DOCSLIB.ORG

California Freshwater Sport Fishing Regulations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Freshwater Sport Fishing Regulations 2017–2018 CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS For Freshwater Sport Fishing in California Effective March 1, 2017 through February 28, 2018 Relax. For about the same cost as auto insurance, Specialty RV Insurance has you covered. Make sure you don’t have unexpected costs with the extra coverage a Specialty RV Insurance policy provides. Guaranteed Replacement Protection Other recreational vehicle insurance we offer: • Travel Trailer Personal Contents Coverage • Toy Hauler Campsite Liability • Boat/Watercraft • Motorcycle Full-Timer Protection • Plus more AIS RV Specialists can help save you time and money by shopping multiple RV specialty carriers for the best combination of price and coverage. Recreational Call today to receive your free quote Vehicle Insurance 1 (800) 449-8943 AISinsurance.com/RV We Search. We Find. You Save. Offices throughout California. CA Insurance License # 0524784. fish-wildlife.indd 1 3/16/2017 1:22:42 PM 9 2017–2018 CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS General Provisions and Definitions Contents Unlawful Actions ���������������������������������������������������������������4 14 Quick Steps to Find the Correct Fishing Regulation ���������������4 Keeping Up With In-season Regulation Changes ������������������4 New Regulations for 2017 ���������������������������������������������������4 License Information �����������������������������������������������������������5 General Provisions and Definitions ������������������������������������� 9 Regulations for Fishing and Frogging in Inland Waters ������������ 12 Fishing Methods and Gear Restrictions ����������������������������� 12 Black Bass Regulations Fishing Hours ������������������������������������������������������������������ 13 Bait Regulations for Inland Waters ������������������������������������� 13 Species Regulations ������������������������������������������������������� 14 Black Bass Regulations ��������������������������������������������������� 14 21 Catfish Regulations ��������������������������������������������������������� 16 Sturgeon Regulations ������������������������������������������������������ 18 Trout, Salmon and Special Regulations ������������������������������ 21 List of Waters with Special Fishing Regulations �������������������25 Supplemental Regulations ������������������������������������������������43 Public Health Advisory on Fish Consumption ��������������������� 45 Trout, Salmon and Special Regulations Like us on Facebook! facebook.com/CaliforniaDFW Contact wildlife.ca.gov Regulations seen in RED TEXT are new this year. Headquarters State of California 1416 Ninth Street, Sacramento 95814 Governor Edmund G� Brown, Jr� (916) 653-7664 Natural Resources Agency wildlife.ca.gov/explore/contact-us Secretary John Laird License and Revenue Branch Department of Fish and Wildlife FREE FISHING DAYS 1740 North Market Blvd�, Director Charlton H� Bonham July 1 and September 2, 2017 Sacramento, CA 95834 California Fish and Game Commission The Fish and Game Commission is composed of five members appointed by the Governor and confirmed by Eric Sklar Russel Burns the State Senate� The Commission sets hunting and sport fishing regulations including seasons, bag limits, President – St� Helena Member - Napa methods and areas of take� In addition, the Commission formulates general policies for the Department of Fish and Wildlife and regulates aspects of commercial fishing� Monthly topical meetings are held to hear regulation Jacque Hostler-Carmesin Peter Silva change proposals� The public may make recommendations in writing before a Commission meeting or present Vice President – McKinleyville Member - Chula Vista its proposals verbally at the meeting� The Commission’s meeting schedule, including specific topics, dates and locations, is posted on their web site www.fgc.ca.gov. Written comments can be directed to the Fish and Anthony Williams Valerie Termini Game Commission at 1416 Ninth Street, Room 1320, Sacramento, CA 95814, or by e-mail to fgc@fgc�ca�gov� Member – Huntington Beach Executive Director - Sacramento Alternate communication formats are available upon request� If reasonable accommodation is needed call CDFW at (916) 322-8911� The California Relay Service for the deaf or hearing-impaired can be utilized from TDD phones at (800) 735-2929� Cover Photo: Stephanie Hogan releases a wild rainbow trout on Putah Creek Products or services provided by advertisers are not promoted or endorsed by the Department of Fish and Wildlife� in Yolo County� Photo courtesy of Roger Bloom� 2 GENERAL INFORMATION REGIONAL OFFICES NORTHERN REGION BAY DELTA REGION Serving Del Norte, Humboldt, Lassen, Mendocino, Serving Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Modoc, Shasta, Siskiyou, Tehama and Trinity counties. Sacramento, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Santa Cruz, 601 Locust Street, Redding 96001 San Francisco, San Joaquin, Solano, Sonoma, and (530) 225-2300 Yolo counties Williamstown, MA | Birmingham, AL [email protected] 7329 Silverado Trail, Napa 94558 (707) 944-5500 Eureka Field Office [email protected] 619 Second Street Eureka 95501 (707) 445-6493 Stockton Field Office 2109 Arch Airport Road, Suite 100 About This Guide Stockton 95206 NORTH CENTRAL REGION (209) 234-3420 Serving Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, This high-quality guide is offered to you El Dorado, Glenn, Lake, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, by the California Department of Fish & Sacramento, San Joaquin, Sierra, Sutter, Yolo and SOUTH COAST REGION Yuba counties. Serving Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, Santa Bar- Wildlife through its unique partnership 1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova 95670 bara and Ventura counties. with J.F. Griffin Publishing, LLC. (916) 358-2900 3883 Ruffin Road, San Diego 92123 The revenue generated through ad sales [email protected] (858) 467-4201 significantly lowers production costs and [email protected] generates savings. These savings translate Los Alamitos Field Office into additional funds for other important CENTRAL REGION agency programs. Serving Fresno, Kern, Kings, Madera, Mariposa, 4665 Lampson Avenue, Suite C Merced, Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Los Alamitos 90720 If you have any feedback or are inter- Stanislaus, Tulare and Tuolumne counties. (562) 342-7100 ested in advertising, please contact us at 1234 E. Shaw Avenue, Fresno 93710 413.884.1001 or at www.JFGriffin.com (559) 243-4005 CALIFORNIA [email protected] INLAND DESERTS REGION Graphic Design: SPORT FISHING DISTRICTSServing Imperial, Inyo, Mono, Riverside and San Jon Gulley, Dane Fay, John Corey, Bernardino counties. Evelyn Haddad, Chris Sobolowski 3602 Inland Empire Blvd., Ste. C-220 Ontario 91764 (909) 484-0167 [email protected] Licenses are not sold at this office. MARINE REGION Serving the entire California coast, from border to border and three nautical miles out to sea. 20 Lower Ragsdale Drive, Ste. 100 Monterey 93940 (831) 649-2870 [email protected] CALIFORNIA SPORT FISHING DISTRICTS North Coast North Central South Central Southern This guide is also Colorado River available online at Sierra Valley 2017-2018 CALIFORNIA FRESHWATER SPORT FISHING REGULATIONS Exp. 12/31/07 WHEN IT COMES TO FISHING YOU’RE THE EXPERT But when it comes to protecting your boat and fishing gear, BoatU.S. is the real pro. Our insurance program features policies that were custom-built for fishing enthusiasts like you. Agreed Value Coverage for your Boat and Motor Broad Cruising Limits within North America Coverage for your Boating & Fishing Tournament Coverage Including Equipment—Up to $5,000 per Incident Entry Fee Reimbursement* Water Towing and Roadside Assistance from 24/7 Claims Service from Boating Experts TowBoatU.S.- the Nation’s Largest Fleet Ask About Our Options for Fishing Guides! GO ONLINE OR CALL FOR A FREE QUOTE BoatUS.com/insurance 800-283-2883 *If covered claim prevents participation. All policies subject to limits and exclusions. In the state of California, the BoatU.S. Marine Insurance Program is provided through Boat Owners Association Insurance Services, CA License # 0H87086. 4 GENERAL INFORMATION WHAT’S NEW FOR 2017? IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO THE FOLLOWING Section 1.74, Sport Fishing Report Card Require- The bald eagle closures at Eastman Lake in ments, has been amended to remove outdated Madera and Mariposa counties are no longer language pertaining to spiny lobsters. Reporting needed so they have been removed from Sec- • Fish without a valid fishing license requirements remain the same for all freshwater tion 7.50. Eastman Lake is now open to fishing if you are 16 years of age or older species. Remember, if you hold a steelhead, salm- year round! (FGC 7145); on, or white sturgeon report card, you must report • Fail to return a report card by the your results to the Department by January 31 of Two additional changes to Section 7.50 have deadline printed on the report card� the following year, or you may be restricted from been made to protect steelhead trout. The take Reporting harvest online at www. obtaining the same card in a subsequent license of rainbow trout is now prohibited in Los Padres wildlife.ca.gov satisfies the return year. See www.wildlife.ca.gov/reportcards for Reservoir. (See subsection (b)(105).) In addition, requirement (CCR T-14, Section 1�74); details on how to report your harvest online! Las Garzas Creek and its tributaries have been • Take or possess fish taken illegally removed from subsection (b)(97) of the Special (FGC 2000 and 2002); Section 7.50, Special Fishing Regulations, has Fishing Regulations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay
    Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared for California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 SSEP Contract No. P0775013 30 September 2009 Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Final Report Prepared by Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting 41 Croft Lane Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567-1160 USA Prepared at the Request of Carl Jochums California Department of Fish & Game Oil Spill Prevention and Response (OSPR) 425 G Executive Court North Fairfield, CA 94534-4019 Submitted to Bruce Joab, SSEP Coordinator and Contract Manager Office of Spill Prevention and Response CA Department of Fish and Game 1700 K Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95811 Phone 916-322-7561 SSEP Contract No. PO775013 Note: This study was conducted in collaboration with Applied Science Associates (ASA), Inc., of South Kingston, RI, under SSEP Contract No. PO775010. ASA submitted a separate Final Report entitled Transport and Impacts of Oil Spills in San Francisco Bay – Implications for Response. i Effectiveness of Larger-Area Exclusion Booming to Protect Sensitive Sites in San Francisco Bay Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report
    Santa Clara County Angler Survey: Final Report Mark Seelos November 28, 2018 Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 2 General Background 3 3 Regulatory Background 4 4 Purpose 4 5 Survey Methodology 5 6 Results 6 6.1 Respondent Demographics . .6 6.2 Fish Consumption . .7 6.3 Awareness . .8 6.4 Health Risk . .9 7 Discussion 10 7.1 Respondent Demographics . 10 7.2 Fish Consumption . 12 7.3 Advisory Awareness . 12 7.4 Health Risk . 12 8 Recommendations 13 9 Acknowledgments 14 10 Figures 15 List of Figures 1 Water Bodies Included in Survey . .6 2 Surveys Conducted at Each Water Body . 15 3 Ethnicities of Anglers Interviewed . 16 4 Ages of Anglers Interviewed . 16 5 Counties of Residence of Anglers Interviewed . 17 6 Median Incomes of Angler Zip Codes . 17 7 Reservoir and Plan for Catch . 17 8 Ethnicity and Plan for Catch . 18 9 Age and Plan for Catch . 18 10 Consumption by Median Income of Zip Code . 19 11 Information Sources where Anglers Learned of Advisories . 19 12 Awareness of Health Advisories by Ethnicity . 20 13 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Ethnicity . 20 14 Awareness of Health Advisories by Age . 21 15 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Age . 21 16 Health Advisory Awareness by Income . 22 17 Health Advisory Awareness and Fish Consumption by Income . 22 1 18 Sign Density and Fish Consumption . 23 19 Anglers who Feed Catch to High-Risk Groups . 23 20 Local vs. Commercial Fish Consumption of Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch . 24 21 Monthly Consumption of locally caught Fish by Anglers who have Ever Eaten Catch 24 22 Percentage of Times Fished vs.
    [Show full text]
  • About WETA Present Future a Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service
    About WETA Maintenance Facility will consolidate Central and South Bay fleet operations, include a fueling facility with emergency fuel The San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation storage capacity, and provide an alternative EOC location, Authority (WETA) is a regional public transit agency tasked with thereby significantly expanding WETA’s emergency response operating and expanding ferry service on the San Francisco and recovery capabilities. Bay, and is responsible for coordinating the water transit response to regional emergencies. Future Present WETA is planning for a system that seamlessly connects cities in the greater Bay Area with San Francisco, using Today, WETA operates daily passenger ferry service to the fast, environmentally responsible vessels, with wait times cities of Alameda, Oakland, San Francisco, Vallejo, and South of 15 minutes or less during peak commute hours. WETA’s San Francisco, carr4$)"(*- /#)тѵр million passengers 2035 vision would expand service throughout the Bay Area, annually under the San Francisco Bay Ferry brand. Over the operating 12 services at 16 terminals with a fleet of 44 vessels. last five years, SF Bay Ferry ridership has grown чф percent. In the near term, WETA will launch a Richmond/San Francisco route (201ш) and new service to Treasure Island. Other By the Numbers terminal sites such as Seaplane Lagoon in Alameda, Berkeley, Mission Bay, Redwood City, the South Bay, and the Carquinez *- /#)ǔǹǒ --$ ./-).+*-/0+ Strait are on the not-too-distant horizon. ($''$*)-$ -. /*ǗǕǑ$& .-*.. 0. 4 --4 /# 4 #4ǹ 1 -44 -ǹ A Plan for Expanded Bay Area Ferry Service --4-$ -.#$+ 1 )! --$ . Vallejo #.$)- . /*!' / /2 )ǓǑǒǘ CARQUINEZ STRAIT Ǚǖʞ.$) ǓǑǒǓǹ )ǓǑǓǑǹ Hercules WETA Expansion Targets Richmond Funded Traveling by ferry has become increasingly more popular in • Richmond Berkeley the Bay Area, as the economy continues to improve and the • Treasure Island Partially Funded Pier 41 Treasure Island population grows.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: an Overview
    Marine Geology 345 (2013) 3–17 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Marine Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/margeo Sediment transport in the San Francisco Bay Coastal System: An overview Patrick L. Barnard a,⁎, David H. Schoellhamer b,c, Bruce E. Jaffe a, Lester J. McKee d a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b U.S. Geological Survey, California Water Science Center, Sacramento, CA, USA c University of California, Davis, USA d San Francisco Estuary Institute, Richmond, CA, USA article info abstract Article history: The papers in this special issue feature state-of-the-art approaches to understanding the physical processes Received 29 March 2012 related to sediment transport and geomorphology of complex coastal–estuarine systems. Here we focus on Received in revised form 9 April 2013 the San Francisco Bay Coastal System, extending from the lower San Joaquin–Sacramento Delta, through the Accepted 13 April 2013 Bay, and along the adjacent outer Pacific Coast. San Francisco Bay is an urbanized estuary that is impacted by Available online 20 April 2013 numerous anthropogenic activities common to many large estuaries, including a mining legacy, channel dredging, aggregate mining, reservoirs, freshwater diversion, watershed modifications, urban run-off, ship traffic, exotic Keywords: sediment transport species introductions, land reclamation, and wetland restoration. The Golden Gate strait is the sole inlet 9 3 estuaries connecting the Bay to the Pacific Ocean, and serves as the conduit for a tidal flow of ~8 × 10 m /day, in addition circulation to the transport of mud, sand, biogenic material, nutrients, and pollutants.
    [Show full text]
  • RTD-Earthquake-Fact
    The California Water Fix Delta Tunnels don’t eliminate earthquake threats to water supply. Earthquake risk mythmaking serves water exporters’ interests. Water exporters misrepresent the risk of earthquakes to generate support for the Delta Tunnels. Fattening the levees is a more effective solution. Californians should work together to build a more seismically resistant Delta that will protect water exports, other critical infrastructure, and save lives -- all at a lower cost than the CA Water Fix. Developing regional water supplies provides a more reliable water supply. The best way to prevent earthquake disruption is to invest in local water solutions, including increased comprehensive water conservation and technology, maximizing wastewater reuse and groundwater recharge, while capturing storm water and rainwater, graywater, and fixing local leaky pipes. Cleaning up local aquifers and providing local jobs for local water makes economic sense. Rather than a huge investment in faraway tunnels let's instead make the levees in the Delta more resilient and prepare all California communities to be less reliant on imported water. MYTH #1: The Delta tunnels will protect California’s water supply from earthquakes. FACT: Earthquakes would hit the existing water transfer conveyance in other parts of California harder than they would hit the Delta. The earthquake threat to the Delta is minimal. The Hayward Fault is 40 miles from the Delta’s center. But the State Water Project (SWP) and federal Central Valley Project (CVP) cross right over high-risk fault areas, from Coalinga south to LA, including the San Andreas Fault. Cement canals in the southern part of the state are more vulnerable to earthquakes than Delta levees.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • David K. Clark, PE
    AFC15 David K. Clark, PE THE METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAKE SHASTA LAKE OROVILLE Bay-Delta LOS ANGELES AQUEDUCTS (City of Los Angeles) COLORADO CALIFORNIA RIVER AQUEDUCT AQUEDUCT (State of Calif.) (Metropolitan) LOCAL SUPPLIES, RECYCLING, GROUNDWATER & CONSERVATION Background Seismic Preparedness Seismic upgrade of facilities Seismic vulnerability assessments Emergency response Collaboration with External Agencies Conclusions 1.7 billion gallons/day average 6 counties, 18 million residents Comprised of 26 member public agencies Imports Colorado River & State Water Project supplies Operates 5 water treatment & 16 hydroelectric plants Maintains 830 miles of pipeline & 9 reservoirs Biennial budget for FY 2014-16 is approximately $3 billion Comprehensive Reliability Strategy Water System InfrastructureInfrastructure System EmergencyEmergency Supply Capacity ReliabilityReliability FlexibilityFlexibility ResponseResponse Seismic Preparedness 1. Seismic Upgrade of Facilities 2. Vulnerability Assessments 3. Emergency Response 4. Collaboration w/External Agencies Scope: Buildings & Structures Dams & Reservoirs Geotechnical Hazards Drivers: Code Changes Increased Knowledge Approach: Re-assess as necessary Upgrade as required Use latest codes Use site-specific data Expect same performance as for new facilities Example of Code Changes (Weymouth Water Treatment Plant) Year Design Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) UBC 1933 0.1g UBC 1958 0.1g* UBC 1991 0.4g IBC 2009 0.52g IBC 2012 0.71g *Estimated value, PGA was not specifically
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA
    Historic Context Statement City of Benicia February 2011 Benicia, CA Prepared for City of Benicia Department of Public Works & Community Development Prepared by page & turnbull, inc. 1000 Sansome Street, Ste. 200, San Francisco CA 94111 415.362.5154 / www.page-turnbull.com Benicia Historic Context Statement FOREWORD “Benicia is a very pretty place; the situation is well chosen, the land gradually sloping back from the water, with ample space for the spread of the town. The anchorage is excellent, vessels of the largest size being able to tie so near shore as to land goods without lightering. The back country, including the Napa and Sonoma Valleys, is one of the finest agriculture districts in California. Notwithstanding these advantages, Benicia must always remain inferior in commercial advantages, both to San Francisco and Sacramento City.”1 So wrote Bayard Taylor in 1850, less than three years after Benicia’s founding, and another three years before the city would—at least briefly—serve as the capital of California. In the century that followed, Taylor’s assessment was echoed by many authors—that although Benicia had all the ingredients for a great metropolis, it was destined to remain in the shadow of others. Yet these assessments only tell a half truth. While Benicia never became the great commercial center envisioned by its founders, its role in Northern California history is nevertheless one that far outstrips the scale of its geography or the number of its citizens. Benicia gave rise to the first large industrial works in California, hosted the largest train ferries ever constructed, and housed the West Coast’s primary ordnance facility for over 100 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Mnn Sept 2020
    Paula Leary · 408.425.3345 [email protected] · Lic. #01469235 Terry Leary · 408.921.4343 Erik Jacobsen (Lic. [email protected]. 01231234) · Lic. #01854782 Office: (650) 847-1141 Golden Gate Sotheby's International Realty [email protected] LearyProperties.com www.goldengatesir.com Median Sales Price 95033 Santa Clara County Santa Cruz County $1.4M MEDIAN PRICES 2017–2020 ZIPCODE 95033 $1.3M SANTA CLARA $1.2M COUNTY $1.1M $1.0M $0.9M SANTA CRUZ COUNTY $0.8M $0.7M 1-20172017 1-20182018 1-20192019 1-20202020 95033 & Santa Clara County & Santa Cruz County Each data point is rolling six months of activity. Data is from August 7, 2020. All data from MLSListings,All data from Inc.MLSListings, Data deemed Inc. Data reliable, deemed but reliable, not guaranteed. but not guaranteed. Provided by Each Golden data Gatepoint Sotheby'sis rolling six International months of activity. Realty. DataInfoSparks is from ©August 2020 7,ShowingTime. 2020. SOLD IN 9 DAYS SOLD IN 10 DAYS SOLD IN 11 DAYS OVER ASKING 24455 Loma Prieta Avenue, Los Gatos 24179 Summit Woods 24960 Skyland Ridge 24145 Summit Woods Built in 2013 · 4 Bedrooms · 4.5 Bathrooms Drive, Los Gatos Road, Los Gatos Drive, Los Gatos Home ±4,300 sf · Lot ±9 acres $1,335,000 $1,765,000 $1,430,000 663 Blossom Hill Road Suite 200, Los Gatos · GoldenGateSIR.com · Each Office is Independently Owned and Operated. Get a head start to Access thousands of new listings before anyone else, finding your home. only at compass.com. Aptos Scotts Valley Scotts 600 Lassen Park Court Benjamin Guilardi Elvie
    [Show full text]
  • Methyl and Total Mercury Spatial and Temporal Trends in Surficial Sediments of the San Francisco Bay-Delta
    Methyl and Total Mercury Spatial and Temporal Trends in Surficial Sediments of the San Francisco Bay-Delta Assessment of Ecological and Human Health Impacts of Mercury in the Bay-Delta Watershed CALFED Bay-Delta Mercury Project Final Report Submitted to: Mark Stephenson California Department of Fish and Game Moss Landing Marine Labs 7544 Sandholdt Road Moss Landing, CA 95039 Submitted by: Wesley A. Heim Moss Landing Marine Laboratories 8272 Moss Landing Rd Moss Landing, CA 95039 [email protected] (email) 831-771-4459 (voice) Dr. Kenneth Coale Moss Landing Marine Laboratories 8272 Moss Landing Rd Moss Landing, CA 95039 Mark Stephenson California Department of Fish and Game Moss Landing Marine Labs 7544 Sandholdt Road Moss Landing, CA 95039 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recent studies indicate significant amounts of mercury are transported into the Bay-Delta from the Coastal and Sierra mountain ranges. In response to mercury contamination of the Bay-Delta and potential risks to humans, health advisories have been posted in the estuary, recommending no consumption of large striped bass and limited consumption of other sport fish. The major objective of the CALFED Bay-Delta Mercury Project “Assessment of Ecological and Human Health Impacts of Mercury in the Bay-Delta Watershed” is to reduce mercury levels in fish tissue to levels that do not pose a health threat to humans or wildlife. This report summarizes the accomplishments of the Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (MLML) and California Department of Fish and Game (CDF&G) at Moss Landing as participants in the CALFED Bay-Delta Mercury Project. Specific objectives of MLML and CDF&G include: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 30-Mile Studio Zone Map N S U G Viejo E
    David Rd Banducci Rd S d Horse Thief o R d 33 r Rd a e Golf & Country Club 58 14 L iv 5 e ak g R e 99 d ld R v d O Mojave l Rid B r 166 Maricopa Maricopa Hwy Airport y d le t 166 i R 166 e Tehachapi Mountains C e e h in a Rd i m W ek Mojave n y SAN LUIS OBISPO e r Cr a ld o l O f i C l a COUNTY C Pine Cyn Rd 58 North Edwards d R yn 58 d C R d t o e o u S nw o sq o da Boron u tt p o L a e C R k T d e d R n 166 14 o y n a Backus Rd d I C r y R d w d o v d s l R in is d l g Hw R B R A F s R n i r n o a o n r t r h i California o e d il KERN r t l k p R an c r i d e s Aliso Park S i e d Aqueduct m p Cerr a S P R o c w l r en Rd l o Edwards n h T o l 58 e Noro a - c l COUNTY i Hi B L e s r e AFB v i st W e nk i a Foothill Rd K Rd j p l o ey a M h 5 c Rd a h e T Rosamond C erro N Willow Springs Airport oroest e Rd Raceway Barstow Fort Tejon Rosamond Blvd t d S n R i State Historic Park Mil P otrero Hw Rosamond Blvd n Ma Lenwood y Rosamond a S m d i er Frazier e 395 r C R ud a H Fo dy xen Va Park lle w C y F a R razier Mountain P y ny d ark Rd on R 33 d r ve B e Ri a av rs Moj LOS PADRES t ow y NATIONAL FOREST G w R o d d rm s H an R il P a o Lanc E r aster e s Quail Rd T l d t R t al d a S n R n Lake y o yo Avenue D d ti n Avenue D h w n a t C r Na e 0 s 138 l o 138 F s 2 Ali 138 e y Sisquoc 1 H Hungry Valley e 1 l Figueroa Mounta River l in Rd 0 a t State Vehicular General V h 15 d e S William J Fox p 247 VENTURA Recreation Area t y R W e W o l Cuyama t W Airfield all e N2 S V t d Sierra Madre t River n R E h S F t t Mountains ood A Avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project Decision Support Model (SARCCUP DSM)
    Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project Decision Support Model (SARCCUP DSM) SARCCUP DSM MODEL DOCUMENTATION DRAFT MARCH 2017 Prepared for Prepared by 1. Introduction The Santa Ana Watershed Project Authority (SAWPA) and its five member agencies, Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA), Orange County Water District (OCWD), San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District (SBVMWD), and Western Municipal Water District (WMWD), collectively “Agencies” in this memorandum, are developing and implementing the Santa Ana River Conservation and Conjunctive Use Project (SARCCUP). SARCCUP is a collaborative regional program that will improve the water supply resiliency of the Santa Ana River Watershed through development of additional dry year yield, reduced water use, and improved habitat for native threatened species populations. The primary goal of the conjunctive use element is to maximize the development and use of imported water supplies and to conjunctively manage these local and imported water supplies such that the aggregate yield and water supply reliability generated by the SARCCUP is greater than the independent management of these resources. Phase 1 of SARCCUP will develop an 180,000 acre‐foot (AF) groundwater bank storage program with capacity to recharge and store 60,000 acre‐feet per year (AFY) during each of three wet years in a decade and extraction facilities to withdraw 60,000 AFY in each of three dry years in a decade. SARCCUP management will also include the ability to utilize transfers and exchanges of other water supplies in lieu of recharging and extracting banked groundwater. In support of the future development of a SARCCUP Master Plan for the conjunctive use element, the Agencies have engaged the CH2M team to develop a Santa Ana River watershed‐wide decision support model (DSM) to optimize the conjunctive use element of SARCCUP.
    [Show full text]