Second International Humanitarian Pledging Conference for Syria State of Kuwait | 15 Jan

Second International Humanitarian Pledging Conference for Syria State of Kuwait | 15 Jan. 2014 Contents

1. Agenda (1 page) 2. Regional Dashboard Funding Update 2013/2014 (1 page) 3. Beneficiaries Needs Targeted and Assisted in

2013 (1 page) 4. Common Planning

Framework 2014 (16 pages) 5. How Humanitarian Funds for the Syria Crisis were

spent in 2013 (41 pages)

Other relevant documents including the SHARP and RRP6 is provided digitally on a USB flash drive.

Photo credit: WFP/Abeer Etefa Regional Dashboard funding update - Syria Crisis

Requirement 2014 $6.54 billion TURKEY $522.3 $4.34 billion Requirement 2013 million 37% $2.46 billion Funded 2013 63% $372.3 $1.87 billion Gap 2013 million SYRIA $2.27 billion

CYPRUS $1.41 billion LEBANON 28% IRAQ $1.72 72% $552.5 billion million 47% 31% 53% 69% $1.21 $310.8 billion million West Bank ISRAEL JORDAN $1.20 billion 27%

EGYPT 73% $168.8 $976.5 million million

52% 48% $66.7 SAUDI ARABIA million

$2.28 billion ($1.41 billion requirements for SHARP in 2013) $4.26 billion ($2.98 billion requirements for RRP5 in 2013) Syria Humanitarian Assistance Response Plan (SHARP) Syria Regional Refugee Response Plan (RRP) (Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt)

9.3million 6.5million 4.1million 2.7million people in need of internally displaced Refugees targetted Host community humanitarian aid people targetted SHARP FUNDING BY SECTOR RRP FUNDING BY SECTOR Funded Shortfall (million $) Required (million $) Required 2013 2013 Required 2013 2014 2014 518.3 99.6 FOOD & AGRICULTURE 1118.7 Food Security 1152.1 716.6 NON-FOOD ITEMS (NFIs) 420.9 130.3 212.9 & SHELTER Livelihoods 273.0 33.3 HEALTH 233.4 124.6 52.7

WASH 154.8 53.2 15.2 Protection 559.4 338.8

EDUCATION 103.2 37.4 8.3

EARLY RECOVERY 71.1 WASH 499.2 317.8 & LIVELIHOODS 6.7 36.4

PROTECTION & COMMUNITY 73.5 SERVICES 22.8 11.9 Health 442.3 242.1

COORDINATION 50.8 29.7 -2.4 Education 393.3 243.5 STAFF SAFETY SERVICES 6.2 6.9 18.5

LOGISTICS CLUSTER 12.1 10.4 4.0 Shelter 367.1 398.1

NUTRITION 30.0 3.7 6.8 NFI 104.2 NFI 265.2 EMERGENCY 1.6 0.0 2.0 TELECOMMUNICATIONS

CLUSTER NOT YET SPECIFIED 69.8 0.0 Sector not included 62.2 0 in the RRP5 0 200 400 600 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Creation date: 4 Jan 2014 Sources: UNHCR, OCHA Syria Crisis : beneficiaries needs targeted and assisted in 2013 PEOPLE TARGETED, REACHED AND IN NEED (2013) (Inside Syria as of 31 Dec 2013)

Percentage Reached Targeted Targeted In need In need of revised in 2013 Jan 2013 revised Jan 2013 revised target (million) (million) June 2013 (million) June 2013 reached reached (million) (million) in 20131 WASH 23 million 100% 10.00 1.50 10.00 4.00 23.00

Treatment, vaccinations, 76% 4.10 4.00 5.40 6.80 Health consultations etc. 4.00

IEHK and other kits 43% 2.30 n/a 5.40 4.00 6.80

NFIs in need NFIs & Shelter 132% 4.86 1.56 3.67 1.50 6.80

Cash 61% 0.56 n/a 0.92 1.50 6.80

Shelter 24% 0.09 n/a 0.37 1.50 4.25 Protection & Community 2 Services 34% 1.03 3.00 3.00 3.00 6.80

Early Recovery 3 & Livelihoods 57% 0.40 0.07 0.70 0.07 6.80

Food & Food targeted 89% 3.94 2.50 4.42 4.00 4.42 Agriculture Agriculture 14% 0.09 n/a 0.62 4.00 4.00

Education 125% 1.50 0.50 1.20 1.00 2.58

Nutrition 63% 0.80 n/a 1.27 n/a 1.61

0 4 8 12 16

1The percentage achieved may decrease as the targets are revised up with the revision of the SHARP. 2As of 30 Nov 2013 3As of 30 Sept 2013 BENEFICIARIES TARGETED AND ASSISTED (2013) (In Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt, as of 30 Nov 2013) Refugees Refugees targeted assisted 2013 2013 (million) (million)

3.54 2.21 Protection

2.95 1.6 NFI NFI

Health 2.57 1.25

Livelihoods 2.49 1.14

Food Security 2.41 2.2

Shelter 1.59 0.84

WASH 1.27 1.24

Education 0.81 0.67

Sector not included 0.35 0.12 in the RRP

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

©IRIN

KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 Syria Crisis

Contents

1. The Evolving Context Page 1 2. Efforts and Achievements 2013 Page 4 3. Combined Requests for 2014 Page 6 4. Priorities Page 9 5. Comprehensive Regional Strategy Page 13

United Nations, January 2014 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

1 THE EVOLVING CONTEXT

Since Kuwait hosted the first pledging conference on 30 January 2013 the humanitarian situation has worsened significantly inside Syria and become more complex affecting the fragile stability of the region. The social, economic and political impact of the conflict in the region has intensified and become more complex. The most vulnerable groups are in particular need of immediate protection and support. The protracted nature of the conflict threatens to derail the development trajectory and to unravel the hard won development gains that neighbouring countries had achieved over the past several years. The numbers speak for themselves: During 2013 the Number of people in need number of conflict-related deaths surpassed 100,000, in Syria (in millions) with 650,000 injured. At the time of last year’s conference, 2 million Syrian women, children and men 37% increase since April 2013 9.3 were internally displaced, and 4 million overall needed humanitarian assistance within Syria1. Today, these numbers have reached 6.5 million internally displaced 6.8 and 9.3 million in need overall, of which 46% are children. Polio has re-emerged for the first time since 1999. Access remains a critical issue: 2.5 million 4 Syrians are in areas hard to reach by humanitarian responders as a result of insecurity. Over 250,000 2.5 people are in locations besieged by the Syrian 1 Government or opposition groups without access to basic services. They are in immediate need of SHARP 2012 SHARP 2012 SHARP 2013 SHARP 2013 SHARP 2014 protection and support. The number of Syrians seeking (Jun-2012) (Sep-2012) (Dec-2012) (Apr-2013) (Sep-2013) refuge from the conflict in neighbouring states, which stood at 583,000 this time last year, has increased by a factor of four, and now stands at 2.3 million. Of 540,000 Palestine refugees in Syria, 440,000 are now in urgent 2 Refugee population in 2012, 2013 need of assistance . Over 70,000 Palestine refugees and projection 2014 are estimated to have fled to Lebanon, Jordan and 4,500 Egypt, and elsewhere. Egypt 4,000 Syria itself has witnessed a year of continued Iraq devastation and brutality, amidst rapidly shifting 3,500 Turkey allegiances and battle lines, widespread human rights 3,000 abuses and the documented use of chemical weapons. Jordan Public services and infrastructure have continued to 2,500 erode. Between 4,100 and 4,500 schools are out of use 2,000 Lebanon due to damage, destruction, or because they are used 1,500 as IDP shelters. In addition, 64% out of 88 assessed hospitals have been impacted and are largely out of 1,000 service3. Local production of medicines has been 500 2 reduced by 65–70%. .This has had an immediate 0 Thousands impact on the availability of life-saving medicines and Dec 2012 Dec 2013 June 2014 Dec 2014 medical supplies. Factories are struggling with interruptions to supply-lines and insecure routes. Shelter needs have vastly augmented under the pressure of mass-displacement. Accelerating inflation and disruptions to harvests and trade routes has meant that access to essential commodities, such as food, fuel, agricultural inputs and basic household items, has become increasingly limited. A recent Joint Rapid Food and Nutrition Assessment suggests that 9.9 million people are unable to purchase sufficient food to maintain their usual level of consumption. Of these 6.3

1 OCHA Regional Dashboard, 26 January 2013. 2 Sources: RRP4, RRP6, SHARP 2013, SHARP 2014, UNRWA. 3 ESCWA 2013

1 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

million are in critical need of sustained food assistance4. With more than half of all Syrian families now living below the poverty line, and a near 45% unemployment rate, household resilience is quickly diminishing. As the crisis moves towards its fourth year, the spectre of a “lost generation” of youth, with no access to education or work, looms over Syria5. Neighbouring countries have borne the brunt of the impact from the outflow of the crisis and have seen their national burdens grow exponentially over the past year. Host communities, which have welcomed 84% of all Syrian refugees into their midst, have seen their livelihoods come under increasing strain, particularly in locations where poverty levels were already high. The mass refugee influx has imposed new and unsustainable demands on local utilities, services and infrastructure, on schoolrooms, health facilities and housing. Wages have been driven downwards at the same time that prices, particularly for food, fuel and accommodation, have risen. Last year, hosting communities hardly featured in the discussions of 2013 conference. This year, they are a central element: 2.7 million affected nationals around the region are now targeted in the appeals. The surge in refugee arrivals since the beginning of 2013 has occurred at a time of wider economic difficulty in the region6, propelled by the Syrian conflict and other sources of political uncertainty. Smaller economies, and in particular those that are highly dependent on foreign direct investment, regional trade and tourism, have experienced the most strain, as investors shift their attention elsewhere, and as visitors stay away. The resulting effects on Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have been negative, with Jordan reporting a 2% shortfall on projected growth during 2013, and Lebanon a 3% shortfall in the same period. Poverty has worsened. The effects on employment levels, particularly in the construction and hospitality sectors, have been negative. In Lebanon, unemployment is expected to double, rising above 20%, with the national deficit widening by $2.6 billion and a cumulative economic loss reaching $7.5 billion by end 2014. Critically, the economic slowdown has affected public revenues precisely at a time when governments have struggled to meet the additional costs raised by the growing refugee presence for healthcare, education and municipal services, and subsidies for food, fuel and electricity. In the smaller and more exposed host economies the mounting refugee presence has moved beyond humanitarian parameters to become a matter of structural instability. The risk of a spread of communicable human diseases (including polio) has risen, together with higher risks of animal disease transmission from Syria. As a result, governments have started to engage more closely with the international community in assessing additional fiscal needs and determining modalities for meeting them. Substantive progress on this front has been achieved particularly in Lebanon and Jordan, where national resilience and stability plans have been finalised and in Lebanon a multi- donor trust fund has been established. This will help Poverty & Unemployment rates in Syria to ensure that the massive assistance effort becomes more sustainable over time. (2010, 2013) The Syrian conflict has continued to polarize the region, and to affect local politics inside Unemployment neighbouring states. In Lebanon, Iraq, Jordan and Turkey, the mass arrival of refugees has produced Upper Poverty Line heightened security concerns in border areas, and in localities where tensions between Syrians and host Lower Poverty communities have flared. Line

The common planning assumptions of the UN Food Poverty response plans for 2014 are based on a projection of current trends. Within Syria, the SHARP’s most 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% likely scenario foresees a further deterioration in the 2013 2010 humanitarian situation, marked by a continuation and escalation of the crisis countrywide. This will

4 Special Report: Crop and Food Security Assessment Mission (CFSAM) to the Syrian Arab Republic. FAO and WFP at the request of the Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform, July 2013. 5 See http://www.unicef.org/emergencies/syria/70207_67574.html. 6 Government of Jordan National Resilience Plan, (Draft 2013); World Bank Lebanon Economic and Social Impact Assessment, (2013).

2 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

result in increased disruption of social services, including the further destruction/disruption of health infrastructure; a deepening of the economic crisis; further erosion of coping mechanisms; increasing vulnerability; and increased displacement and refugee outflows. The planning scenario assumes continued cooperation with the Syrian government, Syrian NGOs, and host governments in the region, to increase outreach and access to affected populations, and for people who are seeking international protection. It is assumed that protection space in refugee-hosting countries will be preserved, with continued collaboration among actors to respond collectively to the protection rights of refugees and children, and to address rising gender-based violence in both Syria and the region. Calls for international burden-sharing will continue, and all countries beyond the region are urged to put in place mechanisms to allow refugees humanitarian access. The crisis highlights the international community’s overriding imperative to address without delay the urgent needs of those most immediately affected. At the same time, the complex impact of the crisis calls for concerted attention to be given to strengthening the resilience, at community, municipal and central levels, of vulnerable host countries now and over the medium term. Governments, donors, international financial institutions, humanitarian, development and private sector actors are coming together to develop a shared regional comprehensive strategy. This combined effort will support national leadership of the response in each country, strengthen individual and collective resilience and provide longer-term development accompaniment of SHARP and RRP6 efforts. The comprehensive regional strategy also promotes the development of common analytical tools for decision-making, gap analysis, strategic monitoring and for targeting of efficient and effective crisis response actions. Several governments have already initiated or completed consultative processes to define national resilience and stabilization plans. Ultimately however, humanitarian and longer-term interventions, even if fully funded and effectively executed, cannot have sustained impact without a political solution to the conflict.

3 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

3 EFFORTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS DURING 2013

The sharp deterioration in the humanitarian situation during 2013 was met by a targeted effort to mitigate the worst effects of violence and destruction inside Syria and support neighbouring countries. Despite the ongoing fighting and resulting access challenges inside Syria, the delivery of urgent assistance has increased. The key challenges in host countries continue to be expansion of programmes to keep pace with accelerating refugee arrivals in different locations, and to match needs with the resources available by targeting assistance to those in the most acute need. During 2013, the UN and its partners provided humanitarian assistance to up to 10 million people inside Syria and 2.2 million people in countries hosting refugees. The following graphics summarize achievements for 20137. Though targeted at beneficiaries, international assistance has in several cases had a broader positive impact on local economies.

7 The reported number of beneficiaries reached by the Health sector in Syria refers to end of October 2013

4 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

Increased efforts were made throughout the year to reinforce the planning and assessment work of the host governments, and to improve the coordination between UN plans and programmes inside Syria and those in the host countries. Governments and international actors developed a Stabilisation Road Map in Lebanon and a National Resilience Plan in Jordan to assess the longer term needs. Other initiatives include the “No Lost Generation Initiative” and “A Resilience-Based Development Response”8. The resolve of millions of Syrian women, children and men in coping with family dislocations, overcoming personal trauma, making do with ever-diminishing resources, and in extending help and support to fellow citizens through informal networks in the face of deepening divisions, is often overlooked. The continuing generosity of Lebanese, Jordanian, Turkish, Egyptian, Iraqi and Palestinian communities in sharing their homes, schoools and clinics, and in coping with the resulting strains and tensions must also be recognised. Central and local authorities in several host countries moved quickly in the past year to provide assistance to the most affected areas. To do so, they have assessed both immediate and medium/longer term needs with increasing specificity and sought ways to mobilize scarce resources, despite mounting national resource constraints. Central and municipal governments have worked increasingly closely with international partners to plan and provide humanitarian assistance and resilience-based to expand public service coverage. For its part, the international community re-doubled its efforts to provide urgent assistance in 2013, although needs continued to outpace the response. Altogether, funds received through UN appeals from the donors amounted to US$3 billion. This far exceeds the US$1.5 billion appealed for at the Kuwait conference in January 2013, and represents nearly 70% of revised requirements for the year. At least an additional $1.4 billion was reeceived outside of the appeals9. At a total of at least US$4.4 billion, the combined funding received in 2013 was more than four times higher than that received in 2012. This sum represents nearly one- third of all humanitarian funding in 2013, a clear indication of both the unprecedented scale of the crisis and of the international community’s commitment to the people of Syria. Of the total funding channelled through the UN appeals, US$1 billion was committed for response inside Syria, and US$2 billion in host countries.

2012 Funding for the Syria crisis: 2013 Funding for the Syria crisis: $963 million $4.44 billion

$1.40 billion $403 31% million $560 $3.04 42% million billion 58% 69%

Appeal funding Other Appeal funding Other

8 See: http://www.unicef.org/emergencies/syria/70207_67574.html. See also: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/rbas/doc/SyriaResponse/Syria_UNDP_response_brochure_Dec13_Final.pddf 9 OCHA Financial Tracking System

5 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

4 COMBINED REQUESTS, STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES FOR 2014

Summary

During 2014, the SHARP and RRP6 will address these increasing humanitarian and resilience needs in Syria and the neighbouring countries. The combined budgetary requirements for the Syria crisis are US$ 6.5 billion, as defined in the two appeals. In the 2014 SHARP, UN agencies, IOM and INGOs working on the Syria response seek US$ 2.27 billion through 122 projects to respond to 9.3 million people in need of critical humanitarian aid across the country. In the 2014 RRP6, 108 UN agencies, IOM, national and international NGOs working on the Syria response seek US$ 4.2 billion across all sectors to respond to a projected total of 4.1 million refugees (and an aggregate total of 6.8 million people) in need of critical assistance and 2.7 million affected nationals living in host communities. In the first six months, US$ 3.6 billion is required (US$ 2.18 billion in hosting countries and US$ 1.42 billion in Syria). Both plans are strategic and flexible. The following graphics indicate targets by sector in 2014. In addition, Jordan and Lebanon are both appealing for support to meet increased requirements to address the impact of the Syria crisis.

6 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

Funding requirements (per sector, country, priority level)

The following tables summarize the financial requests made through the SHARP 2014, RRP6 and national plans of Lebanon and Jordan.

SHARP 2014 funding requirements for Syria (per sector) in million USD Requirements Requirements Full for first six for first six Requirements Sector requirements months Jan- months as % of July-December 2014 Jun 2014 full Coordination 50.8 (not broken down by six months) Early recovery and 71.1 46.2 65% 24.9 livelihoods Education 103.2 63.0 61% 40.2 Emergency 1.6 (not broken down by six months) telecommunications Food & agriculture 1118.7 637.7 57% 481.0 Health 233.4 228.7 98% 4.7 Logistics 12.1 (not broken down by six months) Non-food items and shelter 420.9 252.5 60% 168.4 Nutrition 30 29.4 98% 0.6 Protection 73.5 72.0 98% 1.5 Staff safety services 6.2 (not broken down by six months) Water, sanitation and 154.8 91.3 59% 63.5 hygiene Total 2276.3 1420.8 63% 855.5

RRP6 funding requirements (per host country) in million USD

in USD millions First six months 2014 by category Total last Host Country Total Life-saving Capacity- Total first six months Vulnerabilities Govts 2014 measures building six months 2014

Egypt 168.8 60.9 31.5 8.9 101.4 67.4 4.3

Iraq 552.5 170.7 99.1 17.7 287.4 265.1 -

Jordan 1,200.7 391.2 252.3 37.6 681.1 519.6 413.7

Lebanon 1,723.9 526.2 260.8 62.7 849.6 874.2 165.1

Turkey 522.4 147.3 86.3 23.7 257.3 265.1 -

Totals 4,264.7* 1,296.3 730.0 150.6 2,176.8 1,991.4 583.1 *this includes USD 96.4 million in regional requirements

7 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

2014 Lebanon Stabilization Requirements Description Appealed funds (USD) Remarks

This budget represents about 25% of the total 2014 budget Stabilization interventions of UN , of RRP6 ($ 1,888,974,546). It includes resources for affected Government and implementing 470,580,162 Lebanese ($406,997,485 equal to 21.5%) and for Lebanese partners included in RRP6 returnees from Syria ($ 63,582,677 equal to 3.4%).

Includes estimated totals for Tracks I and II, with interventions which also appear in the RRP6 subtracted to Roadmap stabilization interventions for 138,700,000 avoid double‐counting. (Total Tracks I and II for 2014: $369m 2014 not included in RRP6 ‐ Stabilization interventions also appearing in the RRP6: $230.3m = $138.7m) Other stabilization interventions This budget reflects UN stabilization interventions outside outside the Lebanon roadmap and the 16,200,000* the roadmap and RRP6. RRP6 Stabilization interventions support Lebanese institutions and people regardless of sectors. Roadmap Tracks I (immediate impact) and II (short to medium‐term delivery) are limited to 2‐3 national priorities per sector only aimed alleviating the impact of the government’s budget and Total Stabilization Needs for Lebanon vulnerable communities, deducting those which also appear 625,480,162 for 2014: in the RRP6 to prevent duplication. Other UN resilience‐ based interventions provide a sum total of stabilization needs for Lebanon for 2014 ($625,480,162). Each directly responds to the social and economic impacts of the Syrian conflict on highlighted in the economic and social impact assessment. *Estimates reflect 2014 needs only. Additional priority interventions are detailed in the Roadmap.

National Resilience Plan for Jordan funding requirements (per sector) in USD Sector 2014 2015 2016 All Years Education 110,250,000 126,500,000 158,000,000 394,750,000 Energy 35,300,000 44,840,000 30,000,000 110,140,000 Health 154,207,600 162,217,000 167,702,000 484,126,600 Housing 1,913,000 1,714,000 1,629,000 5,256,000 Livelihoods & Employment 50,150,000 53,800,000 36,800,000 140,750,000 Municipal Services 79,834,800 72,895,000 53,124,000 205,853,800 Protection & Social Protection 113,533,136 114,483,136 85,994,549 314,010,821 Water and Sanitation 186,036,000 365,018,000 199,670,000 750,724,000

Sub Total: NRP Programmatic Response 731,224,536 941,467,136 732,919,549 2,405,611,221

Sub Total: Subsidies for Syrian Refugees 208,000,000 250,000,000 300,000,000 758,000,000

Sub Total: Security Support 291,650,000 320,815,000 352,896,500 965,361,500 Grand Total 1,230,874,536 1,512,282,136 1,385,816,049 4,128,972,721

* The NRP figures are indicative as of 6 January 2014 and may be subject to further changes.

8 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

5 PRIORITIES

Common Priorities

The SHARP and the RRP6 will pursue life-saving interventions, backed, where feasible, by targeted, quick- impact actions to promote host community stability and resilience. In Lebanon and Jordan this will additionally be comprehensively supported by national plans. It will provide protection to vulnerable categories, including children and Palestine refugees from Syria. Considering the significant increase in the number of beneficiaries and in protection concerns, the 2014 SHARP is ensuring a more strategic focus beyond the delivery of aid to ensure stronger responses in protection response, local livelihoods and resilience, and social cohesion. Likewise within the RRP, there is an important recognition that refugee protection can be maintained by enhancing social cohesion and investing in local service delivery, infrastructure, economy, and social support. The growing engagement of development agencies in and around the evolving RRP and national plans reflects this broader approach. A full prioritization of expenditures and actions, by sector and geographical location, is provided in each of the of the SHARP 2014 and RRP 6 documents. Key humanitarian priorities are highlighted here below.

Priorities in Syria

Humanitarian actors have undertaken a decentralised, inter-sector geographical prioritization of needs at the district level in order to support efficient targeting, planning and implementation and to ensure that resources are allocated impartially, equitably and transparently. The analysis of needs will be regularly updates as the situation evolves, as part of the recurrent monitoring framework of the SHARP 2014.

The First Six Months

The inter-sector humanitarian forum in Syria has performed an analysis of the consolidated funding requirements for the first 6 months of 2014, according to which 65% of the funding requirements (USD 1.42 billion) will need to be obtained during the first half of the year. A number of policy, programme and operational factors, as well as the specifics of the country context are taken into consideration:

 emphasis on priority need for life-saving emergency food provision

 emergency health needs, including life-saving medicines and medical supplies, trauma, mental health and epidemic control.

 Vaccination campaigns, including for polio

 the mainstreaming of child protection

 nutritional support

 facilitation of safe access to basic services in shelters, host communities and conflict-affected areas

 labour-intensive rehabilitation of damaged infrastructure in relatively stable areas and host communities

 seasonal nature of some key humanitarian programmes

 logistical obstacles with procurement and delivery of humanitarian supplies priority programmatic geographies and indicators across all the key sectors

9 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

Capacity and Access in Syria In Syria there are currently 15 UN Agencies and 18 international NGOs10 working in all governorates, with 112 international staff and 1,439 national staff (not including 3,700 UNRWA national staff)11. Further capacity would be improved by expeditious approval of visa requests for international staff and a further increase of INGOs registrations. This would allow the UN to partner with more INGOs, and ease procedures with local NGOs. With greater access, the ability to do assessments, monitor and verify aid, and report back in

accordance with international standards and protocols, will increase.

Capacity in 2013

Despite prevailing constraints, staff capacity has increased significantly from June to December 2013, particularly in November and December, both in terms of numbers as well as geographical spread. The UN and IOM expanded their presence to 13 governorates. The approval by the Government of Syria on 27 November 2013 to open two new planned UN Hubs in Quamishli (Al-Hasakeh) and Aleppo City (Aleppo), will sharply increase capacity to decentralize and deliver assistance. Although the number of UN international staff has recently decreased in line with security restrictions and programme criticality over the course of the year, the overall staffing capacity has increased by 17% in addition to the establishment of ‘facilitators’ in key locations to enable and monitor delivery of programmes. International NGOs have increased in number by 29% (to 18) and overall staffing and volunteers by 28% with expanded presence to 10 governorates through focal points and facilitators. When the pending visa requests for international staff are approved, further capacity would be rapidly enabled.

10 Note: There are three NGOs which are registered but not yet operational in Syria. 11 Note: Numbers of international staff in Syria are subject to some variation. The number of international staff cited here does not include OPCW or UN Mission staff.

10 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

Impact of potentially increased capacities to respond

Enhanced operational capacity of national and international humanitarian responders and administrative support to the members of humanitarian community would:

 Enable an expansion in the network of field coordination hub to accelerate assessments and delivery.

 Enable more timely and accurate staff security assessments to be made

 Improve local capacity to engage in early recovery and resilience interventions.

Priorities in Host Countries

EGYPT - Requirements by category $ millions (first 6 months)

A: 61 B: 32 C: 9 Last 6 months: 67.4

0% 10%20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%

A: Life Saving B: Preventing deterioration of vulne rabilities C: Capacity-building/Resilience

IRAQ - Requirements by category $ millions (first 6 months)

A: 171 B: 99 C:18 Last 6 months: 265.1

0% 10%20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A: Life Saving B: Preventing deterioration of vulnerabilities C: Capacity-building/Resilience

11 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

JORDAN - Requirements by category $ millions (first 6 months)

A: 391 B: 252 C:38 Last 6 months: 519.6

0% 10%20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A: Life Saving B: Preventing deterioration of vulnerabilities C : Capacity-building/Resilience

LEBANON - Requirements by category $ millions (first 6 months)

A: 526 B: 261 C:63 Last 6 months: 874.2

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%90% 100%

A: Life Saving B: Preventing deterioration of vulnerabilities C : Capacity-building/Resilience

TURKEY - Requirements by category $ millions (first 6 months)

A: 147 B: 86 C:24 Last 6 months: 265.1

0% 10%20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

A: Life Saving B: Preventing deterioration of vulnerabilities C : Capacity-building/Resilience

12 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

RRP Requirements by category (First 6 months)

6 TOWARDS A COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL STRATEGY

The Syrian crisis and its ever-widening effects continue to escalate and deepen across the region, with profound consequences in the political, security, fiscal, economic and social domains which impose enormous strains on the resources and capacities of governments, of communities and of the international aid system. Measures to stabilise livelihoods and communities and to restore eroded essential services are required to complement urgent life-saving interventions. To coherently address these complex requirements, a Comprehensive Regional Strategy is under preparation. The essential elements of the Comprehensive Regional Strategy currently under development (and of which a first draft was endorsed by host governments, development and humanitarian partners on 4 November 2013) are:  to assure a comprehensive response, simultaneously integrating humanitarian, development, macro- economic and fiscal support interventions which together strengthen resilience, stability and social cohesion;  in all affected countries, to support and sustain communities under threat, to reduce the risk of gender-based violence and to support sustainable livelihoods and learning opportunities;  in host countries, to meet the needs of the most vulnerable refugees and host communities, whilst supporting sustainable development and increasing resilience to current and future shocks;  to support host countries (national governments, local authorities, civil society organisations and the private sector) to maintain and sustain social and economic services, stimulate investment in

13 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014

livelihoods and economic development and obtain access to additional ODA, budgetary support and investments;  to support national leadership and coordination of the response in each country to ensure that strategies, policies, plans and interventions are appropriate to the social, economic and political realities of each country and that national capacities for service delivery are strengthened;  to assure robust, comprehensive vulnerability and capacity assessments, to enhance knowledge bases that can drive gap analyses and inform resilience-focused development interventions;  to establish mutual accountability frameworks between host governments and their partners which generate monitoring frameworks or dashboards, together with analytical tools for decision-making and prioritization of resource allocations to cost-effective interventions, targeted to reach the most vulnerable.

The Comprehensive Regional Strategy is scheduled to be completed by end-April 2014.

 The draft strategy has helped to guide the development of this common planning framework document for the SHARP and RRP6 2014 appeals, both of which include proposals for supporting early recovery, community stabilization, resilience and capacity-building, whether in Syria or in host communities in neighbouring countries.  It has been informed by the UN Development Group paper “A Resilience-Based Development Response to the Syria Crisis”.  In addition, the No Lost Generation initiative underscores the combined humanitarian and development imperative of enabling Syrian children and youth to continue their education, even under the most adverse circumstances.  Country chapters for the strategy are under formulation.  Jordan and Lebanon launched national planning consultations in the second half of 2013 and completed their respective stability and resilience plans.  Following an assessment of the impact of the Syrian crisis, Lebanon has developed a Road Map of Priority Interventions for Stabilization, while the World Bank-managed Lebanon Syrian Crisis Trust Fund has been launched.  Work is progressing on development of accountability and analytical frameworks for strengthened gap analysis, prioritization, targeting and costing of strategic interventions, aimed at addressing, within a common strategic framework: immediate humanitarian needs, individual and communal resilience, macro-economic development and fiscal stability.  UN agencies and partners are working on developing shared monitoring and evaluation frameworks for RRP6, SHARP 2014 and for development programming which is integrated with, and supportive of, national resilience and stabilization plans.  Delivery modalities are being examined for their capacity to effectively support locally-adopted resilience and recovery strategies of affected populations living in very different national contexts. Four possible delivery channels are under scrutiny: (a) central governments; (b) local authorities and local associations; (c) UN agencies and INGOs; (d) the private sector. The comprehensive regional strategy will include a detailed review of delivery modalities and their suitability in different settings.

The comprehensive regional strategy will be completed by the end of April 2014, after exhaustive consultations amongst actors and in time to inform a mid-year review of priorities and outstanding resource requirements for national resilience/recovery plans and for RRP6 and SHARP 2014.

14 COMMON PLANNING FRAMEWORK 2014 KUWAIT II: CONFERENCE BRIEF

The diagram below illustrates how core humanitarian sectors coalesce with those of the resilience-based development approach. It provides a coherent structure for integrating analysis, planning and programming to underpin the Comprehensive Regional Strategy.

Syrian refugee children run towards Domiz refugee camp, near Dohuk, in the Kurdistan region of Iraq Photo credit: © UNHCR/B. Sokol

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT Covering January to December 2013 Syria Humanitarian Assistance Response Plan / Regional Response Plan

Photo2013 credit: WFP/Abeer Etefa The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this document do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the Humanitarian Country Team. HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

CONTENTS

SUMMARY ...... 3 Full 2013 Syria Humanitarian KEY FACTS ABOUT FUNDING ...... 9 Assistance Response Plan SHARP ACHIEVEMENTS PER SECTOR ...... 17 (revised June 2013):

RRP ACHIEVEMENTS PER SECTOR ...... 24 Full 2013 Syria Regional Annex: details of funding in 2013 per donor and Response Plan (revised June recipient organization ...... 28 2013):

Funding data, updated daily:

FUNDING

US$ 4.4 billion total humanitarian funding for the Syria crisis in 2013

Total funding for the Syria response plans 69% of requirement

US$ 3.03 billion received of which: Syria Humanitarian Assistance Syria Regional Response Plan Response Plan (SHARP) (RRP) $1.4 billion required $2.98 billion required

72% of requirement 68% of requirement $1.01 billion received $2.02 billion received

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

SUMMARY

This report presents the results achieved in 2013 with humanitarian funds directed to the organizations and actions in the Syria Humanitarian Assistance Response Plan (SHARP) and Syria Regional Response Plan (RRP). Funding for the actions and organizations in these two plans constituted the major part of humanitarian funding for the Syria crisis in 2013, and the destination for 67% of the funds so far arising from the first Kuwait Pledging Conference in January 2013.

Figure 1: 2013 SHARP and RRP (in US$) $4.4 billion $3.05 billion 69% $1.4 billion Other humanitarian funding for Syria Required Received Funded crisis in 2013 (See annex for full details of donors and recipient organizations.)

Within the Syrian Arab Republic, humanitarian actors scaled up and aimed to reach a target (revised at mid-year) of at least 6.8 million people in need. They largely succeeded, and in some cases surpassed the mid-year targets as needs continued to mount. On-going insecurity and the use of siege as a weapon of war have delivery of relief supplies and services to all in need extremely difficult.  Organizations working in the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector provided 10 million people with safe drinking water.  The health sector provided 3.6 million people with health consultations, treatments and interventions, plus 2.3 million people with emergency health kits, burn kits and other kits. They reached 1,100,505 children with measles-mumps-rubella vaccinations and 840,752 children with polio vaccinations, and fielded 51 mobile medical teams, reaching 246,546 internally displaced children with medical check-ups.  The food and agriculture sector reached 4.02 million people (out of a targeted 5.040 million people), of whom 3.4 million people with direct food assistance, 89,000 people with agricultural and livestock support, and 536,000 Palestine refugees with food and cash grant assistance.  The sector for shelter and household items (‘non-food items’ or NFI) provided household items to 4.86 million people (surpassing its target of 3.67 million); rehabilitated 151 collective shelters (with rehabilitation of another 52 under way); and delivered cash assistance to 564,465 people.  The education sector surpassed its targets, delivering school supplies to 1,500,000 conflict- affected children and arranging remedial education and catch-up classes for 310,000 children.  In early recovery and livelihoods, 55,000 families with disrupted livelihoods received support. Organizations working in this sector reached 45,000 internally displaced families in the 14 governorates (30,000 already reached, 15,000 in process), providing 30,000 quilts (15,400 already distributed, 15,000 are in process), 4,000 rugs and mats, and 67,000 items of summer and winter clothing for women and children (25,500 distributed, 41,000 in process). 10,500 children in Homs received winter underwear and 8,000 hygiene kits were distributed in several governorates. Around 5,000 local labourers were employed in a cash-for-work scheme for solid waste removal and disposal in Homs, Aleppo, Deir Ezzor and Tartous, improving living conditions for 700,000 internally displaced people.  Protection and community services programmes reached over 150,000 people, through eight community centres (in Aleppo, Damascus, Rural Damascus, Dara’a, Sweida and Tartous Governorates) offering a range of legal and social services including psycho-social activities in a

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

protective and calm space, and a community mobilization programme in eight Governorates. Organizations provided psycho-social support for 460,000 children, helping them cope with the distress and disruption to their lives resulting from violence and displacement. More than 78,655 survivors of gender-based violence were assisted with psycho-social support, psychological first aid, medical counselling and vocational skills programmes through mobile teams and clinics.  Nutrition sector partners were able to reach more than 500,000 children and more than 300,000 pregnant and lactating women, for screening, prevention or treatment of malnutrition and counselling and education for caretakers on nutrition. 290,417 children (age 6-59 months) were screened for malnutrition; more than 500,000 children were provided with multi-micronutrients for the prevention of malnutrition; over 491,936 children aged 6-59 months received complementary food including Plumpy’Doz, Plumpy’Sup and high-energy biscuits; 62,682 moderately malnourished children were provided with Plumpy’Sup treatment for malnutrition; and 13,778 children were treated for severe malnutrition with plumpynuts, F-75 and F-100.  The logistics cluster has transported over 30,000 cubic meters of aid cargo vital to shelter, nutrition, health, WASH, and agriculture programmes on behalf of 16 humanitarian organizations in Syria. Over 70,000 cubic meters of humanitarian cargo was stored for 16 organizations at the cluster’s common storage locations in Syria. The cluster supported over 30 joint humanitarian convoys, transporting aid cargo to the governorates of Idleb, Aleppo, Homs, Daraa, Hama, Raqqa, Rural Damascus, and Hassakeh. Two primary storage hubs—Safita (near Tartous) and Sahnaya (Rural Damascus)—provided a total storage capacity of 8,060 square meters for the humanitarian community. In spite of the complex security environment and the changes in logistics needs this entailed, the logistics cluster met 440 out of 467 service requests for storage and transport in 2013.  The emergency telecommunications cluster installed over 200 VHF/HF radios for six humanitarian organizations, and activated a satellite receiver in Damascus for data and voice transmission.  To handle the complexity of the humanitarian crisis in Syria, the coordination sector has promoted maximum effectiveness of humanitarian response through information management, analysis and dissemination of information, assessment of needs, coordination of inter-sector response planning, monitoring of results, communication and advocacy, emergency preparedness and contingency planning, facilitation of inter-agency convoys and initiatives, and resource mobilization. The sector coordinated 42 inter-agency convoys to reach people in need in hard-to-access locations.  The staff safety and security sector conducted regular risk assessments, enhanced the physical security of UN premises in all locations, established 24/7 radio rooms at both UN hubs (Homs and Tartus), provided security support for UN convoys and missions to the field including cross- line areas, and deployed six fully equipped armour-protected vehicles in Damascus, Homs, Tartus and Qamishly to support aid delivery.  Overall expenditure of funds received for SHARP programmes in 2013 is estimated at 86% by 31 December 2013.

In 2013 the number of Syrians fleeing their homeland increased dramatically, making this one of the largest refugee crises in the world. Applications for asylum have been submitted in 90 countries. By 30 November 2013, nearly 2.2 million refugees from Syria had been registered in the Arab Republic of Egypt (Egypt), the Republic of Iraq (Iraq), the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (Jordan), the Lebanese Republic (Lebanon), and the Republic of Turkey (Turkey). During 2013, UNHCR registered some 1.7 million Syrian refugees in the region, with registration serving as the entry point for Syrians to be documented and their vulnerabilities assessed for protection purposes. The key assistance delivered to refugees and affected host communities in Lebanon, Jordan, Turkey, Iraq and Egypt included:

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

 More than 2 million refugees in the region have received food assistance, including in-kind food such as welcome meals, food rations and/or daily micronutrient-fortified snacks, as well as value- based vouchers for purchasing food. Food vouchers inject millions of dollars into the local market economy.  Syrian refugees have made more than a million visits to primary health care facilities and more than 1,500,000 vaccinations have been given against measles and other diseases.  836,000 people have received safe drinking water through delivery, storage facilities and connection to the water network. About 626,517 people benefitted from sanitation facilities and services including access to adequate latrines, shower facilities and solid waste collection and disposal services.  339,000 children have benefitted from psycho-social support and activities. 190 child-/youth- /women-friendly spaces have been established in camps and host communities. 9,600 unaccompanied or at-risk children have been identified and assisted.  The education sector has reached 668,150 children (out of a target of 810,000) with educational assistance. Some 670 schools have been assisted with infrastructure, renovations and refurbishments. More than 8,800 teachers and other support staff received training.  Shelter sector organizations distributed more than 144,000 tents, temporary and emergency shelters to vulnerable families, and 840,000 individuals benefitted from shelter assistance, including cash assistance for rents. Overall, 840,000 refugees received various kinds of shelter assistance (out of a target of roughly 1,600,000 refugees).  Approximately 1,600,000 refugees were reached with support for household items and 195,714 cash assistance distributions were made to support refugee families cover other basic needs. An extensive assistance package was rolled out across the region to help refugees cope with harsh winter conditions.

Summaries per sector for aid inside Syria and in the neighbouring countries appear in the following sections.

A Syrian man tries to warm himself as snow falls in the Terbol tented settlement in Bekaa Valley, Lebanon, December 2013. The Alexa storm has brought severe weather to Lebanon and much of the Middle

East, affecting tens of thousands of Syrian refugees. © UNHCR/A. McConnell/December 2013

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 2: SHARP funding per sector: required vs. received

Original Revised Funding % Covered requirements requirements

Coordination 7,606,730 27,377,013 29,737,504 109% Early recovery and livelihoods 27,502,693 43,085,792 6,699,507 16% Education 23,024,800 45,720,901 37,445,211 82% Emergency 0 1,953,013 0 0% telecommunications cluster Food and agriculture 196,896,716 617,912,193 518,342,656 84% Health 80,055,133 177,274,711 124,612,929 70% Logistics cluster 5,500,000 14,400,000 10,439,108 72% Non-food items and shelter 110,771,867 343,112,899 130,253,185 38% Nutrition 1,850,000 10,562,459 3,724,621 35% Protection and community 20,547,692 34,641,123 22,790,828 66% services Staff safety services 8,454,837 25,349,739 6,881,687 27% Water, sanitation and hygiene 37,416,579 68,422,623 53,178,260 78% Cluster not yet specified 0 0 69,812,833 0%

Total: 519,627,047 1,409,812,466 1,013,918,329 72%

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

Figure 3: RRP funding: required vs. received per country

Original Revised Funding % Covered requirements requirements

Egypt 14,337,831 66,705,984 35,387,154 53% Iraq 86,042,526 310,858,973 166,588,949 54% Jordan 495,030,847 976,576,971 716,137,741 73% Lebanon 267,087,536 1,216,189,393 823,558,877 68% Region 23,000,000 38,918,277 140,417,174 361% Turkey 158,613,814 372,390,514 137,784,165 37% Total: 1,044,112,554 2,981,640,112 2,091,874,060 68%

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org). (RRP 2013 requirements and funding are not designated by sector.)

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Hundreds of Syrian refugees cross into Iraq at the Peshkhabour border crossing in Dohuk Governorate on August 15, 2013 © UNHCR G. Gubaeva

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

KEY FACTS ABOUT FUNDING

Figure 4: 2013 SHARP and RRP (in US$)

$4.4 billion $3.03 billion 69% $1.4 billion Other humanitarian funding for Required Received Funded Syria crisis (See annexes for full details of all donors and recipient organizations.) (All funding figures in this document, unless otherwise noted, are taken from the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org) on 31 December 2013. FTS data comes from donor and recipient organizations. FTS on-line data are updated daily according to new reports including end-of- year reports; by 15 January 2014 the on-line funding figures for the Syria crisis in 2013 are likely to differ from those in this document.)

Donors for Syria crisis humanitarian response

More than 65 donor countries have provided funding for the Syria humanitarian response since the beginning of 2012. Donors increased their funding for the Syria crisis from 2012 to 2013 from $963 million in 2012 to $4.45 billion in 2013. The donors with major increases include: the United States ($1.16 billion in 2013 for the Syria crisis, compared to $189 million in 2012), the United Kingdom ($381 million in 2013, $72 million in 2012), the European Commission ($732 million in 2013, $109 million in 2012), the State of Kuwait ($324 million in 2013, $8 million in 2012), and Germany ($312 million in 2013, $99 million in 2012). In addition, almost $200 million has been mobilized from private donors since the beginning of 2012, including large amounts from United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) National Committees and private fundraising campaigns in Europe and the Middle East.

SHARP and RRP requirements and funding

These two inter-agency plans do not encompass all humanitarian response for the Syria crisis, but they do encompass the major part of international humanitarian response, its requirements and its funding. The first RRP and SHARP were launched in March and June 2012 respectively, with combined requirements of $264 million, later raised to $836 million. Funding response from donors in 2012 was $560 million (67% of requirements). For 2013, the total requested for Syria and neighbouring countries was initially $1.56 billion, of which one-third was for needs inside Syria ($520 million) and two-thirds for needs in neighbouring countries ($1.04 billion). By mid-2013, requirements increased to $4.39 billion ($1.41 billion for Syria and $2.98 billion for neighbouring countries). Funding mounted steadily in response, and by year’s end, more than $3.03 billion—69% of the required total—had been raised by the international community.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 5: Evolution of combined SHARP and RRP Figure 6: 2013 SHARP and RRP funding: cumulative requirements, 2012-2013 (million $) total over time (in billions $)

8,000 6,540 4bn

6,000 4,390 3bn

4,000 2bn

1,560 2,000 836 1bn 264

Jun-12 Sep-12 Dec-12 Mar-13 Jun-13 Sep-13 Dec-13 0bn Nov-12 Feb-13 May-13 Aug-13 Nov-13 Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org) Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

In addition to funding for activities outlined in the SHARP and RRP, official and private donors contributed more than $1.8 billion in 2012 and 2013 to other activities and organizations, including to the Red Cross/Red Crescent movement and bilateral aid to the governments of the refugee-hosting countries.

Expenditure rate

The following table shows indicative 2013 expenditure rates for most organizations in the SHARP and the largest organizations (in terms of requirements) in the RRP. Expenditure figures are unofficial snapshots, since the financial year has only just closed and formal year-end figures are not yet available. (Only some SHARP and RRP organizations are shown, as it has not yet been possible to obtain expenditure information for all 95 organizations in the 2013 SHARP and RRP, and for the many others that have received funds for the Syria crisis response outside the SHARP and RRP.) Expenditure rates must be understood in the context of when funds were received: for example, no less than $360 million of SHARP and RRP funding has been committed just since 1 November 2013—12% of the total SHARP/RRP funding for 2013—and by agreement with the donors is to be partly spent in 2014.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Amount and percentage expended Agency Amount received (USD)* (USD) as of 31 December

$897,808,503 $939,990,241 96% $441,672,100 $489,607,606 a 90% $816,500,000 $857,000,000 b 95% $69,365,201 $94,622,455 73% $137,909,938 $147,589,967 93% $29,858,268 $24,713,398

(Emergency Response Fund) 83%

$46,950,385 $64,619,081

73% $20,553,548 $28,546,594 75% $129,837,266 $180,763,555 72% $6,894,604 $13,755,415 c 50% $2,989,130 $3,128,672 96% $21,001,484 $24,822,485 85%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

$4,120,445 $10,207,119 d 40% $54,025,774 $93,257,008 58% $782,250 $1,124,627 70%

$27,144,174 $47,598,872 57%

$2,077,649 $4,590,251 45%e

$846,025 $846,025 100%

$46,025,200 $86,842,196 f 53%

$34,303,178 $34,303,178 100%

$ 13,500,000 $29,300,000 g 46% $12,552,350 $13,102,938 89%

*Note: some figures for funding per agency differ from those in the tables in the annex, because of different time scales used to calculate expenditure. a Overall, more than one-fifth of UNICEF funding for the Syria crisis in 2013 came in during the last two months of 2013. In particular, for actions inside Syria, more than a quarter (40.6 million) of the funds arrived in the last two months of the year. b WFP expenditures include not only funds spent, but also funds that have been allocated to projects and yet to be disbursed. c A number of contributions were granted to FAO only towards the end of 2013, which explains the relatively low level of expenditures. The use of such funds will be carried over into 2014. d Significant funding received in the third quarter of 2013 and several contracts running into 2014 as per agreement with donors. e Estimates as of end December; some funding to be spent in 2014 as per agreement with donors. f Preliminary figures; some funding to be spent in 2014 as per agreement with donors. g Includes funding received in 2013 for 24-month projects, as per agreement with donors.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Kuwait Conference I pledges

At the Kuwait Pledging Conference in January 2013, 43 donors pledged $1.54 billion for the Syria crisis humanitarian response. By the end of 2013, over $1.18 billion (76%) of the amount pledged at the Kuwait Conference was committed or paid, constituting a quarter of all humanitarian funding for Syria and neighbouring countries in 2013. Thirty-four donors have fully disbursed or committed their pledges. The top ten major pledges that have been fully committed are: Kuwait ($300 million), the United States of America ($155 million), the European Commission ($133 million), the United Kingdom ($81 million), Saudi Arabia ($78 million), Japan ($65 million), Norway ($38 million), Canada ($25 million), and Sweden ($23 million). The ad hoc consortium of the International Islamic Charitable Organization and its NGO partners raised $116 million. 67% ($785 million) of the commitments arising from the first Kuwait Conference was directed to the organisations and activities in the SHARP and RRP.

Figure 7: Top ten Kuwait Conference I commitments, million US$

Kuwait 300 USA 155 ECHO 133 ad hoc consortium 116 UK 81 Saudi Arabia 78 Japan 65 Norway 38 Canada 25 Sweden 23

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

In addition to the announcements made at the conference on 30 January 2013, most donors have committed much more over the course of the year than they pledged at the conference. Donors pledging at the first Kuwait Conference committed $2.7 billion for the Syria crisis in addition to the funding they announced at the conference itself. The pledges announced by Australia, Canada, Denmark, the European Commission, Germany, Netherlands, the United Kingdom and the United States at the conference represent only 20% or less of their overall commitments for the Syria crisis in 2013. For other donors such as Norway, Sweden or Japan, their Kuwait Conference pledges represent about 50% of their overall commitments in 2013 for the Syria crisis. Requirements nearly tripled between the time of the first Kuwait Pledging Conference and the mid-year revision of the SHARP and RRP.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 8: 2013 Kuwait Conference commitments in relation to overall Syria crisis funding in 2013 ($4.4 billion)

Uncommitted pledges (Kuwait Conference 1 and other): $531 million Additional commitments by Commitments Kuwait Conference arising from Kuwait I donors, Conference I $2.7 billion directed to SHARP/RRP, Commitments $785 million arising from Kuwait Conference I, $1.18 billion Commitments arising from Kuwait Conference I directed to other Syria crisis actions, $395 million

Commitments by other donors, $0.54 billion

Source: donor and recipient organization report to the Financial Tracking Service.

Syria crisis funding in the context of global humanitarian funding for 2012 and 2013

Total funding for the Syria crisis amounts to 30% of all global humanitarian funding in 2013 ($4.4 billion out of $14.6 billion). The two inter-agency coordinated plans for the Syria crisis (SHARP and RRP combined) were 69% funded in 2013 and 67% in 2012, above the average funding of other inter-agency appeals which were funded, on average, at 62% in both 2012 and 2013. The combined funding for the SHARP and RRP amounts to 35% of the total funding for 2013 coordinated appeals ($3.03 billion out of $8.6 billion). The unmet requirements of the SHARP and the RRP represent currently 25% of the overall unmet requirements for all coordinated appeals in 2013 ($1.35 billion out of $5.3 billion).

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 9: Evolution of humanitarian funding for the Syria crisis and global humanitarian funding in 2013 (in US$ billions)

$16 billion $14 billion $12 billion

$10 billion Syria crisis funding $8 billion Global funding $6 billion $4 billion $2 billion $0 billion Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

Syria Emergency Response Fund

The Syria Emergency Response Fund (ERF) has received $67.9 million in contributions from 20 donors since it was established in 2012. As of end December 2013, over $44 million had been allocated to NGOs, UN agencies and the Red Cross/Red Crescent to support 140 projects in Syria, Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq. NGOs have received 62% of all funding allocated to date, and almost three-quarters of funding has supported priority activities in shelter/NFI (23%), health (19%), WASH (17%) and multi-sector support for refugees (13%). The ERF allocated funds to the organizations best positioned to implement the most urgent actions at a given time. For a complete list of donors and recipients, see the following pages for 2012 and 2013 data: http://fts.unocha.org/reports/daily/ocha_RPool2C_C206_Y2013___1401021243.pdf and http://fts.unocha.org/reports/daily/ocha_RPool2C_C206_Y2012___1401021243.pdf.

Click here or scan code at right for an on-line list of all Syria crisis contributions in 2013 (updated daily, sortable by donor, recipient organization, country etc.)

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

On 3 September, a young girl and a woman walk past destroyed buildings and mounds of rubble, in the city of Maarat al-Numaan, Idlib Governorate. © UNICEF, 2013

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

SHARP ACHIEVEMENTS PER SECTOR

Humanitarian actors across sectors have scaled up the humanitarian response, reaching more beneficiaries across the country. This scale-up was made possible through strengthened collaboration with the Syrian Arab Red Crescent and line ministries, and expanded partnerships with Syrian charities, enhanced field outreach, and additional human resources capacity through the deployment of larger numbers of experienced staff. Significant efforts have been made to reach people who have been forced to flee their homes and communities assisting them, in hard-to-reach areas. This has been mainly through increased local partnerships and enhanced field presence through the establishment of UN hubs which have been the key to achieving predictability and regularity of humanitarian access across a wider geographical reach, and to complement regular assistance programmes. A special focus has been to reach people in need in hot-spot areas across lines of fighting within the country. Below are the figures per sector of the number of people reached with key assistance, vis-à-vis the targets set at mid-2013 . (The source of all of the following implementation information is the sector lead agencies.)

Food and Agriculture

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 617,912,193 518,342,656 84% 373,775,783 72%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

NFIs and Shelter

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 343,112,899 130,253,185 38% 221,190,127 170%* *Note: expenditure greater than reported funding indicates that agencies have allocated flexible funds to their actions in this sector.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Health

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 177,274,711 124,612,929 70% 104,292,822 84%

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 68,422,623 53,178,260 78% 26,857,308 51%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Education

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 45,720,901 37,445,211 82% 12,185,450 33%

Protection and Community Services

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 34,641,123 22,790,828 66% 22,790,828 100%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Early Recovery and Livelihoods

Requirements 2013 Received 2013 % funded Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 43,085,792 6,699,507 16% 3,000,000 45%

Logistics

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Nutrition

Figure 10: Achievements vs. targets 2013 (in thousands)

Target Achievements

Distribution of MM for children 569,500 491,936 Supplementary feeding (MAM) 500,000 with Plumpydoz, HEBs etc 491,936

Screening of children under five 300,000 290,417

Distribution of MM for PLWs 300,000 144,519

Screening of PLWs 100,000 109,841 Treatment of SAM (Plumpy nut, 13,000 F75, F100 etc) 13,778

Source: sector lead agency

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 11: Capacity-building for nutrition in emergencies and community management of acute malnutrition

Govt Doctors Govt Paramedics NGO Doctors NGO Paramedics Requirements Received 2013 % funded 2013 21% 10,562,459 3,724,621 35% Spent 2013 Expenditure rate 5,726,267 154%* 61% 18% *Note: expenditure greater than reported funding indicates that agencies have allocated flexible funds to their actions in this sector.

Source: sector lead agency

Emergency Telecommunications (ETC)

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

(Achievements in the SHARP sectors of Coordination and Staff Safety and Security are not represented graphically.)

RRP ACHIEVEMENTS PER SECTOR

Protection

Overall (projected) refugees targeted:

3.45 million Figure 12: # of people reached with protection activities Total registered refugee population: million Target Achievements 2.2 Overall refugees reached:

3,450,000 2.2 million

2,200,000  339,000 children have benefitted from psycho-social support and activities  190 child-/youth-/women-friendly spaces in camps and host communities Source: sector lead agency  9,600 unaccompanied or at-risk children identified and assisted

Education

Overall (projected) refugees targeted: 809,356 Total registered refugee population:

Figure 13: # of people reached with education activities 2.2 million

Target Achievements Overall refugees reached: 668,150 2,200,000  670 schools have been assisted with infrastructure, renovations and refurbishments 668,150  More than 8,800 teachers and other support staff received training

Source: sector lead agency

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Food Security

Overall (projected) refugees targeted:

2,413,800 Figure 14: # of people reached with food assistance Total registered refugee population:

Target Achievements 2.2 million Overall population reached:1 2,413,800 2,262,500 2,262,500  1,736,500 food vouchers or cash assistance distributed to refugees  408,000 food parcels or food rations Source: sector lead agency were distributed

Non-Food Items (NFIs) and Basic Needs

Overall (projected) refugees targeted: 2.94 million Total registered refugee population: Figure 15: # of people reached with NFIs activities 2.2 million Target Achievements Overall refugees reached:

2,200,000 1.6 million  195,714 cash assistance distributions 1,600,000 have been made to support refugee families

Source: sector lead agency

1 While predominantly Syrian refugees, this number also includes Lebanese returnees and Palestine refugees from Syria. Please note that final food security figures are being reconciled.

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Shelter

Overall (projected) refugees targeted:

1,591,575 Figure 16: # of people reached with shelter activities Total registered refugee population:

Target Achievements 2.2 million Overall refugees reached: 1,591,575 840,000 840,000  121,160 tents and 13,881 prefabricated container units have been distributed to provide vulnerable families with emergency shelter Source: sector lead agency  280,574 individuals benefitted from shelter assistance, including cash assistance for rent

Health

Overall (projected) refugees targeted:

2,572,400 Figure 17: # of people reached with health activities Total registered refugee population:

Target Achievements 2.2 million Overall refugees reached: 2,572,400 1,250,000 1,250,000  Over 1,250,000 visits to primary health care facilities  More than 1,500,000 children and Source: sector lead agency young adults vaccinated against measles and other immunization

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Water, Sanitation and Hygiene

Overall (projected) refugees targeted:

1,269,723 Figure 18: # of people reached with WASH activities Total registered refugee population:

Target Achievements 2.2 million Overall refugees reached: 1,269,723 1,224,000 1,224,000  836,000 beneficiaries provided with access to water through delivery, storage facilities and connection to the water network Source: sector lead agency  626,517 beneficiaries of sanitation facilities and services including access to adequate latrines, shower facilities and solid waste collection and disposal services

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

ANNEX: DETAILS OF FUNDING IN 2013 PER DONOR AND RECIPIENT ORGANIZATION

(Click here or scan this QR code to access full Syria crisis funding details on the Financial Tracking Service, updated daily. The figures below are as reported by donors or recipient organizations to FTS as of 31 December 2013.)

Figure 19: Total humanitarian funding per donor to Syria crisis in 2013 ...... 28 Figure 20: SHARP funding: required vs. received per organization ...... 30 Figure 21: SHARP funding per donor ...... 31 Figure 22: RRP funding: required vs. received per organization ...... 33 Figure 23: RRP funding per donor ...... 36 Figure 24: Total funding for the Syria crisis in 2013 per destination country ...... 37 Figure 25: Total funding for the Syria crisis in 2013 per recipient organization ...... 38

Figure 19: Total humanitarian funding per donor to Syria crisis in 2013

% of Grand Donor country Funding Uncommitted pledges Total United States 1,159,994,311 26.1% 0 European Commission 731,938,813 16.5% 0 United Kingdom 380,832,407 8.6% 0 Kuwait 324,057,835 7.3% 0 Germany 311,448,890 7.0% 0 Private (individuals & organisations) 225,783,299 5.1% 89,604,083 Canada 176,420,590 4.0% 0 Japan 122,416,103 2.8% 21,800,000 Various (details not yet provided) 114,477,480 2.6% 0 Saudi Arabia 96,111,079 2.2% 0 Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) 82,189,016 1.8% 0 Australia 77,429,159 1.7% 0 Norway 75,536,714 1.7% 18,037,495 United Arab Emirates 70,629,939 1.6% 266,555,406 Qatar 66,237,898 1.5% 50,000,000 Denmark 54,275,782 1.2% 0 Sweden 51,491,687 1.2% 0 Netherlands 46,285,249 1.0% 0 Switzerland 38,396,014 0.9% 2,725,947

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

% of Grand Donor country Funding Uncommitted pledges Total Allocation of unearmarked funds by UN 37,200,869 0.8% 0 agencies Italy 27,197,706 0.6% 53,495,037 France 25,590,451 0.6% 0 Finland 22,086,162 0.5% 0 Carry-over (donors not specified) 21,985,682 0.5% 0 Russian Federation 19,300,000 0.4% 0 Ireland 15,699,903 0.4% 1,696,065 Spain 12,360,285 0.3% 0 Belgium 11,498,139 0.3% 0 Iraq 9,965,812 0.2% 0 Luxembourg 8,761,932 0.2% 0 Austria 6,981,245 0.2% 0 China 3,200,000 0.1% 0 Korea, Republic of 3,200,000 0.1% 0 Poland 2,491,344 0.1% 0 New Zealand 2,398,369 0.1% 0 Algeria 2,000,000 0.0% 0 Czech Republic 1,622,961 0.0% 0 Turkey 1,000,000 0.0% 0 Estonia 953,344 0.0% 0 Allocation of funds from Red Cross / Red 746,479 0.0% 0 Crescent Allocation of unearmarked funds by IGOs 735,176 0.0% 0 Indonesia 500,000 0.0% 0 India 300,000 0.0% 2,200,000 Iceland 280,000 0.0% 0 Hungary 251,633 0.0% 0 Brazil 250,000 0.0% 0 Croatia 234,144 0.0% 203,522 Bulgaria 208,073 0.0% 0 Monaco 203,713 0.0% 0 Kazakhstan 200,000 0.0% 0 Romania 200,000 0.0% 0 Greece 194,237 0.0% 0 Colombia 100,000 0.0% 0 Chile 100,000 0.0% 0 South Africa 93,465 0.0% 0 Slovenia 79,973 0.0% 0 Latvia 68,871 0.0% 0 Slovakia 67,843 0.0% 0 Portugal 66,313 0.0% 0 Malta 65,849 0.0% 0 Georgia 50,000 0.0% 0 Andorra 44,111 0.0% 0 Lithuania 26,237 0.0% 0 Cyprus 25,989 0.0% 0

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

% of Grand Donor country Funding Uncommitted pledges Total Mongolia 10,000 0.0% 0 Montenegro 5,000 0.0% 0 Morocco 0 0.0% 4,000,000 Mauritania 0 0.0% 1,000,000 Bahrain 0 0.0% 20,000,000 Botswana 0 0.0% 50,000 Grand Total 4,446,553,575 100.0% 531,367,555

Figure 20: SHARP funding: required vs. received per organization

Original Organization Revised requirements Funding % Covered requirements

ACF - Spain 0 2,154,124 1,238,825 57.5% DRC 0 11,230,442 2,854,729 25.4% FAO 34,850,000 41,696,000 10,875,550 26.1% HELP e.V. 0 500,000 461,662 92.3% IMC 0 1,124,198 0 0.0% IOM 0 41,100,000 29,566,244 71.9% Mercy Corps 0 3,311,448 0 0.0% OHC 4,950,000 12,890,029 14,715,449 100.0% PU 0 6,862,390 5,012,470 73.0% SIF 0 7,019,200 321,000 4.6% UN Resident Coordinator's 0 9,729,778 0 0.0% Office UNDP 45,101,953 41,182,091 5,759,321 14.0% UNDSS 3,244,000 5,428,109 1,123,190 20.7% UNESCO 0 1,500,000 0 0.0% UNFPA 12,000,000 16,100,000 14,617,298 90.8% UN-HABITAT 0 4,743,200 952,286 20.1% UNHCR 82,925,000 248,751,893 122,998,135 49.4% UNICEF 68,438,800 110,460,980 154,353,469 100.0% UNMAS 5,305,025 801,926 420,624 52.5% UNRWA 75,087,822 225,087,823 123,878,311 55.0% WFP 139,259,447 489,519,685 450,625,197 92.1% WHO 48,465,000 128,619,150 74,144,569 57.6% Total: 519,627,047 1,409,812,466 1,013,918,329 71.9%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 21: SHARP funding per donor

Funding (disbursed Donor or committed) United States of America 314,713,766 European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office 182,622,831 United Kingdom 120,483,315 Kuwait 71,581,148 Germany 54,350,485 Canada 44,488,529 Central Emergency Response Fund 40,403,808 Australia 28,043,370 European Commission 22,689,107 Japan 17,650,000 Emergency Response Fund (OCHA) 10,969,031 Allocation of unearmarked funds by WFP 10,648,064 Sweden 8,880,757 Norway 8,556,188 Switzerland 8,441,269 Russian Federation 8,300,000 Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNICEF 6,523,029 Netherlands 5,870,259 Italy 5,382,980 Spain 4,837,376 Belgium 4,251,235 Finland 4,166,276 Ireland 3,708,398 Denmark 3,473,402 USA Fund for UNICEF 2,646,783 Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) 2,160,000 Austria 2,150,810 Private (individuals & organisations) 2,042,250 China 2,000,000 Luxembourg 1,901,995 Allocation of unearmarked funds by OCHA 1,305,399 France 1,303,781 Korea, Republic of 1,000,000 UNICEF National Committee/Belgium 940,666 Poland 890,902 Various Donors (details not yet provided) 757,560 UNICEF National Committee/Netherlands 540,658

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Funding (disbursed Donor or committed) Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNFPA 500,000 United Arab Emirates 499,973 Carry-over (donors not specified) 444,000 UNICEF National Committee/Germany 397,351 UNICEF National Committee/United Kingdom 229,008 Bulgaria 208,073 UNICEF National Committee/France 198,673 UNICEF National Committee/Norway 158,680 UNICEF National Committee/Japan 113,668 South Africa 93,465 Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNHCR 77,424 Czech Republic 76,258 Slovakia 67,843 Portugal 66,313 Hungary 57,471 Andorra 44,111 UNRWA Spanish Committee 6,158 CAN FOUNDATION 4,433 Total: 1,013,918,329

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 22: RRP funding: required vs. received per organization

Original Revised % Organization Funding requirements requirements Covered

ACT Alliance / Finn Church Aid 655,374 840,000 655,374 78% ACT Alliance / Lutheran Development 0 35,748 0 0% Service ACT Alliance / Lutheran World Federation 0 4,000,000 2,718,716 68% Action Contre la Faim 3,421,250 3,208,512 1,369,638 43% ActionAid 0 3,925,900 0 0% Adventist Development and Relief Agency 0 500,000 0 0% Agency for Technical Cooperation and 19,796,100 15,155,000 18,354,155 121% Development Association for the Advancement of 0 170,000 202,608 119% Democratic Rights-Legal Aid Associazione Volontari per il Servizio 240,000 1,982,500 2,338,015 118% Internazionale CARE International 4,955,000 5,800,000 13,543,565 234% CARITAS 1,500,000 1,192,372 19,328,683 1621% Caritas Lebanon Migrants Center 5,032,290 17,617,760 4,134,485 23% Catholic Relief Services 0 650,000 319,916 49% Center for Victims of Torture 750,000 2,200,000 1,596,666 73% CHF International 1,902,900 2,390,000 0 0% Children without Borders 0 193,900 0 0% Comitato Internationale per lo Sviluppo dei 1,105,000 3,035,581 498,502 16% Popoli Danish Refugee Council 10,507,050 76,273,299 81,497,855 107% Food & Agriculture Organization of the 0 30,115,000 3,175,294 11% United Nations Fundacion Promocion Social de la Cultura 0 1,022,125 976,397 96% Gruppo Volontariato Civile 1,086,518 4,927,531 1,492,353 30% Handicap International 2,850,000 17,071,600 13,948,216 82% Heartland Alliance International 211,000 594,999 0 0% Institute for Family Health 0 700,437 0 0% International Catholic Migration Commission 1,450,000 1,680,000 1,399,845 83% International Medical Corps 2,934,000 7,679,094 494,698 6% International Organization for Migration 21,978,115 54,052,000 25,322,112 47% International Orthodox Christian Charities 2,865,000 14,258,900 6,467,657 45% International Relief and Development 4,608,000 24,654,809 1,500,000 6% International Rescue Committee 6,084,733 13,300,700 6,595,532 50% Internews Europe 750,000 0 0

INTERSOS 160,000 8,151,625 2,350,582 29% Islamic Relief Worldwide 0 52,591,329 2,584,905 5% Japan Emergency NGOs 332,000 4,310,000 1,368,851 32%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Original Revised % Organization Funding requirements requirements Covered

Jesuit Refugee Service 0 1,153,804 0 0% Jordan Hashemite Charity Organization 50,000,000 0 0

Jordan Health Aid Society 4,850,000 14,844,637 6,486,350 44% JORDAN RIVER FOUNDATION 678,000 0 0

Lebanese Association for Development Al 0 290,000 0 0% Majmoua Lebanese Association for Human Promotion 0 162,913 0 0% and Literacy Lebanese Association for Popular Action 352,800 1,669,050 651,819 39% Lebanese Red Cross 0 51,000 0 0% Madrasati 840,000 1,336,724 719,100 54% Makassed Philanthropic Islamic Association 0 166,200 0 0% of Beirut MEDAIR 2,445,000 19,634,740 11,605,371 59% Médecins du Monde 0 2,746,287 0 0% Mercy Corps 11,612,000 32,059,894 34,620,650 108% MPDL - Movimiento por la Paz, el Desarme 250,000 250,003 0 0% y la Libertad Nippon International Cooperation for 0 339,722 0 0% Community Development Norwegian Refugee Council 7,699,494 42,454,464 25,062,105 59% Operation Mercy 0 500,000 0 0% OXFAM GB 8,500,000 23,217,584 23,061,953 99% People in Need 55,500 0 0

Première Urgence - Aide Médicale 7,965,000 9,036,430 29,127,735 322% Internationale Qatar Red Crescent Society 0 1,500,000 0 0% Questscope 0 600,000 267,532 45% Refugee Education Trust 0 5,328,250 0 0% Relief International 6,268,000 7,694,083 3,731,730 49% René Moawad Foundation 0 675,000 0 0% RESTART 300,000 50,000 805,500 1611% Royal Health Awareness Society 0 500,000 133,226 27% Safadi Foundation 0 324,000 0 0% Save the Children 16,610,089 34,622,540 50,495,781 146% Search for Common Ground 0 662,424 124,655 19% Social, Humanitarian, Economical 0 1,947,600 2,183,930 112% Intervention for Local Development Solidarités International 0 3,688,160 4,027,433 109% Technisches Hilfswerk (THW) 12,900,000 1,800,000 12,900,000 717% Terre des Hommes - Italy 0 1,000,000 1,671,196 167% Terre des Hommes - Lausanne 290,000 1,081,000 280,000 26% Terre des Hommes International 0 586,000 0 0%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Original Revised % Organization Funding requirements requirements Covered

Un Ponte Per 1,100,000 1,184,034 847,389 72% United Nations Children's Fund 127,332,880 360,192,407 271,523,301 75% United Nations Development Fund for 250,000 1,900,000 0 0% Women United Nations Development Programme 975,000 16,395,000 8,979,513 55% United Nations Educational, Scientific and 4,385,919 9,671,892 2,125,114 22% Cultural Organization United Nations High Commissioner for 493,768,013 1,167,172,703 806,942,767 69% Refugees United Nations Human Settlements 100,000 12,447,856 170,000 1% Programme (UN-HABITAT) United Nations Office for Project Services 8,500,000 5,500,000 0 0% United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 0 260,000 50,000 19% United Nations Population Fund 8,567,476 26,510,306 13,936,839 53% United Nations Relief and Works Agency for 13,293,529 70,005,413 65,616,448 94% Palestine Refugees in the Near East War Child Holland 560,120 2,714,815 1,273,974 47% World Food Programme 143,251,804 641,911,131 401,033,873 62% World Health Organization 8,326,000 46,535,480 20,457,301 44% World Rehabilitation Fund 0 3,404,495 250,000 7% World Vision International 6,911,600 28,841,850 18,960,140 66% YMCA 0 739,500 0 0% Total: 1,044,112,554 2,981,640,112 2,034,357,345 68%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 23: RRP funding per donor

% of grand Donor Funding total United States of America 548,108,575 27% Kuwait 199,518,852 10% European Commission Humanitarian Aid Office 190,077,234 9% United Kingdom 187,887,015 9% Germany 149,106,150 7% Various Donors (details not yet provided) 113,719,920 6% European Commission 85,848,815 4% Japan 77,210,867 4% Canada 74,093,647 4% Private (individuals & organisations) 59,115,745 3% Central Emergency Response Fund 40,658,166 2% Australia 34,088,561 2% Netherlands 33,800,777 2% Denmark 32,906,749 2% European Commission EuropeAid Development and Cooperation 30,763,455 2% Norway 27,441,937 1% Allocation of unearmarked funds by WFP 20,756,670 1% Sweden 17,401,311 1% Switzerland 16,173,947 1% France 13,298,461 1% Emergency Response Fund (OCHA) 13,218,016 1% Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNICEF 13,108,805 1% Finland 12,342,022 1% Russian Federation 10,000,000 0.5% Iraq 9,965,812 0.5% Italy 7,411,770 0.4% Ireland 5,508,515 0.3% Spain 2,539,920 0.1% Luxembourg 2,291,580 0.1% Disasters Emergency Committee (UK) 2,076,822 0.1% Austria 2,071,141 0.1% New Zealand 1,578,486 0.1% USA Fund for UNICEF 1,363,088 0.1% Belgium 1,356,852 0.1% China 1,200,000 0.1% Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation 1,000,000 0.05% Turkey 1,000,000 0.05% Chaine du Bonheur 996,005 0.05% Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNFPA 985,000 0.05% Poland 840,486 0.04% COFRA 825,088 0.04% Korea, Republic of 800,000 0.04% Czech Republic 736,344 0.04% Arab Gulf Programme for United Nations Development Organizations 735,176 0.04%

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

% of grand Donor Funding total UNICEF National Committee/Italy 678,426 0.03% Estonia 602,496 0.03% UNICEF National Committee/Netherlands 548,832 0.03% OPEC Fund for International Development 521,898 0.03% UNICEF National Committee/France 253,404 0.01% Qatar Red Crescent Society 250,000 0.01% Brazil 250,000 0.01% UNICEF National Committee/New Zealand 220,736 0.01% Saudi Arabia (Kingdom of) 207,794 0.01% Monaco 203,713 0.01% Iceland 190,000 0.01% UNICEF National Committee/Spain 159,284 0.01% UNICEF National Committee/Sweden 155,073 0.01% Greece 130,380 0.01% American Friends of UNRWA 106,000 0.01% Chile 100,000 0.005% European Union 86,030 0.004% Hungary 83,397 0.004% Latvia 68,871 0.003% Malta 65,849 0.003% National Commission for Lebanese Women 52,966 0.003% Allocation of unearmarked funds by UNESCO 46,500 0.002% UNICEF National Committee/Norway 41,200 0.002% Slovenia 40,706 0.002% Lithuania 26,237 0.001% Cyprus 25,989 0.001% Les Amis du Liban 9,959 0.0005% Total: 2,034,357,345 100%

Source: donor and recipient organization reports to the Financial Tracking Service (fts.unocha.org)

Figure 24: Total funding for the Syria crisis in 2013 per destination country

Destination Country Funding Bulgaria 1,420,691 Egypt 37,066,613 Iraq 198,241,577 Jordan 866,579,128 Lebanon 934,853,146 Region (or unspecified) 776,856,231 Syrian Arab Republic 1,455,248,988 Turkey 176,170,304 Total: 4,446,553,575

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Figure 25: Total funding for the Syria crisis in 2013 per recipient organization

Funding received Organization or committed ($) United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees 939,990,240 World Food Programme 861,117,485 United Nations Children's Fund 461,678,411 Various (details not yet provided) 755,230,646 United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East 210,124,625 International Committee of the Red Cross 143,649,276 World Health Organization 94,737,740 Danish Refugee Council 89,872,808 Save the Children 56,257,588 International Organization for Migration 54,888,356 Bilateral (to affected country government) 46,117,110 Mercy Corps 37,957,161 International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies 31,767,876 Première Urgence - Aide Médicale Internationale 29,290,708 United Nations Population Fund 28,554,137 Emergency Response Fund (OCHA) 25,899,687 Norwegian Refugee Council 25,674,287 OXFAM GB 23,624,024 Technisches Hilfswerk (THW) 22,732,592 CARITAS 22,051,114 Agency for Technical Cooperation and Development 21,911,720 German Red Cross 21,478,090 World Vision International 18,960,140 United Nations Development Programme 17,837,038 Red Crescent Society of the United Arab Emirates 15,436,628 Office of the Humanitarian Coordinator 14,715,449 Handicap International 14,382,350 CARE International 14,163,522 Food & Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 14,050,844 MEDAIR 11,605,371 Norwegian Red Cross 11,361,646 Danish Red Cross 9,308,642 Finnish Red Cross 9,270,156 Mercy Corps Scotland 6,961,976 ACT Alliance / Diakonie Emergency Aid 6,700,346 International Rescue Committee 6,595,532 Jordan Health Aid Society 6,486,350 International Orthodox Christian Charities 6,467,657 Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) 6,073,736 CARE Austria 6,026,238 ACT Alliance / Norwegian Church Aid 5,893,760 Malteser International 5,846,054 Premiere Urgence 5,012,470 OXFAM Quebec 5,000,266

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Funding received Organization or committed ($) Swedish Red Cross 4,752,055 Canadian Catholic Organization for Development and Peace 4,562,675 Solidarités International 4,439,566 Japanese NGOs 4,300,000 Caritas Lebanon Migrants Center 4,134,485 Netherlands Red Cross 3,959,664 Relief International 3,731,730 Norwegian Aid Committee 3,699,099 Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs 3,651,890 Concern Worldwide 3,639,177 Arche Nova E.V. - Initiative for People in Need 3,350,954 Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e.V. (German Agro Action) 3,282,493 HELP e.V. 3,128,672 Terre des Hommes - Italy 2,731,429 ACT Alliance / Lutheran World Federation 2,718,716 Solidarites-France 2,713,704 Kuwait Red Crescent Society 2,636,590 Islamic Relief Worldwide 2,584,905 Médecins du Monde 2,560,760 Johanniter Unfallhilfe e.V. 2,555,029 INTERSOS 2,350,582 Associazione Volontari per il Servizio Internazionale 2,338,015 Social, Humanitarian, Economical Intervention for Local Development 2,183,930 CARE Canada 2,144,900 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 2,125,114 Australian Red Cross 2,066,116 ACF - Canada 2,030,217 ČLOVEK V TÍSNI, O.P.S. 2,000,000 Action Contre la Faim 1,871,448 Secours Islamique France 1,695,013 Caritas Denmark 1,624,079 Center for Victims of Torture 1,596,666 International Relief and Development 1,500,000 Gruppo Volontariato Civile 1,492,353 Caritas France 1,469,667 Care Germany 1,463,525 Assessment Capacities Project 1,423,740 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit 1,417,910 International Catholic Migration Commission 1,399,845 Japan Emergency NGOs 1,368,851 Medical Emergency Relief International 1,324,503 United Nations Humanitarian Response Depot 1,282,891 Stichting Vluchteling 1,277,139 War Child Holland 1,273,974 OXFAM International 1,257,264 Union Des Organisations Syrienne de Secours Medicaux 1,248,895 ACF - Spain 1,238,825

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Funding received Organization or committed ($) United Nations Dept of Safety and Security 1,123,190 United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-HABITAT) 1,122,286 Aviation Sans Frontieres 1,095,842 Fundacion Promocion Social de la Cultura 976,397 CANADEM 944,287 Department of Ecumenical Relations and Development 928,393 Caritas Germany (DCV) 919,540 RedR 894,454 Medico International 859,156 GOAL 847,458 Un Ponte Per 847,389 United Nations Mine Action Service 846,025 Austrian Red Cross 839,965 Catholic Relief Services 817,469 RESTART 805,500 Polish Center for International Aid 759,956 Madrasati 719,100 Lebanese Association for Popular Action 718,132 Jesuit Refugee Service 715,054 Humedica 698,433 ACT Alliance / DanChurchAid 682,057 Fondation Caritas Luxembourg 655,398 ACT Alliance / Finn Church Aid 655,374 Handicap International Luxembourg 593,442 Mennonite Central Committee 571,973 Peace Winds Japan 544,484 Swiss Red Cross 516,129 Developmental Action Without Border (Nabaa) 509,092 Stitching War Child 506,505 American Near East Refugee Aid 499,128 Comitato Internationale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli 498,502 International Medical Corps 494,698 Al-Afeea Fund 493,600 Child Care Society 470,000 SOS Villages d'Enfants 458,115 Armenian Red Cross Society 434,193 Association for Aid and Relief Japan 405,391 Welfare Association 397,878 Social Humanitarian Economical Intervention for Local Development 348,500 United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women 327,955 Adventist Development and Relief Agency 323,773 Armadilla S.c.s. Onlus 285,263 Terre des Hommes - Lausanne 280,000 French Red Cross 271,370 Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe e.V. 271,370 Questscope 267,532 Syrian Arab Red Crescent 266,951

HOW HUMANITARIAN FUNDS FOR THE SYRIA CRISIS WERE SPENT – 2013 SHARP AND RRP

Funding received Organization or committed ($) People in Need 255,363 Darya Organization for Developing Woman and Community 250,380 World Rehabilitation Fund 250,000 AMURT International 245,300 SOS Kinderdorf 242,744 Kanz Humanitarian organization 227,653 Charity Palestinian NGO 227,085 Arab Women Association 207,684 Secours Catholique et Développement 207,347 Brotherhood Association humanity of Human Rights 207,040 Oeuvre d'Orient 202,930 Association for the Advancement of Democratic Rights-Legal Aid 202,608 Gynécologie sans frontières 183,778 Private (individuals & organisations) 177,476 Al-Ofiq Organization for Development and Emergency 168,979 Maarouf Saad Social and Cultural Foundation 154,772 National Institution of Social Care & Vocational Training 154,772 American Lebanese Language Center 150,000 Children without Borders 142,335 ETANA Press 137,313 Royal Health Awareness Society 133,226 Search for Common Ground 124,655 NGO Mondo 116,136 Czech Evang. Diacony 102,934 International Volunteer Center of Yamagata 86,564 Pour une Syrie libre 66,313 Life for Syria 65,189 Luxembourg Red Cross 60,925 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime 50,000 Bashaer 39,113 Kuehne & Nagel 21,429 Iqra Cultural Center 2,714 Bulgarian Red Cross 2,066 Total: 4,446,553,575