DOCSLIB.ORG

Geometry: the Line and the Circle VOL AMS / MAA TEXTBOOKS 44

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AMS / MAA TEXTBOOKS VOL 44 Geometry: The Line and the Circle VOL AMS / MAA TEXTBOOKS 44 Maureen T. Carroll and Elyn Rykken Geometry: The Line and the Circle Geometry: Geometry: The Line and the Circle is an undergraduate text with a strong narrative that is written at the appropriate level of rigor for an upper-level survey or axiomatic course in geometry. Starting with Euclid’s Elements, the book connects topics in Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry in an intentional and meaningful way, with historical context. The line and the circle are the principal characters driving the narrative. In every geometry considered—which include spherical, hyperbolic, and and Elyn Rykken Carroll T. Maureen taxicab, as well as finite affine and projective geometries—these two objects are analyzed and highlighted. Along the way, the reader contem- plates fundamental questions such as: What is a straight line? What does parallel mean? What is distance? What is area? There is a strong focus on axiomatic structures throughout the text. While Euclid is a constant inspiration and the Elements is repeatedly revisited with substantial coverage of Books I, II, III, IV, and VI, non-Euclidean geometries are introduced very early to give the reader perspective on questions of axiomatics. Rounding out the thorough coverage of axiomatics are concluding chapters on transformations and constructa- bility. The book is compulsively readable with great attention paid to the historical narrative and hundreds of attractive problems. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/text-44 AMS/ MAA PRESS TEXT/44 4-Color Process 496 pages on 50lb stock • Backspace 1 11/16'' 10.1090/text/044 Geometry: The Line and the Circle AMS/MAA TEXTBOOKS VOL 44 Geometry: The Line and the Circle Maureen T. Carroll Elyn Rykken Committee on Books Jennifer J. Quinn, Chair MAA Textbooks Editorial Board Stanley E. Seltzer, Editor Bela Bajnok Suzanne Lynne Larson Jeffrey L. Stuart Matthias Beck John Lorch Ron D. Taylor, Jr. Heather Ann Dye Michael J. McAsey Elizabeth Thoren William Robert Green Virginia Noonburg Ruth Vanderpool Charles R. Hampton 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 51-01. For additional information and updates on this book, visit www.ams.org/bookpages/text-44 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Carroll, Maureen T., 1966– author. | Rykken, Elyn, 1967– author. Title: Geometry: The line and the circle / Maureen T. Carroll, Elyn Rykken. Description: Providence, Rhode Island: MAA Press, an imprint of the American Mathematical Society, [2018] | Series: AMS/MAA textbooks; volume 44 | Designed for an upper-level college geometry course. | Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Identifiers: LCCN 2018034790 | ISBN 9781470448431 (alk. paper) Subjects: LCSH: Geometry–Textbooks. | Geometry–Study and teaching (Higher) Classification: LCC QA445 .C2985 2018 | DDC 516–dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2018034790 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary ac- knowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permit- ted only under license from the American Mathematical Society. Requests for permission to reuse portions of AMS publication content are handled by the Copyright Clearance Center. For more information, please visit www.ams.org/publications/pubpermissions. Send requests for translation rights and licensed reprints to [email protected]. © 2018 by the authors. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ⃝1 The paper used in this book is acid-free and falls within the guidelines established to ensure permanence and durability. Visit the AMS home page at https://www.ams.org/ 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 23 22 21 20 19 18 To our parents for their love, support and encouragement Contents Note to the Instructor xi Outline of the book xii Designing a course using this text xiii Note to the Reader xvii Acknowledgments xix 1 The Line and the Circle 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Which came first? 2 1.3 What is a straight line, anyways? 4 2 Euclid’s Elements: Definitions and Axioms 7 2.1 The Elements 7 2.2 Definitions 9 2.3 Postulates and common notions 12 3 Book I of Euclid’s Elements: Neutral Geometry 17 3.1 Propositions I.1 through I.8 18 3.2 Propositions I.9 through I.15 32 3.3 Propositions I.16 through I.28 and I.31 41 4 Spherical Geometry 59 4.1 What is a straight line, anyways? - Part 2 60 4.2 Triangles in Spherical geometry 65 4.3 Euclid’s axioms viewed in Spherical geometry 68 4.4 Neutral geometry on the sphere 71 4.5 Area in Spherical geometry 77 4.6 Trigonometry for spherical triangles 82 4.7 Uniquely spherical constructions 88 5 Taxicab Geometry 93 5.1 Points, lines, angles, distances and circles 94 5.2 Euclid’s postulates in Taxicab geometry 100 5.3 Congruence schemes in Taxicab geometry 101 5.4 The rest of Neutral geometry 102 6 Hilbert and Gödel 105 6.1 Axiomatic systems 106 6.2 A Four Point geometry 110 vii viii Contents 6.3 Hilbert’s axioms for Euclidean plane geometry 113 6.4 Spherical and Taxicab geometries 120 6.5 Gödel and consistency 123 7 Book I: Non-Neutral Geometry 127 7.1 Parallel lines 128 7.2 Propositions I.32 and I.33 132 7.3 Area 135 7.4 Propositions I.34 through I.41 138 7.5 Propositions I.42 through I.46 145 7.6 The Pythagorean Theorem 151 8 Book II: Geometric Algebra 159 8.1 Proposition II.1 through II.10 160 8.2 Propositions II.11 through II.14 165 8.3 Quadrature on the sphere 171 9 Book VI: Similarity 175 9.1 Book V: Ratio and proportion 176 9.2 Similarity 176 9.3 A generalized Pythagorean Theorem 184 10 Book III: Circles 189 10.1 Definitions 190 10.2 Tangency 193 10.3 Arcs, chords and angles 201 10.4 Area Propositions: III.35 through III.37 210 10.5 The circumference of a circle & 휋 216 11 Book IV: Circles & Polygons 221 11.1 Definitions 222 11.2 Circles & triangles 223 11.3 Circles & squares 236 11.4 Circles & pentagons 241 11.5 Constructing regular polygons 246 11.6 The area of a circle & 휋 251 12 Models for the Hyperbolic Plane 261 12.1 Historical overview 262 12.2 Models of the hyperbolic plane 266 12.3 Arc length & distance in the half-plane model 277 13 Axiomatic Hyperbolic Geometry 289 13.1 Parallel lines 291 13.2 Omega triangles 302 13.3 Saccheri quadrilaterals 307 13.4 Hyperbolic area 320 Contents ix 14 Finite Geometries 331 14.1 Four Point geometry - Part 2 332 14.2 Fano’s plane 335 14.3 Projective geometry 339 14.4 Affine planes 355 14.5 Transforming afine into projective 366 14.6 Open problem in finite geometry 370 15 Isometries 373 15.1 Rigid motions or isometries 374 15.2 Reflections 378 15.3 Isometries of the Euclidean plane 382 15.4 Inversions in the Euclidean plane 399 15.5 Isometries of the hyperbolic plane 406 16 Constructibility 415 16.1 Four famous problems of antiquity 416 16.2 Constructible numbers 419 16.3 Four counterexamples 429 16.4 The limits of geometry 435 Appendix A Euclid’s Definitions and Axioms 437 A.1 Definitions 437 A.2 Postulates 438 A.3 Common notions 438 Appendix B Euclid’s Propositions 439 B.1 Book I 439 B.2 Book II 442 B.3 Book III 443 B.4 Book IV 444 B.5 Book VI 445 Appendix C Visual Guide to Euclid’s Propositions 447 C.1 Book I 447 C.2 Book II 453 C.3 Book III 454 C.4 Book IV 456 Appendix D Euclid’s Proofs 457 D.1 Book I 457 Appendix E Hilbert’s Axioms for Plane Euclidean Geometry 461 Credits, Permissions and Acknowledgements 463 Bibliography 465 Notation Index 471 Index 473 Note to the Instructor This book is an introduction to Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry designed for an upper-level college geometry course. Its content and narrative grew out of our ex- perience teaching junior/senior level advanced geometry and history of mathematics courses for over twenty years. We have learned that, independent of ability and math- ematical maturity, most students have only faint memories of the synthetic Euclidean geometry that they studied in high school. This, coupled with the fact that mathemat- ics students rarely have occasion to read primary sources in their major, led us to take full advantage of the unique opportunity available in geometry and introduce our read- ers to the bible of mathematics, Euclid’s Elements. With Euclid as a guide, the reader begins by travelling along the same path as millions of geometry students spanning multiple millennia, continents and languages. Before beginning our journey with Euclid, we introduce the two most important and familiar geometric objects as our main characters, the line and the circle. These characters coincide with the Euclidean tools provided by the axioms at the start of the Elements. For us, they serve as a narrative touchstone as we periodically check in on them as we make our way through the Elements, noting that, while some books em- phasize the line, others highlight the circle. In Book I, for example, the line has the starring role in the proposition statements, but the circle is doing a lot of the heavy lift- ing behind the scenes within the proofs.
Recommended publications
  • Extending Euclidean Constructions with Dynamic Geometry Software

    Extending Euclidean Constructions with Dynamic Geometry Software

    Proceedings of the 20th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (Leshan, China, 2015) Extending Euclidean constructions with dynamic geometry software Alasdair McAndrew [email protected] College of Engineering and Science Victoria University PO Box 18821, Melbourne 8001 Australia Abstract In order to solve cubic equations by Euclidean means, the standard ruler and compass construction tools are insufficient, as was demonstrated by Pierre Wantzel in the 19th century. However, the ancient Greek mathematicians also used another construction method, the neusis, which was a straightedge with two marked points. We show in this article how a neusis construction can be implemented using dynamic geometry software, and give some examples of its use. 1 Introduction Standard Euclidean geometry, as codified by Euclid, permits of two constructions: drawing a straight line between two given points, and constructing a circle with center at one given point, and passing through another. It can be shown that the set of points constructible by these methods form the quadratic closure of the rationals: that is, the set of all points obtainable by any finite sequence of arithmetic operations and the taking of square roots. With the rise of Galois theory, and of field theory generally in the 19th century, it is now known that irreducible cubic equations cannot be solved by these Euclidean methods: so that the \doubling of the cube", and the \trisection of the angle" problems would need further constructions. Doubling the cube requires us to be able to solve the equation x3 − 2 = 0 and trisecting the angle, if it were possible, would enable us to trisect 60◦ (which is con- structible), to obtain 20◦.
  • Structure, Classification, and Conformal Symmetry, of Elementary

    Structure, Classification, and Conformal Symmetry, of Elementary

    Lett Math Phys (2009) 89:171–182 DOI 10.1007/s11005-009-0351-2 Structure, Classification, and Conformal Symmetry, of Elementary Particles over Non-Archimedean Space–Time V. S. VARADARAJAN and JUKKA VIRTANEN Department of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1555, USA. e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] Received: 3 April 2009 / Revised: 12 September 2009 / Accepted: 12 September 2009 Publishedonline:23September2009–©TheAuthor(s)2009. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract. It is known that no length or time measurements are possible in sub-Planckian regions of spacetime. The Volovich hypothesis postulates that the micro-geometry of space- time may therefore be assumed to be non-archimedean. In this letter, the consequences of this hypothesis for the structure, classification, and conformal symmetry of elementary particles, when spacetime is a flat space over a non-archimedean field such as the p-adic numbers, is explored. Both the Poincare´ and Galilean groups are treated. The results are based on a new variant of the Mackey machine for projective unitary representations of semidirect product groups which are locally compact and second countable. Conformal spacetime is constructed over p-adic fields and the impossibility of conformal symmetry of massive and eventually massive particles is proved. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 22E50, 22E70, 20C35, 81R05. Keywords. Volovich hypothesis, non-archimedean fields, Poincare´ group, Galilean group, semidirect product, cocycles, affine action, conformal spacetime, conformal symmetry, massive, eventually massive, massless particles. 1. Introduction In the 1970s many physicists, concerned about the divergences in quantum field theories, started exploring the micro-structure of space–time itself as a possible source of these problems.
  • Squaring the Circle a Case Study in the History of Mathematics the Problem

    Squaring the Circle a Case Study in the History of Mathematics the Problem

    Squaring the Circle A Case Study in the History of Mathematics The Problem Using only a compass and straightedge, construct for any given circle, a square with the same area as the circle. The general problem of constructing a square with the same area as a given figure is known as the Quadrature of that figure. So, we seek a quadrature of the circle. The Answer It has been known since 1822 that the quadrature of a circle with straightedge and compass is impossible. Notes: First of all we are not saying that a square of equal area does not exist. If the circle has area A, then a square with side √A clearly has the same area. Secondly, we are not saying that a quadrature of a circle is impossible, since it is possible, but not under the restriction of using only a straightedge and compass. Precursors It has been written, in many places, that the quadrature problem appears in one of the earliest extant mathematical sources, the Rhind Papyrus (~ 1650 B.C.). This is not really an accurate statement. If one means by the “quadrature of the circle” simply a quadrature by any means, then one is just asking for the determination of the area of a circle. This problem does appear in the Rhind Papyrus, but I consider it as just a precursor to the construction problem we are examining. The Rhind Papyrus The papyrus was found in Thebes (Luxor) in the ruins of a small building near the Ramesseum.1 It was purchased in 1858 in Egypt by the Scottish Egyptologist A.
  • A One-Page Primer the Centers and Circles of a Triangle

    A One-Page Primer the Centers and Circles of a Triangle

    1 The Triangle: A One-Page Primer (Date: March 15, 2004 ) An angle is formed by two intersecting lines. A right angle has 90◦. An angle that is less (greater) than a right angle is called acute (obtuse). Two angles whose sum is 90◦ (180◦) are called complementary (supplementary). Two intersecting perpendicular lines form right angles. The angle bisectors are given by the locus of points equidistant from its two lines. The internal and external angle bisectors are perpendicular to each other. The vertically opposite angles formed by the intersection of two lines are equal. In triangle ABC, the angles are denoted A, B, C; the sides are denoted a = BC, b = AC, c = AB; the semi- 1 ◦ perimeter (s) is 2 the perimeter (a + b + c). A + B + C = 180 . Similar figures are equiangular and their corresponding components are proportional. Two triangles are similar if they share two equal angles. Euclid's VI.19, 2 ∆ABC a the areas of similar triangles are proportional to the second power of their corresponding sides ( ∆A0B0C0 = a02 ). An acute triangle has three acute angles. An obtuse triangle has one obtuse angle. A scalene triangle has all its sides unequal. An isosceles triangle has two equal sides. I.5 (pons asinorum): The angles at the base of an isosceles triangle are equal. An equilateral triangle has all its sides congruent. A right triangle has one right angle (at C). The hypotenuse of a right triangle is the side opposite the 90◦ angle and the catheti are its other legs. In a opp adj opp adj hyp hyp right triangle, sin = , cos = , tan = , cot = , sec = , csc = .
  • Noncommutative Geometry and the Spectral Model of Space-Time

    Noncommutative Geometry and the Spectral Model of Space-Time

    S´eminaire Poincar´eX (2007) 179 – 202 S´eminaire Poincar´e Noncommutative geometry and the spectral model of space-time Alain Connes IHES´ 35, route de Chartres 91440 Bures-sur-Yvette - France Abstract. This is a report on our joint work with A. Chamseddine and M. Marcolli. This essay gives a short introduction to a potential application in physics of a new type of geometry based on spectral considerations which is convenient when dealing with noncommutative spaces i.e. spaces in which the simplifying rule of commutativity is no longer applied to the coordinates. Starting from the phenomenological Lagrangian of gravity coupled with matter one infers, using the spectral action principle, that space-time admits a fine structure which is a subtle mixture of the usual 4-dimensional continuum with a finite discrete structure F . Under the (unrealistic) hypothesis that this structure remains valid (i.e. one does not have any “hyperfine” modification) until the unification scale, one obtains a number of predictions whose approximate validity is a basic test of the approach. 1 Background Our knowledge of space-time can be summarized by the transition from the flat Minkowski metric ds2 = − dt2 + dx2 + dy2 + dz2 (1) to the Lorentzian metric 2 µ ν ds = gµν dx dx (2) of curved space-time with gravitational potential gµν . The basic principle is the Einstein-Hilbert action principle Z 1 √ 4 SE[ gµν ] = r g d x (3) G M where r is the scalar curvature of the space-time manifold M. This action principle only accounts for the gravitational forces and a full account of the forces observed so far requires the addition of new fields, and of corresponding new terms SSM in the action, which constitute the Standard Model so that the total action is of the form, S = SE + SSM .
  • Hyperbolic Geometry

    Hyperbolic Geometry

    Hyperbolic Geometry David Gu Yau Mathematics Science Center Tsinghua University Computer Science Department Stony Brook University [email protected] September 12, 2020 David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 1 / 65 Uniformization Figure: Closed surface uniformization. David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 2 / 65 Hyperbolic Structure Fundamental Group Suppose (S; g) is a closed high genus surface g > 1. The fundamental group is π1(S; q), represented as −1 −1 −1 −1 π1(S; q) = a1; b1; a2; b2; ; ag ; bg a1b1a b ag bg a b : h ··· j 1 1 ··· g g i Universal Covering Space universal covering space of S is S~, the projection map is p : S~ S.A ! deck transformation is an automorphism of S~, ' : S~ S~, p ' = '. All the deck transformations form the Deck transformation! group◦ DeckS~. ' Deck(S~), choose a pointq ~ S~, andγ ~ S~ connectsq ~ and '(~q). The 2 2 ⊂ projection γ = p(~γ) is a loop on S, then we obtain an isomorphism: Deck(S~) π1(S; q);' [γ] ! 7! David Gu (Stony Brook University) Computational Conformal Geometry September 12, 2020 3 / 65 Hyperbolic Structure Uniformization The uniformization metric is ¯g = e2ug, such that the K¯ 1 everywhere. ≡ − 2 Then (S~; ¯g) can be isometrically embedded on the hyperbolic plane H . The On the hyperbolic plane, all the Deck transformations are isometric transformations, Deck(S~) becomes the so-called Fuchsian group, −1 −1 −1 −1 Fuchs(S) = α1; β1; α2; β2; ; αg ; βg α1β1α β αg βg α β : h ··· j 1 1 ··· g g i The Fuchsian group generators are global conformal invariants, and form the coordinates in Teichm¨ullerspace.
  • Properties of Equidiagonal Quadrilaterals (2014)

    Properties of Equidiagonal Quadrilaterals (2014)

    Forum Geometricorum Volume 14 (2014) 129–144. FORUM GEOM ISSN 1534-1178 Properties of Equidiagonal Quadrilaterals Martin Josefsson Abstract. We prove eight necessary and sufficient conditions for a convex quadri- lateral to have congruent diagonals, and one dual connection between equidiag- onal and orthodiagonal quadrilaterals. Quadrilaterals with both congruent and perpendicular diagonals are also discussed, including a proposal for what they may be called and how to calculate their area in several ways. Finally we derive a cubic equation for calculating the lengths of the congruent diagonals. 1. Introduction One class of quadrilaterals that have received little interest in the geometrical literature are the equidiagonal quadrilaterals. They are defined to be quadrilat- erals with congruent diagonals. Three well known special cases of them are the isosceles trapezoid, the rectangle and the square, but there are other as well. Fur- thermore, there exists many equidiagonal quadrilaterals that besides congruent di- agonals have no special properties. Take any convex quadrilateral ABCD and move the vertex D along the line BD into a position D such that AC = BD. Then ABCD is an equidiagonal quadrilateral (see Figure 1). C D D A B Figure 1. An equidiagonal quadrilateral ABCD Before we begin to study equidiagonal quadrilaterals, let us define our notations. In a convex quadrilateral ABCD, the sides are labeled a = AB, b = BC, c = CD and d = DA, and the diagonals are p = AC and q = BD. We use θ for the angle between the diagonals. The line segments connecting the midpoints of opposite sides of a quadrilateral are called the bimedians and are denoted m and n, where m connects the midpoints of the sides a and c.
  • Descriptive Geometry Section 10.1 Basic Descriptive Geometry and Board Drafting Section 10.2 Solving Descriptive Geometry Problems with CAD

    Descriptive Geometry Section 10.1 Basic Descriptive Geometry and Board Drafting Section 10.2 Solving Descriptive Geometry Problems with CAD

    10 Descriptive Geometry Section 10.1 Basic Descriptive Geometry and Board Drafting Section 10.2 Solving Descriptive Geometry Problems with CAD Chapter Objectives • Locate points in three-dimensional (3D) space. • Identify and describe the three basic types of lines. • Identify and describe the three basic types of planes. • Solve descriptive geometry problems using board-drafting techniques. • Create points, lines, planes, and solids in 3D space using CAD. • Solve descriptive geometry problems using CAD. Plane Spoken Rutan’s unconventional 202 Boomerang aircraft has an asymmetrical design, with one engine on the fuselage and another mounted on a pod. What special allowances would need to be made for such a design? 328 Drafting Career Burt Rutan, Aeronautical Engineer Effi cient travel through space has become an ambi- tion of aeronautical engineer, Burt Rutan. “I want to go high,” he says, “because that’s where the view is.” His unconventional designs have included every- thing from crafts that can enter space twice within a two week period, to planes than can circle the Earth without stopping to refuel. Designed by Rutan and built at his company, Scaled Composites LLC, the 202 Boomerang aircraft is named for its forward-swept asymmetrical wing. The design allows the Boomerang to fl y faster and farther than conventional twin-engine aircraft, hav- ing corrected aerodynamic mistakes made previously in twin-engine design. It is hailed as one of the most beautiful aircraft ever built. Academic Skills and Abilities • Algebra, geometry, calculus • Biology, chemistry, physics • English • Social studies • Humanities • Computer use Career Pathways Engineers should be creative, inquisitive, ana- lytical, detail oriented, and able to work as part of a team and to communicate well.
  • Växjö University

    Växjö University

    School of Mathematics and System Engineering Reports from MSI - Rapporter från MSI Växjö University Geometrical Constructions Tanveer Sabir Aamir Muneer June MSI Report 09021 2009 Växjö University ISSN 1650-2647 SE-351 95 VÄXJÖ ISRN VXU/MSI/MA/E/--09021/--SE Tanveer Sabir Aamir Muneer Trisecting the Angle, Doubling the Cube, Squaring the Circle and Construction of n-gons Master thesis Mathematics 2009 Växjö University Abstract In this thesis, we are dealing with following four problems (i) Trisecting the angle; (ii) Doubling the cube; (iii) Squaring the circle; (iv) Construction of all regular polygons; With the help of field extensions, a part of the theory of abstract algebra, these problems seems to be impossible by using unmarked ruler and compass. First two problems, trisecting the angle and doubling the cube are solved by using marked ruler and compass, because when we use marked ruler more points are possible to con- struct and with the help of these points more figures are possible to construct. The problems, squaring the circle and Construction of all regular polygons are still im- possible to solve. iii Key-words: iv Acknowledgments We are obliged to our supervisor Per-Anders Svensson for accepting and giving us chance to do our thesis under his kind supervision. We are also thankful to our Programme Man- ager Marcus Nilsson for his work that set up a road map for us. We wish to thank Astrid Hilbert for being in Växjö and teaching us, She is really a cool, calm and knowledgeable, as an educator should. We also want to thank of our head of department and teachers who time to time supported in different subjects.
  • Cross-Ratio Dynamics on Ideal Polygons

    Cross-Ratio Dynamics on Ideal Polygons

    Cross-ratio dynamics on ideal polygons Maxim Arnold∗ Dmitry Fuchsy Ivan Izmestievz Serge Tabachnikovx Abstract Two ideal polygons, (p1; : : : ; pn) and (q1; : : : ; qn), in the hyperbolic plane or in hyperbolic space are said to be α-related if the cross-ratio [pi; pi+1; qi; qi+1] = α for all i (the vertices lie on the projective line, real or complex, respectively). For example, if α = 1, the respec- − tive sides of the two polygons are orthogonal. This relation extends to twisted ideal polygons, that is, polygons with monodromy, and it descends to the moduli space of M¨obius-equivalent polygons. We prove that this relation, which is, generically, a 2-2 map, is completely integrable in the sense of Liouville. We describe integrals and invari- ant Poisson structures, and show that these relations, with different values of the constants α, commute, in an appropriate sense. We inves- tigate the case of small-gons, describe the exceptional ideal polygons, that possess infinitely many α-related polygons, and study the ideal polygons that are α-related to themselves (with a cyclic shift of the indices). Contents 1 Introduction 3 ∗Department of Mathematics, University of Texas, 800 West Campbell Road, Richard- son, TX 75080; [email protected] yDepartment of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; [email protected] zDepartment of Mathematics, University of Fribourg, Chemin du Mus´ee 23, CH-1700 Fribourg; [email protected] xDepartment of Mathematics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; [email protected] 1 1.1 Motivation: iterations of evolutes . .3 1.2 Plan of the paper and main results .
  • 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Lines, and Planes

    1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Lines, and Planes

    Understanding Points, 1-11-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Lines, and Planes Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Objectives Identify, name, and draw points, lines, segments, rays, and planes. Apply basic facts about points, lines, and planes. Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Vocabulary undefined term point line plane collinear coplanar segment endpoint ray opposite rays postulate Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes The most basic figures in geometry are undefined terms, which cannot be defined by using other figures. The undefined terms point, line, and plane are the building blocks of geometry. Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Points that lie on the same line are collinear. K, L, and M are collinear. K, L, and N are noncollinear. Points that lie on the same plane are coplanar. Otherwise they are noncoplanar. K L M N Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Example 1: Naming Points, Lines, and Planes A. Name four coplanar points. A, B, C, D B. Name three lines. Possible answer: AE, BE, CE Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Example 2: Drawing Segments and Rays Draw and label each of the following. A. a segment with endpoints M and N. N M B. opposite rays with a common endpoint T. T Holt Geometry 1-1 Understanding Points, Lines, and Planes Check It Out! Example 2 Draw and label a ray with endpoint M that contains N.
  • Read Book Advanced Euclidean Geometry Ebook

    Read Book Advanced Euclidean Geometry Ebook

    ADVANCED EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Roger A. Johnson | 336 pages | 30 Nov 2007 | Dover Publications Inc. | 9780486462370 | English | New York, United States Advanced Euclidean Geometry PDF Book As P approaches nearer to A , r passes through all values from one to zero; as P passes through A , and moves toward B, r becomes zero and then passes through all negative values, becoming —1 at the mid-point of AB. Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. In Elements Angle bisector theorem Exterior angle theorem Euclidean algorithm Euclid's theorem Geometric mean theorem Greek geometric algebra Hinge theorem Inscribed angle theorem Intercept theorem Pons asinorum Pythagorean theorem Thales's theorem Theorem of the gnomon. It might also be so named because of the geometrical figure's resemblance to a steep bridge that only a sure-footed donkey could cross. Calculus Real analysis Complex analysis Differential equations Functional analysis Harmonic analysis. This article needs attention from an expert in mathematics. Facebook Twitter. On any line there is one and only one point at infinity. This may be formulated and proved algebraically:. When we have occasion to deal with a geometric quantity that may be regarded as measurable in either of two directions, it is often convenient to regard measurements in one of these directions as positive, the other as negative. Logical questions thus become completely independent of empirical or psychological questions For example, proposition I. This volume serves as an extension of high school-level studies of geometry and algebra, and He was formerly professor of mathematics education and dean of the School of Education at The City College of the City University of New York, where he spent the previous 40 years.