~ Q
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION/PRIVACY ACTS SECTION
COVER SHEET
SUBJECT: NEW ALLIANCE PARTY SUBJECT: NEW ALLIANCE PARTY
FILE NUMBER: PX 100-87 67 IOU 515/
~11!
PH
_ nu-I. In 1 - ~ * **" " " " -~'" "' l_,_____.._.-.>»-.¢,~ J Z ;- 4-150 Rev.12-14-es! 1_J XXXXXX' XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OE INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET l Pagewithheld s! entirelyat thislocation in the file. Oneor more of the following s atements, where indicated, explain this deletion. éleletionsmade wereto thepursuantexemptions below noindicated with segregablematerial available for release to you.
Section 552 Section 552a
E] b! ! El I 5/<1!<1>> El l D El [:1 l E] Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your I ¬q9216St. E] Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages containinformation furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be ._§>_advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. El Page s!for withheld followingthe & reason q s!: lgb X 5 For your information: 7 [Z/The followingnumber is to be used forreference regardingthese pages: XXXXXX9* l<>~>~8:u=1~l XXXXXX G IdGD! V -1 ' FBI - I'HANSMlTVIA: E] Immediate 2Priority Q7/Teletype J RECEDENCE: CLASSIFICAW5. ; E1Routine 1:1 TOP SECRET --_. ______.___AE1Facsimile 3 V: ._, E1 SECRET E].__._.______C] CONFIDENTIAL E] UNCLASEFTO _. __,e. -_~_.-._@_ U"!C|-55 ,_ A _f *-»A% 1 Date 95: 2 FM PHOENIX l0OA-8767! P! 3 To mm-:c'ron,FBI PRIORITY! 4 A ALBANY pnxozurry! 5 ANCHORAGE PRIORITY! e ATLANTA muearrv! 7 BALTIMORE PRIORITY! a BOSTON PRIORITY! 9 BUFFALO | PRIORI'I Y! 1 10 1 BUTTE PRIORITY! A CI-IARIOTTE PRIORITY! 1,! A cuzczxco pnronrry! 12 _ cowmaus pnronmz! 13 nswzn pnxonny! 14 DETROIT PRIORITY! 15 MEMBERS OF THE NEW ALLIANCE- PARTY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED 1e AND DANGEROUS AS THEY ARE KNOWN TO POSSESS WEAPONS. 11 1s A ALL |n:F@::1;;=x:0:~~1 CO¬~lTAl192 ED 19 HEREM us.,;._;1.11¢;s92m-11> 20 oAIL3.;as./=. Z~.BY-mi- ¥ 21 -_ ,1, ii '7C. A d; Transmstted- -13549 9°- _ er P L ppmve Numb r! Tame! :U.5- GPO1957 - 181-485 C O , I ,1 ' .» _ _ A _-_. A A PAGE TWO PX 100A-8767 UNCLAS INDIANAPOLIS PRIORITY! JACKSON BRIORITY! KANSAS crry PRIORITY! LOS ANGELES PRIORITY! MEMPHIS PRIORITY! NEWARK PRIORITY! NEW HAVEN PRIORITY! NEW YORK PRIORITY! OMAHA PRIORITY! PHILADELPHIA PRIORTIY! SAN FRANCISCO PRIORITY! WFO PRIORITY! B'I UNCLAS SECTION 2 OF 2 LEADS ALL RECEIVING OFFICES ARE REQUESTED TO NOTE NEW ALLIANCE PARTY REGIONALAND STATEOFFICES As SET cum ABOVE.EACH RECEIVING OFFICE IS REQUESTED TO CHECK INDICES REGARDING THE NEW ~'# ' PAR I'Y'"AND"CON'I'KC'I" IDGICPC[I"SOURCES ANDWINFURH1§NTSWT;N'_~ _ k _ W. ___._ _ -_ _A - ..__ i_- - -___¢§ __ -__»-- ~ PAGE THREE PX lO0A 8767 UNCLAS AN EFFORTTO DETERMINEWHAT ISADVOCATED BYMEMBERS OFTHIS PARTY IN THEIR RESPECTIVE DIVISIONS. PHOENIX DIVISION AT PHOENIX INVESTIGATION CONTINUING TO DEVELOP INFORMATION REGARDING CAP'1 IONED GROUP. MEMBERS OF THE NEW ALLIANCE PARTY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND DANGEROUS AS THEY ARE KNOWN TO POSSESS WEAPONS. BT ' _// 5 I ' ' 4-750 Rev. 12- i XXXXXX XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. E] Deletions were made pursuantto the exemptions indicated below with no segregablematerial available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a E] b! ! U b! ! A! E1 d! ! E] b! ! U b! ! B! E] OX2! [:1 b! ! U b! ! C! E] k! ! [:1 b! ! D! E1 l E1 b! ! E! E] U b! ! [:1 b! ! E] l C1 b! ! El b! 9! E1 KX6! D b! ! U k! ! E] Information pertainedonly to a third party with no referenceto you or the subject of your IBQUESI. [I] Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. E] Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. .___.___..-Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. Zr? Pagewithheldthe s! following forreason s!: q §;92;Q [DO121222-/ J -. H IF?H5151? [:1 For your information: [B4he followingnumber to isbeused referencefor regardingthese pages: 91; too-87¢? - 3 M 8 XXXXXX xiooooooooorxioooooorxxx XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! x XXXXXX NO DUPLICATION FEE x < . 92_,~.¢92¢ I ' J J - 92/. 92./ Tranullf ctfeclud by Fcclirlllr _ _ RI-ocodmu Priority______=-_x_ T0: PhOen1x OOA-8767! D0901 rm. s».c, Kaunas Q:§,1:y* O0A-167414! Tlmol Tranommod - Subpcn New AILFQ-ace Party / lnl aln ~ B Flnguprlm Photo G Flngnrprlm Rocwd G Map E] Novupapnr ellpplng [:1 Photograph E Milli: Cuneop en E2015" __gE_.L_E'IYPE _ _ $9 ac! ul handling in mu man s: 4 App!-Quad; rs» 94;; *{LlNFf ' 92<>"° 92 ,¢@¢+-$?@z 7 4 ' r?=*<;II?""'?'7t .-. | _"' -I I 92~_ 9292. 4 zcszrms 4 4-750 Rev.12~14-88! XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION F OIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET -ii? Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. E] Deletions were made pursuant to the exemptions indicated below with no segregable material available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a E1 b! ! , El b! ! A! U d! ! E1 b! ! II] b! ! B! [:1 j! ! U b! ! El b! ! C! U El b! ! D! [:1 KXZ! E] b! ! E! E] k! ! I [I1 b! ! F! I] l E1 b! ! El b! 8! U k! ! E1 b! ! Q b! 9! U l E1 b! ! U i E] Information pertainedonly to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your TCQUGSY. E] Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. D Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. _9__Page s!for withheld thefollowing reason5451}Q B s!:& PA Q |L>U~! Y up EIlss1i<2t.sx9vtin¬Qrmetiqn;s __ s I _ @4he followingnumber to is be used forreference regardingthese pages: _e».t>-87/»1'9~eM,ta1>t,~t. Helm EOQQO XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! X NO DUPLICATION FEE X XXXXXX FOR THIS PAGE X XXXXXX XX FBI/DOJ FD 36 Rev 8 29 65! FBI *__ oi} TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE: CLASSIFICATION: U Teletype El Immediate E] TOP SECRET E1 Facsimile EJ Priority D SECRET fa Ayl=2_L_____ D Routine El CONFIDENTIAL i Cruncms E F 1'o~ El uucuxs Date 2/19/as 'ro= IRECTOR, FBI FROI¢ OMAHA92¢> 92 Re Phoenix teletype to FBIHQ, et al, dated l/28/88, and Bureau teletype to Albany, et al, dated 2/9/88. ' Referenced teletype requested receiving offices to gather information regarding the NAP. Omaha considers this matter RUC. ALL lNFOi}MliTlONcom HERELI Ia uh DATE_5__!£___B'5 Y e /Z Bureau 27Phoenix Approved: ______Transmitted ______Per H Numben §T"==v=_..- , ..-, #US GPO-19O7 13Y'43. REIIIEWEDmosxms FORFEB I 9 '2 Q- | 4-750 Rev. 12-14-88! statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. J xxxxxx xxxxxx FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET 2 Page s!withheld entirelyat this location thein file.One or more of thefollowing E1 <1> [Z/]3eletionsmade were pursuantto theexemptions indicatedbelow with no segregablematerial availableEi4>x2> for release to you. E1 <1> Section 552 Section 552a E1 E] __, [:1 Information pertained onlyto a third party with no referenceto you or the subject of your request. El Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. E] Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. 5 Pagewithheld s!the following forreason s!: IOU-Yj m-47 6 Q/Forinf your ormationi Ezfhe followingnumber is to be usd forreference regardingthese pages: EX 92DU-87'§j'923yA&92~,~ W; QRMS-TEXT 1-1A$..1___'QOC11M_E ,LL']'§_____,______r_ _ _A __N h __# _7 ___ __~____ __-_v V __ NBOX.1 #377! ZEXT: , vzczcssoooa i {R PX !E BS #0003 0501555 III Iii?-'l ~. I.; I1;.= a..;Z 1' .921 .. ZNR UUUUU M! ~.»l92~JLl92- vi 1 T615232 FEB 87 um .3291/ ay FM BOSTON IOOA-477l7! P! PORTSMOUTH RA! C 7! ?HOENIX lOOA 8767! ROUTINE! BT JNCLAS T NEW ALLIANCE PARTY;DOMESTIC SECURITY/TERRORISM,O0: PHOENIX- REFERENCE PHOENIX TELETYPE TODIRECTOR DATEDl/28/88 AND TELCAL SEAN» sAi2/11/8:» QQ ON 2/17/88 A REVIEWOF SEABROOK,NEW HAMPSHIRE,CRISS CROSS IRECTORY DISCLOSED 57¢ HID "~.92 C1 $2. 92o 92 " I ...___ O H AGE TWO DE BS OOO3 UNCLAS BOSTON INDICESWERE NEGATIVEFOR THENEW ALLIANCEPARTY. BOSTONDISCLOSED INDICESFOLLOWING THE FoR REFERENCES bjc _WITH NOs FURTHER IDENTIFYINGDATA: b7C!b1b .. ' LEAD: BOSTON AT BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS: WILL REVIEW BOSTON :.92ss FILESwxm REFERENCESFOR AS SET FORTHIN nus COMMUNICATION ; DETERMINEIDENTICAL AND, IF " EnQ KT #0003 NNNN 4-15012-14-as! Rev. A XXXXXX . FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET Z0 Page withhelds! entirelyat this location thein file.One ormore ofthe following s tements, where indicated, explain this deletion. E letionsmade wereto pursuant exemptionsthe below indicatedno with segregablematerial available for release to you. Section 552 §t_i9_g__5_§_211_ ?b> > s <2> U b! ! A! U d! ! U mo! [:1 b! ! B! El .i! ! [Q/ b! ! C! [:1 [:1 b! ! F! El l E] Bftbxo U E] Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your I'¬ql16St. El Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. Q53Page s! withheld' for the following' = reason s! DU- -._l_<9'. !9 '3 /Zed !, 77! In/Ig;/e E1fsmeat.iI2¬9tma99e=_e._d _ . e in _._i e_,,,, [ e followingnumbertou be ference is these pages: regarding XXXXXXQx 1ot>_8 ?4>7-!9 XXXXXX Ir C SUBJECT: NEW ALLIANCE PARTY FILE NUMBER: 100A NY-183032 _ ..~...... __._ . ._,--»-~ _;.~_ 92,~ ~ ' We ..~_<92 ' . .»- . ¢ _ . -_._ .. _7 ______f__~.._$ ___ ,1- -2; ' ::_ _; ~ Vzzwfx K .~ :|_92'_ v_. _~'; ._' , = Q";'7,-;___ .1 75-~_* -_ T T " -'~ .. _ ' V, ' ~ e _ . ' .3 /» I-*1-V,_"*-~" §_I.. _ - _ . J . v .~_ .;,- . V- , ,=_ .-.92_ . -I :'»- 1. _'4 § A . 1 - <-V? ~ ~~Pm :V.Z¥.s,»5; », -.,§""". -. _;92*._»-".11 ~. ~: t ~ V ;»Z~ : 3 :1" V. .. _ -V ~-" lm, ' -H. j. 2"- T-Qt -. 1» _. 92 ''5:--57 151'. . ' __-._.__ -_..._»V, ~v-¢ - I -- .r < ~ =; V .._»$ . 13" ta»... .;;. V~ 92192.- LA : _ 92:_j92V; > * ~1~. »' *» --.=;» -_.V - V A _ : §+ _~j~v _ """.»- z;*F ~ wk - Vsvlusucsw * FEDERAL sunnu or mvss - ' '¢~_."i _ ~ A '_ ~ wnsnmcrou, n.c.nG"'°" ,. g -~_,_V.f5 {;;_.<~- @¬?r"_ _ -*V.'_? - > _ ;; - V- _ 3'. 1?}: ~-»~.~V V ~. /=~sV*"4§ »'. __',5 T3.'-_~ .» . . }-, muqv _ .I _ ,_ _. _, , 92_. -3 . __,>~ r~.. 4- -- .,.I. --* _. *. -1; .- Qéz _ 51:2. %/4 '5 V . <~ J,-ta -5 4,, _.-_ . ._ G. ,~__ I _ > 1 . _ _ __ » -VV V*-_ *~~ ~.~¢:':,-$5. ..V~"~ »¢~.:"%¥. K .2 @V =-F;- V 1 V"-.~ .- .1-._,; f;IV'w . :"';,rV -»'." -,.i;;i -3.";j;"-"; .. .._.i I V *2; 1 =2. "I,-;_.5. V R- s .15 .. ,. V 3.-;'V_ 92_» -= .. ». V, _. _ _ . ..~ * "1,-;. - .. ' _.r»-.¢~-.;,_..7'-. - _- ->.~.-~~ in xv,= E :,;'-~- .1" v--V _» .- "5" .. q,- V.-+ z;I1;.§-.;~_ _- ':- Vi ~ " _ I . _.-_. 92 :4»_ 3'4 . . V_.-Y -_1 _' . - ' -_ ? _ . .v f'§__f~"Q ~-. _:.-- » : _ L 92 §'V$'3 ' " 3 ":A . ltami ~QD.?;, O. inn".-,1-.-1-_;~ V->V .- . V . . l --*1 _ '.r.-. -- * 1. <1! _> W... , ,. . '- e ; V ___ ! ".'~ * u 92 ,1? - V ; I f~*i V.-V _j";_. r-3~- - . _ ~ -_'..-.2;-V,_1_~'1V ~ ' -.~ .. 92. - ~ '.;~.. _ __:kl: _ . V...... 5 },~_t:: ~-.-.. . -_.! . '~ ..=92=.;~?Vf;_-.{_' 92V, V 'V 1 1 _... . i . -1 Q11. ' ' $1 f _ .-C __.L _ - , V 4 r . /- 1 ¢V_ ,-'..V_,; . ¢_, * ~.~.. :'._.':.4 ~ " '9. -ft! _; , . _ r V V E _/ Q , I 1 i ' 1 , _ . . i - 92 _ > :"1 ~ i ._ 92 I l .7 ~ '1 3 : -."' - ..- : _ v V . L 1 -__!r , . . .5 9292§v92:>;92_¢~» v___.-fyi V,-.-V.-. 3 !:5' _ V V V-Q.- > _ ' : .. ~=V'#;11*:r .sV**~*4 %%: . 5. ._ , -'~92» .5.-J, "1/ _.='£; M.92 _ 1..§$ 11-1- Q : X. 3; . . .;:,: 1 92 Q . '_ .;_> _.- .5 , V, V £; ''* J~ .fl".-"~'r:92 '5 ;'r_L _ » ._92."'ib". ""+:'=7 ii...-., -_" _ - . ' q ">~ : .1 .- . _. 1. ¢ ~-V-_ V r Q '92 92_ __ .92 ~_. _ . 92 _.. ~__ 7' _ _ _ _ 7 - = _ V_~.'_ _ ~ :;~-- _ 1: jag;-. "1' ~_-Q .92-» 92 _','? _-'-' "-:','1-»- _l_". x_;~{" _&l'':92; § Q ,_ _'~'.*-_¢_,"_ »IV' '______ ;. ;-VVV.-..~wJ -1 / .. :-- ' 1.r»=.;-¢» 1'-=. * - - .' "1 , -1* '_ .' -Ia:~ V ~*~ -*1» ,.. .'_-;.,,V":"t '_ :'V~. ,~=~f'" - %.'-"I '§'="*? VV'e.1.i?.1:-.1?" ~ . ~ . _'-; ~- 1 '~.-'__, T .-_t,_-rV',_';',', *; 3 __ .';~".»~. .-_;-~--~t. _ ~. __ -. ~_ -F At. ~.-1, -.,v~~_~ '- V mi Tm . -____ I , »=V~ _ V» » "V- , "av -.115 .- . '/A,, . '5',,""<~ " ,Z_:?r 1; xi ; * .__L~'aV~ -' 7-:%é%.'=V" "L <1 ' . Z . .. ".' .~,..'.,V _ *_VV::~<*l92.-i¬¢ '- .-"V "._-.;1; ="r V" '-_~"< *,5 ;-'§§~-. 92 ~ > x- - -;', ~"~,a;*~»:;-*-;.- = <" 922, z_- . - " 7 <~" V"§V-»~="' * " ' _%>;¢~,.» V.» -+--' _ ' » "'Q ' ¢-": . V_ -~ ;..1=. "*;., . 5c.. , _»=:¢.V.-_~ - _ VV ~:..'.~.:'V" _ 3 _ ' -- V V~-~- -----~_ -" . V » -1 ' - ~ _-_~ "Vr .1 .-.-=<-1: -V "-raw: ~;' * - >;:V?"~ 1: ""=:..= ., Address of Contributor! . ,,._4 pec j gent! _ To BeRetumed Y¢§E'N'o El GivenYes El Receipt ,E/NF- Zr ' Grand JuryMaterial - Disseminate Only Pursuantto Rule6 e!, FederalRules of Criminal Procedure El Yes El No -» 'Ftie: ,/I/._ //9!///u, Communication EnclosingMaterial! .. ~ kl ~. . .= . i ' .- -_ '7, - ;- '»~ 5 "'1 ' V -'~ '3 ~. » t . 1 '- ' '1-f92 _.o - _ s ,1. i 92Oqc'" _ Z °3°'|Pu°n'_Q _ _t_§§!'_e_|_ _t§"Y|_erYYr_9,',,r___,__,__+______D ___i-_.__ s ' AuiiiFOi2i.iATi0N I com HEr %El-.-ii.5 u b'LA DATE3 g,';'-71 A1 '<0./t1.;I9!,52 . 92 ' _' <_<_. ______-_~ -1--- _ _ _ ,7 _ __ ¢ __ 7 ___ _~ 4-150 Rev.12-14-as! ' -3" XXXXXX XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET l Page s!withheld entirelyat this location the in file.One ormore of the following st ements, where indicated, explain this deletion. Aetionsmade wereto pursuant exemptionsthe below noindicated with segregablematerial available for release to you. Section 552 [:1 b! ! U b! ! A! Section 552a U b! ! El b! ! B! U d! ! [:1 b! ! |Z! b! ! C! U j! ! [:1 b! ! D! U El b! ! E! E] l U b! ! F! U El b! ! E1 l E1 b! ! El b! 8! E1 l C1 Information pertainedonly to a third party with no referenceto you or the subject ofyour l'8q92l¬St. Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation witi theother agency ies!. Page s! withheld for the following reason s!: 5 E] For your information: We followingnumber to is be used forreference regardingthese pages: XXXXXX XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! X 9 4-150 Rev. 12-14-as! 1* XXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET C] Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. Deletions were made pursuant to the exemptions indicated below with no segregablematerial available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a [:1 b! ! E] b! ! A! U d! ! U b! ! U b! ! B! [:1 j! ! U b! ! El b! ! C! U E1 b! ! D! El l El b! ! E! U k! ! I U b! ! F! E1 4 E1 b! ! U b! ! U l El U b! ! E1 b! 9! U U Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your request. Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. [J For your information: Z 2Page s!for withheld followingthe reason iQ!- s!: Y&772Z¢ V / k Q_}t92 9-$762-Z/J|.w-ys1712.- 1+9 /Q j [Z/The followingnumber to is beused forreference regardingthese pages: /W loo- 195052-1-QM, ~/ XXXXXX UNITED STATESDEPARTMENT JUSTICE OP FEDERAL BUREAUOF INVESTIGATION C7neuoaaunun I, _ pate : Jéjs///35>? nuM to: Y ¬;»;»ur&,fS/ / '/ao~/23032 ,8r,»e 1o¢v-> :% $7TF! T! .1 92 9292 SUBJECT:Au mmu Na ! D5 _/T _ ALLKNFORMATION CDNT . om. /QM /_v-" HERHN 92S uNC1 - DATEl__i-E ' 3%. //Lea/1,1 /1/¢ l/L{4<'/ /7U/4/9 '1/1, ¢,_§,4_,,_4 6'2<',.-.;-¢"?,<.' 2.~ i_7 i !¥;Z§vw,Lue4,t2Z» ¢. -5 1-#'92 *2 M c. 92O/I nae 5 owas I ; .y*'3;' "n£* i__ _;*{¬ ; -:f¥ I N Q8 H yeot tobuildi Iilm >"'n'independentpoliticsT W -" ' " ~ ' thisin~ -~ -e*_,»-. country because H92_,______A_F__ __;;_? _ ~'~=~-'" i the0: e gDemocratsand Republicans no longerexpress the viewpointthe of I uajori yt of Alericanswant who suchthings decent as ' housingahd two ; jobs,party a na tionalpoliticalmonopoly healthservice unhealthy ispeace, andthe for American said.Fulani people The }, ' Elections,CONTACTf Annie - Roboffor 212-an-snob,of Leno : 92 B. -Ful ' it@ * for Fair 5e¥,,,_,__,.______.e...... ,._...... ___----'5 !-519$ "5X'$a 35,957 4-150 Rev.12-14-as! I /-927 A ! XXXXXX ct _ _, xxxxxx XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET Q Pagewithheld s! entirelyat thislocation the in file. One more or the of following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. Qéeletions weremade pursuantto theexemptions indicatedbelow withno segregable material available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a l£ b! l! El b! ! A! E] d! ! U b! ! II! b! ! B! El UX2! U b! ! [3/ b! ! C! U k! ! C] b! ! D! 1:1 l El b! ! E! [:1 Y Cl b! ! F! E1 l U b! ! El b! ! E1 l U b! ! El b! 9! [:1 l U b! ! /~' l_| Cl l__.l El Information pertainedonly to a third party with no reference toyou or the subjectof your E] request. Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be _L iadvised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. I E1___F_<1r_¥992!!..i*1£¥>_r§*1?£i I followingnumber to isbeused for reference regardingthese pages: NY '0 "929 3°32 '5 I XXXXXX XXXXXX r" 92 g~.92_,_! 5"} UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION zwezaa I . 1!ATE::W£2//9/Y5? ° /10/5', %1'"47 ' /92/U/~J P! ld0A-/ 83632,! ':""rnou= 5;} j @ TTF§ * ° =DT/5 {92s12/1»//<5/ déaQt /L/00:1/lg, » O01 P/we/wL>g 4 Z/I/dZ,4* >2.dL km. r/4/4344/{* F 1»92,» _7!F01 j /5M>=/¢~ I-2/jvfto! i_iI|"* _ A7@ . __ oawu-mowED CONTN A . _ _AN'EL92$ AuN92392-P~$392FF-D7' K 2 i%~'t"Q HERBWE3;.1_§;12.BY. A Ry }0 0A- ' !Z*.=>¢>%2_ M FEB081.988._ I . FBINEWYOF 5555555 4-15012-14-as! Rev. 3 1 XXXXXX 92 ~ . XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION I FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET _ll_ Page s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. [3/l!eletions weremade pursuantto theexemptions indicatedbelow with no segregablematerial available for release to you. Section 552 5ii U b! ! y [II b! ! A! U d! ! U b! ! El j! Z! U b! ! l[?»> Cl b! ! E! [:1 l El b! ! F! [:1 l [:1 b! ! D b! 8! U l B b! ! E] b! 9! U Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. ._._Z_- Page s! withheld for the following reason s!: [II For your information: Bzhe followingnumberis to be used r ferencefor regarding pages: these XXXXXX}i92 l0u* @'J332.-7Q §§ 92A.s.s-717 XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! X XXXXXX " 9292 ' ' i1 . S! UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION iErio1zA § u1ii ''" _"_' J "' " M * nun: ;__/,-kg/I I '1 0: D/C I /92/@<,u Ak/0/1~/C. /TC>@/4'/X.3<-UBI/2! 54-ii» SUBJECT: /V224 u//4/92/Qa" ¢r:rz/ _D ,4; 7* v'/- 4;; 5?? / /-¢E>3< I 7%/; A -1 /I/45/s ,4. /.~ Lam",/1; / _ / T'-.{//Z7/_/ . _//,7 / 92 /Z ./4:1 -" _ 7, r w yami _ / *"/ ~ti _ L 5 } 7 Z/4/2!/ 5/",0 C f - ,3 L /92//§'74. :>/1;/A. j_ A 1~1~*/ .- /92/461;? "/>2/¢,¢/>»<>4 L / U , /154/SH 5 /J _ /92> A/Z T/Y ? /Ué-Z2/1/ J7A. L C />41 /Jkl;/if / -92_'_ .Q->1 1; ,. ALL :i£F;' i 1a.; ;£3. ;Tr;"s.»¢U* 1 L! ».., 0-. __.______A_..__--4___ .._.__V-._ .__ I__ _ _ - 1?, »;? 1 ,// 1. // I //'/ - ~ / I I 4/I FEB1 1 1988 92692° x 1* 1I ._. _w g ; V _.i-i... - J "' ' __. .__ THE NAT! ON 4L . .__,¢~.- _---.i_i_-__--~ ~ - Eleen ve E5001: - Jacqueline _ nannn -Z Salil Mada] Elbe: .,- Michael Hardy - Sada Elmore: 1 §;.:4¥m..¢ 5 ' 4 PhylliiGqldb l I Michael Klein .' Carolin: Lawence / Wil92iam_P!e;as_§n£ J Covmilu ng Elton: M§g_,E_ridley. Napc;.Gunn. 4'Verailill. Fr!dkNc_wman. Freda Rosen. Lorraine S153/ens. Ch|rIes Pvudnaionilcon Mary Ygd g Md. Production Eitor: Rithlll l li Dedp: Ilene Hindqu. Jo eph Spirito. Mary Weldom Jeff Williamsmr-" ' '*4"=="" " . -'¢< &q;,,_6 .~ llulnliouz Robert Lewis 4 ' Selim Fhotopnpiy El n: Abu£_a1_'§__ Photography Elton asx ess... Contributing Flonopnpbenz Phyllis Cohen, sh= ~ ~i"Wa1x=r RickFrangjs. Terrence James. Waller " Smith. " ' lle onl Bureau: Boston Ciho C-i !1§h92DU Jackson. MS {V/* lnl Angles John Fnire Piladelpla KSIIEETQ-I '_;_ WI-IHIQOI. D.C. Kwakg unen "um! Ham 1 Gena-ulM.unpn d Gill! Dhuildiol: Ehiqelhpilbn Alverddq Manger: Ro&1 Qnuu£ Midwest kins: Manger: Md ; Hm Cid Plwheeler: Juiii fd . . - I Prookuden: Fem: o U!OhUhEb¬4 Pmloliolqlspccill Events: . 92 *Ian'ie!e_ News Writers: Jeseiceadgrta. Jew Production Stuff: {eh A-bhili Anner ekgg. To Grip! Michael ein. Jmrea aru. mm Pin iro. 1¢nmuy* "" ,..--- - b*~ - --ca-i Subscription Rates $10 jbr I year; In.m'!u- tions $20 for 1 yew? Imemaiional Rater $25 per yea: Bulk rates $.13 per copy 00 copy minimum!. For display adveniring will 12! 956-5550 and ask /br Roger: _ 77:3 Na!idn}:1AA1liarlcc ISM 0888-I39!! iv pub- lished weekly Friday!except the week of July 4 and the week of December 25 by New Alliance Produc- tions. lnc.. 216 W I02nd St. 2C. NZ NY !m25 12! 864-ma Applicalion to mail at Serond Class post- 92 age rates is pending at New York. New York. Rm- marer Send addnesr changer ta the above addmm 92 e u ,4 ~. I ,'92 ,_- 92 1 W 0 -1 ; 4-15012~14-as! Rev. <1 _ xxxxxx 3999994 xxxxxx FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET __ LPage s! withheld entirely at this location in the file. One or more of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. [:1/gezletionsmade were pursuantto theexemptions below indicatedno with segregable material available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a El b! ! A! E{ b! ! U d! ! d b! ! El j! ! U b! ! g!b! ! B! [1 l El b! ! E! [:1 ['1 Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies!. SA Pagemfg, s!for withheld followingthe'lO,a],ZD 1 5 Mi reason HQ7 I00-l/8122Z_..s!: In, [la E] For your information: [Z/'1"henumber followingis to be usedfor referenceregarding pages:these XXXXXXM 92w-9283~>>z-'7 ~92'i92i._£L4- XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! x NO DUPLICATION FEE x XXXXXX FOR THIS PAGE x ,<~>Q_ t, s it c 9. . U-"1IT[ D .qT.792.Tl':S!!F.P1'92."l'T"'1f .Y -I ? JU5TTC§ 05' F'l'*IU;'7.'RP92LFAU '7!?I7J927Y'I§§'fI5.§,92.TI'7!92Z [11? TTTF 1- ,1: i»v - - - i- -'~ ~ ~*92 192 {PaL. Pg" ' C ' 7 ' ' yr -__' 7 _- -- 1__;_-E J §-U331- TO: IQEW I! 3, Dam JUNwas zsi S B 92 . F-Ion" 3 ADIC, = YORK rm-2 C!q$! as -92, sU@J_; A wt i 5! 92992 I>e.:ia.ss:tyu~ {£R ca: g7Q This communicationis classified SSH i-n--i+e- eatjzgi-E cab ReNYairte1 to Director, dated 3/22/88, captioned as above, and NYairte1 to Director, dated 5/16/88, captioned "NEW ALLIANCE PARTY NAP; DOMESTIC SECURITY/TERRORISM DS/T; O0: PHOENIX" . Q-we .2 NEW NAP NY which was n 1979, by Dr. FREDERICK NEWMANand is an outgrowthfrom THE 92 INTERNATIONAL WORKERS PARTY also founded by NEWMAN. 6'79 2 Bureau RM! Field RM! _/Y New York mynz awas i ..i-.*;i:I=1'é15T §-4 " 92 ,."i'iElT92E 1 ______z_ *"-v -' '--pi-t A i & s§ Clas 'fied- b Declfy %i o%DR 3 ~ . R f92 92_. . . 4 . V '4 » "; ::Pc - Ii, The WA? is currently running' Ll H?" ,.; QHIA .r1 I ao iv- J Presidential candidate. FULPNI is Q Developmental Psychologist xdua head s the HAP's Institutes. I J 3EEjass'fied G 3 .92. §;Dec1a%fyOADR 0 L ll 4-15012-14-as! Rev. f XXXXXX 7 _, / XXXXXX XXXXXX FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION FOIPA DELETED PAGE INFORMATION SHEET L Page s!withheld entirelyat thislocation the in file.One ormore of the following statements, where indicated, explain this deletion. 4 Deletions weremade pursuant to the exemptions indicated below with no segregable material available for release to you. Section 552 Section 552a E~Q>><1> U b! ! A! El d! ! [:1 b! ! E1 b! ! B! El j! ! E1 b! ! D/ b! ! C! El [:1 b! ! F! D U b! ! El b! 8! El l El b! ! El b! 9! [:1 l El b! ! r-| L_l El Information pertained only to a third party with no reference to you or the subject of your El I 8C1ll8St. Information pertained only to a third party. Your name is listed in the title only. El Documents originated with another Government agency ies!. These documents were referred to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnished by another Government agency ies!. You will be advised by the FBI as to the releasability of this information following our consultation with the other agency ies! _3_ Page fors! following withheldthe reason1 H Q1 !-' s!: Yh z-3 E] rnraonF9r_¥<1 _-i£<.>_H3 - ii. U I _ _ [ e followingnumber to isbeused for reference regarding these pages: zq XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! x XXXXXX NO DUPLICATION FEE x FOR THIS PAGE x XXXXXX m SUBJECT: NEW ALLIANCE PARTY FILE NUMBER: 100-487772 " ' _ ' rum. - '- - . £::: A; 0 I A.;;!C.r.: ". r::AI>u. » n ' gin/Eu rwsuvm . . a §=_* A:- ¢_="f'¢....*' 1<-%-- use-552! TY tiff - ---' "'_ Tl-XI: lsd Z8 D, v I c ~ 14 - -' ¬F'fuv£sT92sA1|on --_ ;_;;,. -xiii" . -- -1 PPH01 AL m AT BA as BU BT cs cs co nu us IP ..m KC LA as NK an ;f':'£='§:'=5='_"__ ir;.'..-.3______uv on PH sr-" us- o ,j.=.:'=~"° ' A TC!""1:"92P-1 DE PxQ0014 02-30010 |:..-5='{=.-'=';§',,"" %1 ZNR 92_n_u_92:_n_| P 2502551 JAN as ' Pa PHOENIX maoon-ave?» P! to nxastron. FBI PRIORITY! ~ ALBANY PRIURITY! _ ANY-HURA!.~iE PRICIRITY!{kl-L NV J-WLANIA PRICIRITYDHERB bu|_,u_@92 E_ur.|_rm:»F:E 1M1 ;-"'lIJN I-'RlHHHYI PR1C92P.IT92'.92DAT e' ' x_qgo _ jg 0 5_ ~ 2m.w=m_o PRIURITYJ ' fé I Y _ fmraru? u-mum1'v.92 /"'J _';-l '~ j i a ' 9.iHAP.L OTTE PR IOP. ITY! 1: ~ T.Il'll[3A?3[l . PR1 UN [T Y! sq Q L-1-3. n - _,__ um ~msf;§ u>P.1uRrrv> maven P|»' g? 0 Q 0 0 I . - .>>g.---<-.. ---_Q>.-i- p- 92v" _ ' PAUE THOné PX0014 UNCLAS ' AN? nnusaaous AS THEY ARE KNUUN T0 POSSESS WEAPONS. INDIANAPOLIS PRIORITY! - dACk$DN cPRxoR11v>' KANSAQ CITY PRIORITY! * was ANBELES 1PRTDRITYT*: * ' * " NEH!-'H1f:¬ I-'RILIR1 H»~!-s~~~~ ~~ * Msuaux tPH10RITYJ NEH I-'AVhN PR 1UR1TY¥ was 92'UF'.l- £F'RIUR.ITY .1 "M tmmn PRIUHI 1 vi vuxnaneawnxn PRIORITY! gi saw FHANUIQCO PRIURITYJ HFU PRIORITY! I I -1;--1 ,§;~,'~,;»~zr ~,, 1- ---3 ~ I .:1_:: H,,A M ~ I .. ~_.',,~~41 - =:4 " ¢ __~; - _ :,,, V ______4-150 12-14-38! Iwtluuux _ XXXXXX ' XXXXXX HQ.AL I BUREAU OI-' INVESTIGATI FOIPA " "LE'l ED PAGEINFORMATION SHE! 5Jétatements, Pagewithheld s! indicated, entirelyat this location wherethis "deletion.in the file.explain Oneor moreof the following Deletions weremade pursuantto the exemptions indicatedbelow withno segregablematerial available for release to you. Segtign Q52 S££G.QD_i§Z_§ E1 b! ! A! ElX>u> b! ! El u>><1> U d! ! E1 b! ! E/u>><1><¢>U j! ! U l if u>><1><1>>E] k! ! U b! ! E! U KX3! U bX7! F! U KX4! [:1 b! ! El b! 8! El l U b! ! U b! 9! [:1 92 U b! ! [:1 RX7! E] Information pertained onlyto a third partywith no reference toyou or the subjectof your request. -4 [J Information pertained onlyto a third party. Your name islisted inthe title only. at [:1 Documentsoriginated withanother Governmentagency ies!. Thesedocuments werereferred 12 to that agency ies! for review and direct response to you. Pages contain information furnishedby anotherGovernment agency ies!.You will be advised bythe FBI as to the releasabilityof this information followingour consultation with the other agency ies!. Quit Page s! withheldfor the following reason s!: B For your information: E4he following numberis to be usedfor referenceregarding pages:these 7 Q K _ 1 _ qV I X 1 'Ii" r -r1~*7<,I>§i< _3*.i 3-i2¬or* ¢4l l,l'r.1i.<>,*:.'~'~$f~Ii$7$ 35*§§$§>&5? -~f~e§wv, ' _ i _ . * 1 ti':- H 1 "___, ,_ ' "- ,:,;'t:v,t~¢»;i t Um XXXXXX DELETED PAGE S! X NO DUPLICATION FEE X XXXXXX FOR THIS PAGE X IDOCXXX FBI/DOJ RAGE SIX DE PX 0014 LIiBLAb A 'lf1l'*"$1l- A1 lVh_ in E CA -E AGENT ON EXTENDEDLEAVE FROM 12/18/87 THROUGH 1/3/83 ~ B1 lam MEMBERS OF'lHE NEHALLIANCE PARTY SHOULD BE CONSIDERED ARMED AND ITANGERLIUSAb IHEY ARE KNUHN1O POS°E&~RHEAF'll'N 3 B r $09! 4 w%¢ ~qmW-;-»~ '1T9227 3IJ J >92l aux} Memorandum DIRECTOR, FBI ATTN: cm - ns/'rUNIT! 4/11/as 1° . Date Fm _ s , spin FRANCISCO l0OA-80392! RUC! SQ 13! - / J 8 ALL m ~mrf»:~z cmemwso57 Q I];g92'}1Tl:LLIANCEPARTY? I * 8 oo. PHOENIX,, Re Puoenix teletype dated January 28, 1988, Bureau teletypes dated February 2, 1988, and February ll, 1988: and San '5 Franciscotelcalto Phoenix, on April11, 1988. Q: 9 Referenced telcal determined no extension of this investigation to have been authorized, but reporting of ~ *3 investigation already conducted to be desired The following investigation was conducted at Oakland, California: "Igas £f? ;E§ 578*? ' ' ' es nega 92 1' and ve for_Q V . Further investigation was held in abeyance per FBIHQ instructions perreferenced Buretel t pes. r , /"*_ Z ~ Members of the New Allianceoz-35 P rty//Z30 should-/ 4/5///>4 be considered ARMED NDA D A NGE ROUS¢ . H isigé F @ - Bureau , F, 12 ,; I O enéx,. l99»92-BZ671r1e~ , ._ M _ .40,APR14 19»? * ""'92Il~i.-.-aw 92;2<. -I h c955 v Fi' :C.-'E§§L¢!<§I 1 . . q I I 92 s92_ .Y.'_;E f92*,____ -.~. ._ . _ ,_ _ n ~-..,-._._...-.. < " I lti-£ii|'. . LIA, n.- .*3_:;_ I -_._. IQ, _-__'92:_-~..'=»_~_-.___ - , ' 4.. __._, 1 ~.-. .92... ~" !ZF'?:.;i3 ii} 455 i.""~ - /Jr§;j_1 " j »~ - L. ,v.., . ', 'J 1 u.P L;;='p.-;;ii;,&T! !M -- _~... _ g ?- H 1' 1'-~' '.-.._ 1 : ~Ih!" - 1 - .-~ 0: . _ I__4__ I5| nu H1 |__ ~ : l v - . __ i. I . * -__._-. 1, - .._, ~-*1, | ;, ~ *- *'~'-'~;-:1 * > 1: é": »~- -_ ,__ '--..*-%_.,.g A . " " ~::'I¢; 1 w Y r -.._ i'_f' Y ' " i'!lII92..92.'r~": ::' : U".'=¢ a 3!I-.7?&'.£" a1*l_=1IIr> .1r;.-~-» A.1.f.----- .921 .-% ,, , /' 9 l3l.'cc'-~'- ~ -- ~I Sift .rm : 1 1- 1 ..un 4. . I-'1 H |"-1| u...~ "92v %<~_.__ ./ ,. _ _ .__92 57¢ g-'13:-" if-' , h! _~._.&, -:;5_,'-";.,/ 1 - ;--;~;;!_l} =_[gV I -< h"f; ;92,'.,92|»92-.-'.wv92" w. _ . l'1'.;-;-;1;:...»> 'rr~! = - » _ 5.5L-2 5 <40 5,0 _ V ,.n-1| ' - 3 9292./ , -._1_::. §_ ;j r !." .!: M 1-':92_-_-1; Y; [u_2=v:~ r g af kw zj ée-1: 'g'v_.-'1 -!_§{-¢ _;g_'-;--';7:_-.r_:; g"-3 - t ;L:I:!sf Q '~ .»n< _ K;-1..s 61 _ 9 V 1 1==. W. s.»'==&¢~'*-~»- e=.=1.=;:-r= = !'1.==:.--=.M=. .'-."-'. .- ~U =':.1|-.=. 1. .'-.*»'"=;=1.=. =1 B7 Q L1-D ?..YU!-U!"il :! I A UFF1l'_?%':' I N E1! I CE5 NEGAT I '/ E HE !>.?liZ!I NII g,'I 92 ju k 4? M // *"*1I' 1"-H.~ . xi- $1 ? BEST corv AVAILABLE §Q,s>@@ @a% ' ~ l"" V 1| I|-. 92 _.._r. .|_ I, .. _ ll "1 92' ," - ., -i ii .X.£_ . - if? Q -I . .. - l éé v Q ; 92 4 LT - ~;-.=-G" a -iii 5' ~ ?_*:f~i*@§@+,~%****¢;*. »"*@;=~ #»»L~F » ~*"92' - .» ._ _, _ z ~ 1 . ,=. _, , * - _ ,:,_ _,,_ I» , ~ 92 k -<1" - / V i _ . ;'.<_ ;» . . V 1. 92 szsr 00PYAVAllA_BL£ . _ ;- . I>-r-V5a-:6-a2! £131. ' E - Q . __'I ' FBI ' CLASSIFICATION: TOP SECRET TRANSMIT VIA: PRECEDENCE2 SECRET D Teletype El Immediate E] Facsimile , El Priority CONFIDENTIAL AIRTEL I-J Routine UNCLASE FT O UNCLAS j mm 341488 G . ; TO = cron, I rm: SSA DOMESTIC TERRORISM UNIT! g_ U c, nos-pron" IOOA-47717! >!/ , = ALLIANCE PARTY mm!; noussnc SECURITY/TERRORISM; Q <1 co: PHOENIX I i. 1 For the information of recipients, enclosed is a copy of Februaryan article on the26-March NEW3, 1988 ALLIANCEissue PARTY, ofthe which Boston appearedPhoenix. in the 7 - AU. |i §;'7_-~'.T.'..'.': IL .: §§§ ]'I.~ .iT-FED A *2 -2* "¬" § o mm-.9_-,2; $@m,@@w .5 1,4011!. W _ ga e E »< -Newc;ggk xné.i! W L 92 // -Phoenix E116. 1! § n lOD8 477l7! " M,, R § ; W;-W?Hl# ?""i . I6 MARs was K Approved: Transmitted < ' i 1:: Number! Time! 1"" , , ------re it -- % 92 ';;*Ir.'-s = i,;&%:t:."$%.t.i"*% - - ,-r '- * L ....>-pi. w p-. Q ~ - »crA~i-w- _ .. .=-- _ l awaac; 39$ {LE}.51_ . 2 TON'S LARGESTWEEKLY THREE SECTI - - TZ ZEl'E¬EERI986: NAP-backed "Rainbow Slate" candidates run for state- delegate seatsat half a dozen Boston~area Democratic caucuses, Q25THE blasting theexisting wardcommit- tees as racist, sexist,and homopho- bic. The candidates whom 1. #2: caucus-goers wouldlater remem~ ber as disruptive and "robotic" - .»- JWAE all lose, and two days later le formal protests of the balloting The cultish process withthe StateDemoaatic Committee. A review board later ways oi the dismisses allthe appeals.Members, of the Reverend Jesse Jackson's New Rainbow Coalition also attend the caucuses, passing yersout of cial~ Pcirty ly distancing their Rainbow from that of the NAP candidates. - by Sean Flynn After a review board hears an NAP appeal against theWard 19 n 1981 m bers of the caucus forits allegedfailure, among Alliance !, in HP" other things,to enc urage minority representation, who ' ist.19313: if ~ £111.p sive,_2 so- in lQ§_7_would run s the NAP's lto face the wayinto top candidatgjgr ! asks orga tional positionsin _jgli;_ Ward I9 committee m ber Geor- Arro campaign for Boston gia Mattison if he ca take her oo mmittee, the rst time a picture for the party'sweekly Latino is running for city-wide newspaper, theNational Alliance. of ce. Arroyoaides, suspiciousof Mattison refuses and raises her we the" them soft-sidedtbriefcase-fto shield-her mm, andArroyo refuses the party's face, bumpingSan ]uan'scamera. oi cial endorsement. Two years Two days later, San Juan les later, Arroyoruns againand NAP I ~ ' Continued on page8 members areagain barredfrom the 92 . --.1-mi.|§!Y_'f"_r"l-r-f|r.-- ' 1 5 r.r~..-'-v-- Pry: campaign. . r .__.7 _ _ h-1--4 » ;.1 .. ..'..- amt-.*' Q1!o:_57; @1125 I _ _ THUNDER / O O I QMTHE , Since theday it rst kickedto life,nine years agoin New York City,the New Alliance Party,one wouldthink, should have been welcomed by American progressives likea prayed-for messiah. The brainchild of Fred Newman, a long- time political organizer whospent the late '60sand early '70s meandering through thespectrum ufradical politics, The cultish the NAPhas a written agenda thatreads like the conscience of the American left: an end to racism, sexism, and anti~gay ways oi the bigotry;a national health service;free education through graduate school; New Alliance peace, notwar; peopleinstead ofpro ts Party ' -- all the plaguesof allmankind gone for good, thanksto the righteous rise ofthe working classand thevictorious emerg- ence of this "black-led. multi-racial, pro- gay" movement. by SecxnFlynn But reviewsof the party, atbest, have been less than attering, and at worst they've beendownright scathing. Although nearlyevery group even slight- Continued frompage .1 ly left of center embraces theNAP assault-and-battery chargesagainst Mat- message. theparty : methods and tison, whothen filescountercharges of motives havecost itthe supportof most assault and harassment. All charges are mainstream progressivesand earnedit eventually dropped.The NationalAl- the seething. damning criticismof re- liance. meanwhile.runs an overblown 92 searchers who'vestudied it in depth. account ofthe incident.complete witha Despite thesincerity Newmanand ht cartoon showingan enragedMattison followers ooze, the NAP'smuddled past swinging herbriefcase likea sledgeharn- and questionablepresent haveset it up mer. - for pointblankattacks, amongthem the 1987: Officialsa m charge thatit's a cover for a totalitarian. Ga and Lesb' " psychopolitical cult.a sick orgy ofmind games andrevolution orchestratedby _rom receivegaybusinessm veral whosay they complaintsNewman, thewhite male guru whowas were connedinto dona g to the NAP >nce a follower of neo-fascist Lyndon by partymembers canvassingfor the LaRouche. Directly tied to the party are a "Alliance" implying Theywere sup- network of therapy" centers ported bythe GBGLPA.The GBGLPA where the NAP's politicsare translated decides tomake "ita point not towork into radical theories of mental health, with them,"says executivedirector Will dreamed upand mappedout by New- I-lutchinson. man and administered byparty mem- luly 1987:A memberof theNAP wins bers. Addto that unsavorylinkage the an uncontestedrace for a seat on the NAP : tactics including its apparently national board of the New jewish deliberate attemptsto confuseitself with Agenda NJA!,aprogressive coalition more-popular groupssuch asthe Rain- that worksto unifythe Jewishcommuni- bow Coalition and its members confron- * ty"ar92dpolitical the left.Soon after,NJA '~ ~, s _, members around the country begin calling thenational headquarters.asking for'information aboutthe NAP and its members, whobegin joininglocal NIA chapters. Afterresearching group, thethe national board votes to denounce the NAP officially,making anylinking ofthe partywith the NIA groundsfor expulsion from the_hl}A. i 92 1 I it I'92l 92ll ' _',_ 92 a 4I , . tational debate style - and even those District of Columbia. For a band of organizing, and - perhaps more impor- who suffer just a casual brush with the wacked-out cultists, those are impressive tant - why, especially given its leaders achievements. y past and what critics say is the NAP's party come away with the same eerie consistent refusal to deal with that feeling: there's something weird about The support the NAP has found these people. granted.it hardly makes the party a history honestly. major political force at this point! isn'tAccording to researchers like Berlet "What they do on the surface sounds and Joe Conason, who wrote a 1982 terrific." says Chip Berlet, of the Cam- hard to understand. Its entire political rap is built on the simple premise that the Village Voice article about the NAP, bridge-based independent think-tank Newman put himself and his followers 9. Political Research Associates, who spent two-party system has failed the working -1- class -_ which, in a lot of ways, is true. under Lyndon LaRouche's leadership - four years digging into Newman and his then called "hegemony" - for a relative- C followers. But like anything that sounds Cash has become the major player in too good to be true, it is. Newman American politics, which means politi- ly short time in the early 1970s in New cians serious about surviving - even York. Although LaRouche was then represents another white male guru, and. operating within the left and had yet to who needs it? No matter how benevolent devout progressives - have to woo the nation's moneybags. Unfortunately, that develop fully his neo~fascist theories of their currentpolitical line might be, if today, he was nonetheless a twisted man theytook over the country, you'd have leaves the poor and members of the working class playing second string. But, with twisted ideas. By autumn 1973, US Strongman Fred Newman." communists had already denounced him lf all the criticisms are true, then there'sas the NAP rightly calculates, those something really scary aboutthe New people are ripe for picking by any group as a neo-Nazi after his "Operation Mop- Alliance Party it's growing. Since its that sells itself well. And any party that up" tenor spree, which featured his , ... can swing that bloc of voters to its ranks young followers pummeling rival leftists founding. in 1979, theparty has spread to with chains and baseball bats. And waarpnnn 22 states, and it currently boasts an has a decent shot at serious power. "We're building something," says l.aRouche s bizarre and degrading psy- estimated 30,000 members, including chosexual theories were pretty well I 5000in New England. It offers its own NAP New England coordinator Mary brand of psychotherapy at clinics around Pridley, come hell or high water. that'sformed by the winter of '73. And though the oountry - including one in Jamaica capable of engaging the right in this it wasn't until lune 1974 that Newman f 4 Plain and also boasts a network of country. And furthermore, we've found officially put himself and almost 40 of his legal, educational, and other community- - it's been tested through millions of cadre under Lakouche a fact NAP hours on the streets, millions of hours members don't dispute!. party members based services that touch perhaps hun- deny that the Newman~l.aRouche ties dreds of thousands of poor and working- going door-knocking and millions of hours on the phone that people started much earlier and continued for ea class people. its weekly newspaper, the some time after Newman and his group National Alliance, is read by as many as respond to a militant, black-led, indepen- E 100,000people. nd this year the party'sdent movement. That's the way we chose jumped ship, in August 1974. According to go." to Berlet's and Conason's evidence, presidential can idate, , though, Newman's C enters for Change became the rst ck_wnman..ey:r..to_ No one questions the NAPfs ability to qualify §01 _.1I!il¢ ' [email protected] pople on to its ideas; indeed, that's CFC!, a grassroots leftist organization, what frightens its critics. The concerns, held "joint forums" with LaRouche's Fede'i5l'Election C '_ ' -and she is Continued on page 14 on the ballot in al 50 states and the rather. are about how the party does its E i .F 1 1 '~ . -3: , ll r ji s*s?.i.q~ "", ".5 1' I, was .- "*3 _ y , " >3 * i ~- - ~. ;. , » s _,.~ {_-. ._>. .». .k=_§,__5;g;t-_»_;%?§:§,;§:i%m;_Tbig é .- . .. 4 }. mm F!WWv"i 92*'L -.- *"1"<*"s':=r='n"r*=r=re's g *|_ ./ _;__"' '"' ~ "~;;vl- -II <- e - .- . ~;~~- .._ .~_--v ~ - "The ,oo|~ed absurd," l'e¬a11$ Sandy'Story,of theeditor]amai- - - ca PlainCitizen, whowas atthe /, National Caucusof LaborCom- Ward 11 caucus, "reading from mittees NCLC! as early as No- those cards saying. There s no vember 1973 and continued to blacks here,there's gays no and debate points of shared ideology lesbians, when the room was with LaRouche after the split and probably three-quartersfull of after the rest of the left had writ- those twogroups." AddsDick ten LaRouche off as a proto- Jones, amember ofthe Ward ll Nazi. But Newman followers to- committee: "The people who day insist that the relationship were reallyupset werethe people lasted only two months, and of color, the gays and lesbians, Newman himself, quoted in a who were treated as if they were National Alliance interview, says whitemales in the backsmoking his CFC got involved with the cigars. They[NAP members NCLC only because the CFC were humorless, driven, focused was "blissfully ignorant" about people whodidn't any see per- the left and LaRouche in 1974 spective.seemed It almostlikea an odd claim coming from a man movie about Nazi youth."At the who boasts a doctorate from Ward 19 caucus, observers re- Stanford University and who member a similar scene. Georgia was a serious politicalorganizer Mattison, a Ward 19 committee by 1968.As Berlet wrote in aDe- member andthe allegedbriefcase cember 1987 report on the New basher, saysthe caucusesthat Alliance Party, "The question is year were very strange, very not how long the Newmanites ugly. The way they act it seems worked under the political lead- clear that they want more mem- 1 ership of Lyndon LaRouche,but bers or to destroy other groups, how they can explain what at- particularly minorityand lib- tracted Newman and his follow- eral/progressive groups.That's ers to LaRouche in the first place how they act not what they . . . an organization which at best say, buthow theyact." was a collection of paranoid sex- And though the NAP prides ist homophobic thugs and at itself on being "black led and worst a nascent fascist political multi-racial," minority leaders rho-'ement." question whetherthat's of out Actually, NAPmembers say,it honest concem and a sense of solidarity orif theparty ismerely was LaRouche's economic 92' analyses thatattracted Newman trying toestablish "hegemony." and his followers - that and They'repersevering too - let's E ? naiveté. use thatword when they want to work for a candidate, even e But even if the LaRouche con- nection couldbe wiped from Fred when that candidate hasn'tasked Newman's hispast, New Al- for their support." says Felix liance Party still wouldn'twin Arroyo, whosecampaigns NAP members tried to "control" in much favor from other activists. -1 1981 and1983. "And they do that With creepy regularity, people especially withminorities." Mel who have come into contact with King. thepopular blackleader the NAP-remember its members who ran for mayorin 1983 and and methods as confrontational, disruptive, and exploitative. accepted NAPsupport, alsosays When theparty's RainbowSlate the NAP tries to "ingratiate" candidates descended on ward itself to "those peoplewho are caucuses in 1986 including nonpreferred inour by Wgrds 11and 19,considered exploiting appropriate issues. among the most progressivein Even partymembers themselves the area - they read hardline begin tosound a bit desperatefor speeches fromindex cardsattack- black acceptancewhen they de- fend the NAP's tiesto the con- in 8 the_, ward committees . and, ah- Democrats "as Y -. racist. sexist.and homophobic.-, . _.,. , , nkharuwhohubeencalledantii Far?xv Li; _ '-- Q"..§! H Semiticand anti-gay."We re- spect him because theblack Continued onpage 16 _ _-n .0 -. ~ . - . .1 .- L ..1. -7-inlley.America " ='92'hite d.: lllll, Ul LOUIS , L; anus-a>a--an have the right to tell P-' The NAl"s own tactics - d A'm eric'a whofollow or v.-ho to scribedas usually either respect." Thor:h rt». .s true,it's disruptive" or "annoying' 92 t a weak l~-' .c~ra political have left a bitter taste among' allegiance, -r-metiallywhen the Boston's activistcommunity. and NAP gan*'~92-- '-beachhead in reports likeBerlet's become have the Ne" sh Agenda, a standard testamentagainst New- PfOgl ES5l92'uup that has -_, little man and his Alliance. But though love for Pan ar"~ in.David Coyne, all thepolitical sophisticates have a spokespersonfor the 4500- been, as GBGLP-A'sWill member NJA,suggests thatthe Hutchinson says,"making it a NAP waseager tojoin theNIA in point notto workwith them" order to have a lewish shield though GBGLPAdoes indude againsta Farrakhan backlash. the NAP in candidate fonims it "They pickedthe wronggroup," sponsors!, nobody'sbothered to he says."We won'tjust sit still. spread newsthe theto politically We can'tafford to have these disenfranchised peoplethe NAP people aroundus if,with princi- ir targets. fact,ln asBerlet rightly Frighteningly enough, pled efforts,we're to going attract 0 argues, theprogressive reaction Fridley s assessmentof LaRouche people toour banner."And that to the NAP - namely. toisolate is pretty accurate. Foryears 2-. from a man whose group in- its membersas freaks - is Lallouche wasdismissed asa t cludes everyshade ofleft politics. back ring badly."lt's double- a cultist anda flake, albeit a scary i Perhaps most damning. edged sword."Berle: says."On one. But while he was being though, arethe statements made the onehand, theylie consistent- written off in the world of by DennisSurrette. a black man ly aboutwho theyare andwhat traditional politics,he was mak- *8 who ranfor presidentunder the they do.But mainstreampolitical ing somenasty entrances:two NAP banner in 1984 and says he u use totally inappropriate Lallouchites wonIllinois De- later left the party because it ax to isolatethem. wholeThe mocratic primariesin April_l986. 1. offered blacks no real leadership idea ofdemocracy informed is joining theballot ascandidates roles. "l left the party becauseit consent; excludingthem doesn't for lieutenantgovernor and continued to claim it was black- secretary of state with i led l knew better," Surrette Yet the NAP. armed with gubernatorial candidateAdlai told Mississippi'sJackson Ad- shrewd organizers,has managed Stevenson, wholater dropped 1 vocate. "l don'tthey feel can use to make its isolation work to its out. Thatsame year, Lakouchites black-led continuouslywithout bene t. recycling criticism into in California managed toget on falling on their faces ammunition to use on the streets. the ballot a plan for what falsehoods justwon't up hold The partyblasts theAmerican amounted tomandatory and under close scrutiny. political superstructurefor. as it widespread AIDStesting. a i Finally, theNAP's persistent, sees it. moving further utd state-backed discrimination self-serving useof "Rainbow" further right.dropping thework- against peoplewho hadbeen i f _ titles for its affiliated organiza- ing classand oppressedlike so exposedthe to disease.A similar tions haslong beena targetof many pebblesin the wake ofa proposal goesbefore votersin glacier. In tum. mainstream the nextelection there.And in other NAPhigher-ups say_the progressives,argues, it clingto 1987 theNew AllianceParty. the Rainbow Lobby.a Washington- the Democratic Party like so left'sdirty own secret, has a can- i based NAP offshoot. makesclear many half-starvedlamprey. suck- didate runningfor presidentin that it is separate from the ing out what legitimacythey can. all 50 states, armed with Reverend lesseJackson's Rain- The criticismslaunched atNew- $205,565.18matching in funds bow Coalition,the similar name man andthe party,NAP figures, from thefederal government.So. is convenientlyopportunistic at are just more evidenceof an indeed, whatwill the left do best. "Our contention is,we don't increuingly paranoid.desperate, about theright? Andwhat willit think theRainbow [title]belongs and impotent Establishment. do aboutitself? U Even worse. NAP members use in the Demom c Party." says P S Fridley, "but.ce're than more the cult brand to tie the tra- ditional left to the rise of the willingtogivethemthename.lright. "lt'spart of the cover-up the left is doing,"says Frldley, mean.we're going to fight not "because l think that, if in calling over, it.But we re_certainly con- the NAP and Dr. Newman a cult cerned withwhere theRainbow and a guru, that kind of allows ends up.We don'twant tosee it I them tocall l.aRouchea guruand Q end upinthe handsof a Richard a cult, which heisn't. it Andkind ~-:.c¢ 92,¢¢;, , .. , ._-_ .,6 ofallows -- -- _1 - ~ -- vision." And the GreaterBoston Gay andLesbian PoliticalAl- about the right. which is the liance's assertionthat their short serious issue.Again, if you want title the "Alliance" was to talk about the serious and ripped off by money-hungry principled issues,it's the Fuck NAP canvassersis dismissed just NAP, whatare goingto doabout as easily:"Who saidthose people the right? lt's rising,and own names?lt's andmore more l.aRouche isamajor player in it. likely thatthey goaround saying - Dr. Newmanrecognizes that,and they'reAlliance the andpeople l'm proudto follow him. l will t.?.!,;'_i them becausethey think M} tnat unequivocally." /- z , 92a 92 r "ln therapy," says NAP critic Chip Berlet, who spent four years re- E- oiiiicoli searching the group, "you're baring your innermost thoughts, which leaves great potential for abuse by the therapy therapist. And when your therapist is y members own admission, the your political leader - it's a system 92_ psychotherapy side of New where your political guru knows Alliance Party politics is rad- what's going on inside your id and ical, controversial, and "revolution- ego. Here you have a system where ary." Based on "a therapy of em- the abuse is institutionalized and that's the problem." _§ powerment," its basic tenet sounds But the therapists who, by the reasonable enough: people develop way, are not regulated by the com- mental-health problems . because monwealth don't see that nasty society is screwed up in a major way; link, or at least don't admit it if they E social con icts breed personal con- do. My main response to that is l flicts, which in turn spawn emotional almost want to laugh," says Gwen "l *"¢ = trauma. For the most part, though, it isn't Lowenheim, director of the Boston theorythat has critics of the program Institute for Social Therapy and Re- so uptight. lf the NAP's institutes for search and an NAP member. "lt's Social Therapy, whichare scattered ludicrous. lt's a real insult, both to -r around the country includingone on people in the New Alliance Party and Centre Street in Iarnaica Plain!, were people in therapy. lt's almost like merely staffed by single-minded clini- saying they're mindless. Sure, some cians, the program probably wouldn't people become political from being in therapy. If they do, that's great. But .23 get much play outside head-shrinker it's more that we iust say what our cliques. But the "social therapists" are politics are. You can walk into a playing more than mind games psychiatrists office and see copies of they're also trying to organize a Time. Newsweek. People - if that's political and social revolution. And not political,-what is? I think we're v I that connection. say u-itics, is at the least unethical and may perhaps even more up-front. |>9°Ple know who we be brainwashing. - II Plausible as that argument may NAP followers and therapists, of sound. it creates a few disturbing course, dismiss that charge as a knots for those not quite ready to join a ludicrous cheap shot from paranoid the New Alliance Party in completely rivals. But the connection between the upsetting the status quo. Sure, Tme party and the therapy clinics both and People may be political, but they of which target poor and working- still reflect rather generically what class communities -- casts a disturb- most people see as reality. But the 1 ing light on the NAl"s entire agenda. e issues of the National Alliance stacked Both were created by Fred N . a in the institute's waiting room is a long-time activist glaring account of the NAl"s philoso- followers as brilliant and by his cities phy,which doesn't quite agree with as a guru. And both preach the same the current state of affairs. The ques- basic message, coming. conveniently, tionf then. is, are emotionally vulnera- from two directions that meet in the ble people seeking aid and comfort at 1 middle: society sucks. In therapy, a disadvantage when faced with a i patients leam that they are conflicted therapist's version of u-uth, one that because society is con icted and that goes against a lifetime of social adjust- g the only way to deal with that is to ment? 'l he_answer may not be "brain- V . t ,_ 39. WW, 1- v_'- ~ . ». -r ~ ~ ,-~ , 1 a .<~ l 1 ' their . , organizers , _ .> l for the New Alliance Party. which SP says, in essence. "We can change this i con icted society." ' 92 -'-Pl ' J50 Rev. 10-19-77! -11°" -7*? -73- ~e-.1 any :*"£.F' 7; 92 _-r if ' . _Q -5 BUMClipping in Space Below! '9? - . _ , o 0- Q -:s;r' -- 9 -" - . <§vv"192JIharu:e: Ihu1t'Ii3dh1g;tr>~ 390$. &_ *' if .~'2. - v ._ ~-- -"'£; T:|.._.',_. _'= ;__-I--4. . < kl !§§¢1::.£;~:* A1¢R inb0WABannerA av '92<~ - 1988 #§§% '~~ tbg Blimp»- uvel vnnn pohucalunpowumqn. As_l;h,ithsa nc92ad llnllpponof A .~ $3./"I A . i|:lQo h:U.S.l:!i,wI|ichhaspi:ched 1; -. ., :--1 in tz.ll'lv.IIl=~l lb ¢w|Iin = paw. .' 33*-7. . . . A . - 5 '5; o - _ 3 *j:}" -'12? '* "-.'+>~'» S. .< L - ! ..'. - ,- ; ' - A '- ,_ . A < _.~ .4_s, -- -.. -- ' numerous outreach and fundniaing Indicatepagq, name of newspaper, caty and state.! ::a1».*;a22&n:2: _"I woRnodsA|ukt92u lhnOne"md -J. '92 projects Jachon'_s cqnpnigngnd ll: av J NAPla1|u ? @.f,rn! =d ,,. L 2.. £urPnhnimgunnnu::k xi /Jd hdcpeodeat - _ k A - ', * " " **" ~ - A "5? A -aia 1. A " ~'-§ §;__.' 9~ _ J ~ C - * - - ' ~ - 3 ' . i-Qiqns .; _z - y ~--a'Q.!¢92*'J _ , . 141111 - "' .§q,1_g-p, -1 ilk -,-£5-¢;¢ - .1 *1" ,-#39" ' " - - ,4" . _ _-..~4,.- A. . , ,,.- : ;, 1*: ~ -14,5 _ 11 .g tar » /-.»-_ _ ~wf~r**f'_'7_ > ~,$_° _. -1 .5-;;. . _.;_1 v _; Uni : a . -. U A Y >1: -cg "'3" ,W Q _ I"§ ___ I _ ' ' , L*"'1i _ $1"- **:' vu '. _ P. .1 -1 2U ~ _ __ '~ '> .,"__L . - 4" _ ix : Edltl . X f-A ~'§; ' L.~1_:J.192_§t»v.~¢_a1m¢zc:::;: 5-" 2&1 -~»:~».:-1.-'..»'-' ar A :r._ 2 -p - ~ '1 Tmetgb ram." 92H L1 ea W ri , - 4A&1-ls:---_ - ' ' . ous Jacktzmsuppotters and Rainbow oftheNAPforwha h:yaeeudeli£::I H I ai. . anemputoexploit 92eRainbow'sp|estige inrNAP'sovwnnmuwconcetm. § 0 0 is manipulative and canagmupaspiretom polmttl leadership when withonehanditreacha outtodnoseinneedofemodomlhelp, mdwiththeodnerhmdpoinutoatehnd "politie1lorgu_92i1.92tio||aucme? 0N_APhascovered upthemnhnbout manyofitsleaden involvem_eutIii!:l gmupledbyno-h|cin gueLyndon_ chsms nttlse Rnuchevudnrnguxpuqpuugia-191q;wmuuAP '1 .- &n,Bu'Hdananl:na ~ ~ e * 0 EEEREI I AT0EicalReB9_rt KK- 5. §§°f.A?iI §§Z§§ T<.%/?ii%..,.... Fl *2. CLOUDS ~' ' BLUR THE RAINBOW: '*' M 92 The Other Side of the e New Alliance Party i . 3 . v Q s2.oo Q w _ a~ _ Q : '- 1 2.: -1; ~-*-- 3*-;=~"' _ - - !,~;;: " , 9e¢,__.>, ,. ~;= "" »_~ » ~.;f' : v 1,: '' , r». . . V _. . . 1 _ - - __ _ » * " .92 4 .- e -.-_,~ N .- .. I Political Research Associates I I ' F I . > l ;._ ~_ __ ~._~!: .1..~.< ,1 - > ~ ' 12 ' 92_ "*_'"_~} -P"- ~-W- -:--pqvv--1-=-'~ _-<,.-- - ~<- ,,,,..v A? _V_" 92 > 1 ix I _7 '5o¢_ i-- - 4I s Political ResearchAssociates isan inde- Political ResearchAssociates offersclasses on ii pendent researchinstitute whichcollects anddis- the Americanright wing,provides speakersfor l seminates informationon right-wingpolitical groups andconferences, publisheseducational groups andtrends. Centralizedin itsarchives is a posters, prepares,and request, on speci cre- ii continuously-updated collectionof over one search reportson topics pertaining the to political hundred right-wingpublications, including newspapers, magazines,newsletters, anddirect The PoliticalResearch AssociatesMonograph 4 mail appeals.The institute'slibrary contains Series providesindividual authorsand re- ~==s=,~._._. hundreds volumesof relatingto the political right searchers opportunityan exploreto speci c Aaae wing. Alsomaintained areextensive filesof aspectsright-wing of activismin depth. Topical 4 primary andsecondary materialon individuals. Reports providebackground informationon a groups, topicsand interestof those to researchingsubjectcurrent of interestto those monitoring the the rightwing. right wingin America Q 5 a s as . CloudsBlurtheRainbow: " 'l'heOtlserSide theof NewAllian Party //1* *3 ResearchA AS0618 , Q 1 p Copyright 1931, Political . $21!! . 1 I iiii. a, i tsau #0-91s9a'lo 'l é _. Political Research I_ 'es A 678 Massachusetts Avenue,Suite205 ~ T... fl i ._ V -I -- N " '1" -"1,_!;=t-fa cmuug=.uss=s¢h&iuo21s9_,, »' ~ _ '_ 1:» '. up L F ' §?w' r Ah' .,. w y,... x _; nip Lt 9;.- ' ~h.1'I~ 92 *+ w-ai!92??" 3 "5~ - §~;e;~,.92,,,2§ ._t'_, I 3 <1: N1 t X i 2i ' Q I 0 92 I I A Political Research Associates Topical Report I 41 _ r: 4 :;;~;+si ; Clouds Blur the Rainbow The Other Side of the i 0» .. New-Alliance Party J - ByChip Bede: December, 1987 WhatistheNewAllhncePat1y .' Tthe New Alliance Party describes M as a Black-led, wonaen-led, na_u1ti-racial, pro-gay spoken cnncscall it an oppomuusue polinal rnovenaentcontrolledyyanunethicaltherapyculthowever, isseldomdiscussedwitheandor. With the Ne92vA!lianee Partyalreadywell-established whosewhitemaiegtinoneeledhisfollowersintoinseveralcities,ineludingNewYorkandBost0ll. ana liationwithneo-fascistcuitleaderLyndonand with newly-opened national headquarters in Chieagqadiscussinnoftheponpislongoverdue. Lallouehe. 'I'odiseussNAP92vithoutre£erenoetothepolitical milieuin which it operates is impossible. This m=e ra-my is wmptk controversial, and ul- report attempts to seriously analyze the history, timately a matter of perspective and dimensionsofNAPinthe judgment. The controversy surrounding NAP, eontenof'usworkintheArnerieanprogressive ofthe role ofNAPwithintha|eon|nurnity, bin is nntananernptrobaittheorganizationonthebasis ofits publicly-espoused aidfor the C.I.A. supportedcontra ter- Current NAP Activities rorists andagainst armingSouth African In Mayof 1985the NewAlliance Partyheld a supported mercenariesin Angola. And national foundingconvention Chicago. in Thesig- the RainbowLobby isexp"-sing the ni canceof the event isblurred bythe fact that its Right : misuseof federal funds f0r.4ID$- own historydates the-originalfounding oftheNew The New Alliance Party moved its national Alliance Partyas 1979.The chairpersonelected at headquartersChicago to be to closerto Minister the 1985Chicago-meeting Etnjlyéégter, was Louis an Farrakhan,The Rev.Jesse Jackson and organizer fiomJackson, Mississippiw o joined Mayor HaroldWashington, accordingto NAP the NewAlliance Pa__g_yin NewYork in1981. She chairwoman EmilyCarter. Theoffice is located on callsherse a ormer organizer, nowtherapist. Chicago'sside north inthe 44thWard!» and When theNew AllianceParty movedits nation- fundraisers arealready solicitingsupport forthe al headquartersto Chicago, it came with a related Rainbow. TheNAP-related ChicagoCenter for medical and therapeutic center. In fact, Crisis Normalizationis-open andanother therapy wherever theNew AllianceParty hasa major or- centeris planned forthe west side.NAP or- ganizing effortunderway, there is a related ganizers beenhave recruitingin some sectors of therapy" groupreaching outto personswith the Blackand progressivepolitical communityfor progressive politicswho are also seekingemotion- al or psychological counseling.The therapy almostfiveyears,andhaveapresenceinseveral groups usea technique they call Social Therapy or Crisis Normalization" designedto provide Chicagocolleges. C C immediate helpfor theeveryday crisis situations In NewYork the New AllianceParty offersa that happento everyone. Both thepolitical or- freelegal clinic in Harlem,sponsors lectures,and ganization theand therapy institutes makea point publishes newspaper,its Nationalthe Alliance. to involvepersons of color, gay menand lesbians, National Alliancediscusion groupsare heldin and politicalradicals. Chicago, Illinois;Jackson, Mississippi;Long ls- Closely alliediwiththe NewAlliance 'Party is land, NewYork; Philadelphia,Pennsylvania; Washington, D.C.and Boston, Massachusetts. That theslogans of the New AllianceParty, Rain- The NewAlliance Party maintains regional and s»¢ns-neezsiratisa.M bobby M4w state olficesin: Alasltl.Arizonl. California Oak- re ect a framework is not land andLos Angeles!,Colorado, Connecticut, questioned. l-lerefor example are someof their Delaware. Georgia.Illinois, Indiana.Kansas. slogans andissues: Maryland, Massachusetts,Michigan AnnArbor 0 Put teeth back into Civil Rights laws and Detroit!,Mississippi. Montana,Nebraska. 0 RepealGramm-Rudman New Jersey,New Harnpshire,New York Albany. New YorkCity andBuffalo!, North Carolina, Pen- 0 Supportthe FairElections billintro- , nsylvania, RhodeIsland. South Carolina, Ten- ducedby Rep. John Conyers D., Mich.! nessee, Vermontand Washington,D.C. 0 Seeklegislationthatwould proteetthe dernocraticrightsofgaysandall Fred Newmanand theHistorical is Roots of NAP Oneflyereaplains: The historyof theNew AllianceParty starts 71teRat'nbowLobbyt's ghtingfor grandjuryreform. a ordablepublic withahistoryofitsprimarytheoretician,Dr.Fred ltou.ringandCongole:elt'bemn'anfmm »a E. .. ,_ .t"i92i'Q11 ,1 , . 4*J92<__ ,. no ~ = 1 , , ., . ,._, M ~.§-.».st.;~;.g,%¥» 1/rut»._.._.l...1'71", .. 1;i ;_:_ hr",_, . . ;'°"'F'j ,~, .' .4... V1. A .. ~ ' ""Ir I Newman. .--~~. In. "1""?-1",1~=- " ?" 1 _"T-""'_P- " T . ? "~ ;_ 1968l Newman M severalDuh1 and - J ' personsat onewhotime chose to put themselves < undrr_the.poliLical_ leadership_o§Lyndon La- Rouche,becomes it crucialto examine the Even afterofficially leavingNCLC inAugust, 1974, Newmanand his followers continuedto relationship carefully: debate andcriticize LaRouche the NQLG--_ and m_,__._- During mostof 1974, the NCLCunder La- over issuesof shared political ideologyasif it rep- Rouche primarilywas attractingmiddle-class andresented lcgitimateleftist theory long afterthe upper-class intellectualwhite studentsfrompres- tigiouseastern and mid-western collegecam- restof the American hadLeft denouncedNCLC puses hardlya coreof trade unionists andas eitherproto-Nazi Brownshirts,a sickpolitical welfare recipientsas characterized by Newman scult, oroutright policeagents. FredNewman insists his groupwas notsophis- l supporters. ticated aboutthe American Leftwhen it joined A former memberof LaRouche s NCLC with Lallouche,yetwhen the Newrnanites split remembersarrival the 1974in of what were called from NCLC,they announcedthe formation of a the Newmanitesz vanguard Marxist-Lcninistpolitical party. In r I l They putthemselves underthe actual the resignationletter signed by Newman and of38 l political leadershipof Lakouche fora ht followers.there a is signi cant use Marxist-of H few months,and wecame believeto that Leninist terminologywhich suggestsa far greater what Newmanreally wantedduring that +5 p ,1 period wasto act as anundcrstudy La- to Announcing Newman'sthat International Rouche to learn ltis methodsand tech- Workers Party IWP! had now becomethe van- niquesof controlling persons anin guard partyof the working class."the letter went organization. on to say: The individualsin Newman'sgroup The organizationof thevanguard seemedlack to clarityand politicalfocus party asis. Maratmakes clear.the on- and wereobsessed withpsye-hologv and ganizationthe ofclass. The formationof sexuality. Newmanwas clearly the leader the [WPhas grownfrom ourattempt to and itwas obviousthat LaRom:he sego organize[NCLC]frorn the withinthat it l F andNewrnan'sweretoo ego bigto allow might movefroma position ofle them towork togetherinthe sameon- =: hegemonya position to of leadershipof ganization long.for the class. ; While actualmembership by New Alliance When joiningthe NCLC, Newman announced Party executiveboard membersin LaRouche's he wasputting himselfand followershis under the ' l NCLC mayhave lastedonly afew months,the political hegemony of Lil?-ouche.After leading working alliancebetween groupsledby La- his followersout ofthe NCLC,Newman eon- t L Rouche, Newmananda third New Yorkpolitical tinued tostruggle withLaRouche overtheory leader namedGino Parentelasted farlonger. within theprinciples criticism of amongfriends. l Some aetmsts' ' from N ew orY k mber reme the Nonethis of indicatesa casual. naive or short-lived l threegroupsworkinginalooseallianoearoundis-relationship. l i l 'l192eNatureofNCLCDuringthe t suessuehaswe1farereform,farmlabor,andor- gnnizingthe for perioda long as as Newmanlte Alliance l one year.One internalNCLC discussionof the Still, Newman'smerger andsplit withLa- Newmanites describes ten months of serious Rouche wouldhave littlemerit asa criticism of political discussion before severalmonths ae- of ~ - _ , ' as ' n NAP afterallitisasignofpoliticalmaturityto l t ®°°"-- ~~ " <'" ° " """ illP ... - -.» 1 Jr t Y. -.> " t ~ in " ~,..t:.::.' _ ,.., - * ~ ". ~"s _ r .. *7.e~A- . stash '.1*. .'.'.-.;<192 _, " _ ._...92 -4|v § .__,. ~..,».. November andDecember, 1973, and the New- natureoiLaRouche andtheNCl..Cinlate1973 manitesplit took plaee inlateAugust. 1974. and 1974-theperiod whenNewman grewclose 4 - Political Research Associates 1 to NCLCand thenput himselfand hisfollowers under thepolitical leadershipof LaRouche.ln 1974 NCLCwasitot attracting organic progres- sive leaders" from the welfare rights movement, as claimedby the Newmanites. Infact, it was cal andsexual impotenceof his followers.NCLC having troubleattracting signi cantBlack support members were forced into what was called at all,since itwas leadinga successful attempt to psychological therapyand deprogramming but destroy theBlack-led NationalWelfare Rights were what former memberscall brainwashing Organization anddefame itspopular leader,the and ego-stripping sessions. TheNCLC rapidly late GeorgeWiley. became totalitarianin style, with a pec iar obses- sion withsexuality andhomophobia usedas a ,I During the same period, LaRouche also weapon againstinternal dissent. To theextent propounded ideaswhich werewidely perceivedto represent outrightracism. Lallouche,for in- that myphysical powersdo not prevent me,"La- Rouche toldhis followersin August,1973, Iam stance, offendedthe Hispaniccommunity ina .ri| now con dentand capable of ending your politi- November, 1973essay publishedin both English cal-and sexual-impotence;the twoare inter- and Spanish!titled TheMale Impotenceof the Puerto-Rican SocialistParty. An internal memo connected aspectsof the same problem. 2| by Lakoucheasked Canwe imagineanything By 1974Lakouchn hadstarted hisswing more viciouslysadistic thanthe Black Ghetto toward fascisteconomic andpolitical principles- mother? He described themajority of the well before-Newman andhis followersjoined ll Chinese peopleas approximatingthe lower NCLC and announced thatthey would place animal species by manifestinga paranoid per- themselves underLaRouche s politicalleadership sonality....a parallelgeneral formof fundamental and hegemony. It wu during thisperiod that distinction fromactual humanpersonalities. LaRouche begantalking of the need forrapid in- dustrializationto build the workingclass. He Asearlyasthespringof1973LaRouchehadtalked of a historic tactical alliance between beguntoarticulate apsychosexualtheoryof politi- revolutionaries, workingthe classand theforces cal organizingand begandescending intoa of industrial capital againstthe forcesof nance paranoid styleof historical analysis thatstressed not Marxist dialectical materialism and class mpital Hebegan dewelopingan authoritarian i analysis. butmacabre conspiracytheories anda worldviewwithagloriftcationofhistoricmission. , I ofagldbalplotbytheClA/KGBtokidnapandmetaphysicalcommitmentphysical and confron- -92 tation. Hetold reportersthat onlyhe wascapable programhismembershiptoassassinatehirn.l-Iisof bringing revolution andsocialism theto United homophobia becamea central theme of the States, andhis speechesbegan to take on thetone and styleof a demagogue.Lallouche, inshort, organization's conspiracytheories. Hesaid .-..» 1 women s feelingsof degradation in modern society couldbe traced to thephysicJ placementbegantoadoptthesameideasandstyleswhich él ofsexualorgansneartheantuwhichcausedthem toconfuse with sex excretion hadformedthebas'sofNationalSocialism,a_ ..a_.' .I ~11 A September9 1973 editorialin the NCLC ideological journalCampaigner chargedthat Concretely, alfacrossthe USA there are politicalthat tendency historicallybecamepartof workers whoare preparedto ght.They areheld the Europeanfascist movementand eventually -moat - from their l . 1913 memo, La playedakeyroleinl-litler'srisetopowerinNazi Rouche propoundedthe startlingand sexist psychological theorythat theprinciple sourceof Germany.lnfact,Lakouchewasdenouncedaa impotence, bothmale andfemale, theis mother. Nazi byU.S. Communistsfo owing physicalat- Lallouche claimedonly hecould curethe politi- tacLsontl|em'm1973byNCLCmernberswho _ werelikened Hitler's to Brownshins. violent l many injuriesan_d somepersons required hospitalization._ Operation MOP -Tip"was front-page news Ill virtually everyAmeryzan progressivenewspaper ly toassist assaultsin members on Teamsters of during 1973,and itis difficult to believeit was not for aDemocratic Unionand anotherrank-and- known toNewman andhis followerswhen they first contactedNCLC afew weeks afterOperation file~Teamsterreform group,PROD.. Mop-Up wasdeclared success a LaRouche.by In 1974,according former to NCLCmembers, Furthermore, physicalassaults byNCLC mem- LaRouche rstbegan toseek contactwith ex- bers againstcritics werereported regularlywell tremist andanti-Semitic right-winggroups andin- into 1976,and periodicassaults byLaRouche dividuals aroundthe ideaof tactical unity in fundraisers stilloccur. In 1974, manyformer opposing imperialismand theruling classin NCLC membersreport, theywere still required to general, andthe Rocltefellersin particular. i take paramilitarytraining classesledby fellow LaRouche s obsessionwith conspiracy theories blossomedin 1974, and duringthis periodhe members. began expoundingaview linking certain Jewishin- ,~»v-is F stitutionsa toplot to destroyWestern civililalitm _,'l'he,trigger,_for_0pver_ation Up wasa and usherin a New DarkAge . Mop March, 1973warningbyNCl.C to the Communist Thisis the character theof NCLCthat at- i Party, USA.to stopopposing thecreation byLa- tracted Newmanand hisfollowers earlyin 1974. In his1974 bookPower and/tutI|on'ty,Newman Rouche ofan alternative to theBlack-led Nation- I al WelfareRights Organization NWRO! which w-rote thathis followerswould organizein the I.aRouche denouncedas being part of a union- spirit outlined by Lallouche. The questionis not busting slave-labor alliance. LaRoucheset up an how longthe Newmanites worked underthe alternative, theNational Unemployedand Wel- political leadershipof Lyndon Lallouche, but how theycan explainwhat attractedNewman and fare RightsOrganization NUWRO!,and, ac- -_._.-I cording to Lakouche, NCLC then sent his followersto Lallouche in thefirst place.To delegations intopublic CommunistParty meet- this dayNAP leadershiphas refusedto renounce ings. demandingthatthiscriminalbehaviorofthe ortodealeandidlyoraccuratelywiththe factthat CP leadership -thatis, siipport for theoriginal NWRO- be openlydiscussed andvoted down theNewmanitesatonetimejoinedanorganin- S by thebody assembled. tion which wasat besta collection of paranoid Eyewitnesses recallthis discussion usually sexist homophobicthugs andat worsta nascent l consistedof primarily-white and youngNCLC ~. :-.1, 1 members standingup and disrupting meetingsof the primarily-Blackand older NWRO withcalls for a debate on LaRouche scharges against UsingtheFBlto l-larassDissidents F NWRO leadersuntil membersof the audience lt wasduring theperiodthat Newmanitesthe 0 were forcedto physicallydrag theNCl.£ mem- were involvedwith NCLCthat NCLCbegan to . collect anddisseminate intelligenceon progres- bersoutofthemeeting.Theseeonfrontationsbe-sive groups.lt iswell documentedthat NCLC wenton to provide intelligenceto domestic and cameformalized Operation under Mop-Up.foreign governmentagencies. Whiledocuments When the Workers Party joinedin released underthe Freedomof Information Act supporting Black-led NWRO,they reveal thatU.S. gmernmentagencies frequently too wereattacked by the predominantly white disnissed thematerial providedby the NCLC, it NCLC supporters.While theOperation Mop-Upwas providednonetheless. early Asas February, attackswereof ciallyendedinlate 1974,1973orearly NCLCrepresentatives with met anofficial in the US. Departmentof Commerce to provide '92 m 4 ~ substantial evidencewhich wouldexonerate United, gt Autoworlters M55¢ .othert Q; industrial phndwd unions. y . .' Reportsof these assaults continued through1976, and NCLCmembers havecontinued untilrecent- eordingto hCommerceDepartme_ntmemoran-1*Ii§'§~ 6 - Political Résoarchltssoctates dumreleasedundertheFreedom Information of Ad. , I 92 A The Newmaniteswere atthe centerof the rst d0cumented instanceof NCLC collaboration with U.S. intelligenceagencies. 1974,In severalNew- manites NCLCin attemptedto use the FBIto lo- cate andspy ona former Newmanite hadwho left at the time ofthe NCLC/Newmanitemerger and taken hischild withhim. J irnRetherford hadleft E the Newmanitesciting psychologicalmanipula- Lallouchites and the Newmanites are very tion among other reasons. Hisspouse, Ann similar: Green, remainedin the organization andquite .1 reasooablysoughtto access theirchild. Greenand a A methodological betweenlink the psychologicalthe and political which l NewmaniteHarry Kreslry, an attorney,contacted the FBIand suggestedthat Retherfordwas a forms botha theoreticalworld-view and t| l l former memberof the Weatherman factionof ajusti cation forindoctrinating mem- bers throughso-called therapy . 1? . SDS, hadharbored WeatherUnderground fugi- tives, andwasin contact with JaneAlpert, afugi- o Psychologicallycoercive techniquesto tive theFBI wasparticularly keenon locating. manipulate members views andactions. tr Supporters Newmanof claimhe wasunaware a organizingstrategies target that accord- 3 of the contact with the FBI. However,a former ing tostratas sectorsor ratherthan so- member of Newman's Centersfor Change who cial class. CI joined and left NCLCwith Newman, and then 0 Attemptsto establish hegemonic _ ' <.:15. . -> . _ ~ ' relationshipswith othersimilar political groups, and,failing that,attempts un-to latersplitwiththeNewmanites,recallstheFBlin-dermitle thegroup and establish parallel organizations. , il cidentwaswidelyknownwithinNCLCandtheo Virulent and unprineipledattacks on critics. includinginsults, agent-baiting, threats attorneysby anddefamation law- Newmanite The[Centers CFCfaction. suits. for aa92 lXthe l Change/Newmanite] peoplefor the mos part o A sharedpolitical strategy vanguardism .3». stuck togelherwhile inthe NCl.C....denyingFred with rootsin Trotskyistpolitical theory!. Newman knewabout thecommunications with 0 Re-writingof thegroup's and political the FBIis utterlyabsurd." _' " organizational historyto meet current needs. _ I 'IheIntematiomlW 0 A closed and coverthierarchical internal After leaving NCLC, formedthe structure thath not necessarily con- _ ' The New- gruent with the publicorganizational manitedocument' dupontheirleavingNCl..C 5!l"lldlIl'G. gu andestablishingthel ernationalworkersParty Q Differentiationbetween internalin- l n 1970'slight of intheir subsequentactivities. All ~ three white maepolitical leaderssaw Marxist revolution th'rough theprism ofego-mania, and used psychologicallymanipulative techniquesto enforce obediencein the institutions they have built-institutions which sought political hegemony overother groups. 1 All threegroups sharemany elementsof a concluded thatin terms of theirpolitical theoryof E totalitarian movement as outlined by Hanna organi ng, theymake rciitcialdistinction be- - - - Arendt inThe Originsof Totalitariattism. In recent tween thecote cadre primarily white intellec- years therehas beena revisionist interpretation of tuals! andthe organic members primarily Arendt'slinking work, nazismand communismas peoplecolor!. of Accordingto King, the primari- ly-white intellectualvanguard trainedby Newman ir twosidesofthesameideologicalcoinordaiming § through therapy is in the processof using therapy toraise theconsciousness the of thatall communistor Marxistmovements primarily Black are and Latinorecruits sothat some totalitarian, or that only nazi and communist dayin thefuture theywill havethe wherewithalto ideologies canbecome totalitarian.Arendt actually leadthe organization...butnot yet.King speci cally repudiatesthis simplisticinterpreta- has describedthis as paternalistic racism." 92 tion ofher workwhen she writes ...ideologies of ~ the nineteenthcentury are not in themselves totalitarian," andthat althoughfascism andcom- Institutes for Social Therapy 8 munism became the decisiveideologies ofthe Dr. FredNewman's is doctoratenotin a health- twentieth centurythey werenot, inprinciple, any related field,but inthe philosophyof science and more totalitarian than others. According to foundations ofmathematics. Forseveral years I Arendt, the ideological victoryof fascismand i v psychologistsgroups and concernedabout cults communism overother twentiethcentury belief have questionedthe ethics of theprocess usedby structures was decided before the totalitarian the institutesfor SocialTherapy. Thesecriticisms movements tookhold of precisely these are crystallizedin the following statementby an ideologies asa vehicle,-for seizing andholding EastCoast Latinaactivistworkinginthearea of state power. ' support forCentral Americans: 1 A totalitarianmovement correctlyis de nedby k I rstcame intocontact withthe So- 5 itsstyle,structureandmetltodsnotbyitsstatcdor cial ThempyInstitutes dtmugha friend J apparent ideology. ,1 J-, who...said therewasayoup that o ered E therapy forpeoplewith progessiveviews. 1 The IntellectualVanguard so I went tosee what they o eted. '1 The earlytheoreticalwritingsoflakouche and I wastold everybodyhas problems. theearlyandcurrenttheoreticalwritingsNew- of which istrue everyone40¢-1. butthey use man reflecta derivative and heretical!form of that asan excuseto recruitpeople. Y ?l _ f,.. People withemotional problemsthink theyaregoingt/ be helpedbuttheydon't 'l'rotskyistMarxismthatisbothunusualandvir-h¢lPp¢vPl¢- Before ora erthetltempysessiovl. theywould say why notsell the tuallyuniqueontheAmericanleft. l'hissharedttewspapf. or maybe youcould dous a favorandhattdouttheselea ets-' 17te thempyo ices are tllofdteirpolitical theorybestdescribed as is an aberrant Mes-propaganda thegmupIn therapysome- sianic form,o"fTrotskyismwith anego-centric times wediscussed polidcsand their viewoftheirnportanceofthe individualleaderin political patty.people to get HQ r "'%§ 5-" *'* |. M _ they give anytreatment. This Q3 class andpeople ofcolor thatreflects politicala >1-|. I I I I l Talbot notedthat criticscall NAPthe La- t groupsthe list Newtnanitesasa cult. other criticsestablishedWashington, in theD.C. Rainbow '¢"* _ -Rot hiessay thecore of thethe Eult e-Left."Several theis Therapyof watchdog.Institute. cult ._l-QbbfRainbow ._ Alliance." billed__a_s TheThe Rainbow Lobbying LobbyOffice lll 5326:-" Of "" whilea few critics thinkthe entireNAP movement fices 236at MassachusettsAvenue, .E., N andlists displays cultaspects. Thosethat say the New- rnanite movementis totalitarian in style feel the Nancy Rossas Executive Director Tamaraand Weinstein asAssistant Director. I word cultis super uous,since totalitariangroups The RainbowLobby officehas beenfrequent- by de nitionenforce a high level blindof loyalty ly mistakenfor the Washington of Jof ce csse and unqucstioningobedience. Jackson'sCoalition, Rainbowmistake a inthat the As early as 1977,journalist DennisKing was past, NAPleadership to seems havegone of out I writing theof cult-likenature the of Newrnanites,its waynot toclarify. Newspaperarticles haveap- and interviewedFrank Touehet,a New York peared aboutNAP's Lobby Rainbowwhich in professional psychotherapistwho studiestherapy throughout.reporter the assumesthe Rainbow cults suchas theReichians andthe Sullivanians.Lobby representsJackson theand Rainbow t Afterstudyingthe therapygroupwhiehformstheCoalition¢ a circumstance NAP leadership could core ofNewman s followers,Touchet concluded:have easilyavoided explaining by upfrontthat the What youare dealingwith peopleis two groupsare unrelated, s who havebeen crintinallytampered with Jacksonhad has topublicly distancehimself in thedeepest fibersof their being, and and theRainbow Coalitionfrom NAP and its who have descended into a strange Rainbow Allianceand Rainbow Lobby severalon childlikeworld of dependency,which in occasions. Mostrecently Jacksontold Chicago .- the rationaljiurctions ofthe egoare relin- Sun-Tmes reporterBasil Talbotthat wehave no quished completelyto FredNewman - who regtlatestheir liveson themost relationship atall." ln thelune 21,1985 issueof the National Al-§¢_ . intimate leveL I ' ii lt isdi cult toresolvethe issueof psychologi- cal manipulationbecause thereare undoubtedly NAP supporterswho aresincere andgenuine in liance,anarticleonthcRainbowAllianc=shows i their beliefsand haveno connectionto the New- 5 4 manites, the[WP notthe SocialTherapy in- howartfullytbequestionofarelationshiphas5 stitutes. Still,most of the functional core er r leadershipNAP of hasa connection to the 1 1: Therapy Institutesand theNewmanite politicalbeeninpast: dodgedthe 1 philosophy. Ultimatelythe question of psychological manipulation,cultisrn cultand of i Hostile critics andcurious alliesare personalityonly can beresolved each by person forever sayingto Nancy Ross. Doe!. who comesinto contactwith NAPon thebasis of Jesse Jacksonsupport whatyou re -u I '2 doing?" within theframework one s of own to Ross. whoheads tlibWashington of- and wanness'about culttsm.' fice ofthe RainbowAlliance Confederation : lobbyingamt. ltd-1 Fl learned howto respond to such '-U .; 92, Opponnnismp. V s 5% K1» 1»-M' The pointis not whctherlesse Jack- 1 opportumsmthe Newmamtesof and theNew Al- sonsupportsrne. butwhetherlsuppon Z 0 I I I! _ toric tiesbetween Jesseand rnysel be- . cause I am committed to see that his vision ofa justsociety bebrought about Washington, D.C.which supportsimpor- today. " i l tant legislationthat a ectscivil, human, voting anddemocratic riyttsat home While admittedly clever. theabove explanation and abroad.For moreinfomiation on is essentiallya dishonest misrepresentation theof the Lobby.please contactNancy Rossat facts, designedto confuse the issueand suggesta 236 MassachusettsAve, N.E., Suite 409. connection where none exists. The confusion over Washington, D.C.20002 02! S43-8324. support fromJesse Jacksonand the Rainbow Coalition isexacerbated by how the New Alliance 77re RainbowLobby, Inc.is an inde- Party describesitself. TheFebruary 13,1987 edi- pendent lobby.not a iliatedwith the tion ofthe NationalAlliance newspapercontained Rainbow Coalitiwl, Inc. a centerfoldspread withthe rnulti-colorslogan The disclaimerbegan appearing during the it Thekeal Rainbow spanningthetwopages.A same timeperiod thatNAP launchedthe cam- letter onNew AllianceParty stationery to gayac- paign Lenoraof Fulanifor President. During 1987 the NAP began to publicly attack theRainbow tivistsonthewestcoasthadtheslogan ThePartyCoalition and in the National Alliance Lenora Fulani was quoted assaying Withall duerespect ofthe Rainbow. A petitioncalling an for inde- to Brother Jesse Jackson,almost everyoneknows :| pendent Black Presidential campaignwas titled he hasn tbuiltarealRainbow.J-letnighthave in- _._ __>Y An OpenLetter ToReverend JesseJ ackson. corporated somethingcalled theNational Rain- Ironically, ina 1983issue of the Newrnanite bow Coalition,lnc., but he hasn'tbuilt aRainbow. 4- .i -1 theoretical joumalPractice, Newmanattacked We've builta teal Rainbow." Jesse Jacksonand J aekson'sprogressive sup- Despite thecriticisms anddisclaimers, thereis R porters instrong terms: still much public confusionconcerning the v The U.S.ulrm-Left hastraditiortally relationship ofNAP tothe RainbowCoalition, su ered verybadly om a mentaldisor- and Jackson's candidacy. This con- derperhaps bestidatti ed as premature fusion isnot alleviatedby NAPpublic statements. T l For instancein the November Z3.1987 issueof the l rs.-':*li pastfewyears, beenapos iveattemptby National Alliance,Willhns Pleasantattacks the l some torectify thisproblem calledby Rainbow Coalition as the Democratic Party s some friendlyleft critics wrecltti eatian ! phony left wing". butthen writesthat Fulani-. L under her Two RoadsAreBetter'l'han0ne plan, which, however.has dealtmainly with l thesynptonuofthediseasebyessential- baelts ReverendJesse Jacksonin the Democratic ly helpingthe client to feel more com- Party primaries.But she ha doneeverything pos- fortable rnasnubating.Hence, someof sible toensure thatthe progressiveRainbow agen- 1» the recti edultra-lqt forenrmple sup- da willbe carried throughto thegeneral election porters of Jesse Jackson. in November... are smilinglycartvincingthernselves t.it L tltesedaysthatitisaltiglutouttite with SmenrlngCrltJs JacItsan s proyessiveaspectsi Many ~ < have raisedquestions asto whichpanof Among themost persistentcritics oftheNew JacItson sanatorny embodies his progessive'aspecu.' Alliancehrtyarefreelancewriterbennisliingof At the end of 1987 the National Alliance NewYork, author thethis of study,Chip Berlet andother members of thePublic EyeNetwork!, anq __ and two researchers whooften work closely /'/ A 17ieRainbowLobbyisaninde- Stern ofIllinois. In Ken Lawrenceand Dan pendentct'tizens'lobbybasedin SternprovidedinfonnationonNAPtoCharles Tisdale, publisherof the Jackson Advocate newspaperinMississippi.Tisdaleranasesiesof i Cloudabluttha alnbow - 11 1 articles critical of Newman and NAP in the Advo- cy with which NAP engaged in what critics con- cate, wh_i<_:h for many years hgs_se_rEd_ as a voice sidered disruptive tactics. Lily Mae Irwin, a well- for Black residents the area. known welfare rights activist toldthe Z vocare In response to the Advocate articles. NAP em- how, in 1985, NAP tried to merge with the gr0'- P -. barked on a smear campaign against its critics - a she was leading, the Mississippi Welfare Rights tactic it frequently employs. An article by William Organization. After she refused the merger idea, Pleasant in NAP s National Alliance newspaper she soon discovered NAP was scheduling their attacked Tisdale, Lawrence, Stern and Berlet. A meetings with her key organizers opposite the photograph of Tisdale whois Black! is accom- regular monthly Welfare Rights Organization panied by a bold headline which reads: Jackson meetings. Yes Siree, said lrwin, they were Advocate publisher Charles fisdale: The Advo- trying to hold meetings at the same time we were; _ cate has come to play the role of a Black front for they were trying to mess us up." Eddie Sandifer, a well-known Mississippi Gay ¥ I anationalnetworkthatisanestingplaceformm i rights activist. told the Advocate he resented the at r rze. ~ 4 'l hesamearticleclaimsthatDennisKingandclaimbyNAPthatitisthe partyofgays,lesbians, i their earlier false and sectarian charges of La- ticular, Sandifer was that NAP contacted Rouche affiliation or cultisnt. In fact, both Ber- several members of the Mississippi Gay Alliance if letandl ngstillstandbytheirearlier charges.! and invited them to NAP meetings, but did not Ken Lawrence and Dan Stern are described as contact him, the group s leader. "l think their pur- absorbed in another agenda, beyond sec- pose is to divide and conquer, said Sandifer. Pm ~lf,." . tarianism, bordering on straight out very suspicious of them....l m worried about what 92 provocateurism." NAP organizers also began cir- they are doing in Mississippi! ' culating charges that Ken Lawrence was a govern- A long-time gay activist in California voiced ment agent. similar concerns to the author after NAP spon- When Tisdale refused to back down from his sored a gay rights conference in that state. He H V __Y t criticisms of NAP, and continued to detail the feared the NAP wanted to duplicate the work of ~ A I »,. charges of other NAP critics, NAP chairwoman existing gay organizations as a way to build -1: Emily Carter responded by ling a defamation credibility and recruit new members for the NAP. l Y 3 lawsuit KenLawrence. against Tisdale, Ajudge thelacksan subsequently Advocate orderedandA woman activist in New York told the author i 1' Lawrencedroppedfromthelawsuit!.Aftertheof a call she received from a friend in England lawsuit was filed, when well-known organizer Flo 6 complainingofdisruptiveactivitiesbyaNAPor- I Kennedy accepted an invitation to spealtat aban- » quet SpulISOl ¢d by the Jackson Advocate, a self- ganizer who attended functions of a women'sl ;E described NAP member disrupted a press peace group. Disruption has been a hallmark of _§ conference with her by shouting You're a very NAPorganizing foryears. and reports ofthis na- v k stupid woman." Other critics of NAP are fre- ture have been consistently surfaced over the . l 99F'Y "' years from a wide variety of sources. F 1 * ml un:r. ~;u>< was/.~ .~»- . i1e¢92~<. » Oaeearlyexa'mpleofaNewmanite attemptto penetrate and manipulate a progressive organin- ii vb. Penetratiotiiind Disruption ofR|val'tion involved the now-defunct People's Party, a multi-racial progressive electoral party which Grou once earlyran 1978,Dr. according Benjamin to aSpock formerfor People's President. PartyIn 1-J ,-- - s -t-'~ '5 p ticsusedbythegroupistopenetrateaprogres- operatingwithin partyasasecretfaetionvnth . A Jackson siveorganizationandseektotakeitoverorreeruitAdvocate series on NAPwas the frequen- anundisclosedagendaasto their intentionsand away its membership. One of the themes in the plans. A 12 - Political Researetmssociates i -1 ire §-~' O ! The Newtnanites had told members of the People'sthat Party Nev/man s International Workers Partyhadgbeen disbanded,but the People s Partystumbled across a secret New- manite newslettermarked con dential intemal bulletin andbearing thename PartyBuilding. Ac- cording tcPony Building,the Newrnaniteswere recruiting insidethe People sParty andother progressivegroups to build a secret pre-party formation. Thecon dential Newrnanitenewslet- ter explainedit was being published functionto as intelligenceand communicationsnetworks, Serrctte wentpublic withhis chargesin Mississippi's AdvocateJackson newspaper. reportingonthesocialmovementofvariousstrata I leftthe parry because it continuedtoclaim it was Black-led-Iknew better, Serrette quotedis inparticular areas. as sayingin theJackson Advocate. I mean no Even thou ithe IWBwas supposedto have harm tothese powerfulBlack women,Emily dissolved, planswere outin Pony Build- Carter, LenoraFulani andBarbara Taylor.when ing forits FourthParty Plenary held inGary, In- I saythat....l knewfrom beingthere thatthey were dianain early1977. Themeeting broughttogether not leadingFred Newman he was leading representatives fromvarious Nennnanitefront them- that'swhy Ileft....l don'tfeel they can use groups organizedunder thepublic bannerof the Black-led continuouslywithout fallingon their Council ofIndependent Organizers. faces- falsehoodsjust won thold up under close Z . scrutiny. Depth ofBlack Lmdershlp Accordingtoserrette. NAPhadnorea1com- mitment toBlack-led independentpolitics. Ihad TheNewAlliance Partydoesengageinac- to thinkaboutmyreputationthen-ofpeoplewho ttté», support Blackcandidates. the as fol- continue tobelieve inme. After raising his lowingencerpt froma letterby NAP supporters criticisms internally,Serrette saidhe wascut off 1; .4 from theflow ofinformation withinthe party. It In l984m erenmpaigu'ng{or. got soI didn t know whenthey wereholding meet- ings oranything, saidSerrette. -2 lnthecourseofthelawsuitbyEmilyCarter i Reverendlesselaclrsormndwiutessingagainst Jacksonthe Advocate,Dennis Serrettewas called byCarter s attorneyto answer questions in a deposition.Serrette thoroughlydenounced Newman andhis followersas running a racist, sexist therapycult" thatput peopleof colorin é i Nationalin Fmncisco. SanConvendon public leadershippositions merelya window I92b Pmo92ednItead»ithiu|'ndependentdressing. Regardingthe New Alliance Party,Ser- Presidential campaigrfor theAfro- rette said: - ...ldon t believethat it .roopnic-in Ame:icancandidoteDennt'sLSenetteturns ofit beinga move- menr...Black. whiteand Latino.I think re innteconi-b:enln'ng33:t0te;wherethe it : an elitistovganization. lteertainlyse» pnltyhadmanngedtoseaueaeteisto - ves the purposesof its lender....t't a nus theballot. lie. itwas elendy0 tactical ...a meist WhattheletterfailstomentionisthatSerrette scheme usingBlack andLatino and left theNew AllianceParty afterunsuccessfully Asian peopletodo the bidding ofone struggling forleadership role for man. namelyFred _Newmnn.that : my optnton. ' and to useotherwhim Ht"-as BlaekNAPo & alswhohefelthadorganization-you Iatowdlmujlt thethempypmctice.r- altitlesbutnorealinf1uenceorcontroLAtfirst,No one challenges FredNewman. I have seenpeople maybearise afew Serrette,asapcintofpersonalandpolitiealprin- became obviousNAP leaderswere characterizing wovd.11tereisno.ntchd:ingasopposi- his reasonsfor leavingas primarilypersonal. and t, I O Q y Q would askthem todo. could demonstrate a dt erentwill or challengetq power,a iii erent political I wouldn'teven be surprised if they'd positiona ofmajor order. unless lte turn froma so-called le]'t_oiganizatiort ta______agreed withit in some way. a right-wingorganization a blink withof an eye.I think that theideological ques- __L__ Serrette saidhe cameto believe the promise tion thatis supposedly the thrust of who that theorganization eventuallywould turned be they callthemselves, Intemational over Blackto peoplewas lie,a andhe challenged WorkersPony, ' there s nothing more Newman onthe point: _ thana front itself- And I stated tohim, turnedover I certainlybelieve that[of] the New means, youlatow, resources,it means Alliance Party,and when I say front. I making policy,it means running person- just meanit sthe coverto cover. possibly nel...that'scontrol Black to me. Idon't theego of Fred Newmanand thecontrol understandit as just havinga Black face of so many individualsin termsojpowen in ahighplace.That snothingmore I than racismand nothingmore thanwin- Serrettc alsosaidthe therapywasnotvoluntary it and thatone Newmanassociate madethis clear: dow dressing. Shesaidthatitwasana ;f!'}'?V>'92 :3 orderthatifs <1 .1.» " * It sno differentfrom thesystem we seem ghtto inthis case.So Iraised you wantedto bepart of this organiza- i tion, youwill havetotake therapy be- those questionsto Fred and we had a Q I0 veryheated meeting. It wasa meetingin cause isit thebackbone our of which manyof theBlack leadershipwas tendency...shethat says comes as an there. order... frontthe govemingbody. It wasvery intense.We hadLenora [Fulani] makingcriticisrns...£mily Support Ministerfor Farrakhan. [Carter] makingcriticisms. therewas a When MinisterLouis Farrakhanaddressed a lot offolks making criticismssome of of New YorkCity rallyof his supporters in 1985, he the racismthat theyheretofore hadn't was greetedwitha telegram of support from the ._i mentionedto l- red. but hadtold meand then NAPmayoral candidateDr. LenoraFulani: P told otherBlacks ina whispertype kind It iswith deeprespect andthe most of way, the timesthat we were profound commitmentto theliberation ' >- together...andcame they forward of ourpeople Ithat welcanteyott to New Shortly afterthat meeting.according Ser- to York City,hope tlthatyourvisitwill - , rette, hisstature andtreatment other by NAP P bring us. as Blackpeople, leadership the i leaders changeddramatically. Serrettesaid he of allthis country :oppressed. a step 1 was notopposed therapy to on principle since he closer toatlrfreedont. l 2' believed manypeople are helped otherby forms NAP atthe timewas seeking a working of therapy.But therapyplayed different a in-role relationshipFarrakhalfs with Nationof Islam, i l side NAPaccording toSerrette: F ~ ~tMIm-we wvrvlrwinrpwele andmembersoibothgroupshadanendedeach to notonly operatein an organizational way. butalsoawayofcontmllingevery others conferences!-'ulaniwasnotnnawareof g, aspecttheir of lives...youcertainly the controversialnature someof Farralthan sof F <1 couldn'tanybody srrai ttenant. But it remarks regardingJewish peopleand other , groups.remain I concernedthat Minister I " " " s 'V Farr - s '-;1 canheinterpretedasantr _ . l "r-~ 3 =~l _ .. _ V_=. 2.»., A -ii . . ,.' .~. ... 9: I ';>- 7' _~..,_.4__. ___. f"_ » _ I, A ,__- , .:s= thirrpthatwereaskedoftltem...theyf3°""'5» ";,_ 'l°"d$ln 9:f'5"P°°'l" °h ° i {D woulddoanythingabout,he n<>lhi=st<>f==r justthatfmI=lh= 111° F t 14 Political. Research Associates 1* _ ___W . .- . pv- I _I l I~~o o a Minister Farrakhan slanguage isindeed a The connectionbetweenthe leadership of the cause forconcern, a'sare theactions ofhis or- New AllianceParty andthe NewmaniteSocial I ganization. InChicago, representativesof the Na- Therapy centersis manipulative and unethical.So tion ofIslam invitedthe authorof a book calling long asthere suchis a relationship, the NewAl- the NaziHolocaust hoaxa toshare their stage with lianceParty must be judgedin the context beingof other specialguests. Membersof anti-Jewish a politicalmoment thatlacks clarity concerning white racialistgroups havebeen invitedto attend basic moralissues involvingpersonal andpolitical Nation ofIslam events.Representatives the of Na- exploitation.can I-lowa group aspire moral to and ;I tion ofIslam havemade speecheswhere whitera- political leadershipwhen withone handit reaches cial characteristicshave beenheld up for ridicule. out tothose inneed ofemotional help,and with It istrue thatmany criticsof MinisterFarrak- the otherhand pointsto a related politicalor- ganizationas a cure? V han treat him in a racist manner.Further, manyof Farrakhan s statementsagainst politicalZionism Finally, issuethe the of apparentopportunistic and theactions ofthe stateof Israel in the Middle use ofthe Rainbow slogan isimportant tocon- East are,for whateverreason, incorrectlylabeled front. Thisis especiallytrue in Chicago Where I anti-Semitic." Howeverthereis ample documen- political ' eonsultam Don Rose,hardly political a tation that Farrakhan regularlyrnakcs references neophyte, thoughta Rainbow Lobby fundraiser aboutthe Jewish people thatreflect abigoted and that cameto his home wasrepresenting Jesse I stereotyped bias.This isnot a questionof seman- Jackson untilhe spotteda name he recognizedas tics, buta questionof prejudice. being involvedwith theNewmanites the on litera- ture.If a personwith politicalsophistication can ._,_ 1 make themistake, whatabout theaverage citizen? Condusions This continuedconfusion inthe citythat provides The refusalof the Newmanites todeal candid- ly with,and acceptcriticism for.the Lallouche abaseforlesselacksonandtherealllainbow period no- matterhow short-lived and the at- as tempt to provoke theFBI totarget formera mem- Coalitioncan serveonly weaken to Jackson's berandcritics, willcontinuetobeavalidissue to credibility amongpotential constituentswhose g. raise publiclyconcerning theNew AllianceParty rst crucialintroduction theto Rainbowmay well until that group s leadershipaccepts respon- be throughthe distortedprkm of the Newmanites sibility forthe actionsof itsfounders andcurrent and NAP. l colleagues. ' o 0 0 3* ;| -4 _, - > ol30. ID.Howeve:.lh:lIu=aofonlya fe92valhotuppeu>inthei:weeklyaews- PqI=.|h:Nlinnn|Al|ian|::.ndun|92yo ll|:i: ol cu"I:hum:aofH1ov@u- ||isu.o|-ponoffnahoalium $ipi can92ly.$yoHhennnbus dzydogetuedrumfnnlhelicqy p92uins|h:ylovl|v:In$hcuI|- Iy.Scnn:n u nlnaccun un_ hub : Oulywunn lhnq. l y 1|. It II-A ofn92embe1shipinlheNAPisIrillinpeal18'¢- gB1a Sf no one afe froni mkeepgomg&oth:npynd mNAPli|n:.Ancordi||gnoFeda:lEhcdonCom- n'sion lings.Belleco92n92vapnidno- , l nnmherslmclwgedfor iemlwiec.| ulof$7£l!l&u|0anh¢392oDuc:nha-W I - l'o|h:NAP,|ais|q|ue|u|ioui:lKofl9l7ua"eannhnt"bi:Fki nveua uenamesofpounpnducyformurl1ni;a.lvmnolnn'lAp-i|7Qnl|: exisung legnumnleorpninnomannouuidnli edn nlianlapoknspaaon coincxknoe. For I long time many l cr92!nF92|lnniwIQnign 'naNlion Al- thoughrd'mI.hcRainbo92vLobbyhadcon- NAP s slander?-3 necuons wulh Jesse Jackson : Rainbow Anu&'¢|lql:i_dnnNAP"s Main lopr men. Couliuou. Lanly. the Lobby? which 5 U kivb hadqumemd in Wadaingmu. D.C.. was tac:ics.Ah:nbeNAPlndpuinmdnu|ics obligedlopnuac schmeu-ialilcpin 92 wlnnF|udNevn_anqndnonnwwohnnaim:|o h:NewAli-q::Pmyvril:nbyJIvinTyn::.uAIn>Anaica|ndchai:dO:any-main. hailnming u: New Jewish AgendaNevYa|'k$&CuI|lnilPl1y.h:cnn:hd:dhinpo|:mic."ymnink.'One eI&kofnou u|:imofa|IlliuudaiphsvueanAI:o-Amaimnndavile a¢:tn'nun¢.sIl q:lut'nhsa iu-.|Q'udurithmmyNAPpol.icie:l92dponi- whueaudnnuuncewddheuinnanymiagluanovutexpeaianof-n-mar-q cuaudvrihllle philo- Anunhrexlqkdiqllnan on nas.|hln|ionn|guupndnpudu|no-Illi- BuI|'nvuln92nilaInd|ad pd'IiaI 'nnIinn.I92=zs:pli ed 92e islh:NAP schim|hn|Fuhniisoulheno92mcingNAP. Bcmnd this ' ' NAPpnain:dvilify 0|:[email protected]!B¢ill!Yi!|h:ylq:pennheBla¢ : hdJo:i||$0m|:s.|ntan.umuu|:sdo liunndlpiaianilpupuuloh lh -led"!. Mo¢ofN¢vYct'||In&Ihtp&|pn||nnlltiahlvehaen 92evi:- lb: Nuioall Aims: amp-pa emcasin hnafNAP"avi:iuu|hrnndohhnnandnm:k.MninanB¢rmghPresihn &zuo|:uny|h:NAPanomnnia- peuivekvish :a:dD iuhnhnnl dad |pu!yh|t."0ugmmMajcr0vn|ld nhnmplsu Forulnplm xnnymllh mA.'!92nNJAciq&p||dt lellnulunia live Ii iiy u'|:nauiq1nn'iwi|lnuIn:t. |aly ww%3@%%ad n N crindincdy,92vi|hNAP.", . 'liaMd|o'§*n:.'|id|lldn- hn¢qun&>at'NlA.'92vbync'- j'@'nnIhn:i¢ElbiIc- only In has aiq is pain at IlI IlI'2i%," &pd §0fln|Il17. I'Bl|nici||nbdl92qqc92l|Ili'Il:|||k~ Firihnhkcslchnxuuiapuii kikhii hnii M81- llusive Jewish uphnia Eh he h|II'i|l.1 hNAPkh$Q pda.hhu.0nnol'oI$nh|l'|b-qahinncqI_ 1Iieq'lpihNou nrdu&p. ievclhuyouczuldnmdoupullrdr . , _ NcI$IIdlht'Il$hl"Ja92i.|u_||ln§$d@pn|i|i¢nd& 7' I nynonnannlynunnanzonrle p fauyanvilcu innfn dwtnd-dmm n:n4:_'pabIdyu> cIp|h|¢nu92'n|!I rnn|inm.&vy- 1% gfhckainlinnudhuul indBil Inqi.