Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies Website of the Expert Community of Belarus «Nashe Mnenie» (Our Opinion)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies Website of the Expert Community of Belarus «Nashe Mnenie» (Our Opinion) 1 BELARUSIAN INSTITUTE FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES WEBSITE OF THE EXPERT COMMUNITY OF BELARUS «NASHE MNENIE» (OUR OPINION) BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 A survey and analysis of developments in the Republic of Belarus in 2010 Minsk, 2011 2 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 Compiled and edited by: Anatoly Pankovsky, Valeria Kostyugova Prepress by Stefani Kalinowskaya English version translated by Mark Bence, Volha Hapeyeva, Andrey Kuznetsov, Vladimir Kuznetsov, Tatsiana Tulush English version edited by Max Nuijens Scientific reviewers and consultants: Miroslav Kollar, Institute for Public Affairs, Program Director of the Slovak annual Global Report; Vitaly Silitsky, Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS, Lithuania); Pavel Daneiko, Belarusian Economic Research and Outreach Center (BEROC); Andrey Vardomatsky, NOVAK laboratory; Pyotr Martsev, BISS Board member; Ales Ancipenka, Belaru- sian Collegium; Vladimir Dunaev, Agency of Policy Expertise; Viktor Chernov, independent expert. The yearbook is published with support of The German Marshall Fund of the United States The opinions expressed are those of the authors, and do not necessari- ly represent the opinion of the editorial board. © Belarusian Institute for Strategic ISSN 18224091 Studies 3 CONTENTS EDITORIAL FOREWORD 7 STATE AUTHORITY Pyotr Valuev Presidential Administration and Security Agencies: Before and after the presidential election 10 Inna Romashevskaya Five Hundred-Dollar Government 19 Alexandr Alessin, Andrey Volodkin Cooperation in Arms: Building up new upon old 27 Andrey Kazakevich Parliament: An ornamental element of «law-making» 37 Zmicier Kuhley Local Authorities: Self-government sacrificed to liberalization 45 ELECTION Vladimir Rovdo Presidential Campaign 52 Sergey Nikolyuk Presidential Election: Sociology of electoral stability 63 4 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 FOREIGN POLICY Valeria Kostyugova, Anatoly Pankovsky Russian-Belarusian Relations: Ultimate dependence 71 Dzianis Melyantsou Belarus EU: Dialogue anticipating the elections 78 Andrey Fyodorov Belarus U.S.: From dialogue to sanctions 87 Kamil Klysinski Polish-Belarusian Relations: Another crisis 94 Gennady Maksak Belarus Ukraine: New emphases open opportunities 100 Vladimir Dunaev Regional Integration in Eastern Europe 109 Siarhei Bohdan Belarusian Policy in the Developing World in 2010: Cautious money-making 122 SOCIETY Inna Fedotova, Vitaly Belovsky Civil Society: Hyperactivity with a view to future performance 133 5 Yury Chausov Party Theatrics for Political Process 150 Natallia Vasilevich Religious Sphere: In the run-up to the presidential campaign 162 Svetlana Matskevich Belarusian Education: A short-term victory or a long-term loss? 176 Alexandr Gritsanov Science: New goals indicate decline 188 Boris Tasman Sports: Olympic ups and doping downs 194 Nadezhda Yefimova Public Opinion: Yearly dynamics and certain results 203 ECONOMY Dmitry Kruk Macroeconomic Situation: Growth at any cost 216 Alexandr Mukha Belarus Foreign Exchange Market and Banking System 233 Kiryl Hajduk Labor Market and Social Policy: Post-crisis recovery amid presidential election 240 6 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 Alyona Rybkina Energy Sector: Rent cuts 250 Maria Akulova Foreign Investments: Not only lure them, but make them work 258 Konstantin Skuratovich Agriculture: Growth amid poverty 267 APPENDIX. BISS Trends reviews 275 AUTHORS 337 7 EDITORIAL FOREWORD The Belarusian Yearbook is a longterm joint project of Belarus’ ex pert community. This publication presents an integral analysis of the state of affairs in essential domains of state and society on an annual basis. The presidential election campaign of 2010 predetermined the developments in almost every segment of social and state life, while the finale of the campaign – the brutal dispersion of the rally in the Independence Square – has already had an impact on all aspects of state life with no exception (including the sectors that have traditionally stayed out of politics – sports, popculture, etc.) Below are the key trends of the year 2010, based on a complex contentanalysis of the Yearbook’s texts: • Decisionmaking authority is concentrated within a progressive ly narrowing group of people who bear no responsibility whatso ever for implementation; • The deteriorating state administration crisis manifested itself in a misalignment of policies pursued by state institutions, primarily due to the widening gap between those making decisions and those responsible for implementation; • The series of successful attempts to fit into the regional political and economic context through modifications of the foreign polit ical paradigm became a trend that was ruined by lateyear devel opments; • Less successful, but not less persistent attempts to overcome the isolation of the state and society were made throughout the year by both sides, but then again, the outcomes of the December 2010 events froze all the positive trends; • Belarus has made a name in the global economic system, mostly as a borrower, and completed the year as a debtor with vague re payment prospects. Contributing to this Yearbook were independent analysts and experts, as well as specialists representing various think tanks, including the Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies (BISS), the Institute for Political Studies “Political Sphere”, the Research Center of the Institute for Privatization and Management, the Agency of Humanitarian Technologies – Centre for Social Innovation, NOVAK Axiometrical Research Laboratory, the Independent Institute of Socio Economic and Political Studies (IISEPS), the Belarusian Economic 8 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 Research and Outreach Center (BEROC), the Centre for Eastern Studies (Warsaw, Poland), the Polesski Fund of International and Regional Studies (Chernigov, Ukraine), eBelarus Research Center. As a joint effort, the Yearbook is designed to promote public discussions about current transformations in Belarus and development options the country has, and facilitate the work of state functionaries, business managers, members of the diplomatic corps, journalists, politicians and community leaders. Valeria Kostyugova Anatoly Pankovsky Vitaly Silitsky 9 STATE AUTHORITY 10 BELARUSIAN YEARBOOK 2010 PRESIDENTIAL ADMINISTRATION AND SECURITY AGENCIES: BEFORE AND AFTER THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION Pyotr Valuev Summary The process of transformation of Belarusian security agencies started after Viktor Sheyman vacated the office of state secretary of the Security Council that also entailed reauthorization and reallocation of duties in other security agencies. As a result, special services and security agencies were actually subordinated to the Presidential Administration, or, to be more exact, to President’s National Security Aide Viktor Lukashenko, the eldest son of the Belarusian president. Control over the strongest and most effective special services is thus concentrated in “one hand.” The changes above, and also the 19 December events and the crackdown on the opposition that followed, interrupted the dialogue with the European Union, which was one step away from recognition of Lukashenko’s Victory (on certain terms) and aiding him financially. Given the substantial disagreements among Belarus and Russia, Alexander Lukashenko faces not easily soluble problems, first of all economic, caused by the lack of resources to keep the present model functioning. Besides, there were other serious problems inside the country, specifically the dropping popularity rating on the threshold of the election, the opposition backed by the West, functionaries uncertain about their future, special services balled in “one fist”, the lack of a consolidating ideological core, and so on. In 2011, Alexander Lukashenko will keep trying to balance between Russia, the West, and home policy vectors. Tendencies: • De jure and/or de facto, security agencies and special services found themselves underfoot of the Presidential Administration, to be more exact, President’s National Security Aide Viktor Lukashenko; • Inconsistency of actions and misunderstanding throughout the past year (including the pre8election period) within the “opposition8Europe8 Lukashenko” triangle resulted in the 19 December events and reprisals that followed, against the background of the frozen dialogue with Europe. Reform called “Viktor Lukashenko” In contemporary Belarus, the hierarchy of governmental agencies is less important than the person who controls it all. The Security Coun cil used to supervise special services before 2008. The Presidential State authority 11 Administration or, as a matter of fact, President’s National Security Aide Viktor Lukashenko, took over control. As a result, the Security Council turned into an advisory board. Although Viktor Lukashenko is a member himself, it did not enable the Council to make any partic ular decisions. Realignment of human resources began in 2008 and gained momentum in the autumn of the same year after Viktor Sheyman resigned his office of secretary general of the Security Council. Viktor Lukashenko controlled security agencies singlehandedly in 2009 and 2010. He certainly made use of advice from more experienced fellows, who had been building up political muscle for years in top floor offices. However, the 2009 and 2010 personnel reshuffles were initiated by Viktor Lukashenko personally. A few scandals surfaced at that time, namely the criminal charges pressed against officers of the State Control Committee’s Financial Investigations Department and highranking KGB officers. Essential changes occurred in
Recommended publications
  • The Generation Gap, Or Belarusian Differences in Goals, Values and Strategy 2 3
    1 The Generation Gap, or Belarusian Differences in Goals, Values and Strategy 2 3 The Generation Gap, or Belarusian Differences in Goals, Values and Strategy Edited by Andrej Dynko 4 Komitet Redakcyjny: Andrzej Sulima-Kamiński, Valer Bulhakau, Andrej Dynko, Eulalia Łazarska, Amanda Murphy. © Copyright by Wyższa Szkoła Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego w Warszawie, Instytut Przestrzeni Obywatelskiej i Polityki Społecznej, Warszawa 2008 Projekt jest współfinansowany przez National Endowment for Democracy. Oficyna Wydawnicza Wyższej Szkoły Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego 02-662 Warszawa ul. Świeradowska 43 tel. 022 54-35-450 e-mail: [email protected] www.lazarski.edu.pl ISBN 978-83-60694-19-0 Materiały z konferencji w dniach 3-5 czerwca 2006 r. Nakład 300 egz. DegVXdlVc^Z`dbejiZgdlZ!Ygj`^degVlV/ 9dbLnYVlc^Xon:A>EH6! ja#>c[aVcX`V&*$&.-!%%"&-.LVghoVlV iZa#$[Vm%''+(*%(%&!%''+(*&,-*! Z"bV^a/Za^ehV5Za^ehV#ea!lll#Za^ehV#ea 5 CONTENTS Andrzej Sulima Kaminski. A few words of introduction ............................................7 THE GENERATION GAP: THE MOTOR OR THE BRAKES ? Jan Maksymiuk. Is the Belarusian Oppositio n Losing the Battle for Young Minds? ................................................................................................. 13 Dzianis Mieljancou. The Change of Generations within the Belarusian Opposition: Is There a Conflict? .................................................. 18 Walter Stankevich. A New Wave of Emigrants: Varied Goals and Values ............... 22 Ales Mikhalevich. Generations
    [Show full text]
  • Part Two: Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss
    Part Two Administrative Organization, Balance Sheet and Profit and Loss Account of Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran As at the end of 1390 (March 19, 2012) EXECUTIVE BOARD Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor Seyyed Hamid Pour Mohammadi (as of 18.07.1388) Deputy Governor Seyyed Mahmoud Ahmadi (as of 09.10.1388) Secretary General Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (as of 21.04.1390 Vice-Governor for Foreign until 28.08.1390) Exchange Affairs Minoo Kianirad (as of 28.08.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Hossein Ghazavi (as of 29.07.1388 Vice-Governor for Economic Affairs until 23.08.1390) Bahman Mesgarha (as of 09.10.1388) Vice-Governor for Administrative and Training Affairs Hossein Habibi (as of 19.03.1388) Vice-Governor for Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Ebrahim Darvishi (as of 10.09.1390 Vice-Governor for Banking Supervision Affairs Hamid Borhani (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for Foreign Exchange Affairs Seyyed Kamal Seyyed Ali (until 21.04.1390) Vice-Governor for International Affairs 138 MONEY AND CREDIT COUNCIL Mahmoud Bahmani (as of 02.07.1387) Governor of the Central Bank Seyyed Shamseddin Hosseini (as of 23.04.1388) Minister of Economic Affairs and Finance Ebrahim Azizi (as of 07.07.1388) President Deputy for Strategic Planning and Control Abdolreza Sheikholeslami (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Cooperatives, Labor, and Social Welfare Mehdi Ghazanfari (as of 12.05.1390) Minister of Industry, Mine, and Trade Sadeq Khalilian (as of 11.08.1390) Minister of Jihad-e Agriculture Kurosh Parvizian (as of 08.05.1390)
    [Show full text]
  • Russia's Military Doctrine
    Conflict Studies Research Centre Occasional Brief 77 OB77 Russia’s Military Doctrine Dr S J Main Russia's military doctrine was signed by Russia’s newly-elected head of state, V Putin, and passed into law on 21st April 2000.1 There are a number of differences between the Doctrine as passed in April 2000 and the draft which appeared in October 19992, both in content and in the layout of the text. This brief paper will set out to highlight the changes between the two documents, as well as providing an analysis of what these changes could mean in terms of Russia’s future military-strategic stance. As usual, time will probably reveal the real importance of the measures described below. For convenience, the contents of the two versions are summarised in an Annex to this paper. From the opening words of the April 2000 officially approved doctrine, there is already apparent an important difference between this and the October 1999 draft: in the latter, the opening preamble described the nature of the world’s security system being caught between the establishment of a multi- polar system (where the security concerns of one state are not allowed to dominate the security concerns of the other states of the world) and a uni- polar system (where the security concerns of a single state are allowed to dominate those of the rest). In the 2000 April doctrine, there is no mention of this. After the preamble, the opening section, “military-political principles: the military-political situation” in both versions is virtually the same, with the exception of the addition of the phrase, “on the high seas” in the April 2000 doctrine, in the section concerning “main threats to military security”, sub- section on “attacks (armed provocations)”.
    [Show full text]
  • Яюm I C R O S O F T W O R
    Belarusian Association of Journalists (BAJ) MASS MEDIA IN BELARUS 2004 ANNUAL REPORT Minsk 2005 C O N T E N T S INFRINGEMENTS OF FREEDOM OF MASS INFORMATION IN BELARUS IN 2004. REVIEW /2 STATISTICAL BACKGROUND /3 CHANGES IN THE LEGISLATION /5 INFRINGEMENTS OF RIGHTS OF MASS-MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS, CONFLICTS IN THE SPHERE OF MASS-MEDIA Criminal cases for publications in mass-media /13 Encroachments on journalists and media /16 Termination or suspension of mass-media by authorities /21 Detentions of journalists, summoning journalists to law enforcement bodies. Warnings of the Office of Public Prosecutor /29 Censorship. Interference in professional independence of editions /35 Infringements related to access to information (refusals in granting information, restrictive use of institute of accreditation) /40 The conflicts related to reception and dissemination of foreign information or activity of foreign mass-media /47 Economic policy in the sphere of mass-media /53 Restriction of the right on founding mass-media /57 Interference with production of mass-media /59 Hindrance to distribution of mass-media production /62 SENSATIONAL CASES The most significant litigations with participation of mass-media and journalists /70 Dmitry Zavadsky's case /79 Belarusian periodic printed editions mentioned in the monitoring /81 1 INFRINGEMENTS OF FREEDOM OF MASS INFORMATION IN BELARUS IN 2004. REVIEW The year 2004 for Belarus was the year of parliamentary elections and the referendum. As usual during significant political campaigns, the pressure on mass-media has increased in 2004. The deterioration of the media situation was not a temporary deviation after which everything usually comes back to normal, but represented strengthening of systematic and regular pressure upon mass- media, which continued after the election campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Belarus in 2016
    2016 Minerals Yearbook BELARUS [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior February 2020 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Belarus By Elena Safirova Belarus’s mineral production enterprises included a potash The total value of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Belarus’s mining company, three metallurgical steel plants, a nitrogen economy in 2016 was $6.9 billion, which was a 4.3% decrease production enterprise, and two crude petroleum refineries. compared with the FDI in 2015. The mineral sector received Belarus was the third-ranked country among the world’s potash only 2.3% of the total foreign investment. Russia provided producers following Canada and Russia (Jasinski, 2018). 51.5% of the total FDI and was the main source of foreign The country’s only mineral production enterprise that played investment in 2016 (National Statistical Committee of the a major role in world markets was its potash mining firm Republic of Belarus, 2017, p. 423–438). OAO Belaruskali. Belarus does not have significant resources In 2016, Belarus exported $23.5 billion worth of goods, which of mineral fuels within its territory; however, its energy was an 11.7% decrease compared with the total export revenue infrastructure includes an extensive network of oil pipelines in 2015. Belarus also imported $27.6 billion worth of goods, and gas pipelines, which position the country as an important which was an 8.9% decrease compared with the value of imports participant in the transportation of oil and natural gas to in 2015. In 2016, Belarus exported 13.0 Mt of refined petroleum Europe from Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • 171101 Final PRODOC Autom
    UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Project of the Republic of Belarus Project number: ID 170165 Project title: Institutional strengthening and policy support to upgrade the component manufacturers in the automotive sector in the Republic of Belarus Project phase Phase II Thematic area code GC2 Advancing Economic Competitiveness Starting date: Phase I: 2014–2017 Phase II: 2017–2019 Duration: Phase I: 30 months Phase II: 15 months Project site: Republic of Belarus Government Coordinating agency: National Academy of Sciences of Belarus Main counterpart: Ministry of Economy and Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Belarus Executing agency: UNIDO Donor: Russian Federation Project Inputs Phase I: - Project costs: USD 880,530 - Support costs 13%: USD 114,470 - Total project costs: USD 995,000 Project Inputs Phase II: - Project costs: USD 398,230 - Support costs 13%: USD 51,770 - Total project costs: USD 450,000 (the Russian voluntary contribution to UNIDO IDF) Brief description: The overall objective of the project is to assist the automotive component suppliers in the Republic of Belarus to meet the requirements of Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and the first-tier automotive component manufacturers. More specifically, the project foresees: Enhancing the performance of participating suppliers in the automotive component industry in the Republic of Belarus to ensure their international competitiveness through enterprises oriented direct shop floor interventions, at a first step on a pilot-bases, and finally through selected business support and advisory institutions. Upgrading the relevant support institutions through strengthening institutional set-up, optimization of the service portfolio and development of a base of well-trained national engineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Gender and Complaints Mechanisms
    GENDER AND COMPLAINTS MECHANISMS A Handbook for Armed Forces and Ombuds Institutions to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Related Discrimination, Harassment, Bullying and Abuse Megan Bastick DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law GENDER AND COMPLAINTS MECHANISMS A Handbook for Armed Forces and Ombuds Institutions to Prevent and Respond to Gender-Related Discrimination, Harassment, Bullying and Abuse Megan Bastick DCAF DCAF a centre for security, development and the rule of law The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces (DCAF) is an international foundation whose mission is to assist the international community in pursuing good governance and reform of the security sector. DCAF develops and promotes norms and standards, conducts tailored policy research, identifies good practices and recommendations to promote democratic security sector governance, and provides in‐country advisory support and practical assistance programmes. Visit us at www.dcaf.ch. Published by DCAF Maison de la Paix Chemin Eugène‐Rigot 2E 1202 Geneva Switzerland www.dcaf.ch ISBN 978‐92‐9222‐372‐4 Project leaders: Hans Born and Megan Bastick Design: Alice Lake‐Hammond, www.alicelh.co Cover photo: Norwegian Home Guard during an exercise in Norway © Ole Gunnar Henriksen Nordli/Norwegian Armed Forces taken on September 29, 2011. © 2015 DCAF Cite as: Bastick, Megan, Gender and Complaints Mechanisms: A Handbook for Armed Forces and Ombuds Institutions (Geneva: DCAF, 2015). The views expressed are those of the author alone and do not necessarily reflect the views of the institutions referred to or represented within this handbook. All website addresses cited in the handbook were available and accessed in July 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Present State and Prospects for Development of Belarusian Air Force
    The Copernicus Journal of Political Studies 2019 No. 1/2019, pp. 21– 42 ISSN 2299-4335 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/CJPS.2019.002 www.apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/CJPS Arkadiusz Czwołek Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń PRESENT STATE AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF BELARUSIAN AIR FORCE ABSTRACT After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Belarus inherited a substantial fleet of warplanes . The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe, effective since 1992, obliged Belarus to reduce its air force . In 1996–2010 Belarusian air force underwent the majority of organizational changes . Limited technological and financial resources contributed to gradual reduction of Belarusian military aviation . Today Belarusian air force is not able to replace the recalled warplanes with new constructions . In the immediate years the difficulties of Belarusian air force should be expected to grow as the combat potential decreases . Key words Belarus, security, army, air force, modernization Introduction In 1991 Belarus proclaimed independence . At the end of January 1992 the process of recalling tactical nuclear weapons from its territory to Russia was initiated . As early as in August 1991 the armed forces deployed in the Belarusian territory, except the strategic forces, went under supervision of the Council of Ministers . 22 Arkadiusz Czwołek In March 1992 the Supreme Council passed the law “On the Armed Forces of the Republic of Belarus”, which paved the way for the formation of the state’s own armed forces . At that time in Belarus there were stationed around 700 warplanes of various kinds (e g. fighters, bombers, attack helicopters, cargo planes) that earlier belonged to the Soviet Air Defence Forces, the Soviet Air Forces, Long- Range Aviation, Military Transport Aviation, and the Baltic Fleet of the Navy .
    [Show full text]
  • English Version of This Report Is the Only Official Document
    Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights REPUBLIC OF BELARUS PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS 23 September 2012 OSCE/ODIHR Election Observation Mission Final Report Warsaw 14 December 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................1 II. INTRODUCTION AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS....................................................3 III. POLITICAL BACKGROUND.........................................................................................3 IV. LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND ELECTORAL SYSTEM..............................................4 V. ELECTION ADMINISTRATION ...................................................................................5 A. CENTRAL ELECTION COMMISSION.....................................................................................6 B. DISTRICT AND PRECINCT ELECTION COMMISSIONS..........................................................7 VI. VOTER REGISTRATION ...............................................................................................7 VII. CANDIDATE REGISTRATION .....................................................................................8 VIII. ELECTION CAMPAIGN ...............................................................................................10 A. CAMPAIGN ENVIRONMENT................................................................................................10 B. CAMPAIGN FINANCE..........................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Protests in Belarus (1994-2011) .Pdf
    Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources UPI "Belarus against Marks Russification of National Front of Independence 27 7 1994 Minsk 6500 0 Belarus Belarus Day" "the state's decision to discontinue eight [opposition] UPI "Belarussians 4 1 1995 Minsk 300 0 newspapers" protest press ban" " lower taxes, increase wages, create new jobs and enlarge AP "Thousands spending for health Rally In Minsk care, education Against Low Pay, 26 1 1995 Minsk 40000 0 and science." Unions Price Hikes" "introduction of teaching in the BBC World "Police Belarussian confiscate grenade language at higher at Belarussian educational Assembly of language 15 2 1995 unk 100 1 establishments," Belarussian Gentry demonstration" PAP News Wire Financing of "BELARUSSIAN construction of ASSOCIATION OF POLES DEMAND Polish language POLES IN POLISH SCHOOL 1 3 1995 Minsk 10 0 school BELARUS IN GRODNO" BBC World " Police arrest student activists Procession of for burning state 24 5 1995 Minsk 70 30 Uknown Political Convicts flag" ITAR-TASS "Minsk workers march on Police arrest presidential student activists residence in payment of back for burning state protest at wage 17 7 1995 Minsk . 0 wages flag arrears" AFP "Security forces arrest Minsk Minsk Metro metro strike 21 8 1995 Minsk 150 1 Metro strike Workers leaders" Number of Participants Number of Day Month Year Location (numeric) Arrests Topic Organizing Group Sources Interfax "Belarusian Popular Front Reconsideration of protests against oil oil agreement with
    [Show full text]
  • Belt and Road Initiative: the Role of Belarus
    20 April 2018 Belt and Road Initiative: The Role of Belarus Belarus, a landlocked nation in Eastern Europe bordering Russia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Ukraine, has caught rising interest among Hong Kong’s business community in recent years under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Going hand in hand with its role as a transport gateway linking China with the EU and CIS countries, it is seen as an increasingly open investment destination for manufacturing and high-tech developments. An Important Transport Node on the Silk Road Economic Belt Strategically located on the new Eurasia land bridge, eight rail container routes on the China-Western Europe trade pass through Belarus, enabling cargo to move much faster between China and Germany via Kazakhstan, Russia, Belarus and Poland, taking about 17 days. In comparison, sea freight takes around three weeks longer, although the freight cost of travelling by rail is about 60-70% higher. As shippers have become more receptive to the expanding rail container routes, more than 3,000 Sino-European trains used Belarus’s rail network in 2017. Belarus is a bridge between Europe (CIS and EU) and Asia. Source: Great Stone Industrial Park Two pan-European Corridors – II (Berlin-Moscow) and IX (Helsinki-Greece) – pass through Belarus, strengthening its position as a main trade and transport thoroughfare in the region. Standing at the border between Belarus and Poland is the Kozlovichi-Kukuryki checkpoint – one of the busiest cargo truck checkpoints between the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the European Union (EU). 1 Belt and Road Initiative: The Role of Belarus The Kozlovichi-Kukuryki checkpoint at the Belarusian-Polish border is one of the busiest cargo checkpoints between CIS and the EU.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    !"#$%&'()*'+' ,&)$%'* - ! ! . " / 0 / ! !10 - 1 2,(2 ')*(&1 3 4 - 5" 6 5 )*)2 . " / 0 / ! !10- Table of contents Commonwealth of Independent States: from integration processes to regional cooperation ...................................................................................... 3 Eurasian Economic Union: Focusing on Long-Term Priorities ................ 14 Belarus-Russia: regions expand partnerships ............................................ 24 Belarus: Toward Export Diversification ..................................................... 38 Belarus: Priority - Integrated Regional Development................................. 50 Belarus: Investment and Export Locomotives for Regional Development 60 Great Stone Industrial Park: The goal is to innovate .................................. 72 Belarusian Universal Commodity Exchange: To make the most of its potential ....................................................................................................... 82 Belarusian Universal Commodity Exchange: peculiarities of multi-vector partnership ................................................................................................... 92 Belarus: Projects for the future are being built today ............................... 102 Literature ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]