DOCSLIB.ORG

2017 Winter Q.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2017 Winter Q.Indd QUARTERLY Winter 2017 R with some of his friends, formed a non- by Charles Money profi t organiza on in 1938 to con nue As I consider the pending close to the prac ce in the other southwestern my career of service to na onal parks monuments he oversaw. and other public lands, it is hard not to For more than 50 years, these be drawn into refl ec on of what chang- small organiza ons func oned without es have occurred in those four decades, signifi cant change, selling books, guides especially during the years dedicated to and maps in park visitor centers. Some nonprofi t organiza ons. In some ways, generated enough money to invest the forces that changed the landscape in publishing their own books, fi lling of support for our na onal heritage informa onal gaps that commercial were mirrored in the chapters of my publishers couldn’t. The more successful own journey. organiza ons generated enough money Thirty-plus years ago, I took a to donate to the park, primarily to sup- chance. I le a management posi on port the park’s educa onal mission. with the Na onal Park Service (NPS) to However, in 1981, an incident involving join the small staff of a “coopera ng the then Secretary of the Interior, James associa on.” At that me, Southwest Wa , changed the course of coopera ng Parks and Monuments Associa on associa ons. (SPMA) was one of the few nonprofi t For several years, coopera ng as- organiza ons formed by the Na onal socia ons were asked to contribute to Park Service to have paid staff beyond a the Na onal Park Service “Director’s few part- me bookstore clerks. In fact, Fund” to support na onal ini a ves and most of the associa ons were actually programs. Cas ng about to fi nd funds managed by the NPS to do those things to host a private recep on in Arlington that the agency was not allowed to do, House, Secretary Wa procured the principally, to sell books. necessary money from this Director’s SPMA’s own origins in the 1930s Fund. When Wa ’s private use of the emerge from the eff orts of legendary funds and the Arlington House came to superintendent Frank (Boss) Pinkley, to the a en on of the Inspector General’s stem the increasing vandalism to Ari- Offi ce, the close rela onship between zona’s Casa Grande Na onal Monument the coopera ng associa ons and by improving visitor knowledge of the Na onal Park Service employees also site. With no staff and li le fi nancial re- came under scru ny. Soon therea er, a sources, Pinkley personally printed small policy order was issued prohibi ng NPS informa onal booklets, placed them in a employees from si ng on cooperat- coff ee can at the entrance to the monu- ing associa on boards of directors and ment and posted a request for a few from directly engaging in the business cents to be le behind by visitors. Since of the associa ons. These ac ons forced charging the public for informa on was frowned upon by the NPS, Pinkley, along (Refl ecƟ on, con nued on page 2) I: MEET ROCKY’S NEW SUPERINTENDENT! (SEE PAGE 8) 2 Rocky Mountain Conservancy Newsle er (Refl ecƟ on con nued) launched campaign a er campaign to created about li le-known parks, like rebuild decaying infrastructure; building the six-million-acre Gates of the Arc c, the nonprofi ts to expand their boards new trails, construc ng visitor centers, and the largely misunderstood Arc c to include a broader representa on of and crea ng educa onal programs that Na onal Wildlife Refuge, were now their communi es, and to hire manage- sought and welcomed children and priori es, as well as publishing books ment staff . With greater independence families from previously underserved on climate change and the preserva- and increased exposure to innova ve popula ons. on of wildlife habitat. We then turned approaches in the nonprofi t sector, the While championed by the park and our a en on to the youth of Alaska, a stage was set for associa ons to create local communi es, the GGNP Conser- genera on that would eventually face a new vision of support to vancy was not without decisions that would determine the fate na onal parks. With greater indepen- itsi cri cs, especially of the Arc c. Working hand-in-hand In 1988, I was lured dence and increased withinw the more tradi- with our partner agencies, we formed back to San Francisco to be onal leadership circles youth advisory groups and service learn- a part of a newly organized exposure to innova ve ofo the Na onal Park ing programs to help ins ll conserva on nonprofi t focused on the approaches in the Service.S Cries to break values and the importance of intact eco- Golden Gate Na onal nonprofi t sector, the upu the organiza on by systems. The organiza on started to see Recrea on Area (GGNRA), stage was set for separas ng its cooper- its mission beyond working within the a park for which I worked associa ons to create a a ng associa on role boundaries of those public lands, and several years earlier. The new vision of support fromf its development working more on behalf of their survival. Golden Gate Na onal Parks anda fundraising role Our family relished its 14 years in Conservancy, with new- to na onal parks. resounded.r However, Alaska, and each of us carried its wild- found freedoms and the thet success of the Con- ness within us as we migrated south support of a progressive servancy had become to a new adventure, this me back to park management team, set about to widely known and other organiza ons, the fi rst park in which I ever set foot. I create a new model of private-sector sup- including the Rocky Mountain Nature have found within the Rocky Mountain port for a na onal park. Up to that point, Associa on (RMNA), were beginning to Conservancy elements of each of the GGNRA was only known by its individual see the value of such “hybrid” en es. organiza ons for which I have had the parts, a random collec on of abandoned Though some like RMNA were eventually honor of serving. From off ering high- military posts and a few neglected city forced to split, the GGNP Conservancy, quality visitor services and programs, to and state parks. Knowing that it could with the help of a vocal community, resist- improving and growing the park through take decades and tens, if not hundreds, ed such a empts and con nued to be an the philanthropic support of the com- of millions of dollars to transform these example of a highly eff ec ve park partner. munity, to engaging the next genera on disparate parts into something deserving A er more than a decade of work- of park stewards, the Rocky Mountain of the name “na onal park,” the organi- ing to help build a na onal park in the Conservancy is playing vital roles that za on established a full-scale fundraising San Francisco Bay Area, in 1998, the will ensure the park’s relevance and program. “call of the wild” became irresis ble and survival into the next 100 years. By building on the revenues from our family moved northward to Alaska. And just as my personal journey sales of innova ve products and fee- There I was asked to lead what would has followed changing opportuni es to based interpre ve programs in highly later be known as Alaska Geographic. A make a diff erence for these lands, so popular venues in the park such as signifi cant departure from Golden Gate, will the con nued evolu on of nonprofi t Alcatraz Island and Muir Woods, we this organiza on was chartered to sup- organiza ons like the Rocky Mountain pport all of the na onal parks, Conservancy support and nourish our fforests and wildlife refuges in na onal parks and other treasured lands AAlaska, well over 100 million in ways we have yet to imagine. aacres. Yet, despite the size of tthese public lands, annually, tthe number of visitors to just Charley Money AAlcatraz Island alone exceeded has been the aall those that would visit Alaska. execu ve Given the low number of visi- director of the Rocky Mountain ttors, Alaska Geographic became Conservancy ffocused less on visitor ameni es since 2012. aand more about reaching those wwho could have an impact on tthe protec on of Alaska, but wwhom may never see its broad eexpanse of wilderness. Films photo: Jim Ward Rocky Mountain Conservancy Newsle er 3 Ask Nancy Quarterly Editor Nancy Wilson a empts to unearth answers to any ques ons asked by Conservancy members and park visitors. If you are curious about something in or about the park, email [email protected] or write: Nancy Wilson, Rocky Mountain Conservancy, PO Box 3100, Estes Park, CO 80517. What is the word origin of “ptarmigan”? The word ptarmigan comes from the Sco sh Gaelic tàrmachan, which literally means TheThe ConservancyConservancy Publishes:Publishes: “croaker.” The silent p was added in 1684 by Robert Sibbald through the infl uence of Greek, especially pteron, meaning “wing,” “feath- A Unique Paper Collage er,” or “pinion.” — The Oxford Dic onary of Bri sh Bird Names Why do aspen trees form buds for the next season in the Alphabet Book for Rocky late fall when they will soon be exposed to many months of freezing temperatures and desicca ng winds? Why not wait The Rocky Mountain Conservancy is pleased to un l spring to develop these seemingly tender and vulner- able growths? Aspen, as do many trees, form the next year’s buds present its newest publica on for kids: ABC Rocky! during the current year’s growing season — o en these buds are A Rocky Mountain Na onal Park Alphabet Book.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stanley Hotel: Tourism and Building in the West ​ 2
    1.Title / Content Area: Stanley Hotel: Tourism and Building in the West ​ 2. Historic Site: Stanley Hotel ​ 3. Episode: https://www.pbs.org/video/colorado-experience-stanley-hotel/ ​ 3. Developed by: Laura Israelsen, Denver Public Schools ​ Michelle Pearson, Adams 12 Five Star Schools 4. Grade Level and 6-8: ​ Standards: 6th: History 1.1, 1.2, Geography 2.1, 2.2 7th: History 1.1, 1.2, Geography 2.1, 2.2, Civics 4.1 8th: History 1.1, 1.2, Geography 2.1 5. Assessment Why does the Stanley hotel play an iconic role in the landscape of upper Estes Park ​ Question(s): and the region as a whole? 6. Contextual Paragraph F.O. Stanley was an inventor and a visionary for his time. After coming to Colorado ​ because of health reasons, he not only established and built the iconic Stanley Hotel, but was responsible for the development of the site of Estes Park as well through his involvement in the development of the road systems, financing the water system, and launching a major advertising campaign to bring tourists to the city via motor coaches which traveled through the canyon from Estes Park. Known as a resort hotel, the Stanley was a “draw” to tourists from across the nation who were looking for a comfortable and luxurious way to travel in the Colorado Rockies at the turn of the century. The hotel has been a host to contemporary travelers and moviemakers and is known today as the setting for the movie based on Stephen King's novel The Shining.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stanley Hotel History
    The Stanley Hotel History: The property of the Stanley hotel was a favorite of Mr. Windham Thomas Whydham‐Quin the fourth Earl of Dunraven. He would come to the area for his summer hunting. “Lord Dunraven” wanted to put a Hunting lodge and game preserve. Wyndham Thomas Quinn the 4th Earl of Dunraven Dunraven hired some local Agents and purchased 15,000 acres from the U.S. Government. Soon after the purchase there were claims filed by twenty‐one different parties including Mr. R.Q. McGregor. They all claimed that Dunraven had no right to the land because he was not a U.S. citizen. Mr. Dunraven lost the property due to the claims of Mr. McGregor. F.O. Stanley A local who wanted to purchase the land for himself had hired R.Q. McGregor. This was Mr. Freelan Oscar Stanley. Freelan Oscar (F.O.) Stanley was born in 1849; he was diagnosed with tuberculosis in 1903 and was told to move to Colorado because the “fresh mountain air” would help his condition. Mr. Stanley and his wife moved to a home located at 1401 Gilpin St in Denver. After a month in Denver, he was showing no signs of change. Arrangements were made for him to visit a friend’s cabin in Estes Park. Mr. & Mrs. Stanley fell in love with the area and in 1904 purchased 8.4 acres of their own. F.O. Stanley’s sister Flora Jane Record Tileston, who would become Mrs. Stanley (1848‐1949) was an active member of the community, she was known for dressing up as a Gypsy and doing fortune telling at fundraisers for the Estes Park Women’s Club They purchased the property with the assistance of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resource Vital Signs at Rocky Mountain National Park
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Natural Resource Vital Signs at Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMO/NRR—2015/946 PHOTO CREDITS On the cover: elk, Ann Schonlau; limber pine, white-tailed ptarmigan, and Fern Lake fire, National Park Service. Where not otherwise indicated, photos in this report are courtesy of the National Park Service. NPS 121/128364, April 2015 b Natural Resource Vital Signs at Rocky Mountain National Park Natural Resource Report NPS/ROMO/NRR—2015/946 Mary Ann Franke, Therese Johnson*, Isabel Ashton, and Ben Bobowski National Park Service Rocky Mountain National Park 1000 Highway 36 Estes Park, CO 80517-8397 *Corresponding author: [email protected] April 2015 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Fort Collins, Colorado The National Park Service, Natural Resource Stewardship and Science office in Fort Collins, Colo- rado, publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics. These reports are of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate comprehensive information and analysis about natural resources and related topics concerning lands managed by the National Park Service. The series supports the advancement of science, informed decision-making, and the achievement of the National Park Service mission. The series also provides a forum for presenting more lengthy results that may not be accepted by publications with page limitations.
    [Show full text]
  • State of the Park Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior State of the Park Report Rocky Mountain National Park Colorado December 2017 National Park Service. 2017. State of the Park Report for Rocky Mountain National Park. State of the Park Series No. 50. National Park Service, Washington, DC. On the cover: Hallett Peak reflected in Dream Lake. NPS Photo. Disclaimer. This State of the Park report summarizes the current condition of park resources, visitor experience, and park infrastructure as assessed by a combination of available factual information and the expert opinion and professional judgment of park staff and subject matter experts. The internet version of this report provides additional details and sources of information about the findings summarized in the report, including references, accounts on the origin and quality of the data, and the methods and analytic approaches used in data collection and assessments of condition. This report provides evaluations of status and trends based on interpretation by NPS scientists and managers of both quantitative and non-quantitative assessments and observations. Future condition ratings may differ from findings in this report as new data and knowledge become available. The park superintendent approved the publication of this report. Executive Summary The mission of the National Park Service is to preserve unimpaired the natural and cultural resources and values of national parks for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations. NPS Management Policies (2006) state that “The Service will also strive to ensure that park resources and values are passed on to future generations in a condition that is as good as, or better than, the conditions that exist today.” As part of the stewardship of national parks for the American people, the NPS has begun to develop State of the Park reports to assess the overall status and trends of each park’s resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortner V State of Colorado
    Case 1:14-cv-02297-BNB Document 1 Filed 08/19/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 32 jf'l[t;J lJ. S. Dl S T R i ;~ T ·::; 0 U R T :J!STRICT or ~;:. ... cRADO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO 2014 AUG 19 PM 3: 31 ·~;;:T.:. :_ ;. ::i. :~LL':;·r::LL CivilActi~oo. '14 - CV - 0 2 2 9 7 (.l i:.i': ', OaA'-rl'/J ~'tlJ?r (To be supplied by the court) _A II /Cf,y/ftffJ - ~ Al ffico 56 BY n::P. CLK {J /.e~ ~ /tffq- ~MJ Gx ':fl= / , Plaintiff, v. S{q"fa a f a,/qyak t4wi'fy of' £1 &ra, c;wq)o, fl/ackfkert Ere ~Qrd , --------------, Defendant(s). (List each named defendant on a separate line.) COMPLAINT (Rev. 07/06) Case 1:14-cv-02297-BNB Document 1 Filed 08/19/14 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 32 PARTIES 1. Plaintiff 5fJz/J/i,hJ fit·#=- f is a citizen of IJJA '-JfJ o+- .f-- who presently resides at the following address: .-i.~,,....... • ...L>o~---i..L.·./....!.:., itf::LL.!££<.L--7 reY:k~a,.,i!fJ,/.~~l:;R'fltdr-/1 !i//ffP Qwt"P; e;~ 2. Defendant. q CJ?,/' flCJf!l/'Pr fl) is. a citizen. of / who hve(s) at or is/are located at the following address: ------- £ep qfh cl iQ re I 3. Defendant ---:--:------- is. a citizen. of who live(s) at or is/are loc?d at the following address: ------- fr;.e rztLt:?tAecL J5r #- / (Attach a separate page, if necessary, to list additional parties.) JURISDICTION .J- t/~ l}IUC.
    [Show full text]
  • Destinationcolorado.Com 2019 Official Statewide Meeting Planner Guide
    COLORADO 2019 Official Statewide Meeting Planner Guide DESTINATION COLORADO PARTNERS: destinationcolorado.com destinationcolorado.com WELCOME WELCOME DESTINATION COLORADO DESTINATION COLORADO Steamboat Springs Fort Collins Estes Loveland Park Greeley Longmont Northeast FRONT RANGE REGION: Northwest Granby Boulder Front Visit www.destinationcolorado.com for more information on all of our members. Winter Park Range BLACK HAWK, BOULDER, ESTES Beaver Black Hawk Keystone Colorado is a paradise for meeting planners and incentive buyers, combining the most magnificent PARK, FORT COLLINS, GREELEY, Creek Vail Golden Aurora Glenwood Springs Breckenridge Denver Copper Mtn natural beauty in the world with first-class accommodations, state-of-the-art meeting space LONGMONT, LOVELAND Snowmass Palisade Denver North of Denver, this region combines some Aspen and convenient access. We have organized our 2019 Meeting Planner Guide into state regions, Grand Buena Vista Colorado of Colorado’s finest college communities with Junction Crested Butte Springs beginning with our Front Range just north of Denver and ending with information on transportation Gateway Salida some of its most spectacular scenery. Boulder, Pueblo in the state. We have included a map illustrating each of our regions and a brief descriptor of some Fort Collins and Greeley, home to the state’s of the features they represent. Rest assured, no matter where you plan your meeting in Colorado, finest public universities, also offer charming Southwest South all of our members can provide you with the type of quality and services you have grown to expect. communities with an abundance of meeting space, Central dining, accommodations and activities. Estes Park Telluride Southeast Colorado is located in the western half of the United States and is easily accessible from both is situated in one of the state’s most spectacular backdrops, Rocky Mountain National Park, while Durango coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Knoll-Willows Nature Preserve
    0 50 100 200 300 400 Feet The Knoll-Willows Maintained Trail Nature Preserve Unimproved Trail Please stay on the trails Trail Map KNOLL/WILLOWS MASTER PLAN Knoll/Willows Citizen Advisory Council Town of Estes Park Board of Trustees Adopted February 25, 2003 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Background 3 1.1 Land Assembly 3 1.2 Knoll -Willows Conservancy Report 4 1.3 EVLT Open Space Agreement 4 2. Master Planning Process 6 2.1 Appointment of Citizen’s Advisory Council 6 2.2 Council Meetings 6 2.3 Public Comment 6 3. Existing Conditions 7 3.1 Natural Resources 7 3.2 Visual Resources 8 3.3 Cultural Resources 8 4. Goals, Policies, and Objectives 8 4.1 Mission Statement 8 4.2 Goals 9 4.3 Policies and Objectives, Use Restrictions 10 5. Recommendations 11 5.1 Cultural Resources Management 11 5.2 Natural Resources Management 12 5.3 Parking Plan 13 5.4 Trails Plan 13 5.5 Final Adopted Trail Plan 15 5.6 Implementation 15 6. Appendix 16 6.1 Wetlands Report 16 6.2 Charrette Report 30 6.3 Accessibility Report 43 6.4 Historic Structures Assessment 46 6.5 Knoll Willow Conservancy Report 48 6.6 Open Space Agreement 68 2 1. Background 1 1 Land Assembly The Knoll/Willows properties consist of approximately 20 acres of contiguous natural open space located between the Highway 34 bypass, MacGregor Avenue, and the downtown, See fig. 1. The land has been subdivided into several separate parcels and held in separate ownerships over the past seventy five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Rocky Mountain
    Rocky Mountain Administrative History CHAPTER XII: INHOLDINGS, CONCESSIONS AND BOUNDARY EXTENSIONS When created in 1915, Rocky Mountain National Park contained within its 229,062 acres of land over 11,000 acres of private inholdings. These inholdings consisted primarily of patented lands, based on Homestead, Timber and Stone, and Pre-emption entries, and of a number of irrigation ditches, reservoirs and mineral claims in the name of private parties and corporations. [1] On the west side of the Continental Divide, the private land holdings extended from Lulu City to Grand Lake. On the east side they were located principally in Moraine Park, Hallowell Park, and Beaver Meadows. Most of the land suitable for human use, including every meadow, was privately owned. Then as a result of subsequent boundary extensions, an additional 2,000 acres of private land became incorporated within the Park. Yet by 1965, the total amount of inholdings had been reduced through government purchases and exchanges to 2,300 acres. [2] What follows is the story of the land purchases, the boundary extensions and adjustments, and the people affected by these actions during the Park's first 50 years. A subordinate part of the story concerns changes in Park concession policies and some road building activities made possible or necessary by land and visitor developments. Initially, the Park administration granted permits for continued operation of the six hotels, lodges and camps that had operated on federal land when the Park lands had been part of the Colorado National Forest. [3] At the same time, there were nine other hotels within the Park's boundaries, all located on private property and therefore not under the jurisdiction of the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside: GSA Bookstore Update, a Special Insert, P
    VOL. 14, NO. 6 A PUBLICATION OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA JUNE 2004 Title Sponsor of the 2004 GSA Annual Meeting. Inside: GSA Bookstore Update, A Special Insert, p. 33 Limnogeology Division Award, p. 59 GeoMart Geoscience Directory, p. 62 VOLUME 14, NUMBER 6 JUNE 2004 GSA TODAY publishes news and information for more than 18,000 GSA members and subscribing libraries. GSA Today Cover Images: Upper left: “The Big Blue lead science articles should present the results of exciting new research or summarize and synthesize important problems or Marble,” courtesy of NASA. Lower left: Larson issues, and they must be understandable to all in the earth B Ice Shelf collapse. Image courtesy of NASA/ science community. Submit manuscripts to science editors GSFC/LaRC/JPL, MISR Team. View of the Keith A. Howard, [email protected], or Gerald M. Ross, Soyuz TMA-2 spacecraft docked to the cargo [email protected]. block on the International Space Station. GSA TODAY (ISSN 1052-5173 USPS 0456-530) is published 11 Image courtesy of the crew of ISS Expedition times per year, monthly, with a combined April/May issue, by The Geological Society of America, Inc., with offices at 3300 Penrose 7, NASA. Place, Boulder, Colorado. Mailing address: P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140, U.S.A. Periodicals postage paid at Boulder, Colorado, and at additional mailing offices. Postmaster: Send address changes to GSA Today, GSA Sales and Service, P.O. Box 9140, Boulder, CO 80301-9140. Copyright © 2004, The Geological Society of America, Inc. (GSA). Geoscience in a Changing World: Denver 2004 All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Rocky Mountain National Park Research Conference Honoring the Past, Celebrating the Present, and Inspiring the Future
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Rocky Mountain National Park Continental Divide Research Learning Center 2015 Rocky Mountain National Park Research Conference Honoring the past, celebrating the present, and inspiring the future. Rocky Mountain National Park 2015 Research Conference Welcome to Rocky Mountain National Parks’ th 7 Research Conference. The world has become smaller. Issues of resource protection that once could be addressed within or near our National Park Service boundaries now extend across landscapes, oceans and continents. The ever-increasing human footprint is shrinking habitats and species that once dominated landscapes. Like most change, it is often subtle to our daily experience; but the scientific evidence is clear – we are on the brink of a sixth extinction. It is now possible, more than ever, that protected areas may lose species before we can even identify them. Foundational to finding a way forward is the ability of a protected area to connect from local to global scales of conservation. For a park to best protect those species and systems it is mandated to, it has to work at scales appropriate to its conservation – such as airsheds, watersheds, ecosystems, wildlife corridors, metapopulations, species ranges, and migratory pathways. Obvious to the solution, but not often addressed with rigor, is the fact that success in the biosphere is dependent upon our success with our ethnosphere. This fact should give us pause to understand better our environmental history, the diversity of cultures that once engaged this landscape, as well as those that do today. Simply, there lies much opportunity ahead of us.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Darn-Break Modeling of the July 15, 1982 Lawn Lake Dam and Cascade Lake Dam Failures, Larimer County, Colorado
    Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Darn-Break Modeling of the July 15, 1982 Lawn Lake Dam and Cascade Lake Dam Failures, Larimer County, Colorado U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAFEM 1369 Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Dam-Break Modeling of the July 15, 1982 Lawn Lake Dam and Cascade Lake Dam Failures, Larimer County, Colorado By ROBERT D. JARRETT and JOHN E. COSTA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1369 Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1986 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jarrett, Robert D. Hydrology, geomorphology, and dam-break modeling of the July 15,1982, Lawn Lake Dam and Cascade Lake Dam failures, Larimer County, Colorado (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1369) "Prepared in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, Divison of Water Resources, Office of the State Engineer." Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.16:1369 1. Floods Colorado Roaring River 1982. 2. Dam failures Colorado Roaring River Valley. 3. Lawn Lake Dam (Colo.) 4. Cascade Lake Dam (Colo.) 5. Geomorphology Colorado Roaring River Valley. I. Costa, John E. III. Colorado. Offices of the State Engineer. III. Title. IV. Series. GB1399.4.C6J36 1986 551.48'9'09788 85-600157 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Record Front Range and Eastern Colorado Floods of September 11–17, 2013
    Service Assessment The Record Front Range and Eastern Colorado Floods of September 11–17, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service Silver Spring, Maryland Cover Photograph: Left Image Map of event total rainfall for the period Sep. 9–16 (NOAA/ESRL) Upper Right River flooding on the South Platte River at Highway 34 near Greely, CO (Huffington Post.com) Middle Right Flash flood damage in Jamestown, CO, along Left Hand Creek (M. Leffingwell, Boulder Daily Camera) Lower Right Flash Flood damage on Rock Creek at Dillon Road and Highway 287, Louisville, CO (M. Leffingwell, Boulder Daily Camera) ii Service Assessment The Record Front Range and Eastern Colorado Floods of September 11–17, 2013 June 2014 National Weather Service Louis W. Uccellini Assistant Administrator for Weather Services iii Preface Copious amounts of tropical moisture flowed northward from the Pacific Ocean and Gulf of Mexico into eastern Colorado on September 9–16, 2013. The combination of a slow moving upper-level system over the Great Basin region, favorable upslope easterly flow along the Front Range, and the presence of a stalled frontal system resulted in several episodes of torrential rainfall. The heaviest rain fell on the evenings of September 11–12. By week’s end, a swath of 8–17 inches of rain resulted in widespread, devastating flash flooding in the South Platte River Basin from Denver downstream to western Nebraska and in the upper Arkansas River Basin along the upper Fountain Creek. There were eight fatalities directly attributed to the flooding. Because of the significant impacts of the event, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Weather Service formed a service assessment team to evaluate its performance before and during the record flooding.
    [Show full text]