.1943 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE 3059 Lena A. Voreis, Richmond Beach, Wash., PosTMASTERS of executive papers in the following de­ in place of Frank Williams, removed without LOUISIANA partments and agency: prejudice. Maurice Primeaux, Kaplan. 1. Department of Agriculture. Robert I. Matheson, Suquamish, Wash. Leo L. Ehrhardt, Simmesport. 2. The National Archives. Office became Presidential July 1, 1942. Harry M. Bona, Tillicum, Wash. Office MICHIGAN 3. Department of the Navy. became Presidential July 1, 1942. Simon F. Blake, Bellaire. 4. Department of War. Fairleigh B. Wilkins, Yakima, Wash., in Helen E. Daly, Carrollton. TREASURY AND POST OFFICE DEPART· place of F. B. Wilkins. Incumbent's com­ LaVange M. Taggart, Cement City. MENT APPROPRIATION BILL-CONFER· mission expired June 23, 1942. Marian A. Cleary, Clawsnn. Mary Elllott, Haslett. ENCE REPORT WEST VIRGINIA Helen B. Martin, Indian River. Mr. LUDLOW. Mr. Speaker, from the Stella M. Krevosky, Grant Town, W. Va., Nellie I. Blemaster, Maple Rapids. Committee on Appropriations I present · in place of E. J. Rush, resigned. Margaret C. Cryan, Mendon. a conference report and statement on the Jeremiah W. Dingess, Huntington, W. Va., Anna C. Kulish, Minden City. bill

• l943 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE 3089· The Clerk announced the following be 2 hours. After the legislative bill is Mr. SHAFER. Mr. Speaker, I ask pairs: disposed cf we will take up the Hobbs unanimous consent to extend my own Mr. Treadway for, with Mr. Daughton bill. remarks in the RECORD and to include against. I may say in further amplification of therein an editorial. Mr. Holmes of Massachusetts for, with Mr. the program that between now and a The SPEAKER. Is there objection to O'Toole against. week from Saturday we have a great the request of the gentleman from Michi­ Mr. Boren for, with Mr. Domengeaux deal of business to take care of, but I against. gan [Mr. SHAFER]? Mr. Jackson for, with Mr. Dingell against. hope we shall be able to dispose of it. I There was no objection. hope we can at least finish general de­ Mr. WOODRUFF of Michigan. Mr. General pairs: bate on the Hobbs bill tomorrow: That Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to ex­ Mr. Gordon with Mr. Smith of Maine. would be very helpful. tend my own remarks in the RECORD by Mr. Gorski with Mr. Robsion of Kentucky. Mr. DICKSTEIN. Mr. Speaker, re­ printing two short editorials. Mr. O'Brien of lllinois with Mr. Stevenson. serving the right to object, is it intended Mr. Outland with Mr. LaFollette. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to Mr. Pfeifer with Mr. Allen of Illinois. to vote on the Hobbs bill tomorrow if we the request of the gentleman from Michi­ Mr. Burch of Virginia with Mr. Cole of New get through with debate on it, or will gan [Mr. WOODRUFF]? • York. the vote go over until Friday or Monday? There was no objection. Mr. Weaver with Mr. Douglas. Mr. McCORMACK. No; we are going PASSAGE OF TAX BILL Mr. Byrne with Mr. Eaton. to sit Friday and Saturday, and it is very Mr. Starnes of Alabama with Mr. Graham. important that Members be here. As a Mr. WOODRUFF of Michigan. Mr. Mr. Cullen with Mr. Guyer. matter of fact, a bill from the Committee Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to pro­ Mr. Lewis of Colorado with Mr. Howell. ceed for 1 minute. Mr. Randolph with Mr. Knutson. on Immigration is on the calendar for Mr. Gavagan with Mr. Wheat. the latter part of the week. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to Mr. Rowan with Mr. Wilson. Mr. MARTIN of Massachusetts. . the request of the gentleman from Michi­ Mr. Elliott with Mr. Bennett of Missouri. Which bill, may I ask? gan [Mr. WOODRUFF]? Mr. Barry with Mr Plumley. Mr. DICKSTEIN. A bill to restore There was no objection. Mr. Bates of Kentucky with Mr. Culkin. citizenshi:r: to deserting soldiers who Mr. WOODRUFF of Michigan. Mr. Mr Boykin with Mr. Mason. have been taken back into the Army. Speaker, American taxpayers are begin­ Mr. Fogarty with Mr. Wolverton of New ning to burn with indignation over the Jersey Under present law, upon court martial Mr Kleberg with Mr. Gallagher. such soldiers lose their citizenship. The threatened deiay now being voiced by Mr. Clark with Mr. Winter. bill was reported out unanimously and administration leaders-or some of Mr. Richards with Mr. Lambertson. it has the approval of the War Depart­ them-in devising a tax bill which will . Mr. Cox with Mr. Engel. ment, the Navy Department, and the embrace current payment features. Mr. Woodrum of Virginia with Mr. Ander- Marine Corps. There is no question in anybody's son of California. mind, at least those who have studied the Mr. Vinson of Georgia with Mr. Kearney. The SPEAKER. Is there objection to Mr. West with Mr. Scott. the request of the gentleman from situation, that we will have to devise a Mr. Colmer with Mr. Maas. Massachusetts? current-payment tax plan so the Ameri­ Mr. Sheppard With Mr: Andrews. There was no objection. can people can pay as they earn. Unless Mr. Mansfield of Texas with Mr. Welch. this is done, the Government will find EXTENSION OF REMARKS itself confronted with an impossible tax­ The result of the vote was announced Mr. WALTER. Mr. Speaker, I ask collection situation, and the individual as above recorded. unanimous consent to extend my own citizens will find themselves confronted The SPEAKER. The . question is on remarks in the RECORD and include an with an impossible tax-payment situa­ the engrossment and third reading of editorial. tion. There was no excuse, no valid rea­ the bill. The SPEAKER. Without objection, it son whatsoever, for the administration The bill was ordered to be engrossed is so ordered. to make the Carlson tax plan a political and read a third time and was read the There was no objection. football as they did. third time. COMMITI'EE ON THE JUDICIARY Figures have been presented from time The SPEAKER. The question is on to time showing that the amount of in­ the passage of the bill. Mr. BRYSON. Mr. Speaker, I ask come in 1942, based on a 1940 dollar, was The biil was passed, and a motion to unanimous consent that the chairman about $18,000,000,000 for those above the reconsider was laid on the table. of the Committee on the Judiciary may income level of $10,000 per year; that the GENERAL LEAVE TO EXTEND REMARKS have until midnight tonight to file a ii1.come for the group b0tween $1,700 and ON THE STATE, JUSTICE, AND COM­ supplemental report on the bill; H. R. $10,000 a year amounted to about $73,- MERCE APPROPRIATION BILL 653, to amend the Antiracketeering Act. 000,000,000; and that the income of the Mr. RABAUT. Mr. Speaker, I ask The SPEAKER. Without objection, it group below $1,700 a year was about unanimous consent that all Members is so ordered. $9,000,000,000. Any effort to trace down may have 5 legislative days in which to There was no objection. figures like these through governmental extend their own remarks on the bill just EXTENSION OF REMARKS departments usually results in complete passed.