WP No.60638/12
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2012
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE AJIT J.GUNJAL
WRIT PETITION NO.60638 OF 2012 (GM-KSR)
BETWEEN:
I. MALLAPRABHA VIDYAVARDHAKA SANGH (R) PARISHWAD TALUK KHANAPUR DIST: BELGAUM BY ITS SECRETARY CHANDRAGOUDA MALLANAGOUDA PATIL AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R 0 DEVALATIII TALUK: KIIANAPUR DIST: BELGAUM
2. MALLAPRABIIA VIDYVARDHAKA SANGII (R) PARISHWAD TALUK: KHANAPUR 01ST: BELGAUM BY ITS CHAIRMAN SHRI, ASHOK GURUSIDDAPPA ANGADI AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R 0 PARISH WAD TALUK: KIIANAPUR DIST: BELGAUM, PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.SANJAY S K()TAGERI, ADV.)
APPROPRIATE
WRIT
227
4.
(BY
3.
AND:
2.
1.
TALUK:
AT
BY
MALLAPRABHA
DIST: (R) AGED AT:
DIST:
SAMBARAGI THE
SHRI. THE
R/O DIST:
BY THE
MALLAPRABHA AND
(R) BELGAUM
HAVLOCK
BELGAUM. CAMP
SOCIETY,
HAVLOCK
SMT.K.VIDYAVATHI
OF
THIS
PARISH
PARISHWAD
ITS
PARISHWAD
ITS
IN
PARISHWAD,
HIREMUNAVALLI
THE
REGISTRAR
ENGQUIRY
REGISTRAR
DEPUTY
BELGAUM
BELGAUM.
BELGAUM
CHANDRASHEKAR
ABOUT
BELGAUM.
THE
SECRETARY.
CHAIRMAN
KHANAPUR
PETITION
CONSTITUTION
BELGAUM
WAD,
ROAD,
ROAD
NATURE
WRIT
REGISTRAR
68
VIDYVARDHAKA
VIDYVARDHAKA
GROUP
GROUP
OFFICER
TALUK:
YEARS
OF
TALUIC:
OF
CAMP
IS
OR
SOCIETIES
AGA
SOCIETIES
FILED
OF
KHANAPUR
KHANAPUR.
B$SAVANNEPPA
FOR
ORDRE
OF
OF
:2:
CERTIORARI
UNDER
CO-OPERATIVE
INDIA
Ri
OFFICE
SANGH
SANGH
&
OR
R2)
PRAYING
ARTICLES
OR
DIRECTION,
RESPONDENTS
WP
ANY
No.60638/12
TO
226
ISSUE
OTHER
AND
BY A
lie
inasmuch
hearing,
Advocate
2.
and a
HEARING,
ISSUED QUASHING
NO.DRL/
P.
memo
in
4.
a
3.
The
2.
THIS
Memo
narrow
BY
Smt.Vidvavathi
Even
SONO/
with
seeking
is
learned
THIS
as
RESPONDENT
directed
THE
PETITION
the
is
though
consent,
compass.
DAY.
MA,V.VA.SAM/
granted
subject
dispensation
counsel
ENDORSEMENT
THE
to
the
COMING
take
at
K.
it
COURT
matter
ORDER
NO.
appearing
matter
his
is
learned
notice
1
10/VICHARANCE/
taken
risk.
HEREIN
of
MADE
of
ON
notice
is
Additional
the
DATED
for
up
listed
for
THE
FOR
AS
writ
respondents
the
for
to
PER
WP
for
FOLLOWING:
petition respondents
05.12.2011
petitioner
final
PRELIMINARY
Government
No.60638/12
preliminary
ANNEXURE
1
1-12.
disposal
would
1
files
and
IN 3
contested
initiated
members
Section
approval
Act. Village
accepting and
1960.
The
also
8.
7.
6.
4.
5.
have
Suffice
25
The
Suffice
Both
It
said
in
of
the
the
by-laws
was
is
the
of
respect
registered
petitioner
society
proceedings.
change
the
the
the
by
it
said
it
to
to
were
rival case
Karnataka
certain
of
Sangha.
say
was
report.
say
the
a
and
amended
groups
that
of
registered
that
Sangha
conduct
the
:4:
persons
other
an
certain
Societies
petitioners
entered
inquiry
under
and
members
on
of
who
changes
14.8.1969.
the
were
was
the
Registration
appearance
WP
were
Sangha
that
repealed
of
sought
approved
No.60638/12
took
Parishwad
the
not
under
to
place
4
said
Act,
and
BPT
the
be by
parties
only their
parties petitioner
contention is
dispute
the
society.
required petitioner genuine
respondent
30.07.2011
required
petitioner
a
rights
9.
11.
10.
one
to
to
Prima
society.
between
Ultimately
to
I
approach
Prima
is
line
that
approach
have
to
be
of
has
No.1
indicating
that
as
be
resolved
facie,
order
the
the
well
facie
not
heard
settled
The
and
two
respondent
the
the
learned
I
rejecting
as
applied
dispute
the
am
said
it
the
in
factions
Civil
the
the
that
in
inquiry
appears
a
also
Civil
report
respondent
a
Civil
learned
State.
:5:
Court.
Civil
his
counsel
the
the
of
inter
No.1
Court
Court.
in
the
officer
mind
was
that
report
Court.
petitioner-society
counsel
respect
se
view
before
sent
for
appearing
there
No.1
inasmuch
between
files
and
Nevertheless
that
WP
adjudication
for
appearing
directing of
informed
directing
is
a
No.60638/12
the
approval
the
report
a
them
for
as
dispute
serious
same
is
it
the the
the
the
the
for
on
of
is
to
is St. a
to
order
the
No.1
to
an
Having
accept
why
order
view
inasmuch
(iv)
(iii)
(ii)
(i)
is
12.
perused
passed:
the
that
it
or
Indeed,
the
The
respondents
Rule notify
consideration respondent Annexure-P The
Needless
Petition
is
report
reject
the
required
extent
as
the
is
matter
impugned
matter
whenever
the
he
the
is
issued
of
communication
to
indicated
allowed.’
is
the
to
inquiry
is
say
3
requires
required
petitioner
be
in
quashed.
and
Inquiry
and
stands
No.1
respondent
a
accordance
a
4.
reasoned
communication
report.
above.
statutory
made
remittance
to
officer
at
apply
as
remitted
for
Hence,
Annexure-P.
absolute
order
No,
with
xvell authority
is
WP
his
1
to
not
fresh
shall
the
indicating
law.
No.60638/12
mind
respondent
as
to
to
at
accepted.
following
I
passes
either
am
as of
Advocate
ssI file
memo
Smt.K.Vidyavathi,
appearing
of
appearance
for
respondents
within
learned
:7:
four
Additional
weeks.
1
&
2
WP
is
JUDGE
permitted
No.60638/12
Government
Sd/ to -a