Minutes of Meeting

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minutes of Meeting MEETING meeting date 9-12th March 2009 ref./réf. page/page 1 date de la réunion 18 meeting place ESA-ESTEC, ERASMUS Auditorium chairman Jason P Hatton (ESA HSF-US) lieu de la réunion présidant minute’s date 19th March 2009 participants See Attendee list dates de minute participants subject/objet Minutes of Meeting – Jules Verne copy/copie John Ellwood (ESA D/SRE) Multi-instrument aircraft campaign intermediate science results description/description action/action due date/date limite Monday 9th March 2009 Introduction from John Ellwood (ESA, ATV Project Manager): John Ellwood thanked the science team for their hardwork in performing the campaign. There had been a Long standing interest in doing observations of ATV reentry during ATV development, but initial assessments were not feasible. JV-MAC campaign proposed in late 2007 & succeeded in obtaining detail observations of the reentry Introduction from Tomasso Sgobba (ESA, Chairman of ATV Reentry Safety Panel): Proposed this workshop should be the start of a series of workshops to discuss reentry safety. Future missions may include HTV. Mike Steinkopf (ESA, ATV Mission Director for Reentry Operations). “ATV-CC Mission operations & MAC team interfaces during re-entry observation” See PDF presentation #1 Presented mission operations. Explained modification of post undocking mission to facilitate reentry observations during night which was a requirement of the JV-MAC mission. Also ISS observations (FIALKA) required phasing manoeuvres to put ATV under ISS at time of reentry. The result was a delay of 24 days from undock until reentry. Coordination of JV-MAC reentry observations with ATV-CC, required close cooperation to ensure mission success. This was done through an interface control document, with first trajectory data provide at R-27d, then updates at intervals until R-1day. Also inflight updates of trajectory information were provided by satellite phone to both aircraft. Communications tests identified some off nominal communications issues, but this resolved by retrying & troubleshooting in the case of the Gulfstream V Inmarsat phone. a ESTEC JV-MAC-MoM-9-12Mar2009-v5- Keplerlaan 1 - 2201 AZ Noordwijk - The Netherlands draft Tel. (31) 71 5656565 - Fax (31) 71 5656040 MEETING meeting date ref./réf. page/page 2 date de la réunion 18 Jason Hatton (ESA, JV-MAC coordinator on ESA side) “Jules Verne MAC observation campaign: overview of mission concept, planning & operations” See PDF presentation #2. The general concept of the mission was presented, including instrument package objectives, general organisation & a brief overview of the raw instrument data Q. from audience – how was ATV apparent attitude (eg. elevation / azimuth) data aquired = A. star field + GPS & astrometry of fragments position relative to star field. Jim Albers (SETI Institute, Aircraft flight planning) “ATV Reentry – Aircraft flight planning, execution & lessons learned”. See PDF presentation #3. Flight planning – presented general concept & planning. The aircaft needed to be turned to follow ATV. Effect of wind had to be incorporated into planning, to ensure aircraft pointing in the correct direction. For the Gulfstream V, the most critical parameter was timing of the turn, uncertainties in trajectory were of less concern. Conversely for the DC-8 the trajectory variation (long or short) would require the angle & duration of turn to be varied. Therefore, it was necessary to react in real time to any variations in trajectory. During mission the trajectory of the main fragment was longer than predicted, DC-8 tried to react but increased turn too late to adequately follow main body. Inflight a spreadsheet was used to update the reference points for the aircraft manoeuvres. Three waypoints were provided by satellite telephone which were then input into the spreadsheet. For the GV manoeuvre this was practiced during observation flight approx half hour prior to reentry. Exchange of trajectory data prior to mission practiced & verified. Actual flight paths presented. There was a significant cross wind (100kt) which resulted in some differences in position WRT original plan. This was compensated by flight crew, pointing of aircraft WRT ATV was correct. Actual initial points shifted, but pointing of aircraft was relatively insensitive to absolute position. Also some replanning in Tahiti, GV position moved back to provide better coverage by some instruments (aircraft positioned ~20km further back to permit Clay Center Observatory spectrograph to cover entire trajectory) Lessons learned: Generally went well, but some improvement possible. Good coordination with ATV-CC. First time aircraft turned during observations in a MAC mission, this generally worked well but some constraints particularly for DC-8. Better coordination needed between observers & flight planning early in process. Some aircraft pointing errors. Internal comms in GV good in cockpit, but difficult to get feedback from observers & GV cockpit. In DC-8 inputs from observers to crew through headset, but 1-2 people between observers & pilots which delays transfer of information. Peter Jenniskens (SETI Institute: JV-MAC Principle Investigator). “Overview of status of analysis & key results to date – ATV-1 Jules Verne MAC” See PDF presentation #4 Overview of status of analysis & key events. The overall timeline was presented which shows the key events. The main explosion resulted in a glowing cloud. The ATV intensity did not increase according to the theoretical light curve. No clear indication of tumbling in photometric data. A number of flares were observed prior to explosion. Brightening faster than predicted may be result of ablation processes. Slitless was spectroscopy used extensively, permitting direct imaging plus spectra. Visual example is DSLR slitless spectroscopy, the AlO & Sodium spectra are quite apparent on the image. A Series of flares & flashes seen preceeding the main explosion, the earliest flares had a very strong emission of magnesium. Later flares prior to main explosion released a lot of AlO. Main explosion at 13:36:19UT 29Sep2009. The Main explosion overexposed most instruments, but in INT instrument MEETING meeting date ref./réf. page/page 3 date de la réunion 18 recorded an unsaturateds reflection in window. After explosion a very strong signal was detected, which turns out to be Lithium this is part of one of the three main objects. Lead object visible after last main fragment break up has a strong line emission. Explosion cloud has a defined brightness Review of HDTV video’s by Peter Jenniskens & Jason Hatton The video’s from the Gulfstream V and DC-8 were show. The general features & events were explained & how data can be exploited. Antoine Bavandi (ESA, TEC; HDTV camera operator on DC-8) “Number of fragments for E-HDTV recording”. See PDF presentation #5 Fragments were counted from the Utah State HDTV recording. This was compared to the HDTV from NASA-Ames, Antoine’s / Mike Taylor’s camera & low light / intensitifed cameras. When Compared to low light camera images, this does not show significantly more bright fragments. Therefore, the HDTV record can be used for fragment counting, this is important for comparison to models. Estimate 400-500 fragments detected. Q. What is the minimum size of fragments that can be detected. This needs to be calculated based on size & surface area. Perhaps spectroscopy can be used to identify specific fragments (eg. batteries) as a reference to cross calibrate size. Fragment sizes were counted by hand. Hans Stenbaek-Nielsen (Univ. Alaska Fairbanks; HFRS instrument PI): “ATV Re-entry path by triangulation”. See PDF presentation #6 Triangulation of trajectory from tracking camera’s. Used data from the WATEC camera’s. GPS recordings provide position and time to within a few tens of meters. Look angles determined from background stars. Used software developed by Hans Nielsen, originally developed for chemical cloud tracking (Aurora / upper atmosphere research). Star fitting, reference to SAO catalogue includes spectra characteristics. Calibration for brightness. Images are relatively flat, except at edge of field of view. Distortion of field is not a significant problem for this analysis since field of view is quite small. Data available from both camera’s for a part of trajectory. Initial calculations done for each 10s on main fragment. Each image set presented & calculate triangulated trajectory. One challenge for two point observations is that the same fragment may look different (eg. different brightness) from the two different view points. This can make identification of individual fragments difficult. Text file of look angles available. Accuracy calculations: Pixel resolution gives 100-600m resolution at distance of ATV. GPS accuracy approx 100m. This also defines how many individual fragments can be seen in tracking camera’s. Star field astrometry is a few pixels (eg. limited by refraction effects). The ATV is moving at ~8km/s. Therefore each frame = 250m along track uncertainty (however comparison with high frame rate imagers would allow more accurate along track determination). Refraction is important for negative elevation angles, where stars are not readily visible. Calculated this effect & effect is to shift altitude by ~1km. For brightness estimates most data is saturated. However, this is not a significant problem, since the brightness of the object is expected to follow a Gausian profile, so it may be possible to use this on the ATV data. Software used for this analysis can in principle
Recommended publications
  • NASA Ames Jim Arnold, Craig Burkhardt Et Al
    The re-entry of artificial meteoroid WT1190F AIAA SciTech 2016 1/5/2016 2008 TC3 Impact October 7, 2008 Mohammad Odeh International Astronomical Center, Abu Dhabi Peter Jenniskens SETI Institute Asteroid Threat Assessment Project (ATAP) - NASA Ames Jim Arnold, Craig Burkhardt et al. Michael Aftosmis - NASA Ames 2 Darrel Robertson - NASA Ames Next TC3 Consortium http://impact.seti.org Mission Statement: Steve Larson (Catalina Sky Survey) “Be prepared for the next 2008 TC3 John Tonry (ATLAS) impact” José Luis Galache (Minor Planet Center) Focus on two aspects: Steve Chesley (NASA JPL) 1. Airborne observations of the reentry Alan Fitzsimmons (Queen’s Univ. Belfast) 2. Rapid recovery of meteorites Eileen Ryan (Magdalena Ridge Obs.) Franck Marchis (SETI Institute) Ron Dantowitz (Clay Center Observatory) Jay Grinstead (NASA Ames Res. Cent.) Peter Jenniskens (SETI Institute - POC) You? 5 NASA/JPL “Sentry” early alert October 3, 2015: WT1190F Davide Farnocchia (NASA/JPL) Catalina Sky Survey: Richard Kowalski Steve Chesley (NASA/JPL) Marco Michelli (ESA NEOO CC) 6 WT1190F Found: October 3, 2015: one more passage Oct. 24 Traced back to: 2013, 2012, 2011, …, 2009 Re-entry: Friday November 13, 2015 10.61 km/s 20.6º angle Bill Gray 11 IAC + UAE Space Agency chartered commercial G450 Mohammad Odeh (IAC, Abu Dhabi) Support: UAE Space Agency Dexter Southfield /Embry-Riddle AU 14 ESA/University Stuttgart 15 SETI Institute 16 Dexter Southfield team Time UAE Camera Trans-Lunar Insertion Stage Leading candidate (1/13/2016): LUNAR PROSPECTOR T.L.I.S. Launch: January 7, 1998 UT Lunar Prospector itself was deliberately crashed on Moon July 31, 1999 Carbon fiber composite Spin hull thrusters Titanium case holds Amonium Thiokol Perchlorate fuel and Star Stage 3700S HTPB binder (both contain H) P.I.: Alan Binder Scott Hubbard 57-minutes later: Mission Director Separation of TLIS NASA Ames http://impact.seti.org 30 .
    [Show full text]
  • Radar-Enabled Recovery of the Sutter's Mill Meteorite, A
    RESEARCH ARTICLES the area (2). One meteorite fell at Sutter’sMill (SM), the gold discovery site that initiated the California Gold Rush. Two months after the fall, Radar-Enabled Recovery of the Sutter’s SM find numbers were assigned to the 77 me- teorites listed in table S3 (3), with a total mass of 943 g. The biggest meteorite is 205 g. Mill Meteorite, a Carbonaceous This is a tiny fraction of the pre-atmospheric mass, based on the kinetic energy derived from Chondrite Regolith Breccia infrasound records. Eyewitnesses reported hearing aloudboomfollowedbyadeeprumble.Infra- Peter Jenniskens,1,2* Marc D. Fries,3 Qing-Zhu Yin,4 Michael Zolensky,5 Alexander N. Krot,6 sound signals (table S2A) at stations I57US and 2 2 7 8 8,9 Scott A. Sandford, Derek Sears, Robert Beauford, Denton S. Ebel, Jon M. Friedrich, I56US of the International Monitoring System 6 4 4 10 Kazuhide Nagashima, Josh Wimpenny, Akane Yamakawa, Kunihiko Nishiizumi, (4), located ~770 and ~1080 km from the source, 11 12 10 13 Yasunori Hamajima, Marc W. Caffee, Kees C. Welten, Matthias Laubenstein, are consistent with stratospherically ducted ar- 14,15 14 14,15 16 Andrew M. Davis, Steven B. Simon, Philipp R. Heck, Edward D. Young, rivals (5). The combined average periods of all 17 18 18 19 20 Issaku E. Kohl, Mark H. Thiemens, Morgan H. Nunn, Takashi Mikouchi, Kenji Hagiya, phase-aligned stacked waveforms at each station 21 22 22 22 23 Kazumasa Ohsumi, Thomas A. Cahill, Jonathan A. Lawton, David Barnes, Andrew Steele, of 7.6 s correspond to a mean source energy of 24 4 24 2 25 Pierre Rochette, Kenneth L.
    [Show full text]
  • Career Pages of Astronomer Dr. Peter Jenniskens Peter Jenniskens, Ph.D
    10/8/2014 Career pages of astronomer Dr. Peter Jenniskens Peter Jenniskens, Ph.D. Meteor astronomer Carl Sagan Center, The SETI Institute. E-mail: Petrus.M.Jenniskens [at] nasa.gov, Tel: 1 (650) 810 0216; Fax: 1 (650) 962 9419 Last update: December 08, 2008; List of Publications Curriculum vitae Astronomer Dr. Peter Jenniskens [Portrait (3.2 Mbyte)] is a Research Scientist with the Carl Sagan Center at the SETI Institute and works on mission projects at NASA/Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, and on research topics that relate to interstellar and interplanetary matter. Research Interests: Meteor showers - Jenniskens is an expert on meteor showers, and is known for identifying the parent body of the Quadrantid shower: a minor planet called 2003 EH1. Main belt asteroid 1999 TY224 was named (42981) "Jenniskens". He is the Principal Investigator of ASIMA - the Asteroid Impact Analyzer, a proposed satellite mission (2014-2016) to measure the carbon content of meteors from space and study the diversity of comets and asteroids. He predicted the return of the unusual Aurigid shower from dust ejected around 4 AD by long-period comet Kiess on September 1, 2007, and was the Principal Investigator of the Aurigid Multi-Instrument Aircraft Campaign (Aurigid MAC), an airborne mission that deployed from NASA Ames to study this meteor outburst. This was followed by a study of dust ejected by comet 8P/Tuttle (Ursid MAC) in December 2007, and a mission in January 2008 to study the Quadrantid meteor shower for clues to its date of origin (Quadrantid MAC). Before that, Jenniskens was the Principal Investigator of NASA's first Astrobiology mission, Leonid MAC, an airborne campaign to explore the 1998 - 2002 Leonid storms and study meteoroids and their paths from extra-terrestrial to terrestrial matter.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1999 Leonid Multi.Instrument Aircraft Campaign - an Early Review
    THE 1999 LEONID MULTI.INSTRUMENT AIRCRAFT CAMPAIGN - AN EARLY REVIEW PETER JENNISKENS _, STEVEN J. BUTOW _, AND MARK FONDA NASA Ames Research Center, Mai_ Stop 239-4, Moffett Field, CA 94035-1000 I with SETI Institute E.mail: [email protected] (Received 10 July 2000; Accepted 15August 2000) Abstract. The Leonid meteor storm of 1999 was observed from two B707-type research aircraft by a team of 35 scientists of seven nationalities over the Mediterranean Sea on Nov. 18, 1999. The mission was sponsored by various science programs of NASA, and offered the best possible observing conditions, free of clouds and at a prime location for viewing the storm. The 1999 mission followed a similar effort in 1998, improving upon mission strategy and scope. As before, spectroscopic and imaging experiments targeted meteors and persistent trains, but also airglow, aurora, elves and sprites. The research aimed to address outstanding questions in Planetary Science, Astronomy, Astrobiology and upper atmospheric research, including Aeronomie. In addition, near real-time flux measurements contributed to a USAF sponsored program for space weather awareness. An overview of the first results is given, which are discussed in preparation for future missions. Keywords: Airborne astronomy, astrobiology, chemistry, comets, composition, elves, exobiology, instrumental techniques, Leonid MAC, Leonids 1999, lower thermosphere, meteoroids, meteor storm, meteors, mesosphere, orbital dynamics, satellite impact hazard, sprites 1. Introduction The widely anticipated return of the Leonid shower in November of 1999 offered our best chance yet to observe a meteor storm with modern techniques. Just prior to the last year's campaign, E.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 TC3: the Small Asteroid with an Impact
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45, Nr 10–11, 1553–1556 (2010) doi: 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01156.x Introduction 2008 TC3: The small asteroid with an impact The story is now familiar: On October 6, 2008, THE IMPACT OF 2008 TC3 ON METEORITICS & Richard Kowalski at the Catalina Sky Survey in PLANETARY SCIENCE Arizona spotted a small 3 m sized asteroid, now named 2008 TC3. It was soon discovered that, 20 h later, this And what an asteroid it was! The research asteroid was to impact Earth. Steve Chesley of presented here sheds new light on the smelting process NASA ⁄ JPL calculated an impact location in the Nubian recognized in the ureilites. The cooling rates calculated desert of northern Sudan. In the hours before impact, from the quenching of the smelting implied that a astronomers measured the light curve of the rare protoplanet broke in 10–100 m sized fragments tumbling asteroid and a reflectance spectrum, describing following a giant collision. Those fragments were later its shape and taxonomic type. This was the first time that ground down into the tiny pieces found in 2008 TC3, an asteroid was studied in space before hitting the Earth. presumably in subsequent collisions. The final fragments In the predawn hour of October 7, satellites gathered in loosely welded together assemblages of recorded the fireball west of Station 6, putting the main small millimeter and sub-millimeter sized fragments, )20 magnitude detonation at a high 37 km altitude. The with much pore space in between. Other fragments of impact happened around the time of morning prayer.
    [Show full text]
  • Primefocus Tri-Valley Stargazers January 2016
    PRIMEFOCUS Tri-Valley Stargazers January 2016 January Meeting The History and Science of Lick Observatory Dr. Paul Lynam Lick Observatory, wholly owned and operated by the University of California, was the first astronomical observatory purpose-built at alti- tude. It demonstrated the practicality of large- scale glass substrate reflecting telescopes for research. It was the fulcrum upon which the United States pivoted to dominance in obser- Meeting Info vational astronomy at the close of the 19th What: century and the dawn 20th. This presentation The History and Science of Lick offers a little known history of James Lick, what Observatory motivated him to establish Lick Observatory and the processes and people that lead to the Who: establishment of what was for decades the Dr. Paul Lynam world’s foremost astronomical observatory, When: located in the county of Santa Clara. Even prior January 15, 2016 to completion, Lick Observatory was making Doors open at 7:00 p.m. important discoveries, developing technolo- Meeting at 7:30 p.m. gies and setting standards. It continues to train Caption: 3-meter Shane Telescope Lecture at 8:00 p.m. generations of scientists and inspire the wider at Lick Observatory. Credit: Ken public --- a role it has fulfilled for over 100 Sperber Where: years. Lick remains at the forefront of scientific Unitarian Universalist and technological advances, annually enabling over 200 Californian astronomers Church in Livermore to undertake and publish front line, cutting-edge research. Lick continues to pio- 1893 N. Vasco Road neer and has much more work to do. Some outstanding contributions from Lick’s history and current work shall be highlighted, as well as some prospects for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Workings: Networks of Cameras Are Tracking Meteorites With
    INNER WORKINGS INNER WORKINGS Networks of cameras are tracking meteorites with unprecedented precision Danielle Venton, Science Writer Around the globe, networks of camera lenses are which asteroids or near-earth region of space from trained upward. They scan the night skies, aiming to which the rocks emanate. Those participating in these catch streaks of bright light: meteorites as they fall to networks are photographing, tracking, and hunting Earth. Searching for these space rocks is not new. down meteorites. But the precision and resolution with which increasingly The DFN consists of 52 autonomous digital cam- expansive networks of Earth-bound cameras are track- eras placed in the hot, dry Nullarbor desert, with an- ing meteorites is starting to offer insights into both other dozen cameras scattered in multiple countries. where these bodies go and where they came from. Waterproof containers help the cameras survive the For astronomers, catching sight of a meteor is Australian outback; inbuilt fans keep the cameras cool more than a stroke of luck. It represents a potentially through the day. The project is a collaboration be- valuable research sample that has fallen to Earth. tween Imperial College London, Ondrejov Observa- “These are samples of heavenly bodies reaching us tory in the Czech Republic, Curtin University in Western decades before we might actually go there,” says Australia, and the Western Australian Museum. Phil Bland, planetary scientist at Curtin University To help achieve a high-resolution view of the skies, and director of the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) the network also enlists citizen scientists. According to in Australia. His network is one of several high-tech the project’s website, more than 26,000 people in attempts to track and gather meteorites in the 88 countries have downloaded the app “Fireballs in hopes of understanding their origins, frequency, the Sky.” Users point their phones to the place in the and composition.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 X 11 Long.P65
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-85349-1 - Meteor Showers and their Parent Comets Peter Jenniskens Frontmatter More information Meteor Showers and Their Parent Comets It is only in the past ten years that advanced computing techniques and painstaking observations have enabled the successful prediction and observation of meteor storms. Spectacular displays of ‘‘shooting stars’’ are created when the Earth crosses a meteoroid stream, causing the meteoroids to light up into meteors as they enter our atmosphere. Meteor Showers and Their Parent Comets is a unique handbook for astronomers interested in observing meteor storms and outbursts. The author, a leading astro- nomer in the field and an active meteor storm chaser, explains how meteoroid streams originate from the decay of comets (and asteroids) and how they evolve into ever changing orbits by the gravitational pull of planets to cause meteor showers on Earth. He includes the findings of recent space missions that have visited comets and asteroids, the risk of meteoroid impacts on Earth, what showers to expect on other planets, and how meteor showers may have seeded the Earth with the ingredients that made life possible. All known meteor showers are identified, accompanied by fascinating details on the most important showers and their parent comets. The book predicts when exceptional meteor showers will occur over the next 50 years, making it a valuable resource for both amateur and professional astronomers. Astronomer P ETER J ENNISKENS completed his Ph.D. at Leiden University, the Netherlands, in 1992. He then worked as a National Research Council Associate at the Exobiology branch of the NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, California, where he uncovered exotic properties of astrophysical ices, such as those in comets.
    [Show full text]
  • Annexe I : Description Des Services D’Observations Labellisés Liés À La Planétologie
    Annexe I : description des services d’observations labellisés liés à la planétologie Consultation BDD Service des éphémérides Type AA-ANO1 Coordination Intitulé OSU Directeur de l'OSU Responsable du SNO Email du responsable du SNO IMCCE Jacques LASKAR Jacques LASKAR [email protected] Partenaires Intitulé OSU Directeur de l'OSU Resp. du SNO dans l'OSU Email du resp. du SNO dans l'OSU Obs. Paris Claude CATALA OCA Thierry LANZ Agnès FIENGA [email protected] Description L'IMCCE a la responsabilité, sous l'égide du Bureau des longitudes, de produire et de diffuser les calendriers et éphémérides au niveau national. Cette fonction est assurée l'institut par son Service des éphémérides. Aussi celui-ci a) produit les publications et éditions annuelles tout comme les éphémérides en ligne, b) diffuse les éphémérides de divers corps du système solaire - naturels et artificiels, et de phénomènes célestes, c) assure la maintenance et la mise jour des bases de données, d) procure une expertise juridique aux tribunaux, e) procure des éphémérides et données la demande pour les services similaires (USA, Japon), les agences, les chercheurs, les laboratoires et les observatoires. Consultation BDD Gaia Type AA-ANO1, AA-ANO4 Coordination Intitulé OSU Directeur de l'OSU Responsable du SNO Email du responsable du SNO OCA Thierry LANZ François MIGNARD [email protected] Partenaires Intitulé OSU Directeur de l'OSU Resp. du SNO dans l'OSU Email du resp. du SNO dans l'OSU Obs. Paris Claude CATALA Frédéric ARENOU [email protected] IMCCE Jacques LASKAR Daniel HESTROFFER [email protected] OASU Marie Lise DUBERNET-TUCKEY Caroline SOUBIRAN [email protected] THETA Philippe ROUSSELOT Annie ROBIN [email protected] IAP Francis BERNARDEAU Brigitte ROCCA VOLMERANGE [email protected] ObAS Pierre-Alain DUC Jean-Louis HALBWACHS [email protected] Description Participation aux activités du Consortium DPAC (Data Processing and Analysis Consortium) pour la mission Gaia.
    [Show full text]
  • Radar-Enabled Recovery of the Sutter's Mill Meteorite, a Carbonaceous Chondrite Regolith Breccia RESEARCHARTICLES
    RESEARCH ARTICLES the area (2). One meteorite fell at Sutter’s Mill (SM), the gold discovery site that initiated the California Gold Rush. Two months after the fall, Radar-Enabled Recovery of the Sutter’s SM find numbers were assigned to the 77 me- teorites listed in table S3 (3), with a total mass of 943 g. The biggest meteorite is 205 g. Mill Meteorite, a Carbonaceous This is a tiny fraction of the pre-atmospheric mass, based on the kinetic energy derived from Chondrite Regolith Breccia infrasound records. Eyewitnesses reported hearing a loud boom followed by a deep rumble. Infra- 1,2 3 4 5 6 Peter Jenniskens, * Marc D. Fries, Qing-Zhu Yin, Michael Zolensky, Alexander N. Krot, sound signals (table S2A) at stations I57US and 2 2 7 8 8,9 Scott A. Sandford, Derek Sears, Robert Beauford, Denton S. Ebel, Jon M. Friedrich, I56US of the International Monitoring System 6 4 4 10 Kazuhide Nagashima, Josh Wimpenny, Akane Yamakawa, Kunihiko Nishiizumi, (4), located ~770 and ~1080 km from the source, 11 12 10 13 Yasunori Hamajima, Marc W. Caffee, Kees C. Welten, Matthias Laubenstein, are consistent with stratospherically ducted ar- 14,15 14 14,15 16 Andrew M. Davis, Steven B. Simon, Philipp R. Heck, Edward D. Young, rivals (5). The combined average periods of all 17 18 18 19 20 Issaku E. Kohl, Mark H. Thiemens, Morgan H. Nunn, Takashi Mikouchi, Kenji Hagiya, phase-aligned stacked waveforms at each station 21 22 22 22 23 Kazumasa Ohsumi, Thomas A. Cahill, Jonathan A. Lawton, David Barnes, Andrew Steele, of 7.6 s correspond to a mean source energy of 24 4 24 2 25 Pierre Rochette, Kenneth L.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. PETER JENNISKENS 2019 Jenniskens, P., Popova, O. P
    Dr. PETER JENNISKENS 2019 Jenniskens, P., Popova, O. P., Glazachev, D. O., Podobnaya, E. D., Kartashova, A. P., 2019. Tunguska eyewitness accounts, injuries, and casualties. Icarus (in press) [#204]. Jenniskens, P., 2019. Review of asteroid-family and meteorite-type links. In: A century of asteroid families. J. Masseido, ed., IAU Transactions (in press) [#203]. Jenniskens, P., Utas J., Qing-zhu Yin, Matson R. D., Fries M., Howell J. A., Free D., Albers J., Devillepoix H., Bland P., Miller A., Verish R., Garvie L. A. J., Zolensky M. E., Ziegler K., Sanborn M. E., Verosub K. ., Rowland D. J., Ostrowski D. R., Bryson K., Laubenstein M, Zhou Q., Li, Q.-L., Li X.-H., Liu Y., Tang G.-Q., Welten K., Meier M. M. M., Plant A. A., Maden C., Busemann H., Granvik M., 2018. The Creston, California, meteorite fall and the origin of L chondrites. MAPS (in press) [#202]. Harp, G. R., Richards, J., Jenniskens, P., Shostak, S., Tarter, J. C., 2019. Radio SETI observations of the interstellar object 'OUMUAMUA. Acta Astronautica 155, 51–54 [#201]. 2018 Jenniskens, P., 2018. A shower look-up table to trace the dynamics of meteoroid streams and their sources. AAS DPA meeting #49, San Jose, id.102.04 (abstract). Kartashova, A. P., Popova, O. P., Glazachev, D. O., Jenniskens, P., Podobnaya, E. D., 2018. Eyewitness accounts and modeling results for Chelyabinsk Airburst. 81st. Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society, 22-27 July 2018 in Mosow, Russia, LPI Contr. No. 2067, 2018, id.6169. Goodrich, C. A., Fioretti, A., Zolensky, M., Shaddad, M., Hiroi, T., Kohl, I., Young, E., Kita, N., Sanborn, M., Yin, Q.-Z., Downes, H., Ross, D., Jenniskens, P., 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Inner Workings: Networks of Cameras Are Tracking Meteorites With
    INNER WORKINGS INNER WORKINGS Networks of cameras are tracking meteorites with unprecedented precision Danielle Venton, Science Writer Around the globe, networks of camera lenses are which asteroids or near-earth region of space from trained upward. They scan the night skies, aiming to which the rocks emanate. Those participating in these catch streaks of bright light: meteorites as they fall to networks are photographing, tracking, and hunting Earth. Searching for these space rocks is not new. down meteorites. But the precision and resolution with which increasingly The DFN consists of 52 autonomous digital cam- expansive networks of Earth-bound cameras are track- eras placed in the hot, dry Nullarbor desert, with an- ing meteorites is starting to offer insights into both other dozen cameras scattered in multiple countries. where these bodies go and where they came from. Waterproof containers help the cameras survive the For astronomers, catching sight of a meteor is Australian outback; inbuilt fans keep the cameras cool more than a stroke of luck. It represents a potentially through the day. The project is a collaboration be- valuable research sample that has fallen to Earth. tween Imperial College London, Ondrejov Observa- “These are samples of heavenly bodies reaching us tory in the Czech Republic, Curtin University in Western decades before we might actually go there,” says Australia, and the Western Australian Museum. Phil Bland, planetary scientist at Curtin University To help achieve a high-resolution view of the skies, and director of the Desert Fireball Network (DFN) the network also enlists citizen scientists. According to in Australia. His network is one of several high-tech the project’s website, more than 26,000 people in attempts to track and gather meteorites in the 88 countries have downloaded the app “Fireballs in hopes of understanding their origins, frequency, the Sky.” Users point their phones to the place in the and composition.
    [Show full text]