DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluación De La Distribución De Ácaros, Fitófagos Y Depredadores, Durante La Época Seca En Cultivos De Importancia Económica En Guatemala

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluación De La Distribución De Ácaros, Fitófagos Y Depredadores, Durante La Época Seca En Cultivos De Importancia Económica En Guatemala CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA-CONCYT- SECRETARIA NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA-SENACYT- FONDO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGIA –FONACYT- UNIVERSIDAD DEL VALLE DE GUATEMALA-UVG- INFORME FINAL Evaluación de la distribución de ácaros, fitófagos y depredadores, durante la época seca en cultivos de importancia económica en Guatemala PROYECTO FODECYT 29-2008 Manuel Antonio Porres Arreaga, Ph D. Investigador principal GUATEMALA, junio 2013 AGRADECIMIENTOS La realización de este trabajo, ha sido posible gracias al apoyo financiero dentro del Fondo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología,- FONACYT-, otorgado por la Secretaria Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología-SENACYT-y al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología -CONCYT-. ii OTROS AGRADECIMIENTOS Se agradece la cooperación del Dr. Gregory Evans en la identificación de especies de ácaros Depredadores de la familia Phytoseiidae y de ácaros fitófagos de la familia Tenuipalpidae. iii CONTENIDO Página RESUMEN ................................................................................................................ vii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................. viii PARTE I ...................................................................................................................... 1 I.1. INTRODUCCION ............................................................................................ 1 I.2. PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA ....................................................... 2 I.2.1. Antecedentes en Guatemala ....................................................................... 2 I.2.2. Justificación del trabajo de investigación ................................................... 2 I.3. OBJETIVOS ......................................................................................................... 3 I.3.1. Objetivo general ......................................................................................... 3 I.3.2. Objetivos específicos .................................................................................. 3 I.4. METODOLOGIA ................................................................................................. 4 1.4.1. Área experimental ..................................................................................... 4 1.4.2. Las variables ............................................................................................. 5 1.4.3. Diseño experimental ................................................................................... 5 I.4.4. Colecta de muestras de campo .................................................................... 5 I.4.5. Trabajo de Laboratorio................................................................................ 8 PARTE II .................................................................................................................... 9 MARCO TEÓRICO ................................................................................................... 9 PARTE III ................................................................................................................. 23 III. RESULTADOS .................................................................................................. 23 III.1. Discusión de Resultados ............................................................................ 34 PARTE IV ................................................................................................................. 36 IV.1. CONCLUSIONES .......................................................................................... 36 IV.2. RECOMENDACIONES ................................................................................. 37 IV.3. REFERENCIAS BIBLIOGRÁFICAS ........................................................... 38 IV.4. ANEXOS .......................................................................................................... 42 PARTE V .................................................................................................................. 44 V.1. Informe financiero ..................................................................................... 44 iv INDICE DE FIGURAS Figura 1. Segmentación en la subclase Acari ................................................................ 9 Figura 2. Separación de grupos en orden Parasitiforme según número y posición de estigmas ................................................................................................. 10 Figura 3. Superfamilia Eriophyoidea .......................................................................... 11 Figura 4. Familia Tetranychidae Donnadieu ............................................................... 12 Figura 5. Familia Tenuipalpidae Berlese .................................................................... 12 Figura 6. Familia Tarsonemidae Kramer ................................................................... 13 Figura 7. Familia Acaridae ......................................................................................... 14 Figura 8. Colocación de las setas dorsales en los diferentes géneros de ácaros de la familia Phytoseiidae. ............................................................................... 15 INDICE DE FOTOGRAFÍAS Fotografía 01. Oligonychus punicae del aguacate ........................................................ 2 Fotografía 02. Deformación de frutos ........................................................................ 42 Fotografía 03. Rayado del fruto ................................................................................. 42 Fotografía 04. Decoloración del fruto ........................................................................ 42 Fotografía 05. Manchado del fruto ............................................................................ 42 Fotografía 06. Clorosis del follaje ............................................................................. 42 Fotografía 07. Necrosis de los tejidos ........................................................................ 42 Fotografía 08. Presencia de telarañas en el follaje...................................................... 43 Fotografía 09. Recolección de ácaros del follaje por el MAGA ................................. 43 Fotografía 10. Recolección de ácaros del follaje ........................................................ 43 Fotografía 11. Infestación de ácaros en el follaje de chile (MAGA) ........................... 43 Fotografía 12. Follaje infestado por ácaros (MAGA) ................................................. 43 INDICE DE GRÁFICAS Gráfica 1. Periodo de incubación de un huevecillo a estado adulto según temperatura .............................................................................................. 17 Gráfica 2. Proceso de control de ácaros .................................................................... 18 v INDICE DE TABLAS Tabla 1 Regiones muestreadas en los diferentes cultivos. .............................................. 6 Tabla 2 Especies de ácaros depredadores .................................................................... 23 Tabla 3 Especies de ácaros fitófagos ........................................................................... 26 vi RESUMEN El objetivo del presente estudio fue la identificación de ácaros depredadores y fitófagos asociados con los principales cultivos de importancia económica de Guatemala. La Unidad de Normas y Regulaciones del MAGA (Ministerio de Agricultura, Ganadería y Alimentación), tuvo su cargo la recolección de especímenes de ácaros en los cultivos en los diferentes departamentos del país. Los especímenes recolectados fueron llevados al laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada de la Universidad del Valle, donde se hicieron los montajes en portaobjetos y cubre objeto de vidrio, utilizando Hoyer‟s como medio de montaje. Luego se procedió a su secamiento y clarificación en un horno de laboratorio por cuatro días a temperatura de 45°F. Se procedió a su anillamiento con pintura de uñas y a su identificaron en el laboratorio de Entomología Aplicada, enviando los especímenes que no se pudieron identificar, al Dr. Evans del USDA, para su identificación. Es importante iniciar la identificación de ácaros en Guatemala, debido a que existe poca información sobre ellos y se hace importante para las exportaciones porque son las plagas de mayor importancia en este aspecto. Al detectarlos en los materiales vegetativos el USDA no permite su entrada a Los Estados Unidos, causando problemas económicos a los exportadores. Uno de los obstáculos para las exportaciones de materiales vegetativos de plantas, es la presencia de algún estado de acaros en las hojas, de tal manera que ocurren intercepciones por el USDA en los puertos de entrada a Los Estados Unidos. Aunque ellos encuentren un espécimen que sea depredador, el embarque es sancionado. De aquí que es necesario hacer tratamientos para reducir los chances de que los follajes estén infestados. Al realizar las identificaciones se logró establecer que la mayoría pertenecen a las familias Tenuipalpidae y Tetranychidae, existiendo una buena cantidad de plantas hospederas en la familia Tenuipalpidae. Se encontró que existe una alta cantidad de ácaros depredadores, principalmente en la familia Phytoseiidae, lo cual es de importancia porque existe control natural de fitófagos. vii ABSTRACT The objective of this study was the identification of predacious and phytophagous mites associated to the main crops of economic importance in Guatemala. Personal from the Ministerio de Agricultura
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NDP 39 Hazelnut Big Bud Mite
    NDP ## V# - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae National Diagnostic Protocol Phytoptus avellanae Nalepa Hazelnut big bud mite NDP 39 V1 NDP 39 V1 - National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae © Commonwealth of Australia Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia (referred to as the Commonwealth). Creative Commons licence All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en. The full licence terms are available from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. This publication (and any material sourced from it) should be attributed as: Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2017). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae – NDP39 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics) Author Davies, J; Reviewer Knihinicki, D. ISBN 978-0-9945113-9-3 CC BY 3.0. Cataloguing data Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostics (2017). National Diagnostic Protocol for Phytoptus avellanae NDP39 V1. (Eds. Subcommittee on Plant Health
    [Show full text]
  • Download Article (PDF)
    Biologia 67/3: 546—560, 2012 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-012-0025-x Measuring the host specificity of plant-feeding mites based on field data – a case study of the Aceria species Anna Skoracka1 &Lechoslaw Kuczynski´ 2 1Department of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umultowska 89, 61–614 Pozna´n, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Avian Biology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Umul- towska 89, 61–614 Pozna´n, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: For the majority of eriophyoid species, host ranges have been established purely on the basis of collection records, usually without quantitative data. The aim of this study was to: (1) quantitatively examine published literature to explore whether relevant analyses of field-collected quantitative data were used to assess host specificity of herbivores; (2) propose a protocol for data analysis that could be applied to plant-feeding mites; (3) analyse host specificity of the grass-feeding Aceria species as a case study. Field data were collected in Central and Northern Europe over a period of 11 years, and included 73 grass species. For the eight Aceria species found, infestation parameters and host specificity indexes were assessed. Accumulation curves were calculated to study how the sampling effort influenced estimates of host specificity indexes. A literature analysis showed that among the studies that declared an aim of estimating the host range only 56% of them applied any quantitative analysis or informed on estimation reliability. The analysis of field-collected data and its interpretation showed the most complete and reliable conclusions about the host specificity of Aceria species when all indices were considered and, if available, other information about the mite’s ecology and biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Diverse Mite Family Acaridae
    Disentangling Species Boundaries and the Evolution of Habitat Specialization for the Ecologically Diverse Mite Family Acaridae by Pamela Murillo-Rojas A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ecology and Evolutionary Biology) in the University of Michigan 2019 Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Thomas F. Duda Jr, Chair Assistant Professor Alison R. Davis-Rabosky Associate Professor Johannes Foufopoulos Professor Emeritus Barry M. OConnor Pamela Murillo-Rojas [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7823-7302 © Pamela Murillo-Rojas 2019 Dedication To my husband Juan M. for his support since day one, for leaving all his life behind to join me in this journey and because you always believed in me ii Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to say thanks to the University of Michigan, the Rackham Graduate School and mostly to the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology for all their support during all these years. To all the funding sources of the University of Michigan that made possible to complete this dissertation and let me take part of different scientific congresses through Block Grants, Rackham Graduate Student Research Grants, Rackham International Research Award (RIRA), Rackham One Term Fellowship and the Hinsdale-Walker scholarship. I also want to thank Fulbright- LASPAU fellowship, the University of Costa Rica (OAICE-08-CAB-147-2013), and Consejo Nacional para Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICIT-Costa Rica, FI- 0161-13) for all the financial support. I would like to thank, all specialists that help me with the identification of some hosts for the mites: Brett Ratcliffe at the University of Nebraska State Museum, Lincoln, NE, identified the dynastine scarabs.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrastructural Study of the Relationship Between the Mite Floracarus Perrepae Knihinicki & Boczek (Acariformes:Eriophyidae) and the Fern
    1 Running title: Floracarus ultrastructure For submission to Australian Journal of Entomology An ultrastructural study of the relationship between the mite Floracarus perrepae Knihinicki & Boczek (Acariformes:Eriophyidae) and the fern Lygodium microphyllum (Cav.) R. Br. (Lygodiaceae) Thomas P. Freeman,1* John A. Goolsby,2 Sebahat K. Ozman,3 Dennis R. Nelson4 1North Dakota State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, North Dakota, USA 2USDA-ARS, Australian Biological Control Laboratory, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, 4068, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 3CRC for Tropical Plant Protection and Dept. of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, 4072, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; current address, Ondokuz Mayis University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Plant Protection, 55139, Samsun, Turkey 4USDA-ARS, Biosciences Research Laboratory, 1605 Albrecht Blvd, Fargo, North Dakota, USA *Corresponding author (email: [email protected], telephone: 701-231-8234, facsimile: 701-239-1395) 2 ABSTRACT The ultrastructure of Floracarus perrepae was investigated in relation to its host, Lygodium microphyllum. Feeding by the mite induces a change in epidermal cell size, and cell division is stimulated by mite feeding, causing the leaf margin to curl over into a roll with two to three windings. The enlarged epidermal layer greatly increases its cytoplasmic contents, which become a nutritive tissue for the mite and its progeny. The structure and depth of stylet penetration by the mite, and the thickness of the epidermal cell wall of L. microphyllum, does not appear to account for the mite’s differential ability to induce leaf rolling in its co- adapted host from southeast Queensland but not in the invasive genotype of the fern in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome and Metagenome of the Phytophagous Gall-Inducing Mite Fragariocoptes Setiger (Eriophyoidea): Are Symbiotic Bacteria Responsible for Gall-Formation?
    Genome and Metagenome of The Phytophagous Gall-Inducing Mite Fragariocoptes Setiger (Eriophyoidea): Are Symbiotic Bacteria Responsible For Gall-Formation? Pavel B. Klimov ( [email protected] ) X-BIO Institute, Tyumen State University Philipp E. Chetverikov Saint-Petersburg State University Irina E. Dodueva Saint-Petersburg State University Andrey E. Vishnyakov Saint-Petersburg State University Samuel J. Bolton Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Gainesville, Florida, USA Svetlana S. Paponova Saint-Petersburg State University Ljudmila A. Lutova Saint-Petersburg State University Andrey V. Tolstikov X-BIO Institute, Tyumen State University Research Article Keywords: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Betabaculovirus Posted Date: August 20th, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-821190/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/16 Abstract Eriophyoid mites represent a hyperdiverse, phytophagous lineage with an unclear phylogenetic position. These mites have succeeded in colonizing nearly every seed plant species, and this evolutionary success was in part due to the mites' ability to induce galls in plants. A gall is a unique niche that provides the inducer of this modication with vital resources. The exact mechanism of gall formation is still not understood, even as to whether it is endogenic (mites directly cause galls) or exogenic (symbiotic microorganisms are involved). Here we (i) investigate the phylogenetic anities of eriophyoids and (ii) use comparative metagenomics to test the hypothesis that the endosymbionts of eriophyoid mites are involved in gall-formation. Our phylogenomic analysis robustly inferred eriophyoids as closely related to Nematalycidae, a group of deep-soil mites belonging to Endeostigmata.
    [Show full text]
  • An Ultrastructural Study of the Relationship Between The
    et al . Australian Journal of Entomology (2005) 44, 57–61 An ultrastructural study of the relationship between the mite Floracarus perrepae Knihinicki & Boczek (Acariformes: Eriophyidae) and the fern Lygodium microphyllum (Lygodiaceae) Thomas P Freeman,1* John A Goolsby,2 Sebahat K Ozman3† and Dennis R Nelson4 1North Dakota State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Northern Crop Science Laboratory, Fargo, ND 58105- 5517, USA. 2USDA-ARS, Australian Biological Control Laboratory, 120 Meiers Road, Indooroopilly, Qld 4068, Australia. 3CRC for Tropical Plant Protection and Department of Zoology and Entomology, The University of Queensland, Qld 4072, Australia. 4USDA-ARS, Biosciences Research Laboratory, 1605 Albrecht Blvd, Fargo, ND 58105, USA. Abstract The ultrastructure of the mite Floracarus perrepae was investigated in relation to its host, Lygodium microphyllum, the Old World climbing fern. Floracarus perrepae has been suggested as a means of biological control for the fern, which is an aggressive weed in tropical areas. Feeding by the mite induces a change in the size of epidermal cells, and cell division is stimulated by mite feeding, causing the leaf margin to curl over into a roll with two to three windings. The enlarged epidermal layer greatly increases its cytoplasmic contents, which become a nutritive tissue for the mite and its progeny. Damage by the mite ultimately debilitates the fern. The structure and depth of stylet penetration by the mite, and the thickness of the epidermal cell wall of L. microphyllum, do not appear to account for the mite’s differential ability to induce leaf rolling in its co-adapted host from south-east Queensland but not in the invasive genotype of the fern in Florida.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine Structure of Receptor Organs in Oribatid Mites (Acari)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Biosystematics and Ecology Jahr/Year: 1998 Band/Volume: 14 Autor(en)/Author(s): Alberti Gerd Artikel/Article: Fine structure of receptor organs in oribatid mites (Acari). In: EBERMANN E. (ed.), Arthropod Biology: Contributions to Morphology, Ecology and Systematics. 27-77 Ebermann, E. (Ed) 1998:©Akademie Arthropod d. Wissenschaften Biology: Wien; Contributions download unter towww.biologiezentrum.at Morphology, Ecology and Systematics. - Biosystematics and Ecology Series 14: 27-77. Fine structure of receptor organs in oribatid mites (Acari) G. A l b e r t i Abstract: Receptor organs of oribatid mites represent important characters in taxonomy. However, knowledge about their detailed morphology and function in the living animal is only scarce. A putative sensory role of several integumental structures has been discussed over years but was only recently clarified. In the following the present state of knowledge on sensory structures of oribatid mites is reviewed. Setiform sensilla are the most obvious sensory structures in Oribatida. According to a clas- sification developed mainly by Grandjean the following types are known: simple setae, trichobothria, eupathidia, famuli and solenidia. InEupelops sp. the simple notogastral setae are innervated by two dendrites terminating with tubulär bodies indicative of mechanore- ceptive cells. A similar innervation was seen in trichobothria ofAcrogalumna longipluma. The trichobothria are provided with a setal basis of a very high complexity not known from other arthropods. The setal shafts of these two types of sensilla are solid and without pores. They thus represent so called no pore sensilla (np-sensilla).
    [Show full text]
  • Present Status of Eriophyoid Mites in Thailand
    J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn., 25(S1): 83-107. March 25, 2016 © The Acarological Society of Japan http://www.acarology-japan.org/ 83 Present status of eriophyoid mites in Thailand 1 2 3 Angsumarn CHANDRAPATYA *, Ploychompoo KONVIPASRUANG and James W. AMRINE 1Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, 50 Ngam Wong Wan Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand 2Plant Protection Research and Development Office, Department of Agriculture, Paholyothin Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10900, Thailand 3Division of Plant and Soil Sciences, College of Agriculture and Forestry, West Virginia University, P. O. Box 6108, Morgantown, WV 26506-6108, USA ABSTRACT One of the common groups of phytophagous mites encountered on various plants in Thailand is that of the eriophyoid mites, which can be found on agricultural, horticultural, ornamental, and medicinal plants, including fruit and forest trees. Because there is a paucity of information on eriophyoid taxonomy in Thailand, where the host plants are so diverse, there is a need to investigate the presence of these tiny creatures – especially those species that can be harmful to economic crops. Here, the taxonomy of the eriophyoid mites in the collection of the first author was revised, together with the taxonomy of those reported by other researchers. To date, a total of 215 species of eriophyoid mites have been recorded from Thailand. The family Eriophyidae comprises 157 species, whereas only 58 species are reported in the family Diptilomiopidae. These mites are found on 161 plant species under 60 host plant families; they are relatively more numerous (＞10 species) on plants in the families Fabaceae, Poaceae, Moraceae, Sapindaceae, Rubiaceae, Anacardiaceae, Myrtaceae, and Euphorbiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity : Exploration, Exploitation, Conservation and Management – Vision and Mission”
    -2- “Biodiversity : Exploration, Exploitation, Conservation and Management – Vision and Mission” Proceedings of the UGC Sponsored National Seminar 19-20th November, 2016 Editor-in-Chief Dr. Sumana Saha Associate Editors Dr. Madhumita Manna, Dr. Jayati Ghosh, Dr. Sanjoy Podder, Dr. Enamul Haque Dr. Srikanta Guria, Sri Somaditya Dey Organised by Post Graduate Department of Zoology Barasat Government College Barasat, Kolkata – 700 124, India In Collaboration with The Zoological Society, Kolkata West Bengal Biodiversity Board -3- Citation S. Saha, M. Manna, J. Ghosh, S. Podder, E. Haque, S. Guria and S. Dey (Eds.). Biodiversity : Exploration, Exploitation, Conservation and Management - Vision and Mission. Proceedings of the UGC Sponsored National Seminar, Kolkata, India, 19-20th November, 2016. World Scientific News 71 (2017) 1-228 Reviewer Prof. Jerzy Borowski Department of Forest Protection and Ecology, SGGW, Warsaw, Poland Published On-line 03 May, 2017, WSN Volume 71 (2017), pp. 1-228 http://www.worldscientificnews.com/ Published By Dr. Tomasz Borowski Scientific Publishing House „DARWIN”, 22/12 Adama Mickiewicza Street, 78-520 Złocieniec, Poland ISBN 978-83-947896-2-6 ISSN 2392-2192 Technical Inputs Ruby Das All Rights Reserved No part/s of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover Design Dr. Sumana Saha -4- Contents SECTION : I Page no. 1. Message ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Illustrated Guide to Plant Abnormalities Caused by Eriophyid Mites in North America by Hartford H
    /«-J /3-7.-7 5¿>'^ Ln/ij.? r^ /^«% United states '« »JM Department of Agriculture An Illustrated Guide A*a«r«* Agricultural Research Service to Plant Abnormalities Agriculture Handbook Number 573 Caused by Eriophyid IVIites in North America United States Department of Agriculture An Illustrated Guide Agricultural to Plant Abnonnalities Research Service Caused by Eriophyid Agriculture Handbook Number 573 Mites in North America By Hartford H. Keifer, Edward W. Baker, Tokuwo Kono, Mercedes Delfinado, and William E. Styer Abstract Acknowledgment Keifer, Hartford H., Baker, Edward W., Kono, Tokuwo, Without the cooperation of several individuals, this manual Delfinado, Mercedes, and Styer, William E. 1982. An illus- could not have been completed. We thank them all for their trated guide to plant abnormalities caused by eriophyid mites advice and assistance. We particularly thank the following in North America. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricul- persons for providing color slides of certain eriophyid mite- ture Handbook No. 573, 178 pp. plant injuries: H. A. Denmark, Florida Department of Agri- culture, Gainesville; E. Doreste, Facultad de Agronomía, This guide includes taxonomic descriptions of eriophyid mites Universidad de Venezuela, Maracay; F. P. Freitez, CI ARCO, (Eriophyoidea: Acari), their life histories, distribution, and Estación Experimental de Araure, Acarigua, Venezuela; P. host data. Characteristic plant injuries, such as galls, erineum, Genty, Industrial Agraria la Palma, Bucaramanga, Colombia; big bud, and witches'-broom, that are caused by these mites F. H. Haramoto, Entomology Department, University of are illustrated with color photographs. Selected references are Hawaii, Honolulu; F. Osman Hassan, Faculty of Agriculture, given. This guide will assist in mite identification and mite- University of Kartoum, Sudan; L.
    [Show full text]
  • Beaulieu, F., W. Knee, V. Nowell, M. Schwarzfeld, Z. Lindo, V.M. Behan
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 819: 77–168 (2019) Acari of Canada 77 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.819.28307 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Acari of Canada Frédéric Beaulieu1, Wayne Knee1, Victoria Nowell1, Marla Schwarzfeld1, Zoë Lindo2, Valerie M. Behan‑Pelletier1, Lisa Lumley3, Monica R. Young4, Ian Smith1, Heather C. Proctor5, Sergei V. Mironov6, Terry D. Galloway7, David E. Walter8,9, Evert E. Lindquist1 1 Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Otta- wa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada 2 Department of Biology, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada 3 Royal Alberta Museum, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 0G2, Canada 4 Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada 5 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada 6 Department of Parasitology, Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Universitetskaya embankment 1, Saint Petersburg 199034, Russia 7 Department of Entomology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3T 2N2, Canada 8 University of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, 4556, Queensland, Australia 9 Queensland Museum, South Brisbane, 4101, Queensland, Australia Corresponding author: Frédéric Beaulieu ([email protected]) Academic editor: D. Langor | Received 11 July 2018 | Accepted 27 September 2018 | Published 24 January 2019 http://zoobank.org/652E4B39-E719-4C0B-8325-B3AC7A889351 Citation: Beaulieu F, Knee W, Nowell V, Schwarzfeld M, Lindo Z, Behan‑Pelletier VM, Lumley L, Young MR, Smith I, Proctor HC, Mironov SV, Galloway TD, Walter DE, Lindquist EE (2019) Acari of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Effectiveness of Eriophyid Mites for Biological Control of Weedy Plants and Challenges for Future Research
    Exp Appl Acarol (2010) 51:115–149 DOI 10.1007/s10493-009-9299-2 Effectiveness of eriophyid mites for biological control of weedy plants and challenges for future research L. Smith Æ E. de Lillo Æ J. W. Amrine Jr. Received: 31 March 2009 / Accepted: 3 August 2009 / Published online: 16 September 2009 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Abstract Eriophyid mites have been considered to have a high potential for use as classical biological control agents of weeds. We reviewed known examples of the use of eriophyid mites to control weedy plants to learn how effective they have been. In the past 13 years, since Rosenthal’s 1996 review, 13 species have undergone some degree of pre- release evaluation (Aceria genistae, A. lantanae, Aceria sp. [boneseed leaf buckle mite (BLBM)], A. salsolae, A. sobhiani, A. solstitialis, A. tamaricis, A. thalgi, A. thessalonicae, Cecidophyes rouhollahi, Floracarus perrepae, Leipothrix dipsacivagus and L. knautiae), but only four (A. genistae, Aceria sp. [BLBM], C. rouhollahi and F. perrepae) have been authorized for introduction. Prior to this, three species (Aceria chondrillae, A. malherbae and Aculus hyperici) were introduced and have become established. Although these three species impact the fitness of their host plant, it is not clear how much they have contributed to reduction of the population of the target weed. In some cases, natural enemies, resistant plant genotypes, and adverse abiotic conditions have reduced the ability of eriophyid mites to control target weed populations. Some eriophyid mites that are highly coevolved with their host plant may be poor prospects for biological control because of host plant resis- tance or tolerance of the plant to the mite.
    [Show full text]