Quick viewing(Text Mode)

North Saxon Influences in the Phonology of Standard German As

North Saxon Influences in the Phonology of Standard German As

NORTH SAXON INFLUENCES

IN THE OF

AS SPOKEN IN KIEL

by Karen M8rcke

Erste Staatspriifung fiir das Lehramt an Mittelschulen, Kid, 1964

Piidagogische Priifung fiir das Lehramt an Mittelschulen, Kiel, 1965

A THESIS SUBMI'M'ED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF

THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

MASTER OF ARTS

in the Department

of

Modern

@KAREN MORCKE, 1970

SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY

November, 1970 APPROVAL

Name: Karen X6rcke

Degree: Master of Arts

Title of Thesis: North Saxon influences in the phonology of Standard

German as spoken in Kiel

Examining Committee:

(~r.N. 3. ~incoln) Chairman

(Dr. W. R. ~abcock) Senior Supervisor

(Dr. E. R. Colhoun) Examining Committee

(Mrs. P. polson) External Examiner Instructor Department of English Simon Fraser University ABSTRACT

It is assumed that the Low German substratum has influenced the colloquial form of standad German as spoken in Kiel, on the level of and The correlation hypothesis is tested by comparing the phonology of standard German and North Saxon (the Low

German under consideration), and examining whether in the cases of divergence the colloquial standard German of Kiel shows the North

Saxon peculiarities, The hypothesis is found to be correct, The inno- vations in standard German in Kiel are minor, since the Low German and

High German phonological systems are similar, Only in one case is the phonemic inventory changed: /Z/ is replaced by /?/, Besides this we find influences only on the purely phonetic level (mainly in the co- louring of ), in the allophonic pattern (Lea differences in the distribution of - causing overlapping of in several cases), and differences in the combination of phonemes and allophones (mainly in clusters - a rmmber of them brought about through elisions, assimilations and contractions), 20 phonological rules are formulated to account for the changes of standard German in its colloquial fom spoken in Kiel, The application and non-application of these 20 rules is found to be more or less in free variation,

1) As was confirmed to me by correspondence with the 1'Germenistisches Seminar der Universit'at Kiel, Niederdeuts che Abteilungf', no investi- gation touching on this problem exists so far. Iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTROW CTION

I. Hypothesis and goals...... 1

111. Terminology ...... 5 IV. Transcription...... 5 A. STANDARD GERMAN I. Standardized High German - the Wiebsff...... 7 11. Phonology of standard German 1. VOW~~S...... 9

2. ...... ~...... ~~.~o~ 13

B. NORTH SAXON

I, Absence of a standardized form of North Saxon...... 22

11. Phonology of North Saxon

1. VOW~~S...... ~~.~~~ 23 2. Consonants ....,...... 26 C, STAVDARD GERMAN AS SPOKEX IN KIEL

I. Influence of North Saxon in the vowels...... 35 11. Influence of North Saxon in the consonants...... 41 111. Articulatory basis...... 51 CONCLUSION I. Summary...... o...... 53 11. Phonological rules...... 57 BIRLIOGRAPIfl..~~...~...... ~...~~...~~.....~..~~...... ~~..~.. 63

APPEND'M~~~~..~~.~..~..~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~....~~.~~~~~.~~~~~~..68 The Low German (according to W. Foerste, 1952, p.1832) I. Hypothesis and goals

The line running west-east between Benrath and Magdeburg marks the division between the Low Gennan and High Gennan dialect areas: south of it the second High German sound shift took place between the fourth and seventh century, In the North, Low Gennan was the official and literary until the sixteenth century, The Hanseatic League used a commercial koine with features of Liibeck usage. With the decline of the Hanseatic League and Luther's translation of the Bible - used the East Middle of the Upper Saxon Chancellory - High Gembecame the prestige language also in the (protestant! ) North, while Low German was considered more and more the dialect of the uneducated and rural. popu- lation, as an indication of social inferiority, In North German schools,

High Geman was taught as the undisputed first foreign language. Around

1700, significantly, in North German theatres the local dialect was used only in clown scenes, the dignified and important persons spoke High erna an.') The nobility and the patriciate of the North Gerrnan cities had completely abandoned Low Gennan by 1800, the bourgeoisie followed in the nineteenth century, In the twentieth century even the working class in the industlcial areas and the wealthier fanning communities, especially near the cities, have abandoned their local dialect, and only the more remote farming areas and fishing villages still cling to Low German, at

1) See F. W, Twaddell (1959). least in their colloquial , The progress of modern transportation and mass communication favoured the general use of the standard lan- guage, a tendency which was largely accelerated by the vast population movements afterworldwar 11, by the influence of refugees and exiles from the East. Today, with the generation born during and after the war, Low German is threatened with extinction, There are movements for the preservation and protecuon of Low German, but the members of these associations and clubs (Low Gemtheatres etc,) are mainly intellec- tuals and townspeople who do not normally speak Low German themselves.

Neither in Kiel, an industrial city wfth a population of roughly

300 000, nor in the surrounding villages, is pure Low German heard any more, but communication, on all levels, is conducted in the standard language, Yet it seems evident to me that the dialect substratum has had an effect on the phonology, , and lads of the collo- quial High German standard of Kiel. Low German and High Gennan did not merge together, but Low Gennan was replaced by High German, a High German tinged with local dialect features.

I have restricted qy investigation to the level of phonetics and phonemics, i.e. sound influences of Low German in the standard High

German of Kiel. The Low Gennan dialect under consideration is North

Saxon, the dialect spoken between the Ems river and the line running southward from the Baltic coast near Liibeck. Though it might seem most convenient to take into account only the varieties around

Kiel, this is rendered difficult by the fact that in the villages round Kiel - maybe with t;he exception of a few old people - the standard language is spoken. I therefore consider only those Low German dialect features that are consistent throughout the North Saxon area, or at least the Holstein varieties,

The paper has three parts: a description of standard German (hereafter referred to' as SG), a description of North Saxon (referred to as NS), thirdly, a test of the hypothesis of a correlation between North Saxon and standard German as spoken in Kiel (referred to as K), examining those cases where North Saxon sounds differ from standard

Gemn ones and therefore might have caused peculiarities in the collo- quial form of standard German in ael, The will be purely synchronic, i.e, I shall compare the sounds of present day North Saxon

(without taking into consideration their historical development) to those of the local form of the standard language in Kiel, looking for possible influence. In the conclusion of this paper I shall try to set up phonological rules for the changes occurring for standard German in

Kiel, caused by the North Saxon substratum,

. .. 11, Methodology

Before collecting the data in Kiel city, a questionnaire was developed, consisting of 150 , This questionnaire, however, proved to be of limited usefulness, since the informants, when the isolated words, were influenced by the spelling of SG and pronounced them far less ffKielerischftthan when talking freely, Besides this, the language of an individual has several levels (or tfregistersff)suitable for a variety of social situations; when put into a reading situation

(especially knowing that I was recording) most informants automatically adopted a formal . (one of my informants, a civil servant who has to dictate on tape a lot in his profession, used his best, well- pronounced standard German as soon as he saw the microphone! ). I there- fore rely mostly on the data received through picture stimuli - I used the photographs of the Luftbildatlas ~chlesdg-I-?olstein2)- and on free conversation, which was sometimes recorded without the informantst

knowledge. I chose 12 informants who had to fulfill certain specified qualifications: they are all monolingual SG speakers, born in Kiel, and

at least 45 years of age. My main informant. a housewife, was born in

1888 and has lived in Kiel all her life, 3)

In the classification of the socio-linguistic strata of Kiel, one can, I believe, follow the three types of W, Kurath (1939):

Type I Little formal education, little reading and restricted social contacts. For Kiel: workers of the docks and ship-yards, fish-

. .. market, factories etc. Type I1 Better formal education (usually high school) and/or wider reading and social contacts. For Kiel: middle class (employees, businessmen, arti- sans etc.)

Type I11 Superior education (usually college), cultured back-

ground, wide reading and/or extensive social contacts.

For Kiel: university education ( teachers, lawyers, doctors etc,)

2) 1968. Karl Wachholtz Verlag. Neumtnster. 3) I chose her as my main informant, since she showed the least shyness or bias in front of the tape recorder; in fact she quite fulfilled W. Kurathls notion that the ideal informant is the one who cannot help talking the way he does. (See R. Pickford, 1956). I chose my 12 informants from Types I1 and III'), i.e. all have reln- tively good schooling and education. I did not select them according to'specific geographical parts of Kiel city, because the population with- in Kiel is rather mobile; there are extensive new satellite towns and suburban developments,

Unless otherwise slated and defined explicitly upon introduction, I use the terns which have become conventional in descriptive linguis- tics. For the terms dialect, and -koine I refer to T. Hill (1958) : a dialect continuum comprises mutually intelligible vernaculars or dialects; a koine can designate (a) any , distinct from his own vernacular, that a person shares with the speakers of some other vernaculars or (b) a common tongue used for more restricted pur- poses (poetry, business etc,). The term colloquial speech is my trans- lation (following the use of F. W. Leopold, 1959) of the German term

Umgangssprache (or better Allkagssprache5 ), which F. W. Twaddell (1959) defines as ?'easy going every day useft, i.e. the nondalectal speech of every day lifeo

IV. Transcription

For the I use the of the Inter- national Phonetic Association, adding the following diacritic marks:

4) I suspect that the speech of Type I, the lotrer class, would reveal the most Low German influence. However, I did not have the opportu- nity to find enough informants of that group. 5) In the second edition of & Wunder 9Sprache us as el, 1962), W. Pomig changed the vague term Wrngangssprachetf (which may also designate a commercial koine) into tfAlltagssprachet', meaning the informal speech used at home and in familiar circles,

relative length of the first element in diphthongs

nasalization of vowels

fronting of vowels

glottal stop

aspiration for p t k

(lessening of the energy of articulation; lenition of the voiceless fortis p t k results in voiceless lenis 8 3) syllabicity6 )

For the phonemic transcription I remain (following W. G. Moulton,

closer b the spelling alphabet of German, using as diacritics

( closedness) for vowels 7) laxness (openness) open juncture and / - / a pause at open juncture 8 1 stress9)

6) Strictly speaking, syllabicity should not be marked in phonetic transcription, as [, 1 does not change the of a . I add this diacritic, however, as it facilitates the reading of the phonetic texts. 7) The terms tense and closed as well as lax and open are considered synonymous: presence or absence of muscular tension in the articula- tar corresponds to relative closed- or openness of the oral passage (relative of the tongue toward the palate). 8) The term open .kncture refers to juncture within words (open internal juncture) or between words (open external juncture). In the Appendix, I only mark open juncture at audible pauses by /- / . Open juncture between words is indicated by a blank. 9) is marked only for words with more than one . In the Appendix, the -stress (for polysyllabic words) and the sentence- stress are indicated. A. STANDARD GEAMAN

I. Standandized High German - t,he "Siebs"

As T. Hill (1958) defines it, the standard language is a koine standardized under a state authority (an academy, a generally accepted dictionary etc.). It becomes possible and usual for the population at large to write and also speak the standard language in a uniform manner at the grammatical and lexical levels, but not, or at least not entirely, at the phonetic level.

An approximate witten standard has existed in Germany since

Luther, who familiarized most of the speakers of German with the East

Middle German language as a proper medium for communication in print.

A need for a phonological uniformity to match the emerging graphic uni- formity was first expressed by Goethe, who, as director of the Weimar

Court Theatre, was displeased at a cast of actors, allegedly members of the same family on the stage, whose proclaimed their wide- 1) ly divergent childhood homes in various German dialect areas. Thus the problem that the spoken language was anything but uniform, and that no geographical part had the prestige of a ffcorrecttfpronunciation, became

first a matter of concern for thetheatre.In 1898, on the request of the "Deutscher ~~envereintf, Theodor Siebs published the first edition of Deutsche Riihnenaussprache. Its aim was maximal efficiency in acoustic intelligibility, combined with the least expense in physiological energy.

He based his rules on existing pronunciation habits of the stage by

1) See F. W. Twaddell (1959). In his Regeln -fiir Schauspieler from 1803 Goethe says: "Kein Provinzialismus taugt auf der Biihne. Dort herrscht nur die mine deutsche Mundart, wie sie durch Geschmack. Kunst und Wissenschaf t ausgebildet und virfeinert worden. f1 ~uoted-in M. Mangold ( 1961). taking phonetic notes in the theatres of all parts of Germany, then

levelling out the differences according to -he most widely spread usage.

This resulted in a satisfactory solution for Norfh, Middle and South

~erman~~.)The pronunciktion as standardized by T. Siebs is meant to be the highest norm, flkein starres Gesetz.. .. , sondern ein Ideal, das als Ziel und Wasstab f6r alles gebildete Sprechen aufgestellt istfle3) Siebsg

book gradually came to assert itself a wider sphere of influence, be-

cause a need for a common spoken German became mare urgent in areas other

than the theatre. In 1922, the title changed to Deutsche Hochsprache and

in 1969 the 19th edition (edited by He Moser, . de Boor and Ch. Winkler)

appeared, replacing the imprecise term "Hochsprache" (which can designate

all levels of the language) by f1H0chlautung"~The Siebs has been criti-

cised as artificial, hypercorrect and stilted (see A. Littmann, 1965),

as the codified pronunciation is realized only by small circles, and by

those only for special occasions: actors in serious drama, speech thera-

pists and some trained radio announcers. No German actually speaks lfBiihnendeutschff in his daily usage, The 1969 edition of the -Siebs there- I I fore allows a "gemxssigte Hochlautungf' (modified standard pronunciation)

at the side of the ff reine Hochlautungtl (pure stmdard pronunciation). 4)

The ffreineHochlautungtl remains the ideal, the received standard German I norm. 2) The North German sounds were often preferred. Several times we find the pronunciation instruction ff...wie es in Norddeutschland iiblich ist". T. Siebs defined nowhere, however, to which North German dia- lect or dialects he referred. (The Low German phonological systems within the Low German dialect continuum vary to a considerable ex- tent! ) 3) see T. Siebs 181961, p. 6, 4) The Duden Aussprachew6rterbuch (1962) was the first to distinguish three levels of the ~ronunciationof German: llHochlautunnfl (the norm according to the siibs), llgemissigte Hochlautung" (defined as being (contld) Though the latest edition of the Siebs contains a paragraph on the phonology of "pureu and ttmodifiedff standard German, the Siebs trans- cription is not a phonemic one, but rather is based on a relative- ly broad branscription ' of German. There exist various phonological descriptions of SG, mainly W. G. Moulton (1947 and 1962), G. Heike (1961), H. Pilch (1966). M. Adamus (1967) and H. ~uzera(1968) - all basing their phonological analysis essentially on the Siebs norm, the ttreine Hochlau- tungfl, because it is - though in some ways an artificiality - the fonn of German having the broadest range of intelligibility.

11. Phonology of Standard German

The phonemic analysis of SG is controversial in many cases. How- ever, I shall problems at length here, but limit this section to essentials, since in this paper the presentation of SG phono- logy is of concern only as a frame of reference by which to gauge the influence of North Saxon on the ~lAlltagslautung~of Kiel.

1. Vowels

The Siebs distinguishes two sets of SG vowels, long and short ones : i: y: u: I Y V

For a phonemic analysis, I take the view of W. G. Moulton (1962)

less clearly articulated and more tolerant) and Wmgangslautungtt (defined as containing a vast amount of individual, regional and social colourings) . The 1969 edition of the -Siebs contains the following diagram (p. 8):

Hochlautung

Alltagslautung \ and W. 0. Droescher (1964), which provides the most economic pattern: length is considered a secondary, non-phonemic of SG vowels.

The distinctive features are tenseness and laxness (corresponding to open- and closedness), tenseness coinciding automatically with decen- tralisation, laxness with centralisation. All tense vowels are capable of being lengthened when stressed; (in unstressed the tense vowels occur always unlengthened), Also the lax vowels may occasionally be lengthened through emphasis, Thus length is phonetically, but not pho- nemically relevant.

Moulton, contrary to Siebs, states that SG practice clearly indi- cates a qualitative as well as a quantitative distinction of the two a-sounds: /a/ = [a :] versus /&/ = La] (there are minimal pairs). This opposition, however, is suspended in unstressed position, where only the lax member, /& / , occurs. C Moulton assumes furthennore the neutral mid central vowel /a/ , which occurs in unstressed position only, as a distinct ; (for , . a contrary view see ~uzera,1968, who considers to be an of the lax /$/ ).

We can thus plot the 15 vowel phonemes (according to ~oulton)as follows : -Front Central -Back unrounded rounded rounded

tense High lax

tense

lax -Low tense According to the Siebs we must then assume a sixteenth vowel phoneme, /%/phonetically LC:] , which distinguishes forms that other- ,wise would become homonymous (as in "Ahre - Ehrel ). Possibly because /;?if is not well integrated into the SG vowel system (it does not take part in the tense - lax opposition), it is more and more replaced by / / , especially in the North (see p, 37 ). ~uzeratakes it to be a hypercorrect spelling pronunciation of the letter a and does not list

it as a separate phoneme,

There are three diphthongs in SG: /ai / /O i//&k/, /li/ and /au/ begin in low central position, /oil in mid back rounded position. The -Siebs transcribes them as [qe J@ ao] , but v. Essen (1959) stated, on the basis of experimental data, that in educated SG the diphthongs rise in fact to [L] and [u] . (Besides these three, the marginal diphthong /hi/ occurs, I disregard it here, as it only exists in the interjections

hui' and 1 pfui') . w The -Siebs also lists the French nasals LA 3 (X 1 as sounds , . of SG, I omit them in the phonological analysis, since they only occur 5) in loan words of French origin.

The distribution of the SG vowel phonemes is as follows: lax

vowels occur, with the exception of a few interjections (like 'ha! etc,),

I only before consonants, i.e. in checked position, tense vowels and diphthongs can also occur before vowels or at the end of a word, i,e.

in free position. I add a list of their distribution with examples:

5) I agree with Ku;erat s opinion (1968) : 'We realise, of course, that it is not easy to decide which foreign words should be included in the data serving as the basis of the phonological analysis. But unassimilated of foreign origin must be excluded if the resulting phonemic system is to be realistic'' (p, 31), phoneme checked position free position

/in/ ' him' z 'you' /in/ . (in1 - /z$/ 'laket

9

z / 'so'

-

/fr 9 / 1 early! - b / lgust' - /dt/ 'there* -

/j i / 1 sudden' /bit,/ 'please1

Finally it should be noted that several phonologists (e,g.

He Mueller, 1958) have assumed a length phoneme called uberlXnge, contrasting the phonetically long tense vowels to Noverlongll tense vowels (in pairs like ' Ruth' - ruht' , fliesst' .. fliehst'). Specto- graphic investigations of W. R, Babcock et ale (1965). however, have shown clearly that there is no phonemic "6berlXnge" in SG. It is only in the frame provided by a sentence that two homonyms become unam- biguous. "Overlength" is not attached to a vowel of a certain word, but all tense vowels can be long, or even f'overlongft, under special stress.

2. Consonants

The number of phonemes of SG depends on the interpre- tation of SG sounds. The phonemic status of L*] t$3 13 1 13 1 C 81 and of the affricates [&)I [ts] ipf] is controversial. I distinguish 19 conso- nant phonemes: /p b t d k j f v S z 3 x j h hl n 1 r /.

Distribution of their allophones:

/p / p 1 unaspirated voiceless bilabial stop (1) in the clusters lpf/ and /ps /

( 2) syllablefinal if the next syllable

0. (a) begins with a stop (if it is a homorganic stop,

the first stop is not released)

(b) is a derivational affix, beginning with a voiced

consonant (-sam, -1ich etc. )

/pf+/ lpf4 ' post1

/p~tlm/ ipszlm] 1 ps ah'

/'ppplain/ ip.yplarn] 1 little doll1 [pcJ aspirated voiceless bilabial stop elsewhere ' passportt caterpillar'

/b/ [b] voiced bilabial stop initially and medially /.his/ Lbrs] t until'

fcb3/ [~ba] 1 low tide'

voiceless bilabial stop syllable-final (singly or in

clusters) Lbl does not occur syllable-final, neither singly nor in clusters, but in this position only occurs, i.e. the voiceless counterpart of CbJ . This phenomenon of SG, which applies for all stops and fricatives, is gene-

rally called 1f AuslautverhXrtungtf. 6)

For this syllable-final Cp] then Siebs' aspiration rules

for& apply: /grfb/ c jr3pcl rough' /gibtl [ 9i:~ct'] ' gives' /liblix/ c Lli:plrcl9 1 lovely1

/t/ [t ] unaspirated voiceless alveolar stop in the cluster /t~/

6) No So Trubetzkoy (1939) considered the SG ttAuslautverhiirtungt~ a case of neutralization ('tAufhebungft) of a phonological opposition. Here the opposition /b/ ll /pi , relevant in other positions, is neutralized under the voiceless member of the opposition. According to Trubetzkoy, we would have to transcribe /p/ or better /P/ , the (farchiphonemet', i. e. the bilabial stop in general. I prefer the view of v. Essen ( 1964), that in phonemic transcription we have to maintain /b/ , since the inflected forms (which yield the base forms) indicate the phoneme /b/ , e.g. 'Lie&' , lieber' , hence / b- X / . /b/ is automatically changed to Cp] in fin5 position, i. e. it is a positional variant of /b/ .V. Essen (1964, p. 15) says: Wertritt man den Standpunkt, dass in solchen F'illen die Xingeren Wortformen das zu Grunde liegende Phonem verraten, so wird man die betreffenden Laute als positionsbedingte Realisierungsvarianten de- klarieren miissentl. Thus in the so-called flneutralizedffposition, an opposition is not really annihilated (tfaufgehobenff),but positional variants of a phoneme occur, which may or may not coincide with other phonemes. If they do coincide with the realisation of other phonemes, (like here /b/ in final position -7 Lp] , coinciding with the reali- sation of /p/ 1, we have a case of overlappinq of phonemes. I adopt in the following this conception of v. Essen (1964, p. 15-24] (Cont d) and in the cases (2) listed for/p/ .

L LC] aspirated voiceless alveolar stop elsewhere ' valley' r Lra:tCan] 'to guess'

/d / id voiced alveolar stop initially and rnedially

Id ax/ Cd ax7 roof t

[k ] voiceless alveolar stop syllable-final, singly or in clusters. For L*] the aspiration rules for /&/ apply.

/k / [k] unaspirated voiceless velar stop in the cluster /ks/

which is based on the model of generative , more specifically of enerative phonoloa (see e.g. N. Chomsky, 1968). R, We Langacker (19f7) gives the following diagram of ''the linguistic system man possessed' (p, 90):

CONCEPTUAL STRUCTURE ( meaning) I Semantic and Syntactic Systems I (choice of lexical JI items; syntactic SURFACE STRUCTURE rules) 6 IPhonological Rules I J, PHONETIC MANIFESTATION The Surface Structure - the string of morphemes constituting a sentence - is the underlying phonological representation, The Pho- nological Rules assign the precise phonetic shape to these under- lying (abstract! ) f oms. Whereas the Chomskyan school does not accept a proper phonemic level (they talk of "underlying segments"), v.Essen uses the terms "underlying phoneme'' (t'zu Grunde liegendes Phonemtt) and ltpositional variant'' (= allophone) i ("positionsbedingte ~ealisienvl~svariante"). and in the cases (2) listed for /p/ .

I k 'I aspiratid voiceless velar stop elsewhere / k &in/ [kirn] ' no' /'h+kan/ Lha:kcanJ ' hook1 /di k/ [dr kc] fat'

19 1 L9 1 voiced velar stop initially and medially /gr?s/ Lgro:~] 1big'

/'re jan/ be:jan] 1 rain1 [ k ] voiceless velar stop syllable-final, singly or in clusters. For l k3 the aspiration rules for /k / apply.

/by9 I Lbvr kc] castle'

/ la941 lza:kctC3 1 says' The -Siebs makes an exception for the ending /i 9 /, ,' which should be pronounced r3 $1,, ( sea p. 4.4 ) .

If [f 1 voiceless labio-dental fricative in all.occurrences lf~fil fromt /'hlfan 1 [ha: f an] ' harbour' /rif/ [ri:f] called'

/v / fv] voiced labio-dental fricative initially and medially

Ivt)/ Lvo:] ' where' /'bva/ C lg~d lion' If1 voiceless labio-dental fricative syllable-final, singly

or in clusters.

/'Iovxah/ Cl@fcao]2 1 little lion' /5/ IS]voiceless alveolar fricative in all occurrences

/S k +t/ [S kca:t'] 1 skat'

bvasar/ LvasarJ water1 /vp/ LVASJ ' what'

/Z / Lz] voiced alveolar fricative initially and medially /'zona/ [z~nal sun1

/'v+za/ [vs:ral t vase1

L S I voiceless alveolar fricative syllable-f inal, sf ngly or in clusters,

/raizt/ Lrar st1 travels1

/ i 5 3 voiceless alveo-palatal fricative (with lip rounding) in all occurrences

L33 voiced apico-palatal fricative, occurring in loan-

words only7

/x 1 [x ] voiceless velar fricative after low and back vowels

1 roof ' ' hole' ' book'

[c] voiceless palatal fricative elsewhere >

7) G. Heike (1961) does not list it in his analysis of SG, / ix/ tyl 'I'

/~,Lix/ I:MIILJ 1 milk' The -then (occurring after open internal junc-

ture) ahys has LclP : /'ku +xarl/Lkcu:canJ(little cow1

opposed to /'k u* ran/ L kCu:xan]' cake1. 8)'

voiced palatal fricative in all occurrences

ljaka/C j r kcaJ 9 jacket' /'koj a/ 1kc: j 21 berth'

glottal aspirate /he// Chr 11 ' light'

voiced bilabial nasal in all occurrences

/+/ Lme: IJ flour1

/'+ma/ Ldo:vna] 8 lady1

/I$m/ C 1 avn] 1 lamb'

voiced velar nasal in the phoneme-sequence /n9/+ $3

and /n k/+ ~~41~)

&"!an/ Chaqan] to hangt

8) Moulton (1962), disregarding juncture before the morpheme [:ah], assumes two separate phonemes /x/ and /$ / . 9) Moulton ( 1962) considers L 9 3 an autonomous phoneme. I follow W. M. Austin (1968), who shows that Lg3 has the underlying phonemic sequence /h5/ or /n k/ and that L33 is merely a result of regressive assimilation: /ng/+(h~~l)-1 C9], Ink/ -t r3k] . Thus l31 is the only case of assimilation tolerated in the "reine Hochlautungff. It does not apply, however, if open juncture lies between the nasal and the velar stop, e.g. /+n + ge ban/ -7 Caoge: ban], /an+ kcman/+ fznk>mmJ. 10) Note that there is no "AuslautverKartungff for 1'3 I inLthe sequence /n$/. voiced alveolar nasal elsewhere

/y/ Ch3xl 1 still'

/'I aina/ Clarnal 1 rope1

/sin/' Lam1 1 at

voiced alveolar lateral in all occurrences11)

/I+/ [ I i : tcl 1 song1 /'kol a / [ko:fa] coal1

4!l/ Ifi:1] ' much'

apico alveolar trill or in all occurrences 12) uvular trill Both are, according to the -Siebs equally accepted and occur in free variation in SG. /(redon/ [re:dan 1- CRe:clan] 'to talk' /'fk.rm/ Lf4:ranl- Cf a: Ran] 1 to drive'

/V +/ [vi:rJ - [vi:~] 1 wet

Experimental phonetic investigations of E. M. Krech (1968) show that we cannot consider the glottal stop [?I in SG to be a separate phoneme, but rather that it is a facultative phonetic variant of the realisation of a vowel without the glottal stop. It usually occurs for a vowel after open juncture. Within a consistent, linked utterance it can be absent, especially with unstressed vowels, e. g. /f~n + o ix/ 3 C

11) Syllabic L 3 ( as well as syllabic C 7 9 1 ) is not accepted in the "reine Hochlautungff. 12) f r\ 1 in final postvocalic position, listed by Moulton (1962), is not recognized in the -Siebs: s iebs Ca:bar1. -. Ca:baRI ' Moulton [a: b~] The 1969 edition of the -Siebs allows[td] for the ending -er in the "gemassigte Hochlautungfl. [fJn '31: 1 Ifm 31 C] of you1 Siebs does not tolerate word or - > . syllable initial vowels without the glottal stop. Following Siebsl rule, Moulton (1947) assumes the glottal stop not to be in free variation, but part of the allophone that any vowel shows after open juncture.

The affricates /t S/ /t$/ and /,f/ are interpreted here as two-phoneme sequences, i.e. as clusters. This agrees with the analysis of M. Morcinniec (1958) , followed also by Moulton (1962) and us era ( 1968) , who bases his conclusion on arguments of parallelism with other elements of the phonemic system (for a contrary interpretation see P. Delattre,

1965, and M. Adamus, 1968). There are no minimal pairs in SG distinguished solely by the contrast of an affricate and the corresponding phoneme pair, e.g. /8/ versus /tl/ . Moulton also gives the argument that there seems to be no good reason for singling out these affricates, since SG has a whole series of clusters of stop plus fricative or sibilant ( ips/ /

Besid,es these affricates SG has numerous other clusters, with a . . maximum of three consonants in the onset of the syllable (e. g. C ~f1 ~vma]

1 plum1 ) and a mximum of four consonants in the coda ( e. g. [ h & r p S t '

autumn1). The most frequent syllable types of SG are CVC, VC, CV and

CW. Fifteen different structures are possible, from V to CCCV- and

-vcCCC (see P. Delattre, 1965).

Distribution of phonemes:

There are certain phonemes ( or allophones) and phoneme (or allo- 13) phone) combinations, which are only admissible in certain positions.

13) OIConnor (1953) defines the syllable as na minimal pattern of pho- neme combination, with a vowel unit as nucleus, preceded and followed by a consonant or permitted consonant combinationll. See also Trubetzkoyf s (1939) ffGrenzsignaleft, i. e. phonemes and phoneme com- binations indicating open juncture. As mentioned above, Lb d j VZ 3J1 nwer occur in the coda. but the coda is always devoiced (ffAuslautverK~tung~!) . /h / and [?I occur initially only, whereas /x/ never. occurs in this position (except in some loan words). /z / occurs initially only before vowels; /S / can occur before consonants initially, but only in foreign words ( e. g. A k ;tsa/ sketch1) . In words of German origin we find /I/ instead of /5/ initially (e.g.

1st unda/c hourt , I 15~i / l gamet ) . The clusters /St / and /.P/ occur medially and finally only (e. g. /rfst/ rest1 , /vest)/ 'vest1). The combinations /br/ bv/ /{I/ - to mention only few - can occur in the onset only, /xi/ /d/y//mpf/in the coda only. 14) For this paper only those clusters that vary in SG and K are of interest and will be discussed in chapter C,

14) For a complete list of syllabic position memberships in SG see He ~uzera(1968), p. 55. - 22 -

Be NORTH SAXON

I. Absence of a standardized form of North Saxon

Since the decline of "Liibeck usage", going hand in hand with the decline of the Hanseatic League (see p. 1). there has been no stan- dard form of Low German, for spelling or for pronunciation. Within the

NS dialect area, various varieties are spoken, none of them having the prestige of being the f'correctfl form of NS. 1)

Whereas there exist numerous phonological descriptions of SG, the descriptions of NS are scarce - unfortunately so, since phonologi- cal differences are bound to occur in such a relatively large area. The principal works in the field are 0. v. Essen (1964) , who describes the dialect of Kirchwerder near Hamburg, and Re E. Keller (1961). who gives a description of the Lower Elbe variety. There is, as far as I know, no phonological description of the Holstein varieties near Kiel. However, for noting divergencies from v. Essen and Keller, the tapes of the

Deutsches Spracharchiv in Miinster were of help. I used the recordings of the villages of Hutzfeld, ScKlp, Lutterbek and Blekendorf. I base the following phonemic analysis of NS on v. Essen's description of

Kirchwerder (abbriviated KW). Significant differences in the Lower

Elbe variety (LE) and the Holstein dialects will be mentioned.

Modern writers, in their effort to revive Low German, write in various vernaculars. The spelling is generally not phonemic, nor a broad phonetic transcription, but the rules are adopted from the SG , e.g. shortness of the vowel is indicated by doubling of the following consonant ( see Keller, 1961, p. 25). In many cases we find etymological spelling, i.e. the spelling indicates the historical development of NS. As orthographical habits of NS are by no means uniform, I shall only use phonemic and phonetic transcrip- tion in this paper. 11. Phonology of North Saxon

1. Vowels With the exception of the low vowels - there is only one a-quality in Kw, a lax front vowel - the vowels of Kw occur, like the vowels of SG, in a tense (closed) and lax (open) variety, tenseness correlated with length (under stress), laxness with shortness. The best solution for an analysis of the vowel phonemes of NS therefore seems to me here, corresponding to the analysis of SG, to consider laxness and tenseness as primary distinctive features, and length only as a secondary, prosodic feature, occurring for tense vowels under 2) stress.

A problem, however, is then posed by long open :1 , which

Keller states for LE to contrast with short open , s.g. / / on1 , /d 9:3/ 'dayt. (unfortunately he does not give minimal pairs). In cases where Kw has /o / (=Lo:] ) , we find mostly /? :/ ( = ) in

Keller' s description of LE (e.g. Kw / k?n / , LE / k0: n/ 1 boat' ) , C sometimes, however, /?/ (e.g. KW /br~t/,LE /brat/ 'bread'). As I noticed on the tapes, the /0/of Kw is realised in the Holstein dialects as a low or mid back vowel with lip rounding, between l't3: 1 and L:,:] , in cases where the Low German spelling usually indicates 3) a or aa , e. g. 'Kaan, Water, slapen' , it is realised as LO:] or COvJ

V. Essen assumes that open- and closedness are dependent on quan- tity and therefore only sets up 8 phonemes /a. e i o u o i; a/ and a phoneme length /'/ . Looking through his phonemic transcription, however, we find that there are inconsistencies: he also marks open- ness by /, / , and, parallel to his phonetic transcription, the open vowels also occur lengthened, e.g. /mEn / . On the other hand the closed vowels occur unlengthened in uns%ressed position, e. g. /dot b7/, which means that quantity is only relevant under stress. i. e. derived mainly from WGmc < 2) , in cases where the spelling indicates o or 004). e.g lBroot, kol'. It seems to me that we have to assume a phoneme /+/ 5), realised in most Holstein and Schleswig dialects as LO:~or [3 :] , in Kw as

LO:] , e.g. /kan/ is [ka:n] or Lk3:nj , in KW [to:n] . In KW we have thus overlapping of the phonemes /+/ and /q / . The mid central vowel /a/ only occurs, like in SG, in un- stressed position. We can thus plot the fifteen vowel phonemes of NS as follows:

-Front Central -Back unround ed rounded rounded

tense High lax

tense -Mid lax lax Low - tense

There are, as in SG, the three diphthongs /a;/ /au/ [oil in NS 6), but the initial element of the diphthong is relatively longer than in sG: 1ar7 L2uJ and [3' T] . Where the Geest dialects have the long mid vowels :I [#:I LO:] for /$ / /i? / ( O/ , the Holstein dialects diphthongize (usually with lengthening of the first element) to [c.I]Lq.11 and [onUI ; ( occasi- onally the second element rises to tense [ i] in [e. i] and 14' iJ , to

[u] in [o-U] 1.

4) i. e. derived from WGmc < 0 > and c a u ) . 5) I phonemicise it /a/ because of the symmetry of pattern, though phonetically it does not have a real a-colouring. 6) In Kw there is also a diphthong /ao / , which Keller does not list for LE and which does not seem to exist in Holstein. As in SG, lax vowels occur, except for some interjections, in checked position, tense vowels occur checked or free: phoneme checked position free position phonetic realisation

Holstein IOW~

1 OX' 0 131 ' louse1 /nu / now1 I u (:)I

pleasure' 0 I vJ barn1 h$f/ ' sun' ' sow' /+/ Holstein [p. 17

/+n/ 'boat1 /j+/ 'yes' [o(:)] [I o 11 Holstein [b (:)I A peculiarity of the NS dialects is the occurrence of bberl~n~e or Schleifton. The "schleiftff (meaning lengthening with pitch n variation) over the sequence V - V, e. g. [st u : uv] , in fast speech 0 $ t u : : y ] 1 room1 . schl&fton arises where an unstressed /a / has dropped after a vowel or the voiced consonants / bg 1 v / , preceded by a tense root vowel (after /a / has dropped, /bg z v/ become lenicized) , e. g. /I id a/ -7 [ z ; : : d ] I silk1. Before fortis consonants Schleifton 0 is found only if these consonants do not belong to the same morpheme,

0.g. /he. 'bru at/+ Lhc bru::t ]I he brewst. Schleifton may be regarded as an allophone of the unstressed phoneme /a / . Also typical for NS is the nasalization of a vowel or diph- thong before /n/ in fast speech (at the same time the nasal consonant drops), e.g. /vinlze/+ [VYZC:] 'if you1. C W. Foerste (1952) and Keller (1961) mention the NS tendency of rounding of front vowels, mainly / i / , in labial surroundings, e. g. C

/ik bin/+ Irkbrn] 11 am1.

The strong accent concentration of NS on the root syllable results in weakening of the unstressed syllables, Except in foreign words and compounds only /a/ and /i / are at all frequent in un- C stressed position ( see Keller, 1961).

2. Consonants

NS has 18 consonant phonemes: /P b t d k 3 f 5 z 1x J' h m n I r /. Distribution of their allophones: /p / L pc] aspirated voiceless bilabial stop initially

/ptnI [pian? 1 pan1 [ ] voiceless lenis bilabial stop medially between vowels

/lapol/c Cabal]O apple1 7 [ p 1 unaspirated voiceless bilabial stop elsewhere

/OP/ * C+ 1 on1

/ b/ [ p 1 voiced bilabial fricative medially between vowels 8) /'zabaln/ [zapaln] 1 to talk' Lpl voiceless bilabial stop finally9)

/I! b/ LIi:pJ I body' l b 1 voiced bilabial stop elsewhere

/by L bi:] 1by'

/t/ Lt 'J aspirated voiceless alveolar stop initially

/tit/ [tci:t] 1 time1 f d 1 voiceless lenis alveolar stop medially between vowels 0

/'Li; C ta/ hdal 'little' ( f. ) 0 t, unaspirated voiceless alveolar stop elsewhere [ , . /vit/ CvrtJ 'white'

/ C f'l voiced alveolar flap (varying with ld1 ) nedially between vowels10 > /'vecl art c CVE~ again1

7) Final and postconsonantal stops are often lenicized in consistent speech ( e. g. p/+ La %] ) , especially if a vowel follows. 8) Fricativisation of intervocalic voiced stops occurs mainly in the Holstein dialects. It is usually in free variation with the corres- ponding voiced stop. 9) Thus NS has, like SG, '1 Auslautverhartungff for syllable-final voiced stops and fricatives (either singly or in clusters). Final /b/ is realised as Cf 1 , not as C pl , in many NS dialects, e.g./iib/-?Cli:fI 'badyl. 10) Especially where it is the reflex of geminate -dd- (see Keller, 1961). [t] voiceless alveolar stop finally

/r?d / h0.d3 red' Ldl voiced alveolar stop elsewhere

/dj k/- ccIi:kJ pond'

/k/ [kc] aspirated voiceless velar stop initially /k0 k/ L k'j6.1 k] kitchen' L! 1 voiceless lenis velar stop medially between vowels

/trec, kar/ Ltrrg 31 1 tractor'

[ k] unaspirated voiceless velar step elsewhere

/iC k/ LI k? 'I'

/9 1r1 voiced velar fricative (varying with Ij] ) nedially between vowels

[X after low and back vowels syllable-final, singly [cl elsewim-e or in clusters

/he lfgt/ Lhe Ivct]? 'he lies' Lg] voiced velar stop elsewhere

If [f 1 voiceless labiodental fricative in all occurrences /f yl [f u.1 f rom' /hpf / L h~fl yard1

/v/ [V voiced labiodental fricative initially and medidly

/va4/C Cvatl what' /'h j van / [hi:v7] 1 to lift1 [ f voiceless labiodental fricative syllable-final, singly or in clusters

/he hivt/ [he hi:ft] 1 he lifts'

15 / [S voiceless alveolar fricative in all occurrences

/d ec x/ [sl~c] ' bad' /fpU Lf~s-1 1fox*

/'di;sat. / [d YS a] these'

/z / CZ~voiced alveolar fricative initially and medidlly

/re 1 [re-rl 1 she' /'ve zan/ Cvcrz:] ' to be' LS 1 voiceless alveolar fricative syllable-final, singly or in clusters

/vezt/ Cvcstl been' C ' 15 [{ 1 voiceless alveo-palatal fricative in all occurrences ' (less liprounding than SG /I / ) /J?f/ gWf1 drawer' [d 151 ' table'

/j / CJ 1 voiced palatal fricative L j 1 is in free variation with 1: 3 3 , the voiced alveo-palatal fricative11)

/X / [XIvoiceless velar fricative after back and low vowels )ax tar/ [&xt3 1 behind' C - 11) In many local dialects i31 is slightly affricated to Cd3I . C 9 1 voiceless palatal f rlcative elsewhere

12) /h/ Lh] glottal aspirate

/hotC t/' ChJ~tl 1 wood' hi [h] voiced bilabial nasal in all occurrences /min/ [mi: n] 'w'

/helkicmt/t [he kumt] 'he comes'

[ 31 voiced velar nasal, resulting, as in SG, from regressive assimilation of the phoneme sequences /ng / and / Ik / . /bpn$al/ [brylJ ' guyr

/mznk/t Lma3kI among'

In final position we usually find lfAuslautverh'Mm@:

, /hf1j&n3/ [he jv?k] he went' , . [n] voiced alveolar nasal elsewhere /v/ [nu:] ' now' /'&nar hnd under' C ] Through progressive assimilation of the fomer suffix /an/

to the preceding consonant, syllabic C? 3 [ rnI 1 and C J arise. Syllabic Cr;] results from /an/ after labials, e.g. /z u pan/+ lzu:pm]l to drink', syllabic 1 from I 3 /an/ after velars, e.g. /Ilkso/ -7 C lr k 1 9 ' lick'* syllabic Ly 1 after all other consonants. Stops before

12) As /h/ occurs only initially, /x/ only medially and finally, Keller interprets [ h] [ x] and :] as allophones of one phoneme / h / . 13) This is the only case where final /Q / is realised [ k] and not LxJ or L$l . syllabic 9 1 are not released through the oral,

but through the nasal cavity. The result is a nasal ex-

plosion, e. g. [zu : P $ '1 .

: rn: : ~hrough.assimilativechanges which affected former /an/ [: I after Lml and L3l , long syllabic I~:][T:][a:] 14). arise . 15) /'kprnan/3 [k&%] + I 'to come1 I

/I / voiced velarized lateral in final position /pol/ Lp0:kl ' post' LaI mid central vowel (varying with ) in preconsonantal position

'which' /veCI l k/ Cvra k] I 1 voiced alveolar lateral elsewhere .' /,ti ks/ L91 i:ks] 'at once1 Ia1/ L I ] syllabic I 1 results out of /a// . /'vodal/ [VWJ I]I carrot' C

1.1 [ t 1 apico-alveolar trill in prevocalic position /grot/ [yr~*~t1 big' [3] unrounded lower mid central vowel after tense vowels 16 and diphthongs and as the reflex of fonner /ar/ .

14) Keller assumes Cn: m: Q:] to have phonemic status, as they con- trast with ch m 3) . This interpretation is not possible, if one considers (as I do in this paper) the underlying form to yield the string of phonemes; in this case /art/ assimilated to a prece- ding homorganic nasal. 15) This form is audible in relatively slow speech. 16) V. Essen (l961L) transcribes 1 and calls it "Keimvokalv. HB (contld) 8 more'

1 water1

cV:'l lengthening of lax vowels17) C

1 species'

church1

The gottal stop [ '1 is, is in SG, not phonemic. It can occur with +owel after open juncture. It also occurs with syllabic [: 31 , accompanying the nasal explosion after stops, e. g. /'z C( paII/-7 [Z U: fG3.

Distribution of phonemes:

The distribution of phonemes differs in several cases from SG. As onset we have always /s/ , never 15 / in front of a consonant:

/s m S Q Sv Sp st / . The SG cluster /~f/ ( resulting from the second sound shift p 7 pf ) does not occur in NS ; thus as onset in NS only

CC and C are possible, not CCC. As coda the number of phonemes is CCCC, if we consider the underlying form. If we consider the phonetic mani- festation, only CCC is possible, since /r/ and /I / are vocalised in final clusters, e. g. /h trvs k /+ L ha: kt]' autumn'. The phonetic manifestation of phonemes is also changed through a number of elisions, assimilations and contractions: Elisions: In rapid speech /&/ after 1.5 / (or occasionally after other voiceless consonants) drops, e. g.

/b$/ -+ LIVS] 1 pleasure'

says: "S chwaches , stets unbetontes la3 wurde als Realisierungsvari- ante des -r bzw. -er verzeichnet. Diese Herkunft ist im Bewusstsein der Sprachteager noch lebendig, sodass es nicht moglich ist, fur diesen Laut ein eigenes Phonem anzusetzen" (p. 17). Thus length of lax vowels is, like [3 1 , a positional variant of /r / . (Long lax vowels should not occur in phonemic transcription as they do in v. Essen, 1964). The spelling of NS indicates that rJS speakers are still aware of the underlying /r / , e. g. [ k 'a : k 1 spelled 'K ark' . Final /L/ is frequently elided in unstressed syllables

/ma\/ -7 Lhl~:] 1 once'

Intervocalic /hd / becomes / n /

/kindar/C -7 Lk'rn31 children'

Assimilations: At open juncture (unless there is an audible pause),

the word or syllable final nasal /M/ is assimilated to the following point of articulation ( regressive

assimilation). /n 1 before /p b f v / becomes L m 1

(before /fv / sometimes the labiodental nasal t 71 )

1 /un ppparl -7 Cvmprb3] 'and pepper' C

ovi + Lqovyvi] 1 go wet /n / is completely assimilated to the f ollawing /m / /mantmut/ + Lmamvtl one must'

Contractions: If /s/ and /j / meet at open juncture, they are con- " 18) tracted into 1

/'jed a s jar/ 9 L3er d 2Jov3l 1 every year' A homorganic voiceless and voiced stop are contracted and lenition occurs18)

/hie de/ -7 hrder3O 'with the' Two identical stops are contracted into one (without

occurrence of aspiration) :

/'i~*lfah~t'-L~C t / 9 CmfagktovJ 'begins to' Contraction applies for all identical consonants colliding at open juncture.

As unaccentuated syllables tend to be reduced in NS,

18) These are, strictly speaking, cases of ( creation of a third fonn from the juxtaposit;fon of two other forms). contractions extend sometimes over the unstressed syllable (especially with the form /is / 1 is' ) : /Idat is j?/ -7 [dajal 'that is really' C c

/nu Cis j+/ -7 [nula] now is really' C. STANDARD GEM AS SPOKEN IN KIEL

In this chapter only the cases where SG and NS differ will be dealt with: I shall test whether in these cases the NS peculiaritLes are found in K. The examples are taken from my recordings of K. Excerpts of consistent speech are found in the Appendix.

I. Influence of North Saxon in the vowels

1. Low vowels Whereas SG has two low centralized vowels, lax /a;/ a1 and tense /d/ : (:)I . NS has a very clear front [a] and a back vowel / / , phonetically a low back vowel with slight lip rounding [R (:)I , a mid vowel [a(:)] or even tense LO(:)] . The lax /$ / in K tends towards a very clear, higher low, fronted L? 1 : /'bakan / Cbak~J+ to bake' /'amzal/ blckbinl' c ,' L~rnz!]+ / 3 ahs/ Lgtns7 ' quite' The tense /a / is frequently realised in K as the back vowel L D :I , phonetically intermediate between [3 :1 and [a :I :

/ja/ [j~:l 'yes* /hafan/ Lhb:f~1 harbour' is in free variation with less fronted Lb] ., L D (:)I with the [ a+ ] non-rounded low back [l (:)I.

2. Lengthening of diphthongs In the diphthongs /at / /ah/ and /o;/ , a relative lengthening of the first element, as in US, is often to be found in K: 'on it'

1 three'

lone and the same'

1 people'

3. Diphthongization

There are no tense mid vowels [ C $6 0 ] in Holstein NS, but the three diphthongs [en1 #.r 0-u] take their place. In K the pho- nemes /$ 0. 0. / also show this tendency to diphthongize (often the diphthongs rise to [ i.1 and [h , mainly under stress). As in the three diphthongs under (2). p. 35, it seems that .the first element is 1 relatively longer, >

lake1

anyway1

'she goes1 ' evil'

1 beautiful1

1 sounds'

roset

1 cheers1

'where'

4, Rounding As in NS , we find in K rounding of [ i / in labial surroundings, C especially in fast speech:

1) These diphthongs might be considered as new phonemes in K, since they change the system: loss of three tense vowels, gain of three diphthongs, However, as they are more or less in free variation with the non-diphthonglzed tense vowels, I rather prefer to consider them as phonetic realizations of the phonemes 9 / /'birnaln/t [bvrnaln] ' to tinkle' /'imar/ LY~~I always / Ix 'bin/ C C [I+ bv~] 11 am' /'bisx,an/ c . Cbq71 'a little' In these cases /i/ = LYJ overlaps with the phoneme /ii/ . C

5. Nasalization

In NS., vowels before /n / are occasionally nasalieed. This phenomenon is very rare in K and only occurs in fast speech:

1 sometimes'

6. The phoneme /% / The long mid open vowel /L/ , phonetically [t :I , which does not occur in the NS dialects around Kiel, is also absent from K. It is replaced by tense , which is usually diphthongized to LC- I] : /'za%an / Lze.19 21 'to saw'

/balJCdigt/C [bajc.rd~~t] damaged'

/'kLza/ [I~Ix~] cheese'

The non-occurrence of [E :) changes the phonemic system of K by reducing the number of vowel phonemes compared to SG as required by the Siebs. 2)

It is doubtful, however, whether we can explain this change in K through

NS influence, since [c:] seems to have disappeared from the colloquial speech in most pasts of Germany.

7. Vocalization of /r /

Though phonemically this section should be dealt with under con-

2) It is also possible to interpret that the phonemes /a/ and /e / overlap completely in K, being both realized as Ce.11 . sonants (~ositionalvariants of /r/ ), I discuss the post-vocalic 3) / r/ - realizations here, since phonetically they are vowels.

(a) As in NS, /r / after tense vowels (before consonants or word final)

and the sequence /;r/ is realized as the open mid central vowel 131 4):

Lvi : 33 1 we'

This also applies before syllabic (though /r/ in this case

precedes an underlying vowel) : /'f&an/ Lfy:~$ 'to guide'

/Iboran/ Lb0:30]I to drillt

/'goran/ Lgl:3pl 1 kids 1

After tense /+/ , /r/ is not vocalized to 131 , but we hear one long ( overlong? - see p. 41) low vowel:

/'g+r ni xk/ 'not at all' (b) Lax vowels are lengthened as a substitute for Crj , as in WS (lfEr-

3) Vocalization of post-vocalic /r/ in the Wtgangslautungf' is not only limited to those areas of Germany where a Low German substratum can be assumed (see footnote 12, p. 19). 4) Some informants have the open front vowel [ € J instead of more central L32 , e.g. Ivi:~][ty:~]. In fast speech the neutral CaJ is frequent, e. g. L f y : atJ . This means an occasional overlapping of /r/ with /F/ and /a/ . 5) We canrfind pairs of lengthened and non-lengthened lax vowels, e.g. Lfm] 4 /fpn/ 'of' - [f>:n] 'before' 4 /f~i,a/,~'~) /'d&rfan / Ldv: f TI ' may'

/'{t$roa / [s~c:na3 1 stars'

/'rnerkvi;rdig/c a, hr:kvv: drc] > 1 strange'

/'mtr3an/ * L~D:9 a? morning1 /f$rldiir& / [f~da:k] dried up'

/Ikirxa/ [kc=: c7 a] church'

/turm/c Itc,: m] tower'

/varm/ Cva: mJ 1 warm' 6) C +

This is almost always the case in final position:

It is interesting to note that after lengthening of lax back and low vowels the phoneme /x/ is pronounced Lx] . If / is voca-

8. Vocalization of /I /

As in NS , we find / I / vocalized to 2 7 in preconsonantal

Lk'ah] /kan/ 'can1 - Lkh:p] 'cart1

/M~/I

/halb/c. hap] 'half' In these cases /I/ = [a] overlaps with the phoneme /a / .

9. Unstressed vowels

As the root syllable bears a strong accent, in K as in NS, un- stressed syllables are weakened. The prefixes /e r / , /feC r/ and /ts ec r / are usually realized as [f C] [t5 B] . Thus in unstressed syllables the lax vowel is not lengthened as a substitute for /r / , e.g.

/ferff. lrsan/C lftlasl;r] 1 left'

The suffixes /ar/ and /am/ are pronounced [3 1 and [J PI] , as in NS:

/'v&sar/c [VLS 31 water'

/'b$sar J Lbes3 3 better'

/'kletarn/C [:kefc$3 171 1 to climb' The difference between the lax front [El and the more central vowel C31 is often difficult to perceive. They seem to vary in prefixes as well as in suffixes. In fast speech the central schwa [a] can be sub- stituted for either of them.

Words of foreign origin likewise show the weakening of unstressed syllables:

/karlCofalC me1 / [ k3 t~fl MC-I I] potatoe flour1 I /rna~~s'rina/ L vnaga- r;: naJ 1 margarine1 C Lo

10. Schleif ton

As an influence of the NS Wchleifton", which occurs on tense vowels after the apocope of /a/ , we might expect forms where an in- flectional /a/ dropped, to be "overlongfl in K. On the tapes forms like /ix 'gea/;r [rc je:] '1 go1, /nqrna/+ [ ne: MI (I) take1 occur, > but as far as I can judge, the vowels are no longer than stressed tense vowels normally are, fir instance in the inflected form [ri y e:tI

'she goes1. Therefore, t'schleiftonff resulting from an inflectional

/a / in the following morpheme is improbable in K. 8)

However, theoretically, an overlong low [q : :I or [b :: J is possible in K, resulting from the vocalization of /r / after tense

/ / , phonetically La :) or [b :] : / -7 ( La:d) + [a::] We could find pairs, e.g.

/jp/ = L~cL:~1 yes' - ::'year1 c /j=r/ /v+h/= [vQ:~] 'frenzy' - Lvq::?] 'were1 /Vpran/ But it seems to me that usually, at least in fast speech, the phoneme sequence /Q T/ is not longer than /a/ , though occasionally genuine

"Schleiftonf' seems audible, i.e. lengthening of the tense vowel with pitch variation, e. g. /vir'v+ra~/ -Z Lvi3 va-a:] we were' However, exact results on the relative length of /a/ and /ar/ could only be obtained by measurements on the sound spectogram. In any case this occurrence of ffSchleiftonflin K would not be phonemic, as it is a positional variant of /r / .

11. Influence of North Saxon in the consonants

1. stops

(a) P tk NS an d SG differ in the realization of medial stops: SG requires aspiration, NS has lenition, In K we find the voiceless stops lenicized to [ b d 41 intervocalically; (after tense vowels 00 and diphthongs lenition varies with the unaspiratsd voiceless

stops) :

LbrviaJ ' bridge1

[ZI ba]0 * clan' hvd3] mother! 0 C hud a] hut' 0

L~.WCIO J 1 car' 0

Lenition also occurs in postconsonantal position, before unstressed

L33 La1 :

/'hintar/ behind' c Chr~d31o /9at(ai+at/c LgaJaida at1 switchedv

/'ges-Lawc / kjssd3nl0 1 yes terday' As in NS, strong aspiration occurs only initially, especially after

an audible pause,

In K medial /b d 9 / show very rarely the tendency to become fricatives as in NS. /b/ is occasionally realised as the bilabial fricative L P] : /'le bar/ [ IC:PJJ liver'

8) Forms where a former medial /a/. is syncopized are not considered here, since these forms are obsolete in SG in general (e,g. Ibliihete'- , 1 ) and do not occur on the tapes. Only 4 of the 12 informants have occasional intervocalic f rj :

Intervocalic /d / is - rarely - an apical r-like flap or fricative:

/'budah/ [bvlaln] 1 to dig!

/'odar / 10133 8 or' 9)

In syllable-final position, either singly or in clusters, the voiced-voiceless opposition of /b 11 P/ and /d 11 t/ is 101 "neutralized" as in NS under the unaspirated voiceless stops.

Occasionally very weak aspiration can be observed, never the strong

aspiration required for SG in final release:

/'miidxam/ heart can]> ' girl1

/ba'tri b/ [batri:pJ Ifirm' 'PP/ bp3 ' whether' /irc hab(a)/ LSC> h93 'I have'

/bitdlc Cb11tJ 1picture'

/Strand/C LStraht] beach' Sometimes, especially in fast speech, the neutralized position is

lenicized; this is particularly khe case, as in NS, before a voiced consonant or a vowel:

9) Unfortunately there is no example of f m V 1 U 4 /'m 2 ti / 'Mum1 on the tapes, as one can hear from children playing in the streets of Kiel - thus showing weakening of t-) c/ + 1 . 10) For / b/ the positional variant [ f 1 never occurs0 finally, as it does in NS. /'end l i x/ Icnd0 Ircl I finally'

/'glaub(a) ciu/ [gl~vbo IC] -I I believe'

/'voIt(a)jx/t [valclrc]0) I would1

/hartC / [hard] hard1

rratkcl/ [rodO kovl] red cabbage' The opposition / k 11 9 / , as in NS, is not ~neutrelizedfl.Syllable-final

/ k / is realized as unaspirated [ k] , e. g. /d k / -7 C d 1 k 1 1fat* . has the positional variants after back and low vowels and /CJ/ [XI 11) elsewhere. Thus we have here overlapping of /5 / and /x/ .

/tag/ [tcax] 1 day' ' you say' 12) ' flight'

/'tii-g 1 Ci K/ Lt'e.1 drc]> 3 daily'

/zi 'lGcjk/ [zi ly:ct]) 'she lies'

Lbt tc]> 8 mountain'

In his attempt to level out the differences between South and North

German pronunciation, Siebs adopted the North German form for the ending 9 , e.g. /ric ~ti3/lLr~ctrf] > 'fight'. 13) The same articulation I mentioned for the phoneme /XIafter /r / , applies for Lx] and [$'J as positional variants of /g/ : if lax back and low vowels are lengthened, we have b] , if /r/ is voca-

11) Some informants, when reading, have occasionally final Lk] as in SG. 12) In K thus pairs like Flug - Flucht , mag - machl are homonymous. 13) Swiss and Austrian theatres, like the ttBurgtheater'f of Wien, never accepted this [L $3 , ( see A. Littmann, 1965). NS has the phoneme /j / (occurring only initially), realized as Lj 3 C3 1 or Ld3I , SG has two phonemes, /j / and /3 / (both occurring initially and medially) . Whereas 13 1 is an originally Low German sound, 13 / in SG occurs only in foreign words borrowed from

French. /j / in K has the tendency to be realized as the voiced alveo-palatal fricative L33 , sometimes affricated to Id3] : (4 of the 12 infor- mants have Ljj instead of Lj 1 , one has id3] - all in free varia- tion with [jl 1: /jedar/ Cje.rd31 - L3e-Kd3I - Id3c.r d3I leverpone'

For these SG speakers of Kiel, the phonemes /j/ = C31 and /3 / overlap. 14)

It is remarkable thatK speakers, on the basis of the NS substratum, 15) have no difficulty articulating the /3/ in foreign words :

/k13!1 [lo3 i:] lodging' irotsenttrala/ LSi:roLscn+ra:Iaj 'bank' . . c

14) It would be possible to regard this change in K as a reduction in the phonemic stock and to say that only /3/ occurs in K, not /j / . However, this does not seem a good solution, since for the phoneme /j / , C I varies with l j 1 . Perhaps the best solution would be to list /3/ not in the SG inventory, but to disregard it like the French nasals. Then we would have a one-to-one corres- pondence of SG /j / and NS /j / , the latter , wi~the free variants C 3 and Cj7, influencing K. 15) The hden ?see M. Mangold, 1964) states that /3 / is replaced by the originally Germanic LS] in the Vmgangslautungfl, especially by uneducated speakers. 3. Nasals

(a) t31 In final position the phoneme sequence /ng/ is not realized L 3 1 , but ffAuslautverh2rtungtf applies, as in NS (this is the only case where final /g / is not realized lx] or C$3 ) :

(b) InI y 31 16 ) 'She phoneme sequence /a 0 / is reduced in K to syllabic

After labials L is assimilated and results in the bilabial

nasal [ y] '?). This means overlapping of the phonemes /n / = and /tn/.

/'riban/. Izi:bwr] 1 seven1

/'karpfm/C kc&:pf ?I carp,

/'bf an 1 [ha:frn]I ' harbour' After velars assimilated Ly] results in a 1 :

After stops the airstreaa is released through the naval cavity

and, as in NS, a nasal explosion is caused. Occasionally the air

is audibly released from the glottis, through the nasal cavity:

16) Syllabic in K also results from the indefinite article lain/ -7 Lpl. 17) Syllabic I y 1 also arises from the dative morpheme /a ml , e. g. Idi zam/+~di:z~]' thist at.) (c) [y "'I a:] Assimilation of Ln] after nasals results in the lengthening I 18) of the nasal. Thus long m: : arise. In slow speech a 1T: I 1 double nasal is audible, in fast speech only one long nasal:

/'bGnan/4 -7 [by:Tn] -=I [by:::] 1 stages1 I

/cj~lkornan/->C kjak~~]I 3 Cgak3 m:]I come1 (PP)

4. The lateral / I

In K we do not find the two different /I /-qualities (two posi-

tional variants of /I / ) as in NS, but only the voiced alveolar lateral.

The phoneme sequence /a 1 / is usually realized as syllabic / f I : I

5. Prevocalic /r /

In places where /r/ is not vocalized, i. e. in prevocalic posi-

tion, it is mostly articulated as an alveolar trill [r] , as in NS.

However, one of my informants has [r] and [R] in free variation, 4 have the uvular trill LRJ only, e.g.

18) Whereas the reduction of /an/ to a syllabic nasal is found in the colloquial speech in all parts of Gennany, long syllabic nasals seem to be limited to the northern parts, thus explicable through LOWGerman, 19) Before syllabic 7 9 1 / an / and /a I/ , like before /ar/ and a, consonants are treatedI the same as intervocalically, i.e. for K lenition of /p + k / and occasional friction of /b d y / . The only exception is /r/ , which is not treated as in prevocalic posi- tion before syllabic L 7 3 , but is vocalized (see p. 38). 6. Clusters

As the distribution of phonemes differs in a few cases in SG and YS, NS influence can be found in K: (a) Initial clusters with /5 / do not occur in NS. Whereas K has the SG clusters /Sn (m $v/ , Ns influence is revealed in the initial

clusters /st/ and /SP/ , realized with the alveolar fricative. 1st / and 154 / are in free variation with 4 of my informants,

3 have always /st / :

/'sterna/C (SG /I;Lerna/)C ME:ha3 !starst /q$/ (SG Ispi: I/ ) ESP;: 11 gamev

(b) The cluster /pf/ , absent in NS, occurs in K medially, but is generally replaced by just / f / initially:

/(PI f pd/ Cfu~tl pound'

IYp)f pa/ Cf anal 1 panv

/(p)fal I Cf 4: I] 1 post' The onset in K is therefore, as in NS, reduced to the possibili-

ties CC, C and zero.

Clusters with /r/ do not occur in the coda, since /r/ is vocalized in this position. Resides this, a number of elisions, assi- milations and contractions occur, so that the clusters in the coda are generally shorter than in SG. They never exceed the phonetic sequence CCC .

7. Elisions

(a) As in NS, word-final /&/ after voiceless consonants, especially after [S] , drops:

/ni~t/c hr$ not1 /dybrjn3st/ Cdrc brr9ksl you bring1

/du hast/C Cdu has] ' you have1 (b) In the intervocalic phoneme sequence /nd/ , /d/ is occasionally

dropped :

/'vundarbar/c Lvvn3 bo:] wonderful'

/landc arn 1 [amn] ' others'

/'hundart/c C hvmt] ' hundred1

(c) In unstressed syllables final / I / is elided:

/@I Im 03 1 oncet /V?I / lvol probably1

(d) Occasionally / b 4 9 / before syllabic nasals are omitted:

/virlh+ban/ [vi3 hq:mJI we have1

/'ge ban/ L9e:yI 'to give1

/'ahganblik/c Lzvmblrkl moment1 I

8. Assimilations (a) Progressive assimilation, occurring with syllabic C ? 1 , was discussed on p. 46.

(b) K has, like NS, a number of regressive assimilations, occurring 20) at open juncture (unless there is an audible pause).

h / becomes C 3 3 before /k 3 / :

/'an kgmar,/ Ca3ka m:]I to arrive' /rain gant~as/ Crxr3 janksasl 'his whole.. '

20) It seems to me doubtful whether these cases of assindlation can be expl-ained through NS influence, They seem to mist in all parts of Germany (and occur in other languages as well), explicable through the facilitation of the articulatory process. /n/ becomes Lml before /p b f v / (before /f v/ the labio-dental nasal 1rr~ J occurs sometimes) :

/'fain bret / Cf a-rm bro-vt1 1 white bread1

/'an bi ndan/ * 'to tie' C L [ambrnd7]

/'anfC an5C ah/ hfq:J 1 to begin1

/'dimvand / [XI 3vant 1 1 ob jectionl / n / before [ rn is completely assimilated:

/'&in rnaxanlC to preserve'

9. Contractions ( a) As in NS , CS~+ / j / are contracted to L {J (i. e. a case of

&dhi) : /d~'my&)j+/ idumvla) !you must indeed' /du 'kansCc) ja/ [du kamj~] you can indeed' (b) Sandhi also occurs if a hornorganic voiceless and voiced stop

meet. Whereas in SG, in the combinations [ P + b t s d k + cj 1 , voicing starts after the first (unreleased) element, one lenicized

stop results in K: 'with the.. .

[abr~cn] 1 to break off 0 > I

1 fat enough1

(c) Two identical consonants are contracted into one; if they are stops,

no aspiration occurs:

1 washing bowl1

1 with aunt.. .l 'to scrape off1 On the tapes one can find a great number of contractions, explicable through assimilation and the typical slurring articulation of Schles-

,wig-Holstein. Occasionally whole phoneme sequences and even unstressed words ( ' ist' etc. ) are suppressed:

/'bisxan / LbysyI la little' C

/'ordan+Iir/ L3: ndo I IC]1 1 decent1 21) /nixts/ [n~4~1 1 nothing1 C

/IkonanC jk. volj. jqvoJ .. can probably1

/'for! 98" / cf"'y 31 1 last1 /'ai ahtIix/ Caxdlrc] 1 actually1 3 C 0 7 /,it'ainam/ Crnr?$ 'with a...'

111. Articulatory basis

So far I have examined the influence of NS on separate phonemes and phoneme groups of K. However, this does not account for all the differences, or better, for the different sound of K in general, com- pared to well-articulated SG. To account for this, we have to consider the different articulatory bases of SG and NS.

For SG an active movement of the lower jaw and the lips is characteristic. There is a distinct rounding and protrusion of the lips. They are almost always detached from the teeth and the tongue generally keeps a loose contact with the lower incisors (see He Krech,

1954). The larynx is wide open. NS, on the other hand, is marked for the inactivity of the articulatory movements. Lips and lower jaw are

"lazytt, The tongue is slightly drawn back and spreaded (ffverbreitertu - see v. Essen, 1964). Contraction of the larynx is frequent.

21) Probably an adaptation of the NS lexical item / 17 i s / nothingv. C In K we observe that for the articulation of rounded vowels and / 5 , the lips are much less rounded and protruded than in SG. Spreading and backward position of the tongue causes a relatively greater spreading of the lips for [a] (apparent particularly in the diphthongs La.11 and l2ul ), for [I] and for LC] and [33 as positio- nal variants of /r / . In the e-qualities L e 3 2 a pharyngal con- traction is often noticeable. Thus the NS articulatory basis, characte- rized by the general passiveness of lips and lower jaw, combined with a slightly retracted and spreaded position of the tongue, is also charac- 22) teristic for K.

22) K speakers (and North German speakers in general) are said to be '1 mundf aul" . I believe that the inactivity of the articulatory muscles is also the reason why a number of monosyllabic lexical items, pronounced with a tense vowel in SG, are articulated with a lax vowel in K, - 53 -

CONCLUSION

I. Summary

The investigation of K for those cases where NS deviates from SG showed that the hypothesis of an influence of NS on K - a North Saxon substratum - is correct. Except for the dark [*el and for final / b / realized C f 3 , all peculiarities of NS were found in K.

The changes in K are minor, however, since the SG and NS phono-

logic inventories are almost identical. Both have the basic opposition

of lax and tense vowels, the tense vowels being phonetically longer

under stress than the lax vowels. SG has one vowel phoneme ( /a / ) more than NS; in the consonant inventory the only difference is that SG has /j / and /3 1 , NS only /j / . SG as spoken in Kiel shows only one innovation in the phonemic stock: /i/ is replaced by /+/ . Apart from this one case, there are only changes in the phonetic realization

of phonemes, changes in the allophonic pattern and differences in the

combination of phonemes and allophones.

Charted in the cardinal , the phonetic realizations

of the vowels of K are as follows (encircled are the ones differing

from SG and identical with NS):

unrounded rounded The tense mid vowels /e 0 5 / diphthongize, mainly under I.' stress, to 1e.1 O'V (d' I] Lax /a / becomes clear fronted [a 1 , . e + ,tense / a / becomes rounded low back [b (: 11 (varying with unrounded [a (: ) . / i/ in labial surroundings is rounded, thus overlapping with 16 / Vowels before /n/ are ocasionally nasalized, The phoneme C . / r / is vocalized to 13 7 , varying with L €3 and [a] , in postvoca- lic position after tense vowels, ( L3l also results from the sequence

/ 9' / ) ; after lax vowels / r / is substituted by lengthening of the lax vowel (in unstressed syllables, however, no lengthening occurs).

The vocalization of /r/ after stressed tense /a/ (phonetically long

[ :7 or La : I ) may cause uberlZnge or Schleifton, i. e. L b :: 1 La : :1 . Before consonants, / I / can be vocalized to La . The diphthongs /ai a~ oL/ reveal a relative lengthening of the first element: /xi ( 4 [ a. I] -- [a. i] /a(( / 3 is V] -- [aSu] /oi/4 [>.I-. o~J.They can be represented as follows:

The consonant phonemes of K are as follows (encircled is NS 1) influence) :

1) Strictly speaking, the syllabic nasals and L 11 belong on the mor- phemic level: I:~vp:~:~:I J are allomorphs of /an/ and al. I list them here, however, a[s they are phonetically conditioned. - 55 - Phonemes Allophones Ini ti ally Medially between vowels

I!c /.)'/I I ain clusters 1 Thus we have, besides rounded / i / , coinciding with the pho- neme /&/ , four more cases of overlapping of overlapping of phonemes: C [ 3 becomes an allophone of / j / ( in free variation irith 1 ) , LX 1 and L 5 1 are positional variants of /g / , C ~3 and C (and

[ 3 1 ) are allophones in free variation of / / , [a 1 is also an allophone of / I / . Besides these cases, NS caused further differences in the allo- phonic pattern of K consonants : voiceless stops are lenicized medially, unaspirated (varying with lenition) in final position; ( aspiration, as in SG, occurs initially only). Voiced stops have occasional slight friction intervocalically. The glottal stop, normally accompanying a vowel after open juncture, can occur with voiceless stops before syllabic nasals.

The distribution of phonemes differs from SG in two cases: initial 1jt p / , non-existent in US, are replaced by /st SP / . The cluster / pf/ is replaced by single /f / in the onset. The sequence /an/ is reduced to syllabic ] , assimilated to the preceding consonant. Through assimilation to a homorganic nasal, long syllabic Ln : m : 9 : ] arise. /a 1 / results in syllabic I I . I I t A number of regressive assimilations occur, likewise causing a change in the combination of allophones: instead of SG 1 for final /n3 / , K has flAuslautverKirtungtf, i. e. L 3 k ] . At open juncture, /n be- comes Cm] before fp b f v / (thus we have a further case of overlapping:

/rn/ and /n[=Lm3), In/ becomes L71 before /kg/, and is com- pletely assimilated before /mi . Two cases of sandhi occur: collision of a homarganic voiceless and voiced stop at open juncture results in lenition, of L SJ and / j I in 15 1 . Two identical consonants are generally contracted into one. Together with a number of elisions

(the most frequent ones being loss of final /t/ after CS] , of final / / in unstressed words, of /d/ in the intervocalic sequence /nd / , and of / b d j / befor* a syllabic nasal), contractions are very fre-

quent and indicative of the typical slurring articulation of K. The

articulatory basis is identical with NS: passiveness of the lips and the lower jaw, slight retraction and spreading of the tongue.

11. Phonological rules

In order to arrive at the phonetic manifestation of K from the phonemic base of SG, we can formulate two sets of phonological rules.

The first set consists of the phonological rules that are equal for

SG and NS and therefore also for K. The second set accounts for the

changes that take place in K resulting from differences between SG and

NS. The rules seem to be partly ordered, i.e. several rules of the

second set can only be applied after previous application of one or more rules of the first or second set. I shall annotate ordering with

each rule in question. I use the following symbols (in addition to those listed on p. 6): V vowels w voiced fricatives c consonants F voiceless fricatives Q stressed vowels B labials unstressed vowels N nasals U back and low vowels N syllabic nasals I D voiced stops * non-aspiration T voiceless stops @ zero - 58 -

1. Phonological rules for SG, NS and K

1.1 Lengthening of tense vowels under stress

1.3 Aspiration of initial voiceless stops /T/ + [T']/+ -

1.4 Palatalization c4/ u- /x/ L 3 / elsewhere - 1.5 Assimilation of nasals

1.6 ~lottalization( optional) /v/+ [?vJ/+-

2. Phonological rules for K

2.1 Fronting

2.2 Backing and rounding of /a / 2.3 Diphthong lengthening [vv] WVI

2.4 Diphthongization of tense vowels

/:/= [ 3 --+ [:,I (th- Ruleapplies) 2.3

2.5 Suppression of /i/

/ -> /$/ (then Rule 2.4 applies)

2.6 Nasalization

2.7 Vocalization

For unstressed vowels (4 /r/ +[:]-[3-c-a]/y-g] then:

2.8 Lenition of medial voiceless stops

2.9 Fricativization of medial voiced stops o 1 - LWJ/JVI- ivi 2.10 Non-aspiration of final voiceless stops

(For final voiced stops Rule 1.2 applies before this one)

2.11 Final /g /

( a) AuslautverKartung ( i. e. application of Rule 1.2)

(b) Fricativization (this rule is an exception to ~ule1.2, thus applies before Rule 1.2)

2.14 /P/ - deletion

2.15 Syllabicity

2.16 Application of glottal stop with syllabic nasals 2.17 Pro~ressiveassimilation

] / elsewhere -

2.18 Regressive assimilation at open juncture

2.19 Elisions

2.20 Contractions In the Appendix, the phonemic represents the under-

lying forms of K, i.e. the forms before the application of these phonological rules. The phonetic writing represents K, Foe. the actual phonetic manifestation after the application of the rules.

The 20 rules of the second set apply in K with different

frequencies. Some of the changes thus formulated are in free variation,

for one and the same speaker, with the SG realizations of the phonemes

(i.e. application of the first set of rules only). The rules of the

second set that seem almost always to apply are 4, 5, 7 (a, b, c), 8, 10, 11 (a, b), 14, 15, 17 (a) and (b), 20 (a) and (c). Very rarely applied are the rules 1 (b), 6 and 9. This may be an indication that

the received standard German pronunciation is becoming more and more

influencial (at least in the more educated social strata) and that

dialectal colourings are in the process of being superceded by the SG ~Hochlautungff. As He Vogt (193) says about , we have, at any moment between the initiation and conclusion of these

changes, a state characterized by the presence of more or less free

variants. Whether such a trend towards a unified standard German on

the level of phonetics does indeed exist, would need further investi-

gation. The 20 phonological rules, found in K for the generation above

45, would have to be tested on the young generation, for example on the age-group 15 to 20. At present we still have in Kiel, as I showed

in this paper, various regional peculiarities, explicable through

dialect features of the North Saxon substratum. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adamus, M. 1967. Phonemtheorie --und das deutsche Phoneminventar. Wroclaw.

Austin, W.M. 1968. On the phonemic status of < ng ? in German. Studies -in Linguistics 20: 37 - 40. Babcock, W.R. et al. 1965. A spectographic investigation of the structural status of Ueberlaenge in German vowels. Language -and Speech 8: 214 - 218. Bach, A. 21950. Deutsche Mundartforschune;. Heidelberg.

Bazell, C. E. 1956. Three conceptions of phonological neutralization. --For . The Hague. 25 - 30. Bloch, B. 1941. Phonemic overlapping. American Speech 16: 278 - 84. Bloomfield, L. 1933. Language. New York.

Bock, K.Y. 1933. Niederdeutsch auf 8&nischem Substrat. Copenhague.

Chomsky, N. & M. Halle 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York. Cochran, W. G. 1953. Sampling techniques. New York. Colhoun, E.R. 1967. Local and non-local frames -of reference in Puerto -Rican . Unpublished PhD Thesis. Cornell ~nivzsit~. Delattre, P. 1965. Comparing -the phonetic features -of English, French, German and Spanish. Heidelberg.

Dixon, J .Re C. 1968. & Plattdeutsch zweier Gedihrsleute. --Ein Ver- gleich. Unpublished. Kiel University.

Droescher, W.O. 1964. and stress in German. --Te Reo 7: 23 - 27. Ellis, J . 1965. Linguistic sociology and institutional linguistics. Linmistics 19: 5 - 20. v. Essen, 0. 1953. Allgemeine und angewandte Phonetik. Berlin. 1957. Ueberlange und gedehnte Konsonanten des Hochdeutschen. Zeitschrift -fiir Phonetik -und allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 10:

1964. Kirchwerder bei Hamburg. Lautbibliothek -der deutschen Mundarten Heft 33/34. Gzttingen. Fishman, J. A, l9&. Language maintenance and language shift. Linguistics 9: 32 - 70. Foerste, W. 1952. Geschichte der niederdeutschen Mundarten. Deutsche Philologie -im Aufriss 1: 1729 .. 1898. Berlin.

1960, Einheit und Vielfalt c& niederdeutschen Mundarten. Miinster.

Gleason, H.A. 1955. & introduction to descriptive linguistics. New

-York. - 4 Harris, Z.S. 1951. Methods -in . Chicago. Heike, G. 1961. Das phonologische System des Deutschen als binares Distinktionssystem. Phonetica 6: 162 - 76. 1964. Zur Phonolol?;ie- der Stadtk'6lner Mundart. Marburg. Henzen, We *1954, Schriftsprache -und Mundarten. Bern. Hill, T. 1958. Institutional linguistics. -Orbis 8: 441 .. 55. Hockett, C.F. 1958. A course 2 modern linguistics. New York. Ingling, J. Unpublished. Methodological problems -in American dialec- tology, Simon Fraser University.

Jakobson R. & Me Halle 1967. Tenseness and laxness. Preliminaries -to Speech Analysis. ~ambridge/~ass.57 - 61. ~brgensen,P. 1954.. @ schleswimr Niederdeutsch. Copenhagen. Kehlenbeck, A.P. 194% An Iowa Low German dialect, Publications -of -the American Dialect Societ. 10. Greensboro. Keller, R.E. 1961, German Dialects, Phonology -and morphology. Manchester.

Krech, E.M. 1968. Sprechwissenschaftlich-phonetische Untersuchungen -zum Gebrauch -des Glottissch1.ageinsatzes --in der allgemeinen deutschen Hochlautunf~.BaseL.

Krech, H. 199. Zur Artikulationsbasis der deutschen IIochlautung. Zeitschrift -fur Phonetik 8: 92 - 107. 1961. Reitrage zur deutschen Ausspracheregelunq. Berlin.

~u%era,A. R G.K. Monroe 1968. A comparative, quantitative phonology -of Russian, --Czech, and ~erma;. New York. Kuhlmann, We 71963. Deutsche Aussprache. Freiburg. Kurath, W. 1939. Yandbook --of the linguistic geography of New England. Providence.

Langacker, R.W. 1967. Language --and its structure. New York. Leopold, F.W. 1959. The decline of German dialects. Word- 15: 130 - 53. Littmann, A. 1965. Die P roblematik der deutschen Hochlautung. Moderna ~pr&7: 1 - 29. Lotzmann, G. 1967. Zur Norm und Realisation der deutschen Hochlautung. Wirkendes Wort- 17: 228 - 38. Mangold, M. 1961. Laut und Schrift im Deutschen. Duden-BeitrXge 3. Mannheim.

et al. 1962. Duden-Aussprachew'd.rterbuch. Mannheim. Martens, P. 1961. Phonetik -der deutschen Aussprache. Miinchen. Martin, B. 1959. -Die deutschen Mundarten. Marburg. Martinet, A. 199/55. Dialect. Romance Philology 8: 1 - 11. 1955. Economie -des changements phontkiques. Bern.

Meyer-Eppler, W. 1959. Zur Spektralstruktur der r-Allophone im Deutschen. Acustica 9: 247 - 50. Morcinniec, M. 1958. Zur phonologischen Wertung der deutschen Affri- kate und Diphthonge. Zeitschrift -fur Phonetik 11: 49 - 66. Moulton, W.G. 1947. Juncture in modern standard German. Language 23: 212 - 26. 1956. Syllable nuclei and final consonant clusters in German. --For Roman Jakobson. The IIague. 372 - 81. 1962. The sounds -of English and German. Chicago. Mueller , H. 1958. Deutsch. Erstes -Buch. Milwaukee. Niekerken, 1948/50. Zur Lage des Miederdeutschen in unserer Zeit. Viederdeutsches Jahrbuch 71 - 73: 337 - 47. 1953. Zu den Problemen der Zweisprachigkeit im niederdeutschen Raum (mit besonderer Berucksichtigung des ~ordniedersachsischen). Niederdeutsches Jahrbuch 76: 64 - 76.

OtConnor, J.D. & J.M. Trim 1953. Vowel, consonant and syllable. A phonological definition. Word 9: 103 - 22. Pickford, R. 1956. American linguistic geography. A sociological appraisal. Word 12: 211 - 33. Pilch, H. 1964. Phonemtheorie. Basel. , , 1966. Das Lautsystem der hochdeutschen Umgangssprache. Zeit- schrift -fiir Mundartforschwg 33: 247 - 66. Porzig, W. 31962. & i-lunder -der Sprache. Basel. Postal, P.M. 1968. Aspects -of phonolo@cal theory. New York. Runschke, E. 1947. Rwdfunk und Aussprache. Zeitschrift -fur Phonetik 1: 214 - 50.

Samarin, W.J. 1967. Field linguistics. Vew York.

Sapon, S.M. 1950. Socio-economic differentials in linguistic phenomena. Studies -in Linguistics 11: 57 - 68. Saporta, S. 1965. Ordered rules, dialect differences , and historical process. Language 41: Schirmunski , V.M. 1962. Deutsche Mundartkunde. Berlin. Siebs, T. 181961. Deutsche Hochsprache. B'henaussprache. Ed. by He de Boor & P. Diels. Berlin. 191969. Deutsche Aussprache. Raine und fledssigte Hochlautung -mit Aussprached6rterbuch. Ed. by H. de Boor, H. Moser R C. Winkler. Berlin.

Trier, J. 1966. Alltagssprache. Die deutsche Sprache -des 20. Jahrhun- derts. Gottingen. 110 - 33. Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1939. Grundziige -der Phonologie. Prague. (TCLP 7)

Twaddell, F.W. 1959. Standard German. Anthropological Linguistics 1.3: 1 - 7. Voegelin, C.F. 1956. Phonemicizing for dialect study. Language 32: 116 - 35. Vogt, H. 199. Language contacts. Word 10: 365 - 74. Wangler, H .I1 . 1960. Grundriss einer Phonetik des Deutschen. Farburg. 1961. ---Atlas deutscher Drachlaute. Berlin. 1963. Instruction & German pronunciation. St. ~aul/Ninn. Waterman, J.T. 1966. A history --of the German language. Seattle and London. Weinreich, U. 1953. Languages contact. Vew York. 199. Is a structural dialectology possible? Word 10: 388 - 400. Weinrich, He 1961. Phonologie der Sprechpause. Phonetics 7: 4 - 18. Wright, J. T. 1966. Urban dialects; a consideration of methods. Zeitschrift -fiir Mundartforschung 33: 232 - 47. APPENDIX

[devl ttserl mama. ?o.umcl vi fRyc maca f~~kstue + 3 /denc er'tselc man mat - 'oma-. vi 'fri;or rolwa '(P)fingstturc -

Denn erzahl man malt Oma, wie friiher solche Pfinsttour,

1) zovv1 fr9ksd?~vsfluxba~ ?31$ fo3 Z~C I 0 > 3~3k] r? aio '(p)fjngstacls{lug - bpi Y 'fer ri x 3: ng / so ein Pfingstausflug bei euch vor sich ging. -

Cja: das VQ: na cjroSvsa 'svfrei 3 "3' ?&:sma vvad js I /Ij+ - das v+r (+a I3rcsa 'auf re j yng - erst ma1 vurd (3) j+ C Ja, das war eine grosse Aufregung. Erstmal wurde ja

I 'irnar I?s nox dam himat cja'kqr kt - vi(da)slvetar vol var - unt C C b C C C irnmerlos nach dem Hirnmel geguckt, wie das Wetter wohl war. Und

vens dr~?a.roi 3rna:sn dem 51b~dnvia [ovs ha%:, 3 0 Ol + I ven(a)sc dft, 'ainjgarmasao - Jzn Si partan vir 10s - nax dem C wenn es denn einigermassen (war), denn schipperten wir los, nach dem

I 'banhof - unt'dbn-c maistans 'kaman vir Ci~(aivrja~ 'f;va-cjan. , - Rahnhof. Und denn, meistens kamen wir in einen Viehwagen.

1) The personal pronouns tich, mich, dich, sich' and the endings '-ig, dch, -licht have L r] in the Siebs, whereas L i3 in K. 2 vvad? row gro.usa 'a3cjahe3kd nrc cjro.vsa va3334s vow 0 > 'vurdan z? I5rosa I ayahencjt - nirt - I3rosa vtgtsI - - vq , , C C (~a)wurden so grosse . angehkgt, nicht, grosse Wagons, wo

dzn z? prov;)roriJ...c 'b:bka rairt ~zftzt'varrn vjxt-unt den 9 - c denn so provisorisch B'hke reingesetzt waren, nicht. Und denn

vuada ds naxlle3 vrn dos drps fa1 "a: d~nvvaela dc~ro7 + 'vyrda da 'naxhcr - v:n das dings 'fol ver- dfn 1vurd a dr zo ate *c9 C C C C . . wurde da nachher, wenn das Ding voll war, denn wurde da so ein

bulk3t foagale.vbm damst kCa-rn3 vi:d3 ravspl vmpsn I I I balka~forgak;? ban - dlmi& 'kainar vidar 'rausplumpsar, C Balken vorgeschoben, damit keiner wieder rausplumpsen

kc9nda di tcy3 mvsda ?~fmbla.rbm jo: ?undth 'vnzs 0 0 I I 0 I I konta - di Ciir rnysta 'ofah 'blaiban - jk- unt den - unzar C . C t C konnte. Die Tiir msste offen bleiben. Ja, und denn, unser

frlksdavsf lux 413k ja 'rma nax malcnda malcnda grcrns 0 + + 4 0

1(p)fjn3stausflug gingc ja. ';marC n$x mdlentac c - mallen+o rems C C 9 c Pfingstausflug ging ja imer nach Malente, Malente-Grems-

my:ln di kandm via jq (on f>b hrndn ?unt f2:na di t'ua I + 01 0 l

'miitan - dj 'kantan vir, ja Jpn fpn 'hjntan frtt 'farnaC - di tur - miihlen. Die kannten wir ja schon von hinten und vorne, die Tour. ynt 1 &baral 'jtigan n.l$ti;t-l iu nor (ai)wlmtn a 'loita lvidar c c* * C 3 und iiberall stiegen. natiirlich noch eine Menge Leute wieder

3) ain ,=ma rrn rn den fi:vI3:CJg nr$ 1 mjt ah- imar I rjn in den 'fivacj3n - nixt/ c C mit ein, imrner rein in den Viehwagen, nicht.

[da vvad: ja d; fx9k.l kcla.rd:, ts~drrkt1

/d a 'vrrrdanC ja..* d; S6nan'(p)f ingst klaidar tsecrbr;rt/c

Da wurden ja die sch5nen Pfingstkleider zerdriickt!

[jclja undcn rnvsdm V~J?xvx n3x ?xvf(asn das via rat 0 O 1 4- I / jtjh- unt den'mustan vir aux npx 'auf pa~ah-df~vir nixt C C C * c Jaja, und denn mussten wir auch noch aufpassen, dass wir nicht

nax tCe:3f lrg a und rovas dara-in trrcdn yrrmsmy:In >o 1 I ngx 'herfleka e unt 'rovas da'rain 'krjgtan- yrerns'm~~alr C C noch Teerflecke und sowas darein kriegte. Gremsm'ithlen

war die Haltestelle. Und denn trudelte alles raus, und meistens

N 2) French nasals /V/ , realized as LV31 and LVgklin final position. 3) Lexical item from Low German: rin = ' into' 913:via den a.v an3n b~':ngtarc vov c13 Iyt3,:bvar3 fy + > I.In an vir dcn auf (=I+ kndarn 'ban~tai~- vo der 'I;tjr,n brrrgar 9= 8 . c# ( c gingen wir denn auf den andern Bahnsteig, wo der Liitjenburger

~SVX?apfci~t 'vndtn I k~ In di h31stzrni a va-its 0 39 S I )pfert - unt dem in (a)s in di 'holstain j ~a 'jvaits - C G 9L 7 L . C Zug abfghrt. Und denn ging es in die Holsteinische Schweiz,

hPxm ktlsra.~ mxxrna: gx3k daja avx ?E:S naxmrdaxs + I + 0 nax dern1k~larze- 1 manxmpl 3tng das ja aux zrst 'numitags C , C L nach dem Kellersee. Manchmal ging das ja auch erst nachrnittags

drh hadn via 'c:s naxrns ?IT brq:rnbc:~; hotel tsvm +01 19s - d%n'hatan vir 'erst nzx mrl im 'bram berg - h&el tsum C C . L C c 10s. Denn hatten wir erst nochmal in ?3rahrnberg, Hotel zum

bra:rnbe:c mr xsx jajcs: das hrrscln fzj3a3k do hadn + 0 l 0 1 I bram berg -'mi tag ga'gfsa~- das haist den 'f ijgang- da'hatao C L 'C t Brarnberg , Mittag gegessen; das heisst, den Fischgang, da hatten

'anltalc ha~rt uht Ii* dts j+ nix t 'zer da.'rn;ta L - a~ar'hau~tzexliwc c Onkel Hans und ich das ja nicht sehr damit, aber hauptsXchlich

~PS is VLS as h1nd3ht1a 3a:p das [~jiavn5 ja ze13 0 + das 'aiz - vas 7s hintorh~rg+b -das 'lokta yns ja zer - C C C C C das Eis, was es hinterher gab, das lockte uns ja sehr. vjr das imlma an'hatan-clen 'a vidar 'raus - in di 'frisa Iyft- c b a7 c c J* c c wir das im Magen hatten, denn ja wieder raus in die frische Luft.

Und denn waren da ja an den Hauptwegen all solche kleinen

bu:dn zana jb:m+: ks bu:du 'vnda 9a:p das dm d~'bary:mt7 I + I 0 +

Buden, so Jahrmarktsbuden, und da gab das denn die befihmten,

Wie hiessen sie, Malzbonbon, oder Rahmbonhon hiessen sie ja f*er,

nicht, solch kleine viereckige Dinger, die schmeckten fein. Da

krrct;l vi3 den 'aux n3x na tcy:da fan vndcn 6ri:brn via 3 0 0 I I I krjgtsn vir den aux her: (ai)na t4C2 fon- untdehitrib,nc v;r C Kriegten wir denn auch noch eine Tiite von. Und denn trieben wir 'vns da ja 'rn d3 ge.1 gyt hcrvm]

unsc da Ja in der1cje9and Clhtrqrn/ 'C uns da ja in der Gegend hem. -

[fu:3*1 ds 'avx own rnctoa bovda ds:molr 1 I 5 0 /'furan d+ lux Jon 'motorbaka. . 'damals / Fuhren da auch schon Motorboote damals? -

jo: rnotoabovda0 fu:3~ ds'avx Sown lvnt alas rn frsLlicn I + ) I I / ja - m?t?rbo-b 'furan d+ aux Sovl - unt 'alas ~n'festlic~n C C 6 .> Ja, Motorboote fuhren da auch schon. Und alles in festlichen

gavcndear, I bly:mcan> ?rm kn2pf l3x 1

ga'vendarnr. - witc (zin3m 'bl~rnxancim knorflox/ C G eGindern, mit einem Bliimchen im Knopf1och.-

[~b:+vic) du hads d3x 'avx g~sdsn?a:bmt $la.-i mrt nrc 0 0 I #

/'lr?dvi CJ - du 'hatastC douC auu Iggstarn '+band '$1 ai mi&- hic xt- Ludwig , du hattest doch auch gestern abend Schlei mit, nicht?

hod1 di3 ,ga$rn~kt 20 nax h~lstarneo:t mrd rnc:redrc vr\t 0 0 0 ) I 6 EC hat dir a mekt - ro nrx h:Is+ainar trt-mit 'rnerr:ti C x-untr. 9's c ' C C Hat er dir geschmeckt? So nach holsteiner Art mit Meerrettich und jlarza:na ja das w:n galv3nas fest "a: 3 dia nrc 4- 1 51 zana - ja dts varain 3ga'lyng[a)nas fe$- v+r tr dir njrt Schlagsahne? Ja, das .war ein gelungenes Fest. War er dir nicht

Cncirl das+ va: vvnobs: 1 fnair, - dps var 'v yndarbar/ Nein, das war wunderbar.-

[foa mi3 hap I? : lof brld0 fin pcl$~r,da IS di kcraca> d;

/'fqr mjr h+b(a)ix C ain'l~ftbild fen 'pion - da ist di 'kirra - di c L . C c Vor mir habe ich ein Luftbild van PS6n. Da ist die Kirche, die

kcray hat+ &sip : tCv:m de 7rs ~tvazrgGi t rne.rta ho-vx

'ki rxa hat ainan '4urr-n - dfr ist etvb 'zextsi cj 'metar he X - C C C L C Kirche hat einen Turn, der ist ekwa sechzig Meter hoch.

ja: ?u*t hi^ Jas+ $1~f3n d3:t I.VS hat man+ ?at7: vvndcj9r::

ja - yn-L hjr das 'SI~S- fon dortC aus - hatc rnsnC ainan'vundarJ2nah C Ja, und hier das Schloss. Von dort aus hat man einen wunderschhen blrk 'yba den gro-vsn pl$rnc ze.i drm zi:d man hic d; 1 0 bl ik - Gbar den 'gro san lplijnar Ire - den zit ma0 hir di , . C C Blick iiber den grossen PlZner See. Denn sieht man hier die

b0:niin.a vas dzs dcn dg ax jut dasnzs d3 na.zbz~d~ 1 + t I ban l in ja - vts 'das d~nda - ax j+ - dpsjst der'noibau der C C C Bahnlinie. Was (ist) das denn da? Ach ja, das ist der Neubau der

k*a.rsrp~:Casa vo ge-rts d~ndci: I~t$rnbvaz3 jtrs:sa by:lc 1

kraisYparkasa- V? get (a)s den'da -'I&tsamc J burgar t. $tr+sa - b~~or Kreissparkasse. Wo geht es denn da - Liitjenburger Strasse, Piihler-

ve-if 7rx n+ dcnrs ga anrt rnrdra-vf ri:t ?alas zo rui: 'a.V5 I~$9 - $Y I nk - dtr :st gar nix& mit 'elrawf - zit atas ro'ryi4 aus - C weg- achn:, deristgarnichtmitdrauf. Siehtalles so ruhig aus,

vndqbai '1s d2x 'rm~fi:l baGi:p va.11 das ns ra-ma dvzf ga3ts 4- unt 'dabzi jst dow imar f i I bdtrj b -vail clas (ai)na 'rzina 'dyrx an s C C * 3L 3 und dabei ist doch imer viel Betrieb, weil das eine reine Durchgangs-

k~nclas ja rlas ic V~IS go:. nrcp me3 fia tsu

art ist - j+ -jx 'kenca)c dasr jd'alas'C - ix vbis xt m$r 'fi [ 4s u c C art ist. Ja, ich kenne das ja alles; ich weiss gar nicht mehr viel zu

'&se*il: venrcsdnr01 rs plg:n rrn ze:s [email protected]*las {kitcan> 1 I er'tsalat, - venic~stans. . Cist plb'n rin 'zet- '$?*as 'Stataan /

erzzhlen. Wenigstens ist PYbn ein sehr sch'cines S6dtchen.- [j~:blzo hi3 ?zs ja de kcana:l hia 7~sde h4:frn da rs I /ja '$1~0- hir ist j~ der'kanal - hir ist der 'hafan - da ist ". C 1 C Ja, also, hier ist ja der Kanal. Hier ist der Hafen, da ist

di 'nordC mp la - uutc hir zint d; 'baidan 'Sl~izanainf~rtao-vn+dj C t die Nordmole, und hier sind die beiden Schleuseneinfahrten, und die

hovxbRv3a lybs di via nzx Jzakrei ?vnt $&Randl fa:: nre > I 'box brl;ko - +bar clj vir oax {i 1 k~eunt 'jtranda 'faran-hixk- C C C . C L C Hochbriicke, uber die wir nach Schilksee und Strande fahren, nicht,

I 1 unt di dox 'v2ramt der kilar voxa ' ori as at-- ba'r;idjgt var - C C . C f. .a j. und die doch warend der Kieler Woche voriges Jahr bescK&digt war

f2n a.im J 9RovsnI fRzxta ?vhdadvrco p mvsta d3 gantsa I en alnarn l3rosan fraxtarc - bnt badurx 'mustac derIgantsac L C van einem grossen Frachter; und dadurch musste der ganze

Sache. Ein Frachter war zu hoch und hatte da irgendwelche f~i(3apgabRaxy 1

Ip)failat- 'a-pC ?a broc xan 1 Pfeiler abgebrochen.. .

I Iynt da 'kan mall naw lmSltanqrt - zer gut ainan $p~t~jrg~ng'tnaxa~- ' C C Und da kann man nach H6ltenort sehr gut einen Spaziergang machen,

d3 z~a9af~eicd '0 'rs mrt hvpSr: zanl~:rgd3 veer= 'ohm I

der zer 'h~~~anC 'an1 a an -derc ve, '?ban c ga(p)fe4t:st - mitc 4 9'- der sehr gepflegt ist, mit hiibschen Anlagen, der Weg. Oben

7 bu&lFt f3n d.:t +v5 kaman di $rfa r~*us7vnd 0 rzir, I I auszjxt - fon 'dort aus - kanma~di, 'yif a - raus ~lntrai~ L t C Aussicht. Von dort aus kann man die Schiffe raus und rein-

f4:n zt-in ?a.vsm kei:\3 ho:fm 'vnt vi:ds raavs ?~c,di I I farah 'zean - a~sdem kilar 'h)fan - ~lntC vidar 'raus - in di C fahren sehen, aus dem Kieler Hafen, und wieder raus in die bitze: 1 I ostze / ,c , Ostsee. -

[vi vie imzcbt'embe na.r~Lsanhvn ~t n~.rhvnzettsif 10

/v! vjr jrn rep'tembar 'nair,~s

'~lalbv~fb:n I fu:,: f u:anI via 3a:nts gamy:tlit Rrcdv3k0

'~rlaub'frran-yr?ran-'furm vir-'$antsC 3a'mi;tlix. . -'riYtrnS Urlaub fahren - fuhren - fuhren wir ganz gemiitlich Richtung

o:da 5tatsjo:n va: Ro*~dobv:xda a i:l vns drs nrc ry:d: + I 3 f 3 Iz+dam - ersta $ta6sljon - v+r 'sotanburg - ds I yns dar ni~t C c ' Siiden, Erste Station war Rothenburg. Da gefiel uns das nicht bar3ndes da vo: truf i:lo.vs vie zetsdn 'uns dan apC vardc 0 l + 0 I I bazondars- do var ~sulfjl'los - ~ir'z~tstanbns dan 'ap - vaitar- C I. C c c besonders; da war zuviel los, Wir setzten uns dann ab, weiter

Rrctv3k> dr9j lsby:l n~Jaso kla-inas ma:/ ari'jas ite*itca~fast 'I

Richtung Dinkelsbiihl: nettes, kleines, malerisches StZdtchen, fast nax rrn u:etsu$tant JES m~dlald~srhaldn da: gafi:l as 01+ 0 + 01 w hpx- jm 'urtsu Stand- desc 'mitaloltarsc eGhaltan- el? 3a'f il as LC noch im Urzustand des Mittelalters erhalten. Da gefiel es

vns da va: Ru:a vi via ti Rrctrc bRa-vxdn vcrnao z3n > > 0 I + I I I uns - cJa vat rua - v; vir zi 'pi x t i br au vtan ven marl ro ah . . . . C - C C uns, da war Ruhe, wie wir sie richtig brauchten. Wenn man so ein

g:n-bsas ja: gat: bsidat hat dcr~IS rnavl fRo-v vemama 0 +

ganzes Jahrgearbeitet hat, denn ist man froh, wenn man ma1

a-os dern gRo:s: CRb:bI ro RscCrt Raws 1s ?zm nc-itsdm I > 0 l aus dem 'grossn 'krubal - 20 'riwtig c, Irkus ist- am 'nixStao C C aus dem grossen Trubel so richtig raus ist. Am nkhsten

fax cjrgk_as va.idr rm3 ry:tvc:ts ?ybs 7a*uksbvrf + 0 'ky- 41~3as 'va~tar- imarc 'r

'&:stas tsi:l vs: d?n fYc vos 5135 \zndsho.vf hadr, +01 I erst as ksjl - var dsn f3r u~nSlos 'Iindar hof - hatan vir C C L C Erstes Ziel war dann fiir uns Schloss Linderhof. Hatten wir

I fil {on jdh~rt- vpltan 'zeah-vi denC dizl 'attahc 'bstri~ao

vie1 von gexort; wollten sehen, wie denn diese alten bayrischen Re+ n&$a tsae~tvcmar, + ri:t vas di damals fya gcCt \ 're&C 'rrpta 'tsait venC mah 'zit-"as eli 'damxls fcr c~glcl - c e . recht nette Zeit, wenn man sieht, was die damals r Geld

?rnvesti~dnJvm ?i3 fcjny:ga tsu habm I 0 1 I

investierten, um ihr Vergniigen zu haben.9