DOCSLIB.ORG

Fenland District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Fenland District Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Level 1 SFRA July 2011 Prepared for Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Revision Schedule Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 01 May 2010 Draft SFRA for Helen Judd Elizabeth Gent Jon Robinson comment Assistant Hydrologist Principal Consultant Associate Director pending EA Meeting Gemma Hoad Assistant Water Scientist 02 December Level 1 SFRA Elizabeth Gent Carl Pelling Jon Robinson 2010 for sign off Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Associate Director Gemma Hoad Assistant Water Scientist 03 February Draft FINAL Elizabeth Gent Carl Pelling 2011 Level 1 SFRA Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Gemma Hoad Assistant Water Scientist 04 July 2011 FINAL Level 1 Elizabeth Gent Carl Pelling Carl Pelling SFRA Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Principal Consultant Gemma Hoad Assistant Water Scientist Helen Judd Senior Assistant Hydrologist Scott Wilson Scott House Alençon Link Basingstoke This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of Scott Wilson's appointment with its client and is subject to the terms of that appointment. It is addressed Hants to and for the sole and confidential use and reliance of Scott Wilson's client. Scott Wilson RG21 7PP accepts no liability for any use of this document other than by its client and only for the purposes for which it was prepared and provided. No person other than t he client may copy (in whole or in part) use or rely on the contents of this document, without the prior written permission of the Company Secretary of Scott Wilson Ltd. Any advice, opinions, or Tel: 01256 310200 recommendations within this document should be read and relie d upon only in the context Fax: 01256 310210 of the document as a whole. The contents of this document do not provide legal or tax advice or opinion. © Scott Wilson Ltd 2011 www.scottwilson.com Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Acronyms and Abbreviations Abbreviation Description AONB Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty BAR Broad Areas for Regeneration BGS British Geological Society CAMC Creating Asset Management CFMP Catchment Flood Management Plan CLG Communities and Local Government Defra Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs DPD Development Plan Document DTM Digital Terrain Model FRA Flood Risk Assessment GIS Geographical Information System IDB Internal Drainage Board LLFA Lead Local Flood Authority LDDs Local Development Documents LDF Local Development Framework LDS Local Development Scheme LiDAR Light Detection and Ranging LPA Local Planning Authority mAOD Metres Above Ordnance Datum NFCDD National Flood and Coastal Defence Database PCPS 2004 Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 PPS Planning Policy Statement RBMP River Basin Management Plan RFRA Regional Flood Risk Appraisal RPG Regional Planning Guidance RSS Regional Spatial Strategy (East of England Plan) SA Sustainability Appraisal SAB SuDS Approving Body SFRA Strategic Flood Risk Assessment SPA Special Protection Area SPD Supplementary Planning Document SPZ Source Protection Zone SuDS Sustainable Drainage Systems Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2011 i Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Abbreviation Description WFD Water Framework Directive Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2011 ii Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Glossary Term Definition Event that on average will occur once every 100 years. Also expressed as an event, 1 in 100 year event which has a 1% probability of occurring in any one year. Flood defence that is designed for an event, which has an annual probability of 1%. 1 in 100 year design In events more severe than this the defence would be expected to fail or to allow standard flooding. Layers of rock sufficiently porous to hold water and permeable enough to allow Aquifer water to flow through them in quantities that are suitable for water supply. The Environment Agency has defined ‘primary’ (previously major) and ‘secondary’ (previously minor) aquifers. Formations that permit water to move through them, but at much lower rates than Aquitard through the adjoining aquifers. Formations that may be sufficiently porous to hold water, but do not allow water to Aquicludes move through them. A high-level planning strategy through which the Environment Agency works with Catchment Flood their key decision makers within a river catchment to identify and agree policies to Management Plan secure the long-term sustainable management of flood risk. Culvert A channel or pipe that carries water below the level of the ground. Poorly sorted sediment showing great lateral and vertical variations in thickness, Diamicton composition and texture. All material of glacial origin found anywhere on land or at sea, including sediment Drift geology and large rocks (glacial erratic). Floodplain Area adjacent to river, coast or estuary that is naturally susceptible to flooding. Flood storage A temporary area that stores excess runoff or river flow often ponds or reservoirs. Fluvial flooding Flooding by a river or a watercourse. Freeboard Height of flood defence crest level (or building level) above designed water level Water that is in the ground, this is usually referring to water in the saturated zone Groundwater below the water table. Head deposit describes ground deposits at the very top of the geological Head Deposit succession , that could not be classified more accurately Inundation Flooding The core of the updated planning system (introduced by the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004). The LDF comprises the Local Development Local Development Documents, including the development plan documents that expand on policies and Framework (LDF) provide greater detail. The development plan includes a core strategy, site allocations and a proposals map. An element of development design which may be used to manage flood risk or avoid Mitigation measure an increase in flood risk elsewhere. Risk The probability or likelihood of an event occurring. Sewer flooding Flooding caused by a blockage or overflowing in a sewer or urban drainage system. Solid geology Bedrock (not drift) Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2011 iii Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Term Definition Flooding caused when intense rainfall exceeds the capacity of the drainage Surface Water flooding systems or when, during prolonged periods of wet weather, the soil is so saturated such that it cannot accept any more water. Sustainable drainage Methods of management practices and control structures that are designed to drain system surface water in a more sustainable manner than some conventional techniques. Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment July 2011 iv Fenland District Council Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations.....................................................................i Glossary .................................................................................................... iii 1 Non-Technical Summary ................................................................ 1 1.1 SFRA Background.......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 SFRA Planning Objectives.............................................................................................. 1 1.3 SFRA Report Layout....................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Fenland District Council Considerations .........................................................................1 1.5 Way Forward .................................................................................................................. 3 1.6 A Living Document.......................................................................................................... 3 2 Introduction ..................................................................................... 4 2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Growth in Fenland .......................................................................................................... 4 2.3 The Aim of Fenland DC SFRA........................................................................................5 2.4 Level 1 SFRA Objectives................................................................................................ 5 2.5 SFRA Structure .............................................................................................................. 5 3 Fenland DC SFRA Study Area........................................................ 7 3.1 Fenland SFRA Boundary................................................................................................7 3.2 Fenland Study Area Characteristics................................................................................7 3.3 History of Flooding in Fenland ...................................................................................... 11 3.4 Sources of Flooding...................................................................................................... 14 3.5 Operating authorities .................................................................................................... 22 4 Policy Context ..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Adopted Core Strategy

    Adopted Core Strategy

    Huntingdonshire D I S T R I C T C O U N C I L Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted September 2009 Environment and Community Services - Planning www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk.uk Local Development Framework Core Strategy Adopted September 2009 Environment and Community Services - Planning www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk This document can be viewed and downloaded from www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk. Further copies of this document can be obtained from: Head of Planning Services Huntingdonshire District Council Pathfinder House St Mary’s Street Huntingdon PE29 3TN If you require this document in another format or translated into another language please contact a member of the Development Plans section on 01480 388388 or [email protected]. © Huntingdonshire District Council 2009 Contents Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword i 1 Introduction 1 2 Links with Other Documents 4 3 The Spatial Vision 6 A Spatial Portrait of Huntingdonshire 6 The Planning Context 9 A Spatial Vision for Huntingdonshire 11 Objectives of the Core Strategy 13 4 The Cornerstone of Sustainable Development 15 5 The Spatial Strategy 19 Key Diagram 19 Strategic Housing Development 21 Settlement Hierarchy 24 Addressing Housing Need 26 Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Showpeople 29 Economic Development 30 Retail and Town Centre Uses 33 Areas of Strategic Green Infrastructure Enhancement 35 Infrastructure and Implementation 39 6 Monitoring 45 Appendices 1 Glossary 52 2 Evidence Base & Supporting Documents 58 3 Saved Policies to be Superseded 63 Contents Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword Huntingdonshire LDF | Core Strategy: Adopted 2009 Foreword The District Council knows that Huntingdonshire is an attractive place where people and communities can thrive and develop in a safe and healthy environment.
  • Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy

    Cambridgeshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Page 1 of 176 June 2011 Contributors The Strategy has been shaped and informed by many partners including: The Green Infrastructure Forum Anglian Water Cambridge City Council Cambridge Past, Present and Future (formerly Cambridge Preservation Society) Cambridge Sports Lake Trust Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Record Centre Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council East of England Development Agency (EEDA) English Heritage The Environment Agency Fenland District Council Forestry Commission Farming and Wildlife Advisory Group GO-East Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England NHS Cambridgeshire Peterborough Environment City Trust Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) South Cambridgeshire District Council The National Trust The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire & Peterborough The Woodland Trust Project Group To manage the review and report to the Green Infrastructure Forum. Cambridge City Council Cambridgeshire County Council Cambridgeshire Horizons East Cambridgeshire District Council Environment Agency Fenland District Council Huntingdonshire District Council Natural England South Cambridgeshire District Council The Wildlife Trust Consultants: LDA Design Page 2 of 176 Contents 1 Executive Summary ................................................................................11 2 Background
  • 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area Profile: Supporting Documents

    National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents www.naturalengland.org.uk 1 National Character 88. Bedfordshire and Cambridgeshire Claylands Area profile: Supporting documents Introduction National Character Areas map As part of Natural England’s responsibilities as set out in the Natural Environment White Paper,1 Biodiversity 20202 and the European Landscape Convention,3 we are revising profiles for England’s 159 National Character Areas North (NCAs). These are areas that share similar landscape characteristics, and which East follow natural lines in the landscape rather than administrative boundaries, making them a good decision-making framework for the natural environment. Yorkshire & The North Humber NCA profiles are guidance documents which can help communities to inform West their decision-making about the places that they live in and care for. The information they contain will support the planning of conservation initiatives at a East landscape scale, inform the delivery of Nature Improvement Areas and encourage Midlands broader partnership working through Local Nature Partnerships. The profiles will West also help to inform choices about how land is managed and can change. Midlands East of Each profile includes a description of the natural and cultural features England that shape our landscapes, how the landscape has changed over time, the current key drivers for ongoing change, and a broad analysis of each London area’s characteristics and ecosystem services. Statements of Environmental South East Opportunity (SEOs) are suggested, which draw on this integrated information. South West The SEOs offer guidance on the critical issues, which could help to achieve sustainable growth and a more secure environmental future.
  • Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1: Report

    Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1: Report

    A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Preliminary Environmental Information report Volume 1: Report June 2019 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements Highways England Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 2. THE SCHEME .......................................................................................................... 8 3. ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................... 24 4. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .......................................... 33 5. AIR QUALITY ......................................................................................................... 44 6. CULTURAL HERITAGE ......................................................................................... 53 7. LANDSCAPE ......................................................................................................... 72 i A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements Highways England Preliminary Environmental Information Report Volume 1 8. BIODIVERSITY ...................................................................................................... 86 9. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ....................................................................................... 106 10. MATERIAL ASSETS AND WASTE ...................................................................... 115 11. NOISE AND VIBRATION ....................................................................................
  • Local Environment Agency Plan

    Local Environment Agency Plan

    (HA-Anytia*? LGAfc to x 3 local environment agency plan BEDFORD OUSE (Lower Reaches) ; EARITH LEAP DECEMBER 1999 LETCHWORTH HITCHIN KEY FACTS AND STATISTICS Total Area: 1556 km2 Ground Levels: Min level: 2 m AOD Max level: 184 m AOD ADMINISTRATIVE DETAILS Environment Agency Organisation: Anglian Region (Central Area) Area Office at Brampton and Catchment (South) Office at Bedford. M a in T o w n s County Councils: (% of LEAP area) District & Borough Councils: Bedford Bedfordshire (47%) Bedford BC Biggleswade Cambridgeshire (40%) East Northamptonshire DC Flitwick Hertfordshire (10%) Huntingdonshire DC Letchworth Northamptonshire (3%) Mid-Bedfordshire DC Hitchin North Hertfordshire DC Huntingdon South Bedfordshire DC St Ives South Cambridgeshire DC St Neots Stevenage BC Water Utility Companies: (% of LEAP area) Internal Drainage Boards: Anglian Water Services Ltd (77%) Alconbury & Ellington Cambridge Water Company (12%) Bedfordshire & Ivel Three Valleys Water Company (11 %) Bluntisham Houghton & Wyton In addition, there are a number of properties which receive Over & Willingham no mains supply and rely on private supply boreholes Swavesey Flood Protection Navigation Length of statutory main rivers: 221 km Length of navigable rivers: 66.6 km Embanked main rivers: 32 km Area protected by embanked channel: 34.2 km2 Conservation Area of natural floodplain: 59.7 krrV Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSIs): 50 Fisheries Water dependent SSSIs: 26 Candidate Special Areas of Conservation Game (trout) fishery: 3 km (cSACs): 1 Cyprinid (coarse)
  • Xx-Dr-Gi-00002 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Peir

    Xx-Dr-Gi-00002 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Peir

    NOTES Hall Green Brook N THIS DRAWING IS TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION Brook WITH ALL OTHER RELEVANT DOCUMENTATION. Grafham West Water (SSSI) e s LEGEND u O t a DCO Site Boundary e r to G Didding n Brook r The Scheme e v i Little Paxton R 500m Study Area Pits (SSSI) Midloe Wood 1km Study Area 2km Study Area Meagre Little Little Paxton Wood Paxton Wood 5km Study Area Wood (SSSI) Special Area of Conservation Papworth Wood (SAC) (SSSI) Papworth Wood River Core area for Barbastelle Kym Cambridge Road Overhall (Source: South Cambridgeshire Grove Biodiversity SPD, July 2009) Huntingdon Wood Junction Caxton Gibbet Junction Willow Pollards West k Overhall Gallow Broo Elsworth Site of Special Scientific of Sharp's Barn (CWS) Elsworth Grove Wood Interest (SSSI) Wood (SSSI) (SSSI) St. Neot's River Great County Wildlife Site (CWS) Common Ouse (CWS) Elsworth (A428 Knapwell Wood (SSSI) Brook to Common Protected Road Verge (PRV) Duloe Farm) (PRV) Fox Brook Wildlife Trust Nature Reserve w Bushmead Wood lo al C ok ro Ancient Woodland Ea B B ste Croxton ro rn ok River Park (CWS) Hon k eydo Broo n m Caldecote Other watercourse a k Eltisley Wood h o n ro Meadows a B (CWS & ancient woodland) Br B en oo n (SSSI) H k a e Ha D ydean Hardwick Abbotsley B rook Litt le Wood (SSSI) ook Wyboston k lmworth Br Broo Co Pits (CWS) Hardwick Wood te Dean Begwary Brook Pits Gasco Begwar y Brook (CWS & Wildlife Trust k W Nature Reserve) o D o a r e r B a e n Black Cat Little l n s a Home Wood l l e Brook a B e Grans a rn y d M ndea D u m r n B Bo Roundabout Barford (CWS) o e
  • Anglian River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the Anglian River Basin District

    Anglian River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the Anglian River Basin District

    Anglian River Basin District Flood Risk Management Plan 2015 - 2021 PART B – Sub Areas in the Anglian River Basin District March 2016 1 of 161 Published by: Environment Agency Further copies of this report are available Horizon house, Deanery Road, from our publications catalogue: Bristol BS1 5AH www.gov.uk/government/publications Email: [email protected] Or the Environment Agency’s National www.gov.uk/environment-agency Customer Contact Centre: T: 03708 506506 © Environment Agency 2016 Email: [email protected]. All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. 2 of 161 Contents Glossary and abbreviations ......................................................................................................... 5 The layout of this document ........................................................................................................ 7 1. Sub-areas in the Anglian River Basin District ...................................................................... 9 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 9 Flood Risk Areas ........................................................................................................................ 10 Management Catchments ........................................................................................................... 10 2. Conclusions, objectives and measures to manage risk in the South Essex
  • Additional Information

    Additional Information

    Client Anglian Water Report Title Proposed Treatment Works at Coldham Hall - Flood Risk Assessment Report Reference 97718-F01V2 Report Status Final V2 Prepared by Joel Read Checked by Aaron Jones Approved by Andrew Pullman Date of Issue 31/07/2019 Issue Method PDF Anglian Water Legal This report has been prepared by Ashfield Flood Risk Solutions (Ashfield) exercising all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of our agreement with the client, incorporating our general Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. This report should not be used by the client in relation to any other matters not covered specifically by aforementioned scope. Unless otherwise and explicitly stated this report is intended for the sole use of the client and may not be copied, forwarded or in any other way distributed to any other party without the knowledge and written consent of Ashfield. We accept no responsibility to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made available and any such party relies on the report at their own risk. If this report does not contain a signature in the Document Control window, then this is an uncontrolled electronic copy and we cannot give any assurances on the source or content of the document. By receiving this report and acting on it, the client or any other person accepts that no individual is personally liable for breach of statutory duty, or otherwise in connection with its content. Ashfield Solutions Group Ltd (Reg. No. 09729218) and Ashfield Flood Risk Solutions Ltd (Reg.
  • Notional River? Authority Information Centre Hood Chics NRA Class Mo National Rivers Authority

    Notional River? Authority Information Centre Hood Chics NRA Class Mo National Rivers Authority

    NRA-Anglian 26 BEDFORD OUSE (LOWER REACHES) CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN SKEGNESS • SUMMARY RE BOSTON* i KINGS LYNN NORWICH • STAMFORD • PETERBOROUGH • CORBY •O U N O LE ► KETTERING WELLINGBOROUGH* • 8URY ST. EDMUNDS • NORTHAMPTON MILTON • SUDBURY KEYNES • BUCKINGHAM Notional River? Authority information Centre Hood Chics NRA Class Mo National Rivers Authority Anglian Region ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 099626 INTRODUCTION Catchment management planning aims to create a consistent framework within which all the N R A ’s functions and responsibilities can be applied in a co­ ordinated manner within a particular catchment area. During this planning process, the current state of the water environment and associated land is systematically analysed and compared with appropriate standards. Where these standards are not being met or are likely to be affected in the future, the shortfalls, together with options for action to resolve them, are presented as issues in a table at the end of this brochure. YOUR VIEWS Formulation of this plan involves consulting and working with many public bodies and individuals. Your views on the issues identified are welcomed. You may also wish to comment on other matters affecting the water environment in the catchment area which you think should be examined by the NRA. Please write with your comments to the following address, from which a full copy of the consultation report may also be obtained: Bedford Ouse (Lower Reaches) Catchment Management Plan, Area Manager, National Rivers Authority, Central Area, Bromholme Lane, Brampton, Huntingdon PE18 8NE. Comments must be received by 12 July 1994. Bedford Ouse - Great Harford area. 2 WHAT IS CATCHMENT PLANNING River catchments are subject to increasing use by a wide variety of activities, many of which interact giving rise to some conflicts.
  • HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST of ENGLAND Contents

    HERITAGE at RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST of ENGLAND Contents

    HERITAGE AT RISK REGISTER 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGEContents AT RISK 2 Buildings atHERITAGE Risk AT RISK 6 2 MonumentsBuildings at Risk at Risk 8 6 Parks and GardensMonuments at Risk at Risk 10 8 Battlefields Parksat Risk and Gardens at Risk 12 11 ShipwrecksBattlefields at Risk and Shipwrecks at Risk13 12 ConservationConservation Areas at Risk Areas at Risk 14 14 The 2009 ConservationThe 2009 CAARs Areas Survey Survey 16 16 Reducing thePublications risks and guidance 18 20 PublicationsTHE and REGISTERguidance 2008 20 21 The register – content and 22 THE REGISTERassessment 2009 criteria 21 Contents Key to the entries 21 25 The registerHeritage – content at Riskand listings 22 26 assessment criteria Key to the entries 24 Heritage at Risk entries 26 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND HERITAGE AT RISK IN THE EAST OF ENGLAND Registered Battlefields at Risk Listed Buildings at Risk Scheduled Monuments at Risk Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk Protected Wrecks at Risk Local Planning Authority 2 HERITAGE AT RISK 2009 / EAST OF ENGLAND We are all justly proud of England’s historic buildings, monuments, parks, gardens and designed landscapes, battlefields and shipwrecks. But too many of them are suffering from neglect, decay and pressure from development. Heritage at Risk is a national project to identify these endangered places and then help secure their future. In 2008 English Heritage published its first register of Heritage at Risk – a region-by-region list of all the Grade I and II* listed buildings (and Grade II listed buildings in London), structural scheduled monuments, registered battlefields and protected wreck sites in England known to be ‘at risk’.
  • Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / East of England

    Heritage at Risk Register 2010 / East of England

    HERITAGE AT RISK 2010 / EAST OF ENGLAND Contents HERITAGE AT RISK 3 Reducing the risks 6 Publications and guidance 9 THE REGISTER 11 Content and assessment criteria 11 Key to the entries 13 Bedford (UA) 16 Cambridgeshire 18 Central Bedfordshire (UA) 28 Essex 30 Hertfordshire 37 Luton (UA) 42 Norfolk 42 Peterborough, City of (UA) 53 Southend-on-Sea (UA) 55 Suffolk 55 Thurrock (UA) 64 The English Heritage scheme for identifying and reducing our Heritage at Risk has been running for more than a decade. Over that time, we have reduced the number of historic sites which have been at risk from destruction or demolition in many parts of the East of England region.The first category of assets which we focused on were Buildings at Risk. In our region, which has suffered the vicissitudes of industrial slumps and changing demographics alongside periods of rapid economic growth, this has led to a number of important buildings facing serious threats. Some of these are redundant farm buildings, mills and industrial structures, others are anything from private houses to ornamental follies. With the expansion of the Buildings at Risk Register and developers to proceed with some building projects, to a Heritage at Risk Register we have undertaken an with the reduced availability of funding. We understand, assessment of registered battlefields, registered parks and too, why it may sometimes be necessary to delay a gardens, scheduled monuments, conservation areas and project, although we also know that to put off routine protected wreck sites. These additional categories have repairs can in the long term be a false economy.
  • Employment Land Study

    Employment Land Study

    Design & Planning Huntingdonshire District Council January 2014 Huntingdonshire Employment Land Study Prepared by: ............................................................. Checked by: ........................................................................ Richard Jones Tom Venables Associate Director Director MidCityPlace, 71 High Holborn, London WC1V 6QS Telephone: 020 7645 2000 Website: http://www.aecom.com Job No 60272853 Reference Huntingdonshire ELS Date Created December 2013 This document has been prepared by AECOM Limited for the sole use of our client (the “Client”) and in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM Limited and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM Limited, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM Limited. Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................... 10 2 Planning context ............................................................................................................................................................