity may from the nearest boundary (Oranga Tamariki). adversely affect cultural and spiritual values; and (vii) the extent to which the activity may • It is proposed to minimise erosion, sediment and adversely affect areas of significant indigenous discharge sedimentation by utilising vegetation or significant habitats of indigenous appropriate erosion and sediment control practises fauna; and as set out in the Guideline Document 2016/005 (GD05). It is anticipated a condition of consent will (viii) the number, trip pattern and type of be imposed requiring that the controls are in place vehicles associated with the activity; and prior to and during the eat-thworks phase of the (ix) the location, adequacy and safety of development. vehicular access and egress; and • Any impact on visual and amenity values will be (x) the means by which any adverse temporary in nature. It is anticipated that the environmental effects of the activity will be earthworks will take approximately 1 week. avoided, remedied or mitigated. • No details are provided with regard to the type of 13 Ir;Ii- '4 Assessment Criteria vehicles associated with the activity, however it is expected that there will be a digger on site during the excavation and fill works and trenching for infrastructure, trucks will be entering the site to deliver the fill material (brown rock) and there will be machinery for compaction of fill. • The location of vehicular access and egress has not been provided. It is expected that the access location will be in the most practicable location (taking into consideration ease of access and safety) to the works area. This likely to be off Station Road. If there is no existing vehicle crossing in place a temporary crossing will be installed to avoid damage to kerbing and footpaths. • There is no reason to expect that the proposal will adversely affect cultural of spiritual values and there are no areas of significant indigenous vegetation or significant habitats of indigenous fauna impacted by the development. • It is proposed that a condition of consent be imposed requiring a Construction Management Plan that sets out the following: (i) The timing of building demolition and construction works, including hours of work, key project and site management personnel. (ii) The transportation of construction materials from and to the site and associated controls on vehicles through sign-posted site entrance/exits and the loading and unloading of materials. (iii) Control of dust and noise on-site and any necessary avoidance or remedial measures. (iv) Prevention of earth and other material being deposited on surrounding roads from vehicles and remedial actions should it occur. (v) Publicity measures and safety measures, including signage, to inform adjacent landowners and occupiers, pedestrians and other users of the roads. (vi) Erosion and sediment control measures to be in place for the duration of the works. Overall, it is considered that earthworks can be appropriately managed/mitigated during construction, to ensure that the adverse effects will be less than minor. 14 7.4 Positive Effects While there is no known management plan for Memorial Park the Lindvart Park Reserve Management Plan (which is located nearby) has the goal of being a sports hub for the area, but there is no space specifically set aside for basketball. Therefore it is consistent with the purpose of the Lindvart Park Reserve Management Plan that a basketball court is located on an adjoining reserve as it will enhance the vision of this area being a sports hub. There are positive social effects, along with improved health and well-being associated with the proposed upgrades. The additional facilities (toilets, BBQ and exercise areas, courts) will encourage families and the community to gather and enjoy a number of recreational and sporting activities. 7.5 Summary of Effects Overall all taking into consideration the assessment against the above matters of control it is considered that the adverse effects will be less than minor for the purpose of Section 95D and Section 95A(8)(b). 8 Affected Persons Assessment In undertaking an assessment of the effects of the proposal, due consideration has been given to the extent of actual and potential effects on the wider environment and adjacent landowners. No persons are considered to be adversely affected to a minor or more than minor extent by the proposal. 9 Statutory Assessment 9.1 Section 104(1)(a) Assessment of Affects Section 104(1)(a) requires that when considering an application for a resource consent, the consent authority must, subject to Part 2, have regard to 'any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity'. An assessment of the adverse effects of the proposal is set out in Section 7 above, where it was determined that the adverse effects will be less than minor. Overall the proposal will have actual and potential effects on the environment that are acceptable. 9.2 Section 104(1)(b) Section 104(1)(b) of the Act requires that when considering an application for a resource consent, the council must, subject to Part 2, have regard to: any relevant provisions of- (i) a national environmental standard: (ii) other regulations: (iii) a national policy statement: (iv) a New Zealand coastal policy statement: (v) a regional policy statement or proposed regional policy statement: 15 (vi) a plan or proposed plan; and An assessment of the relevant statutory documents that corresponds with the scale and significance of the effects that activity may have on the environment has been provided below. 9.2.1 National Environmental Standard for Assessing and Managing Contaminants in Soil (NES) The piece of land is not currently, nor is it known to have been historically used for an activity or industry on the Ministry for the Environment Hazardous Activities and Industries List (HAIL), therefore assessment of the activity against the NES is not required. 9.2.2 Regional Policy Statement The Regional Policy Statement for Northland (RPS) aims to promote the sustainable management of Northland's natural and physical resources, with a focus on key management issues such as water quantity and quality, biodiversity, economic potential and social wellbeing, infrastructure, natural hazard risk and natural character. The proposal is considered to be in general accord with the RPS as it supports social wellbeing by providing improved recreational/activity areas while ensuring that any adverse effects on the environment are avoided. 9.2.3 Far North District Plan The Far North District District Plan contains provisions to achieve sustainable management of the natural and physical resources of the Far North District. Of particular relevance to the application are the objectives and policies within Chapter 9.6 Recreational Activities Zone and Chapter 12.3 Soils and Minerals. Comment Objective/Policy 9.6.3.1 To ensure suitable and adequate area is • The proposal supports the objective of ensuring available for the recreational needs of people. suitable area is available for the recreational needs of people by providing enhanced activity and social 9.6.3.2 To ensure that the effects of the use and areas within Memorial Park. development of recreational areas are compatible with the surrounding environment. • The development and use of the park is not considered incompatible with the surrounding environment. 9.6.4.1 That existing recreational areas are retained • As detailed above the development of a basketball for recreational purposes unless it is demonstrated court within Memorial Park is consistent with the that comparable recreational opportunities can be wider vision for the area (which includes Lindvart provided otherwise, or that the land can serve the Park) becoming a sporting hub. community better if put to an alternative use. • Adverse effects associated with the development 9.6.4.2 That existing recreational areas are used can be avoided, remedied or mitigated to an and developed in a way which will ensure that any acceptable level. adverse effects on the surrounding area are avoided, remedied or mitigated. 12.3.3.1 To achieve an integrated approach to the • No consent for earthworks is required from NRC. responsibilities of the Northland Regional Council • The effects associated with soil excavation and or and Far North District Council in respect to the filling can be effectively managed through management of adverse effects arising from soil appropriate erosion and sediment controls. excavation and filling, and minerals extraction. 16 12.3.3.3 To avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects associated with soil excavation or filling. 12.3.4.1 That the adverse effects of soil erosion are • The effects associated with soil excavation and or avoided, remedied or mitigated. filling can be effectively managed by ensuring appropriate erosion and sediment controls are in 12.3.4.3 That where practicable, activities place prior to the works commencing. associated with soil and mineral extraction be located away from areas where that activity would • None of the matters listed under policy 12.3.4.3 (a) - pose a significant risk of adverse effects to the (d) are trigger by the proposed development. environment and/or to human health. Such areas • The earthworks have been designed and will be may include those where: carried out to ensure that impacts on people and the (a) there are people living in close proximity to the environment are minimised. site or land in the vicinity of the site is zoned • Soil conservation will be promoted by ensuring that Residential, Rural Living, Coastal Residential or appropriate erosion and sediment controls are in Coastal Living; place prior to works commencing. (b) there are significant ecological, landscape, cultural, spiritual or heritage values; (c) there is a potential for adverse effects on lakes, rivers, wetlands and the coastline; (d) natural hazards may pose unacceptable risks. 12.3.4.4 That soil excavation and filling, and mineral extraction activities be designed, constructed and operated to avoid, remedy or mitigate adverse effects on people and the environment. 12.3.4.5 That soil conservation be promoted. The above assessment demonstrates that the proposal is consistent with the relevant objectives and policies of the Far North District Plan. 9.3 Section 104(1)(c) Other Matters Section 104(1)(c) of the Act states that consideration must be given to "any other matters that the consent authority considers relevant and reasonably necessary to determine the application. There are no other matters considered relevant to the proposal. 9.4 Part 2 Assessment As per recent case lawl, an assessment of the application against matters stated in Part 2 is not required unless there are matters of invalidity, incomplete coverage or uncertainty of meaning within the relevant planning documents. In this case, the Operative Far North District Plan is not considered to exhibit any of these matters. Therefore, no assessment of Part 2 is necessary. 9.5 Section 125 Lapsing of Consent As detailed above it is proposed to carry out the development in stages. It is requested that the lapsing period specified on this consent be 10 years to allow the stages of the development to be progressed as funding allows. 1 R J Davidson Family Trust v Marlborough District Council [2017] NZHC 52 17 10 Conclusion FNDC is seeking resource consent to upgrade the recreational facilities at Memorial Park, Kaikohe. The environmental effects associated with the proposal have been assessed as being less than minor and no persons are adversely affected. The proposed development provides positive social effects and health and well-being benefits to the Kaikohe community by providing improved recreational facilities. The proposal is considered to be consistent with the objectives and policies of the Far North District Plan, the Regional Policy Statement for Northland and achieves the purpose of Part 2 of the Act. It is requested that the application be processed as a non-notified application on the basis of the information provided and that the consent have a 10 year lapse date. 18 Appendix A - Development Plans 20 43 91·« \ 2&7- 0 21 j STATION ROAD L LOCATION MAP 1:5000 EXSISTING BUILDING EXISTING PARKING ORANGA TAMARIKI i \12 2/ 480m2 SITE INFO: 00 LOCATION· 21 MEMORIAL AVENUE, KAIKOHE. 'CELINED ROPER rY 806 LEGAL: IOT 1 DP 89178 EXISTING ./ Total Site Area: 12,70?mt EXISTING Permitted Impermeable Area @ 10% 1,21012 L_- /.. Existing Impermeable Area 1,925mZ @ 15.2% - Skate Park. 950m2 -< < --4 SKATE BOW[ - Existing Pathways: 495m2 4 I i .»f -72 // 7----EXISTING COURT - Existing Car Park Asphalt: 480m2 4 -\\( 0 1 I #1 - - J TO BE DEMOLISHED SITE LEGEND: 17.. h /' ------EXISTING PATHWAY \ 0 0 EXISTING »1- -e\.:»40 \ 1 ,-CONCRETE PAD ALLONG- TO BE WITH REMOVED PORTION OF i PATHWAY \ ,·· 4 0 1 EXISTING -9 GENERAL 2, ,-1- -1-19,/ 4 14)r ' PLAYGROUND THIS DRAWING SET IS FOR CONCEPT ONLY. ALL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER CONSULTANTS f DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 0 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS OR SHOP DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REFERRED TO THE AUTHOR. L--1 ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE f TWER BOLLARDS -/-/ r. . _2KIST-ING GATES To NEW ZEALAND BUILDING CODE AND RELEVANT EW ZEALAND ---9- 'c r. 41 ,-2- - --:L/- PIONEERS VILLAGE STANDARDS. REFER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND URPINNING REQUIREMENTS, 4 E LI -----\L- b-©131 /*gel, ..j' . 0 ND - Sll E INVESTIGATION REPORTS MAY PIONEER VILLAGE ISE 11* RIGHT AND SHALL NOTTHIS QQTRICTLYBECOPIED. COP'r h / RE8¥OED. LENT OR USED Fe R ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN AS 10*j LY INTENDED, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE io 1,0 CD .-© 6,3 KAIKOHE BASKETBALL EXISTING SITE PLAN 1:500 @ A3 SK-00 \ \ SITE INFO: \ \ LOCATION: 21 MEMORIAL AVENUE, KA'KOHE. MEMORIAL AVENUE \ .0 J LEGAL: 101 1 DP 89178 TOTAL SITE AREA: 12,701mt / \ 7 1 Permitted Impermeable Area @ 10% 1,270ml 1- Existing Impermeable Area: 1,925m2 @ 15.2% 44./« EXISTING PARKING 1 \ - Skate Park 950m2 480m2 - Existing Pathways: 495ml v - - Existing [ar Park Asphalt: 480m2 //,r>-3.1-7 EXISTING BUILDING 1/ - // Proposed Impermeable Area: 2,591m2 @ 20.4% - 1 \9 J \ 1 ORANGA TAMARIKI ///1 - /3 // / - Proposed Court Area 608m2 0 / - Proposed Footpath Area 10]m2 / drs/ , / 1\1\ 0/1 / k - Existing Pathways to be Remain · 450[n2 .//7, 1 ..1 N «» / - Skate Park: 950m2 1 €+¢310 / ..,- , %3 f ,/ - Existing Car Park Asphalt 480m2 1 1 »«e-- - .-'-'-/N-,1 0-1 SITE LEGEND: EXISTING SKATE BOWL 950m2 EXISTING M-NEW TREES STAGE 1 - PRIORITY WORKS 4, ... / "i /,Fw wwANAA STAGE 2 - FUTURE PROJECTS IPERMEABLE) , 880 AREA / PROPOSED STORM WATER SERVICE CONNECTION -REFER TO FND[ MEMORIAL PARK STORMWATER B CONNETION MAP 16/07/2019 EVICT,kir ''- U I LAIJIFIU GENERAL PLAYGROUND / THIS DRAWING SET IS FOR CONCEPT ONLY. ALL ARCHITECTURAL PEARMIABLE \\ 0 \\\, DRAWINGS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER CONSULTANTS DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS r--1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY 94\ \4 7 1 WORKS OR SHOP DRAWINGS. ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REFERRED f %.\l\, TO THE AUTHOR. ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 1 \ NEW LEARN TO BIKE L EXISTING GATES T NEW ZEALAND BUILDING CODE AND RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND STANDARDS. \ TRACK FOR TAMARIKI PIONEERS VILLAGE 1 REFER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PROPOSED AND UNDERPINNING REQUIREMENTS 01¥08 NOtlY.LS 1 WHAREPAKU?1? SW 2OM L__.3 OPERTY . DRAWING, 1pttkpoOD GROUND - SITE INVESTIGATION REPORTS MAY BERE IliFOUND OTHERWISE. X PIONEER VILLAGE PROPOSED NEW -Ext/Nb 11OING IS STRICTLY COPYRIGHT AND SHALL NOT BE COPIED, 1050mm MANHOLE EPkODUCED, LENT OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN AS 11 7 l ORIGINALLY INTENDED, WITHOUT THE WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE \ 1 ARCHITECT. /111 TO CONNECT INTO f. , EXISTING MANHOLE KAIKOHE BASKETBALL PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1:500 @ A3 L------1 / 4 k TO MEMORIAL SITE LEGEND: 0 3M SETBACK AVENUE K J\/ EXISTING €FQTING FENCEUNE / PR---- Ul ---EXISTING PATH '·, L./.t, 5 \ \ STAGE 1 - PRIORITY WORKS EXISTING , 11 E----1 STAGE 2 - FUTURE PROJECTS (PERMEABLEI SEATING /C / +' 1 \ \2-PROPOSED PLANTING TB[--1....._ .,»/ A+ L____3 SKATE BOWL / f I28m2 - PROPOSED SW SERVICE CONNE[TION -REFER TO FIDE MEMORIAL PARK 1 t /<42 STORMWATER CONNETION MAP 16/07/2019 n UJ / WHANAU & - ,\ , 2 .0 9 GENERAL: \ 9 lieAl /4 1 1 / t. 1 '.*ZX \\PO@0\74 BBQ AREA 1 N \ sm lilli l THIS DRAWING SET IS FOR CONCEPT ONLY. ALL ARCHITECTURAL lapprox 220ml) 111 42 2000 .-- TO STATION RO DRAWINGS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER CONSULTANTS 1 0 0\ lili'Ul 1 1 DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. \\000 / /111 1 VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORKS OR SHOP DRAWINGS, ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REFERRED \ 4 \Re Ill l il-\\ -\j --12> TO THE AUTHOR. ///4\ 16\ ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE Im i \ rSPECTOOR r / NEW ZEALAND BUILDING CODE AND RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND \ \\\ /514 STANDARDS, /4//4-\1 / \ 1 ' ,TING {63 REFER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING 'I %·. NEW WATE„ i /7 / \ AND UNDERPINNING REQUIREMENTS. \ \ rd FOU NTAIN DRAWINGS ASSUME GOOD GROUND - SITE INVESTIGATION REPORTS MAY \ \\ 4140[ ATION fBE REQUIRED IF FOUND OTHERWISE. \ 4COURT 1 lili THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY COPYRIGHT AND SHALL NOT BE COPIEb, \ REPRODUCED. LENT OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE OTHER THAN AS CONN'E[TION TO BE INSTALLED-ny< ORIGINALLY INTENDED, WITH dE WRITTEMPERMISSION OF THE SEPEATLY BY BASKETBALL /\ F4ll ARCHITECT 1 jj p-EXISTING PATHWAY COURT tfAM I ki. 1 il PLAYGROUND , / 1 j \ 4 1 / \ 4. * UU// d //// / / 1 7 j//Pll / / i 3 /44%0 \ 1 .... \ EXERCISE AREAI RE-DIRECT EXISTING---11 h PROPOSED CONCRETE --9 2000 (approx 118mZ) j L-EXISTING CONNECTION TO EDGING WITH TIERED / i PATH AROUND BOTTOM \ \\ PIONEER VILLAGE , EDGE OF NEW COURTS SEATING- _-**st--1 lapprox 103m21 0093--- €ip- / \ ,•ZOm CONNEITION TO BE INSTALLED / SEPERATLY BY BASKETBALL COURT TEAM 1 r------1 EXISTING PATH- / WHAREPAKU?? 1 00 %\\¥/ KAIKOHE BASKETBALL PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1,200 2------i h \ - FOUNDATION LEGEND: TO MEMORIAL AVENUE 91 STAGE 1 - PRIORITY WORKS |-EXISTING PATH1 1000 ·. 4 , 5-«74 STAGE 2 - FUTURE PROJECTS ·-'PROPOSED DU[TIN6 LOCATION FOR STAGE 1 - BROWN RO[K / FILL LOCATION EXISTING LIGHTING - TOP ENERGY TO CONFIRM . \£-PROPOSED PLANTING ..1 SKATE BOWL IMIN Zm FROM COURT EDGE) STAGE 1 - DUCTING TO ALLOW FOR ELETRICAL CABLES - PROPOSED LIGHTING BROWN ROCK FILL TOTAL AREA TBC WITH TOP ENERGY IApprox 1235mE WITH A lM OFFSET FROM EDGE PROPOSED STORM WATER SERVICE CONNECTION /WHANA OF COURT AND PROPOSED FUTURE -REFER TO FND[ MEMORIAL PARK STORMWATER ACTIVITY AREAS HAS TO SLOPE CONNETION MAP 16/07/2019 - 10 STATION RD 1° IN [ORRESPONOANCE WITH GENERAL: i pr j§mi t CONCRETE. THIS DRAWING SET IS FOR CONCEPT ONLY ALL ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH ALL OTHER CONSULTANTS \ DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. l VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS ON SITE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY \ WORKS OR SHOP DRAWINGS ANY DISCREPANCIES SHALL BE REFERRED \ (90m21 TO THE AUTHOR, ALL CONSTRUCTION WORK TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE / / FOONTAI NEW ZEALAND BUILDING CODE AND RELEVANT NEW ZEALAND STANDARDS. REFER STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS FOR ALL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND UNDERPINNING REQUIREMENTS. l COAIAECTION TO BE INSTALLED- DRAWINGS ASSUME GOOD GROUND - SITE INVESTIGATION REPORTS MAY SFF 4 'EQATLY BY BASKETBALL i -EXISTING PATHWAY BE REQUIRED IF FOUND OTHERWISE [Ol IRT NAM THIS DRAWING IS STRICTLY COPYRIGHT AND SHALL NOT BePIED, i REPRODUCED, LENT OR USED FOR ANY PURPOSE 094*OBAAS ./ PLA fGROUND ORIGINALLY INTENDED. WITHOUT THE WRITTEN %1051OF THr A ARCHITECT. -A\nV A l J NET L « 3 \ 11 4«« / ROSE/A 1./ 1 'FAL approutdomfl 1 1 661% L-EXISTING CONNECTION TO RE-DIRECT EXISTING PIONEER VILLAGE PAIM ARUUNU 51 1 IUM EDGE OF NEW COURTS CONNECTION TO BE INSTALLED ..\ ,4--- 20)m CONNECTION TO BE INSTALLED 3>i9If1EFF'GibINE - - SEPERATLY BY BASKETBALL ,/ SEPERATLY BY BASKETBALL COURT TEAM [OURT TEAM EXISTING PATH--O \ / WHAREPAKU?? 1 \:4 // ?\0 / V KAIKOHE BASKETBALL FOUNDATION PLAN 1.200 SK-03 A NOTE: 10 to 30mm DEEP DISH AROUND THE EDGE OF THE COURT DISH METAL BELOW TO SUIT. 6 COURT i, TOP SOIL IORIGINAL REPLACED) TO BE- 1 L EDGE DISH CRASSED OVER WITH MIN 1:20 21·1 RUNNOFF ZONE 25mm COURT TOPPING f-FORMED 10-30mm DIPP IN CONCRETE ACCROSS ?M GRADIENT TO EXISTING GROUND LEVEL 25mm [OURT TOPPING- / / MIN 100mmTHICK 25 MPA [ON[RETE WITH MIN 100mmTHICK 25 MPA CONCRETE2 21== -1 WITH 4 ,= 1 - LE 0. MIN 50 COVER TO 665 MESH MIN 50 COVER TO 665 MESH 3 F.1.>14°':Lf., 3,'#1,v.''<*5 ' , , s %«t>«ke:1¢3.<11-14)14,%,FACk,jigrri<*C/6 40° 77 -400mm [BR12/Clegg 12 COMPACTED - -:[ij¢Ptift[4{D1-295'<-400mm (BRW[[egg74- BLUE/BROWN 12 COMPACTED ROCK BLUE/BROWN ROCK 1 . »« 1-3 COURT FOUNDATION EDGE DETAIL rTh COURT DRAINAGE DETAIL 1 : 20 «.7 1 :20 NOTE: BROWN ROCK TO SLOPE 1° IN ACCORDANCE MAX 1.20 SLOPE ON ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY'S n WITH THE CONCRETE AND COURT TOPPING CONNECTING WITHTO RPOPOSED NZB[: 01 A[(ESSIBLE COURT IN ROUTES ACCORDANCE /-25mm COURT TOPPING PROPOSED CONNECTION - -MIN 100mmTHICK 25 MPA CONCRETE WITH MINI 1200mm WIDE EXISING PATHWAY LEVEL-n PATHWAY 120 GRAIDENT \ : 4* ; A-, ,,, MIN 50 COVER TO 665 MESH 100mm GAP 40 COMPACTED. [BR15/(tegg 11 EXISING GROUND LEVEL 400mm [BR12/Clegg 12 [OMPACTED BLUE/BROWN ROCK >.»»44>9 4» 'A/,4,:.. %44 /14*f» >0/4 49««..«41%4* <446, «»il«»6 ·«'< r«««v ' ..al#&414*.1**244**44&**621&%**RAAR'**P* ANY SOFT SPOTS TO BE REMOVED AND TOP SOIL (ORIGINAL REPLACED) L-DUCT FOR FUTURE REPLACED WITH GOOD, COMPACTED MATERIAL DU[T FOR STORM WATER -- LIGHTING BASED ON : NZS4121-2001 & IN ACCORDANCE WITH NZB[: 01 ACCESSIBLE ROUTES -lhj ACCESSIBLE PATHWAY CONNECTION TO COURTS 1 : 20 - kiff 4* KAIKOHE BASKETBALL COURT FOUNDATION DETAILS SK-04 I A,i LJ Appendix B - LINZ Report 21 41 executed d 1990 £6 M 1!03 Se' i · 44* are cor# inder thi §:&:C 1/3&3 f Surveyor isfzw Land Registrar CENTI 9y Z *ef£E N1i1E JO E :56°8 Correct 59 Mgo 1 9 2 2 2 133.13 ,8411,_13479. 50 3!&11--,}6162.91,Z, 58?30.81512 : 53,13W 22§0# 1i3f :milge 10 79 Sill.... 0 : 84-2.261 ·40 r..., N 112 .577·4 5 r, E logo : ·h·h ·E .33- S O.U. L: 22 9 14 4 4a I . 4 2 €90 2S9j a:: 1 28 U2 i2% 1\ pa.!e 0. A.TO @BUS uaffi 32:i uwddv SUOUNI.list; Z C /L_ \ F f 1 21 U 10 8 C N /2 · O E 8 N M. 0E \99 \©LIN \ 1/F\ 00 M 11| i I/ 0= 3-00''112 © · J \ N /1112. t. 42 Zi 11 01 6 r.3 \ 4 29 4,04 :. - 3\ 1°b 0» Lif : *CLk 1,90 r- 06!83 d. 1 440¥' LM 97130 00 4 0. -- -78.27 Ar o • r- Syb J \%60 'us vi \ €. i 6 4 f NE » 16% \ \\72-00 -j-%20 -240,0_ D > » \ I £1; J:k O ;2 .0 \ 00 5 S iD N Fc s 3..009'.12 + 40411-1-W 92- D 9-6 5 96 4 Re0 f 11 11 ADPT. 50 *ISV? L 164 55 (2094 562 f 0\ O r b £ 2 - 0% -0- - \65 04 4 ·z-31 -uriFI'l. . _55 St _ __ / r'G.'5.'.,Ile V''F:/:I dt./. 6, ,I g1 AJ -F J- &94-*af> i-5 \ 4 rog 4.9 4%81 ..51 44...ky»* ,K - I *Al-a J- . 2 L--iarEPT.-ER'"92144. 50' '0. -1 - 5 d E.6 .D 0 34 E W 15 05 64 8* LD 94 5* *4 54 7* Lk 0* 6£ 86 LE 9£ SE t€ EE ZE lE OE 61 81 ZZ 9 St *t EL.11,861 CE !& AttXHcly,1601.ohcl :16 414| '1'' 1 Ii'|1|'|'11 1;1|.1 1li'1|1' |'|1! landonline Toitu te InformationLand whenua 8.09 ,„ New Zealand Mgpi View Statutory Action Parcel Parcel ID Lot 1 Deposited Plan 89178 5125968 Current Purpose Recreation Reserve Parcel Status Current Statutory Action Type Recorded Action Status DP 89178 Vesting on Deposit 04/04/2002 Create Cut-rent Statute Purpose Recreation Reserve Name Comments *** End of Report *** Client Rettience: mlethbridge{)02 Dated 22:08'2019 12:21 pin, Page 1 01 1 © Copri·ight. Land Intbrniation New Zealand The record ot zinregistered gazette notices mar be incomplete and dnef trit Iler'c wri,·ily represent th c cul·,·ent legal status of land. Appendix C - Correspondence 22 Mandy Wilson From: James Robinson Good afternoon Ms Wilson Following out phone call I have discussed the situation with area Manager Mr Bill Edwards. He informed me that the site record P05/207 refers to Maori land on the north side of Memorial Avenue that is a Maori Reserve (wahi tapu). 1 have appended some photos below confirming this. As such the FNDC proposed development of the basketball court is on the south side of Memorial Avenue and therefore is NOT in the area of the recorded archaeological site. Please ignore my advice given to you over the phone Instead Heritage New Zealand is happy for the work to proceed in the area identified in blue in your email, under an accidental discovery protocol (ADP) Sincerely Dr James Robinson Dr James Robinson 1 Northland Regional Archaeologist 1 Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga 1 PO Box 836, Kerikeri 0245 1 PH: (64 9) 407 0470 1 DDI: (64 9) 407 0473 1 Visit www.heritage.org.nz and learn more about New Zealand's heritage places Tairangahia a tua whakarere; Tatakihia nga reanga o amuri ake nei - Honouring the past; Inspiring the future This communication may be a privileged communication. If you are not the intended recipient, then you are not authorised to retain, copy or distribute it. Please notify the sender and delete the message in its entirety. 1 LE -,A \0, 1 . -3 W: 321-/ i :- ¥; 1. 'i€ 7667* 0 £ l Fr ¥41 r-. 129 £* 1 §?6[ES / Amll 11 '4 4* i t. Imag®y Date: 10/7/,201[6 i i I4t 4 i i 0 0 t 51#bi run in pthe nssucthat the bodies were uplifted sometime after the 1965 site record was writtenno and it is likely that From: Mandy Wilson [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 12:20 p.m. To: James Robinson Cc: Robert Willoughby Subject: Proposed Upgrade to the recreational facilities at Memorial Park, Kaikohe Kia ora James, 3 FNDC is proposing to upgrade of recreational facilities in Memorial Park, located at 21 Memorial Ave, Kaikohe. The proposed upgrades are to be staged as follows: Stage 1 - Construction of an outdoor basketball court, mounded areas and footpath. Stage 2 - Construction of a family BBQ area, exercise area and public toilet. Legal Description Lot 1 DP 89178 Certificate of Title Vested Area 12,707mz Land Owner Far North District Council District Plan Zone Recreational Activities District Plan Resources Nil 4 U y . . Orao.gg [email protected]@ [®. * 21 =NDC Omces . Proposed Basketball Court * ¥<1 4 fp 1 Pioneer Village • 9.6.5.1.5 Stormwater Management • 12.3.6.1.2 Excavation and/or Filling - Permitted threshold is 300m3 the proposed volume of earthworks is approximately 500ml The majority of this will be in fill used to develop a mounded viewing area around the basketball courts (see attached plan). Some excavations will be required for the construction of the basketball foundations (approximately 400mm depth). I have had a look at Archsite and note that P05/207 (grave, cemetary/urupa) is in proximity to where the works are proposed. I have read the site record (attached) and it appears the site was cleared at the time the area was developed for commercial use. I would appreciate if you could advise if the proposed work can proceed under an ADP. I understand you are meeting with Robert Willoughby later today so he can answer any questions you may have regarding the project. Nga mihi MandySenior Wilson Infrastructure Consents Planner 1\, Infrastructure & Asset Management, Far North District Council I 24-hour Contact Centre 0800 920 029 ddi +6494070426 I m +64272160871 I [email protected] Website | Facebook | Linkedln | Careers Get it done online at your convenience, visit our website - www.fndc.govt.nz Attention: The information contained in this email (including any attachments) is intended solely for the addressee(s). It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have received this email in error you must not use, copy, disclose or distribute it or any information in it. Please simply notify the sender and delete or destroy all copies of the email immediately. Unless formally stated, this e-mail and any attachments do not necessarily reflect the views of the Far North District Council. The Far North District Council accepts no responsibility for any interception of, or changes to, our email after it leaves us. We do not accept responsibility for any viruses or similar carried with our email, or any effects our email may have on the recipients computer system or network. Far North District Council I Te Kaunihera o Tai Tokerau Ki Te Raki Ph. 09 401 5200 I Fax. 09 401 2137 I Email. [email protected] Address. Memorial Avenue, Private Bag 752, Kaikohe 0440, New Zealand Please considerthe environment before printingthisemail. G Appendix D - Stormwater Management Calculations 23 1 Rational method 24hr ; Pre - Development water flow Pre-developmen : Roof Conciete & Metaled area Othe, Slope (Original water flow) & decks smooth seal 0, rough seal Impervious Vegetation Bush % Total area. Area [m-2) 1 [m-2) 2 (m'2) 3 (m'2) 4 Im-2) 5 Im-21 6 (ng 10 1235.00 0| 100 0 | 0 | 1135 | 0 Ci correcdtion Runoff coefficent Ci (coefficient) EDI (coeificient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficientl 0.00 Use -C- values trom FNDC TR55 chart FALSE 0.96 FALSE FALSE 0.59 FALSE Generall,1 do not use slope adiustment Ci factor if using TR55 0.96 0.96 0.83 0.8 0.59 0.53 Rainfall intensit, 1 Immhil 1 Imm,hil 1 Imm/hrl I fmmfhr) 1 Imm,h,) I fmmthr) Post-developmer Rai•fall Ditifio- NIVA. Hirds 4. RCP6. 2081-2100 10.70 10.70 | 10.70 10.70 1 10.70 1 10.70 Slope LIse an appropiate event for the situation % Flow iate of surface water Qc Im-3,sec) Qc (rn-3/sec) Qc (m-3/sec) Qc (m"3/seel Q° (m)/sec) Qc Ins/sec) 10 0.000 I 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.002 1 0.000 Ci correcdtion Pre - development flow Qp Im-3sec) Qp (Usec) 0.00 of developed area 0.0023 | 2.28 Post - Development water flow Any area where there is a change in the impermiablity valuei Any area where there is no change to the impermiablity values Roof Concrete & Metaled area Concrete & Metaled area Balance & decks smooth seal Or rough seal Vegetation smooth seal Or rough seal Vegetation original Total area. Area (m-2) 1[m-2) 2 (m2) 3 Im-21 4 (rn*21 5 fm''a 6 [m-2) 7 (m 21 8 (m-2) 1235.00 1235 I 10100101010 Ci (coefficient] Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficientl Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Ci (coefficient) Use -C- values from FNDC TR55 chart 0.96 FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE FALSE I Generally do not use slope adiustment Ci factor if using TR55 0.96 0.98 0.96 0.59 0.96 0.8 0.59 0.59 Rainfall intensit,rate 1 (mrnthr) 1 (mrn/hr) 1 (mrnthr) 1 Imm/hr) 1 (mrrWhi) 1 Immhr) 1 Imm2hr) 1 Inrril·,r) Rai.fall Dati from NIVA. Hirds 4. RCP6. 2081-2100 12.20 12.20 | 12.20 | 12.20 10.70 | 10.70 1 10.70 1 10.70 Use an appropiate event for the situation Flow iate ol surface water Qc (m'Nsecl Qc (m-38ec) Qc (mlsec) Qc frn-38*CJ Qc (rri3/sec:) Qc Im-3#sed] Qc: (rri3sec) Gle (m-isec) 0.004 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 Qc IL/sec) 130 IL/seo) QI (L/seol 130 fl/se:) Qc (Useo) Qc (L/se,9 Qc (L/sec) Qc (Lisec) 4.02 0.00 I 0.00 1 0.00 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 1 0.00 Total included Total excluded In attenuation Qa Im-3/sec) Qa (L/se:) from attenuation Qby (m-3/secl Ob, IL/sec) sistem calc's 0.004 4.02 s,stem calc's 0.000 0.00 1 Developed area Qt (m-3Kse,51 Qtf'/secl post - development flow 0.004 4.02 Total area developed At Im*21 [total - b2!39).E...----1235 Post - Pre development flow Qtpp {m-3/secl Qtpp (Lise¢) 0.0017 1.74 Total post development flow Developed flow + undeveloped flow Qatt frn'Nseol Qatt (useol 0.0040 4.02 0 to 10min 0.0}300 I -" 0.0250 0.0201 ------'- w - 1 1 .0130 r . - r' 4 0.0100 00050 4 - -4 OECD ACC eoo 0 U 2 4CC hmas (m) ; Round Square Totaltankarea usable height J Select 1 for type of tanklarea, 0 for other 1 0 | 42 hmax [m) 1 Estimate storage volume Tank radius 1 40.72 | 1.12 I Adiust to match max Vstored Num. 01 tanks r (m) r-F,-7 Round area illli 1 1.8 1 40.72 1 _ OK A Num. Of tanks Width Length m2 hstor max. 1.120 Last Last-30 : Last -230 Squarehectangularareal 1 ] 3 I 3.01 I 3.03 Vstored max. 45.595 J. 0,03055 0.03237 0.04446 Vin 24h, Vstored min- 0.692 0.03330 0.03528 0.04843 Vout Short tube. 0.76 Orifice type'u" 9 0.6 to 2.8% 1.52 108.989 108.990 109.06 Thin sharp, 0-62 0.76 9.81 left ® 24hi - 0.0013 Diff. = 0.0015+-0.0005 24hr 12hr 6hr 2hr 60 30 20 10 i Pie - development flow 018 L18 AM18 AV18 * BEE BN18 1 3 of developed 0.00228 000345 "'1.J18''-'0.00506 AD180.00885 0.01238 0.01727 0.02101 0.02956 i Attenuation requiredChange in surface vate, flow rate Qp (m'31see) Qp (Laec) Hally use 1.25hr (75min. For calculation purposes this section changes Dia check Dia Area Qout max thedia on19 and thereby the area 1 0.0568 0.05671 0.0025 1 0.00900 I 8.333 The information is not used for an,thing else 56.71 Qin max. | 0.02642 1 4 4 Calculate maximum storage volume For period 2081-210{ Kaikohe Chart intensity Chart intensity: Storm duration- Storm duration- Post - pre devel. CC IRCF'61 Intensitit Curient{0 deg] Chart step Factor Check hr values accumulated THR Event data. TMINS Direct to Atten. Post-devel 1,(mmlhr) Pre-devl 1, (mmlhr) Adiust step factor if steps used minute steps Chr) mins Qa (Useel 100, 100, requfred 24 360 6.00 360 1.7 12.2 10.7 14 OK-: 12 540 3.00 180 2.8 18.9 16.2 0.38 8 OK 6 660 2.00 120 4.3 28.3 23.8 0,6 f *OK h 2 690 0.50 30 7.8 50.5 41.6 07 1 OK ? 1 705 0.25 15 11.0 71.1 58.2 1 OK j 30 710 0.08 5 15.4 93.2 81.2 0.07 OK 20 715 0.08 5 18.8 121 98.8 1 2. . 01<.waU 10 720 0.08 5 26.4 170 139 10 725 0.08 5 26.4 170 133 20 730 0.08 5 18.8 121 98.8 30 735 0.08 5 15,4 99.2 81.2 1 750 0.25 15 11.0 71.1 58.2 2 780 0.50 30 7.8 50.5 41.6 6 300 2.00 120 4.3 28.3 23.8 12 1080 3.00 180 2.8 18.9 18.2 24 1440 6.00 360 1.7 12.2 10.7 This will have further development at a later stage, including a 2yr orifice size & position (3 orifices in total). Fixed values u g Desc hrs 0.76 9.81 L 2.11 Adjust untill orifices are closest to the values of tab 10yr & loOrr "cell 084" Change orifice factor "u" to suit, short tube 0.76 & thin sharp edge 0.62 Val00yr Qav holooyr hav Or1004'r 100¥r 14.545 0.0019 2.36 1.18 0.0258 2.36 holOOyr Total storage height required 100yr tab Cell H71 Cell H67 0.023 OrlOyr Size of lower orifice (fitted 150mm above bottom/base iftank fer attenuation only-l 1.56 holoyr Storage he ght at which Ortop is fitted ValOyr Qav holovr hav OrlOyr 0.017 Ortop Size of second orifice fitted at holoyr above lower orifice Orloyrl 1Cyr 9.587 0.0013 1.555 0.78 0.0233 10yr tab Cell H71 Cell H67 Vdet Qav htop hhalf 100 - 10yr 496 0.0007 0-81 0.40 0.4025 Vocomb Qav hchart hav 10yr con 10.75 0-Oold 1.96 0.98 00233 0.0004 Area Vtop Qav htop hav Ortop 100-iOyrcor 3.80 0.0005 0.805 0.4025 0.0173 Curve Numbers & C values for typical Far North District conditions (CN - C) Area Type B soils Type C soils Type D soils Open space (lawns, parks etc.) | Fair condition (short grass, cover 50-75%) 69 - 0.53 79 - 0.65 84 - 0.72 |Good condition (medium length grass cover >75%} 61-0.44 74 - 0.59 80 - 0.67 Rural and undeveloped Dune sand (short grass, cover <75%). Uncompacted, Type A 49 - 0.32 69 - 0.53 79 - 0.65 84 - 0.72 Pasture, grassland (open & medium to longgrass} 61-0.44 74 - 0.59 80 - 0.67 Grass and/or bush (longgrass &/or deep ground litter} 48 - 0.32 65 - 0.48 73 - 0.57 Trees and grass combination (short grass, orchards) 58 - 0.41 72 - 0.56 79 - 0.65 Forest (low to medium slope, grass, brush & ground litter) 55 - 0.38 70 - 0.54 77 - 0.63 Forest (medium to steep, open with little ground litter) 66 - 0.49 74 - 0.59 79 - 0.65 Imperviousareas Smooth; roads, parking lots, driveways, curbs, channels, roofs, etc. 98 - 0.96 98 - 0.96 98 - 0.96 Rough; roads, paving, parking lots, driveways, roofs, etc. 95 - 0.9 95 - 0.9 95 - 0.9 Roads and streets Paved; batters & open drains 89 - 0.8 92 - 0.85 93 - 0.87 Smooth; Unsealed/Gravel roads, accessway & parking areas 92 - 0.85 94 - 0.89 95 - 0.9 Rough; Unsealed/Gravel roads, accessway & parking areas 85- 0.74 89 - 0.8 91 - 0.83 Reference TR55, Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds D Ver-y low permeability such as clay (e.g. Northland Allochthon/Onerahi Chaos) C Low permeability such as loam (e.g. Kerikeri volcanics) B Medium permeability, compacted coastal sands (e.g. Karikari Peninsular& Houhcra sands) A High permeability such as fractured rock, deeply bedded scoria deposits. coastal Mind blown sands (e.g. Karikari Peninsular& Houhora coastal dune sands} Soiltype A is not usually encountered at surface levels and typically is only used for discharge to ground solutions by deep infiltration. Soiltype A would not normally be used forthe calculation of surface run-off. Usethe slope adjustment factor from El/VM1 as required.