A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1 Status: A1 APPROVED - PUBLISHED Document Ref: HE543917-ATK-GEN-XX-AL-ZM-000001

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Notice

This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Highways England’s information and use in relation to A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements.

Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents.

This document has 21 pages including the cover. Document history

Job number: HE543917 Document ref: HE543917-ATK-GEN--XX-AL-ZM-000001

Purpose Revision Status Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date description

C02 A1 For Approval EBB RJM RJM CH 05/08/19 C01 B1 For Review EBB SW RJM RJM 29/07/19

Revision C02 Page 2 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Table of contents

Chapter Pages 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Purpose of report 4 2. Appraisal of Bean North roundabout MOD-1 4 2.1 Highways Engineering 4 2.2 Safety Risk Assessment 7 2.3 Impact on Published Orders 7 2.4 Impact on Traffic and Operation 8 2.5 Environmental Review 8 2.6 Cost estimate 11 3. Conclusions 12 Appendices 13 Appendix A Bean North Roundabout – Published Scheme Appendix B Bean North Roundabout – Modification Layout Appendix C Bean North Roundabout – Impact on Orders Figures

Figure 2.1: Extract from PCF Stage 3 Preliminary Design - Engineering General arrangement, ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-DR-CH-000204_C05 5 Figure 2.2: Extract from sketch with ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-SK-CH-000101_C01 6

Revision C02 Page 3 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1MOD-1

1. Introduction

1.1 Purpose of report 1.1.1 The modification MOD-1 for Bean North roundabout is being promoted by Highways England as a modification to the Published Orders. The purpose of this report is to assess the implications of the modification on highways engineering and design, safety, traffic and operation, cost and environment. Appendix C sets out the implications of the modification on the Published Orders. 2. Appraisal of Bean North roundabout MOD-1

2.1 Highways Engineering Bean North roundabout – Published scheme 2.1.1 The Bean North roundabout is enlarged and signalised to improve the capacity and operation for future traffic demands. The circulatory carriageway consists of 3 lanes except for the west section of the circulatory carriageway (between the approach of the eastbound off slip road and the approach of the B255 southbound) and the south section (just for the length between the Bean southbound bridge and the Bean northbound bridge). 2.1.2 The A2 eastbound exit slip to Bean North roundabout is converted from a lane drop at taper diverge to a ghost island lane drop diverge. The existing physical Segregated Left Turn Lane (SLTL) is designed allowing for a larger curvature and improving the visibility throughout the SLTL. 2.1.3 The northbound B255 is widened on the exit from Bean North roundabout and tapers to the existing two lanes just before the B255 overbridge. The southbound B255 is also widened to three lanes on the approach to the roundabout. 2.1.4 The layout of the Bean North roundabout as per the preliminary design is shown in Figure 2.1 below (also refer to Appendix A).

Revision C02 Page 4 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Figure 2.1: Extract from PCF Stage 3 Preliminary Design - Engineering General arrangement, ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-DR-CH-000204_C05

Revision C02 Page 5 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Bean North roundabout – Modification layout 2.1.5 The size and signalisation of the roundabout remains unchanged. 2.1.6 The SLTL is redesigned to follow (as much as possible) the existing alignment. As a result, the impact on the existing carriageway edge is minimised. 2.1.7 The A2 eastbound exit slip road is realigned at the approach to the Bean North roundabout to match the existing carriageway. An additional lane to the approach is to be provided (3 lanes instead of 2 lanes in the Published Scheme). 2.1.8 The northbound and southbound B255 are also redesigned (following new SLTL configuration) by moving the alignment towards the East. 2.1.9 The Bean North roundabout is redesigned as per standards requirements although the maximum inscribed circle remains the same as in the published layout. The circulatory carriageway consists of 3 lanes throughout the gyratory. 2.1.10 The modified layout of the Bean North roundabout is shown in Figure 2.2 below (also refer to Appendix B). Figure 2.2: Extract from sketch with ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-SK-CH- 000101_C01

Revision C02 Page 6 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

2.2 Safety Risk Assessment 2.2.1 The SLTL layout in the Published Scheme has been modified to match the existing carriageway at the northwest side of the Bean North roundabout. After the modification, the area would be affected by the following departures from standards: • An existing departure for Stopping Sight Distance (visibility) on the current operating layout would remain. The achieved Stopping Sight Distance (approx. 55m) for the section of the SLTL between the end of the entry taper and the start of exit taper, is less than the Desirable Minimum SSD as per DMRB TD 51/17, cl. 2.4.3. The accident records for the current operation of the SLTL do not highlight this section as an area of concern. Therefore, as there are no existing concerns, keeping the current layout as is would not have an impact on safety on the revised layout. • A departure is proposed for the SLTL entry taper length achieved (approx. 50m) which is less than the standard length of 102m stipulated in TD 51/17, cl. 2.6.7. However, the impact of this reduced taper is considered to be low as drivers destined for the SLTL would have to make the decision before the A2 mainline diverge. Appropriate signing and road markings would be in place in advance of the diverge to inform drivers of the decision they need to make and to enable them to select the correct lane in advance of the slip road taper preventing/discouraging vehicles from weaving on the approach to the roundabout. Should a driver destined for the B255 northbound inadvertently select the right-hand lane on the approach to the slip road, the layout would still permit the northbound manoeuvre at the roundabout entry. If a vehicle destined for Bean Lane inadvertently selects the left-hand lane, that vehicle would need to travel to the next roundabout at Bluewater Parkway where they can make a 360deg turn and return to Bean North Roundabout. • It should be noted that a 2D design of the modified option has been undertaken at this stage. During the detailed design phase, the layout shall be designed in 3D and potential existing vertical alignment departures would need to be retained. These existing departures are not expected to result in any safety issues. They have been discussed with the safety experts at Highways England and where it has been indicted that any departures would be likely to be approved at detailed design stage as the impact on safety is low/negligible and adequate mitigation measures through signing and road marking would be in place.

2.3 Impact on Published Orders 2.3.1 The modification does not impact on the scheme boundary. Modifications to the Made Side Roads Order and Draft Line Order would be required if the alternative design for Bean North Roundabout is taken forward. However, no modifications would be required to the Compulsory Purchase Order. Further details of the impacts on the published Orders are included in Appendix C. 2.3.2 In addition to the information contained in Appendix C, copies of the revised documents and plans can be found in the separate documents: - "Detailed Modification MOD-1: Amendments required to the Made Side Roads Order" (file ref: HE543917-ATK-LHA-XX-LN-ZL-000054), and - "Detailed Modification MOD-1: Amendments required to the Draft Line Order" (file ref: HE543917-ATK-LHA-XX-LN-ZL-000057).

Revision C02 Page 7 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

2.4 Impact on Traffic and Operation 2.4.1 A high-level traffic operational performance test was undertaken for the 2038 PM peak scenario which indicated that there is no operational impact on the roundabout as a result of the modified layout except for an increased queue length on the proposed Bean North Bridge, from 4 vehicles in the published preliminary design, to 10 with the modified design for Bean North Roundabout. However, with the modified layout the Bean North Roundabout is predicted to operate within capacity, which is similar to the published preliminary design.

2.5 Environmental Review 2.5.1 This modification to Bean North roundabout has been reviewed against the assessment findings for each environmental topic presented in the Environmental Statement (ES) Volumes 1-3. A qualitative assessment has been undertaken for air quality, noise and vibration, and road drainage and water environment, in the absence of specific quantitative data. In addition to considering the assessment results presented in the ES, the qualitative assessment for air quality, and noise and vibration, has taken account of the distance of the nearest sensitive receptors to the proposed modification. The qualitative assessment for noise and vibration has also considered the extent of the change and the distance from the nearest property to the modification. For road drainage and water environment, the review is based on WEBTAG (Transport Appraisal Guidance (TAG) Unit A3 (DfT, December 2015) as this provides more of a qualitative assessment based on professional judgement, in the absence of specific quantitative data. Air Quality 2.5.2 The modification is unlikely to have any effect on the findings of the air quality assessment presented in the ES during either the construction or operational phases. During construction, the area which could potentially be affected by construction dust emissions is considered unlikely to change from that in the ES. 2.5.3 During operation, any changes in road alignment or traffic with this modification are expected to be less than the DMRB criteria for assessment, therefore it can be considered unlikely that there would be a measurable change in air quality at any sensitive receptors within 200m. The nearest receptors to the Bean North Roundabout are in any case over 140m to the south at Hope Cottages and would be more affected by changes on the closer road sources of the B255 and Bean South Roundabout, than by any modification at the Bean North Roundabout. Noise and Vibration 2.5.4 The modification is unlikely to have any effect on the findings of the noise and vibration assessment presented in the ES, for both the construction and operational phases. 2.5.5 At the nearest residential receptors, Hope Cottages, the noise contribution from the A2 and B255 far exceeds the contribution from the modification at the Bean North Roundabout, which is at least 100m from the property. The same is true for other properties close to the modification. Therefore, the alignment change would be negligible, and not perceptible, above what has already been predicted in the ES.

Revision C02 Page 8 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

2.5.6 The modification is unlikely to have any effect on the findings of the noise and vibration assessment presented in the ES, for both the construction and operational phases. 2.5.7 At the nearest residential receptors, Hope Cottages, the noise contribution from the A2 and B255 far exceeds the contribution from modification at the Bean North Roundabout, which is at least 100m from the property. The same is true for other properties close to the modification, such as Brickfield Nursery in the Bean Triangle and the new properties to the north, within Ebbsfleet Valley. Therefore, the alignment change would be negligible, and not perceptible, above what has already been predicted in the ES. Biodiversity 2.5.8 The modification would involve the retention of the A2 eastbound off slip embankment and B255 southbound link, which would both be maintained as existing, along with the associated vegetation. Therefore, vegetation clearance would no longer be required along the embankment. This would be a beneficial change to the published scheme for biodiversity receptors, as overall temporary habitat loss and subsequent effects on hazel dormice, nesting birds, common species of reptile and badgers would be reduced. Due to habitat loss affecting other parts of the published Scheme during construction, mitigation measures regarding the potential presence of protected species identified above (including the requirement to carry the works out under a European Protected Species mitigation licence for hazel dormice) provided within the ES would still be applied. Habitat creation measures provided in the ES would also remain unchanged due to the proposed loss of woodland and trees within other areas of the scheme. 2.5.9 Although the retention of the existing vegetation reduces the impact of the scheme on biodiversity receptors, the significance of effects remains unchanged due to the overall loss of habitats and the resulting temporary effects on hazel dormice. There would therefore be no change in the findings of the biodiversity assessment presented in the ES during the operational phase. Road Drainage and the Water Environment 2.5.10 Likely impacts during the construction phase are reported in the ES. These impacts would apply to any configuration of the design. Subject to the correct implementation of all mitigation measures, the overall residual effect on the water environment has been assessed as neutral which is not considered significant. 2.5.11 Likely impacts from the operation of the road are reported in the ES. There would be no anticipated residual effects on the water environment, on the assumption that this modification would result in minor changes to the catchment and the mitigation measures published in the ES would be implemented. As for the Preliminary Design, these assumptions would be reviewed once infiltration tests and further surveys have been undertaken during detailed design. Landscape 2.5.12 The retention of the existing vegetation to the embankment to the eastbound off slip would be a beneficial change to the published scheme for landscape and visual receptors. The retention of the existing embankment planting would retain vegetation on the skyline for receptors south west of the junction and screen views of traffic on the B255 during operation.

Revision C02 Page 9 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

2.5.13 The significance of effects of the modification on the following receptors during year 1 of the Operation phase would reduce from moderate adverse to slight adverse: • Receptor 21 – Restricted byway DR27, between Lower Bean Farmhouse and Bean House. • Receptor 23 – Lower Bean Farmhouse, • Receptor 24 – Footpath DR26, Between Darenth Wood SSSI and Lower Bean Farmhouse. • Receptor 25 – Footpath DR26, between Shellbank Lane and Lower Bean Farmhouse. 2.5.14 Although the retention of the existing vegetation reduces the impact of the scheme on landscape character areas C1-C3 Darenth and Bean Woods and G2 A2 Corridor North (Open and Closed), the significance of effects remains at moderate adverse due to the overall loss of vegetation at the junction. Cultural Heritage 2.5.15 It has been assumed in the historic environment assessment, as stated in the ES, that groundworks could occur anywhere within the Scheme boundary. Therefore, the modification does not have any effect on the findings of the historic environment assessment for the construction or operational phases as presented in the ES. Geology and Soils 2.5.16 It has been assumed in the geology and soils assessment, as stated in the ES, that groundworks could occur anywhere within the Scheme boundary. Therefore, the modification does not have any effect on the findings of the geology and soils assessment for the construction or operational phases as presented in the ES. Materials and Waste 2.5.17 With this modification, the existing vegetation and earthworks along the North- West banks to Bean North Roundabout will be retained. Therefore, the modification does not have any effect on the findings of the materials and waste assessment for the construction or operational phases as presented in the ES. People and Communities Private Dwellings: Amenity 2.5.18 As a result of the modification, an improvement to visual amenity during the operational phase at Lower Bean Farmhouse has been identified in section 2.5.10. At this receptor, no residual significant amenity effects arising from noise or air quality were identified as part of the Scheme and therefore there was no overall significant in-combination amenity effect. Whilst there is a recognisable improvement at this receptor, this change would not impact the overall assessment of no overall amenity effect during operation. 2.5.19 The above air quality and noise assessments state that impacts are unlikely to change as a result of the change to Bean North roundabout. Therefore, no changes to overall amenity assessment are anticipated.

Revision C02 Page 10 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Non-motorised Users (NMU) 2.5.20 DR26 and DR27 are anticipated to see an improvement in visual amenity during operation (section 2.5.10) as a result of this modification. This effect would see an overall change in significance of amenity effects from slight adverse (in balance) to neutral (in balance). No change in noise or air quality effects are identified. Driver Stress 2.5.21 The modification is not anticipated to have any significant effect on flow or speed and therefore, no changes are anticipated to the overall driver stress assessment. Effects on Climate Change 2.5.22 The changes to the material quantities and construction required for the modification are likely to be minimal and would not have a discernible impact on overall greenhouse gas emissions from the Scheme. As the effect of the Scheme on climate has been assessed to not be significant due to the small magnitude of emissions compared with overall national budgets, this modification is also unlikely to have a significant effect on climate. Vulnerability to Climate Change 2.5.23 The modification is closely aligned with the existing alignment. It is therefore considered that the modification would not change the climate vulnerability assessment in the ES. Cumulative Effects 2.5.24 The above visual, air quality and noise assessments state that impacts are unlikely to change as a result of the modification. Therefore, no changes to the assessment of cumulative effects are anticipated.

2.6 Cost estimate 2.6.1 This detailed modification would generate a saving of approximately £3.85m. It reduces the extent of construction works required at Bean North roundabout and reduces the delivery programme for the works. Quantities of earthworks and pavement works are reduced, and utility diversions are avoided as a consequence of the modification.

Revision C02 Page 11 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

3. Conclusions

3.1.1 The modification proposes a value engineered solution at a reduced implementation cost while keeping a similar operational performance and a neutral-positive impact on the environmental assessments presented in the Environmental Statement. In summary, the modification provides the following advantages and disadvantages. Advantages: • The environmental disciplines have assessed the modification to the design and consider there are neutral or positive impacts compared to the results presented in the Environmental Statement (ES). In general, the mitigation measures already proposed in the ES are not expected to require amendment to accommodate this modification and the assumptions made in the ES for the mitigation measures are still applicable. • The modification is unlikely to have any effect on the findings of the air quality, noise and vibration, cultural heritage, geology and soils, materials and waste, climate effects and vulnerability and cumulative effects presented in the ES during either the construction or operational phases. • The road drainage and water environment assessment is in line with the ES findings based on a qualitative assessment. • For biodiversity and landscape, the modification would be a beneficial change as some associated vegetation loss would be avoided. However, the mitigation and the habitat creation measures identified in the ES for biodiversity and mitigation proposed in the landscape chapter are remaining the same as the overall significance of effects remain unchanged. • For people and communities, there would be an improvement to visual amenity for a private dwelling due to the modification, however the overall assessment for amenity is not changed from the ES findings. For non-motorised users there would be a change in the overall significance of amenity effects from slight adverse (in balance) to neutral (in balance). Driver stress is unlikely to have any change from the findings in the ES. • This detailed modification would generate a saving of approximately £3.85m. It reduces the extent of construction works required at Bean North roundabout and reduces the delivery programme for the works. Quantities of earthworks and pavement works are reduced, and utility diversions are avoided as a consequence of the modification. Disadvantages: • The modification requires departures from standards, although some of these also apply to the original design. Proposals have been discussed with HE SES specialists and based on these it is believed these have a low level of risk associated with them. These would need to be progressed to conclusion during detailed design stage • Traffic is largely unaffected, other than increased queue lengths during peak periods on Bean Lane northbound bridge (from 4 to 10 cars at peak period in design year 2038).

Revision C02 Page 12 of 21

Appendices

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Appendix A. Bean North roundabout - Published scheme

Engineering General Arrangements, ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-DR-CH-000204_C05

Revision C02 Page 14 of 21

100

FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 12 BEAN LANE (NORTH) A296 NORTHBOUND B255 WATLING STREET WIDENED ON EXIT FROM MAIN CONSTRUCTION SOUTHBOUND B255 SITE COMPOUND BEAN NORTH ROUNDABOUT WIDENED TO THREE 100 WITH LANE DROP TO EXISTING LANES. TIE INTO TWO LANES EXISTING TWO LANES PROPOSED ENTRY TO EXISTING CAR PARK (NORTH), ATTENUATION POND,

Millimetres DBC WOODLAND AND EXISTING PYLON EARTHWORK SLOPE 1:2 (V:H) EARTHWORK SLOPE 1:2 (V:H) NORTHBOUND BEAN LANE DIL IFT WIDENED TO TWO LANES

RS PROPOSED ACCESS TO ATTENUATION POND, DBC 100 IFT DIL WOODLAND AND EXISTING 10 PYLON AREA IDENTIFIED FOR EARTHWORK SLOPE 1:2 (V:H)

0 IFT POTENTIAL DRAINAGE DIL PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND ATTENUATION WORKS BEAN NORTH ROUNDABOUT ENLARGED AND SIGNALISED DIL

PROPOSED 1:1 (V:H) 0 THRIFT WATLING SOIL REINFORCED SLOPE COTTAGE

H HOUSE RS MAXIMUM HEIGHT 5m PROPOSED 1:3 (V:H) SLOPE WITH DIL H RETAINING WALL ALONG THE TOE MAXIMUM HEIGHT 6.0m EXISTING HARD SHOULDER (SEE GENERAL NOTE 8) DIL CONVERTED TO RUNNING LANE RS RS WITH PROVISION OF FOUR

DO NOT SCALE PROPOSED 312.884 NARROW LANES DRAINAGE AND 277.220 DIL NEW SINGLE LANE EASTBOUND ATTENUATION 100 RS DBC WOODLAND ACCESS 0 ON SLIP WITH TYPE E - LANE WORKS 300 ! 226.466 RS GAIN MERGE DIL HS/HGN/01 0 PROPOSED ACCESS TO PYLON RS 275.887 RS C (SEE GENERAL NOTE 8) RS 250 PROPOSED RETAINING WALL

DIL MAXIMUM HEIGHT 1m H FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 5 250 261.013 BEAN JUNCTION RS EASTBOUND RS ! DIL 200 HS/HGN/01 OFFSLIP ROAD DIL RS RS

100 RS RS 200 FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 3 200 0

200 4400

4300 4500

4200

100

RS 4600 EXISTING MS3 PROPOSED BEAN

194.902 0 4100 CANTILEVER GANTRY JUNCTION RS A2

CH.4350 EASTBOUND RS 150 ON SLIP ROAD 100 RS 150 100 RS RS RS

4000 RS 0 RS DIL SEE NOTE 3

3900

DIL EXISTING CONFIRMATORY ADS 100 PORTAL GANTRY EXISTING IGTHAM COTTAGES ! 100 H CH.4559 EARTHWORKS CUTTING TO BE DEMOLISHED HS/HGN/01 1:2 SLOPE EXISTING SEGREGATED LEFT EXISTING NMU ROUTE TURN LANE WIDENED AND BEAN JUNCTION RELOCATED TO BEAN IMPROVED 186.265 WESTBOUND NEW BRIDGE OFFSLIP ROAD

EXISTING LIGHTING HAZARD RS 50 EXISTING BEAN 0 (SEE GENERAL NOTE 3 AND KEY) 50 OVERBRIDGE (BX02) TO BE 0 BEAN JUNCTION WESTBOUND RETAINED FOR 100 ONSLIP ROAD NORTHBOUND TRAFFIC RS

EXISTING CENTRAL RESERVE WITH METALLIC BARRIER CONVERTED TO NEW BRIDGE PROPOSED NARROW CENTRAL RESERVE WITH 194.754 BEAN PARALLEL TO EXISTING 0 0 ENTRY TO BEAN SOUTH CONCRETE STEP BARRIER BEAN OVERBRIDGE FOR EXISTING TYPE F LANE GAIN WITH ROUNDABOUT WIDENED SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC FROM TWO LANES TO GHOST ISLAND MERGE RETAINED PROPOSED LIGHTING HAZARD H JUNCTION LENGTH - 77.9m DIL THREE LANES (SEE GENERAL NOTE 3 AND KEY) WIDTH - 14.0m H EXISTING CONFIRMATORY ADS SUPERSPAN GANTRY START OF PROPOSED BEAN LANE NORTHBOUND CH.3973 CONCRETE STEP BARRIER CONNECTING BEAN SOUTH AND DIL NORTH ROUNDABOUT WIDENED AREA IDENTIFIED FOR FROM TWO LANES TO THREE DIL POTENTIAL ADVANCE TREE LANES PLANTING AND SPECIES - RICH HOPE DIL GRASSLAND FOR SCREENING EXISTING RETAINING SOLUTION AND ECOLOGY MITIGATION TYPE UNKNOWN, NO AVAILABLE RECORDS COTTAGES BEAN SOUTH ROUNDABOUT BEAN LANE (SOUTH) PROPOSED MAINTENANCE This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the ACCESS TO SOAKAWAY permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller ENLARGED AND SIGNALISED of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown copyright. Scale 1:1000 Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Highways FOR CONTINUATION REFER TO SHEET 11 England 100018928, 2018. 10m 0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m 60m 70m

ACCESS ONLY

SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL Description Drawing Suitability Status Project Title NOTES FOR HE REVIEW APPROVED - ORDERS / LICENSES A2 A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junctions Improvement INFORMATION Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work B1 C01 RKK OP CT CH 05/07/18 Drawing Title detailed on this drawing, note the following significant residual risks Description Epsom Gateway 2. FOR GENERAL NOTES AND KEY REFER TO DRG. No. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-DR-CH-000200. 14 (Reference shall also be made to the design hazard log). STAGE 3 DESIGN FIX 3 Ashley Avenue 3. REMOVAL OF SOUTHBOUND GANTRIES TO BE CONSIDERED AT DETAILED DESIGN STAGE. Construction 13 Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Epsom PCF STAGE 3 – PRELIMINARY DESIGN A1 C02 RKK JA CT CH 22/08/18 1. HS/HGN/01-WORKING ADJACENT TO EXISTING OH HV LINES AND 12 16 Surrey KT18 5AL ENGINEERING GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PYLONS. 8 Description 2. HS/HLG/01 & 03-PROPOSED COLUMN IN THE VICINITY OF THE 4 5 6 7 FOR STAGE 3 SIGN-OFF "THESE DRAWINGS ARE A PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR USE DURING PCF 3 15 9 Tel: +44 (0)1372 726140 2 11 EXISTING OH LINE. 1a A2 Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Fax: +44 (0)1372 740055 STAGE 3. THEY SHOW AN INDICATION OF THE PROPOSED LAYOUT BUT Maintenance / Cleaning 1 EBBSFLEET 10 BEAN JUNCTION A1 C03 RKK JA AEM CH 21/11/18 Copyright C Atkins Limited (2018) www.atkinsglobal.com HS/HLG/02-EXISTING COLUMN IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING M25 J2 DO NOT SHOW FULL CONSTRUCTIONAL DETAILS OR WIDTHS. FURTHER JUNCTION Description OH LINE. PEPPERHILL Client Drawing Number OVERBRIDGE FOR INFORMATION; EBBSFLEET PYLON ACCESS REVISED ON SHEETS 8 AND 16 REFINED DETAILED DESIGN WILL BE UNDERTAKEN DURING LATER Use Project Originator Volume REFER TO HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK REGISTER DOCUMENT No. Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date HE543917 - ATK - HGN - STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCHEME PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. SHEET LAYOUT A1 C04 RKK AEM CH CH 18/01/19 FOR INFORMATION ONLY." HE543917-ATK-GHS-XX-HS-ZS-000004. N.T.S Decommissioning / Demolition Description XX - DR - CH - 000204 REFER TO HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK REGISTER DOCUMENT No. FOR INFORMATION Location Type Role Number HE543917-ATK-GHS-XX-HS-ZS-000004. Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Original Project Scale: Sheet: Rev: A2 C05 RKK EBB AEM RJM 22/02/19 Size: A1 1:1000 Ref. No: 5158159 4 of 16 C05 This Drawing is saved on ProjectWise. Plotted: 22/02/2019 19:08:44 By: KNRA9354 A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Appendix B. Bean North roundabout Modification Layout

Highways Outline Design sketch, ref. HE543917-ATK-HGN-XX-SK-CH-000101_C01

Revision C02 Page 15 of 21

100 Millimetres 10 0 DO NOT SCALE

This map is based on Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown copyright. Scale 1:1000 Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Highways England 100018928, 2018. 10m 0m 10m 20m 30m 40m 50m 60m 70m

SAFETY, HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL Description Drawing Suitability Status Project Title NOTES APPROVED - PUBLISHED A1 A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN METRES UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. INFORMATION Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date In addition to the hazards/risks normally associated with the types of work 2. TO BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE TECHNICAL NOTE Drawing Title HE543917-ATK-HML-J2-TN-CH-000001. detailed on this drawing, note the following significant residual risks Description Epsom Gateway 14 (Reference shall also be made to the design hazard log). Ashley Avenue Construction 13 Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Epsom MODIFIED HIGHWAYS OUTLINE DESIGN KEY 1. HS/HGN/01-WORKING ADJACENT TO EXISTING OH HV LINES AND 12 16 Surrey PYLONS. Description KT18 5AL MODIFIED HIGHWAY LAYOUT 4 5 6 7 8 2. HS/HLG/01 & 03-PROPOSED COLUMN IN THE VICINITY OF THE 3 15 9 Tel: +44 (0)1372 726140 2 11 STAGE 3 HIGHWAY LAYOUT EXISTING OH LINE. 1a A2 Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Fax: +44 (0)1372 740055 Maintenance / Cleaning 1 EBBSFLEET 10 BEAN JUNCTION Copyright C Atkins Limited (2018) www.atkinsglobal.com TOPO SURVEY DATA HS/HLG/02-EXISTING COLUMN IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING M25 J2 JUNCTION Description OH LINE. PEPPERHILL Client Drawing Number OVERBRIDGE FOR INFORMATION Use Project Originator Volume REFER TO HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK REGISTER DOCUMENT No. Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date HE543917 - ATK - HGN - SHEET LAYOUT A1 C01 PM OP EBB RJM 31/05/19 HE543917-ATK-GHS-XX-HS-ZS-000004. N.T.S Decommissioning / Demolition Description XX - SK - CH - 000101 REFER TO HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK REGISTER DOCUMENT No. FOR INFORMATION Location Type Role Number HE543917-ATK-GHS-XX-HS-ZS-000004. Status Revision Drawn Checked Reviewed Authorised Issue Date Original Project Scale: Sheet: Rev: A1 C02 PM OP EBB RJM 01/08/19 Size: A1 1:1000 Ref. No: 5158159 1 of 1 C02 This Drawing is saved on ProjectWise. Plotted: 02/08/2019 09:49:45 By: MPAR2993 A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Appendix C. Bean North roundabout - Impact on Orders

C.1 Bean North Modification - Impact on Published Orders

Revision C02 Page 16 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Revision C02 Page 17 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Revision C02 Page 18 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Revision C02 Page 19 of 21

A2 Bean and Ebbsfleet Junction Improvements Detailed Modification MOD-1

Revision C02 Page 20 of 21

© Crown copyright (2019). You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence: visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email [email protected].

Printed on paper from well-managed forests and other controlled sources.

Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363