DOCSLIB.ORG

Misc 188609.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Misc 188609.Pdf WILLIAM FERNANDEZ HARDIN “This Unpleasant Business” Slavery, Law, and the Pleasants Family in Post- Revolutionary Virginia n 1799, the Virginia Court of Appeals decided the case of Pleasants v. Pleasants .1 John Marshall, future Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme ICourt, persuaded the court to free more than 400 slaves according to the will of their deceased former master. It was the largest judicial manumission in American history, and yet it has received limited attention. 2 The case is often overlooked, it seems, because the facts are unique and the decision itself was not cited extensively. 3 In addition, the reasoning supporting the decision is extremely technical and complex, making it difficult to decipher. Judges and lawyers of late eighteenth-century Virginia did not, it must be observed, esteem brevity or clarity. The historical value of the Pleasants case, however, comes into view when it and the family dispute that drove the case are placed in a historical context. Presented in this manner, the Pleasants dispute demonstrates how the legal relationship between manumission and the law shaped the lives of Virginians at a pivotal period in the formation of American slavery. In 1790, Virginia was home to more slaves and slaveholders than any other state in the nation, and it would continue to be so through the 1860 census. After the Revolution, slaveholders in Virginia for the first time faced well-organ - ized politically savvy opponents who denied the legitimacy of slavery along moral, religious, and legal lines. Always a small minority of the white popu - lation, nonetheless, antislavery activists compelled slaveholders to justify their slaveholding in religion, morality, and law. Reconstructing the William Fernandez Hardin, J.D., Ph.D., is a history teacher at Montgomery Bell Academy in Nashville, Tennessee. VIRGINIA MAGAZINE OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY VOL. 125 • NO. 3 212 • Virginia Magazine Pleasants dispute provides a fresh insight into how lesser-known slavehold - ers in the post-Revolutionary period responded to the challenge of antislav - ery along these lines. In the dispute, larger forces—the law, antislavery, religion—helped to shape and define a generational debate over slavery at a critical moment in a critical place in the history of emancipations. That debate, spanning a number of years, forced the court to consider the nature of manumission and how it would function in the common law. The court would decide if manumission was the restoration of a natural right to freedom or the ultimate largesse, the gift of a benevolent slaveowner to a grateful slave. THE DISPUTE BEGAN WITH the will of John Pleasants III, a wealthy slavehold - ing Quaker. His plantation, Curles Neck, sat on a marshy peninsula along the James River fifteen or so miles downriver from Richmond. The estate, it was said, abounded in “riches, negroes and grandeur.” 4 On a summer evening in 1771, John Pleasants collapsed in his hallway and died soon after. 5 Like many Virginia planters of the time, his wealth was in his slaves. Numbering 212, they were valued at £10,000; the total value of his estate, slaves included, was tabulated at £12,000. 6 Earlier that year, he had revised his will with the assistance of his eldest son, Robert—a committed abolition - ist, political activist, and religious elder in the Society of Friends (known as the Quakers). 7 After retiring from commerce, the elder Pleasants took an increasingly active role in the Society just as it was attempting to rid itself of slaveholding members. Father and son, in accordance with Quaker antislav - ery imperatives, drafted a will they hoped would free the slaves. There was one major problem: private manumission (the act of freeing of a slave) was illegal in colonial Virginia. Freedom would have to wait until the law changed. According to John Pleasants’s will, elderly slaves of his household—Joe Cooper, old Suckey, Fanny, old Robin, Carpenter Will, old Nat, old Cesar, and Aggy—were set at liberty to live with any of his children they chose and enjoy the “benefit of their [own] labour.” But the trustees of the estate were empowered to revoke their liberty. Freedom was often conditional under the will and contingent, in some cases, on continued economic productivity. Charles White and his sons, for example, were permitted to ply Virginia’s Hardin— ”This Unpleasant Business” • 213 waterways as a batteauxmen as long as White “proved honest” by remitting two-thirds of his earnings to the estate. 8 Other people were retained as quasi- servants under unique terms. 9 The vast majority of Pleasants’s slaves were, however, distributed by lots. Samuel Pleasants of Philadelphia, Robert’s brother, was assigned one-third. Jonathan Pleasants (Robert’s half-brother) and Robert himself each received the remaining thirds. All the slaves were bequeathed according to the following condition: “all of [the slaves] as I shall die possessed with shall be free if they choose it when they arrive to the age of thirty years, and the laws of the land will admit them to be set free with - out their being transported out of the country. I say all my slaves now born or hereafter to be born, whilst their mothers are in the service of me or my heirs, to be free at the age of thirty years as above mentioned, to be adjudged of by my trustees their age.” 10 The antislavery imperatives of the Quakers dovetailed in this case with Robert’s responsibility as executor of his father’s will. 11 That responsibility was doubled when his half-brother Jonathan died and left a similar, but more expansive, provision in his 1777 will. 12 But little could be done until manu - mission became legal. In 1782, the General Assembly, responding to Quaker petitions and political lobbying, did so. 13 Some in the Pleasants family immediately freed their bondsmen—most did not. 14 Robert Pleasants spent the next two decades trying to convince a lot of his kin to emancipate his father’s former slaves. The duty to emancipate was a straightforward issue for Robert Pleasants. By accepting custody of the slaves, family members had implicitly endorsed the beneficent purposes of the freedom provision. Slaveholding family members were, in this view, more like custodial guardians rather than slaveowners. 15 This line of reasoning appealed most strongly to heirs who inherited slaves directly under the will. But it found little traction among heirs who received title to slaves from secondary sources. For example, Jonathan Pleasants, Robert’s half-brother who died in 1776, stipulated that his one-third share of the slaves (received under the will of John Pleasants III) were to be divided among his own heirs under the same freedom provi - sion. And it is this group of subsidiary, often former Quaker, slaveholders that were the most resistant to emancipation and most active in responding to calls of emancipation with proslavery formulations. 214 • Virginia Magazine Robert’s half-sister Mary “Molly” Pleasants is a good example. As a young girl she inherited approximately fifty slaves under her late brother Jonathan’s will. Her parents had died and Robert Pleasants was tasked with her upbringing. Fearing that she might fall prey to “some designing fellow,” he sent her to Philadelphia to live under the watchful care of her Quaker rel - atives. She soon met Charles Logan, the very sort of fellow Pleasants hoped she would avoid. 16 He was the high-born, low-achieving grandson of the esteemed colonial statesman, James Logan. 17 Molly’s fifty or so slaves, along with the land she inherited in Virginia, undoubtedly helped attract Logan’s attention. However, under pressure from Quaker family members and friends, the couple signed a written promise to free the slaves. 18 They, how - ever, reneged on that promise and moved to Virginia and Molly’s sizeable inheritance. Both were subsequently expelled by the Quakers for their con - duct. 19 Robert Pleasants demanded that they fulfill their promise to emanci - pate. 20 When they refused, he consulted Edmund Randolph, one of Virginia’s most respected lawyers, who concluded that the promise could not be legally enforced. Because the deed of emancipation was signed just moments before the wedding ceremony, the law supposed a groom in Logan’s position to be under “particular influences” that were deleterious to sound judgment. Nuptial bliss forestalled by a request to sign the deed, Randolph explained, may have put Logan under sufficient mental duress to negate his legal consent to the manumission. 21 Randolph also concluded that Logan did not possess the right to free Molly’s slaves because the marriage had not yet taken place when the promise was made. 22 Lastly, the promise would fail because Molly was “under age” and lacked the legal capacity to emancipate the slaves or to consent to their manumission. 23 It was a matter like the transfer of any other valuable property under common law. A slave’s humanity, according to Randolph, lacked relevance in a purely legal consid - eration of the matter. Pleasants was not dissuaded, however, but he was troubled. Logan, he suspected, was selling slaves out of state and was wait - ing for a “suitable opportunity” to sell many more. 24 Pleasants therefore enlisted the aid of the Pennsylvania Abolition Society (PAS) to assist in the matter. 25 The PAS had previously assisted Pleasants in several other freedom cases, and he hoped its members could persuade Logan. 26 Hardin— ”This Unpleasant Business” • 215 Mentor and former law partner of John Marshall (1755 –1835), Edmund Ran- dolph (1753 –1813) represented the slaveholding defendants in the Pleasants case. He had returned to his Richmond law practice after resigning as George Washington’s (1732 –1799) secretary of state.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEAES Guide: the Historical Society of Pennsylvania
    PEAES Guide: The Historical Society of Pennsylvania http://www.librarycompany.org/Economics/PEAESguide/hsp.htm Keyword Search Entire Guide View Resources by Institution Search Guide Institutions Surveyed - Select One The Historical Society of Pennsylvania 1300 Locust Street Philadelphia, PA 19107 215-732-6200 http://www.hsp.org Overview: The entries in this survey highlight some of the most important collections, as well as some of the smaller gems, that researchers will find valuable in their work on the early American economy. Together, they are a representative sampling of the range of manuscript collections at HSP, but scholars are urged to pursue fruitful lines of inquiry to locate and use the scores of additional materials in each area that is surveyed here. There are numerous helpful unprinted guides at HSP that index or describe large collections. Some of these are listed below, especially when they point in numerous directions for research. In addition, the HSP has a printed Guide to the Manuscript Collections of the Historical Society of Pennsylvania (HSP: Philadelphia, 1991), which includes an index of proper names; it is not especially helpful for searching specific topics, item names, of subject areas. In addition, entries in the Guide are frequently too brief to explain the richness of many collections. Finally, although the on-line guide to the manuscript collections is generally a reproduction of the Guide, it is at present being updated, corrected, and expanded. This survey does not contain a separate section on land acquisition, surveying, usage, conveyance, or disputes, but there is much information about these subjects in the individual collections reviewed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography (PMHB), LXIII (1939), 285, 286; Wickersham, Education, 249; Arthur S
    PennsylvaniTHE a Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY Anthony Benezet and the Africans' School: Toward A Theory of Full Equality AMONG the many but relatively little-known achievements of A Philadelphia Quaker educator, humanitarian, and social critic Anthony Benezet (1713-1784), probably the most significant, both in his time and in the two centuries since, was his discovery of the inherent equality of the black and white races. By applying his radical Protestant theories of human brotherhood in his classes for black children, he proved to his own satisfaction first, and then to others, that the widespread belief in black mental and moral inferiority was founded only in the fears and prejudices of the white ruling race. Beyond the long-range effect of this start- ling social discovery on a skeptical, sophisticated Enlightenment audience, the impact it had on his own students and their peers and descendants may turn out to be even more important in an ongoing revolution in attitudes and sociopolitical adjustments. Anthony Benezet's Philadelphia had grown to a city of approxi- mately 15,000 inhabitants by the year 1750, when he first began his experiments in teaching black children to read, write, and do simple arithmetic. The port city had never had a large slave popula- tion, owing largely to the commercial nature of its economy. Esti- 399 4<X) NANCY SLOCUM HORNICK October mates of the black population at mid-century range upward from 3,000, of which an unknown proportion were freemen. A very few of the slaves may have been tutored in the homes of their masters, their reading limited to the Bible and catechism.
    [Show full text]
  • Litigating the Lash: Quaker Emancipator Robert Pleasants, the Law
    LITIGATING THE LASH: QUAKER EMANCIPATOR ROBERT PLEASANTS, THE LAW OF SLAVERY, AND THE MEANING OF MANUMISSION IN REVOLUTIONARY AND EARLY NATIONAL VIRGINIA By William Fernandez Hardin Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in History May, 2013 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Richard J.M. Blackett David L. Carlton Daniel J. Sharfstein Daniel H. Usner Copyright © by William Fernandez Hardin All Rights Reserved To Jessica, for loving a grumpy man, and to Ainsley, for making him less grumpy. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank the Virginia Historical Society and the John D. Rockefeller Jr. Library at Colonial Williamsburg for their support in the research of this dissertation—both collections proved invaluable and the staff helped a fledging graduate student navigate unfamiliar terrain. I would also like to thank the Folger Institute’s Center for the History of British Political Thought in Washington D.C. and my fellow participants in the “Changing Conceptions of Property” seminar for the opportunity to spend a summer discussing the relationship between English property law and colonial governance. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt history department for its generous support. It has been a pleasure to learn the craft from such a distinguished group of historians. Professors Michael Bess, Bill Caferro, Katie Crawford, Dennis Dickerson, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, each—in vastly different ways—helped me discover new ways of considering the past and the people who lived there and I thank them for it. I would also like to thank the Vanderbilt Americanist Works-in-Progress Seminar for graciously allowing me to present my work and the invaluable comments and critiques provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Magazine of HISTORY and BIOGRAPHY
    THE Pennsylvania Magazine OF HISTORY AND BIOGRAPHY John Swanwick: Spokesman for "Merchant-Republicanism ' In Philadelphia, 1790-179 8 HE literature on the era of Jeffersonian democracy is largely- dominated by the great triumvirate of Thomas Jefferson, TJames Madison, and Albert Gallatin.* During the last dec- ade, however, historians have been paying more attention to state and local political leaders who played significant roles in the Demo- cratic-Republican movement.1 Among the more notable second-rank * In a somewhat abbreviated form this article was presented as a paper at the annual meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association held at Williamsport, Pa., on Oct. 22-23, 1971. The author wishes to express his gratitude to his colleague, Bernard Sternsher, for his helpful editorial suggestions. 1 Historians have given most of their attention to secondary Federalists, but since i960 the number of modern scholarly biographies of less prominent Republicans has increased. We now have first-rate biographies on Robert R. Livingston, David Rittenhouse, Aaron Burr, Daniel D. Tompkins, John Breckinridge, Luther Martin, Benjamin Rush (2), Samuel Smith, and James Monroe. There are also a number of good unpublished doctoral dissertations. Among the more notable studies are those on Elkanah Watson, Simon Snyder, Mathew Carey, Samuel Latham Mitchell, Melancton Smith, Levi Woodbury, William Lowndes, William Duane, William Jones (2), Eleazer Oswald, Thomas McKean, Levi Lincoln, Ephraim Kirby, and John Nicholson. Major biographies of Tench Coxe by Jacob E. Cooke, of John Beckley by Edmund Berkeley, and of Thomas McKean by John M. Coleman and Gail Stuart Rowe are now in progress. 131 132 ROLAND M.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 4
    BBC Update BBC News: Seven Baptisms! Dr. Thomas M. Strouse, Pastor The Lord blessed Bible Baptist Church by setting in the assembly BBC Update seven believers (cf. I Cor. 12:18), six of whom are from the area. Sev- eral of these folks have been saved recently from the church outreach. We are thankful that the Lord added to Bible Baptist Church (cf. Acts 2:47) including Miss Hannah Akers, Mrs. Yolanda Mendoza, Mr. Jean- not Rossignol, and Mr. and Mrs. Pedro Tarrats. On Sunday, November 7, 2010, we travelled as a caravan to Pastor Main’s church in Stafford Springs for the afternoon service. His church, Galilean Baptist Church, graciously allowed us to use the baptistery to immerse these believ- ers who professed faith in the Lord Jesus Christ (cf. Acts 8:37). To para- Mrs. Yolanda Mendoza phrase Dr. Harold David- 1 son, “a price tag cannot be put on the joy of seeing people come to 1 Num. 21 Vol. Christ and obey Him in baptism and church membership.” As Bible Baptist Church is approaching her first year anniversary (Dec. 4), it is such a blessing to see the Lord confirm the decision to leave an area church and plant Bible Baptist Church and house Bible Baptist Theo- logical Seminary. The Lord Jesus Christ has confirmed Bible Baptist Church as one of His candlesticks in multiple ways, including through New Testament authority, through area pastors’ recognition, through abundant financial blessings, through Satanic opposition, and through a total of eleven being added to membership via baptism. Please pray that Bible Baptist Church will continue to please God in doctrine and practice, as Paul stated, saying, “For do I now persuade men, or God? or do I seek to please men? for if I yet pleased men, I should Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Reports of the Town of Milton, New Hampshire for the Fiscal Year
    19 ANNUAL REPORTS TOWN OF MILTON UNTVERS1DC OF NEW HM1P3K1R* LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORTS of the TOWN OF MILTON NEW HAMPSHIRE For the Fiscal Year Ending December 31st 19 School District and Assessed Valuations FOSTER PRESS FARMINGTON. NEW HAMPSHIRE TABLE OF CONTENTS Animal Control Officer Report 50 Appropriations and Taxes Assessed 18 Comparative Statement 20 Deatiled Statement of Payments 28 Financial Report 44 Fire Warden Report 51 Inventory 68 Inventory of Taxpayers 1-A Juvenile Officer Report 50 Lockhart Trust Fund 62 Milton Emergency Ambulance Report 52 Milton Fire Department 51 Milton Free Public Library 38 Miltorn Mills Fire Chief 58 Milton Mills Fire District Budget 55 Milton Mills Fire District Financial Report 56 Milton Mills Fire District Treasurer's Report 57 Milton Mills Fire District Warrant 53 Milton Police Report 49 Minutes of 1985 Annual Meeting 5 Nute Charitable Organization 60 Rural District Health Council 58 Schedule of Town Property 68 School Report - Index S-2 Summary of Payments 26 Summary of Receipts 25 Summary of Tax Sale Accounts 24 Summary of Trust Funds 59 Town Budget 14 Tax Collector's Report 40 Tax Rates 19 Town Clerk's Report 39 Town Officers 3 Town Warrant 10 Treasurer's Report 42 Trust Funds 63 Unredeemed Taxes from Tax Sale 22 Vital Statistics S-40 Water District - Budget 46 Water District - Collector's Report 48 Water District - Financial Report 47 Water District - Warrant 45 TOWN OFFICERS SELECTMEN John F. Nolan, Chairman 1986 Charles H. Logan 1987 Theodore L. Tasker, Jr. 1988 MODERATOR Donavon C. Current 1986 TOWN CLERK TREASURER Isabelle H.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2015 Newsletter (PDF)
    A PRAIRIE SEIORS ASSOCIATIO PUBLICATIO PRAIRIE TIMES VOLUME 11, ISSUE 4 APRIL, 2015 PSA EWS A SAD FAREWELL AD A HAPPY HELLO!! This will be the last Praire Senior Association ewsletter April 23 rd will be the last Prairie Senior Association sponsored potluck in our current location….Potlucks will continue in our new location! See Keith’s Korner. We cannot move forward with a closed mind, please give our new location a chance. MEMORIES are a very special part of our lives. LOOK BACK FODLY and savor the memories and friends made in years gone by…….. while LOOKIG FORWARD WITH ATICIPATIO to making new memories and friends in the years to come, use this opportunity to grow and enjoy our BRAD EW HOME. * * * * * * * * * * * * A SPECIAL THAK YOU TO ALL THE LOCAL BUSIESSES WHO HAVE SUPPORTED US BY PURCHASIG ADS AUALLY I OUR EWSLETTER * * * * * * * * * * * * THAK YOU to the following for donating door prizes given away at our February Potluck Erica Cawley from Columbus Healthcare for donating two plush blankets. Patsy Easton from Comfort Keepers for two $5.00 gift cards. Patsy also gave out free coupons to Chick-fil-A to all members at the potluck, and invited everyone to a Bingo Breakfast at Chick-fil-A on March 2 nd for fun & prizes. A good time was had by all who attended!! * * * * * * * * * * * * Members participating as contestants in the PSA 3 rd annual chili cook off are; Mary Meyer, Peggy Hines, Bud Leming, Shirley Long, Brenda Held, Ken Shadle, Conrad & Karen Martin, Ruth Carter Prizes are; 1 st place $15.00, 2 nd place $10.00, 3 rd place $5.00 Judges are; Randi Good-Prairie Township, Ellen Barney-St.
    [Show full text]
  • Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia
    Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia by Aaron Vickers Wunsch A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Margaret Crawford, Chair Professor Paul Groth Professor David Henkin Fall 2009 Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia © 2009 by Aaron Vickers Wunsch 1 Abstract Parceling the Picturesque: “Rural” Cemeteries and Urban Context in Nineteenth-Century Philadelphia Aaron V. Wunsch Doctor of Philosophy in the History of Architecture University of California, Berkeley Margaret Crawford, Chair Moving beyond traditional studies of the picturesque as a European-born artistic phenomenon, this dissertation connects the naturalistic treatment of landscape to a particular city’s cultural and economic transformation in the early industrial age. Three narrative strands unite the project. The first traces the arrival of garden-like graveyards on Philadelphia’s periphery. Known after 1830 as “rural” cemeteries, these places were incubators for new conceptions of home, community, and outdoor aesthetic propriety. Closely related to this geographical shift was a vocational one. Beginning in the antebellum decades, several occupations involved in the division and depiction of land recast their services in new terms. Although Philadelphia’s landscape architecture profession eventually emerged from this ferment, my focus is on the period just prior to coalescence – a period when surveyors, horticulturists, and “rural architects” competed for legitimacy (and commissions) in a field without clear-cut boundaries. Embedded in these stories is a third, involving the city as built and imagined.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Saint Joseph Catholic Church 2704 33Rd Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida 34205 • 941.756.3732 • Email: [email protected] • Website: Sjcfl.Org
    Saint Joseph Catholic Church 2704 33rd Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida 34205 • 941.756.3732 • Email: [email protected] • Website: sjcfl.org AUGUST 22, 2021 PASTOR Fr. Rafal Ligenza PAROCHIAL VICAR Fr. Jim Simko MASS SCHEDULE Monday - Saturday �������������� 8:00am Saturday Vigil ������������������������4:00pm Sunday 7:30am • 9:00am • 11:00am ������������������������������������������������������5:30pm RECONCILIATION Saturdays - Following 8:00am Mass and at 3:00pm Thursdays - Before First Friday and Eve of Holy Days Following 8:00am Mass SACRAMENTS Baptism Registration Call the parish office at 756-3732� Wedding Registration Call the parish office (756-3732) at least six (6) months in advance of proposed wedding date about Marriage Preparation classes and requirements for the Sacrament of Marriage� John 6:68 Twenty-First Sunday in Ordinary Time — Year B — 2 — ♦ TOLord, WHOM SHALL WE GO? You have the words of Church Address 3100 26th St. W., Bradenton, FL 34205 John 6:68 Parish Office: Location and Mailing Address eternal life. 2704 33rd Ave. W., Bradenton, FL 34205 OFFICE HOURS Sunday Reflection With Fr. Rafal Monday - Friday ................8:00am-4:00pm Closed Noon - 1:00pm for lunch Dear St. Joseph Parishioners and Visitors, Contact Information As we gather on this 21st Sunday in Ordinary Time, the First Phone ....................................... 941.756.3732 Reading is showing us the person of Joshua asking his fellow Israelites to make the Email ........................................ [email protected] final decision when he gathered the tribes at Shechem. "You can turn back." Joshua Website ....................................www.sjcfl.org told them. "Return to the gods of the culture if you want. But as for me and my house- Emergency - After Hours/Weekends hold, we will serve the Lord." .....................................................941.756.3644 In today's Gospel Jesus also does something similar; he asks us to make a deci- Parish Staff sion.
    [Show full text]
  • “I'm Looking for Jack Bauer at That Time”: 24, Torture
    “I’M LOOKING FOR JACK BAUER AT THAT TIME”: 24, TORTURE, & GETTING YOUR HANDS DIRTY IN THE NAME OF IDEOLOGY By RYAN JAMES THOMAS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS IN COMMUNICATION WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY The Edward R. Murrow School of Communication MAY 2008 To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the thesis of RYAN JAMES THOMAS find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ____________________________________ Chair ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank my committee chair, Dr. Elizabeth Blanks Hindman, for her advice, insight, dedication, and suggestions, all of which have helped shape this project into what it is today, not to mention keeping me on track with timely yet thorough feedback. I would also like to extend my sincere thanks to the rest of my committee, Dr. Susan Dente Ross, Dr. Michael Salvador, and Dr. Richard Taflinger. Each of them has offered interesting, considerate, and challenging feedback, and both this project and I are considerably richer as a result of their input. To my girlfriend, Alexandra Ford: thank you for your constant encouragement, support, and love. You have helped me meet deadlines, keep on track, stay focused, and remain positive. Perhaps most importantly, you make me smile. A lot. So thanks for that. You are an unending source of joy in my life. Finally, I wish also to thank my parents for all the encouragement they have given me from an early age to aspire to be all that I can be, instilling in me a love for books, education, and self-improvement that I have to this day.
    [Show full text]
  • Down but Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University History Theses Department of History 12-16-2015 Down But Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era Jason Butler Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses Recommended Citation Butler, Jason, "Down But Not Out: How American Slavery Survived the Constitutional Era." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2015. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/history_theses/99 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of History at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOWN BUT NOT OUT: HOW AMERICAN SLAVERY SURVIVED THE CONSTITUTIONAL ERA by JASON E. BUTLER Under the Direction of H. Robert Baker, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Whether through legal assault, private manumissions or slave revolt, the institution of slavery weathered sustained and substantial blows throughout the era spanning the American Revolution and Constitutional Era. The tumult of the rebellion against the British, the inspiration of Enlightenment ideals and the evolution of the American economy combined to weaken slavery as the delegates converged on Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Even in the South, it was not hard to find prominent individuals working, speaking or writing against slavery. During the Convention, however, Northern delegates capitulated to staunch Southern advocates of slavery not because of philosophical misgivings but because of economic considerations. Delegates from North and South looked with anticipation toward the nation’s expansion into the Southwest, confident it would occasion a slavery-based economic boom.
    [Show full text]