A History of Water Law, Water Rights & Water

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Water Law, Water Rights & Water A HISTORY OF WATER LAW, WATER RIGHTS & WATER DEVELOPMENT IN WYOMING Written by: Craig Cooper, M.S. Cooper Consulting, LLC 1627 Major Avenue Riverton, WY Illustrated by: Evan Simpson, P.E. Sunrise Engineering, Inc. 47 E. 4th Avenue Afton, WY 83110 A HISTORY OF WATER LAW, WATER RIGHTS & WATER DEVELOPMENT IN WYOMING 1868-2002 June 2004 FUNDED BY: WYOMING WATER DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION And STATE ENGINEER’S OFFICE Written by: Craig O. Cooper, M.S. Cooper Consulting, LLC 1627 Major Avenue Riverton, WY 82501 Illustrated by: Sunrise Engineering, Inc. 47 E. 4th Avenue Afton, WY 83110 Evan J. Simpson, P.E. 1 Table of Contents Preface .................................................................................................................... 4 Foreword by Pat Tyrrell………………………………………………………………7 Part I. The Territorial Years................................................................................... 9 The 1869 Laws ...........................................................................................10 The 1876 Laws ...........................................................................................11 The 1886 Laws ...........................................................................................12 The 1887 Laws ...........................................................................................14 The 1888 Laws ...........................................................................................15 The 1889 Constitutional Convention .........................................................17 The 1890 Territorial Laws..........................................................................19 Part II. Early Statehood, 1890-1900 The 1890-91 State Laws.............................................................................22 The Period Between 1890 and 1900...........................................................28 The 1895 Laws ...........................................................................................28 Litigation 1890-1896..................................................................................30 The 1899 Laws ...........................................................................................31 Part III. The Development Years, 1900-1930 The Period Between 1900 and 1907...........................................................32 The 1907 Laws ...........................................................................................36 Litigation 1900-1910..................................................................................37 The 1909-1910 Laws..................................................................................39 The 1911 Laws ...........................................................................................40 The 1913 Laws ...........................................................................................42 The 1915 Laws ...........................................................................................43 The 1917 Laws ...........................................................................................44 Litigation 1910-1920..................................................................................45 The Period Between 1920 and 1930...........................................................47 The 1921 Laws ...........................................................................................48 The 1923 Laws ...........................................................................................50 The 1925 Laws ...........................................................................................50 Litigation 1920-1930..................................................................................50 Part IV. Protectionism, 1930-1970 The Period Between 1930 and 1940...........................................................53 Interstate Court Decrees, 1930’s ................................................................56 Interstate Compacts, 1930’s .......................................................................57 The 1935 Laws ...........................................................................................60 Litigation 1930-1940..................................................................................60 The Period Between 1940 to 1950 .............................................................62 2 The 1941 Laws ...........................................................................................62 The 1945 Laws ...........................................................................................64 The 1947 Laws ...........................................................................................64 Litigation 1930-1940..................................................................................66 The Period Between 1950 and 1960...........................................................67 The 1951 Laws ...........................................................................................69 The 1955 Laws ...........................................................................................70 The 1957 Laws ...........................................................................................71 The 1959 Laws ...........................................................................................73 Litigation 1950-1960..................................................................................74 The Period Between 1960 and 1970...........................................................75 The 1965 and 1967 Laws ...........................................................................75 The 1969 Laws ...........................................................................................77 Litigation 1960-1970..................................................................................78 Part V. Years of Challenge, 1970-2000 The Period Between 1970 and 1980...........................................................80 The 1973 Laws ...........................................................................................81 The 1975, 1977 and 1979 Laws .................................................................82 Litigation 1970-1980..................................................................................84 The Period Between 1980 and 1990...........................................................86 The 1985 and 1986 Laws ...........................................................................87 Litigation 1980-1990..................................................................................88 The Period Between 1990 and 2000...........................................................91 The 1991 Laws ...........................................................................................92 Litigation 1990-2000..................................................................................93 Part VI. Conclusion..................................................................................................96 REFERENCES ..........................................................................................................97 APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………. 103 A. Appropriation, Allotment and Duty of Water………………………104 B. Water Commissioners………………………………………………108 C. State Board of Control ……………………………………………..112 D. Instream Flows ……………………………………………………. 118 LIST OF MAPS Organization of Wyoming Territory, 1868…………………………………20 The Five Counties and Major Waterways of Wyoming Territory, 1868......21 The Four Water Divisions Created by the Wyoming Constitution...………23 Significant Reservoirs of Wyoming, Constructed 1879-2002..……………52 Wyoming Rivers Contribution to Major River Basins of the U.S…………59 3 PREFACE Wyoming’s water laws have often been an example to other western states for their ability to keep order in the use of all the varied water supplies within her borders. Although somewhat of a latecomer among the western states to have her water supplies undergo widespread development, Wyoming was a frontrunner in pioneering concepts for the innovative handling of the complex process of bestowing the use of her water to her citizens. From the time of the initial creation in 1868 of the separate western territory now called Wyoming, her streams and rivers have been the lifeblood of her economy and growth. Indeed, the progression of water laws enacted first by territorial legislatures and then by the state legislature for using and allocating her waters can reflect the history and development of the State itself. The names of individuals found on Wyoming water right documents comprise a fascinating “who’s who” of the founding figures in the State’s progress from territorial times to the present. Water is often looked at as a “free” resource, responsible for man’s continued presence on earth, and consequently the inherent property of every living thing. Still, the history of mankind shows it to be one of the commodities over which wars for its control have been fought. Such contention has engendered, at least in the American west, the vesting of water control and distribution in responsible, neutral and knowledgeable quarters authorized to manipulate its use for the good of all. In Wyoming, that responsibility has been shared by the citizens of the state, through the legislature and offices of territorial and state government, employing, either intentionally or accidentally, many of the greatest water minds in the country. Numerous individuals are responsible for the existence today of a water use system that meets the present needs of Wyoming residents and provides confidence
Recommended publications
  • Seminoe Reservoir Inflow
    Annual Operating Plans Table of Contents Preface ..................................................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................. 5 System Planning and Control ................................................ 7 System Operations Water Year 2018 ................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Inflow ........................................................................... 10 Seminoe Reservoir Storage and Releases .............................................. 10 Kortes Reservoir Storage and Releases .................................................. 12 Gains to the North Platte River from Kortes Dam to Pathfinder Dam .................................................................................................... 13 Pathfinder Reservoir Storage and Releases ........................................... 14 Alcova and Gray Reef Reservoirs Storage and Releases .................... 17 Gains to the North Platte River from Alcova Dam to Glendo Reservoir ........................................................................................... 18 Glendo Reservoir Storage and Releases ................................................. 18 Gains to the North Platte River from Glendo Dam to Guernsey Reservoir ........................................................................................... 21 Guernsey Reservoir Storage and Releases ............................................ 22 Precipitation Summary for Water Year 2018 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • 50 State Survey(Longdoc)
    AGREEMENTS TO INDEMNIFY & GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE: A Fifty State Survey WEINBERG WHEELER H U D G I N S G U N N & D I A L TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Alabama 4 Alaska 7 Arizona 12 Arkansas 15 California 19 Damages arising out of bodily injury or death to persons. 22 Damage to property. 22 Any other damage or expense arising under either (a) or (b). 22 Colorado 23 Connecticut 26 Delaware 29 Florida 32 Georgia 36 Hawaii 42 Idaho 45 Illinois 47 Indiana 52 Iowa 59 Kansas 65 Kentucky 68 Louisiana 69 Maine 72 Maryland 77 Massachusetts 81 Michigan 89 Minnesota 91 Mississippi 94 Missouri 97 Montana 100 Nebraska 104 Nevada 107 New Hampshire 109 New Jersey 111 New Mexico 115 New York 118 North Carolina 122 North Dakota 124 Ohio 126 Oklahoma 130 Oregon 132 Pennsylvania 139 Rhode Island 143 South Carolina 146 South Dakota 150 Tennessee 153 Texas 157 Utah 161 Vermont 165 Virginia 168 Washington 171 West Virginia 175 Wisconsin 177 Wyoming 180 INTRODUCTION Indemnity is compensation given to make another whole from a loss already sustained. It generally contemplates reimbursement by one person or entity of the entire amount of the loss or damage sustained by another. Indemnity takes two forms – common law and contractual. While this survey is limited to contractual indemnity, it is important to note that many states have looked to the law relating to common law indemnity in developing that state’s jurisprudence respecting contractual indemnity. Common law indemnity is the shifting of responsibility for damage or injury from one tortfeasor to another
    [Show full text]
  • June 29, 2021 Chief Justice Michael K. Davis 307-777-7421 JUDI
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE For more information contact: June 29, 2021 Chief Justice Michael K. Davis 307-777-7421 JUDICIAL NOMINATING COMMISSION ANNOUNCES VACANCY IN CIRCUIT COURT, NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT (FREMONT COUNTY) Wyoming Supreme Court Chief Justice Michael K. Davis announced today that Circuit Court Judge Robert B. Denhardt, Ninth Judicial District (Fremont County–Lander), will be retiring effective October 4, 2021. The Judicial Nominating Commission will accept expressions of interest from qualified persons to fill the vacancy through Monday, July 26, 2021. The expression of interest form can be obtained from the Supreme Court’s website, http://www.courts.state.wy.us/Administration/Careers. The completed form must be received in the office of Justice Fox no later than 5:00 p.m., on Monday, July 26, 2021. Please do not submit letters of recommendation, as the Commission will not consider them, but will instead only review documents specifically required by the Expression of Interest. Governor Mark Gordon will appoint the Ninth Judicial District Circuit Court Judge (Fremont County–Lander) from a list of three names submitted to him by the Judicial Nominating Commission. Serving on the Judicial Nominating Commission are the Chief Justice (Justice Fox as of July 1, 2021), three lawyers elected by the Wyoming State Bar: Gay Woodhouse of Cheyenne, Anna Reeves Olson of Casper, and Katherine Strike of Lander; and three non-lawyers appointed by the Governor: Gudrid Espenscheid of Big Piney, Paul Scherbel of Afton, and Dan Kirkbride of Chugwater. TO SERVE AS A CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE, ONE MUST BE A QUALIFIED ELECTOR OF THE STATE, AND AUTHORIZED TO PRACTICE LAW IN WYOMING.
    [Show full text]
  • Campbell County History
    Campbell County History Early Expeditions: Information about the first European explorers and trappers to enter the Powder River Basin is very limited and confirmation on exact routes and locations will never be known. Some of the earliest expeditions believed to have been in the region include the Francois and Louis-Joseph Verendrye in 1743, Charles LaRaye in 1802, and Francois Antoine Laroque in 1805. Wyoming historian T. A. Larson believes the first American trapper in Northeast Wyoming was John Colter during the winter of 1807-1808. He returned three years later with Alexander Henry and approximately thirty other trappers. Ezekiel Williams and Jean Baptiste Champlain and a party of twenty-one trappers worked the Belle Fourche River in 1911. That same year saw Wilson Price Hunt and an expedition of men sent out by John Jacob Astor crossed the basin. The overland Astorians, as they became known, were headed for the Columbia River drainage and envisioned a series of fur trading posts stretching from the Great Lakes to the Pacific Ocean. The Powder River Basin was not prime trapping country, but was often traversed in order to get to the better streams to the west and also was used as a winter camp location by trappers. Robert Campbell and a party of Rocky Mountain Fur Company men spent the winter on Powder River in 1828. Father DeSmet, a Jesuit priest, traveled through the basin in 1851 and made reference to the “Gourd Buttes,” which are now known as the Pumpkin Buttes in Campbell County. A wealthy Irishman by the name of Sir George Gore and a large party of men and wagons entered the basin in 1855 on an extravagant hunting and fishing expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Pre-Statehood Legal Materials: an Annotated Bibliography
    Wyoming Law Review Volume 7 Number 1 Article 2 January 2007 Wyoming Pre-Statehood Legal Materials: An Annotated Bibliography Debora A. Person Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr Recommended Citation Person, Debora A. (2007) "Wyoming Pre-Statehood Legal Materials: An Annotated Bibliography," Wyoming Law Review: Vol. 7 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/wlr/vol7/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wyoming Law Review by an authorized editor of Law Archive of Wyoming Scholarship. Person: Wyoming Pre-Statehood Legal Materials: An Annotated Bibliography WYOMING LAW REVIEW VOLUME 7 2007 NUMBER 1 Editor's Note The following bibliography is Part I of a two-part guide to the history and development ofWyoming law, compiled and annotated by University ofWyoming College of Law Associate Law Librarian Debora A. Person. Part I on Wyoming Pre-statehood Legal Materials contains both primary and selected secondary resources covering pre-Wyoming Territory, the administration of the Wyoming Territory, and the establishment of Wyoming as a state. This section was previ- ously published in 2005 in PrestatehoodLegal Materials: A Fifty-State Research Guide, Including New York City and the District of Columbia, edited by Michael Chiorazzi, J.D., M.L.L. and Marguerite Most, J.D., M.L.L. It is reprinted here with permission from Haworth Press, Inc. Part II of the annotated bibliography is forthcoming in Wyoming Law Review, Volume 7, Number 2, which will be published in summer, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic History of Wyoming During the Great Depression
    The economic history of Wyoming during The Great Depression Item Type text; Electronic Thesis Authors Jones, Miranda Rae Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 29/09/2021 18:06:27 Item License http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/626819 THE ECONOMIC HISTORY OF WYOMING DURING THE GREAT DEPRESSION By MIRANDA RAE JONES ____________________ A Thesis Submitted to The Honors College In Partial Fulfillment of the Bachelors degree With Honors in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and Law THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA M A Y 2 0 1 7 Approved by: ____________________________ Dr. Price Fishback Department of Economics Abstract This paper analyzes Wyoming’s response to the Great Depression and the federal aid programs that arose from it. Since Wyoming was already facing a depression for a decade before the rest of the nation followed after the stock market crash in 1929, the Wyoming legislature was already struggling to find new ways to cut costs and raise revenues. From 1929 to 1940, this time-period saw four different governors, the establishment of Grand Teton National Park, the enactment of a sales tax, the decline of Wyoming’s oil industry, and an attempted secession movement. With a more complete picture of Wyoming’s political and economic climate, in conjunction with an econometric analysis of tax revenue impacts nation-wide, this thesis creates a fuller understanding of Wyoming’s specific response to the Great Depression.
    [Show full text]
  • E. Heritage Health Index Participants
    The Heritage Health Index Report E1 Appendix E—Heritage Health Index Participants* Alabama Morgan County Alabama Archives Air University Library National Voting Rights Museum Alabama Department of Archives and History Natural History Collections, University of South Alabama Supreme Court and State Law Library Alabama Alabama’s Constitution Village North Alabama Railroad Museum Aliceville Museum Inc. Palisades Park American Truck Historical Society Pelham Public Library Archaeological Resource Laboratory, Jacksonville Pond Spring–General Joseph Wheeler House State University Ruffner Mountain Nature Center Archaeology Laboratory, Auburn University Mont- South University Library gomery State Black Archives Research Center and Athens State University Library Museum Autauga-Prattville Public Library Troy State University Library Bay Minette Public Library Birmingham Botanical Society, Inc. Alaska Birmingham Public Library Alaska Division of Archives Bridgeport Public Library Alaska Historical Society Carrollton Public Library Alaska Native Language Center Center for Archaeological Studies, University of Alaska State Council on the Arts South Alabama Alaska State Museums Dauphin Island Sea Lab Estuarium Alutiiq Museum and Archaeological Repository Depot Museum, Inc. Anchorage Museum of History and Art Dismals Canyon Bethel Broadcasting, Inc. Earle A. Rainwater Memorial Library Copper Valley Historical Society Elton B. Stephens Library Elmendorf Air Force Base Museum Fendall Hall Herbarium, U.S. Department of Agriculture For- Freeman Cabin/Blountsville Historical Society est Service, Alaska Region Gaineswood Mansion Herbarium, University of Alaska Fairbanks Hale County Public Library Herbarium, University of Alaska Juneau Herbarium, Troy State University Historical Collections, Alaska State Library Herbarium, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa Hoonah Cultural Center Historical Collections, Lister Hill Library of Katmai National Park and Preserve Health Sciences Kenai Peninsula College Library Huntington Botanical Garden Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park J.
    [Show full text]
  • Edmund G. Ross As Governor of New Mexico Territory: a Reappraisal
    New Mexico Historical Review Volume 36 Number 3 Article 2 7-1-1961 Edmund G. Ross as Governor of New Mexico Territory: A Reappraisal Howard R. Lamar Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr Recommended Citation Lamar, Howard R.. "Edmund G. Ross as Governor of New Mexico Territory: A Reappraisal." New Mexico Historical Review 36, 3 (1961). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmhr/vol36/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in New Mexico Historical Review by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. NEW MEXICO HISTORICAL REVIEW VOL. XXXVI JULY, 1961 No.3 EDMUND G. ROSS AS GOVERNOR OF NEW MEXICO TERRITORY A REAPPRAISAL By HOWARD R. LAMAR NE evening in the early spring of 1889, Edmund G. Ross O invited the Territorial Secretary of New Mexico, George W. Lane, in for a smoke by a warm fire. As they sat in the family living quarters of the Palace of the Governors and talked over the'day's events, it became obvious that the Gov- , ernor was troubled about something. Unable to keep still he left his chair and paced the floor in silence. Finally he re­ marked: "I had hoped to induct New Mexico into Statehood."1 In those few words Ross summed up all the frustrations he had experienced in his four tempestuous years as the chief executive of New Mexico Territory. , So briefly, or hostilely, has his career as governor been re­ ported-both in the press of his own time and in the standard histories of New Mexico-and so little legislation is associated with his name, that one learns with genuine surprise that he had been even an advocate of statehood.
    [Show full text]
  • Remote Access to Court Records
    WYOMING LEGISLATIVE SERVICE OFFICE Remote Access to Court Records Date: June 17, 2019 Author: Tamara Rivale, Senior Staff Attorney Re: Remote Access to Court Records INTRODUCTION around the nation. The Wyoming Judicial This introductory brief provides a high-level Branch has undertaken multiple and ongoing efforts to implement and upgrade technology summary from the Legislative Service Office 1 (LSO) describing the status of remote access in the courts including eFiling, automated to public court records in Wyoming. This jury notification, and courtroom technology. topic was added to the interim work of the These efforts, although related, are distinct Joint Appropriations Committee (JAC) by from the JAC interim topic, which focuses on Management Council at its March 22, 2019 remote access to court records. The following meeting. Specifically, the approved topic definitions from the Wyoming Supreme states: Court's Rules Governing Access to Court Records help illustrate the scope of this The Committee will review the status of interim topic: storage and access to public court records and documents, especially within the • "Court records" means case records and district and circuit courts, to improve administrative records, in whatever access, including access for documents format, except personnel records, judicial necessary for background checks. The or judicial staff work product, internal Committee will review and consider the electronic or physical mail, memoranda or revenues used to fund implementation of drafts, appellate case assignments, and needed and desired technology upgrades, records made confidential by statute, including subscription-based funding administrative rule, court rule, or court models utilized in other states, i.e., Utah, order.
    [Show full text]
  • HHI Front Matter
    A PUBLIC TRUST AT RISK: The Heritage Health Index Report on the State of America’s Collections HHIHeritage Health Index a partnership between Heritage Preservation and the Institute of Museum and Library Services ©2005 Heritage Preservation, Inc. Heritage Preservation 1012 14th St. Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005 202-233-0800 fax 202-233-0807 www.heritagepreservation.org [email protected] Heritage Preservation receives funding from the National Park Service, Department of the Interior. However, the content and opinions included in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. Table of Contents Introduction and Acknowledgements . i Executive Summary . 1 1. Heritage Health Index Development . 3 2. Methodology . 11 3. Characteristics of Collecting Institutions in the United States. 23 4. Condition of Collections. 27 5. Collections Environment . 51 6. Collections Storage . 57 7. Emergency Plannning and Security . 61 8. Preservation Staffing and Activitives . 67 9. Preservation Expenditures and Funding . 73 10. Intellectual Control and Assessment . 79 Appendices: A. Institutional Advisory Committee Members . A1 B. Working Group Members . B1 C. Heritage Preservation Board Members. C1 D. Sources Consulted in Identifying the Heritage Health Index Study Population. D1 E. Heritage Health Index Participants. E1 F. Heritage Health Index Survey Instrument, Instructions, and Frequently Asked Questions . F1 G. Selected Bibliography of Sources Consulted in Planning the Heritage Health Index. G1 H. N Values for Data Shown in Report Figures . H1 The Heritage Health Index Report i Introduction and Acknowledgements At this time a year ago, staff members of thou- Mary Chute, Schroeder Cherry, Mary Estelle sands of museums, libraries, and archives nation- Kenelly, Joyce Ray, Mamie Bittner, Eileen wide were breathing a sigh of relief as they fin- Maxwell, Christine Henry, and Elizabeth Lyons.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Wyoming
    2018 18LSO-0490 TATE OF YOMING S W HOUSE BILL NO. HB0167 The Marriage and Constitution Restoration Act. Sponsored by: Representative(s) Lone and Edwards A BILL for 1 AN ACT relating to marriage and sexual orientation; 2 prohibiting any state action that treats sexual orientation 3 as a suspect class; prohibiting the state and its political 4 subdivisions from granting, endorsing, respecting or 5 recognizing any marriage not between a man and woman; 6 providing legislative findings; and providing for an 7 effective date. 8 9 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Wyoming: 10 11 Section 1. 12 13 (a) The legislature finds that: 14 15 (i) Parody marriages and policies that endorse 16 parody marriages are nonsecular in nature for purposes of 1 HB0167 2018 STATE OF WYOMING 18LSO-0490 1 the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the 2 United States Constitution; 3 4 (ii) Marriages between a man and a woman and 5 policies that endorse marriages between a man and a women 6 are secular in nature for purposes of the Establishment 7 Clause of the First Amendment to the United States 8 Constitution; 9 10 (iii) Civilizations for millennia have defined 11 marriage as a union between a man and a woman; 12 13 (iv) Marriage between a man and a woman arose 14 out of the nature of things and is natural, neutral and 15 noncontroversial unlike parody marriages; 16 17 (v) The state of Wyoming has a duty under 18 article 6 of the United States Constitution to uphold the 19 United States Constitution; 20 21 (vi) The First Amendment applies to
    [Show full text]
  • HERRERA V. WYOMING
    (Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2018 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U. S. 321, 337. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus HERRERA v. WYOMING CERTIORARI TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF WYOMING, SHERIDAN COUNTY No. 17–532. Argued January 8, 2019—Decided May 20, 2019 An 1868 treaty between the United States and the Crow Tribe prom- ised that in exchange for most of the Tribe’s territory in modern-day Montana and Wyoming, its members would “have the right to hunt on the unoccupied lands of the United States so long as game may be found thereon . and peace subsists . on the borders of the hunt- ing districts.” 15 Stat. 650. In 2014, Wyoming charged petitioner Clayvin Herrera with off-season hunting in Bighorn National Forest and being an accessory to the same. The state trial court rejected Herrera’s argument that he had a protected right to hunt in the for- est pursuant to the 1868 Treaty, and a jury convicted him. On ap- peal, the state appellate court relied on the reasoning of the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Crow Tribe of Indians v. Repsis, 73 F. 3d 982— which in turn relied upon this Court’s decision in Ward v.
    [Show full text]