Wafer-Level Molding of Chalcogenide High volume production

EPIC Meeting on Wafer Level Optics Neuchâtel, CH, Nov. 7th – 8th 2019

Tim Grunwald, Jan-Helge Staasmeyer, Gang Liu

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Fraunhofer Gesellschaft Institutes und sites Key Figures ◼ 72 institutes ◼ 26 000 employees ◼ > 2.3 bn € annual fund for research

➔ Largest organization for applied research in Europe

Fraunhofer Society ◼ Founded in 1949 ◼ Legal form: nonprofit association ◼ Headquarter in Munich, Germany

Goal ◼ Contract research for economy and society ◼ Transferring fundamental research to industrial application

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 2 Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT Overview

459 Employees, thereof 31 m € operating budget, 214 permanently thereof 13 m € Industry projects

Aachen

Fraunhofer IPT is certified according to DIN EN ISO 9001:2015

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 3 Introduction Product Spectrum & Scope of Application

Aspherical Optics Freeform Optics Lighting Optics ◼ Wide range of possible geometries ◼ Accuracies can be adjusted according to the field of application: – Imaging Diffractive Optics Micro Optics Infrared Optics – Lighting – Optics ◼ High reproducibility/ repeatability as a consequence of the Cylindric Arrays Wafer Optics molding process

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 4 Introduction Glass Types and Molding temperatures

Chalcogenide glass

Low-Tg-Glass

Soda-lime glass

Borosilicate glass

Fused silica

Customer-specific glass types

T [°C] 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 5 Introduction Infrared Optics – Market, Application and Motivation

Uncooled Infrared Imaging Qty. Systems Mobile 2,000,000 Thermography Zivilcommercial < 1 k$/Stück < 1 k$/ piece Source: FLIR Militärischmilitary > 10> 10 k$/ k$/Stück piece 1,500,000

Automotive 1,000,000 Night Vision Source: Autoliv

500,000 Low-Cost Presence 0 Detection 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Source: Panasonic

Motivation The rising demand for low-cost, aspheric infrared optics can only be met with a scalable replicative production technology such as precision glass molding.

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 6 Source: Yole Uncooled Infrared Imaging Technology & Market Trends 2017 Introduction Chalcogenide glass – Amorphous material for infrared optics

IV V VI ◼ Covalently bonded chalcogenides of Carbon Nitrogen elements of group IV and V Group group C N O ◼ Cost-effective synthesis by glass melting compared to Carbon Nitrogen growth processes Si P S Silicon Phosphorus ◼ Characteristic properties: Ge As Se Germanium Arsenic Sn Sb Te Chalcogenide glass Optical glass Tin Antimony Trade name IG6 / IRG26 IG5 / IRG25 N-BK7 ≥9 Oxides Composition As2Se3 Ge28Sb12Se60 (SiO2 , B2O3 ,…) Transmission 1 – 12 1 – 11 0,35 – 1,9 [µm] Refractive 2,8 2,6 1,5 index [1] Tg [°C] 185 285 557 훼 [10-6/K] 20,7 14 7,1

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 7 Introduction Precision glass molding of infrared optics – process overview

Force Precision Glass Molding Temperature Mold Temperature Glass Mold Position

Pros Cons Low-costs due to Process scalability development Temperature, Force, Position Force, Temperature, effort Zeit Material efficiency Time-to-Market

Umformung Kühlung & Erwärmen Heating Soaking Molding EntnahmeCooling Molded Lens

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 8 Current Developments Project Overview »SKALIR« 2017 - 2020 ◼ Project target: “Scalable replication of infrared lenses” – Cost reduction for precision molded infrared optics by a factor of 5 – 10 due to scalable mold concepts.

Single-Cavity Multi-Cavity Wafer Level

◼ One lens per cycle, ◼ Rotational symmetric ◼ Lenses smaller Ø5 mm however also large or lenses smaller Ø20 mm complex lenses feasible

~100x 2-20x 1x Lenses per cycle

Lenses per cycle

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 9 Challenges in molding chalcogenide glass on wafer scale Challenge overview

Design Mold Molding process

Glass Shrinkage Service Life-time

Glass Fracturing

Glass Flow

Mold Machining

Wafer-Level Glass Molding

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 10 Challenges in molding chalcogenide glass on wafer scale Challenge – Glass Wafer breakage

Crack probability ◼ Glass breakage observed more frequently with wafer- based processes compared to ball preforms ◼ Expansion and shrinkage while heating or cooling induce a higher risk of breakage, especially in the case of CTE-mismatches (tool/glass)

CTE comparison Cooling shrinkage (center) Cooling shrinkage (outer dia.) Tungsten Carbide Soda-Lime Glass Chalcogenide Glass Aluminum Center line 0 5 10 15 20 -6 -1 훼 [10 K ] Approximate Tensile uniform shrinkage stresses in the center cause glass fracture

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 11 Background: Glass material Fracture behavior of glass

) 휎푢 at high strain-rate

푢 휎 휎푢 at low strain-rate ≈ 100% break line Flexural strength ≈ 0% break line

Ultimate stress( Small deformation fracture (Brittle) Big deformation fracture (Transition) No fracture (Ductile) Temperature Weibull statistics ◼ Temperature and strain-rate determines 휎 , which 푢 (fracture probability 푃 ) determines the fracture behavior of glass 푓 휎 푚푉 Both brittle fracture and transition fracture of glass − ׬ 푑푉 ◼ 푉 휎 follows Weibull statistics, however their Weibull 푃푓 = 1 − 푒 0 푉 푓표푟 휎 > 0 parameters (푚푉 and 휎0 푉) are different

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 13 Background: Glass material Flexural strength: chalcogenide glass vs. silica glass

◼ Chalcogenide glass is much (Tg)

Silica glass* more fragile than silica glass (MPa)

푓 ◼ The 휎 -휂(temperature) curve 휎 100 푓 of chalcogenide glass is also different from silica glass *Modeling Fracture Behavior in Precision Glass Molding; Gang Liu; RWTH Aachen University; 2018 ◼ Further study on the fracture of chalcogenide

glass is necessary Flexural Flexural strength

**Temperature dependence of the mechanical behavior of a GeAsSe glass; E. Le Bourhis et al., Scripta Materialia 45, 2001.

Chalcogenide glass** 20

0

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 14 Our Solution and Development Goal FEM-Simulation with advanced material models Finite Element Method Simulation with advanced material models for chalcogenide glass Functionality ◼ Visualization of glass flow

→ Mold design optimization

◼ Prediction of lens shrinkage

→ Aspheric mold compensation

◼ Calculation of fracture probability

→ Process optimization

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 15 Thank you for your kind attention! Offers, Contact and Acknowledgement

What we can offer: − Simulation studies in M.Sc. glass forming Tim Grunwald Head of Department “Fine Machining and − Process development Optics” − Prototype Fraunhofer Institute IPT Steinbachstrasse 17 • D-52074 Aachen manufacturing Phone.: 0241 / 8904 – 408 [email protected] What we are looking for: − Application cases − Inspiration for new developments M.Sc. Jan-Helge Staasmeyer − Partners for bilateral Group Manager “Optics” or public-funded Many thanks to: Fraunhofer IPT projects Steinbachstraße 17 • D-52074 Aachen Phone: +49 241 / 8904 - 568 [email protected]

© WZL/Fraunhofer IPT Seite 16 This presentation was presented at EPIC Meeting on Wafer Level Optics 2019 HOSTED BY

GOLD SPONSOR DINNER SPONSOR

SILVER SPONSORS

BRONZE SPONSORS

EU initiatives funded by www.photonics21.org