Wildlife of the Brahmaputra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wildlife of the Brahmaputra WILDLIFE OF THE BRAHMAPUTRA Kashmira Kakati “The native town of Gowahatty is built entirely of bamboos, reeds, and grass. To the south an extensive marsh almost surround the whole station, and the contiguity of many old tanks, choked with jungle, coupled with the vicinity of the hills on every quarter except the north, renders this town, in spite of the improvements already alluded to, one of the most insalubrious in Assam’. “I arrived at the mouth of the little stream Dikhoo, and mounting an elephant, rode through a dense tree and grass jungle to Seebsaugur, distant twelve miles from the Burrampooter”. “In the Chawlkhowa river, opposite Burpetah, I have seen basking in the sun on the sand banks, as many as ten crocodiles at a time; and upon one occasion, a heap of a hundred crocodiles’s eggs, each about the size of a turkey’s egg, were discovered on a sand bank, and brought to me”. - From ‘A Sketch of Assam’, John Butler, 1847 Photo on previous age: A makhna at Poba Reserve Forest, the last rainforest remnant flush on the Brahmaputra. 2 CONTENTS Acknowledgment ...4 Summary...7 Introduction...8 Objectives & Methods...10 Site/Species Accounts...17 1. D’ering Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh...17 2. Kobo Chapori & Poba Reserve Forest...20 3. Dibru-Saikhowa National park and Motapung-Maguri Beels...25 4. The River Elephants...29 5. Panidehing WLS & Dikhowmukh...41 6. Molai Chapori...44 7. Bordoibam-Bilmukh Proposed Bird Sanctuary...48 8. Satjan Wetland & Ranganadi and Subansiri Dams...50 9. River Dolphins – by Abdul Wakid...53 10. Kaziranga National Parks and the Greater One-horned Rhino...61 11. The Brahmaputra Chaporis...76 12. The Bengal Florican...84 13. Laokhowa and Burachapori Wildlife Sanctuaries...86 14. Island tigers...94 15. Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary...99 16. Rivers and forests – A forest officer’s perspective...101 17. The golden langur...104 18. Wetlands of the Western Brahmaputra...105 Conclusion...112 3 Acknowledgment I thank Dr K.K.Dwivedi for this opportunity to compile these vignettes on the wildlife of the Brahmaputra. On my visits to wildlife areas starting from D’ering WLS in East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh all the way downstream to Dhubri, several people freely shared with me their wealth of knowledge and experience from living and working on or close to the river. Among them were those making a living on the river – boatmen, fishermen and herders; officials, foresters, scientists, conservationists and guides; and villagers whose daily lives involve interactions with Brahmaputra wildlife. At Assam Forest Department – Dr C.Ramesh, DFO, Parbatjhora Division for his insights into what the Brahmaputra represents in terms of its forest value; Mr P.Sivakumar, Conservator of Forests, Northern Assam Circle, Tezpur for his time and suggestions on key persons to meet at Burhachapori and Laokhowa WLS; Dr Sonali Ghosh, for information on wetlands in Kokrajhar and Bongaigaon and providing important contacts; Mr Bhaskarjyoti Buragohain, Assistant Conservator of Forests, Northern Range, Biswanath Ghat, Kaziranga National Park and Mr Ashok Das, Range Forest Officer, Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary and for their time and a glimpse into what it takes to protect Assam’s rhinos; Mr M.C. Talukdar, DFO Dhemaji and his wife for their kind help and hospitality at Dhemaji; Mr R.N.Boro, DFO Wildlife Kokrajhar for kindly providing information on Dheer and Diplai Beels; Mr. H.Medak, Deputy Ranger, Jonai, Forest guards Mr Farid Ali at Orang National Park, Mr Boloram Doley at Gogamukh, Dhemaji, Mr Tularam Modi, Mr Prabhat Gogoi, Mr Keri Kramsa and Mr Jibon Pau at Poba Reserve Forest and Kobo Chapori; Mr Manoj Kumar Das and all staff of the Borgang Boat Camp; Mr Tankeshwar Phukan, Panidehing Bird Sanctuary; B. Rajbongshi and G. Sajem on NH 37; Md. Idris Ali, Boatman, Burhachapori WLS; Mr Girish Ray, Mr Dhiraj Ch.Ray and Mr Mukul Kalita at Kokrajhar Division for all help rendered and field stories and knowledge shared. At Arunachal Pradesh Forest Department – Mr Tashi Mize, DFO, D’ering Wildlife Sanctuary, East Siang district for being completely unfazed by my 5:30 am appearance at his Pasighat residence and personally taking me into the sanctuary to see the abundant evidence of wildlife in the lush grasslands of the sanctuary, sharing documents and checklists, and arranging a tasty lunch at the Pilomukh Beat; Mr G.Borang, Deputy Ranger and forest guards who accompanied us to the field; Mr Tanyo Siram, Eco-development Committee, D’ering WLS on hope for wildlife. At Tinsukia – Dr Ranjan Das, professor, birder and photographer, for his time at Maguri Beel and a wide-angle view of wetland conservation; Mr Puru Gupta, Deputy 4 Commissioner, for his overview on the conservation issues concerning Dibru-Saikhowa National Park; Probin Hatibarua and Polash Phukan at Kohuwa Resort for logistics. At Aaranyak – Abdul Wakid for writing the chapter on river dolphins and taking me to meet conservation volunteers in Jorhat, Sibsagar and Dibrugarh down many a feeder road to the river from NH-37; Namita Brahma for sharing her research findings on Bengal Floricans; Bibhuti Lahkar for his explanation of floodplain grassland dynamics; Firoz Ahmed for information on the herpetofauna of the Brahmaputra and tigers of Kaziranga. At WWF, India – Hiten Baishya and David Smith, of the North Bank Landscape Elephant Program at Tezpur for their detailed data and analysis of the causes of the elephant-human conflict in the landscape; Tridip Sharma and Jimmy Borah of the Tiger program for sharing information on their monitoring of the Brahmaputra river islands for tigers and prey; Anupam Sharma, Head of WWF’s Assam Landscape for facilitating my visit and interviews; and Amit Sharma, Senior Coordinator – Rhino Conservation for the information on the Indian Rhino Vision 2020 program. At Lakhimpur and Dhemaji – Mr Bikul Goswami, Green Heritage, for his poignant story of loss of the north bank forests and living rivers rendered dead by dams, but also hope in the form of the tiny Satjan wetland where waterfowl are protected by the community; Mr Baliram Gogoi, pioneer of the community guardian movement for the waterfowl; Mr Mriganabh Gogoi, painter and sculptor, who sketches and paints the fish and birds of his native Dhakuakhana; Mr Debojit Phukan of Megamix Nature Club and Mr Bhaskar Bora, Green Heritage who I was unable to meet, but who provided me contacts and information over phone; Mr Royal Pegu, journalist and environmentalist, Dhemaji for sharing information on Poba Reserve Forest; Bijoy Shankar Singh, village headman, Kobo Chapori, recounted the disappearance of some species of wildlife like wild buffalo, tiger and sambar from the island in the last two decades; Dhruba Das, volunteer, for his perspective of the river elephants from trying to follow them for over a year along the chaporis. At Dibrugarh, Sibsagar and Jorhat – Sintu Deori, Gunabhiram Deori, Pradip Deori, and Pranab Bharali of Deorigaon Village, Dehingmukh Reserve Forest for recounting their years of conflict with elephants on the Brahmaputra; Lekhon Gogoi, guide spoke about the birds and elephants at Panidehing Bird Sanctuary; Eyang Gam, Volunteer of the Dolphin Conservation Network for a Mising folk tale about the river dolphin and Durgiram Yein about their trials with the river elephants, at Disangmukh; Hiren Dutta and Dijen Bora of NGO Dolphin spoke about stork conservation at Dikhowmukh and walked us to the Azan Peer dargah and thanks also to Mrs Dutta for making us delicious jolpan at their home; Mr Ananta Dutta of NGO Keteki gave an added perspective on the river elephants, and sadly gives a term for them - ‘the homeless herd’; Madhab Das and Sushil Kalita at Neamatighat for 5 showing us which routes the river elephants move to Majuli; and Jadav Payenge, the outspoken Forest Man of India for his story of the reforestation of a barren river island, now named for him as ‘Molai Chapori’. At Laokhowa-Burhachapori WLS - Smarajit Ojah, Asst. Professor, Geography & NRM, Nowgong Girls College and Prasanta Bordoloi, Wildlife Filmmaker and Painter, both also of the Laokhowa-Burhachapori Conservation Society, for driving from Nowgong to Burhachapori late evening to share their exciting documentation of wildlife in the two sanctuaries and the river islands and about conservation goals that can be achieved when NGOs and government join hands; Prem Prasad Adhikari, village headman, Dhaniya, for speaking about how the sanctuary came to be established and their present difficulties; Shabana Hussain, M.A. scholar shared her research findings on the socio-economic status of the fringe villagers of the WLS. At Sonitpur and Darrang – Imtiaz Ahmed for kindly arranging my visit, accompanying me to Orang National Park and Lohori Char and setting up my interviews with the villagers; Safiuddin Ahmed, teacher, for his observant accounts about snakes and frogs, unusual among most interviewees who spoke mainly of elephants and rhinos; Nurul Islam and Usman Ghani, senior villagers at Badlisar; Tayab Ali and Nobi Hussain, settlers on Lohori Chapori who share their space with wild pigs, rhinos and tigers; Mahendra Upadhyay, cattle owner and Sunnilal Yadav, herder, on Sande Chapori recount their travels up the Brahmaputra with their livestock and the wildlife that they encountered then and now. At Guwahati - Dr Anwaruddin Choudhury for sharing his extensive information on wildlife of the northeast and his suggestions of people to meet in the field; Mr Dwipen Kalita, elephant expert, for his insights into the river
Recommended publications
  • Lohit District GAZETTEER of INDIA ARUNACHAL PRADESH LOHIT DISTRICT ARUNACHAL PRADESH DISTRICT GAZETTEERS
    Ciazetteer of India ARUNACHAL PRADESH Lohit District GAZETTEER OF INDIA ARUNACHAL PRADESH LOHIT DISTRICT ARUNACHAL PRADESH DISTRICT GAZETTEERS LOHIT DISTRICT By S. DUTTA CHOUDHURY Editor GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1978 Published by Shri M.P. Hazarika Director of Information and Public Relations Government of Amnachal Pradesh, Shillong Printed by Shri K.K. Ray at Navana Printing Works Private Limited 47 Ganesh Chunder Avenue Calcutta 700 013 ' Government of Arunachal Pradesh FirstEdition: 19781 First Reprint Edition: 2008 ISBN- 978-81-906587-0-6 Price:.Rs. 225/- Reprinted by M/s Himalayan Publishers Legi Shopping Corqplex, BankTinali,Itanagar-791 111. FOREWORD I have much pleasure in introducing the Lohit Distri<^ Gazetteer, the first of a series of District Gazetteers proposed to be brought out by the Government of Arunachal Pradesh. A'Gazetteer is a repository of care­ fully collected and systematically collated information on a wide range of subjects pertaining to a particular area. These information are of con­ siderable importance and interest. Since independence, Arunachal Pra­ desh has been making steady progress in various spheres. This north-east frontier comer of the country has, during these years, witnessed tremen­ dous changes in social, economic, political and cultural spheres. These changes are reflected in die Gazetteers. 1 hope that as a reflex of these changes, the Lohit District Gazetteer would prove to be quite useful not only to the administrators but also to researdi schplars and all those who are keen to know in detail about one of the districts of Arunachal Pradesh. Raj Niwas K. A. A. Raja Itanagar-791 111 Lieutenant Governor, Arunachal Pradesh October 5, i m Vili I should like to take this opportunity of expressing my deep sense of gratitude to Shri K; A.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of ACCEPTED CANDIDATES APPLIED for the POST of GD. IV of AMALGAMATED ESTABLISHMENT of DEPUTY COMMISSIONER's, LAKHIMPUR
    LIST OF ACCEPTED CANDIDATES APPLIED FOR THE POST OF GD. IV OF AMALGAMATED ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER's, LAKHIMPUR Date of form Sl Post Registration No Candidate Name Father's Name Present Address Mobile No Date of Birth Submission 1 Grade IV 101321 RATUL BORAH NAREN BORAH VILL:-BORPATHAR NO-1,NARAYANPUR,GOSAIBARI,LAKHIMPUR,Assam,787033 6000682491 30-09-1978 18-11-2020 2 Grade IV 101739 YASHMINA HUSSAIN MUZIBUL HUSSAIN WARD NO-14, TOWN BANTOW,NORTH LAKHIMPUR,KHELMATI,LAKHIMPUR,ASSAM,787031 6002014868 08-07-1997 01-12-2020 3 Grade IV 102050 RAHUL LAMA BIKASH LAMA 191,VILL NO 2 DOLABARI,KALIABHOMORA,SONITPUR,ASSAM,784001 9678122171 01-10-1999 26-11-2020 4 Grade IV 102187 NIRUPAM NATH NIDHU BHUSAN NATH 98,MONTALI,MAHISHASAN,KARIMGANJ,ASSAM,788781 9854532604 03-01-2000 29-11-2020 5 Grade IV 102253 LAKHYA JYOTI HAZARIKA JATIN HAZARIKA NH-15,BRAHMAJAN,BRAHMAJAN,BISWANATH,ASSAM,784172 8638045134 26-10-1991 06-12-2020 6 Grade IV 102458 NABAJIT SAIKIA LATE CENIRAM SAIKIA PANIGAON,PANIGAON,PANIGAON,LAKHIMPUR,ASSAM,787052 9127451770 31-12-1994 07-12-2020 7 Grade IV 102516 BABY MISSONG TANKESWAR MISSONG KAITONG,KAITONG ,KAITONG,DHEMAJI,ASSAM,787058 6001247428 04-10-2001 05-12-2020 8 Grade IV 103091 MADHYA MONI SAIKIA BOLURAM SAIKIA Near Gosaipukhuri Namghor,Gosaipukhuri,Adi alengi,Lakhimpur,Assam,787054 8011440485 01-01-1987 07-12-2020 9 Grade IV 103220 JAHAN IDRISH AHMED MUKSHED ALI HAZARIKA K B ROAD,KHUTAKATIA,JAPISAJIA,LAKHIMPUR,ASSAM,787031 7002409259 01-01-1988 01-12-2020 10 Grade IV 103270 NIHARIKA KALITA ARABINDA KALITA 006,GUWAHATI,KAHILIPARA,KAMRUP
    [Show full text]
  • When and How to Study the Nesting Biology of Indian Birds: Research Needs, Ethical Considerations, and Best Practices
    BARVE ET AL.: Nesting biology of Indian birds 1 When and how to study the nesting biology of Indian birds: Research needs, ethical considerations, and best practices Sahas Barve, T. R. Shankar Raman, Aparajita Datta & Girish Jathar Barve, S., Raman, T. R. S, Datta, A., & Jathar, G., 2020. When and how to study the nesting biology of Indian birds: Research needs, ethical considerations, and best practices. Indian BIRDS 16 (1): 1–9. Sahas Barve, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, 10th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, D.C. 20560. E-mail: [email protected]. [Corresponding author.] T. R. Shankar Raman, Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, ‘Amritha’, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysore 570017, Karnataka, India. Aparajita Datta, Nature Conservation Foundation, 1311, ‘Amritha’, 12th A Main, Vijayanagar 1st Stage, Mysore 570017, Karnataka, India. Girish Jathar, Bombay Natural History Society, Hornbill House, Dr Salim Ali Chowk, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Road, Mumbai 400001, Maharashtra, India. Manuscript received on 03 February 2020. Abstract The nesting biology of a bird species is likely the most important component of its life history and it is affected by several ecological and environmental factors. Various components of avian nesting biology have proved to be important traits for testing fundamental ecological and evolutionary hypotheses, and for monitoring the efficacy of biological conservation programs. Despite its significance, the nesting biology of most Indian bird species is still poorly understood. The past few years have, however, seen a significant increase in the number of submissions to Indian BIRDS, of observational studies of avian nesting biology, which promises an exciting new wave of ornithological natural history research in India.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre for Wildlife Rehabilitation and Conservation (CWRC), Kaziranga National Park, Assam
    Centre for Wildlife Rehabilitation and Conservation (CWRC), Kaziranga National Park, Assam Annual Report 2018-19 Cover page photo credits: Subhamoy B/IFAW-WTI Annual report 2018-19: CWRC, Assam CONTENTS 1. Report of the Officer-in-charge ...................................................................................................... 1 2. History of the Rescue Centre .......................................................................................................... 1 Kaziranga National Park................................................................................................................. 1 Threats to Kaziranga National Park ............................................................................................. 2 Wildlife Trust of India (WTI) ........................................................................................................... 3 3. Vision .............................................................................................................................................. 3 4. Mission ........................................................................................................................................... 3 5. Objective ......................................................................................................................................... 3 6. About us .......................................................................................................................................... 4 7. Organizational Chart of the Rescue Centre ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Flood Situation of Assam – a Case Study
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264878734 The Flood Situation of Assam – A Case Study Article CITATION READS 1 34,158 2 authors, including: Mukul Bora Dibrugarh University 10 PUBLICATIONS 88 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Mukul Bora on 31 October 2014. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. The Flood Situation of Assam – A Case Study Mukul Chandra Bora Lecturer (Sélection Grade) in Civil Engineering Dibrugarh Polytechnic, Lahowal: Pin: 786010 Assam, India Abstract The problem caused by water may broadly be catagorised into two major groups’ viz. shortage of water and surplus of water. Shortage of water causes drought and surplus water causes flood. The water is the vital ingredients for the survival of human being but sometimes it may cause woe to the human life not due to insufficient water but due to abundant water which in turn causes the natural disaster called as flood. Assam is situated at the easternmost part of India. Geographically it is at the foothills of the Himalaya. Every year Assam experiences a huge amount of losses due to devastating flood caused by the river Brahmaputra. The losses are more in few places like (Majuli, the biggest river Island), Dhemaji, North Lakhimpur, Dhakuakhana and few places of Barak valley in Assam. The problem of flood is very old in Assam and the solution is very much difficult due to complex and devastating nature of the River Brahmaputra. Both short term and long term measures are sometimes failed to mitigate the losses caused by flood.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Action Plan the Ganges River Dolphin
    THE CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE GANGES RIVER DOLPHIN 2010-2020 National Ganga River Basin Authority Ministry of Environment & Forests Government of India Prepared by R. K. Sinha, S. Behera and B. C. Choudhary 2 MINISTER’S FOREWORD I am pleased to introduce the Conservation Action Plan for the Ganges river dolphin (Platanista gangetica gangetica) in the Ganga river basin. The Gangetic Dolphin is one of the last three surviving river dolphin species and we have declared it India's National Aquatic Animal. Its conservation is crucial to the welfare of the Ganga river ecosystem. Just as the Tiger represents the health of the forest and the Snow Leopard represents the health of the mountainous regions, the presence of the Dolphin in a river system signals its good health and biodiversity. This Plan has several important features that will ensure the existence of healthy populations of the Gangetic dolphin in the Ganga river system. First, this action plan proposes a set of detailed surveys to assess the population of the dolphin and the threats it faces. Second, immediate actions for dolphin conservation, such as the creation of protected areas and the restoration of degraded ecosystems, are detailed. Third, community involvement and the mitigation of human-dolphin conflict are proposed as methods that will ensure the long-term survival of the dolphin in the rivers of India. This Action Plan will aid in their conservation and reduce the threats that the Ganges river dolphin faces today. Finally, I would like to thank Dr. R. K. Sinha , Dr. S. K. Behera and Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers of Peace: Restructuring India Bangladesh Relations
    C-306 Montana, Lokhandwala Complex, Andheri West Mumbai 400053, India E-mail: [email protected] Project Leaders: Sundeep Waslekar, Ilmas Futehally Project Coordinator: Anumita Raj Research Team: Sahiba Trivedi, Aneesha Kumar, Diana Philip, Esha Singh Creative Head: Preeti Rathi Motwani All rights are reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or utilised in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, without prior permission from the publisher. Copyright © Strategic Foresight Group 2013 ISBN 978-81-88262-19-9 Design and production by MadderRed Printed at Mail Order Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India PREFACE At the superficial level, relations between India and Bangladesh seem to be sailing through troubled waters. The failure to sign the Teesta River Agreement is apparently the most visible example of the failure of reason in the relations between the two countries. What is apparent is often not real. Behind the cacophony of critics, the Governments of the two countries have been working diligently to establish sound foundation for constructive relationship between the two countries. There is a positive momentum. There are also difficulties, but they are surmountable. The reason why the Teesta River Agreement has not been signed is that seasonal variations reduce the flow of the river to less than 1 BCM per month during the lean season. This creates difficulties for the mainly agrarian and poor population of the northern districts of West Bengal province in India and the north-western districts of Bangladesh. There is temptation to argue for maximum allocation of the water flow to secure access to water in the lean season.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment on the Impact of the Tripura Earthquake
    www.gi.sanu.ac.rs, www.doiserbia.nb.rs J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic. 2021, 71(1), pp. 1–13 Original scientific paper UDC: 911.2:5580.34(540)“2017” https://doi.org/10.2298/IJGI2101001D Received: October 8, 2020 Reviewed: March 15, 2021 Accepted: March 22, 2021 ASSESSMENT ON THE IMPACT OF THE TRIPURA EARTHQUAKE (JANUARY 3, 2017, MW = 5.6) IN NORTHEAST INDIA Jimmi Debbarma1, Jatan Debnath1* 1Tripura University, Department of Geography & Disaster Management, Suryamaninagar, Tripura, India; e-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract: The northeastern part of the Indian subcontinent, considered as the most active seismic zone of the Indian subcontinent, was hit by an earthquake of Mw 5.6 on January 3, 2017. The epicenter of this earthquake was Kanchanbari located in the Dhalai district of Tripura. The present study aims to assess the environmental and socio-economic impact of this earthquake in the vicinity of the epicenter. To assess and determine the level of damage, the affected areas were visited during the first week of the 2017 earthquake. Various Government offices were also consulted to acquire data on damages caused by the earthquake. Moreover, Remote Sensing and Geographical Information System (RS & GIS) techniques were applied to address the influence of this earthquake on bank erosion. During the field visit, the striking features of soil liquefaction generated by the earthquake were observed in the flood plain area of the Manu River. Landslide, with three casualties in India and the neighbor Bangladesh, and damages of infrastructure were also reported. Additionally, an assessment of the bank erosion study revealed that the rate of the post-earthquake bank erosion increased to 592%, compared to the pre-earthquake bank erosion within the study length of the Manu River.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study on Deepor Beel: the Ramsar Site and the Most
    A case study on Deepor Beel: The Ramsar site and the most prominent flood plain wetland of Brahmaputra The genesis Deepor Beel Wildlife Sanctuary and the Ramsar site of international importance recognized under the Ramsar Convention, 1971, located about 18 km southwest of Guwahati city between 90036∕ 39∕∕ E and 91041∕∕25∕∕ E longitude and 26005∕26∕∕ N and 2609∕26∕∕ N latitude and 55 m above the mean sea level is considered as one of the largest and prominent flood-plain lakes in the Brahmaputra valley in Ramcharani Mouza of Guwahati sub-division under Kamrup (Metropolitan) district. Deepor Beel included in the Directory of Asian Wetlands as a wetland type 14 is an open beel connected with a set of inflow and out flow channels. The main inlets of the beel are the Mara Bharalu and the Basishtha-Bahini rivers which carry the sewage as well as rain water from Guwahati city. The only outlet of the beel is Khanajan located towards the north- east having connection with the main river Brahmaputra. Another outlet, Kalmoni has now no existence due to the rampant construction over the channel. Conservation History of Deepor Beel 1989: Preliminary notification of Deepor Beel Wildlife Sanctuary vide FRW 1∕89∕25, 12 January (Area - 4.1sq. km.) 1997: Formation of Deepor beel Management Authority by Government of Assam 2002: Declaration of Ramsar site (Area - 40 sq. km.) 2004: Declaration of Important Bird Area (IBA) by Birdlife International 2009: Final notification of Deepor Beel Wildlife Sanctuary vide FRM 140∕2005∕260, 21 February (Area - 4.1sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Indian Freshwater Turtles, Which Are Usually Bigger
    Fantastic Facts Indian Part 3 Freshwater Turtles Conservation / Threat Status of Turtles Many turtles, terrapins and tortoises are threatened with extinction, that is, dying out completely. Listed below are the turtles discussed in this article (from Part 1 to 3), with their status, or prospects of survival. Name Status (Global) Assam Roofed Turtle Endangered Cochin Forest Cane Turtle Endangered Crowned River Turtle Vulnerable Rock Terrapin Near Threatened Indian Flapshell Turtle Least Concern Indian Softshell Turtle Vulnerable Indian Narrow-headed Softshell Turtle Endangered Red-crowned Roofed Turtle Critically Endangered Northern River Terrapin Critically Endangered THE CATEGORIES Critically Endangered -- This is the highest category that a species can be assigned before “extinction”. It represents a “last ditch” effort to provide a warning to wildlife agencies and governments to activate management measures to protect the species before it disappears from the face of the earth. When a species is Critically Endangered, usually its chances of living for the next 100 years are very low. Often, its chances of surviving even for 10 years are not good at all ! Endangered -- This is the second highest threat category that a species can be assigned before it becomes further threatened e.g. Critically Endangered or Extinct. When a species is Endangered, its chances of survival as a species for the next 100 years are low. Vulnerable -- The IUCN Red List defines Vulnerable as when a species is not Critically Endangered or Endangered, but is still facing a high risk of extinction in the wild. This is the first threat category for ranking a species when it has some serious problems from human-related threats.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of POST GST COMMISSIONERATE, DIVISION and RANGE USER DETAILS ZONE NAME ZONE CODE Search
    LIST OF POST GST COMMISSIONERATE, DIVISION AND RANGE USER DETAILS ZONE NAME GUW ZONE CODE 70 Search: Commission Commissionerate Code Commissionerate Jurisdiction Division Code Division Name Division Jurisdiction Range Code Range Name Range Jurisdiction erate Name Districts of Kamrup (Metro), Kamrup (Rural), Baksa, Kokrajhar, Bongaigon, Chirang, Barapeta, Dhubri, South Salmara- Entire District of Barpeta, Baksa, Nalbari, Mankachar, Nalbari, Goalpara, Morigaon, Kamrup (Rural) and part of Kamrup (Metro) Nagoan, Hojai, East KarbiAnglong, West [Areas under Paltan Bazar PS, Latasil PS, Karbi Anglong, Dima Hasao, Cachar, Panbazar PS, Fatasil Ambari PS, Areas under Panbazar PS, Paltanbazar PS & Hailakandi and Karimganj in the state of Bharalumukh PS, Jalukbari PS, Azara PS & Latasil PS of Kamrup (Metro) District of UQ Guwahati Assam. UQ01 Guwahati-I Gorchuk PS] in the State of Assam UQ0101 I-A Assam Areas under Fatasil Ambari PS, UQ0102 I-B Bharalumukh PS of Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Gorchuk, Jalukbari & Azara PS UQ0103 I-C of Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Nagarbera PS, Boko PS, Palashbari PS & Chaygaon PS of Kamrup UQ0104 I-D District Areas under Hajo PS, Kaya PS & Sualkuchi UQ0105 I-E PS of Kamrup District Areas under Baihata PS, Kamalpur PS and UQ0106 I-F Rangiya PS of Kamrup District Areas under entire Nalbari District & Baksa UQ0107 Nalbari District UQ0108 Barpeta Areas under Barpeta District Part of Kamrup (Metro) [other than the areas covered under Guwahati-I Division], Morigaon, Nagaon, Hojai, East Karbi Anglong, West Karbi Anglong District in the Areas under Chandmari & Bhangagarh PS of UQ02 Guwahati-II State of Assam UQ0201 II-A Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Noonmati & Geetanagar PS of UQ0202 II-B Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Pragjyotishpur PS, Satgaon PS UQ0203 II-C & Sasal PS of Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Dispur PS & Hatigaon PS of UQ0204 II-D Kamrup (Metro) District Areas under Basistha PS, Sonapur PS & UQ0205 II-E Khetri PS of Kamrup (Metropolitan) District.
    [Show full text]