DOCSLIB.ORG

In Search of an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Search of an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory In Search of an Ontology for Quantum Field Theory Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorw¨urde, dem Promotionsausschuß Dr. phil. der Universit¨atBremen vorgelegt von Meinard Kuhlmann Bremen, den 6. Juni 2000 Contents Preface 4 List of Abbreviations 6 I Introduction 7 II Context, Methods and Presuppositions 15 1 Philosophical Background 16 1.1 The Development of Atomism in the History of Philosophy . 18 1.2 Philosophical Versus Scientific Atomism . 23 1.3 Atomism and Reductionism . 24 2 Ontology and Physics 27 2.1 \On What There Is": Notions of Ontology . 27 2.2 The Analytical Tradition of Ontology . 30 2.3 Excursion: No-Go Theorems in Quantum Physics . 32 3 Fundamentals of Quantum Physics 35 3.1 The Legacy of Quantum Mechanics . 35 3.2 The Standard Formalism of QFT and its Problems . 40 3.3 The Relation of QFT and AQFT . 43 3.4 Basic Ideas of AQFT . 45 1 CONTENTS 2 4 (A)QFT as Objects of Philosophy 48 4.1 Quantum Mechanics versus QFT . 48 4.2 QFT versus Algebraic QFT . 52 4.3 The Philosophical Interest in (A)QFT . 56 III Classical Ontologies 59 5 Classical vs. Revisionary Ontologies 60 5.1 Introduction . 61 5.2 Aristotle's Theory of Substances . 64 5.3 Substances under Attack . 69 6 The Particle Interpretation of QFT 73 6.1 The Particle Concept . 74 6.2 Theory and Experiment in Elementary Particle Physics - Is a Particle Track a Track of a Particle? . 77 6.3 Localization Problems . 80 6.3.1 The Clash of Causality and Localizability . 82 6.3.2 Locating the Origin of Non-Localizability . 87 6.4 Further Problems for a Particle Interpretation of QFT . 93 6.5 Results . 95 7 Field Interpretations of QFT 96 7.1 The Field Concept . 97 7.2 Fields as Basic Entities of QFT . 98 7.2.1 The Role of Field Operators in QFT . 98 7.2.2 Indirect Evidence for Fields . 101 IV Revisionary Ontologies 102 8 Process Ontology 103 8.1 The Strands of Process Ontology . 103 8.2 Why Process Ontology in QM and QFT? . 104 CONTENTS 3 8.3 A `Case Study': Consequences of the Ontological Hypothe- ses for the Interpretation of Feynman Diagrams . 107 8.4 Evaluation of the `Case Study' . 114 8.5 Remaining Problems . 115 9 Trope Ontology 117 9.1 Introduction - The Ontological Status of Properties . 118 9.2 Trope Ontology as a Solution to the Problem of Universals . 122 9.3 The Bundle Theory of Tropes . 124 9.4 Evaluation . 126 V Proposal for a New Ontology of QFT 128 10 Dispositional Trope Ontology 129 10.1 Introduction . 129 10.2 Dispositional Tropes of `Many-Particle Systems' . 131 10.2.1 `Elementary Particles' . 131 10.2.2 Individuality of Quantum Objects . 132 10.2.3 Dispositions and Tropes . 136 10.2.4 An Example . 139 10.3 From Many-Particle Systems to Fields . 140 10.4 Reconciliation of Theory and Experience . 141 10.5 Summing Up . 143 VI Conclusion 144 11 The Interplay of Physics and Philosophy 145 12 Evaluation and Comparison 148 12.1 General Remarks . 148 12.2 Comparison of Ontological Approaches to QFT . 150 12.2.1 Particles Versus Fields . 150 12.2.2 Processes Versus Tropes . 154 CONTENTS 4 12.2.3 The Merits of Dispositional Trope Ontology . 155 VII Glossaries 159 Physics Glossary 160 Philosophy Glossary 163 VIII Appendices 165 A The Quantum Theory of Measurement 166 B Assumptions of AQFT 169 C Proof of Malament's No-Go Theorem 174 References 178 Acknowledgement 191 Preface Some parts of this book have been or will be published in extended or shortened versions and/or in a different arrangement. Parts of chapter 1 will appear as the introduction in Kuhlmann et al. (2000). Parts of sec- tion 3.1 and chapter 8 have appeared as \Processes as objects of quantum field theory" Kuhlmann (2000). Parts of chapters 5 and 9 have appeared as \Quanta and tropes: Trope ontology as descriptive metaphysics of quantum field theory" Kuhlmann (1999a) and as \Quanten und Tropen - Philoso- phie der Physik und Sprachphilosophie" Kuhlmann and St¨ockler (2000). Parts of chapter 6 have appeared as \Was sagt das Vakuum ¨uber Teilchen aus? Neuere Ergebnisse aus der theoretischen Physik schaffen zus¨atzliche Probleme f¨urden Teilchenbegriff" Kuhlmann (1999b). 5 List of Abbreviations AQFT Algebraic Quantum Field Theory CCR Canonical Commutation Relations GRT General Relativity Theory prob Probability SRT Special Relativity Theory QFT Quantum Field Theory QM Quantum Mechanics 6 Part I Introduction 7 Introduction Which questions will be explored? The philosophical topic of this thesis is ontology restricted to the investigation of the most general struc- tures of what there is in the world. We will ask which kinds of things and modes of being there are in the most general sense. However, the questions which are of concern in the present work are only relative ones. What is being discussed are the ways to conceive of the world which are compat- ible with the mathematical formalism of QFT. No assumptions are being made about the truth of QFT or its relation to reality. Questions about truth, reality, \the world" and their connection have no direct impact on the study. Moreover, being as such will not be an issue at all. QFT is thus the unquestioned starting point of the following investigation. The only sense in which this procedure will be reflected upon is with regard to the conceptual consistency and maturity of QFT and the status of QFT within physics. The immediate question why QFT of all scientific theories has been chosen for this enterprise has a straightforward answer. If any theory about nature can lay claim on being the most fundamental one it is QFT. This is not to say that everything can or should be reduced to QFT. However, when special sciences come under ontological consideration at all, QFT is of outstanding importance. Accordingly, it is of particular interest which picture of the world this theory paints. The term `ontology' is often used in a twofold way, at least in the tradition of analytical philosophy which is the philosophical background of the present work. Besides the search for or the theory of the most general structures of being, `ontology' denotes the domain itself to which 8 9 a language or theory refers. Following this tradition I will freely make use of both senses of `ontology' as well. It is not presupposed that there is one definite set of basic entitites to which QFT refers and which one could simply, or after some closer investigation, read off QFT. The only two things I will presuppose with respect to ontological questions is, firstly, that these questions make sense at all and, secondly, that special sciences like physics constitute objects whose conceptual analysis yields a valuable contribution to the general ontological questions. What kind of answers should be expected? This thesis will hope- fully purvey inspiring information about QFT and some ways one can and cannot imagine the world to be in line with QFT. However, it will not supply the right or appropriate ontology of QFT. Not only is the number of proposals as well as the number of issues to be taken into account al- most impossible to exhaust. Moreover, there might never be a final unified answer. Although a final answer to the posed questions should not be expected it will become clear in the course of this investigation that not all problems are equally important and not all options are equally viable. Eventually, I will introduce and explain a new option for the ontology of QFT and justify my preference for this option. Historical and systematical background. The ontological analysis of QFT is a relatively new area of philosophical concern. Nevertheless it clearly has a well-known immediate historical and systematical background. In a sense it is a follow-up to the famous discussion about the wave-particle duality which originated with the formation of quantum mechanics (QM). Quantum objects seem to defy a representation in classical terms. With the quantum measurement problem the very idea of an objective ascrip- tion of properties to things came under suspicion. Finally, Heisenberg's uncertainty relations together with the non-classical behaviour of systems containing so-called identical particles endanger the individuality of quan- 10 tum objects. All these questions still linger on in the present investigation. There is, however, a much longer tradition of kindred questions in the history of atomism beginning with ancient greek philosophy. Here we have similar considerations about the building blocks of the world and their properties. Nevertheless, there is a pivotal difference between the old atom- ist's reasoning and the way we proceed nowadays. Except for its very last period the history of atomism consists exclusively of conceptual considera- tions. In contrast to that the ontological study of QFT starts with a theory which has been exceedingly well corroborated in a plethora of experiments. Main results in this thesis. Besides an account of the current state of research and of some systematical as well as historical foundations this work contains four original contributions by the present author to the ongoing research. The first point is preparatory and consists in the embedding of the main topic of this thesis into philosophy of physics on the one side and general philosophy on the other side. Each of the next three contributions to the research concerns a different option for the ontology of QFT. The reference to different options is not the only feature which distinguishes these three contributions. Moreover, their nature differs in at least one respect which makes it possible to say that the first contribution is in a negative context, the second in neutral one and the third in a positive context.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Questions in Quantum Physics: a Personal View
    Questions in quantum physics: a personal view Rudolf Haag Waldschmidtstraße 4b, D–83727 Schliersee-Neuhaus, Germany Abstract An assessment of the present status of the theory, some immediate tasks which are suggested thereby and some questions whose answers may require a longer breath since they relate to significant changes in the conceptual and mathematical structure of the theory. 1 Introduction Personal views are shaped by past experiences and so it may be worth while pondering a little about accidental circumstances which channelled the course of one’s own thinking. Meeting the right person at the right time, stumbling across a book or article which suddenly opens a new window. Fifty years ago, as eager students at Munich University just entering the phase of our own scientific research, we were studying the enormous papers by Julian Schwinger on Quantum Electrodynamics, following the arguments line by line but not really grasping the message. I remember the feelings of frustration, realizing that we were far away from the centers of action. But, mixed with this, also some dismay which did not only refer to the enormous arsenal of formalism in the new arXiv:hep-th/0001006v1 3 Jan 2000 developments of QED but began with the standard presentation of the interpretation of Quantum Theory. I remember long discussions with my thesis advisor Fritz Bopp, often while circling some blocks of streets ten times late in the evening, where we looked in vain for some reality behind the enigma of wave-particle dualism. Why should physical quantities correspond to operators in Hilbert space? Why should probabilities be described as absolute squares of amplitudes?, etc., etc.
    [Show full text]
  • From Algebraic Quantum Field Theory to Effective Quantum Gravity
    Algebraic approach to QFT Quantum gravity Locality and beyond: from algebraic quantum field theory to effective quantum gravity Kasia Rejzner University of York Local Quantum Physics and beyond in memoriam Rudolf Haag, 26.09.2016 Kasia Rejzner Locality and beyond 1 / 26 Algebraic approach to QFT Quantum gravity Outline of the talk 1 Algebraic approach to QFT AQFT LCQFT pAQFT 2 Quantum gravity Effective quantum gravity Observables The author of a beautiful book Local Quantum Physics. One of the fathers of LQP. We will all miss him. AQFT Algebraic approach to QFT LCQFT Quantum gravity pAQFT The father of Local Quantum Physics Rudolf Haag (1922 – 2016). Kasia Rejzner Locality and beyond 2 / 26 One of the fathers of LQP. We will all miss him. AQFT Algebraic approach to QFT LCQFT Quantum gravity pAQFT The father of Local Quantum Physics Rudolf Haag (1922 – 2016). The author of a beautiful book Local Quantum Physics. Kasia Rejzner Locality and beyond 2 / 26 We will all miss him. AQFT Algebraic approach to QFT LCQFT Quantum gravity pAQFT The father of Local Quantum Physics Rudolf Haag (1922 – 2016). The author of a beautiful book Local Quantum Physics. One of the fathers of LQP. Kasia Rejzner Locality and beyond 2 / 26 AQFT Algebraic approach to QFT LCQFT Quantum gravity pAQFT The father of Local Quantum Physics Rudolf Haag (1922 – 2016). The author of a beautiful book Local Quantum Physics. One of the fathers of LQP. We will all miss him. Kasia Rejzner Locality and beyond 2 / 26 It started as the axiomatic framework of Haag-Kastler[ Haag & Kastler 64]: a model is defined by associating to each region O of Minkowski spacetime the algebra A(O) of observables that can be measured in O.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Contract As Bourgeois Ideology Stephen C
    Social Contract as Bourgeois Ideology Stephen C. Ferguson II John Rawls (Photo © Steve Pyke.) Since the publication of John Rawls’ magnum opus A Theory of Justice in 1971, there has been a significant resurgence of philosophical work in the tradition of contractarianism. The distinguished bourgeois political philosopher Robert Nozick has argued that A Theory of Justice is one of the most important works in political philosophy since the writings of John Stuart Mill. “Political philosophers,” Nozick concludes, “now must either work within Rawls’ theory or explain why.”1 It is not far from the truth that Rawls single-handedly not only gave life to analytical political philosophy, but also resuscitated contractarianism, a philosophical tradition that — in many respects — had been lying dormant in a philosophical coma. In fact, social contract theory has become the hegemonic tradition in liberal social and political philosophy. As the Afro-Caribbean My thanks for advice, guidance and/or invaluable criticism of earlier drafts to John H. McClendon III, Ann Cudd, Rex Martin, Tom Tuozzo, Robert J. Antonio and Tariq Al-Jamil. I would also like to extend a hearty thanks to Greg Meyerson and David Siar for their invaluable editorial comments. And, lastly, thanks to my wife, Cassondra, and my two sons, Kendall and Trey, for your unqualified love and support in times of tranquility as well as times of crisis. 1 Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974): 183. Copyright © 2007 by Stephen C. Ferguson and Cultural Logic, ISSN 1097-3087 Ferguson 2 philosopher Charles Mills has put it, contract talk is, after all, the political lingua franca of our times.2 In this essay, we will examine the ideological character and theoretical content of contractrarianism as a philosophical tradition beginning with its classic exposition in the works of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and, finally, culminating in the work of John Rawls.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Mechanical Laws - Bogdan Mielnik and Oscar Rosas-Ruiz
    FUNDAMENTALS OF PHYSICS – Vol. I - Quantum Mechanical Laws - Bogdan Mielnik and Oscar Rosas-Ruiz QUANTUM MECHANICAL LAWS Bogdan Mielnik and Oscar Rosas-Ortiz Departamento de Física, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, México Keywords: Indeterminism, Quantum Observables, Probabilistic Interpretation, Schrödinger’s cat, Quantum Control, Entangled States, Einstein-Podolski-Rosen Paradox, Canonical Quantization, Bell Inequalities, Path integral, Quantum Cryptography, Quantum Teleportation, Quantum Computing. Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Black body radiation: the lateral problem becomes fundamental. 3. The discovery of photons 4. Compton’s effect: collisions confirm the existence of photons 5. Atoms: the contradictions of the planetary model 6. The mystery of the allowed energy levels 7. Luis de Broglie: particles or waves? 8. Schrödinger’s wave mechanics: wave vibrations explain the energy levels 9. The statistical interpretation 10. The Schrödinger’s picture of quantum theory 11. The uncertainty principle: instrumental and mathematical aspects. 12. Typical states and spectra 13. Unitary evolution 14. Canonical quantization: scientific or magic algorithm? 15. The mixed states 16. Quantum control: how to manipulate the particle? 17. Measurement theory and its conceptual consequences 18. Interpretational polemics and paradoxes 19. Entangled states 20. Dirac’s theory of the electron as the square root of the Klein-Gordon law 21. Feynman: the interference of virtual histories 22. Locality problems 23. The idea UNESCOof quantum computing and future – perspectives EOLSS 24. Open questions Glossary Bibliography Biographical SketchesSAMPLE CHAPTERS Summary The present day quantum laws unify simple empirical facts and fundamental principles describing the behavior of micro-systems. A parallel but different component is the symbolic language adequate to express the ‘logic’ of quantum phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Numdam:AIHPA 1996__64 4 385 0
    ANNALES DE L’I. H. P., SECTION A RUDOLF HAAG IZUMI OJIMA On the problem of defining a specific theory within the frame of local quantum physics Annales de l’I. H. P., section A, tome 64, no 4 (1996), p. 385-393 <http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIHPA_1996__64_4_385_0> © Gauthier-Villars, 1996, tous droits réservés. L’accès aux archives de la revue « Annales de l’I. H. P., section A » implique l’accord avec les conditions générales d’utilisation (http://www.numdam. org/conditions). Toute utilisation commerciale ou impression systématique est constitutive d’une infraction pénale. Toute copie ou impression de ce fichier doit contenir la présente mention de copyright. Article numérisé dans le cadre du programme Numérisation de documents anciens mathématiques http://www.numdam.org/ Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare, Vol. 64, n° 4, 1996, 385 Physique theorique On the problem of defining a specific theory within the frame of local quantum physics Rudolf HAAG Waldschmidtstraße 4B D-83727 Schliersee, Germany. Izumi OJIMA Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01, Japan. ABSTRACT. - The notion and use of germs of states are discussed. La notion de germe d’état et son utilisation sont 1’ objet de cette discussion. 1. INTRODUCTION The customary procedure of defining a specific theory or model in Quantum Field Theory starts by writing down a Lagrangean in terms of point-like fields. This defines first of all a classical field theory which is then subjected to a process called "quantization", either in the old fashioned form of replacing the numerical-valued fields by field operators with commutation relations or by a Feynman-Schwinger functional integral which should directly give the correlation functions of fields in the vacuum state.
    [Show full text]
  • V.Y. Glaser SOME RETROSPECTIVE REMARKS by Ph. Blanchard
    V.Y. Glaser SOME RETROSPECTIVE REMARKS by Ph. Blanchard OPENINGS MATHEMATICS IN PHYSICS GREAT ENCOUNTERS ALONG THE WAY Zagreb, Göttingen, Copenhagen, Geneva, Strasbourg, Bures sur Yvette USING MATHEMATICS WITH CLARITY AND ELEGANCE Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory O P E N I N G S I am happy to have been asked to speak about Yurko Glaser, his thinking and its actions. It is an honor for me to pay tribute to the brilliant achievements of this leading mathematical physicist, gifted teacher and exceptional friend. It was in Strasbourg at the spring meeting of the RCP 25, where we first met 1967. At this time I was in Zürich at the ETH, working on the Paul-Fierz model of the infrared catastrophe under the direction of Res Jost. Yurko was born on April 21, 1924 just before the discovery by Schrödinger, Heisenberg, Dirac, Born … of modern Quantum Theory in the mid 1920’s. Carlo Rubbia was also born in Gorizia, Görz, Friaul – Julisch Venetien. Quantum Theory before 1925 – the Old Quantum Theory (Planck, Einstein, Bohr, Sommerfeld …) – was part craft part art. Old principles had been founded wanting, new ones had not yet been discovered. Modern Quantum Theory was a real revolution of our understanding of physical process. Compared with this change, Einstein’s relativity, born in 1905, seem not much more than very interesting variations on nevertheless classical themes. Yurko studied at the University of Zagreb, where he received his Diploma in 1950 and his Ph.D in 1953 under the supervision of W. Heisenberg. He moved to Göttingen in 1951-1952 and made his first important contributions to physics, a book of QED published 1955 in Zagreb and outstanding results on QFT, the attempt to clarify the compatibility of special relativity theory with Quantum Theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Communitarianism I
    Communitarianism I Communitarianism I Charles Taylor’s Anti-Atomism Dr. Clea F. Rees [email protected] Centre for Lifelong Learning Cardiff University Autumn 2011 b Communitarianism I Outline Advertisement: Free Christmas Lecture! Overview and Introduction Taylor’s Anti-Atomism Terminology Argument Structure Two Forms of Resistance Objections b Communitarianism I Advertisement: Free Christmas Lecture! Advertisement: Free Christmas Lecture! Cardiff Philosophy Christmas Lecture Tuesday 6th December at 7.00pm THE EGO TRICK Julian Baggini Large Shandon Lecture Theatre Main Building, North Wing Cardiff University Park Place, Cathays, Cardiff Free! All welcome! Arrive early to avoid disappointment! b Communitarianism I Overview and Introduction Overview and Introduction Some communitarians (disputed and otherwise) Alasdair Charles Michael Michael J. MacIntyre Taylor Walzer Sandel 1929– 1931– 1935– 1953– b Communitarianism I Overview and Introduction Overview and Introduction I These philosophers do not all necessarily consider themselves to be communitarians. I Why, then, are they classified as such by others? I They certainly have very different views from each other. I They tend to agree that political communities are importantly historical. I The right, the good, the just etc. are shared concepts. I These ideas reflect a particular cultural perspective. Either questions about justice, rights, ethics etc. cannot be answered independently of cultural context or if they can be answered, the answers would be of no interest to actual, situated human beings. I They tend to agree, then, that there is no point in asking what persons removed from their historical and cultural contexts would choose. I They tend to think that different answers will be correct for different cultures, times and places.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Rigorous Formulations of Quantum Field Theory
    An introduction to rigorous formulations of quantum field theory Daniel Ranard Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics Advisors: Ryszard Kostecki and Lucien Hardy May 2015 Abstract No robust mathematical formalism exists for nonperturbative quantum field theory. However, the attempt to rigorously formulate field theory may help one understand its structure. Multiple approaches to axiomatization are discussed, with an emphasis on the different conceptual pictures that inspire each approach. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 3 1.1 Personal perspective . 3 1.2 Goals and outline . 3 2 Sketches of quantum field theory 4 2.1 Locality through tensor products . 4 2.2 Schr¨odinger(wavefunctional) representation . 6 2.3 Poincar´einvariance and microcausality . 9 2.4 Experimental predictions . 12 2.5 Path integral picture . 13 2.6 Particles and the Fock space . 17 2.7 Localized particles . 19 3 Seeking rigor 21 3.1 Hilbert spaces . 21 3.2 Fock space . 23 3.3 Smeared fields . 23 3.4 From Hilbert space to algebra . 25 3.5 Euclidean path integral . 30 4 Axioms for quantum field theory 31 4.1 Wightman axioms . 32 4.2 Haag-Kastler axioms . 32 4.3 Osterwalder-Schrader axioms . 33 4.4 Consequences of the axioms . 34 5 Outlook 35 6 Acknowledgments 35 2 1 Introduction 1.1 Personal perspective What is quantum field theory? Rather than ask how nature truly acts, simply ask: what is this theory? For a moment, strip the physical theory of its interpretation. What remains is the abstract mathematical arena in which one performs calculations. The theory of general relativity becomes geometry on a Lorentzian manifold; quantum theory becomes the analysis of Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators.
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Aug 2021 Self-Normalizing Path Integrals
    Self-normalizing Path Integrals Ivan M. Burbano∗1 and Francisco Calder´on†2 1Department of Physics, University of California, 366 Physics North MC 7300, Berkeley, CA 94720-7300, USA 2Department of Philosophy, University of Michigan, 435 South State Street 2215 Angell Hall, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003, USA September 3, 2021 Abstract We address the problem of computing the overall normalization constant of path integrals using zeta-function regularization techniques. In particular, we study a phe- nomenon we called “self-normalization,” in which the ambiguity of the integral mea- sure, which would typically need to be renormalized, resolves itself. Hawking had already detected this phenomenon in the context of Gaussian integrals. However, our approach extends Hawking’s work for the cases in which the space of fields is not a vector space but instead has another structure which we call a “linear foliation.” After describing the general framework, we work out examples in one (the transition ampli- tudes and partition functions for the harmonic oscillator and the particle on a circle in the presence of a magnetic field) and two (the partition functions for the massive and compact bosons on the torus and the cylinder) spacetime dimensions in a detailed fashion. One of the applications of our results, explicitly shown in the examples, is the computation of the overall normalization of path integrals that do not self-normalize. That is usually done in the literature using different comparison methods involving arXiv:2109.00517v1 [hep-th] 31 Aug 2021 additional assumptions on the nature of this constant. Our method recovers the nor- malization without the need for those extra assumptions.
    [Show full text]
  • DICTIONARY of PHILOSOPHY This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    A DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY This page intentionally left blank. A Dictionary of Philosophy Third edition A.R.Lacey Department of Philosophy, King’s College, University of London First published in 1976 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd Second edition 1986 Third edition 1996 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © A.R.Lacey 1976, 1986, 1996 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Lacey, A.R. A dictionary of philosophy.—3rd edn. 1. Philosophy—Dictionaries I. Title 190′.3′21 B41 ISBN 0-203-19819-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-19822-0 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-13332-7 (Print Edition) Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available on request Preface to the first edition This book aims to give the layman or intending student a pocket encyclopaedia of philosophy, one with a bias towards explaining terminology. The latter task is not an easy one since philosophy is regularly concerned with concepts which are unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Wolgast, the Grammar of Justice
    Elizabeth H. Wolgast, The Grammar of Justice Elizabeth H. Wolgast was born in 1929 in Plainfield, New Jersey. emy in West Point, New York, and has been a Fellow of the Ameri- She attended Cornell University and received her bachelor’s degree can Association of University Women, the American Council of in English in 1950. She then enrolled in the graduate program in phi- Learned Societies, the National Endowment for the Humanities, losophy at Cornell. After completing her master’s degree in 1952, she Cambridge University, and the Finnish Academy. went to the University of Washington to pursue a doctorate. Upon completing her doctoral degree in 1955, Wolgast accepted a position Wolgast has published numerous journal articles on the theory of at the Research Center at the University of Michigan. She later taught knowledge, ethics, and political philosophy. She is also the author of at San Francisco State University, the University of California, four books: Paradoxes of Knowledge (1977), Equality and the Rights Davis, and the University of California, Berkeley. In 1968 she joined of Women (1980), The Grammar of Justice (1987), and Ethics of an the faculty at California State University, Hayward, where she re- Artificial Person: Lost Responsibility in Professions and Organiza- mained until her retirement in 1994. Wolgast has been Visiting Pro- tions (1992). fessor at Dartmouth College and at the United States Military Acad- A World of Social Atoms We call on the ideas of social atomism when we reason about po- Standing against the old authorities required a secure point, an litical and ethical issues, but, perhaps because they are so familiar, Archimedean point from which to strike.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociological Individualism
    Chapter 4 Sociological Individualism Peter Hedström and Petri Ylikoski 1 Introduction Methodological individualism is often seen as an import from the outside; something that threatens to colonize the discipline of sociology and to make it into something that it was not intended to be, or at least to introduce some alien elements into the discipline. Often some form of “economic imperialism” is seen as the main culprit. While Gary Becker (1976) and his “unflinching” eco- nomic approach to human behavior may appear simplistic and even offensive to many of us, it is important to be aware that methodological individualism was not an invention of economists. On the contrary, it is an important part of our own intellectual heritage. This is perhaps most clearly demonstrated in the work of Max Weber, in his insistence that one should never accept aggregate associations as explanatory until they have been broken down into intelligible patterns of individual action (see Udéhn 2001). Methodological individualism does not have a single accepted meaning. Simply uttering the words “methodological individualism” thus does not con- vey much in terms of meaning. Therefore, let us start with clarifying what we mean by the term. We start by briefly alluding to some positions with which it is often but incorrectly associated, and then provide what we believe to be an appropriate definition of the term. First of all, and as Schumpeter already emphasized a long time ago, to be a methodological individualist implies no commitment whatsoever to any other form of individualism, political or otherwise. It is a methodological position, pure and simple – a view of what acceptable explanations in the social sci- ences should be all about.
    [Show full text]