Meeting Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Meeting Program This program is produced for assistance on site at the meeting. Additional information about hotels and general travel information can be found on the conference Web site. 2011 ASLO Aquatic Sciences Meeting is on Facebook and Twitter. Stay connected before and during the meeting for important updates. MeetinG Program www.aslo.org/sanjuan2011 SponSored by Meeting Program ASLO Contents Welcome to the 2011 ASLO Aquatic Sciences Meeting ................................. 2 Workshop: Engaging Our Students Using Real-Time Data: From Platforms to Homemade Sensors ......................................................................... 14 Meeting Organizers ................................................................................................. 2 Town Hall Meeting: Microbial Biogeography and Biogeochemistry ...................... 14 ASLO Board of Directors and Staff ...................................................................... 3 Field Trips ................................................................................................................. 14 ASK ME! ..................................................................................................................... 3 Jobos Bay Field Trip Information ..................................................................................... 14 Plenary Lectures and Presentations ..................................................................... 3 San Juan Bay Estuary Field Trips ...................................................................................... 15 Roundtable Discussion and Special Presentation ........................................... 5 Additional Participant and Attendee Information ........................................ 15 Society Award Presentations ................................................................................. 5 ASLO Membership ............................................................................................................. 15 About Puerto Rico .................................................................................................... 5 Registration Information ................................................................................................... 15 About the Conference Meeting Site .................................................................... 6 Guest/Spouse Fee ................................................................................................................ 15 Receipts .................................................................................................................................. 15 Meeting Schedule ..................................................................................................... 6 Letters of Participation ....................................................................................................... 15 Poster Receptions ..................................................................................................... 7 Child Care Information ................................................................................................... 15 Final Talk Raffle ......................................................................................................... 8 Transportation ....................................................................................................... 16 At the meeting ........................................................................................................... 8 Special Car Rental Rates ................................................................................................... 16 Conference Registration and Check-In ............................................................................ 8 Taxicabs ................................................................................................................................ 16 Message Boards ...................................................................................................................... 8 Airport Shuttle Service ...................................................................................................... 16 Special Needs ......................................................................................................................... 8 Parking ................................................................................................................................. 16 Coffee Breaks .......................................................................................................................... 8 Attendee Shuttle ................................................................................................................. 16 Concessions ............................................................................................................................ 8 Local Public Transportation ............................................................................................. 17 Lunch Time During the Meeting ....................................................................................... 8 Instructions for Poster Presenters ...................................................................... 17 Local Evening Dining ............................................................................................................ 8 Poster Set-up ......................................................................................................................... 17 Old San Juan Trolleys ........................................................................................................... 8 Poster Teardown .................................................................................................................. 17 Email/Internet Access........................................................................................................... 8 Printing Your Poster ............................................................................................................ 17 Exhibitors and Sponsors ......................................................................................... 8 Instructions for Oral Presenters.......................................................................... 17 Information for Students and Early Career Participants .............................. 10 Preparing Your Electronic Presentation ....................................................................... 17 Outstanding Student Presentation Awards ................................................................... 10 Advance Submission ........................................................................................................... 17 Career Center ....................................................................................................................... 10 Microsoft PowerPoint Tips ............................................................................................... 17 Student Career Development Workshops ..................................................................... 10 Apple Macintosh Users ...................................................................................................... 18 Student Social Mixer ........................................................................................................... 10 Bring a Backup ..................................................................................................................... 18 Early Career Meet and Mix ............................................................................................... 11 During Your Presentation .................................................................................................. 18 Early Career Workshop – Beyond Imagination: Computer Equipment ......................................................................................................... 18 Creating Research Opportunities, Leadership, and Thinking BIG .......................... 11 Laptops ................................................................................................................................... 18 ASLO 2011 Multicultural Program ................................................................................. 11 Rental of Additional Audio-Visual Equipment ............................................................ 18 Emerging Issues Seminars .................................................................................... 11 Presentation Room .............................................................................................................. 18 Emerging Issues Seminar I: Role of Aquatic Networks Security .................................................................................................................................. 18 in the Boreal Carbon Cycle ............................................................................................... 11 Speaker Ready Room .......................................................................................................... 18 Emerging Issues Seminar II: Microbial Carbon Pump in the Ocean ...................... 12 Emerging Issues Seminar III: Integrating Terrestrial and Aquatic P Science ........ 12 Puerto Rico Convention Center Maps .............................................................. 19 Emerging Issues Seminar IV: Implications of Increased Carbon Monday At A Glance ............................................................................................. 20 Supply and Artificial Habitat for the Global Expansion of Jellyfish Blooms ......... 12 Tuesday At A Glance ............................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104Th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Ashingtw On, March 24–29, 2012
    W&M ScholarWorks VIMS Articles 4-2012 Abstracts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012 National Shellfisheries Association Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons Recommended Citation National Shellfisheries Association, Abstr" acts of Technical Papers, Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting, National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, ashingtW on, March 24–29, 2012" (2012). VIMS Articles. 524. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/vimsarticles/524 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in VIMS Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Shellfish Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 231, 2012. ABSTRACTS OF TECHNICAL PAPERS Presented at the 104th Annual Meeting NATIONAL SHELLFISHERIES ASSOCIATION Seattle, Washington March 24–29, 2012 231 National Shellfisheries Association, Seattle, Washington Abstracts 104th Annual Meeting, March 24–29, 2012 233 CONTENTS Alisha Aagesen, Chris Langdon, Claudia Hase AN ANALYSIS OF TYPE IV PILI IN VIBRIO PARAHAEMOLYTICUS AND THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN PACIFICOYSTERCOLONIZATION........................................................... 257 Cathryn L. Abbott, Nicolas Corradi, Gary Meyer, Fabien Burki, Stewart C. Johnson, Patrick Keeling MULTIPLE GENE SEGMENTS ISOLATED BY NEXT-GENERATION SEQUENCING
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa: Systematics of the Genus Scleroplax Rathbun, 1893
    Zootaxa 1344: 33–41 (2006) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA 1344 Copyright © 2006 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Systematics of the genus Scleroplax Rathbun, 1893 (Crustacea: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) ERNESTO CAMPOS Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Apartado Postal 2300, Ensenada, Baja California, 22800 México. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract The taxonomic status of the monotypic genus Scleroplax Rathbun, 1893, is evaluated and separated from other genera of the Pinnixa White, 1846, complex. Distinguishing characters of Scleroplax are a hard, subheptagonal and dorsally, highly convex carapace, and a third maxilliped with a propodus that extends to the end of the dactylus. The genera Scleroplax, Pinnixa, Austinixa Heard & Manning, 1997, Glassella Campos & Wicksten, 1997, Indopinnixa Manning & Morton, 1987, and Tetrias Rathbun, 1898, share a carapace than is wider than long and a distinct lateral exopod lobe on the third maxilliped, all of which may represent monophyletic characters. Updated information on the distribution and hosts of S. granulata Rathbun, 1893, indicate that the species now ranges from Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to El Coyote estuary, Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur, México. It inhabits burrows of the echiuroid Urechis caupo Fisher & MacGinitie, 1928, and the mud shrimps Neotrypaea californiensis (Dana, 1854), N. gigas (Dana, 1852) (new host record), Upogebia pugettensis (Dana, 1852), and occasionally U. macginiteorum Williams, 1986 (new host record). Key words: Crustacea, Brachyura, Pinnotheridae, Scleroplax, systematics, geographic distribution, new hosts Resumen El estatus taxonómico del género monotípico Scleroplax Rathbun, 1893, es evaluado y separado de otros géneros del complejo Pinnixa White, 1846.
    [Show full text]
  • Upogebia Pugettensis Class: Malacostraca Order: Decapoda Section: Anomura, Paguroidea the Blue Mud Shrimp Family: Upogebiidae
    Phylum: Arthropoda, Crustacea Upogebia pugettensis Class: Malacostraca Order: Decapoda Section: Anomura, Paguroidea The blue mud shrimp Family: Upogebiidae Taxonomy: Dana described Gebia (on either side of the mouth), two pairs of pugettensis in 1852 and this species was later maxillae and three pairs of maxillipeds. The redescribed as Upogebia pugettensis maxillae and maxillipeds attach posterior to (Stevens 1928; Williams 1986). the mouth and extend to cover the mandibles (Ruppert et al. 2004). Description Carapace: Bears two rows of 11–12 Size: The type specimen was 50.8 mm in teeth laterally (Fig. 1) in addition to a small length and the illustrated specimen (ovigerous distal spines (13 distal spines, 20 lateral teeth female from Coos Bay, Fig. 1) was 90 mm in on carapace shoulder, see Wicksten 2011). length. Individuals are often larger and reach Carapace with thalassinidean line extending sizes to 100 mm (range 75–112 mm) and from anterior to posterior margin (Wicksten northern specimens are larger than those in 2011). southern California (MacGinitie and Rostrum: Large, tridentate, obtuse, MacGinitie 1949; Wicksten 2011). rough and hairy (Schmitt 1921), the sides Color: Light blue green to deep olive brown bear 3–5 short conical teeth (Wicksten 2011). with brown fringes on pleopods and pleon. Rostral tip shorter than antennular peduncle. Individual color variable and may depend on Two short processes extending on either side feeding habits (see Fig. 321, Kozloff 1993; each with 0–2 dorsal teeth (Wicksten 2011). Wicksten 2011). Teeth: General Morphology: The body of decapod Pereopods: Two to five simple crustaceans can be divided into the walking legs.
    [Show full text]
  • John L. Jenney
    IGE TElf TUESDAY, TONE 15719481 miim Imning Herald A v tn G t Daily Cireulatioii F mt «Im Moatk of May, 1942 Tka Wtathar raradMt of O. & WaatiMr BarM On Dance ProGram Report Work X;^Biiyonet Arch at<lA>c^s^eclflinG ; the Itmlted'supply ofshomra avail­ 8 ,2 3 ) ( ) About >Fown Real Estate Berry Pickets Miowoia and thaadetatom s able fW pQrehaee, which has been ; M m M tiM A«dn . oodlaG toniGht; eoole*: tohiGht and Of^RedCIross demonstrated,^ by the curtfdlment 'ThoMUy forawod. Tha mentMn at the lluichaater Sales-Better of new house construction.'They ArfemFieldf f u b te HMlth NurKnc A^MOdatlon also realiu the lie n r i^ to be de­ Mtmehester-—A jCfcy of ViUage Wia jMHd Ita annual lUMUns: f Activities Chairmen rived, throuGh the purchase of ''a jnpvfow a ^ rn o o n att 3 o’clock at HOLC Reports Im- home'lKjw on the favorable terms Women’s Land Army I« .Pm home of Itiaa Ann C. Samp* vise Directors lat offered by- HOLC, toe^ther with VOL. LXIL.n o . l i t on Id) MANCHESTER, COI^N., WEDNESDAT, JUNE 1^ 194| (EIGHTEEN PAGES) PRICE THREE CEN'1'8^' rtum, j#80 Sprint atreet. proVemeiit; Knofla the 'tonG tehn. self - "liQuidatinG AssistinG Growers. Ji« * • -• _J<- Has Been Dnhe. Has Bui Two ’Left. mortGaGe. \ ' ■ Private Robert M. Plnley haa The corporation- Is .desirous of Harvest Crop .Here. baan hbina on a abort leave at ab> TTie m e e ^ G at the Board of placinG these homes with Qualified ■ aence from Fort Devena.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • No Evidence That the Introduced Parasite Orthione Griffenis Markham
    Aquatic Invasions (2017) Volume 12, Issue 2: 213–224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2017.12.2.09 Open Access © 2017 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2017 REABIC Research Article No evidence that the introduced parasite Orthione griffenis Markham, 2004 causes sex change or differential mortality in the native mud shrimp, Upogebia pugettensis (Dana, 1852) Danielle Asson1,2,*, John W. Chapman3 and Brett R. Dumbauld3,4 1ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia 2Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA 3Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Newport, OR 97365, USA 4Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Newport, OR 97365, USA Author e-mails: [email protected] (DA), [email protected] (JWC), [email protected] (BRD) *Corresponding author Received: 22 November 2017 / Accepted: 17 March 2017 / Published online: 4 April 2017 Handling editor: John Mark Hanson Abstract Dramatic, rapid, population declines of the native North American burrowing shrimp Upogebia pugettensis (Dana, 1852) are associated with intense infestations by the introduced Asian bopyrid isopod parasite, Orthione griffenis Markham, 2004. However, expected host weight losses with increasing parasite weights do not occur, even among apparently castrated females. The prevailing assumption that energetic losses cause host castration have thus remained open to question, and the mechanism(s) resulting in castration and consequent population declines of U. pugettensis have remained unclear. Proposed alternative explanations for these declines, which have been based on a dramatically greater prevalence of O.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Critical Coastal Habitats of the Western Region, Ghana
    Assessment of Critical Coastal Habitats of the Western Region, Ghana July, 2011 THE UNIVERSITY of Rhode Island Coastal GRADUATE SCHOOL Resources OF OCEANOGRAPHY Center This publication is available electronically on the Coastal Resources Center’s website at http://www.crc.uri.edu For additional information on partner activities: WorldFish: http://www.worldfishcenter.org Friends of the Nation: http://www.fonghana.org Hen Mpoano: http://www.henmpoano.org Sustainametrix: http://www.sustainametrix.com For more information on the Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Governance project, contact: Coastal Resources Center, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett Bay Campus, 220 South Ferry Road, Narragansett, Rhode Island 02882, USA. Brian Crawford, Director International Programs at [email protected]; Tel: 401-874-6224; Fax: 401-874-6920. Citation: Coastal Resources Center and Friends of the Nation. (2011). Assessment of Critical Coastal Habitats of the Western Region, Ghana. Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Governance Initiative for the Western Region of Ghana. Narragansett, RI: Coastal Resources Center, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island. 132 pp.. Disclaimer: This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/Ghana. The contents of this report are the responsibility of the Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Governance (ICFG) Program and do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Government. Associate Cooperative Agreement No. 641-A-00-09-00036-00 for “Integrated Coastal and Fisheries Governance (ICFG) Program for the Western Region of Ghana,” under the Leader with Associates Award No. EPP-A-00-04-00014-00. Cover Photo: Ankrobra town, at high tide.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Mini-Ecosystem Or Seafood Smorgasbord? for Website
    Mini-ecosystem or Seafood Smorgasbord? by Linda Schroeder, photos by Greg Jensen This is how Greg Jensen phrased it in his email when he sent me the photo of this Blue mud shrimp, Upogebia pugettensis, found during a May survey on the east side of Indian Island. The survey is part of preparations to remove the man-made connection between Indian and Marrowstone Islands, restoring the water channel. There were several notable features of this mud shrimp. First, it was sitting out of its burrow at low tide, “waiting to be eaten by a seagull” said Greg. Secondly, he noted the pea crab, Scleroplax granulata, remained clinging to the shrimp. While it is a known associate of the shrimp, living in its burrows, it seemed more unusual that it hadn’t remained in the burrow and instead stayed with the shrimp as it left the safety of the burrow. It was actually clinging to the Mud shrimp clam as much as the shrimp. This clam, Neaeromya rugifera, is well- known to live commensally on the abdomen of the mud shrimp. The final notable feature was the presence of the parasitic isopod, Orthione griffenis. This is an invasive Asian species first discovered in Washington in 1988. The isopod appears to be causing the collapse of mud shrimp populations along the Pacific coast. It prevents the female shrimp from being able to reproduce and in some places more than 90% of the mud shrimps are infected. This shrimp harbored quite the little ecosystem going on with both commensal and parasitic relationships. It was also a seafood smorgasbord featuring three crustacean species and a mollusk for some happy gull if Greg hadn’t found it first.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of National Seminar on Biodiversity And
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION OF COASTAL AND MARINE ECOSYSTEMS OF INDIA (2012) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Patrons: 1. Hindi VidyaPracharSamiti, Ghatkopar, Mumbai 2. Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS) 3. Association of Teachers in Biological Sciences (ATBS) 4. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) 5. Mangroves for the Future (MFF) Advisory Committee for the Conference 1. Dr. S. M. Karmarkar, President, ATBS and Hon. Dir., C B Patel Research Institute, Mumbai 2. Dr. Sharad Chaphekar, Prof. Emeritus, Univ. of Mumbai 3. Dr. Asad Rehmani, Director, BNHS, Mumbi 4. Dr. A. M. Bhagwat, Director, C B Patel Research Centre, Mumbai 5. Dr. Naresh Chandra, Pro-V. C., University of Mumbai 6. Dr. R. S. Hande. Director, BCUD, University of Mumbai 7. Dr. Madhuri Pejaver, Dean, Faculty of Science, University of Mumbai 8. Dr. Vinay Deshmukh, Sr. Scientist, CMFRI, Mumbai 9. Dr. Vinayak Dalvie, Chairman, BoS in Zoology, University of Mumbai 10. Dr. Sasikumar Menon, Dy. Dir., Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Centre, Mumbai 11. Dr, Sanjay Deshmukh, Head, Dept. of Life Sciences, University of Mumbai 12. Dr. S. T. Ingale, Vice-Principal, R. J. College, Ghatkopar 13. Dr. Rekha Vartak, Head, Biology Cell, HBCSE, Mumbai 14. Dr. S. S. Barve, Head, Dept. of Botany, Vaze College, Mumbai 15. Dr. Satish Bhalerao, Head, Dept. of Botany, Wilson College Organizing Committee 1. Convenor- Dr. Usha Mukundan, Principal, R. J. College 2. Co-convenor- Deepak Apte, Dy. Director, BNHS 3. Organizing Secretary- Dr. Purushottam Kale, Head, Dept. of Zoology, R. J. College 4. Treasurer- Prof. Pravin Nayak 5. Members- Dr. S. T. Ingale Dr. Himanshu Dawda Dr. Mrinalini Date Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Density on the Cultivation of the Native Mangrove Oyster Crassostrea Tulipa (Lamarck, 1819)
    Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 48(5): 855-868, 2020 The effect of density on the cultivation of Crassostrea tulipa 855 DOI: 10.3856/vol48-issue5-fulltext-2446 Research Articles The effect of density on the cultivation of the native mangrove oyster Crassostrea tulipa (Lamarck, 1819) Lincon José Brunetto1, Carlos Henrique Araújo de Miranda Gomes1, Cassio de Oliveira Ramos1 Francisco Carlos da Silva1, João Paulo Ramos Ferreira1 1 1 Graziela Cleusa Vieira & Claudio Manoel Rodrigues De Melo 1Laboratory of Marine Mollusks, Department of Aquaculture, Federal University of Santa Catarina Florianopolis, Brazil Corresponding author: Claudio Manoel Rodrigues De Melo ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. In Brazil, the cultivation of Crassostrea tulipa (= C. gasar) is gaining in importance. However, little is known about the best conditions for farming. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of oyster density (50, 100, 200, and 400 mL of seeds/0.15 m2; 100, 200, 300, and 400 ind/0.10 m2 (basket area) and 30, 60, 120, and 180 ind/0.13 m2 (lantern floor area) in nursey, juvenile and adult phase, respectively) on the growth and survival of C. tulipa in farm cultivation. In the nursery phase, the 50 mL density resulted in smaller oyster size, as expressed in height and height/length (H/L) ratio (1.31 ± 0.03 mm), compared to other densities, while the length and width was equal among densities. The animals' individual average weight and H/L ratio were negatively influenced by a density of 100 ind/0.10 m2 or bigger. However, animals grown at the density of 200 ind/0.10 m2 did not differ statistically in length or width from those grown with 100 ind/0.10 m2.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Limnology Issn No: 2691-3208
    Freely Available Online INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIMNOLOGY ISSN NO: 2691-3208 Research DOI: 10.14302/issn.2691-3208.ijli-18-2476 The Possibility of Using the Fresh Water Bivalve, Spathopsis Rubens, in The Nile River, El Mahmoudia Water Stream As Bioindicator For Pollution E H Radwan1,*, A Abdel Mawgood2, A Z Ghonim1, R El Nagar1 1Faculty of Science, Damanhour University, Egypt 2Institute of Graduate Studies and Environmental Research, Damanhour University, Egypt Abstract Bivalves are used as bioindicators of heavy metals pollution because they are known to concentrate these elements, providing a time integrated indication of environmental contamination. Trace metals can reach high concentrations in sediments and also in aquatic organisms by bioaccumulation through the food chain. Six heavy metals (Hg, Zn, Pb, Fe, Mg and Cu) were collected and investigated from Abu Hummus, El Behara. The concentration of Hg was high in winter as 2.3µg/g in sediment. The Zn concentration was high in summer in sediment as 8.1µg/g. The Pb concentration was high in winter in water as 3.3µg/l. The concentration of Fe in sediment was high in summer as 492 µg/g. The concentration of Mg was high in sediment as 408µg/g. The concentration of Cu was high in summer in sediment as 301µg/g. The mean concentrations of Fe in the present study are within the permissible limits of law 48/1982 (<1 mg/l) and the guideline of (WHO, 1993) which is <1 mg/l. The mean concentration level of copper is within the permissible limits of law 48/1982 (<1.0 mg/l).
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Introductions of Non-Indigenous Marine
    ICES COOPERATIVE RESEARCH REPORT RAPPORT DES RECHERCHES COLLECTIVES NO. 231 STATUS OF INTRODUCTIONS OF NON-INDIGENOUS MARINE SPECIES TO NORTH ATLANTIC WATERS 1981–1991 Editors: Dr A.L.S. Munro, Dr S.D. Utting, and Prof. I. Wallentinus International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer ISSN 2707-7144 ISBN 978-87-7482-438-1 Palægade 2–4 DK-1261 Copenhagen K Denmark https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5362 May 1999 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page FOREWORD.................................................................................................................................................... iii 1 INTRODUCTION AND TRANSFER OF PLANTS...............................................................................1 1.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Introduced Species in the Different Countries ............................................................................................. 1 1.2.1 Belgium....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.2 Canada......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2.3 Marine species, including phytoplankton, in the Laurentian Great Lakes (Canada and USA) .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]