COUNCIL

SUBMISSION TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ON REVISED WARDING ARRANGEMENTS AS PART OF THE ELECTORAL REVIEW OF MILTON KEYNES COUNCIL

APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL ON 9 OCTOBER 2012

1

1. Introduction

Milton Keynes Council is a unitary authority established in 1997. The former Borough Council was subject to an electoral review prior to the establishment of the unitary authority and a further electoral review was held in 2000. As a result, the number of Members was increased from 46 to 51 representing 23 wards on a hybrid system of one, two and three Member wards. The electoral quota on the last review was one Member to approximately 3,000 electors. That quota has now increased to one to 3,500+, and is projected to rise to one to 3,700+ by 2018. The ratio of elected Members to electors, which was roughly even in 2000, has now wide discrepancies because of the growth of parts of Milton Keynes in the interim, and the gaps will continue to widen in the period up to 2018 and beyond.

As a result , the Local Government Boundary Commission for England proposed an electoral review of Milton Keynes. Initially, the Council was asked to comment on the future size of the Council, and submitted proposals that the number of Members should be increased from 51 to 57. The Commission consulted more widely on the basis that the number should remain at 51, whilst recognising that the Council wished to increase the Council size to 57 Members. After considering the representations received, the Local Government Boundary Commission agreed to proceed on the basis of a Council size of 57 Members, and formally announced the next stage of the electoral review in July 2012.

The Commission invited proposals for warding arrangements based on this Council’s size and on a uniform system of three Member wards. Representations were requested by 15 October 2012, and on 9 October 2012, the Council agreed a scheme which was forwarded to the Commission in map and numerical form on 11 October 2012.

2. Statutory Criteria

The Local Government Boundary Commission for England is required by statute to have regard to the following criteria:

(a) the need to secure equality of representation;

(b) the need to reflect the identities and interests of local communities. and

(c) the need to secure effective and convenient local government;

The Council’s proposal seeks to meet all these criteria as follows:

2

2.1 Equality of Representation

The projected electorate for Milton Keynes in 2018 is 190,576. Equally spread over 19 wards, this would give an electorate per ward of 10,030. The Council’s proposed scheme (a copy of the map is attached as Annex A(i) and the details of the wards by parish and polling districts is attached as Annex A(ii)) has a range of wards from 9,046 electors to 10,988 electors by 2018. All of the wards are within 10% of the electoral quota. It is recognised, however, that in 2014, when elections are expected to be held on these wards, the range of electors by ward is 5,952 to 11,348. The closing of this gap over the following years, to 2018, reflects the continuing growth of Milton Keynes in certain areas and the need for the agreed scheme to have some “future-proofing” rather than achieving equality for the first elections.

2.2 Community Identity

Milton Keynes has three identifiable communities:

(a) the historic market and industrial towns such as , , and which pre- date the new city;

(b) the planned new city, started in 1969 and built on a unique grid square and interlinking arterial road network which is continuing to expand into the 21st Century; and

(c) the rural hinterland primarily in the north of the Borough consisting of mainly working farms and small villages.

The Commission acknowledges that it is not possible to measure levels of community identity, but the Council believes that any submission of this nature needs to reflect, as far as possible, the three fundamental communities outlined above.

Equally, the Borough has a number of clearly identifiable boundaries running in a general north/south direction, namely, the M1, the A5/West Coast railway line corridor and the River Ouzel/Ouzel Valley linear park. These boundaries also need to be observed as far as possible in any warding proposals.

2.3 Effective and Convenient Local Government

Milton Keynes is unusual, if not unique, in being a fully parished Borough. The Local Government Boundary Commission’s guidelines state that in areas where parishes exist, the parish boundaries often represent the extent of a community, and parishes should be used as the building blocks of wards. In Milton Keynes parishes have different electorate sizes, vary in geographical size, and are not all internally

3

warded. However, the Council’s submission seeks to retain, as far as possible, parish council boundaries and to maintain community links between estates. This retention of parish identities within the warding arrangements is seen as a strong means of ensuring effective and convenient Local Government, with particular regard to the aims of the Localism Act 2011.

2.4 The Approach

2.4.1 The Council recognises that the three criteria for electoral arrangement reviews can sometimes be in conflict. The Council has, therefore adopted an approach which divides the Borough into 6 ‘regions’ which can largely be dealt with separately, namely:  the rural North  the urban North  the West Flank  Bletchley  the East Flank, and  the Central Spine.

2.4.2 The rural North, comprising the current wards of Olney (2 members), (1 member) and Park (1 member), does not have enough electors for 2 new 3-member wards and has been combined with Newport Pagnell North, which considers itself more rural than urban Milton Keynes, to create 2 new northern rural wards.

2.4.3 The urban North has been created from the 4 current wards of Wolverton, , Linford North and Newport Pagnell South to create 3 new wards along the Wolverton to Newport Pagnell road.

2.4.4 The Western Flank, bounded by the A5D to the North East and Standing Way to the South East consists of the 4 current wards of Stony Stratford (3 members), Loughton Park (3 members), Furzton (2 members) and Emerson Valley (3 members) with a 2018 projected electorate of 45,714. This is too many for 4 new wards (11428 each), but theoretically enough for 5 new wards (9142 each). However, the granularity of the parish ward building blocks is such that 5 wards cannot be created from the West Flank electorate without at least one ward breaching the -10% limit. To create 5 wards within the +/-10% limit requires more electors. The A5D boundary is significantly ‘harder’ than the Standing Way boundary, so the Bletchley parish area 121 (Scotts) has been included in the West Flank wards. The new Stony Stratford ward is largely the same as the current ward, but without the largely unpopulated areas 63 ( with 17 electors) and 64 (Whitehouse with 11 electors). Those areas have been incorporated into a new ward which has also taken areas 43 (Crownhill), 46 (Grange Farm & Hazeley) and 117 (Shenley Wood) from the currently oversized Loughton Park Ward. The new Loughton Park Ward, as well as losing the above mentioned areas, has gained area 30 (Shenley Lodge) to

4

bring it within limits. The current Emerson Valley and Furzton wards have been slightly reconfigured to bring them within limits.

2.4.5 The 3 new Bletchley wards are a reconfiguration of the current 4 wards with the exception of area 121 (Scotts). The current Eaton Manor ward will not have enough electors in 2018 to meet the new limits, so areas 4 (Central Bletchley) and 8 (Manor North) have been included in the new ward. Area 3 (Poets) was considered but there is a very tenuous link between that area and Eaton. The rest of Bletchley has been reconfigured to present as little change as possible while recognising the need to reduce the number of wards by 1 to bring them within limits.

2.4.6 The East Flank is a more natural block of 3 wards made up of the 4 current wards of Linford South, Middleton, Walton Park and Danesborough.

2.4.7 The Central Spine of 3 new wards is a slight reconfiguration of the 3 current wards of Bradwell, and to bring them within limits.

2.5 Using this fundamental approach, this submission seeks primarily to achieve equality representation, whilst observing communities of interest and promoting effective and local government as far as possible.

5

3. Detailed Warding Proposals

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 1 Bletchley North & 3 8,228 9,046 -9.8% This seats covers much of the Fenny Stratford existing Bletchley and Fenny Stratford ward. The revised proposals seek to reduce the width of the ward and to bring together abutting wards. It brings the Abbeys Polling District (EC) into the seat as it abuts Church Green Polling District (AA) and Fenny Stratford Polling District (AG). It transfers the Saints Polling District (AB) into the ward. The seat has a variance of -9.8%. This could only be improved by moving a Polling District from a neighbouring parish, say Tinkers Bridge Polling District (WC). We would be opposed to this as it breaches our attempt to retain parish council boundaries. The other alternative is to move the Manor North Polling District (AH) into it. This would impact on the variance in the Bletchley South seat. Bletchley North also includes the parish of Simpson as currently, though part of the parish sits to the east of the canal.

6

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 2 Bletchley South & 3 9,077 9,830 -2% This is the current Eaton Manor Eaton ward plus Central Bletchley Polling District (AD) and the Manor North Polling District (AH). This is a tight compact seat with strong community links served by shared schools, a central shopping area and transport links.

3 Bletchley West & 3 9,460 9,403 -6.2% This ward brings together much of Whaddon the West Bletchley Parish Council area. It includes the Saints Polling District (AB) where there are road links with the neighbouring Racecourses Polling District (UA). It includes the Counties Polling District (EB) which directly abuts the Rivers Polling District (UC) meaning both sides of the Shenley Road are in the same ward.

The ward excludes the Scots PD (EA). This is in WARD 6 only because of the need for electoral parity. Its community links, such as schools, Catholic and other churches are in the West Bletchley parish council area, though for some the nearest shops are in Furzton.

7

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 4 Bradwell 3 10,758 10,363 3.3% This ward brings together the areas of the current ward that runs to the north of the city centre. For electoral quota purposes Downs Barn has been added to this ward. This is due to strong historical and geographical links between Conniburrow and Downs Barn that includes governance issues and transport links. The proposal will create a cohesive north of ward.

8

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 5 Central Milton 3 8,639 9,394 -6.3% This seat includes the City Centre Keynes and the grid squares directly adjacent to it.

The whole CMK Parish is included in this ward. There are clear and strong reasons for maintaining the City Centre as one ward in terms of governance and representation on major matters that are strategic to the whole of Milton Keynes Borough. It would be impractical to split this parish.

However the surrounding grid squares are large in terms of electors and it is not possible to maintain the current ward.

As such the wards which have the best links to the City Centre are Campbell Park, Oldbrook and Fishermead. Good transport links exist between them including the ability to commute on foot between them quickly and the areas share similar governance issues. The size of these areas also places the ward within quota and creates a cohesive geographical area to the City Centre.

9

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 6 Emerson 3 7,760 9,857 -1.7% The area of Tattenhoe is large in terms of electors. Placing this area with other Polling Districts of relatively new expansion and growth will create a cohesive ward of within quota and shared issues. There are shared school, shopping links and transport links.

7 Furzton 3 9,876 9,822 -2.1% This ward brings together parts of the existing Furzton and Emerson Valley wards. The Polling Districts abut and share facilities such as schools. They do not have the longevity of historic communities like Newport Pagnell, Wolverton, Stony Stratford or Bletchley. The combination of areas achieves electoral parity. However to make the west flank balance in voter parity terms, because of the size of some Polling Districts there is a need to bring some voters in to the west. The Council proposal suggests this should be the West Bletchley Polling District of Scots (EA). There are alternatives in both the centre and north of the borough, but the inclusion of the Scots Polling District reflects some school links and the common A421 boundary.

10

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 8 Loughton 3 9,850 9,632 -4% This Ward brings together the Loughton Parish with the Shenley Lodge Polling District (HA) which share several geographical and governance issues and together create a more robust ward. Crownhilll PD (LB) therefore goes into Ward 13 for electoral parity purposes as retaining it would place the proposed ward over quota. 9 Middleton & 3 8,721 10,724 6.9% This brings together the Downhead Willen Park and Willen Polling Districts (KC, KD, KE) with Milton Keynes Village and the new Kingston area. It includes the Woolstone Polling District (CB). The areas have many geographical links, share transport links and community services. Together they form a strong ward proposal with many shared governance issues.

10 Newport Pagnell 3 10,151 10,772 7.4% The north ward brings the town and North & Hanslope rural west together as there are strong shared interests between these areas.

11

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 11 Newport Pagnell 3 11,202 10,692 6.6% This ward links the south of Newport South & Giffard Pagnell to the area Park and the two Polling Districts of Great Linford (JA) and Giffard Park and Blakelands (JC). There are strong geographical and historical links between the areas. There are good public transport links and it is possible to walk between areas such as Blakelands into Newport Pagnell easily. There is also a recent Railway Walk that has been established that links the area of Great Linford to Newport Pagnell

along the route of the old railway line that existed between the areas. It is acknowledged that this seat crosses the M1, however the transport links and community links make this a strong and cohesive seat for governance that the M1 does not undermine.

The H3 (A422) forms the main boundary to the south and Marlborough Street (V8) is the long standing boundary between Great Linford and Stantonbury.

12

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 12 Olney & 3 10,004 9,921 -1.1% This is a large rural area with shared Sherington rural and community issues that takes into account the large number of disparate Parish Councils in the area.

13 Oxley 3 5,952 9,054 -9.7% This will be an entirely new ward. It brings together areas of new expansion and will include areas due to be built over the next few years. There are planned links between those estates, as well as allowing for shared governance issues. It includes the current Crownhill area (LB) to achieve electoral parity as an area with shared geographical interest.

13

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 14 Stantonbury 3 11,348 10,988 9.5% Stantonbury ward is currently several thousand electors below quota but has strong community links as highlighted by Stantonbury Parish Council and therefore forms the basis of the new ward.

The inclusion of Hodge Lea and Stacey Bushes is taken on both geographical and community lines. The current ward shares a current geographical boundary with this area and it is possible to walk between the areas quickly. There are strong links with the estates being built at the same time, with similar social housing, and so they share governance issues. There are frequent and direct public transport links between the Stantonbury estates and Hodge Lea and Stacey Bushes. Hodge Lea and Stacey Bushes share strong historic links between them.

Including these estates still means that the proposed seat would be seriously under quota.

14

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 14 Stantonbury It is therefore proposed to include (cont) the areas of Neath Hill, Bolbeck Park and Pennyland into this ward. In similar terms to Hodge Lea and Stacey Bushes, these two estates share historic links with each other including transport links and governance issues. It is extremely practical and helpful to keep these areas together if possible. They share a common secondary school, Stantonbury Campus. They also share strong similarities and links with the Stantonbury area, including good transport links. The Neath Hill area in particular shares regeneration needs with Stantonbury and will provide for good community governance in the ward.

15

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 14 Stantonbury Stantonbury Parish Council has (cont) expressed a preference for the new Oakridge Park development to enter into the Stantonbury ward. This area was moved into the Stantonbury Parish Council area in 2011. However, the necessary inclusion of Hodge Lea, Stacey Bushes, Neath Hill and Bolbeck Park into the Stantonbury ward for quota and good governance purposes bringsthe ward to a level that is unable to accommodate the new Oakridge Park development in the proposed ward. Including Oakridge Park in Stantonbury ward would have unnecessary and disproportionate effects on the governance of other areas of Milton Keynes given the complexity of the proposal. It is noted that the best geographical link would seem to be for Oakridge Park to be included in the proposed Wolverton ward, which could accommodate the estate and still be within quota. However the submission has taken account of the second preference of Stantonbury Parish Council and included the estate in the proposed Newport Rural seat, Ward 10.

16

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 15 Stony Stratford 3 9,260 9,334 -7% The main change from the present arrangement is that the new Ward excludes the Western Expansion Areas of Fairfields and Whitehouse, whilst retaining the village of Calverton, which is linked to Stony Stratford through a single spine road. The majority of the seat falls within the Stony Stratford Town Council boundary and has historic links dating back over 30 years to the building of the Galley Hill and Fullers Slade estates. Two Mile Ash with over three thousand electors is included for electoral parity but has strong links to the Parish including transport and boundaries, as well as also currently being in the existing Stony Stratford seat.

16 Walton Park 3 10,402 10,964 9.3% This is the existing Walton Park ward and the relatively new and expanding Monkston Park estate. They share several community interests and governance issues all being relatively similar newer estates and form a strong ward proposal.

17

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 17 Woughton & 3 10,511 10,424 3.9% This ward brings together the Netherfield historic parish of Woughton with the new city areas that form the Woughton parish council area. This restores the cohesion of the area and creates a balanced ward served by common shops, schools and churches.

The new ward unites all areas to the west of the River Ouzel and the large Ouzel Valley linear park area. This is the natural boundary between the original new city areas and the east flank growth area.

The ward now includes the Springfield Polling District (CC) which has strong community connections with the Woughton area, especially Peartree Bridge and in terms of common schools, leisure and churches.

18

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 18 & 3 8,204 10,674 6.4% This brings together the historic Broughton centre of Woburn Sands with the rural surround. However the combination of all these areas still places the seat significantly under the quota needed. As the A5 and Caldecotte Lake form a strong natural barrier between the east of Milton Keynes and the traditionally separate area of Bletchley, the large area of Broughton has been included in this ward for quota parity. It shares good geographical links with the Woburn Sands area. Broughton is not built in the traditional Milton Keynes grid pattern and it is therefore thought it may develop some commonality in governance issues with its more traditional neighbour than other Milton Keynes estates would. As a new estate it is also hoped it can develop strong community ties with its older, more established, neighbour.

19

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 19 Wolverton 3 9,101 9,682 -3.5% The current Wolverton ward has 57 178,504 190,576 strong links but will not be within quota in 2018.

Wolverton is an historic railway town built in a predominantly terraced style to house employees of the . was built during the same period and links between the two areas date back several centuries. Strong community links exist between the two areas with residents of New Bradwell shopping in Wolverton. Public transport links are frequent with several bus services, with Wolverton train station also situated between the two areas. New Bradwell Parish Council has expressed a strong desire to remain in the Wolverton ward due to shared governance issues that arise from the close historical nature of the link between the two.

20

WARD WORKING TITLE MEMBERS ELECTORATE ELECTORATE FORECAST DESCRIPTION 2012 2018 VARIANCE 19 Wolverton (cont) Greenleys was one of the first new estates to be built as Milton Keynes expanded. It has strong historical links with Wolverton and has formed a part of Town Council since the inception of that body in its current form. There are good transport links between the two and shared geography.

For electoral parity reasons the Stacey Bushes Polling District (VF) and the Hodge Lea Polling District (VE) are moved to Ward 14. While both these wards fall within the Wolverton and Greenleys Town Council area, this has only been the case since 2011. It would be possible to split these areas and include one in the proposed new Wolverton ward. However, Hodge Lea and Stacey Bushes have strong community and historical links including geography, public transport, community facilities, and the previous parish council. They have always previously been linked together; splitting them would be impractical and unnecessary for good governance.

21

4. Conclusion

The Council’s submission has been the subject of discussion by a Member Working Group and was considered at a special Council meeting on 9 October 2012 when it was approved by a majority of the Members present and voting. The scheme presented to the Council did not have final proposed ward names, and the Council reserves the right to review the ward names when the Boundary Commission’s recommendations are received.

This submission has been prepared taking careful account of the three main criteria set by the Boundary Commission - to achieve equality of representation, to reflect the identities and interests of local communities and to secure effective and convenient local government - and is submitted for the Boundary Commission’s consideration on that basis.

22

Submission to the Boundary Commission approved by Milton Keynes Council on 9 October 2012

949494 919191

878787 909090 868686

888888 939393 929292 898989 929292

969696 102102102

105105105

103103103 104104104 343434

959595 101101101 989898

999999

100100100 114114114 333333 353535 115115115 116116116

393939 363636 393939 979797 373737 979797 777777 373737

747474 383838 555555 108108108 757575 414141 757575 112112112 575757 112112112 122122122 585858 107107107 606060 767676 404040 797979 111111 595959 797979 474747 110110110 616161 787878 121212 110110110 616161 787878 123123123 109109109 123123123 101010 101010 171717 636363 626262 141414 636363 626262 151515 111111111 484848 111111111 131313 484848 444444 565656 494949 515151 505050 161616 505050 838383 696969 646464 434343 424242 424242 858585 666666 858585 545454 525252535353545454 454545 535353 191919 848484 808080 828282 656565 464646 808080 828282 656565 303030 818181 118118118 999 555 676767 119119119 313131 117117117 282828 323232 777 323232 121121121 686868 252525 120120120 272727 181818 242424 666 242424 202020 292929 727272 292929 727272 111 262626 444 262626 707070 717171 707070 888 333 222 737373 222222 113113113 106106106

212121 232323

The numbers on the map refer to the ID of the Parish Ward. See accompanying excel spreadsheet for a key. NewPARISH_WARD Ward Count Fill Sum(ELECTORATE_2012) Sum(ELECTORATE_2018)

***** 0 00 Bletchley-North:Fenny 7 8,228 9,046 Bletchley-South:Eaton 6 9,077 9,830 Bletchley-West:Whaddon 6 9,460 9,403 Bradwell 5 10,758 10,363 CMK 5 8,639 9,394 Emerson 4 7,760 9,857 Furzton 5 9,876 9,822 Loughton 4 9,850 9,632 Middleton and Willen 5 8,721 10,724 Newport North cum Hanslope 7 10,151 10,772 Newport South / Gifford 3 11,202 10,692 Olney cum Sherington 19 10,004 9,921 Oxley 5 5,952 9,054 Stantonbury 7 11,348 10,988 Stony Stratford 7 9,260 9,334 Walton Park 5 10,402 10,964 WCC - Netherfield 12 10,511 10,424 Woburn & Broughton 7 8,204 10,674 Wolverton 4 9,101 9,682 ELECTORATE ELECTORATE Draft New Area Parish Wards Parish Ward ID 2012 2018 Bletchley-North:Fenny CHURCH GREEN 1 1872 2032 Bletchley-North:Fenny POETS 3 1334 1338 Bletchley-North:Fenny SIMPSON VILLAGE 5 495 497 Bletchley-North:Fenny FENNY STRATFORD 6 1747 2181 Bletchley-North:Fenny GRANBY 7 207 207 Bletchley-North:Fenny ASHLAND 9 337 626 Bletchley-North:Fenny ABBEYS 120 2236 2165 Bletchley-South:Eaton CENTRAL BLETCHLEY 4 2361 2367 Bletchley-South:Eaton MANOR NORTH 8 740 828 Bletchley-South:Eaton EATON SOUTH 21 1475 1513 Bletchley-South:Eaton MANOR SOUTH 22 2134 2061 Bletchley-South:Eaton NEWTON LEYS 23 320 1115 Bletchley-South:Eaton EATON NORTH 113 2047 1972 Bletchley-West:Whaddon SAINTS 2 1292 1297 Bletchley-West:Whaddon COUNTIES 20 1664 1618 Bletchley-West:Whaddon CASTLES 70 1469 1428 Bletchley-West:Whaddon FAIRWAYS 71 1562 1541 Bletchley-West:Whaddon RIVERS 72 2019 1971 Bletchley-West:Whaddon RACECOURSES 73 1454 1414 Bradwell BRADWELL COMMON 10 2378 2275 Bradwell HEELANDS 11 2427 2322 Bradwell CONNIBURROW 12 2056 1967 Bradwell DOWNS BARN 40 1709 1704 Bradwell BRADWELL 109 2188 2095 CMK FISHERMEAD 13 2642 2590 CMK OLDBROOK 16 3758 3682 CMK CENTRAL MILTON KEYNES EAST 17 836 819 CMK CENTRAL MILTON KEYNES WEST 111 924 1320 CMK CAMPBELL PARK 123 479 983 Emerson TATTENHOE 26 2708 3972 Emerson WESTCROFT 27 1702 1847 Emerson 28 2464 2598 Emerson KINGSMEAD 29 886 1440 Furzton EMERSON VALLEY SOUTH 24 1041 1069 Furzton EMERSON VALLEY NORTH 25 2598 2668 Furzton FURZTON NORTH 31 2169 2124 Furzton FURZTON SOUTH 32 2015 1976 Furzton SCOTTS 121 2053 1985 Loughton SHENLEY LODGE 30 2327 2278 Loughton LOUGHTON 42 2434 2378 Loughton GREAT HOLM 44 2408 2353 Loughton 45 2681 2623 Middleton and Willen WOOLSTONE 14 682 669 Middleton and Willen MILTON KEYNES VILLAGE 47 1992 3709 Middleton and Willen MONKSTON & KINGSTON 48 2593 2820 Middleton and Willen DOWNHEAD PARK & WILLEN PARK 112 2334 2408 Middleton and Willen WILLEN AND NEWLANDS 122 1120 1118 Newport North cum Hanslope 33 832 889 Newport North cum Hanslope HANSLOPE 34 1848 1935 Newport North cum Hanslope 35 658 689 Newport North cum Hanslope OAKRIDGE PARK 36 494 902 Newport North cum Hanslope 95 115 113 Newport North cum Hanslope NEWPORT PAGNELL NORTH 114 5862 5634 Newport North cum Hanslope REDHOUSE PARK 116 342 610 Newport South / Gifford GREAT LINFORD 37 2788 2652 Newport South / Gifford GIFFARD PARK & BLAKELANDS 39 2395 2278 Newport South / Gifford NEWPORT PAGNELL SOUTH 115 6019 5762 Olney cum Sherington OLNEY WEST 86 3366 3345 Olney cum Sherington OLNEY EAST 87 1642 1645 Olney cum Sherington WESTON UNDERWOOD 88 189 187 Olney cum Sherington RAVENSTONE 89 181 179 Olney cum Sherington 90 70 70 Olney cum Sherington 91 994 983 Olney cum Sherington 92 123 122 Olney cum Sherington 93 192 190 Olney cum Sherington WARRINGTON 94 34 34 Olney cum Sherington 96 477 470 Olney cum Sherington 97 250 246 Olney cum Sherington 98 86 85 Olney cum Sherington 99 125 123 Olney cum Sherington 100 606 597 Olney cum Sherington SHERINGTON 101 784 773 Olney cum Sherington 102 504 497 Olney cum Sherington ASTWOOD 103 149 147 Olney cum Sherington 104 57 56 Olney cum Sherington & FILGRAVE 105 175 172 Oxley CROWNHILL 43 1869 1827 Oxley GRANGE FARM & HAZELEY 46 1178 1151 Oxley FAIRFIELDS 63 17 1169 Oxley WHITEHOUSE 64 11 1162 Oxley SHENLEY WOOD 117 2877 3745 Stantonbury BOLBECK PARK & PENNYLAND 38 1482 1408 Stantonbury NEATH HILL 41 1425 1422 Stantonbury STANTONBURY 55 2387 2303 Stantonbury HODGE LEA 78 831 808 Stantonbury STACEY BUSHES 79 844 821 Stantonbury BANCROFT, BANCROFT PARK & BLUEBRIDGE 107 1513 1462 Stantonbury BRADVILLE 108 2866 2764 Stony Stratford CALVERTON 56 142 142 Stony Stratford STONY STRATFORD NORTH 57 1309 1339 Stony Stratford STONY STRATFORD SOUTH EAST 58 1344 1341 Stony Stratford STONY STRATFORD SOUTH WEST 59 1432 1430 Stony Stratford GALLEY HILL 60 779 778 Stony Stratford FULLERS SLADE 61 1042 1102 Stony Stratford TWO MILE ASH 62 3212 3202 Walton Park MONKSTON PARK 51 1068 1164 Walton Park WALNUT TREE & WALTON 65 3478 3775 Walton Park GATE 66 1644 1674 Walton Park BROWNS WOOD & OLD FARM PARK 67 2427 2471 Walton Park KENTS HILL & BRINKLOW 69 1785 1880 WCC - Netherfield SPRINGFIELD 15 1816 1785 WCC - Netherfield WOUGHTON ON THE GREEN NORTH 49 287 315 WCC - Netherfield PEARTREE BRIDGE 50 660 718 WCC - Netherfield PASSMORE 52 171 186 WCC - Netherfield WOUGHTON PARK 53 155 169 WCC - Netherfield WOUGHTON ON THE GREEN SOUTH 54 180 198 WCC - Netherfield NETHERFIELD 80 1597 1554 WCC - Netherfield BEANHILL 81 1346 1310 WCC - Netherfield TINKERS BRIDGE 82 517 506 WCC - Netherfield EAGLESTONE 83 1554 1512 WCC - Netherfield COFFEE HALL 84 1556 1517 WCC - Netherfield LEADENHALL 85 672 654 Woburn & Broughton 18 437 425 Woburn & Broughton WAVENDON 19 653 1369 Woburn & Broughton CALDECOTTE 68 1025 1043 Woburn & Broughton 106 326 320 Woburn & Broughton BROUGHTON & ATTERBURY 110 3495 5050 Woburn & Broughton WOBURN SANDS NORTH 118 1089 1275 Woburn & Broughton WOBURN SANDS SOUTH 119 1179 1192 Wolverton WOLVERTON WEST 74 3086 3766 Wolverton WOLVERTON EAST 75 2220 2207 Wolverton GREENLEYS 76 1721 1675 Wolverton NEW BRADWELL 77 2074 2034